the complete art of making the chemical fulminating objects, _&c. &c. &c._ _entered at stationers' hall._ _the whole secret laid open_, or the complete art of making _the chemical_ fulminating objects, _such as the_ lace, or girt of security, _fulminating letters_, _balls_, _bombs_, garters, cards, spiders, segars, chairs, drawers, boots, shoes, &c. &c. fourth edition. london: published by j. johnston, 98, cheapside, for the author, 12, king-street, portman-square, and sold by all booksellers. address to the reader. that chemistry is one of the most sublime sciences is generally acknowledged; to it may be ascribed the brilliant discoveries lately made in the arts and sciences, and without whose aid the wonderful phenomena, which are the subject of the following pages, could never have been discovered. the author has for some time observed the wonder occasioned by the introduction of the chemical _fulminating objects_ to the public: they are indeed objects of wonder, and when it is considered how trifling a portion of matter it requires to produce effects so surprising, we cannot but hail that science as truly grand, which can create such rare productions, from what we daily handle, with such safety and unconcern, and without which we should be at a loss to carry on our intercourse in trade; i mean silver, which is the basis of all the objects presented to view. i have long seen with astonishment the manufacture of these objects, and the knowledge of that manufacture confined to very few persons, and i considered that it could not but be very much wished by all who had witnessed these astonishing productions, to acquire a true knowledge of how, and by what means, they were produced; i therefore examined them minutely, and having discovered their composition, i have given them to the public in an entire and perfect form, accompanied with patterns of the most difficult, and have enlarged them by several objects of my own invention. that they will be found an innocent amusement, as well as a safeguard, need not be doubted, and also tend to exemplify the astonishing powers of chemistry, the study of which i would earnestly recommend to all who have not studied that science, and to those who have, to continue it with a steady perseverance. it is a study in itself truly sublime, it is highly conducive to morality, and tends most materially to convince every wavering or doubting mind, that the world we inhabit, and all its necessaries, its conveniences, its luxuries, and its blessings, are the work of that divine author "who sees, with equal eye, as god of all, a hero perish, or a sparrow fall." _pope._ having said thus much, i can only assure my reader, that by adhering to the rules i have laid down in the following pages, they may enjoy a rational and innocent employment of time, and be able to inform learned enquirers the nature and properties of the objects of their leisure hours' amusement, and that it may inspire them with a thirst for nearer acquaintance with chemical truths, is the sincere wish of the author. _march 1, 1818._ _general_ observations. in pointing out the method of forming the fulminating objects i have endeavoured to be as explicit as possible; and i feel a confidence that every necessary information is here contained. the reason why i sometimes mention fulminating silver, and at others preface it by brugnatelli's, is, that there are two kinds: one sold under the name of fulminating silver, the other called brugnatelli's fulminating silver. the quantities here directed for each object must be strictly adhered to, as it is of too dangerous a nature to be increased in quantity, without the risk of accident. i must also beg great care will be observed in handling it, both before and after the objects are manufactured: with a trifling degree of caution, no accident can possibly occur; all that is required is to avoid heat and friction, as either in excess produces instant detonation. it is also necessary to guard against exploding the objects near the eyes; these precautions observed, no danger need be apprehended. the best place to purchase the principal materials are the undermentioned places: for the fulminating silver, and brugnatelli's ditto, is messrs. accum and garden, old compton-street, london, and every other manufacturing chemist; the glass globes, of all sizes, are to be had of f. pastorelli, barometer and thermometer manufacturer, no. 4, cross-street, hatton-garden, london. the spiders are to be had of most glass blowers--for the cards, &c. every one is aware where to apply. the glass composition is made as follows: take one ounce of gum arabic, and dissolve it in a quarter of a pint of water, boil it till tolerably thick, and then add as much coarse powdered glass as will form a very thick composition. n.b. when the glass composition cannot be conveniently obtained, glass paper may be used, pasted in the same way as directed for the composition. complete art, &c. the lace, _or girt of security_. the lace or girt is made of strong brace-web, after the manner and size of the paper pattern enclosed; the parts marked with ink are to be covered with the glass composition, to be laid on tolerably thick--say the thickness of a three shilling piece, and about an eighth of an inch broad in each place; let it remain until quite dry, and then sew it in like manner as the pattern, and from one to one grain and a half of fulminating silver to be enclosed in the part marked s; a piece of paper or silk well pasted on one side is then to be wrapped twice round in the same manner as the paper in the pattern is pinned; a strong lace-hole is then to be worked at each end--the manner of applying it is to hang it on two hooks, one on the door post, and the other on the door, taking care to place the part in such a position as to come in contact with the edge of the door, on its being opened, which will cause an immediate explosion louder than a musket. hooks may also be placed on windows or shutters, and the lace being hung on them will produce the same effect: a greater safeguard against midnight intruders has never been discovered. fulminating letters. the letter inclosed is a pattern of the manner in which they are put together, an examination of which will give the true idea to every attentive observer: a sheet of paper should be used doubled, and cut according to pattern; two slips of parchment must be used instead of those of paper, as enclosed in the pattern letter. the ends marked with ink must be slightly covered with glass composition, and about an eighth of an inch wide, they must then be laid separately to dry, and when quite dry they must be sewn at one edge as shewn in the pattern, you must then put one third of a grain of brugnatelli's fulminating silver in between the parts marked s, a piece of coloured paper or ribbon is then to be pasted well on one side, and wound twice round in the same way as the paper is now pinned round. the parchment slips thus prepared, must be pasted at each end for about an inch, and so fastened to the letter marked with a cross; the letter is then to be folded, and no further sealing is required. it must here be observed, that although the pattern is in miniature, the directions here given are intended for a common size letter; all that is required to make it so, being to use longer strips of parchment, taking care that the parchment is always as long as the letter is wide. this letter may be sent to any part of the world, and on its being opened will cause a report nearly as loud as a pistol: it is consequently well adapted to prove a never-failing source of amusement. _fulminating_ balls & bombs. the ball comprises a glass globe rather larger than a pea, having a small aperture, into which should be put from one third to half a grain of brugnatelli's fulminating silver: a piece of paper is then to be pasted carefully all over the ball, in order to cover the glass and prevent the escape of the silver.--the method of using the balls is to throw them down smartly, or to place one under the ball of the heel and tread hard upon it, which causes an explosion equal to a pistol and free from danger; the latter method of using them is generally preferred, and is assuredly the most certain. * * * * * a bomb consists of the same materials as a ball, only on a larger scale: the globe for a bomb is the size of a common nut, and the quantity of brugnatelli's fulminating silver is from one grain to one grain and a half, according to the report wished to be produced. the way of applying bombs is by throwing them down with violence, and it should here be remembered that this is the less exceptionable method of using them: they should on no occasion be used, without apprising the bye-standers, nor must they ever be pressed on by the foot; as the shock produced by the detonation would be rather too violent. fulminating spiders. the spider is formed after the manner of the common spider, it has a glass body, into which is put one third of a grain of fulminating silver. the manner of using: being formed in every respect so as to resemble the spider, they may be left on the ground, in closets, or on any article of wearing apparel, from whence they will consequently soon be dislodged, and from the natural antipathy towards this disagreeable insect, there can be no doubt of its being soon trod upon, when, to the no small surprise of the treader, a report equal to that of a pistol will be produced.--many persons apply them to ladies' dresses, but from the well-known delicacy of female nerves, it were better perhaps to abstain from this experiment. observe, the spiders cannot be exploded but by pressure, which is best done by the foot. fulminating cards & segars. the card is of the pattern herein enclosed; it must be opened at one end with a pen-knife, as here shewn, into which opening put one-fourth, or one-third of a grain at most, of fulminating silver; the edges are then to be pasted slightly, and closed together; a notch should also be cut at the other end, as in the pattern. when dry it will be complete for use. the manner of using, is to take it by the notched end, and light the square end at the candle, when a sharp detonation ensues.--the card should be three quarters of an inch wide, and from four to five inches in length. cards thus prepared, have long sold in paris under the denomination of "detonating cards." * * * * * the segar is made by just opening the end of a common segar, (which may be had at all tobacconists) and gently placing within it one-fourth of a grain of fulminating silver between the leaves, the end is then to be closed again, and care taken to close it, so as to prevent the powder falling out. this, on being set fire to, causes a loud explosion, and not a little disconcerts the nerves of the smoker; nor does it fail to move the risible features of the lookers-on. * * * * * the segar, when exploded, may be smoked with perfect safety. _fulminating pins._ take one third of a grain of brugnatelli's fulminating silver, and enclose in a very small fold of paper; this enclose in a second paper, which has been previously pasted, and then let it be wrapped 2 or 3 times round a common pin, observing to leave the point clear.--pins, thus prepared, may be stuck in the wick of the candle, in the candle itself, or thrown into the fire, and immediately on their taking fire a loud explosion will follow. observe, not to place them too near any person's eyes, least, on an explosion, the pins should be thrown out, which might prove unpleasant. _fulminating_ wax tapers. these tapers are prepared by taking off a small part of the wax, near the tip of the wick, and putting one-third of a grain of fulminating silver in the wick, then replace the wax, and on its taking fire, a loud detonation will be produced. fulminating garters. the garter is formed of common tape, or of the common worsted binding, which should not exceed the length and breadth of the enclosed pattern; the parts marked with ink are to be covered with the glass composition in the same manner as directed for the lace of security; suffer it to remain till quite dry, and then sew it together as in the pattern; half a grain of the fulminating silver is then to be placed between the parts marked s, and a piece of paper or ribbon, well pasted on one side, is to be wrapped twice round in the same way as directed for the lace. the manner of applying it is, to take one end in each hand, and by suddenly pulling it, a loud report will be given, equal to a large pistol.--this experiment may also be performed by offering one end to another person, and requesting them to pull against you, or by giving them the garter, and desiring them to use it as first directed. keep the garter below the eyes. _fulminating chairs_ are thus prepared: enclose half a grain of brugnatelli's fulminating silver in a piece of glass paper, and that should be again enclosed in a square piece of tinfoil; this doubled in a very small compass may be placed immediately under the foot of a chair, and the chair placed very lightly upon it, or pasting it would be much better; be careful to stand the chair down very gently: on any one's setting down on a chair so prepared, a loud detonation will follow.--this experiment is particularly innocent, and may be productive of much mirth. fulminating _drawers_. the preparation for the drawers is the same as used for the chairs: it should be pasted directly under the drawer, or on the side; if the drawer be left partly open, the effect will more certainly be produced: on the drawer being opened or shut, a loud explosion will be caused. this experiment is also perfectly harmless, and as there could be no suspicion of the trick, it cannot fail to prove the source of much amusement, to create great surprise, and to cause many whimsical conjectures as to the origin of the wonderful phenomenon. _fulminating_ snuffers. one fourth of a grain of fulminating silver is to be inclosed in a small piece of paper, and put inside the snuffers; on the snuffers being applied to the candle, a smart report will follow. be careful to notice, that the snuffers are quite cold when the paper is introduced, as the heat would cause it to explode sooner than might be thought agreeable. fulminating boots & shoes. these are prepared by enclosing half a grain of brugnatelli's fulminating silver in a fold of glass paper, and pasting it in the middle of a piece of court plaster; if the edges of the court plaster are then slightly wet, it will adhere, and must be placed in the middle of the heel of a boot or shoe, and by being pressed upon will detonate loudly. observe, it must be fastened on the outside of the heel. this experiment may be easily accomplished, while you are left alone, in any apartment where boots or shoes are kept, and would cause a tolerable degree of astonishment to the wearer, on his placing his foot to the ground. fulminating _pipe lights_. these lights are made by inserting one-third of a grain of fulminating silver, in one end of a piece of hemp-stalk, in the same way as directed for the segars. a piece of stout deal shaving might be used, prepared in the same manner as directed for the fulminating cards. be careful to notice, that, whatever is used, has some particular mark attached to it, so as to point out which end is to be lighted. _fulminating_ walking sticks. these may be made by inclosing half a grain of brugnatelli's fulminating silver in a small fold of glass paper, and putting it into a ferule, which ferule may be placed gently on the stick; and on its being applied to the ground, a loud explosion will take place. * * * * * a vast number of other fulminating objects might be prepared by the same means as here used, as it must have been observed, the silver detonates either by friction or heat. but great attention must be paid to the quantity of fulminating silver used, as very unpleasant consequences might arise from the use of too large a quantity; and on the other hand, no effect produced by too small a quantity; but from one fourth to half a grain will most commonly be found quite sufficient for those purposes that require handling; and here again let me impress it on the mind, how necessary it is to pay attention to the quantities i have here specified for each object: and let me request that it may in no one instance be exceeded. finis. _printed by t. hamblin, garlick hill, thames street._ [transcriber's notes: the following errors are noted, but have not been corrected: page 17, footnote: "plutomium" should be "plutonium" page 8: "knowns" should be "knows" in element names, {} represents subscripted numbers and <> represents superscripted numbers. readers may also refer to the html version of the text, in which super and subscripted numbers are represented visually. italic emphasis is indicated by surrounding the word with _underscores_. greek letters in the original text are marked in brackets, e. g. [alpha] or [gamma]. table i (the transuranium elements) has been moved from pages 12-13, in the middle of the book, to the end of the text.] a brief history of element discovery, synthesis, and analysis glen w. watson september 1963 [illustration] lawrence radiation laboratory university of california berkeley and livermore operating under contract with the united states atomic energy commission [illustration: radioactive elements: alpha particles from a speck of radium leave tracks on a photographic emulsion. (occhialini and powell, 1947)] a brief history of element discovery, synthesis, and analysis it is well known that the number of elements has grown from four in the days of the greeks to 103 at present, but the change in methods needed for their discovery is not so well known. up until 1939, only 88 naturally occurring elements had been discovered. it took a dramatic modern technique (based on ernest o. lawrence's nobel-prize-winning atom smasher, the cyclotron) to synthesize the most recently discovered elements. most of these recent discoveries are directly attributed to scientists working under the atomic energy commission at the university of california's radiation laboratory at berkeley. but it is apparent that our present knowledge of the elements stretches back into history: back to england's ernest rutherford, who in 1919 proved that, occasionally, when an alpha particle from radium strikes a nitrogen atom, either a proton or a hydrogen nucleus is ejected; to the dane niels bohr and his 1913 idea of electron orbits; to a once unknown swiss patent clerk, albert einstein, and his now famous theories; to poland's marie curie who, in 1898, with her french husband pierre laboriously isolated polonium and radium; back to the french scientist h. a. becquerel, who first discovered something he called a "spontaneous emission of penetrating rays from certain salts of uranium"; to the german physicist w. k. roentgen and his discovery of x rays in 1895; and back still further. during this passage of scientific history, the very idea of "element" has undergone several great changes. the early greeks suggested earth, air, fire, and water as being the essential material from which all others were made. aristotle considered these as being combinations of four properties: hot, cold, dry, and moist (see fig. 1). [illustration: fig. 1. the elements as proposed by the early greeks.] later, a fifth "essence," ether, the building material of the heavenly bodies was added. paracelsus (1493-1541) introduced the three alchemical symbols salt, sulfur, and mercury. sulfur was the principle of combustability, salt the fixed part left after burning (calcination), and mercury the essential part of all metals. for example, gold and silver were supposedly different combinations of sulfur and mercury. robert boyle in his "sceptical chymist" (1661) first defined the word element in the sense which it retained until the discovery of radioactivity (1896), namely, a form of matter that could not be split into simpler forms. the first discovery of a true element in historical time was that of phosphorus by dr. brand of hamburg, in 1669. brand kept his process secret, but, as in modern times, knowledge of the element's existence was sufficient to let others, like kunkel and boyle in england, succeed independently in isolating it shortly afterward. as in our atomic age, a delicate balance was made between the "light-giving" (desirable) and "heat-giving" (feared) powers of a discovery. an early experimenter was at first "delighted with the white, waxy substance that glowed so charmingly in the dark of his laboratory," but later wrote, "i am not making it any more for much harm may come of it." robert boyle wrote in 1680 of phosphorus, "it shone so briskly and lookt so oddly that the sight was extreamly pleasing, having in it a mixture of strangeness, beauty and frightfulness." these words describe almost exactly the impressions of eye witnesses of the first atom bomb test at alamagordo, new mexico, july 16, 1945. for the next two and three-quarters centuries the chemists had much fun and some fame discovering new elements. frequently there was a long interval between discovery and recognition. thus scheele made chlorine in 1774 by the action of "black manganese" (manganese dioxide) on concentrated muriatic acid (hydrochloric acid), but it was not recognized as an element till the work of davy in 1810. occasionally the development of a new technique would lead to the "easy" discovery of a whole group of new elements. thus davy, starting in 1807, applied the method of electrolysis, using a development of volta's pile as a source of current; in a short time he discovered aluminum, barium, boron, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, and strontium. the invention of the spectroscope by bunsen and kirchhoff in 1859 provided a new tool which could establish the purity of substances already known and lead to the discovery of others. thus, helium was discovered in the sun's spectrum by jansen and isolated from uranite by ramsay in 1895. the discovery of radioactivity by becquerel in 1896 (touched off by roentgen's discovery of x rays the year before) gave an even more sensitive method of detecting the presence or absence of certain kinds of matter. it is well known that pierre and marie curie used this new-found radioactivity to identify the new elements polonium and radium. compounds of these new elements were obtained by patient fractional recrystallization of their salts. the "explanation" of radioactivity led to the discovery of isotopes by rutherford and soddy in 1914, and with this discovery a revision of our idea of elements became necessary. since boyle, it had been assumed that all atoms of the individual elements were identical and unlike any others, and could not be changed into anything simpler. now it became evident that the atoms of radioactive elements were constantly changing into other elements, thereby releasing very large amounts of energy, and that many different forms of the same element (lead was the first studied) were possible. we now think of an element as a form of matter in which all atoms have the same nuclear charge. the human mind has always sought order and simplification of the external world; in chemistry the fruitful classifications were dobereiner's triads (1829), newland's law of octaves (1865), and mendeleev's periodic law (1869). the chart expressing this periodic law seemed to indicate the maximum extent of the elements and gave good hints "where to look for" and "the probable properties of" the remaining ones (see fig. 2). by 1925, all but four of the slots in the 92-place file had been filled. the vacancies were at 43, 61, 85, and 87. [illustration: fig. 2. periodic chart of the elements (1963)] workers using traditional analytical techniques continued to search for these elements, but their efforts were foredoomed to failure. none of the nuclei of the isotopes of elements 43, 61, 85, and 87 are stable; hence weighable quantities of them do not exist in nature, and new techniques had to be developed before we could really say we had "discovered" them. in 1919, rutherford accomplished scientifically what medieval alchemists had failed to do with "magic" experiments and other less sophisticated techniques. it wasn't gold (the goal of the alchemists) he found but something more valuable with even greater potential for good and evil: a method of transmuting one element into another. by bombarding nitrogen nuclei with alpha particles from radium, he found that nitrogen was changed into oxygen. the process for radioactive transmutation is somewhat like a common chemical reaction. an alpha particle, which has the same charge (+2) and atomic mass (4) as a helium nucleus, penetrates the repulsive forces of the nitrogen nucleus and deposits one proton and one neutron; this changes the nitrogen atom into an oxygen atom. the reaction is written {7}n<14> + {2}he<4> --> {1}h<1> + {8}o<17>. the number at the lower left of each element symbol in the above reaction is the proton number. this number determines the basic chemical identity of an atom, and it is this number scientists must change before one element can be transformed into another. the common way to accomplish this artificially is by bombarding nuclei with nuclear projectiles. rutherford used naturally occurring alpha particles from radium as his projectiles because they were the most effective he could then find. but these natural alpha particles have several drawbacks: they are positively charged, like the nucleus itself, and are therefore more or less repulsed depending on the proton number of the element being bombarded; they do not move fast enough to penetrate the nuclei of heavier elements (those with many protons); and, for various other reasons (some of them unexplained), are inefficient in breaking up the nucleus. it is estimated that only 1 out of 300,000 of these alpha particles will react with nitrogen. physicists immediately began the search for artificial means to accelerate a wider variety of nuclear particles to high energies. protons, because they have a +1 charge rather than the +2 charge of the alpha particles, are repulsed less strongly by the positive charge on the nucleus, and are therefore more useful as bombarding projectiles. in 1929, e. t. s. walton and j. d. cockcroft passed an electric discharge through hydrogen gas, thereby removing electrons from the hydrogen atom; this left a beam of protons (i. e., hydrogen ions), which was then accelerated by high voltages. this cockcroft-walton voltage multiplier accelerated the protons to fairly high energies (about 800,000 electron volts), but the protons still had a plus charge and their energies were still not high enough to overcome the repulsive forces (coulombic repulsion) of the heavier nuclei. a later development, the van de graaff electrostatic generator, produced a beam of hydrogen ions and other positively charged ions, and electrons at even higher energies. an early model of the linear accelerator also gave a beam of heavy positive ions at high energies. these were the next two instruments devised in the search for efficient bombarding projectiles. however, the impasse continued: neither instrument allowed scientists to crack the nuclei of the heavier elements. ernest o. lawrence's cyclotron, built in 1931, was the first device capable of accelerating positive ions to the very high energies needed. its basic principle of operation is not difficult to understand. a charged particle accelerated in a cyclotron is analogous to a ball being whirled on a string fastened to the top of a pole. a negative electric field attracts the positively charged particle (ball) towards it and then switches off until the particle swings halfway around; the field then becomes negative in front of the particle again, and again attracts it. as the particle moves faster and faster it spirals outward in an ever increasing circle, something like a tether ball unwinding from a pole. the energies achieved would have seemed fantastic to earlier scientists. the bevatron, a modern offspring of the first cyclotron, accelerates protons to 99.13% the speed of light, thereby giving them 6.2 billion electron volts (bev). another instrument, the heavy-ion linear accelerator (hilac), accelerates ions as heavy as neon to about 15% the speed of light. it is called a linear accelerator because it accelerates particles in a straight line. stanford university is currently (1963) in the process of building a linear accelerator approximately two miles long which will accelerate charged particles to 99.9% the speed of light. but highly accelerated charged particles did not solve all of science's questions about the inner workings of the nucleus. in 1932, during the early search for more efficient ways to bombard nuclei, james chadwick discovered the neutron. this particle, which is neutral in charge and is approximately the same mass as a proton, has the remarkable quality of efficiently producing nuclear reactions even at very low energies. no one exactly knowns why. at low energies, protons, alpha particles, or other charged particles do not interact with nuclei because they cannot penetrate the electrostatic energy barriers. for example, slow positive particles pick up electrons, become neutral, and lose their ability to cause nuclear transformations. slow neutrons, on the other hand, can enter nearly all atomic nuclei and induce fission of certain of the heavier ones. it is, in fact, these properties of the neutron which have made possible the utilization of atomic energy. with these tools, researchers were not long in accurately identifying the missing elements 43, 61, 85, and 87 and more--indeed, the list of new elements, isotopes, and particles now seems endless. element 43 was "made" for the first time as a result of bombarding molybdenum with deuterons in the berkeley cyclotron. the chemical work of identifying the element was done by emilio segrè and others then working at palermo, sicily, and they chose to call it technetium, because it was the element first made by artificial technical methods. element 61 was made for the first time from the fission disintegration products of uranium in the clinton (oak ridge) reactor. marinsky and glendenin, who did the chemical work of identification, chose to call it promethium because they wished to point out that just as prometheus stole fire (a great force for good or evil) from the hidden storehouse of the gods and presented it to man, so their newly assembled reactor delivered to mankind an even greater force, nuclear energy. element 85 is called astatine, from the greek astatos, meaning "unstable," because astatine _is_ unstable (of course all other elements having a nuclear charge number greater than 84 are unstable, too). astatine was first made at berkeley by bombarding bismuth with alpha particles, which produced astatine and released two neutrons. the element has since been found in nature as a small constituent of the natural decay of actinium. the last of the original 92 elements to be discovered was element 87, francium. it was identified in 1939 by french scientist marguerite perey. children have a game in which they pile blocks up to see how high they can go before they topple over. in medieval times, petty rulers in their italian states vied with one another to see who could build the tallest tower. some beautiful results of this game still remain in florence, siena, and other italian hill cities. currently, americans vie in a similar way with the wheelbase and overall length of their cars. after 1934, the game among scientists took the form of seeing who could extend the length of the periodic system of the elements; as with medieval towers, it was italy that again began with the most enthusiasm and activity under the leadership of enrico fermi. merely adding neutrons would not be enough; that would make only a heavier isotope of the already known heaviest elements, uranium. however, if the incoming neutron caused some rearrangement within the nucleus and if it were accompanied by expulsion of electrons, that _would_ make a new element. trials by fermi and his co-workers with various elements led to unmistakeable evidence of the expulsion of electrons (beta activity) with at least four different rates of decay (half-lives). claims were advanced for the creation of elements 93 and 94 and possibly further (the transuranium elements, table i). much difficulty was experienced, however, in proving that the activity really was due to the formation of elements 93 and 94. as more people became interested and extended the scope of the experiments, the picture became more confused rather than clarified. careful studies soon showed that the activities did _not_ decay logarithmically--which means that they were caused by mixtures, not individual pure substances--and the original four activities reported by fermi grew to at least nine. as a matter of fact, the way out of the difficulty had been indicated soon after fermi's original announcement. dr. ida noddack pointed out that no one had searched among the products of fermi's experiment for elements _lighter_ than lead, but no one paid any attention to her suggestion at the time. the matter was finally cleared up by dr. otto hahn and f. strassmann. they were able to show that instead of uranium having small pieces like helium nuclei, fast electrons, and super-hard x-rays, knocked off as expected, the atom had split into two roughly equal pieces, together with some excess neutrons. this process is called nuclear fission. the two large pieces were unstable and decayed further with the loss of electrons, hence the [beta] activity. this process is so complicated that there are not, as originally reported, only four half-lives, but at least 200 different varieties of at least 35 different elements. the discovery of fission attended by the release of enormous amounts of energy led to feverish activity on the part of physicists and chemists everywhere in the world. in june 1940, mcmillan and abelson presented definite proof that element 93 had been found in uranium penetrated by neutrons during deuteron bombardment in the cyclotron at the university of california radiation laboratory. the california scientists called the newly discovered element neptunium, because it lies beyond the element uranium just as the planet neptune lies beyond uranus. the particular isotope formed in those first experiments was {93}np<239>; this is read neptunium having a nuclear charge of 93 and an atomic mass number of 239. it has a half-life of 2.3 days, during which it gives up another electron ([beta] particle) and becomes element 94, or plutonium (so called after pluto, the next planet beyond neptune). this particular form of plutonium ({94}pu<239>) has such a long half-life (24,000 years) that it could not be detected. the first isotope of element 94 to be discovered was pu<238>, made by direct deuteron bombardment in the berkeley 60-inch cyclotron by radiation laboratory scientists seaborg, mcmillan, kennedy, and wahl; it had an [alpha]-decay half-life of 86.4 years, which gave it sufficient radioactivity so that its chemistry could be studied. having found these chemical properties in pu<238>, experimenters knew {94}pu<239> would behave similarly. it was soon shown that the nucleus of {94}pu<239> would undergo fission in the same way as {92}u<235> when bombarded with slow neutrons and that it could be produced in the newly assembled atomic pile. researchers wished to learn as much as possible about its chemistry; therefore, during the summer of 1942 two large cyclotrons at st. louis and berkeley bombarded hundreds of pounds of uranium almost continuously. this resulted in the formation of 200 micrograms of plutonium. from this small amount, enough of the chemical properties of the element were learned to permit correct design of the huge plutonium-recovery plant at hanford, washington. in the course of these investigations, balances that would weigh up to 10.5 mg with a sensitivity of 0.02 microgram were developed. the "test tubes" and "beakers" used had internal diameters of 0.1 to 1 mm and could measure volumes of 1/10 to 1/10,000 ml with an accuracy of 1%. the fact that there was no intermediate stage of experimentation, but a direct scale-up at hanford of ten billion times, required truly heroic skill and courage. by 1944 sufficient plutonium was available from uranium piles (reactors) so that it was available as target material for cyclotrons. at berkeley it was bombarded with 32-mev doubly charged helium ions, and the following reactions took place: {94}pu<239> ([alpha], n) {96}cm<242> [alpha] / 150 days --> {94}pu<238>. this is to be read: plutonium having an atomic number of 94 (94 positively charged protons in the nucleus) and a mass number of 239 (the whole atom weighs approximately 239 times as much as a proton), when bombarded with alpha particles (positively charged helium nuclei) reacts to give off a neutron and a new element, curium, that has atomic number 96 and mass number 242. this gives off alpha particles at such a rate that half of it has decomposed in 150 days, leaving plutonium with atomic number 94 and mass number 238. the radiochemical work leading to the isolation and identification of the atoms of element 96 was done at the metallurgical laboratory of the university of chicago. the intense neutron flux available in modern reactors led to a new element, americium (am), as follows: {94}pu<239> (n, [gamma]) {94}pu<240> (n, [gamma]) {94}pu<241> [beta] --> {95}am<241>. the notation (n, [gamma]) means that the plutonium absorbs a neutron and gives off some energy in the form of gamma rays (very hard x rays); it first forms {94}pu<240> and then {94}pu<241>, which is unstable and gives off fast electrons ([beta]), leaving {95}am<241>. berkelium and californium, elements 97 and 98, were produced at the university of california by methods analogous to that used for curium, as shown in the following equations: {95}am<240> + [alpha] --> {97}bk<243> + {0}n<1>, and {96}cm<241> + [alpha] --> {98}cf<244> + {0}n<1>. the next two elements, einsteinium ({99}es) and fermium ({100}fm), were originally found in the debris from the thermonuclear device "mike," which was detonated on eniwetok atoll november 1952. (this method of creating new substances is somewhat more extravagant than the mythical chinese method of burning down a building to get a roast pig.) these elements have since been made in nuclear reactors and by bombardment. this time the "bullet" was n<14> stripped of electrons till it had a charge of +6, and the target was plutonium. researchers at the university of california used new techniques in forming and identifying element 101, mendelevium. a very thin layer of {99}es<253> was electroplated onto a thin gold foil and was then bombarded, from behind the layer, with 41-mev [alpha] particles. unchanged {99}es<253> stayed on the gold, but those atoms hit by [alpha] particles were knocked off and deposited on a "catcher" gold foil, which was then dissolved and analyzed (fig. 3). this freed the new element from most of the very reactive parent substances, so that analysis was easier. even so, the radioactivity was so weak that the new element was identified "one atom at a time"; this is possible because its daughter element, fermium, spontaneously fissions and releases energy in greater bursts than any possible contaminant. [illustration: fig. 3. the production of mendelevium.] in 1957, in stockholm, element 102 was reported found by an international team of scientists (who called it nobelium), but diligent and extensive research failed to duplicate the stockholm findings. however, a still newer technique developed at berkeley showed the footprints--if not the living presence--of 102 (see fig. 4). the rare isotope curium-246 is coated on a small piece of nickel foil, enclosed in a helium-filled container, and placed in the heavy-ion linear accelerator (hilac) beam. positively charged atoms of element 102 are knocked off the foil by the beam, which is of carbon-12 or carbon-13 nuclei, and are deposited on a negatively charged conveyor apron. but element 102 doesn't live long enough to be actually measured. as it decays, its daughter product, {100}fm<250>, is attracted onto a charged aluminum foil where it can be analyzed. the researchers have decided that the hen really did come first: they have the egg; therefore the hen must have existed. by measuring the time distance between target and daughter product, they figure that the hen-mother (element 102) must have a half-life of three seconds. [illustration: fig. 4. the experimental arrangement used in the discovery of element 102.] in an experiment completed in 1961, researchers at the university of california at berkeley unearthed similar "footprints" belonging to element 103 (named lawrencium in honor of nobel prizewinner ernest o. lawrence). they found that the bombardment of californium with boron ions released [alpha] particles which had an energy of 8.6 mev and decayed with a half-life of 8 ± 2 seconds. these particles can only be produced by element 103, which, according to one scientific theory, is a type of "dinosaur" of matter that died out a few weeks after creation of the universe. the half-life of lawrencium (lw) is about 8 seconds, and its mass number is thought to be 257, although further research is required to establish this conclusively. research on lawrencium is complicated. its total [alpha] activity amounts to barely a few counts per hour. and, since scientists had the [alpha]-particle "footprints" only and not the beast itself, the complications increased. therefore no direct chemical techniques could be used, and element 103 was the first to be discovered solely by nuclear methods.[a] for many years the periodic system was considered closed at 92. it has now been extended by at least eleven places (table i), and one of the extensions (plutonium) has been made in truckload lots. its production and use affect the life of everyone in the united states and most of the world. surely the end is again in sight, at least for ordinary matter, although persistent scientists may shift their search to the other-world "anti" particles. these, too, will call for very special techniques for detection of their fleeting presence. early enthusiastic researchers complained that a man's life was not long enough to let him do all the work he would like on an element. the situation has now reached a state of equilibrium; neither man nor element lives long enough to permit all the desired work. [a] in august 1964 russian scientists claimed that they created element 104 with a half-life of about 0.3 seconds by bombarding plutomium with accelerated neon-22 ions. table i. the transuranium elements ======================================================================== element name (symbol) mass year discovered; by whom; number where; how ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 93 neptunium (np) 238 1940; e. m. mcmillan, p. h. abelson; university of california at berkeley; slow-neutron bombardment of u<238> in the 60-inch cyclotron. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 94 plutonium (pu) 238 1941; j. w. kennedy, e. m. mcmillan, g. t. seaborg, and a. c. wahl; university of california at berkeley; 16-mev deuteron bombardment of u<238> in the 60-inch cyclotron. (pu) 239 pu<239>; the fissionable isotope of plutonium, was also discovered in 1941 by j. w. kennedy, g. t. seaborg, e. segrè and a. c. wahl; university of california at berkeley; slow-neutron bombardment of u<238> in the 60-inch cyclotron. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 95 americium (am) 241 1944-45; berkeley scientists a. ghiorso, r. a. james, l. o. morgan, and g. t. seaborg at the university of chicago; intense neutron bombardment of plutonium in nuclear reactors. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 96 curium (cm) 242 1945; berkeley scientists a. ghiorso, r. a. james, and g. t. seaborg at the university of chicago; bombardment of pu<239> by 32-mev helium ions from the 60-inch cyclotron. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 97 berkelium (bk) 243 1949; s. g. thompson, a. ghiorso, and g. t. seaborg; university of california at berkeley; 35-mev helium-ion bombardment of am<241>. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 98 californium (cf) 245 1950; s. g. thompson, k. street, a. ghiorso, g. t. seaborg; university of california at berkeley; 35-mev helium-ion bombardment of cm<242>. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 99 einsteinium (es) 253 1952-53; a. ghiorso, s. g. 100 fermium (fm) 255 thompson, g. h. higgins, g. t. seaborg, m. h. studier, p. r. fields, s. m. fried, h. diamond, j. f. mech, g. l. pyle, j. r. huizenga, a. hirsch, w. m. manning, c. i. browne, h. l. smith, r. w. spence; "mike" explosion in south pacific; work done at university of california at berkeley, los alamos scientific laboratory, and argonne national laboratory; both elements created by multiple capture of neutrons in uranium of first detonation of a thermonuclear device. the elements were chemically isolated from the debris of the explosion. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 101 mendelevium (md) 256 1955; a. ghiorso, b. g. harvey, g. r. choppin, s. g. thompson, g. t. seaborg; university of california at berkeley; 41-mev helium-ion bombardment of es<253> in 60-inch cyclotron. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 102 unnamed[b] 254 1958; a. ghiorso, t. sikkeland, a. e. larsh, r. m. latimer; university of california, lawrence radiation laboratory, berkeley; 68-mev carbon-ion bombardment of cm<246> in heavy-ion linear accelerator (hilac). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 103 lawrencium 257 1961; a. ghiorso, t. sikkeland, a. e. larsh, r. m. latimer; university of california, lawrence radiation laboratory, berkeley; 70-mev boron-ion bombardment of cf<250>, cf<251>, and cf<252> in hilac. ======================================================================== [b] a 1957 claim for the synthesis and identification of element 102 was accepted at that time by the international union of pure and applied chemistry, and the name nobelium (symbol no) was adopted. the university of california scientists, a. ghiorso et al., cited here believe they have disproved the earlier claim and have the right to suggest a different name for the element. generously made available by the internet archive/american libraries.) the elements of blowpipe analysis [illustration] the elements of blowpipe analysis by frederick hutton getman, f.c.s. instructor in chemistry in the stamford high school new york the macmillan company london: macmillan & co., ltd. 1899 _all rights reserved_ copyright, 1899, by the macmillan company. norwood press j. s. cushing & co.--berwick & smith norwood mass. u.s.a. transcriber's note: a word surrounded by underscores like _this_ signifies the word is italics in the text. a word surrounded by cedillas like ~this~, signifies the word is bolded in the text. for numbers and equations, underscores before bracketed numbers in equations denote a subscript. preface these few pages are intended to serve a twofold purpose,--to give the student a general outline of blowpipe analysis, and to introduce him to the methods of determinative mineralogy. every effort has been made to simplify details so that the book may be used in both high schools and colleges. tables for "systematic" examination have been intentionally omitted, for in the author's estimation these tend to dull the student's power of observation, and to make him place little value upon minute details. the alphabetic arrangement has been followed for the sake of convenience when referring to the book. the last chapter is not intended to serve as a key to determining the minerals therein described, but rather it is added to give the student exercise in blowpipe analysis, and at the same time to point out the _methods_ of determinative mineralogy. finally, the author would acknowledge his indebtedness to the following works: "manual of qualitative analysis," fresenius; "qualitative chemical analysis," venable; roscoe and schorlemmer's "treatise on chemistry"; foye's "hand-book of mineralogy"; dana's "mineralogy"; kobell's "tafeln zur bestimmung der mineralien"; etc. frederick hutton getman. stamford, conn., feb. 22, 1899. table of contents chapter i page apparatus and reagents 1-7 chapter ii general outline of blowpipe analysis 8 definitions 9 examination on charcoal alone 10 examination on charcoal with sodium carbonate 13 examination in tube with sodium carbonate and charcoal 15 examination on platinum wire 16 examination in borax bead 17 examination with cobalt nitrate 20 chapter iii general reactions for the detection of the metallic elements in simple compounds 22 aluminum 23 antimony 24 arsenic 25 bismuth 25 cadmium 26 chromium 26 cobalt 27 copper 28 iron 28 lead 29 manganese 30 mercury 30 nickel 31 silver 32 tin 32 zinc 33 the alkali metals 34 ammonium 34 potassium 35 sodium 35 lithium 36 the alkaline earths 36 barium 36 calcium 37 strontium 37 the acid elements 37 borates 37 bromides 38 chlorides 38 fluorides 38 iodides 39 nitrates 39 phosphates 40 silicates 40 sulphides 41 chapter iv behavior of some of the principal ores before the blowpipe 43 ores of antimony 46 ores of arsenic 47 ores of bismuth 48 ores of chromium 49 ores of cobalt 50 ores of copper 52 ores of iron 57 ores of lead 60 ores of manganese 63 ores of mercury 64 ores of nickel 65 ores of silver 66 ores of tin 69 ores of zinc 70 comparative tables i. colors of coatings on charcoal 73 ii. flame colorations 73 iii. colors of borax beads in oxidizing flame 74 iv. colors of borax beads in reducing flame 75 v. colors of microcosmic salt beads in oxidizing flame 76 vi. colors of microcosmic salt beads in reducing flame 77 [illustration: the blowpipe fig. 1] [illustration: bunsen burner fig. 2] [illustration: charcoal borers fig. 3] [illustration: agate mortar & pestle fig. 4] [illustration: forceps fig. 5] [illustration: hammer fig. 6] [illustration: 3-cornered files fig. 7] blowpipe analysis chapter i the blowpipe was first applied to mineral analysis in 1733 by anton swab, and its applications have since been improved and extended by various chemists, among whom may be mentioned bergmann, cronstedt, gahn, berzelius, and plattner. ~blowpipe.~--the common blowpipe of the jeweller is not particularly well suited to the operations of blowpipe analysis, since the flame has often to be kept playing upon the assay for some time, and the condensed moisture of the breath would seriously interfere with the passage of the air through the jet. one of the best and least expensive forms of blowpipe is shown in fig. 1. this consists, as is seen from the illustration, of a conical-shaped tube of tin closed at the wide end and formed into a mouthpiece at the small end; soldered into the tube at the large end, and at right angles to its axis, is a small brass tube which terminates in a conical tip pierced with a very fine hole. with this pipe it is possible to perform all of the operations of mineral analysis. some little practice is necessary to keep the flame steady and to take the breath at the same time. no rule can well be given to the beginner, but his experience becomes his best guide. ~bunsen flame.~--any kind of flame can be used for the blowpipe, provided it be not too small; but since almost every laboratory to-day is furnished with gas and the bunsen burner (fig. 2), it will only be necessary to describe the use of the flame from this source. upon examining the bunsen flame with care, it will be seen that the flame consists of three distinct parts. a dark inner cone which consists of gas not yet raised to the ignition point. beyond this there is a luminous cone, where combustion is incomplete owing to lack of oxygen, and outside of this we find the non-luminous cone where the gas is completely burned. this outer envelope is the hottest portion of the flame, and is known as the "oxidizing" flame because there is an excess of oxygen which is imparted to substances placed therein. the luminous cone is known as the "reducing" flame, for in it metallic oxides are reduced, the oxygen being taken up by the small incandescent particles of carbon. if the air-holes at the base of the bunsen burner be opened, the two inner cones become elongated, and the flame appears almost colorless. the blowpipe enables us to get an oxidizing and a reducing flame of better form and greater power. to do this we cut off the air supply at the base of the burner and turn off the gas until the flame is about 1 cm. high; then upon introducing the blowpipe, and blowing a strong continuous jet of air across the bunsen flame, we produce an oxidizing flame about 4-5 cm. in length. if the tip of the blowpipe be held outside of the bunsen flame, and the pressure of the stream of air be diminished, we obtain a reducing flame. ~supports.~--for supports, charcoal, platinum, and glass are chiefly used. the charcoal should be made from some light wood, such as alder. it should be well burnt, and should not scintillate or smoke. the platinum supports are generally in the form of wire and foil. platinum-tipped forceps are frequently employed in blowpipe analysis. glass is used in the form of tubing. hard glass tubing, 3 mm. bore, is drawn off into ignition tubes 7-8 cm. in length. several dozen of these tubes should be made before commencing the tests of the next chapter. ~apparatus.~--a small agate mortar, 4-5 cm. in diameter, should be provided in which to grind the samples to be examined. the pestle, which should also be of agate, must be adapted to the mortar in shape and size. two pairs of forceps will also be needed. one pair should be of steel, and the other pair of brass, with fine points. of other apparatus, the most necessary is:- a small hammer and anvil. two three-cornered files. small piece of cobalt glass, about 5 × 10 cm. pocket magnifying lens. several small watch glasses--for metallic beads, etc. ~chemicals.~--a list of the principal chemicals is here given:- sodium carbonate, na_{2}co_{3}. borax, na_{2}b_{4}o_{7} + 10 h_{2}o. microcosmic salt, (hnanh_{4}), po_{4} + 8 h_{2}o. cobalt nitrate, co(no_{3})_{2} + 5 h_{2}o. potassium cyanide, kcn. hydrochloric acid, (dilute), hcl + nh_{2}o. litmus paper, red and blue. brazil-wood paper. any other special reagents which may be needed will be mentioned as required. chapter ii general outline of blowpipe analysis [abbreviations: o. f. for oxidizing flame, r. f. for reducing flame, ch. for charcoal, ct. for coating, bp. for blowpipe.] in order to examine a substance before the blowpipe to determine the presence or absence of certain elements, it becomes necessary to arrange a systematic method. as with all branches of chemical work, one's success is largely dependent upon neatness of manipulation and carefulness of observation. the following order of observation is essentially that given by berzelius:- 1. examination on charcoal by itself. 2. examination on charcoal with na_{2}co_{3}. 3. examination in ignition tube with na_{2}co_{3} and charcoal. 4. examination on platinum wire. 5. examination in borax bead. 6. examination with co(no_{3})_{2}. after having examined a body in these six different ways, we shall be able to say what are its principal constituents. before describing the method of carrying out these six different operations, it will be necessary to give a few definitions of terms which we shall have frequent occasion to employ. ~definitions.~--_ignition_ is the heating of a substance to a high temperature. _fusion_ is the heating of a substance to the melting-point. _intumescence_ is the swelling of the substance upon heating. _decrepitation_ is the crackling of a substance due to the sudden expansion of combined water upon heating. _deflagration_ is the burning of a substance with explosive violence, generally due to excess of oxygen. _incandescence_ is the white light emitted by a substance that is infusible when subjected to a high temperature. ~examination on charcoal alone.~--the size of the assay should be about that of a mustard seed. this is sufficiently large to show all of the reactions clearly, and though a larger piece would exhibit the characteristic phenomena, yet much more effort is required. a very small, shallow hole should be cut in the ch. to receive the assay. the bp. flame should be directed at an angle of about 30° with the surface of the ch. considerable care must be taken lest the hole in the ch. is burned too deep and the assay lost in the coal. the force of the air from the jet must also be borne in mind for a strong blast, or sudden puffs may blow the substance away. the following changes are to be looked for:-_a._ whether the substance is volatile or non-volatile. _illustrations._ examine before the bp. on ch. some arsenious oxide, as_{2}o_{3}, also some alumina, al_{2}o_{3}. _b._ whether the substance is fusible or infusible. _illustrations._ examine before the bp. on ch. some silver oxide, ago, also some zinc oxide, zno. _c._ whether the substance is alkaline or non-alkaline when placed upon moistened red litmus. _illustrations._ ignite some calcium carbonate, caco_{3}, before the bp. on ch., and place residue on moistened red litmus. in like manner, examine some magnesium carbonate, mgco_{3}. _d._ color of coating on ch. caused by combination of metal and oxygen due to heat of bp. flame. _illustrations._ examine some oxide of lead, pbo, before the bp. on ch., also some oxide of cadmium, cdo. _e._ decrepitation. _illustration._ examine some sodium chloride, nacl, before the bp. on ch. _f._ deflagration. _illustrations._ examine some potassium nitrate, kno_{3}, before the bp. on ch., also some ammonium nitrate, nh_{4}no_{3}. _g._ intumescence. _illustration._ examine some alum, k_{2}al_{2}(so_{4})_{4}, before the bp. on ch. _h._ incandescence. _illustration._ examine some oxide of barium, bao, before the bp. on ch. _i._ formation of a metallic bead--color and malleability. _illustration._ examine some silver oxide, ago, before the bp. on ch. ~examination on charcoal with na_{2}co_{3}.~--metallic compounds are often difficult to reduce with the blowpipe flame alone, and hence no bead is obtained. in order to facilitate reduction and the obtaining of a metallic bead, the substance in a finely powdered condition is mixed with four parts of sodium carbonate, na_{2}co_{3}, and ignited before the bp. on ch. the metallic compound is decomposed, the metal being transformed into the carbonate, which in turn, through the agency of the ch. and the heat of the flame, is reduced to the free metal. sometimes the reduction is made easier by adding to the substance about its own bulk of potassium cyanide, kcn, which takes up oxygen from the compound and is converted into potassium cyanate, kcno. the reactions in reducing copper sulphate, cuso_{4}, with na_{2}co_{3} and with kcn before the blowpipe, are here given:- cuso_{4} + na_{2}co_{3} = cuco_{3} + na_{2}so_{4} } (1) 2cuco_{3} + c = 3co_{2} + 2cu } cuso_{4} + na_{2}co_{3} = cuco_{3} + na_{2}so_{4} } cuco_{3} = cuo + co_{2} } (2) cuo + kcn = cu + kcno } after obtaining beads, it is well to obtain their coatings, for oftentimes it is only in this way that we can distinguish between the metals. ~examination in tube with na_{2}co_{3} and charcoal.~--if the substance in a finely pulverized condition be mixed with twelve parts, na_{2}co_{3}, and six parts of charcoal powder and the mixture be placed in an ignition tube and subjected to heat, the acid of the substance combines with the soda and the metal is set free. if this metal is volatile, a sublimate is formed in the upper end of the tube. mercury deposits in minute globules, which may be seen with the magnifying glass. arsenic forms a ring, which, when examined with the magnifying glass, is seen to be made up of minute crystals. ammonia is recognized by its characteristic odor, and also by its turning a slip of moistened red litmus (held over the mouth of the tube) blue. ~examination on platinum wire.~--many substances possess the property of imparting to the colorless flame of the bunsen burner characteristic colors. the chlorides of these substances exhibit these flame reactions best, and hence before applying the flame tests we dip the wire which serves as a support into hydrochloric acid and then into the substance. when the substance has been taken up on the wire, it is placed in the edge of the long colorless flame of the bunsen burner near the apex, when instantly the flame becomes tinged with the characteristic color of the substance. _illustrations._ sodium compounds color the flame yellow, and a crystal of potassium dichromate appears colorless in the sodium light. this sodium reaction is extremely delicate, it being possible to detect with ease a quantity of a sodium salt less than 1/3000000 of a milligram in weight. potassium colors the flame purplish-violet. barium colors the flame apple-green. strontium colors the flame crimson. calcium colors the flame orange-red, distinguished from strontium, by appearing gray when seen through blue glass. boracic acid colors the flame green when the substance has been moistened with glycerine. ~examination in borax bead.~--borax, na_{2}b_{4}o_{7}, and microcosmic salt, nanh_{4}h . po_{4}, possess the property of dissolving many of the metallic oxides at the temperature of the bunsen flame. for example, with oxide of cobalt, the following reactions take place with the two fluxes:- coo + na_{2}b_{4}o_{7} = co(bo_{2})_{2} + 2 nabo_{2}. on heating, nanh_{4}h. po_{4}, it is decomposed into the metaphosphate of sodium, napo_{3}, coo + napo_{3} = conapo_{4}. now in such cases of solution the metallic oxides impart a characteristic color to the flux. the platinum wire is the best support,--it is heated to incandescence in the bunsen flame, and then is quickly dipped into the borax, when a small globule will adhere,--this is removed to the flame again when the borax melts to a clear glassy bead. while the bead is still melted, touch it to the finely pulverized substance and replace in the flame. in a few seconds the small particles of the substance will have dissolved, and the bead will be seen to have assumed the color characteristic of the substance. note the color when hot and then when cold; often there is a wide difference. then, too, the test should be made in both o. f. and r. f. some analysts prefer to make a small loop in the end of the wire before taking up the borax to make the bead. care should be taken to see that the bead is colorless before bringing it in contact with the substance. as the depth of color produced is largely dependent upon the amount of substance taken, some little caution should be exercised to insure taking up about the same quantity each time. _illustrations._ make several beads, and note the colors characteristic of the following oxides: cobalt, nickel, iron, manganese, chromium, and copper. the microcosmic salt bead dissolves almost every oxide except silica, sio_{2}, and this is seen to float about in the melted mass. this is used as a test for silica. ~examination with co(no_{3})_{2}.~--if after examination on the ch. _per se_, a white infusible residue remains, it is moistened with a drop of cobalt nitrate co(no_{3})_{2} and re-ignited before the bp., when a change of color will be observed. this change in color is owing to the fact that the heat of the bp. flame decomposes the cobalt nitrate, nitric acid being driven off, and the remaining coo forming with the oxide of the residue a colored mass. _illustrations._ ignite before the bp. on ch. the following oxides,--allow to cool, add a drop of co(no_{3})_{2}, re-ignite, and note color,--aluminum, magnesium, zinc, and calcium. care should be taken to thoroughly ignite before adding the cobalt nitrate solution. with the six methods of examination just given almost every simple substance can be detected, but should any doubt remain, a few simple tests in the "liquid way" will be sufficient to substantiate the blowpipe examination. chapter iii general reactions for the detection of the metallic elements in simple compounds for the sake of convenience, rather than for scientific reasons, the following compounds have been arranged in alphabetic order. also the oxides of the elements have been taken, since they exhibit the reactions to best advantage. the student should work through carefully each one of the tests and satisfy himself as to the characteristic reactions of the various elements, for only in this way can he expect to recognize the substances when presented to him as "unknowns." it is advisable to provide a note-book and rule it as follows:----------------------------------------------------------------------------- behavior of substance | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------| before bp.| before bp. | in ignition | in flame| in flame | after first | on ch. | on ch. with | tube with | on | with borax| ignition | alone | na_{2}co_{3}| na_{2}co_{3}| platinum| bead | with | | | and ch. | wire | | co(no_{3})_{2}| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------| _remarks_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | | _substance_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------1. ~aluminum, al_{2}o_{3}.~--before the bp. on ch. infusible. no change. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3}. forms an infusible compound with slight intumescence. in ignition tube with na_{2}co_{3} and ch. no change. moisture driven off. in flame on platinum wire. no change. becomes incandescent. in flame with borax bead. in o. f. dissolves slowly, forming a colorless glass which remains so on cooling. with co(no_{3})_{2}. mass becomes blue upon re-ignition. 2. ~antimony, sb_{2}o_{3}.~--before the bp. on ch. in o. f. volatilizes without change. in r. f. is reduced and volatilized. white coating of antimonious oxide deposited on ch. blue tinge imparted to flame. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3}. readily reduced. white brittle bead. very volatile, giving characteristic white coating. in ignition tube with na_{2}co_{3} and ch. volatilized. in flame on platinum wire. volatilized. colors flame greenish blue. with borax bead on platinum wire. in o. f. dissolves to a colorless glass. with co(no_{3})_{2}.____ 3. ~arsenic, as_{2}o_{3}.~--before the bp. on ch. very volatile. strong garlic odor to fumes. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3}. reduced with emission of arsenical fumes. in ignition tube with na_{2}co_{3} and ch. volatilizes, forming a mirror-like deposit of metallic as in the cooler part of tube. in flame on platinum wire____ with borax bead on platinum wire____ with co(no_{3})_{2}.____ 4. ~bismuth, bi_{2}o_{3}.~--before the bp. on ch. yields a coating--orange-yellow when hot, lemon-yellow when cold. the yellow coating usually has a white outline. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3}. easily reduced to metallic bismuth. yellow bead brittle, but less so than antimony. in ignition tube with na_{2}co_{3} and ch.____ in flame on platinum wire____ with borax bead on platinum wire. in o. f. small quantity dissolves to a clear yellow glass, which becomes colorless when cold. with co(no_{3})_{2}____ 5. ~cadmium, cdo.~--before the bp. on ch. gives a coating on the coal. reddish-brown when cold. very volatile. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3}. readily reduced. the metal volatilizes easily, giving the characteristic coating. in ignition tube with na_{2}co_{3} and ch.____ in flame on platinum wire____ with borax bead. in o. f. dissolves to a clear yellowish bead, colorless when cold. with co(no_{3})_{2}____ 6. ~chromium, cr_{2}o_{3}.~--before the bp. on ch. no change. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3}. cannot be reduced. soda sinks in ch. and a green colored mass remains. in ignition tube with na_{2}co_{3} and ch.____ in flame on platinum wire____ ~with borax bead.~ dissolves slowly but colors intensely. yellow while hot, green when cold. with microcosmic salt bead. colors red when hot, green when cold. with co(no_{3})_{2}____ 7. ~cobalt, coo.~--before the bp. on ch. in o. f. unchanged. in r. f. is reduced to the metal and is magnetic. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3}. reduced to a gray magnetic mass. in ignition tube with na_{2}co_{3} and ch.____ in flame on platinum wire____ with borax bead on platinum wire. in o. f. colors very intensely blue, both hot and cold. with co(no_{3})_{2}____ 8. ~copper, cuo.~--before the bp. on ch. fuses to a black globule, which can be reduced with some difficulty. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3}. readily reduced to metallic bead, which is red in color, hard, malleable. in ignition tube with na_{2}co_{3} and ch.____ in flame on platinum wire. colors flame emerald-green. with borax bead on platinum wire. in o. f. green when hot, blue when cold. with co(no_{3})_{2}____ 9. ~iron, fe_{2}o_{3}.~--before the bp. on ch. in o. f. unchanged. in r. f. becomes black and magnetic. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3} reduced to a metallic powder, magnetic. in ignition tube with na_{2}co_{3} and ch.____ in flame on platinum wire____ with borax bead on platinum wire. in o. f. red while hot, yellow when cold. with co(no_{3})_{2}____ 10. ~lead, pbo.~--before the bp. on ch. easily reduced to the metal, bead very malleable. coating yellow, surrounded by white ring. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3}. instantly reduced. coats the ch. upon further blowing. in ignition tube with na_{2}co_{3} and ch. reduced to the metal. in flame on platinum wire. tinges flame blue. with borax bead on platinum wire. in o. f. dissolves easily, forming a limpid glass. with co(no_{3})_{2}____ 11. ~manganese, mn_{2}o_{3}.~--before the bp. on ch. at high temperature turns red. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3}. is not reduced. before the bp. in o. f. on platinum foil with na_{2}co_{3}. transparent green mass when hot. opaque, bluish-green when cold. in ignition tube with na_{2}co_{3} and ch. not reduced. in flame on platinum wire____ with borax bead on platinum wire. in o. f. violet-red while hot, amethyst-red when cold. with co(no_{3})_{2}____ 12. ~mercury, hgo.~--before the bp. on ch. instantly reduced. very volatile. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3}. reduced and volatilized. in ignition tube with na_{2}co_{3} and ch. sublimes condensing in the upper part of the tube as a metallic ring which is seen with the lens to consist of minute globules of mercury. in flame on platinum wire____ with borax bead on platinum wire____ with co(no_{3})_{2}____ 13. ~nickel, nio.~--before the bp. on ch. in o. f. unchanged. in r. f. reduced to metal, slightly magnetic. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3}. easily reduced to the metal. in ignition tube with na_{2}co_{3} and ch.____ in flame on platinum wire____ with borax bead on platinum wire. in o. f. violet while hot, reddish-brown when cold. with co(no_{3})_{2}____ 14. ~silver, ago.~--before the bp. on ch. easily reduced to the metal. white, malleable, hard bead. coats the coal dark red near assay. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3}. instantly reduced to metallic globule. in ignition tube with na_{2}co_{3} and ch. reduced to the metal. in flame on platinum wire____ with borax bead on platinum wire. in o. f. partially dissolved. bead becomes milk-white. with co(no_{3})_{2}____ 15. ~tin, sno_{2}.~--before the bp. on ch. coats the coal yellow while hot, dirty white when cool. not reduced. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3}. reduced to metallic tin. white, hard, malleable bead. coating white and close to assay. in ignition tube with na_{2}co_{3} and ch.____ in flame on platinum wire____ with borax bead on platinum wire. in o. f. small quantity dissolves to limpid glass. with co(no_{3})_{2}. greenish-blue color. 16. ~zinc, zno.~--before the bp. on ch. upon ignition becomes yellow. is not reduced. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3}. reduced to metal. rapidly volatilized, coating the coal white. in ignition tube with na_{2}co_{3} and ch.____ in flame on platinum wire____ with borax bead on platinum wire. in o. f. yellow while hot, limpid glass when cold. with co(no_{3})_{2}. green mass. having now given the principal reactions for the most important metals, we will proceed to the examination of the alkali metals, the alkaline earths, and some of the acid elements. the alkali metals 17. ~ammonium, nh_{4}.~--this hypothetical compound is commonly classed among the alkali metals from its close resemblance to the members of this group. to detect the presence of this hypothetical metal, mix the assay with about four parts of na_{2}co_{3}, place in an ignition tube, and apply heat. the odor of the evolved gas will be recognized, and if a piece of red litmus paper be moistened and held at the mouth of the tube, it will be turned blue by the escaping ammonia gas. we are not authorized to infer the pre-existence of ammonium, however, from the appearance of this reaction, for the presence of nitrogenous organic matter in the substance, which would be decomposed by this treatment, would give rise to such a reaction. 18. ~potassium.~--potassium is recognized by the color which its salts impart to the bunsen flame. if a portion of a salt of potassium be held on a platinum wire in the flame, it imparts a blue-violet tint which rapidly disappears. 19. ~sodium.~--like potassium, this alkali metal is detected by the color which its salts give to the flame. if a sodium salt be held on the platinum wire in the flame, it imparts an intense yellow color. the extreme delicacy of this reaction has been mentioned elsewhere. the value of this test is really lessened by its great delicacy, for it is possible to detect minute quantities of sodium in almost all substances, although it may not be in chemical combination. as an example, draw the platinum wire between the fingers, and then place in flame, and note presence of sodium. 20. ~lithium, li_{2}o.~--in the bunsen flame on the platinum wire it imparts a carmine-red tinge. hydrochloric acid on the sample augments the coloration. the alkaline earths 21. ~barium, bao.~--in the bunsen flame on the platinum wire it imparts an apple-green coloration. this reaction is intensified by moistening the sample with hydrochloric acid. 22. ~calcium, cao.~--in the bunsen flame on the platinum wire it imparts an orange-red color, which appears gray when seen through blue glass. hydrochloric acid on the sample makes the color more intense. 23. ~strontium, sro.~--in the bunsen flame on the platinum wire it imparts an intensely red color, which is increased by converting the substance into the chloride. the acid elements 24. ~borates.~--if the substance be finely powdered, moistened with glycerine, and then placed on a platinum wire in the bunsen flame, it imparts a brilliant green color. if turmeric paper be dipped into a solution of a borate, and then be dried at 100° c., it is turned to a peculiar red color. these two reactions are extremely delicate. 25. ~bromides.~--bromides treated with microcosmic salt and oxide of copper on platinum wire impart to the flame a greenish-blue color, the edges being decidedly green. 26. ~chlorides.~--chlorides are treated in the same way as bromides. the color imparted to the flame is azure-blue. to discriminate between bromides and chlorides more clearly, the substance is mixed with anhydrous potassium bisulphate and fused in an ignition tube. bromine and sulphur dioxide are evolved (if the substance be a bromide), the tube being filled with a yellow gas possessing the characteristic odor of bromine. 27. ~fluorides.~--a small portion of the substance in a finely powdered condition is placed in one of the ignition tubes, a strip of moist brazil-wood paper is introduced into the open end, and heat is applied. hydrofluoric acid is evolved, and the red color of the paper is changed into a straw-yellow. mica, containing only 0.75% of fluorine, shows the reaction clearly. 28. ~iodides.~--iodides are treated, as the bromides and chlorides, in a bead of microcosmic salt with oxide of copper. the flame is colored green. fused with potassium bisulphate in an ignition tube the violet vapors of iodine are evolved, and thus iodides may be distinguished from chlorides and bromides. 29. ~nitrates.~--if a nitrate be heated upon charcoal before the bp., violent deflagration occurs. if the substance containing the nitric acid be mixed with a _very small_ quantity of finely powdered potassium cyanide, the deflagration is accompanied with ignition and detonation. if the substance be mixed in a dry condition with dry potassium bisulphate, and is then heated in an ignition tube, red-brown nitrous fumes are evolved. this reaction takes place if there is but a small quantity of nitrate present. 30. ~phosphates.~--phosphates impart to the flame a bluish green color. the color is made more intense by moistening the substance with sulphuric acid, and then taking the paste so formed on the platinum wire and placing it in the bunsen flame. 31. ~silicates.~--silicates, when treated with microcosmic salt on a platinum wire, suffer decomposition; the bases unite with the phosphoric acid to form a transparent glass in which the silica may be seen floating as a cloudy mass. the bead must only be examined for silica while hot, since on cooling it becomes opaque. 32. ~sulphides.~--many sulphides, when heated in an ignition tube, volatilize and give a sublimate of sulphur in combination with the metallic portion of the substance. a very delicate test for sulphur in whatever combination it may be found in a substance, and which may be performed with great ease, is to mix the finely powdered assay with four parts, na_{2}co_{3}, and fuse in an ignition tube. when thoroughly fused the tube is broken, and the fused mass is placed on a bright silver coin, and a drop of water is added. if the substance contains sulphur, a black spot will be observed on the coin where the fused mass was placed. before going on to the next chapter, the student should assure himself of his familiarity with the reactions just given, and he should practise with various substances, the nature of which is unknown to him. chapter iv behavior of some of the principal ores before the blowpipe for the sake of practice, and as a fitting introduction to "determinative mineralogy," this chapter is appended. it is not intended to give a detailed account of the minerals, but rather to set before the student the most marked characters, such as hardness, specific gravity, color, lustre, etc. to determine the hardness of a mineral, we try to scratch it with the minerals forming an arbitrary "scale of hardness," proceeding successively from the softest to the hardest. when we say that a certain mineral has hardness = 4, we mean that the mineral is scratched by 4 on the scale, and that 4 on the scale is scratched by the mineral. the scale of hardness chiefly in use is the mohs-breithaupt scale, which is as follows:- 1. talc, common laminated light green variety. 2. gypsum, crystallized. 3. calcareous spar, transparent variety. 4. fluor spar, crystalline. 5. apatite, transparent. 6. orthoclase, white cleavable variety. 7. quartz, transparent. 8. topaz, transparent. 9. sapphire, cleavable variety. 10. diamond. it seldom happens in determining the hardness of a mineral that its hardness exactly conforms to that of some one member of the scale. in such cases we generally estimate the hardness. for example, suppose a mineral was harder than 4, but softer than 5, and that it was nearer 5 than 4, then we would call its hardness 4-3/4. in order to preserve the scale some operators use a three-cornered file, first cutting the mineral and then the scale until a number is found, which is abraded to about the same depth as the mineral under examination. since a set of minerals forming a scale of hardness is not always at hand, the following scale given by chapman is appended:- 1. yields easily to the nail. 2. yields with difficulty to the nail or just receives an impression from it. does not scratch a copper coin. 3. scratches a copper coin but is also scratched by it, being of about the same degree of hardness. 4. not scratched by a copper coin. does not scratch glass. 5. scratches glass with difficulty, leaving its powder on it. yields readily to the knife. 6. scratches glass easily. yields with difficulty to the knife. 7. does not yield to the knife. yields to the edge of a file, though with difficulty. 8, 9, 10. harder than flint. specific gravity cannot well be determined without the aid of a balance, and hence its value here is not great. as in the preceding chapter, alphabetic arrangement will be employed. ores of antimony ~stibnite~, sb_{2}s_{3}, sb . 71, s . 29.--[a]h = 2, g = 4.52-4.62. of lead-gray color and metallic lustre. consists of a large number of needle-shaped crystals. brittle. fuses in candle flame. in an ignition tube yields a sublimate of sulphur. on ch. before the bp. it is volatilized, giving antimony coating and tinges the flame pale blue. [footnote a: h = hardness, g = specific gravity.] ores of arsenic ~native arsenic, as.~--this contains traces of sb, ag, fe, co, and ni. h = 3.5, g = 5.7-5.8. dark gray in color. fracture tin-white, tarnishing rapidly. volatilizes before the bp. on ch. without melting, giving white coating of arsenious acid and characteristic garlic odor. in ignition tube it sublimes, giving arsenical ring. ~realgar~, ass, as . 70, s . 30.--h = 1.5-2, g = 3.56. bright red to orange-red color and resinous lustre. in an ignition tube it fuses and finally sublimes. the sublimate when cool is red and transparent. fuses readily before the bp. on ch. and burns with pale yellowish flame, emitting gray-white fumes having garlic odor. ~orpiment~, as_{2}s_{3}, as . 61, s . 39.- h = 1.5-2.0, g = 3.4-3.5. lemon-yellow in color and resinous or pearly lustre. sectile. before the bp. on ch. behaves like realgar, but in an ignition tube it gives a dark yellow sublimate which is transparent. ores of bismuth ~native bismuth, bi.~--this contains traces of as, te, and s. h = 2.0-2.5, g = 9.7-9.83. color, silver-white, slightly tinged with red. metallic lustre. brittle when cold, but may be laminated when hot. before the bp. on ch. behaves like pure bi. ~bismuthite~, bi_{2}o_{3} . 90, co_{2} . 7, h_{2}o . 3,- h = 4.0-4.5, g = 6.9-7.8. usually of a white or light greenish color and vitreous lustre, in acicular crystallizations. in an ignition tube decrepitates, yielding water and turning gray. before the bp. on ch. it fuses easily and is reduced to metallic globule, coating the ch. with bi_{2}o_{3}. with na_{2}co_{3} it occasionally gives the sulphur reaction. ores of chromium ~chromic iron ore~, feo . 32, cr_{2}o_{3} . 68.--al_{2}o_{3}, fe_{2}o_{3}, mno, and mgo are commonly present. h = 5.5, g = 4.32-4.57. occurs usually massive. color, iron-black to brownish black. in many varieties strongly magnetic. lustre, shining and somewhat metallic. heated in an ignition tube, remains unchanged. infusible before the bp. on ch. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3} and kcn yields metallic iron. in borax bead it slowly dissolves to a clear transparent glass, which is a beautiful green when cool. ores of cobalt ~smaltite~, co(fe, ni) as_{2}, co . 28, as . 72.--h = 5.5, g = 6.37-7.30. color, tin-white or steel-gray. lustre, metallic. when heated to redness in an ignition tube it yields a sublimate of metallic arsenic. before the bp. on ch. it fuses readily, with emission of arsenical fumes, to a grayish black magnetic globule. this globule may be examined for iron, cobalt, and nickel with the borax bead. ~cobaltite~, cos_{2} + coas_{2}, co . 36, as . 45, s . 19.--h = 5.5, g = 6.0-6.3. color, silver-white tinged with red. metallic lustre. before the bp. on ch. fuses easily, with emission of copious arsenical fumes, to a gray magnetic globule. remains unchanged in the ignition tube. ~linnaeite~, (co, ni)_{3}s_{4}, (co, ni)58, s . 42.--h = 5.5, g = 4.8-5.0. color, bright steel-gray, sometimes reddish. lustre, metallic. crystallizes in the regular octahedron. before the bp. on ch. fuses to a metallic globule which is attracted by the magnet. with borax bead gives reaction for cobalt. ~erythrite~, co_{3}o_{8}as_{2} + 8 h_{2}o, as_{2}s_{5} . 38.4, coo . 37.6, h_{2}o . 24.0.- h = 1.5-2.0, g = 2.95. color, crimson to peach-red. when crystallized, of pearly lustre, but frequently dull and earthy. heated in ignition tube gives off water, and color changes to blue or green. before the bp. on ch. in r. f. it emits arsenical fumes and melts to a dark gray globule which with the borax bead reacts for cobalt. ores of copper ~native copper, cu.~- h = 2.5-3, g = 8.5-8.9. color, copper-red. lustre, metallic. occurs usually massive and very arborescent. before the bp. on ch. it fuses, and if the heat is sufficiently high it assumes a bright bluish-green surface; on cooling it is covered with a coat of black oxide. in the borax bead it reacts for copper. ~chalcopyrite~, cufes_{2}, cu . 35, fe . 30, s . 35.--h = 3.5-4, g = 4.1-4.3. color, brass-yellow, often golden-yellow. lustre, metallic. occurs crystallized, but is generally found massive. is easily scratched with a knife. heated in an ignition tube decrepitates, and occasionally yields a faint sublimate of sulphur. before the bp. on ch. it blackens, but becomes red again on cooling. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3} and kcn it is reduced, and the metals are obtained in separate masses. it reacts with the borax bead for copper and iron. ~copper glance~, cu_{2}s, cu . 80, s . 20.--h = 2.5-3.0, g = 5.5-5.8. color, dark blue to steel-gray. occurs in compact masses, often very shining. before the bp. on ch. fuses to a globule which boils and emits glowing drops. sulphur dioxide escapes abundantly, and the outer flame is colored blue. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3} yielding a metallic globule. ~tetrahedrite~, 4 cus + sb_{2}s_{3}.--frequently contains silver, iron, mercury, and zinc. h = 3.0-4.0, g = 4.5-5. color, steel-gray to iron-black. heated in an ignition tube fuses and gives a sublimate of antimonious oxide. when mercury is present this condenses in the upper part of the tube, forming the characteristic mirror. before the bp. on ch. it fuses readily to a metallic globule, emitting dense white fumes; zinc and antimony coatings are deposited on the ch. after long ignition before the bp., if the mineral is finely powdered and mixed with na_{2}co_{3} and kcn, the ore is reduced to the metal. ~cuprite~, cu_{2}o, cu . 89, o . 11.- h = 3.5-4.0, g = 5.5-6.15. color, intense crimson-red. before the bp. on ch. blackens and fuses quietly, and finally yields a metallic globule of copper. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3} and kcn it is easily reduced. ~malachite~, 2 cuo + co_{2} + h_{2}o, cuo . 72, co_{2} . 20, h_{2}o . 8.- h = 3.5-4.0, g = 3.90-4.03. color, bright green. occurs generally in mammillated concretions. lustre, shining and fracture, silky. heated in an ignition tube yields water and blackens. before the bp. on ch. it fuses to a metallic globule. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3} and kcn it is easily reduced. with borax bead gives characteristic coloration. ~azurite~, 3 cuo + 2 co_{2} + h_{2}o, cuo . 69, co_{2} . 26, h_{2}o . 5.- h = 3.5-4.0, g = 3.77-3.83. color, azure-blue. occurs usually in crystallized or globular masses. lustre, earthy or vitreous. before the bp. and with other reagents behaves like malachite. ~chrysocolla~, cuo + sio_{2} + 2 h_{2}o, sio_{2} . 34.2, cuo . 45.3, h_{2}o . 20.5.--h = 2.0-3.0, g = 2. color, bluish-green, closely resembling malachite. occurs usually as an incrustation, its surface being very smooth, like enamel. in an ignition tube it blackens and yields water. before the bp. on ch. in o. f. it blackens, coloring the flame bright green; in the r. f. it turns red. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3} yields metallic copper. in borax bead it reacts for copper. ~atacamite~, cucl_{2} + 3 cuo_{2}h_{2}--cl . 16.6, o . 20.3, cu . 50.1, h_{2}o . 13.0.- h = 3.0-3.5, g = 3.75-3.77. color, green to blackish green. lustre, adamantine to vitreous. in an ignition tube yields water. before the bp. on ch. colors flame blue. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3} and kcn is reduced to the metal. in borax bead it reacts for copper. ores of iron ~limonite~, 2 fe_{2}o_{3} + 3 h_{2}o, fe_{2}o_{3} . 86, h_{2}o . 14.--h = 5.0-5.5, g = 3.6-4.0. color, brown to ochre-yellow. earthy or semi-metallic in appearance. in an ignition tube yields water. before the bp. on ch. infusible. in borax bead reacts for iron. ~hematite~, fe_{2}o_{3}, fe . 70, o . 30.- h = 5.5-6.5, g = 4.9-5.3. color, dark steel-gray to iron-black. lustre, metallic. when pulverized yields a red powder. before the bp. on ch. infusible. after long roasting becomes magnetic. in borax bead gives usual indications of iron. ~magnetite~, fe_{3}o_{4}, feo . 31, fe_{2}o_{3} . 69.- h = 5.5-6.5, g = 5.17-5.18. color, iron-black. lustre, shining and metallic. pulverized, its powder is black. it is strongly magnetic. fuses with difficulty before the bp. on ch. in borax bead reacts for iron. ~pyrites~, fes_{2}, fe . 47, s . 53.- h = 6.0-6.5, g = 4.95-5.20. color, brass-yellow. lustre, metallic. occurs commonly in cubes. it often contains small quantities of au, ag, cu, as, co, and mn. heated in an ignition tube gives a sublimate of sulphur, the residue becoming magnetic. before the bp. on ch. in o. f. sulphur is burned off and the red oxide remains. this residue may then be examined for iron, etc. ~marcasite~ (white iron pyrites).--having the same general composition as pyrite, but much lighter in color. crystals, prismatic. before the bp. on ch. behaves like pyrite. ~pyrrhotite~, fe_{7}s_{8}, fe . 60.5, s . 39.5.- h = 3.5-4.5, g = 4.58-4.64. color, bronze-yellow. closely resembles pyrite, but may be distinguished from it by being feebly magnetic. heated in an ignition tube yields no sublimate. before the bp. on ch. fuses to a magnetic globule, which exhibits a yellowish crystalline structure when fractured. ~mispickel~, feass, fe . 34, as . 46, s . 20.--h = 5.5-6.0, g = 6.0-6.2. color, silver-white. lustre, metallic; very brittle. often associated with it we find small quantities of co, ag, and au. heated in an ignition tube it first yields a red sublimate of sulphide of arsenic, and then afterward a crystalline sublimate of metallic arsenic. before the bp. on ch. emits dense fumes of arsenic and deposits a coating on the coal; it then fuses to a globule which behaves like pyrrhotite. ~siderite~, feco_{3}, feo . 62, co_{2} . 38.--h = 3.5-4.5, g = 3.7-3.9. color, grayish yellow to reddish brown. lustre, pearly. crystallizes in rhombohedrons with curved faces; these crystals are distinctly cleavable and massive. heated in an ignition tube it decrepitates with evolution of carbon dioxide. before the bp. on ch. infusible. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3} it fuses to a magnetic mass. with borax bead it reacts for iron and sometimes for manganese. ores of lead ~galena~, pbs, pb . 87, s . 13.- h = 2.5, g = 7.4-7.6. color, bluish gray, slowly tarnishing. lustre, metallic. crystals in the form of cubes. heated in an ignition tube it sometimes decrepitates and yields a sublimate of sulphur. before the bp. on ch. easily reduced to the metallic state, the ch. becoming coated with sulphate and oxide of lead. the metallic globule usually contains a little silver. to separate this, the process known as "cupellation" is employed. a hole is bored into the ch. about 1 cm. in diameter and about 6 mm. deep. into this hole is placed a stiff paste made by mixing finely pulverized bone-ash with a little soda and water. this paste is pressed in hard, and then the surface is smoothed off, and the centre is slightly depressed with the rounded end of a glass rod. the charcoal so prepared is set in a warm place to allow the paste to dry. when the paste is quite dry the small globule of lead is placed in the depression in the centre of the bone-ash "cupel," and is there exposed to the o. f. from the bp. the lead is oxidized and is absorbed by the bone-ash, while any silver present will remain in the central depression as a bright shining bead. ~cerusite~, pbco_{3}, pbo . 84, co_{2} . 16.--h = 3.0-3.5, g = 6.46-6.57. color, white, gray, or yellow. lustre, adamantine. crystallizes in prismatic needles. when heated in an ignition tube carbon dioxide is evolved and the residue turns yellow. before the bp. on ch. readily reduced to metallic lead. ~anglesite~, pbso_{4}, pbo . 74, so_{3} . 26.--h = 2.0-3.0, g = 6.12-6.39. color, yellow, gray, and brown. lustre, adamantine, resinous. heated in an ignition tube decrepitates, and sometimes yields a little water. before the bp. on ch. fuses to a clear bead, which on cooling becomes opaque. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3} is reduced to the metal giving a yellow coating. the na_{2}co_{3} absorbed by the coal reacts for s. ores of manganese ~pyrolusite~, mno_{2}, mn . 63.2, o . 36.8.--h = 2.0-2.5, g = 4.82. color, iron-black to steel-gray. lustre, non-metallic. heated in an ignition tube yields generally a little water, and if the temperature be high enough, oxygen is evolved. before the bp. on ch. infusible. in borax bead gives characteristic color. ~psilomelane~, mn_{2}o_{3} + h_{2}o.- h = 5.5-6.0, g = 3.7-4.7. color, iron-black to steel-gray. generally resembles pyrolusite, but is distinguished from it by its superior hardness. it frequently contains bao and li_{2}o. it behaves before the bp. like pyrolusite. ~wad~ (bog manganese).--this mineral is essentially mno_{2}, mno, and h_{2}o, with small quantities of fe_{2}o_{3}, al_{2}o_{3}, bao, sio_{2}, etc., associated with it. h = 0.5-6.0, g = 3.0-4.2. color, dull black. heated in an ignition tube yields water in abundance, otherwise it behaves like pyrolusite. ores of mercury ~native mercury, hg.~--g = 13.5-13.6. color, silver-white. is liquid at all ordinary temperatures. heated in an ignition tube is volatilized, the vapors condensing in the upper end of tube to small metallic globules of hg. before the bp. on ch. it is volatilized. frequently contains ag. ~cinnabar~, hgs_{2}, hg . 86, s . 14.- h = 2.0-2.5, g = 8.0-8.2. color, scarlet-red to brick-red. lustre, non-metallic. when pulverized yields a powder of vermilion-red color. heated in an ignition tube it volatilizes, yielding a black sublimate, which by friction becomes red. before the bp. on ch. it is wholly volatilized. heated in an ignition tube with na_{2}co_{3} metallic mercury sublimes, condensing in the upper portion of the tube in minute globules. ores of nickel ~millerite~, nis, ni . 64.4, s . 35.6.- h = 3.0-3.5, g = 5.2-5.6. color, brass-yellow. brittle. before the bp. on ch. it fuses to a magnetic, metallic globule. the roasted mineral gives in the borax bead the color reaction characteristic of nickel, and sometimes that of cobalt, which is often associated with it. ~niccolite~, nias, ni . 44, as . 56.- h = 5.0-5.5, g = 7.35-7.67. color, pale copper-red. lustre, metallic. very brittle. heated in an ignition tube yields a copious sublimate of arsenious oxide, the residue falling to a greenish powder. before the bp. on ch. fuses to a white brittle globule emitting arsenical fumes. in borax bead gives color characteristic of nickel. frequently in this mineral a portion of the arsenic is replaced by antimony. ores of silver ~native silver, ag.~- h = 2.5-3.0, g = 10.1-11.0. color, silver-white. lustre, metallic. ductile and malleable. usually occurs associated with au, as, sb, cu, fe, etc. before the bp. on ch. easily fuses to a globule which is surrounded with a dark red coating on the coal. ~argentite~, ag_{2}s, ag . 87.1, s . 12.9.- h = 2.0-2.5, g = 7.20-7.36. color, blackish lead-gray. lustre, metallic. very sectile. before the bp. on ch. in o. f. intumesces with evolution of sulphur dioxide, finally yielding a metallic globule of ag. ~pyrargyrite~, ag_{3}sbs_{3}, ag . 59.8, sb . 22.5, s . 17.7.--h = 2.5, g = 5.77-5.86. color, black to dark cochineal-red. lustre, metallic, adamantine. in an ignition tube it yields on continued heating a sublimate of antimony sulphide. before the bp. on ch. it gives a coating of antimony trioxide. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3} is reduced to metallic silver. ~proustite~, ag_{3}s_{3}as, ag . 65.5, as . 15.1, s . 19.4.--h = 2.0-2.5, g = 5.57-5.64. color, light red. lustre, splendent, adamantine. before the bp. on ch. it behaves like pyrargyrite, save that it gives off arsenical fumes instead of antimonious oxide. ~stephanite~, ag_{5}s_{4}sb, ag . 68.5, sb . 15.3, s . 16.2.--h = 2.0-2.5, g = 6.2-6.3. color, iron-black to blackish gray. lustre, metallic. very brittle and fragile. in an ignition tube it decrepitates, fuses, and finally yields a slight sublimate of antimony trisulphide. before the bp. on ch. gives a coating of antimonious oxide. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3} a globule of metallic silver is obtained. the mineral frequently contains copper and iron. ~kerargyrite~, agcl, ag . 75.3, cl . 24.7.--h = 1.0-1.5, g = 5.52. color, white, gray, yellowish, greenish to blue. lustre, resinous, adamantine. soft like wax. fuses easily in a candle-flame. before the bp. on ch. it is readily reduced to metallic silver. ores of tin ~cassiterite~, sno_{2}, sn . 79, o . 21.- h = 6.0-7.0, g = 6.8-7.0. color, brown, black. lustre, adamantine, brilliant. occurs crystallized in square prisms. reëntrant angles characteristic. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3} and kcn reduced to a metallic globule of tin. in the borax bead gives characteristic reaction. ~stannite~, 2 cu_{2}s . sns_{2} + 2 (fes . zns) sn . s_{2}.--h = 4.0, g = 4.3-4.5. color, steel-gray to iron-black. lustre, metallic. occurs usually massive and disseminated. heated in an ignition tube it yields sulphur dioxide. before the bp. on ch. it emits sulphur dioxide and becomes covered with oxide of tin. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3} and kcn it gives an impure globule of copper. a very difficult mineral to determine. ores of zinc ~calamine~, h_{2}zn_{2}o_{5}si, sio_{2} . 25.0, zno . 67.5, h_{2}o . 7.5.--h = 4.5-5.0, g = 3.4-3.5. color, white, gray, bluish, or brown. lustre, vitreous. brittle. in an ignition tube yields water when heated and becomes milky white. before the bp. on ch. practically infusible. with co(no_{3})_{2} it assumes a green color which passes into a fine blue when the heat is increased. ~smithsonite~, zn . co_{3}, zno . 64.8, co_{2} . 35.2.-h = 5, g = 4.30-4.45. color, gray, yellow, brown, and green. lustre, vitreous, pearly. heated in an ignition tube co_{2} is evolved, residue appearing white. it often contains impurities of cd, pb, fe, mn, ca, and mg. when these are present the residue in the ignition tube becomes dark on cooling. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3} and exposed to the r. f. it is decomposed. it gives the characteristic reaction for zinc with co(no_{3})_{2}. ~zincite~, zno, zn . 80.3, o . 19.7- h = 4.0-4.5, g = 5.43-5.70. color, blood-red. lustre, brilliant, subadamantine. before the bp. on ch. infusible. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3} gives coating of zinc oxide. gives characteristic reaction with co(no_{3})_{2}. it frequently contains a small quantity of mn_{2}o_{3}, which may be detected in the borax bead. ~sphalerite~, zns, zn . 67, s . 33.- h = 3.5-4.0, g = 3.9-4.1. color, yellow to black. lustre, resinous, brilliant, and sometimes submetallic. heated in an ignition tube sometimes decrepitates. before the bp. on ch. infusible. before the bp. on ch. with na_{2}co_{3} easily reduced. with co(no_{3})_{2} gives the characteristic reaction. it frequently contains small quantities of cd, hg, sn, pb, au, ag, etc. i table of colors of coatings on charcoal ------------------------------------------------- element | color hot | color cold | ---------|------------------------|---------------| antimony | (rather volatile) | white | | | | arsenic | (very volatile) | white | | | | bismuth | orange-yellow | lemon-yellow | | | | cadmium | brownish yellow | reddish brown | | | | lead | lemon-yellow (volatile)| lemon-yellow | | | | silver | dark red | dark red | | | | tin | faint yellow | white | | | | zinc | yellow | white | -------------------------------------------------ii table of flame colorations ----------------------------------- red | yellow | green | -------------|----------|-----------| calcium | sodium | barium | | | | lithium | | boron | | | | strontium | | iodine | -------------|----------|-----------| bluish green | blue | violet | -------------|----------|-----------| bromine | chlorine | potassium | | | | copper | | | | | | phosphorus | | | -----------------------------------iii table of colors of borax beads in oxidizing flame -------------------------------------------------------- element | color hot | color cold | ---------|------------------------|---------------------| aluminum | colorless to cloudy | colorless to cloudy | | | | antimony | yellowish | colorless | | | | barium | colorless to opaque | colorless to opaque | | | | bismuth | yellow | colorless | | | | cadmium | yellow | colorless to white | | | | calcium | colorless | colorless | | | | chromium | reddish yellow | yellowish green | | | | cobalt | blue | blue | | | | copper | green | greenish blue | | | | iron | orange | yellow | | | | lead | yellow | colorless | | | | magnesium| colorless | colorless | | | | manganese| violet | reddish violet | | | | nickel | violet | reddish brown | | | | silver | colorless | milk-white | | | | strontium| colorless to opaque | colorless to opaque | | | | tin | colorless | colorless | | | | zinc | yellowish | colorless | --------------------------------------------------------iv table of colors of borax beads in reducing flame -----------------------------------------------element | color hot | color cold | -----------------------------------------------aluminum | colorless | colorless | | | | antimony | colorless | cloudy | | | | barium | colorless | colorless | | | | bismuth | colorless | gray--cloudy | | | | cadmium | colorless | gray--cloudy | | | | calcium | colorless | colorless | | | | chromium | green | green | | | | cobalt | blue | blue | | | | copper | colorless | red | | | | iron | yellowish green | yellowish green | | | | lead | colorless | gray | | | | magnesium | colorless | colorless | | | | manganese | colorless | pink | | | | nickel | colorless | gray--cloudy | | | | silver | colorless | gray | | | | strontium | colorless | colorless | | | | tin | colorless | colorless | | | | zinc | colorless | gray | -----------------------------------------------v table of colors of microcosmic salt beads in oxidizing flame -------------------------------------------------- element | color hot | color cold | ---------------------------------------------------| aluminum | colorless | colorless | | | | antimony | yellowish | colorless | | | | barium |colorless to opaque| colorless to opaque| | | | bismuth | yellow | colorless | | | | cadmium | yellowish | colorless | | | | calcium | colorless | colorless to opaque| | | | chromium | reddish | green | | | | cobalt | blue | blue | | | | copper | green | greenish blue | | | | iron | red | brownish red | | | | lead | yellowish | colorless | | | | magnesium | colorless | colorless | | | | manganese | brownish violet | reddish violet | | | | nickel | reddish | yellow | | | | silver | yellowish | yellowish | | | | strontium | colorless | colorless | | | | tin | colorless | colorless | | | | zinc | yellowish | colorless | --------------------------------------------------vi table of colors of microcosmic salt beads in reducing flame +-----------+-------------+--------------+ | element | color hot | color cold | |-----------+-------------+--------------+ | aluminum | colorless | colorless | | | | | | antimony | colorless | gray--cloudy | | | | | | barium | colorless | colorless | | | | | | bismuth | colorless | gray--cloudy | | | | | | cadmium | colorless | gray--cloudy | | | | | | calcium | colorless | colorless | | | | | | chromium | reddish | green | | | | | | cobalt | blue | blue | | | | | | copper | dark green | brownish red | | | | | | iron | red | reddish | | | | | | lead | colorless | gray--opaque | | | | | | magnesium | colorless | colorless | | | | | | manganese | colorless | colorless | | | | | | nickel | colorless | gray | | | | | | silver | colorless | gray | | | | | | strontium | colorless | colorless | | | | | | tin | colorless | colorless | | | | | | zinc | colorless | gray--cloudy | ------------+-------------+--------------+ the practical methods of organic chemistry authorized translation 12mo. cloth. price, $1.60, _net_ by translated by ludwig gattermann, ph.d., william shafer, ph.d., _professor in university_ _instructor in organic chemistry_ _of heidelberg._ _in lehigh university._ * * * * * the guardian. "the selection and judgment throughout is excellent. the book is a most useful, practical adjunct to any good text-book on organic chemistry." pharmaceutical review. "this is a book that should be in the library of every teacher of organic chemistry, and one which will no doubt be of great value to students in their second year of organic chemistry. its chief peculiarity and merit is in the great stress laid on practical laboratory work.... it is permanently a worker's guide." nature. "since the advance of organic chemistry in this country must, in a measure, depend on the nature of the available text-books, both the author and the translator deserve our thanks for providing us with a work such as the present one." * * * * * published by the macmillan company 66 fifth avenue, new york outlines of industrial chemistry a text-book for students by frank hall thorp, ph.d., _instructor in industrial chemistry in the massachusetts institute of technology._ cloth. 8vo. price, $3.50 _net_ * * * * * james lewis howe, _department of chemistry, washington and lee university._ "the book is brought thoroughly up to date, and in some cases the lines of probable development are nicely foreshadowed. the descriptions are particularly lucid and the illustrations well selected. the general arrangement and make-up of the book is excellent, and ... altogether the book fills well a need long felt by teachers of industrial chemistry. i shall adopt the book for my class and shall take pleasure in recommending it." charles e. coates, jr., ph.d., _professor of chemistry, louisiana state university._ "i have examined it carefully and think it a most excellent book, meeting a want i have long felt in my higher classes. i have introduced it in this year's classes." w. a. noyes, in _science_. "the descriptions of processes, while necessarily concise, are clear and interesting. the author has evidently made a careful study of recent methods of manufacture as well as of older, standard processes. the frequent reference to american practice is an important feature which distinguishes the book from other works on chemical technology. a select bibliography follows each subject, and will be found very useful." * * * * * published by the macmillan company 66 fifth avenue, new york discovery of oxygen part 2 experiments by carl wilhelm scheele (1777) re issue edition: published for the alembic club by e. & s. livingstone ltd. 16 & 17 teviot place edinburgh 1964 [illustration] preface the portions of scheele's "chemical treatise on air and fire" here reproduced in english are intended to form a companion volume to no. 7 of the club reprints, which contains priestley's account of his discovery of oxygen. not only have the claims of scheele to the independent discovery of this gas never been disputed, but the valuable volume of "letters and memoranda" of scheele, edited by nordenskjöld, which was published in 1892, places it beyond doubt that scheele had obtained oxygen by more than one method at least as early as priestley's first isolation of the gas, although his printed account of the discovery only appeared about two years after priestley's. the evidence of this has been found in scheele's laboratory notes, which are still preserved in the royal academy of science in stockholm. in his "chemical treatise" scheele endeavours, at considerable length, to prove by experiments his views as to the compound character of heat and of light. these portions of the work have been entirely omitted from what is reproduced here. all the places where omissions have been made are indicated. every care has been taken in the endeavour to make the translation a faithful reproduction of the meaning of the original, whilst literal accuracy has been aimed at rather than literary elegance. l. d. chemical treatise on air and fire.[a] +1.+ it is the object and chief business of chemistry to skilfully separate substances into their constituents, to discover their properties, and to compound them in different ways. how difficult it is, however, to carry out such operations with the greatest accuracy, can only be unknown to one who either has never undertaken this occupation, or at least has not done so with sufficient attention. +2.+ hitherto chemical investigators are not agreed as to how many elements or fundamental materials compose all substances. in fact this is one of the most difficult problems; some indeed hold that there remains no further hope of searching out the elements of substances. poor comfort for those who feel their greatest pleasure in the investigation of natural things! far is he mistaken, who endeavours to confine chemistry, this noble science, within such narrow bounds! others believe that earth and phlogiston are the things from which all material nature has derived its origin. the majority seem completely attached to the peripatetic elements. +3.+ i must admit that i have bestowed no little trouble upon this matter in order to obtain a clear conception of it. one may reasonably be amazed at the numerous ideas and conjectures which authors have recorded on the subject, especially when they give a decision respecting the fiery phenomenon; and this very matter was of the greatest importance to me. i perceived the necessity of a knowledge of fire, because without this it is not possible to make any experiment; and without fire and heat it is not possible to make use of the action of any solvent. i began accordingly to put aside all explanations of fire; i undertook a multitude of experiments in order to fathom this beautiful phenomenon as fully as possible. i soon found, however, that one could not form any true judgment regarding the phenomena which fire presents, without a knowledge of the air. i saw, after carrying out a series of experiments, that air really enters into the mixture of fire, and with it forms a constituent of flame and of sparks. i learned accordingly that a treatise like this, on fire, could not be drawn up with proper completeness without taking the air also into consideration. [footnote a: carl wilhelm scheele's chemische abhandlung von der luft und dem feuer. upsala and leipzig, 1777.] +4.+ air is that fluid invisible substance which we continually breathe, which surrounds the whole surface of the earth, is very elastic, and possesses weight. it is always filled with an astonishing quantity of all kinds of exhalations, which are so finely subdivided in it that they are scarcely visible even in the sun's rays. water vapours always have the preponderance amongst these foreign particles. the air, however, is also mixed with another elastic substance resembling air, which differs from it in numerous properties, and is, with good reason, called aerial acid by professor bergman. it owes its presence to organised bodies, destroyed by putrefaction or combustion. +5.+ nothing has given philosophers more trouble for some years than just this delicate acid or so called fixed air. indeed it is not surprising that the conclusions which one draws from the properties of this elastic acid are not favourable to all who are prejudiced by previously conceived opinions. these defenders of the paracelsian doctrine believe that the air is in itself unalterable; and, with hales, that it really unites with substances thereby losing its elasticity; but that it regains its original nature as soon as it is driven out of these by fire or fermentation. but since they see that the air so produced is endowed with properties quite different from common air, they conclude, without experimental proofs, that this air has united with foreign materials, and that it must be purified from these admixed foreign particles by agitation and filtration with various liquids. i believe that there would be no hesitation in accepting this opinion, if one could only demonstrate clearly by experiments that a given quantity of air is capable of being completely converted into fixed or other kind of air by the admixture of foreign materials; but since this has not been done, i hope i do not err if i assume as many kinds of air as experiment reveals to me. for when i have collected an elastic fluid, and observe concerning it that its expansive power is increased by heat and diminished by cold, while it still uniformly retains its elastic fluidity, but also discover in it properties and behaviour different from those of common air, then i consider myself justified in believing that this is a peculiar kind of air. i say that air thus collected must retain its elasticity even in the greatest cold, because otherwise an innumerable multitude of varieties of air would have to be assumed, since it is very probable that all substances can be converted by excessive heat into a vapour resembling air. +6.+ substances which are subjected to putrefaction or to destruction by means of fire diminish, and at the same time consume, a part of the air; sometimes it happens that they perceptibly increase the bulk of the air, and sometimes finally that they neither increase nor diminish a given quantity of air; phenomena which are certainly remarkable. conjectures can here determine nothing with certainty, at least they can only bring small satisfaction to a chemical philosopher, who must have his proofs in his hands. who does not see the necessity of making experiments in this case, in order to obtain light concerning this secret of nature? +7. general properties of ordinary air.+ (1.) fire must burn for a certain time in a given quantity of air. (2.) if, so far as can be seen, this fire does not produce during combustion any fluid resembling air, then, after the fire has gone out of itself, the quantity of air must be diminished between a third and a fourth part. (3.) it must not unite with common water. (4.) all kinds of animals must live for a certain time in a confined quantity of air. (5.) seeds, as for example peas, in a given quantity of similarly confined air, must strike roots and attain a certain height with the aid of some water and of a moderate heat. consequently, when i have a fluid resembling air in its external appearance, and find that it has not the properties mentioned, even when only one of them is wanting, i feel convinced that it is not ordinary air. +8. air must be composed of elastic fluids of two kinds.+ +first experiment.+--i dissolved one ounce of alkaline liver of sulphur in eight ounces of water; i poured 4 ounces of this solution into an empty bottle capable of holding 24 ounces of water, and closed it most securely with a cork; i then inverted the bottle and placed the neck in a small vessel with water; in this position i allowed it to stand for 14 days. during this time the solution had lost a part of its red colour and had also deposited some sulphur: afterwards i took the bottle and held it in the same position in a larger vessel with water, so that the mouth was under and the bottom above the water-level, and withdrew the cork under the water; immediately water rose with violence into the bottle. i closed the bottle again, removed it from the water, and weighed the fluid which it contained. there were 10 ounces. after subtracting from this the 4 ounces of solution of sulphur there remain 6 ounces, consequently it is apparent from this experiment that of 20 parts of air 6 parts have been lost in 14 days. +9. second experiment.+--(_a._) i repeated the preceding experiment with the same quantity of liver of sulphur, but with this difference that i only allowed the bottle to stand a week, tightly closed. i then found that of 20 parts of air only 4 had been lost. (_b._) on another occasion i allowed the very same bottle to stand 4 months; the solution still possessed a somewhat dark yellow colour. but no more air had been lost than in the first experiment, that is to say 6 parts. +10. third experiment.+--i mixed 2 ounces of caustic ley, which was prepared from alkali of tartar and unslaked lime and did not precipitate lime water, with half an ounce of the preceding solution of sulphur which likewise did not precipitate lime water. this mixture had a yellow colour. i poured it into the same bottle, and after this had stood 14 days, well closed, i found the mixture entirely without colour and also without precipitate. i was enabled to conclude that the air in this bottle had likewise diminished, from the fact that air rushed into the bottle with a hissing sound after i had made a small hole in the cork. +11. fourth experiment.+--(_a._) i took 4 ounces of a solution of sulphur in lime water; i poured this solution into a bottle and closed it tightly. after 14 days the yellow colour had disappeared, and of 20 parts of air 4 parts had been lost. the solution contained no sulphur, but had allowed a precipitate to fall which was chiefly gypsum. (_b._) volatile liver of sulphur likewise diminishes the bulk of air. (_c._) sulphur, however, and volatile spirit of sulphur, undergo no alteration in it. +12. fifth experiment.+--i hung up over burning sulphur, linen rags which were dipped in a solution of alkali of tartar. after the alkali was saturated with the volatile acid, i placed the rags in a flask, and closed the mouth most carefully with a wet bladder. after 3 weeks had elapsed i found the bladder strongly pressed down; i inverted the flask, held its mouth in water, and made a hole in the bladder; thereupon water rose with violence into the flask and filled the fourth part. +13. sixth experiment.+--i collected in a bladder the nitrous air which arises on the dissolution of the metals in nitrous acid, and after i had tied the bladder tightly i laid it in a flask and secured the mouth very carefully with a wet bladder. the nitrous air gradually lost its elasticity, the bladder collapsed, and became yellow as if corroded by _aqua fortis_. after 14 days i made a hole in the bladder tied over the flask, having previously held it, inverted, under water; the water rose rapidly into the flask, and it remained only 2/3 empty. +14. seventh experiment.+--(_a._) i immersed the mouth of a flask in a vessel with oil of turpentine. the oil rose in the flask a few lines every day. after the lapse of 14 days the fourth part of the flask was filled with it; i allowed it to stand for 3 weeks longer, but the oil did not rise higher. all those oils which dry in the air, and become converted into resinous substances, possess this property. oil of turpentine, however, and linseed oil rise up sooner if the flask is previously rinsed out with a concentrated sharp ley. (_b._) i poured 2 ounces of colourless and transparent animal oil of dippel into a bottle and closed it very lightly; after the expiry of two months the oil was thick and black. i then held the bottle, inverted, under water and drew out the cork; the bottle immediately became 1/4 filed with water. +15. eighth experiment.+--(_a._) i dissolved 2 ounces of vitriol of iron in 32 ounces of water, and precipitated this solution with a caustic ley. after the precipitate had settled, i poured away the clear fluid and put the dark green precipitate of iron so obtained, together with the remaining water, into the before-mentioned bottle (§ 8), and closed it tightly. after 14 days (during which time i shook the bottle frequently), this green calx of iron had acquired the colour of crocus of iron, and of 40 parts of air 12 had been lost. (_b._) when iron filings are moistened with some water and preserved for a few weeks in a well closed bottle, a portion of the air is likewise lost. (_c._) the solution of iron in vinegar has the same effect upon air. in this case the vinegar permits the dissolved iron to fall out in the form of a yellow crocus, and becomes completely deprived of this metal. (_d._) the solution of copper prepared in closed vessels with spirit of salt likewise diminishes air. in none of the foregoing kinds of air can either a candle burn or the smallest spark glow. +16.+ it is seen from these experiments that phlogiston, the simple inflammable principle, is present in each of them. it is known that the air strongly attracts to itself the inflammable part of substances and deprives them of it: not only this may be seen from the experiments cited, but it is at the same time evident that on the transference of the inflammable substance to the air a considerable part of the air is lost. but that the inflammable substance[b] alone is the cause of this action, is plain from this, that, according to the 10th paragraph, not the least trace of sulphur remains over, since, according to my experiments this colourless ley contains only some vitriolated tartar. the 11th paragraph likewise shews this. but since sulphur alone, and also the volatile spirit of sulphur, have no effect upon the air (§ 11. _c._), it is clear that the decomposition of liver of sulphur takes place according to the laws of double affinity,--that is to say, that the alkalies and lime attract the vitriolic acid, and the air attracts the phlogiston. [footnote b: "das brennbare."] it may also be seen from the above experiments, that a given quantity of air can only unite with, and at the same time saturate, a certain quantity of the inflammable substance: this is evident from the 9th paragraph, _letter b_. but whether the phlogiston which was lost by the substances was still present in the air left behind in the bottle, or whether the air which was lost had united and fixed itself with the materials such as liver of sulphur, oils, &c., are questions of importance. from the first view, it would necessarily follow that the inflammable substance possessed the property of depriving the air of part of its elasticity, and that in consequence of this it becomes more closely compressed by the external air. in order now to help myself out of these uncertainties, i formed the opinion that any such air must be specifically heavier than ordinary air, both on account of its containing phlogiston and also of its greater condensation. but how perplexed was i when i saw that a very thin flask which was filled with this air, and most accurately weighed, not only did not counterpoise an equal quantity of ordinary air, but was even somewhat lighter. i then thought that the latter view might be admissible; but in that case it would necessarily follow also that the lost air could be separated again from the materials employed. none of the experiments cited seemed to me capable of shewing this more clearly than that according to the 10th paragraph, because this residuum, as already mentioned, consists of vitriolated tartar and alkali. in order therefore to see whether the lost air had been converted into fixed air, i tried whether the latter shewed itself when some of the caustic ley was poured into lime water; but in vain--no precipitation took place. indeed, i tried in several ways to obtain the lost air from this alkaline mixture, but as the results were similar to the foregoing, in order to avoid prolixity i shall not cite these experiments. thus much i see from the experiments mentioned, that the air consists of two fluids, differing from each other, the one of which does not manifest in the least the property of attracting phlogiston, while the other, which composes between the third and the fourth part of the whole mass of the air, is peculiarly disposed to such attraction. but where this latter kind of air has gone to after it has united with the inflammable substance, is a question which must be decided by further experiments, and not by conjectures. we shall now see how the air behaves towards inflammable substances when they get into fiery motion. we shall first consider that kind of fire which does not give out during the combustion any fluid resembling air. +17. first experiment.+--i placed 9 grains of phosphorus from urine in a thin flask, which was capable of holding 30 ounces of water, and closed its mouth very tightly. i then heated, with a burning candle, the part of the flask where the phosphorus lay; the phosphorus began to melt, and immediately afterwards took fire; the flask became filled with a white cloud, which attached itself to the sides like white flowers; this was the dry acid of phosphorus. after the flask had become cold again, i held it, inverted, under water and opened it; scarcely had this been done when the external air pressed water into the flask; this water amounted to 9 ounces. +18. second experiment.+--when i placed pieces of phosphorus in the same flask and allowed it to stand, closed, for 6 weeks, or until it no longer glowed, i found that 1/3 of the air had been lost. +19. third experiment.+--i placed 3 teaspoonfuls of iron filings in a bottle capable of holding 2 ounces of water; to this i added an ounce of water, and gradually mixed with them half an ounce of oil of vitriol. a violent heating and fermentation took place. when the froth had somewhat subsided, i fixed into the bottle an accurately fitting cork, through which i had previously fixed a glass tube a (fig. 1). i placed this bottle in a vessel filled with hot water, b b (cold water would greatly retard the solution). i then approached a burning candle to the orifice of the tube, whereupon the inflammable air took fire and burned with a small yellowish-green flame. as soon as this had taken place, i took a small flask c, which was capable of holding 20 ounces of water, and held it so deep in the water that the little flame stood in the middle of the flask. the water at once began to rise gradually into the flask, and when the level had reached the point d the flame went out. immediately afterwards the water began to sink again, and was entirely driven out of the flask. the space in the flask up to d contained 4 ounces, therefore the fifth part of the air had been lost. i poured a few ounces of lime water into the flask in order to see whether any aerial acid had also been produced during the combustion, but i did not find any. i made the same experiment with zinc filings, and it proceeded in every way similarly to that just mentioned. i shall demonstrate the constituents of this inflammable air further on; for, although it seems to follow from these experiments that it is only phlogiston, still other experiments are contrary to this. we shall now see the behaviour of air towards that kind of fire which gives off, during the combustion, a fluid resembling air. [illustration: _fig. 1._] [illustration: _fig. 2._] [illustration: _fig. 3._] [illustration: _fig. 4._] [illustration: _fig. 5._] +20. fourth experiment.+--it is well known that the flame of a candle absorbs air; but as it is very difficult, and, indeed, scarcely possible, to light a candle in a closed flask, the following experiment was made in the first place:--i set a burning candle in a dish full water; i then placed an inverted flask over this candle; at once there arose from the water large air bubbles, which were caused by the expansion, by heat, of the air in the flask. when the flame became somewhat smaller, the water began to rise in the flask; after it had gone out and the flask had become cold, i found the fourth part filled with water. this experiment was very undecisive to me, because i was not assured whether this fourth part of the air had not been driven out by the heat of the flame; since necessarily in that case the external air resting upon the water seeks equilibrium again after the flask has become cold, and presses the same measure of water into the flask as of air had been previously driven out by the heat. accordingly, i made the following experiment: +21. fifth experiment.+--(_a._) i pressed upon the bottom of the dish a (fig. 2) a tough mass, of the thickness of two fingers, made of wax, resin, and turpentine metal together; in the middle i fastened a thick iron wire which reached to the middle of the flask b; upon the point of this wire c, i stuck a small wax candle, whose wick i had twisted together out of three slender threads. i then lighted the candle, and at the same time placed over it the inverted flask b, which i then pressed very deep into the mass. as soon as this was done, i filled the dish with water. after the flame was extinguished and everything had become quite cold, i opened the flask in the same position under the water, when 2 ounces of water entered; the flask held 160 ounces of water. accordingly, there is wanting here so much air as occupies the space of 2 ounces of water. has this air been absorbed by the inflammable substance, or has the heat of the small flame driven it out even before i could press the flask into the tough mass? the latter seems to have taken place in this case, as i conclude from the following:--i took a small flask capable of holding 20 ounces of water; in this i caused a candle to burn as in the preceding; after everything had become cold, i opened this flask likewise under water, whereupon similarly nearly 2 ounces entered. had the former 2 ounces measure of air been absorbed, then there should have been only 2 drachms measure absorbed in this experiment. (_b._) i repeated the preceding experiment with the large flask in exactly the same way, except that i employed spirit of wine in place of the candle. i fastened three iron wires, which were of equal length and reached up to the middle of the flask, into the tough mass which was firmly pressed on to the bottom of the dish. upon these wires i laid a four-cornered plate of metal, and upon this i placed a small vessel into which spirit of wine was poured. i set fire to this and placed the flask over it. after cooling, i observed that 3 ounces measure of air had been driven out by the heat of the flame. (_c._) upon the same stand i placed a few small glowing coals, and allowed then go out in the same way under the flask. i found after cooling that the heat of the coals had driven out three and a half ounces measure of air. the experiments seem to prove that the transference of phlogiston to the air does not always diminish its bulk, which, however, the experiments mentioned in §§ 8.16 shew distinctly. but the following will shew that that portion of the air which unites with the inflammable substance, and is at the same time absorbed by it, is replaced by the newly formed aerial acid. +22. sixth experiment.+--after the fire had gone out and everything had become cold in the experiments mentioned above (§ 21. _a._ _b._ _c._), i poured into each flask 6 ounces of milk of lime (lime water which has in it more unslaked lime than the water can dissolve); i then placed my hand firmly on the mouth of the flask and swung it several times up and down; then i held the flask inverted under water and drew my hand a little to one side, so that a small orifice might be made. water immediately rose into the flask. then i shut the mouth again very tightly with my hand under water, and afterwards shook it several times up and down. i opened it again under water; this operation i repeated twice more until no more water would rise into the flask, or until no more aerial acid was present in it. i then perceived that in each experiment between 7 and 8 ounces of water rose into the flasks, consequently the nineteenth part of the air has been lost. this was indeed something, but since in the combustion of phosphorus (§ 17) nearly the third part of the air was lost, there must be another reason besides, why as much is not absorbed in this case also. it is known that one part of aerial acid mixed with 10 parts of ordinary air extinguishes fire; and there are here in addition, expanded by the heat of the flame and surrounding the latter, the watery vapours produced by the destruction of these oily substances. it is these two elastic fluids, separating themselves from such a flame, which present no small hindrance to the fire which would otherwise certainly burn much longer, especially since there is here no current of air by means of which they can be driven away from the flame. when the aerial acid is separated from this air by milk of lime, then a candle can burn in it again, although only for a very short time. +23. seventh experiment.+--i placed upon the stand (§ 21. _b._) a small crucible which was filled with sulphur; i set fire to it and placed the flask over it. after the sulphur was extinguished and everything had become cold, i found that out of 160 parts of air, 2 parts were driven out of the flask by the heat of the flame. i next poured 6 ounces of clear lime water into the flask and dealt with it by shaking, as already explained, and observed that the sixth part of all the air had been lost in consequence of the combustion. the lime water was not in the least precipitated in this case, an indication that sulphur gives out no aerial acid during its combustion, but another substance somewhat resembling air; this is the volatile acid of sulphur, which occupies again the empty space produced by the union of the inflammable substance with air. it is not, as may be seen, a trifling circumstance that phlogiston, whether it separates itself from substances and enters into union with air, with or without a fiery motion, still in every case diminishes the air so considerably in its external bulk. +24. experiments which prove that ordinary air, consisting of two kinds of elastic fluids, can be compounded again after these have been separated from each other by means of phlogiston.+ i have already stated in § 16 that i was not able to find again the lost air. one might indeed object, that the lost air still remains in the residual air which can no more unite with phlogiston; for, since i have found that it is lighter than ordinary air, it might be believed that the phlogiston united with this air makes it lighter, as appears to be known already from other experiments. but since phlogiston is a substance, which always presupposes some weight, i much doubt whether such hypothesis has any foundation.... +25.+ how often must not chemists have distilled the fuming acid of nitre from oil of vitriol and nitre, when it is impossible that they should not have observed how this acid went over red in the beginning, white and colourless in the middle of the distillation, but at the end red again; and indeed so dark-red that one could not see through the receiver? it is to be noticed here that if the heat is permitted to increase too much at the end of the distillation, the whole mixture enters into such frothing that everything goes over into the receiver; and, what is of the greatest importance, a kind of air goes over during this frothing which deserves no small attention. if one takes for such distillation a very black oil of vitriol, not only does the acid go over at the beginning of a far darker red than when one takes a white oil of vitriol, but further, when one introduces a burning candle into the receiver after about an ounce has gone over, this goes out immediately. on the other hand, when one places a burning candle in the receiver filled with blood-red vapours, towards the end of the distillation when, as has been said, the mixture froths strongly, not only will it continue to burn, but this will take place with a much brighter light than in ordinary air. the same thing occurs when one attaches, at the close of the distillation, a receiver which is filled with an air in which fire will not burn, for, when this has been attached for half an hour, a candle will likewise continue to burn in the air. in this case there now arises in the first place the question: are the vapours of the acid of nitre naturally red? i beg leave to raise this question here because i believe there are people who advance the redness of this acid as a distinguishing characteristic. the colours of the acid of nitre are accidental. when a few ounces of fuming acid of nitre are distilled by a very gentle heat, the yellow separates itself from it and goes into the receiver, and the residuum in the retort becomes white and colourless like water. this acid has all the chief properties of acid of nitre, except that the yellow colour is wanting. this i call the pure acid of nitre; as soon, however, as it comes into contact with an inflammable substance, it becomes more or less red. this red acid is more volatile than the pure, hence heat alone can separate them from one another; and, for exactly the same reason, the volatile spirit must go over first in the distillation of glauber's spirit of nitre. when this has gone over, the colourless acid follows; but why does the acid make its appearance again so blood-red at the end of the distillation? why has not this redness already been driven over at the beginning? where does it now obtain its phlogiston? this is the difficulty. +26.+ i intimated in the preceding paragraph that the candle went out in the receiver at the beginning of the distillation. the reason is to be found in the experiment which i have cited in § 13. in this case the acid of nitre, passing over in vapours, takes to itself the inflammable substance, whose presence is indicated by the black colour of the oil of vitriol; as soon as this has taken place it meets with the air, which again robs the now phlogisticated acid of its inflammable substance; by this means a part of the air contained in the receiver becomes lost, hence the fire introduced into it must go out (§ 15). +27.+ the acid of nitre can attract phlogiston in varying quantity, when it likewise receives other properties with each proportion. (_a._) when it becomes, as it were, saturated with it, a true fire arises, and it is then completely destroyed. (_b._) when the inflammable principle is present in smaller quantity, this acid is converted into a kind of air which will not unite either with the alkalies or with the absorbent earths, and with water only in very small quantity. when this acid of nitre, resembling air, meets with the air, the latter takes the inflammable substance from it again, it loses its elasticity (§ 13), the vapours acquire redness, and the air undergoes at the same time this no less remarkable than natural alteration, that it is not only diminished, but also becomes warm. (_c._) when the acid of nitre receives still somewhat less phlogiston, it is likewise converted into a kind of air, which, like the air, is also invisible, but unites with the alkalies and earths, and along with them can bring forth real intermediate salts. this phlogisticated acid is, however, so loosely united with these absorbing substances, that even the simple mixture with the vegetable acids can drive it out. it is present in this condition in nitre which has been made red hot, and also in _nitrum antimoniatum_. when this acid of nitre meets the air it also loses its elasticity and is converted into red vapours. when it is mixed in a certain quantity with water, this acquires a blue, green, or yellow colour. (_d._) when the pure acid of nitre receives but very little of the inflammable substance, the vapours only acquire a red colour, and are wanting in expansive power; it is, however, more volatile than the pure acid. this acid holds this small quantity of phlogiston so firmly that even the air, which so strongly attracts the inflammable substance, is not able to separate this from it. * * * * * +29.+ i took a glass retort which was capable of holding 8 ounces of water, and distilled fuming acid of nitre according to the usual method. in the beginning the acid went over red, then it became colourless, and finally all became red again; as soon as i perceived the latter, i took away the receiver and tied on a bladder, emptied of air, into which i poured some thick milk of lime (§ 22) in order to prevent the corrosion of the bladder. i then proceeded with the distillation. the bladder began to expand gradually. after this i permitted everything to cool, and tied up the bladder. lastly i removed it from the neck of the retort. i filled a bottle, which contained 10 ounces of water, with this gas (§ 30, _e._), i then placed a small lighted candle in it; scarcely had this been done when the candle began to burn with a large flame, whereby it gave out such a bright light that it was sufficient to dazzle the eyes. i mixed one part of this air with three parts of that kind of air in which fire would not burn; i had here an air which was like the ordinary air in every respect. since this air is necessarily required for the origination of fire, and makes up about the third part of our common air, i shall call it after this, for the sake of shortness, fire-air; but the other air which is not in the least serviceable for the fiery phenomenon, and makes up about two-thirds of our air, i shall designate after this with the name already known, of vitiated air. +30.+ anyone might ask me in what way i bring air from one vessel into another. i find it necessary therefore to describe this in the first place. my arrangements and vessels are the very simplest that one can possibly have: flasks, retorts, bottles, glasses, and ox bladders are the things which i employ. the bladders, while they are still fresh, are rubbed, and blown up very fully, then tightly tied and hung up to dry. when i wish to use such a bladder and find it blown up just as fully as at first, i am thereby assured that it is tight. (_a._) when i wish to collect any kind of air in a bladder, for example the phlogisticated acid of nitre (§ 13), i take a soft bladder smeared inside with a few drops of oil, and place in it some filings of a metal, as iron, zinc, or tin; i then press the air as completely as possible out of the bladder and tie it very tightly over a small bottle into which some _aqua fortis_ has been poured; i then partly unfold the bladder so that a few iron filings may fall into the _aqua fortis_, according as this dissolves the bladder becomes expanded. when i have collected enough of the air so produced, i tightly tie up the bladder with a thread close above the mouth of the bottle, and then detach it from the bottle. (_b._) if this phlogisticated acid of nitre is mixed with aerial acid, which is the case when the acid of the nitre is extracted over sugar, i tie a bladder, softened with some water, to the extreme end of the neck of the retort a (fig. 3); in order, however, that i may properly prevent the escape of the air it is necessary to scratch the neck of the retort somewhat at this place with a flint. (retorts which i employ for investigations of this kind i have blown not larger than to be capable of holding only from one half to three ounces of water, but which have at the same time a neck which is about half an ell long, and that for this reason that the attached bladder may not be destroyed during the operation by the heat of the furnace or by the hot vapours.) into this bladder i pour some milk of lime (§ 22), and press the air out as fully as possible. this lime will absorb the aerial acid during the distillation, and leave the phlogisticated acid of nitre untouched. (_c._) in exactly the same way as is described in _a_ i also collect aerial acid and the inflammable air of sulphur (of which i shall speak further on). but if the bladders are moist, or even if only the air surrounding them is so, both these kinds of air penetrate completely through the bladders in a few days; if the bladders and air are dry, however, this does not take place. i obtain inflammable air from the metals, as iron or zinc, in exactly the same way, except that i place the bottle in warm sand. this air is still more subtle than the preceding; it penetrates through the fine pores of the bladder in a few days, although air and bladder are dry. i frequently experienced this to my vexation. (_d._) i not infrequently catch air in bladders, without any bottles. i place in a soft bladder (aa, fig. 4) the material from which i intend to collect the air, for example, chalk; above this chalk i draw the bladder together with twine bb; i then pour above it the acid diluted with water and press out the air as completely as possible; i finally tie up the bladder above at cc. i then untie the twine b, when the acid runs upon the chalk; it immediately drives out the aerial acid, whereupon the bladder must expand. (_e._) when i require to get an air out of the bladder into a flask, glass, retort, or bottle, i fill such apparatus with water and place in it a tightly fitting cork; i then tie the bladder which contains the air, that is, the opening from c to d (fig. 4), very firmly over such bottle; i then invert the bottle so that the bladder comes below and the bottle above, whereupon i hold the bottle with the left hand and with the right i withdraw the cork; i hold this cork firmly between both fingers inside the bladder until the water has flowed out of the bottle into the bladder, and the air has mounted out of the bladder into the bottle; i then put in the cork and detach the bladder from the bottle. when i wish to preserve the air for a long time i place the neck of the bottle in a vessel with water. (_f._) when there is aerial acid in the bladder, or another air which can unite with water, and i wish to unite it with water neatly, i fill a bottle with cold water, and, after it has been attached to the bladder, i permit about the fourth part to run into the bladder; i then push the cork, which, as previously, was firmly held within the bladder, into the bottle again; i then shake the bottle gently, when the air will dissolve in the water. thereupon i make a small opening by means of the cork, when air passes out of the bladder into the bottle in order to fill up again the space which has become empty, without any water running into the bladder; i then push the cork again into the bottle and shake the water contained in it. i repeat this operation two or three times more, when the water is saturated with this air. (_g._) when i wish to mix together two kinds of air in a flask or bottle, i permit in the first place just as much water, by measure, to run from the bottle filled with water, into the bladder, as i wish to have of air. i then tie the bottle over with a bladder filled with another kind of air and permit the remaining water to run into the bladder, whereupon i immediately replace the cork in the bottle, as soon as the last of the water has run out. (_h._) when i wish to have in a bladder an air collected in a bottle, i reverse the operation. that is to say, i fill the bladder with as much water as i wish to have in it of air and tie it up at the top; i then tie this bladder tightly over the top of the bottle and untie the ligature of the bladder, draw the cork out of the bottle and so permit the water to run out of the bladder into the bottle. i then tie up the bladder, which now contains the air out of the bottle, and detach it from the bottle. (_i._) when i have in a bottle an air mixed with another kind of air which can be absorbed by water or lime, but wish to know how much of each kind is present in the bottle, i tie over it a bladder into which so much milk of lime has been poured that the bottle can be filled with it; i then withdraw the cork and permit the water or milk of lime to run into the bottle. i afterwards invert the bottle and permit the milk of lime to flow again into the bladder; i repeat this running out and in several times. so much air by measure has been absorbed as there now remains behind of milk of lime in the bottle. these are the methods which i employed in my investigations of air. i admit that they will not particularly please some, because they do not decide with great exactness. they afforded me satisfaction, however, in all my investigations; and people will often split a hair where it is not in the least necessary. +31. continuation of the experiment mentioned in § 29+ ... anyone might object and say that the air obtained according to § 29 is perhaps nothing else than a dry acid of nitre converted into elastic vapours. but if this opinion had any foundation, this air should not only be corrosive, but should also produce nitre anew with alkalies. this, however, does not occur. nevertheless, this objection would possess considerable weight were i not able to prove that several substances produce the same air as the acid of nitre does during distillation. but proof of this is not wanting. i have proved in a treatise on manganese, which is to be found in the transactions of the royal swedish academy of sciences for the year 1774, that this mineral is not soluble in any acid unless an inflammable substance be added, which communicates the phlogiston to the manganese, and by this means effects an entrance of the latter into the acids. i have shown in the same place that vitriolic acid, nevertheless, during a strong distillation with powdered manganese, unites with it and makes it soluble in water; and if this manganese is separated again from the vitriolic acid by means of precipitating agents, there are found in it the most distinct traces of the inflammable substance.... i had already observed a few years ago, that if in the calcination of manganese with oil of vitriol in an open crucible, some coal dust was driven by the current of air over the surface of this mixture, these fine coals took fire in the same instant with very great brilliancy. i accordingly made the following experiments. +32. first experiment.+--i mixed so much concentrated oil of vitriol with finely powdered manganese that it became a stiff magma. i distilled this mixture from a small retort on the open fire. in place of a receiver i made use of a bladder, empty of air, and, in order that the vapours which might pass over should not attack the bladder, i poured into it some milk of lime (§ 30, letter _b_). as soon as the bottom of the retort became red hot, an air passed over which gradually expanded the bladder. this air had all the properties of a pure fire-air. +33. second experiment.+--when i distilled two parts of finely pulverised manganese with one part of the phosphorous acid of urine in the same way as is indicated in the preceding paragraph, i likewise obtained fire-air. +34. third experiment.+--(_a._) i dissolved in _aqua fortis_ the white magnesia employed in medicine; i evaporated this solution to dryness. i then placed the salt in a small retort for distillation, as is described in § 32. even before the retort was red hot the acid of nitre separated from the magnesia, and that in blood-red vapours; and at the same moment the bladder began to expand. the air thus obtained was my fire-air. it is thus seen constantly that the acid of nitre goes off again blood-red when separated by means of heat from the metals which had been dissolved in this menstruum. (_b._) i distilled mercurial nitre in the foregoing manner until the acid of nitre had separated from the residual red precipitate. in this case also i obtained our fire-air.... whence comes the boiling of nitre, fused in a crucible and obscurely red-hot? neither smoke nor vapours are seen to rise from it, and yet coal dust flying above the open crucible takes fire, burning brilliantly. whence comes it that such nitre maintained in red-hot fusion in a glass retort for half an hour, becomes moist in open air and deliquesces after cooling, and still does not show any trace of alkali? (§ 27, letter _c._) what is the reason that this liquefied nitre permits its volatile acid to escape immediately, when rubbed or mixed with the vegetable acids?... if the chemists of the preceding century had thought worthy of a more particular examination, the elastic fluids resembling air which manifest themselves in so many operations, how advanced should we now be! they desired to see everything in corporeal form, and to collect everything as drops in the receiver. this is now for the first time better inquired into, and the air has begun to be carefully examined: and who is there who does not perceive the advantage which the results of such experiments carry with them? * * * * * +35. fourth experiment.+--i put an ounce of purified nitre into a glass retort for distillation and made use of a bladder, moistened and emptied of air, in place of a receiver (fig. 3). as soon as the nitre began to glow it also began to boil, and at the same time the bladder was expanded by the air that passed over. i proceeded with the distillation until the boiling in the retort ceased, and the nitre was about to force its way through the softened retort. i obtained in the bladder the pure fire-air which occupied the space of 50 ounces of water. this is the cheapest and best method of obtaining fire-air. * * * * * +38. fifth experiment.+--i took a silver solution prepared with acid of nitre, and precipitated it with alkali of tartar; i washed the precipitate thus obtained and dried it. i then placed this calx of silver in a small glass retort on the open fire for reduction, and fastened an empty bladder to the neck. the bladder was immediately expanded by the air which passed over. after the end of the distillation i found the calx of silver half melted together in the retort, with its metallic lustre; however, as i had effected the precipitation with alkali of tartar, and this is always united with a quantity of aerial acid which attaches itself to the calx of silver in the precipitation, so this acid was necessarily present also in the bladder. this acid was removed from it by milk of lime (§ 30, letter _i._), and there remained behind one-half of pure fire-air. +39. sixth experiment.+--i precipitated with alkali of tartar a solution of gold which was made with _aqua regia_; i reduced in the foregoing manner the washed and dried calx of gold. i obtained in this case the same fire-air, except that no aerial acid accompanied it. this is not to be wondered at, because the saturated solution of gold effervesces with the alkali, which does not take place with the solution of silver. +40. seventh experiment.+--it is likewise known that the red precipitate of mercury regains its flowing condition without the addition of an inflammable substance. since mercury, however, really loses its phlogiston as well by means of vitriolic acid as of the acid of nitre, it must necessarily assume this again as soon as it recovers its metallic property. (_a._) i added a solution of alkali of tartar, drop by drop, to a solution of corrosive sublimate. i washed the brown-red precipitate obtained, and dried it; then i placed it, for reduction, upon the open fire in a small retort, which was provided with a bladder empty of air. as soon as the calx began to glow, the bladder became expanded, and quicksilver rose into the neck. the fire-air obtained had some aerial acid mixed with it. (_b._) mercury converted into calx by the acid of nitre, or red precipitate, treated in the same way behaved similarly. in this case i obtained a pure fire-air, without any aerial acid in it. +41. eighth experiment.+--i have proved, in a treatise on arsenic communicated to the royal swedish academy of sciences, that this poisonous substance is compounded of a peculiar acid and an inflammable substance. i also shewed in the same treatise how this acid can be sublimed into ordinary arsenic simply by continued heat; and although i clearly perceived the reason for this, even at that time, still i was unwilling to mention it there in order to avoid prolixity. i placed some of this fixed acid of arsenic in a small retort with a bladder attached, for distillation. when the acid had gone into fusion, and glowed brightly, it began to boil; during this ebullition arsenic rose into the neck and the bladder became expanded; i continued with this heat as long as the retort would hold out. the air collected was likewise fire-air. in the same treatise i made mention of a peculiar explosion which took place in the distillation of zinc with the acid of arsenic. how clear, how manifest does the explanation of this phenomenon not become when one is satisfied that in this case fire-air is present in the retort in its greatest purity, and the zinc is in red hot fusion? what more is necessary for its ignition? i have very often regarded with pleasure the brightly glowing sparks which are produced in a retort by heat alone, during the reduction of metallic calces, when only a very little coal dust is mixed along with it. we shall now see whether this fire-air is not the same air which had been lost without fire (§§ 8-15), and with fire (§§ 17-23). +42. first experiment.+--i filled a bottle which was capable of holding 16 ounces of water with pure fire-air according to the method which is described in § 30, letter e. i placed the bottle, inverted, in a glass which was filled with a solution of liver of sulphur. the solution rose a little into the bottle hour by hour, and after the lapse of 2 days the bottle was filled with it. +43. second experiment.+--i mixed in a bottle 14 parts of that air from which the fire-air had been removed by liver of sulphur (§ 8), and which i have called vitiated air (§ 29), with 4 parts of our fire-air, and placed the bottle, inverted and open, in a vessel which was also filled with a solution of liver of sulphur. after 14 days the 4 parts of fire-air were lost, and the solution had risen into their place. +44. third experiment.+--after i had filled a bottle with our air, i poured some colourless animal oil into it and closed it tightly. after a few hours it had already become brown, and by the next day black. it is no small inconvenience to preserve this oil white in apothecaries' shops. it is found necessary to pour this oil into small phials, and to preserve it most carefully from the access of air. when such a colourless oil is mixed with any acid, the acid, as well as the oil, becomes black even in an hour, although it has been diluted with water. even vinegar has the same effect. there is no other reason, therefore, why the oil becomes at once black in the air, than that the fire-air present in the air deprives it of its phlogiston, and thereby develops a subtle acid, previously united with this phlogiston, which produces the blackness. +45. fourth experiment.+--(_a._) into a bottle of 7 ounces, which was filled with fire-air, i put a piece of phosphorus from urine and closed it with a cork. i then heated, by means of a burning candle, the place where the phosphorus lay; the phosphorus took fire with very great brilliancy. as soon as the flame had gone out, the bottle broke into fragments. (_b._) as the bottle in the foregoing experiment was very thin, i repeated it with a somewhat thicker bottle, and after everything had become cold i wanted to take the cork out of the bottle under water. it was not possible for me to do this, however, so tightly did the external air press the cork into the bottle. accordingly i forced it inside the bottle; thereupon water entered the bottle and filled it almost completely. since the first bottle was only very thin, the reason that it was crushed must be ascribed to the external air. (_c._) when i mixed vitiated air with one third of fire-air, and burned a piece of phosphorus in the mixture, only 1/3 of it was absorbed. +46. fifth experiment.+--i also repeated the same experiment which is described in § 19, only with this difference that i took the tube longer, and filled the flask with my fire-air. it was pleasing to observe how the water rose gradually into the flask; and how the flame went out when 7/8 of the flask were full of water. +47. sixth experiment.+--i laid some glowing coals upon the stand (§ 21, letter _c_), and placed over them a flask which was filled with fire-air. the coals had not even reached the air in the flask before they began to burn very brilliantly. after everything had become cold, i made an aperture under the flask, whereupon the fourth part became filled with water. but when i removed, by means of milk of lime, the aerial acid which was present in the residual air (§ 22) there remained in the flask only the fourth part. in this air a candle could still burn. +48. seventh experiment.+--i also examined the behaviour of fire-air with sulphur (§ 23). as soon as the burning sulphur came into contact with the fire-air contained in the flask, the flame became much larger and brighter. when this fire had gone out, the water in the dish had found a way to come through the mass into the flask, which became 3/4 filled with it. as i employed for these last 3 experiments a flask which was only of 30 ounces measure, i was obliged to arrange the stand (§ 21) to suit. +49.+ i have mentioned (§ 16) that i found vitiated air lighter than ordinary air. must it not follow from this that the fire-air is heavier than our air? as a matter of fact, i actually found, when i accurately weighed as much fire-air as occupied the space of 20 ounces of water, that this was almost 2 grains heavier than the same bulk of common air. +50.+ these experiments shew, therefore, that this fire-air is just that air by means of which fire burns in common air; only it is there mixed with a kind of air which seems to possess no attraction at all for the inflammable substance, and this it is which places some hindrance in the way of the otherwise rapid and violent inflammation. and in fact, if air consisted of nothing but fire-air, water would surely render small service in extinguishing outbreaks of fire. aerial acid mixed with this fire-air, has the same effect as vitiated air. i mixed one part of fire-air with 4 parts of aerial acid; in this mixture a candle still burned moderately well. the heat which lurks in the small interstices of the inflammable substance cannot possibly make up so much heat as is felt in fire; and i think i am not mistaken when i conclude from my experiments that the heat is really brought forth and produced in the first place from fire-air and the phlogiston of the inflammable substance.... * * * * * +80.+ i had long wished to have some of the precipitate of mercury _per se_, in order to see whether it also would yield fire-air during reduction by means of heat alone. at length i obtained some from my much esteemed friend doctor gahn. this so-called precipitate had the appearance of small dark-red crystals resembling cinnabar. now, as i know that mercury cannot be dissolved in muriatic acid unless it has lost its phlogiston, which takes place during its solution in acid of nitre or in vitriolic acid; and as this is also the reason why nitre must be present in a mixture of calcined vitriol, common salt, and quicksilver, i therefore poured muriatic acid upon a part of this red precipitate; the solution was soon formed and was somewhat hot; i evaporated it to dryness and increased the heat. everything sublimed, and a true corrosive sublimate was formed. hence this precipitate, produced by heat alone, is a calcined mercury. i then placed the other part of this precipitate over the fire in a small glass retort to which i had fastened an empty bladder. as soon as the retort became red hot the bladder became expanded, and at the same time the reduced mercury rose into the neck. in this case no red sublimate arose as customarily takes place with that calx which is prepared by the acid of nitre. the air obtained was a pure fire-air. this is a remarkable circumstance, that the fire-air which had previously removed from the mercury its phlogiston in a slow calcination, gives this same phlogiston up to it again when the calx is simply made red-hot. still we have several such phenomena, where heat similarly alters the attractive forces between substances. * * * * * +83. air is a dulcified elastic acid.+ in the foregoing experiments i have demonstrated the two proximate constituents of common air, because it was not necessary to know anything more about it for a clear knowledge of fire. i shall now go further, and see whether a still deeper decompounding of air is possible. +first experiment.+--i placed a rat in a flask capable of holding 4 quarts of water; i gave it some bread softened in milk and closed the flask with a wet bladder. it died 31 hours afterwards. i then held the flask, inverted, under water and made a hole in the bladder, when two ounces of water rose into it. this small diminution of the air was probably caused by the heat which the rat took with it, which had previously driven the air out. +84. second experiment.+--i took a large soft bladder and fastened a tube into its opening; then i filled it with the air out of my lungs, and held the tube and bladder with my right hand and closed my nostrils with the left. i respired the air as long as i could, and was able to make 24 inspirations (regarding which it is to be observed that at the last i was obliged to draw the whole bladder full of air into my lungs at once, while at the beginning only the half of it was necessary). i then closed the tube with my finger, and tied up the bladder. this air had properties similar to the preceding in which the rat died. that is to say, it contained one-thirtieth part of aerial acid, which i separated from it by milk of lime; and a burning candle at once went out in it. +85. third experiment.+--i placed a few flies in a bottle into which i had put some honey smeared upon paper. after a few days they had died. they likewise had not absorbed any air; milk of lime, however, diminished this air about one fourth part, and the remainder extinguished fire. i then took a bottle of 20 ounces measure and bored a hole in the bottom of it with the corner of a broken file (fig. 5, a). into this bottle i put a small piece of unslaked lime, and closed the mouth with a cork through which i had previously fixed a tube b. round about this cork i placed a ring of pitch, and placed over it an inverted glass c, into which i had previously put a large bee and had given it some honey which was smeared upon paper; but in order that no air could penetrate within the ring of pitch, i pressed the glass firmly in; i afterwards placed the bottle in the dish d, into which i poured so much water that it was half immersed in it; as soon i observed that the bottle was raised by the water, i put a small weight upon the glass. the water rose a little into the bottle every day through the opening a; and i also shook the bottle a little sometimes in order that the skin which formed over the milk of lime might break. after the lapse of seven days the water had risen to e, and the bee was dead. occasionally i put 2 bees into the glass c, when just as much air was converted into aerial acid in half the time. caterpillars and butterflies behaved in exactly the same way. +86. fourth experiment.+--i placed some peas in a small flask, which was capable of holding 24 ounces of water, and poured so much water upon them that they were half covered with it; i then closed the flask. the peas began to strike roots, and grew up. as i found after 14 days that they would not increase further, i opened the flask, inverted, under water, and found the air neither increased nor diminished. the fourth part, however, was absorbed by milk of lime, and the remaining air extinguished flame. i kept fresh roots, fruits, herbs, flowers, and leaves, each by itself, in the flask, and after a few days i likewise observed the fourth part of the air converted into aerial acid. if flies are placed in such air they die immediately. +87.+ these are accordingly strange circumstances, that the air is not noticeably absorbed by animals endowed with lungs, contains in it very little aerial acid, and yet extinguishes fire. on the other hand insects and plants alter the air in exactly the same way, but still they convert the fourth part of it into aerial acid. accordingly i was curious to know whether the fire-air was not that which was here converted into aerial acid, because in these latter experiments just as much of the air was converted into aerial acid as there was of fire-air present in it. +88. fifth experiment.+--in a bottle of 20 ounces capacity, i mixed one part of fire-air with 3 parts of the preceding air in which peas would not any longer grow, and from which the aerial acid was separated. (that is to say, i filled the bottle with water, and placed 4 peas in it; i then allowed one fourth of the water to run into the bladder in which fire-air was contained, and the remainder into another bladder in which this vitiated air was contained (§ 30, _g._), while i took care that the peas did not fall into the bladder. i also left so much water behind, that the peas were half covered with it.) here also i observed the peas growing up, and after they would not increase any more i found this air likewise not absorbed, but almost the fourth part was absorbed by milk of lime. hence it is the fire-air which is here converted into aerial acid. in 3 parts of aerial acid and one part of fire-air peas do not grow. i mixed vitiated air (§ 20) with fire-air which behaved in just the same way: that is to say the fire-air was converted into aerial acid. +89. sixth experiment.+--i mixed, in the same proportions, fire-air and air vitiated by peas, and filled a bladder with it. then when i had completely exhaled the air present in my lungs, i respired this newly compounded air as many times as possible. i then found that it contained very little aerial acid in it, and when this was separated from it, it extinguished fire. i believe that one must ascribe to the blood present in the pulmonary veins, the effect which animals endowed with lungs have upon the air. the following experiment gives me cause for this. it is known that freshly drawn blood, when it stands in the open air, assumes a fine red on the surface, and that the under portions likewise become red when they come into contact with the air. does the air in this case undergo any alteration? i filled a flask one third part with freshly drawn ox blood, closed it tightly with a bladder, and shook up the blood frequently. eight hours afterwards i neither found aerial acid in this air, nor that its bulk was diminished; but the flame of a candle was immediately extinguished in it. i made this experiment in winter time, from which may be gathered that the effect cannot be ascribed to any putrefaction, for this blood was found still fresh 6 days afterwards, and besides, all putrefactions produce aerial acid. i was now curious to know how fire-air by itself would behave with animals and plants. +90. seventh experiment.+--(_a._) i put 2 ounces of nitre into a small glass retort upon glowing coals, and attached a large bladder softened with water (§ 35), and allowed the nitre to boil until i had received 3/4 of a quart of fire-air in the bladder. i then tied up the bladder and separated it from the retort; i then placed a tube in its opening, and after i had completely emptied my lungs, i began to respire air from this bladder (§ 84). this proceeded very well, and i was able to make 40 inspirations before it became difficult for me; eventually i expelled the air again from my lungs as completely as possible. it did not seem to have diminished particularly, and when i filled a bottle with it and introduced a burning candle, this still burned. i then began to respire this air anew, and was able to make 16 more inspirations. it now extinguished the flame, but i found only some traces of aerial acid in it. (_b._) i was surprised that i was not able the first time to take away from this air the property of allowing fire to burn in it; i thought that perhaps the great humidity prevented me from drawing this air into my lungs so often as was really possible. accordingly i repeated the same experiment, only with this difference, that i put a handful of potashes into the bladder before the fire-air was driven into it. i then began to draw this air into my lungs, and counted 65 inspirations before i was compelled to desist. but when i lowered a burning candle into this air, it still burned well, although only for a few seconds. +91. eighth experiment.+--i closed the hole in the bottle at a (fig. 5) with a cork, as also the tube b, and then filled the bottle with fire-air (§ 30, _e._). then i had at hand the glass c, in which i had placed 2 large bees, and had provided some honey for their stay. i opened the stopped-up tube, placed this glass over it as quickly as possible, and pressed it into the ring of pitch. i afterwards placed the whole in the dish d, which i had filled with milk of lime, and withdrew the cork at a. in this case i observed the milk of lime to rise a little into the bottle every day, and after 8 days had elapsed the bottle was almost completely filled with it, and the bees were dead. +92. ninth experiment.+--plants, however, will not grow noticeably in pure fire-air. i filled with this air a bottle capable of holding 16 ounces of water, and which contained 4 peas (§ 88). they got roots, but did not grow up at all; with milk of lime the twelfth part was absorbed. i then filled this air into another bottle which also contained 4 peas. after 14 days they had got roots, but also did not grow up, and with milk of lime likewise only the twelfth part was absorbed. i repeated this experiment 3 times more with the same air, and it was observed that the fourth and fifth times the peas had grown upwards a little. there still remained one-half of the whole air, and in this fire could still burn. there is no doubt that the whole quantity of fire-air could have been converted into aerial acid if i had continued the operation longer. it may also be observed that the peas act more strongly upon the fire-air when they send out roots than subsequently. +93.+ hence it is the fire-air by means of which the circulation of the blood and of the juices in animals and plants is so fully maintained. still it is a peculiar circumstance that blood and the lungs have not such action upon fire-air as insects and plants have, for the latter convert it into aerial acid, and the former into vitiated air (§§ 29, 89, 90). it is not so easy to furnish the reason for this, yet i will risk it. it is known that the acids lose those properties by which they reveal themselves as acids, by the addition of the inflammable substance, as sulphur, the elastic acid of nitre, regulus of arsenic, sugar, and the like, plainly shew. i am inclined to believe that fire-air consists of a subtle acid substance united with phlogiston, and it is probable that all acids derive their origin from fire-air. now, if this air penetrates into plants, these must attract the phlogiston, and consequently the acid, which manifests itself as aerial acid, must be produced. this they again give up. the objection that so great a quantity of aerial acid is nevertheless obtained in the destruction of plants, and that, consequently, these must attract the aerial acid, has no weight, since otherwise the air in my vessels in which the peas were contained must have become for the most part lost, which, however, did not take place.... if plants abstract the phlogiston from the air, the aerial acid must be lighter. but experiment shows me the opposite; i found it, after careful weighing, somewhat heavier, but this is not contrary to my opinion; as it is known that all acids retain water strongly, the aerial acid must possess the same property, and this may consequently cause the most of the weight. if all this is accurate, another question then arises: why do not blood and the lungs likewise convert fire-air into such an aerial acid? i take the liberty here also of giving my opinion of this, for how would all these laboriously executed experiments help me if i had not the hope of coming by means of them nearer to my ultimate object, the truth? phlogiston, which makes most substances with which it unites liquid as well as mobile and elastic, must have the same effect upon blood. the globules of blood must attract it from the air through the small pores of the lungs. by this union they become separated from one another, and are consequently made more liquid. they then appear bright red (§ 89). they must, however, give this attracted phlogiston up again during the circulation, and in consequence, be placed in a condition to absorb the inflammable substance anew from the air at that place where they are in the most intimate contact with it, that is, in the lungs. where this phlogiston has gone to during the circulation of the blood, i leave to others to ascertain. the attraction which the blood has for phlogiston cannot be so strong as that with which plants and insects attract it from the air, and then the blood cannot convert air into aerial acid; still it becomes converted into an air which lies midway between fire-air and aerial acid, that is, a vitiated air; for it unites neither with lime nor with water after the manner of fire-air and it extinguishes fire, after that of aerial acid. but that the blood really attracts the inflammable substance i have additional experiment to prove, since i have removed phlogiston by help of my lungs from inflammable air, and have converted this into vitiated air. i filled a bladder with the air which one obtains from iron filings and vitriolic acid (§ 30, _c._), and respired it in the manner previously described (§ 84). i was only able to inhale it 20 times, and after i had somewhat recovered, i expelled the air once more from my lungs as completely as possible, and again inhaled this inflammable air: after 10 inhalations i was compelled to desist from it, and observed that it could no longer be kindled, and also would not unite with lime water. in one word it was a vitiated air. i kept a piece of sulphur in continuous ebullition over the fire in a retort, capable of holding 12 ounces of water, with an empty bladder attached in place of a receiver, the retort also placed so that the sulphur which rose into the neck could run back again. after all had become cold, i found the air neither increased nor diminished: it smelt slightly hepatic, and extinguished a burning candle. i shall prove further on that sulphur can unite with more phlogiston; and it seems to me to follow from this experiment that something inflammable from the air had deposited itself upon the sulphur, and that the air had thereby acquired the property of a vitiated air. it is, however, also remarkable that other bodies which attract the inflammable substance more strongly, as for example, the fuming acid of nitre, do not abstract it from the air. it is likewise strange that i was able to inhale the inflammable air into my lungs only 20 times; and i observe here as something peculiar that, if i mistake not, i became very warm a quarter of an hour afterwards. it is also to be observed that fire-air, vitiated by the lungs, extinguishes fire; why does not the aerial acid attract the phlogiston again? why not also the vitiated air? mr. priestley indeed has accomplished this, but it did not succeed with me however much i also wished it. he has converted aerial acid into wholesome air by means of a mixture of iron filings, sulphur, and some water. when i desired to repeat this experiment, the aerial acid was always absorbed by the iron filings. i likewise powdered finely some iron filings which had been fused together with excess of sulphur, moistened this with water, and preserved it in a bottle which was filled with aerial acid: but with the same result. after 2 two days the aerial acid was almost entirely absorbed. this philosopher also says that he has made vitiated air wholesome again by agitation with water. i must admit, however, that with me this likewise failed. i filled a flask one fourth part with vitiated air, and the remainder with fresh water; i closed the flask very tightly, and shook it up and down for almost a whole hour. then when i collected this air in a bladder, and from this in a bottle, i found that the candle was extinguished afterwards as it was before. he mixed with water, by agitation, the inflammable air from metals; this also would not succeed with me, although i used only little inflammable air, and much water. he also observed that plants made vitiated air wholesome again. it follows from my experiments that they vitiate air. i kept plants, in the dark as well as exposed to sunlight, in a flask which was filled with vitiated air and carefully secured (which careful securing must really be attended to). i tested a little of this air every 2 days, and always found it vitiated. +94.+ water has the peculiar property of separating the proximate constituents of air; of uniting with fire-air; and of entering into no kind of union with vitiated air. (1.) i filled a large bottle with boiled water which had been cooled shortly before, and permitted the tenth part to run out. i then placed the bottle, inverted and open, in a vessel with water. i observed the quantity of air to diminish a little every day, and when this diminution ceased, i collected the remaining air first in a bladder (§ 30, _h._), and from the bladder in a bottle (§ 30, _c._), and brought a burning candle into the bottle; it had scarcely reached the mouth when it went out. (2.) i then took the same kind of water freed from air, filled a bottle with it, and permitted the tenth part of it to run into a bladder filled with vitiated air. i next placed the bottle, inverted, in a vessel with water, and observed the space which the air occupied in it. i found, 14 days afterwards, that the water had not absorbed the smallest quantity of it. (3.) i placed a large bottle, from which the bottom was knocked out, in a deep kettle with water, so that the water outside reached above the top of the bottle. i then tied a bladder, empty of air, over the top of the bottle, and made the water boil up once over the fire. the air which was in that portion of the water contained under the bottle rose into the bladder; and after i had tied up the bladder, and detached it front the bottle, i filled a phial with it, and put a small burning candle into it; it burned there more brightly than in ordinary air. this fire-air, dissolved in water, must be as indispensable for aquatic animals as for those which live upon the earth. they must draw it into their bodies, and convert it either into aerial acid or into vitiated air. into whichever kind it is, however, it must always become separated from the water again, for as aerial acid it does not remain with the water in the open air, and vitiated air cannot unite with water at all (no. 2), the water is then in a condition again to absorb fire-air anew, and to convey it to the animals. my experiments made with respect to this matter agree with this entirely. i allowed a few leeches to remain in a bottle, which was half filled with water and well closed, until they died. i then examined the air standing over this water. it had no smell, nor had the water; it appeared to have increased a little and it extinguished fire. it seems that these creatures live only upon the phlogiston in fire-air, perhaps also upon the heat. i have preserved them alive in water, and that the same water, for two years; the bottle was only tied over with gauze. i have a convenient method to ascertain whether fire-air is present in water or not. i take, for example, an ounce of it, and add to it about 4 drops of a solution of vitriol of iron, and 2 drops of a solution of alkali of tartar which has been somewhat diluted with water. a dark green precipitate is immediately formed, which, however becomes yellow in a couple of minutes if the water contains fire-air; but if the water has been boiled, and has become cold without access of air, or if it is even a recently distilled water, the precipitate retains its green colour, and does not become yellow sooner than an hour afterwards, and not yellow at all if it is protected from access of air in full bottles. i have already shown (§ 15) that the green precipitate of iron owes its colour to phlogiston which still adheres to the earth, and it follows from this that fire-air, although not in the elastic condition, is able to attract phlogiston. the following experiment likewise shewed me that aquatic animals take fire-air from the water. i placed a leech in a bottle which was completely filled with water, and was protected from every kind of air. after two days it was almost dead. i then examined the water in the manner described above, and found that the earth of iron retained its green colour. the swelling up of peas in cold water is to be ascribed mainly to the fire-air present in the water. if a bottle is filled full of water and a few peas are placed in it, after 24 hours the water contains aerial acid it is true, but no fire-air. in water boiled and become cold, peas swell up only a little. i perceive in this the reason why the waters distilled from plants not only lose their smell, but why also a mucilaginous substance settles to the bottom, when the bottles are frequently opened, whereas the same waters, in perfectly full bottles, retain their smell and clearness unchanged. all plants communicate to water some mucilaginous material which is carried over along with it. fire-air is the chief cause of this corruption; if this enters the water again, it attracts to itself the inflammable substance from the subtle oily and mucilaginous matter, and alters the whole of the water. * * * * * transcriber's note all bold text has been surrounded by + signs. italic text is denoted by underscores. the story of a tinder-box. [illustration: the story of a tinder-box] _the romance of science._ * * * * * the story of a tinder-box. _a course of lectures_ _delivered before a juvenile auditory at the london institution during the christmas holidays of 1888-89._ by the late charles meymott tidy, m.b., m.s., f.c.s. formerly barrister-at-law; professor of chemistry and of forensic medicine at the london hospital; medical officer of health for islington; vice-president of the institute of chemistry; one of the official analysts to the home office. london: society for promoting christian knowledge, northumberland avenue, w.c.; 43, queen victoria street, e.c. brighton: 129, north street. new york: e. & j. b. young & co. 1897. [published under the direction of the general literature committee.] preface. these lectures were delivered with the assistance merely of a few notes, the author in preparing them for the press adhering as nearly as possible to the shorthand writer's manuscript. they must be read as intentionally untechnical holiday lectures intended for juveniles. but as the print cannot convey the experiments or the demonstrations, the reader is begged to make the necessary allowance. the author desires to take this opportunity of expressing his thanks to messrs. bryant and may; to messrs. woodhouse and rawson, electrical engineers; to mr. woolf, the lead-pencil manufacturer; and to mr. gardiner, for numerous specimens with which the lectures were illustrated. the story of a tinder-box lecture i. my young friends,--some months ago the directors of this institution honoured me with a request that i should deliver a course of christmas juvenile lectures. i must admit i did my best to shirk the task, feeling that the duty would be better intrusted to one who had fewer demands upon his time. it was under the genial influence of a bright summer's afternoon, when one thought christmas-tide such a long way off that it might never come, that i consented to undertake this course of lectures. no sooner had i done so than i was pressed to name a subject. now it is a very difficult thing to choose a subject, and especially a subject for a course of juvenile lectures; and i will take you thus much into my confidence by telling you that i selected the subject upon which i am to speak to you, long before i had a notion what i could make of it, or indeed whether i could make anything at all of it. i mention these details to ask you and our elders who honour us--you and me--with their company at these lectures, for some little indulgence, if at times the story i have to tell proves somewhat commonplace, something you may have heard before, a tale oft told. my sole desire is that these lectures should be true _juvenile_ lectures. well, you all know what this is? [_holding up a box of matches._] it is a box of matches. and you know, moreover, what it is used for, and how to use it. i will take out one of the matches, rub it on the box, and "strike a light." you say that experiment is commonplace enough. be it so. at any rate, i want you to recollect that phrase--"strike a light." it will occur again in our course of lectures. but, you must know, there was a time when people wanted fire, but had no matches wherewith to procure it. how did they obtain fire? the necessity for, and therefore the art of producing, fire is, i should suppose, as old as the world itself. although it may be true that our very earliest ancestors relied for necessary food chiefly on an uncooked vegetable diet, nevertheless it is certain that very early in the history of the world people discovered that cooked meat (the venison that our souls love) was a thing not altogether to be despised. certainly by the time of tubal cain, an early worker in metals, not only the methods of producing fire, but also the uses to which fire could be applied, must have been well understood. imagine the astonishment of our ancestors when they first saw fire! possibly, the first sight of this wonderful "element" vouchsafed to mortals was a burning mountain, or something of that kind. one is scarcely astonished that there should have been in those early times a number of people who were professed fire-worshippers. no wonder, i say, that fire should have been regarded with intense reverence. it constituted an essential part of early sacrificial worship. some of my young friends, too, may remember how in ancient rome there was a special order (called the order of the vestal virgins), whose duty it was to preserve the sacred fire, which if once extinguished, it was thought would bring ruin and destruction upon their city. [illustration: fig. 1.] how did our ancestors, think you, obtain fire in those early times? i suggested a burning mountain as a source of fire. you remember, too, perhaps reading about prometheus, who stole fire from heaven, bringing it to earth in a copper rod, which combined act of theft and scientific experiment made the gods very angry, because they were afraid mortals might learn as many wonderful things as they knew themselves. history seems to show that the energetic rubbing together of dry sticks was one of the earliest methods adopted by our ancestors for producing fire. i find, for instance, described and pictured by an early author some such plan as the following:--a thick piece of wood was placed upon the ground. into a hole bored in this piece of wood a cone of wood was fitted. by placing a boy or man on the top of the cone, and whirling him round, sufficient friction resulted where the two pieces of wood rubbed one against the other to produce fire. our artist has modernized the picture to give you an idea of the operation (fig. 1). now instead of repeating that experiment exactly, i will try to obtain fire by the friction of wood with wood. i take this piece of boxwood, and having cut it to a point, rub it briskly on another piece of wood (fig. 2). if i employ sufficient energy, i have no doubt i may make it hot enough to fire tinder. yes! i have done so, as you see. (i will at once apologize for the smoke. unfortunately we cannot generally have fire without smoke.) every boy knows that experiment in another form. a boy takes a brass button, and after giving it a good rub on his desk, applies it to the cheek of some inoffensive boy at his side, much to the astonishment of his quiet neighbour. well, i am going to see whether i can produce fire with a brass button. i have mounted my button, as you see, for certain reasons on a cork, and i will endeavour by rubbing the button on a piece of pinewood to make it sufficiently hot to fire tinder. already i have done so. [illustration: fig. 2.] talking about friction as a means of producing heat, i should like to mention that at the last paris exhibition i saw water made to boil, and coffee prepared from it, by the heat resulting from the friction of two copper plates within the liquid. that then is the earliest history i can give you of the production of fire, and at once from that history i come to the reign of the tinder-box. the tinder-box constitutes one of the very earliest methods, no doubt, of obtaining fire. i have searched for some history of the tinder-box, and all i can say for certain is that it was in use long before the age of printing. i have here several rare old tinder-boxes. i intend showing you in the course of these lectures every detail of their construction and use. i have no doubt this very old tinder-box that you see here (fig. 3 a) was once upon a time kept on the mantel-piece of the kitchen well polished and bright, and i do not doubt but that it has lit hundreds and thousands of fires, and, what is more, has very often been spoken to very disrespectfully when the servant wanted to light the fire, and her master was waiting for his breakfast. i will project a picture of it on the screen, so that you may all see it. there it is. it is a beautiful piece of apparatus. there is the tinder, the steel (fig. 3 _b_), the flint (_c_), and the matches (_d_) complete. [illustration: fig. 3.] [illustration: fig. 4.] it was with this instrument, long before the invention of matches, that our grandfathers obtained light. i want to show you how the trick was managed. first of all it was necessary to have good tinder. to obtain this, they took a piece of linen and simply charred or burnt it, as you see i am doing now (fig. 4). (cambric, i am told, makes the best tinder for match-lighting, and the ladies, in the kindness of their hearts, formerly made a point of saving their old cambric handkerchiefs for this purpose.) the servants prepared the tinder over-night, for reasons i shall explain to you directly. having made the tinder, they shut it down in the box with the lid (fig. 3 a) to prevent contact with air. you see i have the tinder now safely secured in my tinder-box. here is a piece of common flint, and here is the steel. here too are the matches, and i am fortunate in having some of the old matches made many years ago, prepared as you see with a little sulphur upon their tips. well, having got all these etceteras, box, tinder, flint and steel, we set to work in this way:--taking the steel in one hand, and the flint in the other, i must give the steel a blow, or rather a succession of blows with the flint (fig. 3 b). notice what beautiful sparks i obtain! i want one of these sparks, if i can persuade it to do so, to fall on my tinder. there! it has done so, and my tinder has caught fire. i blow my fired tinder a little to make it burn better, and now i apply a sulphur match to the red-hot tinder. see, i have succeeded in getting my match in flame. i will now set light to one of these old-fashioned candles--a rushlight--with which our ancestors were satisfied before the days of gas and electric lighting. this was their light, and this was the way they lighted it. no wonder (perhaps you say) that they went to bed early. i should like to draw your attention to one other form of tinder-box, because i do not suppose you have ever seen these kind of things before. i have here two specimens of the pistol form of tinder-box (fig. 5). here is the flint, the tinder being contained in this little box. it is the same sort of tinder as we made just now. the tinder was fired with flint and steel in the same way as the old-fashioned flint pistols fired the gunpowder. and you see this pistol tinder-box is so constructed as to serve as a candlestick as well as a tinder-box. i have fired, as you perceive, my charred linen with this curious tinder-box, and thus i get my sulphur match alight once more! [illustration: fig. 5.] it was in the year 1669 that brandt, an alchemist and a merchant--a very distinguished scientific man--discovered the remarkable substance i have here, which we call phosphorus. brandt was an alchemist. i do not know whether you know what an alchemist is. an alchemist was an old-fashioned chemist. these alchemists had three prominent ideas before them. the first thing they sought for was to discover a something--a powder they thought it ought to be--that would change the commoner or baser metals (such as iron) into gold. the second idea was to discover "a universal solvent," that is, a liquid which would dissolve everything, and they hoped out of this liquid to be able to crystallize gems. and then, having obtained gold and gems, the third thing they desired was "a vital elixir" to prolong their lives indefinitely to enjoy the gold and gems they had manufactured. these were the modest aims of alchemy. well now--although you may say such notions sound very foolish--let me tell you that great practical discoveries had their origin in the very out-of-the-way researches of the alchemists. depend upon this, that an object of lofty pursuit, though that object be one of practically impossible attainment, is not unworthy the ambition of the scientific man. though we cannot scale the summit of the volcanic cone, we may notwithstanding reach a point where we can examine the lava its fires have melted. we may do a great deal even in our attempt to grasp the impossible. it was so with brandt. he was searching for a something that would change the baser metals into gold, and, in the search, he discovered phosphorus. the chief thing that struck brandt about phosphorus was its property of shining in the dark without having previously been exposed to light. a great many substances were known to science even at that time that shone in the dark _after_ they had been exposed to light. but it was not until brandt, in the year 1669, discovered phosphorus that a substance luminous in the dark, without having been previously exposed to light, had been observed. i should like, in passing, to show you how beautifully these phosphorescent powders shine after having been exposed to a powerful light. see how magnificently brilliant they are! these, or something like them, were known before the time of brandt. shortly after phosphorus had been discovered, people came to the conclusion that it might be employed for the purpose of procuring artificial light. but i want you to note, that although phosphorus was discovered in 1669 (and the general properties of phosphorus seem to have been studied and were well understood within five years of its discovery), it was not until the year 1833 that phosphorus matches became a commercial success, so that until the year 1833, our old friend the tinder-box held its ground. i will try and give you as nearly as i can a complete list of the various attempts made with the purpose of procuring fire between the years 1669 and 1833. the first invention was what were called "phosphoric tapers." from the accounts given (although it is not easy to understand the description), phosphoric tapers seem to have been sulphur matches with a little piece of phosphorus enclosed in glass fixed on the top of the match, the idea being that you had only to break the glass and expose the phosphorus to air for it to catch fire immediately and ignite the sulphur. if this was the notion (although i am not sure), it is not easy to understand how the phosphoric tapers were worked. the second invention for the purpose of utilizing phosphorus for getting fire was by scraping with a match a little phosphorus from a bottle coated with a phosphorus composition, and firing it by friction. the fact is, phosphorus may be easily ignited by slight friction. if i wrap a small piece of phosphorus in paper, as i am doing now, and rub the paper on the table, you see i readily fire my phosphorus. [illustration: fig. 6.] after this, "homberg's pyrophorus," consisting of a roasted mixture of alum and flour, was suggested as a means of obtaining fire. then comes the "electrophorus," an electrical instrument suggested by volta, which was thought at the time a grand invention for the purpose of getting light (fig. 6 a). the nuisance about this instrument was that it proved somewhat capricious in its action, and altogether declined to work in damp foggy weather. i do not know whether i shall be successful in lighting a gas-jet with the electrophorus, but i will try. i excite this plate of resin with a cat-skin (fig. 6 b), then put this brass plate upon the resin plate and touch the brass (fig. 6 c); then take the brass plate off the resin plate by the insulating handle and draw a spark from it, which i hope will light the gas. there, i have done it! (fig. 6 d.) [illustration: fig. 7.] well, next after the electrophorus comes the "fire syringe" (fig. 7). the necessary heat in this case is produced by the compression of air. you see in this syringe stopped at one end, i have a certain quantity of air. my piston-rod (c) fits very closely into the syringe (b), so that the air cannot escape. if i push the piston down i compress the air particles, for they can't get out;--i make them in fact occupy less bulk. in the act of compressing the air i produce heat, and the heat, as you see, fires my tinder. it was in or about the year 1807 that "chemical matches" were introduced to the public for the first time. these chemical matches were simply sulphur matches tipped with a mixture of chlorate of potash and sugar. these matches were fired by dipping them in a bottle containing asbestos moistened with sulphuric acid. here is one of these "chemical matches," and here the bottle of asbestos and sulphuric acid. i dip the match into the bottle and, as you see, it catches fire. [illustration: fig. 8.] in the year 1820, dobereiner, a very learned man, discovered a method of getting fire by permitting a jet of hydrogen to play upon finely-divided platinum. the platinum, owing to a property it possesses in a high degree (which property however is not special to platinum), has the power of coercing the union of the hydrogen and oxygen. here is one of dobereiner's original lamps (fig. 8). i am going to show you the experiment, however, on a somewhat larger scale than this lamp permits. here i have a quantity of fine platinum-wire, made up in the form of a rosette. i place this over the coal-gas as it issues from the gas-burner, and, as you see, the platinum begins to glow, until at last it becomes sufficiently hot to fire the gas (fig. 9). [illustration: fig. 9.] in the year 1826 what were called "lucifers" were invented, and i show you here some of the original "lucifers." they are simply sulphur matches tipped with a mixture of chlorate of potash and sulphide of antimony, and were ignited by drawing them briskly through a little piece of folded glass-paper. in the year 1828, "prometheans" were invented. i have here two of the original "prometheans." they consist (as you see) of a small quantity of chlorate of potash and sugar rolled up tightly in a piece of paper. inside the paper roll is placed a small and sealed glass bubble containing sulphuric acid. when it was wanted to light a "promethean" you had only to break the bulb of sulphuric acid, the action of which set fire to the mixture of chlorate of potash and sugar, which ignited the paper roll. in the year 1830 "matches" with sulphur tips were introduced as a means of obtaining fire. they were fired, so far as i can make out, by dipping them into a bottle containing a little phosphorus, which then had to be ignited by friction. so far as i know, i have now given you very shortly the history of obtaining fire between the years 1669 and 1830. you see how brisk ingenuity had been during this long period, and yet nothing ousted our old friend the tinder-box. the tinder-box seems, as it were, to speak to us with a feeling of pride and say, "yes, all you have been talking about were the clever ideas of clever men, but i lived through them all; my flint and my steel were easily procured, my ingredients were not dangerous, and i was fairly certain in my action." in the year 1833 the reign of the tinder-box came to an end. it had had a very long innings--many, many hundred years; but in 1833 its reign was finished. it was in this year the discovery was announced, that bone could be made to yield large quantities of phosphorus at a cheap rate. originally the price of phosphorus was sufficient to prevent its every-day use. hanckwitz thus advertises it--"for the information of the curious, he is the only one in london who makes inflammable phosphorus that can be preserved in water. all varieties unadulterated. sells wholesale and retail. wholesale, 50s. per oz.; retail, â£3 sterling per oz. every description of good drugs. my portrait will be distributed amongst my customers as a keepsake." [illustration: fig. 10.] let me give you a brief account of the method of preparing lucifer matches, and to illustrate this part of my story, i am indebted to messrs. bryant and may for specimens. pieces of wood are cut into blocks of the size you see here (fig. 10 a). these blocks are then cut into little pieces, or splints, of about one-eighth of an inch square (fig. 10 b). by the bye, abroad they usually make their match splints round by forcing them through a circular plate, pierced with small round holes. i do not know why we in england make our matches square, except for the reason that englishmen are fond of doing things on the square. the next part of the process is to coat the splints with paraffin or melted sulphur. the necessity for this coating of sulphur or paraffin you will understand by an experiment. if i take some pieces of phosphorus and place them upon a sheet of cartridge paper, and then set fire to the pieces of phosphorus, curiously enough, the ignited phosphorus will not set fire to the paper. i have taken five little pieces of phosphorus (as you see), so as to give the paper every chance of catching fire (fig. 11). now that is exactly what would happen if paraffin (or some similarly combustible body) was not placed on the end of the splint; my phosphorus would burn when i rubbed it on the box, but it would not set fire to the match. it is essential, therefore, as you see, in the first instance, to put something on the match that the ignited phosphorus will easily fire, and which will ignite the wood. i will say no more about this now, as i shall have to draw your attention to the subject in another lecture. the end of the splints are generally scorched by contact with a hot plate before they are dipped in the paraffin, after which the phosphorus composition is applied to the match. this composition is simply a mixture of phosphorus, glue, and chlorate of potash. the composition is spread upon a warm plate, and the matches dipped on the plate, so that a small quantity of the phosphorus mixture may adhere to the tip of the match. every match passes through about seventeen people's hands before it is finished. i told you that in england we generally use chlorate of potash in the preparation of the phosphorus composition, whilst abroad nitrate of potash is usually employed. you know that when we strike a light with an english match a slight snap results, which is due to the chlorate of potash in the match. in the case of nitrate of potash no such snapping noise occurs. some people are wicked enough to call them "thieves' matches." just let me show you (in passing) how a mixture of chlorate of potash and sulphur explodes when i strike it. [illustration: fig. 11.] now, then, comes a very remarkable story to which i desire to draw your attention. there were many disadvantages in the use of this yellow phosphorus. first of all, it is a poisonous substance; and what is more, the vapour of the phosphorus was liable to affect the workpeople engaged in the manufacture of lucifer matches with a bad disease of the jaw, and which was practically, i am afraid, incurable. a very great chemist, schrã¶tter, discovered that phosphorus existed under another form, some of which i have here. this, which is of a red colour, was found to be exactly the same chemical substance as the yellow phosphorus, but possessing in many respects different properties. for instance, you see i keep this yellow phosphorus under water; i don't keep the red phosphorus in water. amongst other peculiarities it was found that red phosphorus was not a poison, whilst the yellow phosphorus was, as i told you, very poisonous indeed. about two to three grains of yellow phosphorus is sufficient to poison an adult. i have known several cases of children poisoned by sucking the ends of phosphorus matches. so you see it was not unimportant for the workpeople, as well as for the public generally, that something should be discovered equally effective to take the place of this poisonous yellow phosphorus. [illustration: fig. 12.] i should like to show you what very different properties these two kinds of phosphorus possess. for instance, if i take a small piece of the yellow phosphorus and pour upon it a little of this liquid--bi-sulphide of carbon--and in another bottle treat the red phosphorus in a similar way, we shall find the yellow phosphorus is soluble in the liquid, whilst the red is not. i will pour these solutions on blotting-paper, when you will find that the solution of the yellow phosphorus will before long catch fire spontaneously (fig. 12 a), whilst the solution (although it is not a solution, for the red phosphorus is not soluble in the bi-sulphide of carbon) of the red phosphorus will not fire (fig. 12 b). again, if i add a little iodine to the yellow phosphorus, you see it immediately catches fire (fig. 13 a); but the same result does not follow with the red phosphorus (fig. 13 b). i will show you an experiment, however, to prove, notwithstanding these different properties, that this red and yellow material are the same elementary body. i will take a little piece of the yellow phosphorus, and after igniting it introduce it into a jar containing oxygen, and i will make a similar experiment with the red phosphorus. you will notice that the red phosphorus does not catch fire quite so readily as the yellow. however, exactly the same result takes place when they burn--you get the same white smoke with each, and they combust equally brilliantly. the red and yellow varieties are the same body--that is what i want to show you--with different properties. [illustration: fig. 13.] then comes the next improvement in the manufacture of matches, which is putting the phosphorus on the box and not on the match. this is why the use of red phosphorus, was introduced into this country by messrs. bryant and may. i have no doubt that many a good drawing-room paper has been spared by the use of matches that light only on the box. i cannot help thinking that the old tinder-box, which i have placed on the table in a prominent position before you to-night, feels a certain pleasure in listening to our story. envious perhaps a little of its successor, it nevertheless fully recognizes that its own reign had been a thousand times longer than that of the lucifer match. if we could only hear that tinder-box talk, i think we should find it saying something of this kind to the lucifer match--"i gave way to you, because my time was over; but mind, your turn will come next, and you will then have to give way to something else, as once upon a time i had to give way to you." and that is the end of the first chapter of my story of a tinder-box. lecture ii. we were engaged in our last lecture in considering the various methods that have been adopted from early times for obtaining fire, and we left off at the invention of the lucifer match. i ventured to hint at the conclusion of my last lecture, that the tinder-box had something to say to the lucifer match, by way of suggestion, that just as the lucifer match had ousted it, so it was not impossible that something some day might oust the lucifer match. electricians have unlimited confidence (i can assure you) in the unlimited applications of electricity:--they believe in their science. now one of the effects of electricity is to cause a considerable rise of temperature in certain substances through which the electrical current is passed. here is a piece of platinum wire, for example, and if i pass an electrical current through it, you see how the wire glows (fig. 14). if we were to pass more current through it, which i can easily do, we should be able to make the platinum wire white hot, in which condition it would give out a considerable amount of light. there is the secret of those beautiful incandescent glow lamps that you so often see now-a-days (fig. 15). instead of a platinum wire, a fine thread of carbon is brought to a very high temperature by the passage through it of the electrical current, in which condition it gives out light. all that you have to do to light up is to connect your lamp with the battery. the reign of the match, as you see, so far as incandescent electric lamps are concerned, is a thing of the past. we need no match to fire it. here are various forms of these beautiful little lamps. this is, as you see, a little rosette for the coat. notice how i can turn the minute incandescent lamp, placed in the centre of the rose, off or on at my pleasure. if i disconnect it with the battery, which is in my pocket, the lamp goes out; if i connect it with my battery the lamp shines brilliantly. this all comes by "switching it on" or "switching it off," as we commonly express the act of connecting or disconnecting the lamp with the source of electricity. [illustration: fig. 14.] [illustration: fig. 15.] here is another apparatus to which i desire to call your attention. if i take a battery such as i have here--a small galvanic battery of some ten cells--you will see a very little spark when i make and break contact of the two poles. this is what is called an electrical torch, in which i utilize this small spark as a gas-lighter (fig. 16). this instrument contains at its lower part a source of electricity, and if i connect the two wires that run through this long tube with the apparatus which generates the current, which i do by pressing on this button, you see a little spark is at once produced which readily sets fire to my gas-lamp. we have in this electrical torch a substitute--partial substitute, i ought to say--for the lucifer match. i think you will admit that it was with some show of reason i suggested that after all it is possible the lucifer match may not have quite so long an innings as the tinder-box. but there is another curious thing to note in these days of great scientific progress, viz. that there are signs of the old tinder-box coming to the front again. men, i have often noticed, find it a very difficult thing to light their pipes with a match on the top of an omnibus on a windy day, and inventors are always trying to find out something that will enable them to do so without the trouble and difficulty of striking a match, and keeping the flame a-going long enough to light their cigars. and so we have various forms of pipe-lighting apparatus, of which here is one--which is nothing more than a tinder-box with its flint and steel (fig. 17). you set to work somewhat in this way: placing the tinder (_a_) on the flint (_b_), you strike the flint with the steel (_c_), and--there, i have done it!--my tinder is fired by the spark. so you see there are signs, not only of the lucifer match being ousted by the applications of electricity, but of the old tinder-box coming amongst us once again in a new form. [illustration: fig. 16.] [illustration: fig. 17.] i am now going to ask you to travel with me step by step through the operation of getting fire out of the tinder-box. the first thing i have to do is to prepare my tinder, and i told you, if you remember, that the way we made tinder was by charring pieces of linen (see fig. 4). i told you last time what a dear old friend told me, who from practical experience is far more familiar with tinder-boxes and their working than i am, that no material was better for making tinder than an old cambric handkerchief. however, as i have no cambric handkerchief to operate upon, i must use a piece of common linen rag. i want you to see precisely what takes place. i set fire to my linen (which, by the bye, i have taken care to wash carefully so that there should be no dirt nor starch left in it), and while it is burning shut it down in my tinder-box. that is my tinder. let us now call this charred linen by its proper name--my tinder is carbon in a state of somewhat fine subdivision. carbon is an elementary body. an element--i do not say this is a very good definition, but it is sufficiently good for my purpose--an element is a thing from which nothing can be obtained but the element itself. iron is an element. you cannot get anything out of iron but iron; you cannot decompose iron. carbon is an element; you can get nothing out of carbon but carbon. you can combine it with other things, but if you have only carbon you can get nothing out of the carbon but carbon. but this carbon is found to exist in very different states or conditions. for instance, it is found in the form of the diamond. (fig. 18 _a_). diamonds consist of nothing more nor less than this simple elementary body--carbon. it is a very different form of carbon, no doubt you think, to tinder. just let me tell you, to use a very hard word, that we call the diamond an "allotropic" form of carbon. allotropic means an element with another _form_ to it--the diamond is simply an allotropic form of carbon. now the diamond is a very hard substance indeed. you know perfectly well that when the glass-cutter wants to cut glass he employs a diamond for the purpose, and the reason why glass can be cut with a diamond is because the diamond is harder than the glass. i dare say you have often seen the names of people scratched on the windows of railway-carriages, with the object i suppose that it may be known to all future occupants of these carriages that persons of a certain name wore diamond rings. well, in addition to the diamond there is another form of carbon, which is called black-lead. black-lead--or, as we term it, graphite--of which i have several specimens here--is simply carbon--an allotrope of carbon--the same elementary substance, notwithstanding, as the diamond. this black-lead (understand black-lead, as it is called, contains no metallic lead) is used largely for making lead-pencils. the manufacture of lead-pencils, by the bye, is a very interesting subject. formerly they cut little pieces of black-lead out of lumps of the natural black-lead such as you see there; but now-a-days they powder the black-lead, and then compress the very fine powder into a block. there is a block of graphite or black lead, for instance, prepared by simple pressure (fig. 18 _b_). the great pressure to which the powder is subjected brings these fine particles very close together, when they cohere, and form a substantial block. i will show you an experiment to illustrate what i mean. here are two pieces of common metallic lead. no ordinary pressure would make these two pieces stick together; but if i push them together very energetically--boys would call it giving them "a shove" together--that is to say, employing considerable pressure to bring them into close contact--i have no doubt that i can make these two pieces of lead stick together--in other words, make them cohere. to cohere is not to adhere. cohesion is the union of similar particles--like to like; adhesion is the union of dissimilar particles. now that is exactly what is done in the preparation of the black-lead for lead-pencils. the black-lead powder is submitted to great pressure, and then all these fine particles cohere into one solid lump. the pencil maker now cuts these blocks with a saw into very thin pieces (fig. 19 _b_). the next thing is to prepare the wood to receive the black-lead strips. to do this they take a piece of flat cedar wood and cut a number of grooves in it, placing one of these little strips of black-lead into each of the grooves (fig. 19 _a_, which represents one of the grooves). then having glued on the cover (fig. 19 _c_), they cut it into strips, and plane each little strip into a round lead-pencil (fig. 19 _d_). but what you have there as black-lead in the pencil (for this is what i more particularly wish you to remember) is simply carbon, being just the same chemical substance as the diamond. to a chemist diamond and black-lead have the same composition, being indeed the same substance. as to their money value, of course there is some difference; still, so far as chemical composition is concerned, diamonds and black-lead are both absolutely true varieties of the element carbon. [illustration: fig. 18.] [illustration: fig. 19.] well now, i come to another form of carbon, called charcoal (fig. 18 _c_). you all know what charcoal is. there is a lump of wood charcoal. it is, as you see, very soft,--so soft indeed is it that one can cut it easily with a knife. graphite is not porous, but this charcoal is very porous. but mind, whether it be diamond, or black-lead, or this porous charcoal, each and all have the same chemical composition; they are what we call the elementary undecomposable substance carbon. the tinder i made a little while ago (fig. 4), and which i have securely shut down in my tinder-box, is carbon. it is not a diamond. it is not black-lead, but all the same it is _carbon_--that form of porous carbon which we generally call charcoal. now i hope you understand the meaning of that learned word _allotropic_. diamond, black-lead, and tinder are allotropic forms of carbon, just as i explained to you in my last lecture, that the elementary body phosphorus was also known to exist in two forms, the red and the yellow variety, each having very different properties. [illustration: fig. 20.] now it has been noticed when substances are in a very finely-divided state that they often possess greater chemical activity than they have in lump. let me try and illustrate what i mean. here i have a metal called antimony, which is easily acted upon by chlorine. i will place this lump of antimony in a jar of chlorine, and so far as you can see very little action takes place between the metal and the chlorine. there is an action taking place, but it is rather slow (fig. 20 a). now i will introduce into the chlorine some of the same metal which i have finely powdered. see! it catches fire immediately (fig. 20 b). what i want you to understand is, that although i have in both these cases precisely the same chlorine and the same metal, nevertheless, that whilst the action of the chlorine on the _lump_ of antimony was not very apparent, in the case of the _powdered_ antimony the action was very energetic. again, there is a lump of lead (fig. 21 _a_). you would be very much astonished if the lead pipe that conveys the water through your houses caught fire spontaneously; but let me tell you that, if your lead water-pipes were reduced to a sufficiently fine powder, they would catch fire when exposed to the air. i have some finely-powdered lead in this tube (fig. 21 _b_), which you will notice catches fire directly it is exposed to the atmosphere (fig. 21 _c_). there it is! only powder the lead sufficiently fine,--that is to say, bring it into a state of minute subdivision,--and it fires by contact with the oxygen of the air. and now apply this. we have in our diamond the element carbon, but diamond-carbon is a hard substance, and not in a finely-divided state. we have in this tinder the same substance as the diamond, but tinder-carbon is finely divided, and it is because it is in a finely-divided condition that the carbon in our tinder-box catches fire so readily. i hope i have made that part of my subject quite clear to you. i should wish you to note that this very finely-divided carbon has rather an inclination to attract moisture. that is the reason why our tinder is so disposed to get damp, as i told you; and, as damp tinder is very difficult to light, this explains the meaning of those disrespectful words that i suggested our tinder-box had often had addressed to it in the course of its active life of service. [illustration: fig. 21.] but to proceed. what do i want now? i want a spark to fire my tinder. a spark is enough. do you remember the motto of the royal humane society? some of my young friends can no doubt translate it, "lateat scintilla forsan"--perchance a spark may lie hid. if a person rescued from drowning has but a spark of life remaining, try and get the spark to burst into activity. that is what the motto of that excellent society means. how am i to get this spark from the flint and steel to set fire to my tinder? i take the steel in one hand, as you see, and i set to work to strike it as vehemently as i can with the flint which i hold in the other (fig. 3 a b). spark follows spark. see how brilliant they are! but i want one spark at least to fall on my tinder. there, i have succeeded, and it has set fire to my tinder. one spark was enough. the spark was obtained by the collision of the steel and flint. the sparks produced by this striking of flint against steel were formerly the only safe light the coal-miner had to light him in his dark dreary work of procuring coal. here is the flint and steel lamp which originally belonged to sir humphry davy (fig. 22). the miners could not use candles in coal-mines because that would have been dangerous, and they were driven to employ an apparatus consisting of an iron wheel revolving against a piece of flint for the purpose of getting as much light as the sparks would yield. this instrument has been very kindly lent to me by professor dewar. i will project a picture of the apparatus on the screen, so that those at a distance may be better able to see the construction of the instrument. [illustration: fig. 22.] and now follow me carefully. i take the steel and the flint, and striking them together i get sparks. i want you to ask yourselves, where do the sparks come from? each spark is due to a minute piece of _iron_ being knocked off the steel by the blow of flint with steel. note the precise character of the spark. let me sprinkle some iron filings into this large gas flame. you will notice that the sparks of burning iron filings are very similar in appearance to the spark i produce by the collision of my flint and steel. [illustration: fig. 23.] but now i want to carry you somewhat further in our story. it would not do for me simply to knock off a small piece of iron; i want when i knock it off that it should be red-hot. stay for a moment and think of this--iron particles knocked off--iron particles made red-hot. all mechanical force generates heat.[a] you remember, in my last lecture, i rubbed together some pieces of wood, and they became sufficiently hot to fire phosphorus. on a cold day you rub your hands together to warm them, and the cabmen buffet themselves. it is the same story--mechanical force generating heat! the bather knows perfectly well that a rough sea is warmer than a smooth sea. why?--because the mechanical dash of the waves has been converted into heat. let me remind you of the familiar phrase, "striking a light," when i rub the match on the match-box. "forgive me urging such simple facts by such simple illustrations and such simple experiments. the facts i am endeavouring to bring before you are illustrations of principles that determine the polity of the whole material universe." friction produces heat. here is a little toy (cracker) that you may have seen before (fig. 23). it is scientific in its way. a small quantity of fulminating material is placed between two pieces of card on which a few fragments of sand have been sprinkled (fig. 23 _a_). the two ends of the paper (_b b_) are pulled asunder. the friction produces heat, the heat fires the fulminate, and off it goes with a crack. and now put this question to yourselves, what produced the friction? force. what is more, the amount of heat produced is the exact measure of the amount of force used. heat is a form of force. i must urge you to realize precisely this energy of force. when you sharpen a knife you put oil upon the hone. why?--when the carpenter saws a piece of wood he greases the saw. why?--when you travel by train you see the railway-porter running up and down the platform with a box of yellow grease with which he greases the wheels. why?--the answer to these questions is not far to seek--it is because you want your knife sharpened; it is because you want the saw to cut; it is because you want the train to travel. the carpenter finds sawing hard work, and he does not want the force of the muscles of his arm--his labour, in short--to be converted into heat, and so he greases the saw, knowing that the more completely he prevents friction, the more wood he will cut. it is the force of steam that makes the engine travel. steam costs money. the engine-driver does not want that steam-force to be converted into heat, because every degree of heat produced means diminished speed of his train; and so the porter greases the wheels. but as you approach the station the train must be stopped. the steam is turned off, and the guard puts on what he calls "the brake." what is the brake? it is a piece of wood so constructed and placed that it can be made to press upon the wheel. considerable friction results between the wheel and the brake;--heat is produced;--the train gradually comes to a stop. why? we have now the conversion of that force into heat which a minute ago was being used for the purpose of keeping the train a-going. given a certain force you can have heat _or_ motion; but you cannot have heat _and_ motion with the same force in the same amount as if you had them singly. in every-day life, you cannot have your pudding and eat it. [a] i need scarcely say, that whatever is of any value in the following remarks is derived from that charming book of professor tyndall's, _heat a mode of motion_. heat then is generated by mechanical force; it is a mode of motion. there was an old theory that heat was material. there was heat, for instance, you were told, in this nail. suppose i hammer it, it will get hot, and at the same time i shall reduce by hammering the bulk of the iron nail. a pint pot will not hold so much as a quart pot. the nail (you were told) cannot hold so much heat when it occupies a less bulk as it did when it occupied a larger bulk. therefore if i reduce the bulk of the nail i squeeze out some of the heat. that was the old theory. one single experiment knocked it on the head. it was certain, that in water there is a great deal more entrapped heat--"latent heat" it was called--than there is in ice. if you take two pieces of ice and rub them together, you will find the ice melts--the solid ice changes (that is to say) into liquid water. where did the heat come from to melt the ice? you could not get the heat _from_ the ice, because it was not there, there being admittedly more latent heat in the water than in the ice. the explanation is certain--the heat was the result of the friction. and now let me go to my hammer and nail. i wish to see whether i can make this nail hot by hammering. it is quite cold at the present time. i hope to make the nail hot enough by hammering it to fire that piece of phosphorus (fig. 24). one or two sharp blows with the hammer suffice, and as you see the thing is done--_i_ have fired the phosphorus. but follow the precise details of the experiment. it was _i_ who gave motion to the hammer. _i_ brought that hammer on to that nail. where did the motion go to that i gave the hammer? it went into the nail, and it is that very motion that made the nail hot, and it was that heat which lighted the phosphorus. it was _i_ who fired the phosphorus: do not be mistaken, _i_ fired the phosphorus. it was my arm that gave motion to the hammer. it was my force that was communicated to the hammer. it was _i_ who made the hammer give the motion to the nail. it was _i_ myself that fired the phosphorus. [illustration: fig. 24.] i want you then to realize this great fact, that when i hold the steel and strike it with the flint, and get sparks, i first of all knock off a minute fragment of iron by the blow that i impart to it, whilst the force i use in striking the blow actually renders the little piece of detached iron red-hot. what a wonderful thought this is! look at the sun, the great centre of heat! it looks as if it were a blazing ball of fire in the heavens. where does the heat of the sun come from? it seems bold to suggest that the heat is produced by the impact of meteorites on the sun. just as i, for instance, take a hammer and heat the nail by the dash of the hammer on it, so the dash of these meteorites on the sun are supposed to produce the heat so essential to our life and comfort. [illustration: fig. 25.] [illustration: fig. 26.] [illustration: fig. 27.] let us take another step forward in the story of our tinder-box. having produced a red-hot spark and set fire to my tinder, i want you to see what i do next. i set to work to blow upon my lighted tinder. you remember, by the bye, that latin motto of our school-books--_al[)e]re flammam_, nourish the flame. when i blow on the tinder my object is to nourish the flame. here is a pair of common kitchen bellows (fig. 25); when the fire is low the cook blows the fire to make it burn up. what is the object of this blowing operation? it is to supply a larger quantity of atmospheric oxygen to the almost lifeless fire than it would otherwise obtain. oxygen is the spark's nourishment and life, and the more it gets the better it thrives. oxygen is an extremely active agent in nourishing flame. if, for instance, i take a little piece of carbon and merely set fire to one small corner of it, and then introduce it into this jar of oxygen, see how brilliantly it burns; you notice how rapidly the carbon is becoming consumed (fig. 26). in the tinder-box i blow on the tinder to supply a larger amount of oxygen to my spark. a thing to burn under ordinary conditions must have oxygen, and the more oxygen it gets the better it burns. it does not follow that the supply of oxygen to a burning body must necessarily come directly from the air. here, for instance, i have a squib. i will fire it and put it under water (fig. 27). you see it goes on burning whether it is in the water or out of it, because one of the materials of which the squib is composed supplies the oxygen. the oxygen is actually locked up inside the squib. when then i blow upon my tinder, my object is to supply more oxygen to it than it would get under ordinary conditions. and, as you see, the more i blow, within certain limits, the more the spark spreads, until now the whole of my tinder has become red-hot. but my time is gone, and we must leave the rest of our story for the next lecture. lecture iii. recall for a few minutes the facts i brought before you in my last lecture. the first point we discussed was the preparation of the tinder. i explained to you that tinder was nothing more than carbon in a finely-divided state. the second point was, that i had to strike the steel with the flint in such manner that a minute particle of the iron should be detached; the force used in knocking it off being sufficient to make the small particle of iron red-hot. this spark falling upon the tinder set fire to it. the next stage of the operation was to blow upon the tinder, in order, as i said, to nourish the flame; in other words, to promote combustion by an increased supply of oxygen, just as we use an ordinary pair of bellows for the purpose of fanning a fire which has nearly gone out into a blaze. and now comes the next point in my story of a tinder-box. having ignited the tinder i want to set fire to the match. now i have here some of the old tinder-box matches, and you will see that they are simply wooden splints with a little sulphur at the end. why (you say) use sulphur? for this reason--the wood is not combustible enough to be fired by the red-hot tinder. we put therefore upon the wood a substance which is more combustible than the wood. this sulphur--which most people call brimstone--has been known from very early times. in the middle ages it was regarded as the "principle of fire." it is referred to by moses and homer and pliny. a very distinguished chemist, geber, describes it as one of "the principles of nature." having fired my tinder, as you see, and blown upon it, i place my sulphur match in contact with the red-hot tinder. and now i want you to notice that the sulphur match does not catch fire immediately. it wants, in fact, a little time, and as you see a little coaxing. now i have got it alight. but note, it is the sulphur that at the present moment is burning. the burning sulphur is now beginning to set fire to the wood. the whole match is well alight now! but it was the sulphur that caught fire first, and it was the sulphur that set fire to the wood. a little time was occupied, we said, in making the sulphur catch fire. ask yourselves this question--why was it that the sulphur took a little time to catch fire? this was the reason--because before the sulphur could catch fire it was necessary to change the _solid_ sulphur (the condition in which it was upon the match end) into _gaseous_ sulphur. the solid sulphur could not catch fire. therefore the heat of my tinder during the interval that i was coaxing the match (as i called it) was being exerted in converting my solid into gaseous sulphur. when the solid sulphur had had sufficient heat applied to it to vapourize it, the sulphur gas immediately caught fire. now understand, that in order to convert a solid into a liquid, or a liquid into a gas, heat is always a necessity. i must have heat to produce a gas out of a solid or a liquid. i will endeavour to make this clear to you by an experiment. i have here, as you see, a wooden stool, and i am about to pour a little water on this stool. i place a glass beaker on the stool, the liquid water only intervening between the stool and the bottom of the glass. you see the glass is perfectly loose, and easily lifted off the stool notwithstanding the layer of water. i will now pour into the beaker a little of a very volatile liquid--_i. e._ a liquid that is easily converted into a gas--(bisulphide of carbon). i wish somewhat rapidly to effect the change of this liquid bisulphide of carbon into gaseous bisulphide of carbon, and in order to accomplish this object i must have heat. so i take this tube which, as you see, is connected with a pair of bellows, and simply blow on my bisulphide of carbon. this effects the change of the liquid into a gas with great rapidity. just as i converted my solid sulphur into a gas by the heat of the tinder, so here i am converting this liquid bisulphide of carbon into a gas by the wind from my bellows. but my liquid bisulphide of carbon must get heat somewhere or another in order that the change of the liquid into a gas, that i desire should take place, may be effected; and so, seeing that the water that i have placed between the glass and the stool is the most convenient place from which the liquid can derive the necessary heat, it says, "i will take the heat out of the water." it does so, but in removing the heat from the water it changes the liquid water into solid ice. and see, already the beaker is frozen to the stool, so that i can actually lift up the stool by the beaker (fig. 28). understand then why my sulphur match wanted some time and some coaxing before it caught fire, viz. to change this solid sulphur into gaseous sulphur. [illustration: fig. 28.] but let us go a step further: why must the solid sulphur be converted into a gas? we want a flame, and whenever we have flame it is absolutely necessary that we should have a gas to burn. you cannot have flame without you have gas. let me endeavour to illustrate what i mean. i pour into this flask a small quantity of ether, a liquid easily converted into a gas. if i apply a lighted taper to the mouth of the flask, no gas, or practically none, being evolved at the moment, nothing happens. but i will heat the ether so as to convert it into a gas. and now that i have evolved a large quantity of ether gas, when i apply a lighted taper to the mouth of the flask i get a large flame (fig. 29). there it is! the more gas i evolve (that is, the more actively i apply the heat) the larger is the flame. you see it is a very large flame now. if i take the spirit lamp away, the production of gas grows less and less, until my flame almost dies out; but you see if i again apply my heat and set more gas free, i revive my flame. i want you to grasp this very important fact, upon which i cannot enlarge further now, that given flame, i must have a gas to burn, and therefore heat as a power is needed before i can obtain flame. [illustration: fig. 29.] well, you ask me, is that true of all flame? where is the gas, you say, in that candle flame? think for a moment of the science involved in lighting a candle. what am i doing when i apply a lighted match to this candle? the first thing i do is to melt the tallow, the melted tallow being drawn up by the capillarity of the wick. the next thing i do is to convert the liquid tallow into a gas. this done, i set fire to the gas. i don't suppose you ever thought so much was involved in lighting a candle. my candle is nothing more than a portable gas-works, similar in principle to the gas-works from which the gas that i am burning here is supplied. whether it is a lamp, or a gas-burner, or a candle, they are all in a true sense gas-works, and they all pre-suppose the application of heat to some material or another for the purpose of forming a gas which will burn. [illustration: fig. 30.] before i pass on, i want to refer to the beautiful burner that i have here. it is the burner used by the whitechapel stall-keepers on a saturday night (fig. 30). (fig. _a_ is an enlarged drawing of the burner.) just let me explain the science of the whitechapel burner. first of all you will see the man with a funnel filling this top portion with naphtha (_c_). here is a stop-cock, by turning which he lets a little naphtha run down the tube through a very minute orifice into this small cup at the bottom of the burner (_a_). this cup he heats in a friend's lamp, thereby converting the liquid naphtha, which runs into the cup, into a gas. so soon as the gas is formed--in other words, so soon as the naphtha has been sufficiently heated--the naphtha gas catches fire, the heat being then sufficient to maintain that little cup hot enough to keep up a regular supply of naphtha gas. when the lamp does not burn very well, you will often see the man poking it with a pin. the carbon given off from the naphtha is very disposed to choke up the little hole through which the naphtha runs into the cup, and the costermonger pushes a pin into the little hole to allow the free passage of the naphtha. that, then, is the mechanism of this beautiful lamp of the whitechapel traders, known as halliday's lamp. now i go to another point: having obtained the gas, i must set fire to it. it is important to note that the temperature required to set fire to different gases varies with the gas. for instance, i will set free in this bottle a small quantity of gas, which fires at a very low temperature. it is the vapour of carbon disulphide. see, i merely place a hot rod into the bottle, and the gas fires at once. if i put a hot rod into this bottle of coal gas, no such effect results, since coal gas requires a very much higher temperature to ignite it than bisulphide of carbon gas. i want almost--not quite--actual flame to fire coal gas. but here is another gas, about which i may have to say something directly, called marsh gas (the gas of coal-mines). this requires a much higher temperature than even coal gas to fire it. i want you to understand that although all gases require heat to fire them, different gases ignite at very different temperatures. bisulphide of carbon gas, _e. g._, ignites at a very low temperature, whilst marsh gas requires a very high temperature indeed for its ignition. you will see directly that this is a very important fact. sulphur gas ignites fortunately at a fairly low temperature, and that is why sulphur is so useful an addition to the wood splint by which to get fire out of the tinder-box. [illustration: fig. 31.] and here i wish to make a slight digression in my story. i will show you an experiment preparatory to bringing before you the fact i am anxious now to make clear. i have before me a tube, one half of which is brass and the other half wood. i have covered the tube, as you see, with a tightly-fitting piece of white paper. the whole tube, wood and brass, has been treated in exactly the same manner. now i will set fire to some spirit in the trough i have here, and expose the entire tube to the action of the flame. notice this very curious result, viz. that the paper covering the brass portion of the tube does not catch fire, whereas the paper covering the wood is rapidly consumed (fig. 31). you see the exact line that divides wood from brass by the burning of the paper. well, why is that? now all of you know that some things conduct heat (_i. e._ carry away heat) better than other substances. for instance, if you were to put a copper rod and a glass rod into the fire, allowing a part of each to project, the copper rod that projects out of the fire would soon become so very hot that you dare not touch it, owing to the copper conducting the heat from the fire, whereas you would be able to take hold of the projecting end of the glass rod long after the end of the glass exposed to the fire had melted. the fact is, the copper carries heat well, and the glass carries heat badly. now with the teaching of that experiment before you, you will understand, i hope, the exact object of one or two experiments i am about to show you. here is a piece of coarse wire gauze--i am about to place it over the flame of this argand burner. you will notice that it lowers the flame for a moment, but almost immediately the flame dashes through the gauze (fig. 32 a). here is another piece of gauze, not quite so coarse as the last. i place this over the flame, and for a moment the flame cannot get through it. there, you see it is through now, but it did not pass with the same readiness that it did in the case of the other piece of gauze, which was coarser. now, when i take a piece of fine gauze, the flame does not pass through at all until the gauze is nearly red-hot. there is plenty of gas passing all the time. if i take a still finer gauze, i shall find that the flame won't pass even when it is almost red-hot (fig. 32 b). plenty of gas is passing through, remember, all the time, but the flame does not pass through. now why is it that the flame is unable to pass? the reason is this--because the metal gauze has so cooled the flame that the heat on one side is not sufficient to set fire to the gas on the other side. i must have, you see, a certain temperature to fire my gas. when therefore i experiment with a very fine piece of gauze, where i have a good deal of metal and a large conducting surface, there is no possibility of the flame passing. in fact, i have so cooled the flame by the metal gauze that it is no longer hot enough to set fire to the gas on the opposite side. i will give you one or two more illustrations of the same fact. suppose i put upon this gauze a piece of camphor (camphor being a substance that gives off a heavy combustible vapour when heated), and then heat it, you see the camphor gas burning on the under side of the gauze, but the camphor gas on the upper side is not fired (fig. 33). plenty of camphor gas is being given off, but the flame of the burning camphor on the under side is not high enough to set fire to the camphor gas on the upper side, owing to the conducting power of the metal between the flame and the upper gas. there is one other experiment i should like to show you. upon this piece of metal gauze i have piled up a small heap of gunpowder. i will place a spirit-lamp underneath the gunpowder, as you see i am now doing, and i don't suppose the gunpowder will catch fire. i see the sulphur of the gunpowder at the present moment volatilizing, but the flame, cooled by the action of the metal, is not hot enough to set fire to the gunpowder. [illustration: fig. 32.] [illustration: fig. 33.] i showed you the steel and flint lamp--if i may call it a lamp--used by coal-miners at the time of davy (fig. 22). davy set to work to invent a more satisfactory lamp than that, and the result of his experiments was the beautiful miner's lamp which i have here (fig. 34). i regard this lamp with considerable affection, because i have been down many a coal-mine with it. this is the coal-miner's safety-lamp. the old-fashioned form of it that i have here has been much improved, but it illustrates the principle as well as, if not better than, more elaborate varieties. it is simply an oil flame covered with a gauze shade, exactly like that gauze with which i have been experimenting. i will allow a jet of coal gas to play upon this lamp, but the gas, as you see, does not catch fire. you will notice the oil flame in the lamp elongates in a curious manner. the flame of the lamp cooled by the gauze is not hot enough to set fire to the coal gas, but the appearance of the flame warns the miner, and tells him when there is danger. and that is the explanation of the beautiful miner's safety-lamp invented by sir humphry davy. [illustration: fig. 34.] now let me once more put this fact clearly before you, that whether it is the gas flame or our farthing rushlight, whether it is our lamp or our lucifer match, if we have a flame we must have a gas to burn, and having a gas, we must heat it to, and maintain it at, a certain temperature. we have now reached a point where our tinder-box has presented us with flame. a flame is indeed the consummated work of the tinder-box. [illustration: fig. 35.] [illustration: fig. 36.] just let me say a few words about the grand result--the consummated work of the tinder-box. a flame is a very remarkable thing. it looks solid, but it is not solid. you will find that the inside of a flame consists of unburnt gas--gas, that is to say, not in a state of combustion at all. the only spot where true combustion takes place is the outer covering of the flame. i will try to show you some experiments illustrating this. i will take a large flame for this purpose. here is a piece of glass tube which i have covered with ordinary white paper. holding the covered glass tube in our large flame for a minute or two, you observe i get two rings of charred paper, corresponding to the outer envelope of the flame, whilst that portion of the paper between the black rings has not even been scorched, showing you that it is only the outer part of the flame that is burning (fig. 35). the heat of the flame is at that part where, as i said before, the combustible gases come into contact--into collision with the atmosphere. so completely is this true, that if i take a tube, such as i have here, i can easily convey the unburnt gas in the centre of the flame away from the flame, and set fire to it, as you see, at the end of the glass tube a long distance from the flame (fig. 36). i will place in the centre of my flame some phosphorus which is at the present moment in a state of active burning, and observe how instantly the combustion of the phosphorus ceases so soon as it gets into the centre of the flame. the crucible which contains it is cooled down immediately, and presents an entirely different appearance within the flame to what it did outside the flame. it is a curious way, perhaps you think, to stop a substance burning by putting it into a flame. indeed i can put a heap of gunpowder inside a flame so that the outer envelope of burning gas does not ignite it (fig. 37). there you see a heap of gunpowder in the centre of our large flame. the flame is so completely hollow that even it cannot explode the powder. [illustration: fig. 37.] [illustration: fig. 38.] i want you, if you will, to go a step further the heat of the flame is due, as i explained in my last lecture, to the clashing of molecules. but what is the light of my candle and gas due to? the light is due to the solid matter in the flame, brought to a state of white heat or incandescence by the heat of the flame. the heat is due to the clashing of the particles, the light is due to the heated solid matter in the flame. let me see if i can show you that. i am setting free in this bottle some hydrogen, which i am about to ignite at the end of this piece of glass tube (fig. 38 a). i shall be a little cautious, because there is danger if my hydrogen gets mixed with air. there is my hydrogen burning; but see, it gives little or no light. but this candle flame gives light. why? the light of the candle is due to the intensely heated solid matter in the flame; the absence of light in the hydrogen flame depends on the absence of solid matter. let me hold clean white plates over both these flames. see the quantity of black solid matter that i am able to collect from this candle flame (fig. 38 b). but my hydrogen yields me no soot or solid matter whatsoever (fig. 38 a). the plate remains perfectly clean, and only a little moisture collects upon it. the light that candle gives depends upon the solid matter in the flame becoming intensely heated. if what i say be true, it follows that if i take a flame which gives no light, like this hydrogen flame (fig. 39 a), and give it solid particles, i ought to change the non-luminous flame into a luminous one. let us see whether this be so or not. i have here a glass tube containing a little cotton wadding (fig. 39 b _a_), and i am about to pour on the wadding a little ether, and to make the hydrogen gas pass through the cotton wadding soaked with ether before i fire it. and now if what i have said is correct, the hydrogen flame to which i have imparted a large quantity of solid matter ought to produce a good light, and so it does! see, i have converted the flame which gave no light (fig. 39 a) into a flame which gives an excellent light merely by incorporating solid matter with the flame (fig. 39 b). what is more, the amount of light that a flame gives depends upon the amount or rather the number of solid particles that it contains. the more solid particles there are in the flame, the greater is the light. let me give you an illustration of this. here is an interesting little piece of apparatus given to my predecessor in the chair of chemistry at the london hospital by the augustus harris of that day. it is one of the torches formerly used by the pantomime fairies as they descended from the realms of the carpenters. i have an alcohol flame at the top of the torch which gives me very little light. here, you see, is an arrangement by which i can shake a quantity of solid matter (lycopodium) into the non-luminous alcohol flame. you will observe what a magnificently luminous flame i produce (fig. 40). [illustration: fig. 39.] [illustration: fig. 40.] i have told you that the light of a flame is due to solid matter in the flame;[b] further, that the amount of light is due to the amount of solid matter. and now i want to show you that the kind of light is due to the kind of solid matter in the flame. here are some pieces of cotton wadding, which i am about to saturate with alcoholic solutions of different kinds of solid matter. for instance, i have in one bottle an alcoholic solution of a lithium salt, in another of a barium, in a third of a strontium, and so on. i will set fire to all these solutions, and you see how vastly different the colours are, the colour of the flames being dependent on the various forms of solid matter that i have introduced into them. [b] i have not forgotten frankland's experiments on this subject, but the lectures did not admit of dealing with exceptional cases. thus i have shown you that the heat of our flame is due to the clashing of the two gases, and the light of the flame to the solid matter in the flame, and the kind of light to the kind of solid matter. well, there is another point to which i desire to refer. light is the paint which colours bodies. you know that ordinary white light is made up of a series of beautiful colours (the spectrum), which i show you here. if i take all these spectrum or rainbow colours which are painted on this glass i can, as you see, recompose them into white light by rotating the disc with sufficient rapidity that they may get mixed together on the little screen at the back of your eye. white light then is a mixture of a number of colours. just ask yourselves this question. why is this piece of ribbon white? the white light falls upon it. white light is made up of all those colours you saw just now upon the screen. the light is reflected from this ribbon exactly as it fell upon the ribbon. the whole of those colours come off together, and that ribbon is white because the whole of the colours of the spectrum are reflected at the same moment. why is that ribbon green? the white light falls upon the ribbon--the violet, the indigo, the red, the blue, the orange, and the yellow, are absorbed by the dye of the ribbon, and you do not see them. the ribbon, as it were, drinks in all these colours, but it cannot drink in the green. and reflecting the green of the spectrum, you see that ribbon green because the ribbon is incapable of absorbing the green of the white light. why is this ribbon red? for the same reason. it can absorb the green which the previous piece of ribbon could not absorb, but it cannot absorb the red. the fact is, colour is not an inherent property of a body. if you ask me why that ribbon is green, and why this ribbon is red, the real answer is, that the red ribbon has absorbed every colour except the red, and the green ribbon every colour except the green, not because they are of themselves red and green but because they have the power of reflecting those colours from their surfaces. this then is the consummated work of our tinder-box. our tinder-box set fire to the match, and the match set fire to the candle, whilst the heat and the light of the candle are the finished work of the candle that the tinder-box lighted. the clock warns me that i must bring to an end my story of a tinder-box. to be sure, the tinder-box is a thing of the past, but i hope its story has not been altogether without teaching. let me assure you that the failure, if failure there be, is not the fault of the story, but of the story-teller. if some day, my young friends, you desire to be great philosophers--and such desire is a high and holy ambition--be content in the first instance to listen to the familiar stories told you by the commonest of common things. there is nothing, depend upon it, too little to learn from. in time you will rise to higher efforts of thought and intellectual activity, but you will be primed for those efforts by the grasp you have secured in your studies of every-day phenomena. "great things are made of little things, and little things go lessening, till at last comes god behind them." the end. richard clay & sons, limited, london & bungay. publications of the society for promoting christian knowledge. natural history rambles. _fcap. 8vo., with numerous woodcuts, cloth boards, 2s. 6d. each._ * * * * * in search of minerals. by the late d. t. anstead, m.a., f.r.s. lakes and rivers. by c. o. groom napier, f.g.s. lane and field. by the late rev. j. g. wood, m.a. mountain and moor. by j. e. taylor, f.l.s., f.g.s. ponds and ditches. by m. c. cooke, m.a., ll.d. the sea-shore. by professor p. martin duncan, m.b., (london), f.r.s. the woodlands. by m. c. cooke, m.a., ll.d., author of "freaks and marvels of plant life," &c. underground. by j. e. taylor, f.l.s., f.g.s. manuals of health. _fcap. 8vo, 128 pp., limp cloth, price 1s. each._ * * * * * air, water, and disinfectants. by c. h. aikman, m.a., d.sc., f.r.s.e. health and occupation. by the late sir b. w. richardson, f.r.s., m.d. habitation in relation to health (the). by f. s. b. chaumont, m.d., f.r.s. on personal care of health. by the late e. a. parkes, m.d., f.r.s. notes on the ventilation and warming of houses, churches, schools, and other buildings. by the late ernest h. jacob, m.a., m.d. (oxon). manuals of elementary science. _foolscap 8vo, 128 pp., with illustrations, limp cloth, 1s. each._ * * * * * physiology. by professor a. macalister, ll.d., m.d., f.r.s., f.s.a. geology. by the rev. t. g. bonney, m.a., f.g.s. astronomy. by w. h. christie, m.a., the royal observatory, greenwich. botany. by the late professor robert bentley. zoology. by alfred newton, m.a., f.r.s., professor of zoology in the university of cambridge. a new and revised edition. matter and motion. by the late j. clerk maxwell, m.a. spectroscope (the), and its work. by the late richard a. proctor. crystallography. by henry palin gurney, m.a., clare college, cambridge. electricity. by the late prof. fleeming jenkin. atlases. _s._ _d._ handy general atlas of the world (the). a comprehensive series of maps illustrating general and commercial geography. with index. _half morocco_ 42 0 bible atlas (the). maps and plans, with explanatory notes, complete index. royal 4to. _cloth boards_ 14 0 the graphic atlas and gazetteer of the world. edited by j. g. bartholomew, f.r.s.e., f.r.g.s. with 128 maps and plans. _cloth boards_ 12 6 _half morocco_ 15 0 a modern atlas; containing 30 maps, with indexes, &c. _cloth boards_ 12 0 handy reference atlas of the world. complete index and geographical statistics. _cloth_ 7 6 star atlas (the). translated and adapted from the german by the rev. e. mcclure, m.a. with 18 charts. _cloth_ 7 6 student's atlas (the) of ancient and modern geography, with 48 maps and a copious consulting index. _cloth boards_ 7 6 world (the), an atlas, containing 34 coloured maps and complete index. folded 8vo. _cloth gilt_ 5 0 handy atlas of the counties of england. forty-three coloured maps and index. _cloth_ 5 0 century atlas and gazetteer of the world, containing 52 maps and gazetteer of 35,000 names, 4to. _cloth_ 3 6 young scholar's atlas (the), containing 24 coloured maps and index. imp. 4to. _cloth_ 2 6 pocket atlas of the world (the). with complete index, &c. 2 6 british colonial pocket atlas (the). fifty-six maps of the colonies and index. _cloth boards_ 2 6 jubilee atlas of the british empire, with descriptive and statistical notes. _paper boards_ 1 0 physical atlas for beginners, containing 12 coloured maps. _paper cover_ 1 0 shilling quarto atlas (the), containing 24 coloured maps. _paper wrapper_ 1 0 sixpenny bible atlas (the), containing 16 coloured maps. _paper wrapper_ 0 6 british colonies (atlas of the), containing 16 coloured maps. _paper cover_ 0 6 threepenny atlas (the), containing 16 coloured maps. crown 8vo. _paper cover_ 0 3 penny atlas (the), containing 13 maps. small 4to. 0 1 maps. mounted on canvas and roller, varnished. _s. d._ eastern hemisphere 4 ft. 10 in. by 4 ft. 2 in. 13 0 western hemisphere ditto. 13 0 europe ditto. 13 0 asia. scale, 138 miles to an inch ditto. 13 0 africa ditto. 13 0 north america. scale, 97 m. to in. ditto. 13 0 south america. scale, ditto ditto. 13 0 australasia ditto. 13 0 australasia (diocesan map) ditto. 14 0 india. scale, 40 m. to in. 50 in. by 58 in. 13 0 australia 3 ft. 6 in. by 2 ft. 10 in. 9 0 ireland. scale, 8 m. to in. 2 ft. 10 in. by 3 ft. 6 in. 9 0 scotland. scale, ditto ditto. 9 0 gt. britain and ireland, the united kingdom of 6 ft. 3 in. by 7 ft. 4 in. 42 0 england and wales (photo-relievo) 4 ft. 8 in. by 3 ft. 10 in. 13 0 england and wales (diocesan map) 4 ft. 2 in. by 4 ft. 10 in. 16 0 british isles 58 in. by 50 in. 13 0 holy land 4 ft. 2 in. by 4 ft. 10 in. 13 0 holy land, to illustrate the old and new testaments. scale, 9 miles to an inch 27 in. by 32 in. 6 0 sinai (the peninsula of), the negeb, and lower egypt. to illustrate the history of the patriarchs and the exodus 2 ft. 10 in. by 3 ft. 6 in. 9 0 places mentioned in the acts and the epistles. scale, 57 miles to an inch 3 ft. 6 in. by 2 ft. 10 in. 9 0 small maps of holy land:- old testament--new testament--places mentioned in acts and epistles _on sheets_, each 1 6 _millboard, varnished_, each 2 0 photo-relievo maps. on sheets 19 inches by 14 inches. _s. d._ england and wales. scotland. europe. names of places and rivers left to be filled in by scholars each 0 6 with rivers and names of places " 0 9 with names of places, and with county and country divisions in colours 1 0 asia and north america. names of places and rivers left to be filled in by scholars " 0 6 with rivers and names of places, &c. " 0 9 north and south london. with names of places, &c. " 0 6 photo-relievo wall map. england and wales. 56 in. by 46 in. _on canvas roller and varnished._ _plain 12s., coloured_ 13 0 heroes of science. _crown 8vo. cloth boards, 4s. each._ * * * * * =astronomers.= by e. j. c. morton, b.a. =botanists, zoologists, and geologists.= by professor p. martin duncan, f.r.s., &c. =chemists.= by m. m. pattison muir, esq., f.r.s.e. =mechanicians.= by t. c. lewis, m.a. =physicists.= by w. garnett, esq., m.a. specific subjects. _fcap. 8vo, 64 pages, limp cloth, price 4d. each._ * * * * * algebra. by w. h. h. hudson, m.a. answers to the examples given in the above, _limp cloth_, 6_d._ euclid. books 1 and 2. edited by w. h. h. hudson, m.a. elementary mechanics. by w. garnett, m.a. physical geography. by the rev. t. g. bonney, f.g.s. the romance of science. _post 8vo. with numerous illustrations. cloth boards._ * * * * * _coal, and what we get from it._ by professor r. meldola, f.r.s., f.i.c. 2_s._ 6_d._ _colour measurement and mixture._ by captain w. de w. abney, c.b., r.e., f.r.s. 2_s._ 6_d._ _diseases of plants._ by professor marshall ward, m.a., f.r.s., f.l.s. 2_s._ 6_d._ _our secret friends and foes._ second edition, revised and enlarged. by percy faraday frankland, ph.d., f.r.s. 3_s._ _soap-bubbles, and the forces which mould them._ by c. v. boys, a.r.s.m., f.r.s. 2_s._ 6_d._ _spinning tops._ by professor j. perry, m.e., f.r.s. 2_s._ 6_d._ _time and tide: a romance of the moon._ third edition, revised. by sir robert s. ball. 2_s._ 6_d._ _the making of flowers._ by rev. professor g. henslow, m.a., f.l.s., f.g.s. 2_s._ 6_d._ _the story of a tinder-box._ by the late c. meymott tidy, m.b., m.s. 2_s._ _the birth and growth of worlds._ by the late professor a. h. green, m.a., f.r.s. 1_s._ _the splash of a drop._ by professor a. m. worthington, f.r.s. 1_s._ 6_d._ london: northumberland avenue, w.c. transcriber's note: in this etext an 'e' with breve is represented as [)e] bold font is represented by = images generously made available by the internet archive/american libraries.) laboratory manual of glass-blowing mcgraw-hill book company _publishers of books for_ electrical world engineering record railway age gazette signal engineer electric railway journal metallurgical and chemical engineering the engineering and mining journal engineering news american machinist american engineer coal age power laboratory manual of glass-blowing by francis c. frary, ph. d. assistant professor of chemistry university of minnesota mcgraw-hill book company, inc. 239 west 39th street, new york 6 bouverie street, london, e. c. 1914 copyright, 1914, by the mcgraw-hill book company, inc. preface the purpose of this little book is to provide a clear and detailed discussion of the elements of glass-blowing. many laboratories in this country, especially in the west, are located a long way from any professional glass-blower, and the time and money spent in shipping broken apparatus several hundred miles to be mended could often be saved if some of the laboratory force could seal on a new stopcock, replace a broken tube, or make some temporary repairs. many men in physical or chemical laboratories have occasion to modify some piece of apparatus designed perhaps for other uses, or to design new apparatus. to such also, the ability to perform some of the operations herein described may be very valuable. no originality is claimed for the methods here described. they are those which the author has found most suitable and convenient in his own work, and most easily learned by students. the aim has been to describe each operation in such detail that a beginner can follow the process without help and, with practice, attain satisfactory results. it is, however, much easier to perform any of the operations described, after seeing some one else perform it correctly; since the temperature, the exact time to begin blowing the glass, and many other little details are very difficult to obtain from a description. it has not been thought worth while to describe the process of making stopcocks, thermometers, vacuum tubes, etc., as such things can be purchased more cheaply and of much better quality than any amateur can make unless he is willing to spend a very large amount of time in practice. for similar reasons the manipulation of quartz glass has been omitted. the author will be grateful for all suggestions and criticisms tending to improve the methods presented. if some of them appear to be given in excessive detail, the reader will remember that many things which are obvious to the experienced worker are not so to the beginner, and that it is the little details in the manipulation which often spell success or failure in glass-blowing. f. c. f. minneapolis, minn., _january, 1914._ contents page preface v chapter i materials and apparatus 1 varieties and defects of glass--devitrification--annealing glass--blowpipe and bellows--light--arrangement of exercises. chapter ii general operations 7 cutting, bending, constricting and flanging the tubing--methods of rotation and blowing. chapter iii elementary exercises 16 joining two pieces of tubing of the same diameter--the "tee" tube--joining two tubes of different diameters--blowing bulbs. chapter iv advanced exercises 35 sealing a tube through another tube: the gas-washing tube, suction pump, and kjeldahl trap. chapter v modified methods and special operations 43 capillary tubing--glass rod--mending stopcocks--closed circuits of tubing--spirals--ground joints--sealing in platinum wire--sealing vacuum tubes--closed tubes for heating under pressure. index 59 laboratory manual of glass-blowing chapter i materials and apparatus one of the most important factors in the success of any piece of glass-blowing is the glass employed. as is well known, there are two general varieties of glass: lead glass and soda glass. formerly much apparatus was made of lead glass, but at present it is very seldom met with, except in the little drops of special glass used to seal platinum wires into the larger sizes of tubes. lead glass is softer and more readily fusible than soda glass, but has the disagreeable property of growing black in a few seconds unless worked in a strong oxidizing flame. this may be prevented by using a "hissing" flame, with a large excess of air, and working in the extreme end of the flame; or the black lead formed may thus be reoxidized, and the glass restored to its original clearness. almost all the soft glass on the market is a soda glass, although sometimes part of the soda is replaced by potash. most of the hard glass appears to be a potash glass. the following qualities are desirable in a glass for ordinary working: (1) moderately low working temperature, (2) freedom from air bubbles, striations and irregularities, (3) proper composition, so that the glass will not devitrify or crystallize while being handled at its working temperature, (4) ability to withstand rapid heating without cracking. the working temperature of different samples of so-called "soft glass" varies a good deal, and is best determined by trial. the glass should become almost soft enough for blowing in a flame that still shows a little yellow near the tip, so that at the highest temperature of the flame it may flow fairly freely and thus easily eliminate irregularities in thickness. if the glass is too hard, the shrinking of the glass, collection of material for a bulb, and in fact most of the working processes will be slower, and the glass will not stay at its working temperature long enough after its removal from the flame to permit it to be properly blown. air bubbles in the original batch of glass are drawn out into long hair-like tubes during the process of manufacture. when such tubing is worked, the walls of these microscopic tubes collapse in spots, and the air thus enclosed will often collect as a small bubble in the wall, thus weakening it. irregularities are of various kinds. some of the larger sizes of thin-walled tubing often have one half of their walls much thicker than the other, and such tubing should only be used for the simplest work. some tubing has occasional knots or lumps of unfused material. the rest of the tube is usually all right, but often the defective part must be cut out. the presence of striations running along the tube is generally an indication of hard, inferior glass. crookedness and non-uniformity of diameter are troublesome only when long pieces must be used. devitrification is one of the worst faults glass can possibly have. it is especially common in old glass, and in glass which has contained acids. it seems to be of two sorts. one variety manifests itself on the surface of the glass before it reaches its working temperature, but if the glass be heated to the highest temperature of the flame it will disappear except in the portion at the edge of the heated part. the glass seems to work all right, but an ugly crystallized ring is left at the edge of the portion heated. this kind appears most frequently in old glass which was originally of good quality, but has in time been superficially altered, probably by the loss of alkalies. the other variety of devitrification does not appear when the glass is first heated; but after it has been maintained at or above its working temperature for a longer or shorter time, it will be noticed that the outer surface has lost its smoothness, and appears to be covered with minute wrinkles. it will also be found that the glass has become harder, so that it becomes impossible to work it easily. further heating only makes the matter worse, as does the use of a higher temperature from the start. in fact it will often be found that a piece of comparatively soft glass which devitrifies almost at once in a "hissing" flame can be worked without serious difficulty if care be taken to use a flame still decidedly tinged with yellow. even good glass will begin to devitrify in this way if heated too long at the highest temperature of the flame, so care should always be taken (1) _to reduce the time of heating of any spot of glass to a minimum_; _i.e._, get the desired result at the first attempt, if possible, or at least with the minimum of reheating and "doctoring," and (2) _avoid keeping the glass at the highest temperature of the flame any longer than necessary_. this may be accomplished by doing all heating, shrinking, etc., of the glass in a flame more or less tinged with yellow, and only raising the temperature to the highest point when ready to blow the glass. this kind of devitrification is apparently due to volatilization of the alkalies from the glass in the flame, and it is said that it can be partly remedied or prevented by holding a swab of cotton saturated with a strong solution of common salt in the flame from time to time as the glass is heated. the toughness of glass, _i.e._, its ability to withstand variations of temperature, depends on its composition and the care taken in its annealing. in general, large pieces of glass should be heated very slowly in the smoky flame, and the larger the diameter of the tube the greater the length which must be kept warm to prevent cracking. all large pieces should be carefully heated over their whole circumference to the point where the soot deposit burns off, before being finally cooled. after being thus heated they are cooled in a large smoky flame until well coated with soot, then the flame is gradually reduced in size and the object finally cooled in the hot air above it until it will not set fire to cotton. if thought necessary, it may then be well wrapped in cotton and allowed to cool in the air. if not properly annealed the place heated may crack spontaneously when cold, and it is quite certain to crack if it is reheated later. next in importance to the glass are the blow-pipe and the bellows. any good blast lamp, such as is ordinarily used in a chemical laboratory for the ignition of precipitates, will be satisfactory; provided it gives a smooth regular flame of sufficient size for the work in hand, and when turned down will give a sharp-pointed flame with well-defined parts. where gas is not available, an ordinary gasoline blow-torch does very well for all operations requiring a large flame, and a mouth blow-pipe arranged to blow through a kerosene flame does well for a small flame. several dealers make blow-torches for oil or alcohol which are arranged to give a small well-defined flame, and they would doubtless be very satisfactory for glass-work. any good bellows will be satisfactory if it does not leak and will give a steady supply of air under sufficient pressure for the maximum size of flame given by the lamp used. a bellows with a leaky valve will give a pulsating flame which is very annoying and makes good work very difficult. when compressed air is available it can be used, but if possible it should be arranged so that the supply can be controlled by the foot, as both hands are usually needed to hold the work. for the same reason the supply of air is usually regulated by varying the rate of operation of the bellows, rather than by adjusting the valve of the blast-lamp. on the other hand, it will be found best to always adjust the flow of the gas by means of the cock on the lamp, rather than that at the supply pipe. the operator must have complete control over the flame, and be able to change its size and character at short notice without giving the work a chance to cool, and often without ceasing to support it with both hands. glass-blowing should be done in a good light, but preferably not in direct sunlight. the operator should be seated in a chair or on a stool of such a height that when working he may comfortably rest one or both elbows on the table. the comfort of the operator has a decided influence on the character of his work; especially in the case of a beginner, who often defeats his purpose by assuming uncomfortable and strained positions. steadiness and exact control of both hands are essential in most operations; any uncomfortable or strained position tires the muscles and weakens the control of the operator over them. in the arrangement of the exercises here presented, several factors have been considered. it is important that the first exercises be simple, although not necessarily the simplest, and they should teach the fundamental operations which will be used and amplified later. they should in themselves be things which are of importance and commonly used in glass-work, and they should be so arranged that the fundamental points, such as the rotation of glass, the proper temperature, blowing and shrinking the glass may be learned with a minimum expenditure of time, glass and gas. it is therefore recommended that the beginner take them up in the order given, at least as far as no. 7, and that each be mastered before attempting the next. the beginner should not leave the first exercise, for example, until he can join together two pieces of tubing so that they form one piece of substantially uniform inner and outer diameter, and without thick or thin spots. from two to four practice periods of two hours each should suffice for this. this chapter and the following one should also be frequently read over, as many of the points discussed will not be understood at first and many of the manipulations described will not be necessary in the simpler exercises. chapter ii general operations =cutting the glass.=--for this purpose a "glass-knife" is preferred to a file, if the glass is cold: if it is hot a file must always be used, and its edge slightly moistened to prevent drawing the temper. the glass-knife is simply a flat piece of hard steel, with the edges ground sharp on an emery wheel. the bevel of the edge should be from 30 to 60 degrees. an old flat file can easily be ground into a suitable knife. the glass-knife makes a narrower scratch than the file but appears more likely to start the minute crack which is to cause the tube to break at that point, and the break is more likely to give a good square end. the scratch should be made by passing part of the knife or file once across the glass, never by "sawing" the tool back and forth. this latter procedure dulls the tool very quickly. in breaking a piece of glass tubing, many persons forget that it is necessary to _pull_ the ends apart, as well as to bend the tube very _slightly_ in such a direction as to open up the minute crack started in the scratch. care in breaking the tube is essential, as it is impossible to do as good work with uneven ends as with square ones. when tubing of large diameter or thin wall is to be cut, it is often better not to attempt to break it in the usual way, but to heat a very small globule of glass (1/16 to 1/8 inch diameter) to red heat, and touch it to the scratch. this will usually start the crack around the tube; if it has not proceeded far enough, or has not gone in the desired direction, it may be led along with a hot point of glass. this is put a little beyond the end of the crack, and as the latter grows out toward it, moved along the path where the crack is desired. this point of glass is also very useful in breaking off very short ends of tubes, where there is not room to get a firm enough hold and sufficient leverage to break the tube in the ordinary way, and for breaking tubes attached to large or heavy objects, which would be likely to make trouble if treated in the ordinary way. another way of cutting large tubing, especially if it has rather thick walls, is to make a scratch in the usual way, and then turn on the smallest and sharpest possible flame of the blast lamp. the tube is next taken in both hands and held horizontally above the flame so that the scratch is exactly over it. the tubing is now rotated rapidly about its axis, and lowered so that the flame is just tangent to its lower side. after about ten seconds of heating, it is removed from the flame and the hot portion quickly breathed upon, when it will generally crack apart very nicely. care must be taken to hold the tube at right angles to the flame during the heating, and to rotate it so that only a narrow strip of the circumference is heated, and the scratch should be in the center of this heated strip. by this means tubing as large as two inches in diameter is readily broken. griffin's glass cutter, which contains a hardened steel wheel, like that on any ordinary window-glass cutter, and a device by which this can be made to make a true cut clear around the tube, is a very handy article, especially for large tubing, and may be obtained from any dealers in chemical apparatus. =bending glass.=--inasmuch as this is one of the commonest operations in the laboratory, it is assumed that the reader knows how to perform it. however, it should be noted that in order to obtain the best results a broad (fish-tail burner) flame should generally be used, and the tube rotated on its axis during the heating, and allowed to bend mostly by its own weight. if large tubing is to be bent, one end must be stoppered and great care used. whenever the tube shows signs of collapsing or becoming deformed, it must be gently blown out into shape, heating the desired spot locally if necessary. a blast-lamp is likely to be more useful here than the fish-tail burner. =drawing out a tube.=--most students learn this the first day of their laboratory work in chemistry, but few take pains to do it well. the tube should be heated in the flame of a bunsen burner, or blast lamp (preferably the latter) until it is very soft. during this time it must be continuously rotated about its axis, and so held that the edges of the heated zone are sharply defined; _i.e._, it should not be allowed to move back and forth along its own axis. when so hot that it cannot longer be held in shape, the tube is removed from the flame, and the ends slowly and regularly drawn apart, _continuing the rotation of the tube about its axis_. by regulating the rate of drawing and the length of tube heated, the desired length and diameter of capillary may be obtained. the tube should always be rotated and kept in a straight line until the glass has set, so that the capillary may have the same axis as the main tube. this capillary or "tail" is often a very necessary handle in glass-blowing, and if it is not straight and true, will continually make trouble. in drawing out very large tubing, say from one to two inches in diameter, it is often necessary to draw the tube _in the flame_, proceeding very slowly and at a lower temperature than would be used with small tubing. this is partly on account of the difficulty of heating large tubing uniformly to a high temperature, and partly in order to prevent making the conical part of the tube too thin for subsequent operations. =constricting a tube.=--where a constriction is to be made in a tube, the above method must be modified, as the strength of the tube must be maintained, and the constricted portion is usually short. small tubes are often constricted without materially changing their outside diameter, by a process of thickening the walls. the tube is heated before the blast lamp, rotating it about its axis as later described, and as it softens is gradually pushed together so as to thicken the walls at the heated point, as in _a_, fig. 1. when this operation has proceeded far enough, the tube is removed from the flame, and the ends cautiously and gently drawn apart, continuing the rotation of the tube about its axis and taking care not to draw too rapidly at first. the resulting tube should have a uniform exterior diameter, as shown in _b_, fig. 1. [illustration: fig. 1.--constricting a tube.] this method of constriction is not suited to tubes much over 1/4 inch in diameter, since the mass of glass in the constricted part becomes so thick as to be difficult to handle when hot, and likely to crack on cooling. larger tubes are therefore constricted by heating in a narrow flame, with constant rotation, and when soft, alternately gently pulling the ends apart and pushing them together, each motion being so regulated that the diameter of a short section of the tube is gradually reduced, while the thickness of the wall of the reduced portion remains the same as that of the rest of the tube, or increases only slightly. this pulling and pushing of the glass takes place _in the flame_, while the rotation is being continued regularly. the result may appear as indicated in _c_, fig. 1. the strength of the work depends upon the thickness of the walls of the constricted portion, which should never be less than that in the main tube, and usually a little greater. this operation is most successful with tubing having a relatively thin wall. =flanging a tube.=--this operation produces the characteristic flange seen on test-tubes, necks of flasks, etc., the object being twofold: to finish the end neatly and to strengthen it so that a cork may be inserted without breaking it. this flanging may be done in several ways. in any case the first operation is to cut the tube to a square end, and then heat this end so that the extreme sixteenth or eighth of an inch of it is soft and begins to shrink. the tube is of course rotated during this heating, which should take place in a flame of slightly greater diameter than the tube, if possible. the flange is now produced by expanding this softened part with some suitable tool. a cone of charcoal has been recommended for this purpose, and works fairly well, if made so its height is about equal to the diameter of its base. the tube is rotated and the cone, held in the other hand, is pressed into the open end until the flange is formed. a pyramid with eight or ten sides would probably be better than the cone. [illustration: fig. 2.--flanging tool.] a better flanging tool is made from a triangular piece of copper or brass, about 1/16 inch thick, and mounted in a suitable handle. such a tool is shown in fig. 2, being cut from a sheet of copper and provided with a handle made by wrapping asbestos paper moistened with sodium silicate solution about the shank of the tool. it is well to have several sizes and shapes of these tools, for different sizes of tubing. the two sizes most used will be those having about the following dimensions: (1) _a_ = 2 inches, _b_ = 1 inch; (2) _a_ = 1 inch, _b_ = 1 inch. when the end of the tube is softened, the tool is inserted at an angle, as indicated in fig. 3, and pressed against the soft part, while the tube is quickly rotated about its axis. if the flange is insufficient the operation may be repeated. the tool should always be warmed in the flame before use, and occasionally greased by touching it to a piece of wax or paraffin. after the flange is complete, the end must be heated again to the softening temperature and cooled slowly, to prevent it from cracking. [illustration: fig. 3.--flanging a tube with flanging tool.] [illustration: fig. 4.--flanging a tube with carbon rod or wire.] some glass-blowers use a small carbon rod, about 3/16 inch in diameter, as a flanging tool for tubes larger than about 3/8 inch diameter, and a small iron wire or similar piece of metal for smaller tubes. in this case the tube is heated as above described, and the rod or wire inserted in the end at an angle and pressed against the softened part, as indicated in fig. 4, while the tube is rotated about its axis. for large heavy tubes a larger carbon would be used. =rotation of the tube.=--this is the fundamental manipulation in glass-blowing, and upon it more than all else depends the uniformity and finish of the work, and often the possibility of accomplishing the work at all. directions for it will be given on the assumption that the reader is right-handed; if otherwise, the position of the hands is of course reversed. the object of rotation is to insure even heating of the whole circumference of the tube at the point of attack, to equalize the effect of gravity on the hot glass and prevent it from falling out of shape when soft, and to keep the parts of the tube on each side of the heated portion in the same straight line. in rotating the tube, both hands must be used, so that the two ends may revolve at the same rate and the glass in the hot part not be twisted. the rotation is performed by the thumb and first finger of each hand, the other fingers serving to support the tube. as it is almost always necessary to follow rotating and heating a tube by blowing it, the hands should be so placed that it will be easy to bring the right-hand end up to the mouth without shifting the hold on the glass. for this reason the left hand grasps the glass with the palm down, and the right hand with the palm turned toward the left. if there is any choice, the longer and heavier part of the tube is usually given to the left hand, and it is planned to blow into the shorter end. this is because it is easier to support the tube with the hand which has the palm down. this support is accomplished by bending the hand at the wrist so that it points slightly downward, and then curling the second, third and little fingers in under the tube, which is held between them and the palm. this support should be loose enough so that the thumb and first finger can easily cause the tube to rotate regularly on its axis, but firm enough to carry all the weight of the tube, leaving the thumb and first finger nothing to do but rotate it. the hand must be so turned, and the other fingers so bent, that the thumb and first finger stretch out nearly to their full length to grasp the tube comfortably. the right hand is held with the palm toward the left, the fingers except the first slightly bent, and the tube held between the first finger and the thumb while it rests on the second finger and that portion of the hand between the base of the first finger and the thumb. rotation of the tube is accomplished by rolling it between the thumbs and first fingers: the rotation being continued in the same direction regularly, and not reversed. it is better to roll slowly and evenly, with a series of light touches, each of which moves the tube a little, than to attempt to turn the tube a half a revolution or so with each motion of the hands. the hands must be held steady, and the tube must be under good control at all times, so that both ends may be rotated at the same angular velocity, even though they may be of different diameters, and the tube be neither drawn apart nor pushed together unless such a motion is expressly desired, as it sometimes is. the hot part of the glass must be constantly watched to see that it is uniformly rotated and not twisted, nor pulled out or pushed together more than is desired. care must also be taken to keep the parts of the tube in the same straight line, or as near it as possible, during the heating and all other manipulations. when flanging a tube, it is held and rotated with the left hand as above described, while the right hand holds the flanging tool. when part of the end of a tube must be heated, as in exercise 6, and rotation must be very carefully performed and continued during the blowing, both hands are used. the right hand is held as above described, and the left hand close to it and either as above described or else with the palm toward the right, grasping the tube in the same way as the right hand does. this puts both hands in a position where the tube may be blown and rotated uniformly while its axis is kept horizontal. smoothness and exactness are the two things for which the beginner must constantly strive in glass-blowing, and they are only attained by a careful attention to the details of manipulation, with a steady hand and watchful eye. every move must count, and the exercise must be finished with a minimum of reheating and retouching, for the best results. chapter iii elementary exercises exercise no. 1 joining two pieces of tubing, end to end--first method this exercise is most easily learned on tubing with an exterior diameter of 1/4 inch, or a little less, having moderately heavy walls. a piece of such tubing is heated before the blow-pipe at a point ten or twelve inches from the end, and there drawn out to a capillary as previously described (page 9). the capillary is sealed off about two inches from the main tube, and the latter is cut near the middle. care should be taken to get square ends where the cut is made (page 7). the flame is now so regulated that it is a little broader than the diameter of the tube, the sealed half of the tube taken in the left hand and the other half in the right. the open end of the sealed part and one of the ends of the other part are now held in opposite sides of the flame, inclined at a slight angle to one another as indicated in fig. 5, and rotated and heated until the surfaces of both ends are just softened. the two ends are then carefully and quickly brought together (_a_, fig. 6), removed from the flame and pulled apart a little, to reduce the lump formed at the joint as much as possible, as indicated in _b_. the joint is then tested by blowing into the open end of the tube to see if it is tight. if so, the flame is reduced to half or less than half of its former size, and the joint heated in it, holding the tube and continually rotating it as directed in the last chapter (page 13). [illustration: fig. 5.--softening ends of two pieces of tubing.] [illustration: fig. 6.--joining two pieces of tubing end to end--first method.] as the tube softens and tends to shrink, the two ends are pressed together a little and the walls allowed to thicken slightly, as in _c_. it is then quickly removed from the flame and gently blown as indicated in _d_, continuing the rotation of the tube during the blowing, and at the same time pressing the ends of the tube together a little so as to make a _short_ thick-walled bulb. the joint is then returned to the flame and reheated, rotating as before, shrinking to about the shape of _e_. when this stage is reached, the glass should be very hot and fluid, and the mass of hot glass thick enough to remain at its working temperature for about five seconds after removal from the flame. the glass is now reblown as indicated in _f_, to form a bulb having walls of practically the same thickness as the original tube. as soon as the bulb is blown, the tube is removed from the mouth, held horizontally in front of the worker, and gently drawn out to form one continuous tube, as indicated in _g_. during both the blowing and drawing of this bulb the rotation must be continued, and both blowing and drawing must be carefully regulated so that the resulting tube may have the same internal and external diameter at the joint as elsewhere. =discussion.=--in making the original joint, (_a_, fig. 6), care should be taken that the lump formed is as small as possible so that it may be entirely removed during the subsequent operations. for this reason, only the very tip ends of the two pieces of tubing are held in the flame, and the softening should not extend more than 1/16 inch down the tube. as soon as the ends are sufficiently soft to stick together, they are made to do so. the first drawing of the tube (_b_) should take place immediately, and reduce the lump as much as possible without making the adjacent walls of the tube thin. the whole purpose of the rest of the manipulation is to absorb or "iron out" the lump at the joint. for this reason, care is taken that this lump is always in the center of the flame while the joint is being heated, and a small flame is used so that little of the main tube may be softened. during the first shrinking of the joint (_c_) the walls next the lump, being thinner than it is, reach the softening temperature first and are thickened by the slight pushing together of the ends, so that they taper from the lump to the unchanged wall. upon blowing this joint, these thickened walls blow out with the lump, but as they are thinnest next the unchanged tube, they stiffen there first. then as the thicker parts are still hot, these blow out more, and with the lump make a more or less uniform wall. by this first operation most of the lump will have been removed, provided it was not too large at first, and the tube was hot enough when it was blown. beginners almost invariably have the glass too cool here, and find difficulty in blowing out a satisfactory bulb. under such circumstances the lump will be scarcely affected by the operation. during the shrinking of this bulb, the thinner parts of course are the first to reach the softening point, and thus contract more than the thick parts, so that practically all of the lump can be absorbed, and a uniformly thickened part of the tube left as in _e_. when this is just accomplished, the second bulb must be blown during one or two seconds, and the tube then drawn out as described, so as to change the bulb to a tube. the drawing must proceed with care: portions nearest the unchanged tubes are the first to reach the proper diameter, and must be given time to just set at that point before the center of the bulb is finally drawn into shape. the drawing is perhaps best done intermittently in a series of quick pulls, each drawing the tube perhaps 1/16 inch, and each taking place as the thumbs and first fingers grasp the tube for a new turn in the rotation. if the tube is not rotated during the blowing, the bulbs will be lop-sided and it will be impossible to get a joint of uniform wall-thickness; if rotation is omitted during the drawing, the tube will almost invariably be quite crooked. if the lump still shows distinctly after the operations described, the cross-section of the tube will be as in _h_, and the tube will be likely to break if ever reheated at this point after it becomes cold. the operations _d_, _e_, _f_, and _g_ may be repeated upon it, and it may be possible to get it to come out all right. care must be taken not to blow the bulbs _d_ and _f_ too thin as they then become very difficult to handle, and the joint is usually spoiled. the wall-thickness of these bulbs must never be much less than that of the original tube. if the joint as completed has thinner walls than the rest of the tube, it will be more easily broken. it should be remembered that the length of the finished tube must be exactly the same as that of the original piece, if the walls of the joint are to be of their original thickness. therefore the pushing together during the two operations _c_ and _d_ must shorten the tube just as much as the final drawing (_f_ to _g_) lengthens it. the interval between the removal of the work from the flame and the beginning of the blowing must be made as short as possible, or else the portions next the main parts of the tube will set before they can be blown out, and cause irregular shrunken areas. exercise no. 2 joining two tubes end to end--second method the method described in exercise no. 1 is very satisfactory for joining short lengths of straight tubing, but becomes inconvenient or impossible when the pieces are long or bent, on account of the difficulty in uniformly rotating such work. in such cases, this second method is used. it does not usually give as smooth and pretty a joint as the first method, and takes a little longer. the joint is begun exactly as in the first method, and the manipulation is the same until after the preliminary tight joint (_b_, fig. 6) is made. the flame is reduced as usual, but instead of rotating the tube in the flame, only one part of the circumference is heated, and this is allowed to shrink thoroughly before blowing. it is then blown gently so that it becomes a slight swelling on the tube, and the operation repeated on an adjoining part of the joint. three or four repetitions of the operation will usually cover the whole circumference of the joint, in a small tube, the result being a swelling roughly similar to the first thick bulb in the first method (_d_, fig. 6). if all the lumps of the original joint have not been removed by this operation, it may now be repeated upon such parts as may require it. the thickness of the wall in the bulb should be about the same as that in the original tube. the whole of the expanded joint is now heated as uniformly as may be until soft enough so that it begins to shrink a little, and the swelling is gently drawn down to the same diameter as the main tube, as in the first case. any irregularities in the finished joint may be corrected by local reheating, shrinking or blowing as required. =discussion.=--in using this method, especially with larger sizes of tubing, it is very important to keep the whole circumference of the joint hot enough during the operation so that it does not crack apart at the part which has not yet been worked. for that reason the first heating, shrinking and blowing should be performed as quickly as possible, leaving the resulting irregularities to be corrected later, rather than attempting to reblow the same part of the joint several times in succession until it is satisfactory. care must be taken in this as in the first method that the blowing follows immediately upon the completion of the shrinking and removal of the object from the flame: delay in blowing will cause shrunken places where the joint meets the original tubes, on account of the cooling and setting of the glass before it was blown. most beginners err in being afraid to shrink the part of the joint enough before blowing it. on small tubing, the shrinkage may often extend so far that the inner surface of the shrunken part reaches the center of the tube. insufficient shrinking results in failure to remove the lump formed at the original joint. it is often of advantage, after blowing out part of the joint, to allow that part a few seconds to set before going on with the rest, keeping the whole joint warm meanwhile in or near the smoky flame. this helps to prevent the twisting of the joint, or other distortion incident to the handling of a piece of work of awkward shape. in making a joint on a very long or heavy piece by this method, it is often advantageous to attach a piece of rubber tubing to the open end, hold the other end of this tubing in the mouth during the process, and blow through it, rather than attempt to bring the end of the glass up to the mouth. this enables one to keep closer watch on the joint, and avoid drawing it out or distorting it in handling. on the other hand, the rubber tube is an inconvenience on account of its weight and the consequent pull on the end of the apparatus, and makes rotation difficult. exercise no. 3 the "tee" tube the operations involved are two: the blowing of a short side tube on a piece of tubing, and sealing another piece of tubing on this, by what is essentially the second method as just described. [illustration: fig. 7.--the "tee" tube.] the two pieces of tubing to be used each have one end cut square and the other sealed in the usual manner. the longer of the two is now heated at the point at which the joint is to be made, until it begins to color the flame. a small flame is used, and the tube rotated until the flame begins to be colored, when the rotation is stopped, and only one spot heated until a spot the diameter of the tube to be sealed on has become red hot and begun to shrink. this is now gently blown out into a small bulb, as in _a_, fig. 7, and it will be noted that this bulb will have walls tapering from the thick walls of the tube to a very thin wall at the top. the sides of this bulb, below the dotted line, are to form the small side tube to which the main side tube is to be sealed. the top of the bulb is now softened by directing a small flame directly upon it, and as soon as it shrinks to the level indicated by the dotted line, it is removed from the flame and quickly blown out to form a thin bulb, as indicated in _b_, fig. 7. this will usually be so very thin that a stroke of the file or glass-knife will break it off at the dotted line, leaving the side tube, to which the short piece of tubing is now sealed according to the second method (exercise no 2). in doing this, care is taken to direct the flame partly on the main tube in the two crotches, so that both tubes blow out a little and give space for the gases to turn in, as indicated in _c_, fig. 7, and at the same time increase the mechanical strength of the job. on the other hand, care is taken not to deform the main tube, and not to produce such a bulge or bulb at the joint as will prevent the finished tube from lying flat on a table. =discussion.=--most beginners tend to err in the first steps of this operation, by blowing too hard and too long when blowing out the little bulb. the result is a large, very thin bulb, which breaks off in such a way as to leave a hole in the main tube, occupying nearly half the circumference of the tube at that point, instead of the neat side tube which they should have. it is not difficult to seal a tube on this side tube, but it is very difficult to seal a tube into a hole in another tube. care should be taken here, as in the two previous exercises, that the lump obtained at the joint when the two tubes are put together is made as small as possible, and reduced if possible by gently drawing on the side tube as soon as the tubes have actually joined. it is much easier to prevent the formation of a lump at the joint than it is to remove the lump after it is formed. the remarks previously made about blowing quickly after removing the work from the flame apply here with especial force. a "tee" tube, from its very nature, is exposed to a good many strains, so care must be taken that the walls of the joint are of uniform thickness with the rest of the tube. the beginner will find it easiest to make this tube out of two pieces of the same tube, about 1/4 inch in diameter. larger or smaller tubing is usually more difficult. if tubing much more than 1/4 inch is used, the whole joint, including part of the main tube, must be heated nearly to the softening point at the close of the operation, and well annealed, as described in chapter 1 (page 3) or it will be almost certain to crack. in the larger sizes of tube it will be necessary to heat the whole circumference of the main tube frequently during the operation, to prevent it from cracking. in sealing a small tube on the side of a large one, it is usually advisable, after warming the spot where the joint is to be made, to attach a small drop of glass to the tube at that point, and direct the flame upon that, thus supplying at the same time both a definite point to be heated and an extra supply of glass for the little side tube which is desired. in this way it is also easier to blow out a side tube with a sufficiently small diameter. if the diameter of this tube should be much greater than that of the small tube, the latter may be enlarged with a carbon or a flanging tool. exercise no. 4 to join two tubes of different diameters in this case the first method (exercise no. 1) is to be used whenever possible, as it gives a much smoother joint than the second method. the directions given will describe the adaptation of this method to the problem: if the second method must be used on account of awkward shape, etc., of the work, the modifications required will be obvious to any one who has learned to make the joint by the first method. after sealing or corking one end of the larger tube, the other end is drawn out to form a tail as described on page 9, taking care to have the tube uniformly heated, and to draw the tail rapidly enough so that the cone is short, as indicated in _a_, fig. 8. the tube is now rotated, a small flame directed against the cone at right angles to an element of it, and it is allowed to shrink a little, as indicated in _b_, fig. 8, so that its walls will thicken. when the tail is cut off, at the dotted line, the diameter of the opening and the thickness of the walls at that point should correspond with the dimensions of the tube to be sealed on. as the glass is hot, the scratch for cutting it must be made with a file (moisten the edge!), and it often will not break square across. before proceeding to seal on the small tube, any large projections on the cut end are best removed, by warming the cut surface a little, directing the small flame upon each projection in turn and touching it with a warm scrap of glass. it will adhere to this and may then be removed by rotating this scrap a little so as to wind up the projection on it, and then drawing it off, while the flame is still playing on the spot. this must be done rapidly and care taken not to soften the main part of the cone. [illustration: fig. 8.--joining two tubes of different diameters.] the large tube is now taken in the left hand, the small one in the right, the ends heated and joined in the usual manner, taking care not to get any larger lump at the joint than necessary. a small flame is now directed on the cone at right angles to its elements as before, and the tube rotated so as to heat the whole circumference. the flame should be just large enough to heat the whole of the cone. as the latter shrinks, the lump at the joint is brought into the edge of the flame, and it and a very little of the small tube allowed to shrink with the cone. when well shrunk and heated to blowing temperature the joint is removed from the flame and blown gently with careful rotation, pushing the tubes together a little when the blowing is about finished, so that the cone becomes a short thick half-bulb, as shown in _d_, fig. 8. this corresponds to the first thick bulb in the first method (_d_, fig. 6), and is treated similarly. it is again heated and shrunk, taking care not to involve either the large tube or the small one in the shrinking, blown quickly to about the same shape as before, (_d_, fig. 8), and then gently drawn out into a smooth cone (_e_), exactly as in the first exercise. care should be taken not to draw too rapidly or too far, as then the resulting cone (_f_) is weaker than it should be, and does not look well. =discussion.=--the beginner will find that this operation is best learned on two tubes which are not too nearly of the same diameter. a tube about 5/8 inch in diameter and one a little less than 1/4 inch will be suitable. both should have moderately heavy walls (1/16 inch or a trifle over for the large tube, and a trifle less for the small one) but the large tube should not be too heavy or else it will be hard to prevent melting down too much of the small tube, and getting this drawn out too thin during the process. one of the troublesome features of this exercise is the difficulty of rotating two tubes of different diameters with the same angular velocity, so as not to twist the joint. another difficulty is found in getting the cone uniformly heated to blowing temperature without overheating and overshrinking the small tube. the reason for this is obviously the much greater circumference of the cone, especially at its large end, so that relatively much less of it is being heated at any time. the beginner is also inclined to start with too long a cone, or else heat so much of the large tube that part of its glass is included in the cone, with the result that in order to get the right wall-thickness the cone must be made too long (_g_, fig. 8). this does not look well, and usually will be irregular in shape. exercise no. 5 tube for condensing sulphur dioxide this is useful as a test of mastery of the preceding exercise. a piece of 3/16 or 7/32 inch tubing is joined to each end of a piece of tubing 5/8 by about 5 inches, and two constrictions made in the large tube, by the method described on page 10. the small tubes are then bent in the same plane, as shown, and their ends fire-polished (fig. 9). [illustration: fig. 9.--tube for condensing sulphur dioxide.] exercise no. 6 bulb at the end of a tube for this exercise tubing of 1/4 inch diameter and moderately strong walls is selected. a tail is drawn out on one end of the tube, and a piece of tubing about nine or ten inches long is cut off. the tail should be carefully drawn in the axis of the tube, and in the same straight line with it, as it is to be used as a handle in assembling the glass for the bulb. this tail must be long enough so that it can be conveniently held in the left hand, as described on page 13, and rotated about the same axis as the main tube. holding the main tube in the right hand and the tail in the left, the tube is rotated in a large flame so that a piece of it, beginning where the tail stops and extending about an inch to the right, may be uniformly heated to the highest temperature at which it can be kept in shape. as soon as this temperature is reached, the tube is removed from the flame, continuing the rotation and taking care not to draw out the heated part, and gently blown. the rotation is carefully continued during the blowing, holding the tube in approximately a horizontal position. as soon as the tube has expanded a little the tail is pushed gently toward the main tube, continuing the gentle blowing. if this is properly done, the heated piece of tube will become a short bulb of about double its original diameter, and about the same wall thickness as the original tube. it will have somewhat the appearance of _a_, fig. 10, when properly manipulated. [illustration: fig. 10.--blowing a bulb on the end of a tube.] the tube is now reheated as before, taking care this time that the heating extends over all that part of the bulb to the right of the dotted line in the figure, as well as part of the main tube adjoining. if this heating has been properly placed, when the operation of blowing and pushing together is repeated the result will be to lengthen the bulb into a uniform cylinder, as shown in _b_, fig. 10. otherwise the result will be a series of bulbs, as in _c_, fig. 10, separated by thickened ridges which will be almost impossible of removal later and will disfigure the final bulb. this operation of heating, blowing and pushing together is repeated several times, until the cylinder becomes as long as can be conveniently handled (about 1-1/4 inches to 1-1/2 inches). if more glass is needed than is then contained in the cylinder, the latter may now be heated as a whole, and blown and pushed gently into a shorter cylinder of a slightly greater diameter, and more glass then added as before. when enough glass has been collected for the bulb, it is all well heated and blown gently a couple of times, pushing the mass together as required, until a thick bulb like _d_, fig. 10, is obtained. the tail must now be removed at the point indicated by the dotted line. to do this, a very fine flame is directed on the point where the tail joins the bulb, and the tube well rotated as the glass softens at that point. when sufficiently soft, the work is raised a little, so that the flame instead of striking the glass squarely at the point indicated passes below and tangential to it. the tail is now drawn off slowly, continuing the rotation, raising the work just out of the flame whenever the thread of glass drawn off becomes too thin, and lowering it again to the point where the flame just touches it when the glass stiffens a little. by this means the tail may be drawn off without leaving an appreciable lump behind, as indicated in _e_ and _f_, fig. 10. when as much of the extra glass has been removed as is practicable, the flame is brought to play squarely upon the little lump left, the last of the tail removed, and the lump heated and gently blown to a small excrescence on the main bulb. the whole end of the latter is now heated until it begins to shrink a little, and gently blown to make it uniform in thickness. the whole bulb is then heated in a flame of the proper size, so that it all may shrink to about two-thirds of its diameter. the flame must be very carefully chosen and directed, so as to shrink all the bulb, right up to the main tube, but not soften the latter. as soon as this stage is reached, the bulb is removed from the flame, continuing the even rotation, and blown to the desired size, preferably by a series of gentle puffs following one another at very short intervals. during the blowing, the main tube is held in a horizontal position, and any tendency of the bulb to fall out of line is corrected by the rotation. if the shape of the bulb or its size are not satisfactory, it may be shrunk again and reblown. such shrinking should begin in a large yellow flame, with just enough air to give it direction. the amount of air may be gradually increased as the bulb shrinks and the walls become thick enough to bear it without collapsing. if the bulb starts to collapse at any time, it must be immediately blown enough to regain its convex surface, before the shrinking proceeds further. =discussion.=--in collecting the glass for the bulb, enough must be gathered to give the walls the desired strength. since the area of a sphere is proportional to the cube of its diameter, it is evident that doubling the size of a bulb diminishes the thickness of its walls to a very large extent. the limit of diameter for a strong bulb on ordinary 1/4-inch tubing, collecting the glass as above, is about 1-1/2 inches, and the beginner will do well not to blow his bulbs more than an inch in diameter. the collection of the glass is one of the most important parts of the process. if the mass of glass be twisted, furrowed or ridged, or lop-sided, it is very difficult to get a good, even, spherical bulb, no matter how many times it is shrunk and blown. the greatest care should therefore be taken to get a uniform cylinder, on the same axis as the main tube; and to this end the rotation of the tube must be carried on very evenly. for method of holding the tube, see page 14. if a very large bulb is required, it will often be economical to seal on the end of the tube a short piece of a large tube, provided with the proper tail, and use the glass in the large tube for the bulb instead of attempting to collect it from the small tube. in this case part of the small tube will usually be included in the bulb, so that the joint comes in the latter, and not where it joins the tube. as the amount of glass carried on the end of the tube increases in weight and size the difficulties of heating it uniformly, keeping it in the proper position and handling it increase rapidly. in collecting glass, it is usually best not to leave the part of the cylinder next the tube with too thick walls. this is always the coolest part during the preparation for blowing the bulb, consequently it does not get blown out, and causes an ugly thickened appearance on that end of the bulb. if the bulb grows too long or pear-shaped, it may be easily shortened by heating to the blowing temperature, and then blowing gently with the main tube in a vertical position, and the bulb at the top of it. gravity will then shorten the bulb nicely. the finished bulb should be a nearly perfect sphere, with the axis of the tube passing through its center, and the portion of the tube adjoining the bulb must not be distorted, twisted, or blown out. in order to prevent the distortion of the tube, care must be taken that it is never heated quite to its softening point during the process. exercise no. 7 blowing a bulb in a tube the tube is selected and one end closed as in the previous exercise, but it should be cut a little longer, say about twelve inches. beginning at a point about four inches from the closed end, glass is collected and blown into a thick-walled bulb, exactly as in the previous exercise. greater care must be taken, however, that the cylinder collected and this thick bulb are of uniform thickness and set squarely in the axis of the tube. instead of removing the tail, the bulb must be blown in this case with both pieces of tubing attached, and care must be taken that they "line up" properly, _i.e._, are in the same straight line, and that this line passes as near as may be through the center of the bulb. the tube is held in approximately horizontal position during the blowing of the bulb, as in the previous case, and especial care taken with the rotation. both pieces of tube must of course be rotated at the same rate, and their softened ends must be kept at exactly the proper distance from each other, so that the bulb may be spherical and not elongated. if the blowing of the bulb be quickly and accurately done, it may usually be completed before the glass is quite set, and the alignment of the two tubes may then be rectified while looking straight through the bore of the tube. =discussion.=--the two points of greatest importance are the collection of the glass, and the uniform rotation of the tube. a larger tube may be sealed in the middle of a small one when a large amount of glass is necessary. the piece of tubing used for the exercise must be long enough so that the fingers may be kept on a cool part of the glass without getting uncomfortably near the ends of the tube. it should not be any longer than necessary, however, as the extra weight and length make the manipulation of the hot glass more difficult. when a string of bulbs are required on the same tube, a piece of glass 18 inches long may be used at the start, and the first bulb made near the closed end, as described. each succeeding bulb will then be in plain view during the blowing, and when the open end becomes too short for comfort, it may be dried out, cut off, and another piece joined to it, starting as in the first method (exercise no. 1), but instead of drawing out the thick bulb to a tube, it is made part of the glass collected for the next bulb. if the string of bulbs becomes awkward to handle on account of its length and weight, it may be made in several parts and these later sealed together by the second method, preferably blowing through a rubber tube attached to the open end, as described on page 22. very neat small bulbs may be made on tubing of a diameter of 3/16 inch or a little less, but the beginner is advised to start with tubing of about 1/4 inch diameter. the use of tubing with too thick walls usually produces bulbs which are thick-walled at the point where they leave the tube, but inclined to be too thin at the point of maximum diameter (perpendicular to the axis of the tube) where most of the strain comes and strength is particularly needed. chapter iv advanced exercises exercise no. 8 sealing a tube through another tube _first method--making a gas-washing tube_ this first method can be used whenever one can work through an open end opposite to the end of the tube where the joint is to be made. to illustrate it, take a piece of rather thin-walled tubing, about 3/4 inch in diameter, and some pieces of rather strong tubing a little less than 1/4 inch in diameter. draw off the large tube in a short cone, then draw off the tail as in the making of the bulb on the end of the tube, blow out the little lump slightly, shrink the whole cone a little and blow gently to form a rounded end like that on a test-tube, with walls about the thickness of those of the rest of the tube. cut this tube to a suitable length, say about six inches, and provide two corks which will fit the open end of it. now cut a piece of the small tubing of the proper length to form the piece which is to be inside the large tube. for practice purposes, this piece should be about an inch shorter than the large tube. flange one end of this tube a little, and anneal the flange well in the smoky flame. bore one of the corks so that a piece of the small tubing will fit it, and cut a couple of notches in the side of this cork so that air can pass between it and the glass. pass a short piece of the small tubing through this cork, and attach the flanged piece of small tube to this by means of a short piece of rubber tubing, so that when the whole is inserted in the large tube it is arranged as in _a_, fig. 11. the piece of glass tubing projecting out through the cork is now cut off so as to leave an end about 1/2 inch long when the cork is firmly seated and the inner tube pushed into contact with the center of the end of the large tube, as shown in the drawing. care should be taken that the little rubber tube which joins the two pieces is arranged as in the figure; _i.e._, most of it on the piece of tubing which passes through the cork, and very little on the other piece, so that when the cork is removed after the small tube has been sealed through the large one, the rubber tube may easily come with it. select a short piece of the small tubing of suitable length for the piece which is to be on the outside of the large tube as a continuation of the piece inside, and another piece for the delivery tube. a small bulb may be blown in the latter at a point about 2-1/2 inches from the closed end, and the open end cut off about 1-1/2 inches from the bulb. a cork or cork-boring of suitable size to stopper the small tube is prepared, and laid ready with the other (unbored) cork for the large tube. [illustration: fig. 11.--gas-washing tube.] when everything is in readiness, the rounded end of the large tube is slowly heated until it softens and joins firmly to the small tube inside. after it has shrunk down well, it is blown out to its original size, placing the whole end of the large tube, cork and all, in the mouth. now with a fine-pointed flame the glass covering the end of the small tube is heated to the softening temperature, and then is blown out to an excrescence by blowing on the end of the small tube which passes through the cork. the end of this excrescence is heated and blown off in the usual way, so as to leave the small tube sealed on the inside of the large one and opening through it into this short tube which has been blown out. the end of the small tube which passes through the cork is now closed with the cork prepared for it, and the short outer tube is joined to the tube that has just been blown out, so that the joint appears like _b_, fig. 11. use the first method (exercise no. 1) for this joint. reheat the whole of the end of the tube nearly to the softening temperature, anneal it a little, and allow to cool a few seconds until well set. now remove the cork, short glass tube and rubber tube from the open end of the large tube and insert the solid cork in their place. warm the joint and the whole of that end of the tube again carefully up to about the softening point, then seal on the side tube for the delivery of the gas in the usual way, taking care that the whole of the end and the joint are kept warm meanwhile. when thoroughly sealed, the delivery tube is bent up parallel to the tube through which the gas enters, and then out at right angles to it, as shown in _c_. the whole of the end of the tube is now cautiously reheated and then cooled slowly to anneal it. the cork may now be removed from the open end of the large tube, this end heated in a large flame, caught together with a scrap of glass tubing and drawn off into a cone so that the base of the cone is about opposite the end of the inner tube. the lump of glass is drawn off the point of this cone and it is reblown to form a rounded end, as previously described. after this cools, the tube through which the gas enters may be heated at the proper point and bent at right angles to form the finished apparatus as shown in _d_. the ends of the small tube are cut off square and fire-polished. =discussion.=--after the joint has once been made, great care must be taken that it is kept hot during all the subsequent manipulations, and if it becomes somewhat cool at any time it must be reheated very slowly. it is obvious that the rate of heating and cooling of the inner tube will be slower than that of the outer tube, and this will readily produce stresses which tend to crack the tube at the joint. the amount of heating and cooling which such a joint will stand depends upon its form. the beginner should examine such a joint on regular factory-made apparatus, and note the uniformity of wall-thickness and the "clean-cut" appearance of the joint, as a model for his imitation. a ragged joint, where the line of joining of the inner and outer tubes wavers instead of going squarely around the tube, is almost sure to crack during the cooling and heating unless extra precautions are taken with it. the presence of a small lump of glass at any point on the joint affords an excellent starting place for a crack, as do also the points on a ragged joint where the inner tube comes farther down on the outer tube than at other points. in order to insure a joint which is square and not ragged, it is essential that the angle between the inner and outer tubes at the joint be very nearly a right angle. for this reason the two tubes should not be of too near the same size, or if this cannot be avoided, a small bulb should be blown on the end where the joint is to be made. if this bulb be made with the same wall-thickness as the rest of the tube, and somewhat pear-shaped, it may be drawn out to the same size as the rest of the tube, if necessary, after the joint has been made. this method is used wherever possible in preference to the second method (exercise no. 9), as it is easier to get a good joint with it. it may also be used where it is desired to seal the tube through the side of a tube, or for a tube sealed through the wall of a bulb, as in a geissler potash bulb or similar apparatus. where there is not space to join the inner tube to the blowing tube by a rubber tube, this joint may be made with a small piece of gummed paper, which can readily be broken when desired. exercise no. 9 sealing a tube through another tube _second method--making a suction pump_ select a piece of tubing 3/8 to 1/2 inch in diameter, with walls about 1/16 inch or a little less in thickness, heat a place about 4 inches from one end and draw it out so that when cut off at the proper point it will look like _a_, fig. 12; the open end of the drawn out part being small enough to slip inside another piece of the original tube. a small thick-walled bulb is now blown as indicated by the dotted lines, and annealed. a piece of the original tubing is now prepared, 7 or 8 inches long, with one end cut square off and the other closed. a piece of 1/4-in tubing about 2 inches long, and drawn out at one end to a tail several inches long is also prepared, to form the inlet tube for the air. another piece of the 3/8-inch tube is prepared, about 4 inches long, and provided with a tail drawn out as indicated in _b_, so that when cut off at about 2-1/2 or 3 inches from the main tube its inner diameter may be slightly less than that of the narrowest point of the tube _a_. a small thick-walled bulb is blown at the point indicated by the dotted lines, and annealed. care must be taken in drawing the capillary and blowing the bulb in both _a_ and _b_ that the capillary tubes are in the axis of the main tube, and in the same straight line with it. [illustration: fig. 12.--suction pump.] the open end of the 8-inch piece of tube and the bulb of the piece _a_ are now warmed together, the end of the tube only moderately and the bulb to about its softening temperature. the tube _a_ is now inserted in the open end of the large tube, and the bulb softened with a suitable flame and pressed into good contact with the tube. it is then reheated, including the joint, blown a little and pulled out to form a straight tube in line with the main tube. by warming the joint a little, and proper rotation, the capillary may be brought into the same straight line with the rest of the tube. keeping this joint hot, a place about an inch from it on the tube _a_ is warmed, and the piece of 1/4-inch tubing previously prepared is sealed on at that point. the joint is then well annealed and allowed to cool. the tube _a_ is now cut at such a place that when _b_ is inserted in the open end the point will come near the end of the constriction of _a_, as shown in _c_. care is taken to get a clean square cut. the side tube is now cut off about an inch from the main tube and corked. tube _b_ is sealed into the open end of _a_, in the same way as _a_ was sealed into the large tube, and the joint carefully annealed. =discussion.=--as in the first method, the secret of success lies in getting a square joint, and having the inner tube leave the outer one at nearly right angles. all the remarks about annealing, lumps, etc., made under the previous method apply here. this method may be applied in sealing a small tube into the end of a large one, the latter being either drawn to a cone and cut off at the desired diameter, or else given a rounded end like a test-tube and a hole the proper size blown in the center of it. a suitable thick-walled bulb is to be blown on the small tube, as in the case described above. this method is also used in making the kjeldahl trap (_a_, fig. 13), the small tube to be inserted being first drawn, the thick bulb blown at its point of union with the main tube, and then the small tube bent and cut. the large bulb is best made with rather heavy wall, being either blown in the middle of a tube, and one piece of the tube drawn or cut off, or else made on the end of a tube. in the latter case a drop of glass must be put on the point where the joint is to be, so as to get a hole of the proper size with enough glass around it to prevent it from growing larger when it is heated. the author prefers to blow the bulb in the middle of the tube, draw off one end of the bulb, and blow out the desired hole where the tube was drawn off. the whole bulb must generally be reheated and blown a little at the end of the process, and well annealed. [illustration: fig. 13.--_a_, kjeldahl trap; _b_, suction pump on smaller tubing.] the suction pump can also be made on 1/4-inch tubing, and one joint saved if desired, by constricting the tube to form the raceway for the water and air, as shown in _b_, fig. 13. (see page 10 for method.) but it is more difficult to make a square joint on such small tubing. chapter v modified methods and special operations capillary tubing this is commonly used in many forms of apparatus for gas analysis, and one is often called upon to join two pieces or to make a tee on it. the methods are nearly the same as with other tubing, except that more care and patience are required. the work must be done much more slowly on account of the thickness of the walls, and open ends of the tube must always be enlarged before joining them to anything. this is best done by carefully sealing the end and then blowing, with several suitable reheatings, to form a pear-shaped bulb as in _a_, fig. 14. the end of this is then heated and blown off, and the piece is ready to be joined to another similar end, or to a piece of ordinary tubing if desired. the joints are best not blown too much, as thick walls shrink very slowly. much may be done by gently pushing the tube together or pulling it apart in the flame, to remove lumps and irregularities. it is necessary that the bore of the joint be approximately that of the main tube, and care must be taken that the latter is not constricted at the point where the joint begins. [illustration: fig. 14.--capillary tubing.] especial care must be taken to warm the tube slowly when starting and cool it slowly when through, as the thick walls frequently crack if not carefully handled. for this reason the whole neighborhood of the joint must be heated somewhat so that there may not be stresses set up between the heated and unheated portions. in making the tee (_b_, fig. 14) the inability to blow the joint makes itself decidedly felt, but if the side tube is properly enlarged as previously described, a good joint can be made by alternately pulling and pushing on the end of the side tube, and shrinking well. very fine capillary tubing should be blown with a rubber bulb instead of the mouth, so as not to get moisture into the tube. the rubber bulb may also be used to advantage on some of the coarser capillary tubing. when a bulb is to be joined to a piece of capillary tubing, the joint is preferably made before blowing the bulb, and will then be taken up a little way on the bulb during the process. care must of course be taken not to constrict the capillary; the pear-shaped bulb blown on the end (_a_, fig. 14) may well extend back a little further than usual into the tube so as to prevent this. if a bulb is required in the middle of a capillary tube, the latter is usually best cut and a piece of ordinary tubing of suitable size sealed in to provide material for the bulb. glass rod joints, tees, etc., in glass rod are made on the same principle as in tubing, except that of course they cannot be blown, and regularity must be obtained by accumulating a small mass of uniformly heated glass, and then drawing it to a suitable rod, on the same principle as exercise no. 1. great care must be taken in heating and cooling this, as in the case of the capillary tubing, and for the same reasons. by joining pieces side by side, pressing with carbon plates or a plate and a rod, and other suitable manipulations, stirrers, spatulas, and other objects may easily be made from rod, and its manipulation is relatively easy on account of the fact that one does not have to worry about the bore of the tube. but the same general rule about not having thick and thin spots in contact, and making all changes in diameter on a taper if possible instead of abruptly, applies here. thick pieces will cool and contract at different rates from thin ones, and cracks are likely to develop where they join. work which has been formed with any tool must always be heated to the softening point afterward before allowing it to cool in order to remove the stresses caused by the contact of the tool with the hot glass. when it is necessary to join a piece of rod to the side of a piece of tubing, the end of the rod is made very hot while the wall of the tube at the spot desired is heated to just below the softening temperature. the rod can then be pressed into firm union with the tube and drawn a little to remove the excess of glass without deforming the tube. mending stopcocks =mending the plug.=--the plug of the stopcock occasionally falls out and is broken. if the break is in the main part of the plug, nothing can be done except to search for a spare plug of suitable size and grind it to fit, as described below. if only the little cross-piece at the end is broken off, it can easily be replaced. in most ordinary stopcocks the plug is solid, but the little handle is hollow. what has been said above regarding care in heating and cooling glass rod applies with especial force here. it is usually best to wind the whole of the plug with several thicknesses of asbestos cord, leaving bare only the end where the handle is to be joined. this diminishes the danger of cracking the plug by too rapid heating, and also makes it more comfortable to hold. a piece of rather thick-walled tubing of suitable diameter is chosen, drawn out so as to have a suitable taper (taking care to heat enough of the tube so that the capillary tail has good wall-thickness and strength), and then a corresponding taper is drawn to form the other side of the handle. the result is shown in fig. 15, _a_. the capillary tail is now heated and bent back to form a handle which will be in the same straight line as the axis of the plug (_b_, fig. 15) and the main part of the tube drawn off at the dotted line, making a neat seal at that point. the broken end of the plug is now slowly warmed in the smoky flame, the heat gradually increased by a gentle stream of air from the bellows, and the point at which this handle is to be attached finally brought to the temperature at which the glass flows freely. in the mean time, the little handle has been warmed almost to the softening point. it is now quickly pushed into place (_c_, fig. 15), taking care that its axis is parallel to the hole in the plug, and then drawn away from the plug just enough to make a graceful neck instead of the bulging one indicated by the arrow in the figure. with a fine pointed flame the little tail is now drawn off at the point indicated by the dotted line (_c_, fig. 15) and the whole carefully annealed. if necessary, the handle can be blown a little before the tail is removed. local heating and blowing at the point where the handle joins the plug is often necessary in order to make a smooth job. [illustration: fig. 15.--stopcock plug.] =regrinding.=--this is sometimes necessary to make stopcocks tight, when the grinding has not been properly done in the factory. for this, a very little fine flour of emery or carborundum is the best and quickest. if this is not at hand, some clean sand may be ground in an agate mortar, and if possible sieved. only material which passes the 100-mesh sieve should be used. it will be ground still finer in the process. for the final polishing, a little infusorial earth or even kaolin will do. the surface to be ground is moistened with water and dusted over with a little of the abrasive. the plug is now inserted in the stopcock, and turned with a gentle pressure. this turning should be in the same direction for several revolutions, then in the opposite direction for several more revolutions, etc. as the abrasive becomes finer during the grinding, a little more may be added if necessary. in general, only a little grinding will be required, and one small pinch of carborundum or emery will be ample. the beginner usually grinds too much, and with too coarse material. as the grinding surface becomes dry, water is added drop by drop, and the grinding continued until the abrasive seems to be reduced to an impalpable powder, most of which has been squeezed out of the stopcock. the two surfaces in the stopcock are usually grinding upon each other at this stage, and inspection will show whether the contact between them is uniformly good. if not, the grinding must be continued with a little fresh abrasive. if contact appears to be good, the surfaces are ground together for a little with practically no abrasive, so as to polish them, and the joint is then washed out and tested. in grinding in a new plug to replace a broken one, the plug selected should have practically the same taper as the seat into which it is to be ground, and should be a very little too large. care must be taken to so distribute the abrasive material as to grind mostly on the places where the plug fits tightly. =sealing on a new tube.=--it frequently happens that one of the tubes of the stopcock is broken off close to the cock itself, and a new one must be joined to the stub of the old one. with care, this may often be successfully done even where the break is within 1/4 inch of the stopcock. the first step is to clean and dry the stopcock, remove the plug, cork the open ends of the stopcock sleeve and the other tube, and wind a couple of layers of asbestos cord carefully over the sleeve and the most of the corks which close it. a suitable tube, having as near as possible the same diameter and wall strength as the one broken off, is selected and a piece the desired length cut off. the broken end of the tube on the stopcock is now squared off as well as possible, by cutting or by heating and drawing off the projections, and the new tube sealed on, usually with the first method (exercise no. 1). if the break is very close to the stopcock, very little reheating and blowing can be done, on account of the danger of getting the stopcock sleeve out of shape, and the work must be heated very slowly to prevent cracking. the main reliance is then placed on making a good joint when the tubes are brought together, and then drawing out this joint a little, at once, to get an even wall. closed circuits of tubing. in some pieces of apparatus closed circuits of circular or rectangular shape are required. a similar problem is involved in apparatus like the ordinary soxhlet extractor, where a small tube is joined to the side of a large one, bent to form a siphon, and attached again to a continuation of the original large tube. the difficulty in all such cases is to provide for the contraction taking place as the last joint cools. if part of the circuit has the shape of the letter s, or is a spiral, the natural springiness of the glass will take care of this. if not, the side of the circuit opposite to the joint and parallel to it must be heated also, the two being finally heated together to the softening point after the joint is completed, and then allowed to cool together. to make the last joint, the rest of the tube is made in approximately the desired form, the two pieces which are to be joined to make the last joint being just enough out of the desired position to allow them to pass one another. the final joint is preferably made in the middle of a straight piece of tube, not at a tee. the two pieces which are to be joined are bent so as to just pass each other, marked at the right point with the glass-knife, and cut there, preferably with a small bead of hot glass. one or both of these tubes are now warmed to the softening point in such a place that the tubes can be made to meet properly, and the two cut ends pressed together. they are now warmed in the flame, and joined together, either by simultaneously warming the opposite side of the circuit or some other suitable part, so as to allow the two ends to be pushed together again after they are softened, or by gently touching the places that do not unite with a hot bead of glass, and using the glass to fill up the crack where the ends do not quite meet. care must be taken not to leave knots or lumps of glass in the finished joint, and the latter should be well reblown, and if necessary left as a small bulb or enlargement, rather than have it have too thick walls. spirals spirals of glass tubing are probably best made free-hand before the blow-pipe, unless one has a great many of them to make, and extreme accuracy is desired. to begin with, a piece of tubing of the desired size (say 3/16 inch in diameter) and a convenient length (about two feet) is selected, one end closed, and a right-angle bend made about six inches from the closed end. holding the closed end in the left hand and the long open one in the right, the spiral is begun. the short closed end is to be parallel to the axis of the spiral, and preferably in that axis. using a moderate-sized flame, of somewhat yellow color, and taking care to heat the whole circumference of the tube, the long open end is wound little by little into a spiral having the short end _a_ (fig. 16) as an axis. the bend at _b_, where the tube changes from the radius to the circumference of the circle, must be rather short, but the tube must not be flattened or constricted here. especial pains is to be taken with the first turn of the spiral (_b_ to _c_, fig. 16), as the shape of this determines the diameter of the whole spiral, and serves as a guide for the rest of the turns. the winding of the tube is best accomplished, after a portion has been softened, by slowly turning the short end _a_ a little about its own axis, while the long open end remains where it was. this winds the tube into a spiral, just as if there were a solid cylinder in the center of it, and this cylinder was being turned about its axis, and was winding up the soft glass upon its circumference. as the cylinder is not actually there, the curve of the turns must be carefully estimated by the eye, so that the spiral may be uniform and moderately smooth. when the original piece of tube has been used up, another piece is sealed on to the open end, and the operation continued as far as may be required. [illustration: fig. 16.--making a spiral.] ground joints it is sometimes required to join two pieces of tubing end to end, by means of a ground joint. whenever possible, a regular sealed joint should be used instead of this ground joint, as it is quicker to make, and more certain to be tight. where a ground joint is necessary, however, it is best made in the conical form shown in _c_, fig. 17. if the wall of the tube to be used is not very thick, it is thickened by collecting glass as for a bulb on the ends of two tubes (exercise no. 6), and drawing to form cones of suitable shape (_a_ and _b_, fig. 17) and of such relative sizes that a will slip about half way into _b_. in order to make _a_ straight and give it the proper angle, it may be rolled when hot, upon a hot plate of carbon. blowing during this rolling is often helpful to remove depressions. after _b_ has been drawn to nearly the proper size and shape, it may be smoothed by the use of a small carbon rod, held inside it at a slight angle, or better by the use of a truncated hexagonal pyramid of carbon, whose edges have the proper slant to make the inside of the cone right. the proper taper for both these cones is the same as that used in stopcocks of similar size. the hexagonal carbon can easily be made by carefully filing down an electric light carbon, and finally impregnating it with paraffin or beeswax, and is extremely useful wherever a conical surface has to be formed from the inside of a tube. [illustration: fig. 17.--ground joint.] the tail is allowed to remain on piece _a_, as a sort of guide in grinding, and should therefore be in the axis of the tube and have rather thick walls. grind with emery or carborundum, as described under a previous head. (regrinding plug for stopcock.) if many such joints are to be made, it will pay to have a little sleeve of brass made with the proper taper, and rough down the plug _a_ in it to about the proper size, while _b_ is roughed down by means of a brass or iron plug having the same taper. this prevents excessive grinding of one-half of the joint in order to remove a defect in the other half, and is the method commercially used in making stopcocks. sealing in platinum wire very often it is necessary to seal platinum wire into the wall of a tube. professional glass-blowers usually use a special sort of glass ("einschmelzglas") which is usually a lead glass, and is made of such composition that it has the same or practically the same coefficient of expansion as platinum. a little globule of this glass is sealed into the tube in such a way that it joins the platinum to the glass of the tube. to do this, the small globule of special glass is fused on the platinum wire at the proper point and the tube into which the wire is to be sealed is heated and a small tail drawn out at the point where the wire is to be inserted. the lump of the special glass should be from 3/32 to 1/8 inch in diameter, and the tail drawn on the tube should have a slightly less diameter at the point (about 1/8 inch or less from the tube) where it is cut off. there are now two ways of sealing in the wire. (1) the wire with the globule of glass is placed inside the tube and the latter revolved until the end of the wire sticks out of the cut tail (_a_, fig. 18). the latter is now gently heated, and the two glass surfaces fused together, taking care to use only the end of the hissing flame, if the special glass contains lead. (see chapter i, page 1.) the whole circumference of the tube is then heated and annealed carefully. (2) the end of the wire which is to be outside the tube is attached to the end of a thin scrap of glass, by heating the glass and thrusting the wire into it a very little way. using this piece of glass as a handle, the wire is inserted in the cut tail (_b_, fig. 18) and the globule brought near to the end of the tail. (if the main tube is cold, it must of course first be warmed.) with the end of the hissing flame, as in the first method, the globule of glass is melted and the end of the tail softened. the wire is now pushed into place, the handle removed by heating the end and withdrawing it, and the tail reheated a little if necessary to make it shrink back into line with the walls of the tube. the whole circumference of the tube is heated at that point and annealed as usual. [illustration: fig. 18.] the use of this special glass is not absolutely necessary if the platinum wire is small (1/4 millimeter or less in diameter), and in fact it is often better in such cases not to use it, unless the apparatus is to be subjected to a very high vacuum. on small tubes, especially, it is undesirable to use the special glass, as a lump of it will usually cause the tube to crack on cooling. when such glass is not at hand or is not to be used, the procedure is altered somewhat. the tail which is drawn out is very fine, having only a sufficient diameter so that when it is cut off the wire can be inserted in it. such a fine tail is readily made by heating a small spot on the tube, touching it with a warm platinum wire, removing from the flame and drawing out the tail with the wire. after cutting off the tail the wire is inserted in it, being held on a scrap of glass as in the previous case, and the wire and tail heated until the latter shrinks back into line with the walls of the tube. if too great shrinkage occurs, the place may be blown out gently after reheating. thus the wire is sealed through the wall of the tube without changing the thickness of the latter, and consequently without developing undue stresses at that point. such a joint must of course be carefully reheated and annealed. with fine platinum wire there is very little risk of the tube cracking if care is taken to avoid formation of any lump and to reheat the whole circumference of the tube at that point. any glass adhering to the end of the platinum wire, where the scrap of glass was sealed on for a handle, may be removed when the glass has cooled by crushing it carefully with a pair of pliers. sealing vacuum tubes tubes which have been evacuated usually are sealed off while they are still connected to the vacuum pump. the connection should be through a small, rather thick-walled tube. when this is to be sealed, it is slowly heated toward the softening point. as the glass just begins to soften, the air-pressure will force it in, and care must be taken that the softening is uniform over the whole circumference of the tube. as the shrinking goes on, the tube is gently drawn out to make a thick-walled cone at that place, and the end is drawn off as soon as the tube is sealed. the principal point to be guarded is the thickness of the walls of the cone, and uniform heating. a thin place or a hot place will give way under the air-pressure and be sucked into the tube. closed tubes for heating under pressure (_carius method for determination of the halogens and sulphur._) in this case the tubing used must have thick walls (usually about 3/32 inch) to withstand the pressure. its external diameter is usually about 3/4 inch. one length will usually make two tubes of standard length for the cannon furnace. especial care must be taken in heating and cooling it on account of the thick walls. a length is gradually warmed in the center, finally heated at that point until soft, drawn out, cut apart and annealed. taking one of the pieces, the cone is carefully heated and shrunk, as in exercise 4, until its walls are as thick as those of the main tube. a flame with a little tinge of yellow should be used for this operation to prevent devitrification (page 2), as the thick glass shrinks slowly. the tail is now drawn off and the whole end heated and gently blown several times to make a rounded end, like a test-tube, with walls as thick as those of the main tube. this must be carefully annealed. it is more important that the walls be thick than that the end be nicely rounded: it may indeed be left somewhat conical in shape. at a point about two inches from the open end of the tube, it is slowly warmed and finally heated to the softening point. grasping the open end with a pair of crucible tongs, it is cautiously pulled out, a little at a time, usually during rotation in the flame, to make a constriction of moderate wall-thickness, but of sufficient internal diameter to admit the tube containing the substance. after annealing this, cooling and cleaning the tube, the acid and salt are introduced (the former by means of a long-stemmed funnel) and the tube is inclined and rotated about its axis so that the acid wets its surface about half way up from the bottom. the substance is now weighed out in a piece of thin-walled glass tubing, closed at one end, and about two inches long. inclining the large tube at a suitable angle, the small one is introduced, closed end first, and allowed to slide down the walls of the large tube until it reaches the place where the acid has wet the tube. here it will stop, and if the tube is kept inclined during the rest of the operation it will roll around inside the tube at this point and thus not get down where any acid is likely to get into it and produce any pressure by decomposing it before the open end of the tube is sealed. now the tube is held in an inclined position, taking care that the acid does not reach up to the substance, the constricted portion cautiously warmed and shrunk. it is finally shrunk and drawn out into a somewhat elongated cone, with walls as thick as the rest of the tube, and when this is accomplished the end of the cone is sealed and the waste piece drawn off. anneal with great care, and cool in such a position that the acid cannot reach the hot glass. the shrinking of this cone takes a good deal of patience, and is one of the most important parts of the process. if the walls are left too thin, the tube may burst when heated, and the whole labor is lost. if care is taken, the same tube can be used for a number of determinations, until it becomes quite short. index annealing glass, 4, 24 bellows, 4 bending glass, 8 blowing glass, 13, 19, 20, 21, 24, 29, 31 with a rubber tube, 22 blowpipe, 4 bulb at end of tube, 28 in middle of tube, 32 very large, 32 bulbs, string of, 33 capillary tube, drawing on larger tube, 9, 54 tubing, working, 43 carius method, tubes for, 55 closed circuits of tubing, 48 tubes, for heating under pressure, 55 collecting glass for bulb, 29, 31, 32 constricting a tube, 10 crystallization of glass, see devitrification. cutting glass, 7, 25 devitrification, 1, 2 drawing out a tube, 9, 18, 19, 27 flanging a tube, 11, 14 tool, 11 gas-washing tube, 35 glass, annealing, 4, 24 glass, bending, 8 blowing, 13, 19, 20, 21, 24, 29, 31 collecting for bulb, 29, 31, 32 cutting, 7 defects, 2 grinding, 47 hard, 1 knife, 7 lead, 1 qualities desired, 1 rod and tube, joining, 45 rod, working, 44 shrinking, 18, 19, 22, 26 soft, 1 working temperature, 1, 13, 19, 27 grinding stopcock or joint, 47 ground joints, 51 handle on stopcock, mending, 45 hard glass, 1 holding tube, 13, 14 insertion of tube through another, see sealing a tube through another tube. joints, ground, 51 joining rod and tube, 45 tubing end to end: first method, 16 second method, 20 joining tubes of different diameters, 25 a new tube to a stopcock, 48 kjeldahl trap, 41 lead glass, 1 lump of glass, removed, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 26, 30, 38 platinum wires, sealed into glass, 1, 52 position for glass-working, 5 pressure, tubes for heating under, 55 quality of glass, 1 rod, glass, working, 44 rotation of the tube, 13, 19 rounded end of tube, 35, 38 rubber tube used for blowing, 22 sealing a tube through another tube, 35, 39 sealing vacuum tubes, 55 shrinking glass, 18, 19, 22, 26, 31 side tube, blowing, 22, 25 soda glass, 1 soft glass, 1 spirals, making, 50 stopcocks, mending, 45 suction pump, 39, 42 sulphur dioxide tube, 28 "tail" of glass, drawing out, 9, 54 removed, 30, 35 tubes, closed, for heating under pressure, 55 "tee" tube, 22 on capillary tubing, 43 small side tube on a large tube, 24 vacuum tubes, sealing, 55 working temperature of glass, 1, 13, 19, 27 +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | | | | | transcriber's note: | | | | words in italics are indicated by the use of _underscores_ and words | | | | in =bold= by the use of equals signs as shown. | | | | | | | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ the golden calf, which the world adores, and desires: in which is handled the most rare and incomparable wonder of nature, in transmuting metals; viz. how the intire substance of lead, was in one moment transmuted in gold-obrizon, with an exceeding small particle of the true philosophick stone. at the hague. in the year 1666. written in latin by john frederick helvetius, doctor and practitioner of medicine at the hague, and faithfully englished. london, printed for john starkey at the mitre in fleetstreet near temple-barr, 1670. to the most excellent d. theodorus ketjes, by his many peregrinations, a most famous phisician, and an happy practitioner of medicine at amsterdam, one of my intimate friends. also, to the most noble, most excellent, and most experienc'd, and accurate searchers into the vulcanian anatomy, d. john casparus fausius, counsellor, and chief physician of the most serene elector palatine of heidelberg. and d. christian mentzelius, principal physician in the court of the most serene elector of brandenburg: my reverend patrons, and intire friends. the epistle dedicatory: most noble, most excellent, most expert, and most accurate inspectors of the vulcanian anatomy, and my most real friends. although i neither was willing, nor able to be wanting to my honoured friends, yet would not divulge and bring to light the verity of the spagirick art, but by this most precious, and miraculous arcanum, which i not only saw with these eyes, but taking a little of the transmutatory powder, i myself also transmuted an impure mass of lead volatile in the fire, into fixed gold, constantly sustaining every examen of fire: in such wise, as henceforth it can no more be suspected by any man, no not by those, who unto this day have perswaded themselves and others, that this arcanum is given to no man: but contrarily we were fully and indubitately perswaded, that, in things of nature, the mercury of philosophers is primo-material, and is like a fountain overflowing with wonderfull effects, and those escaping every acuteness, and light of human reprehensible reason, as shall be evidenced in this my little work: which i was willing to dedicate and consecrate to you, my primary patrons, as to most prudent masters, and defenders. yet in the mean while, i pray consider, that i have not writ to the end i would teach any one, that art, which i my self know not, but only that i might recite the true process of this arcanum. for, what can more confirm, and patronize verity, than the true light of truth it self? it is the property of brute animals to pass their life in silence, and especially not to heed those things in them, which do most of all look to, and are required for the propagation of the glory of the most wise, and most powerful god our creator. wherefore, since it is a thing unworthy, and to the divine majesty ungrateful, for man, who should be a consort of the divine nature, to wax brutish with brutes, i present to you, my most faithful friends, and patrons of this science, this most rare history: having as time, and my ability would permit, recollected all things, and have faithfully commemorated them. therefore, omitting all paints, and flourishes of rhetorical expressions, i will forthwith betake my self to the discovery of all, whatsoever i both saw, and heard from elias the artist touching this. for truly, i was not so intimately familiar with him, as that he should instruct me in the way of preparing the universal medicine, after the method of physico-artificial chimistry: yet he supplyed me with such reasons in the method of healing, as i shall never be able to commend his worth with condigne praises. therefore, most curious favourers, and true lovers of the chimical art, accept of this little work, as a mean gift, or if you had rather, peruse if only for recreation of the mind; for in it i shall relate all things whatsoever, that were discoursed of between him and me, at several times: humbly requesting, that with the same benevolence you have received other of my small treatises, you would also accept of this novel, which i freely dedicate, and officiously give to you, for a motion, and increase of admiration. farewel, avete, favete. your most humble john fredrick helvetius. chap.i. most excellent, and prudent sirs. before i enter upon the description of the philosophick pigmy, (in this little theatre of secrets) overcoming and subduing giants, i pray permit me here to use the words of vanhelmont, taken out of his book de arbore vitæ, fol. 630. and here transcribed. i compelled to believe, that there is an aurifick, and argentick stone. but (friend of the spagyrick art) i am not ignorant, that many have been found among the most wise, yea among the exquisite chimists, who have not only consumed their own goods, but the goods of others also, in this great vulanick secret, as experience even at this very day sufficiently proves. for we have seen, the more is the pity! how unwary chimists, yea such as are more worthy, than those who are called alchimists; how, i say, they, labouring simply, are daily deluded with guile of this kind, by diabolick, aurifick, and argentick suckgoods. also i know, that many stupid men will rise up, and contradict the truth of my true experience, touching the philosophick stone. one will have it to be a work of the devil; another affirms there is no such thing; a third faith it is the soul of gold only, and that with an ounce of that gold, an ounce of lead, and no more may be again tinged: but this is repugnant to the attestation of kifflerus, as i shall briefly commemorate; a fourth believes the verity and possibility thereof, but faith it is so chargeable, as it will never quit cost; with many other like allegations. yet i wonder not at this, for according to this saying, quorum rationem non intelligimus, miramur, que vero pernoscere volupe est, rimamur. what we cannot attain to, we admire, but what to know is pleasing, do desire. how can a man, fallen from the fountain of light, into the abyss of darkness, effect any thing to purpose, in natural things, especially when his wisdome in this natural philosophick study is barren and sophisticate? it is, for the most part, proper to these fools and unapt men, presently to contemn a thing, not knowing, that more are yet to be sought by them, than they have the possession of. therefore, rightly saith seneca, in lib. de moribus: thou art not yet happy, if the rout deride thee not. but i matter not, whether they believe, or contradict what i write, touching the transmutation of metals. i rest satisfied in this one thing, which with my eyes i have seen, and what with my hands i have done. for what philosophers say of themselves, i also have with my hands handled this spark of the eternal wisdome, or this saturnine catholick magnesia of philosophers, a fire of potency sufficient to penetrate stones, yea, a treasure of so great value, as 20 tun of gold cannot exceed the price thereof. what seek you? i believe what i have seen with the eyes of thomas, and handled as he, (but in the nature of things only) as well as the adept philosophers; although in this our decrepit age of the world, that be accounted a most secret hyperphysico-magical saturn, and not known, unless to some cabalistick christian only. we judge him the most happy of all physicians, who hath the knowledge of this pleasant medicinal potion of our mercury, or of the medicine of the son of our esculapius resisting the force of death, against which there is no panacea otherwise produced in gardens. moreover, the most wise god doth not reveal his gifts of solomon promiscuously to all mortals. they indeed seem strange to them, when they behold a creature, from the occult magnetick potency incited in it self, deduced into art by its own like; as for example: in iron is a magnetick, ingenited, potential virtue from the magnet: a magnetick virtue in gold from mercury: a magnetick virtue in silver from venus, or copper: and so consequently in all metals, minerals, and stones, herbs, and plants, &c. moreover, i may properly quæry, which of the wisest philosophers is so sage, as to be able to comprehend with the acuteness of his own most dextrous ingeny, with what obumbracle the imaginative tinging, venemons, or monstrous faculty of any pregnant woman, compleats its work in one moment, if it be deduced into art by some external object? i do assuredly believe, that very many will foolishly say, that this is a mortomagical work of the devil; but the doltish and ignorant are affraid to be out-shined by the true resplendent light of verity, with which their owl-like sight is troubled, and afflicted. also the stars are a cause of what we treat of, and this cause is not to be contemned, although i, nor you, know not how to comprehend the celestial influences of them in our mind. nor are the plants, which the earth supplies us with, to be rejected, although i; or you, from the external signature of them, know not how to judge aright of the effect of virtues ingenited in them, which they notoriously exercise, according to their power, in healing and conserving humane bodies. therefore, since all others are also offended at the internal light, being ignorant of all abstruse things, of which you, or i, want the science, how can the same virtues be deduced into art, according to the end for which they were created? a thousand other like things might be instanced. although you know not the splendour in angels, the candour in the heavens, the perspicuity in the air, limpitude in waters, the variety of colours in flowers, hardness of metals and stones, proportion in animals, the image of god in regenerate men, faith in believers, and reason in the soul; yet in them there is such a beauty, as hath been throughly beheld, and fully known by very few mortals. although in the stone of philosophers there be so potent a virtue, and the same hath been seen by me, yet i would not therefore have any man to think, that my primary scope, and intention, is to perswade the worthy, or unworthy sons of this age, to labour in this work, no, not at all: but i shall rather dehort all, and every of the curious indagators of this art, that they seriously abstain from this most perilous arcanum, as from a certain sanctum sanctorum; yea, and i would admonish the studious of this arcanum, accurately to take heed to himself, and beware of the lectures, and association of false philosophers. but i hope i shall satisfie the curious naturalists, or investigators of physical arcanums, by communicating and publishing in this present discourse, all which passed between elias the artist, and me, touching the nature of the stone of philosophers. for that is an ens more effulgent than the morning, or a carbuncle: more splendid, than the sun, or gold: more fair, than the moon, or silver: so very recreable, and amiable, was the sight of this light, and most pleasing object to me, as out of my inward mind, it cannot be obliterated, or extinguished by any oblivion; although the same be credited by none of the fatuate learned, or illiterate ignorant asses, and such as glory only in the praise of ambitious eloquence. for in this malignant ulcerated age of the world, nothing is so safe and secure from calumnies, but it is taken in a wrong sense, and perverted unworthily by the idiotick ignorance of mad-brain'd cacozelots. so very farr do all these dark-sighted men deviate from the true rule of verity, as in success of time, they, intangled with their own errors, will miserably wast away and expire; but our assertion, built on the eternal foundation of triumphing verity, shall continue and remain, unto the consummation of all ages, without diminution, although this art be not yet known to all mortals. for the adept philosophers, according to the antient faith of their experience, have affirmed, that this natural mystery (which many anxious men have sinistrously sought, and required) is only to be found with jehovah, saturninely placed in the centre of the world. in the mean while, we proclaim those happy, who take care, by the help of art, how they may wash this philosophick queen, or how they ought to circulate the virgin-catholick-earth, in physico-magical crystalline artifice, as khunradus. did; they only, and none others besides them, shall see the crowned, and internally fiery king of philosophers, coming forth from his glassy sepulchre, in an external fiery body glorified, more then perfect with all the colours in the world, as a shining carbuncle, or perspicuous, compact and ponderous crystal, a salamander spewing out waters, and by the benefit thereof in the fire washing leprous metals, as i my self have seen. what? how shall they see the abyss of the spagyrick art? when as this royal art hath so long lain hid, and been absconded in the mineral kingdom, as in the safest of all secret places, for so very many years? assuredly the genuine sons of this laudable art, shall not only behold a like flood of numicius, in which æneas heretofore, by the command of venus, washed and absolved from his immortality, was immediately transformed into an immortal god; but also the lydian river of pactolus all transmuted into gold, and how midas mygdonius washed himself in the same. likewise those candid rivals of this art, shall in a serious order behold the bathing-place of naked diana, the fountain of narcissus and scylla walking in the sea, without garments, by reason of the most fervent rayes of sol: partly also the blood of pyramus and thisbe, of it self collected, by the help of which, white mulberries are tinged into red; partly also the blood of adonis, by the descending goddess venus transformed into a rose of anemona; partly likewise the blood of ajax, from which arose that most beautiful flower the violet; partly also the blood of the giants slain by jupiters thunder-bolt; partly also the shed tears of althea, when she put off her golden vestments; and partly the drops, which fell from the decocted water of medea, by which green things immediatly sprang out of the earth; partly also the cocted potion of medea, made of various herbs, gathered always three dayes before full moon, for the cure of jasons aged father; partly also those leaves, by the tast of which, the nature of gaucus was changed into neptune; partly also the exprest juice of jason, by the benefit of which, he, in the land of cholcons, received the golden fleece, afterward by reason of that, compleatly armed, he fought in the feild of mars, not without the hazard of life; partly also the garden of the hesperides, where golden apples may be gathered from the trees; partly also hippomenes running for the mastery with atalanta, and staying her course, and so overcoming her with three golden apples, the gifts of venus; partly also the aurora of cephalus, partly also romulus transformed by jupiter into a god; partly also the soul of julius cæsar, by the goddess venus, transfigured into a comet, and placed among the stars; partly also python, juno's serpent, arising out of the putrid earth (after deucalions flood) made hot by the rayes of the sun; partly also the fire, with which medea kindled seven lights; partly also the moon, inflamed by the burning of phæton; partly also the withered olive branch, a new; flourishing and bearing fruit; yea, becoming a new and tender olive tree; partly also arcadia, where jupiter was wont to walk; partly also the habitation of pluto, at the gate whereof lay the three-headed cerberus; & also partly that mountain, where hercules burned all his members, received from the mother, upon wood, but the parts of the father remained fixed, and incombustible in fire, and nothing of his life was destroyed, but he, at length, was transmuted into a god. likewise we will not forget those germans, the sons of true philosophers, who entred into a country-house, at length transformed into a temple, whose covering was made of pure gold. certainly, i cannot choose, but must yet once more with acclamation, say with the adept: o happy, and thrice happy is that artificer, who by the most merciful benediction of the highest, jehovah pursues the art of confecting, and preparing that (as it were, divine) salt, by the efficacious operation of which, a metallick, or mineral body, is corrupted, destroyed, and dyes; yet the soul thereof is in the mean while revived, to a glorious resurrection of a philosophick body. yea, i say, most happy is the son of that man, who, by his prayers, obtains this art of arts, unto the glory of god. for it is most certain, that this mystery can be known no other way, unless it be drawn and imbibed from god, the fountain of fountains. therefore, let every serious lover of this inestimable art judge, that the whole work of him required, is, that he constantly, with the prayer of true faith, in all his labour, implore and solicite the divine grace of the holy spirit. for the solemn manner of god alone is, candidly and liberally, either mediately or immediately, to communicate his gifts and benefits, to none, unless to candid and liberal ingenies only. in this holy way of practical piety, all inquisitors of profound arts, find what they seek, when they, in their work, exercise themselves theosophically by solitary colloquies with jehovah, with a pure heart and mouth, religiously. for the heavenly sophia, indeed, willingly embraces our friendship, presenting, and offering to us, her inexhaustible rivolets, most full of gracious goodness and benevolence. but, happy is he, to whom the royal way, in which he is to walk, shall be shown by some one expert in this arcanum. i seem to presage to my self, that i have not equally satisfied all readers in this preface; but it is, as if i did presume to teach them an art, unknown to my self; yet i hope better of the greatest part of them. for my intention was, only to relate to you a certain history. therefore, drink, my friends, of the following dialogue, or springing colloquy, presented by me, wishing you well, that thence you may satisfie, and allay all the thirst of your thirsting minds: for i doubt not in the least, but that this study of divine wisdome, will be more sweet to you, than nectar and ambrosia. no other will i communicate, no other have i common, then that of jul. cæs. scaliger: the end, of wisemen, is the communication of wisdome: according to that of gregory nyßen: he who is good, in nature, the same very willingly communicates his goods to others. for it is the part of good men, to be profitable to others. chap. ii. divers ilustrious men have written touching the verity of this arcanum, among these, take the sayings of some of them, as follows. paracelsus in his book of the signature of natural things. the tincture of naturalists, is a, true sign, that by the transmutative virtue thereof, all imperfect metals are changed, viz. the white into silver, and the red into the best gold, if an exceeding small part of this medicine well prepared, be injected upon the metal, while in flux in a crucible, &c. the same. for the invincible astrum of metals overcomes all things, and changeth into a nature like it self, &c. this gold and silver is more noble, and better, than those, which are dug out of metallick mines; for medicinal arcanums to be prepared therefrom. the same. therefore, i say every alchimist, which hath the astrum of gold, is able to tinge all red metals into gold, &c. the same. our tincture of gold hath astrums in it self, is a substance most fixed, and in multiplication immutable. it is a powder, haveing a colour most red, almost like saffron, yet its whole corporal substance, is liquid as rosin, perspicuous as crystal, brittle as glass, of the colour of a rubie, and exceeding poaderous, &c. also read paracelsus his heaven of philosophers. likewise, paracelsus his seventh book, of the transmutation of natural things. transmutation is a great natural mystery, metallick, and not contrary to the course of nature, nor repugnant to the order of god, as many men of it do falsly judge. for imperfect metals, are changed neither into gold, nor into silver, without this stone of philosophers. paracelsus, in his manual of the medicinal stone of philosophers. our stone is a celestial, and more than perfect medicine, because it cleanseth all the impurities of metals, &c. henry khunradus in his amphitheatre of eternal sapience. i travelled long, invited others, who knew somewhat by experience, and could with very firm judgement conjecture; and this not alwayes in vain. among which, i call god to witness, by his wonderful ordination, i, from one, received the green catholick lyon, and the blood of the lyon, viz. gold, not the vulgar, but of philosophers, with my eyes i saw the same, with my hands, i handled it, and with my nostrils, smelt the odour thereof. o how wonderful is god in his works! they, i say, gave those gifts prepared, which i in most desperate cases, used with admirable success to the benefit of my needy neighbour. and (by instinct of jehovah's mercy) they sincerely revealed to me, the wayes of preparing, &c. the same. this wonderful method, the wonderful god gave me. in this way, in which i walked, god alone, i say, immediately, and mediately; yet subdelegately, nature, fire, and art, of my master, as well living as mute, corporally, and spiritually good, sleeping and waking, gave the same to me, &c, the same. i write not fables; with your hands you shall handle, and with, your eyes you shall see azoth, viz. the catholick [or universal] mercury of philosophers; which alone, with the internal and external fire, yet with sympathetick harmony, with olympick fire (by reason of inevitable necessity) physico-magically united, will suffice thee for obtaining our stone, &c. the same. you shall see, the stone of philosophers; our king, and lord of those that bare rule, coming from his bridal throne of the glassy sepulchre, into this mundane scene, in his glorified body, viz, regenerate, and more then perfect: namely, a shining carbuncle, a most temperate splendour; and of which, tire most subtile, and depurated parts, are by the concordant peace of mixtion, inseparably united into one, and perfectly equallized, clear as crystal, compact, and most ponderous, as fluid in fire, as rosin, and before the flight of mercury, as wax flowing, yet without fume, entring and penetrating, solid and close bodies, as oyl, paper; resolvable in every liquor, melting, and commiscible therewith; brittle as glass, in powder, of the colour of saffron, but in the intire mass, like a blushing rubie; (which redness is a sign of perfect fixation, and fixed perfection) permanently colouring, or tinging; in all examens whatsoever, even of sulphur adurtive, and in tryals of corroding waters, and in the most vehement persecution of fire, fixed, alwayes during, and unburnable; permanent as the salamander, &c. the same. the stone of philosophers in the greater world, is in the parts thereof, fermented; by reason of the ferment, it transforms it self into whatsoever it will &c. hence you may learn the reason, why philosophers on their azoth imposed the name of mercury which adheres to bodies, &c. the same. it is fermented with metals, viz, the white existant in the highest whiteness, with pure silver for the white; but the sanguineous stone, with gold obrizon for the red. and this is the work of three dayes, &c. helmont, of eternal life for i have oftentimes seen it, and with, my hands handled the same, &c. see in the same place further. then i projected this quarter of one grane, wrapt up in paper, upon eight ounces of argentvive, hot in a crucible, and immediately the whole hydrargyry, with some little noise ceased to flow, and remained congealed like yellow wax: after fusion thereof, by blowing the bellows, there were found eight ounces of gold, wanting eleven grane. therefore, one grane of this powder, transmutes 19186 equal parts of argentvive, into the best gold. within the earth, the aforesaid powder is found, or what is in a sort like thereunto, which transmutes almost an infinite mass of impure metal into perfect gold, by uniting the same to it self, it defends from rust, and ærugo, from cankring, and death, and maketh the same, as it were, immortal, against all torture of fire, and art, and transfers it into the virgin-purity of gold; it requires only heat. the same helmont, of the tree of life. i am compelled to believe the aurifick, and argentifick stone; because at several distinct: times, with my own hand, made projection of one grane of this powder, upon some thousands of granes of argentvive hot in a crucible; and in the presence of our principal friends, the business, with a pleasing admiration, succeeded well in the fire: as our books promise thee, &c. the same. he, who first gave me the powder, had at least, so much thereof, as would be sufficient for transmuting two hundred thousand pound weight of metal, into gold, &c.. the same. for he gave to me not so much as half a grane of that powder, and with that were transmuted nine ounces, and three quarters of an ounce of argetitvive. that was given me one evening by a strange friend, &c the same so also it is written, that sixty years since, alexander scotus, made projection of that kinde, in the trust: famous city of colonia and hanovia, &c.. i cannot in this place over-pass, some examples worthy of note, touching the possibility of transmutation. read the following true extract out of an epistle written by doctor kufflerus. kufflerus: artist, i found-in my own laboratory, an aqua-fortis. secondly, i again found another in the laboratory, caroli de roy; this aqua-fortis i poured upon the calx of sol, prepared of gold, in the vulgar manner, and after the third cohobation, it sublimed the tincture of gold with it self in the neck of the retort; this tincture i mixed with silver, precipited in the vulgar manner, and i saw that one ounce of the sublimed tincture of gold, with ordinary flux in a crucible, had transmuted one ounce, and halfe of the two ounces of precipitate silver, into the best gold: but a third part of the silver yet remaining, was a white and fixed gold: the other two parts thereof were perfect silver, fixed in every examen of fire. this is my experience, after this time, we could never find the like aqua-fortis. i helvetius saw this gold white, and without tincture. the same. there is yet one other example very rare; of what was done at the hague by a silver-smith, whose name was grill: how he in the year 1664. by spirit of salt, not prepared in the vulgar manner, transmuted lead so, as from one pound, he received three parts of the best silver, and two ounces of most fixed gold. at the hague, a certain silver-smith, and a much exercised disciple of alchimy, but according to the nature of alchimy, a very poor man; did sometime since require spirit of salt, not vulgarly prepared, of a loving friend of mine, a cloath-dyer, by name, john casparus knottnerus. my friend giving the same to him; demanded, whether he would use that spirit of salt, he now had, for metals, or not? grill made answer; for metalls. and accordingly he afterward powred this spirit of salt upon lead, which he had put into a glass dish, usual for conditures and confections. the space of two weeks being elapsed, supernatant on the spirit of salt, appeared a most splendid silver-starre, so exceeding curious, as if it had been made with an instrument by a most ingenious artist. at the sight of which, the said grill, filled with exceeding joy, signified to us, that he had seen the signate star of philosophers, touching which he had read in basilius, as he thought. i, and many other honest men, did behold this star supernatant on the spirit of salt, the lead in the mean while remaining in the bottom of an ash colour, and swollen like a sponge. but in the space of seven or nine dayes, that humidity of the spirit of salt, being absumed by the exceeding heat of the aire, in july, did vanish; but the star settled down, and still stood above that earthly spongeous lead. that was a thing worthy of admiration, and beheld by not a few spectators. at length grill himself having taken part of cinereous, or ash-like lead, with the star adhering, cupellated in a test, and found from one ounce of this lead, twelve ounces of cupellate silver, and from these twelve ounces, he also had two ounces of the best gold. and i helvetius am able to shew some of this spongeous lead with part of the star yet adhering, & besides the pieces of the star the silver and gold made thereof. which when this subtile (and likewise foolish) grill understood, he would not be known to knottterus, whether he had used the spirit of salt, or not; but thenceforth attempted to learn of him the art how to make it; yet some time being elapsed, the worthy knottnerus had for got what spirit of salt (for he was expert in various kinds thereof) he had given him; not being able to call the same to mind so suddenly: in the mean while, he and his family were visited with the pestilence and dyed: the other falling into the water was drowned. after the death of these two, none could find out the way of either of their operations. certainly here is cause of admiration, that the internal nature of lead, by the simple maturation of spirit of salt, should appear in an external form so noble. no less admirable and wonderful to the mind is this, viz. that the mirifick stone of philosophers can so exceeding swiftly transmute metals; having virtue potentially insited in it self, so as it is deduced into art, as in iron by contact of the magnet. but touching these enough for the sons of art. chap. iii. since promises are so much the better esteemed, by how much the sooner they are fulfilled, i, without any dilation, immediately come to my promised declaration of the following history, which thus take. at the hague, on the sixth calend of january or the 27th. of december, in the year 1666, a certain man came to my house in the afternoon, to me indeed planely unknown, but endued with an honest gravity, and serious authority of countenance, cloathed in a plebick habit, like to some memnonite of a middle stature, his visage somewhat long, with some pock-holes here and there dispersed: his hairs were indeed very black, yet not curled, little or no no hair on his chin, and about three or four and fourty years of age: his countrey (as far as i am able to conjecture) is the septentrional batavia, vulgarly called nord hollund. after salutations ended, his new guest, with great reverence, asked, whether he might have freedom to come to me; because for the pyrotechnick art sake, he could not, nor was he willing to pass by the door of my house; adding, that he had not only thought to have made use of some friend to come to me, but had also read some of my little treaties, especially that, which i published against d. digbies sympathetick powder, in which i discovered my doubt of the true philosophick mystery. therefore, this occasion being taken, he asked me, whether i could believe, that place was given to such a mystery in the things of nature, by the benefit of which a physician might be able to cure all diseases universally, unless the sick already had a defect either of the lungs, or liver, or of any like noble member? to which i answered. such a remedy is exceeding necessary for a physician, but no man knows, what and how great are the secrets yet hidden in nature, nor did i ever, in all my life see such an adept man, although i have read and perused many things, touching the verity of this thing, or art, in the writings of philosophers. i also enquired of him, whether he (speaking of the universal medicine) were not a physician? but he answering by denyal, professed, that he was no other than a melter of orichalcum, and that in the flower of his years, he had known many things, from his friend, rare to the sight, and especially the way of extracting medicinal arcanums by the force of fire, and that for this very cause, he was a lover of this so noble science of medicine. moreover, long after other discourses, touching experiments in metals, made by the violence of fire, elias the artist spake to me thus; do not you know the highest secret, when it is offered to your sight, viz. the stone of phylosophers, you having read in the writings of many chymists most excellent, touching the substance, colour, and strange effect of the same? i answered, not at all; except what i have read in paracelsus, helmont, basilius, sandivogius, and like books of adept phylosophers extant. nevertheless, i think, i am not able to know the phylosophick matter, whether it be true, or not, although i should see it present before me. whilst i was speaking thus, he pulled out of his pocket an ivory box, in which he had three ponderous fragments, in magnitude scarcely equalizing a small walnut; these were glass-like, of the colour of pale sulphur, to which the interior scales of that crucible did adhere, in which this most noble substance was liquified, for i suppose the value of it might equalize twenty tun of gold. but after i had plighted my faith, i held that [greek: cheimhêlion], [or pretious treasure] of this stone, within these my hands for almost a quarter of an hour, and from the philosophick mouth of the owner, i heard many things worthy of note, touching the wonderful effect of the same, for humane and metallick bodies. indeed, i, with a sad and afflictedly afflicted mind, restored this treasure of treasures to him, the lord and possessor, who gave the same into my hand for a very short space of time; and yet i did that (after the manner of men overcoming themselves) not without the greatest action of thanks, as was fit in such a case. afterward i asked him, how it came to pass, (since i had otherwise read, that the stones of philosophers, were endowed with a rubinate, or purple colour) that this his philosophick stone was tinged with a sulphureous colour? he answered me thus: o sir; this is nothing to the purpose: for the matter is sufficiently mature. moreover, when i entreated him, that he would give to me, for a perpetual remembrance, one small part of the medicine included in his box, although no more in bulk than a coriander-seed; he denied, answering: o no! for this is not lawful for me to do, although you would give me this whole roome full of gold in duckets; and that not by reason of the price of the matter, but by reason of another certain consequence; yea, surely, if it were possible, that fire could be burned with fire, i would sooner cast this whole substance into the devouring flames of vulcan, before your eyes. a little after this, he also asked me, whether i had not another room, the windows of which were not to the street-side; i presently brought this phænix, or bird most rare to be seen in this land, into my best furnished chamber; yet he, at his entrance (as the manner of hollanders is, in their countryes) did not shake off his shooes, which were dropping wet with snow. i indeed, at that very time, thus thought: perhaps he will provide, or hath in readiness some treasure for me; but he dash'd my hope all to pieces. for he immediatey asked of me a piece of the best gold-mony; and in the mean while layed off his cloak, and country coat; also he opened his bosom, and under his shirt he wore in green silk, five great golden pendants, round, filling up the magnitude of the interior space of an orb of tin. where, in comparing these, in respect of colour and flexibility, the difference between his gold, and mine, was exceeding great. on these pendants he had inscribed with an iron instrument, the following words, which, at my request, he gave leave i should coppy out. the form of the pendants, and words engraven thereon, are as follows. i. amen holy, holy, holy is the lord our god, for all things are full of his power. leo: libra. ii. the wonderfull wonder-working wisdome of jehovah in the catholick book of nature. made the 26. day aug. 1666. [alchemical symbols: gold, mercury, silver] the wonderfull god, nature and he spagyrick art, make nothing in vain. sacred, holy spirit hallelujha hallelujha away devil, speak not of god without light, amen. the eternal invisible, only wise, best of all and omnipotent god of gods; holy, holy, holy, governour & conserver deservedly ought to be praysed. moreover, when i, affected with admiration said to him; my master, i pray tell me, where had you this greatest science of the whole world? he answered, i received such magnalia from the communication of a certain extraneous friend, who for certain dayes lodged in my house, professing, that, he was a lover of art, and came to teach me various arts; viz. how, besides the aforesaid, of stones and crystal, most beautiful precious stones are made much more fair than rubies, chrysolites, saphires, and others of that kind. also how to prepare a crocus martis in a quarter of an hour of which one only dose infallibly heals a pestilential dysentery likewise a metallic liquor, by the help of which, every species of the dropsy may be cured certainly in four dayes space also a certain limpid water, more sweet, than hony, by the help of which, i can extract the tincture of granates, corals, and of all glasses blown by artificers, in the space of two hours in hot sand only. many other things like to these he told me, which i neither well observed, nor committed to memory; because my intention was: carryed further, viz. to learn the art of pressing that so noble juice out of metals for metals; but the shadow in waters deceived the dog of his piece of flesh, which was substantial. moreover, this artist told me that his master, who taught him this art, bad him bring glass full of rain water, with which he mixed a very small: quantity of a most white pouder; commanding me, (here the disciple of that master proceeds in his discourse) to go to the silver-smith, for one ounce of cupellate silver, laminate, [or beat very thin,] which silver was dissolved in a quarter of an hour, as ice in hot water. then he presently gave to me one half of this potion, by himself so speedily made, to drink; which in my mouth tasted as sweet milk, and i thence became very cheerful. he having related these things, i ceased not to enquire of him, to what end he had instanced this? whether the potion was philosophick? to this, he answered, you must not be so curious. afterward, he told me, how he, by the command of that laudable artist his master, took a piece of the leaden gutter of his house, and when the lead was melted in a now crucible, the said artist drew out off his pocket a gasket full of sulphureous powder, of which, he took a very small part upon the point of a knife, once, and again, and injected the same; upon the lead in flux; presently. giving order, that the fire should be blown with two pair of bellows strongly, for exciting the heat more vehemently; a little after he powred out of the crucible, most pure gold, upon the red stones, which were in the kitchen. i (said this most pleasing discourser to me) did commodiously behold this verity of the transmutation of metals, but was so astonished with fear and admiration, that i was scarcely able to speak one word; but my master heartning me, said; cheer, up and be contented: take for your self a sixteenth part of this mass, which keep for a memorandum; but the other fifteen parts distribute to the poor: and i did as he said. for, (if my memory deceive me not) he bestowed this exceeding great alms, on the sparrendamen church; but whether, he gave it at distinct times or not, or whether he told it down in the substance of gold, or of silver, i asked him not. and at length (saith he speaking of his master) he directly taught me this great divine art. therefore, the; narration of all these things being ended, i most humbly entreated him, that he would shew me the effect of transmutation upon impure metals, that i thence might have the better assurance of those things by him related to me, and my faith being confirmed, securely give credit to the real truth of the matter. but he very discreetly gave me the repulse; yet taking his leave of me, he promised to return again after three weeks, and then shew to me certain curious arts, by fire, as also the way of projecting; making this provisoe, if it should then be lawful for him. the three weeks being elapsed, according to his word, he came to my house, and invited me to walk abroad with him for one hour, or two, as we both did, having in that time certain, discourses of the secrets of nature in the fire, but in the mean while, this well spoken companion in the way, was not lavish, but rather too sparing of his words, touching the great secret; affirming, that this singular mystery tended not, but to the alone magnifying of the most illustrious fame of the most glorious god; and that very few men considered, how they might; condignly sacrifice; themselves by their works to so great a god uttering these expressions no otherwise, then as if he had been a pastor of the church. but i, in the mean time, fayled not to solicit him, to demonstrate to me the transmutation of metals. moreover, i beseeched and intreated him, to vouchsafe to eat with me, and to lodge in my house, urging him with such earnestness, as no rival, or lover, could ever use more perswasive words, for winning his beloved to a willingness of gratifying him above all others: but he, agitated by a spirit of so great constancy, made void of all i endeavoured. nevertheless, i could not choose but speak to him thus: sir, you see i have a very convenient laboratory, in which you may shew me the metallick transmutation. for whosoever assents to him, that asketh, obligeth himself to him. it is true (answered he) bit i made a promise to you of imparting some things with this exception, if at my, return, i be not interdicted, but have leave to do the same. all, and every of these, my requests being in vain, i instantly, and earnestly besought him, that (if he would not, or by reason of the heavenly interdiction could not demonstrate what i asked) he would only give me so much of his treasure, as would be sufficient for transmuting four grains of lead into gold. at this my request, he, after a little while, pouring forth a flood of philosophick mercy, gave a small particle, as big as a rape-seed, saying: take of the greatest treasure of the world, which very few great kings, or princes could ever see. but i, saying my master, this is so small particle perhaps will not be sufficient for tinging four granes of lead. he answered; give it me. i, accordingly gave it him, conceiving, good hope of receiving somewhat a greater particle instead thereof; but he breaking off the one half almost of it with his thumb-nayl, threw it into the fire, and wrapping the other up in blew paper, he gave to me, faying, it is yet sufficient for thee. to which, i with, a sad countenance and perplexed mind, answered: ah sir! what mean you by this? before i doubted, and now i cannot believe, that so small a quantity of this medicine will suffice for transmuting four grains of lead; o, said he, if you cannot rightly handle your lead in the crucible, by reason of the so very small quantity thereof then take two drams, or half an ounce, or a little more of the lead, for more must not be tinged, then well may. to him i again said: i cannot, easily believe this, viz. that so little of the tincture will transmute so great a quantity of lead into gold. but he, answered; what i say is true. in, mean, while, i, giving him great; thanks, inclosed my diminished and in the superlative degree concentrated treasure, in my own casket, saying: to morrow i will make this tryal; and give no notice to any man thereof, as long as i live. not so, not so, answered; he, but all things, which tend to the glory of god omnipotent, ought by us, singularly to be declared to the sons of art that we may live theosophically, and not at all dye sophistically. then, i confessed to him; that when held the mass of his medicine, in that short space of time, i attempted to raze something there-from with my finger nayl, but i got no more, than a certain invisible atome; and, when i had cleansed my nayl, and had injected the collected matter, wrapt in paper, upon lead in flux, i could see no transmutation of it into gold; but almost the whole mass of lead vanished into aire, and the remaining substance was transmuted into a glassy earth. at the hearing of this, he smiling, say'd you could more dexterously play the thief, than apply the tincture. i wonder, that you, so expert in the fire, do no better understand the fuming nature of lead. for if you had wrapped your theft in yellow wax, that it might have been conserved from the fume of lead, then it would so have penetrated into the lead, as to have transmuted the same into gold. but now a sympathetick operation was performed in fume, and so the medicine permixed with the fume, flew away: for all gold, silver, tin, mercury, and like metals, are corrupted by lead vapours, and likewise converted to a brittle glass. while he was thus speaking, i shewed him my crucible, who, viewing the remaining substance, perceived a most beautiful saffron-coloured tincture, adhering to the sides of the crucible, and say'd, to-morrow at nine of the clock, i will return, and shew you; how your medicine must be used to transmute lead into gold. in which promise of him, i rested secure. yet, in the mean while, i again and again requested information of him, whether this philosophick work, required great charges in the preparing, and a very long time. o my friend, answered he, you very accurately affect to know all things, yet i will open this to you; the charge is not great, nor is the time long. but, as touching the matter of which our arcanum is made, i would have you to know; there are only two metals and minerals, of which it is prepared. and because the sulphur of philosophers is more abundant in these minerals, therefore it is made of them. then i again asked him: what the menstruum was, and whether the operations were made in glasses, or in crucibles. he answered; the menstruum is a celestial salt, or a salt of celestial virtue, by the benefit of which, philosophers only dissolve the terrene metallick body, and in dissolving, the noble elixir of philosophers is produced. but the operation is, performed in a crucible, from the beginning to the end, in an open fire. and the whole work may be begun, and plainly ended in no longer time, then four dayes: also in this whole work, no greater cost is required, then the value of three florens. lastly he added; neither the mineral, from which, nor the salt by which, is of any great price. i again said to him: my master; this is strange, for it is repugnant to the sayings of various philosophers, who have writ, that at least seven, or nine moneths are imployed in this work. he answered: the true writings of philosophers are only; understood by the truly adept. therefore, touching the time, they would write nothing certain; yea; i say, no lover of this art, can find the art of preparing this mystery in his whole life without the communication of some true adept man. in this respect and for this cause, i advise you, my friend, because you have seen the true matter of the true work, not to forget your self, and thirsting after the perfection of this art, to cast away your own goods; for you can never find it out. then i say'd: my master, although i am so unknown to you, as you are unknown to me; nevertheless, since he was unknown to you who shewed you the way of finding out the operation of this arcanum, perhaps you may also, if you be willing, notifie to me somewhat, touching this secret, that the most difficult rudiments being overcome, i may (as the saying is) happily add somewhat to things already found out; for by the occasion of one thing found, another is not difficultly invented. but the artist answered: in this work the matter is not so, for unless you know the thing, from the beginning of the work to the end, you know nothing thereof. indeed i have told you enough, yet you are ignorant how the stone of philosophers is made, and again, how the glassy seal of hermes is broaken, in which sol gives forth splendor from his metallick rayes, wonderfully coloured, and in which speculum, the eyes of narcißus behold metals transmutable, and from which rayes the adept gather their fire, by the help of which, volatile metals are fixed into most fixed gold, or silver. but enough for this time, because (god willing) on the morrow, we shall have occasion of meeting yet once more, that we may talk together touching this philosophick matter; and according as i said, at nine a clock, i will come to your house, and shew you the way of projecting. but with that happy valediction for one night, that elias the artist hath left me most sad in expectation unto this very day. yea, the mercury of philosophers did with him vanish into aire; because from him i did no more again hear so much as one word. yet he, (because he promised that he would come again to me betimes the next morning) half an hour before ten, sent to me another unknown man, signifying, that, that friend, who yesternight promised to revisit me this morning, by reason of other urgent business, could not come, nevertheless, at three of the clock in the afternoon, he would again see me. but after i had, with a most vehement desire expected him, till almost eight a clock, i began to doubt in the truth of the matter. besides, my wife also, a very curious searcher in the art of that laudable man, came to me, troubling me, by reason of the philosophick art, cited in that aforesaid severe, and honest man; saying, go to, let us try, i pray thee, the verity of the work, ac cording to what that man said. for otherwise, i certainly shall not sleep all this night. but i answered; i pray let us deferr it till to morrow; perhaps the man will come then. nevertheless, when i had ordered my son to kindle the fire; these thoughts arose in me; that man indeed, otherwise in his discourses so divine, is now found the first time guilty of a lye. a second time, when i would make experiment of my stollen matter hid under my nayl, but to no purpose, because the lead was not transmuted into gold. lastly a third time, he gave me so very little of the matter, for tinging so great a mass of lead; that he almost drove me to desperation. notwithstanding these thoughts, i commanded yellow wax to be brought, wherein to wrap the matter, and finding lead, i cut off half an ounce, or six drachmes. my wife wrapped the matter of the stone in the wax, and when the lead was in flux, she cast in that little mass, which, with hissing and flatuosity, so performed its operation in the crucible well closed; as in one quarter of an hour, the whole mass of lead was transmuted into the best gold. certainly, had i lived in the age of ovid, i could not have believed, any metamorphosis more rare, than this of the chimical art; but if i could behold things with the hundred eyes of argus, i should scarcely see any work of nature more admirable, for this lead, mixt with the stone of the wise, and in the fire melted, demonstrated to us a most beautiful colour, yea, i say, it was most green; but when i poured it out into a [cone, or] fusory cup, it received a colour like blood, and when it waxed cold, shined with the colour of the best gold: i, and all who were present with me, being amazed, made what haste we, could with the aurificate lead (even before it was through cold) to a gold-smith, who after a precious examen, judged it to be gold most excellent, and that in the whole world, better could not be found; withall, adding, that for every ounce of such gold, he would give 50 florens. the next day, the rumour of this wonderful metallick transmutation was spread all over our hague; whence many illustrious men, and lovers of art, made hast to me, among which, by name, the general examiner of the moneys of this province of holland, d^n porelius, came to me, with certain other most illustrious men, earnestly desiring, that i would communicate to them some small particle of my artificial gold, to prove it by legitimate examens: these, for their curiosity sake, i willingly gratified; and we went together to the house of a certain very curious silver-smith, by name brechtelius, in whose workhouse, the excellency of my gold was evidenced, by that form of probation, which skilful artists call. quarta, viz. when they in a crucible melt three or four parts or silver, with one part of gold, and then by hammering, reduce that mixture into thin plates, on which they pour a sufficient quantity of aquafortis, by which the silver is dissolved, but the gold settles to the bottome, like a black powder. afterward, the aquafortis is poured off, and the golden powder, is again put into a crucible, and by strong fire reduced to gold. but when this work was ended, we supposed, that one half of the gold was vanished, yet in very deed it was not so: for we found that the gold, besides its own weight, had transmuted some part of the silver into gold, viz. two drams of the gold, transmuted two scruples of the silver (through the abundance of its tincture) into like gold homogeneal to it self. after this, we, suspecting that the silver was not well separated from the gold did presently make a mixture: with seven times as much antimony. and after this examen, we lost eight grains of gold; but when i had again evaporated the antimony, i found nine grains of gold, yet in colour somewhat pale. thus, in the best tryal of fire, we lost nothing of this gold, and this infallible kind of probation, i thrice performed in presence of those most noble and illustricsus men, and found, that every dram of gold acquired from the silver for an augmentation to it self, one scruple, of gold: and the silver, is pure good, and very flexible. so according to this, the five drams of gold, attracted to it self from the silver, five scruples; and (that i may together, and at once, comprise all that remains to be said) the whole weight that that laudable powder, in quantity so exceeding small, did transmute, was six drams, and two scruples, of a more vile metal, into gold, in such wise fixed, as it was able perseveringly to sustain the most intense torture of fire. behold! thus have i exactly, from first to last, commemorated this history. the gold i indeed have, but where, or in what land or countrey. elias the artist is at this day hospited, i am wholly ignorant for he told me, his purpose was to abide in his own country no longer then this summer; that after he would travil into asia, and visit the holy land. let the most wise king of heaven (under the shadow of whose divine wings he hath hitherto layn hid) by his administratory angels accompany him in his intended journey, and prosper it so as he living to a great age, may with his inestimable talent greatly succour the whole republick of christians, and after this life gloriously behold, and take of the prepared inheritance of life eternal. amen. chap. iv. therefore, now to compleat my promise, i will forthwith betake my self to the dialogue or, colloque between elias the artist, and me the physician. elias the artist. god save you, master helvetius! if i may not be too troublesome, i desire to have the freedom of discoursing with you for a little time, because i have heard, that you are a curious indagator of natural things. for i have perused your books, and among them, especially that whole treatise, which you write against the effect of sir kenelm digbies sympathetick powder, where it is gloried, that the same, can at distance cure all wounds. assuredly i am incredibly delighted in those things, which are beheld in this speculum, whether sympathetick, or antipathetick, naturally implanted in creatures. for the inexhausted treasures of the divine light and deity, no less abundantly, than liberally granted to us, may best of all be known from all the creatures, which are produced either under the ætherial heaven, or in the belly of the earth, or in the womb of the sea, to the end, that by their potentially insited virtues, they should restore health to the mortal body of men. helvetius the physician o sir! the presence of such a new guest shall never be troublesome to me, but rather i receive you as one of my best friends. for philosophick discourse, touching the secrets cf nature, is the only recreation of my mind, also it is such convenient salutiferous nutriment, as no man can be worthy to taste of, before he shall be rightly disposed for that banquet. enter, i pray, friend, into the house. artist indeed sir! here, as it seems to to me, you have a compleat vulcanian shop, and perhaps all these things spagyrically and exactly drawn from, the mineral kingdom; but i pray, to what end so many medicaments? i believe, that god in the things of nature, naturally gives such medicines, with a very few of which, we may much sooner, and more safely re-integrate the decayed, and languishing health of man, unless the disease be mortal, from a deficiency of nature, or from the putrefaction of some noble internal part hurt, or by reason of a total absumption of the radical humidity in which desperate cases, no galenick cure, or paracelsick tincture can yeild releif. but in ordinary diseases it is not so; and yet here, very many men, before the fatal term of life be expired (abfit nemesis dicto) are enforced to pass out of this fair kingdom of pleasing light, into the shadowed land of the dead, whilst, either they neglect the health of their own body, or commit the same to the faith of physicians, unskilful of the remedy they have in their hand. physician. as far as i can gather from your discourse, if my judgement deceive me not, you are either a physician, or a man expert in chimistry. certainly, according as you say, so i believe, that in the things of nature are given other more excellent medicaments, as also very many other philosophers affirm, that there is a certain (although to few known) universal medicament, by the benefit which, we may prolong life unto the appointed end, cure all diseases otherwise uncurable, and many other such things. but, where is any among all the wisest men of this world, that can shew us the way, how to find out so noble a fountain, whence such a wonderful medicamentous juice, nobilitating the physician, is drawn? perhaps no one man. artist. indeed, i am not a physician, but only a melter of orichalcum, and almost from my child-hood, have exercised my ingeny in pyrotechny, and so have sought out the internal nature of metals and although i now cease from my usual diligence in elaborating some accurate work, by the art of vulcan, yet my mind still takes delight in labours of that kind, and in the lovers of this most curious spagyrick art; and i do verily. believe and judge, that the most wise god, will in this our age communicate gratis, or for nothing, the metallick mysteries of nature to his spagyrick sons, praying, and physico-chimically labouring. physician. my friend, i must needs grant this, that god, for nothing, communicates to his sons, this laudable good, as well as all other gifts; yet you shall very rarely hear, that he for nothing gives or vends this medicamentous wine or nectar to his sons. for we certainly know, how great a number of chymists lived in former ages who, (according to the proverb ) strove to draw water in a sieve, whilest they presumed to prepare this universal stone of philosophers. besides, out of the books of them, who triumph in the glory of adept, no one man can learn the way of preparing, nor know their first matter, so as any one, searching to the lowest roots of mountains, can never ascend to those their heights, where ambrosia, and nectar of macrosophists, is drank. in the mean time, it is the part of a good physician, since he wants such an universal elixir, (not without the daily study of conserving his conscience pure and sound) to adhibit to the diseases of the sick, commended to his cure, such curations; or remedies as for restoring sanity as in which he (from the effect) certainly knows, that a virtue of healing is incited. wherefore, in all desperate diseases, i, with many other practitioners, do alwayes use such most simple medicaments, that thence the diseased may soon be restored to their pristine state of health, or to a better than the pristine. for indeed, various and diverse kinds of salts, are generated in the glandules and lymphatick vessels, after the putrefaction of this, or that nutriment taken, which afterward wax florid in various humours, for diverse diseases, either internal, or external. experience teacheth, that as many as are the constitutions, or complexions of humane bodies, to so many diversities of diseases the same are obnoxious; although in one manner, and the same disease, as our daily conversation evidenceth to us in those who drink wine, whence divers operations manifestly discover themselves. because peter drinks wine, he labours with an angry, i will not say, furious mind. on the contrary, paul drinking wine, seems to imbibe his mind with an agnine timorousness. but matthias sings, and luke weeps. also, touching the scorbutick contagious venome, viz. of peter, his radical juice in the lymphatick vessels, and glandules, is converted into an acidity, stopping the passages, and all organs of the whole body, whence, under the skin, arise spots on the arms and legs of a blewish colour, but in times of pestilence, they swell like pepper corns. also the juice of pauls parts is changed into an aperitive bitterness; whence, under the skin of the arms and legs, arise red spots, pricking like the bitings of fleas; but in a pestilential time, they are blanes. also the juice of matthias his parts, is converted into a sweetness easily putrifying; whence, under the skin of arms and leg, arise watery tumours, almost such as are conspicuous in dropsical persons; but in time of the pest, they are pestilential tumours. also, the juice of the parts of luke, is changed into a saline, and drying sharpness; whence, under the skin of the arms and legs, arise precipitations of the ordinary ferment of the flesh, and exficcations, as usually happens in this atrophia, yea most frequently in the true atrophia. but in the pest, they become most ardent buboes, with madness, even until death. behold, my friend, no physician, by one only universal medicament, can heal the evil of this scorbutick, or pestilential, or febrile venome, but indeed, by the mediation of some particular vegetable, or mineral remedy, given to us from god in nature, he may exterminate the same. for, as i cannot heal, or help all scorbutick persons, with one only scorbutick herb, as scurvy-grass, or sorrel, or fumitory, or brooklime; so, much less of a certain remedy made of these diverse species congested into one; because, between the herbs scurvy-grass and sorrel, there is an antipathy, as between fire and water; and so there is the same antipathy between the herbs fumitory and brook-lime. therefore, the correctory of peters scorbutick saline acid tinging venome, is made with the volatile bitter salt of scurvy-grass. but the correctory of pauls scorbutick saline bitter tinging venome, is made with the acid fixed salt of the herb sorrel. the correctory of matthias his scorbutick sweetish, and moistning tinging venome is made by the help of the fixed bitter drying sulphur of the herb fumitory. and the correctory of lukes scorbutick tinging saline and drying venome, is made with the help of the sweet moistning mercury of the herb brook-lime, or red colewort, as from the external signature of these herbs, it is easie to judge of the internal specifick remedy against there diverse scorbutick disease. certainly, my friend, if this be observed by a prudent physician, he must needs doubt of the universal medicine, artist. all you have discoursed of, i can easily grant; yet very few physicians use this method of healing. yet, in the meanwhile, it is not impossible, that an universal medicine should be given in the highest mineral kingdome, by the benefit of which we may perform and administer all things, which are by you related to me, touching the lowest kingdom of vegitables; but the most wise god, for several weighty reasons, hath not on all philosophers promiscuously conferred this most magnificent charisma of supereminent science, but hath revealed it only; to a very few. according as all the adept, with one mouth, confess, and say: the science is true, and, the verity thereof not to be doubted. physician sir, besides the above commemorated, there are also other observations; strenuously refuting the operation on an universal medicine, partly in respect of the age and strength of man, partly by reason of the sex, and other circumstances, whilst a difference is to be made between the tender, and the robust, whether from nature, or from education; or between the male and female, or between a young man and a virgin, or between the beginning, middle, or end of diseases; or it is to be understood whether a disease, be inveterate, or the sick be lately invaded; or lastly, whether the ferment be promoted in this disease, or be precipited in in another. effervescency is made either in the stomach or in the intestines. assuredly there are many contradictions of the wonderful effect, of the universal medicine. for the greatest part of rational physicians want the perspicil of thomas didymus in their fingers. artist indeed, sir; you have philosophised rightly, and well, yea, arthodoxly, against the universal medicament, according to that notorious, and far spred proverb. as many heads, so many senses. for as sweet sounding musick delights not the ears of every midas; nor doth the same history related please all historians; nor of bread and wine, of the same taste, is there a like relish in all palats. so also the judgements of skilful men do strangely differ, touching the wonderful effect of this universal medicine, on humane and metallick bodies. for this universal medicine, in its way of operating, vastly differs, from a particular medicine, which may in some sense be called universal, as the herb scurvy-grass, curing every scorbutick marked with blew spots; or sorrel, healing every scurvy, noted with red spots; or brook-lime, healing an atrophia of that kind, or fumitory remedying tumors of that kind: and that especially with such physicians, with whom the observation you before recited, is of any esteem. moreover, there is an exceeding great difference between the universal medicine of philosophers, refreshing the vital spirits, and between a particular medicament of proletary-curation, with which is corrected the venom of humors; viz. such as boyles up against nature, in this man, acid; in that man, the bitter is predominant; in one, what is saline, in another, what is sharp, grow potent. but, if these corrupt humors be not without all delay presently expelled out of the body, by the ordinary emunctories of nature either by the belly, or by urine of the bladder, or by the sweat through the pores, or by the spittle of the mouth, or by the nostrils, assuredly the corruption of one, becomes the generation of another, viz. of a disease. for, from every spark, if we do not timely extinguish it, an exceding great burning will arise. also, if there be a defect, of the vital spirits, it is impossible to effect this. therefore the only care of a conscientious physician should be, how to deduce the motion of the vital spirits to a digestible natural heat, and that is best of all, and most securely performed by the operation of our universal medicament, by which they are found to be notably recreated. for as soon as this more than perfect medicine hath driven the morbifick evil from the seat it occupies, then immediately it infuseth the lost sanity, and that only from the harmony, or sympathy it self, which the vital spirits, and this medicine, have mutually in themselves. wherefore, it, by the adept, is called the mystery of nature, and the defensive of old age, against all diseases. which, i fay, even in a most pestilent season, most full of contagious diseases every where raging, makes of man a salamander, bearing such epidemical plagues of heaven displeased, until the utmost term of his life be expired. physician as far as i, beloved friend, can understand, this medicine makes not for the emendation of depraved humours, but is chiefly conducent for the recreation of the vital spirits. besides, among practical chimists, this secret is taught, viz. that by the spayrick art, it may be commonstrated, how the pure should be separated from the impure, and by the same, how the immature are rendred mature, and how the bitter are corrected into sourish, and the sourish into sweet, and the sharp into gentle, and the gentle into sharp; and the acid into sweet, and the sweet into acid. also this laudable medicine of philosophers, according to my understanding, cannot prolong life, beyond the term prefixed from above, but only preserve from the effect of all venimous, or otherwise mortiferous diseases: and so it is certainly true, as is commonly believed, that the prolongation of humane life depends, on the will of the omnipotent god only. but, omitting these, i would here ask this one question. whether by the use of this universal medicine, the pristine nature of man may be converted into new, so as a slothful man may degenerate into a diligent, or stirring man, and a man, who before was by nature melancholy and sad, afterward became jovial, chearful, and full of joy, or like alterations, reformations, permutations, or vicissitudes happen in the nature of man? artist. not at all sir. for so great power was never conferred on any medicament, that it could change the nature of man. wine inebriating, taken by diverse individual men, in him, who is drunk, changeth not his nature but only provokes, and deduceth into act, what is naturally, and potentially in him, but before was as it were, dead. even so is the operation of the universal medicine, which by recreation of the vital spirits, excites sanity, for a time only suppressed, because it was naturally in him before; even as the heat of the sun changeth not herbs, or flowers, but only provokes the same, and from the proper potential nature of them, deduceth them into act only. for a man of a melancholy temper, is again raised up to exercise his own melancholy matters; and the jovial man, who was pleasant, is recreated in all his chearful actions, and so consequently, in all desperate diseases it is a present, or most excellent preservative. hence a man, presaging that some evil will befal him, will rather prevent than be prevented. but if any prolongation of life, by some philosophick medicament, could have been induced, against the predestination of the omnipotent god, undoubtedly neither hermes trismegistus, nor paracelsus, nor raymundlully, nor the count bernhard, and many more like illustrious possessors of this great mystery, would not have yeilded to the common death of all mortals, but perhaps have protracted their life until this very day, therefore, it would be the part of a fanatick, and foolish man to affirm this, yea of a most foolish man, to believe, and assent to the same, touching any one medicament in the things of nature. physician. my friend, whatsoever you have spoken no less regularly, than fundamentally, touching the operation of the universal medicine, i indeed cherefully, and willingly grant, but as long as i am ignorant of preparing the same rightly, i do no other than attempt to carry my boat from a very small lake, into the vast ocean, because it will certainly be driven back to the shore, without any fruit. for although many of those illustrious men have written somewhat touching that laudable preparation, yet they involved that in such a wrapper of shadowed caution, as the footsteps of them latently demonstrated, can be known by few or none of the most diligent readers, who should follow them so far, as until they come where they would be. also, who is so wealthy, and well informed, as to be able, and to know where to buy all those books, in which, here, and there an hypothesis of this kind is handled: betides, you may consume the greatest part of your life, before you can gather thence any sufficient knowledge, or the direct manual operation. therefore it is best for us to abide patiently in our laboratory, praying to the blessed god, according to that saying: ora, ac labora; & deus dat omni hora. labour, and pray; god gives alway. artist you argue rightly enough sir. for, from the writings of philosophers, this art of arts is most rarely learned; but the sense them is very well, and clearely understood by the manuduction of some adept philosopher. but let us hence pass to the transmutative effect of this most noble tincture, touching which, the possessors, or many of the adept, have written many books, and the most of their genuine disciples, labouring much in the fire, did at length compleatly attain to the wished end of their arcanum, physician i perceive your mastership takes pleasure in passing from the use of the medicine, to the infinite transmutation of metals. although i could easily believe the possibility of art, viz. that a chymical experiment of that kind was in the adept, as i have also made mention above, touching that experiment of dr. kifflerus who, with the tincture of one ounce of gold transmuted 1 ounce & half of silver into the best gold, not to mention the experiment of helmont; nor of scotus, which he made in the most famous cities of colonia, and hanovia; nor much to insist on that illustrious, and well known example, manifested at prague, before cæsar ferdinando the third, himself; where with one only grain of the tincture, three pounds mercury were transmuted into most noble gold; insomuch that i am brought no less into a neccessity, than into a will of believing, that the art may be true; yet i cannot to this hour sufficiently receive it without some doubt, because with these my eyes, i never in all my life saw the man, who was the true possessor thereof. artist. sir, you say true? yet art will be art, whether you can believe it or no. even as is seen in the magnet. how it by its own insited sulphureous virtue, of iron, by contact presently makes a magnet. although you will not believe, that such wonderful operations are latent in it, yet they are, and will remain true. so also you should judge of the stone of philosophers, in which is all that the wise seek. and because the clouded writings of them, can be understood, and explained but by very few, it is to be desired earnestly by all, and with the hands it must be endavoured, that some one general epitomen of the whole art, may so be made, as in a very short space of time, and without much labour, all things necessary may be gathered, by the help of which, a most easy transition to real authors, might be effected. now since you have presented some few examples, by which you endeavour to assert the confirmed possibility of the matter; i my self will here shew to you the true matter of secret philosophers. behold it! look well, upon it. physician. so my master, is this sulphureous, and yellow glassy substance the very philosophick matter? and are you your self the possessor of this science? i am ready to believe you do but jest with me. i pray sir, tell me the truth, whether it be really so, or not? artist. yes, matter doctor, you now have within your hand, the most pretious treasure in the world. for this is the true stone of philosophers, than which, no man ever had a better, nor shall have any other. and i my self did elaborate the composition, from beginning to end. if you have another convenient chamber, i will shew you metal transmuted into gold, by such a stone as this (when i had brought him into another chamber.) behold (said he) these five pendants, were, by the benefit of this philosophick tincture, prepared of saturn, or lead; which i wear for a perpetual remembrance of my master. but i suppose, you, having perused many writings of the adept, seeing the substance, and nature of this stone, will very sufficiently know the true matter, or rightly understand the same. physician. i understand by your self, that you had a master, from whom you rather learned your art, than acquired the same, by your proper labour and invention. and although i now have seen that substance, which you affirm to be the true tincture of philosophers, as also those five pendants, nevertheless i am still left ignorant, and in doubt, whether it be true or no. therefore, i earnestly again and again request of you, to confer on me only so small a part of that matter, as will suffice to transmute only four grains of lead into gold, that you may this way remove from me all scruple or doubt, and render me so much the more certain of the verity of the matter. give me but the magnitude of one grain only, or of a coriander-seed, that thence a specimen, or probation, may be exhibited, either in some desperate disease, or in a metallick transmutation. artist. i do confess, that a certain man of good condition, to me wholly unknown, by demonstrating taught me; first, the possibility of transmutation; secondly the way of preparing also. and this is that infallible art, touching which you have no reason to doubt. but whereas, you request that i should give you one small part of my treasure; that is no wise lawful for me to do, although, you would give as a recompense, so many ducats, as this whole room, from the bottom to the top, would contein; and that not by reason of the estimation of the matter, because it is of small price, but for another weighty reason, in respect of which, if it were possible, that fire could be consumed by fire, i would at this time, rather cast this whole mass into the devouring flames, before your eyes. wherefore, in the meanwhile, i admonish you, not to be so eager in coveting this so great science. for you have this day seen more in my possession, than many kings, and princes could ever behold, although they eagerly desired to see the same. besides, i think of comming to you again, after 3 weeks, then i will shew to you certain excellent arts, and manuductions in the chymical science. also, if it shall then be lawful for me, to shew you the way of transmutation, i will truely satisfie your curiosity therein. in the mean while, i bid you farewel, withal, admonishing, that you take heed to your self, and meddle not with such a great, and profound labour, least: you miserably loose both your fame, and substance in the ashes like some other covetous inquisitors, of the same most noble art. physician. now, what shall i do, my master? if it happen, that, by reason of your philosophick oath, confirmed by that small draught of silver, dissolved in rain-water, it shall not be lawful for you to give me that requested exceeding small part of the tincture so wonderful. you cannot be ignorant, that i (according to your suspicion) am in mind anxious, and earnestlie desirous of tasting of this so noble science. yea, i do verilie think, if adam himself, the first patriark of the world (who was once driven out of paradice, for eating the apple of either wisedom) were yet living in this our age, he would not forbear again the taste of this golden apple, from the garden of atlantis. your mastership said: manie princes could not see this which i have seen. i, indeed have seen the matter, of which you give so rare a testimony; but in the mean while i have not beheld the transmutative effect; only i give credit to your words. and, since you have told me, that you will go hence, and after three weeks return to me again, to teach me some excellent chymical arts, as also the way of projection, if it shall then be lawful for you. in the fruition of this good hope, i at this time rest satisfied; in the mean time, giving you hearty thanks, for your exceeding great friendship shewed to me alreadie, and, for your singular care, and faithful admonition, that i should not in chymical labours, consume both my goods and reputation. i assuredly have never yet made tryal of so great, and high things, nor ever will i attempt the me, unless your self will first gratis, and from the pure benevolence of friendship, demonstrate to me, the way and manner of preparing. yet i shall admire the verity of art, and please my self with the remembrance of the friendship you have shewed me; because you, who have revealed this to me, are an adept philosopher. but if any king, or prince, or any great man, or men, should know, that you are the possessor of this art, and therefore (which god forbid) should lay hold of you, and attempt by tortures to bring you to a discovery, would you reveal this art to them? artist. i have not shewed the stone of philosophers to any man, except to one aged man, and to your self; to both of you, i have revealed that i am the possessor; but, henceforth, no man must ever see or hear such a thing. and although any king, or prince, should (which god i hope will not permit) cast, me into prison, i would not, after the manner of circumforanean physicians [or mountebanks] or vagabond impostors or of poor alchimists, directly, or indirectly, discover the art to them, but would rather suffer my self to be most cruelly wracked, tortured, or tormented with burning fire, untill my life expire. physician good friend, are there not authors, which, touching the verity of this art, write more plainly, then all the number of them, which, concerning it, utter words so obscure, as perhaps they themselves did not understand, unless they adhibited the. commentaries, and annotations of evident paraphrasists. i suppose you have in times past read them, and therefore are best able to inform me, who were adept. artist. master doctor, i indeed read not, nor have i read many books, yet among those i have read, i find no authors more curious, than sandivogius, especially in that book, which is entituled cosmopolita, in dutch, borger der werelt. also brother basilius in in his twelve keys. as to sandivogius, this author you may peruse, untill i return, as i said: for in his obscure words the truth is latent, even as our tincture of philosophers is both included, and retruded, in external minerals, and metallick bodies. physician sir, i give you thanks, for this so great friendship. i shall do according to your advice, and as to what you say, touching the objects of the tincture, i easily assent to, and grant; for i believe that the wonderful, and efficacious essences of metals, are hid under the external rinds and shells of bodies, although i find very few so well exercised, and experienced in the fire, who know how to uncase the kernel, according to the rule of art. every external, and robust substance, of any animal, vegetable, or mineral, is the body, like unto that terrestrial province, into which (as isaac holland hath prescribed) excellent essences spiritually enter. wherefore, it is needful, that the sons of art should know, how by some saline suitable ferment, grateful to the metallick nature, they may subdue, dissolve, separate and concentrate, not only the magnetick metallick virtue of tinging, but also, how they may multiply the same in its own philosophick homogeneal golden, or silvery-manner. for we see, that the bodies of all creatures, are not only easily destroyed, but thenceforth also the internals cease to live, and hasten to the dark shadowings, in which they were, before they, by the creation of god the creator, were brought to light. but what man will discover to us this art in the metallick kingdom? artist you say well, and have rightly judged of the natural destruction of things, and if it shall be pleasing to the most merciful god, to deal graciously with you as he hath done with me; he, according to your good hope, will direct some one of the adept to demonstrate, to you the way of destroying metals, and of collecting the internal souls of them. but, in the mean while, do you invoke the most wise god, to whose vigilant eyes i commend you, which are always open upon his sons, regenerated to him by christ. again farewel, and rest assured, i will be your friend. i must at this time go hence, but i hope to see you again in good health, ere it be long. thus my new friend took his leave, and went away; it leaving me, his friend, most sad for the space of three weeks, which being expired, according to his word, he returned, and gave me the tincture, as you may learn by the above-recited history. after this, that philosophick man of god went from me, and i never more saw him, from that time, unto to this very day, nor could i hear of him by any of the carriers, or posts, or by any of my intimate acquaintance. nevertheless, he left with me (as a spurre) the acute memory of, him, reposted in my minde, as also the opinion of paracelsus affirming, that by metals, of metals, and with metals, cleansed, spiritual, and first depurated from their feculency, are made metals, and the living gold and silver of philosophers, as well for humane, as for metallick bodies. wherefore if that guest, my friend of but little acquaintance, had exactly shewed to me, the way of preparing preparing this celestial spiritual salt, by which, and with which, from corporeal, and earthly substances, i might, as it were, in the matrix of them, collect the spiritual rayes of sol or luna: assuredly, he from his own light, would have enkindled in me so great a light, as i should have seen, and understood how i ought in other corporeal metals, by sympathy to transmute the eternal soul of them so, as by the help thereof they had clarified, or transformed their own like body, either into gold, or into silver, according to the disposition of the red seed, into a red body, or according to the nature of the white seed, into a white body. for elias the artist affirmed to me, that the chalybs of sandivogius is that true mercurial metallick humidity, by the help of which, without any corrosive, the artist might, in an open fire, and crucible, separate the fixed rayes of sol or luna from their own body, and thenceforth make them volatile and mercurial, for the dry philosophick tincture, as he demonstrated to me; and communicated somewhat relating to the transmutation of metals. indeed all men well skilled in the chymical science, have a necessity of assenting to me in this, viz. that pyrotechny is the mother, and nurse of various noble sciences and arts. for they can easily judge from the colours of the chaos of metals in the fire, what metallic body is therein. even so dayly in the bowels of the earth are procreated metals, and perspicuous stones, from a proper noble vaporous seed, from a spiritual tinging sulphureous seed, in their diverse saline matrixes. for the common sulphur, whether of an impure, or pure metal whilst conjoyned with its own body, mixt with salt peter only in the burning heat of fire is easily changed into a most hard and most fixed earth, but this earth is thenceforth by the aire easily changed into a most limpid water: and this water afterward, by a more strong fire, according to the nature of the metallick pure or impure sulphur mixt is converted into glass, admirably well tinged with various colours. almost in the very same manner, from the white of an egge is generated a chick by natural heat. so also from the seminal bond of life of any one metal, is made a new, and more noble metal, by an heat of fire convenient to the saline nature; although very few chimists rightly and perfectly know, how the internal, and alwayes moving magnetick virtues, are distinguished according to the harmony, or disconsonancy of them. whence we see, this metal hath a sympathy or antipathy with another, so very singular, as is found in the magnet with iron, in mercury with gold, in silver with copper, a very remarkable sympathy, but on the contrary, there is a notable antipathy in lead against tin, in iron against gold, in antimony against silver, in lead against mercury. infinite other like sympathetic, and antipathetick annotations occurr in the animal & vegetable kingdom; as you may read and find in various authors, who have written of such curiosities, from the accurate, and absolute knowledge of which, the true philosophers, and masters of nature had their beginning, and esteem. thus have i described, what i my self have seen and done; and have caused the same to be printed for you, candid readers, out of mere liberality, gratis communicating it, according to that of seneca: i desire in this to know somewhat, that i may teach others. si cum hac exceptione detur sapientia, ut illlam inclusam tencam, abjiciam, &c. but if any man doubt of the real truth of this matter, let him only with a lively faith believe in his crucified jesus, that in him, he (by the strict way of regeneration) may become a new creature; in the same let him fix the whole anchor, of his faith, and likewise shew his [greek: philanthropia], or love of mankind, unto all his neighbours, and especially exercise the works of mercy, and brotherly love towards the needy members of the christian religion, that at length, when the whole course of his life is justly, and holily finished, in that fatal and mortal hour, he may hence, through the watery ocean of this tempestuous and rocky world, arrive in safety at the most blessed port of eternal rest, and sing the new song with the triumphing philosophers of the heavenly jerusalem, of which he hopes to take, who is, your most faithful and assured friend john frederick helvetius, doctor and practitioner of medicine at the hague. * * * * * transcriber's note: repeated word "perused" deleted. experiments and observations on the following subjects; 1. on the preparation, calcination, and medicinal uses of magnesia alba. 2. on the solvent qualities of calcined magnesia. 3. on the variety in the solvent powers of quick-lime, when used in different quantities. 4. on various absorbents, as promoting or retarding putrefaction. 5. on the comparative antiseptic powers of vegetable infusions prepared with lime, &c. 6. on the sweetening properties of fixed air. by thomas henry, apothecary. _utut tamen se res habeat, ego bona saltem fide tradam quæ hactenus rescivi omnia._ sydenham. london: printed for joseph johnson, no. 72, st. paul's church-yard. mdcclxxiii. to thomas percival, m.d. f.r.s. & s.a. dear sir, when i reflect how much the friendship with which you have favoured me has contributed to my happiness; that from you has been imbibed a considerable share of the small taste i possess for experimental inquiries; and that to your skilful and affectionate treatment i am greatly indebted even for the health i enjoy; it is impossible to hesitate a moment in the choice of a patron: gratitude and esteem direct me to inscribe this treatise to you, and i chearfully obey their dictates. if to these any additional motive had been wanting, i should have received it from your having been an evidence to the result of many of the experiments related in the following pages. that your own health may long enable you to continue exemplarily useful to your friends and to the public, is the sincere and ardent wish of, dear sir, your truly affectionate and very humble servant, thomas henry. manchester, 18th jan. 1773. the preface. a right composition of the several articles used in medicine, is of so much importance to the practice of it, that every attempt to improve or ascertain the method of preparing them, cannot fail of a candid reception from the public. though great advancement has been made within these few years in chemical pharmacy, by the labours of the very ingenious dr. lewis, and some other writers on chemistry and the materia medica, there is still a wide field left for improvement. it is to be wished that apothecaries, to whose province researches of this kind more peculiarly belong, and many of whom are well qualified by a liberal education to pursue them with advantage, would give their attention to these material interests of the art: for while the several professors of medicine and of surgery, are most laudably and assiduously employed in adding to the enlargement of these sciences, why should the sons of pharmacy remain supinely inactive, and leave every thing towards the improvement of their profession to be performed by the members of the elder branch of physic, instead of contributing _their_ share to its support? as if tacitly acknowledging themselves unequal to the task, and thereby incurring the too general, though unmerited, imputation of want of knowledge and skill in their department. the first part of the ensuing treatise, which relates _an improved method of preparing magnesia alba_, has been communicated to the college of physicians; and that learned body have done the author the honour to insert it in the second volume of their transactions. it is here reprinted as a proper introduction to the subsequent pages. the calcination of magnesia is not a new process[a]; but, as in this state it is a medicine not much introduced into practice, perhaps a few hints may be suggested, in regard to its medicinal and pharmaceutical properties, which are not generally known; and it is hoped that some useful information may be communicated relative to the various action of absorbent medicines on the bile. [a] the german and italian chemists formerly prepared magnesia by evaporating the mother of nitre, and then calcining the residuum; but, hoffman having discovered the method of precipitating it from the bittern remaining after the crystallization of sea salt, the calcination was disused, as tedious and unnecessary. in the succeeding chapters, it is attempted to determine how far, and in what proportion, lime promotes the solution of vegetable astringents, and other drugs in water; and whether the action of antiseptic medicines, thus dissolved, be in any degree impaired or increased by this mode of obtaining tinctures from them. in endeavouring to contribute to the determination of the question, whether fixed air has the power of restoring sweetness to putrid substances, the author may at first sight appear to have transgressed his proper limits; but, as fixed air, if possessed of this property, is likely to be a valuable acquisition to the materia medica, he flatters himself he shall incur no censure by the attempt. the contents. chap. i. page _an account of an improved method of preparing magnesia alba._ 1 chap. ii. _miscellaneous observations._ 12 chap. iii. _on the medicinal properties of magnesia alba._ 25 chap. iv. _on the calcination of magnesia alba._ 39 chap. v. _on the medicinal virtues of calcined magnesia._ 48 chap. vi. _on the action of various absorbents, as promoting or retarding putrefaction._ 58 chap. vii. _on the solvent qualities of calcined magnesia._ 80 chap. viii. _on the various solvent powers of quick lime in different quantities._ 88 chap. ix. _on the comparative antiseptic powers of vegetable infusions prepared with lime, &c._ 105 chap. x. _on the sweetening properties of fixed air._ 114 chap. xi. _a review of the general conclusions deducible from the foregoing observations and experiments._ 135 an appendix 143 errata. page 8, line 14, after _quantity_ read _of water_. page 10, line 18, for _interrupt_ read _intercept_. page 13, line 1, read _is there said_. page 16, line 1, read _the other absorbents_. page 29, note, line 4 from the bottom, for _albuminis_ read _aluminis_. page 31, line 4, for _patients_ read _parents_. page 83, line 9, after _elegant_ read _green_. page 126, line 3, erase the _comma_ after _smell_. page 127, line 3, place a _comma_ instead of the _semicolon_. chap. i. an account of an improved method of preparing magnesia alba. although magnesia alba is a medicine which has been in general use for many years, yet the proper mode of making it is very little known. our _pharmacopæia_ affords us no information about it; and the _formula_ which is given by the edinburgh college, as well as that with which the ingenious doctor black[b] has favoured us, is deficient in several circumstances. hence the preparation of pure magnesia has been confined to very few persons, who have preferred the emolument they have received by keeping their method secret, to the more diffusive utility of which a publication of it would have been productive.[c] i therefore beg leave to lay before the public a process for the preparation of magnesia, by which it will be in the power of every apothecary to make it himself, in all respects equal to that which is sold by those who conceal their method. [b] essays and observations physical and literary, vol. ii. [c] mr. glass, a few years since, published an essay on magnesia alba, in which all the information he affords us relative to the preparation is what we knew before, viz. that it is prepared from epsom salts and pot ashes; and has related a number of difficulties which occur in the process, at the same time carefully, i had almost said meanly, avoiding giving the least instruction which might teach us how to shun them, though he has given a long detail of the many tragical consequences which may attend the use of magnesia prepared under such disadvantages. i am the more strongly induced to make this communication, because the magnesia which is generally to be found in the shops, is either extremely coarse and ill prepared, or, which is still worse, sophisticated with calcareous substances, differing greatly from true magnesia. i have been assured by some physicians, that they have met with it mixed with chalk, and even with lime, and i have sometimes seen it so adulterated: a fraud of very dangerous tendency, as this powder is so frequently administered to very young infants, and to adults of tender bowels and costive habits. this medicine was originally prepared abroad, from the liquor called the _mother of nitre_, which is composed of a light earth united with an acid; and these being separated, either by a strong fire, or by the addition of an alkali, the powder was washed in water, and obtained the name of magnesia alba. hoffman afterwards prepared it from the bittern remaining after the crystallization of sea salt, which he found to be similar to the mother of nitre. and the factitious epsom salt being prepared from this bittern, and evidently composed of magnesia and the vitriolic acid, dr. black, who has favoured the world with a number of very valuable experiments on this subject, made use of this salt with success for the same purpose. happening some years ago to live in the neighbourhood of a gentleman who has long been celebrated as the preparer of the most genuine magnesia, and never having been able myself to make magnesia comparable to his, by the commonly known methods, i was desirous of gaining some intelligence as to his process, and was at last so fortunate as to obtain some useful hints. i availed myself of these, and after repeated trials, produced magnesia equally pure, white, tasteless, light and impalpable with that of mr. glass; nay sometimes that of my own preparing has been superiour to his, and in one respect has generally the advantage of it, namely, that mine is not so stiff when dried, and may be reduced to the finest powder by simple pressure; whereas _his_ requires some degree of trituration to break the lumps effectually; which i imagine may be owing to his pursuing dr. black's method of drying it, by straining and _pressing_ out the water through a cloth. the following is the manner of preparing it, which i have found successful. dissolve any quantity of _sal catharticus amarus_, commonly called epsom salts, in its own weight of water; filter the liquor, and add to it by degrees a filtrated solution of pearl ashes in an equal quantity of water, stirring them gently until the mixed liquors have acquired the appearance of a complete coagulum: then cease adding any more of the alkaline lixivium; and, having diluted the precipitate, and mixed it intimately with a small quantity of hot water, immediately throw the mixture into a large vessel of boiling water. keep it boiling for a quarter of an hour, then take it out, and put it into glazed earthen vessels. as soon as the powder has subsided, and before the water be quite cold, pour it off, and add a fresh quantity of boiling water: repeat these ablutions with several parcels of hot water, till the liquor has entirely lost its saline taste. then let it be so agitated as to suspend the finer parts of the powder; in which state decant it into other vessels, and having separated the water from the magnesia by inclination, put it on large chalk stones, till a considerable part of the humidity be absorbed. then wrap it up in sheets of white paper, and dry it before the fire. pour hot water on the remaining powder, stir it, decant it in its turbid state, and separate the magnesia from the water as before. by these means, the whole, or most of it, will be reduced to an equal degree of fineness. the separation of the magnesia will be promoted by heating the saline lixivia before they are mixed; and the larger the quantity of water into which the precipitated powder is cast, the more speedily and perfectly will the vitriolated tartar, which is formed by the alkali of the _sal catharticus_, be washed off. dr. black directs that three or four times the quantity of water, to that of the solutions, should be added; but this i have found greatly insufficient. the neutral salt should be washed off as quickly as possible; otherwise, as he justly observes, by allowing the mixture to stand for some time, the powder concretes into minute grains, which when viewed with a microscope, appear to be assemblages of needles diverging from a point. these concretions cannot be redissolved by any washing, however long continued. his intention, in boiling the mixture, is much better answered, by adding it to the water when in a state of ebullition; and once boiling in this manner is more effectual than a dozen washings in hot water. much depends on the purity of the water used in the process. if it be hard pump water, the selenites with which it is impregnated will be decompounded, and the calcareous earth be deposited, after boiling; which mixing with the magnesia will render it impure, gritty and discoloured. rain water collected free from impurities, or clear river water, are most eligible; but if the situation of the operator does not permit him to procure these in a proper state, he should either use distilled water, which has been kept till the empyreuma is gone off, or at least such pump water as is free from any calcareous or saline impregnation. when poured on the magnesia, it should be strained through a thick linen cloth, so as to intercept any accidental impurities which it may acquire in heating. the drying should be performed with expedition. to this end, the chalk stones should be exposed to a moderate degree of heat; and when they have been employed two or three times, should be dried before a fresh quantity of the magnesia is put on them. cleanliness should be particularly attended to through the whole process; and the vessels ought to be carefully covered, that no dust may enter. we may safely make use of a large copper brewing-pan, to boil the magnesia in; for as the acid is perfectly neutralized, there can be no danger of its quitting the alkali, to which it has a greater affinity than to the metal; and copper does not readily dissolve, even in acids, when boiling hot; nor have i ever observed the least corrosion, though i have frequently used such vessels for this purpose. chap. ii. miscellaneous observations. since the drawing up of the paper which has been the subject of the last chapter, some observations have occurred, which are either so immediately connected with, or at least deduced from it, that it may not perhaps seem inexpedient to introduce them in this place. i was very much surprised to observe, in the lectures lately published, _as delivered_ by the very learned and ingenious dr. cullen, that magnesia is there said to be no more purgative than any other absorbent earth. the sentence is this; (speaking of other absorbents) "magnesia alba should have been added to this set. it has had a considerable reputation as an absorbent, and when neutralized, as a purgative; but i find it is not more absorbent than any of the rest, nor more purgative in less quantity, as chalk or crab's eyes given in the same quantity, viz. dramij, will have the same effect. therefore it may be neglected." surely this must have been an error of the person who wrote down the lectures, and have escaped the notice of the ingenious editors; who, from their skill in chemistry, must know that pure magnesia differs from every calcareous or testaceous earth with which we are hitherto acquainted. these earths are nearly insoluble in the vitriolic acid, and what part does unite with it, forms a selenitical salt, the most difficult of solution of all others, and of an astringent nature: whereas the magnesia[d] united with the same acid, produces what is commonly called epsom salt, easy of solution, and purgative to the bowels. the former, with the nitrous acid constitutes a calcareous nitre, incapable of crystallization; with the marine acid a calcareous muriatic salt; and when dissolved in vinegar, the mixture spontaneously dries up into a friable sub-astringent salt: whereas magnesia, with all these acids, forms _purging salts_; that with the nitrous acid, yellow, capable of being reduced into crystals retaining their form in a dry air, but melting in a moist one: with the muriatic acid, a salt is produced which does not crystallize, and easily melts when exposed to the air: with distilled vinegar, a saline uncrystallizable mass is formed, resembling glue both in colour and consistence while warm, but becoming brittle when cold. dr. black says, that two drachms of this salt purged a middle aged man four times; and half an ounce of the same gave a woman of a strong constitution no less than ten stools.[e] [d] essays physical and literary, vol. ii. p. 164. [e] ibid. p. 64. besides, where an acid prevails, much smaller doses than two drachms of magnesia prove purgative; and it seldom happens that even that dose of the other absorbents[f] will produce the same effect. nor am i singular in my opinion, when i declare my doubt whether magnesia be not of itself in some degree purgative, independent of its junction with any acid whatsoever. it appears to be an earth _sui generis_. that of alum resembles it in some respects, yet differs from it essentially, when combined with the vitriolic acid: the alum is strongly astringent and antiseptic, the epsom salt purgative and septic. [f] hoffman, having attributed the purgative quality of magnesia to its forming a bitter cathartic salt with the acid it meets with in the stomach and bowels, adds, "at vero in contrarium quoddam dubium contra hanc sententiam moveri posse intelligo, quum nempe alia terrea, quæ prompte solvent et absorbent inhærescens primis viis acidum, neutiquam effectum laxantem exserant. sed his regerere licet, quod interdum a pulveribus absorbentibus vel bezoardicis utique alvus fluidior fiat, si multum acidi primam regionem incolet: vis tamen eorum purgandi non tanta est, quanta magnesiæ, quia solutiones illorum cum acidis liquoribus factæ non tam eminente salino acri, sed moderate salso sapore imbutæ sunt, quam quidem ea, quæ ex magnesia et acidis liquoribus conficitur. atque adeo ex eo apparet, præter alcali terreum aliud adhuc esse in magnesia principium, quod ad mixturam acidi in materiem stimulantem et purgantem transeat." hoffman. animadversiones et experimenta circa magnesiam, &c. op. tom. 4. p. 480. i have very lately seen a paper signed by doctor cadogan and dated in the year 1767, in which he complains grievously of the advertisers of magnesia, making use of his name without his consent, and has published the process for making _his_ magnesia. the doctor's intent in this was doubtless benevolent, but his manner of preparing this powder is unnecessarily expensive and wasteful. he directs only one pound of lixivium tartari to five pounds of sal catharticus amarus, which is greatly insufficient to precipitate all the magnesia. and he insists strongly on the superiority of the lixivium prepared from salt of tartar, to that made of potashes, as if the chemical effects of one, were different from the other. but, says the doctor, potashes render the magnesia bitter. surely the vitriolated tartar produced by a union of one vegetable fixed alkali with the vitriolic acid, is equally soluble in water with that prepared with any other, and if so, will be as easily washed off from the magnesia. but behold a champion steps forth, and at one blow levels to the ground the whole tribe of magnesia makers, who have procured it from the factitious epsom salts. i confess i have not had the happiness to peruse this ingenious gentleman's pamphlet on the subject, but i have formed a very extraordinary opinion of his _candour_, _modesty_, _and knowledge_, from the very curious paper which he distributes with his magnesia. notwithstanding doctor black, and since him mr. glass and several others, have procured _pure_ magnesia from the factitious epsom salts, mr. dale ingram, assures us, that he has made an improvement, "which is by the learned esteemed one of the greatest acquisitions to the materia medica." and wherein does this mighty discovery consist? even that magnesia prepared from the waters of epsom, is superiour to that prepared from the bitter purging salt; and he assures us that the magnesia sold by him is so prepared. to the first assertion i shall only reply, that every person at all conversant in chemistry knows that magnesia earth is the same, from whatever substance it can be separated in a pure state; that the factitious epsom salt yields it in as great a degree of purity as the salt of the epsom water, and that dr. alston assures us, the artificial salt "by various and repeated experiments, made in france as well as in britain, is demonstrated to be every way as good as, yea to be the very same with, the genuine made of the epsom waters."[g] [g] alston's materia medica, vol. i. p. 164. as to the other declaration, it will be sufficient to observe that one gallon of epsom water contains only seven drachms of salt in a dry season, and hardly six drachms in a wet one;[h] and that for this salt to precipitate its magnesia properly, it is necessary it should be diluted with little more than its own weight of water.[i] six drachms of salt will yield two drachms of magnesia. so that to procure a pound of this powder mr. ingram must evaporate above sixty gallons of the water, to between five and six pints, before he begins the precipitation. sure never did empiricism appear so thinly disguised! [h] ibid. [i] essays physical and literary, p. 163. in the preceding chapter, the necessity of using water free from any calcareous impregnation has been particularly insisted on, and i have, on another occasion,[j] observed that great attention should be given to the purity of the water used in the making of all the saline preparations; and i may add in almost all the operations of pharmacy. dr. percival, in his ingenious experiments on water, found a quart of the manchester pump water to contain upwards of sixty grains of adventitious matter.[k] suppose therefore, for instance, that in making the extract from a pound of peruvian bark, it be boiled only six times in the quantity of water directed by the london dispensatory, nine gallons will be consumed in the process; which is a very moderate allowance, six coctions not being sufficient to extract all the virtues of that drug. dr. percival boiled half an ounce of bark twenty five times, in so many different pints of water, the last of which had some impregnation, and the residuum gave a deep colour, and considerable bitterness to rectified spirit of wine. if we likewise suppose only one half of the foreign contents of such water to be left by evaporation, then the quantity of calcareous and saline matter, undesignedly mixed with the extract, will be two ounces and two drachms, or nearly equal to the quantity of extract procured from a pound of bark by pure water. thus this important medicine becomes grossly adulterated, without any such intention in the operator; and i know it is the common practice to use pump water in making it. [j] vide percival's essays, 2d. edit. p. 321. [k] ibid. p. 87. i have particularly selected the peruvian bark, as requiring a very large quantity of water to extract the whole which it is capable of yielding; but the proportion of water which i have here allowed, will not be too great in obtaining extracts from most vegetable substances; and how greatly not only the quantity, but the quality of the medicine must be affected by the admixture of such a weight of insoluble calcareous earth, is so obvious, that it is needless to expatiate on it. chap. iii. on the medicinal properties of magnesia alba. the medicinal uses to which magnesia has hitherto been applied are in general so well known, that it will be necessary only to give a short summary of the cases in which it is beneficial, for the information of young practitioners, and of those of my readers who may not be acquainted with medical subjects, this medicine being frequently administered without the advice of a physician. if it should appear in the subsequent part of this treatise that magnesia is possessed of any properties hitherto unsuspected in it, the sagacious reader will in a great measure be left to draw his own practical inferences therefrom. magnesia alba is a powerful absorbent, and is given with great success in disorders of the stomach and bowels arising from acidity. this preparation had been introduced into the materia medica abroad several years before it attracted the attention of our countrymen. the celebrated hoffman having strongly recommended it to the medical world, some english practitioners began to prescribe it, and dr. cadogan bestowing high encomiums on it, in his treatise on the nursing and management of children, it soon made its way into general practice, and supplied the place of the testaceous powders and chalk, which before this period were the medicines usually given to correct acidities in the primæ viæ. the acquisition of this medicine was of the more importance, on account of its entire and easy solution in acids, and of the purgative quality which it possesses; whereas the common absorbents are apt to form concretions, and to induce costiveness; strong objections to their free exhibition, as these properties render them peculiarly unfit for the bowels of tender infants who are particularly liable to diseases of this class. this tendency to acidity generally attends children during the first months and the time of dentition, and discovers itself when too redundant by the green stools, sour vomitings, gripes and purgings which it occasions: and as the nerves of children are extremely irritable, spasmodic affections are often the consequence of this acrid stimulus being retained in their bowels. in these cases magnesia may be administered in doses from five to twenty or thirty grains, according to the age of the infant; and in proportion as it is intended to act, either as an alterative, or as an easy purgative. it has been a common practice to give magnesia to children as a preventive, and to mix it for this purpose with their food, in order to correct that disposition which milk and the farinaceous aliments have to turn sour. this however should be done with caution, for it is only the excess of acidity which is prejudicial to infants,[l] some degree of it is necessary; and should we too officiously and entirely destroy, what we ought only to restrain within due bounds, we may create disorders of an opposite nature to those we have endeavoured to prevent, and instead of an acid, produce an alkalescent disposition in the first passages. indeed i fear that diseases have been more frequently created than obviated by the use of preventive medicines, and they should only be allowed in cases where the approach to disease is manifest. but when a child is in a healthy state, the best means to preserve him from a superabundant acidity, is to pay due attention to the regulation of his diet, to give him proper exercise, not to confine him too much in the foul air of hot unventilated rooms, to wash his whole body every day in cold water, and to rub him very well night and morning with a dry flannel, taking care that his stomach be not too full at the time when this friction is performed. [l] hactenus monstravimus, sicut cordis, musculorumque vires debiles erant, ita et solidorum quoque statum necessario imbecillem fuisse, et succos tenues, dilutosque; ut natura ampliationem vasculorum facilius efficeret, et incrementum animale minori cum molestiâ perageret. sed ne status iste tonusque partium debilis laxusque ultra modum procederet (quod sæpe accidit, morbosque excitare solet) acidum quoddam juvenilium animalium stomachis datum est, quod quamvis aluminis instar, lac coagulat, atque ob eam causam aliquando morbum procreat, tamen fibrarum tonum astringet confirmatque, et putredinem omnem alkalinam, a qua alioquin periculum esset, reprimit. quod quidem videri est, vel in coagulo stomachi vitulini, vel in aliis animalibus: sed istud tamen acidum, quod infantibus tarn idoneum est, redundat fortasse nonnumquam, et vel per testaceas pulveres, vel per medicamenta antiacida, ut supra dixi, corrigi debet. russelli oeconomia naturæ, p. 56. nor would i advise parents to rely with too much security on the virtues of this medicine, where the disorders of their children are complicated, or obstinate. the advice of the sagacious and distinguishing practitioner will then be necessary to direct what method of treatment is to be pursued. nor can i here avoid lamenting that the management of children when diseased, is so often in the hands of nurses and ignorant women, from an absurd notion that their diseases are not proper subjects of medical investigation; when in truth, there are none which require a clearer judgement, a quicker penetration, or a greater share of medical knowledge in the prescriber. during the period between dentition and puberty, the diseases attendant on a lax fibre still continue, though not so predominantly as in the former stage; yet acescency is the manifest cause, or at least the concomitant of many of the complaints to which children are at this time liable. to this they are disposed, notwithstanding the change in their diet to a more alkalescent kind, by the great quantities of fruit, frequently crude and unripe, cakes, and other sweet and greasy food with which they are too often indulged. by these errors their bowels are overcharged, their digestion impaired, and the aliment remaining too long in the stomach becomes sour, and occasions vomitings, head achs, and other complaints which are often thought to proceed from worms, and indeed are frequently attended with that disorder; as the crudities thus generated in the bowels serve as a nidus for these destructive vermin. here likewise magnesia may be of considerable advantage as an alkaline purgative, neutralizing the offending acid, and at the same time promoting its discharge by stool. but if the stomach be overloaded with mucus or undigested aliment, a gentle vomit ought to precede the exhibition of the magnesia. and even in a more advanced stage of life, persons of weak habits, and who lead sedentary lives, are often afflicted with indigestion, sour eructations, heart-burn, vomitings, and costiveness. these disorders very frequently attend women during their state of pregnancy, and are sometimes almost instantly removed by the use of magnesia. dr. watson[m] has published the case of a pregnant woman, who was afflicted with such severe vomitings as to bring on convulsions, hiccoughing, and violent pain at her stomach. what she brought up was acid, and so very acrimonious, as to inflame and excoriate her mouth and throat; and the great uneasiness she felt at her stomach upon swallowing any liquor that had the least degree of acrimony, or was more than lukewarm, made it probable that the internal surface of the stomach was affected in the same manner. in this desperate situation, after a variety of remedies had been tried in vain, the stomach was washed with unsalted mutton broth, till the liquor was discharged without any acid taste. her pain was by this means abated, but in about two hours was apparently returning with the same violence as before. this ingenious physician then directed a drachm of magnesia to be given in mutton broth, and to be repeated as often as her pain returned, without any regard to the quantity the whole might amount to, supposing her pain to continue severe. the first dose relieved her, and in three days she took three ounces of magnesia; and in the next three days, two ounces more, by which time all her symptoms were removed. it is remarkable in this case that a hypercatharsis was not the consequence of taking so large a quantity of magnesia, where there was so much acid to neutralize it. [m] medical observations and inquiries, vol. iii. p. 335. in bilious habits, where there is generally a disposition in the stomach contrary to acidity, magnesia is usually esteemed to be improper, taken alone: but i am dubious whether this opinion is well founded, and many reasons for these doubts may be deduced from the experiments hereafter to be recited. however, where putrid bile is to be corrected and discharged, by stool, very good purposes may, perhaps, be answered by taking the magnesia, joined with a sufficient quantity of acid to neutralize it, while in a state of effervescence; or by swallowing the magnesia and the acid, one immediately after the other, so as to produce the fermentation in the stomach: for thus the fixed air with which the magnesia so greatly abounds, being let loose, may powerfully correct the tendency to putridity in the contents of the primæ viæ, and at the same time evacuate them downwards. how far magnesia may be of service in diseases of the skin i do not take upon me to determine. several authors have attributed cutaneous eruptions, and indeed the ancient chemists ascribed almost all disorders, to the presence of an acid in the blood; whilst others absolutely deny that an acid can be admitted into the lacteals, or, if admitted, exist in the blood in a state of acidity. in these cases however, if an acid acrimony abounds in the stomach and bowels, with a costive habit, and pale complexion, magnesia will be a useful corrector, and entering into the circulation in the form of a mild neutral salt, may act as an excellent alterative,[n] proving both diaphoretic and diuretic. having thus given a cursory detail of the medicinal properties of magnesia, in its natural state, i shall now proceed to consider it in a state of calcination: but before any description of its uses in medicine be given, it may be proper to take a view of the changes which are produced in the nature of it by this operation. [n] neque enim tantum absorbentem et catharticam, si acidum primâ in regione stabulatur, virtutem exserit; verum etiam si in remissiore dosi, ad grana xv. vel xx. usurpatur, diaphoreticum et diureticum effectum sequi, non semel observavimus. hoffman. circa magnesiam. oper. tom. 4. p. 481. chap. iv. on the calcination of magnesia alba. the free spirit of inquiry, and taste for experimental researches which have of late so happily prevailed, have given rise to several very important discoveries in the course of the last half century; among which, those of the properties of the electrical fluid, and of fixed air, hold a principal rank. that excellent philosopher and experimentalist, the late doctor hales, first proved that most bodies contain, as one of their component principles, a quantity of air, differing from that of the common atmosphere in several of its properties. the proportion of this element varies in different substances, and in some constitutes nearly one half of their weight. all calcareous earths, the testaceous powders, magnesia and alkaline salts contain it abundantly, and have the strongest affinity with it of any bodies, except metals. from all these it is discharged by an acid, and the stronger the acid is, the more sudden and plentiful is the discharge of this vapour, which is of the same nature as that emitted by fermenting liquors. though it may be inspired in small quantities with impunity, and, as appears from some late observations, even with advantage in some cases,[o] yet it is a known fact that animals expire sooner in a receiver filled with fixed air, than in vacuo. lastly, it is said to have the remarkable property of rendering putrid substances sweet. [o] the reader is referred for further information on this subject, to an excellent treatise on the management of pregnant and lying-in women, lately published by my worthy and ingenious friend mr. white; to a volume of experiments and observations, by dr. percival, which is now in the press; and to some very curious papers on factitious air, which have lately been communicated to the royal society, by dr. priestley. in the precipitation of magnesia, the acid of the epsom salt uniting with the alkali which is added to the solution, expels the fixed air which the latter contains; but the vapour instead of being dissipated as in the common effervescing mixtures of acids and alkalis, is quietly and immediately absorbed by the magnesia earth, to which it has a strong affinity; and thus a double elective attraction takes place. the very large proportion of this element contained in magnesia alba has given dr. black an opportunity of throwing much light on this hitherto obscure subject; and that excellent chemist has drawn such inferences from the result of his experiments on magnesia, quick-lime, and other alkaline substances, as are of the utmost importance to chemistry. as this treatise may fall into the hands of several who may not have an opportunity of perusing the valuable essays in which these experiments are contained, i shall take the liberty to make a short extract from them, in order to elucidate the subject of the subsequent pages. the first object of dr. black's enquiry was, whether magnesia could be reduced to quick-lime. to this purpose, he calcined an ounce of magnesia in a strong fire. when taken out of the crucible and weighed, it had lost seven twelfths of its weight. combined with different acids, it formed salts of a similar nature to those constituted by the same acids with the uncalcined powder; but dissolved in them without the least degree of effervescence. it slowly precipitated the corrosive sublimate of mercury, in the form of a black powder; whereas before calcination a dark red precipitate was formed from the same substance. mixed with a warm solution of salt ammoniac, it separated the volatile alkali from the acid; but it made no separation of an acid from a calcareous earth, nor did it induce any change upon lime-water; whereas in an uncalcined state, it rendered quick-lime mild. lastly, being digested for some hours with water, it produced not the least alteration in the water.[p] [p] in making this experiment some time since, i imagined that doctor black had been mistaken in this point, and that some impurity in the water had prevented the success of his process, for i found the water impregnated, as i supposed, with the magnesia. flushed with my supposed success, i proceeded to make experiments on the lithontriptic powers of this water, which i found to be very considerable, acting more efficaciously on the human calculus, than either oyster-shell lime water, or a dilute solution of soap ley. i communicated this interesting intelligence to some of my medical friends; but on repeating my experiment several times with different parcels of magnesia, that the truth of the fact might be absolutely ascertained, i at last was convinced, to my no small mortification, that what i had too sanguinely flattered myself to be a discovery likely to be highly serviceable to mankind, was founded on error; and that the properties communicated to the water proceeded from some calcareous matter which the magnesia had received by being washed with impure water. i mention this as a caution to every young experimentalist, to be extremely careful in drawing conclusions. however, as something may be learned, even from an unsuccessful experiment, it proves that a very small quantity of lime is sufficient to impregnate a large quantity of water; for i used the calcined magnesia, in the same proportion as lime is directed for making lime-water, so that very little of it could be quick-lime. and as oyster-shell lime water is a superiour solvent of the calculus to the water prepared with stone lime, is there not some reason to think that the calcareous earth, which has been dissolved in hard water, may, when calcined, be a more powerful lithontriptic, than either of the others? if any inference can be drawn from it, which may in the least promote the interests of mankind, i shall be sufficiently recompensed for the humiliating circumstance of recounting an erroneous experiment. in pursuing his inquiries, he found that a very small portion of what had been lost in the calcination was water, and that the other part was fixed air, by the loss of which the magnesia was deprived of its power of effervescing with acids. and from hence the doctor concluded, that the change made in calcareous substances and in magnesia by calcination, was chiefly produced by depriving them of this air; and that this volatile proteus may be conveyed from one body containing it to another body with which it has a greater affinity. thus lime being deprived of its air by calcination, and having a stronger affinity with it than alkaline salts have, being mixed with a lixivium of these salts, absorbs all the air from them, deprives them of their property of effervescing with acids, and renders them more acrid, at the same time that the lime becomes mild, and incapable of impregnating water, but recovers its power of fermenting when mixed with an acid. chap. v. on the medicinal virtues of calcined magnesia. frequent objections have been made to the use of magnesia alba, on account of the great quantity of air which enters into its composition. whenever it meets with an acid in the stomach they immediately unite; but in forming this union, all the air contained in the magnesia is discharged with a great degree of effervescence, and recovering its elasticity sometimes occasions very uneasy sensations in weak bowels,[q] inflating and distending them overmuch, inducing griping pains, and above all a sense of debility or sinking, which is not easily described. [q] neque tamen præterire possumus, id incommodi nos quandoque ab hoc magnesiæ pulvere deprehendisse, quod flatulentias et morsicationes in imo ventri reliquerit, si videlicet frequentius in usum trahatur, primaque regio progignendis corrosivis succis, ut in hypochondriacis fieri solet, exposita sit. hoffman. oper. tom. 4. p. 381. my much respected friend doctor percival, who had often complained of these disagreeable effects from the use of magnesia, suggested to me the idea of depriving it of its fixed air by calcination, having been informed that they would be obviated by this method. doctor black had indeed proved the practicability of the process, but he does not appear to have made trial of the calcined magnesia as a medicine. in consequence of the above hint i calcined some magnesia, and was afterwards insensibly led to make further experiments, the event of which, i hope, will be deemed of sufficient importance to apologize for my communicating them to the public. experiment i. eight ounces of pure magnesia alba were calcined with a strong fire in an air furnace. three hours calcination were necessary to discharge the whole of the air from the magnesia. when removed from the fire, it had lost four ounces and three drachms of its original weight, and produced no effervescence with acids; it had not acquired any degree of acrimony to the taste, and when thirty grains of it were diluted with a few spoonfuls of water and swallowed, it occasioned no uneasy sensation in my stomach, nor sense of heat in my throat; proved nearly as aperient as a double quantity of uncalcined magnesia, and operated without the least griping. it was remarkable that calcination had not reduced the powder in bulk, in proportion to the diminution of its weight. by the process of this experiment, magnesia alba is not only divested of the disagreeable qualities which have been alluded to, but acquires new properties which render it likely to answer some very important practical purposes. doctor macbride, who has with the greatest ingenuity and accuracy, prosecuted the investigation of the nature of fixed air, discovered, that a large quantity of it is discharged in the fermentation of alimentary mixtures; and that the saliva being, in a healthy state, void of air, acts as an absorbent of it, thereby moderating and restraining the discharge of this vapour in the stomach. but when the tone of that viscus is too relaxed to perform the digestion of the aliment with proper vigour, or the saliva is diseased and corrupted, the air expelled from the food becomes too elastic, and produces those disorders which are commonly termed flatulent; and, perhaps, by its effects on that prodigious plexus of nerves which is diffused over the coats of the stomach, may sometimes occasion spasmodic or paralytic affections. it has been observed above, that calcareous earths, alkaline salts, and magnesia, being deprived of their air, attract it from every substance with which it has a smaller degree of affinity. the two former becoming highly caustic by the loss of their air cannot be administered but in very small doses. but the calcined magnesia being absolutely divested of air, though not rendered acrimonious, and being able to absorb a large quantity of this elastic flatus, may act more powerfully than the whole tribe of carminatives, yet essentially differs from them in many respects. _they_ contain a large quantity of air; _magnesia_ in this state is entirely free from it; _aromatics_ may be apt to ferment, and increase acidities; the _calcined magnesia_ is incapable of effervescence, and powerfully corrects an acescent disposition in the gastric juices; the _former_ constipate the belly; the _latter_ is laxative. from this property of magnesia, when calcined, of absorbing air, it occurred to me, that it would of all others be the most proper cathartic for patients labouring under the stone, who might be taking the lixivium saponarium, having the advantage over all the vegetable purgatives, which abound with air, and consequently have a tendency to render the caustic alkali mild and inert. i even flattered myself that it might coincide in promoting the efficacy of that powerful solvent of the human calculus. dr. macbride's theory, that the lixivium acts by depriving the calculus of its fixed air, appears to be well founded; and mr. chittick in the exhibition of his nostrum, which, notwithstanding all his empirical arts to disguise it, is now known to have been the soap ley, kept his patients from every kind of diet abounding with air. we may therefore venture to recommend it, though not as a lithontriptic, being insoluble in water, yet as an assistant to the lixivium, by absorbing a part of that air in the primæ viæ which would otherwise be attracted by the caustic alkali, and thereby render it incapable of acting on the calculus. in all the diseases attended with an acescent disposition in the first passages, in which magnesia has been recommended in the third chapter, the calcined powder may be given with superiour advantages, as it will not produce any of those inconveniences, which have been attributed to that medicine when uncalcined. besides that it will act in a three-fold capacity, viz. as an absorbent of air, and of acidity, and also as an easy purgative. i know several persons who could never bear to take the common magnesia, with whom the calcined perfectly agrees. it seems likely to be very serviceable in flatulent cholics, and i have been informed of one very obstinate chronical case of that kind, which was greatly relieved, though not perfectly cured by the use of it in the chester infirmary, under the direction of a very judicious and ingenious physician. even in gouty habits, joined with some warm aromatic, it may probably be found useful in correcting the very great flatulency which so much afflicts persons of this constitution; and perhaps the cayenne pepper would be the most proper addition to it, on account of the small quantity of this spice that would be necessary to make the magnesia gratefully warm to the stomach. it will appear in the succeeding chapter that calcined magnesia is strongly antiseptic: but i shall postpone my observations on that subject till i have related the experiments which prove its claim to that property. chap. vi. on the action of various absorbents as promoting or retarding putrefaction. the whimsical and ill-grounded hypotheses which were framed by the chymists of the sixteenth century, had, unhappily, too much influence, on the medical practice of that and the succeeding age. among other false theories which the physicians had adopted from them, was that of attributing the origin of most diseases either to an acid or alkaline cause: but the former, being more obvious to the senses, was supposed to be the most frequent parent of diseases. among others, fevers, even of the putrid kind, were imagined to be occasioned by an acid, and from hence the testaceous medicines acquired so high a degree of reputation, as to be deemed the grand correctors of acrimony, and were almost universally prescribed as alexipharmics; and the most celebrated compositions which are ranged under that head, contain a large proportion of these powders. but a very learned physician, by a series of accurate and ingenious experiments on septics and antiseptics, has proved that chalk and all the testaceous powders accelerate the corruption of animal flesh, and from the result of one he made on bile with crab's eyes, he naturally concluded that all these substances would produce the same effect on that humour, as they had all uniformly proved septic to flesh. yet, even upon this supposition, he candidly allows, that in some fevers, they may have their uses, even where no offending acid exists; as in order to cure some diseases, it may be requisite to attenuate the humours, and relax the fibres by a degree of putrefaction, and that possibly the crisis of fevers of this kind, may be hastened or perfected by the testaceous powders. in diseases, however, where the disposition to putrescency is already too strong, all medicines, which in the smallest degree increase such tendency should be studiously avoided; and, on this account, the administration of the testacea in putrid, malignant fevers has of late been condemned by some ingenious writers. i was myself fully convinced of the rectitude of this opinion, and, in drawing up an account of the medicinal uses of magnesia, had therefore suggested the impropriety of prescribing them where a bilious acrimony prevails. but not being able to recollect, that the septic powers of magnesia had ever been experimentally proved,[r] i thought it would be most satisfactory to determine them by that method; little doubting but that the event would justify my doctrine. my inquiries evince the accuracy with which sir john pringle has made his experiments, but as i was induced to carry the investigation of this subject further than he has proceeded, very different practical inferences, from those i at first expected, may, perhaps, be deduced therefrom. [r] i at that time overlooked an experiment of dr. macbride's which proves magnesia to be septic to _animal flesh_; but having met with it just before these papers were going to the press, i take this method of acknowledging it. experiment ii. two drachms of fresh beef, two scruples of magnesia, and two ounces of distilled water were mixed in one bottle; and in another the same quantity of beef with two ounces of distilled water only: the meat was cut small, and the bottles were placed uncorked in a heat rather inferior to that of the human blood. in twenty four hours the beef in the mixture with magnesia was become quite putrid. the standard was perfectly sweet, and remained for some days, before it acquired the true putrid foetor. being thus convinced that magnesia is possessed of the property of hastening the putrefaction of animal flesh, in common with the rest of the absorbent tribe, it was imagined, that it might be of some consequence to practice, to determine how far it exceeded or was inferiour to the calcareous and testaceous earths as a septic; and also whether calcination produced any difference in it, in this respect. in reciting the experiments, where i only mention _magnesia_, i always would be understood to mean that powder in its uncalcined state, the calcined shall constantly be distinguished by that epithet. it also appeared to be a convenient opportunity of repeating the inquiry, how far the addition of the testacea might take effect in diminishing the antiseptic qualities of the contrayerva root. experiment iii. into one phial were put two scruples of magnesia, into a second the same weight of calcined magnesia, and into three others the same quantity of chalk, _pulv. e chel. cancr. comp._ and _pulv. contrayerv. comp._ to each of these, two drachms of fresh beef, and two ounces of distilled water were added. a sixth phial was kept as a standard, and contained only the same proportions of beef and water. the bottles, distinguished in the order they are mentioned by the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, were placed in the same heat as that to which the magnesia was exposed in the former experiment, and were frequently shaken up and examined. in twelve hours, number 1 began to smell; an intestine motion was perceptible in numbers 3, 4, 5, and 6, but especially in the chalk. in twenty-four hours, number 1 was become highly putrid, number 3 smelled offensively, number 4 had acquired a very slight foetor, as had number 5 which fermented briskly. the standard had acquired a vinous smell, but number 2 remained unchanged. in thirty six hours, number 3 was very putrid, numbers 4 and 5 had made little progress since the last examination, though number 5 was rather more putrid than the other, allowance being made for the peculiar odour of the contrayerva; but in four hours more they both stunk intolerably. the standard continued two or three days longer before it became absolutely putrid, and the calcined magnesia preserved the beef untainted for several days longer, when it was removed to make room for other phials. the water which was mixed with the calcined magnesia differed from all the others in not becoming bloody, nor did the beef in it seem so tender as when infused in lime water. when i made the first experiment, i had not observed any discharge of air from the magnesia and beef, and in the present one no fermentation was perceptible either in number 1 or 2. as this was an unexpected circumstance in the former, i repeated the experiment several times, but the event was always the same. magnesia was afterwards compared with crab's eyes, burnt hartshorn, and prepared coral. the mixture with magnesia grew putrid first, afterwards that with the crab's eyes; the other two remained for some hours longer before the putrid foetor came on. from the above experiments it appears that magnesia alba, when replete with fixed air, is a stronger septic to animal flesh than any other absorbent which was compared with it; and yet when deprived of its air by calcination, it powerfully resists putrefaction. dr. macbride has endeavoured to account for this difference between calcareous earths and quick-lime, by supposing the particles of the lime to insinuate themselves intimately into the texture of the beef, and to prevent the escape of the fixed air, by attracting, absorbing, and thus confining it within the substance of the beef. how far this theory is satisfactory is not my province to determine; and the matter is so obscure, that i do not presume to offer any conjecture of my own, relative to the reason of it. nitre is found to be a strong antiseptic when applied to animal flesh, but to resist the putrefaction of bile with a very disproportionate force: and dr. percival has lately observed the same difference in the action of the columbo root. these variations encouraged me to try the effect of magnesia on gall; but being strongly prepossessed with the notion of its septic quality, i entertained very small hopes of a different event. i was also desirous to compare the action of the calcined magnesia with the other. the heat used in the succeeding experiments was the same as that in the preceding trials. experiment iv. to two drachms of fresh ox gall, were added two scruples of magnesia, and two ounces of water, in one phial. two scruples of calcined magnesia with the same quantity of gall and water were placed in another; and a third containing two drachms of bile without any other addition than water, served as a standard, which began to have a rank smell in forty-eight hours, and in sixty hours was highly offensive. the calcined magnesia and bile emitted a sweetish smell, something resembling that of the urine in a diabetes: the liquor which swam above was quite pellucid and colourless, whereas that of the other magnesia was turbid and tinged green with the bile. both were perfectly free from any putrid foetor; the latter continued so for ten days, and the bile with the calcined magnesia remained unchanged as long as any notice was taken of it. experiment v. twenty grains of magnesia preserved six drachms of ox's gall free from any signs of corruption for twenty-four hours after the standard containing gall and water, of each six drachms, had become putrid. a scruple of the calcined magnesia mixed with the same proportions of gall and water, remained without any alteration as long as they were attended to, which was about ten days. experiment vi. the putrid liquor which had been used as a standard in the fourth experiment, was divided into four parts, one of which was continued as a standard, to another was added about half a drachm of magnesia, and an effervescence was procured by some drops of oil of vitriol. the offensive smell continued for a few minutes, but was soon much abated, and at length entirely sweetened. to another portion was added twenty grains of magnesia only, this in fifteen minutes had almost lost its putrid smell, and in two or three hours became quite sweet. to the fourth was added the same weight of calcined magnesia, which almost instantly deprived the liquor of every degree of putridity. the standard was then mixed with a scruple of crab's eyes, which, for about a minute, seemed to diminish the foetor, but it then returned as strongly as ever; whereas the others continued sweet for several days. experiment vii. two drachms of putrid bile, which had been kept closely corked in a phial since the year 1770, and smelled very offensively, were mixed in a cup with twenty grains of magnesia, and half an ounce of water, and thereby restored to sweetness. twenty grains of calcined magnesia were also added to two drachms of the same bile: on stirring them a pungent smell was observed, like that of volatile salts, and half an ounce of water being put to the mixture, the bile was totally deprived of any putrid smell. even five grains of the same powder sweetened two drachms of putrid gall. experiment viii. magnesia, calcined magnesia, chalk, crab's eyes, _pulv. e chel. cancr. c._ and _pulv. contrayerv. comp._ each in the proportion of two scruples to two drachms of ox gall and two ounces of water, were exposed to the usual warmth. the crab's eyes mixture grew rank in twenty-four hours, and in forty-eight was absolutely putrid: the bile with the chalk was in the same condition in twelve hours more. the magnesia mixture became putrid on the ninth day; the _pulvis e chel._[s] on the tenth; but the _pulvis contrayerv. comp._ preserved the bile from corruption about three weeks, and no change was perceptible in that with the calcined magnesia when examined above a month after their first admixture. [s] doctor macbride found that _pulv. e chel. c. c._ hastened the corruption of bile: might not this depend on some variety in the composition of that powder? chalk and oyster shells are often substituted in the hospitals and by the druggists, for the other ingredients. experiment ix. twenty grains of magnesia, and the same quantity of chalk, were separately neutralized with distilled vinegar, and their effects on ox gall compared with that of thirty grains of the artificial epsom salt dissolved in a sufficient quantity of water. the bile in this solution became putrid in about sixty hours. that in the solutions made in the vegetable acid retained its sweetness for several days longer. these experiments, which terminated so very differently from what i had expected, seem to justify, in some degree, the practice of giving the testaceous and absorbent medicines in fevers of a putrescent type, at the same time that they point out some of that class which ought to be avoided, and evince how fallacious a method it is to judge of the effects of medicines _a priori_. as the bile is, by many, supposed to be the great source of putrid diseases, ought not the antiseptics which may be prescribed in these cases, to be such as more particularly impede the corruption of this fluid, rather than that of flesh? on account of the superiour antisepticity of the calcined magnesia to most of the absorbents, and its greater purity and solubility, together with the probability of its acting as an evacuant, as well as a corrector of putrid bile, does it not appear to merit a preference to all other medicines of this class? in diseases where an acid cacochymy prevails, and an alkalescent diet, such as wild fowl, fish, &c. is prescribed, but from the scarcity of these articles in some countries, cannot be complied with; may not taking magnesia or the testaceous powders, immediately before or after meal time, coincide with this intention, by increasing the putrefactive fermentation of other animal food in the stomach, which in these disorders is almost totally subdued by the superabundant acid? but where animal food is used in putrescent diseases, either through necessity, or the obstinacy of the patient, ought not magnesia, in an uncalcined state, and all the calcareous and testaceous earths to be carefully abstained from? dr. percival, in a volume of very ingenious experiments and observations which have been before referred to, has mentioned a physician of his acquaintance, who always observed his stools to be more particularly offensive after having taken magnesia. might not this proceed from the action of the magnesia on the animal food he had eaten; and is it not reasonable to suppose that the effect might have been very different where a vegetable or milk diet had been used, as is generally the case in putrid fevers, and in young children? i know a person whose stools are, in common, very little tinged with bile, who after taking calcined magnesia, evacuates fæces of a very bilious appearance, though less foetid than usual. it is a fact worthy of observation, that in the experiments which were made with calcined magnesia and bile, the latter was absorbed by, and had united with the former; and another remarkable circumstance was, that the watery part of all the mixtures which resisted putrefaction, acquired a very pungent, saline taste. chap. vii. on the solvent qualities of calcined magnesia. dr. macbride, whose experimental researches have very justly acquired him a high degree of reputation in the philosophical world, supposes fixed air to be the combining principle of bodies, and has applied this ingenious theory to pharmaceutical improvements. he discovered that lime triturated with resinous gums, promotes their dissolution in water; which, he thinks, is thus enabled to take up the same parts of these substances, as are soluble in spirit of wine. these aqueous tinctures are transparent, not milky like the solutions made with yolk of egg, or gum arabic; but the lime communicates a highly disagreeable taste to them, and the action of lime water, which he used in some instances, is not sufficiently powerful to extract strong tinctures from these bodies. as calcined magnesia has a great affinity with fixed air, i was desirous of trying whether it would contribute to render resinous substances soluble in water; for being itself insoluble, the solutions would consequently be free from any other impregnation than that of the resins. experiment x. five grains of camphor were rubbed for five minutes with an equal quantity of calcined magnesia: after the camphor was reduced to powder, it united into a hard concrete with the magnesia, but immediately dissolved on the addition of a small quantity of distilled water, of which an ounce was mixed with them, and immediately passed through filtering paper. the filtrated liquor was highly impregnated with the camphor. experiment xi. five grains of opium triturated in the same manner, yielded a transparent tincture, of as deep a colour as the tinctura thebaica of the london dispensatory, and tasting strongly of the opium. experiment xii. gum guaiacum and calcined magnesia, of each a scruple, being rubbed with an ounce of water, and filtered, gave an elegant green tincture, quite transparent, and possessing, in a considerable degree, the taste of the gum. gum galbanum, storax, mastick, myrrh, assafætida, scammony and balsam of tolu, being severally triturated with equal weights of calcined magnesia, diluted with water and filtered, afforded neat tinctures, strongly impregnated with the different drugs. experiment xiii. in order to determine the quantity of opium thus dissolved, half an ounce of crude opium, the same quantity of calcined magnesia, and eight ounces of distilled water were rubbed for a quarter of an hour in a glass mortar, and having stood to infuse during two hours, the liquor was separated through paper. the tincture was of a darker colour than that before described, and was reduced by a gentle heat to a pilular consistence. this extract weighed sixty-eight grains, which, allowing for impurities, for what would be dissipated in evaporation, and for the air probably absorbed by the magnesia, is a large proportion to be so soon dissolved. the residuum which was left in the filter was dried, and weighed six drachms. experiment xiv. a drachm of peruvian bark, twenty grains of calcined magnesia, and four ounces of distilled water being rubbed together during fifteen minutes, the filtered infusion resembled in appearance the simple tincture of bark, and had an intensely bitter taste, but was not strongly impregnated with the peculiar aroma of the bark. thus then we have an easy and very elegant method of preparing aqueous tinctures from the gum resins, and administering them in a more convenient form and in larger doses than could be done when dissolved in a spirituous menstruum; and much more agreeably than in the half-dissolved state to which they are reduced by the aid of egg or gum arabic. the magnesia does not impart any thing to them, whereas the lime will seldom be so saturated with air but that some part of it will remain soluble in the water: and as they may be given diluted to whatever degree the prescriber chuses, considerable advantages may be expected therefrom, it being probable that they will be better enabled to pervade the very small vessels; and the heating properties of the balsams be more effectually obviated than by any other mode of preparation. indeed, tinctures prepared by the above method, are not calculated for officinal compositions, but for extemporaneous prescription; as most of them, except camphor, deposite a sediment when they have been kept a week or two. chap. viii. on the various solvent powers of quick-lime in different quantities. the difficulty of solution in the vegetable astringents has been complained of by various writers on the _materia medica_. water and alcohol are the menstrua in use; but great quantities of each are necessary to procure even a slight impregnation, and much heat and long boiling are said actually to destroy the astringent quality, and vegetable texture.[t] as a menstruum capable of dissolving them with greater facility appeared to be a desideratum, not only in pharmacy, but in other arts, particularly in that of dying blacks, i resolved to try dr. macbride's method of increasing the solvent power of water, by means of quick-lime. but as i was aware that the quantity of lime he made use of in obtaining an aqueous tincture of peruvian bark, would be too great for the dyer's use, i wished to use only such a quantity as would be sufficiently saturated with the air contained in the vegetable, to be itself precipitated; and to compare the tinctures thus made, with a standard prepared with simple water. [t] vid. lectures on the materia medica, as delivered by william cullen, m.d. p. 195. experiment xv. i rubbed three drachms of aleppo galls reduced to powder, with four ounces of filtered rain water, for fifteen minutes, and then passed the solution through paper. it was very styptic to the taste, and was nearly of the same colour as huxham's tincture of bark. the residuum in the filter was unchanged in colour. the bottle containing the liquor was marked number 1. experiment xvi. three drachms of the same galls, and two scruples of quick-lime, were triturated with four ounces of rain water, as in the last experiment. the filtered liquor had scarcely any astringency to the taste, and was of a very pale colour. the residuum was of a deep purple. marked number 2. experiment xvii. the same quantity of galls as in the two former experiments, after triture in the same degree with four ounces of lime-water, was separated by filtering through paper. the tincture thus obtained was highly astringent to the palate, of a deep chocolate colour, and the residuum was of a lighter brown than number 1. marked number 3. experiment xviii. to each of the above tinctures were added forty drops of a strong solution of sal martis. number 1 became very black. number 2 changed colour but little, and on standing precipitated a brown sediment, which, the superiour part of the liquor being decanted off, became again transparent on the addition of a few drops of the vitriolic acid. number 3 appeared to strike a deeper black than number 1; and these being tried as inks, number 3 seemed to have the superiority; but a slip of linen cloth being macerated in each for some hours, that in number 1 had taken a more perfect black than the slip number 3. no trial was made with cotton or woollen, which it is probable would have differed from the linen. experiment xix. oak bark was used instead of galls, with similar success, except that the infusion made with lime-water was not so deep in colour as that with simple rain water, though much deeper than that prepared with quick-lime. experiment xx. peruvian bark, quick-lime, and lime water, in the same proportion as directed by dr. macbride, were rubbed together. the filtered infusion had little colour, tasted very slightly of the bark, though strongly of the lime, and on my blowing in a stream of air from my lungs, the surface of it was immediately covered with a cremor calcis, the liquor grew turbid, and deposited a copious sediment. experiment xxi. the same quantity of peruvian bark, and of lime water, without the addition of any fresh lime, being rubbed in the same manner, afforded a tincture tasting strongly of the bark, nearly of the same colour as the simple tincture obtained by proof spirit, and retaining its transparency when blown into. this tincture was much more strongly impregnated than one made by triture with common rain water only. and by this process, allowing a few hours for maceration, an infusion is prepared, greatly superiour in strength to any decoction, infusion, or tincture of bark i ever saw. from the result of these experiments i suspect, that by using a greater quantity of lime in the sixteenth and twentieth experiments than the vegetable could saturate with fixed air, the water became so impregnated with lime as to be more unfit to act on the vegetable. from the purple colour of the residuum of number 2, it was evident that the galls were decompounded, but the water was not capable of dissolving and suspending the particles. dr. percival[u] mentions his having unsuccessfully repeated dr. macbride's experiment with bark and quick-lime. to what then can this difference be owing? perhaps it may be accounted for thus: it seems probable that the lime used by dr. macbride, not being fresh calcined, had recovered part of its air; for he says, "it will no doubt be reckoned superfluous, that lime water is ordered to be added to these several substances, when they are also to be rubbed along with quick-lime; but the reason is this. _if the lime were so quick and fresh as to raise heat when common water is poured on it, the solution might then be made without the aid of lime water; but, as it will for the most part happen, that the lime kept in the shops will not be perfectly fresh, it will be best that the prescriber should direct lime water to be used._" on the contrary, dr. percival used _lime fresh from the kiln_. these circumstances, if my theory be just, would greatly vary the event of the experiment; and the trials i have here recited seem to prove, that so great a quantity of lime, and even a much smaller than is directed by dr. macbride, if fresh, instead of increasing, diminishes the solvent power of water on astringent vegetables. [u] percival's essays medical and experimental, 2d edit. p. 65. but as different drugs yield their virtues with more ease, and in greater quantity to some menstrua than to others, it seemed probable, that even a very small quantity of lime might render water less solvent of particular vegetables, than it is in its pure state, though with others as large or perhaps a greater quantity than what i had used might be necessary: and as the determination of this point might be of some use in pharmacy, the following experiments were made; in the relation of which i shall make use of numbers as before, viz. the vegetable rubbed with four ounces of distilled water will be distinguished by number 1, that with two scruples of lime and four ounces of lime water, number 2, and that with lime water only, number 3. experiment xxii. two drachms of snake root were rubbed for fifteen minutes with the above-mentioned different proportions of distilled water, quick-lime and lime water, and lime water alone. number 1 was a dark brown tincture, tasting strongly of the serpentaria. number 2, straw coloured, taste of the lime disagreeable, that of the root not distinguishable. number 3, amber coloured, tastes of the root. experiment xxiii. two drachms of columbo being triturated in the same manner, number 1, dark brown tincture; tastes much of the columbo. number 2, yellow; faint taste of the columbo, but that of the lime very disagreeably prevalent. number 3, colour as number 1; but tastes more highly of the columbo. experiment xxiv. two drachms of contrayerva root with the same treatment yielded in the following proportions: number 1 gave a pale brown tincture, tasting of the contrayerva. number 2, bright amber colour; taste of the lime so strong as to admit of no other. number 3 exceeded number 1 both in colour and taste. experiment xxv. jalap being triturated in the same proportions, number 1 dark brown; taste of the jalap strong. number 2 pale yellow; taste of the lime predominant, though that of the jalap perceptible. number 3, colour not quite so high as number 1, but equal in taste. experiment xxvi. the result of the same trial with ipecacuanha was, that number 1 was of a light brown colour, tasting highly of the ipecacuanha. number 2 was of a deep yellow, having the same disagreeable taste of the lime complained of in the other tinctures, but that of the ipecacuanha scarcely perceptible. number 3 produced a tincture of the colour of red port wine, strongly flavoured with the ipecacuanha, though it had not so much of the distinguishing sharpness of that root as number 1. experiment xxvii. the different tinctures of rhubarb, prepared in the same manner as above, had the following appearances: number 1 brown, with a yellowish tinge, strongly impregnated with the taste of the rhubarb. number 2 deep yellow, taste of the lime as in the other tinctures prepared with it. number 3 crimson; taste of the rhubarb strong, but unequal to number 1. none of the tinctures prepared with lime water grew turbid from a stream of fixed air being conveyed into them. hence it appears that the triture of quick-lime with all the above roots did not in the least degree promote, but rather impede their solution in water; that lime water extracts the soluble parts of many, and especially their colouring principles, more powerfully than distilled water; but that this is by no means always the case, as in three instances out of six, the tinctures prepared with distilled water exceeded those with lime water in taste, and in two instances were superiour, and in one equal in colour. chap. ix. on the comparative antiseptic powers of vegetable infusions prepared with lime, &c. sir john pringle, in the appendix to his excellent observations on the diseases of the army, allows lime water to possess but a slight antiseptic quality. doctor macbride on the contrary asserts, that it has great power in resisting putrefaction, but at the same time acknowledges that it destroys the cohesion of the constituent particles of animal substances, and therefore cannot be called a _true_ antiseptic, as it absorbs the fixable air from them, and only preserves them sweet by confining it within their texture, into which the lime is enabled to insinuate itself in this dissolved state. as even this effect, if possessed by the tinctures of the antiseptic vegetables prepared with lime or its water, would be an objection to their administration in putrid diseases, i resolved to determine by experiment, how far their antiseptic powers were increased or diminished by this mode of preparation: and i thought it probable, as those prepared with the latter contain no lime when filtered, and yet in the extraction of the tinctures the vegetables are deprived of, at least, a part of their air, they might be rendered less able to resist putrefaction than either the infusions prepared with distilled water, or those with the addition of quick-lime. how far this reasoning was just, the result will discover. experiment xxviii. pieces of beef, each weighing about two drachms, were separately infused in the different tinctures of peruvian bark, snake root, columbo, and contrayerva, prepared with lime, lime water, and distilled water, as in the preceding experiments; and the bottles containing them were exposed for two days to a degree of heat equal to that of the human blood. they were afterwards suffered to remain without any artificial heat, the temperature of the air being warm. the tincture of columbo prepared with quick-lime was the only one not tried, the bottle containing it having been broken. after thirty-six hours infusion they were all sweet, except the infusion of columbo in distilled water, which began to emit a disagreeable, though not putrid foetor. the beef in it, and in the tincture of the same root in lime water, was swelled, and whiter than before infusion. that in the tincture of bark prepared with quick-lime, had its texture greatly destroyed, was of a chocolate colour, but sweet. that in aqua calcis, the same in colour, shrivelled, firm, and sweet. the pieces of beef in the tinctures of snake root and of contrayerva with quick-lime, had more the appearance of calf's lights than of beef, were quite spongy, but had acquired no putrid smell. those in the lime and distilled water, firm, and shewing no signs of putrescency. on the fifth day the infusion of columbo in lime water was very offensive, though the beef when taken out of it was not putrid. that of the same root with distilled water had made no further progress. the tincture of snake root in distilled water was grown turbid, and had lost colour, which it seemed to have imparted to the beef. this and all the others continued sweet. on the tenth day the beef in the distilled water and columbo, as on the fifth. that in the lime water and columbo, putrid. the contrayerva infusion in distilled water had acquired a disagreeable foetor, but the beef was not yet putrid. that with lime water and that with quick-lime still sweet. the infusion of bark with distilled water smelled rather musty; the beef in it sweet. the two infusions of the same with lime and lime water shewed no further change. the tincture of snake root in distilled water had a scum on the surface; beef not putrid. the other two tinctures of the same root unchanged. on the eleventh day, the beef in the infusions of columbo and of contrayerva in distilled water beginning to putrefy, and on the fourteenth day, both entirely putrid. the infusion of bark in distilled water mouldy, but the beef sweet. the beef in the snake root and distilled water, putrid on the sixteenth day; and the infusion of contrayerva with lime water beginning to be offensive, but the beef in it not yet putrid; but on the nineteenth it was quite putrefied. the snake root infusion in lime water, mouldy on its surface; no change in the beef; but this likewise became putrid in a few days more. the remaining tinctures, viz. those of the bark, snake root, and contrayerva with quick-lime, and that of the bark with lime water, remained above five weeks without any further change. some time after, the beef in the snake root became septic. the other three were unaltered at the end of six weeks from their first immersion; and though the infusion of bark in distilled water was very mouldy, the beef in it was free from any putrid foetor. but it should be observed that all the tinctures in the preparation of which quick-lime had been added to the lime water, had a peculiar odour during the whole time, from which the others were exempt. from this experiment we may conclude that lime water, when used in such a quantity in extracting the virtues of vegetables, as not to be saturated with the fixed air it receives from them, _strongly_ counteracts putrefaction, though it at the same time destroys the texture of animal bodies exposed to its action. but when employed for the same purposes, in such proportion as to be fully saturated with air; it abstracts nothing from, but rather increases the antiseptic power of the vegetable; nor does animal flesh immersed in tinctures thus prepared, suffer any diminution in the cohesion of its fibres. chap. x. on the sweetening properties of fixed air. the very curious fact, that fixed air not only preserves bodies from becoming septic, but is also possessed of the power of restoring sweetness to them when actually putrid, seemed to be established by a number of very accurate experiments adduced in support of the doctrine by its ingenious author. this has, however, lately been controverted by a learned writer, who has favoured the public with _an experimental inquiry concerning the causes which have been generally said to produce putrid diseases_, in which he has recounted several experiments, in direct contradiction to those of dr. macbride. the authorities of both these gentlemen deserve considerable attention, and it might seem presumption in me to attempt to decide between them, had i only my own opinion to adduce; but as the accuracy of the following trials was witnessed by a physician, well known for his medical and philosophical writings, i feel the less diffidence in submitting them to the public. they were made with a view, only, to my own information, having in one of the former chapters recommended magnesia to be taken in the act of effervescence with an acid, as a corrector and evacuant of putrid bile; but as the event appeared to be so satisfactory, and as a determination of this point is the more important, from the late introduction of fixed air as an article of the materia medica, i hope i shall not be deemed to have impertinently obtruded into the dispute by relating them, and endeavouring to point out what, probably, has been the cause of dr. alexander's drawing conclusions, so contrary to those of the other celebrated experimentalist. in the experiments which dr. alexander has related in support of his opinion, he has made use of the following methods. he included pieces of putrid mutton in bladders, one containing _four ounces in measure_ of fixed air from fermenting wort; another the same quantity from wort with a piece of putrid mutton in it; and the third, only _about half the quantity_ from a mixture of bread, water, and saliva. in another experiment, he exposed a slice of beef that had just begun to have the putrid smell, to a stream of air brought over from an effervescing mixture of distilled vinegar and salt of wormwood. in a third, the putrid flesh was suspended in the neck of a wide mouthed bottle, while _four ounces_ of distilled vinegar were made into _spirit. minderer._ in a fourth, _four ounces_ of air from bottled small beer were confined twenty-four hours with the putrid substance, which in a fifth experiment was put into the neck of a bottle of small beer, while it fermented before the fire for half an hour. in a sixth, the septic body was included in a bottle with _eight ounces_ of air from an effervescing mixture of common vinegar and salt of hartshorn. in one only, out of all these experiments, he found the beef in any-wise sweetened, and even in that single instance, though he at first thought the piece a little changed, yet when washed it recovered its putrid smell. however he confesses, that by bringing over fixed air from several other fermenting and effervescing mixtures, on pieces of meat just beginning to putrefy, they were rendered a little sweeter, though never to such a degree, as entirely to lose their putrid taint. so very different an account of so interesting a subject was truly mortifying: the old adage, _experientia fallax, judicium difficile_, seemed to be too applicable to the present occasion. some cases, in which fixed air used medicinally as an antiseptic, appeared to have produced good effects, had occurred to some of my medical friends[v], and i even flattered myself that i had directed it to good purpose in an instance or two. but if the theory on which this practice was founded should be false, the whole superstructure seemed likely to be destroyed. on revising dr. alexander's book, i imagined that i had discovered some thing in the conducting of his experiments, which might account for their terminating so differently from those of dr. macbride. [v] see dr. percival's experiments and observations, p. 72; dr. priestley's papers on factitious air; and mr. white's treatise on the management of pregnant and lying-in women, p. 203. the largest quantity of fixed air which dr. alexander made use of in any of these experiments was _eight ounces in measure_, and in one instance, only two ounces were employed to sweeten the putrid substance. in that where the meat was suspended in a wide mouthed bottle while the vinegar was made into _spirit. minderer._ no method seems to have been taken to retard the too rapid flight of the fixed air, which, from the quick distribution of the salt, would be soon dissipated. from hence i suspected, that a larger atmosphere, or a longer continued stream of fixed air might be requisite to restore septic bodies to perfect sweetness; and in order to decide this point, the following experiments were instituted, having previously obtained some slices of beef so exceedingly putrefied as to render the foetor of them scarcely tolerable. experiment xxix. a bottle capable of containing three pints was filled with water, and inverted into a bason of the same; a tube which communicated with another bottle, in which was an effervescing mixture of chalk and oil of vitriol, was then introduced into the mouth of the former, and a stream of fixed air continued, till the whole of the water was driven out by it. a piece of the above-mentioned putrid beef, fastened by a string to a cork, was conveyed into the bottle, which was corked before it was taken out of the water. the beef, after having been suspended in this atmosphere of fixed air for thirteen hours, was very considerably, though not entirely sweetened. _but the air in the bottle seemed to have acquired all the putrid smell of which the flesh had been deprived._ another slice of the same beef was not at all sweetened by exposure, during the same time, to the open air. experiment xxx. a piece of this beef suspended all night in the neck of a bottle of artificial pyrmont water[w], was rendered less putrid, though not near so much altered as that in the foregoing experiment. the water was strongly impregnated with the putrid effluvia. [w] see dr. priestley's directions for impregnating water with fixed air. experiment xxxi. two drachms of magnesia alba diluted with two ounces of water were placed in a quart bottle, to which was added a sufficient quantity of the strong spirit of vitriol to let loose all the fixed air from the magnesia, during the separation of which, another equally putrid piece of beef was suspended in the bottle, which was so corked as to retard, though not totally prevent the escape of the air. another piece of the same beef, was exposed in like manner to the vapour arising from the addition of oil of vitriol to two drachms of chalk diluted with water. they were suffered to remain for twenty two minutes, and being then examined were absolutely free from any putrid foetor, and though well washed in water continued quite sweet. experiment xxxii. air expelled from magnesia by the nitrous acid, sweetened a piece of the same putrid flesh suspended in the neck of the bottle during the effervescence. the beef smelled of the nitrous acid, but remained equally sweet when washed from it in water. very little change was produced in another piece exposed to the smoaking spirit of nitre. it may be some additional evidence in support of the sweetening properties of fixed air, to declare that the highly offensive, sanious discharge of a cancer has been rendered considerably sweeter by it[x]; and that i have seen a case of a dysenteric fever, attended with extremely foetid and bloody stools, in which fixed air was directed, by the physician who attended, to be thrown into the intestinal tube by way of clyster; the consequences of which were the correction of the putrid smell of the discharges, and the reduction of the inflation of the abdomen, together with contributing considerably to the ease of the patient after each injection of air[y]. a third case of this kind has very lately occurred to dr. percival, in which the injection of fixed air removed the foetor of the stools, and the patient recovered without the assistance of any other medicine, except the moderate use of wine as a cordial, and of a decoction of peruvian bark during the convalescent state. i have also experienced the removal of a very large and deep slough, and the healing of the ulcer in the putrid sore throat, more expeditiously by the inspiration of fixed air than by any other method.[z] [x] directions for impregnating water with fixed air, by joseph priestley, l.l.d. f.r.s. [y] this case, together with another similar to it, will probably appear more fully in the next volume of the philosophical transactions, with dr. priestley's papers on factitious air. [z] the patient in this last case being a lady in the country, at such a distance that i could not frequently visit her; by continuing to inspire the fixed air, after the ulcer was cleansed, and in a healing state, brought on a considerable inflammation of the fauces. one circumstance in the twenty ninth experiment peculiarly attracted my attention, viz. that the air in the bottle was so very putrid, though the beef exposed to it was restored to sweetness. the septic effluvium therefore did not appear to be destroyed, but to have changed place. from this fact it occurred to me that there might possibly be an affinity between the fixed air and the septic particles, and that this air might act as a menstruum on the effluvia emitted by putrid bodies. i have since had the pleasure to see that dr. priestley, whose investigation into the nature of factitious air has lately been laid before the royal society, and must contribute to exalt him to a still higher rank as a philosopher, has taken notice of something similar hereto. i am sensible that difficulties attend this theory. doctor percival, in the second volume of his essays, which is now in the press, has offered some ingenious conjectures on the subject, and to them i refer the reader. i shall only mention one experiment which seems to give some force to this doctrine. experiment xxxiii. slips of linen cloth dipped in very rancid oil, had their rancidity much diminished by exposure to a stream of fixed air from an effervescent mixture of chalk and spirit of vitriol. but a pint bottle of the same oil being saturated with this vapour, was equally offensive as before the air was thrown into it, though the oil appeared to absorb a considerable quantity of air. dr. macbride exposed a piece of rag dipped in lixivium tartari, and another tinged blue by the scrapings of raddishes, to the vapour arising from a large vat of melasses wash in high fermentation, without any change being effected in either, which could be supposed to proceed from an acid vapour. but as water impregnated with fixed air has evidently an acidulous taste, and it seemed probable that some of the vitriolic acid might be volatilized during the effervescence which proceeds from its admixture with the alkaline body, when the air is procured from these substances, it was apprehended that the antiseptic and sweetening powers of air thus obtained, might depend on the acid contained in it. in order to evince how far this conjecture was just, doctor percival was so obliging to assist me in suggesting and making the following experiments. experiment xxxiv. twenty drops of syrup of violets mixed with a glass-full of water were changed into a lively red by the addition of one drop of dilute spirit of vitriol. the season of the year did not allow us to use the fresh juices of vegetables, but this trial shews the genuineness of the syrup of violets, and that it was a sufficiently delicate test of acidity. experiment xxxv. a paper besmeared with this syrup, was placed over a vessel which contained an effervescing mixture of chalk and oil of vitriol. no change of colour took place except in one small point[aa], which had probably been accidentally touched by the vitriolic acid. [aa] in making this experiment, if the vegetable juice be placed too near to the effervescing mixture, some particles of the acid will be forced up to it, together with the air, and may occasion an erroneous conclusion to be drawn from it. experiment xxxvi. twenty drops of the syrup of violets were added to a glass-full of water strongly impregnated with fixed air, after the method directed by dr. priestley[ab], but without any variation in the colour of the violets. [ab] directions for impregnating water with fixed air, &c. by joseph priestley, l.l.d. experiment xxxvii. a few drachms of the syrup of violets were dissolved in half a pint of water, which was afterwards impregnated with air from an effervescing mixture of chalk and the smoaking spirit of nitre; but the syrup of violets suffered no change of colour. experiment xxxviii. a piece of putrid flesh which had been sweetened by the vapours of iron filings and the nitrous acid, had a pungent, acidulous smell. it was carefully washed in water, and still remained free from putridity. a few drops of lixivium tartari were instilled into this water without producing any sensible effervescence. may we not infer from these experiments, that if fixed air be an acid, it is an extremely weak one, and not sufficient, as such, to sweeten putrid bodies; which effect must consequently be owing to some other mode of action, the principles of which are not as as yet positively defined? chap. xi. a review of the general conclusions deducible from the foregoing observations and experiments. 1. the due preparation of magnesia alba depends on the proper mixture of the alkaline lixivium with the solution of the sal catharticus amarus; on the precipitated powder being immediately thrown into a very large quantity of boiling water; on the purity of the water used in the process; on the expeditious drying of the medicine, and on an exact attention to cleanliness. 2. the artificial epsom salt, or _sal catharticus amarus_, affords magnesia, at least, equally pure with that obtained from the epsom waters; and as the writers[ac] on mineral waters mention those of epsom to contain besides their salt, a considerable quantity of unneutralized earth, which appears, from dr. rutty's experiments, to be calcareous, they should seem peculiarly unfit for the purpose of preparing magnesia. some of the _epsom magnesia_ being calcined, impregnated distilled water with a calcareous earth. [ac] allen, lucas, rutty, monro, &c. 3. a sufficiently strong and well purified lixivium of potashes is equally adapted to procure the precipitation of magnesia, as a ley made with salt of tartar, or any other fixed alkali. 4. magnesia alba differs essentially in its chemical and medicinal properties from every other known absorbent earth; and when mixed with an acid, either before or after its admission into the stomach, is _purgative in a much smaller quantity_ than chalk, crab's eyes, or any of the calcareous or testaceous earths. 5. the calcination of magnesia divests it of those disagreeable properties complained of by hoffman, and other practitioners; the fixed air which constitutes so great a share of its composition, and is the cause of the uneasy sensation produced by this powder, being expelled in the process. but depriving the magnesia of its air does not render it caustic or unfit for internal uses. 6. it is a common, but unchemical practice, to mix acid and alkaline substances in the same composition, without attending to the changes which will be produced in their nature by being united. among other instances of this kind which might be pointed out, we often meet with lenitive electuary, cream of tartar and magnesia alba prescribed together in one medicine, the consequence of which is, that the magnesia is not only unintentionally neutralized, but the effervescence produced in it by the acid occasions the electuary to swell and renders it unsightly, besides altering the nature of the pulps and syrup which enter the composition, by inducing a vinous fermentation in them. the calcined magnesia being a non-effervescent may be united with acids under this form without any other inconvenience than their producing a neutral salt, and the propriety of this change must depend on the intention of the prescriber. 7. it appears that magnesia alba, though remarkably septic to animal flesh, retards the putrefaction of bile, and restores sweetness to it when actually putrid: that these last effects are still more strongly produced by the calcined magnesia, which also powerfully resists the corruption of flesh: that some of the other absorbents prove antiseptic to bile; and consequently that the opinion of the universal septic property of the absorbent class of medicines, and of the impropriety of prescribing them in bilious diseases, may admit of some exceptions. 8. magnesia, when calcined, has the same property as quick-lime of promoting the solution of resinous gums in water. 9. the increased power of water as a menstruum to vegetable astringents, depends on only such a quantity of lime being employed as can be saturated with air by the _solvend_; but if a larger proportion be used, the action of the water on the vegetable is rather prevented than promoted. 10. though lime water in several instances appears to be a more powerful menstruum to vegetables than distilled water; yet the latter is sometimes preferable, and acts more efficaciously than when impregnated with lime. 11. antiseptic vegetables yield tinctures to lime water, which resist putrefaction more powerfully than those prepared from the same drugs with distilled water, without lessening the cohesion of animal fibres. 12. waters which contain a large quantity of calcareous earth, either simply suspended, or in a neutralized state, are highly improper for pharmaceutical purposes in general, and especially for the preparation of extracts, where much water and long continued boiling are requisite. 13. the power of fixed air to restore sweetness to putrid bodies, is, it is hoped, clearly established: and there appears to be some degree of probability, that fixed air produces this effect by acting as a menstruum to the putrid effluvia: it seems also to be proved, that its antiseptic quality is not owing to any acidity which it carries off with it from the effervescing mixture. _the end._ [illustration: decorative band] an appendix to experiments and observations on the preparation of magnesia, &c. containing strictures on mr. glass's magnesia. by thomas henry, apothecary. manchester, march 8, 1773. it is with the utmost reluctance i find myself indispensibly obliged to address the public on a subject, from the nature of which i may perhaps incur the suspicion of acting from interested views: should i be so unhappy, my friends who know me will, i trust, do me the justice to acquit me of the charge of being influenced by any improper motives; and i shall hope for the candid indulgence of those persons to whom i am a stranger. about a year and half since i transmitted to the college of physicians an account of a method of preparing magnesia alba, equal to that which had been long sold by mr. glass of oxford, and which was generally and deservedly esteemed by others, as well as by myself, to be the standard of purity. though that gentleman carefully concealed the minutiæ on which the success of his process depended, he had always prepared it with the most laudable attention. my process was received by the college, and published in the second volume of the transactions of that truly respectable society, and has since been reprinted in a pamphlet which i lately published, and in which, among other subjects, i have recommended calcined magnesia to the attention of the faculty, as a medicine of considerable importance. notwithstanding i had been informed, by a relation of mr. glass, that he had disposed of his name in the magnesia business to some persons, for a very valuable consideration, yet i doubted not their adhering to the proper manner of preparing it; but as i have since had occasion to change my opinion, and as the credit of the calcined magnesia depends so much on its purity before calcination, i am necessitated to take this method of informing the public of my reasons for declaring that sold under the name of mr. glass to be impure, calcareous, and improper for the purpose of calcining. two or three years had elapsed since i had seen any of mr. glass's magnesia, except a small quantity which i had preserved, as a standard for the levity of what i prepared myself. but having a mind to calcine some of his, in order to compare it with my own, i sent for a box from mr. harrop, an agent of the proprietors in this town. i was surprized, on opening if, to find the magnesia specifically lighter, to an amazing degree, than any i had formerly seen, insomuch that the six shillings box, which used to contain about four ounces, now only contained an ounce and half, troy weight: _so that this medicine is sold at the rate of two pounds eight shillings the troy pound, which is not fourteen ounces avoirdupois_. on attempting to dissolve it in the vitriolic acid, i found the solution very imperfect; and on calcining half of the contents of the box, it was with indignation that i discovered this magnesia, so extolled, so puffed in every newspaper, for _its superior purity and goodness_, to contain no inconsiderable quantity of calcareous earth; for the pungency of it was very disagreeable in the mouth, and one scruple of it impregnated an ounce of water almost as strongly as so much lime would have done. these are tests, which, tho' much stronger than that of levity which the proprietors have artfully placed as the principal one, they have avoided mentioning, being sensible of its deficient solubility, and that it would not stand the fiery ordeal. willing, however, to believe that this impurity might be accidental, though i had reason to think, from the artful conduct above alluded to, that it was not so, i sent for a box of magnesia, from the agent for the sale of mr. glass's magnesia at preston. this likewise proved calcareous, though i thought the lime, produced by calcining it, not quite so pungent as the other; it, however, made a strong lime-water. that i might avoid drawing too hasty conclusions, i procured a third box from chester, which being subjected to the same trials, seemed more impure than either of the other two. this magnesia formed a very imperfect solution in the vitriolic acid; and the taste of the lime, after calcination, was so very disagreeable, that i was not free from it for some hours. the water impregnated with it was as strong to the taste as common lime-water, and the precipitate which fell from it, on blowing air into it, was as copious as i ever observed from that prepared with stone or oyster-shell lime. the boxes were all purchased from the agents for the sale of glass's magnesia, and every box was sealed with his arms, and had every other mark of authenticity. i have retained samples of each in both states. i have since repeated the above experiments on the contents of two boxes of glass's magnesia, the one of which was purchased of mr. r. davis, in sackville-street, piccadilly, the other of mr. william nicoll, in st. paul's church-yard. the magnesia in each proved to be calcareous, and acquired the properties of quick-lime by calcination. it would be natural for every person, who might wish to give the calcined magnesia a fair trial, to obtain mr. glass's for that purpose, on the supposition of its being superior to any other; and as the very first taste of it, in that state, would be sufficient to prejudice any one against the farther use of it, i am necessitated, in justice to my own reputation, and to the public, who may otherwise be deprived of a very valuable medicine, to enter this protest against the use of it. i have fairly and candidly given up to the public what i have found to be the best method of preparing magnesia, sufficiently pure for every medical and chemical purpose; and i sincerely wish that every apothecary, who has opportunity and leisure, would prepare it himself. but as, from various reasons, there are, i am convinced, too many who omit to do it, and that too little attention is paid to examining into the purity of what is used; and as it also appears the public have been imposed on, where they had reason to think themselves most secure, i have sent to mr. johnson, no. 72, st. paul's church-yard, and mr. ridley in st. james's-street, a quantity of magnesia, both in a calcined and uncalcined state, which, though not equal in levity, nor quite so costly, even when calcined, as that sold as mr. glass's, will, i doubt not, prove to be non-calcareous, and superior to it in every other respect. and if it should appear so to the gentlemen of the faculty, i wish for no preference to those apothecaries who prepare the medicine faithfully; but flatter myself that i have a superior title to the favour of physicians, of my brethren, and of the community, than those persons can claim, who have meanly stooped to secrete a process, the knowledge of which must be beneficial to mankind, and have abused the public confidence. i shall only add, that so far was i from expecting to find mr. glass's magnesia impure, that i bought it as a standard; that, as i am informed that gentleman is dead since this inquiry was finished, nothing, less than the reasons i have adduced, could have prevailed on me to have published this appendix at this season; and that i do not consider him, but the present preparers of the medicine, as culpable for the adulteration. that i have been favoured with an account of some experiments made by a physician of considerable eminence, on that magnesia, the result of which was similar to what i have here recited; and i appeal for proof of the truth of what i have asserted, to every reputable person who may now have any of it in his possession, and will make the experiment; and that having rested my cause on that issue, i mean not to enter into any controversy on the subject. n. b. calcareous magnesia is neither so absorbent, nor so purgative as the pure. finis. * * * * * transcriber's notes obvious typographical errors have been corrected, but variations in spelling, punctuation and hyphenation have been retained. in particular, the phrase "head achs" in chapter iii. has been retained. experiment i was erroneously numbered ii. this has been corrected. footnote identifiers are italic in the book. the italic markers have been omitted for the sake of clarity. the reference to an appendix has been added to the table of contents. the errata listed have been corrected in the text. italics are shown thus _italic_. +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ | transcriber's notes: | | | | italics are indicated by the underscore character, as in _word_. | | bold face is indicated by the equal character, as in =word=. | | subscript is indicated by _{subscript}. | | footnotes have been moved to below the paragraph they refer to. | | table of contents: 84-05 changed to 84-95. | | paragraph starting uniting pieces of glass to each other, known as| | welding, or soldering: footnote anchor [1] and number 1. before | | next paragraph deleted. | | caption fig. 18 added to illustration. | | paragraph directly below fig. 18: comma added (or better,...). | | 2nd paragraph under fig. 19: _de through e_ changed to _de_ | | through _e_. | | 2nd paragraph under fig. 34: _whence it might gradually lead into_| | changed to _whence it might gradually leak into_. | | toc: several sections added, so that all named sections are | | included. | | endiometer changed to eudiometer. | | some minor typographical errors and inconsistencies corrected. | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ the methods of glass blowing and of working silica by the same author _with 25 illustrations. crown 8vo, 2s._ =a practical introduction to chemistry.= intended to give a _practical_ acquaintance with the elementary facts and principles of chemistry. longmans, green, and co. london, new york, bombay, calcutta, and madras. the methods of glass blowing and of working silica in the oxy-gas flame _for the use of chemical and physical students_ by w. a. shenstone, f.r.s. formerly lecturer on chemistry in clifton college _ninth impression_ longmans, green, and co. 39 paternoster row, london fourth avenue & 30th street, new york bombay, calcutta, and madras 1916 preface this book consists of a reprint of the third edition of my methods of glass-blowing, together with a new chapter in which i have described the comparatively new art of working vitreous silica. the individual operations of glass-blowing are much less difficult than is usually supposed, and considerable success in the performance of most of them may be attained by any one who is endowed with average powers of manipulation and who is moderately persistent. constructing finished apparatus is often more difficult, as it may involve the performance of several operations under disadvantageous conditions, and may demand a little ingenuity on the part of the operator. but i think the suggestions in chapter iv. will make this comparatively easy also to those who have mastered the operations described in chapter iii. the working of vitreous silica, though more tedious and expensive than glass-blowing, is not really more difficult, and as it seems certain that this new material will soon play a useful part in chemical and physical research, i believe the addition now made to the earlier book will add considerably to its value. as glass is much less expensive to work with than silica, the beginner will find it best to spend a few days working with the common gas blow-pipe and glass before he attempts to manipulate the new and more refractory material. therefore, in writing the new chapter, i have assumed that the reader is already more or less familiar with the rest of the book, and have given only such instructions and advice as will be required by one who is already able to carry out simple work at the blow-pipe. w. a. shenstone. clifton college, _dec. 1901_. contents chapter i. glass-blower's apparatus. page introductory--the working-place--the blow-pipe--the bellows--automatic blower--blow-pipe flames, 1-11 chapter ii. varieties of glass and their management. characters of good glass--cleaning and preparing a tube--presenting glass to the flame--methods of working with lead and soft soda glass respectively--management of soda glass--annealing--the use of combustion tube, 12-25 chapter iii. cutting and bending glass--forming glass apparatus before the blow-pipe--making and grinding stoppers to apparatus, etc. cutting glass tubes--bending glass tubes--rounding and bordering the ends of tubes--sealing--choking, or contracting the bore of a glass tube--widening tubes--piercing tubes--uniting pieces of glass to each other, known as welding, or soldering--blowing a bulb or globe of glass--making and grinding stoppers, 26-54 chapter iv. making thistle funnels, u-tubes, etc.--combining the parts of complicated apparatus--mercury, and other air-tight joints--vacuum taps--safety taps--air-traps. electrodes--u-tubes--spiral tubes--thistle funnels--closing tubes containing chemicals--construction of apparatus consisting of several parts--modes of combining the parts of heavy apparatus--mercury joints--vacuum taps--lubricating taps--air-traps, 55-69 chapter v. graduating and calibrating glass apparatus. to graduate tubes, etc.--to divide a given line into equal parts--to calibrate apparatus--to calibrate tubes for measuring gases--to calibrate the tube of a thermometer, 70-81 chapter vi. glass tubing. diagrams of glass tubes, showing the chief sizes in which they are made, 82-83 chapter vii. vitreous silica introductory--properties of vitreous silica--preparing non-splintering silica from brazil pebble--apparatus--the method of making silica tubes--precautions--making larger tubes and other apparatus of silica--quartz fibres, 84-95 index, 97 chapter i. _glass-blower's apparatus._ =introductory.=--i shall endeavour to give such an account of the operations required in constructing glass apparatus as will be useful to chemical and other students; and as this book probably will come into the hands of beginners who are not in a position to secure any further assistance, i shall include descriptions even of the simple operations which are usually learned during the first few hours of practical work in a chemical or physical laboratory. i shall not give any particular account of the manufacture of such apparatus as thermometers, taps, etc., because, being in large demand, they can be bought so cheaply that time is not profitably spent in making them. but it will be found that what is included will enable any one, who will devote sufficient time to acquiring the necessary manipulative dexterity, to prepare such apparatus as test-tubes, distillation flasks, apparatus for washing gases, ozone generating tubes, etc., when they are required, as they often are, without delay or for special purposes. the amateur probably will not succeed in turning out apparatus so finished in appearance as that of the professional glass-blower until after long practice, but after a little daily practice for the space of a few weeks, any one who is fairly skilful in ordinary manipulation, and who perseveres in the face of failure at first, will find himself able to make almost all the apparatus he needs for lecture or other experiments, with a considerable saving in laboratory expenses, and, which very often is more important, without the delay that occurs when one depends upon the professional glass-worker. in the case of those who, like myself, work in the provinces, this latter advantage is a very weighty one. after the description of the instruments used in glass-blowing, which immediately follows, the following arrangement of the subject has been adopted. in the first place, an account of the two chief kinds of glass is given, and of the peculiarities in the behaviour of each of them before the blow-pipe, which is followed by a tolerably minute description of the method of performing each of the fundamental operations employed in fashioning glass apparatus. these are not very numerous, and they should be thoroughly mastered in succession, preferably upon tubes of both soda and lead glass. then follows, in chapter iv., an account of the application of these operations to setting up complete apparatus, full explanations of the construction of two or three typical pieces of apparatus being given as examples, and also descriptions of the modes of making various pieces of apparatus which in each case present one or more special difficulties in their construction; together with an account, which, i think, will be found valuable, of some apparatus that has been introduced, chiefly during recent years, for experimenting upon gases under reduced pressure, _e.g._ vacuum taps and joints. finally, in chapter v., there is a short account of the methods of graduating and calibrating glass apparatus for use in quantitative experiments. =the working-place.=--the blow-pipe must be placed in a position perfectly free from draughts. it should not face a window, nor be in too strong a light, if that can be avoided, for a strong light will render the non-luminous flames, which are used in glass-blowing, almost invisible, and seriously inconvenience the operator, who cannot apply the various parts of the flames to his glass with the degree of certainty that is necessary; neither can he perceive the condition of the glass so correctly in a strong light, for though in many operations the glass-worker is guided by feeling rather than by seeing, yet sight plays a very important part in his proceedings. my own blow-pipe is placed near a window glazed with opaque glass, which looks southwards, but is faced by buildings at a short distance. in dull weather the light obtained is good; but on most days i find it advantageous to shade the lower half of the window with a green baize screen. some glass-blowers prefer gaslight to daylight. the form of the table used is unimportant, provided that it is of a convenient height, and allows free play to the foot which works the blower underneath it. the blower should be _fixed_ in a convenient position, or it will get out of control at critical moments. the table, or that part of it which surrounds the blow-pipe, should be covered with sheet-iron to protect it from the action of the fragments of hot glass that will fall upon it. the tubes that supply air and gas to the blow-pipe should come from beneath the table, and may pass through holes cut for the purpose. many glass-blowers prefer to work at a rather high table, and sit on a rather high stool, so that they are well above their work. no doubt this gives extra command over the work in hand, which is often valuable. on the other hand, it is somewhat fatiguing. for a long spell of labour at work which is not of a novel character nor specially difficult, i am disposed to recommend sitting on a chair or low stool, at a table of such height as will enable the elbows to rest easily upon it whilst the glass is held in the flame. the precise heights that are desirable for the table and stool, and the exact position of the blow-pipe, will depend upon the height and length of arm of the individual workman, and it must therefore be left to each person to select that which suits him best. a moveable rest made of wood, for supporting the remote end of a long piece of glass tube a few inches above the table, whilst the other end is being heated in the flame, will be found convenient. =the blow-pipe.=--formerly a lamp, in which sweet oil or tallow was burnt, was employed for glass-working, and such lamps are still occasionally used. thus, lamps burning oil or tallow were used on board the _challenger_ for hermetically sealing up flasks of water collected at various depths to preserve them for subsequent examination. i shall not, however, give an account of such a lamp, for the gas apparatus is so much more convenient for most purposes that it has now practically superseded the oil lamps. fig. 1 shows a gas blow-pipe of exceedingly simple construction, which can be easily made, and with which good work can be done. [illustration: fig. 1.] the tube _a_ is of brass, and has a side tube _b_ brazed to it, ten to twelve centimetres from the end _e_, according to the dimensions of the tube. a tube of glass, _ec_, is fitted into _a_ by a cork at _d_. _b_ is connected to a supply of gas by a flexible tube, _c_ is similarly connected to the blower. by means of _ce_ a stream of air can be forced into gas burning at the mouth of the blow-pipe _g_, and various flames, with the characters described in a later section, can be produced with this instrument. for producing the pointed flame (fig. 3, p. 9) the opening _e_ of the air-tube should be contracted to the size of a large knitting needle. for producing a flame of large size, rich in air (fig. 4, p. 9), the internal diameter of _e_ may be nearly half as great as that of _a_ without disadvantage. this blow-pipe may be fixed in position by the spike _f_, which will fit into holes in a block of wood or a large cork. several of these holes in various positions should be made in the block, so that the position of the blow-pipe may be varied easily. two taps must be provided in convenient positions near the edge of the table to enable the workman to regulate the supplies of air and gas. these taps should be fixed to the table and be connected with the gas and air supplies respectively on one side, and with the blow-pipe on the other, by flexible tubes. if blow-pipes of this kind be used, at least two of them should be provided; one of small dimensions for working on small tubes and joints, the other of larger size for operations on larger tubes. it will be convenient to have both of them ready for use at all times, as it is sometimes necessary to employ large and small flames on the same piece of work in rapid succession. by having several air-tubes of different sizes fitted to each blow-pipe, a greater variety of work may be done. for the larger blow-pipe, the internal diameter of _a_ may be fifteen to seventeen millimetres. for the smaller instrument, eleven millimetres for the diameter of _a_ would be a useful size. when a slightly greater outlay can be afforded it will be most convenient to purchase the blow-pipe. they can be obtained of compact form, supported on stands with universal joints giving great freedom of movement, and with taps for regulating the supplies of gas and air, at comparatively small cost. as figures of various blow-pipes can be seen in the price-lists of most dealers in apparatus, they are not given here. their introduction would be of but little service, for the construction of that which is adopted can be readily ascertained by taking it to pieces. the simplest blow-pipe usually used for glass-working is that of herapath. this has two taps to regulate the air and gas supplies respectively, and will give a considerable variety of flames, which will be discussed subsequently. an excellent blow-pipe, made on the same principle as that shown in fig. 1, but more substantially and with interchangeable jets, can be obtained from messrs. muller of holborn for a moderate outlay. another very good blow-pipe is the automaton blow-pipe of mr. fletcher of warrington. in this, one tap regulates the supply both of air and gas, which is a great gain when difficult work is in hand. automaton blow-pipes are made of two sizes. i have found that the larger size, with a powerful bellows, heats large pieces of lead glass very satisfactorily. on the other hand, the fine-pointed oxidising flame of the herapath blow-pipe is, perhaps, the most suitable for working joints of lead glass. therefore a good equipment would be a small herapath blow-pipe and a large-sized automaton. if only one blow-pipe is purchased it should be either a medium-sized herapath, or the smaller automaton, as those are most useful for general work. mr. fletcher also makes an ingenious combination of two blow-pipes in which the gas and air supplies are regulated by a single lever-handle. this is very convenient, and gives flames that answer well with tubes made of soft soda glass, and it is very useful for general work. for use with lead glass the supply of air is rather too small, and does not enable one to get such good results. this can be easily amended, however. by slightly increasing the size of the air-tube of the smaller blow-pipe, and having increased the supply of air to the larger blow-pipe also, by reducing the external diameter of the end of the innermost tube, i now get medium-sized brush flames and pointed flames with this blow-pipe, that are equal to any i have used for heating lead glass. for small laboratories the inexpensive no. 5 bunsen burner of mr. fletcher, which is convertible into a blow-pipe, will be very useful. jets of several sizes to fit the air-tubes of blow-pipes may be obtained with them, and will serve for regulating the supply of air to the flame. =the bellows.=--the usual blowing apparatus is some form of foot-blower. these may be obtained fitted to small tables with sheet-iron tops. but a much less expensive apparatus is the large foot-blower made by mr. fletcher of warrington, which can be used at an ordinary table or laboratory bench. good foot-blowers can also be obtained from makers of furnace bellows. no part of the glass-blower's equipment exceeds the bellows in importance. the best blower procurable should therefore be adopted. a bellows which, when used with a large blow-pipe, will not enable you to heat large pieces of lead glass tube to redness without blackening the glass when the directions for heating lead glass on pages 17-21 are followed, should on no account be received. i am told that at some places, where the water-supply is at very high pressure, it is utilised for working blow-pipes by means of the apparatus described below, and that some glass-workers find it advantageous to use such automatic blowers. but after a little practice, the effort of working the blower with the foot whilst manipulating the glass is not a source of serious inconvenience. indeed, as it gives a certain degree of control over the flame without the use of the hands, the foot-blower is preferable. it is worth while to describe an automatic blower, however. =automatic blower= (fig. 2).--a strong glass tube _a_ is welded into a somewhat larger tube _b_ so that its end is about 2 mm. from the contraction at _g_. _b_ has a side tube _c_ joined to it. the narrow end of _b_ is fixed by an india-rubber cork to a strong bottle _d_ of two or three litres capacity. the india-rubber cork also carries an exit tube _e_, and _d_ is pierced near its bottom by a small hole at _f_. [illustration: fig. 2] in using the apparatus _a_ is connected with the water-supply, and water passing through _g_, carries air with it into _d_. the water escapes from _d_ by the opening at _f_, and the air is allowed to pass out by the tube _e_, its passage being regulated by a tap. fresh supplies of air enter _b_ by _c_. =blow-pipe flames=--_the pointed flame._--if the gas tap of a herapath blow-pipe be adjusted so that comparatively little gas can pass, and if the foot-blower be then worked cautiously, a long tongue of flame ending in a fine point will be produced (fig. 3). this flame will subsequently be described as the _pointed flame_. it should be quite free from luminosity, and as the amount of air necessary for securing a pointed flame is large, in proportion to the gas, there is excess of oxygen towards the end _c_. by adjusting the proportions of air and gas, pointed flames of various dimensions can be obtained with the same blow-pipe. the part of a pointed flame to be used in glass-working is the tip, or in some cases the space slightly beyond the tip. [illustration: fig. 3.] [illustration: fig. 4.] _the brush flame._--if a large supply of gas be turned on and a considerable blast of air sent into the flame, a non-luminous flame of great size will be obtained (fig. 4). in form it somewhat resembles a large camel's hair pencil, and may conveniently be described as a _brush flame_. the chief advantage of a large-sized blow-pipe is, that with it a large brush flame may be produced, which is often invaluable. by gradually diminishing the supply of gas and air smaller brush flames may be produced. the jet used to supply air to the herapath blow-pipe is usually too fine, and consequently does not permit the passage of sufficient air to produce a brush flame that contains excess of oxygen, even with the aid of a very powerful blower. my own herapath blow-pipe only gives a satisfactory oxidising brush flame when the jet is removed altogether from the end of the air-tube. for producing pointed flames the finer jet of the air-tube must be used, but when a highly oxidising flame of large size is required it must be removed. the internal diameter of the central air-tube should be nearly half as great as that of the outer or gas-supply tube. fletcher's automaton with the large air jet gives a very liberal supply of air, and produces an excellent oxidising brush flame. in the case of the larger-sized automaton a consequence of this is, however, that when fitted with the large jet it will not give so good a pointed flame as the herapath, which, in its turn, gives an inferior oxidising brush. by fitting finer jets to the air-tube of fletcher's apparatus pointed flames can be secured when necessary. _the smoky flame._--by turning on a very free supply of gas, and only enough air to give an outward direction to the burning gas, a smoky flame, chiefly useful for annealing and for some simple operations on lead glass, is produced. the gimmingham blow-pipe and fletcher's combination blow-pipe, in addition to the above flames, are also adapted to produce a non-luminous flame, resembling that of the bunsen gas-burner, which is very convenient for the preliminary heating of the glass, and also for gradually cooling finished apparatus. it is not necessary to describe the method of using these last-mentioned blow-pipes. with the more complicated of them directions for its use are supplied. mr. madan has suggested the use of oxygen in place of air for producing the oxidising flame required for working lead glass, and to produce a flame of high temperature for softening tubes of hard, or combustion, glass. for the latter purpose the employment of oxygen may be adopted with great advantage. for working lead glass, however, it is quite unnecessary if the directions already given are followed. the student's subsequent success will so largely depend upon his acquaintance with the resources of his blow-pipe, and on the facility with which he can take advantage of them, that no pains should be spared in the effort to become expert in its management as soon as possible. a few experiments should now be made, therefore, upon the adjustment of the flame, until the student is able to produce and modify any form of flame with promptness and certainty. [illustration: fig. 5.] the remaining apparatus used in glass-working consists of triangular and other files, charcoal pastils for cutting glass, pieces of sound charcoal of various diameters with conical ends; it is convenient to have one end somewhat less pointed than the other (fig. 5). corks of various sizes; the smallest, which are most frequently needed, should be carefully cut with sharpened cork borers from larger corks. besides these there should be provided some freshly distilled turpentine in which camphor has been dissolved,[1] fine and coarse emery powder, and some sheets of cotton-wadding, an india-rubber blowing-bottle, glass tubes, a little white enamel, and a pair of iron tongs. [1] half an ounce of camphor to about six ounces of turpentine will do very well. chapter ii. _varieties of glass and their management._ all the varieties of glass that are ordinarily met with contain silica (sio_{2}) associated with metallic oxides. in a true glass there are at least two metallic oxides. the unmixed silicates are not suitable for the purposes of glass. they are not so capable of developing the viscous condition when heated as mixtures--some of them are easily attacked by water, and many of those which are insoluble are comparatively infusible. there is generally excess of silica in glass, that is, more than is necessary to form normal silicates of the metals present. the best proportions of the various constituents have been ascertained by glass-makers, after long experience; but the relation of these proportions to each other, from a chemical point of view, is not easy to make out. the varieties of glass from which tubes for chemical glass-blowing are made may be placed under three heads, and are known as[2]- soft soda glass. also known as french glass. lead glass. also known as english glass. hard glass. [2] for details of the composition of the various glasses, some work on glass-making may be consulted. in purchasing glass tubes, it is well to lay in a considerable stock of tubes made of each of the two first varieties, and, if possible, to obtain them from the manufacturer, for it frequently happens that pieces of glass from the same batch may be much more readily welded together than pieces of slightly different composition. yet it is not well to lay in too large a stock, as sometimes it is found that glass deteriorates by prolonged keeping. as it is frequently necessary to make additions, alterations, or repairs to purchased apparatus, it is best to provide supplies both of soft soda glass and lead glass, for though purchased glass apparatus is frequently made of lead glass, yet sometimes it is formed from the soda glass, and as it is a matter of some difficulty to effect a permanent union between soda glass and lead glass, it is desirable to be provided with tubes of both kinds. many amateurs find that soda glass is in some respects easier to work with than lead glass. but, on the other hand, it is somewhat more apt to crack during cooling, which causes much loss of time and disappointment. also, perhaps in consequence of its lower conductivity for heat, it very often breaks under sudden changes of temperature during work. if, however, a supply of good soda glass is obtained, and the directions given in this book in regard to annealing it are thoroughly carried out, these objections to the use of soda glass will, to a great extent, be removed. i find, however, that when every precaution has been taken, apparatus made of soda glass will bear variations of temperature less well than that made of lead glass. therefore, although the comparatively inexpensive soda glass may be employed for most purposes without distrust, yet i should advise those who propose to confine themselves to one kind of glass, to take the small extra trouble required in learning to work lead glass. in order to secure glass of good quality, a few pieces should be obtained as a sample, and examined by the directions given below. when the larger supply arrives, a number of pieces, taken at random, should be examined before the blow-pipe, to compare their behaviour with that of the sample pieces, and each piece should be separately examined in all other respects as described subsequently. hard glass is used for apparatus that is required to withstand great heat. it is difficult to soften, especially in large pieces. it should only be employed, therefore, when the low melting points of soda or lead glass would render them unsuitable for the purpose to which the finished apparatus is to be put. what is sold as jena combustion tube should be preferred when this is the case. =characters of good glass.=--glass tubes for glass-blowing should be as free as possible from knots, air-bubbles, and stripes. they should be in straight pieces of uniform thickness, and cylindrical bore. it is not possible to obtain glass tubes of absolutely the same diameter from one end to the other in large quantities, but the variations should not be considerable. when a sharp transverse scratch is made with a good file on a piece of tube, and the scratch is touched with a rather fine point of red-hot glass (this should be lead glass for a lead glass tube, and soda glass for a tube of soda glass), the crack which is started should pass round the glass, so that it may be broken into two pieces with regular ends. if the crack proceeds very irregularly, and especially if it tends to extend along the tube, the glass has been badly annealed, and should not be employed for glass-blowing purposes. it is important that the point of hot glass used shall be very small, however. even good glass will frequently give an irregular fracture if touched with a large mass of molten glass. finally, glass tube which is thin and of small diameter should not crack when suddenly brought into a flame. but larger and thicker tubes will not often withstand this treatment. they should not crack, however, when they are brought into a flame gradually, after having been held in the warm air in front of it for a minute or so. good glass does not readily devitrify when held in the blow-pipe flame. as devitrified glass very often may be restored to its vitreous condition by fusion, devitrification most frequently shows itself round the edges of the heated parts, and may be recognised by the production of a certain degree of roughness there. it is believed to be due to the separation of certain silicates in the crystallised form. hard glass, which contains much calcium, is more apt to devitrify than the more fusible varieties.[3] [3] the presence of silicates of calcium and aluminum are considered to promote a tendency to devitrification in glass; and glasses of complex composition are more apt to devitrify than the simpler varieties. see _glass-making_, by powell, chance, and harris, chap. iv. glass tubes are made of various sizes. when purchasing a supply, it is necessary to be somewhat precise in indicating to the vendor the sizes required. i have therefore placed at the end of the book, in an appendix, a table of numbered diagrams. in ordering tubes it will usually only be necessary to give the numbers of the sizes wished for, and to specify the quantity of each size required. in ordering glass tubes by weight, it must be remembered that a great many lengths of the smaller sizes, but very few lengths of the larger sizes, go to the pound. larger-sized tubes than those on the diagram are also made. in ordering them the external diameter and thickness of glass preferred should be stated. =cleaning and preparing a tube.=--it is frequently much easier to clean the tube from which a piece of apparatus is to be made than to clean the finished apparatus. a simple method of cleaning a tube is to draw a piece of wet rag which has been tied to a string through the tube once or twice, or, with small tubes, to push a bit of wet paper or cotton wool through them. if the dirt cannot be removed in this way, the interior of the tube should be moistened with a little sulphuric acid in which some bichromate of potassium has been dissolved. in any case, it must finally be repeatedly rinsed with distilled water, and dried by cautiously warming it, and sucking or blowing air through it. in order to avoid heating delicate apparatus which has become damp and needs drying, the water may be washed out with a few drops of spirit, which is readily removed at a low temperature. before using a glass tube for an operation in which it will be necessary to blow into it, one end of it must be contracted, unless it is already of such a size that it can be held between the lips with perfect ease; in any case, its edges must be rounded. for descriptions of these operations, see page 35. the other end must be closed. this may be done by means of a cork. =presenting glass to the flame.=--glass tubes must never be brought suddenly into the flame in which they are to be heated. all glass is very likely to crack if so treated. it should in all cases be held for a little while in front of the flame, rotated constantly in the hot air and moved about, in order that it may be warmed over a considerable area. when it has become pretty hot by this treatment, it may be gradually brought nearer to the flame, and, finally, into contact with it, still with constant rotation and movement, so as to warm a considerable part of the tube. when the glass has been brought fairly into contact with the flame, it will be safe to apply the heat at the required part only. care must be taken in these preliminary operations to avoid heating the more fusible glasses sufficiently to soften them. =methods of working with lead and soft soda glass respectively.=--when lead glass is heated in the brush flame of the ordinary herapath blow-pipe, or within the point of the pointed flame, it becomes blackened on its surface, in consequence of a portion of the lead becoming reduced to the metallic state by the reducing gases in the flame. the same thing will happen in bending a lead glass tube if it is made too hot in a luminous flame. a practical acquaintance with this phenomenon may be acquired by the following experiment:-take a piece of lead glass tube, bring it gradually from the point of a pointed flame to a position well within the flame, and observe what happens. when the glass reaches the point _a_ (fig. 3), or thereabouts, a dark red spot will develop on the glass, the area of the spot will increase as the glass is brought further in the direction _a_ to _b_. if the glass be then removed from the flame and examined, it will be found that a dark metallic stain covers the area of the dark red spot previously observed. repeat the experiment, but at the first appearance of the dark spot slowly move the glass in the direction _a_ to _c_. the spot will disappear, and, if the operation be properly performed, in its place there will be a characteristically greenish-yellow luminous spot of highly heated glass. in this proceeding the reduced lead of the dark spot has been re-oxidised on passing into the hot gases, rich in oxygen, which abound at the point of the flame. if one end of the tube has been previously closed by a piece of cork, and if air be forced into the tube with the mouth from the open end before the luminous spot has become cool, the glass will expand. if the experiment be repeated several times, with pointed flames of various sizes, the operator will quickly learn how to apply the pointed flame to lead glass so that it may be heated without becoming stained with reduced lead. if the spot of reduced metal produced in the first experiment be next brought into the oxidising flame, it also may gradually be removed. on occasion, therefore, apparatus which has become stained with lead during its production, may be rendered presentable by suitable treatment in the oxidising flame. the process of re-oxidising a considerable surface in this way after it has cooled down is apt to be very tedious, however, and, especially in the case of thin tubes or bulbs, often is not practicable. in working with lead glass, therefore, any reduction that occurs should be removed by transferring the glass to the oxidising flame at once. small tubes, and small areas on larger tubes of english glass, may be softened without reduction by means of the pointed oxidising flame; but it is not easy to heat any considerable area of glass sufficiently with a pointed flame. and though it is possible, with care, to employ the hot space immediately in front of the visible end of an ordinary brush flame, which is rich in air, yet, in practice, it will not be found convenient to heat large masses of lead glass nor tubes of large size, to a sufficiently high temperature to get the glass into good condition for blowing, by presenting them to the common brush flame. it may seem that as glass which has become stained with reduced lead can be subsequently re-oxidised by heating it with the tip of the pointed flame, the difficulty might be overcome by heating it for working in the brush flame, and subsequently oxidising the reduced lead. it is, however, difficult, as previously stated, to re-oxidise a large surface of glass which has been seriously reduced by the action of the reducing gases of the flame, after it has cooled. moreover, there is this very serious objection, that if, as may be necessary, the action of the reducing flame be prolonged, the extensive reduction that takes place diminishes the tendency of the glass to acquire the proper degree of viscosity for working it, the glass becomes difficult to expand by blowing, seriously roughened on its surface, and often assumes a very brittle or rotten condition. when it is only required to bend or draw out tubes of lead glass, they may be softened sufficiently by a smoky flame, which, probably owing to its having a comparatively low temperature, does not so readily reduce the lead as flames of higher temperature. but for making joints, collecting masses of glass for making bulbs, and in all cases where it is required that the glass shall be thoroughly softened, the smoky flame does not give good results. in the glass-works, where large quantities of ornamental and other glass goods are made of lead or flint glass, the pots in which the glass is melted are so constructed that the gases of the furnace do not come into contact with the glass;[4] and as the intensely-heated sides of the melting-pot maintain a very high temperature within it by radiation, the workman has a very convenient source of heat to his hand,--he has, in fact, only to introduce the object, or that part of it which is to be softened, into the mouth of the melting-pot, and it is quickly heated sufficiently for his purpose, not only without contact of reducing gases, but in air. he can therefore easily work upon very large masses of glass. in a special case, such a source of heat might be devised by the amateur. usually, however, the difficulty may be overcome without special apparatus. it is, in fact, only necessary to carry out the instructions given below to obtain a considerable brush flame rich in air, in which the lead glass can be worked, not only without discoloration, but with the greatest facility. [4] see _principles of glass-making_, p. 31. _to produce an oxidising brush flame._--the blower used must be powerful, the air-tube of the blow-pipe must be about half as great in diameter as the outer tube which supplies the gas. the operator must work his bellows so as to supply a strong and _steady_ blast of air, and the supply of gas must be regulated so that the brush flame produced is free from every sign of incomplete combustion,[5] which may be known by its outer zone being only faintly visible in daylight, and quite free from luminous streaks (see fig. 4, p. 9). when a suitable flame has been produced, try it by rotating a piece of lead glass at or near the end of the inner blue part of the flame (_a_ fig. 4); the appearance of the glass will quickly indicate reduction. when this occurs move the glass forward to the end of the outer zone _b_, but keep it sufficiently within the flame to maintain it at a high temperature. if all is right the metallic reduction will quickly disappear, the glass will become perfectly transparent once more, and will present the appearance previously observed in the experiments with the pointed flame, or, if very hot, assume a brownish-red appearance. if this does not occur, the supply of air must be increased or the supply of gas diminished until the proper effects are secured. [5] nevertheless the supply of air must not be so excessive as to reduce the temperature of the flame sufficiently to prevent the thorough softening of the glass, which will occur if the bellows is worked with too much zeal. in working upon lead glass with the highly oxidising brush flame, it is a good plan to heat it in the reducing part of the flame _a_ for thoroughly softening the glass, and to remove it to the oxidising flame _b_ to burn away the reduced metal. in prolonged operations, in order that reduction may never go too far, hold the glass alternately in the hot reducing flame and in the oxidising flame. the inferiority of the outer oxidising flame to those portions nearer the inner blue zone for softening the glass, may perhaps be accounted for by the presence of a larger proportion of unconsumed air in the former, which being heated at the expense of the hot gases produced by combustion, thereby lowers the temperature of the flame. at or near _a_ (fig. 4) where the combustion is nearly complete, but no excess of air exists, the temperature will naturally be highest. if a very large tube be rotated in the oxidising flame at _b_ (fig. 4) it may happen that the flame is not large enough to surround the tube, and that as it is rotated those parts of it which are most remote from the flame will cool down too considerably to allow all parts of the tube to be simultaneously brought into the desired condition. this difficulty may be overcome by placing two blow-pipes exactly opposite to each other, at such a distance that there is an interval of about an inch between the extremities of their flames, and rotating the tube between the two flames. it may be necessary to provide two blowers for the blow-pipes if they are large. again, if a very narrow zone of a tube of moderate size is to be heated, two pointed flames may be similarly arranged with advantage. occasionally more than two flames are made to converge upon one tube in this manner. another method of preventing one side of a tube from cooling down whilst the other is presented to the flame, is to place a brick at a short distance from the extremity of the flame. the brick checks the loss of heat considerably. a block of beech wood may be used for the same purpose, the wood ignites and thereby itself becomes a source of heat, and is even more effective than a brick. fuller details of the management of lead glass under various circumstances will be found in the subsequent descriptions of operations before the blow-pipe. before proceeding to work with soda glass, the student should not only verify by experiments what has been already said, but he should familiarise himself with the action of the blow-pipe flame on lead glass by trying the glass in every part of the flame, varying the proportions of gas and air in every way, repeating, and repeating, his experiments until he can obtain any desired effect with certainty and promptitude. he should practice some of the simpler operations given in chapter iii. in order to impress what he has learned well on his mind. =management of soda glass.=--in working with soda glass the following points must be constantly kept in mind. that as it is much more apt than lead glass to crack when suddenly heated, great caution must be exercised in bringing it into the flame; and that in making large joints or in making two joints near each other, all parts of the tube adjacent to that which, for the moment, is being heated, must be kept hot, as it is very apt to crack when adjacent parts are unequally heated. this may be effected by stopping work at short intervals and warming the cooler parts of the tube, or by the use of the brick or block of wood to check radiation, or even by placing a supplementary blow-pipe or bunsen burner in such a position that its flame plays upon the more distant parts of the work, not coming sufficiently into contact to soften the glass, however, but near enough to keep it well heated. lastly, to prevent the finished work from falling to pieces after or during cooling, the directions given under the head of annealing must be carefully carried out. in very much of his work the glass-blower is guided more by the _feel_ of the glass than by what he sees. the power of feeling glass can only be acquired by practice, and after a certain amount of preliminary failure. as a rule i have observed that beginners are apt to raise their glass to a higher temperature than is necessary, and that they employ larger flames than are wanted. if glass be made too soft it may fall so completely out of shape as to become unworkable except in very skilful hands. the following rules, therefore, should be strictly adhered to. always employ in the first instance the smallest flame that is likely to do the work required. in operations involving _blowing out_ viscous glass, attempt to blow the glass at low temperatures before higher ones are tried. after a little experience the adoption of the right-sized flame for a given purpose, and the perception of the best condition of glass for blowing it, become almost automatic. i may add that glass which is to be bent needs to be much less heated than glass which is to be blown. =annealing.=--if apparatus, the glass of which is very thin and of uniform substance, be heated, on removal from the source of heat it will cool equally throughout, and therefore may often be heated and cooled without any special precautions. if the glass be thick, and especially if it be of unequal thickness in various parts, the thinner portions will cool more quickly than those which are more massive; this will result in the production of tension between the thicker and thinner parts in consequence of inequality in the rates of contraction, and fractures will occur either spontaneously or upon any sudden shock. thus, if a hot tube be touched with cold or wet iron, or slightly scratched with a cold file, the inequality of the rate of cooling is great, and it breaks at once. it is therefore necessary to secure that hot glass shall cool as regularly as possible. and this is particularly important in the case of articles made of soda glass. some glass-blowers content themselves with permitting the glass to cool gradually in a smoky flame till it is covered with carbon, and then leave it to cool upon the table. but under this treatment many joints made of soda glass which are not quite uniform in substance, but otherwise serviceable, will break down. in glass-works the annealing is done in ovens so arranged that the glass enters at the hottest end of the oven where it is uniformly heated to a temperature not much below that at which it becomes viscous, and slowly passed through the cooler parts of the chamber so that it emerges cold at the other end. this method of annealing is not practicable in a small laboratory. but fortunately very good results can be obtained by the following simple device, viz.:-by wrapping the hot apparatus that is to be annealed closely in cotton wool, and leaving it there till quite cold. the glass should be wrapped up immediately after it is blown into its final shape, as soon as it is no longer soft enough to give way under slight pressure. and it should be heated as uniformly as possible, not only at the joint, but also about the parts adjacent to the joint, at the moment of surrounding it with the cotton. lead glass appears to cool more regularly than soda glass, and these precautions may be more safely neglected with apparatus made of lead glass; but not always. at the date of writing i have had several well-blown joints of thick-walled capillary tube to no. 16 (see diagram, p. 82), break during cooling, in consequence of circumstances making it dangerous to heat the neighbourhood of the joint so much as was necessary. the black carbonaceous coat formed on hot glass when it is placed in cotton wool may be removed by wiping with methylated spirit, or, if it be very closely adherent, by gently rubbing with fine emery, moistened with the spirit. cotton wool is rather dangerously inflammable; it should therefore be kept out of reach of the blow-pipe flame, and care should be taken that the glass is not placed in contact with it at a sufficiently high temperature to cause its ignition. another method of annealing is to cover the hot glass with hot sand, and allow it to cool therein. as in the case of lead glass, so with soda glass. a thorough acquaintance with the effect of the various parts of the flame upon it should be gained before further work is entered upon, for which purpose an hour or more spent in observing its behaviour in the flame will be fully repaid by increased success subsequently. =the use of combustion tube.=--it is often necessary to construct apparatus of what is known as hard glass or combustion tube. it is almost as easy to work combustion tube as to deal with lead and soda glass if the oxy-hydrogen flame be employed. it is not necessary to set up a special apparatus for this purpose; many of the ordinary blow-pipes can be used with oxygen instead of with air. it is only necessary to connect the air-tube of the blow-pipe with a bottle of compressed oxygen instead of with the bellows. the connecting tube should not be too wide nor too long, in order to avoid the accumulation in it, by accident, of large quantities of explosive mixtures. two precautions are necessary in manipulating hard glass in the oxy-hydrogen flame. the glass must _not_ be overheated. at first one is very apt to go wrong in this direction. the supply of oxygen must _not_ be too great; a small hissing flame is not what is wanted. if either of these precautions are neglected most glass will devitrify badly. with a little care and experience, devitrification can be absolutely avoided. ordinary combustion tube can be used, but i find that the glass tube (verbrennungsrã¶hr) made by schott & co. of jena, which can be obtained through any firm of dealers in apparatus, is far better than the ordinary tube. by following these instructions, any one who has learned how to work with lead or soda glass will find it easy to manipulate hard glass. chapter iii. _cutting and bending glass--forming glass apparatus before the blow-pipe--making and grinding stoppers to apparatus, etc._ in the later pages of this chapter it will be assumed that the operations first described have been mastered. the beginner should therefore practise each operation until he finds himself able to perform it with some degree of certainty. generally speaking, however, after the failure of two or three attempts to perform any operation, it is best to give up for a few hours, and proceed to the work next described, returning to that upon which you have failed subsequently. if, unfortunately, it should happen that the work next in order involves the performance of the operation in which the failure has occurred, it is best to pass on to some later work which does not demand this particular accomplishment, or to rest a while, and re-attack the difficulty when refreshed. =cutting glass tubes.=--the simplest method of cutting a glass tube is to make a sharp scratch with a file across the glass at the point where it is desired to cut it, and on pulling apart the two ends, it will break clean off. it is important that the file be sharp. in pulling apart the ends the scratch should be held upwards, and the pull should have a downward direction, which will tend to open out the scratch. in the case of a large tube, a scratch will not ensure its breaking clean across. the tube must be filed to some depth, half-way, or even all round it. a good way of breaking a tube is to place the file in the table after scratching the glass, to hold the glass tube above its edge with one hand on each side of the scratch, and to strike the under side of the tube a sharp blow upon the edge of the file, directly beneath the scratch. in this way very even fractures of large and moderately thin tubes may be made. it answers particularly well for removing short ends of tube, not long enough to hold; the tube is held firmly upon the file, and a sharp blow given to the short end with a piece of large tube or a key. a file whose faces have been ground till they are nearly smooth, so as to leave very finely-serrated edges, will be found useful for cutting glass tubes. such a file should be used almost as a knife is used for cutting a pencil in halves. the simple methods just described are too violent to be applied to delicate apparatus, too tedious when employed upon the largest tubes, and very difficult to apply when the tube to be cut is very thin, or too short to permit the operator to get a good grip of it on either side of the file mark. in such cases, one or other of the following methods will be useful:-1. make a scratch with a file, and touch it with the end of a _very small_ piece of glass drawn out and heated at the tip to its melting point. it is important that the heated point of glass be very small, or the fracture is likely to be uneven, or to spread in several directions. also, it is best to use hot soda glass for starting cracks in tubes of soda glass, and lead glass for doing so in lead glass tubes. if the crack does not pass quite round the tube, you may pull it asunder, as previously described, or you may bring the heated piece of glass with which the crack was started to one end of the crack, and slowly move it (nearly touching the glass) in the required direction; the crack will extend, following the movements of the hot glass. instead of hot glass, pastils of charcoal are sometimes employed for this purpose. they continue to burn when once lighted, and there is no need to re-heat them from time to time. they should be brought as close to the glass as is possible without touching it, and, when no longer needed, should be extinguished by placing the lighted end under sand, or some other incombustible powder, for they must not be wetted. 2. a method much practised by the makers of sheet glass, and suitable for large objects, is to wrap a thread of hot glass round the tube, at once removing it, and touching any point of the glass which the thread covered with water or a cold iron, when a crack will be started and will pass round the glass where it was heated by the thread. 3. tubes which are large and slightly conical may have a ring of red-hot iron passed over them till it comes into contact with the glass, then, the iron being removed, and a point on the heated glass being at once touched with cold iron as before, it will break as desired. or a string, moistened with turpentine, may be loosely twisted round the tube, and the turpentine ignited, afterwards the application of sudden cold to any point on the zone of hot glass will usually start a crack, which, if necessary, may be continued in the usual manner. the last three methods are chiefly useful in dealing with the largest and thickest tubes, and with bottles. a fairly stout copper wire, bent into the form of a bow so that it can be applied when hot to a considerable surface of a glass tube, will be found superior to the point of hot glass or metal usually employed, for leading cracks in glass tubes. with such a wire a tube can be cut so that the cross section of the end is at any desired angle to the axis of the tube, with considerable precision. i am indebted for this suggestion to mr. vernon boys and dr. ebert. =bending glass tubes.=--the blow-pipe flame is not a suitable source of heat for bending tubes, except in certain cases which will be mentioned in a subsequent paragraph. for small tubes, and those of moderate size, a fish-tail burner, such as is used for purposes of illumination, will answer best. use a flame from one to two inches in breadth--from _a_ to _a_ (fig. 6), according to the size of the tube which is to be bent. if the length of tube that is heated be less than this, the bend will probably buckle on its concave side. [illustration: fig. 6.] the tube to be heated should be held in the position shown in fig. 6, supported by the hands on each side. it should be constantly rotated in the flame, that it may be equally heated on all sides. in the figure the hands are represented above the tube, with their backs upwards. a tube can be held equally well from below, the backs of the hands being then directed downwards, and this, i think, is the more frequent habit. it is difficult to say which position of the hands is to be preferred. i lately observed how a tube was held by three skilful amateurs and by a professional glass-blower. all the former held the tube with the hands below it. the latter, however, held it from above, as in fig. 6. he, however, was working with a rather heavy piece of tube, and i am inclined myself to recommend that position in such cases. during a long spell of work, the wrist may be rested from time to time by changing the position of the hands. when the tube has softened, remove it from the flame, and gently bend it to the desired angle. the side of the tube last exposed to the flame will be slightly hotter, and therefore softer, than that which is opposite to it. this hotter side should form the concave side of the bent tube. [illustration: fig. 7.] the exact condition in which the glass is most suitable for bending can only be learned by making a few trials. if it is too soft in consequence of being overheated, the sides will collapse. if, in the endeavour to heat the side _a_ of fig. 7 a little more than _b_, _b_ is insufficiently heated, the tube will be likely to break on the convex side _b_. if the bent tube be likely to become flattened, and this cannot always be prevented in bending very thin tubes, the fault may be avoided by blowing gently into one end of the tube whilst bending it, for which purpose the other end should be closed beforehand. a tube already flattened may, to some extent, be blown into shape after closing one end and re-heating the bent portion, but it is not easy to give it a really good shape. when making a bend like that in fig. 7, to secure that the arms of the tube _c_ and _d_, and the curve at _b_, shall be in one plane, the tube should be held in a position perpendicular to the body, and brought into the position shown in the figure during bending, by which means it will be found easy to secure a good result. lead glass tubes must be removed from the flame before they become hot enough to undergo reduction. if they should become blackened, however, the stain may be removed by re-heating in the oxidising flame (see p. 18). when a very sharp bend is to be made, it is sometimes best to heat a narrow zone of the glass rather highly in the blow-pipe flame, and to blow the bend into shape at the moment of bending it, as previously described, one end having been closed for that purpose beforehand. lead glass should be heated for this purpose in the oxidising flame (pp. 17 to 22). the processes of bending large tubes, making u-tubes and spiral tubes, are more difficult operations, and will be explained in chap. iv. =rounding and bordering the ends of tubes.=--after cutting a piece of glass tube in two pieces, the sharp edges left at its ends should be rounded by holding them in a flame for a few moments till the glass begins to melt. the oxidising point of a pointed flame may be used for both kinds of glass. the flame will be coloured yellow by soda glass at the moment of melting. this indication of the condition of soda glass should be noted, for it serves as a criterion of the condition of the glass. the ends of soda glass tubes may also be rounded in the flame of a common bunsen's burner. when the end of a tube is to be closed with a cork or stopper, its mouth should be expanded a little, or =bordered=. to do this, heat the end of the tube by rotating it in the flame till it softens, then remove it from the flame, at once introduce the charcoal cone (fig. 5, p. 11), and rotate it with gentle pressure against the softened glass till the desired effect is produced. in doing this it is very important that the end of the tube shall be uniformly heated, in order that the enlargement shall be of regular form. if the tube cannot be sufficiently expanded at one operation, it should be re-heated and the process repeated. borders, such as are seen on test-tubes, are made by pressing the softened edge of the tube against a small iron rod. the end of the rod should project over the softened edge of the tube at a slight angle, and be pressed against it, passing the rod round the tube, or rotating the tube under the rod. =sealing=, that is closing the ends of tubes, or other openings, in glass apparatus. in performing this and all the other operations of glass blowing, the following points must be constantly kept in mind:-(_a._) that it is rarely safe to blow glass whilst it is still in the flame, except in certain special cases that will be mentioned subsequently. therefore always remove apparatus from the flame before blowing. (_b._) that when heating glass tubes, unless it is specially desired to heat one portion only, the tube must be constantly rotated in the flame to ensure that it shall be uniformly heated, and to prevent the tube or mass of glass from assuming an irregular form. (_c._) always blow gently at first, and slowly increase the force applied till you feel or see the glass giving way. it is a good plan to force the air forward in successive short blasts rather than in one continued stream. (_d._) when it is necessary to force air into tubes of fine bore, such as thermometer tubes, the mouth must not be used, for moisture is thereby introduced into the tube, which it is very difficult to remove again in many cases. all tubes of very small bore should be blown with the aid of an india-rubber blowing-bottle, such as are used for spray-producers, galton's whistles, etc. the tube to be blown must be securely fixed to the neck of the bottle, which is then held in one hand, and air is forced from it into the tube as it is required. these bottles are frequently of service to the glass-blower--_e.g._, when tubes of very fine bore have to be united, it is necessary to maintain an internal pressure slightly exceeding that of the air throughout the operation, in order to prevent the viscous glass from running together and closing the tube. an india-rubber blowing-ball is very convenient for this purpose. to seal the end of a glass tube (fig. 8), adjust the flame so that it will heat a zone of glass about as broad as the diameter of the tube to be sealed (see _a_, fig. 8). hold the tube on each side of the point where it is to be sealed in the manner described in the description of bending glass tubes (p. 28). bring the tube gradually into the flame, and heat it with constant rotation, till the glass softens (for lead glass the oxidising flame must be used, as has been already explained).[6] when the glass begins to thicken, gently pull asunder the two ends, taking care not to pull out the softened glass too much, but to allow the sides to fall together, as shown at _a_. when this has occurred, heat the glass at the narrow part till it melts, and pull asunder the two ends. the closed end should present the appearance shown at _d_. if the glass be drawn out too quickly its thickness will be unduly reduced, and it will present the appearance shown at _b_. in that case apply a pointed flame at _b_, and repeat the previous operation so as to contract the tube as at _c_, taking care not to allow the glass to become much increased nor decreased in thickness. [6] remember that when the lead glass is heated to the proper temperature it will present an appearance which may be described as a greenish phosphorescence. at higher temperatures it assumes an orange-red appearance. if it loses its transparency and assumes a dull appearance, it must be moved further into the oxidising parts of the flame. if a considerable mass of glass be left at _d_, it may be removed by heating it to redness, touching it with the pointed end of a cold glass tube, to which it will adhere, and by which it may be pulled away. [illustration: fig. 8.] when the end of the tube presents the appearance shown in the diagram _d_, and the mass of glass at _d_ is small, the small lump that remains must be removed by heating it till it softens, and _gently_ blowing with the mouth, so as to round the end and distribute the glass more regularly, as shown in _e_. the whole end, from the dotted line _e_, must then be heated with constant rotation in the flame. if this final heating of the end _e_ be done skilfully, the glass will probably collapse and flatten, as at _f_. the end must then be gently blown into the form shown at _g_. if a flat end to the tube be desired, the tube may be left in the condition shown by _f_, or a thin rounded end may be flattened by pressure on a plate of iron. if a concave end be wished for, it is only necessary to gently suck air from the tube before the flattened end has become solid. in each case, _immediately_ after the tube is completed, it must be closely wrapped in cotton wool and left to cool. with good lead glass this last process, though advantageous, is not absolutely necessary; and as glass cools slowly when enveloped in cotton wool, this precaution may frequently be neglected in the case of apparatus made from lead glass. [illustration: fig. 9.] in order to draw out tubes for sealing, close to one end, and thus to avoid waste of material, it is a good plan to heat simultaneously the end of the glass tube _a_ which is to be sealed, and one end of a piece of waste tube _e_ of about the same diameter, and when they are fused to bring them together as at _dd_ (fig. 9). _e_ will then serve as a handle in the subsequent operations on _a_. such a rough joint as that at _d_ must not be allowed to cool too much during the work in hand, or _e_ and _a_ may separate at an inconvenient moment. or the glass at the end of the tube may be pressed together to close the tube, and the mass of glass may be seized with a pair of tongs and drawn away. =choking, or contracting the bore of a glass tube.=--if it be not desired to maintain the uniformity of external dimensions of the tube whilst decreasing the diameter of the bore, the tube may be heated and drawn out as described in the description of sealing tubes on pp. 32-35. this may be done as shown at _a_ or _b_ in fig. 8, according to the use to which the contracted tube is to be put. [illustration: fig. 10.] greater strength and elegance will be secured by preserving the external diameter of the tube unchanged throughout, as shown in fig. 10. for this purpose heat the tube with the pointed flame, if it be small, or in the brush flame if it be of large size, constantly rotating it till the glass softens and the sides show an inclination to fall together, when this occurs, push the two ends gently towards _a_. if the tube should become too much thickened at _a_, the fault may be corrected by removing it from the flame and gently pulling the two ends apart till it is of the proper size. if the bore at the contracted part of the tube should become too much reduced, it may be enlarged by closing one end of the tube with a small cork, and blowing gently into the open end after sufficiently heating the contracted part. the tube should be rotated during blowing or the enlargement produced may be irregular. when the external diameter of the tube is to be increased as well as its bore diminished, press together the ends of a tube heated at the part to be contracted, as already described, and regulate the size of the bore by blowing into the tube if at any time it threatens to become too much contracted. =widening tubes.=--tubes may be moderately expanded at their extremities by means of the charcoal cone (see bordering, p. 31). they may be slightly expanded at any other part by closing one end and gently blowing into the open end of the tube, after softening the glass at the part to be widened before the blow-pipe. but the best method of obtaining a wide tube with narrow extremities (fig. 11) is to join pieces of narrow tube _aa_ to the ends of a piece of wider tube _b_ of the desired dimensions. the method of performing this operation is described under welding, on pp. 39-47. [illustration: fig. 11.] [illustration: fig. 12.] =piercing tubes.=--the glass-blower very frequently requires to make a large or small opening in some part of a tube or other piece of apparatus. this is known as piercing. suppose it is desired to make a small hole at the point _a_ in _a_ (fig. 12). when the tube has been brought to the flame with the usual precautions, allow the end of the pointed flame to touch it at _a_ till an area corresponding to the desired size of the opening is thoroughly softened. then expand the softened glass by blowing to the form shown at _b_. re-heat _a_, blow a small globe as at _c_, and carefully break the thin glass, then smooth the rough edges by rotating them in the flame till they form a mouth like that of _d_. instead of leaving the bulb to be broken at the third stage _c_, it is a good plan to blow more strongly, so that the bulb becomes very thin and bursts, the removal of the thin glass is then accompanied by less risk of producing a crack in the thicker parts of the glass. openings may be made in a similar manner in the sides of tubes or in globes, in fact, in almost any position on glass apparatus. if another tube is to be attached at the opening, it is a good plan to proceed to this operation before the tube has cooled down. [illustration: fig. 13.] the openings obtained by the method above described are too large when platinum wires are to be sealed into them. suppose that it is necessary to pierce the tube _a_ of fig. 13 in order to insert a platinum wire at _a_; direct the smallest pointed flame that will heat a spot of glass to redness on the point _a_. when the glass is viscous, touch it with the end of a platinum wire _w_, to which the glass will adhere; withdraw the wire and the viscous glass will be drawn out into a small tube, as shown at _b_; by breaking the end of this tube a small opening will be made. introduce a platinum wire into the opening, and again allow the flame to play on the glass at that point; it will melt and close round the wire. before the hot glass has time to cool, blow gently into the mouth of the tube to produce a slightly curved surface, then heat the neighbouring parts of the tube till the glass is about to soften, and let it cool in cotton wool. unless this is done, i find that glass tubes into which platinum wires have been sealed are very apt to break during or after cooling. to ensure that the tube shall be perfectly air-tight, a small piece of white enamel should be attached to the glass at _a_ before sealing in the wire. =uniting pieces of glass to each other, known as welding, or soldering.=--the larger and more complicated pieces of glass apparatus are usually made in separate sections, and completed by joining together the several parts. this is therefore a very important operation, and should be thoroughly mastered before proceeding to further work. in order to produce secure joints, the use of tubes made of different kinds of glass must be avoided. soda glass may be joined securely to soda glass, especially if the tubes belong to the same batch, and lead glass to lead glass. but, though by special care a joint between lead glass and soda glass, if well made, will often hold together, yet it is never certain that it will do so. _to join two tubes of equal diameters._--close one end of one of the tubes with a small cork. heat the open end of the closed tube, and either end of the other tube in a small flame until they are almost melted, taking care that only the ends of the tubes are heated, and not to let the glass be thickened; bring the two ends together with sufficient pressure to make them adhere, but not sufficient to compress the glass to a thickened ring. before the joint has time to cool too much, adjust your blow-pipe for a pointed flame, if you are not already working with that kind of flame, and allow the point of the flame to play on any spot on the joint till it is heated to redness; rotate the tube a little so as to heat the glass adjacent to that which is already red-hot, and repeat this till the whole circumference of the rough joint has been heated.[7] repeat the operation last described, but, when each spot is red-hot, blow gently into the open end of the tube so as to slightly expand the viscous glass. finally, rotate the whole joint in the flame till the glass is softened, and blow gently as before into the open end of the tube, still rotating it, in order that the joint may be as symmetrical as possible. if in the last operation the diameter of the joint becomes greater than that of the rest of the tube, it may be cautiously re-heated and reduced by pulling it out, or this may be secured by gently pulling apart the two ends, whilst the operator blows it into its final shape. [7] some glass-blowers at once work on the glass as next described, without this preliminary treatment. i find that some glass, usually soda glass, will not always bear the necessary movements without breaking unless first heated all round. [illustration: fig. 14.] when small tubes, or tubes of fine bore, are to be joined, in order to prevent the fused glass from running together and closing the tube, it is a good plan to border and enlarge the ends that are to be united, as at _a_ (fig. 14). some glass-blowers prefer to border all tubes before uniting them. when a narrow tube is to be joined to one that is only slightly wider, expand the end of the narrow tube till it corresponds in size to the larger tube. if the tube be too narrow to be enlarged by inserting a charcoal cone, seal one end and pierce it as directed (on p. 37). for joining small thin-walled tubes mr. crookes recommends the use of a small bunsen flame. in welding pieces of lead glass tube, take care that the heated glass is perfectly free from reduced lead at the moment when the two ends of viscous glass are brought into contact. [illustration: fig. 15.] _to join tubes of unequal sizes end to end_ (fig. 15).--draw out the larger tube and cut off the drawn-out end at the part where its diameter is equal to that of the smaller tube, then seal the smaller tube to the contracted end of the larger according to the directions given for joining tubes of equal size. when a good joint has been made, the tube presents the appearance of _a_, fig. 15, the union being at about _bb_. next heat the whole tube between the dotted lines _aa_, and blow it into the shape of _b_ in which the dotted line _dd_ should correspond to the actual line of junction of the two tubes. in making all joints it is important to leave no thick masses of glass about them. if the glass be fairly thin and uniformly distributed, it is less likely to break during or after annealing under any circumstances, and especially if it has to bear alternations of temperature. _joining a tube to the side of another tube_ (fig. 16).--one of the tubes must be pierced as at _a_ in fig. 16 (for the method, see p. 37), and its two ends closed with small pieces of cork. the edges of the opening, and one end of the other tube, must then be heated till they melt, and united by pressing them together. the joint may then be finished as before. [illustration: fig. 16.] a properly blown joint will not present the appearance of _b_ (fig. 16), but rather that of _c_. this is secured by directing the pointed flame upon the glass at _aa_ (_b_) spot by spot, and blowing out each spot when it is sufficiently softened. if the tubes are large, the whole joint should subsequently be heated and blown, but in the case of small tubes this is of less importance. finally it is to be wrapped whilst hot in cotton wool for the annealing process. if a second tube has to be joined near to the first one, say at _b_, it is well to proceed with it before the joint first made cools down, and the joint first made, especially if soda glass be used, must be held in the flame from time to time during the process of making the second joint to keep it hot; if this be not done the first joint is very likely to break. a joint previously made may, however, be re-heated, if well made and well annealed. a three-way tube, like that in fig. 17, is made by bending _a_ (fig. 16) to an angle, and joining _b_ to an opening blown on the convex side of the angle; or, _a_ of fig. 16 may be bent as desired after attaching _b_ in the ordinary way. [illustration: fig. 17.] tubes may also be joined to openings made in the sides of globes or flasks; great care must be taken, however, especially if the walls of the globe be thin, to secure that the tube is well attached to the mouth of the opening when the melted ends are first brought into contact, for, with thin glass, any hole that may be left will probably increase whilst the joint is being blown into shape, owing to cohesion causing the glass to gather in a thickened ring round an enlargement of the original opening.[8] [8] if such an opening be observed, it may usually be closed by touching its edges with a fused point of glass at the end of a drawn out tube. in order to unite a tube of soda glass to a tube of lead glass, the end of the soda glass tube must be carefully covered with a layer of soft arsenic glass.[9] this must be done so perfectly that when the ends to be united are brought together the lead and soda glass are separated by the enamel at every point. [9] this can be obtained from messrs. powells, whitefriars glassworks. _to seal a tube inside a larger tube or bulb._--suppose that an air-trap (3 of fig. 18) is to be constructed from a small bulb (_a_) blown on a glass tube (1). [illustration: fig. 18] either cut off the tube close to the bulb at _b_, or better, remove the end by melting the glass and pulling it away from _b_, and then pierce _a_ at _b_, no. 2, by heating the glass there and blowing out a small bulb as described under piercing. prepare a tube (4) drawn out at _e_ with a bulb blown at _d_. insert _e_ into the opening _b_, press _d_ well against the mouth _b_ and slowly rotate before the blow-pipe till _d_ adheres to _b_. then heat and blow the joint spot by spot as in other cases, taking care that the glass is blown out on each side of the joint; lastly, heat the whole joint between _aa_, and blow it into its final shape. these joints are very apt to break after a few minutes or hours if the glass of _d_ be much thicker than that of the bulb _a_. they should be wrapped in cotton wool for annealing as soon as possible, as the rate at which the tube _e_ cools is likely to be less rapid than that of the parts of the apparatus which are more freely exposed to the air; therefore all such internal joints require very careful annealing, and they should always be made as thin as is consistent with the use to which they are to be put. tubes may also be sealed into the ends or sides of larger tubes by piercing them at the point at which the inserted tube is to be introduced, and proceeding as in the case of the air-trap just described. ozone generators of the form shown on next page (fig. 19), afford an interesting example of the insertion of smaller tubes into larger. on account of the small space that may be left between the inner and outer tubes of an ozone generator, and of the length of the inner tube, its construction needs great care. i find the following mode of procedure gives good results. select the pieces of tube for this instrument as free from curvature as possible. for the inner tube, a tube 12 mm., or rather more, in external diameter, and of rather thin glass, is drawn out, as for closing, until only a very narrow tube remains at _c_, the end of _c_ is closed the area round _c_ is carefully blown into shape, so that by melting off _c_ the tube _a_ will be left with a well-rounded end. a small bulb of glass is next blown on _a_ at _b_. this bulb must be of slightly greater diameter than the contracted end _e_ of the larger tube (ii.), so that _b_ will just fail to pass through _e_. the length from _b_ to _c_ must not be made greater than from _e_ to _g_ on the outside tube. the end at _c_ is then to be cut off so as to leave a pin-hole in the end of _a_. [illustration: fig. 19.] the outer tube (ii.), whose diameter may be 5 or 6 mm. greater than that of _a_, is prepared by sealing a side tube on it at _f_, after previously contracting the end _e_. for this purpose the end _e_ should be closed and rounded, and then re-heated and blown out till the bulb bursts. to ensure that the diameter of the opening is less than that of the tube, care must be taken not to re-heat too large an area of the end before blowing it out. it is very important that the cross section at _e_ shall be in a plane at right angles to the axis of the tube. wrap a strip of writing paper, one inch in breadth, closely round the end of _a_ at _c_ till the tube and paper will only just pass easily into the mouth _d_ of the outer tube, push the inner tube _a_, with the paper upon it, into _d_, and when the paper is entirely within _d_, withdraw _a_, and cautiously push the paper a little further into the outer tube. insert _a_ into _de_ through _e_, so that the bulb _b_ is embraced by _e_. close _d_ with a cork. ascertain that the paper does not fit sufficiently tightly between the two tubes to prevent the free passage of air, by blowing into the mouth _k_ of _a_. air should escape freely from _e_ when this is done. gradually bring the line of contact of _b_ and _e_ and the surrounding parts of the tube before a pointed flame, after previously warming them by holding near a larger flame, and rotate them before the flame so that the glass may soften and adhere. then heat the joint spot by spot as usual. in blowing this joint, take care that the glass on each side of the actual joint is slightly expanded. it should present the form shown by the dotted lines in iii. (these are purposely exaggerated, however). finally, heat the whole joint between the lines _ji_ till it softens, and simultaneously blow and draw it into its final shape as seen at iii. the side tube _f_ should not be too near the end _e_. if, however, it is necessary to have them close together, the joint _f_ must be very carefully annealed when it is made; it must also be very cautiously warmed up before the construction of the joint at _h_ is begun, and must be kept warm by letting the flame play over it from time to time during the process of making the latter joint. a good joint may be recognised by its freedom from lumps of glass, its regularity of curve, and by a sensibly circular line at _h_, where the two tubes are united. when the joint after annealing has become quite cold, the pin-hole at _c_ on the inner tube may be closed, after removing the paper support, by warming the outer tube, and then directing a fine pointed flame through _d_ on to _c_. and the end _d_ of the outer tube may be closed in the ordinary manner, or a narrow tube may be sealed to it. as the end of glass at _d_ will be too short to be held by the fingers when hot, another piece of tube of similar diameter must be attached to it to serve as a handle (see p. 35, fig. 9). =blowing a bulb or globe of glass.=--for this purpose it is very important that the glass tube employed shall be of uniform substance. the size and thickness of the tube to be employed depends partly on the dimensions of the bulb desired, and partly on the size of neck that is required for the bulb. it is easier to blow large bulbs on large-sized tubes than on those of smaller size. when it is necessary to make a large globe on a small tube, it can be done, however, if great care be taken to avoid overheating that part of the small tube which is nearest to the mass of viscous glass from which the bulb is to be formed. for the purpose of blowing a very large bulb on a small tube, it is best to unite a wide tube to that which is to serve as the neck, as it will save some time in collecting the necessary mass of glass from which to form the globe. [illustration: fig. 20.] _to blow a bulb at the end of a tube._--select a good piece of tube, say 1â·5 cm. in diameter, and about 30 cm. long; draw out one end to a light tail (_a_, fig. 20) about 3 inches in length. then heat up a _short_ length of the tube at _b_, with a small brush flame, by rotating the glass in the flame, and gently press it together when soft to thicken it; blow into it if necessary to preserve the regularity of its figure. repeat this process on the portion of tube nearest to that which has been first thickened, and so on, till as much glass has been heated and thickened as you judge will serve to make a bulb of the size desired. you should have a mass of glass somewhat resembling that shown at _b_ (fig. 20), but probably consisting of the results of more successive operations than are suggested in that diagram. apply the flame as before to the narrower parts _cc_ of _b_, gently compress and blow until all the small bulbs first made are brought together into a mass still somewhat resembling the enlarged end of _b_, but more nearly cylindrical, with the glass as regularly distributed as possible, and of such length from _d_ to the contracted part that the whole of it may easily be heated simultaneously with the large brush flame of your blow-pipe. take great care in the foregoing operations not to allow the sides of the mass of glass to fall in and run together, and, on the other hand, do not reduce the thickness of the glass needlessly by blowing it more than is necessary to give the glass as regular a form as possible. when you are satisfied with the mass of glass you have collected, melt off the tail _a_, and remove the pointed end of glass that remains, as directed on page 33. turn on as large a brush flame as is necessary to envelop the whole mass of glass that you have collected, and heat it with constant rotation, so that it may gradually run together to the form seen at _c_ (fig. 20), taking care that it does not get overheated near _d_, or the tube which is to form the neck will soften and give way. the position in which the mass of heated glass is to be held will depend upon circumstances; if the mass of glass be not too great, it is best to keep it in a nearly horizontal position. if the mass of glass be very large, it may be necessary to incline the end _b_ downwards; but as that is apt to result in an excess of glass accumulating towards _d_, avoid doing so if possible by rotating the glass steadily and rapidly. if at any time the glass shows indications of collapsing, it must be removed from the flame and gently blown into shape, during which operation it may be rotated in the perpendicular position; indeed, to promote a regular distribution of the glass by allowing it plenty of time to collect, it is well from time to time to remove the heated mass of glass from the flame, and slightly expand it by blowing. finally, when a regular mass of glass, such as is shown at _c_ (fig. 20) has been obtained, remove it from the flame, and blow it to its final dimensions. a succession of gentle puffs _quickly_ succeeding each other should be employed, in order that the progress of the bulb may be more easily watched and arrested at the right moment. during the process of blowing, the hot glass must be steadily rotated. to collect the glass for blowing a bulb of lead glass, employ the flame described on pp. 17-22 for heating lead glass. if the tube be held horizontally whilst the globe is blown, its form will most nearly approach that of a true globe. if it be held in the perpendicular position, with the mass of glass depending from it, the form of the bulb will usually be somewhat elongated. if it be held perpendicularly, with the mass of glass upwards, the resulting bulb will be flattened. when a bulb is not of a sufficiently regular form, it may sometimes be re-made by re-collecting the glass, and re-blowing it. the greatest care is needed at the earlier stages of re-heating to prevent the glass from collapsing into a formless and unworkable mass. this is to be prevented in all such cases by gently blowing it into shape from time to time whilst gathering the glass. [illustration: fig. 21.] _to blow a bulb between two points_ (fig 21).--select a piece of suitable tube, seal or cork one end, gather together a mass of glass at the desired part, as directed for blowing a bulb at the end of a tube; when a mass of glass has been collected of sufficient thickness, blow it into shape from the open end of the tube by a rapid succession of short blasts of air, till the expanding glass attains the desired dimensions. the tube must be held horizontally, and must be rotated steadily during the process. by slightly pressing together the glass while blowing, the bulb will be flattened; by slightly drawing apart the two ends of the tube, it will be elongated. a pear-shaped bulb may be obtained by gently re-heating an elongated bulb, say from _a_ to _a_, and drawing it out. it is easiest to perform this operation on a bulb which is rather thick in the glass. if the tubes _bb_ are to be small, and a globe of considerable size is wanted, contract a tube as shown in fig. 22, taking care that the narrow portions of the tube are about the same axis as the wider portions, for if this be not the case, the mouths of the bulb will not be symmetrically placed; seal at _c_, cut off the wider tube at _b_, and make the bulb, as previously described, from the glass between _aa_. if, as probably will be the case, the contracted portions of the tube be not very regular, they may be cut off, one at a time, near the bulb, and replaced by pieces of tube of the size desired. [illustration: fig. 22.] when a bulb has to be blown upon a very fine tube, for example upon thermometer tubing, the mouth should not be employed, for the moisture introduced by the breath is extremely difficult to remove afterwards. a small india-rubber bottle or reservoir, such as those which are used in spray-producers, galton's whistles, etc., securely attached to the open end of the tube, should be used. with the help of these bottles bulbs can be blown at the closed ends of fine tubes with ease, though some care is necessary to produce them of good shape, as it is difficult to rotate the hot glass properly when working in this way. =making and grinding stoppers.=--apparatus which is to contain chemicals that are likely to be affected by the free admission of air, needs to have stoppers fitted to it. making a good stopper is a much less tedious process than is commonly supposed. suppose that the tube i. of fig. 23 is to be stoppered at _a_, it must be slightly enlarged by softening the end and opening it with a pointed cone of charcoal; or a conical mouth for the stopper may be made by slightly contracting the tube near one end, as at _b_, cutting off the cylindrical end of the tube at the dotted line _c_, and then very slightly expanding the end at _c_ with a charcoal cone after its edges have been softened by heat. in either case the conical mouth should be as long and regular as possible. [illustration: fig. 23.] for the stopper take a piece of rather thick tube, of such size that it will pass easily, but not too easily, into _a_ or _b_. expand this tube at _d_, as shown in ii., by softening the glass and gently compressing it. the configuration of the enlarged tube as shown at _d_ may be obtained by heating and compressing two or more zones of the tube that are adjacent, one zone being less expanded than the other, so as to give the sides of the imperfect stopper as nearly as possible the form shown at _d_, which, however, is much less regular than may easily be obtained. seal off the head of the tube at _h_, and heat the glass till it runs together into a nearly solid mass; compress this with a pair of iron tongs to the flattened head _e_. in making _d_, aim at giving it a form which will as nearly as possible correspond to that of the tube into which it is to be ground, and make it slightly too large, so that only the lower part at _d_ can be introduced into the mouth of _a_ or _b_. before it is ground, the stopper must be heated nearly to its softening-point and annealed. moisten _d_ with a solution of camphor in recently distilled turpentine, and dust the wet surface with finely-ground emery, then gently grind it into its place till it fits properly. in this operation the tail _g_, which should fit loosely into the tube _a_, will be of assistance by preventing _d_ from unduly pressing in any direction on _a_ in consequence of irregular movements. the stopper should be completely rotated in grinding it. it must not be worked backwards and forwards, or a well-fitting stopper will not be produced. renew the emery and camphorated turpentine frequently during the earlier part of the grinding; when the stopper almost fits, avoid using fresh emery, but continue to remove the stopper frequently at all stages of the operation. that added at the earlier stages will be reduced to a state of very fine division, and will therefore leave the stopper and mouth of _a_ with smoother surfaces than fresh emery.[10] [10] mr. gimmingham recommends giving stoppers a final polish with rotten-stone (_proceedings of the royal society_, p. 396, 1876). note.--the addition of camphor to the turpentine used for grinding glass is very important. notwithstanding its brittle nature, glass will work under a file moistened with this solution almost as well as the metals. small quantities should be made at a time, and the solution should be kept in a well-closed vessel, for after long exposure to the air it is not equally valuable. if the stopper is to fit a tube contracted like _b_, it must be constructed from a piece of tube that will pass through the contraction at _b_. the tail _gf_ will not do such good service as it does in the case of a tube which has been opened out to receive its stopper, but it will help to guide the stopper, and should be retained. when the stopper has been ground into its place, melt off the tail at _f_. the flame must be applied very cautiously, as glass which has been ground is particularly apt to crack on heating. to avoid all risk of this, the tail may simply be cut off, and its edges filed smooth with a file moistened freely with camphorated turpentine. the stoppers of bottles are not made exactly in the manner described above, though, on occasion, a new stopper may be made for a bottle by following those directions. ill-fitting stoppers, which are very common, can be very easily re-ground with emery and camphorated turpentine. chapter iv. _making thistle funnels, u-tubes, etc.--combining the parts of complicated apparatus--mercury, and other air-tight joints--vacuum taps--safety taps--air-traps._ in chapter iii. the simpler operations used in making the separate parts of which apparatus is composed have been described. in this chapter finished apparatus will be described, and the combination of the separate parts into the more or less complicated arrangements used in experiments will be so far explained as to enable the student to set up such apparatus as he is likely to require. i have thought it would be useful that i should add a short account of various contrivances that have come much into use of late years for experimenting under reduced pressure, such as safety taps, air-traps, vacuum joints, etc. [illustration: fig. 24.] =electrodes.=--on page 38 (fig. 13) is shown a simple form of electrode sealed into a glass tube, which for many purposes answers very well. but frequently, in order that there may be less risk of leakage between the glass and the metal, the latter is covered for a considerable part of its length with solid glass, which at one extremity is united to the apparatus. in fig. 24 _w_ is the metal core of the electrode, and _g_ the glass covering around it. the wire is fused into the glass, and the glass is then united to the apparatus; a little white enamel should be applied at one end and combined with the glass by fusion. =u-tubes.=--a u-tube is but a particular case of a bent glass tube. it is scarcely possible when bending very large tubes in the manner described on p. 29 to produce regular curves of sufficient strength. to make a u-tube, or to bend a large tube, close one end of the tube selected with a cork, soften and compress the glass in the flame at the part where it is to be bent till a sufficient mass of glass for the bend is collected, then remove the mass of glass from the flame, let it cool a little, and simultaneously draw out the thickened glass, bend it to the proper form, and blow the bend into shape from the open end of the tube. small irregularities may be partly corrected afterwards. to make a good u-tube of large size, and of uniform diameter from end to end, requires much practice, but to make a tolerably presentable piece of apparatus in which the two limbs are bent round till they are parallel, without any considerable constriction at the bend, can be accomplished without much difficulty.[11] [11] large tubes may also be bent by rotating a sufficient length of the tube in a large flame till it softens, and bending in the same manner as in the case of smaller tubes, and after filling them with sand, closing one end completely, and the other so that the sand cannot escape, though heated air can do so. =spiral tubes.=--these may be made by twisting a tube gradually softened by heat round a metal cylinder. spiral tubes made of small thin tubes possess considerable elasticity, and have been used by mr. crookes for making air-tight connections between separate pieces of apparatus when a rigid connection would have been unnecessary and inconvenient. by the use of such spiral tubes it is possible to combine comparatively free movement with all the advantages attached to hermetically-sealed joints. to make a flexible spiral tube, mount a copper cylinder on a screw, so that the cylinder will travel in the direction of its axis when it is rotated. fix a fine glass tube to the cylinder, and direct a flame towards the cylinder so as to heat and soften the glass, which will then bend to the form of the cylinder. gradually rotate the cylinder before the source of heat, so that fresh portions of tube are successively brought into position, softened, and bent. useful spirals may also be made by hand without a cylinder. as each length of tube is bent, a fresh length may be united to it until the spiral is completed. the fine tubes employed are prepared by heating and drawing out larger tubes. [illustration: fig. 25.] =thistle funnels= (fig. 25).--seal a moderately thick piece of small glass tube at _a_, then heat a wide zone of it a little below _a_ by rotating it horizontally in the blow-pipe flame till the glass softens, and expand the glass to a bulb, as shown at _b_ of 1; during the operation of blowing this bulb, the end _a_ must be directed to the ground. soften the end _a_ and a small portion of _b_ as before, and, holding the tube horizontally from the mouth, blow out the end _c_ as at 2. heat the end of _c_ gradually, till the glass softens and collapses to the dotted line _dd_, and at once blow a steady stream of air into the open end of the tube, rotating it steadily, till it is about to burst; finally clean off the thin glass from round the edges of the funnel, which should have the form shown at 3, and round them. an inspection of a purchased thistle funnel will generally show that the head _b_ has been formed from a larger tube sealed to _e_ at _f_. [illustration: fig. 26.] =closing tubes containing chemicals= for experiments at high temperatures.--tubes of the hard glass used for organic analyses answer best for this purpose; the operation of drawing out the end of such a tube is practically identical with what has been described under the head of choking, p. 35. a well-sealed tube presents the appearance of that shown by fig. 26. in order to secure a thick end to the point of the tube _a_, about an inch or so of the tube near the contracted part should be warmed a little, if it is not already warm, at the moment of finally sealing it; the contraction of the air in the tube, in consequence of the cooling of the warm tube, will then ensure the glass at _a_ running together to a solid end when it is melted in the flame. if it will be necessary to collect a gas produced during a chemical action from such a tube, make the contracted end several inches long, and bend it into the form of a delivery tube. it will then be possible to break the tip of this under a cylinder in a trough of liquid. =in order to explain the construction of apparatus consisting of several parts=, it will be sufficient to take as examples, two very well-known instruments, and to describe their construction in detail. from what is learned in studying these, the student will gather the information that is wanted. [illustration: fig. 27.] 1. _to make hofman's apparatus for the electrolysis of water_ (fig. 27). take two tubes about 35 cm. in length, and 14 mm. in diameter for _aa_, join taps _tt_ to the end _b_ of each of them, draw out the other end, as shown at _d_, after sheets of platinum foil with wires attached to them[12] have been introduced into the tubes, and moved by shaking to _bb_. then allow the platinum wires to pass through the opening _d_ left for the purpose, and seal the glass at _d_ round the platinum as at _e_. pierce the tubes at _jj_, and join them by a short piece of tube _k_, about 14 mm. in diameter, to which the tube _t_, carrying the reservoir _r_, has been previously united. _r_ may be made by blowing a bulb from a larger piece of tube attached to the end of _t_. the mouth _m_ of the reservoir being formed from the other end of the wide tube afterwards. one of the taps can be used for blowing through at the later stages. each joint, especially those at _jj_, must be annealed after it is blown. some operators might prefer to join _aa_ by the tube _k_ in the first instance, then to introduce the electrodes at _e_ and _d_. in some respects this plan would be rather easier than the other, but, on the whole, it is better to make the joints at _jj_ last in order, as they are more apt to be broken than the others during the subsequent manipulations. [12] red-hot platinum welds very well. the wire may be joined to the sheet of foil by placing the latter on a small piece of fire-brick, holding the wire in contact with it at the place where they are to be united, directing a blow-pipe flame upon them till they are at an intense heat, and smartly striking the wire with a hammer. the blow should be several times repeated after re-heating the metal. 2. i have before me the vacuum tube shown by fig. 28, in which the dotted lines relate to details of manipulation only. [illustration: fig. 28.] it is usually possible to detect the parts of which a piece of apparatus has been built up, for even the best-made joints exhibit evidence of their existence. thus, although i did not make the tube that is before me, and cannot therefore pretend to say precisely in what order its parts were made and put together, the evidence which it exhibits of joints at the dotted lines _a_, _b_, _c_, _d_, _e_, _f_, enables me to give a general idea of the processes employed in its construction, and to explain how a similar tube might be constructed. i should advise proceeding as follows:-join a piece of tube somewhat larger than _m_ to its end _a_, draw out the other end of the larger tube, and blow a bulb _l_ as directed on p. 47. then seal the electrode _r_ into the bulb _l_ (p. 55). blow a similar but larger bulb _n_ from a large piece of tube sealed between two tubes of similar size to _m_, as described at p. 50. cut off one of the tubes at _b_, and join the bulb _n_ to _m_ at _b_. form the bulb _q_ in the same manner as in the case of _l_, seal into it the electrode _r_, and add the tube marked by the dotted lines at _f_. seal a narrow tube _p_ to the end of a larger tube, and blow out the tube at the joint till the glass is thin and regular. take a tube _o_, of similar size to _m_, slightly longer than _p_, contract its mouth slightly to meet the wide end of _p_ at _d_, and after loosely supporting _p_ inside _o_ with a cork, or otherwise, close the end _n_ of _o_ by sealing or corking it, and join _p_ to _o_ at _d_. cut off _o_ just above _d_ at _e_, and join it to the bulb _q_, closing either _o_ or _f_ for the purpose. cut off the end of _o_ at _c_ parallel to the end of _p_, and connect _o_ to _n_, using _f_ for blowing the joint at _c_. _f_ may be used subsequently for introducing any gas into the tube, and, when a vacuum has been established, may be sealed before the blow-pipe. [illustration: fig. 29.] =modes of combining the parts of heavy apparatus.=--it is often necessary to connect pieces of apparatus which are too heavy to be freely handled before the blow-pipe, and which, therefore, cannot be welded together as described on p. 39, by some more effective method than the ordinary one of connecting by india-rubber tubing. for example, apparatus which is to be exhausted by a sprengel air-pump must be attached to the pump by a joint as perfectly air-tight as can be obtained. this, indeed, often may be done by welding the apparatus to be exhausted to the air-pump before the blow-pipe. but such a method is open to the obvious objection that it is very troublesome to connect and disconnect the parts as often as may be necessary, and that there is some risk of accidental breakages. nevertheless it may be done on occasion, especially if there be no objection to the use of the flexible spiral tubes already alluded to. when the use of a spiral connecting-tube is not admissible the difficulty is considerably increased. for example, the author has lately required to attach an ozone generator, of the form shown by fig. 19, which previously had been cemented into a heavy copper jacket, to a pressure-gauge rigidly fixed to a support, and of considerable size. the employment of a flexible spiral connection was prohibited by the fact that it was necessary that the volume of the connecting-tube should be but a small fraction of that of the ozone generator, a condition which compelled the use of a tube of almost capillary bore, and of inconsiderable length. at the same time the frailness of such a connection made it necessary to fix the generator and pressure-gauge rigidly to their supports, in order to avoid the possibility of breakage by slight accidental movements of either of them, and it was obviously necessary to fix the pieces of apparatus in their final positions before joining them, lest the fine tube which connected them should be fractured during adjustment. the possibility of a strain being caused by the contraction that would occur during the cooling down of the joint last made had to be provided for also. the desired object was effected as follows. in fig. 29 _a_ represents a section of the ozone generator at the point where the tube to connect it to the gauge was fixed. _b_ represents the top of the gauge, with the side tube _c_, which was to be connected with that from _a_, viz. _d_. the ends of _c_ and _d_ were expanded as shown at _d_ (by melting them and blowing them out), so that one of them, made rather smaller than the other, could be overlapped by the larger one. _a_ and _b_ being rigidly fixed in their final positions, with _c_ and _d_ in contact, as shown in the figure, all openings in the apparatus were closed, except one, to which was attached an india-rubber blowing-bottle by means of a tube of india-rubber long enough to be held in the hand of the operator, and to allow him to observe the operation of joining the tubes at _d_. when everything was in readiness, a very small-pointed flame from a moveable blow-pipe held in the hand was directed upon the glass at _d_ till it melted and the two tubes united. to prevent the fine tube when melted from running into a solid mass of glass, and so becoming closed, a slight excess of pressure was maintained inside the apparatus during the operation by forcing air into it with the india-rubber blower from the moment at which _c_ and _d_ united. a point of charcoal was kept in readiness to support the softened glass at _d_ in case it showed any tendency to fall out of shape. the v-tube at _c_ served to prevent the subsequent fracture of the joint in consequence of any strain caused by the contraction of the glass in cooling.[13] [13] for a method of joining soda glass to lead glass, see p. 81. it is not difficult to connect several pieces of apparatus successively in this manner, nor is this method only useful in such cases as that just described. pieces of apparatus of great length and weight may be joined in a similar manner, irrespective of the size of the tubes to be united. the ends to be joined, prepared as before, so that one slightly overlaps the other, must be held firmly in contact by clamps, and heated in successive portions by a blow-pipe held in the hand of the operator, each patch of glass being re-heated and gently blown, after a rough joint has been made. finally, a larger flame may be used to heat up the whole joint for its final blowing. it is important to place the apparatus so that the operator has free access to it on all sides. a revolving table might be employed. an assistant to work the bellows is necessary. or, better still, air may be admitted to the blow-pipe from a large gas-bag placed in some convenient position. but in most cases one or other of the following air-tight joints can be employed, and will be found to be very convenient:-=mercury joints.=--the simplest form of mercury joint is shown at fig. 30. _a_ and _b_ are the two tubes which are to be connected. a larger tube or cup _f_ is attached to _a_ by the india-rubber tube _e_, and placed on _a_ so that the end of _b_ may be brought into contact with _a_ at _c_, and connected to it by a well-fitting piece of india-rubber tube _c_. the cup _e_ is then brought into the position shown in fig. 30, and mercury is introduced till the india-rubber tube at _c_ is covered. as mercury and glass do not come into true contact, however, such a joint, though said to give good results in practice, is not theoretically air-tight, for air _might_ gradually find its way between the liquid and the glass. by covering the mercury with a little sulphuric acid or glycerine the risk of this occurring may be removed. the same result may be attained by the use of glycerine in place of the mercury in the cup _f_; but glycerine is less pleasant to work with than mercury.[14] [14] if the india-rubber tube _c_ be secured by wires, iron wire, not copper wire, should be employed. [illustration: fig. 30.] when sulphuric acid is to be employed in such a joint, or when for any other reason the use of an india-rubber tube is undesirable, the joint may consist of a hollow stopper _b_ (fig. 31), made of glass tube, and ground to fit the neck of a thistle funnel _a_. _a_ and _b_ are joined respectively to the pieces of apparatus to be connected, and connection is made by placing _b_ in position in the neck of _a_; the joint is made air-tight by introducing mercury with strong sulphuric acid above it into the cup _a_. the joint may be rendered air-tight by introducing sulphuric acid only into the cup. but this plan must not be adopted if the interior of the apparatus is to be exhausted, as sulphuric acid is easily forced between the ground glass surfaces by external pressure. mercury, however, will not pass between well-ground glass surfaces, and is therefore to be employed for connecting apparatus which is to be exhausted, and, if necessary, protected by a layer of strong sulphuric acid to completely exclude air. [illustration: fig. 31.] tubes placed horizontally may be joined by a glycerine or mercury joint such as is shown in fig. 32. the two tubes _a_ and _b_ are joined as before by an india-rubber connection _c_, or one may be ground to fit the other, and the joint is then enclosed within a larger jacketing-tube _d_, with a mouth at _f_, which is filled with glycerine or mercury. _d_ is easily made by drawing out both ends of a piece of tube, leaving them large enough to pass over the connection at _c_, however, and piercing one side at _f_. [illustration: fig. 32.] =vacuum taps.=--it is not necessary to enter into a description of the construction of ordinary glass taps, which can be purchased at very reasonable prices. it may be remarked here, however, as a great many of them are very imperfectly ground by the makers, that they may easily be made air-tight by hand-grinding with camphorated turpentine and fine emery, finishing with rotten-stone. a well-ground tap, which is well lubricated, should be practically air-tight under greatly reduced pressure for a short period; but when it is necessary to have a tap which absolutely forbids the entrance of air into apparatus, one of the following may be employed:-[illustration: fig. 33.] [illustration: fig. 34.] (1.) _mr. cetti's vacuum tap_ (fig. 34): this tap is cupped at _a_ and sealed at _b_, and the cup _a_ is filled with mercury when the tap is in use, so that if, for example, the end _c_ be attached to a flask, and _d_ to an apparatus for exhausting the flask, it will be possible to close the flask by turning off the tap _e_, and if no air be allowed access through _d_, the vacuum produced in the flask at _c_ cannot be affected by air leaking through the tap at _a_ or _b_. a passage _f_ must be drilled from the bottom of the plug _e_ to meet _g_, in order that when the plug is in position no residue of air shall be confined within _b_, whence it might gradually leak into any apparatus connected to it. it is obvious, however, that this tap does not protect a flask sealed to _c_ from the entrance of air through _d_, which, in fact, is the direction in which air is most likely to effect an entrance. when using one of these taps as part of an apparatus for supplying pure oxygen, i have guarded against this by attaching a trap (fig. 33) to the end _d_, _c_ being joined to the delivery tube from the gas-holder. the structure and mode of action of the trap are as follows:-a narrow tube _g_ is joined to _d_ of fig. 34, and terminates in the wide tube _i_, which is connected above to _h_, and below to the air-trap _j_. _j_ is connected at _k_, by a piece of flexible tube, to a reservoir of mercury, from which mercury enters the air-trap, and passing thence to _i_, can be employed for filling the v-trap _hlg_. the air-trap _j_ is in the first instance filled with mercury, and then serves to intercept any stray bubbles of air that the mercury may carry with it. the particular form of the trap shown at _hlg_ was adopted because with it the arm _lg_ is more readily emptied of mercury than with any other form of trap made of small tube that i have tried. it has been used in my apparatus in the following manner:--_h_ was connected with a vessel to be filled with pure oxygen, the tap _e_ closed, and the rise of mercury above _l_ prevented by a clamp on the flexible tube; the vessel to be filled and the trap were then exhausted by a sprengel pump, and oxygen allowed to flow into the exhausted space by opening _e_, the operation of exhausting the tubes and admitting oxygen being repeated as often as necessary. to prevent access of air to _e_ on disconnecting the vessel at _h_, the mercury was allowed to flow into the trap till it reached to _mm_. _e_ was then closed, and _h_ exposed without danger of air reaching _e_, the length of the arms of the trap being sufficient to provide against the effects of any changes of temperature and pressure that could occur. a delivery tube may be connected to _h_ and filled with mercury, by closing _e_ and raising the mercury reservoir. all air being in that way expelled from the delivery tube, and the supply of mercury cut off by clamping the tube from the reservoir, oxygen can be delivered from the tube by opening _e_, when it will send forward the mercury, and pass into a tube placed to receive it without any risk of air being derived from the delivery tube. [illustration: fig. 35.] (2.) _gimmingham's vacuum tap_,[15] shown in fig. 35, consists of three parts. a tube _a_ is ground to fit the neck of _b_. _b_ is closed at its lower end, and has a hole _d_ drilled through it; when _b_ is fitted to _c_, _d_ can be made to coincide with the slit _e_. when _a_, _b_, _c_ are fitted together, if _d_ meet _e_, there is communication between any vessels attached to _a_ and any other vessel attached to _c_, entrance of external air being prevented by mercury being placed in the cups of _c_ and _b_. the tap may be opened and closed at pleasure by rotating _b_. [15] from _proceedings of royal society_, vol. xxv. p. 396. if _a_ has to be removed, _c_ may be converted into a mercury joint _pro tem._ by letting a little mercury from the upper cup fall into the tube and cover _d_, the tap being closed. this mercury must be removed by a fine pipette in order to use the tap again. it should be noted, however, that though external air cannot enter by way of the ground glass joints, there is no absolute protection against the passage of air between _a_ and _c_, or vessels joined to _a_ and _c_, even when the tap is closed. the passage of air from _a_ to _c_ depends upon the grinding and lubrication of the joint at _c_. =lubricating taps.=--for general purposes resin cerate answers very well. in special cases burnt india-rubber, or a mixture of burnt india-rubber and vaseline will answer well, or vaseline may be used alone. sulphuric acid and glycerine are too fluid. when a lubricant is wanted that will withstand the action of ether, the tap may be lubricated by sprinkling phosphorus pentoxide upon it, and exposing it to air till the oxide becomes gummy. the joint must then be protected from the further action of the air if possible. for example, if a safety tap be used the cup may be filled with mercury. =air-traps.=--in fig. 33, p. 66, an air-trap (_j_) is shown. an air-trap is a device for preventing the mercury supplied to sprengel pumps, etc., from carrying air into spaces that are exhausted, or are for any reason to be kept free from air. figs. 36 and 37 give examples of air-traps. in the simpler of the two (fig. 36) mercury flowing upwards from _c_ that may carry bubbles of air with it passes through the bulb _a_, which is _filled_ with mercury before use.[16] any air which accompanies the mercury will collect at _a_, the mercury will flow on through _b_. so long as the level of the mercury in a is above _b_, the trap remains effective. [16] this may be done by clamping the tube which supplies mercury below _c_, exhausting _a_, and then opening the clamped tube and allowing the mercury to rise. [illustration: fig. 36.] [illustration: fig. 37.] in the trap shown by fig. 37, the tube _d_, which corresponds to _b_ in fig. 36, is protected at its end by the cup _e_. _e_ prevents the direct passage of minute bubbles of air through _d_. this trap, like the other, must be filled with mercury before it is used, and it will then remain effective for some time. chapter v. _graduating and calibrating glass apparatus._ although the subjects to which this concluding chapter is devoted do not, properly speaking, consist of operations in glass-blowing, they are so allied to the subject, and of such great importance, that i think a brief account of them may advantageously be included. =graduating tubes, etc.=--it was formerly the custom to graduate the apparatus intended for use in quantitative work into parts of equal capacity; for example, into cubic centimetres and fractions of cubic centimetres. for the operations of volumetric analysis by liquids this is still done. but for most purposes it is better to employ a scale of equal divisions by length, usually of millimetres, and to determine the relative values of the divisions afterwards, as described under calibration. it rarely happens that the tube of which a burette or eudiometer is made has equal divisions of its length of exactly equal capacities throughout its entire length, and indeed, even for ordinary volumetric work, no burette should be employed before its accuracy has been verified. an excellent method for graduating glass tubes by hand[17] has been described in watts's _dictionary of chemistry_, and elsewhere. another excellent plan, which i have permission to describe, has been employed by professor w. ramsay. it will be sufficient if i explain its application to the operation of graduating a tube or strip of glass in millimetre divisions. [17] originally suggested by bunsen. the apparatus required consists of a standard metre measure,[18] divided into millimetres along each of its edges, with centimetre divisions between them, a ruler adapted to the standard metre, as subsequently explained, and a style with a fine point for marking waxed surfaces. [18] such measures can be obtained of steel for about _fifteen shillings_ each. they are made by mr. chesterman of sheffield. they can be obtained also from other makers of philosophical instruments, at prices depending upon their delicacy. those of the greatest accuracy are somewhat costly. [illustration: fig. 38.] fig. 38 represents the standard measure, and the ruler. at _aa_ are the millimetre divisions on the edges of the measure, the longer transverse lines at _bb_ are placed at intervals of five millimetres and of centimetres. the ruler is in the form of a right-angled triangle; it is shown, by the dotted lines, in position on the standard metre measure at _i_; and again, with its under surface upwards, in the smaller figure at 2. it consists of a perfectly flat sheet of metal, about ten centimetres in length from _c_ to _c_, sufficiently thick to be rigid, and has a ledge, _dd_ in each figure, which is pressed against the side of the measure when using it, to ensure that the successive positions of the edge (_ll_) shall be parallel to each other. at _gg_ are two small holes, into which fit small screws with fine points. these must be in a line parallel to the edge (_ll_), so that when the ruler is in position on the scale, the points of the two screws, which project slightly, shall fall into corresponding cuts on the divided scales (_aa_). to graduate a strip of glass, or a glass tube (_hh_), the surface to be marked must first be coated with wax, which should be mixed with a little turpentine, and be applied to the surface of the glass, previously made _warm_ and _dry_, by means of a fine brush, so as to completely cover it with a thin, closely-adherent, and evenly-distributed coat of wax, which must be allowed to cool. fix _hh_ firmly on a table, and fix the standard measure by the side of _hh_. if the thickness of _hh_ be about equal to, but not greater than that of the standard measure, this may be done by large drawing-pins. if, however, a large tube or thick sheet of glass is to be graduated, fix it in position by two strips of wood screwed to the table on each side of it. one of these wooden strips, on which the measure may be placed, may be about as broad as the standard measure, and of such thickness that when the measure lies upon it beside the tube to be graduated, the ruler, when moved along the measure, will move freely above the tube, but will not be elevated more than is necessary to secure free movement. the second strip of wood may be narrower, and of the same thickness as the broader piece on which the standard measure rests. in any case, let the standard measure and the object to be graduated be very firmly secured in their places. bring the ruler into position at any desired part of the tube by placing the points of the screws (_gg_) in corresponding divisions of the scales (_aa_). with the style, which may be a needle mounted in a handle, make a scratch in the wax along the edge of the ruler at _f_, move the ruler so that the screws rest in the next divisions, and repeat the operation till the required number of lines has been ruled. longer marks may be made at intervals of five and ten millimetres. great care must be taken to hold the needle perpendicularly, and to press it steadily against the edge (_ll_) of the ruler in scratching the divisions.[19] the length of the lines marking the millimetre divisions should not be too long; about 1 mm. is a good length. if they are longer than this, the _apparent_ distance between them is diminished, and it is less easy to read fractions of millimetres. before removing the scale to etch the glass, carefully examine it to see that no mistakes have been made. if it is found that any lines have been omitted, or that long lines have been scratched in the place of short ones, remelt the wax by means of a heated wire, and make new marks. finally, mark the numbers on the scale with a needle-point, or better, with a fine steel pen. [19] to avoid variations of the position in which the needle is held when marking the divisions, the edge (_ll_) should not be bevelled; and an upright support may be placed upon the ruler, with a ring through which the handle of the needle passes, thereby securing that the angle formed by the needle and surface of the ruler is constant, and that equal divisions are marked. the marks on the wax should cut through it. when they are satisfactory, they may be etched by one of the following processes:-(1.) by moistening some cotton wool, tied to a stick, with solution of hydrofluoric acid, and gently rubbing this over the scratched surface for a minute or so; then washing away the acid with water, and cleaning off the wax. this is the simplest method, but the marks made are generally transparent, and therefore not very easy to read. the simplicity of this method is a great recommendation, however. (2.) expose the tube to the fumes of hydrofluoric acid generated from a mixture of powdered fluor-spar and strong sulphuric acid, in a leaden trough. the marks produced in this way are usually opaque, and are therefore very visible, and easily read. after the above detailed account it will only be necessary to give an outline of the other process of graduating tubes. [illustration: fig. 39.] the standard scale to be copied, _a_, which may in this case be another graduated tube, or even a paper scale, and the object to be ruled, _b_, are securely fixed, end to end, a little distance apart, in a groove made in a board or in the top of a table. a stiff bar of wood, _c_, has a point fixed at _d_, and a knife edge at _e_, _d_ is placed in any division of _a_, _c_ is held firmly at _e_ and _d_, and a cut is made by the knife through the wax on _b_, the point _d_ is then moved into the next division, and the operation is repeated. to regulate the length and position of the cuts, _b_ is usually held in position by two sheets of brass projecting over the edges of the groove in which it lies; the metal sheets have notches cut into them at the intervals at which longer marks are to be made. when the scale is completed, the equality of the divisions in various parts of it may be, to some extent, verified as follows:--adjust a compass so that its points fall into two divisions 5, 10, or 20 mm. apart. then apply the points of the compass to various parts of the scale. in every part the length of a given number of divisions should be exactly the same. the individual divisions should also be carefully inspected by the eye; they should be sensibly equal. if badly ruled, long and short divisions will be found on the scale. very often a long and a short division will be adjacent, and will be the more easily observed in consequence. =to divide a given line into equal parts.=--occasionally it is necessary to divide a line of given length into _x_ equal parts. for instance, to divide the stem of a thermometer from the freezing-point to the boiling-point into one hundred degrees. the following outline will explain how a line may be so divided. suppose the line _ab_ (fig. 40) is to be divided into nine equal parts. adjust a hinged rule so that the points _a_ and _b_ coincide with the inside edges of the limbs, one of them, _a_, being at the ninth division (_e.g._ the ninth inch) of _ce_. then if lines parallel to _ed_ be drawn from each division of the scale to meet _ab_, _ab_ will be divided into nine equal parts. [illustration: fig. 40.] a very convenient and simple arrangement on this principle for dividing a line into any number of equal parts with considerable accuracy, is described by miss s. marks in the _proceedings of the physical society_, july 1885.[20] one limb of a hinged rule _d_ is made to slide upon a plain rule fixed to it; the plain rule carries needles on its under surface which hold the paper in position. the position of the divided rule and line to be divided being adjusted, the hinged rule is gently pushed forwards, as indicated by the arrow in fig. 40, till division eight coincides with the line _ab_. a mark is made at the point of coincidence, and division seven on the scale is similarly brought to the line _ab_, and so on. the inner edge of _ec_ should have the divisions marked upon it, that their coincidence with _ab_ maybe more accurately noted. the joint _e_ must be a very stiff one. [20] since this was printed i have observed that the above method is not identical with that described by miss marks, but for ordinary purposes i do not think it will be found to be inferior. a line drawn of given length or a piece of paper may be divided into any given number of equal parts, and will then serve as the scale _a_ of fig. 39, p. 74, the thermometer or other object to be graduated taking the place of _b_. scales carefully divided according to any of the methods described will be fairly accurate _if trustworthy instruments have been employed as standards_. it will be found possible when observing the volume of a gas over mercury, or the height of a column of mercury in a tube, to measure differences of one-sixth to one-eighth of a millimetre with a considerable degree of accuracy. to obtain more delicate measurements a vernier[21] must be employed. [21] for the nature and use of the vernier, a treatise on physics or physical measurements may be consulted. =to calibrate apparatus.=--the glass tubes of which graduated apparatus is made are, as already stated, very rarely truly cylindrical throughout their entire lengths. it follows that the capacities of equal lengths of a tube will usually be unequal, and therefore it is necessary to ascertain by experiment the true values of equal linear divisions of a tube at various parts of it. a burette may be calibrated by filling it with distilled water, drawing off portions, say of 5 c.c. in succession, into a weighing bottle of known weight, and weighing them. great care must be taken in reading the level of the liquid at each observation. the best plan is to hold a piece of white paper behind the burette, and to read from the lower edge of the black line that will be seen. each operation should be repeated two or three times, and the mean of the results, which should differ but slightly, may be taken as the value of the portion of the tube under examination. if the weights of water delivered from equal divisions of the tube are found to be equal, the burette is an accurate one, but if, as is more likely, different values are obtained, a table of results should be drawn up in the laboratory book showing the volume of liquid delivered from each portion of the tube examined. and subsequently when the burette is used, the volumes read from the scale on the burette must be corrected. suppose, for example, that a burette delivered the following weights of water from each division of 5 c.c. respectively:- c.c. grams. 0 to 5 gave 4â·90 5 " 10 " 4â·91 10 " 15 " 4â·92 15 " 20 " 4â·93 20 " 25 " 4â·94 25 " 30 " 4â·95 30 " 35 " 4â·96 35 " 40 " 4â·97 40 " 45 " 4â·98 45 " 50 " 4â·99 and that in two experiments 20 c.c. and 45 c.c. respectively of a liquid re-agent were employed. the true volumes calculated from the table would be as 19â·66 to 44â·46. if the temperature remained constant throughout the above series of experiments, and if the temperature selected were 4â° c., the weights of water found, taken in grams, give the volumes in cubic centimetres, for one gram of water at 4â° c. has a volume of one cubic centimetre. if the temperature at which the experiments were made was other than 4â° c., and if great accuracy be desired, a table of densities must be consulted, with the help of which the volume of any weight of water at a known temperature can be readily calculated. pipettes which are to be used as measuring instruments should also have the relation one to another of the volumes of liquid which they deliver determined, and also the proportions these bear to the values found for the divisions of the burettes in conjunction with which they will be employed. =to calibrate tubes for measuring gases.=--prepare a small glass tube sealed at one end and ground at the other to a plate of glass. the tube should hold about as much mercury as will fill 10 mm. divisions of the graduated tube. fill this tube with mercury, removing all bubbles of air that adhere to the sides by closing the open end of the tube with the thumb, and washing them away with a large air-bubble left for the purpose. if any persistently remain, remove them by means of a fine piece of bone or wood. then completely fill the tube with mercury, removing any bubbles that may be introduced in the operation, and remove the excess of mercury by placing the ground-glass plate on the mouth of the tube, and pressing it so as to force out all excess of mercury between the two surfaces. clean the outside of the tube, and place it on a small stand (this may be a small wide-mouthed glass bottle), with which it has been previously weighed when empty, and re-weigh. repeat this operation several times. from the mean of the results, which should differ one from another but very slightly, the capacity of the tube can be calculated. the purest mercury obtainable should be used. since the density of pure mercury at 0â° c. is 13â·596, the weight of mercury required to fill the tube at 0â° c., taken in grams, when divided by 13â·596, will give the capacity of the tube at 0â° c. in cubic centimetres. if the experiment be not made at 0â° c., and if a very exact determination of the capacity of the tube be required, the density of mercury must be corrected for expansion or contraction. having now a vessel of known capacity, it can be employed for ascertaining the capacities of the divisions of a graduated tube in the following manner:--the graduated tube is fixed perpendicularly, mouth upwards, in a secure position. the small tube of known capacity is filled with mercury as previously described, and its contents are transferred to the divided tube. the number of divisions which the known volume of mercury occupies is noted after all air-bubbles have been removed. this process is repeated until the divided tube is filled. a table of results is prepared, showing the number of divisions occupied by each known volume of mercury introduced. in subsequently using the tube the volumes of the gases measured in it must be ascertained from the table of values thus prepared. in observing the level of the mercury, unless a cathetometer is available, a slip of mirror should be held behind the mercury close to the tube, in such a position that the pupil which is visible on the looking-glass is divided into two parts by the surface of the mercury. a correction must be introduced for the error caused by the meniscus of the mercury. as the closed end of the tube was downwards when each measured volume of mercury was introduced, and as the surface of mercury is convex, the volume of mercury in the tube when it is filled to any division _l_ (fig. 41) is represented by _a_ of 1. but in subsequently measuring a gas over mercury in the same tube, when the mercury stands at the same division _l_, the volume of the gas will be as represented by _b_ of 2, which is evidently somewhat greater than _a_. this will be seen still more clearly in 3, where _a_ represents the boundary of the mercury, and _b_ the boundary of the air, when the tube is filled to the mark _l_ with mercury or a gas over mercury respectively. [illustration: fig. 41.] it is plain that when the level of the mercury in measuring a gas is read at _l_, the volume of the gas is greater than the volume of the mercury recorded, by twice the difference between the volume _a_ of mercury measured, and that which would fill the tube to the level _l_, if its surface were plane. the usual mode of finding the true volume of a gas collected over mercury is as follows:-place the graduated tube mouth upwards, introduce some mercury, and, after removing all bubbles, note the division at which it stands. then add a few drops of solution of mercuric chloride; the surface of the mercury will become level, read and record its new position. then, in any measurement, having observed that the mercury stands at _n_ divisions of the tube, add twice the difference between the two positions of the mercury to _n_, and ascertain the volume which corresponds to this reading from the table of capacities. =to calibrate the tube of a thermometer.=--detach a thread of mercury from half an inch to one inch in length from the body of the mercury. move it from point to point throughout the length of the tube, and note its length in each position. if in one part it occupies a length of tube corresponding to eight degrees, and at another only seven degrees, then at the former point the value of each division is only seven-eighths of those at the latter position. from the results obtained, a table of corrections for the thermometer should be prepared. it is sometimes necessary to join soda glass to lead glass. in this case the edge of the lead glass tube may be bordered with white enamel before making the joint. enough enamel must be used to prevent the lead and soda glasses from mingling at any point. the enamel is easily reduced, and must be heated in the oxidising flame. dr. ebert recommends _verre d'urane_ for this purpose. it is supplied by herr gã¶tze of leipzig (liebigstrasse). chapter vi. _glass tubing._ the diagrams given below show the sizes and thickness of the glass tubes most frequently required. in ordering, the numbers of these diagrams may be quoted, or the exact dimensions desired may be stated. glass tubes are usually sold by weight, and therefore the weight of tube of each size that is wished for should be indicated, and also whether it is to be of lead or soda glass. [illustration] [illustration] chapter vii. _vitreous silica._ =introductory.=--vitreous silica was made in fine threads by m. gaudin in 1839,[22] and small tubes of it were made in 1869 by m. a. gautier, but its remarkable qualities were not really recognised till 1889, when professor c. v. boys rediscovered the process of making small pieces of apparatus of this substance, and used the torsion of "quartz fibres" for measuring small forces. more recently the author of this book has devised a process for preventing the "splintering" of quartz which gave so much trouble to the earlier workers, and jointly with mr. h. g. lacell, has produced a variety of apparatus of much larger dimensions than had been attempted =previously=. at the time of writing we can produce by the processes described in the following pages tubes 1 to 1â·5 cm. in diameter and about 750 cm. in length, globes or flasks capable of containing about 50 cc., masses of vitreous silica weighing 100 grams or more, and a variety of other apparatus. [22] a brief summary of the history of this subject will be found in _nature_, vol. 62, and in the proceedings of the royal institution, 1901. =properties of vitreous silica.=--for the convenience of those who are not familiar with the literature of this subject, i may commence this chapter with a brief account of the properties and applications of vitreous silica, as far as they are at present ascertained. vitreous silica is less hard than chalcedony, but harder than felspar. tubes and rods of it can be cut with a file or with a piece of sharpened and hardened steel, and can afterwards be broken like similar articles of glass. its conducting power is low, and mr. boys has shown that fine fibres of silica insulate remarkably well, even in an atmosphere saturated with moisture. the insulating qualities of tubes or rods of large cross sections have not yet been fully tested; one would expect them to give good results provided that they are kept scrupulously clean. a silica rod which had been much handled would probably insulate no better than one of glass in a similar condition. the density of vitreous silica is very near to that of ordinary amorphous silica. in the case of a small rod not absolutely free from minute bubbles it was found to be 2â·21. vitreous silica is optically inactive, when homogeneous, and is highly transparent to ultraviolet radiations. the melting point of vitreous silica cannot be definitely stated. it is plastic over a considerable range of temperature. professor callendar has succeeded in measuring the rate of contraction of fine rods in cooling from 1200â° to 1500â° c., so that its plasticity must be very slight below the latter temperature. if a platinum wire embedded in a thick silica tube be heated from without by an oxy-hydrogen flame the metal may be melted at temperatures at which the silica tube will retain its form for a moderate length of time, but silica softens to a marked extent at temperatures a little above the melting point of platinum. it has been observed by boys, callendar, and others that fine rods of silica, and also the so-called "quartz fibres," are apt to become brittle after they have been heated to redness. but i have not observed this defect in the case of more massive objects, such as thick rods or tubes; and as i have repeatedly observed that mere traces of basic matter, such as may be conveyed by contact with the hand, seriously injure the surface of silica, and have found that silica quickly becomes rotten when it is heated to about 1000â° in contact with an infusible base such as lime, i am disposed to ascribe the above-mentioned phenomenon to chemical rather than to purely physical causes.[23] it is certain, however, that silica apparatus must never be too strongly heated in contact with basic substances. silica is easily attacked by alkalis and by lime, less readily by copper oxide, and still less by iron oxide. [23] in a recent communication professor callendar tells me that the devitrification commences at the outside and is hastened by particles of foreign matter. the rate of expansion of vitreous silica has been studied by h. le chatelier, and more recently by callendar. the former found its mean coefficient of expansion to be 0â·0000007 between 0â° and 10000â°,[24] and that it contracted when heated above 700â°. [24] the silica blocks used were prepared by fusion in an electric furnace; it is therefore probable that they were not quite pure. professor callendar used rods of silica prepared by the author from "brazil crystal"; these were drawn in the oxy-gas flame and had never been heated in contact with solid foreign matter, so that they consisted, presumably, of very pure silica. his results differ in some respects from those obtained by le chatelier, for he finds the mean coefficient of expansion to be only 0â·00000059, _i.e._ about one seventeenth as great as that of platinum. callendar found the rods of silica expanded very regularly up to 1000â° but less regularly above that temperature. above 1200â° they contracted when heated. the behaviour of vitreous silica under sudden changes of temperature is most remarkable. large masses of it may be plunged suddenly when cold into the oxy-gas flame, and tubes or rods at a white heat may be thrust into cold water, or even into liquid air, with impunity. as a consequence of this, it is in one respect much more easily worked in the flame than any form of glass. difficult joints can be thrust suddenly into the flame, or removed from it, at any stage, and they may be heated unequally in different parts with impunity. it is safe to say that joints, etc., in silica never crack whilst one is making them nor during the subsequent cooling. they may be set aside in an unfinished state and taken up again without any precautions. therefore it is possible for an amateur to construct apparatus in silica which he would be quite unable to produce from glass. the behaviour of vitreous silica with solvents has not yet been fully investigated, but mr. h. g. lacell has this subject in hand. if it behaves like the other forms of anhydrous silica it will withstand the action of all acids except hydrofluoric acid. it is, of course, very readily acted upon by solutions of alkalis and alkaline salts. as regards the use of silica in experiments with gases, it must be remarked that vitreous silica, like platinum, is slightly permeable to hydrogen when strongly heated. one consequence of this is that traces of moisture are almost always to be found inside recently-made silica tubes and bulbs, however carefully we may have dried the air forced into them during the process of construction. owing to the very low coefficient of expansion of silica, it is not possible to seal platinum wires into silica tubes. nor can platinum be cemented into the silica by means of arsenic enamel, nor by any of the softer glasses used for such purposes. i have come near to success by using kaolin, but the results with this material do not afford a real solution of the problem, though they may perhaps point to a hopeful line of attack. possibly platinum wires might be soldered into the tubes (see _laboratory arts_, r. threlfall), but this also is uncertain. the process of preparing silica tubes, etc., from lumps of brazil crystal may be described conveniently under the following headings. i describe the various processes fully in these pages, as those who are interested in the matter will probably wish to try every part of the process in the first instance. but i may say that in practice i think almost every one will find it advantageous to start with purchased silica tubes, just as a glass-worker starts with a supply of purchased glass tubes. the manufacturer can obtain his oxygen at a lower price than the retail purchaser, and a workman who gives much time to such work can turn out silica tube so much more quickly than an amateur, that i think it will be found that both time and money can be saved by purchasing the tube. at the same time the beginner will find it worth while to learn and practise each stage of the process at first, as every part of the work described may be useful in the production of finished apparatus from silica tubes. this being so, i am glad to be able to add that a leading firm of dealers in apparatus[25] has commenced making silica goods on a commercial scale, so that the new material is now available for all those who need it or wish to examine its properties. [25] messrs. baird and tatlock. =preparing non-splintering silica from brazil pebble.=--the best variety of native silica is brazil pebble, which may be obtained in chips or larger masses. these should be thoroughly cleaned, heated in boiling water, and dropped into cold water, the treatment being repeated till the masses have cracked to such an extent that they may be broken easily by blows from a clean steel pestle or hammer. the fragments thus produced must be hand-picked, and those which are not perfectly free from foreign matter should be rejected. the pure and transparent pieces must then be heated to a yellow-red heat in a covered platinum dish in a muffle or reverberatory furnace and quickly plunged into a deep clean vessel containing clean distilled water; this process being repeated, if necessary, till the product consists of semi-opaque friable masses, very much like a white enamel in appearance. after these have been washed with distilled water, well drained and dried, they may be brought into the hottest part of an oxy-gas flame safely, or pressed suddenly against masses of white hot silica without any preliminary heating, such as is necessary in the case of natural quartz. quartz which has not been submitted to the above preparatory process, splinters on contact with the flame to such an extent that very few would care to face the trouble and expense of working with so refractory a material. but after the above treatment, which really gives little trouble, all the difficulties which hampered the pioneer workers in silica disappear as if by magic. =apparatus.=--very little special apparatus need be provided for working with silica, but it is absolutely essential to protect the eyes with very dark glasses. these should be so dark as to render it a little difficult to work with them at first. if long spells of work are undertaken, two pairs of spectacles should be provided, for the glasses quickly become hot enough to cause great inconvenience and even injury to the eyes. almost any of the available oxy-gas burners may be used, but they vary considerably in efficiency, and it is economical to obtain a very efficient burner. the 'blow-through' burners are least satisfactory, and i have long since abandoned the use of them. some of the safety 'mixed-gas jets' have an inconvenient trick of burning-back, with sharp explosions, which are highly disconcerting, if the work be brought too near the nozzle of the burner. i have found the patent burner of mr. jackson (brin's oxygen company, manchester) most satisfactory, and it offers the advantage that several jets can be combined in a group easily and inexpensively for work on large apparatus. the large roaring flames such as are used, i understand, for welding steel are very expensive, and not very efficient for the work here described. =the method of making silica tubes.=--before commencing to make a tube a supply of vitreous silica in rods about one or two millimetres in diameter must be prepared. to make one of these, hold a fragment of the non-splintering silica described above in the oxy-gas flame by means of forceps tipped with platinum so as to melt one of its corners, press a small fragment of the same material against the melted part till the two adhere and heat it from below upwards,[26] till it becomes clear and vitreous, add a third fragment in a similar manner, then a fourth, and so on till an irregular rod has been formed. finally re-heat this rod in sections and draw it out whilst plastic into rods or coarse threads of the desired dimensions. if one works carefully the forceps do not suffer much. i have had one pair in almost constant use for several years; they have been used in the training of five beginners and are still practically uninjured. [26] this is to avoid bubbles in the finished glass. the beginner should work with a gauge and regulator on the bottle of oxygen, and should watch the consumption of oxygen closely. a large expenditure of oxygen does not by any means necessarily imply a corresponding output of silica, even by one who has mastered the initial difficulties. when a supply of the small rods of vitreous silica has been provided, bind a few of them round a rod of platinum (diameter say, 1 mm.) by means of platinum wires at the two ends and heat the silica gradually, beginning at one end after slightly withdrawing the platinum core from that end, till a rough tube about four or five centimetres in length has been formed. close one end of this, expand it, by blowing, into a small bulb, attach a silica rod to the remote end of the bulb, re-heat the bulb and draw it out into a fine tube. blow a fresh bulb on one end of this and again draw it out, proceeding in this way till you have a tube about six or eight centimetres in length. all larger tubes and vessels are produced by developing this fine tube suitably. =precautions.=--the following points must be carefully kept in mind, both during the making of the first tube and afterwards:-(1) the hottest spot in the oxy-gas flame is at a point very near the tip of the inner cone of the flame, and silica can be softened best at this hot spot. the excellence of a burner does not depend on the size of its flame, so much as on the temperature of its "hot spot," and the success of the worker depends on his skill in bringing his work exactly to this part of the flame. comparatively large masses of silica may be softened in a comparatively small jet if the hot spot is properly utilised. (2) silica is very apt to exhibit a phenomenon resembling devitrification during working. it becomes covered with a white incrustation, which seems to be comparatively rich in alkali.[27] this incrustation is very easily removed by re-heating the whitened surface, provided that the material has been kept scrupulously clean. if the silica has been brought into the flame when dusty, or even after much contact with the hands of the operator, its surface is very apt to be permanently injured. _too much attention cannot be given to cleanliness by the workman._ [27] the rock crystal exhibits a yellow flame when first heated in the oxy-gas flame, and most samples contain spectroscopic quantities of lithium. (3) when a heated tube or bulb of silica is to be expanded by blowing, it is best not to remove it from the flame, for if that is done it will lose its plasticity quickly unless it be large. the better plan is to move it slightly from the "hot spot" into the surrounding parts of the flame at the moment of blowing. it is best to blow the bulb through an india-rubber tube attached to the open end of the silica tube. at first one frequently bursts the bulbs when doing this, but holes are easily repaired by stopping them with plastic silica applied by the softened end of a fine rod of silica and expanding the lump, after re-heating it, by blowing. after a few hours' practice these mishaps gradually become rare. i find it a good plan to interpose a glass tube packed with granulated potash between the mouth and the silica tube. this prevents the interior of the tube from being soiled. the purifying material must not be packed so closely in the tube as to prevent air from passing freely through it under a very low pressure. it may be mentioned here that a finished tube usually contains a little moisture, and a recognisable quantity of nitric peroxide. these may be removed by heating the tube and drawing filtered air through it, but not by washing, as it is difficult to obtain water which leaves no residue on the silica. =making larger tubes and other apparatus of silica.=--in order to convert a small bulb of silica into a larger one or into a large tube, proceed as follows:--heat one end of a fine rod of silica and apply it to the bulb so as to form a ring as shown in the figure. then heat the ring and the end of the bulb till it softens, and expand the end by blowing. if this process is repeated, the bulb first becomes ovate and then forms a short tube which can be lengthened at will, but the most convenient way to obtain a very long tube is to make several shorter tubes of the required diameter, and say 200 to 250 mm. in length, and to join these end to end. it does not answer to add lumps of silica to the end of the bulb, for the sides of the tube made in this way become too thin, and blow-holes are constantly formed during the making of them. these can be mended, it is true, but they spoil the appearance of the work. [illustration] tubes made in the manner described above are thickened by adding rings of silica and blowing them when hot to spread the silica. if a combination of several jets is employed, very large tubes can be constructed in this way. one of messrs. baird and tatlock's workmen lately blew a bulb about 5 cm. in diameter, and it was clear that he could have converted it into a long cylindrical tube of equal diameter had it been necessary to do so. very thin tubes of 1â·5 cm. diameter, and tubes of considerable thickness and of equal size, are easily made after some practice, and fine capilliaries and millimetre tube can be made with about equal readiness. if a very fine tube of even bore is required, it may be drawn from a small thick cylinder after a little practice. when a tube becomes so large that it cannot be heated uniformly on all sides by rotating it in the flame, it is convenient to place a sheet of silica in front of the flame a little beyond the object to be heated, in order that the former may throw back the flame on those parts of the tube which are most remote from the jet. a suitable plate may be made by sticking together small lumps of silica rendered plastic by heat. the silica tubes thus made can be cut and broken like glass, they can be joined together before the flame, and they can also be drawn into smaller tubes when softened by heat. in order to make a side connection as in a t piece, a ring of silica should be applied to the tube in the position fixed upon for the joint. this ring must then be slightly expanded, a new ring added, and so on, till a short side tube is formed. to this it is easy to seal a longer tube of the required dimensions. it is thus possible to produce geissler tubes, small distilling flasks, etc. solid rods of silica are easily made by pressing together the softened ends of the fine rods or threads previously mentioned. such rods and small masses can be ground and polished without annealing them. =quartz fibres.=--these were introduced into physical work by mr. boys in 1889. they may be made by attaching a fine rod of vitrified quartz to the tail of a small straw arrow provided with a needle-point; placing the arrow in position on a cross-bow, heating the rod of silica till it is thoroughly softened and then letting the arrow fly from the bow, when it will carry with it an extremely fine thread of silica. a little practice is necessary to ensure success, but a good operator can produce threads of great tenacity and great uniformity. fuller accounts of the process and of the various properties and uses of quartz fibres will be found in mr. boys' lectures (roy. inst. proc. 1889, and proc. brit. assn. 1890), and in mr. threlfall's laboratory arts. index. air-traps, 69. annealing, 23. apparatus needed for glass-working, 11. appendix, 82. beginners, failures of, 22. bellows, position of, 3. ---various forms of, 7. _see also_ blower. bending glass tubes, 28. blower, automatic, 8. blow-pipe, cheap form of, 4. ---dimensions of, 4-5. ---fletcher's automaton, 6. ---fletcher's compound, 6. ---gimmingham's, 6. ---herapath's, 6. ---jets for the, 7. ---use of the, 8. _see also_ flames. blow-pipes, use of several in combination, 21. brush flame, 9. ---oxidising, 20. bulbs, methods of blowing, 47. calibrating apparatus, 76-81. camphorated turpentine, 11. cetti's vacuum tap, 66. charcoal pastils, 11. choking or contracting the bores of tubes, 35. combining the parts of complicated apparatus, 61. combustion tube, how to work it, 25. contracting the bore of a tube, 35. cotton wool for annealing, 24. cutting glass tubes, 26, 27, 28. dividing a line into equal parts, 75. electrodes, 38, 55. electrolysis, making apparatus for, 59. files for cutting glass, 27. flame, the pointed, 8. ---the brush, 9. ---the oxidising brush, 20. ---the smoky, 10. fletcher's automaton blow-pipe, 6. fletcher's compound blow-pipe, 6. funnels, thistle-headed, 57. gimmingham's blow-pipe, 6. gimmingham's vacuum tap, 68. glass, annealing, 23. ---devitrification of, 15. ---method of working with lead, 17. ---method of working with soda, 22. ---nature of, 12. ---presenting to the flame, 16. glass tubes, bending, 28. ---bordering, 31. ---characters of good, 14. ---choking, 35. ---cleaning, 15. glass tubes, cutting, 26, 27, 28. ---piercing, 37. ---purchase of, 12. ---sealing, 32. ---sealing hermetically, 58. ---sizes of, 82. ---welding or soldering, 39, 62. ---widening the ends of, 36. graduating apparatus, 70. grinding stoppers, 51. herapath's blow-pipe, 6. hofman's apparatus for electrolysis, 59. inside joints, 43. jets for blow-pipes, 7. joints, air-tight, 64. lead glass, method of working with, 17. lead glass, blackening of, 17. light, effect of, in working, 3. line, to divide into equal parts, 75. mercury joints, various, 64. non-splintering silica, preparation of, from quartz, 88. ozone generator, to make an, 44. pastils of charcoal, 11. piercing tubes, etc., 37. platinum electrodes, sealing in, 38, 55. pointed flame, the, 9. quartz fibres, 94. rounding ends of tubes, 31. sealing or closing openings in tubes, 32. side-tubes, fixing, 41. smoky flame, 10. soda glass, method of working, 22. soldering or welding, 39, 62. spiral tubes, 56. stoppers, making and grinding, 51. table for glass-blower, 3. taps, vacuum, 65. thistle-headed funnels, 57. traps, air, 69. tube, combustion, how to work it, 25. tubes. _see_ glass tubes. ---t-, 41. ---u-, 56. turpentine, camphorated, for grinding, 11. u-tubes, 56. vacuum taps, 65-68. ---tube, to make a, 60. vitreous silica, apparatus required for making, 89. ---behaviour under sudden changes of temperature, 87. ---bulbs, etc., making joints on, 93. ---expansion of, 86. ---hardness of, 85. ---insulating power of, 85. ---melting point of, 85. ---permeability to gases, 87. ---properties of, 84. ---rods, making joints on, 94. ---tubes, method of making, 90. ---tubes, making joints on, 94. welding or soldering tubes together, 39, 62. white enamel, uses of, 39, 56. widening the ends of tubes, 36. working-place, 2. printed by t. and a. constable, printers to his majesty at the edinburgh university press, scotland _basilius valentinus_, a benedictine monk, of _natural & supernatural_ things. also, of the first _tincture_, _root_, and _spirit_ of metals and minerals, how the same are _conceived_, _generated_, _brought forth_, _changed,_ and _augmented_. whereunto is added, frier _roger bacon_, of the _medicine_ or _tincture_ of _antimony_; mr. _john isaac holland_, his work of _saturn_, and alex. van suchten, of the _secrets_ of _antimony_. translated out of _high dutch_ by daniel cable. _london_, printed, and are to be sold by _moses pitt_ at the _white hart_ in _little britain_, 1671. _basilius valentinus_, a benedictine monk, of _natural & supernatural_ things. also, of the first _tincture_, _root_, and _spirit_ of metals and minerals, how the same are _conceived_, _generated_, _brought forth_, _changed_, and _augmented_. translated out of _high dutch_ by daniel cable. whereunto is added alex. van suchten of the secrets of _antimony_. translated out of _high dutch_ by _d. c._ a person of great skill in _chymistry_. _london_, printed, and are to be sold by _moses pitt_ at the _white hart_ in _little britain_, 1670. _basilius valentinus_, of _natural and supernatural things_. chap. i. because i have at this present undertaken to write of the of the first tincture, the root of metals and minerals, and to inform you of the spiritual essence, how the metals and minerals are at first spiritually conceived and born corporally; it will be necessary first of all to utter, and to acquaint you by a speech, that all things consist of two parts, that is, natural and supernatural; what is visible, tangible, and hath form or shape, that is natural; but what is intactible, without form, and spiritual, that is supernatural, and must be apprehended and conceived by faith; such is the creation, and especially the eternity of god without end, immensible and incomprehensible; for nature cannot conceive nor apprehend it by its humane reason: this is supernatural, what reason cannot apprehend, but must be conceived by faith, this is a divine matter, and belongs to theology, which judgeth souls. moreover, there appertains to supernatural things, the angels of the lord, having clarified bodies, doing that by the permission of their creator, which is impossible for any other creature to do, their works being concealed from the eyes of the world, and so likewise are the works of the infernal spirits and devils unknown, which they do by the permission of the most high god. but above all the great works of god are found and acknowledged to be supernatural, not to be scann'd and comprehended by humane imaginations; such is in especial the great grace and mercy of god which he bestows upon mankind out of his great love, which indeed no man can apprehend or know, and other great and wonderful works which he hath manifested divers manner of wayes by christ our saviour and redeemer, for the confirmation of his omnipotence and glory: as when he raised _lazarus_ from the dead, _jairus_ his daughter, the ruler of the synagogue, and the widows son of _naim_. he made the dumb to speak, the deaf to hear, and the blind to see, all which are supernatural, and _magnalia dei_; so also was his conception, resurrection, descension, and ascension into heaven, too deep and mysterious for nature; all which is only to be obtained by faith. there belongs likewise to supernatural things, the taking of _enoch_ and _elias_ into heaven, the divine rapture of st. _paul_ in the spirit into the third heaven. moreover, many supernatural things are done by imagination, dreams, and visions; many wonders are done by the imagination, witness the speckled sheep by the speckled rods laid in their watring places. god warned the wise men of the east by an especial dream not to return again to _herod_; likewise their three persons, their three gifts, presents, or offerings, and the supernatural star, have all their peculiar and mystical meaning. nor was that dream which hapned to _pilates_ wife natural, who unjustly adjudged our lord and saviour jesus christ to death. the vision of the angels which appeared to the shepherds at the birth of christ, and to the women at his sepulchre, who sought his body where they had laid it, cannot be accounted natural. there are many other supernatural things done at several times by the prophets & saints; so was the voice of the ass speaking to _balaam_, contrary to the common course of nature; as also _joseph_'s interpretation of dreams. and so god by his angels preserves us oftentimes from infinite evils, and delivers us out of manifold dangers, impossible for nature to do. all this & many others belong to theology, and to heaven, whereunto the soul is to have regard. now follows the supernatural things of the visible works of god, as we see them in the firmament; to wit, the planets, stars, and elements, which are above our reason, only their course and motion is observed by speculation and reckoning, which belongs to astronomy; it is a visible but incomprehensible being, performing its operation in a magnetick way, out of which likewise divers admirable things are found and observed, which are altogether supernatural; understand it thus, that the heaven operates in the earth, and the earth affords a correspondence with the heavenly. for the earth hath also its seven planets, which are operated and bred by the seven celestial, only by a spiritual impression or infusion, even as the stars operate all minerals. this is done incomprehensibly and spiritually, and therefore it is to be accounted supernatural, even as two lovers, their persons are visible, but their love one to the other is invisible: humane bodies are tangible and natural, but love is invisible, spiritual, intangible and supernatural, comparable to a magnetick attraction only; for the invisible love which is attracted unto it spiritually by the imagination is, accomplish'd by the desires and fruition. in like manner when the heaven hath a love to the earth, and the earth hath a love, inclination, and affection towards man, as the great world to the lesser, for the lesser world is taken out of the greater, and when the earth by the desires of its invisible imagination doth attract unto itself such a love of the heaven, there is thereby an union of the superiour and inferiour, as man and wife are accounted one body together, and after this union the earth is impregnated by the infusion of the heaven, and begins to conceive and bring forth a birth sutable to the infusion, and this birth after its conception is digested by the elements, and brought to a perfect ripeness and this is reckoned among the supernatural things; how the supernatural essence performs its operation in the natural. among the supernatural things are likewise reckoned all magical and cabalistical matters which depend thereon, arising out of the light of true knowledge, not those which proceed from superstition, conjuration, or unlawful exorcisme, such as the sorcerers use; but i mean in this place such a magick as the wise men had that came out of the _east_, who by revelation from god, and by true allowable art judged rightly; or such an one, as those of old had before us, usual among the _egyptians_ and _arabians_, before writing was found, they noted, observed, and reserved by signs, characters and hieroglyphicks. such blessings may be used, which christ the son of god used, as the scripture saith; he took little children, laid his hands upon them, and blessed them. but whatsoever is contrary to god and his word, ought justly to be rejected, and not to be tollerated, because they are not godly, but diabolical. but those supernatural things which oppose not god and his holy word, belong unto magick, and do the soul no prejudice. as concerning visions which holy men of god have often seen, it is reason they should be reckoned among those things which are not natural; for whatsoever man speculates and comprehends by the mind, is supernatural; on the contrary, whatsoever he can take, see, and hold is natural. let us consider the third part of natural & supernatural things in physick, the virtues and powers of each; this medicine of every thing must first be driven out of a visible, tangible, natural body, and be brought into a spiritual, meliorated, supernatural operation, that the spirit which at the first was infused and given to the body to live, might be released, that it should operate and penetrate as a spiritual essence, and fire, having its vent-holes left that it might burn and have no opposition, which might suffocate, suppress, or hinder the burning life; whereas otherwise, if the separation of the soul and spirit from the body should not first be done, there could not succeed any operation either effectual, profitable, or necessary; for whatsoever is visible, to be felt, and inseparably in a body, that is natural and corporal; but so soon as there is a separation, the living departs from the dead, gaining its perfect operation, and the natural body being separated, the spiritual essence is free to penetrate, becoming a spiritual and supernatural medicine. in brief, all things (none excepted) which we can touch and handle, are natural, but they must be made supernatural, if you would prepare them for physick; for the supernatural only hath a living power in it to operate, the natural hath only a dead tangible form. for when _adam_ was made, he was dead, having no life of any virtue, but so soon as the operative quickning spirit came to him, then he manifested his living virtue and power by supernatural admiration, so that in every thing there is the natural and supernatural united in one, and bound together in their habitation, that every thing might be perfect; for all created things in the world are some supernatural, only what concerns the soul and spiritual matters, and some are natural and supernatural, with what concerns the elements and firmament, as likewise the minerals, vegetables, and animals, which is known and found, when they are separated one from the other, that the soul departs out of the body, and the spirit forsakes its soul, leaving the body an empty habitation. moreover, you must understand and consider, that the great and little world are made and formed of one first matter, by an unsearchable almighty essence, at that time in the beginning, when the spirit of god moved upon the water, who was from eternity without beginning. the great world, as heaven and earth, was first, then was man, the little world, taken out of the greater; the water was separated from the earth, the water was the matter whereon the everlasting spirit of god moved; the little world was formed of the noblest earth, as its quintessence, by the aquosity which yet was in the earth, and all was only natural; but after the breathing in of the divine heating breath, immediately the supernatural was added; so then the natural and supernatural were knit and united. the great world is perishable, yet there will be a new earth or world; the little world is eternal, the great, created, dissoluble world will again be brought to nothing, but the little world will be clarified by the spirit of god, because he possesses it, making a celestial clarified water out of the aforesaid earthly water; then it will follow, that the first matter will be turned into the last, and the last matter will become the first. now the reason why the great world is perishable, is this, that the spirit of god hath not his dwelling or habitation in the great world, but in the little world; for man is the temple of the holy ghost, if he do not wilfully defile himself, adhering to the hellish fire, which makes a breach and difference. for he remaines in the little world, which he formed after his own similitude, and made him a consecrated temple; otherwise there is every thing in the little world which is to be found in the great, as heaven and earth with the elements, and what depends thereon, or appertains thereunto. we find also that in the first creation, which was performed of nothing, three things arose; to wit, a soulish, spiritual, invisible essence, which represented a mercurial water, a sulphurous vapour, and a terrene salt; these three gave a compleat and perfect, a tangible and formal body to all things wherein especially all the four elements are contained, as i have already mentioned in my writing where i treat of the microcosme. but that i may yet give a little more information of natural and supernatural things, as well spiritual as corporal: we find that the _canaanitish_ woman was cured of her flux of blood which held her twelve years, only by a bare touch, when she touched the garment of the son of god, her disease being natural, but the medicine or cure was supernatural, because by her faith she gained help from the lord christ. likewise we have an excellent, high and supernatural miracle in the three children, _shadrach_, _meshach_, and _abednego_, who were cast into the fiery furnace, by the command of king _nebuchadnezzar_, yet by god wonderfully delivered, and not consumed, _dan. 3_. so also the confusion of tongues, and infusion of divers speeches at the foolish structure of the tower of _babel_, which should have reached up to heaven, is esteemed for a supernatural miracle. and so was that a supernatural sign, when the children of _israel_ did lap water as dogs do, when a small number at gods command, fought against the _midianites_, judg. 7. 6. so the sending of the dove by _noah_ out of the ark, when she brought an olive branch in her bill, a sign of mercy, and a divine supernatural message. when the holy man of god _moses_ struck the rock with his rod, that the hard rock yielded water, is beyond humane reason; so was the turning of the salt water into sweet and drinkable, supernatural. as also the dry passage of the children of _israel_ through the red sea; and the budding of _aarons_ rod, are all supernatural. in brief, the resurrection of christ the eternal son of god out of the grave, for all the tomb-stone, his appearing to the two men going to _emas_, his revealing himself to his disciples when the door was lock'd, are all divine and supernatural. divers examples more might be recited out of divine writ, which for brevities sake i omit. among supernatural things are accounted all mineral signs, as the appearance of spirits, representations, pigmies appearing diversly and numerously, giving notice of good or bad luck, ruine or riches; so also those figures, shapes, or other works found in the ores of metals, as of men, fishes, and other creatures, so formed and represented by the imagination of the three first principles, then ripened and fully digested by the earth, and other elements. hereunto appertain the monsters of the earth, and such things as are found within the earth at certain times of a wonderful form and shape, but not at all to be found when that time is past, yet appear again and are to be found at some other time. hereunto also belong all visions and appearances performed by water, glasses, cristal, or other means, as also those done by sigils and characters, which yet are so various, some being only natural, yet affording supernatural appearances or sights; but the others which are performed by conjurations, are neither natural nor supernatural, but diabolical, belonging unto sorcery, and are prohibited all good christians; so likewise all those means which oppose holy writ, gods word and commandments, are to be rejected and refuted by true natural cabalists; i say this, because a certain distinction and sure order ought to be found of the natural, supernatural, unnatural things. in like manner there appertains unto supernatural things, all the water-spirits, as the _syrens_, _succubi_, & other water-nymphs, with their relations, as likewise the terrestrial spirits, and those which inhabit the air, who sometimes are heard, seen, or perceived, sometimes foretelling death or other disasters, sometimes they discover by their apparition riches and good fortune in certain places, and the fiery spirits appertain here also, which appear in a fiery shape, or like a burning light; all these are spirits having untangible bodies, yet are they not such spirits as the right hellish spirits, who hunt after mens souls as an eternal jewel, even as the infernal _lucifer_, the devil and his dependents do, who were ejected with him; but these are such spirits which are above nature, set before men for admiration, and are only maintained by the elements, whereby they are nourished and fed; but when this earthly world shall cease, they also shall decay and vanish with it, because they have no souls to be saved. i will say no more hereof at present, but refer the opening of such circumstances more at large to another opportunity, where i shall particularly treat of visions and spiritual appearances, which are esteemed unnatural by most part of the world, yet truly are natural, but they are found to be supernatural in their operations and wonderful qualities. that i may further confirm my assertion, i say likewise, that there are many things to be found in physick, which yield and manifest their workings supernaturally in a magnetical way, operating only by an attractive spiritual power which is attracted to it by the air; for the air is the _medium_ between the physick and the hurt or distemper, even as the _magnet_ ever doth direct and turn it self towards its polestar, though the star be many thousand miles distant from it, yet the spiritual operation and sympathy between them is so prevalent, that it is attracted together at so vast a distance by the _medium_ or middle band of the air; but because this attractive power is only known unto people in general, or as a thing common, it is therefore become customary, and is so esteemed, there being no notice taken of any further secret whence this operative faculty hath its source or original: in like manner hurts and distempers may be healed and cured, though the patient and physitian be very far distant one from the other; not by charmes, exorcismes, or other unlawful prohibited means, which are opposite to god and nature, but by such means wherein the attractive magnetick virtue lies to accomplish it. as when a wounded person goes a journey, leaving the weapon wherewith he was wounded, or else of his bloud which issued out of the wound with his physician, wherewith he proceeds rightly and by orderly means, as is usual in dressing a wound, without all doubt he shall be absolutely cured, this is no witchcraft, but the cure is performed only by the attractive power of the medicine, which is carried to the sore by the means of the air, wherewith it is mundified, that it may perform the spiritual operation. some will think these hard sayings, and impossible in nature, and many will say it is contrary to nature, whereby many will be excited to dispute it, and raise arguments one opposite to the other, whether it be natural or no, whether it be possible or no, or whether it be sorcery: i will thus resolve them, that this cure is natural, but as it operates it is supernatural & spiritual, because it is performed meerly by an attractive incomprehensible means, and that this manner of cure is no sorcery: i affirm it hereby, that it is not mixt or accompanied with any sorcery, nor with any other unnatural means, contrary to god the creator, or his holy and saving word. but it is only natural, out of its supernatural, invisible, incomprehensible, spiritual, and attractive power, which received its original from the sydereal, and performs its operation by the elements. lastly, i likewise approve this cure to be no sorcery, because the devil rather delights in all mischief to mankind, than to assist any manner of way for their benefit, which yet is impossible for him to do without gods permission. much more might be written of this magnetick form, but i chuse rather to be silent; referring it till i come to treat of the natural miracles of the world. the grosser sort of foolish wits, who imagine themselves to be wise philosophers, and all others who are not in their perfect senses, know no difference in this case, but the wise and truly discreet well know how to distinguish betwixt that which is natural and that which is supernatural. for do but observe this comparison, to be proved by a gross example, how many creatures are there which dye absolutely in the water, so that no life is left therein, but so soon as the pleasant summer appears, the natural heat gives a new life, & the body quite restored in the same substance as it was before in its living motion; even as an herb, which dies in the winter, but in the spring it manifests it self anew. the death of these things is to be esteemed natural, but the return of a new life in its knowledge is supernatural; but because we are accustomed to all these things, the least part of us consider what is worthy of further meditation in this case, letting both natural and supernatural go away together. most people overpass, that natural custom which yet is supernatural, as also monstrous births, and those that bring signs and marks with them into the world; which may all be natural, but manifest themselves supernaturally, by the imagination which caused them: these supernatural forms and customs, the mother of the child caused by intervening thoughts, which unexpectedly happened to her, as it were by accident: even as we often see and find, that many men naturally are born with some gestures, which he can never leave, though he endevour with all his might to do it. the natural gestures of these men are natural, but the conception in the womb which caused the imagination of these things is supernatural, and subject to what the heaven imprints. to conclude: i say, that none can defend the supernatural not to be true by good grounds and reasons, except he have learn'd to know the natural, which hath its original, and gained its shape from the supernatural; after he hath learned this, he may evidence it by sure proofs, that he will be conquerour over those, who will not believe what is supernatural; and he will convince the opinions of those who dispute of natural things, and yet know not the grounds, saving only a bare pretence, much talk, tedious and unprofitable debates. chap. ii. _of the first tincture and roots of metals._ but now to come to my intent, and by gods permission to accomplish the same. i undertake to certifie of the first tincture, root, and generation of metals and minerals: know that the first tincture and root of all metals, is likewise a supernatural, flying, fiery spirit; which preserves it self in the air, seeking its habitation naturally in the earth and water, wherein it can rest and operate: this spirit is found in all metals, more abundant in other metals than in gold, because gold, by reason of its well digested, ripened, and fixt body, is tight, close, and compact, and therefore no more can enter into its body than is just requisite; but the other metals have not such fixt bodies, for their pores are open, and far extenuated, therefore the tincture spirit can the more abundantly pass thorough and possess them. but because the bodies of the other metals are inconstant, the tincture cannot remain with those inconstant bodies, but must depart. and whereas the tincture of gold is found in none more plentiful than in _mars_ and _venus_, as man and wife, their bodies therefore are destroyed, and the tinging spirit taken out of them, which makes gold sanguin, being first opened and prepared, and by their food and drink it becomes volatile, wherefore this volatile gold being satisfied with its food and drink, assumes its own bloud to it self, dries it up by its own internal heat, by the help and assistance of the vaporous fire, and there is a conquest again, which is quite fix'd, makes the highest constancy, that the gold becomes an over-fix'd medicine, by reason of abundance of bloud it yields no body, except another superfluous body be again put to it, wherein the abounding fix'd bloud may disperse itself, this additional metallick body, by reason of the great heat of the fix'd lions bloud, is penetrated as by fire, and purged from all impurity, and forthwith throughly digested to a perfect ripeness and fixedness: that first of all the servant brings the matter unto riches, because the master before could not spare any of his cloaths to give away, seeing that nature had lent and endowed him with one noble suit only; on the other side, the king, when he hath received his aides and contributions from his subjects, can then distribute possessions, and permanent liveries, that the lord and servant may remain both together; and do not think it strange, that the king needs to borrow of his subjects, because their bodies are unfix'd and inconstant, for they receive much, and yet can keep but little credit: but if the king can participate thereof, he will the better overcome heat and frost, than the leprous metals can; and henceforth by this receipt he becomes particularly a dominator and conquerour of all other, with a great victory and triumph of riches and of health to long life. i hope you have from the beginning sufficiently understood concerning this natural and supernatural advice, and the first tinging root of metals and minerals, whereon the corner-stone is placed, and where the true rock is grounded in its kind, wherein nature hath placed and buried her secret & deeply concealed gifts; to wit, in the fiery tinged spirits, which colours they gained out of the starry heaven by the operation of the elements; and they can moreover tinge and fix that which before was not tinged and unfix'd, seeing that _luna_ wants the robe of the golden crown, together with the fixedness, as likewise _saturn_, _jupiter_, and _mercury_ do; and although _mars_ and _venus_ need not this rayment, but can communicate it to the other five, yet i say, that they can perform nothing to attain any thing with wealth without the lion, because they are not sufficiently accomodated with a fixedness of their _mercury_, and a gentleness of their salt, except it be that the lion overcome them, that they have triumphed on both parts, and gained a remarkable melioration altogether; this melioration lies concealed in their signate star, or magnet, out of which all metals have themselves received their gifts. now i will proceed, and particularly step to the birth and generation, how the or _archã¦us_ manifests its power; pouring it forth, and daily reveales it, whereby all metallick and mineral forms are visibly proposed, and made formal, tangible, and corporal by the mineral, intangible, flying, fiery spirits: understand therefore further, and observe with diligence and care, that by forgetfulness you let not that which is weighty pass away, nor yet neglect or overlook that which is most profitable, and on the contrary observe the bare words at length, passing over the truth; for what i write herein, is undoubtedly held and esteemed that the highest is undoubtedly by many esteemed for the lowest, and the lowest for the highest mystery, and is so to be reputed. now you must first know, that all metals and minerals of the earth have one only matter and mother, whereby in general they all received conception, gaining a compleat and corporal birth. this matter which comes out of the center, first of all divides it self into three parts, to procure one corporal or certain form of each metal. these three parts are only fed in the earth by the elements, out of their bodies, and nourish'd till they be perfect. but the matter which comes out of the center is imagined by the stars, operated by the elements, and formed by the earth: it is a matter to be known, and the true mother of metals and minerals: it is such a matter and mother, whereof man himself is conceived, born, nourish'd, and made corporal: it may be compared to the middle world, for what is in the great world is in the little world, and what is in the little world is also in the greater; and what is jointly in the great and little world is likewise found in the middle world, which unites and conjoins the great and little world; it is a soul which unites and copulates the spirit with the body. this soul is compared unto water, and it is a right true water, but not so that it wets as other water doth, but it is a celestial water, dry, found in a metallick liquorish substance; it is a soulish water, which loves all spirits, and unites them with their bodies, conducting them to a compleat life; therefore it is reasonably found out, and evidently proved, that water is the mocker of all metals, which are heated by the warm aerial fire, or spirit of _sulphur_, which by its digestion makes the earthly body lively, wherein the salt is evidently found, which preserves from putrefaction so that nothing might be consumed by corruption. at the beginning and birth _quick-silver_ is first operated, which stands yet open with a subtile coagulation, because little salt is imparted to it, whereby he manifests a more spiritual than corporal body; but all the other metals which follow out of its essence, and have more salt, whereby they become corporal, do all follow this; so that i now begin first with the spirit of _mercury_. chap. iii. _of the spirit of_ mercury. though i have a peculiar stile in writing, which will seem strange unto many, causing strange thoughts and fancies in their brains, yet there is reason enough for my so doing; i say enough, that i may remain by my own experience, not esteeming much of others prating, because it is concealed in my knowledge, seeing having alwaies the preheminence before hearing, and reason hath the praise before folly; wherefore i now say, that all visible, tangible things are made of the spirit of _mercury_, which excels all earthly things of the whole world, all things being made out of it, having their off-spring only from it; for all is found therein which can perform all whatsoever the artist desires to find; it is the beginning to operate metals, when it is become a spiritual essence, which is meer air flying to and fro without wings; it is a moving wind, which after it is expelled its dwelling by _vulcan_, it is driven into its _chaos_, where it again enters, and resolves it self into the elements, where it is elevated and attracted by the sydereal stars after a magnetical manner unto themselves, out of love, whence he proceeded before, and was operated, because it affects its like again, and attracts it to it. but if this spirit of _mercury_ can be caught, and made corporal, it resolves into a body, and becomes a pure, clear, transparent water, which is the true spiritual water, and the first _mercurial_ root of the minerals and metals, spiritual, intangible, incombustible, without any mixture of earthly aquosity; it is that celestial water, whereof very much hath been written; for by this spirit of _mercury_ all metals, may if need require, be broken, opened, and resolved into their first matter, without corrosive; it renews the age of man or beast, even as the eagles; it consumes all evil, and conducts a long age to long life. this spirit of _mercury_ is the master-key of my second key, whereof i wrote in the beginning; wherefore i will call; _come ye blessed of the lord, be anointed, and refreshed with water, and embalm your bodies, that they may not putrefie or stink_; for this celestial water is the beginning, the oyl, and the means, seeing it burns not, because it is made of a spiritual sulphur, the salt balsam is corporal, which is united with the water by the oyl, whereof i will afterwards treat more at large, when i shall write of them, and mention them. and that i may further declare what is the essence, matter and form of the spirit of _mercury_, i say, that its essence is blessed, its matter spiritual and its form earthly, which yet must be understood by an incomprehensible way; these are indeed harsh expressions, many will think, thy proposals are all vain, strange effusions, raising wonderful imaginations, and true it is that they are strange, and require strange people to understand these sayings; it is not written for peasants, how they should grease cart-wheels, nor is it written unto those who have no knowledge of the art, though they be never so learned, or think themselves so; for i only account them learned, who next unto gods word, learn to know earthly things, which must be pondered and judged by the understanding, founded upon a true knowledge, to distinguish light from darkness, who chuse that which is good, and reject the evil. it is needless for you to know what the beginning of this spirit of _mercury_ requires, because it can in no wise help nor advantage you, only take notice of this, that its beginning is supernatural, out of the celestial, sydereal and elementary, bestowed on it from the beginning of the first creation, that it may enter further into an earthly substance. but because this is necessary which hath been declared to you, leave the celestial to the soul, apprehend it by faith, and let the sydereal likewise alone, because these sydereal impressions are invisible and intangible, the elements have already brought forth the spirit perfect into the world by the nutriment, therefore let that alone likewise; for man cannot make the elements, but only the creator, and remain by thy made spirit which is already formal and unformal, tangible and intangible, and yet is presented visibly. so have you enough of the first matter, out of which all metals and minerals grow, and is one only thing, and such a matter which unites it self with the _sulphur_ in the following chapter, and enters into a coagulation with the _salt_ of the fifth chapter, that it may be one body, and a perfect medicine of all metals, not only to bring forth in the earth at the beginning, as in the great world, but also by help of the vaporous body to transmute and change, together with the augmentation in the lesser world: let not this seem strange to you, seeing the most high hath permitted, and nature undertaken it. many will not believe this, esteeming it impossible, despise and vilifie these mysteries, which they understand not in the least, they may remain fools and idiots till an illumination follows, which cannot be without gods will; but remains till the time predestinate. but wise and discreet, men who have truly shed the sweat of their brows, will be my sufficient witnesses, and confirm the truth, and indeed believe and hold for a truth all that which i write in this case, as true as heaven and hell are preordained, and proposed as rewards of good and evil to the elect and reprobate. now i write not only with my hands, but my mind, will and heart constrain me to it: those who are highly conceited, illuminated, and world-wise, hate, envy, scandalize, defame and persecute this mystery to the utmost rind, or innermost kernel, which hath its beginning out of the center; but i know assuredly, there will come a time, when my marrow is wasted, and my bones dried up, that some will take my part heartily, after i am in the pit; and if god would permit it, they would willingly raise me from the dead; but that cannot be; wherefore i have left them my writings, that their faith and hope may have a seal of certainty and truth, to testifie of me what my last will and testament was, which i ordained for the poor, and all the lovers of mysteries, though it did not behove me to have wrote so much, yet i could not refrain without prejudice to my soul, but to drive a light or flash through a cloud, that the day might be observed, and the dark night, thick and gloomy, rainy weather expelled. now how the _archã¦us_ operates further by the spirit of _mercury_ in the earth, or veins of the earth, take this advice, that after the spiritual seed is formed by the impression of the stars from above, and fed by the elements, it is a seed, and turns it self into a _mercurial_ water, as first of all the great world was made of nothing, for when the spirit moved upon the water, the celestial heat must needs raise a life in the cold watrish and earthly creatures; in the great world it was gods power, and the operation of the celestial lights; in the little world it is likewise gods power, and the operation to work into the earth by his divine and holy breath. moreover the almighty gave and ordained means to accomplish it, that one creature had obtained power to operate in the other, and the one to help and assist the other, to perform and fulfil all the works of the lord; and so an influence was permitted the earth to bring forth by the lights of heaven, as also an internal heat, to warm and digest that which was too cold for the earth, by reason of its humidity, as unto every creature a peculiar fashion according to its kind; so that a subtile sulphurous vapour, is stired up by the starry heaven, not the common, but another more clarified and pure vapour, distinct from others, which unites it self with the _mercurial_ substance; by whose warm property, in process of time, the superfluous moisture is dryed up, and then when the foulish property comes to it, which gives a preservation to the body and balsam, operating first into the earth by a spiritual and sydereal influence, then are metals generated of it, as it pleaseth the mixture of the three principles, the body being formed according as it assumes unto it the greatest part of those three. but if the spirit of _mercury_ be intended and qualified from above upon animals, it becomes an animal substance; if it goes upon vegetables by order, it becomes a vegetable work; but if, by reason of its infused nature, it fall on minerals, it becomes minerals and metals, yet each one hath its distinction as they are wrought, the animals for themselves, the vegetables, on another manner and form by themselves, and so likewise the minerals, each one a several way, whereof to write particularly would be too tedious, and yield large and various narrations. many one may here demand and not without cause, how such a spirit of _mercury_ may be procured, how to be made, and after what manner it is to be prepared to expel diseases, and change all the kinds of the meaner and baser metals, as if they were born in a little world, by transmutation and augmentation of their seed; many expect this with impatience. i answer without concealing any thing, but will truly discover as much as is permitted me by gods command, in manner and form following. _in the name of the lord_, take a red quick-silver ore which is like unto _sinople_ (or _vermilion_) and the best gold ore you can get; grind of each a like quantity both together, before they partake of any fire, poure an oyl of _mercury_, upon it made _per se_, of common, purified and sublimed quicksilver, set it a month to digest, you have an extract rather celestial than terrestrial; distil this extract gently, as in _balneum mariã¦_, the flegme ascends over, the oyl remaining at bottom, being heavy, which in a moment receives all metals into it poure thrice as much spirit of wine to it, circulate it in a pellican, till it be as red as bloud, and become so sweet that nothing may compare with it; decant the spirit of wine to a liquidness, poure fresh spirit of wine upon it, this reiterate so often, till the matter be exceeding sweet, and transparent red as a a ruby, then put all together, poure that which ascended over upon white calcined _tartar_, and distil it strongly in ashes, the spirit of wine remains behind with the _tartar_, but the spirit of _mercury_ ascends over. if this spirit of _mercury_ be mixt with the spirit of _sulphur_, together with its salt, and so brought over jointly together, that they can never be separated, you have such a work which if it come over, and it get its ferment with gold by solution according to a just measure and time appointed, and be brought to a perfect ripeness, unto the _plusquam_ perfection, nothing may compare therewith, for prevention of diseases, and poverty, and to a rich excessive recreation of the body and goods. this is the way to obtain the spirit of _mercury_, which i have revealed as far as it is permitted me to do, by the supremest emperour; the manual operations are found in the work which i have revealed; you must wisely observe, that you may not endure a bath in hell for me, by my true admonition to thee, forasmuch as a true opening of the door which leads to the royal palace, is performed but with one key, which cures all diseases, be it _dropsie_, _consumption_, _gout_, _stone_, _falling sickness_, _apoplexy_, _leprosie_, or howsoever called in general: this medicine likewise cures all kinds of the _french pox_, and all old sores of long standing, be it _wolf_, _noli me tangere_, _tetter_, _ring-worm_, _cancer_, _fistula_, and corroding hollow sores; all which i have declared, and concealed nothing. last of all, observe, that you do not discover too much, or no more, because all art hath its original or source out of the spirit of _mercury_, which is refreshed and raised to life by the spiritual _sulphur_, that it becomes celestial, & with and by the salt they are made corporal and formal; but the beginning of the soul, of the spirit, and of the body, let it be and remain a magnet, even as it is, and can be acknowledged to be nothing else. this is the summe in brief, that without the spirit of _mercury_, which is the only true key, you can never make corporal gold potable, nor the philosophers stone. let it remain by this conclusion, be silent; for i my self will at present say no more, because silence is enjoyned thee and me by the orderly judge, recommending the execution and further search thereof to another, who hath not as yet reduced the matter into a right order. chap. iv. _of the spirit of_ copper. the star of _venus_ is very difficult, and not well to be calculated, as all _mathematicians_ and _astronomers_ will bear me witness; for its course is found to be otherwise than that of the other six planets, and therefore its birth is otherwise; for the birth of _venus_ possesses the first table, after _mercury_, as for what concerns the generation of metals. _mercury_ makes active, but _venus_ provokes, giving lust and desire, together with the beauty which gave occasion thereunto; though i am accounted no _astronomer_, nor do i give my self out for one, who knows to calculate the course of the heavens; for i should spend my time in my cell in prayer, but that the spare hours after my devotion is ended, may not be spent in vain, i have ordered and proposed it as my aim and intent to exercise my self, and to spend those hours in the knowledge of natural things. so likewise it is not well to be reckoned what arises, grows or proceeds from _venus_ or whence she arose, grew, or proceeded; for she is superfluously cloathed more than she needs, and yet must want that which she needs most of all in her constancy. but you must be advertised, that _venus_ is cloathed with a celestial _sulphur_ which far surpasses the brightness of the sun; for there is more and more abundant _sulphur_ in her than in gold; but it requires a knowledge what the matter of that gold _sulphur_ may be, which is, and rules so plentifully in copper, and whereof i make so great a cry: know then that it is likewise a flying very hot spirit, which can pass through and penetrate, as also ripen and digest all things, as the imperfect metals into perfect, which the inexpert will not believe. and here a question presents it self at hand; _how the spirit of copper can make other imperfect metals perfect, and make them ripe, whereas in its own body it is imperfect and inconstant?_ for answer, i say as i have often said, that this spirit cannot possess or inhabit a permanent body in copper; for when the habitation is burnt by fire, the spirit goes away with it, and must with impatience leave its lodging, for it dwells therein as a sojourner; but it hath protection in the permanent fix'd body of gold, whence no man can expel it, without the warrant of an especial judge; for it is put into the inheritance as an heir, and taken root by her permanent body, that she cannot easily be expelled. the tincture which _venus_ hath obtained, is in like manner found in _mars_, more powerful, high and noble; for _mars_ is the man, and _venus_ the woman, which i speak more of, seeing i write of them. this tincture is delivered in _verdigreece_, and likewise it is found in _vitriol_, as in a mineral whereof a peculiar book might be wrote. in all these things a combustible _sulphur_ is found, and yet a _sulphur_ which is incombustible, this is a strange thing, one is a white sulphur, the other is red in the operative generation; but the true sulphur is incombustible, for it is a pure true spirit, whereof an incombustible oil is prepared, and it is the same sulphur which is made out of one root from the gold-sulphur. i open many mysteries, which ought not to be; but what should i do? to conceal all is not answerable, but a measure is good in all things, as you may observe in my last advice of protestation; forget not my desire therein. this sulphur may well be called the _sulphur of the wise_; for all wisdom is found therein, unto the _mercurial_ spirit; which excels it, which together with the salt of _mars_ must be put together by a spiritual conjunction, that three may come into one understanding, and be advanced to equal operations. this spiritual sulphur proceeds in the same manner and form out of the upper region, as doth the spirit of _mercury_, but in another manner and kind, whereby the stars manifest a separation in fix'd and unfix'd, in colour'd and uncolour'd things. the tincture consists only in the _spirit of copper_, and most of all in that of his bed-fellow; it is a meer vapour, stinking and ill-sented in its beginning; this mist must be dissolved in the manner of a liquor, that the stinking, incombustible oil may be prepared thereof; but yet it must have and take its beginning out of _mars_; this oil unites freely with the spirit of _mercury_, assuming all metallick bodies speedily unto them, if they be first prepared in all points as i have advised in my keys. i observe not the order of the planets, and not without just grounds; for i observe the order of their birth, by which i am directed; for because _venus_ hath much sulphur, she is sooner digested and ripened together with _mars_, before other metals; but because unconstant _mercury_ shewed them both too little assistance, therefore no room is left him to work harder, by reason of the superfluous sulphur, so that they could obtain no melioration of their unfixt bodies. now i will reveal a secret unto thee, that gold, copper, and iron have one sulphur, one tincture, and one matter of their colour; this matter of the tincture is a spirit, a mist and fume; as aforesaid, which can penetrate and pass through all bodies, if you can take it, and acuate it by the spirit which is in the salt of _mars_, and then conjoin the spirit of _mercury_ therewith in a just weight, purging them from all impurity, that they be pleasant and well sented, without all corrosives, you have then such a medicine, whereunto none in the world may compare, being fermented with the bright shining sun, you have made an entrance penetrating to work, and to transmute all metals. o eternal wisdom from the beginning! how shall we thank thee for such great mysteries, which the children of men do no wayes regard, but are despised by the greater number, to know what thou hast concealed in nature, which they see before their eyes, and know it not; they have it in their hands, and comprehend it not; they deal with it, and know not what they have, nor what they do, because the internal is concealed. i will yet reveal this unto thee in truth, and by the love of god, that the root of the philosophical sulphur, which is a celestial spirit, is found with the root of the spiritual supernatural _mercury_, as also the beginning of the spiritual salt, are in one, and found in one matter, out of which the stone is made, which was before me, and not in many things, though all philosophers speak as if the _mercury_, _sulphur_, and _salt_ were each one a part by themselves and distinct, that the _mercury_ is found in one, the _sulphur_ in another, and the _salt_ in a third; yet i tell you, this is only to be understood of their superfluity, which is found to abound most in each, and may be used and prepared divers ways particularly with profit, both for physick and transmutation of metals; but the universal, which is the supreamest treasure of earthly wisdom, and of all the three principles, is one only thing, and is founded and extracted out of one only thing, which can make all metals into one, it is the true spirit of _mercury_, and soul of _sulphur_, together with the spiritual salt, united together, inclosed under one heaven, and dwelling in one body, it is the dragon and the eagle, the king and the lion, the spirit and the body, which must tinge the body of gold to a medicine, that it may gain power plentifully to tinge his other companions. o thou blessed medicine given by god thy creator! o thou celestial magnet of great attractive love! o thou valid substance of metals, how great is thy power, how uninventive is thy virtue, how durable is thy constancy? happy is that man on earth who knows thy light in truth, which all the world takes no notice of; he shall not see poverty, no disease shall touch him, nor no sickness hurt him, till the appointed time of death, and till the last hour predestinated for him by his heavenly king. it is impossible for all the tongues of men to utter the wisdom which is laid in this treasure of the fountain, all orators must be silent and ashamed at it, yea terrified and not able to speak a word, when they shall behold and discern this supernatural glory, and i my self am afraid when i consider that i have discovered too much. but i hope to prevail with god by prayer, that he will not charge it on me as a deadly sin, because i began the work in his fear, obtained it by his grace, and revealed it for his glory. o thou holy everlasting trinity! i praise, honour, and magnifie thee with heart and mouth, that thou hast revealed unto me the great wisdom of this earthly world, next unto thy divine word, whereby i have known thy almighty power, and supernatural wonders, which man will not discern; i heartily beseech thee to give me more understanding and wisdom, that i may bestow the use and profit thereof with a continual sacrifice of praise before thee, unto the christian-like love of my neighbour, and to my own welfare both spiritual and corporal, in power and virtue, that thy name may be made glorious, honoured, and praised, for all thy works in heaven and earth; and that my enemies may know, that thou art the lord full of eternal wonders, that they may repent and be converted, and not be drowned in the falshood of darkness. god the father, son, and holy ghost help me, and all of us, from his heavenly throne, exalted above all glory, might, and majesty, whose wisdom hath neither beginning nor end, and before whom all celestial, earthly, and hellish creatures must tremble with fear, to him be glory forever, _amen_. o _seraphin_! o _cherubin_! how great are thy wonders and actions, look graciously upon thy servant, and be entreated to be pacified that he hath manifested this. the reader must moreover know concerning the generation of copper, and observe, that it is generated of much _sulphur_, but its _mercury_ and salt are in an equality, for there is found to be no more or less of the one than of the other, seeing then that the _sulphur_ in quantity excels the _mercury_ and the salt, thence arises a great coloured redness, which possesses the metal, that the _mercury_ cannot perform its fixation, that a fixt body should be generated thereof. observe and understand it so of copper, that the form of _venus_ body is so stated as that of a tree, which abounds in rosen, as the larch tree, the firr, the pine, deal tree, and other sorts of trees more, the rosen of the tree is its _sulphur_, which it evacuates at sometimes by reason of its superfluity, for it cannot bear it all; such a tree which is tinged with abundance of fatness, by the digestion of nature and the elements, burns quickly and freely, and is not ponderous, nor so durable as is the oak, or other hard wood which is close and compact, whose pores are not so open, as those sorts of light wood, and wherein the sulphur doth not so predominate, but the oak hath therefore the more _mercury_, and a better salt than the pine, firr, and deal trees have, and such wood doth not float so well above the water, as the deal, being bound & closed up compactly, so that the air is easily prevented in bearing it up. so is it to be observed of metals, and especially of gold, which by reason of its abundant, fixt, digested and ripe _mercury_, hath a very close, fast and compact, fixt and invincible body, which neither fire nor water, air, nor any corruption of the earth can prejudice, that the consuming power of the elements can do them no harm; this fixedness & close compacted conjunction gives evidence of its natural ponderosity, which cannot be evidenced in other metals, which is to be observed, not only by weighing it in the scales, but likewise you will find it thus: if you lay but a scruple of pure gold upon a hundred weight of quicksilver, it immediately sinks to the bottom, whereas all other metals being laid upon quicksilver in like manner, float on the top of it, and sink not to the bottom, because they are more open, that the air or wind can penetrate them and bear them up. now what further concerns the spirit of _venus_ or copper in physick, you must last of all take notice and observe, that it is throughout in its virtue and power discerned to be very wholsom and beneficial, not only that spirit which lies in the first _ens_, but also that very spirit which is found in the last matter, its virtue, power and operation is, that it is preferred before all other medicines in the rising of the _matrix_: it's like is not yet found particularly against the _falling sickness_. this spirit hath also received an especial gift to dry the _dropsie_ up; it preserves the bloud from putrefaction, digests all which is adverse to the stomach, breaks the stone, of what kind soever it be. externally in wounds, this spirit lays a ground to heal: _noli me tangere_ and all other sores cannot defend themselves, nor their ill qualities, but this spirit doth assault them, and prepares a good ground for their cure; externally it mundifies and searches out that whereby the medicine may operate, fasten, and make a beginning of the cure. internally this spirit penetrates through & through, searching out all that is evil in the body; even as doth the noblest vulnerary potion; no imposthume can withstand this spirit, but is reformed by it. i say briefly, observe the spirit of _venus_ very well, it will manifest it self to admiration both internally and externally, that many will esteem it to be incredible & supernatural. last of all, you must understand that this spirit of _copper_ is a fiery spirit, penetrating, searching and consuming all evil humours, and superfluous flegme in man and metals, and may in reason be accounted the crown of medicines; it is very fiery and sharp, incombustible, but spiritual and unformal, and therefore as a spirit it can particularly help to make unformal things fiery, digest and ripen them; and if you are a true naturalist, i recommend this spirit unto thee; it will not fail thee in the least, in any necessity of health or wealth, in case you observe it rightly, and execute according to justice. i hope my call and request will at last take place, and have a hearing with those who regard nature, and have an earnest and longing desire to search out, and learn, whereby they may whet their wits, open their eyes, and let their ears hear, and learn such a thing out of my advice, which was never taken notice of, or learn'd before, and is to be found in this spirit of copper, internal and external. he that doth not observe, or truly understand my writings, will not fathom many secrets, nor search out to purpose and in truth, nor learn to advantage without me, therefore no man can direct me, as concerning the spirit of copper, except he hath beforehand inverted and turned the copper inside outwards, and truly learned all the mysteries of its internal virtues, as i have done, if he can find out any thing better, which i know not, i earnestly desire him not to conceal any thing, so shall his instruction be well rewarded, with a thousand-fold advantage, and recommend you herewith to the highest creator. v_ain reason cannot alwayes apprehend_ e_ach matter which_ venus _can bring to an end:_ n_o man can find it presently in sence,_ v_ain reason banns it far away from thence;_ s_uch a spirit only can all things speed,_ _so that_ mercury _be joyn'd with it indeed._ chap. v. _of the spirit and tincture of_ mars. _mars_ and _venus_ have a spirit and tincture as well as gold and other metals, be that spirit which is in each metal never so mean and little. it is undeniable and known to all, that many men have many minds, though all men originally are of one first matter, born and produced from one seed; yet have they divers different minds, because the stars have so operated them, and not without cause; for the influences of the great world operates the next to it in the little world; for all opinions, natures and thoughts, together with the whole complection of man proceed alone from one influence of the stars, manifesting themselves according to the course of the planets and stars, so that nothing can prevent, nor can such influences hinder it, when the birth hath attained to the end of its perfection. as a man is naturally inclined to study; one delights in divinity, another in the study of the laws, a third in physick, a fourth will be a philosopher; moreover there are many wits who are naturally inclined to the mechanicks; as the one is a painter, another a goldsmith; the one a shoomaker, the other a taylor, a carver, and so forth, divers and innumerable; all this happens by the stars influence, whereby the imagination is supernaturally founded & fortified, and whereupon it is resolved to rest; as it is found, that what a man hath once conceived in his mind, and framed a foundation thereof, none can divert him from a constant resolution and relying thereon, except death, which at last concludes all. so is it to be understood of _alchymists_, who are set upon the search of natures secrets, they intend not to cease, till they have discover'd nature, absolved it quite, and brought all to an end, which cannot well be done. even so is it to be understood of metals, according as the influence and imagination is from above, so is the form; and although the metals be called metals in general, and are such, yet you have understood by the various minds of men, which yet proceed from one matter, that there may be manifold and divers metals, one hot and dry, another cold and moist, a third assuming a mixt nature and complection to it self. therefore the metal of _mars_ being ordained in its degree by a gross salt before others in the greatest quantity, is found to have the hardest, ungentle, strongest, and grossest body, which nature appropriated and granted to it, it hath the least portion of _mercury_, but more of _sulphur_, and most of _salt_, hence, and from such a mixture or composition is its corporal essence descended, and born into the world by help of the elements. its spirit is like to the other spirits in operation, but if you can know the right and true spirit of _mars_, i tell you truly, and in true wisdom, that one grain of its spirit or quintessence drunk with the spirit of wine, strengthens the heart, courage, and senses, so that you shall fear no foes; it raises up in him the courage of a lion, and provokes a desire to hunt and fight at _venus_ sports. when the conjunction of _mars_ and _venus_ are rightly placed in a certain constellation, they bring fortune and victory in love and affection, in battel and joy, remaining in unity though the whole world should be against them: but because i am an ecclesiastick under church government, and dedicated my soul to god, without provocation of humane desires, and lusts of the flesh, for they lead a direct way to hell without leave; but gods commands, fear, and a rejection of mans will, which are tollerated by his commands, prepare a way to heaven, if they continue in the true calling upon, and in the true and right faith of the only throne of grace, mediator and patron _jesus christ_ our saviour. all martial diseases are expell'd, cured, and healed in an admirable manner by this spirit; such as are the _bloody flux_, the disease or menstruous _fluxes_ of women, both white and red, and all other _fluxes_ of the belly, and open _sores_ in the legs, or any part of the body, together with all those diseases, both internal and external, howsoever they are called, which bloody _mars_ hath caused, which i omit to nominate particularly, being well known unto the discreet physician what diseases are subject to the jurisdiction of _mars_. if the spirit of iron be truly known, it hath a secret affinity with the spirit of _venus_, so that both may be conjoined in one, both becoming one only matter, of a like operation, form, substance and being, healing and expelling the self-same diseases, as also to bring the particulars of the metals into a change with profit, praise, and excess. but properly _mars_ must be observed thus with its virtues, that in his corporal form he only hath an earthly body, which may be used in many things, for to stanch bloud, externally in wounds, to graduate _luna_, internally to stop or bind the body, which yet is not good at all times, and may be used both internally & externally in mans body, as likewise in metallick affairs; because without the true known means, which nature hath in her secret closet, much profit cannot be gotten _per se_. one thing more i must at present propose, that the magnet and true iron perform almost a like benefit in corporal distempers, having almost one kind of nature in and with them, as it is with it in the celestial, spiritual, and elementary intellect, between the body, soul, and the chaos, out of which the soul and spirit went, the body at last was found out of the composition. how shall we now do? the gross dull-witted lads will not apprehend it, the middle sort of wits will take no notice of what i write, and the supernatural wits will descant too much upon it; i must find out a remedy, and would willingly preserve all these over-wise-people to be my friends still. i will now teach, instruct, and presently inform you, seeing that the argument it self declares and pronounces its definitive sentence, therefore the resolution lies open, and can be declared and resolved, reserved nor directed to any other sentence of the understanding, further than for it self. last of all, reserve this hereupon in this chapter, that there can be no house kept to stand in unity between the married couple, if the one of them turn his coach and drive to the east, and the other towards the west, for they are not equal, so that they cannot draw the coach together in an equal weight, whereby there arises a great dissention and hinderance, in obtaining that which was intended: but if true married people will carry on their house-keeping with a right subsistance, they must be of one spirit, mind, judgment and virtue, to accomplish all whatsoever is in their heart and mind, and that the one operate into the other, if their love and truth shall be permanent; for want of one of these things, the three principles cannot be truly together; for the _mercury_ is banisht, and too little by reason of the firmness and constancy; the _sulphur_ is too little, it cannot warm the body of love, because it is very much extinct; the _salt_ likewise hath not its right, convenient, natural kind, but is too hard and too much, seeing it makes a hard coagulation, is sharp and biting, because it doth not manifest it self in truth and constancy. even so it goes now in the world, which goes astray, and is pregnant with such vices, for the constancy is but small, the love little, and truth as little. i hope you will take this philosophical example in good part, because _syrach_ doth both praise and dispraise the goodness, truth, and wickedness of a false woman, and both after a different manner; and herewith i bid _mars_ farewell, saying, that no man knows how to distinguish the sentence of one, much less of all things, but he who hath in this point taken notice of them, learned and experimented their nature and properties, and truly known and discovered them. god our heavenly father, the everlasting power, proceeding from all beginning, separate us so in the form, that the terrestrial corruptible body may again attain unto, contain, and receive the celestial, spiritual and incorruptible revelation. _amen._ m_aist thou not know me alone indeed,_ a_nd procure a pure help for me in need;_ r_esolve then, and hear what i do speak or say,_ s_o shalt thou find what i can do for aye._ chap. vi. _of the spirit of_ gold. the clearness of heaven hath now commanded me to govern my pen, to reveal a matter of valour and of permanency; for the sun is a burning and consuming fire, hot and dry, wherein is concealed the right and true virtue of all natural things; this virtue of the sun worketh understanding, riches, and health. my mind is very much grieved, and my spirit is terrified within it self to discover it publickly, which was not publish'd in common before, and to make it vocal, which was concealed in the deep with great secresie. but if i consider in my self, and enter into my conscience, i could find no alteration, nor catch at any thing to disturb my mind, or bring it to another resolution, which might cause many obstructions: yet will i speak with discretion, and write understanding, that no evil with may follow, but rather that i may gain a grateful profit, which i have pourtrayed after the manner and occasion, as the philosophers before me have done. mark now, give your mind perfect thoughts, refrain all strange matters, which are not serviceable to your speculation of philosophy, but rather cause a ruine of that benefit, which you pursued with so much diligence; and know if you have a hearty desire and strong affection to gain the golden magnet, that in the first place your prayer be truly directed to god, in true knowledge, sorrow, repentance, and true humility, to know and learn the three distinct worlds which are subject to humane reason; as, there is the super-celestial world, wherein the right immortal soul hath its seat and residence, together with its first coming, and is according to gods creation the first moveable sense, or the first moving sensible soul, which hath operated the natural life from a supernatural essence; this soul and spirit is at first the root and fountain, the first creature which arose to a life, and the first mover, whereof there hath been so much disputing among the learned. now take notice of the second celestial world, and observe it diligently, for therein the planets rule, and all the stars of heaven have their course, virtue and power in this heaven, performing that service therein whereunto they are by god ordained, and in this service they operate the minerals and metals by their spirit. go now out of these 2 distinct worlds into the third, wherein is contained and found what the other two have wrought, to wit, the super-celestial and the celestial worlds; out of the super-celestial arises the fountain of life, and of the soul; out of the other celestial world the light of the spirit; and out of the third or elementary world, the invincible celestial fire, which yet may be felt, out of which, that which is tangible is digested; these three matters and substances produce and generate the form of metals, among all which gold hath the pre-eminence, because the sidereal & elementary operation hath digested and ripened the _mercury_ in this metal the more perfectly to a sufficient ripeness. and even as the male-seed is injected into the womb, and touches the _menstruum_, which is its earth, but the seed which goes out of the male into the female, is operated in both by the sydereal and elementary, that they be united, and nourished by the earth unto the birth. even so understand it likewise, that the soul of metals which is formed and conceived out of the _chaos_ by an intangible, invisible, incomprehensible, concealed, and supernatural, celestial composition of water and air; afterwards it is further concocted by the celestial elementary light and fire of the sun; whereby the stars move the powers, when its heat is perceived in the inward parts of the earth, as in the womb, for the earth is opened by the warm operating property of the upper stars, that their infused spirit yield a nourishment unto the earth, that it may bring forth somewhat, as metals, herbs, trees and animals; where each one in particular brings its seed with it for its farther augmentation and encrease: and as hath been mentioned, even as man is begotten spiritually and heavenly, soul and spirit, and by the nourishment of the earth in the body of the mother is formally brought up to perfection; even so, and in like manner, is to be observed and understood of the metals and minerals in all points. but this is the true mystery of gold, which i will make good to you by an example and parable to certifie you, whereby the possibility of nature, and its mystery is to be found after this manner. it is evident, that the celestial light of the sun is of a fiery quality and essence, given unto it by a celestial, fixt and permanent sulphurous spirit, by the most high god, creator of heaven and earth, to preserve its substance, form, and body; which creature, by its swift motion and course, is enflamed and kindled by the air through that swiftness in a continued manifestation of it; this inflammation can never be extinct, nor decay in any of its power, so long as its course last, or this whole created visible world shall remain and continue, because there is no combustible matter at hand which is given unto it, by whose consumption this great light of heaven should fall to decay. even so gold is so digested, ripened, and made into such a fixt invincible nature by the superiours in its essence, that nothing can hurt it in the least, because the superiour stars have past through the inferiour, that the inferiour fix'd stars by the influence and donation of the superiour, cannot in the least give place to its like, for the inferiour have obtained such a fixedness and permanency from the superiour; this you may well retain, observe, and take notice of as concerning the first matter of gold. i must yet produce one comparison according to the philosophical custom, of the great light of heaven, and of that little terrestrial fire here daily kindled, and made to burn before our eyes; because that great light hath a magnetick simulation and an attractive living power with the small fire here on earth, but yet it is unformal and incomprehensible, only it is found to be spiritual, invisible, insensible and intangible. it is to be observed and remembred, as experience manifests, and is proved, that the great light of heaven bears an especial sympathy, affection and inclination to the little earthly fire, by means of the spiritual air, whereby they are both promoted and preserved from mortality; for behold, when the air receives into it a coruption, by too great humidity attracted up by it, that clouds are generated by mists, and farther coagulations, which hinder the sun-beams that they cannot have a reflection, nor get a right penetrating power. so likewise the small terrestrial fire doth not burn so lively in dusky, dark, rainy weather, nor manifests it self with joy in its operation, as it doth when there is a fair, pure, serene, unfalsified heavenly air; the reason is, because the sympathy is bound and hindered by the obstruction of those accidents and the waterish air, so that the attractive power is grieved, that it cannot accomplish its compleat love and operation as it should, for this hinderance brings the aquosity to the contrary element. now even as the sun, the great light of heaven, hath a peculiar community and sympathy with the small terrestrial fire to attract unto it, after a magnetical manner; so also the sun and gold have a peculiar understanding, and an attractive power and sympathy together; for the sun hath wrought the gold by the three principles, which have their magnets, being nearest related to the sun, and hath gained the next degree to it, for that the three principles are found to be most mighty and powerful therein, gold immediately succeeds it in its corporal form, being composed of the three principles, and hath its beginning and off-spring from the celestial and golden magnet. this is the supremest wisdom of this world, a wisdom above all wisdom, yea a wisdom above all natural reason and understanding; for by this wisdom is comprehended first of all gods creation, the heavenly essence, the firmamentary workings, the spiritual imagination, and the corporal essence, it contains all qualities, and properties, and all whatsoever sustaines and preserves mankind. in this golden magnet sticks and lies buried the resolution and opening of all metals and minerals, their domination, as also the first matter of their generation, their power over health; and again, the coagulation and fixation of metals, together with the operation of expelling all diseases: take notice of this key, for it is celestial, sydereal and elementary, out of which the terrestrial is generated, it is both supernatural and natural, and is generated celestially of the spirit of _mercury_, spiritually of the spirit of _sulphur_, and corporally of the spirit of _salt_; this is all the way, the whole essence, the beginning and end; for the spirit and the body are bound up together in one by the soul, that they can never be separated, but produce a very perfect, durable body, which nothing can hurt. out of this spiritual essence, and out of this spiritual matter, out of which first of all gold was made into a body, and became corporal, out of it is made a more true and compleat _aurum potabile_ than out of gold it self, which must first of all be made spiritual, before a potable gold can be prepared out of it. this spirit cures and heales the _leprosie_ and the _french pox_, as being an over-fix'd mercurial essence, dries up and consumes the _dropsie_, and all running and open sores, which have raged a long season, it strengthens the heart and brain, makes a good memory, generates good blood, brings lust, delight and desires in humane incitation unto natural affections. if the quintessence of pearl be mixt with the tincture of coral, and be administred with an addition of an equal quantity of this spiritual essence of gold, the dose of two grains taken at once in a just observation, you may be bold & confident of the truth, that no disaster of any natural distemper can harm you, or happen to you, to the prejudice of your health, because the nature resides only in the spirit of gold, to alter, remove and amend all weaknesses, so that the body shall be adjudged perfect and free from any disease. the quintessence of pearl corroborates the heart, and make a perfect memory, of the five senses. the tincture of coral expels all poison, and evil spirits which fly from the good. so can the soul of gold in a water turn the spiritual essence of the pearl, and the sulphur of the coral united in one, perform such a thing which otherwise nature could not be intrusted with, but seeing that experience hath manifested it, and confirmed the undeniable truth, therefore this cordial in this temporal life is, and ought in reason to precede all other cordials with admiration and admirable effects, be they called by what name soever. i am an ecclesiastical person, obedient to the ecclesiastical degree, related to the _benedictine_ order by a spiritual and divine oath, by which order with my internal prayer, i obtain comfort and promises of gods word, a refreshment to my soul, but in a corporal temptation of my weaknesses, and for my brethren i have not found and used a better corroboration by gods blessing, than these three compounds united: god give, bless, and increase this virtue and power unto the end of this temporal world, which man must change together with death. o thou golden power of thy soul! o thou golden intellect of thy spirit! o thou golden operation of thy body! god the creator keep thee, and grant unto all earthly creatures, who love and honour him, the true understanding of all gifts, that thy will may be done in heaven and on earth: this is enough revealed at present concerning the spirit of gold, until the coming again of _elias_. _hereunto i add a short process:_ take a spirit of salt, therewith extract the sulphur of gold, separate the oil of salt from it, rectifie the sulphur of gold with spirit of wine, that it be pleasant without corrosive; then take the true oil of _vitriol_, made of the _vitriol_ of _verdigreece_, therein dissolve _mars_, thereof make a _vitriol_ again, and again dissolve it into an oil or spirit, which rectifie in like manner as before with spirit of wine, conjoin them, and abstract the spirit of wine from it, resolve the matter which remaines dry in spirit of _mercury_, according to a just weight, circulate and coagulate it when it is fix'd and permanent without ascention, you have then a medicine to tinge man and metals, if it be fermented with prepared gold. chap. vii. _of the spirit of_ silver. [transcriber's note: original heading had gold with a handwritten correction to silver.] the tincture and spirit of silver manifests its colour of a watchet or sky-colour, otherwise it is a waterish spirit, cold and moist, not so hot in its degree as that which is found in _gold_, _mars_, and _venus_; for _luna_ is more phlegmatick than fiery, though it be brought by the fire out of its waterish substance into a coagulation; and even as the metals gain their tinging spirits and coagulation, in like manner do stones get their fixedness, and colour, as out of one influence. a fix'd coagulated _mercury_ is found in the _diamond_, therefore it is fixeder and harder than the other stones, and cannot be so broken; so the tincture of _mars_, or the sulphur of iron is found in the _ruby_, the sulphur of _venus_ in the _emerald_, the soul of _saturn_ in the _granate_; in tin the tincture which is found in the _topaz_; and _crystal_ is appropriated to common _mercury_; in the _saphire_ is found the sulphur and tincture of _luna_, but each one according to a peculiar understanding, and according to its kind, and in metals according to their form and gender; for when the blew colour is taken and extracted out of the _saphire_, its rayment is gone, and its other body is white as a _diamond_, wanting only the hardness that is in a _diamond_; even so when gold hath lost its soul, it yields a fix'd white gold body, which by searching students and young artists is called fix'd _luna_. wherefore you must now understand and observe, that even as i have declared unto you concerning the _saphire_, for your apprehension, even so on the other side, you must learn to what purpose my speech is intended, for your instruction concerning metals. for this blew spirit is the sulphur and the soul, whence the silver receiveth its life, both in and above the earth, by art, and the white tincture of the silver upon white stands in the magnetick form of an everlasting thing, or creature, wherein is likewise found the first _ens_ of gold. o ye high qualified orators! where is your voice in this case to explain this mystery? and you conceited naturalists, where is your writings and advice of reason? and you physicians, whither is your opinion flown, to fetch somewhat afar off over the seas for to cure the _dropsie_, and all _lunary_ distempers? you will say, that this my speech is too dark for you; is it so? then kindle the terrestrial light, seek, and be not ashamed to make acquaintance with _vulcan_; and let nothing be irksome unto you, so will you find by the assistance of the eternal god, that the spirit of _silver_ contains in it to cure and expel the _dropsie_ quite alone, as the spirit of _gold_, and as that of _mercury_ can expel the _consumption_ radically, or in the root, even so that the center of those diseases cannot be found any more. but that _luna_ in the veins of the earth is not furnished with such a hot substance or quality in its degree, but is subjected to a waterish nature; this fault lies upon that great light of heaven, which by reason of its waterish influence, hath implanted such qualities in the other creatures, and planets of the earth, than it hath in _silver_. and albeit that _silver_ contains a fix'd _mercury_, which is generated in it, yet it wants a hot, fix'd _sulphur_, truly to dry up and consume its phlegme, whereby it hath not obtained a compact body, unless it be done afterwards by the art of the little world. and seeing that its body is not compact by reason of the abounding watery substance, its pores therefore are not rightly defended, nor closed to undergo the weight and endure a battel with the enemies; all which virtues are to be found in _gold_, if it shall overcome all enemies, and endure all trials without defect. all things are difficult in the beginning, but when they are brought to an end they are easie to be understood and apprehended. if you do truly observe the spirit and the soul of _luna_, and learn to know it truly, you may quickly compass the midst of the work, how it shall afford the end with profit; wherefore i will now propose to you an example, and instruct you by a countrey-rule, that you may apprehend it, and consider of it, as childrens play, in a high and weighty matter, that you may search it out with advantage; as followeth: a common peasant casts forth (or sows) his seed in a field well dunged and prepared, this seed after putrefaction, sprouts forth of the earth by the operation and furtherance of the elements, and sets before our eyes the matter of flax together with its seed which it brings with it augmented; this flax is pluck'd up, and separated from its seed; but this flax cannot be used and prepared for any work profitably, except it be first putrefied and rotted in water, whereby the body is opened, and gains an ingress of its doing good; after this putrefaction and opening, it is again dried in the air and sun, and by this coagulation it is again brought into a formal being, that it may do future service. this prepared flax is afterwards buck'd, beaten, broken, peel'd, and last of all dress'd, that the pure may be separated from the impure, the clean from the filth, and the fine from the course; which otherwise could not be done at all, or brought to pass without the preceding preparation; this done, they spin yarn of it, which they boil in water over the fire, or else with ashes set in a warm place, whereby it is purified afresh, whereby the filth and superfluities are fully separated from it, and after a due washing the yarn is dried again, delivered to the workmen, and cloth weaved of it; this cloth is purified or whitened by a frequent casting of water upon it, cut in pieces by taylors, and other people, so converted to future services in houshold affairs, and when this linnen is quite worn out, and torn, the old rags are gathered together, and sent to the paper-mills, whereof they make paper, which is put unto divers uses. if you lay paper upon a metal or glass, kindle and burn it, the vegetable _mercury_ comes forth and flies away into the air, the salt remaines in the ashes and the combustible _sulphur_ which is not so quickly consumed in the burning, dissolves to an oil, which is a good medicine for dim and defective eyes. this oil hath in it a great fatness, which is the matter of the paper, contained originally in the seed of the flax; so that the last matter of the flax which is paper, must again be dissolved into the first matter, which is the fat sulphurous oyliness of the flax-seed, together with the separation of its _mercury_ and _salt_, that so the first may be made of the last, and the ground-work revealed, so the virtues and operations known by the first. and though this discourse be gross and not subtil, yet you may learn thereby to know what is subtile and secret; for that which is subtile must be infused into the ignorant by course examples, that thereby they may be taught to reject the gross, and to embrace that which is subtile. in like manner understand, that the first matter of metals must be observed, known, and found out by the revelation of their last matter, which last matter, as there are the perfect metals, must be separated and divided asunder, that it may plainly appear singly before the eyes of men. out of which separation may be judged and learnt what the first matter was at the beginning, out of which the last was made. accept of this advice concerning _luna_ at present. i could have said more, but i must desist at this time until another opportunity; and intreat you heartily, admonishing you by your conscience, that you observe all that which i have revealed unto you, of all those letters which are contained in the middle between _alpha_ & _omega_, & that you keep all the speeches & writings, that you may not undergo a denial of pardon for your sins, & a continued perpetual vengeance for eternity; which i at last reveal unto you thus: take the sky-coloured sulphur extracted out of _silver_, rectified with spirit of wine, dissolve it according to its quantity in the white spirit of _vitriol_, and in the sweet-sented spirit of _mercury_, coagulate them together by the fixation of the fire, you have the white tincture in your hands with all its medicines; but if you can get all their _primum mobile's_, it is then needless, because you can perfect the work at once. chap. viii. _of the soul or tincture of_ tin. good _jupiter_ possesses almost the mean or middle place between metals, it being not too hot, nor too cold, not too warm, nor too moist, it hath no excess of _mercury_, nor of salt, and it hath the least of sulphur in it; it is found to be white in colour, yet one exceeds the other in the three principles, as it is evidently found in its dissection, the right and true discovery of nature. it is generated of such a composition and mixture of the three first principles, being operated, coagulated into a metal, and brought to the ripeness of perfection. _jupiter_ is a god of peace, a lord of goodness, a ruler and possessor of the middle region; as concerning its state, essence, function, virtue, form and substance; for it holds the mean; no special disease can happen, that _jupiter_ should cause any remarkable damage, if its medicine be used a little at once, not too much in quantity; it is likewise thought needless, where its medicines are not required, that they should be administred in strange cases with a just call, but we should rather abide by those, where the body and its disease have an equal temper with the superiour stars and their assistance, in vertue, power, and operation, and so accord together in their juncture, that there is not found the least contrariety in the operation, nor in the operative nature. _jupiters_ spirit is found not to be wanting in the least, in the generation of metals, as likewise no one spirit of all the metals can be set backwards, because of necessity they accord together from the lowest to the highest degree, and must agree together, as a metal is perfect in the great earth, so should the transmutation & augmentation succeed in the little world; understand it after this manner, that all the degrees from the meanest to the highest metal must be passed through in all perfection, even as the metals must finish their course, from _saturn_ unto _gold_, as concerning the permanency of colour and body, notwithstanding that _saturn_ possesses the highest place in the highest region, wherein the stars reign and perform their course. the generation of tin in and above the earth, is brought to light even as man is and other animals, which are originally nourished and fed by the mothers milk; there is no diet to be found on earth more fit for the nourishment of all men than milk; for its best part is chiefly an animal _sulphur_, which yields the nourishment. even in like manner _tin_ is nourished by its metallick _sulphur_, which likewise feeds it with the greatest acceptation, it assumes in and to it more heat than _saturn_, therefore is _jupiter_ more digested & broiled, whereby its body likewise is more fixt and permanent in the degree of salt. he causes in his dominion and reign, that good rule be observed, and justice done to all men in his court. the spirit of tin is a preserver from all distempers & accidents whereby the liver is consumed or put into malady; its spirit is naturally to be compared unto honey in taste, its _mercury_ being made volatile, gains a venomous quality; for it purges violently, and penetrates through by force, therefore it is not alwayes to be advised, that its opened _mercury_ should be used alone and simply, but if a correction precede, there may an excellent benefit succeed, being used in those distempers and diseases, which are immediately subject to its influence, that is, when its venomous volatility is taken away, and set in a better and fixeder state, which resists the poison. the vulgar physician cannot understand this description; for this art and knowledge proceeds not from the bare talking, but from experience; the common physician hath the foundation and egress in speaking, but our preparation hath its rise from speaking, and then its foundation first of all out of a certain trial, which manifests it by experience, and this is firmed upon hard rocks by manual operations, but the other stands upon moving reeds & sand; wherefore in reason that which is strong and immoveable, made by natures hand, ought to be prefer'd before bare speeches, which proceed only from an inconstant phantastical speculation, because the work alwayes will praise the master. at present i do not indeed speak according to my own poetical manner, nor after such a way as i directed my stile, when i treated of the wonderful generation of the seven planets in my occult philosophy, nor after a magical or cabalistical manner and custom; much less do i observe the method which teaches, and diligently marks the mystical, secret and supernatural arts, to wit, of _hydromancy_, _ã�romancy_, _geomancy_, _pyromancy_, _nigromancy_, and the like: but my present purpose and intent is directed to reveal natures secrets, that all the lovers of art, and the children which seek and desire wisdom, may by gods grace, blessing, and permission, easily understand, observe, mark, and likewise after diligent observation learn, & retain something that is beneficial; this concerns the generation of metals in two parts, in the great and in the little world, as likewise what is the true medicine contained in the inward part of those metallick and mineral forms, which must be apprehended and made moveable by their dissection that their first beginning may be made notoriously visible in three distinct things; then is nature stript, and her secret parts discovered by laying off her temporal cloathing, and all the secret virtues, powers, and, operations revealed for mans health. my persecutors, and, indiscreet physicians will now tell me, thou talkest much of geese, and knowest not a duck; who knows whether all what thou writest be true? i will stick where i am, and remain by what i have tried, and bears the sway among all my associates and physitians; so shall i not be deceived, and am assured that i shall not need to take paines to learn any new matter. he that is of such a resolution, may remain with the ducks; for he is not worthy of a roasted goose, nor to learn what is concealed in nature. but this in truth i acknowledge, and confess it before the supreme trinity, speaking it to the hazzard of that most noble ecclesiastical jewel, that all what i have wrote, and yet shall write in this point, is all true, and shall be found to be no otherwise in truth: but that every ignorant, or vulgar person, which are haters and persecutors of this mystery, do not well, fully, and clearly understand my writings at first; alas! that cannot i help; pray unto god for his grace, and ye persecutors for pardon, labour without repining, read with understanding, then will no mystery be withheld from you, but will be very easie for you to find out. i moreover admonish, that the finder of this gift of god, above all things give thanks unto god day and night without ceasing, with all reverence and due obedience, from the bottom of his heart; because no creature can yield sufficient praise which may recompense so great a benefit; but diligence is known by a right and true industry according to our capacity. i have done my part, which i hope to justifie before god and the world; for what my eyes have seen, my hands felt, and apprehended by an undeceived judgment, that shall no man take from me in this life; only death, which is the determiner of all things. this my speech hath indeed had no force to poure forth from it what is written by me herein; but what i have done is not out of curiosity, nor out of a desire of vain and transitory glory; but i have been induced thereunto by the command of christ the lord, that his glory and goodness in eternal and temporal matters, should not be concealed from any man, but to the praise, honour, and glory of his holy everlasting name, that it might be exalted, acknowledged, and revealed in his majesty by reason of his highness and almightiness, through the confirmation of his wonderful deeds! and secondly, i have been led thereunto by love and charity towards my neighbour, for his good as for my own, and to heap burning coals on my enemies heads. and last of all, that all opposers may know, what erroneous waies others have gone against me, and whether i am most of all to be condemned, or they adjudged most just in what hath been written most truly of the concealments of nature; & likewise that the supremest mystery may not quite be suffocated in darkness, nor be drowned in overflowing waters, but be delivered out of the deep and filthy mire of the ideotish crew by the right appearance of the true light, and obtain many witnesses by the spreading abroad of a sure, true, and right confession, who may follow me in the writings of truth. in my nativity of the twelve signes in the zodiack, _sagitary_ and _pisces_ were allotted unto me; i was born under _pisces_, for i was in waterishness before my life, but _sagitary_ set an arrow to my heart, whereby i lost my waterishness, and by the heat i became worthy of the dry earth; and although at the first the earth was turned by the water into a soft substance, yet you must understand that the water was consumed by the heat of the drying air, so that all the soft matter of the earth went away, and by this drying up was dignified with a hardness; whereby thou learner, and much understander should carefully observe and take good notice, that tin is subject to all the four elements, as also to the other principal planets; which elements received their center from above, and are generated as others. to conclude, i let you know, and give you to understand, that if thou extract out of benevolent _jupiter_ its salt and sulphur, and lettest _saturn_ flux well with it, _saturn_ assumes a fixt body unto it, purges it self, and becomes clear thereby, there being a full change and real transmutation of lead into good tin, which may be found to the height by a durable infallible proof. and though you may think this to be false, yet you must take notice, that seeing the salt of _jupiter_ only by its sulphur is made more corporal, yet likewise it hath obtained an efficacy and power to penetrate _saturn_, the basest and most volatile metal, and bring it to a melioration of its equals, as you will find it in reality. chap. ix. _of the spirit of_ saturn, _or tincture of_ lead. _saturn_ to generate his metal lead, is placed in the upper heaven above all stars, but he possesses the lowest and vilest degree in the under-parts of the earth, even as the supreme light of _saturn_ is mounted aloft in the highest supremacy of all the celestial planets, so hath its children of the lower region succeeded it in kind; and nature hath permitted that _vulcan_ should conduct them to their like, if _saturn_ be content; for the upper light gives occasion thereunto, having generated an unfixt body of _saturn_, penetrated with open pores, that the air can pass through this _saturnine_ body, that the air can keep it aloft, but the fire can quickly assault it, because the body is not compact by reason of its unfixedness, so that it must decay, which must be in all points observed by him that will attain to the search of it; for there is a great difference between the fix'd and unfix'd bodies, and of the causes of their constancy and inconstancy. and though _saturn_ hath an especial ponderosity above other metals, yet observe, when they are poured forth together, after their union in the flux, the other metals alwaies settle at the bottom, even as it likewise comes to pass in the pouring of _antimony_ through with other metals, whereby it is evident, that the other metals fall through equally, and are more compact than _saturn_, for it must give place and preheminence to the other metals, leaving the victory with them; for it must vanish and be quite consumed with the unfixt inconstant metals; in it all the three properties of the three principles are most course; and because its salt is very fluxible above that of other metals and planets, so is its body more fluxible, inconstant, unfixt, and volatile, than any other metallick body. as _saturn_ steps to its regeneration, so know that in like manner, as common water is forced by the natural coldness, by the change of the heavens, whereby it becomes a coagulated ice, in like manner is it to be made evident, that by reason of the great coldness which is found to be in the salt of _saturn_ above other salts; _saturn_ is also coagulated and made corporal; ice dissolves into water by heat; so likewise the coagulated _saturn_ is made fluxible by fire, it hath most of _mercury_ in it, but it is inconstant and volatile; it hath least of sulphur, and therefore according to its small quantity its cold body cannot be made warm; it hath little salt, but fluxible, otherwise iron would be more fluxible and malleable than lead, if the salt alone could cause a malleableness and fluxibleness, because iron contains more salt than any other metal: seeing then there is a difference to be found in this point, you must therefore observe and remember the difference, and how to distinguish between metals. all philosophers have wrote as well as i, that the salt gives the coagulation and body to every metal; and it is true; but to prove it by an example, how and after what manner this relation is to be understood: plume allom is esteemed to be only a meer salt, and is approved to be such, which in this particular may be compared to iron, that the salt of the plume allom is found to be a thing unfluxible as iron is. on the other side, _vitriol_ likewise is a salt, manifesting it self in a small quantity, but fluxible and open, therefore its salt cannot yield such a hard congelation unto its appropriated metal, as the other can; although all the salts of metals grew out of one certain root, and out of one seed, yet nevertheless you must observe a difference in their three principles, as also you must observe & remember, that a difference is found in one herb from the other, and likewise how man differs from other creatures and animals in qualities, original, and the three principles; for one herb is indued with more of this, another with more of that kind, which in like manner is to be understood concerning man and other animals. the soul of lead consists in a sweet quality, as also doth the soul of tin, and sweeter yet, that nothing almost may be compared to it, being first of all purified to the highest by separation, that the pure be well separated from the impure, that a perfect accomplishment may succeed in the operation: otherwise the spirit of lead is by nature cold and dry, wherefore i advise, that it be not much used by men and women, because it over cools nature, so that the seed of both cannot perform their natural function; nor doth it much good to the spleen and bladder, but in other cases it attracts flegmatick humours unto it, which raise up much melancholy in men; for _saturn_ is a ruler, and such a _melancholicus_, whereby a man is confirm'd in his melancholy, wherefore its spirit is used, for one melancholy spirit attracts another unto it, whereby mans body is freed and delivered from its infused melancholy. externally the soul of _saturn_ is so healing, in all sores old or new, cuts, thrusts, or accidents by means or nature, so that no metal can do the like; it is cooling in all hot, tumified members; but noble _venus_ hath the pre-eminence to mundifie and cauterize all putrid sores, and to lay a ground for their cure, which have their access from within; for in her essence she is hot to dry up, but _saturn_ on the contrary is found to be cold in his essence. the celestial light of the sun is much hotter than the light of the moon; for the moon is much lesser than the sun, and according to its dimension and division it contains an eighth part of the greatness in its circle; if then the moon in this her magnitude of the eighth part could excel the sun, as the sun excels the moon, all fruits and productions of the earth must perish, and there would be a perpetual winter, no summer to be found at any time: but the eternal creator hath in this case well ordained a certain order and law for his creatures, that the sun should give light by day, and the moon by night, and so all creatures should be served. those children which are subject to the influence of _saturn_, are melancholy, churlish, continually murmuring, as old covetous people, who do no good to their own bodies, and yet never have enough; they put their bodies to much labour, torment themselves with thoughts and whimsies, seldom recreate themselves, or are merry with other people, nor do they greatly regard the natural love of fair women. in brief, i tell thee that _saturn_ is generated of little sulphur, little salt, and much unripe gross _mercury_, which _mercury_ is to be esteemed as a froth that floates upon the water, in comparison of that _mercury_ which is found in _sol_; and is much more hot in its degree, and therefore the _mercury_ of _saturn_ by reason of its great coldness, hath not so quick a running life as that which is made of gold, wherein more heat is to be found, whence that running life hath its original: therefore in the inferiour world we must take notice of little _vulcan_ in the augmentation and transmutation of metals, as i have described those three principles of _saturn_, as concerning their descent, nature, and complection. and every one must know, that no transmutation of any metal can follow out of _saturn_, by reason of its great coldness, only and except to coagulate common _mercury_; for the cold sulphur of lead can qualifie and take away the hot running spirit of the quicksilver, if the process be rightly ordered, wherefore it is not amiss to observe, that _mercury_ is so detained, that the theory should agree with the practick, and meet together in a certain measure and concordance. you must not therefore quite reject _saturn_, nor in all points scornfully neglect him, because its natures and virtues are known yet but unto few; for the stone of the wise hath the first beginning of its celestial, high-shining colour only out of this metal, and from the influence of this planet, the key of constancy is delivered unto him by putrefaction, because the red cannot be made out of the yellow, except before-hand a white be made out of the beginning of the black. i could yet treat variously, and at large of many wonderful works of natural and supernatural things. but because other labours prevent me therein, of making a longer narration, i therefore put a conclusion to this treatise at present, referring the other concerning the concealed secrets of minerals until i have a purpose to write further, in a particular treatise of _antimony_, _vitriol_, _brimstone_, _magnet_, and which in especial are endowed before others, and depend upon those, out of which gold and silver have their beginning, middle and end, together with the true transmutation particularly; which virtues and power they have received out of one thing, wherein all these lie to be generated invisibly concealed, together with all metals; which matter is publick before the eyes of all men, but because the vertues and powers are very deeply buried and unknown to the most part, therefore this matter is likewise esteemed as nothing, or of no value, and unprofitable, out of ignorance; even as the disciples of the lord going to _emaus_, their eyes were opened at the breaking of bread, that they knew wonder above wonder, what the rich creator hath placed in the vile creature, the name is _hermes_, who carries a flying serpent in his shield, having a wife whose name is _aphrodita_, who can know the hearts of all men, and yet all is one, and one only thing, one only essence, which is common in all places, and known every where, every one grasps it with his hands, and uses it in vile matters, and of small value; he values the vile at a high rate, and that which is high he casts away; it is nothing else but water and fire, out of which the earth is generated by the help of the air, and is yet preserved. praise be to the most high for his gifts: at present enough is revealed what my intent was to shew in this treatise, and so i depart hence; for in separation all is to be found. _of the medicine or tincture of_ antimony_, as well to preserve mans body in health, and to divert all desperate, and incurable diseases, as also to cure the leprosie of metals, to purifie and to transmute them into the best gold._ _written by that noble and learned philosopher_, roger bacon. _stibium_ or _antimony_, as the philosophers say, is composed of a noble mineral sulphur, which they accounted to be the black secret lead of the wise. the _arabians_ call it _asmat_ or _azmat_; the alchymists retain the name _antimony_. _addition._ the _moors_ call it _antimony_, others call it _alabaster_, or _tarbason_. by the _arabians_ and _spaniards_ it is called _alcohol_. _avicennã¦_ c. 7. calls it _artemed_. _alexius_ of _piedmont_, in his seventh book of secrets, calls it _talck_, even as _john jacob wecker_ renders it in his books of secrets; but _talck_ is far different from _antimony_. _pliny_, book 33. chap. 6. of _antimony_. _dioscorides_ gives a preparation of _antimony_, book 5. chap. 39. they call it also _stibi_, _stimmi_, _&c._ the _germans_ call it _spies glass_, or as _george fabricius_ would rather have it, _spies glantz_. _gerlandius_ calls it black _alcophil_, _altofel_, or _alirnu_, others _cosmet_, and it is twofold, masculine and feminine. it will lead us to the consideration of higher mysteries, if we behold and discern that nature wherein gold is exalted, even as the _magi_ have found that this mineral is by god ordained under the constellation of _aries_, which is the first celestial sign, wherein the sun takes its exaltation, though this be not regarded by the vulgar; yet discreet people will know, and the better observe, that even in this place also the mysteries and perpetuity may in part be considered with great benefit, and in part discovered. but some ignorant and indiscreet people think, that when they had _antimony_, they would deal well enough with it by calcination, others by sublimation, and some by reverberation, thereby to obtain its great mystery and perfect medicine. but i tell you, that here in this place it availes not in the least, either calcination, sublimation, or reverberation, whereby afterwards a perfect extraction can or might be done or effected with profit, to transmute the meaner into a better metallick virtue; for it is impossible for you. be not deluded; some of the philosophers which have wrote of such things, as _geber_, _albertus magnus_, _rasis_, _rupecissa_, _aristotle_, and many others: but observe this: some say, that if _antimony_ be made to a _vitrum_ or glass, the bad volatile sulphur is gone, and the oil which may be prepared out of that glass, will be a very fixt oil, and will really give an ingress and medicine of perfection to the imperfect metals. these words and opinion are good and true, but it will not be nor appear such indeed; for i tell you truly, without concealed speeches, that if you lose any of the aforesaid _sulphur_ in the preparation or burning, for a small fire may easily prejudice it, you then have lost the true penetrating spirit, which should make the whole body of _antimony_ to a perfect red oyl, which should also ascend over the helm with a delightful sent, and curious colours; observe likewise, that the whole body of this mineral, with all its members, should be but one oyl, and ascend over the helm without any loss of weight, excepting the _feces_. how should the body be brought to an oil, or yield its pleasant oil, if it be brought to the last being of its degree, for glass is in all things the utmost and last. you shall likewise know that you shall not obtain that perfect noble oil in the least, if it be extracted with corrected vinegar poured upon the _antimony_, nor yet by reverberation; and although its various colours may appear, yet is it not the right way; you may indeed get an oil, but you must know that it hath no part of the tincture, or power of transmutation in it. _now we come to the manual operation._ take in the name of god, and of the eternal trinity, fine and very pure mineral _antimony_, which is fair, white, massie, and inwardly full of yellow streaks or veins, and likewise of red and blew colours, and small veins, this is the best; pound it to fine powder, dissolve it by little and little in _aqua regis_, that the water may conquer it. after solution take it out immediately that the _aqua regis_ may do it no prejudice; for it will quickly dissolve the tincture of the _antimony_; for our water in its nature is like to the _ostrich_, which by his heat can digest iron, and consume it to nothing; for the water will consume it, and turn it to a mud, that it shall remain only as a yellow earth, and then is it quite spoiled. take an example hereof from silver, which is dissolved, fair, pure and fine in these our waters, but if it stand a night therein while the water is strong and full of spirits, i tell you, your good silver will be corroded to nothing in these our waters; and though you would reduce it into a massie body, you cannot; for it will remain as a pale yellow earth, and sometimes it will run together in the form of horn, or of a white horse hoof, which you can by no art reduce into a body. wherefore you must remember to take the _antimony_ out presently after the solution, precipitate and adulterate it according to the custom of _alchymists_, that it may not be corroded with its perfect oil by the water, and burnt up to nothing. _the water wherein we dissolve is thus made._ r. _vitriol_, a pound and a half, _salt-armoniac_ one pound, _azinat_ one pound, _salt-nitre_ a pound and a half, _salt-gemme_ one pound, _allom_ half a pound; these are the ingredients which belong unto the making of the water for the solution of _antimony_. take and mix them well together; at first distil very slowly, for the spirits ascend with greater violence than those of any other common _aqua fortis_; beware of its spirits; for their fumes are very subtile and hurtful in their penetration. when you have adulterated the _antimony_ well and purely from the corrosive water, then put it into a clean vial, poure good distilled vinegar upon it, set it forty dayes and nights to putrefie in horse-dung, or in _balneum mariã¦_, it will be bloud-red. take it out, and see how much is yet to be dissolved, decant off gently the pure and clear, which is red into a glass-gourd, poure other vinegar upon the _fã¦ces_ as before, that if any thing should yet remain therein, it might be dissolved; this must be done four times in fourty days and nights; for if any good be in the _fã¦ces_, it will be dissolved in that time, then cast the dregs away as unprofitable, being but dirt, and to be cast to the dunghill. put all the solutions in a glass-gourd into _balneum mariã¦_, distil all the tart vinegar from it, pour it on again, or else pour fresh, if this be too weak, it will quickly dissolve in the vinegar; distil it again from it, that the matter be quite dry; then take common distilled water, wash all tartness from it with the vinegar imparted to the matter, then dry the matter in the sun, which is of a very deep red, or else dry it very well at a gentle fire. when the philosophers find our _antimony_ thus secretly prepared, they say then that its external nature and virtue is inverted internally, and the internal cast forth externally, henceforth becoming an oil, which is concealed in its innermost and profoundest part, till it be well prepared, and cannot any more be brought into its first essence, untill the last judgment; and it is true, for so soon as it feels the force of the fire, it flies away in a vapour with all its parts, because it is volatile. some of the common laborators, having thus prepared _antimony_, they take one part out because of its consumption, that they may the better operate it, they mix with it one part of _salt-armoniac_, one part of the _vitrum_ (with others _titrum_) one part of the _rebooth_ (with others _cadoli_) wherewith the bodies are cleansed; this mixture they cast upon a pure _luna_, and if there were eight ounces of the _luna_, they found ten drams of good gold in the separation, and sometimes more; and by this work they gained wherewithal to bear their charges, the better to attend upon, and attain unto the great work. the ignorant called this an induction into the silver, but that is false; for this gold is not brought into it by the spirits, but every kind of silver hath one ounce of gold more or less in the mark (or 8 ounces) for gold is so united with the nature of silver, that it cannot be separated from it, either by _aqua fort_, or common _antimony_, as the _gold-smiths_ know. but when the aforesaid composition is cast upon the _luna_ in the flux, then happens such a separation, that the _luna_ doth freely let go the gold implanted therein into the _aqua fort_, and is separated from it, letting it precipitate and sink to the bottom, which otherwise could not be done at all. therefore it is not an induction into the _luna_, but a bringing out of it. but we return again to our proposed work; for we would have only the oil, which was only known to the wise, and not to the ignorant. when you have rubified the _antimony_ very well according to the former directions, you must have in readiness a spirit of wine well rectified, pour it over the red powder of _antimony_, set it four daies and nights in a gentle _balneum mariã¦_, that it may dissolve very well. and if then any of it remain undissolved, pour fresh spirit of wine upon it, set it again into the bath as aforesaid, all will be well dissolved; and if perhaps any more _fã¦ces_ remain, they will be very few, cast them away, for they are good for nothing. put the solution into a glass-gourd, with a head luted upon it, set it into _balneum mariã¦_, with its receiver to take the spirits, distil slowly with a slack heat, till all the spirit of wine be come over, pour it in again upon the dry matter, draw it off again as before; this pouring in & abstracting continue so often, till you see the spirit of wine ascend over the helm in various colours, then it is time that you follow it with a strong fire, then with the spirit of wine ascend red into the helm, and drop into the receiver like a bloody oil, and the tender body ascends like a red oil, dropping into the receiver; truly this is the most secret way of the wise, the so much applauded oil of _antimony_; it is a noble, well sented, virtuous, and powerful oil, as you shall hear afterwards. but here i will teach and instruct you poor operators another way, because you have not the means to attend the great work, not as the ancients did, with the separation of gold out of silver. wherefore take one part of the oil, or half an ounce of _saturn_, four ounces calcined according to art, pour the oil upon the _calx_ of _saturn_, mixing it, set it ten daies and nights in the heat, into the secret furnace; every two days augment the fire one degree, according to the capacity of the furnace; after four days and nights set it into the third degree of fire, therein let it rest three days and nights, then open the door or vent of the fourth degree, which must likewise continue three days and nights; afterwards take it out, the _saturn_ will be above black, like unto charcole dust, but under this black dust you will find other colours, throughout pure, red, yellow, which flux with _venetian borax_, you will find it converted into good gold by the power of our oil, so have you means again to set forward the great work. we return again to our purpose, where we left off before. you have heard, and have been instructed how to abstract the spirit of wine with the oil over the helm into the receiver, and to use it for the work to convert _saturn_ into gold. but we will now hasten to the other work of the tincture, and give advice concerning it. it will therefore be necessary to separate the spirit of wine again from the oil, which do as followeth; take the mixture of the spirit of wine, and of the oil, set it into _balneum mariã¦_; distil the spirit of wine only from the oil with a very slack heat, so that you may be assured that there is no more of the spirit to be found in this most precious oil, which you may easily try; when you see some of the drops ascend over with the spirit of wine, it is a sign that the spirit of wine is separated from the oil, then remove all the fire from under the bath, how little soever it be, that it may cool the sooner. take away the receiver with the spirit of wine, stop it very close, for it is full of spirits which it hath retained from the oil, as you will hear afterwards: but in _balneum mariã¦_ you will find that blessed oil of _antimony_ red as bloud; take it out, wash the lute off by gentle mollification, that nothing impure may fall into that curious red oil, when you take the head off; reserve it carefully, that by no means it may receive prejudice, for you have a celestial oil, which in a dark night shines like a glowing cole, and this is the reason, because its internal power and soul is cast forth externally, the hidden soul being now revealed, shining through the pure body as a candle through a lanthorn, even so at the last day, these our invisible internal souls shall be revealed, and seen out of the body, shining as the clear sun: so keep each apart, as well the spirit of wine full of power, and wonderful in curing humane distempers, as also the blessed, red, noble, celestial oil, which transmutes all the diseases of the imperfect metals into the perfection of gold; and the power of the spiritual wine extends very far being rightly used. i tell you, you have obtained a celestial medicine, to cure all the diseases and distempers of mans body; its use is, as followeth; _in the gout._ give three drops in a cup of wine fasting to the party, just at the time when he feels the beginning of his misery, anguish and pain to come upon him, the second and third, use it in like manner; it allaies all pain the first day how great soever it be, and prevents swelling; the second day it causes sweat, which is very nasty, tough and thick, very soure in taste, and of an evil sent, and most of all in those parts where the members are united and joined together by the joints; and if you should give none in the third day, yet will there be a purgation of the veins, and of the excrements, without any molestation or pain; is not this a great power of nature? _in the leprosie._ at the first time take six drops fasting, and cause the impure party to be alone, free from sound people, in a place far distant, and commodious; for all his body will begin to send forth fumes and steams, like unto a stinking fog, and vapours abundantly; the next will scales and much uncleanness fall from his body; then let him have three drops of this medicine, and let him take it in on the fourth day, afterwards on the eighth or ninth day by the assistance of gods grace and blessing, he will be quite clean. _in the apoplexie._ let one drop fall upon the tongue of the patient, it will attract it forth immediately like unto a mist or fume, and restore the party again; but if he were taken in the body, or in the members and limbs, then give him three drops at once in good wine, as you have been taught in the gout. _in the dropsie._ give one drop in baulm water, or valerian water six days together, the seventh day give three drops in good wine, and it is sufficient. _in the falling sickness, and its kinds, as epilepsie, catalepsie, and analepsie._ in the beginning of the fit give the patient two drops in sage-water, after three hours, give him three drops more, and it is sufficient. but if in case any thing should stir again, give him two drops, as hath been said. _in a hectick._ give the party two drops the first day in water of violets, the second day two drops more in good wine. _in agues._ give the party three drops in the beginning of the fit, early in a morning, in good distilled water of st. _john_'s wort, or of succory, and the next day two drops more fasting. _in the plague._ give the patient seven drops in good wine, let the infected party be alone, and let him sweat well upon it, by the divine assistance that poison will not prejudice him as to his life. _for a prolongation of a healthful life._ take and give two drops at the beginning and entrance of the spring, and in the beginning or entrance of autumn likewise two drops; every one that so takes it, is freed, and well preserved from unhealthful and infectious air, except the disease were by almighty god ordained for the death of the party. we will now step further to the oil, and its power, and shew how by it the diseases of the impure bodies of the metals may be cured. in the name of god, take very pure, fine, refined gold, as much as you will, or think to be sufficient, dissolve it in a rectified wine, as is usual to make _aqua vitã¦_; after solution of the gold, set it a moneth in digestion; this distil in a bath very slow and gently, distil the spirit of wine divers times from it, so long till you see your gold lie at the bottom like a juice: this is the true way and meaning of some of the ancients, to prepare gold. but i will shew and teach you a way much readier, better, and more beneficial; that in stead of this prepared gold, you take one part of the _mercury_ of gold, as i have taught the making of it in another place; abstract from it its water of airiness, that it may be a subtle dust, and take two parts of our blessed oil, poure the oil very slowly upon the dust of the _mercury_ of gold, till all be in it, set it in a vial well sealed, in the heat of the first degree of the secret furnace; therein let it stand ten dayes and nights, your powder and oil will be quite dry, of a black gray colour. after ten days give it the heat of the second degree, the gray and black colour will by little and little become white, till at last it will be of a heavenly white, and at the end of the ten days it will begin to be of a pure red, but let not this trouble you; for all these colours proceed only from the _mercury_ of gold, which swallowed up our blessed oil, and now conceals in the innermost part of its body; but our oil will conquer this _mercury_ of gold by the power of the fire, and cast it forth from within, and the oil will predominate over it with its hot red colour, and be continually outwards. and therefore it will be time, after the expiration of twenty days, that you open the window of the third degree, wherein the external white colour and power will by little and little enter in into the inward part, and the internal red colour will turn outward by the force of the fire. keep this degree of heat ten days without diminution or augmentation of it, you will see a powder which before was white, to be now very red, but let not redness trouble you, for 'tis yet unfix'd and volatile. and after these ten days are ended, thirty days being in all expired, then open the last window of the last degree of fire, keep it ten days in this degree, this high red pouder will then begin to flux, let it stand so in flux the ten days, then take it out, you will find at the bottom a very high, red, transparent stone of a ruby colour, flux'd according to the form of the glass, as is taught in the treatise of _vitriol_, wherewith you may make projection. praise god for such his high revelation, and thank him for ever, _amen_. _its multiplication._ the ancient wise, having found the stone, and prepared it to a perfect power, and mutation of the imperfect metals into gold, have a long time enquired whether a thing were not to be found to augment the power of the stone; and they found two kinds of augmentation, one of the power of it, so that the stone may be brought much higher; of this multiplication you will find direction in the treatise of gold. the other augmentation is an augmentation of the quantity of the stone, in its former power, so that it receives no more, nor loses any thing of its power, though it increase in weight, and augment more and more, that out of one ounce many ounces arise and increase. the augmentation or multiplication is done as followeth; take your stone in gods name, grind it to a subtile powder, add to it as much of the _mercury_ of gold, as is taught before, put them together into a fine round vial, seal it hermetically, set it into the fiery furnace, proceeding as you have been instructed before, only this time is shorter, for whereas before you had ten (thirty) days, now you need no more than four (ten) days, otherwise the work is one and the same. praise and give thanks to almighty god for his high revelation, continue in prayer for his grace and divine blessing in this art and operation, as likewise for continuance of health and prosperity; withal let the poor be recommended to your help and charity. * * * * * _glory be to almighty god._ _a work of_ saturn, _of mr._ john isaac holland. the preface. courteous reader, _the_ philosophers _have written much of their lead which is prepared out of_ antimony, _as_ basilius _hath taught; and i am of the opinion, that this saturnine work of the most_ _excellent philosopher m._ john isaac holland _is not to be understood of common lead_, (_if the matter of the stone be not much more thereby intended_) _but of the_ philosophers _lead. but whether the vulgar_ saturn _be the matter of the philosophers stone, thereof you will receive sufficient satisfaction from the subsequent 17 considerations or documents. this is published for the benefit of all the lovers of this art, because it expounds and declares the stone of fire._ vale. _a work of_ saturn _in the name of the lord_, amen. my child shall know, that the stone called the _philosophers stone_, comes out of _saturn_. and therefore when it is perfected, it makes projection, as well in mans body from all diseases, which may assault them either within or without, be they what they will, or called by what name soever, as also in the imperfect metals. and know, my child, for a truth, that in the whole vegetable work there is no higher nor greater secret than in _saturn_; for we do not find that perfection in gold which is in _saturn_; for internally it is good gold, herein all philosophers agree, and it wants nothing else, but that first you remove what is superfluous in it, that is, its impurity, and make it clean, and then that you turn its inside outwards, which is its redness, then will it be good gold; for gold cannot be made so easily, as you can of _saturn_, for _saturn_ is easily dissolved and congealed, and its _mercury_ may be easily extracted, and this _mercury_ which is extracted from _saturn_, being purified and sublimed, as _mercury_ is usually sublimed, i tell thee, my child, that the same _mercury_ is as good as the _mercury_ which is extracted out of gold, in all operations; for if _saturn_ be gold internally, as in truth it is, then must its _mercury_ be as good as the _mercury_ of gold, therefore i tell you, that _saturn_ is better in our work than gold; for if you should extract the _mercury_ out of gold, it would require a years space to open the body of gold, before you can extract the _mercury_ out of the gold, and you may extract the _mercury_ out of _saturn_ in 14 days, both being alike good. would you make a work out of gold alone, you must labour two whole years upon it, if it shall be well done: and you may finish a work of _saturn_ in 30 or 32 weeks at the most. and being both well made, they are both alike good; _saturn_ costs nothing or very little, it requires a short time, and small labour; this i tell you in truth. my child, lock this up in thy heart and understanding, this [symbol: saturn] is the stone which the philosophers will not name, whose name is concealed unto this day; for if its name were known, then many would operate, and the art would be common, because this work is short, and without charge, a small and mean work. therefore doth the name remain concealed; for the evils sake which might thence proceed. all the strange parables which the philosophers have spoken mystically, of a stone, a moon, a furnace, a vessel, all this is _saturn_; for you must not put any strange thing unto it, only what comes from it, therefore there, is none so poor in this world, which cannot operate and promote this work; for _luna_ may be easily made of _saturn_, in a short time, and in a little longer time _sol_ may be made out of it. and though a man be poor, yet may he very well attain unto it, and may be employed to make the _philosophers stone_. wherefore my child, all is concealed in _saturn_, which we have need of, for in it is a perfect _mercury_, in it are all the colours of the world, which may be discovered in it; in it are the true black, white and red colours, in it is the weight, it is our _lattin_. _example._ the eye of a man cannot endure any thing that is imperfect, how little soever it be, though it be the least atome of dust, it would cause much pain, that he can rest no where. but if you take the quantity of a bean of _saturn_, shave it smooth and round, put it into the eye, it will cause no pain at all; the reason is, because it is internally perfect, even as gold and precious stones. by these and other speeches you may observe, that _saturn_ is our _philosophers stone_, and our _latten_, out of which our _mercury_ and our stone is extracted with small labour, little art and expence, and in a short time. wherefore i admonish you, my child, and all those who know its name, that you conceal it from people, by reason of the evil which might thence arise; and you shall call the stone our _laton_, and call the vinegar water, wherein our stone is to be wash'd; this is the stone and the water whereof the philosophers have wrote so many great volumes. there are many and different works in the mineral stone, and especially in that stone which god hath given us _gratis_, whereof many strange parables are written in the mineral book. but this is the true stone, which the philosophers have sought, because it makes projection upon all the imperfect metals, especially upon quick _mercury_, and moreover it makes projection upon all diseases whatsoever, which may come into mans body, as likewise upon all wounds, _cancer_, _fistulaes_, _open sores_, _buboes_, _imposthumes_, and all whatsoever can come externally upon mans body, therefore this stone is not under the mineral work, but under the vegetable. it is the beginning of the vegetable book, and the principal; this stone is called _lapis philosophorum_, the mineral stone is called _lapis mineralis_, and the third stone is called _lapis animalis_. this stone is the true _aurum potabile_, the true quinessence which we seek, and no other thing else in this world but this stone. therefore the philosophers say, whosoever knows our stone, and can prepare it, needs no more, wherefore they sought this thing and no other. my child shall take 10, 12, or 15 pound of _saturn_, wherein is no mixture of any other metal; laminate it thin, have in readiness a great stone jugg, half full of vinegar, stop the jugg very close, set it in a lukewarm bath, every three or four days scrape off the calcin'd _saturn_ from the plates, and reserve it apart, thus do so long till you have 5 or 6 _l._ of the calcin'd _saturn_, then grind it very well on a stone with good distilled wine-vinegar, so as you may paint therewith, then take two or three great stone-pots, therein put the _calx_ of _saturn_ which you ground, poure good distilled wine-vinegar upon it, that two parts of the pot be full, stir it well together, stop the pot close with a polished glass or pebble-stone, set the pots in a bath, stir it four or five times in a day with a wooden ladle, lay the glass or stone stopple again over it, make the bath no hotter than that you may well endure your hand therein, that is, lukewarm; so let it stand fourteen days and nights, then decant that which is clear into another stone-pot, poure other distilled vinegar upon the _calx_ which is not well dissolved, mix them well together, set it 14 days in the bath, again decant it, and poure other vinegar upon it as before. this decantation and pouring on continue so long till all the _calx_ of _saturn_ be dissolved, then take all the dissolved _saturn_, set it in a bath, evaporate the vinegar by a small fire, the _saturn_ will become a powder or lump. or stir it about until it be dry, you have a mass or powder of a dark yellow, or honey colour, then grind the powder again very finely upon a stone with distilled vinegar; put it into a stone-pot, stir and mix it well together, set it again into a bath, which is but lukewarm so let it stand five or six dayes, stir it every day from the top to the bottom with a wooden ladle, cover it again with the glass-stopple, then let it cool, poure off that which is dissolved into a great stone pot, poure other vinegar upon it, mix and stir them well together, set it into the bath as before, reiterate this decantation and pouring on so often, till no more will dissolve, which try with your tongue, if it be sweet, it is not enough dissolved, or put some of it into a glass-gourd, let it evaporate, if any thing remain, it is not yet all dissolved which would be gold, and then what remaines in the pot are _fã¦ces_, and sweet upon the tongue; if you find any thing in the gourd, it is not yet all dissolved, then may you poure fresh vinegar upon it, till all be dissolved, then coagulate it as before, poure other vinegar upon it, stir it, set it again into the bath, reiterate this operation of solution and coagulation so long till you find no more _fã¦ces_ at the bottom, but all be dissolved into a pure clear water, then is _saturn_ freed from all its leprousness, melancholy, _fã¦ces_, and blackness, being pure and white as snow, for it is cleansed from all its uncleanness, because its coldness stands outwards as _luna_ doth, and its heat is internal, fluxible as wax, and sweet as sugar candy. _why is it as white as snow?_ because it is purified from all its impurities, and because its coldness stands external as _luna_ doth, and its heat is internal. _why is it sweet?_ because the four elements in it are pure, and separated from all sulphurous stink and blackness, which _saturn_ received in the mine; it is almost medicinal, and like unto nature: and because it is so pure, it affords some of its internal virtue outwardly, as that of sweetness; but the heat is so covered with the cold, that it cannot put forth its power externally by reason of the cold which is external (the heat of _saturn_ lies internal, even as in _salt-nitre_) as doth the taste, the spirit of tasting is the most subtile in all things, as is taught more at large in the book of vegetables, how the air doth dilate it self from all herbs and flowers externally; for the spirit of the air lies in the inward part of all things; for god created nothing in this world but it hath its peculiar taste or air, the air and the taste are one spirit, the taste goes out of the air, as smoke from the fire. but how comes it to pass, that a thing which hath a sweet air, is bitter in taste? the cause is, because the _fã¦ces_ of that thing are putrid and stinking in the elements, that is the choler or heat; for whatsoever is unnaturally hot, hath a bitter taste; the air and the taste are both one spirit, and as the spirit of the air presses outwards through a hot thing, so doth the air embrace the taste about, and descends the subtile taste, that it should not be burnt by the vehement burning choler, as in the herbal is at large express'd. but the cause why _saturn_ is sweet in taste is, that it is almost pure and clean, having scarce any unnatural heat in it, which can burn the subtile tast, therefore it hath the taste externally, and the taste hath the spirit of the air lock'd up in it. my child, know what i said before, that a thing wherein is much burning heat, the air locks up the taste therein, because the taste shall not be corrupted by the unnatural heat. so the taste includes the air in it, when it issues forth from a thing which is externally cold; for the subtil spirits of the air or sent of a thing can endure no cold, as we see daily in herbs and flowers that they yield no sent in the winter, as they do in the summer; but they hide themselves in the winter, and the spirit hath the sent inclosed in it, and the spirit of sent or air. behold a man that hath taken cold, immediately he loses his sent, and his tasting is diminished. even so it is here with _saturn_; it is quite cold, so that the taste manifests it self with the spirit of sent; for the spirit of the taste hath the smell in it. look upon sugar which is well clarified from its _fã¦ces_, how sweet it is in taste, yet it yields no sent, yet there is an extraordinary sweetness in sugar. what is the reason of this? sugar is very cold externally, therefore is it white as snow, and of a sweet taste; yet sugar internally is hot and moist, of the temper of gold, and of such great virtue that it is called the philosophers stone, as it is approved, and very prevalent to cure all the distempers of mans body, as appears by its operation. the reason why i say this, my child, is, that you should altogether understand its internal & external, and the spirits which are in these things, whereof we discourse; that thereby you should know gods wonderful works, and what wonders he works in these inferiour things, which are all made for our use. _what hath god in us, for whose sake he hath created all these wonders, and all these things?_ wherefore, my child, believe in god, love him, and follow him, for he loves you, as he makes it appear, and manifests himself in all things, as well in their internals as in their externals. o how wonderful is our lord and god, from whom all wonders proceed! _now, my child, why is_ saturn _fluxible as wax?_ by reason of its abounding _sulphur_, which is therein; for i find no fluxibleness or fusibleness in any thing saving in _sulphur_, _mercury_ and _arsenick_, and all these three are in _saturn_; so that _saturn_ is quickly fluxible, but all these three are cleansed with it from their uncleanness. and do you not know, that the philosophers call their stone _arsenick_, and a white thing; and they say their _sulphur_ is incombustible; they call it likewise a red thing, all this is _saturn_, in it is _arsenick_; for _luna_ is principally generated of a white _sulphur_, as is plainly taught in the book of _sulphurs_, and all _arsenick_ is internally red as bloud, if its inward part be brought outwards, as is demonstrated in the book of colours, _&c._ _saturn_ stands almost in the degree of fix'd _luna_. so that in it there is a red sulphur, as you see, when its internal is placed outwards, it will be red as a ruby; there are no colours but in the spirits, so that there is in it a red and a yellow sulphur. in it is _mercury_, as may be seen, for _mercury_ is extracted out of _saturn_ in a short time, and with little labour. so that all three are in _saturn_, but they are not fix'd therein, but they are clean, pure, incombustible, fluxible as wax; in it are all things which the philosophers have mentioned. they say, our stone is made of a stinking menstruous thing: what think you, is not _saturn_ digg'd out of a stinking earth? for divers are killed with the ill sents and vapours where _saturn_ is digg'd, or they live not long who labour in that stinking black mine, whence _saturn_ is digg'd. and the philosophers say, our stone is of little value, being unprepared; they say, the poor have it as well as the rich, and they say true; for there are not poorer or more miserable people to be found than those which dig and work _saturn_ in the mine; and they say it is to be found in all towns and places, wheresoever you come _saturn_ is there. they say it is a black thing: what think you, is it not black? they say, it is a dry water, if gold or _luna_ be to be refined upon the test, must it not be done with _saturn_? they must be wash'd and tried with it, as a foul garment is made clean with sope. they say, in our stone are the four elements, and they say true; for the four elements may be separated out of _saturn_. they say, our stone consists of soul, spirit and body, and these three become one. they say true; when it is made fix'd for the white _mercury_ and sulphur with its earth, then these three are one. whereby is to be observed, that the philosophers have said true; they concealed its name for the ignorants sake, who are not their children, to keep them still in their ignorance. thus, my child, the ancients took care to conceal the name of the stone; now let us return to our purpose. you have now _saturn_ wash'd and cleansed from all its impurity, and made as white as snow, fusible as wax, but is it not fix'd yet; we will make it fix the _mercury_ and sulphur with its earth. take a glass-vial, put half of your purified _saturn_ into it, reserve the other half till you have occasion to use it; lay a polish'd glass upon the mouth of the glass, set it in a cuple with sifted ashes upon a furnace; or set it on the _tripos_ of secrets, or in the furnace wherein you calcine spirits; give it fire so hot as the heat of the sun at _midsummer_, and no hotter, either a very little hotter, or a very little cooler, as you can best hit it. but if you give it a greater heat, such as you may keep lead in flux, then your matter would melt as if it were oil; and having stood so, ten or twelve days, its sulphur would fly away, and your matter would all be spoiled, for the sulphur which is in your matter is not yet fix'd, but is in the external. wherefore the matter melts presently, and though it be clean, yet it is not fix'd; wherefore give so gentle a fire to it, that it may not flux; so keep it six weeks, then take out a little of it, lay it on a glowing hot plate, if it immediately melts and fumes, it is not yet fixed, but if the matter remain unmelted, the sulphur is then fix'd which is therein; then strengthen the fire notably, till the matter in the glass begins to look yellow, and continually more and more yellow, like to powdered saffron, then augment the fire yet stronger, till the matter begin to be red, then prosecute your fire from one degree to another, even as the powder becomes redder and redder by degrees, so hold on your fire, till the matter be red as a ruby, then augment the fire yet more, that the matter may be glowing hot, then is it fixt, and ready to pour the curious water of paradise upon it. my child must know, that there are two ways of pouring on the water of paradise; i will teach you to make and prepare both, then may you take which you will; for the one is half as good again as the other. my child, you may remember, that i ordered you to reserve the one half of the purified _saturn_, which take and put into a stone-pot, pour upon it a bottle or more of distilled wine-vinegar, set a head on, distil the vinegar again from it in a bath, the head must have a hole at the top to pour fresh vinegar upon the matter, and abstract the vinegar again from it, pour fresh vinegar again on, and again abstract it, this pouring on, and abstracting or distilling off must continue so long, till the vinegar be drawn off as strong as it was when it was put in, then is it enough, and the matter hath in it as much of the spirit of vinegar as it can contain; then take the pot out of the bath, take off the head, and take the matter out, and put it into a thick glass which can endure the fire, set a head on it, put it in a cuple with ashes, which set on a furnace, first make a small fire, and so continually a little stronger, till your matter come over as red as bloud, thick as oil, and sweet as sugar, with a celestial sent, then keep it in that heat so long as it distils, and when it begins to slack, then increase your fire till the glass begin to glow; continu this heat till no more will distil, then let it cool of it self, take the receiver off, stop it very close with wax, take the matter out of the glass, beat it to powder in an iron mortar, with a steel pestle; and then grind it on a stone with good distilled vinegar, put this matter so ground into a pot, poure good distilled vinegar upon it, that two parts be full, set the pot into a bath with a head upon it, distil the vinegar off, poure fresh vinegar again upon it, distil it off again: thus do so long, that the vinegar be as strong as it was when it was first poured upon it, then let it cool, take the matter out of the bath, take the head off, take the matter out of the pot, put it into a stronger round glass which can endure the fire, as you did before, set it upon a furnace in a cuple with sifted ashes, set a head on, and a receiver luted to it, then distil it, first with a small fire, which augment by degrees, till a matter come over red as bloud, and thick as oyl, as aforesaid; give it fire till no more will distil, then let it cool of it self, take off the head, break the glass-pot, and take the matter out, powder it again, and grind it on a stone with distilled vinegar, put it again into the stone pot, poure fresh vinegar upon it, set it into the bath, and its head on, distil the vinegar from it, poure it on again as hath been taught, till the vinegar remain strong as it was. reiterate this distillation in the bath until the matter hath no more spirit of the vinegar in it, then take it out, set it in a glass-pot, distil all that will distil forth in ashes, till the matter become a red oil, then have you the most noble water of paradise, to pour upon all fix'd stones, to perfect the stone; this is one way. this water of paradise thus distilled, the ancients called their sharp clear vinegar, for they conceal its name. my child, i will now teach you other ways to make the water of paradise; this is an easie way, but not so good, nor doth it that high projection in humane medicines, yet it cures all diseases within and without, but the other cures miraculously in a short time. _the second way of preparing the water of paradise._ my child, if you would make it after this manner, you must take the half of your prepared _saturn_ which i ordered you to keep, upon which poure the half of your fix'd and prepared water of paradise, take the half, put it into a stone-pot, poure weak wine vinegar upon it, mix it well together, then take two pounds of calcined _tartar_, which is well clarified by solution and coagulation, so that it leave no more _fã¦ces_ behind it, _salt armoniac_ one pound, which is likewise so clearly sublimed, that no _fã¦ces_ remain after its sublimation, pound both together to a powder, put them speedily into a pot, and stop it close immediately, or else it will run out; for so soon as the _tartar_ and _salt armoniac_ come to the vinegar, they lift themselves up, and would immediately run out of the mouth of the pot, wherefore stop the pot presently, set the pot in a vessel of water, they will cool speedily, otherwise if the cold and hot matter should come together suddenly, they would contest together, rise up, and become so hot, that the pot would break for heat, if it were not set in cold water; therefore take heed, when you put the powders in, that you stop it immediately, and set it in cold water before you put the other powder to it, then will they unite, let them stand a day and a night in that vessel, then take them out, set them into a lukewarm bath two days and nights, let it cool of it self, take the stopple off from the pot, and set a head on, set the pot in sifted ashes, upon a furnace, distil with a small fire, and continually greater till all the vinegar be over, then augment your fire notably, till you see quick _mercury_ drop out of the pipe, when it ceases to drop, then augment the fire by little and little and drive it so long as it drops; you may observe when it will leave dropping, if in the space of one or two _pater-nosters_ one drop doth fall, then augment the fire till the pot glow at the bottom, for twelve hours and when the _mercury_ is over, then should the _salt armoniac_ sublime up into the head, and the _tartar_ remain with the body of _saturn_ at the bottom of the pot, which take out, put it into a linnen bag, hang it in a moist cellar, the _tartar_ will dissolve, receive it in a glass, the body of _saturn_ remains in the bag, take it out, and calcine it in a reverberating furnace three days and nights, with a great heat, as is taught elsewhere, then extract the salt out, as is taught in the mineral book. you may make projection with the salt, and coagulate your _tartar_ again, it will be as good or better than it was, likewise take your _salt armoniac_ out of the head, it is good again, and if you could have no _salt armoniac_, then take three pound of calcined _tartar_, likewise so clarified, that it leave no _fã¦ces_ behind, you then need no _salt armoniac_, therewith may you likewise extract the _mercury_ out of _luna_ and _jupiter_, wherewith you may do wonders, as is taught in the miner. book, where is spoken of the quintessence of metals. now my child must know, that this _mercury_ or quintessence of _saturn_ is as good in all works as the _mercury_ of _sol_, they are both alike good, and herein all philosophers agree. my child, take this _mercury_ of _saturn_, so drawn out of the receiver, put it into a glass box. i have now taught you to make two sorts of the water of paradise; and know, my child, that the first way is the best; though it be made with some danger, longer time, and more charge; for the vinegar is all good, yet the red oil is the best; its time is alike unto the end, and though it be more tedious before you obtain the red oil, yet it fixes it self in a short time, if it come to the matter or fix'd stone, into a simple essence in greater redness; but when the _mercury_ comes to the fix'd stone, it holds on a long time in ascending and descending before it die, and when it is quite dead, it makes the red fix'd stone again into a fixt colour, so covering the red stone with its coldness, that the red stone becomes white again, then must you boil it again gently with a small fire, till it begin to be yellow, prosecuting the fire from one degree to another, as the colour is higher and stronger, and that so long till it attain to a perfect redness, which requires a long time before it be done, which is not requisite in the red oil; for the red oil dies or coagulates forthwith the stone, the one fixing it self with the other into a simple essence, in a short time. therefore i tell thee, my child, that the time of the oyl is alike long in the end, though it appear to be of a shorter time with the _mercury_, but it is equally long at the end of the work, therefore i tell you the art of both works, that you may the better understand the art to make the oyl from the innermost nature of the stone, which is found afterwards. the oyl was unknown to the ancients, for my grandfather with his companions found it with great labour and length of time. so there are two ways to dissolve the stone, and to poure upon it the clear water of paradise. our ancestors called the oyl their sharp vinegar; therefore, my child, keep the name private, and i will teach you first of all how you shall join the _mercury_ to your stone, which you extracted out of _saturn_, to dissolve it; afterwards i will teach you to bring over the helm that red oil which you extracted out of your prepared _saturn_, into a fixt stone, to dissolve your stone. my child, weigh your fixt stone, take half as much of your _mercury_, poure it upon the stone in the glass, cover the glass again with a polish'd glass which may just fit it, set it in a cuple with sifted ashes, make a small fire like the suns heat at _midsummer_, and give no more fire to it, until the water of paradise or _mercury_ become all a dead powder. and know, my child, that the red or fixt stone, which before was darkned, when it hath drunk up the water of paradise, or _mercury_, or how you will call it, that it be a powder between black and gray, then augment the fire from one degree to another, till the matter be perfect white, and when it is white, strengthen the fire yet more, from one degree to another, till it be of a dark yellow colour, then make it yet stronger, till it be of a perfect red; then rejoice, for your stone is perfect, and fluxible as wax. praise god, who gives unto us part of his miracles; and do good to the poor; you may see it with your fleshly eyes, and use gods goodness miraculously in this corrupt life, for i tell you in good charity, that if any one principally attain to this stone, that it is given, afforded, and lent him from god. whosoever hath this stone, may live in a healthful state, to the last term of his life, appointed him by god, and may have all whatsoever he desires on earth. he shall be loved and esteemed of all people, for he can cure them all internally and externally of all diseases which may befall them; but if the stone doth not so, it is false, and deserves not the name of the vegetable stone, or philosophers stone. therefore my child, if god give you this stone, look diligently to it, that you keep your self from offending god, that you make not this stone on earth to be your heaven; govern and rule your self to gods glory and to the comfort of poor people, that gods praise may be augmented, to the defence of the christian religion, and to the relief of poor exiled christians i tell you, my child, if you use it otherwise, god will leave you here a little while to your own will, but afterwards he will speedily send a punishment, either you shall be struck dead, or die by a fall; or die some other sudden death, and go body and soul to hell, and be damned eternally, for your ingratitude to god, who so graciously vouchsafed you so precious and great a gift. therefore, my child, look carefully to it, so to govern your self to gods glory, and the salvation of your soul, that the eternal curse may not fall upon you; and therefore i have left you this writing as my testament. enough hath been said to the wise, therefore look to your self. _the multiplication of the stone now perfected._ now my child, you may take the half of your powder, put it into a glass and melt it, have in readiness a mould made hollow, of box-wood, great or small as you please, it must be made smooth and even within with an instrument, anoint it with oil olive, and when your red powder is flux'd, poure it into the mould, it will be a precious stone, red as a ruby, clear and transparent, take it out of the mould, and make projection upon the imperfect metals, and in the body of man. take ten times as much of prepared _saturn_ as i taught you before, by coagulation and solution, till it leave no _fã¦ces_ behind, then take your precious red powder out of the glass, that two parts be full, set it into your warm bath, and let it dissolve: when any thing is dissolved, decant off that which is clear on the top into another glass, poure other vinegar upon it, let it dissolve again as before, decant and poure fresh vinegar upon it so often, till all be dissolved into a clear water, which is done usually in ten or twelve days, then set all that which is dissolved into a bath, and a head upon it, distil the vinegar from it again, and coagulate the matter so long till it be dry and shine, then put it into another glass, which set upon a furnace in a cuple with sifted ashes, laying a polish'd glass upon the mouth of the glass. my child, know that your matter is become fixt with the stone in the solution, make an indifferent hot fire in the furnace, so hot as the heat of the sun at _midsummer_, or somewhat hotter; till the matter begin to be yellow, then go on with the fire from one degree to another, till you have a perfect yellow, then increase the fire from one degree to another, till you have a perfect redness, which is quickly done, in half the time for the colour to come, and in the multiplication, but operate as before in the beginning, and poure paradise water upon the stone, as was taught you before in this work, boil and mortifie it in every point to a perfect redness as hath been taught. then may you again take half of it out, and make projection therewith, and multiply the other half again in all points as abovesaid, so may you always continue working. now i will teach you the other way, and the best that is to water your red fixt stone or powder with the red oil, that it be fusible; you must know how much your red powder weighs, then take half the weight of your red oil, to the full weight of the stone, and poure it upon the red powder, and when the oil is poured into the glass, you may set a small head on, upon a furnace in sifted ashes, joining a receiver to the nose of the head, make a small fire under it, as the heat of the sun in _march_, and no hotter; for there is yet some moisture of the vinegar in the oil, that it may be abstracted, continue it in that heat, that can perceive no moisture in the head, then augment the fire a little, as the heat of the sun at _midsummer_, and if there be yet more moisture in it, you will perceive it in the head, but if you perceive it not in 6 or 8 days, then take the head off, and lay the polish'd glass again upon the mouth of your glass, increase the fire, that you can scarce endure your hand or finger in the ashes an _ave-mary_ while, continue the fire in that heat till the red oil be all fixt with the powder in the glass, which you may know thus; take a little of the powder out of the glass, lay it on a glowing silver plate, if the powder melts as wax, and penetrates through the plate as oil doth through a dry leather, and makes it gold throughout, as far as the powder went, then is the stone finish'd, and if it do not this, you must then let it stand in that heat till it do so without fuming. now, my child, when the stone is finish'd, take half of it out of the glass, put it into a glass melting-pot, and melt the powder gently, which should be done presently, for it melts as wax; and being melted, poure it into the mould of box-wood as aforesaid, it will be a red stone clear and transparent as crystal, red as a ruby, then make projection therewith, and set the other half again to multiply. then take in gods name twenty parts of _saturn_, which is prepared by solution and coagulation, till it leave no more _fã¦ces_ behind, as hath been said at the beginning. dissolve these twenty parts of _saturn_, dissolve by itself in a glass with distilled vinegar; likewise dissolve the powder of your stone alone by it self in a glass with distilled vinegar, and when both are dissolved into clear water, poure both the solutions together into a great glass, set it into a bath, a head on, and a receiver to it, distil the vinegar from it in the boiling bath, till the matter be dry, then let it cool of itself, put it into a glass, lay a polish'd glass over the mouth of the glass, and set it into a furnace in a cuple with sifted ashes, make a fire under it like to the suns heat in _march_, till the powder be perfect white, which is quickly done. then augment your fire from one degree to another, till the matter become yellower and yellower, to a perfect yellow; then increase it yet stronger, from one degree to another, till it be redder and redder, to a perfect redness; then poure your water upon the red powder with the red oil, or with the water of paradise, or with the clear sharp vinegar, or call it how you will, doing in all points as hath been taught, till the red powder flux like wax upon a silver plate, without fuming, penetrating it as oil doth dry leather, that it become good gold within and without; then render thanks unto god, be obedient to him for his gifts and graces. you may again take one half out of the glass, and make projection, setting the other half in again, as hath been taught, so may you work all your life-time, for the poor, and perform other duties to gods glory, and salvation of your soul, as i have said before; enough to the wise. _projection upon metal._ know, my child, how and in what manner you must use this stone, which makes projection upon _mercury_, and all imperfect metals and bodies of _mars_, _jupiter_ and _venus_, whereof make plates glowing hot, whereon straw the stone, and lay coals on for a season, that the stone may penetrate, but the stones must be made quick with gold, and _jupiter_ also, which is very laborious, as is taught in the projection. but you must project upon _saturn_ or _luna_, which need not be made quick, only flux them, and cast one part upon a thousand parts, it will be a medicine, cast one part of these thousand parts upon ten parts, it will be the best gold that ever was seen on earth. _its use in physick._ this stone cures all leprous people, plague, and all diseases which may reign upon earth, or befal mankind; this is the true _aurum potabile_, and the true quintessence which the ancients sought; this is what thing whereof the whole troop of philosophers speak so wondrously, using all possible skill to conceal its name and operation, as aforesaid. take of this stone the quantity of a wheat-corn, lay it in a little good wine in a small glass, half full, or a quarter full, make the wine warm, the stone will melt like butter, and the wine will be red as bloud, and very sweet in your mouth, as ever you tasted; for to speak comparatively, it is so sweet in taste that honey and sugar may be compared as gall to it; give this unto the patient to drink, lay him in bed, but lay not too many cloaths upon him, the stone hastens forthwith to the heart, expelling thence all ill humors, thence dilating it self through all the arteries and veins of the whole body, rousing up all humours, the party will sweat, for the stone opens all the pores of the body, and drives forth all humours thereby, so that the patient will seem to have been in the water, yet will this sweating not make him sicker, for the stone expels only what is adverse to nature, preserving what is consonant unto it in its being, therefore the patient is not sicker or weaker; but the more he sweats the stronger and lustier will he be, the veins will be lighter, and the sweat continues till all evil humours be driven out of the body, and then it ceases. the next day you shall take of it the quantity of a wheat-corn, in warm wine again, you will go to stool immediately, and that will not cease so long as you have any thing in your body which is contrary to nature, and the more stools the patient hath, the stronger and lighter at heart will he be; for the stone drives nothing forth but what is adverse and prejudicial to nature. the third day give the like quantity in warm wine, as aforesaid; it will so fortifie the veins and heart, that the party will not think himself to be a man, but rather a spirit, all his members will be so light and lively, & if the party will take the like quantity of a wheat-corn every day for the space of nine days, i tell you, his body will be as spiritual as if he had been nine days in the terrestrial paradise, eating every day of the fruit, making him fair, lusty, and young; therefore use this stone weekly, the quantity of a wheat-corn with warm wine, so shall you live in health unto the last hour of the time appointed for you by god. what say you, my child, is not this the true _aurum potabile_, and the true quintessence, and the thing which we seek? it is a spiritual thing, a gift which god bestows upon his friends, therefore, my child, do not undertake this divine work, if you find your self in deadly sins, or that your intent be otherwise than to gods glory, and to perform those things which i taught you before. i tell you truly, you may see the work, or begin it, but i am certain you shall never accomplish it, nor see the stone, god will order it so, it will break, fall, or some one disaster or other will happen, that you shall never see the stone, or accomplish it. therefore if you find yourself otherwise, do not begin the work, for i know assuredly, you will lose your labour; wherefore deceive not yourself. enough to the wise. _its use in external diseases._ my child, there are some people who have external distempers on their bodies, as fistulaes, cancers, wolf, or evil biles, or holes, be they what or how they will, _&c._ give him the weight of one wheat-corn to drink in warm wine two days, as is taught before, the whole body within and without shall be freed from all which is adverse to nature, and you shall deal with the open sores thus; take a drachm of the stone, seeth it in a pottle of wine in a glass, the space of two or three _pater-nosters_, that the stone may melt, the wine will be as red as bloud, therewith wash the sores morning and evening, laying a thin plate of lead over, in a short time, as in ten or twelve days the sores will be whole; and give him every day the quantity of a wheat-corn, in warm wine till he be well. if they be fistulaes or other concave holes, that you cannot come at them, to wash them, then take a silver syringe, and inject of that wine into them, it will heal home, as aforesaid. and if one had a pound of the rankest poison in the world in his body, and immediately drink a drachme thereof in warm wine, the poison shall forthwith evacuate by siege, together with all the evil humors in his body. my child, here ends the most noble and precious work which is in the vegetable book; on whomsoever god bestows this stone, needs no other thing, in this world, therefore keep it as close and well as you can, to gods glory, who grant that we may walk in his obedience, _amen_. * * * * * _god is blessed in his works._ * * * * * finis. [transcriber's note: a few typographical errors have been corrected. details are given at the end of the text.] heads of lectures on a course of experimental philosophy, particularly including chemistry, delivered at the new college in hackney. _by joseph priestley, ll.d. f.r.s._ ac. imp. petrop. r. paris. holm. taurin. aurel. med. paris. harlem. cantab. americ. et philad. soc. qui docet discit.--wm. lilly london: printed for j. johnson, no. 72, st. paul's church-yard. 1794. the preface. situated, as i happily am, in the neighbourhood of the _new college at hackney_, an institution that does honour to the dissenters, an institution open to all persons without distinction[1], and connected as i am by friendship with the tutors, i was glad to give it every assistance in my power; and therefore undertook to read the _lectures on history and general policy_ which i had composed when i was tutor at warrington, and also to give another course on the subject of _experimental philosophy_. with this view i drew up the following _heads of lectures_; and, to save the students the trouble of transcribing them, they are now printed. to other persons they may serve as a compendious view of the most important discoveries relating to the subject. [footnote 1: one gentleman of the roman catholic persuasion, and several of the church of england, are now in the college.] as it was found most convenient, with respect to the other business of the college, to confine this course to one lecture in a week, i contrived to bring within that compass as much of the subject of experimental philosophy as i well could, and especially to include the whole of what is called _chemistry_, to which so much attention is now given, and which presents so many new fields of philosophical investigation. besides that the plan of the young gentlemen's studies would not admit of it, i think it most advisable not to trouble beginners with more than a large outline of any branch of science. by this means they are not fatigued by too long an attention to any one subject, a greater variety of articles may be brought before them, and in future life they may pursue any of them as much farther as their inclination may dispose, and their ability and opportunity shall enable, them to do it. i do not give any account of the _experiments_ introduced into the several lectures. they will be sufficiently indicated by the subjects of them. they were as many as i could conveniently make within the time; and where the experiments themselves could not be made, i usually exhibited both the different substances employed in them, and those that were the result of them. as these lectures were calculated for the use of the students at the new college, i prefix an _address to them_, the same in substance with that which i delivered to them at the close of the session of 1791. in it may be seen a specimen of the language we hold to them on the subject of _politics_, which with reasonable men will serve as an answer to the many calumnies that have been thrown out against us, as disaffected to the government of this country. such institutions will, indeed, always be objects of hatred and dread to _bigots_ and the advocates for _arbitrary power_, but the pride of a truly _free country_. i therefore conclude with my earnest prayer (the accomplishment of which the present state of the college does not allow us to doubt) esto perpetua. the dedication. to the students at the new college in hackney. my young friends, having drawn up the following _heads of lectures_ for your use, i take the liberty thus publickly to dedicate them to you; and as i earnestly wish for your improvement and happiness in all respects, excuse me if i take the farther liberty of making a few observations, and giving you some advice, of a more general nature, adapted to your age and circumstances. as you will soon leave this place of education, and enter upon your several professions and employments, i hope your conduct will demonstrate to the world the solid advantages of this institution, and that the great expence attending it, and the best attention of the managers, have not been bestowed in vain. many liberal friends of science, of virtue, and of religion, have contributed to procure you the advantages which you enjoy. they have spared no pains to provide able and careful tutors, and you have had every other advantage for the prosecution of your studies that they could procure you, unclogged by any subscription to articles of faith, or obligation of any other kind, besides such as they have deemed necessary for your own good, and to give the institution its greatest effect. this is an advantage you could not have found elsewhere, at least in this country. and in every seminary of education much more depends upon opportunity for study, free from any obstruction, and undue bias, than upon the ability of tutors; though there is an additional advantage when they are able men, and eminent in the branches of science which they undertake to teach. but this is by no means so essential as many other circumstances. whatever be the qualifications of your tutors, your improvement must chiefly depend upon yourselves. they cannot _think_ or _labour_ for you. they can only put you in the best way of thinking and labouring for yourselves. if, therefore, you get knowledge, you must acquire it by your own industry. you must form all conclusions, and all maxims, for yourselves, from premises and _data_ collected, and considered by yourselves. and it is the great object of this institution to remove every bias the mind can lie under, and give the greatest scope to true freedom of thinking and inquiry. and provided you be intelligent and virtuous men, and good citizens, it will be no cause of regret to the friends of this institution, if, with respect to _religion_, or _politics_, you adopt systems of principles, and maxims of conduct, very different from theirs. give me leave, now that i am addressing you as _young men_, and young _students_, to suggest a caution on a subject, of the importance of which it is hardly possible that you should be sufficiently aware, because it is only impressed by that _experience_ which you have not yet had. i mean that degree of vanity which generally accompanies the acquirements that diligent persons of your age make in places of liberal education, and the contempt they are too apt to entertain for those who have not made the same proficiency with themselves. and i assure you, that in the observations i shall make on this subject, i have no view whatever to any thing that i have observed, or heard, of any of you in particular. but i have been in your situation myself, and i know the importance of these observations to students in general. you are now at an age in which young persons usually make the most sensible advances in knowledge, and in which the understanding appears to ripen the most rapid manner. you are able to say every year, every month, and almost every day, what particular advances you have made, and how much you know more than you did before. and being taught, and accustomed, to express your thoughts in writing, you find yourselves qualified to do this in a manner of which you had no idea, or expectation, but a little time ago. you also perfectly remember what you have so recently learned, and many respects may be more particular and exact than even your tutors themselves. the almost unavoidable effect of this is a high idea of your own powers and attainments, and too often a proportionable contempt of those who, not having had equal advantages, cannot do what you are easily capable of. a certain degree of vanity is, therefore, excusable in young persons; and, indeed, it is by means of it that they are excited to exert themselves in a manner that they would not otherwise have done. but be careful that this temper be not indulged to excess, for it will then be found to have serious ill consequences; the least of which is the precluding future improvement, from being already satisfied with yourselves, and conscious of a sufficient superiority over others. the foundation of this self-conceit, on account of literary attainments, will be found to be extremely weak. in fact, we learn more before the period to which you are now arrived, and i hope you will continue to learn more after it, without its being so much noticed; and the _ability_ that is discovered in the acquirements which are the subjects of this vanity is not greater than appears on other occasions. only they are not so conspicuous. what we all learn in the first three years of our lives, is much more extraordinary in its nature than all that we acquire afterwards. i mean the perfect use of our limbs, and the elements of speech. what we learn in a month in that early period of life, could not, if we were brought up in the ignorance of it, be learned in a year at any subsequent period. but these acquirements being universal, and what the circumstances in which we are all necessarily in compel us to learn, it does not appear extraordinary in any particular individual. also, the proficiency that boys make at a grammar school, in which, in general, the dead languages only are taught (a knowledge of which is commonly the result of severe application) is too common to be the cause of much self-conceit. but the advances that are made at places of liberal education are both less common, and of a more conspicuous nature. you will also find, if you continue your application to study, that it is only the elements of science that you can acquire here, and that if you live many years, they will bear but a small proportion to your future acquirements. but those future acquirements, in consequence of their bearing a less proportion to your whole stock of knowledge, will not be so conspicuous. thus, though all the buildings that in one year are added to such a city as london would make a pretty large country town, they bear so small a proportion to what was built before, that they are not much noticed; whereas, had half the quantity of building been erected in a place where no house had existed before, it would have been a memorable event in the history of the country. also, as in old cities many buildings will fall to decay, while new ones are added; you must expect to forget much of what you now know. no man can give equal attention to every object; and as we advance in life, we, in general, only learn new things at the expence of the old ones. but then they are the more valuable articles of knowledge, the more general and leading principles, which remain with us; while the more useless ones, things to which we give less attention because we find them to be of less use, disappear. yet it is no uncommon thing for ingenious students to despise old scholars who are not so ready in the _minutiæ_ of literature, though they may have forgotten more than those youths ever knew, and may retain what they cannot acquire without forgetting as much. another observation proper to lessen the conceit of literary men, is, that genius is not confined to _them_, but is equally great, though not equally conspicuous, in every other line of life, and especially in manufactures and the arts. here, however, discoveries equal, with respect to _sagacity_, to those of newton, contribute little to posthumous fame, because the discoverers are not writers. but the greatest branch of intellectual excellence with respect to which every other is nothing, and which, from its nature, can never be foundation of any self-conceit, is _virtue_, or right dispositions of mind, leading to right conduct in life. proper sentiments, and just affections of mind, arise from just, and often comprehensive, views of things, past, present, and to come. and if the real greatness of any thought, or action, be estimated by the number of elements that constitute it, and its remoteness from the dictates of sense and natural appetite, a virtuous and pious man will appear to be a much more dignified character, more proper to be viewed with admiration and esteem, than the greatest scholar; discovering, in fact, greater comprehension and force of mind. i mean, however, that virtue which is the result of reflection, of discipline, and much voluntary exertion, which, though operating with equal promptness and facility, is as much superior to mere _innocence_, and what is commonly called _good nature_, as motions secondarily automative are to those that are primarily so; a comparison which you who have studied _hartley's theory of the mind_ will see the force of. these considerations i take the liberty to suggest, as being proper to lessen that vanity which is so incident to those who distinguish themselves in the fields of literature, and which, operating like the acquisition of riches, or power, or any possession that is _rare_ among men, instead of enlarging, may tend to contract the mind, by confining its attention to itself. beginning with a generous emulation, it proceeds to envy and jealousy, and ends in actual hatred and malignity, against which you cannot, surely, be too strongly put upon your guard; this being the greatest depravity to which human nature is subject, and which yet, like any other vice, may be in full possession of the mind, without the person himself knowing, or suspecting it; unless he give more attention to his feelings than most persons do. if no man ever thought himself to be avaricious, or cruel, can it be expected that any person should ever discover that he is too self-conceited? better, however, infinitely better, were it to rank with the merest dunces, than have the conceit and malignity (produced originally from conceit) of some who have distinguished themselves the most as linguists, critics, and poets. even the study of nature, though, from its vast extent, it is less apt to produce this baneful effect, is not always a sufficient guard against it. this is an affecting and an alarming consideration. but in the intellectual, as in the civil and commercial world, we gain nothing but at the risk of some loss; and in this case the possible gain is worth the risk of even this great loss. for when literary, and scientific excellence coincide with that which is of a moral nature, it adds unspeakably to the value of a character. ingenuity coupled with modesty, and great genius with benevolence and true piety, constitute the perfection of human character, and is what we should ever have in view. and a course of education in which both these objects are equally attended to, is the only one that deserves to be called _liberal_: but such as, i hope, you have found this to be. give me leave further to observe to you, that the time that you spend in a place of liberal education is of more importance to you than you can be at present aware of. whatever be the sphere of life for which you are destined, the probability is, that you will hereafter have but little leisure for reading and studying, compared to what you have now. besides, general maxims of all kinds, such as are the foundation of all our future conduct, in morals, religion, or politics, are generally formed at your time of life. from this period expect no great change in your opinions, or conduct; because now it is that you give particular attention to the forming your opinions on all subjects of importance; so that very little that is materially new to you can be expected to occur to you in future life, and almost every thing that you would choose to read will only tend to confirm you in the general principles that you will now adopt. there are, no doubt, exceptions to this, as well as every other general observation; but it is wisdom to suppose, and to act upon the supposition, that we are constituted as the generality of mankind are, and that we shall feel, and act, as they do. since, then, so much depends on the leading principles and maxims which you will now adopt, be it your care to form just and good ones, and let no authority of tutors, or others, have any undue influence over you. in all cases think and judge for yourselves, and especially on all subjects of importance, and with as much attention as you can give to them. it may not be amiss, in the present state of things, to say something respecting another subject, which now commands universal attention. you cannot but be apprised, that many persons entertain a prejudice against this college, on account of the republican, and, as they choose to call them, the licentious, principles of government, which are supposed to be taught here. show, then, by your general conversation, and conduct, that you are the friends of peace and good order; and that, whatever may be your opinions with respect to the best form of government for people who have no previous prejudices or habits, you will do every thing in your power for the preservation of that form of it which the generality of your countrymen approve, and under which you live, which is all that can be reasonably expected of any subject. as it is not necessary that every good son should think his parent the wisest and best man in the world, but it is thought sufficient if the son pay due respect and obedience to his parent; so neither is it to be expected that every man should be of opinion that the form of government under which he happens to be born is the best of all possible forms of government. it is enough that he submit to it, and that he make no attempt to bring about any change, except by fair reasoning, and endeavouring to convince his countrymen, that it is in their power to better their condition in that respect, as well as in any other. think, therefore, speak, and write, with the greatest freedom on the subject of government, particular or general, as well as on any other that may come before you. it can only be avowed tyranny that would prevent this. but at the same time submit yourselves, and promote submission in others, to that form of government which you find to be most approved, in this country, which at present unquestionably is that by _king, lords, and commons_. as to _religion_, we may, surely, be allowed to think and act entirely for ourselves; in all cases obeying god and conscience rather than man. but let us be thankful for the degree of liberty that we are allowed, though it be not all that we are justly entitled to; and let us not use any other means than reason and argument in order to better our condition. by this peaceable and steady conduct we shall at length convince those who will hear reason, that we are entitled to greater consideration; and doubt not but whatever is _true_ and _right_, will finally prevail, and be universally established. that any of your tutors, or any of the friends of this institution, wish to promote reformation, in church or state, by any other means than those of reason, and argument, is a _calumny_, utterly void of foundation, or probability. but your conduct, dispersed as you will soon be in different parts of the country, will be the best means of refuting it. let us leave the method of proceeding by _riot_ and _tumult_ to those persons to whose schemes such proceedings are congenial. truth stands in no need of such support, and will always triumph when assailed by such weapons. in return, then, for the advantages which you have enjoyed in this institution, do it this service; and in recommending it, i trust you are doing substantial service to the cause of liberty and truth; and conferring a most important benefit on your country, and on mankind. contents. lecture i. _the introduction_ 1 lecture ii. _of the properties of all matter_ 9 _of aeriform substances_ 13 lecture iii. _of atmospherical air_ 15 lecture iv. _of dephlogisticated air_ 18 _of phlogisticated air_ 20 lecture v. _of inflammable air_ 21 lecture vi. _of nitrous air_ 23 lecture vii. _of fixed air_ 27 _of hepatic air_ 29 _of phosphoric air_ 30 lecture viii. _of dephlogisticated marine acid air_ 31 _of phlogisticated marine acid air_ 32 lecture ix. _of vitriolic acid air_ 34 _of fluor acid air_ 36 lecture x. _of alkaline air_ 37 _miscellaneous observations relating to air_ 38 lecture xi. _of liquid substances; and first of water_ 41 lecture xii. _of the nitrous acid_ 45 lecture xiii. _of the vitriolic acid_ 49 _of the marine acid_ 52 lecture xiv. _of the vegetable acids, and others of a less perfect nature_ 54 lecture xv. _of the phosphoric acid_ 59 lecture xvi. _of alkalis_ 62 lecture xvii. _of liquid inflammable substances_ 66 _of æther_ 68 lecture xviii. _of oil_ 70 lecture xix. _of solid substances_ 76 _of calcareous earth_ 77 _of siliceous earth_ 79 lecture xx. _of argillaceous earth_ 81 _of terra ponderosa_ 82 _of magnesia_ 83 lecture xxi. _of ores_ 84 _of gold_ 87 lecture xxii. _of silver_ 90 _of platina_ 92 lecture xxiii. _of mercury_ 94 lecture xxiv. _of lead_ 99 _of copper_ 101 lecture xxv. _of iron_ 105 lecture xxvi. _of tin_ 109 _of the semi-metals_ 113 lecture xxvii. _of nickel_ 115 _of arsenic_ 116 _of cobalt_ 118 _of zinc_ 119 lecture xxviii. _of antimony_ 121 _of manganese_ 123 _of wolfram_ 124 _of molybdena_ 125 _of solid combustible substances_ 126 lecture xxix. _of the doctrine of phlogiston and the composition of water_ 127 lecture xxx. _of heat_ 135 lecture xxxi. _of animal heat_ 145 lecture xxxii. _of light_ 148 lecture xxxiii. _of magnetism_ 155 lecture xxxiv. _of electricity_ 162 lecture xxxv. _the same subject continued_ 170 lecture xxxvi. _the same subject continued_ 177 lectures on experimental philosophy. lecture i. _the introduction._ the object of experimental philosophy is the knowledge of nature in general, or more strictly, that of the properties of natural substances, and of the changes of those properties in different circumstances. this knowledge can only be attained by _experiment_, or _observation_; as that clay is capable of becoming hard by means of fire, and thereby being made into bricks, and that by the same means lime-stone can be converted into quick-lime, and by the addition of water and sand, make mortar. it is by observation also that we discover that stones and other heavy bodies fall to the ground, and that a magnet will attract iron. in other words, experimental philosophy is an investigation of the wisdom of god in the works and _the laws of nature_, so that it is one of the greatest objects to the mind of man, and opens a field of inquiry which has no bounds; every advance we make suggesting new doubts and subjects of farther inquiry. the uniformity we discover in the properties of natural substances enables us to lay down general rules, or principles, which, being invariable, we call the laws of nature; and by our knowledge of these laws we are able to predict, and at our own pleasure to produce, particular results, and this is the source of all the powers of man. it is the direction we acquire of the powers of nature; so that, as lord bacon observed, _knowledge is power_. all arts and manufactures are derived from science. thus the doctrine of _mechanics_ is an application of the law of gravitation. every thing we are capable of doing by means of the steam-engine is derived from our knowledge of the properties of water in steam; all the great effects of gunpowder we owe to our knowledge of the composition, and chemical properties, of that substance. every new appearance in nature is preceded by some new circumstance, and to this, or rather to something always attending it, we say that the appearance is _owing_. this circumstance we therefore call the _cause_, and the new appearance the _effect_ of that cause. thus we say that the union of phlogiston to a particular kind of earth is the cause of its becoming a metal. it is one of the principal rules of philosophizing to admit no more causes than are necessary to account for the effects. thus, if the power of gravity, by which heavy bodies fall to the earth, be sufficient to retain the planets in their orbits, we are authorized to reject the _cartesian vortices_. in other words, we must make no more general propositions than are necessary to comprehend all the particulars contained in them. thus, after having observed that iron consists of a particular kind of earth united to phlogiston, and that it is soluble in acids; and that the same is true of all other metallic substances, we say, universally, that all metals consist of a peculiar earth and phlogiston, and that they are all soluble in some acid. of the circumstances which occasion a change in the properties of bodies, some are the addition of what are properly called _substances_, or things that are the objects of our senses, being _visible_, _tangible_, or having _weight_, &c. thus the addition of an acid changes an alkali into a neutral salt. but other changes are occasioned either by a change of texture in the substance itself, or the addition of something that is not the object of any of our senses. thus, a piece of steel becomes a magnet by the touch of another magnet, and a drop of glass acquires the property of flying asunder by a small fracture, in consequence of falling when red hot into cold water. such also, in the opinion of some, is the difference between hot and cold substances. till the nature of the cause be ascertained, it is convenient to make use of the term _principle_, as including both of the above-mentioned causes of the change of properties in bodies. thus, whatever be the real cause of gravity, or of inflammability, we may speak of the _principle of gravity_, or of _inflammability_; whether, with newton, we suppose gravity to be occasioned by a fluid pervading the whole universe, which he termed _æther_, and whether inflammability be caused by the presence of a real substance called phlogiston, or not. in this manner we use the letters _x_ and _y_ to denote unknown quantities in algebra. when changes are made in substances by the addition of other substances, they make what is called a _chemical union_; and in this case the properties of the compound cannot with any certainty be deduced from those of the component parts, but must be ascertained by fresh experiments. thus, from the specific gravities, or the degrees of fusibility, of two metals, those of the compound cannot be predicted. neither water nor acid of vitriol will separately dissolve iron, so as to produce inflammable air, but both together will do it. however, the properties of similar compounds are similar to one another. thus, all metals dissolved in acids are precipitated by mild alkalis. this chemical union of two substances we ascribe to a certain _elective attraction_, or _affinity_ that subsists between them, in consequence of which they unite with one another whenever a proper opportunity offers, in preference to those substances to which they were before united. thus the vitriolic acid, having a stronger affinity with the vegetable alkali which is the basis of nitre, will unite with that alkali, and with it form another compound, called _vitriolated tartar_, while the acid of nitre, being detached from its base, is collected separately. when two substances compose one liquid, and a third, which has a stronger affinity with either of the two parts than they have with each other, is added to them, it will unite with that part, and take its place in the solution, while the other will in many cases be precipitated, and may be collected. thus the earth of alum is precipitated from a solution of alum by salt of tartar. this is the case of _simple affinity_. when both the substances are compounds, the component parts of which have a weaker affinity with each other than they have with those of the other compound, two new combinations are formed, and this is called a case of _double affinity_. thus when phlogisticated alkali is poured into a solution of green vitriol, the acid of the vitriol unites with the alkali, while the phlogiston joining the calx of iron makes prussian blue. all nature lying open to our investigation, we must consider the different parts in some order. but it is not very material which we adopt, because, begin where we will, the properties of the substances we first treat of will be connected with those which must be particularly considered afterwards, the changes in one substance being occasioned by its union with another. it will be impossible, for example, to explain the properties of metals without considering the _acids_, because by their union with acids very important changes are made in their properties. there have been three principal methods of arranging natural substances. one is according to the _three kingdoms_, as they are called, into which they have been distributed, viz. the _mineral_, the _vegetable_, and the _animal_. another is according to the _elements_ which enter into their composition, and a third according to the _form_ in which they are usually found, viz. _aerial_, _fluid_, or _solid_. upon the whole this last appears to me to be the most convenient, especially as it is easy to intermix general observations concerning the other divisions when they are particularly wanted. as there will be frequent occasion to speak of the component and elementary parts of all substances, i shall here observe, that, according to the latest observations, the following appear to be the elements which compose all natural substances, viz. _dephlogisticated air_, or the _acidifying principle_; _phlogiston_, or the _alkaline principle_; the different _earths_, and the principles of _heat_, _light_, and _electricity_. besides these, there are the following principles which have not been proved to be substances, viz. _attraction_, _repulsion_, and _magnetism_. by the help of these principles we are able, according to the present state of natural knowledge, to explain all the appearances that have yet occurred to us. lecture ii. _of the properties of all matter._ before i consider the properties of particular substances, it will be proper to mention those which are common to them all. but i shall first observe, that the term _substance_ has no proper idea annexed to it, but is merely a convenience in speech; since we cannot speak of the properties of substances, such as _hard_, _round_, _coloured_, &c. &c. (which circumstances alone affect our senses, and thereby give proper ideas) without saying that they inhere in, or belong to, some _thing_, _substance_, or _substratum_. the terms _being_ and _person_ are also in the same predicament. one property of all substances is _extension_, since they all occupy some portion of space. the incapacity of any substance to change its place has been termed, though improperly, the _vis inertiæ_ of matter. it is sufficient to say, that neither this, nor any other effect can be produced without a cause. _infinite divisibility_ is a necessary property of all extended substance; and from this circumstance it will follow, that the smallest quantity of solid matter may be made to fill the largest space, and yet none of the pores shall exceed the smallest given magnitude; and consequently, that, for any thing we know to the contrary, all the bodies in the universe may be comprized in the smallest space. another property usually ascribed to all matter is _impenetrability_, or the necessary exclusion of any substance from the place occupied by another. but the only proof of impenetrability is the _resistance_ that we find to our endeavours to put one substance into the place of another; and it is demonstrated by experiments, that this resistance is not occasioned by the actual contact of the substances, but by a power of repulsion acting at a real distance from their surfaces. it requires a considerable force to bring two solid substances into as near contact as the particles of the same substance; and that _these_ are not in actual contact is evident, from their being capable of being brought nearer by cold; and this is most remarkable with respect to the heaviest, that is, the densest, of all substances, viz. the metals. a more positive argument for the penetrability of matter is, that the particles of light, after entering the densest transparent substance, do not appear to meet with any obstruction to their progress till they come to the opposite side. the powers of _attraction_ and _repulsion_ seem to be common to all matter, and the component parts of all substances are kept in their places by the due balance of those opposite powers. if, by any means, the particles of any substance be removed beyond their sphere of mutual attraction, they repel one another, as those of water when it becomes steam. of the different kinds of attraction, that of _gravitation_ seems to extend to the greatest possible distance; but that which keeps together the parts of the same substance, thence called the _attraction of cohesion_, and the different kinds of chemical attractions, called _affinities_, only act at a small distance. of the causes of these attractions we are entirely ignorant. _of aeriform substances._ aeriform substances, of which the air that we breathe is one, though invisible, are real substances, as appears by their excluding other substances. that the air has _weight_ appears by actually weighing a vessel before and after it is exhausted of air by means of an air-pump (an instrument contrived for that purpose) by its bursting a bladder, and various other experiments. air, being a fluid, presses in all directions, as in the experiment of the fountain in _vacuo_, and others. the weight of the air is the cause of the suspension of mercury in a barometer, and of the action of pumps. the weight of atmospherical air is to that of water in the proportion of about 1 to 800, so as to press with the weight of about fourteen pounds on every square inch of surface. air, being an elastic fluid, is capable of occupying more or less space according to the pressure which it sustains, as appears by a bladder partially filled with air being expanded when the air is drawn from a receiver in which it is put, by means of the air-pump, and compressed in the condensing engine, an instrument the reverse of the air-pump. air is necessary to the conveyance of sound, to the existence of flame, and to animal life. lecture iii. _of atmospherical air._ the first species of air that offers itself to our consideration is that of the atmosphere, which appears to consist of a mixture of two kinds of air, of different and opposite qualities, viz., dephlogisticated and phlogisticated, in the proportion of about one third of the former to two thirds of the latter. it is by means of the former of these two ingredients that it is capable of supporting flame and animal life. this composition of atmospherical air is proved by several substances absorbing the dephlogisticated air, and leaving the phlogisticated. all these processes have been termed _phlogistic_, because the effect is not produced but by substances supposed to contain phlogiston in a volatile state; and by the affinity between phlogiston and the dephlogisticated part of the air, the one is separated from the other. of these processes are the calcination of metals, a mixture of iron-filings and sulphur, liver of sulphur, the burning of phosphorus, and the effluvia of flowers. in some cases, however, it is not so clear that any thing is emitted from the substance that produces this effect; for water deprived of all air will absorb the dephlogisticated part of the atmospherical in preference to the phlogisticated part. as the purity of atmospherical air, or its fitness for respiration, depends upon the proportion of the dephlogisticated air that it contains, any of the above-mentioned processes will suffice to determine it. the more any given quantity of air is diminished by any of them, the purer it was before the diminution. but this effect is produced the most quickly by a mixture of nitrous air, or firing inflammable air in it, being almost instantaneous. in order to measure the purity of air, it is convenient to take more of the nitrous or inflammable air than is necessary to saturate the dephlogisticated air it contains. equal quantities of each best answer the purpose. supposing a given quantity of atmospherical air to be mixed with an equal quantity of nitrous air, and the residuum to be 1.1 measure, the proportion of dephlogisticated and phlogisticated air in it may be found by the following arithmetical operation, it being here taken for granted that one measure of pure dephlogisticated air will saturate two measures of pure nitrous air. 2.0 viz. one of each. 1.1 the residuum. ---- 3)0.9 the quantity that has disappeared. 0.3 the dephlogisticated air contained in the measure of the air examined. and this substracted from 1 leaves .7 for the proportion of phlogisticated air in it. lecture iv. _of dephlogisticated air._ dephlogisticated air, which is one of the component parts of atmospherical air, is a principal element in the composition of acids, and may be extracted by means of heat from many substances which contain them, especially the nitrous and vitriolic; as from nitre, red precipitate, the vitriols, and turbith mineral, and also from these two acids themselves, exposed to a red heat in an earthen tube. this kind of air is also contained in several substances which had attracted it from the atmosphere, as from precipitate _per se_, _minium_, & _manganese_. dephlogisticated air is likewise produced by the action of light upon green vegetables; and this seems to be the chief means employed by nature to preserve the purity of the atmosphere. it is this ingredient in atmospheric air that enables it to support combustion and animal life. by means of it the most intense heat may be produced, and in the purest of it animals will live nearly five times as long as in an equal quantity of atmospherical air. in respiration, part of this air, passing the membrane of the lungs, unites with the blood, and imparts to it its florid colour, while the remainder, uniting with phlogiston exhaled from the venous blood, forms fixed air. it is dephlogisticated air combined with water that enables fishes to live in it. dephlogisticated air is something heavier than atmospherical air, and the purity of it measured by mixing with it two equal quantities of nitrous or inflammable air, deducing the residuum after the diminution from the three measures employed, and dividing the remainder by 3, as in the process for common air. _of phlogisticated air._ the other ingredient in the composition of atmospherical air is phlogisticated air. it is procured by extracting the dephlogisticated part of the common air, as by the calcination of metals, &c. &c. by dissolving animal substances in nitrous acid, and also by the union of phlogiston with nitrous air, as by heating iron in it, and by a mixture of iron-filings and sulphur. phlogisticated air extinguishes a candle, is entirely unfit for respiration, and is something lighter than common air. it is not capable of decomposition, except by exploding it together with a superabundance of dephlogisticated air, and a quantity of inflammable air, or by taking the electric spark repeatedly in a mixture of it and dephlogisticated air. in these cases nitrous acid is formed. lecture v. _of inflammable air._ inflammable air is procured from all combustible substances by means of heat and water, and from several of the metals, especially iron, zink, and tin, by the vitriolic and marine acids. from oils and spirit of wine it is procured by the electric spark. by the same means also alkaline air is converted into it. that which is procured from metals, especially by steam, is the purest and the lightest, about ten times lighter than common air; in consequence of which, if a sufficient quantity be confined in a light covering, it is possible to make it carry up heavy weights. when it is procured from animal or vegetable substances, it is of a heavier kind, and burns with a lambent flame, of various colours, according to the circumstances. calces of metals heated in inflammable air are revived, and the air absorbed; and since all the metals are revived in the same inflammable air, the principle of metallization, or _phlogiston_, appears to be the same in them all. pure inflammable air seems to consist of phlogiston and water, and the lambent kinds to be the same thing, with the addition of some oily vapour diffused through it. lecture vi. _of nitrous air._ nitrous air is procured by dissolving most of the metals, especially iron, mercury, and copper, in the nitrous acid; but that from mercury seems to be the purest. nitrous air produced from copper contains a mixture of phlogisticated air. some nitrous air is also obtained from the solution of all vegetable substances in nitrous acid; whereas animal substances in the same process yield chiefly phlogisticated air: but in both these cases there is a mixture of fixed air. this species of air is likewise produced by impregnating water with nitrous vapour. this process continues to have this effect after the water becomes blue, but ceases when it turns green; there not then, probably, being a sufficient proportion of water. nitrous air is likewise produced by volatile alkali passing over red hot manganese, or green vitriol, when they are yielding dephlogisticated air. this shews that dephlogisticated air is one ingredient in the composition of nitrous air, and the same thing appears by pyrophorus burning in it. on the contrary, when nitrous air is made to pass over red-hot iron, volatile alkali is produced. nitrous air is completely decomposed by a mixture of about half its bulk of dephlogisticated air, and the produce is nitrous acid. and as nitrous acid is likewise formed by the union of inflammable and dephlogisticated air, one principal ingredient in nitrous air must be common to it and inflammable air, or phlogiston. this air is likewise decomposed by dephlogisticated nitrous acid, which by this means becomes phlogisticated. it is also decomposed by a solution of green vitriol, which by this means becomes black, and when exposed to the air, or heated, emits nitrous air, and recovers its former colour. these decompositions of nitrous air seem to be effected by depriving it of phlogiston, and thereby reducing it to the phlogisticated air originally contained in it. this kind of air is diminished to about one fourth of its bulk by a mixture of iron filings and brimstone, or by heating iron in it, or calcining other metals in it, when the remainder is phlogisticated air. all that iron gets in this process is an addition of weight, which appears to be water, but it loses its phlogiston, so that nitrous air seems to contain more phlogiston, and less water than phlogisticated air. nitrous air and dephlogisticated air will act upon one another through a bladder, but in this case there remains about one-fourth of the bulk of nitrous air, and that is phlogisticated air; so that in this case there seems to be a conversion of nitrous air into phlogisticated air without any addition of phlogiston. nitrous air is decomposed by pyrophorus, and by agitation in olive oil, which becomes coagulated by the process. it is also absorbed by spirit of turpentine, by ether, by spirit of wine, and alkaline liquors. it is imbibed by charcoal, and both that air which is afterwards expelled from it by heat, and that which remains unabsorbed, is phlogisticated air. nitrous air resists putrefaction, but is diminished by the animal substances exposed to it to about a fourth of its bulk, and becomes phlogisticated air. it is likewise fatal to plants, and particularly to insects. when nitrous air is long exposed to iron, it is diminished and brought into a state in which a candle will burn in it, though no animal can breathe it. but this peculiar modification of nitrous air, called _dephlogisticated nitrous air_, is produced with the greatest certainty by dissolving iron in spirit of nitre saturated with copper, impregnating water with this air, and then expelling it from the water by heat. if bits of earthen ware be heated in this dephlogisticated nitrous air, a great proportion of it becomes permanent air, not miscible with water, and nearly as pure as common air, so that the principle of _heat_ seems to be wanting to constitute it permanent air. lecture vii. _of fixed air._ having considered the properties of those kinds of air which are not readily absorbed by water, and therefore may be confined by it, i proceed to those which _are_ absorbed by it, and which require to be confined by mercury. there are two kinds, however, in a middle state between these, being absorbed by water, but not very readily; a considerable time, or agitation, being necessary for that purpose. the first of these is _fixed air_. this kind of air is obtained in the purest state by dissolving marble, lime-stone, and other kinds of mild calcareous earth in any acid. it is also obtained by the burning, or the putrefaction, of both animal and vegetable substances, but with a mixture of both phlogisticated and inflammable air. fixed air is also produced by heating together iron filings and red precipitate; the former of which would alone yield inflammable air, and the latter dephlogisticated. fixed air is therefore a combination of these two kinds of air. another fact which proves the same thing is, that if charcoal of copper be heated in dephlogisticated air, almost the whole of it will be converted into fixed air. on the same principle fixed air is produced when iron, and other inflammable substances, are burned in dephlogisticated air, and also when minium, and other substances containing dephlogisticated air, are heated in inflammable air. that water is an essential part of fixed air is proved by an experiment upon _terra ponderosa aerata_, which yields fixed air when it is dissolved in an acid, but not by mere heat. if steam, however, be admitted to it in that state, it will yield as much fixed air as when it is dissolved in an acid. water absorbs something more than its own bulk of fixed air, and then becomes a proper acid. iron dissolved in this water makes it a proper chalybeate; as without iron it is of the same nature with pyrmont or seltzer water, which by this means may be made artificially. ice will not imbibe this air, and therefore freezing expels it from water. fixed air extinguishes flame, and is fatal to animals breathing in it. also water impregnated with this air is fatal to fishes, and highly injurious to plants. but water thus impregnated will prevent, in a great measure, the putrefaction of animal substances. fixed air thrown into the intestines, by way of glyster, has been found to give relief in some cases of putrid disease. _of hepatic air._ another species of air absorbed by water, but not instantly, is termed _hepatic air_, being produced by the solution of liver of sulphur, or of sulphurated iron, in vitriolic or marine acid. water imbibes about twice its bulk of this kind of air, and it is then the same thing with the sulphureous waters of harrowgate. _of phosphoric air._ phosphoric air is produced by the solution of phosphorus in caustic fixed alkali. if this air be confined by mercury, it will take fire on being admitted to atmospheric, and much more to dephlogisticated air. after agitation in water it loses this property, and the residuum is merely inflammable air, with no great diminution of its bulk. this kind of air, therefore, probably consists of phosphorus dissolved in inflammable air; though it cannot be made by melting it in inflammable air. lecture viii. _of dephlogisticated marine acid air._ this species of air is produced by heating spirit of salt with manganese; or more readily, by pouring acid of vitriol on a mixture of salt and manganese, in the proportion of about 16 of the former to 6 of the latter. in this case the acid of vitriol decomposes the salt, and the marine acid, disengaged in the form of air, takes dephlogisticated air from the manganese; so that this species of air seems to consist of marine acid vapour, and dephlogisticated air. this species of air has a peculiarly pungent smell, and is absorbed by water as readily as fixed air. the water takes about twice its bulk of it; and thereby acquires a yellowish tinge. both this air, and the water impregnated with it, discharges vegetable colours from linen or cotton, and is thereby useful in bleaching. this air when cold coagulates into a yellowish substance. it dissolves mercury, and with it forms _corrosive sublimate_. _of phlogisticated marine acid air._ besides the preceding kinds of air which are slowly absorbed by water, there are others which are absorbed by it very rapidly, so that they cannot be confined but by mercury. of this kind is _phlogisticated marine acid air_, procured by the acid of vitriol and common salt; the former seizing upon the alkaline basis of the latter, and thereby expelling the marine acid in the form of air. it is called _phlogisticated_ to distinguish it from _dephlogisticated marine acid air_, which seems to be the same thing, with the addition of dephlogisticated air. phlogisticated marine acid air is heavier than common air. it extinguishes a candle with a blue flame. it dissolves many substances containing phlogiston, as iron, dry flesh, &c. and thereby forms a little inflammable air. water absorbs 360 times its bulk of this air, and is then the strongest spirit of salt. it absorbs one-sixth more than its bulk of alkaline air, and with it forms the common sal ammoniac. its affinity to water enables it to dissolve ice, and to deprive borax, nitre, and other saline substances, of the water that enters into their composition. lecture ix. _of vitriolic acid air._ vitriolic acid air is procured by heating in hot acid of vitriol almost any substance containing phlogiston, especially the metals which are soluble in that acid, as copper, mercury, &c. this kind of air is heavier than common air, and extinguishes a candle, but without any particular colour of its flame. it will not dislodge the nitrous or marine acids from any substance containing them. by its affinity to water it deprives borax of it. one measure of this air saturates two of alkaline air, and with it forms the vitriolic ammoniac. water imbibes between 30 and 40 times its bulk of this air, and retains it when frozen. water thus impregnated dissolves some metals, and thereby yields inflammable air. if this water be confined in a glass tube, together with common air, and be exposed to a long continued heat, it forms real sulphur, the dephlogisticated part of the common air being imbibed, and forming real vitriolic acid, which uniting with the phlogiston in the air, forms the sulphur. also this air mixed with atmospheric air will, without heat, imbibe some part of it, and thereby become the common acid of vitriol; so that water impregnated with vitriolic acid air, commonly called _sulphureous_, or _phlogisticated acid of vitriol_, wants dephlogisticated air to make it the common acid of of vitriol. this kind of air is imbibed by oils, which thereby change their colour; whale oil becoming red, olive oil of an orange colour, and spirit of turpentine of the colour of amber. if this air be confined in a glass tube by mercury, and the electric spark be taken in it, a black tinge will be given to the glass contiguous to the spark, and this black substance appears to be mercury super-phlogisticated; since by exposure to air it becomes running mercury: so that the vapour of mercury must be diffused through every part of this air, to the distance of at least several feet from the surface of the mercury. _of fluor acid air._ fluor acid air is procured by dissolving the earthy substance called _fluor_ in vitriolic acid. this kind of air extinguishes a candle, and, like vitriolic acid air, one measure of it saturates two of alkaline air. it is peculiar to this kind of air to dissolve glass when it is hot. it seems to consist of a peculiar acid vapour united to the stony substance of the fluor; for water being admitted to it absorbs the acid vapour, and the stony substance is deposited. by this means it exhibits an amusing appearance, whether water be admitted to a glass jar previously filled with that air, or the bubbles of air be admitted, as they are formed, to a quantity of water resting on mercury. lecture x. _of alkaline air._ alkaline air is produced by means of heat from caustic volatile alkali, and also from a mixture of sal-ammoniac and slaked lime, in the proportion of about one-fourth of the former to three-fourths of the latter. in this case the marine acid in the sal-ammoniac unites with the calcareous earth, and the volatile alkali (probably with the assistance of the water) takes the form of air. this species of air is heavier than inflammable air, but lighter than any of the acid airs. like them, however, it dissolves ice, and deprives alum, and some other saline substances, of the water which they contain. united with fixed air, it makes the concrete volatile alkali; with marine acid air, the common sal-ammoniac; and with water, the caustic volatile alkali. the electric spark, or a red heat, converts alkaline air into three times its bulk of inflammable air; and the calces of metals are revived in alkaline, as well as in inflammable air; but there remains about one-fourth of its bulk of phlogisticated air. these facts shew that alkaline air consists chiefly of phlogiston. _miscellaneous observations relating to air._ the _nitrous_ acid may be exhibited in the form of air, as well as the vitriolic, the marine, and the fluor acids. but it cannot be confined even by mercury, which it instantly dissolves. it may, however, in some measure, be confined in a dry glass vessel, from which it will in a great measure expel the common air. this nitrous acid air is that red vapour, which is produced by the rapid solution of bismuth, and some other metals in the nitrous acid. but the vegetable acid cannot be exhibited in the form of air. it is only capable of being converted into vapour, like water: and in the common temperature of our atmosphere, returns to a state of fluidity. different kinds of air which have no affinity to each other, when once mixed together will not separate, notwithstanding any difference of specific gravity. such is the case of a mixture of inflammable and dephlogisticated air, and even of inflammable and fixed air. without this property also, the phlogisticated air, which constitutes the greatest part of our atmosphere, being specifically lighter than dephlogisticated air, of which the other part of it consists, would separate from it, and ascend into the higher regions of the atmosphere. inflammable air, however, will not mix with acid or alkaline air. different kinds of air are expanded differently by the same degrees of heat; dephlogisticated air the least, and alkaline air the most. if any fluid, as water, spirit of wine, or even mercury, be heated in a porous earthen vessel, surrounded by any kind of air, the vapour of the fluid will pass through the vessel _one_ way, while the air passes the _other_; and when the operation ceases, with respect to the _one_, it likewise ceases with respect to the _other_. lecture xi. _of liquid substances_; and first of _water_. having considered all the substances that are usually found in the form of _air_, i come to those that are generally in a _fluid_ form, beginning with _water_, which is the principal, if not the only cause of fluidity to all the other substances that i shall place in this class. pure water is a liquid substance, transparent, without colour, taste, or smell; and with different degrees of heat and cold may be made to assume the three forms of a solid, of a fluid, and of air. below 32° of fahrenheit it is ice, and above 212° it is vapour; so that in an atmosphere below 32° it never could have been known to be any thing else than a peculiar kind of stone, and above 212° a peculiar species of air. in passing from the state of a solid to that of a liquid, water absorbs a great quantity of the principle, or matter, of _heat_, which remains in it in a _latent_ state; and in passing from a state of fluid to that of vapour, it absorbs much more; and this heat is found when the processes are reversed. it has been observed, that when water becomes vapour, it takes the form of small globules, hollow within, so as to be specifically lighter than air. the degree of heat at which water is converted into vapour depends upon the pressure of the atmosphere; so that in vacuo, or on the top of a high mountain, it boils with little heat; and when compressed, as in papin's digester, or in the bottom of a deep pit, it requires much heat. in the former case the restoring of the pressure will instantly put a stop to the boiling, and in the latter case the removing of the pressure will instantly convert the heated water into vapour. the ease with which water is converted into vapour by heat, has given a great power to mechanicians, either by employing the natural pressure of the atmosphere, when steam is condensed under a moveable pistern, in an iron cylinder, which was the principle of the old fire-engine, or by employing the elastic power of steam to produce the same effect, which is the principle of mr. watt's steam engine. water was long thought to be incompressible by any external force, but mr. canton has shewn that even the pressure of the atmosphere will condense it very sensibly. we do not know any external force equal to that by which water is expanded when it is converted into ice, or into vapour. for though the particles of water approach nearer by cold, yet when it crystallizes, the particles arrange themselves in a particular manner, with interstices between them; so that, on the whole, it takes up more room than before. water has an affinity to, and combines with, almost all natural substances, aerial, fluid, or solid; but most intimately with acids, alkalies, calcareous earth, and that calx of iron which is called _finery cinder_, from which the strongest heat will not expel it. it has been supposed by some, that by frequent distillation, and also by agitation, water may be converted into a kind of earth; but this does not appear to be the case. it has also of late been thought, that water is resolvable into dephlogisticated and inflammable air; but the experiments which have been alleged to prove this do not satisfy me; so that, for any thing that appeared till very lately, water might be considered as a simple element. by means of heat, however, it seems to be resolvable into such air as that of which the atmosphere consists, viz. dephlogisticated and phlogisticated, only with a greater proportion of the former. water, with respect to specific gravity and temperature, has generally been made the standard to all other substances; its freezing and boiling points being the limits by means of which thermometers are graduated. other substances have also been compared with water, as a standard, with respect to the capacity of receiving heat, and retaining it in a latent state, as will be shewn when we consider the subject of heat. lecture xii. _of the nitrous acid._ under the head of _liquids_ i shall consider _acids_ and _alkalis_, though some of them may be exhibited in the form of air, and others in a solid form. these two chemical principles are formed to unite with one another, and then they constitute what is called a _neutral salt_. both acids and alkalis are distinguishable by their taste. another test, and more accurate, is, that acids change the blue juices of vegetables red, and alkalis turn the syrup of violets green. acids are generally distinguished according to the three kingdoms to which they belong, viz. _mineral_, _vegetable_, and _animal_. the mineral acids are three, the _nitrous_, the _vitriolic_, and the _marine_. the nitrous acid is formed by the union of the purest inflammable air, or the purest nitrous air, with dephlogisticated air. but it is usually procured from nitre by means of the vitriolic acid, which, seizing its base, expels the nitrous acid in a liquid form. on this account this acid is said to be weaker than the vitriolic. if the nitrous acid be made to pass through a red-hot earthen tube, it will be decomposed, and the greatest part of it be converted into dephlogisticated air. like all other acids, the nitrous acid has a strong affinity to water; but it is not capable of so much concentration as the vitriolic. it is generally of an orange or yellow colour; but heat will expel this colour in the form of a red vapour, which is the same acid in the form of air, and loaded with phlogiston; and therefore when it is colourless it is said to be dephlogisticated. but the colourless vapour exposed to heat, or to light, will become coloured again; and the liquid acid imbibing this coloured vapour, becomes coloured as before. this acid tinges the skin of a yellow colour, which does not disappear till the epidermis be changed. the nitrous acid unites with phlogiston, alkalis, metallic substances, and calcareous earth. by means of its affinity with phlogiston it occasions that rapid accension called _detonation_, when any salt containing this acid, especially nitre, is applied to hot charcoal, or when charcoal is put to hot nitre. in fact, the charcoal burns so rapidly by means of the dephlogisticated air supplied by the nitre. a mixture of sulphur assists the accension of these substances, and makes gunpowder, in the explosion of which much nitrous or phlogisticated air is suddenly produced, and expanded by the heat. the application of this force, both to useful and destructive purposes, is well known. if, instead of nitre, a salt made with dephlogisticated marine acid be made use of, the explosion is more easily produced, and is much more violent. friction will do this as well as heat. nitre also enters into the composition of _pulvis fulminans_, viz. three parts nitre, two of dry alkali, and one of sulphur. this composition melts, and yields a blue flame, before it explodes. by means of the affinity of the nitrous acid to _oil_, another substance containing phlogiston, it is capable of producing not only a great heat, but even a sudden flame, especially when mixed with a little vitriolic acid. nitrous acid dissolves all metallic substances except gold and platina, and in the solution nitrous air is produced. the particular kinds of saline substances formed by the union of the nitrous acid with the several metals and earths may be seen in tables constructed for the purpose. they are all deliquescent. lecture xiii. _of the vitriolic acid._ the vitriolic acid, so called because it was originally procured from _vitriol_, is now generally procured from sulphur; the dephlogisticated part of the air uniting with it in the act of burning. that dephlogisticated air is essential to this acid is evident from the decomposition of it; for if the vapour of it be made to pass through a red-hot earthen tube, a great quantity of dephlogisticated air is procured. this acid has a strong affinity to water, with which it unites with much heat; and it is capable of greater concentration, or of being made specifically heavier, than any other acid. when pure, it is entirely free from colour and smell, owing, probably, to its being free from phlogiston, which is inseparable from the nitrous or marine acids. the vitriolic acid will dislodge the nitrous, or marine, or any other acid, from their earthy or metallic bases; from which property it is called the strongest of all the acids. by means of the superior affinity of the vitriolic acid to earths, and especially to _terra ponderosa_, the smallest quantity of it in water may be discovered by a solution of this earth in the marine acid. in this acid the terra ponderosa is held in perfect solution; but with the vitriolic acid it forms a substance that is insoluble in water, and therefore it instantly appears in the form of a white cloud. perhaps chiefly from the strong affinity which this acid has with water, _pyrophorus_, consisting of a mixture of alum and several substances containing phlogiston, takes fire spontaneously on exposure to the air. it is commonly made of three parts of alum and one of brown sugar, or of two parts alum, one of salt of tartar, and one of charcoal. they must be heated till they have for some time emitted a vapour that burns with a blue flame. the saline substances produced by the union of this acid with the several earths and metals, are best exhibited in tables constructed for the purpose. when united to three of the metals, viz. iron, copper, and zinc, they are called _vitriols_, green, blue, and white. and all the substances which this acid unites with crystallize, and do not deliquesce. this acid unites with oil, and the mixture is always black. when any substance containing phlogiston is heated in the vitriolic acid, another species of the acid, called _sulphureous_, is formed, of a pungent smell. in reality, it is water impregnated with vitriolic acid air. it makes, however, a distinct species of acid, and is dislodged from its base by most of the others. _of the marine acid._ the marine acid is procured from common salt by the vitriolic acid, which unites with its base, the fossil alkali. this acid is generally of a straw-colour; but this is owing to an impregnation with some earthy matter, most of which it readily dissolves, especially the metallic ones. it is less capable of concentration than the vitriolic or nitrous acids, perhaps from a more intimate union of phlogiston with it. no heat can extract from it any dephlogisticated air. though this is denominated a weaker acid than the nitrous, yet it will take silver, lead, or mercury, from their union with the nitrous acid. upon this principle, a solution of these metals in the nitrous acid will readily discover whether any water contains the marine acid, the latter uniting with the metal dissolved in the former, and forming with it, if it be silver, a _luna cornea_; which being a substance insoluble in water, discovers itself by a cloudy appearance. the union of the marine acid with earths forms salts that easily deliquesce, but with the metals such as are capable of crystallization; and so also is that formed by the union of this acid to terra ponderosa. neither this acid nor the nitrous will dissolve gold or platina; but a mixture of them, called _aqua regia_, will do it. the marine acid has a strong affinity to dephlogisticated air, and will take it from manganese and other substances; and with this union it becomes a different acid, called _dephlogisticated marine acid_, being water impregnated with dephlogisticated marine acid air, described above. lecture xiv. _of the vegetable acids, and others of a less perfect nature._ the principal of the vegetable acids are the _acetous_ and the _tartareous_. the acetous acid is the produce of a peculiar fermentation of vegetable substances, succeeding the _vinous_, in which ardent spirit it is procured, and succeeded by the _putrefactive_, in which volatile alkali is generated. thus wine is converted into vinegar. crude vinegar, however, contains some ingredient from the vegetable substances from which it was procured: but distillation separates them, and makes the vinegar colourless; though some of the acid is lost in the process. the acetous acid is concentrated by frost, which does not affect the proper acid, but only the water with which it is united. it may likewise be concentrated by being first combined with alkalies, earths, or metals, and then dislodged by a stronger acid, or by mere heat. thus the acetous acid, combined with vegetable alkali, forms a substance that is called the _foliated earth of tartar_; and it may be expelled from it by the vitriolic acid. when combined with copper it makes _verdigris_; and from this union heat alone will expel it in a concentrated state. the acetous acid thus concentrated is called _radical vinegar_. still, however, it is weaker than any of the preceding mineral acids. several vegetables, as lemons, sorrel, and unripe fruit, contain acids, ready formed by nature, mixed with some of the essential oil of the plants, which gives them their peculiar flavours. all these acids have peculiar properties; but it is not necessary to note them in this very general view of the subject. like vinegar, these acids may be concentrated by frost, and also by a combination with other substances, and then expelled by a stronger acid. the _acid of tartar_ is very similar to that of vinegar. tartar, from which it is procured, is a substance deposited on the inside of wine-casks, though it is also found ready formed in several vegetables. it consists of the vegetable alkali and this peculiar acid. when refined from its impurities, it is called _crystals_, or _cream of tartar_. the acid is procured by mixing the tartar with chalk, or lime, which imbibes the superfluous acid, and this is expelled by the acid of vitriol. or it may be procured by boiling the tartar with five or six times its weight of water, and then putting the acid of vitriol to it. this unites with the vegetable alkali, and forms vitriolated tartar; and the pure acid of tartar may be procured in crystals, by evaporation and filtration, equal in weight to half the cream of tartar. this acid of tartar is more soluble in water than the cream of tartar. this acid, united to the mineral alkali, makes _rochelle salt_. every kind of wood, when distilled, or burned, yields a peculiar acid; and it is the vapour of this acid that is so offensive to the eyes in the smoke of wood. a peculiar acid is obtained from most vegetable substances, especially the farinaceous ones, and from sugar, by distillation with the nitrous acid. this seizes upon the substance with which the acid was united, and especially the phlogiston adhering to it, and then the peculiar _acid of sugar_ crystallizes. thus with three parts of sugar, and thirty of nitrous acid, one part of the proper acid of sugar may be obtained. by the same process an acid may be procured from camphor. the _bark of oak_, and some other vegetable substances, especially nut-galls, contain a substance which has obtained the name of _the astringent principle_; the peculiar property of which is, that it precipitates solutions of iron in the form of a black powder, and in this manner _ink_ is made. but by solution in water and evaporation, crystals, which are a proper _acid of galls_, may be obtained. _amber_ is a hard semitransparent substance, chiefly found in prussia, either dug out of the earth, or thrown up by the sea. it is chiefly remarkable for its electrical property; but by distillation in close vessels there sublimes from it a concreted acid, soluble in 24 times its weight of cold water. amber seems to be of vegetable origin, and to consist of an oil united to this peculiar acid. the acids i shall mention next are of a mineral origin; but being of a less perfect nature as acids, i shall only just note them here. _borax_ is a substance chiefly found in a crystallized state in some lakes in the east indies. it consists of the mineral alkali and a peculiar acid, which may be separated, and exhibited in white flakes, by putting acid of vitriol to a solution of it in water. this acid has been called _sedative salt_, from its supposed uses in medicine. it is an acid that requires fifty times its weight of water to dissolve it. several other mineral substances, as _arsenic_, _molybdena_, _tungsten_, and _wolfram_, in consequence of being treated as the preceding vegetables ones, have been lately found to yield peculiar acids. they are also produced in a concrete state, and require a considerable proportion of water to make them liquid; but as the water in which they are dissolved turns the juice of litmus red, and as they also unite with alkalis, they have all the necessary characteristics of acids. lecture xv. _of the phosphoric acid._ the most important acid of _animal_ origin, though it has lately been found in some mineral substances, is the _phosphoric_. phosphorus itself is a remarkable substance, much resembling sulphur, but much more inflammable. it has been procured chiefly, till of late, from urine, but now more generally from _bones_, by means of the vitriolic acid, which unites with the calcareous earth of which bones consist, and sets at liberty the phosphoric acid, or the base of that acid, with which it was naturally combined. the acid thus procured, mixed with charcoal, and exposed to a strong heat, makes phosphorus. this substance burns with a lambent flame in the common temperature of our atmosphere, but with a strong and vivid flame if it be exposed to the open air when moderately warm. in burning it unites with the dephlogisticated air of the atmosphere, and in this manner the purest phosphoric acid is produced. this acid is also procured in great purity by means of the nitrous or vitriolic acids, especially the former, which readily combines with the phlogiston of the phosphorus, and thus leaves the acid pure. in this process phlogisticated air is produced. this acid is perfectly colourless, and when exposed to heat loses all its water, and becomes a glassy substance, not liable to be dissipated by fire, and readily uniting with earths. united to the mineral alkali, it forms a neutral salt, lately introduced into medicine. united to the mineral and vegetable alkalis naturally contained in urine, it has obtained the name of _microcosmic salt_, frequently used as a flux for mineral substances with a blow-pipe. besides the phosphoric, there are other acids of an animal origin; as that of _milk_, that of _sugar of milk_, that of the _animal calculus_, and that of _fat_. the acid of milk is the sour whey contained in butter-milk, which, by a tedious chemical process, may be obtained pure from any foreign substance. the sugar of milk is procured by evaporating the whey to dryness, then dissolving it in water, clarifying it with whites of eggs, and evaporating it to the consistence of honey. in this state white crystals of the acid of sugar of milk will be obtained. by distilling these crystals with nitrous acid, other crystals of the proper _acid of sugar of milk_ will be obtained, similar to those of the acid of sugar. if the human calculus be distilled, it yields a volatile alkali, and something sublimes from it which has a sourish taste, and therefore called the _acid of the calculus_. it is probably some modification of the phosphoric acid. animal fat yields an acid by distillation, or by first combining it with quick-lime, and then separating it by the vitriolic acid. siliceous earth is corroded by this acid. lecture xvi. _of alkalis._ the class of substances that seems particularly formed by nature to unite with acids, and thereby form _neutral salts_, are the _alkalis_. they have all a peculiar acrid taste, not easily defined. they change the blue juices of vegetables green, or purple, and in common with acids have an affinity with water, so as to be capable of being exhibited in a liquid form; though when this water is expelled by heat, some of them will assume a solid form. alkalis are of two kinds; the _fixed_, which have no smell, and the _volatile_ which have a pungent one. the fixed alkalis are of _vegetable_ or _mineral_ origin. when in a solid form, they both melt with a moderate heat, and uniting with earthy substances, make _glass_. with an intense heat they are volatilized. vegetable alkali is procured by burning plants, and lixiviating the ashes; a purer kind by the burning of tartar, hence called _salt of tartar_; but the purest of all is got by the deflagration of nitre; the charcoal uniting with the acid as it assumes the form of dephlogisticated air, and the alkali being left behind. mineral alkali is found in ashes of sea-weed. it is likewise the basis of sea-salt; from which it is separated by several processes, but especially by the calx of lead, which has a stronger affinity with the marine acid with which it is found combined. alkalis united with fixed air are said to be _mild_, and when deprived of it _caustic_, from their readiness to unite with, and thereby _corrode_, vegetable and animal substances. to render them caustic, they are deprived of their fixed air by quick-lime; and in this state they unite with oils, and make _soap_. alkalis have a stronger affinity with acids than metals have with them; so that they will precipitate them from their solutions in acid menstruums. the vegetable fixed alkali has a strong attraction to water, with which it will become saturated in the common state of our atmosphere, when it is said to _deliquesce_; and having the appearance of _oil_, the salt of tartar is thus said to become _oil of tartar per deliquium_. on the other hand, the mineral, or fossil alkali, is apt to lose its water in a dry atmosphere, and then it is said to _effloresce_. in this state it is often found on old walls. volatile alkali is procured by burning animal substances; in egypt (from whence, as contained in _sal ammoniac_, we till of late imported it) from camel's dung; but now from bones, by distillation. to the liquor thus procured they add vitriolic acid, or substances which contain it. this acid unites with the alkali, and common salt being put to it, a double affinity takes place. the vitriolic acid uniting with the mineral alkali of the salt, makes _glauber salt_, and the marine acid uniting with the volatile alkali, makes _sal ammoniac_. slaked lime added to this, unites with the marine acid of the ammoniac, and sets loose the volatile alkali in the form of _alkaline air_, which combining with water, makes the liquid caustic volatile alkali. if chalk (containing calcareous earth united with fixed air) be mixed with the sal ammoniac, heat will make the calcareous earth unite with the marine acid, while the fixed air of the chalk will unite with the volatile alkali, and assume a solid form, being the _sal volatile_ of the apothecaries. lecture xvii. _of liquid inflammable substances._ of liquid inflammable substances the principal is _spirit of wine_, sometimes called _ardent spirit_, and, when highly rectified, _alcohol_. it is obtained from vegetable substances by their going through the vinous fermentation. it is considerably lighter than water, colourless, and transparent, has a peculiar smell and taste, and the property of inebriating. ardent spirit seems to consist of a peculiar combination of phlogiston and water; for when the vapour of it is made to pass through a red-hot earthen tube, it is resolved into water and inflammable air. it is highly inflammable, and burns without smoke, or leaving any residuum; and in the act of burning its phlogiston so unites with dephlogisticated air as to make fixed air. ardent spirit mixes readily with water in all proportions, and also with essential oils, and balsams or resins, which are the same thing inspissated. by its affinity with essential oils, ardent spirit extracts them froth aromatic plants; and these liquors have obtained the name of _tinctures_. when the tinctures are distilled, the more volatile parts of the essential oils, which come over in distillation, have acquired the name of _waters_; as _lavender water_, _rosemary water_, &c. and what remains in the still is called the _extract_ of the plant. if the tinctures be diluted with much water, the resinous part of the plant will be obtained pure, and separated from the extractive part, which will remain dissolved in the water, while the resin separates from it. spirit of wine will not dissolve the gummy parts of vegetables; and by this means the gummy substances may be separated from their solutions in water, the spirit uniting with the water only. on the other hand, if resins be dissolved in spirit of wine, the affusion of water will separate them. by means of the affinity of spirit of wine with water, it will seize upon the water in which several salts are dissolved, and thus produce an instant crystallization of them. salt of tartar has a greater affinity to water than spirit of wine, and by extracting water from it, will assist in concentrating it; but the best method of rendering spirit wine free from water is distillation, the ardent spirit rising before the water. spirit of wine mixed with the vitriolic and other mineral acids, renders them milder, and thereby more proper for certain medicinal uses. this is called _dulcifying_ them. spirit of wine is a powerful antiseptic, and is therefore of use to preserve vegetable and animal substances from putrefaction. _of æther._ if spirit of wine be distilled with almost any of the acids, the produce is a liquor which has obtained the name of _æther_, from its extreme lightness and volatility, being much lighter, and more volatile, than any other fluid that we are acquainted with. it is highly inflammable, but the burning of it is accompanied with smoke, and some soot; and on this account it is a medium between spirit of wine and oil, the acid having taken from the spirit of wine part of the water that was essential to it, at the same time that it communicated something of its acid peculiarly modified; since æthers have different properties according to the acids by which they are made; as the _vitriolic_, the _nitrous_, the _marine_, and the _acetous_. no æther, however, can be made from the marine acid till it has been in some measure dephlogisticated; from which it may be inferred, that dephlogisticated air is necessary to the composition of æther. vitriolic æther is the most common, in consequence of the process by which it is made being the easiest. æther does not mix with water in all proportions, like spirit of wine, but ten parts of water will take up one of æther. it easily mixes with all oils. it is something remarkable, that though æther will not dissolve gold, it will take from aqua regia the gold that has been previously dissolved in it. by the quick evaporation of æther a considerable degree of cold may be procured; and on this principle it has sometimes been applied to relieve the head-ach and other pains. lecture xviii. _of oil._ oil is a liquid inflammable substance, of great tenacity, disposed to pour in a stream rather than in drops. it is little, if at all, soluble in water. it burns with smoke and soot, and leaves a residuum of a coaly substance. it consists of acid and water combined with phlogiston. all oil is the produce of the vegetable or animal kingdom, no proper mineral substance containing any of it. by distillation oil is in part decomposed, and by this means the thicker kinds of oil are rendered thinner and more volatile, the acid, to which their consistence is chiefly owing, being lost in the process. by repeated distillation it is supposed that all oils may be brought almost to the state of æther, and even of ardent spirit. acids act powerfully upon oils, but very differently, according to the nature of each. alkalies also combine with oils, and the less thin and volatile they are, the more easily are they soluble in alkalies. the union of alkali and oil makes _soap_. all oil dissolves sulphur, and with it makes what is called a _balsam_. oils also dissolve metallic substances, but most sensibly copper and lead. united with the calx of lead, it is used in painting. oil not readily mixing with water, it will diffuse itself over its surface, and, notwithstanding its tenacity, it will do this very rapidly, and to a great extent; and then it has the extraordinary effect of preventing the action of the wind upon the water, so as to prevent the forming of waves. if a quantity of oil and water be put into a glass vessel and swung, the surface of the water below the oil will be seen to change with respect to the vessel, but not that of the oil. if spirit of wine be put upon them, that will be at rest, and both the lower fluids in motion. vegetable oil is of two kinds, the _soft_, or _mild_, which has little or no taste or smell, and the _essential_ oil, which is thin, and retains the smell and taste of the plant from which it was extracted. mild or sweet oil is expressed from the grains or kernels of vegetables, and requires a considerable degree of heat to convert it into vapour, in which state alone it is capable of being inflamed. _essential oil_ is volatile in the heat of boiling water, and is generally obtained by means of distillation from the most odoriferous sorts of plants; but is sometimes found in their vesicles, as in the rind of an orange. the strong taste of this kind of oil arises from the disengaged acid which abounds in it; and by this means it is soluble in spirit of wine, which sweet oil is not; but it loses much of this property by repeated distillations. by long exposure to the air it loses its more volatile parts, and thereby approaches to the nature of a resin. this volatile odoriferous principle has been called the _spiritus rector_ of the plant. the essential oils of different plants differ much in their specific gravity, and also in the manner by which they are affected by cold, some being heavier and others lighter than water, and some being more difficultly, and others more easily, congealed. though the differences with respect to _weight_ and _consistency_ in these oils is probably owing to the state of the acid that is combined with them, these two properties are wholly independent of each other; some essential oils being very thin and yet heavy, and others thick and yet light. essential oils are used in perfumes, and also in medicine, acting powerfully the nervous system. essential oils are very apt to be adulterated. if it be with sweet oil, it may be discovered by evaporation on white paper, or by a solution in spirit of wine, which will not act upon the sweet oil. if spirit of wine be mixed with it, it will be discovered by a milky appearance upon putting water to it, which uniting with the spirit, will leave the oil much divided. if oil of turpentine, which is the cheapest of essential oils, be mixed with any of the more valuable kinds, it will be discovered by evaporation; a strong smell of turpentine being left on the paper, or cloth, upon which the evaporation was made. animal oil, like the vegetable, is of two kinds; the first _butter_, or _fat_, which is easily congealed, owing to the quantity of acid that is intimately combined with it. it resembles the sweet oil of vegetables in having no smell or taste. the other kind of animal oil is extracted by distillation from the flesh, the tendons, the bones, and horns, &c. of animals. it differs essentially from the other kind of animal oil, by containing an alkali instead of an acid. by repeated distillation it becomes highly attenuated and volatile; and in this state it is called the _oil of dippel_, the discoverer of it. all oil exposed to much heat is in part decomposed, and acquires a disagreeable smell; and in this state it is said to be _empyreumatic_: but this property is lost by repeated distillations. besides the vegetable and animal oils above described, there is a fossil oil called _bitumen_, the several kinds of which differ much in colour and consistence; the most liquid is called _petroleum_, from being found in the cavities of rocks, and the more solid kinds are _amber_, _jet_, _asphaltum_, and _pit-coal_. when distilled, the principal component parts of all these substances are an oil and an acid. but all fossil oil is probably of vegetable or animal origin, from masses of vegetables or animals long buried in the earth. their differences from resins and other oily matters are probably owing to _time_; the combinations of mineral acids and oils so nearly resembling bitumens, the principal difference being their insolubility in spirit of wine. that the most solid of these, as amber, has been formerly in a liquid state, is evident, from insects and other substances being frequently found in them; and pit-coal has been often found with both the internal texture and external appearance of wood; so that strata of pit-coal have probably been beds of peat in some former state of the earth. lecture xix. _of solid substances._ all solid substances are capable of becoming fluid by heat, and most of them may thereby be reduced into a state of vapour, or air; and in passing from a fluid into a solid state their component parts assume a particular mode of arrangement, called _crystallization_, which differs according to the nature of the substance; so that all solids, especially if they be suffered to concrete slowly, may be called _crystals_. exclusive of _salts_, which have been considered already, as formed by the union of acids and alkalis, solids in general have obtained the names of _earths_, or _stones_, which differ only in their texture; and they are distinguished into those that are _metallizable_, or those that are not; the former being called _ores_, and the latter simply _earths_; the principal of which are the _calcareous_, _siliceous_, _argillaceous_, _magnesia_, _terra ponderosa_, and a few others which have been discovered lately, but have not been much examined. _of calcareous earth._ calcareous earth is found in the shells of fishes, the bones of animals, chalk, lime-stone, marble, and gypsum: but all calcareous earth is supposed to be of animal origin; and beds of chalk, lime-stone, or marble, are thought to have been beds of shells formed in the sea, in some pristine state of the earth. the calcareous earth which is found in shells, lime-stone, and marble, is combined with fixed air, discovered by effervescing with acids. to obtain it perfectly pure, the earth must be pounded and washed with water, in order to free it from any saline substance which may be contained in it, then dissolved in distilled vinegar, and precipitated by mild alkalies. lime-stone exposed to heat loses about half its weight, in fixed air and water, and the remainder, called _quick-lime_, attracts water very powerfully, and their union is attended with much heat, after which it dissolves into a fine powder called _slaked lime_. if it be left exposed to the atmosphere, it will of itself, by gradually imbibing moisture, fall into the state of powder. water dissolves about one seven hundredth part of its weight of quick-lime, and is then called _lime-water_. exposed to the air, a crust will be formed on its surface, which is found to consist of calcareous earth and fixed air. lime and water mixed with sand make _mortar_, by which means different stones may be made to cohere as one mass, which is the most valuable use of this kind of earth. calcareous earth, united with vitriolic acid, makes _gypsum_; and this substance pounded and exposed to heat, parts with its water, and is then called _plaister of paris_. in this state, by imbibing water again, it becomes a firm substance, and thus is useful in making moulds, &c. the earth of animal bones is calcareous united to the phosphoric acid. _of siliceous earth._ siliceous earth seems to be formed by nature from chalk, perhaps by the introduction of some unknown acid, which the vitriolic acid is not able to dislodge. it abounds in most substances which are hard enough to strike fire with steel, as _flint_, _rock crystal_, and most _precious stones_. it is not acted upon by any acid except the fluor and phosphoric, but especially the former: but it is soluble in alkalies; and being then dissolved in water, makes _liquor silicum_, from which the purest siliceous earth may be precipitated by acids. for this purpose about four times the weight of alkali must be made use of. with about equal weights of alkali and siliceous sand is made _glass_, of so great use in admitting light and excluding the weather from our houses, as well as for making various useful utensils. to make glass perfectly colourless, and at the same time more dense, commonly called _flint glass_, manufacturers use a certain proportion of calx of lead and manganese. siliceous earth is not affected by the strongest heat, except by means of a burning lens, or dephlogisticated air. lecture xx. _of argillaceous earth._ argillaceous earth is found in _clay_, _schistus_, or _slate_, and in _mica_; but the purest is that which is precipitated from a solution of alum by alkalies; for alum consists of the union of vitriolic acid and argillaceous earth. this species of earth is ductile with water; it then hardens and contracts by heat, so as to be of the greatest use in forming _bricks_, or stones of any required form or size. by means of the property of clay to contract in the fire, mr. wedgwood has constructed an excellent thermometer to measure the degrees of extreme heat. the ductility of clay seems to depend upon some acid, probably the vitriolic, adhering to it; for it loses that property when it is burned into a brick, but recovers it when it has been again dissolved in an acid. _of terra ponderosa._ _terra ponderosa_, or _marmor metallicum_, is generally found in two states, viz. united to vitriolic acid, when it is called _calk_, or to fixed air, when it is called _terra ponderosa aerata_. to obtain it pure from its union with the vitriolic acid, it must be melted with about twice its weight of fixed alkali; which unites with the acid, and forming a saline substance, may be washed out of it. in this state it contains water, and therefore, when exposed to heat, will yield fixed air; whereas the terra ponderosa aerata will not yield fixed air by heat only, but when steam is made to pass over it when red hot. this proves that water is essential to the composition of fixed air. this stone is distinguishable by its great specific gravity, being four times as heavy as water; but though in this it resembles an _ore_, it has not been found to be metallizable. _of magnesia._ this species of earth is found in _steatites_, or _soap rock_, _spanish chalk_, _asbestus_, and _muscovy talck_; but the purest is got by dissolving _epsom salts_ (which consists of this earth united to the vitriolic acid) and precipitating it by a mild alkali. in this state it becomes united to fixed air, which may be expelled by heat. it is then _calcined_, or _caustic_, but differs from quick-lime by not being soluble in water. _asbestus_, which contains much of this kind of earth, is remarkable for not being destructible by heat, though it is sometimes found in flexible fibres, so as to be capable of being woven into cloth. _muscovy talck_ is remarkable for the thin and transparent flakes into which it is divisible, and thereby capable of various uses. there are some other distinct species of earth, particularly one brought from botany bay, and another called _stontiate_, from the place where it was found in scotland; but they have not as yet been much examined. all stones formed by nature are compounded, and to distinguish them from one another, and ascertain the parts of which they consist, is the subject of _lithology_, a very extensive branch of knowledge. all the simple earths are nearly, if not absolutely, _infusible_; but when they are mixed they may all be fused. lecture xxi. _of ores_. metallizable earths, commonly called _ores_, when united to phlogiston, make the metals, distinguishable for their specific gravity, their opacity, shining appearance, and fusibility. all the proper metals are _malleable_, and those which are not so are called _semi-metals_. the metals again are subdivided into the _perfect_ and _imperfect_. the former, which are _gold_, _silver_, and _platina_, suffer no change by fusion, or the longest continued heat: whereas heat calcines or dissipates the phlogiston of the imperfect metals, which are _mercury_, _lead_, _copper_, _iron_, and _tin_, so that they return to the state of earth; and this earth is always heavier than the metal, though of less specific gravity, having received an addition of weight from water or air: but these earths, or ores, being exposed to heat in contact with substances containing phlogiston, again become metals, and are then said to be _revived_. the semi-metals are _bismuth_, _zinc_, _nickel_, regulus of _arsenic_, of _cobalt_, of _antimony_, of _manganese_, of _wolfram_, and of _molybdena_. all metallic substances are crystallizable, and each in a peculiar form, which is discovered by leaving a hole in the bottom of the crucible in which they are melted, and drawing out the stopper, when the mass is beginning to lose its fluidity. some of the metals will not unite to others when hot, and others of them will; and such as will unite with others are called _solders_. thus tin is a solder for lead, and brass, gold, or silver, for iron. ores are never found in regular strata, like the different kinds of earth; but in places which have formerly been cavities, running in all directions, with respect to the regular strata, and commonly called _veins_. many of the ores in their natural state are said to be _mineralized_ with arsenic or sulphur, those substances being intimately united with the metallic earths. in order to convert the ores into metals, some of them are first reduced to powder, to wash out the earthy or saline particles. they are then kept in a red heat, which the workmen call _roasting_, in order to drive away the arsenic, or sulphur, which are volatile; and in the last place they are fused in contact with charcoal, or other substances containing phlogiston; and to promote the fusion, lime-stone is frequently mixed with them. when the operation is completed, the unmetallic parts are converted into glass, or _scoria_, which lies on the surface, whereas the metal is found at the bottom. to discover the quantity of metal in a small piece of ore is called _assaying_. when metals are fused together, the specific gravity, fusibility, and other properties are changed, and in such a manner as could not be discovered from the properties of the constituent parts. _of gold._ gold is the heaviest of all metallic bodies except platina. it appears yellow or reddish by reflected light, but green or blue by transmitted light, when it is reduced to thin plates. though gold undergoes no change in a common furnace, or burning lens, it may, in part, at least, be calcined by the electric shock. gold has the greatest _ductility_, and in wires of equal diameters, it has the greatest _tenacity_, of all the metals. one grain of it may be made to cover 56 square inches; some gold leaf being less than a 200,000th part of an inch thick; and when it is made to cover a silver wire, the gold upon it may not be more than one twelfth part of the thickness of the gold leaf. this metal is soluble in aqua regia; and being precipitated by a volatile alkali, makes a powder called _aurum fulminans_, which is one fourth heavier than the gold, and explodes with great violence in a heat something greater than that of boiling water. tin precipitates gold in the form of a purple powder, called the _powder of cassius_, from the inventor of it, and is used in enamels, or the glassy coating which is given to metals by heat. gold unites with most of the metals, especially with mercury, and these mixtures are called _amalgams_. in gilding, the amalgam is applied to the surface of the metal to be gilded, and the mercury is driven off by heat, leaving the gold attached to the surface. gold mixed with iron, makes it harder, for the purpose of cutting instruments. to separate gold from the imperfect metals, such as copper, &c. it is mixed with lead, and then exposed to a strong heat, which calcines the lead, and with it the imperfect metals, leaving the gold pure. this process is called _cupellation_, from being performed in a small crucible called a _cupell_. when the gold is mixed with silver, three parts more of silver are put to it, and then the silver is dissolved by nitrous acid, leaving the gold pure. this process is called _quartation_, from the gold being one fourth part of the mass. the fineness of gold is generally estimated by dividing the gold into twenty-four parts, called _carats_. the phrase twenty-three carats fine means that the mass contains twenty-three parts out of twenty-four of pure gold, the remainder being _alloy_, of some baser metal. the fineness of gold may in some measure be discovered by the colour it leaves upon a _touch-stone_, or fine-grained basaltes. gold is generally found nearly pure, but mixed with earth, or diffused in fine grains through stones. lecture xxii. _of silver._ silver is the whitest of all the metals, very ductile, but less so than gold; the thinnest leaves of it being one third thicker than those of gold. it is not calcined in the heat of a common furnace, but partially so by repeated fusion, or a strong burning lens. sulphureous fumes unite with silver, and tinge it black. the nitrous acid dissolves it, and will hold more than half its weight of it in solution. when fully saturated, this solution deposits crystals, which are called _lunar nitre_, or _nitre of silver_. when these crystals are melted, and the water they contain driven off, a black substance, called _lapis infernalis_, or _lunar caustic_, is formed. this is used as a cautery in surgery. a strong heat will decompose this lunar nitre, and recover the silver. though the nitrous acid dissolves silver the most readily, the marine acid will deprive the nitrous of it, and form a substance called _luna cornea_, because, when it is melted and cold, it becomes a transparent mass something resembling _horn_. from this luna cornea the purest silver may be obtained. the vitriolic acid will likewise deprive the nitrous of the silver contained in it, and form a white powder, not easily soluble in water. a fulminating silver may be made by the following process: the silver must first be dissolved in pale nitrous acid, then precipitated by lime-water, dried, and exposed to the air three days. it must then be washed in caustic volatile alkali, after which the fluid must be decanted, and the black powder left to dry in the air. the slightest friction will cause this powder to fulminate. it is said, that even a drop of water falling upon it will produce this effect; so that it ought to be made only in very small quantities, and managed with the greatest caution. most of the metals precipitate silver. that by mercury may be made to assume the form of a tree, called _arbor dianæ_. silver is found native in peru; and the ores frequently contain sulphur, or arsenic, or both. _of platina._ platina is a metal lately discovered in the gold mines of mexico, where it is found in small particles, never exceeding the size of a pea, mixed with ferruginous sand and quartz. the strongest fire will not melt these grains, though it will make them cohere; but they may be melted by a burning lens, or a blow-pipe supplied with dephlogisticated air. pure platina is the heaviest body in nature, its specific gravity exceeding twenty-two. it is very malleable, though considerably harder than gold or silver, and has the property of welding in common with iron. this metal is not affected by exposure to the air, or by any simple acid, though concentrated and hot; but it is dissolved by dephlogisticated marine acid, and by aqua regia, in which a little nitrous air is procured. the solution is brown, and when diluted yellow. this liquor is very corrosive, and tinges animal substances of a blackish brown colour. platina is precipitated from a solution in aqua regia by sal-ammoniac, as gold is by martial vitriol. iron is precipitated from this solution by the prussian alkali. also most of the metals precipitate platina, but not in its metallic state. arsenic facilitates the solution of platina; and by melting it with equal parts of arsenic and vegetable alkali, and then reducing the mass to a powder, it may be made to take any form; and a strong heat will dissipate the arsenic and the alkali, leaving the platina in the shape required, not fusible by any heat in a common furnace. platina does not readily combine with gold or silver, and it resists the action of mercury as much as iron; but it mixes well with lead, making it less ductile, and even brittle, according to the proportion of the platina. with copper it forms a compound which takes a beautiful polish, not liable to tarnish, and is therefore used with advantage for mirrors of reflecting telescopes. it unites easily with tin, and also with bismuth, antimony, and zinc. lecture xxiii. _of mercury._ mercury is the most fusible of all the metals, not becoming solid but in 40° below 0 in fahrenheit's thermometer. it is then malleable. it is heavier than any other metal except gold or platina. it is volatile in a temperature much lower than that of boiling water, and in vacuo in the common temperature of the atmosphere; and at six hundred it boils. in a degree of heat in which it would rise easily in vapour, mercury imbibes pure air, and becomes a red calx, called _precipitate per se_. at a greater degree of heat it parts with that air, and is running mercury again. mercury is not perceptibly altered by exposure to the air. mercury is acted upon by the vitriolic acid when hot. in this process vitriolic acid air is procured, and the mercury is converted into a white substance, which being dipped in water becomes yellow, called _turbith mineral_, one third heavier than the mercury from which it was made. by heat this substance parts with its pure air, and becomes running mercury; but if the process be made in a clean earthen vessel, there will remain a portion of _red calx_, which cannot be reduced by any degree of heat, except in contact with some substance containing phlogiston. if this be done with a burning lens, in inflammable air, much of the air will be absorbed. mercury is dissolved most readily in the nitrous acid, when the purest nitrous air is procured; and there remains a substance which is first yellow, and by continuance red, called _red precipitate_. in a greater degree of heat the dephlogisticated air will be recovered, and the mercury be revived; but the substance yields nitrous air after it becomes solid, and till it changes from yellow to red. the precipitates of mercury from acids by means of alkalies possess the property of exploding, when they are exposed to a gradual heat in an iron spoon, after having been triturated with one sixth of their weight of the flowers of sulphur. the residuum consists of a violet-coloured powder, which, by sublimation, is converted into cinnabar. it seems, therefore, as if the sulphur combined suddenly with the mercury, and expelled the dephlogisticated air in an elastic state. the marine acid seizes upon mercury dissolved in nitrous acid, and if the acid be dephlogisticated, the precipitate is _corrosive sublimate_; but with common marine acid, it is called _calomel_, or _mercurius dulcis_. this preparation is generally made in the dry way, by triturating equal parts of mercury, common salt and vitriol, and exposing the whole to a moderate heat; when the corrosive sublimate rises, and adheres to the upper part of the glass vessel in which the process is made. mercury combines readily with sulphur by trituration, and with it forms a black powder called _ethiops mineral_. a more intimate combination of mercury and sulphur is made by means of fire. this is called _cinnabar_, about one third of which is sulphur. vermillion is cinnabar reduced to powder. mercury readily unites with oil, and with it forms a deep black or blue compound, used in medicine. it readily combines with most of the metals, and when it is used in a sufficient quantity to make them soft, the mixture is called an _amalgam_. it combines most readily with gold, silver, lead, tin, bismuth, and zinc. looking-glasses are covered on the back with an amalgam of mercury and tin. when mercury is united with lead or other metals, it is rendered less brilliant and less fluid; but agitation in pure air converts the impure metal into a calx, together with much of the mercury, in the form of a black powder. heat recovers the pure air, and the mercury, leaving the calx of the impure metal. much mercury is found native in a slaty kind of earth, or in masses of clay or stone; but the greatest quantity is found combined with sulphur in _native cinnabar_. lecture xxiv. _of lead._ lead is a metal of a bluish tinge, of no great tenacity, but very considerable specific gravity, being heavier than silver. it melts long before it is red hot, and is then calcined, if it be in contact with respirable air. when boiling it emits fumes, and calcines very rapidly. it may be granulated by being poured into a wooden box, and agitated. during congelation it is brittle, so that the parts will separate by the stroke of a hammer; and by this means the form of its crystals may be discovered. in the progress of calcination it first becomes a dusky grey powder, then yellow, when it is called _massicot_; then, by imbibing pure air, it becomes red, and is called _minium_, or _red lead_. in a greater degree of heat it becomes massicot again, having parted with its pure air. if the heat be too great, and applied rapidly, it becomes a flaky substance, called _litharge_; and with more heat it becomes a _glass_, which readily unites with metallic calces and earths, and is a principal ingredient in the manufacture of _flint glass_, giving it its peculiar density and refractive power. though lead soon tarnishes, the imperfect calx thus made does not separate from the rest of the metal, and therefore protects it from any farther action of the air, by which means it is very useful for the covering of houses, and other similar purposes. all acids act upon lead, and form with it different saline substances. _white-lead_ consists of its union with vinegar and pure air. also dissolved in vinegar, and crystallized, it becomes _sugar of lead_, which, like all the other preparations of this metal, is a deadly poison. oils dissolve the calces of lead, which, by this means, is the basis of paints, plaisters, &c. by means of heat litharge decomposes common salt, the lead uniting with the marine acid, and forming a yellow substance, used in painting, and by this means the fossil alkali is separated. lead unites with most metals, though not with iron. two parts of lead and one of tin make a _solder_, which melts with less heat than either of the metals separately; but a composition of eight parts of bismuth, five of lead, and three of tin, makes a metal which melts in boiling water. this metal will be dissolved by water if it contain any saline matter, and the drinking of it occasions a peculiar kind of cholic. lead is sometimes found native, but generally minerally mineralized with sulphur or arsenic, and often mixed with a small quantity of silver. _of copper._ copper is a metal of a reddish or brownish colour, considerably sonorous, and very malleable. at a heat far below ignition, the surface, of copper becomes covered with a range of prismatic colours, the commencement of its calcination; and with more heat a black scale is formed, which easily separates from the metal, and in a strong heat it melts, and burns with a bluish green flame. copper rusts by exposure to the air; but the partially-calcined surface adheres to the metal, as in the case of lead, and thus preserves it from farther corrosion. copper dissolved in the vitriolic acid forms crystals of a blot colour, called _blue copperas_. from this solution it is precipitated by iron, which by this means becomes coated with copper. the nitrous acid dissolves copper with most rapidity, producing nitrous air. if the solution be distilled, almost all the acid will be retained in the residuum, which is white; but more heat will expel the acid, chiefly in the form of dephlogisticated air, and the remainder will be a black substance, consisting of the pure calx of copper. the vegetable acids dissolve copper as well as the mineral ones, which makes the use of this metal for culinary purposes in some cases dangerous. to prevent this they give it a coat of tin. the solution of copper in the vegetable acid is called _verdigris_. alkalies dissolve copper as well as acids. with the volatile alkali a blue liquor is formed, but in some cases it becomes colourless. all the circumstances of this change of colour have not yet been examined. both oil and sulphur will dissolve copper, and with the latter it forms a blackish grey compound, used by dyers. copper readily unites with melted tin, at a temperature much lower than that which is necessary to melt the copper; by which means copper vessels are easily covered with a coating of tin. a mixture of copper and tin, called _bronze_, the specific gravity of which is greater than that of the medium of the two metals, is used in casting statues, cannon, and bells; and in a certain proportion this mixture is excellent for the purpose of mirrors of reflecting telescopes, receiving a fine polish, and not being apt to tarnish. copper and arsenic make a brittle compound called _tombach_; and with zinc it makes the useful compound commonly called _brass_, in which zinc is about one third of its weight. copper is sometimes found native; but commonly mixed with sulphur, in ores of a red, green, or blue colour. copper being an earlier discovery than that of iron, was formerly used for weapons and the shoeing of horses; and the ancients had a method, with which we are not well acquainted, of giving it a considerable degree of hardness, so that a sword made of it might have a pretty good edge. lecture xxv. _of iron._ iron is a metal of a bluish colour, of the greatest hardness, the most variable in its properties, and the most useful of all the metals; so that without it it is hardly possible for any people to make great advances in arts and civilization. this metal readily parts with its phlogiston, so as to be very subject to calcine, or rust, by exposure to the air. the same is evident by the colours which appear on its surface when exposed to heat, and also when it is struck with flint; the particles that fly from it being iron partially calcined. in consequence of its readily parting with its phlogiston, it is capable of burning, like wood or other fuel, in pure air. iron and platina have the property of _welding_ when very hot, so that two pieces may be joined without any solder. when iron is heated in contact with steam, part of the water takes the place of the phlogiston, while the rest unites with it, and makes inflammable air. by this means the iron acquires one third more weight, and becomes what is called _finery cinder_. this substance, heated in inflammable air, imbibes it, parts with its water, and becomes perfect iron again. if the iron be heated in pure air, it also imbibes the water, of which that air chiefly consists, and also a portion of the peculiar element of the pure air. the solution of iron in spirit of vitriol produces _green copperas_; which being calcined, becomes a red substance, called _colcothar_. the precipitate of iron, by an infusion of galls, is the colouring matter in _ink_, which is kept suspended by means of gum. the precipitate from the same solution by phlogisticated alkali, is _prussian blue_. water saturated with fixed air dissolves iron, and makes a pleasant chalybeat. the calx of iron gives a green colour to glass. iron readily combines with sulphur. when they are found combined by nature, the substance is called _pyrites_. the union of phosphoric acid with iron makes it brittle when cold, commonly called _cold short_; and the union of arsenic makes it brittle when hot, thence called _red short_. iron unites with gold, silver, and platina, and plunged in a white heat into mercury, it becomes coated with it; and if the process be frequently repeated, it will become brittle, which shews that there is some mutual action between them. iron readily unites with tin; and by dipping thin plates of iron into melted tin, they get a complete coating of it, and make the _tinned plates_ in common use. when crude iron comes from the smelting furnace it is brittle; and when it is white within, it is extremely hard; but when it has a black grain, owing to its having more phlogiston, it is softer, and may be filed and bored. cast iron becomes _malleable_ by being exposed to a blast of air when nearly melting; the consequence of which is a discharge of inflammable air, and the separation of a liquid substance, which, when concreted, is called _finery cinder_. the iron generally loses one fourth of its weight in the process. crude iron contains much _plumbago_, and the access of pure air probably assists in discharging it, by converting it into air, chiefly inflammable. malleable iron, exposed to a red heat in contact with charcoal, called _cementation_, converts it into _steel_, which has the properties of becoming much harder than iron, and very elastic, by being first made very hot, and then suddenly cooled, by plunging it in cold water. by first making it very hard, and then giving different degrees of heat, and cooling it in those different degrees, it is capable of a great variety of _tempers_, proper for different uses. of the degrees of heat workmen judge by the change of colour on its surface. steel, like crude iron, is capable of being melted without losing its properties. it is then called _cast steel_, and is of a more uniform texture. iron acquires some little weight by being converted into steel; and when dissolved in acid, it yields more plumbago. steel has something less specific gravity than iron. if the cementation be continued too long, the steel acquires a darkish fracture, it is more fusible, and incapable of welding. steel heated in contact with earthy matters, is reduced to iron. iron is the only substance capable of _magnetism_; and hardened steel alone is capable of retaining magnetism. the loadstone is an ore of iron. lecture xxvi. _of tin._ tin is a metal of a slightly yellowish cast, though harder than lead, very malleable, but of no great tenacity; so that wires cannot be made of it. it easily extends under the hammer, and plates of it, called _tinfoil_, are made only one thousandth part of an inch thick, and might be made as thin again. tin has less specific gravity than any other metal. it melts long before ignition, at 410 of fahrenheit, and by the continuance of heat is slowly converted into a white powder, which is the chief ingredient in _putty_, used in polishing, &c. like lead, it is brittle when heated little short of fusion, and may be reduced into grains by agitation as it passes from a fluid to a solid state. the calx of tin resists fusion more than that of any other metal, which makes it useful in making an opaque white enamel. tin loses its bright surface when exposed to the air, but is not properly subject to rust; so that it is useful in protecting iron and other metals from the effects of the atmosphere. concentrated vitriolic acid, assisted by heat, dissolves half its weight of tin, and yields vitriolic acid air. with more water it yields inflammable air. during the solution the phlogiston of the tin uniting with the acid, forms sulphur, which makes it turbid. by long standing, or the addition of water, the calx of tin is precipitated from the solution. the nitrous acid dissolves tin very rapidly without heat, and yields but little nitrous air. with marine acid this metal yields inflammable air. with aqua regia it assumes the form of a gelatinous substance used by dyers to heighten the colour of some red tinctures, so as to produce a bright scarlet in dying wool. a transparent liquor, which emits very copious fumes, called, from the inventor, _the smoking liquor of libavius_, is made by distilling equal parts of amalgam of tin and mercury with corrosive sublimate, triturated together. a colourless liquor comes over first, and then a thick white fume, which condenses into the transparent liquor above mentioned. mr. adet has shewn, that this liquor bears the same relation to the common solution of tin, that corrosive sublimate does to calomel, and has given an ingenious solution of many of its properties. tin detonates with nitre; and if the crystals made by the solution of copper in the nitrous acid be inclosed in tinfoil, nitrous fumes will be emitted, and the whole will become red hot. also if five times its weight of sulphur be added to melted tin, a black brittle compound, which readily takes fire, will be formed. another combination of tin, sulphur, and mercury, makes a light yellow substance called _aurum musivum_ used in painting. tin is the principal ingredient in the composition of _pewter_, the other ingredients being lead, zinc, bismuth, and copper; each pewterer having his peculiar receipt. it is also used in coating copper and iron plates, and in silvering looking-glasses, besides being cast into a variety of forms, when it is called _block tin_. tin is sometimes found native, but is generally mineralized with sulphur and arsenic. the latter is thought to be always contained in tin, and to be the cause of the crackling noise made by bending plates of it. _of the semi-metals._ bismuth is a semi-metal of a yellowish or reddish cast, but little subject to change in the air; harder than lead, but easily broken, and reducible to powder. when broken it exhibits large shining facets, in a variety of positions. thin pieces of it are considerably sonorous. bismuth melts at about 460° of fahrenheit. with more heat it ignites, and burns with a slight blue flame, while a yellowish calx, called _flowers of bismuth_, is produced. with more heat it becomes a greenish glass. in a strong heat, and in close vessels, this metal sublimes. vitriolic acid, even concentrated and boiling, has but little effect upon bismuth; but the nitrous acid acts upon it with the greatest rapidity and violence, producing much nitrous air, mixed with phlogisticated nitrous vapour. from the solution of bismuth in this acid, a white substance, called _magistery of bismuth_, is precipitated by the affusion of water. this has been used as a paint for the skin but has been thought to injure it. the marine acid does not readily act upon bismuth; but when concentrated, it forms with it a saline combination, which does not easily crystallize, but may be sublimed in the form of a soft fusible salt, called _butter of bismuth_. bismuth unites with most metallic substances, and in general renders them more fusible. when calcined with the imperfect metals, it unites with them, and has the same effect as lead in cupellation. bismuth is used in the composition of pewter, in printers' types, and other metallic mixtures. this metal is sometimes found native, but more commonly mineralized with sulphur. lecture xxvii. _of nickel._ nickel is a semi-metal of a reddish cast, of great hardness, and always magnetical; on which account it is supposed to contain iron, though chemists have not yet been able to separate them. the purest nickel was so infusible as not to run into a mass in the strongest heat of a smith's forge; but then it was in some degree malleable. concentrated acid of vitriol only corrodes nickel. alkalies precipitate it from its solution in the nitrous acid, and dissolve the precipitate. it readily unites with sulphur. nickel is found either native or mineralized with several other metals, especially with copper, when it is called _kupfer nickel_, or _false copper_, being of a reddish or copper colour. this semi-metal has not yet been applied to any use. _of arsenic._ what is commonly called _arsenic_ is the calx of a semi-metal called the _regulus of arsenic_. it is a white and brittle substance, expelled from the ores of several metals by heat. it is then refined by a second sublimation, and melted into the masses in which it is commonly sold. this calx is soluble in about eighty times its weight of cold water, or in fifteen times its weight of boiling water. it acts in many respects like an acid, as it decomposes nitre by distillation, when the nitrous acid flies off, and the _arsenical salt of macquer_ remains behind. when the calx of arsenic is distilled with sulphur, the vitriolic acid flies off, and a substance of a yellow colour, called _orpiment_, is produced. this appears to consist of sulphur and the regulus of arsenic; part of the sulphur receiving pure air from the calx, to which it communicates phlogiston; and thus the sulphur becomes converted into vitriolic acid, while the arsenical calx is reduced, and combines with the rest of the sulphur. the combination of sulphur and arsenic, by melting them together, is of a red colour, known by the name of _realgal_, or _realgar_. it is less volatile than orpiment. the solution of fixed alkali dissolves the calx of arsenic, and by means of heat a brown tenacious mass is produced, and having also a disagreeable smell, it is called _liver of arsenic_. the regulus of arsenic is of a yellow colour, subject to tarnish or grow black, by exposure to the air, very brittle, and of a laminated texture. in close vessels it wholly sublimes, but burns with a small flame in pure air. vitriolic acid has little action upon this semi-metal, except when hot; but the nitrous acid acts readily upon it, and likewise dissolves the calx, as does boiling marine acid, though it affects it very little when cold. most of the metals unite with the regulus of arsenic. dephlogisticated marine acid converts the calx of arsenic into _arsenical acid_ by giving it pure air. the acid of arsenic acts more or less upon all metals, but the phenomena do not appear to be of much importance. the calx of acid is used in a variety of the arts, especially in the manufactory of glass. orpiment and realgar are used as pigments. some attempts have been made to introduce it into medicine, but being dangerous, the experiments should be made with caution. _of cobalt._ cobalt is a semi-metal of a grey or steel colour, of a close-grained fracture, more difficult of fusion than copper, not easily calcined. it soon tarnishes in the air, but water has no effect upon it. cobalt, dissolved in _aqua regia_, makes an excellent sympathetic ink, appearing green when held to the fire, and disappearing when cold, unless it has been heated too much, when it burns the paper. the calx of cobalt is of a deep blue colour, which, when fused, makes the blue glass called _smalt_. the ore of cobalt, called _zaffre_, is found in several parts of europe, but chiefly in saxony. as it is commonly sold, it contains twice or thrice its weight of powder of flints. the smalt is usually composed of one part of calcined cobalt, fused with two parts of powder of flint and one of pot-ash. the chief use of cobalt is for making smalt; but the powder and the blue-stone used by laundresses is a preparation made by the dutch of a coarse kind of smalt. _of zinc._ zinc is a semi-metal of a bluish cast, brighter than lead, and so far malleable as not to be broken by a hammer, though it cannot be much extended. when broken by bending, it appears to consist of cubical grains. if it be heated nearly to melting, it will be sufficiently brittle to be pulverized. it melts long before ignition, and when it is red hot, it burns with a dazzling white flame, and is calcined with such rapidity, that its calx flies up in the form of white flowers, called _flowers of zinc_, or _philosophical wool_. in a stronger heat they become a clear yellow glass. heated in close vessels, this metal rises without decomposition, being the most volatile of all the metals except the regulus of _arsenic_. zinc dissolved in diluted vitriolic acid, yields much inflammable air, and has a residuum, which appears to be plumbago, and the liquor forms crystals, called _white copperas_. this metals also yields inflammable air when dissolved in the marine acid. dissolved in the nitrous acid, it yields dephlogisticated nitrous air, with very little proper nitrous air. the ore of zinc, called _calamine_, is generally of a white colour; and the chief use of it is to unite it with copper, with which it makes brass and other gold-coloured mixtures of metals. the calx and the salts of this metal are occasionally used in medicine. lecture xxviii. _of antimony._ the regulus of antimony is of a silvery white colour, of a scaly texture, very brittle, and melts soon after ignition. by continuance of heat it calcines in white fumes, called _argentine flowers of antimony_, which melt into a hyacinthine glass. in close vessels it rises without decomposition. its calx is soluble in water, like that of arsenic. this metal tarnishes, but does not properly rust, by exposure to the air. this metal is soluble in aqua regia. it detonates with nitre, and what remains of equal parts of nitre and regulus of antimony after detonation, in a hot crucible, is called _diaphoretic antimony_. the water used in this preparation contains a portion of the calx suspended by the alkali, and being precipitated by an acid, is called _ceruse of antimony_. when regulus of antimony is pulverized and mixed with twice its weight of corrosive sublimate (which is attended with heat) and then distilled with a gentle fire, a thick fluid comes over, which is congealed in the receiver, or in the neck of the retort, and is called _butter of antimony_. the residuum consists of revived mercury, with some regulus and calx of antimony. when this butter of antimony is thrown into pure water, there is a white precipitate, called _powder of algaroth_, a violent emetic. nitrous acid dissolves the butter of antimony; and when an equal weight of nitrous acid has been three times distilled to dryness from butter of antimony, the residuum, after ignition, is called _bezoar mineral_, and seems to be little more than a calx of the metal. crude antimony, which has been much used in the experiments of alchemists, is a combination of sulphur and regulus of antimony. heat melts it, and finally converts it into glass, of a dark red colour, called _liver of antimony_. if antimony be melted or boiled with a fixed alkali, a precipitate is made by cooling, called _kermes mineral_, formerly used in medicine. the antimonial preparations that are now most in use are _antimonial wine_ and _tartar emetic_. the wine is made by infusing pulverized glass of antimony in spanish wine some days, and filtering the clear fluid through paper. the emetic tartar, or antimonial tartar, is a saline substance, composed of acid of tartar, vegetable alkali, and antimony partially calcined. the preparation may be seen in the dispensaries. the regulus of antimony is used in the form of pills, which purge more or less in proportion to the acid they meet with; and as they undergo little or no change in passing through the body, they are called _perpetual pills_. _of manganese._ manganese is a hard, black mineral, very ponderous, and the regulus of it is a semi-metal of a dull white colour when broken, but soon grows dark by exposure to the air. it is hard and brittle, though not pulverizable, rough in its fracture, and of very difficult fusion. its calces are white when imperfect, but black, or dark green, when perfect. the white calx is soluble in acids. when broken in pieces, it falls into powder by a spontaneous calcination, and this powder is magnetical, though the mass was not possessed of that property. the black calx of manganese is altogether insoluble in acids. it contains much dephlogisticated air. the calx of manganese is used in making glass; the glass destroying the colour of that of the other materials, and thereby making the whole mass transparent. this semi-metal mixes with most of the metals in fusion, but not with mercury. there is another ore of manganese, called _black woad_, which inflames spontaneously when mixed with oil. _of wolfram._ wolfram is a mineral of a brownish or black colour, found in the tin mines of cornwall, of a radiated or foliated texture, shining almost like a metal. it contains much of the calx of manganese, and iron; but when the substance is pulverized, these are easily dissolved, and the calx of wolfram is found to be yellow. this calx turns blue by exposure to light; and an hundred grains of it heated with charcoal will yield sixty grains of a peculiar metal, in small particles, which, when broken, look like steel. it is soluble in the vitriolic or marine acids, and reduced to a yellow calx by nitrous acid or aqua regia. _of molybdena._ molybdena is a substance which much resembles plumbago; but its texture is scaly, and not easily pulverized, on account of a degree of flexibility which its laminæ possess. with extreme heat, and mixed with charcoal, it yields small particles of a metal that is grey, brittle, and extremely infusible; and uniting with several of the metals, it forms with them brittle or friable compounds. by heat it is converted into a white calx. _of solid combustible substances._ there yet remains a class of solid substances, of the _combustible_ kind, but most of them have been already considered under the form of the fluids, from which they are originally formed, as _bitumen_, _pit-coal_, and _amber_; or under the principal ingredients of which they are composed, as _sulphur_ and _plumbago_. there only remains to be mentioned the _diamond_, which is of a nature quite different from that of the other precious stones, the principal ingredient in which is siliceous earth, which renders them not liable to be much affected by heat. on the contrary, the diamond is a combustible substance; for in a degree of heat somewhat greater than that which will melt silver, it burns with a slight flame, diminishes common air, and leaves a soot behind. also, if diamond powder be triturated with vitriolic acid, it turns it black, which is another proof of its containing phlogiston. the diamond is valued on account of its extreme hardness, the exquisite polish it is capable of, and its extraordinary refractive power; for light falling on its interior surface with an angle of incidence greater than 24½ will be wholly reflected, whereas in glass it requires an angle of 41 degrees. lecture xxix. _of the doctrine of phlogiston and the composition of water._ it was supposed to be a great discovery of mr. stahl, that all inflammable substances, as well as metals, contain a principle, or substance, to which he gave the name of phlogiston, and that the addition or deprivation of this substance makes some of the most remarkable changes in bodies, especially that the union of a metallic calx and this substance makes a metal; and that combustion consists in the separation of phlogiston from the substances that contain it. that it is the same principle, or substance, that enters into all inflammable substances, and metals, is evident, from its being disengaged from any of them, and entering into the composition of any of the others. thus the phlogiston of charcoal or inflammable air becomes the phlogiston of any of the metals, when the calx is heated in contact with either of them. on the contrary, mr. lavoisier and most of the french chemists, are of opinion, that there is no such principle, or substance, as phlogiston; that metals and other inflammable bodies are simple substances, which have an affinity to pure air; and that combustion consists not in the separation of any thing from the inflammable substance, but in the union of pure air with it. they moreover say, that water is not, as has been commonly supposed, a simple substance, but that it consists of two elements, viz. pure air, or _oxygene_, and another, to which they give the name of _hydrogene_, which, with the principle of _heat_, called by them _calorique_, is inflammable air. the principal fact adduced by them to prove that metals do not lose any thing when they become calces, but only gain something, is, that mercury becomes a calx, called _precipitate per se_, by imbibing pure air, and that it becomes running mercury again by parting with it. this is acknowledged: but it is almost the only case of any calx being revived without the help of some known phlogistic substance; and in this particular case it is not absurd to suppose, that the mercury, in becoming precipitate per se, may retain all its phlogiston, as well as imbibe pure air, and therefore be revived by simply parting with that air. in many other cases the same metal, in different states, contains more or less phlogiston, as cast iron, malleable iron, and steel. also there is a calx of mercury made by the acid of vitriol, which cannot be revived without the help of inflammable air, or some other substance supposed to contain phlogiston: and that the inflammable air is really imbibed in these processes, is evident, from its wholly disappearing, and nothing being left in the vessel in which the process is made beside the metal that is revived by it. if precipitate per se be revived in inflammable air, the air will be imbibed, so that running mercury may contain more or less phlogiston. the antiphlogistians also say, that the diminution of atmospherical air by the burning of phosphorus is a proof of their theory; the pure air being imbibed by that substance, and nothing emitted from it. but there is the same proof of phosphorus containing phlogiston, that there is of dry flesh containing it; since the produce of the solution of it in nitrous acid, and its effect upon the acid, are the same, viz. the production of phlogisticated air, and the phlogistication of the acid. their proof that water is decomposed, is, that in sending steam over hot iron, inflammable air (which they suppose to be one constituent part of it) is procured; while the other part, viz. the oxygene, unites with the iron, and adds to its weight. but it is replied, that the inflammable air may be well supposed to be the phlogiston of the iron, united to part of the water, as its base, while the remainder of the water is imbibed by the calx; and that it is mere water, and not pure air, or oxygene, that is retained in the iron, is evident, from nothing but pure water being recovered when this calx of iron is revived in inflammable air, in which case the inflammable air wholly disappears, taking the place of the water, by which it had been expelled. in answer to this it is said, that the pure air expelled from the calx uniting with the inflammable air in the vessel, recomposes the water found after this process. but in every other case in which any substance containing pure air is heated in inflammable air, though the inflammable air be in part imbibed, some _fixed air_ is produced, and this fixed air is composed of the pure air in the substance and part of the inflammable air in the vessel. thus, if _minium_, which contains pure air, and _massicot_, which contains none, be heated in inflammable air, in both the cases lead will be revived by the absorption of inflammable air; but in the former case only, and not in the latter, will fixed air be produced. the calx of iron, therefore, having the same effect with massicot, when treated in the same manner, appears to contain no more pure air than massicot does. besides this explanation of the facts on which the new theory is founded, which shews it to be unnecessary, the old hypothesis being sufficient for the purpose, some facts are alledged, as inconsistent with the new doctrine. if the calx of iron made by water, and charcoal made by the greatest degree of heat, be mixed together, a great quantity of inflammable air will be produced; though, according to the new theory, neither of these substances contained any water, which they maintain to be the only origin of it. but this fact is easily explained upon the doctrine of phlogiston; the water in this calx uniting with the phlogiston of the charcoal, and then forming inflammable air; and it is the same kind of inflammable air that is made from charcoal and water. also the union of inflammable and pure air, when they are fired together by means of the electric spark, produces not pure water, as, according to the new theory, it ought to do, but _nitrous acid_. to this it has been objected, that the acid thus produced came from the decomposition of phlogisticated air, a small portion of which was at first contained in the mixture of the two kinds of air. but when every particle of phlogisticated air is excluded, the strongest acid is procured. they find, indeed, that by the slow burning of inflammable air in pure air, they get pure water. but then it appears, that whenever this is the case, there is a production of phlogisticated air, which contains the necessary element of nitrous acid; and this is always the case when there is a little surplus of the inflammable air that is fired along with the pure air, as the acid is always procured when there is a redundancy of pure air. that much water should be procured by the decomposition of these kinds of air, is easily accounted for, by supposing that water, or steam, is the basis of these, as well as of all other kinds of air. since air something better than that of the atmosphere is constantly produced from water by converting it into vapour, and also by removing the pressure of the atmosphere, and these processes do not appear to have any limits; it seems probable, that _water_ united to the principle of _heat_; constitutes atmospherical air; and if so, it must consist of the elements of both dephlogisticated and phlogisticated air; which is a supposition very different from that of the french chemists. lecture xxx. _of heat._ heat is an affection of bodies well known by the sensation that it excites. it is produced by friction or compression, as by the striking of flint against steel, and the hammering of iron, by the reflection or refraction of light, and by the combustion of inflammable substances. it has been long disputed, whether the cause of heat be properly a _substance_, or some particular affection of the particles that compose the substance that is heated. but be it a substance, or a principle of any other kind, it is capable of being transferred from one body to another, and the communication of it is attended with the following circumstances. all substances are expanded by heat, but some in a greater degree than others; as metals more than earthy substances, and charcoal more than wood. also some receive and transmit heat through their substance more readily than others; metals more so than earths, and of the metals, copper more readily than iron. instruments contrived to ascertain the expansion of substances by heat, are called _pyrometers_, and are of various constructions. as a standard to measure the degrees of heat, mercury is in general preferable to any other substance, on account of its readily receiving, and communicating, heat through its whole mass. _thermometers_, therefore, or instruments to measure the degrees of heat, are generally constructed of it, though, as it is subject to become solid in a great degree of cold, ardent spirit, which will not freeze at all, is more proper in that particular case. the graduation of thermometers is arbitrary. in that of fahrenheit, which is chiefly used in england, the freezing point of water is 32°, and the boiling point 212°. in that of reaumur, which is chiefly used abroad, the freezing point of water is 0, and the boiling point 80. to measure the degrees of heat above ignition, mr. wedgwood has happily contrived to use pieces of clay, which contract in the fire; and he has also been able to find the coincidence of the degrees in mercurial thermometers with those of his own. to measure the degrees of heat and cold during a person's absence, lord george cavendish contrived an instrument, in which a small bason received the mercury, that was raised higher than the place for which it was regulated by heat or cold, without a power of returning. but mr. six has lately hit upon a better method, viz. introducing into the tube of his thermometer a small piece of iron, which is raised by the ascent of the mercury, and prevented from descending by a small spring; but which may be brought back to its former place by a magnet acting through the glass. heat, like light, is propagated in right lines; and what is more remarkable, cold observes the same laws. for if the substance emitting heat without light, as iron below ignition, be placed in the focus of a burning mirror, a thermometer in the focus of a similar mirror, placed parallel to it, though at a considerable distance, will be heated by it, and if a piece of ice be placed there, the mercury will fall. heat assists the solvent power of almost all menstrua; so that many substances will unite in a certain degree of heat, which will form no union at all without it, as dephlogisticated and inflammable air. if substances be of the same kind, they will receive heat from one another, in proportion to their masses. thus, if a quantity of water heated to 40° be mixed with another equal quantity of water heated to 20°, the whole mass will be heated to 30°. but if the substances be of different kinds, they will receive heat from each other in different proportions, according to their _capacity_ (as it is called) of receiving heat. thus, if a pint of mercury of the temperature of 136 be mixed with a pint of water of the temperature of 50, the temperature of the two after mixture will not be a medium between those two numbers, viz. 93, but 76; consequently the mercury was cooled 60°, while the water was heated only 26; so that 26 degrees of heat in water correspond to 60 in mercury. but mercury is about 13 times specifically heavier than water, so that an equal weight of mercury would contain only one thirtieth part of this heat; and dividing 26 by 13, the quotient is 2. if _weight_, therefore, be considered, the heat discovered by water should be reckoned as 2 instead of 60; and consequently when water receives 2 degrees of heat, an equal weight of mercury will receive 60°; and dividing both the numbers by 2, if the heat of water be 1, that of the mercury will be 30. or since they receive equal degrees of heat, whether they discover it or not (and the less they discover, the more they retain in a latent state) a pound of mercury contains no more than one thirtieth part of the heat actually existing in a pound of water of the same temperature. water, therefore, is said to have a greater capacity for receiving and retaining heat, without discovering it, than mercury, in the proportion of 30 to 1, if weight be considered, or of 60 to 26, that is of 30 to 13; if _bulk_ be the standard, though, according to some, it is as 3 to 2. the capacity of receiving heat in the substance is greatest in a state of vapour, and least in that of a solid; so that when ice is converted into water, heat is absorbed, and more still when it is converted into vapour; and on the contrary, when vapour is converted into water, it gives out the heat which it had imbibed, and when it becomes ice it gives out still more. if equal quantities of ice and water be exposed to heat at the temperature of 32°, the ice will only become water, without receiving any additional sensible heat; but an equal quantity of water in the same situation would be raised to 178°, so that 146 degrees of heat will be imbibed, and remain in latent in the water, in consequence of its passing from a state of ice: and heat communicated by a given weight of vapour will raise an equal weight of a nonevaporable substance, of the same capacity with water, 943 degrees; so that much more heat is latent in steam, than in the water from which it was formed. this doctrine of latent heat explains a great variety of phænomena in nature; as that of cooling bodies by evaporation, the vapour of water, or any other fluid substance, absorbing and carrying off the heat they had before. water, perfectly at rest, will fall considerably below the freezing point, and yet continue fluid: but on the slightest agitation, the congelation of the whole, or part of it, takes place instantly, and if the whole be not solid, it will instantly rise to 32°, the freezing point. from whatever cause, some motion seems necessary to the commencement of congelation, at least in a moderate temperature; but whenever any part of the water becomes solid, it gives out some of the heat it had before, and that heat which was before latent becoming sensible, and being diffused through the whole mass, raises its temperature. on the same principle, when water heated higher than the boiling point in a digester is suddenly permitted to escape in the form of steam, the remainder is instantly reduced to the common boiling point, the heat above that point being carried off in a latent state by the steam. had it not been for this wise provision in nature, the whole of any quantity of water would, in all cases of freezing, have become solid at once; and also the whole of any quantity that was heated to the point of boiling, would have been converted into steam at once; circumstances which would have been extremely inconvenient, and often fatal. this doctrine also explains the effect of freezing mixtures, as that of salt and snow. these solid substances, on being mixed, become fluid, and that fluid absorbing much heat, deprives all the neighbouring bodies of part of what they had. but if the temperature at which the mixture is made be as low as that to which this mixture would have brought it, it has no effect, and in a lower temperature this new fluid would become solid; for that mixture has only a certain determinate capacity for heat, and if the neighbouring bodies have less heat, they will take from it. it has been observed, that the comparative heat of bodies containing phlogiston is increased by calcination or combustion; so that the calx of iron has a greater capacity for heat, and therefore contains more latent heat, than the metal. in general it is not found, that the same substances have their capacity for receiving heat increased by an increase of temperature; but this is said to be the case with a mixture of ardent spirit and water, and also that of spirit of vitriol and water. since all substances contain a greater or less quantity of heat, and in consequence of being deprived of it become colder and colder, it is a question of some curiosity to determine the extent to which this can go, or at what degree in the scale of a thermometer any substance would be absolutely cold, or deprived of all heat; and an attempt has been made to solve this problem in the following manner. comparing the capacity of water with that of ice, by means of a third substance, viz. mercury, it has been found, that if that of ice be 9°, that of water is 10°; so that water in becoming ice gives out one tenth part of its whole quantity of heat. but it has been shown, that ice in becoming water absorbs 146 degrees of heat. this, therefore, being one tenth part of the whole heat of water, it must have contained 1460 degrees; so that taking 32 degrees, which is the freezing point, from that number, the point of absolute cold will be 1426 below 0 of fahrenheit's scale. by a computation, made by means of the heat of inflammable and dephlogisticated air, at the temperature of 50, dr. crawford finds, that it contains nearly 1550 degrees of heat; so that the point of absolute cold will be 1500 below 0. but more experiments are wanted to solve this curious problem to entire satisfaction. lecture xxxi. _of animal heat._ since all animals, and especially those that have red blood, are much hotter than the medium in which they live, the source of this heat has become the subject of much investigation; and as the most probable theory is that of dr. crawford, i shall give a short detail of the reasons on which it is founded. having, with the most scrupulous attention, ascertained the _latent_, or, as he calls it, the _absolute_ heat of blood, and also that of the aliments of which it is composed, he finds that it contains more than could have been derived from _them_. also finding that the absolute heat of arterial blood exceeds that of venous blood, in the proportion of 11½ to 10, he concludes that it derives its heat from the air respired in the lungs, and that it parts with this _latent_ heat, so that it becomes sensible, in the course of its circulation, in which it becomes loaded with phlogiston, which it communicates to the air in the lungs. that this heat is furnished by the _air_, he proves, by finding, that that which we inspire contains more heat than that which we expire, or than the aqueous humor which we expire along with it, in a very considerable proportion; so that if the heat contained in the pure air did not become latent in the blood, it would raise its temperature higher than that of red-hot iron. and again, if the venous blood, in being converted into arterial blood, did not receive a supply of latent heat from the air, its temperature would fall from 96 to 104 below 0 in fahrenheit's thermometer. that the heat procured by combustion has the same source, viz. the dephlogisticated air that is decomposed in the process, is generally allowed; and dr. crawford finds, that when equal portions of air are altered by the respiration of a guinea pig, or by the burning of charcoal, the quantity of heat communicated by the two processes is nearly equal. the following facts are also alleged in favour of his theory. whereas animals which have much red blood, and respire much, have the power of keeping themselves in a temperature considerably higher than that of the surrounding atmosphere, other animals, as _frogs_ and _serpents_, are nearly of the same temperature with it; and those animals which have the largest respiratory organs, as birds, are the warmest; also the degree of heat is in some measure proportionable to the quantity of air that is respired in a given time, as in violent exercise. it has been observed, that animals in a medium hotter than the blood have a power of preserving themselves in the same temperature. in this case the heat is probably carried off by perspiration, while the blood ceases to receive, or give out, any heat; and dr. crawford finds, that when an animal is placed in a warm medium the colour of the venous blood approaches nearer to that of the arterial than when it is placed in a colder medium; and also, that it phlogisticates the air less than in the former case; so that in these circumstances respiration has not the same effect that it has in a colder temperature, in giving the body an additional quantity of heat; which is an excellent provision in nature, as the heat is not wanted, but, on the contrary, would prove inconvenient. lecture xxxii. _of light._ another most important agent in nature, and one that has a near connexion with heat, is _light_, being emitted by all bodies in a state of ignition, and especially by the sun, the great source of light and of heat to this habitable world. whether light consists of particles of matter (which is most probable) or be the undulation of a peculiar fluid, filling all space, it is emitted from all luminous bodies in right lines. falling upon other bodies, part of the light is _reflected_ at an angle equal to that of its incidence, though not by impinging on the reflecting surface, but by a power acting at a small distance from it. but another part of the light enters the body, and is _refracted_ or bent _towards_, or _from_, the perpendicular to the surface of the new medium, if the incidence be oblique to it. in general, rays of light falling obliquely on any medium are bent as if they were attracted by it, when it has a greater density, or contains more of the inflammable principle, than the medium through which it was transmitted to it. more of the rays are reflected when they fall upon a body with a small degree of obliquity to its surface, and more of them are transmitted, or enter the body, when their incidence is nearer to a perpendicular. the velocity with which light is emitted or reflected is the same, and so great that it passes from the sun to the earth in about eight minutes and twelve seconds. rays of light emitted or reflected from a body entering the pupil of the eye, are so refracted by the humours of it, as to be united at the surface of the retina, and so make images of the objects, by means of which they are visible to us; and the magnifying power of telescopes or microscopes depends upon contriving, by means of reflections or refractions, that pencils of rays issuing from every point of any object shall first diverge, and then converge, as they would have done from a much larger object, or from one placed much nearer to the eye. when a beam of light is bent out of its course by refraction, all the rays of which it consists are not equally refracted, but some of them more and others less; and the colour which they are disposed to exhibit is connected invariably with the degree of their refrangibility; the red-coloured rays being the least, and the violet the most refrangible, and the rest being more or less so in proportion to their nearness to these, which are the extremes, in the following order, violet, indigo, blue, green, yellow, orange, red. these colours, when separated as much possible, are still contiguous; and all the shades of each colour have likewise their separate and invariable degrees of refrangibility. when separated as distinctly as possible, they divide the whole space between them exactly as a musical chord is divided in order to found the several notes and half notes of an octave. these differently-coloured rays of light are also separated in passing through the transparent medium of air and water, in consequence of which the sky appears blue and the sea green, these rays being returned, while the red ones proceed to a greater distance. by this means also objects at the bottom of the sea appear to divers red, and so do all objects enlightened by an evening sun. the mixture of all the differently-coloured rays, in the proportions in which they cover the coloured image above mentioned, makes a _white_, and the absence of all light is _blackness_. by means of the different refrangibility of light, the colours of the rainbow may be explained. the distance to which the differently-coloured rays are separated from each other is not in proportion to the mean refractive power of the medium, but depends upon the peculiar constitution of the substance by which they are refracted. the _dispersing power_ of glass, into the composition of which _lead_ enters, is great in proportion to the mean refraction; and it is proportionally little in that glass in which there is much alkaline salt. the construction of _achromatic telescopes_ depends upon this principle. not only have different rays of light these different properties with respect to bodies, so as to be more or less refracted, or dispersed, by them, but different sides of the same rays seem to have different properties, for they are differently affected on entering a piece of _island crystal_. with the same degree of incidence; part of the pencil of rays, consisting of all the colours, proceeds in one direction, and the rest in a different one; so that objects seen through a piece of this substance appear double. at the surface of all bodies rays of light are promiscuously reflected, or transmitted. but if the next surface be very near to it, the rays of one colour chiefly are reflected, and the rest transmitted, and these places occur alternately for rays of each of the colours in passing from the thinnest to the thickest parts of the medium; so that several series, or orders, of colours will be visible on the surface of the same thin transparent body. on this principle coloured rings appear between a plane and a convex lens, in a little oil on the surface of water, and in bubbles made with soap and water. when rays of light pass near to any body, so as to come within the sphere of its attraction and repulsion, an _inflection_ takes place; all the kinds of rays being bent _towards_, or _from_, the body, and these powers affecting some rays more than others, they are by this means also separated from each other, so that coloured streaks appear both within the shadow, and the outside of it, the red rays being inflected at the greatest distance from the body. part of the light which enters bodies is retained within them, and proceeds no farther; but so loosely in some kinds of bodies, that a small degree of heat is sufficient to expel it again, so as to make the body visible in the dark: but the more heat is applied, the sooner is all the light expelled. this is a strong argument for the materiality of light. _bolognian phosphorus_ is a substance which has this property; but a composition made by mr. canton, of calcined oyster-shells and sulphur, in a much greater degree. however, white paper, and most substances, except the metals, are possessed of this property in a small degree. some bodies, especially phosphorus, and animal substances tending to putrefaction, emit light without being sensibly hot. the _colours_ of vegetables, and likewise their _taste_ and _smell_, depend upon light. it is also by means of light falling on the leaves and other green parts of plants, that they emit dephlogisticated air, which preserves the atmosphere fit for respiration. it is light that imparts colour to the skins of men, by means of the fluid immediately under them. this is the cause of _tanning_, of the _copper colour_ of the north americans, and the _black_ of the negroes. light also gives colour to several other substances, especially the solutions of mercury in acids. lecture xxxiii. _of magnetism._ magnetism is a property peculiar to iron, or some ores of it. the earth itself, owing probably to the iron ores contained in it, has the same property. but though all iron is acted upon by magnetism, _steel_ only is capable of having the power communicated to it. every magnet has two poles, denominated _north_ and _south_, each of which attracts the other, and repels that of the same kind with itself. if a magnet be cut into two parts, between the two poles, it will make two magnets, the parts that were contiguous becoming opposite poles. though the poles of a magnet are denominated _north_ and _south_, they do not constantly, and in all parts of the earth, point due north or south, but in most places to the east or west of them, and with a considerable variation in a course of time. also a magnet exactly balanced at its center will have a declination from an horizontal position of about 70 degrees. the former is called the _variation_, and the latter the _dipping_ of the magnetic needle. a straight bar of iron which has been long fixed in a vertical position, will become a magnet, the lower end becoming a north pole, and the upper end a south one; for if it be suspended horizontally, the lower end will point towards the north, and the upper end towards the south. also any bar of iron, not magnetical, held in a vertical position, will become a temporary magnet, the lower end becoming a north pole, and the upper end a south one; and a few strokes of a hammer will fix the poles for a short time, though the position of the ends be changed. magnetism may likewise be given to a bar of iron by placing it firmly in the position of the dipping-needle, and rubbing it hard one way with a polished steel instrument. iron will also become magnetical by ignition and quenching it in water in the position of the dipping-needle. magnetism acts, without any diminution of its force, through any medium; and iron not magnetical will have that power while it is in connexion with a magnet, or rather the power of the magnet is extended through the iron. steel filings gently thrown upon a magnet, adhere to it in a curious manner; and the filings, acquiring magnetism by the contact, adhere together, and form a number of small magnets, which arrange themselves according to the attraction of the poles of the original magnet. this experiment is made to the most advantage upon a piece of pasteboard, or paper, placed over the magnet. magnetism is communicated by the friction, or the near position, of a magnet to a piece of steel of a size less than it. for this reason a combination of magnetical bars will have a greater effect than a single one; and in the following manner, beginning without any magnetism at all, the greatest quantity may be procured. six bars of steel may be rendered slightly magnetical by fixing each of them successively to an upright poker, and stroking it several times from the bottom to the top with the lower end of an old pair of tongs. if then four of these bars be joined, the magnetism of the remaining two will be much increased by a proper method of rubbing with them; and by changing their places, joining the strongest, and acting upon the weakest, they may all be made as magnetical as they are capable of being. the strength of a natural magnet may be increased by covering its polar extremities with steel. this is called the _arming_ of the loadstone. to account for the variation of the needle, dr. halley supposed the earth to consist of two parts, an external _shell_ and an internal _nucleus_, detached, and having a revolution distinct from it; and that the action of the poles of the shell and of the nucleus would explain all the varieties in the position of the needle. but others think that the cause of the magnetism of the earth is not _within_, but _without_ itself. one reason for this opinion is, that a magnet is liable to be affected by a strong aurora borealis; and another is, that the variation of the needle proceeds in such manner as supposes that the motion of the nucleus must be quicker than that of the shell of the earth; whereas, since it is most natural to suppose that motion was communicated to the nucleus by the shell, it would be slower. some idea of the quantity and the progress of the variation of the needle may be formed from the following facts.--at the cape of good hope, when it was discovered by the portuguese, in 1486, there was no variation, the needle there pointing due north; in 1622 it was about 2 degrees westward, in 1675 it was 8° w. in 1700 about 11° w. in 1756 about 18° w. and in 1774 about 21½° w. in london, in 1580, the variation was 11 degrees 15 seconds e.; in 1622 it was 6° e. in 1634 it was 4 deg. 5 min. e. in 1657 it was nothing at all; in 1672 it was 2 deg. 30 min. w. in 1692 it was 6 deg. w. in 1753 it was about 16 w. and at present it is about 21 w. the longitude may in some places be found by the variation of the needle; and mr. churchman, of america, having given much attention to the subject, comparing the observations of others, and many of his own, thinks that he has found a method of determining the longitude to a great degree of certainty, in most cases, by this means. he says there are two magnetic poles of the earth, one to the north and the other to the south, at different distances from the poles of the earth, and revolving in different times; and from the combined influence of these two poles he deduces rules for the position of the needle in all places of the earth, and at all times, past, present, or to come. the north magnetic pole, he says, makes a complete revolution in 426 years, 77 days, 9 hours, and the south pole in about 5459 years. in the beginning of the year 1777 the north magnetic pole was in 76 deg. 4 min. north latitude; and in longitude from greenwich 140 deg. east; and the south was in 72 deg. south latitude, and 140 deg. east from greenwich. lecture xxxiv. _of electricity._ electricity is a property belonging to, or capable of being communicated to, all substances whatever; and whereas by some of them it is transmitted with great ease, and by others with much difficulty, they have been divided into two classes, and denominated _conductors_ or _non-conductors_ of electricity. also the latter receiving this power by friction, and other means, are termed _electrics_, and the former _non-electrics_. metals of all kinds, and water, are conductors, though in very different degrees; so also is charcoal. all other substances, and also a perfect vacuum, are non-conductors of electricity. but many of these substances, when they are made very hot, as glass, resin, baked wood, and perhaps all the rest on which the experiment can be made in this state, are conductors. it is the property of all kinds of electrics, when they are rubbed by bodies different from themselves, to attract light substances of all kinds, to exhibit an appearance of _light_, attended with a particular _sound_, on the approach of any conductor; and if the nostrils are presented, they are affected with a _smell_ like that of phosphorus. this attraction is most easily explained by supposing that electricity is produced by a fluid exceedingly elastic, or repulsive of itself, and attracted by all other substances. an electric exhibiting the appearances above mentioned, is said to be _excited_, and some of them, particularly the _tourmaline_, are excited by heating and cooling, as well as by friction. it appears, however, that excitation consists in the mere transferring of electricity from one substance to another, and that the great source of electricity is in the earth. on this account it is necessary to the considerable excitation of any electric, that the substance against which it is rubbed (hence termed _the rubber_) have a communication with the earth, by means of conductors; for if the rubber be _insulated_, that is cut off from all communication with the earth by means of electrics, the friction has but little effect. when insulated bodies have been attracted by, and brought into contact with, an excited electric, they begin to be repelled by it, and also to repel one another; nor will they be attracted again till they have been brought into contact with some conductor communicating with the earth; but after this they will be attracted as at first. if conductors be _insulated_, electric powers may be communicated to them by the approach of excited electrics, or the contact of other electrified bodies. they will then attract light bodies, and give sparks, &c. like the excited electrics themselves. when electricity is strongly communicated to insulated animal bodies, the pulse is quickened, and perspiration increased; and if they receive, or part with, their electricity on a sudden, a painful sensation is felt at the place of communication. but what is more extraordinary, is, that the influence of the brain and nerves upon the muscles seems to be of an electric nature. this is one of the last and most important of all philosophical discoveries. i shall, therefore, give the result of all the observations that have hitherto been made on the subject, in a _series of propositions_, drawn up by an intelligent friend, who has given much more attention to it than i have done. 1. the nerve of the limb of an animal being laid bare, and surrounded with a piece of sheet lead, or of tinfoil, if a communication be formed between the nerve thus armed and any of the neighbouring muscles, by means of a piece of zinc, strong contractions will be produced in the limb. 2. if a portion of the nerve which has been laid bare be armed as above, contractions will be produced as powerfully, by forming the communication between the armed and bare part of the nerve, as between the armed part and muscle. 3. a similar effect is produced by arming a nerve and simply touching the armed part of the nerve with the metallic conductor. 4. contractions will take place if a muscle be armed, and a communication be formed by means of the conductor between it and a neighbouring nerve. the same effect will be produced if the communication be formed between the armed muscle and another muscle, which is contiguous to it. 5. contractions may be produced in the limb of an animal by bringing the pieces of metal into contact with each other at some distance from the limb, provided the latter make part of a line of communication between the two metallic conductors. the experiment which proves this is made in the following manner. the amputated limb of an animal being placed upon a table, let the operator hold with one hand the principal nerve, previously laid bare, and in the other let him hold a piece of zinc; let a small plate of lead or silver be then laid upon the table, at some distance from the limb, and a communication be formed, by means of water, between the limb and the part of the table where the metal is lying. if the operator touch the piece of silver with the zinc, contractions will be produced in the limb the moment that the metals come into contact with each other. the same effect will be produced if the two pieces of metal be previously placed in contact, and the operator touch one of them with his finger. this fact was discovered by mr. william cruikshank. 6. contractions can be produced in the amputated leg of a frog, by putting it into water, and bringing the two metals into contact with each other at a small distance from the limb. 7. the influence which has passed through, and excited contractions in, one limb, may be made to pass through, and excite contractions in, another limb. in performing this experiment it is necessary to attend to the following circumstances: let two amputated limbs of a frog be taken; let one of them be laid upon a table, and its foot be folded in a piece of silver; let a person lift up the nerve of this limb with a silver probe, and another person hold in his hand a piece of zinc, with which he is to touch the silver including the foot; let the person holding the zinc in one hand catch with the other the nerve of the second limb, and he who touches the nerve of the first limb is to hold in his other hand the foot of the second; let the zinc now be applied to the silver including the foot of the first limb, and contractions will immediately be excited in both limbs. 8. the heart is the only involuntary muscle in which contractions can be excited by these experiments. 9. contractions are produced more strongly, the farther the coating is placed from the origin of the nerve. 10. animals which were almost dead have been found to be considerably revived by exciting this influence. 11. when these experiments are repeated upon an animal that has been killed by opium, or by the electric shock, very slight contractions are produced; and no contractions whatever will take place in an animal that has been killed by corrosive sublimate, or that has been starved to death. 12. zinc appears to be the best exciter when applied to gold, silver, molybdena, steel, or copper. the latter metals, however, excite but feeble contractions when applied to each other. next to zinc, in contact with these metals, tin and lead, and silver and lead, appear to be the most powerful exciters. at least two kinds of fishes, the _torpedo_ and the _electrical eel_, have a voluntary power of giving so strong a shock to the water in which they swim, as to affect fishes and other animals which come near them; and by a conducing communication between different parts of these fishes, an electric shock may be given exactly like that of the leyden phial, which will be described hereafter; and if the communication be interrupted, a flash of electric light will be perceived. the growth of vegetables is also quickened by electricity. lecture xxxv. _the same subject continued._ no electric can be excited without producing electric appearances in the body with which it is excited, provided that body be insulated; for this insulated rubber will attract light bodies, give sparks, and make a snapping noise, upon the approach of a conductor, as well as the excited electric. if an insulated conductor be pointed, or if a pointed conductor, communicating with the earth, be held pretty near it, little or no electric appearance will be exhibited, only a light will appear at each of the points during the act of excitation, and a current of air will be sensible from off them both. the effect of pointed bodies is best explained on the supposition of the electric matter in one body repelling that in another; and consequently the electricity belonging to a body with a large surface making a greater resistance to the entrance of foreign electricity than that belonging to a smaller. these two electricities, viz. that of the excited electric, and that of the rubber, though similar to, are the reverse of, one another. a body attracted by the one will be repelled by the other, and they will attract, and in all respects act upon, one another more sensibly than upon other bodies; so that two pieces of glass or silk possessed of contrary electricities will cohere firmly together, and require a considerable force to separate them. these two electricities having been first discovered by producing one of them from glass, and the other from amber, sealing-wax, sulphur, rosin, &c. first obtained the names of _vitreous_ and _resinous_ electricity; and it being afterwards imagined that one of them was a redundancy, and the other a deficiency, of a supposed electric fluid, the former has obtained the name of _positive_, and the latter that of _negative_, electricity; and these terms are now principally in use. positive and negative electricity may be distinguished from each other by the manner in which they appear at the points of bodies. from a pointed body electrified positively, there issues a stream of light, divided into denser streams, at the extremities; whereas, when the point is electrified negatively, the light is more minutely divided, and diffused equally. the former of these is called a _brush_, and the latter a _star_. if a conductor not insulated be brought within the atmosphere (that is the sphere of action) of any electrified body, it acquires the electricity opposite to that of the electrified body, and the nearer it is brought, the stronger opposite electricity does it acquire, till the one receive a spark from the other, and then the electricity of both will be discharged. the electric substance which separates the two conductors possessing these two opposite kinds of electricity, is said to be _charged_. plates of glass are the most convenient for this purpose, and the thinner the plate the greater is the charge it is capable of holding. the conductors contiguous to each side of the glass are called their _coating_. agreeably to the above-mentioned general principle, it is necessary that one side of the charged glass have a communication with the rubber, while the other receives the electricity from the conductor, or with the conductor, while the other receives from the rubber. it follows also, that the two sides of the plate thus charged are always possessed of the two opposite electricities; that side which communicates with the excited electric having the electricity of the electric, and that which communicates with the rubber, that of the rubber. there is, consequently, a very eager attraction between these two electricities with which the different sides of the plate are charged, and when a proper communication is made by means of conductors, a flash of electric light, attended with a report (which is greater or less in proportion to the quantity of electricity communicated to them, and the goodness of the conductors) is perceived between them, and the electricity of both sides is thereby discharged. the substance of the glass itself in, or upon, which these electricities exist, is impervious to electricity, and does not permit them to unite; but if they be very strong, and the plate of glass very thin, they will force a passage through the glass. this, however, always breaks the glass, and renders it incapable of another charge. the flash of light, together with the explosion between the two opposite sides of a charged electric, is generally called the _electric shock_, on account of the disagreeable sensation it gives any animal whose body is made use of to form the communication been them. the electric shock is always found to perform the circuit from one side of the charged glass to the other by the shortest passage through the best conductors. common communicated electricity also observes the same rule in its transmission from one body to another. it has not been found, that the electric shock takes up any sensible space of time in being transmitted to the greatest distances. the electric shock, as also the common electric spark, displaces the air through which it passes; and if its passage from conductor to conductor be interrupted by non-conductors of a moderate thickness, it will rend and tear them in its passage, in such a manner as to exhibit the appearance of a sudden expansion of the air about the center of the shock. if the electric circuit be interrupted, the electric matter, during the discharge, will pass to any other body that lies near its path, and instantly return. this may be called the _lateral explosion_. the effect of this lateral explosion through a brass chain, when the quantity of electricity is very great, will be the discolouring and partial burning of the paper on which it lies. if a great quantity of electricity be accumulated, as in a _battery_, the explosion will pass over the surfaces of imperfect conductors without entering them, and the effect will be a strong _concussion_ of the substance. also the electric matter thus accumulated and condensed will, by its repulsion, form _concentric circles_, which will appear by melting the surface of a flat piece of metal on which the explosion is received. if an electric shock, or strong spark, be made to pass through, or over, the belly of a muscle, it forces it to contract, as in a convulsion. if a strong shock be sent through a small animal body, it will often deprive it instantly of life. when the electric shock is very strong, it will give polarity to magnetic needles, and sometimes it reverses their poles. great shocks, by which animals are killed, are said to hasten putrefaction. electricity and lightning are in all respects the same thing; since every effect of lightning may be imitated by electricity, and every experiment in electricity may be made with lightning, brought down from the clouds by means of insulated pointed rods of metal. lecture xxxvi. _the same subject continued._ three curious and important instruments, which are among the latest improvements in electricity, deserve a particular explanation, and in all of them the effect depends upon the general principles mentioned above, viz. that bodies placed within the influence, or, as it is usually termed, within the atmosphere, of an electrified body, are affected by a contrary electricity, and that these two electricities mutually attract each other. these instruments are the _electrophorus_, the _condenser_ of electricity, and the _doubler_ of it. the electrophorus consists of an insulated conducting plate applied to an insulated electric. if the latter have any electricity communicated to it, for example the negative, the positive electricity of the former will be attracted by it, and consequently the plate will be capable of receiving electricity from any body communicating with the earth; being, in this situation, capable of containing more electricity than its natural quantity. consequently, when it is removed from the lower plate, and the whole of its electricity equally diffused through it, it will appear to have a redundance, and therefore will give a spark to any body communicating with the earth. being then replaced upon the electric, and touched by any body communicating with the earth, it will be again affected as before, and give a spark on being raised; and this process may be continued at pleasure, the electrophorus supplying the place of any other electrical machine. if the conducting plate of the electrophorus be applied to a piece of dry wood, marble, or any other substance through which electricity can pass but very slowly, or if the insulated conducting plate be covered with a piece of thin silk, which will make some resistance to the passage of electricity, and it be then applied to another plate communicating with the earth; and if, in either of these cases, a body with a large surface possessed of a weak electricity be applied to the conducting plate, the weak electricity not being able to overcome the obstruction presented to it, so as to be communicated to the other plate, will affect it with the contrary electricity, and this reacting on the first plate, will condense its electricity on that part of the plate to which it is contiguous; in consequence of which its capacity of receiving electricity will be increased; so that on the separation of the two plates, that electricity which was before condensed, being equally diffused through the whole plate, will have a greater intensity than it had before, attracting light bodies, or even giving a spark, when the body from which it received its electricity was incapable of it. for though it contained a great quantity of electricity, it was diffused through so large a space that its intensity was very small. this instrument is therefore called a _condenser of electricity_. if an insulated plate of metal possessing the smallest degree of electricity be presented very near to another plate communicating with the earth, it will affect this plate with the opposite electricity; and this being, in the same manner, applied to a third plate, will put it into the same state with the first. if then these two plates be joined, and the first plate be presented to either of them, its own electricity being attracted by that of the plate presented, that of the other will be drawn into it, so that its quantity will be doubled. the same process being repeated, will again double the electricity of this plate, till, from being quite insensible to the most exquisite electrometer, it will become very conspicuous, or even give sparks. this instrument is therefore called a _doubler of electricity_, of excellent use in ascertaining the quality of atmospherical electricity when ever so small. if this instrument be so constructed that these three plates can be successively presented to one another by the revolution of one of them on an axis, it is called the _revolving doubler_; and in this form it is most convenient for use. the end. transcriber's note: details of corrections |position |original |correction | | | | | |lecture i, first paragraph |limestone |lime-stone | |lecture i, last paragraph |_attraction_ |_attraction_, | |lecture iii, first paragraph |viz |viz. | |lecture iii, last paragraph |1. |1 | |lecture xvii, penultimate paragraph |dissoved |dissolved | |lecture xix, "of calcareous earth" |hundreth |hundredth | |lecture xxvi, "of semi-metals" |ignates |ignites | |lecture xxviii, first paragraph |animony |antimony | priestley in america 1794-1804 by edgar f. smith university of pennsylvania philadelphia p. blakiston's son & co. 1012 walnut street copyright, 1920, by p. blakiston's son & co. the maple press york pa preface the writer, in studying the lives of early american chemists, encountered the name of _joseph priestley_ so frequently, that he concluded to institute a search with the view of learning as much as possible of the life and activities, during his exile in this country, of the man whom chemists everywhere deeply revere. recourse, therefore, was had to contemporary newspapers, documents and books, and the resulting material woven into the sketch given in the appended pages. if nothing more, it may be, perhaps, a connecting chapter for any future history of chemistry in america. its preparation has been a genuine pleasure, which, it is hoped by him whose hand guided the pen, will be shared by his fellow chemists, and all who are interested in the growth and development of science in this country. priestley in america there lies before the writer a tube of glass, eleven and one half inches in length and a quarter of an inch in diameter. its walls are thin. at one end there is evidence that an effort was made to bend this tube in the flame. ordinarily it would be tossed aside; but this particular tube was given the writer years ago by a great-grandson of joseph priestley. attached to the tube is a bit of paper upon which appear the words "piece of tubing used by priestley." that legend has made the tube precious in the heart and to the eye of the writer. everything relating to this wonderful figure in science, history, religion, politics and philosophy is very dear to him. on all sides of him are relics and reminders of priestley. not all, but many of his publications are near at hand. after perusal of these at various times, and while reading the many life sketches of priestley, there has come the desire to know more about his activities during the decade (1794-1804) he lived in america. isn't it fair to declare that the great majority of chemical students think of priestley as working only in england, his native land, and never give thought to his efforts during the last ten years of his life? it has been said that he probably inspired and incited the young chemists of this country to renewed endeavor in their science upon his advent here. there is no question that he influenced james woodhouse and his particular confreres most profoundly, as he did a younger generation, represented by robert hare. priestley again set in rapid motion chemical research in the young republic.[1] he must therefore have done something himself. what was it? is it worth while to learn the character of this work? modern tendencies are antagonistic to the past. many persons care nothing for history. it is a closed book. they do not wish it to be opened, and yet the present is built upon the early work. in reviewing the development of chemistry in this country everything, from the first happening here, should be laid upon the table for study and reflection. thus believing, it will not be out of place to seek some light upon the occupation of the discoverer of oxygen after he came to live among us--with our fathers. noble-hearted, sympathetic thomas e. thorpe wrote: if, too, as you draw up to the fire 'betwixt the gloaming and the mirk' of these dull, cold november days, and note the little blue flame playing round the red-hot coals, think kindly of priestley, for he first told us of the nature of that flame when in the exile to which our forefathers drove him. right there, "the nature of the flame," is one thing priestley did explain in america. he discovered carbon monoxide--not in england, but in "exile."[2] it may not be an epoch-making observation. there are not many such and those who make them are not legion in number. it was an interesting fact, with a very definite value, which has persisted through many succeeding decades and is so matter-of-fact that rarely does one arise to ask who first discovered this simple oxide of carbon. priestley was a man of strong human sympathies. he loved to mingle with men and exchange thoughts. furthermore, priestley was a minister--a preacher. he was ordained while at warrington, and gloried in the fact that he was a dissenting minister. it was not his devotion to science which sent him "into exile." his advanced thought along political and religious lines, his unequivocal utterances on such subjects,--proved to be the rock upon which he shipwrecked. it has been said- by some strange irony of fate this man, who was by nature one of the most peaceable and peace-loving of men, singularly calm and dispassionate, not prone to disputation or given to wrangling, acquired the reputation of being perhaps the most cantankerous man of his time.... there is a wide-spread impression that priestley was a chemist. this is the answer which invariably comes from the lips of students upon being interrogated concerning him. the truth is that priestley's attention was only turned to chemistry when in the thirties by matthew turner, who lectured on this subject in the warrington academy in which priestley labored as a teacher. so he was rather advanced in life before the science he enriched was revealed to him in the experimental way. let it again be declared, he was a teacher. his thoughts were mostly those of a teacher. education occupied him. he wrote upon it. the old warrington academy was a "hot-bed of liberal dissent," and there were few subjects upon which he did not publicly declare himself as a dissenter. he learned to know our own delightful franklin in one of his visits to london. franklin was then sixty years of age, while priestley was little more than half his age. a warm friendship immediately sprang up. it reacted powerfully upon priestley's work as "a political thinker and as a natural philosopher." in short, franklin "made priestley into a man of science." this intimacy between these remarkable men should not escape american students. recall that positively fascinating letter (1788) from franklin to benjamin vaughan, in which occur these words: remember me affectionately ... to the honest heretic dr. priestley. i do not call him honest by way of distinction, for i think all the heretics i have known have been virtuous men. they have the virtue of fortitude, or they would not venture to own their heresy; and they cannot afford to be deficient in any of the other virtues, as that would give advantage to their many enemies.... do not however mistake me. it is not to my good friend's heresy that i impute his honesty. on the contrary 'tis his honesty that has brought upon him the character of heretic. much of priestley's thought was given to religious matters. in leeds he acknowledged himself a _humanitarian_, or a believer in the doctrine that jesus christ was in nature solely and truly a man, however highly exalted by god. his home in leeds adjoined a "public brew house." he there amused himself with experiments on carbon dioxide (fixed air). step by step he became strongly attracted to experimentation. his means, however, forbade the purchase of apparatus and he was obliged to devise the same and also to think out his own methods of attack. naturally, his apparatus was simple. he loved to repeat experiments, thus insuring their accuracy. in 1772 he published his first paper on pneumatic chemistry. it told of the impregnation of water with carbon dioxide. it attracted attention and was translated into french. this soda-water paper won for priestley the copley medal (1773). while thus signally honored he continued publishing views on theology and metaphysics. these made a considerable uproar. then came the memorable year of 1774--the birth-year of oxygen. how many chemists, with but two years in the science, have been so fortunate as to discover an element, better still probably the most important of all the elements! it was certainly a rare good fortune! it couldn't help but make him the observed among observers. this may have occasioned the hue and cry against his polemical essays on government and church to become more frequent and in some instances almost furious. it was now that he repaired to london. here he had daily intercourse with franklin, whose encouragement prompted him to go bravely forward in his adopted course. it was in 1780 that he took up his residence in birmingham. this was done at the instance of his brother-in-law. the atmosphere was most congenial and friendly. then, he was most desirous of resuming his ministerial duties; further, he would have near at hand good workmen to aid him in the preparation of apparatus for his philosophical pursuits. best of all his friends were there, including those devoted to science. faujar st. fond, a french geologist has recorded a visit to priestley- dr. priestley received me with the greatest kindness.... the building in which dr. priestley made his chemical and philosophical experiments was detached from his house to avoid the danger of fire. it consisted of several apartments on the ground floor. upon entering it we were struck with a simple and ingenious apparatus for making experiments on inflammable gas extracted from iron and water reduced to vapour. if, only, all the time of dr. priestley in birmingham had been devoted to science, but alas, his "beloved theology" claimed much of it. he would enter into controversy--he would dissent, and the awful hour was advancing by leaps and bounds. the storm was approaching. it burst forth with fury in 1791. the houses of worship, in which he was wont to officiate, were the first to meet destruction, then followed his own house in which were assembled his literary treasures and the apparatus he had constructed and gathered with pains, sacrifice and extreme effort. its demolition filled his very soul with deepest sorrow. close at hand, the writer has a neat little chemical balance. it was brought to this country by priestley, and tradition has it, that it was among the pieces of the celebrated collection of chemical utensils rescued from the hands of the infuriated mob which sought even the life of priestley, who fortunately had been spirited or hidden away by loyal, devoted friends and admirers. in time he ventured forth into the open and journeyed to london, and when quiet was completely restored, he returned to one of his early fields of activity, but wisdom and the calm judgment of friends decided this as unwise. through it all priestley was quiet and philosophical, which is evident from the following story: a friend called on him soon after the riots and condoled with him for his loss in general, then mentioned the destruction of his books as an object of particular regret. priestley answered, "i should have read my books to little purpose if they had not taught me to bear the loss of them with composure and resignation." but the iron had entered his soul. he could not believe that in his own england any man would be treated as he had been treated. his country was dear to him. he prized it beyond expression, but he could not hope for the peace his heart craved. his family circle was broken, two of his sons having come to america, so in the end, deeply concerned for his life-companion's comfort, the decision to emigrate was reached, and their faces were turned to the west. in reviewing the history of chemistry the remark is frequently heard that one blotch on the fair escutcheon of french science was placed there when the remorseless guillotine ushered lavoisier into eternity. was not the british escutcheon of science dimmed when priestley passed into exile? priestley--who had wrought so splendidly! and yet we should not be too severe, for an illustrious name--count rumford--which should have been ours--was lost to us by influences not wholly unlike those which gained us priestley. benjamin thompson, early in life abandoned a home and a country which his fellow citizens had made intolerable. read priestley's volumes on air and on natural philosophy. they are classics. all conversant with their contents agree that the experimental work was marvelous. priestley's discovery of oxygen was epoch-making, but does not represent all that he did. twice he just escaped the discovery of nitrogen. one wonders how this occurred. he had it in hand. the other numerous observations made by him antedate his american life and need not be mentioned here. they alone would have given him a permanent and honorable rank in the history of chemistry. students of the science should reserve judgment of priestley until they have familiarized themselves with all his contributions, still accessible in early periodicals. when that has been done, the loss to english science, by priestley's departure to another clime will be apparent. his dearest friends would have held him with them. not every man's hand was against him--on the contrary, numerous were those, even among the opponents of his political and theological utterances, who hoped that he would not desert them. they regretted that he had- turned his attention too much from the luminous field of philosophic disquisition to the sterile regions of polemic divinity, and the still more thorny paths of polemic politics.... from which the hope was cherished that he would recede and devote all his might to philosophical pursuits. a very considerable number ... of enlightened inhabitants, convinced of his integrity as a man, sincerity as a preacher, and superlative merit as a philosopher, were his strenuous advocates and admirers. but the die had been cast, and to america he sailed on april 8, 1794, in the good ship _sansom_, capt. smith, with a hundred others--his fellow passengers. whilst on the seas his great protagonist lavoisier met his death on the scaffold. such was the treatment bestowed upon the best of their citizens by two nations which considered themselves as without exception the most civilized and enlightened in the world! it is quite natural to query how the grand old scientist busied himself on this voyage of eight weeks and a day. the answer is found in his own words: i read the whole of the greek testament, and the hebrew bible as far as the first book of samuel: also ovid's metamorphoses, buchanan's poems, erasmus' dialogues, also peter pindar's poems, &c.... and to amuse myself i tried the heat of the water at different depths, and made other observations, which suggest various experiments, which i shall prosecute whenever i get my apparatus at liberty. the doctor was quite sea-sick, and at times sad, but uplifted when his eyes beheld the proofs of friendship among those he was leaving behind. thus he must have smiled benignantly on beholding the elegant silver inkstand, with the following inscription, presented ... by three young gentlemen of the university of cambridge: "to joseph priestley, ll.d. &c. on his departure into exile, from a few members of the university of cambridge, who regret that expression of their esteem should be occasioned by the ingratitude of their country." and, surely, he must have taken renewed courage on perusing the valedictory message received from the society of united irishmen of dublin: sir, suffer a society which has been caluminated as devoid of all sense of religion, law or morality, to sympathize with one whom calumny of a similar kind is about to drive from his native land, a land which he has adorned and enlightened in almost every branch of liberal literature, and of useful philosophy. the emigration of dr. priestley will form a striking historical fact, by which alone, future ages will learn to estimate truly the temper of the present time. your departure will not only give evidence of the injury which philosophy and literature have received in your person, but will prove the accumulation of petty disquietudes, which has robbed your life of its zest and enjoyment, for, at your age no one would willingly embark on such a voyage, and sure we are, it was your wish and prayer to be buried in your native country, which contains the dust of your old friends saville, price, jebb, and fothergill. but be cheerful, dear sir, you are going to a happier world--the world of washington and franklin. in idea, we accompany you. we stand near you while you are setting sail. we watch your eyes that linger on the white cliffs and we hear the patriarchal blessing which your soul pours out on the land of your nativity, the aspiration that ascends to god for its peace, its freedom and its prosperity. again, do we participate in your feelings on first beholding nature in her noblest scenes and grandest features, on finding man busied in rendering himself worthy of nature, but more than all, on contemplating with philosophic prescience the coming period when those vast inland seas shall be shadowed with sails, when the st. lawrence and mississippi, shall stretch forth their arms to embrace the continent in a great circle of interior navigation: when the pacific ocean shall pour into the atlantic; when man will become more precious than fine gold, and when his ambition will be to subdue the elements, not to subjugate his fellow-creatures, to make fire, water, earth and air obey his bidding, but to leave the poor ethereal mind as the sole thing in nature free and incoercible. happy indeed would it be were men in power to recollect this quality of the human mind. suffer us to give them an example from a science of which you are a mighty master, that attempts to fix the element of mind only increase its activity, and that to calculate what may be from what has been is a very dangerous deceit.--were all the saltpetre in india monopolized, this would only make chemical researches more ardent and successful. the chalky earths would be searched for it, and nitre beds would be made in every cellar and every stable. did not that prove sufficient the genius of chemistry would find in a new salt a substitute for nitre or a power superior to it.[3] it requires greater genius than mr. pitt seems to possess, to know the wonderful resources of the mind, when patriotism animates philosophy, and all the arts and sciences are put under a state of requisition, when the attention of a whole scientific people is bent to multiplying the means and instruments of destruction and when philosophy rises in a mass to drive on the wedge of war. a black powder has changed the military art, and in a great degree the manners of mankind. why may not the same science which produced it, produce another powder which, inflamed under a certain compression, might impell the air, so as to shake down the strongest towers and scatter destruction. but you are going to a country where science is turned to better uses. your change of place will give room for the matchless activity of your genius; and you will take a sublime pleasure in bestowing on britain the benefit of your future discoveries. as matter changes its form but not a particle is ever lost, so the principles of virtuous minds are equally imperishable; and your change of situation may even render truth more operative, knowledge more productive, and in the event, liberty itself more universal. wafted by the winds or tossed by the waves, the seed that is here thrown out as dead, there shoots up and flourishes. it is probable that emigration to america from the first settlement downward, has not only served the cause of general liberty, but will eventually and circuitously serve it even in britain. what mighty events have arisen from that germ which might once have been supposed to be lost forever in the woods of america, but thrown upon the bosom of nature, the breath of god revived it, and the world hath gathered its fruits. even ireland has contributed her share to the liberties of america; and while purblind statesmen were happy to get rid of the stubborn presbyterians of the north, they little thought that they were serving a good cause in another quarter.--yes! the volunteers of ireland still live--they live across the atlantic. let this idea animate us in our sufferings, and may the pure principles and genuine lustre of the british constitution reflected from their coast, penetrate into ourselves and our dungeons. farewell--great and good man! great by your mental powers, by your multiplied literary labours, but still greater by those household virtues which form the only solid security for public conduct by those mild and gentle qualities, which far from being averse to, are most frequently attended with severe and inflexible patriotism, rising like an oak above a modest mansion.--farewell--but before you go, we beseech a portion of your parting prayer to the author of good for archibald hamilton rowan, the pupil of jebb, our brother, now suffering imprisonment, and for all those who have suffered, and are about to suffer in the same cause--the cause of impartial and adequate representation--the cause of the constitution. pray to the best of beings for muir, palmer, skirving, margarott and gerald, who are now, or will shortly be crossing, like you, the bleak ocean, to a barbarous land!--pray that they may be animated with the same spirit, which in the days of their fathers, triumphed at the stake, and shone in the midst of flames. melancholy indeed, it is that the mildest and most humane of all religions should have been so perverted as to hang or burn men in order to keep them of one faith. it is equally melancholy, that the most deservedly extolled of civil constitutions, should recur to similar modes of coercion, and that hanging and burning are not now employed, principally, because measures apparently milder are considered as more effectual. farewell! soon may you embrace your sons on the american shore, and washington take you by the hand, and the shade of franklin look down with calm delight on the first statesman of the age extending his protection to its first philosopher. and how interestedly did america anticipate the arrival of the world renowned philosopher is in a measure foreshadowed by the following excerpt from the _american daily advertiser_ for thursday, june 5, 1794: dr. priestley, with about one hundred other passengers, are on board the sansom, which may be hourly expected. in an editorial of the same paper, printed about the same date, there appeared the following tribute: it must afford the most sincere gratification to every well wisher to the rights of man, that the united states of america, the land of freedom and independence, has become the asylum of the greatest characters of the present age, who have been persecuted in europe, merely because they have defended the rights of the enslaved nations. the name of joseph priestley will be long remembered among all enlightened people; and there is no doubt that england will one day regret her ungrateful treatment to this venerable and illustrious man. his persecutions in england have presented to him the american republic as a safe and honourable retreat in his declining years; and his arrival in this city calls upon us to testify our respect and esteem for a man whose whole life has been devoted to the sacred duty of diffusing knowledge and happiness among nations. the citizens of united america know well the honourable distinction that is due to virtue and talents; and while they cherish in their hearts the memory of dr. franklin, as a philosopher, they will be proud to rank among the list of their illustrious fellow citizens, the name of dr. priestley. quietly but with great inward rejoicing were the travel-worn voyagers--the doctor and his wife--received on the evening of june 4, 1794, at the old battery in new york, by their son joseph and his wife, who had long awaited them, and now conducted them to a nearby lodging house, which had been the head-quarters of generals howe and clinton. on the following morning the priestleys were visited by governor clinton, dr. prevost, bishop of new york and most of the principal merchants, and deputations of corporate bodies and societies, bringing addresses of welcome. thus, among the very first to present their sympathetic welcome was the democratic society of the city of new york, which in the address of its president, mr. james nicholson, made june 7, 1794, said: sir, we are appointed by the democratic society of the city of new york, a committee to congratulate you on your arrival in this country: and we feel the most lively pleasure in bidding you a hearty welcome to these shores of liberty and equality. while the arm of tyranny is extended in most of the nations of the world, to crush the spirit of liberty, and bind in chains the bodies and minds of men, we acknowledge, with ardent gratitude to the great parent of the universe, our singular felicity in living in a land, where reason has successfully triumphed over the artificial distinctions of european policy and bigotry, and where the law equally protects the virtuous citizen of every description and persuasion. on this occasion we cannot but observe, that we once esteemed ourselves happy in the relation that subsisted between us and the government of great britain--but the multiplied oppressions which characterized that government, excite in us the most painful sensations, and exhibit a spectacle as disgusting in itself, as dishonourable to the british name. the governments of the old world present to us one huge mass of intrigue, corruption and despotism--most of them are now basely combined, to prevent the establishment of liberty in france, and to affect the total destruction of the rights of man. under these afflicting circumstances we rejoice that america opens her arms to receive, with fraternal affection, the friend of liberty and human happiness, and that here he may enjoy the best blessings of civilized society. we sincerely sympathize with you in all that you have suffered, and we consider the persecution with which you have been pursued by a venal court and an imperious and uncharitable priesthood, as an illustrious proof of your personal merit, and a lasting reproach to that government from the grasp of whose tyranny you are so happily removed. accept, sir, of the sincere and best wishes of the society whom we represent, for the continuance of your health, and the increase of your individual and domestic happiness. to which priestley graciously replied: gentlemen, viewing with the deepest concern, as you do, the prospect that is now exhibited in europe, those troubles which are the natural offspring of their forms of government originating, indeed, in the spirit of liberty, but gradually degenerating in tyrannies, equally degrading to the rulers and the ruled, i rejoice in finding an asylum from persecution in a country in which these abuses have come to a natural termination, and have produced another system of liberty founded on such wise principles, as, i trust, will guard it against all future abuses; those artificial distinctions in society, from which they sprung, being completely eradicated, that protection from violence which laws and government promise in all countries, but which i have not found in my own, i doubt not i shall find with you, though, i cannot promise to be a better subject of this government, than my whole conduct will evince that i have been to that of great britain. justly, however, as i think i may complain of the treatment i have met with in england i sincerely wish her prosperity, and, from the good will i bear both that country and this i ardently wish that all former animosities may be forgotten and that a perpetual friendship may subsist between them. and on monday, june, 11, 1794, having taken the first opportunity to visit priestley, the tammany society presented this address: sir, a numerous body of freemen who associate to cultivate among them the love of liberty and the enjoyment of the happy republican government under which they live and who for several years have been known in this city, by the name of the tammany society have deputed us a committee to express to you their pleasure and congratulations on your safe arrival in this country. their venerable ancestors escaped, as you have done, from persecutions of intolerance, bigotry and despotism, and they would deem themselves, an unworthy progeny were they not highly interested in your safety and happiness. it is not alone because your various useful publications evince a life devoted to literature and the industrious pursuit of knowledge; not only because your numerous discoveries in nature are so efficient to the progression of human happiness: but they have long known you to be the friend of mankind and in defiance of calumny and malice, an asserter of the rights of conscience and the champion of civil and religious liberty. they have learned with regret and indignation the abandoned proceedings of those spoilers who destroyed your house and goods, ruined your philosophical apparatus and library, committed to the flames your manuscripts, pryed into the secrets of your private papers, and in their barbarian fury put your life itself in danger. they heard you also with exalted benevolence return unto them "blessings for curses:" and while you thus exemplified the undaunted integrity of the patriot, the mild and forbearing virtues of the christian, they hailed you victor in this magnanimous triumph over your enemies. you have fled from the rude arm of violence, from the flames of bigotry, from the rod of lawless power: and you shall find refuge in the bosom of freedom, of peace, and of americans. you have left your native land, a country doubtless ever dear to you--a country for whose improvement in virtue and knowledge you have long disinterestedly laboured, for which its rewards are ingratitude, injustice and banishment. a country although now presenting a prospect frightful to the eyes of humanity, yet once the nurse of science, of arts, of heroes, and of freeman--a country which although at present apparently self devoted to destruction, we fondly hope may yet tread back the steps of infamy and ruin, and once more rise conspicuous among the free nations of the earth. in this advanced period of your life, when nature demands the sweets of tranquility, you have been constrained to encounter the tempestous deep, to risk disappointed prospects in a foreign land, to give up the satisfaction of domestic quiet, to tear yourself from the friends of your youth, from a numerous acquaintance who revere and love you, and will long deplore your loss. we enter, sir, with emotion and sympathy into the numerous sacrifices you must have made, to an undertaking which so eminently exhibits our country as an asylum for the persecuted and oppressed, and into those regretful sensibilities your heart experienced when the shores of your native land were lessening to your view. alive to the impressions of this occasion we give you a warm and hearty welcome into these united states. we trust a country worthy of you; where providence has unfolded a scene as new as it is august, as felicitating as it is unexampled. the enjoyment of liberty with but one disgraceful exception, pervades every class of citizens. a catholic and sincere spirit of toleration regulates society which rises into zeal when the sacred rights of humanity are invaded. and there exists a sentiment of free and candid inquiry which disdains shackles of tradition, promising a rich harvest of improvement and the glorious triumphs of truth. we hope, sir, that the great being whose laws and works you have made the study of your life, will smile upon and bless you--restore you to every domestic and philosophical enjoyment, prosper you in every undertaking, beneficial to mankind, render you, as you have been to your own, the ornament of this country, and crown you at last with immortal felicity and honour. and to this the venerable scientist was pleased to say: gentlemen, i think myself greatly honoured, flying as i do, from ill treatment in my native country, on account of my attachment to the cause of civil and religious liberty, to be received with the congratulations of "a society of freemen associated to cultivate the love of liberty, and the enjoyment of a happy republican government." happy would our venerable ancestors, as you justly call them, have been, to have found america such a retreat for them as it is to me, when they were driven hither; but happy has it proved to me, and happy will it be for the world, that in the wise and benevolent order of providence, abuses of power are ever destructive of itself, and favourable to liberty. their strenuous exertions and yours now give me that asylum which at my time of life is peculiarly grateful to me, who only wish to continue unmolested those pursuits of various literature to which, without having ever entered into any political connexions my life has been devoted. i join you in viewing with regret the unfavourable prospect of great britain formerly, as you say, the nurse of science, and of freemen, and wish with you, that the unhappy delusion that country is now under may soon vanish, and that whatever be the form of its government it may vie with this country in everything that is favourable to the best interests of mankind, and join with you in removing that only disgraceful circumstance, which you justly acknowledge to be an exception to the enjoyment of equal liberty, among yourselves. that the great being whose providence extends alike to all the human race, and to whose disposal i cheerfully commit myself, may establish whatever is good, and remove whatever is imperfect from your government and from every government in the known world, is the earnest prayer of, gentlemen, your respectful humble servant. as priestley had ever gloried in the fact that he was a teacher, what more appropriate in this period of congratulatory welcome, could have come to him than the following message of new york's teaching body: the associated teachers in the city of new york beg leave to offer you a sincere and hearty welcome to this land of tranquility and freedom. impressed with the idea of the real importance of so valuable an acquisition to the growing interests of science and literature, in this country, we are particularly happy that the honour of your first reception, has fallen to this state, and to the city of new york. as labourers in those fields which you have occupied with the most distinguished eminence, at the arduous and important task of cultivating the human mind, we contemplate with peculiar satisfaction the auspicious influence which your personal residence in this country, will add to that of your highly valuable scientific and literary productions, by which we have already been materially benefited. we beg leave to anticipate the happiness of sharing in some degree, that patronage of science and literature, which it has ever been your delight to afford. this will give facility to our expressions; direct and encourage us in our arduous employments; assist us to form the man, and thereby give efficacy to the diffusion of useful knowledge. our most ardent wishes attend you, good sir, that you may find in this land a virtuous simplicity, a happy recess from the intriguing politics and vitiating refinements of the european world. that your patriotic virtues may add to the vigour of our happy constitution and that the blessings of this country may be abundantly remunerated into your person and your family. and we rejoice in believing, that the parent of nature, by those secret communications of happiness with which he never fails to reward the virtuous mind, will here convey to you that consolation, support, and joy, which are independent of local circumstances, and "which the world can neither give nor take away." touched, indeed was priestley by this simple, outspoken greeting from those who appreciated his genuine interest in the cause of education. hence his reply was in a kindred spirit: a welcome to this country from my fellow labourers in the instruction of youth, is, i assure you, peculiarly grateful to me. classes of men, as well as individuals, are apt to form too high ideas of their own importance; but certainly one of the most important is, that which contributes so much as ours do to the cummunication of useful knowledge, as forming the characters of men, thereby fitting them for their several stations in society. in some form or other this has been my employment and delight; and my principal object in flying for an asylum to this country, "a land," as i hope you justly term it, "of virtuous simplicity, and a recess from the intriguing politics, and vicious refinements of the european world," is that i may, without molestation, pursue my favourite studies. and if i had an opportunity of making choice of an employment for what remains of active exertion in life, it would be one in which i should as i hope i have hitherto done, contribute with you, to advance the cause of science, of virtue, and of religion. further, the medical society of the state of new york through dr. john charlton, its president, said: permit us, sir, to wait upon you with an offering of our sincere congratulations, on your safe arrival, with your lady and family in this happy country, and to express our real joy, in receiving among us, a gentleman, whose labours have contributed so much to the diffusion and establishment of civil and religious liberty, and whose deep researches into the true principles of natural philosophy, have derived so much improvement and real benefit, not only to the sciences of chemistry and medicine, but to various other arts, all of which are necessary to the ornament and utility of human life. may you, sir, possess and enjoy, here, uninterrupted contentment and happiness, and may your valuable life be continued a farther blessing to mankind. and in his answer dr. priestley remarked: i think myself greatly honoured in being congratulated on my arrival in this country by a society of persons whose studies bear some relation to my own. to continue, without fear of molestation, on account of the most open profession of any sentiments, civil or religious, those pursuits which you are sensible have for their object the advantage of all mankind, (being, as you justly observe, "necessary to the ornament and utility of human life") is my principal motive for leaving a country in which that tranquility and sense of security which scientificial pursuits require, cannot be had; and i am happy to find here, persons who are engaged in the same pursuits, and who have the just sense that you discover of their truly enviable situation. as a climax to greetings extended in the city of new york, the republican natives of great britain and ireland resident in that city said, we, the republican natives of great britain and ireland, resident in the city of new york, embrace, with the highest satisfaction, the opportunity which your arrival in this city presents, of bearing our testimony to your character and virtue and of expressing our joy that you come among us in circumstances of such good health and spirits. we have beheld with the keenest sensibility, the unparallelled persecutions which attended you in your native country, and have sympathized with you under all their variety and extent. in the firm hope, that you are now completely removed from the effects of every species of intolerance, we most sincerely congratulate you. after a fruitless opposition to a corrupt and tyrannical government, many of us have, like you, sought freedom and protection in the united states of america; but to this we have all been principally induced, from the full persuasion, that a republican representative government, was not merely best adapted to promote human happiness, but that it is the only rational system worthy the wisdom of man to project, or to which his reason should assent. participating in the many blessings which the government of this country is calculated to insure, we are happy in giving it this proof of our respectful attachment:--we are only grieved, that a system of such beauty and excellence, should be at all tarnished by the existence of slavery in any form; but as friends to the equal rights of man, we must be permitted to say, that we wish these rights extended to every human being, be his complexion what it may. we, however, look forward with pleasing anticipation to a yet more perfect state of society; and, from that love of liberty which forms so distinguishing a trait in american character, are taught to hope that this last--this worse disgrace to a free government, will finally and forever be done away. while we look back on our native country with emotions of pity and indignation at the outrages which humanity has sustained in the persons of the virtuous muir, and his patriotic associates; and deeply lament the fatal apathy into which our countrymen have fallen; we desire to be thankful to the great author of our being that we are in america, and that it has pleased him, in his wise providence, to make the united states an asylum not only from the immediate tyranny of the british government, but also from those impending calamities, which its increasing despotism and multiplied iniquities, must infallibly bring down on a deluded and oppressed people. accept, sir, of our affectionate and best wishes for a long continuance of your health and happiness. the answer of the aged philosopher to this address was: i think myself peculiarly happy in finding in this country so many persons of sentiments similar to my own, some of whom have probably left great britain or ireland on the same account, and to be so cheerfully welcomed by them on my arrival. you have already had experience of the difference between the governments of the two countries, and i doubt not, have seen sufficient reason to give the decided preference that you do to that of this. there all liberty of speech and of the press as far as politics are concerned, is at an end, and a spirit of intolerance in matters of religion is almost as high as in the time of the stuarts. here, having no countenance from government, whatever may remain of this spirit, from the ignorance and consequent bigotry, of former times, it may be expected soon to die away; and on all subjects whatever, every man enjoys invaluable liberty of speaking and writing whatever he pleases. the wisdom and happiness of republican governments and the evils resulting from hereditary monarchical ones, cannot appear in a stronger light to you than they do to me. we need only look to the present state of europe and of america, to be fully satisfied in this respect. the former will easily reform themselves, and among other improvements, i am persuaded, will be the removal of that vestige of servitude to which you allude, as it so ill accords with the spirit of equal liberty, from which the rest of the system has flowed; whereas no material reformation of the many abuses to which the latter are subject, it is to be feared, can be made without violence and confusion. i congratulate you, gentlemen, as you do me, on our arrival in a country in which men who wish well to their fellow citizens, and use their best endeavours to render them the most important services, men who are an honour to human nature and to any country, are in no danger of being treated like the worst felons, as is now the case in great britain. happy should i think myself in joining with you in welcoming to this country every friend of liberty, who is exposed to danger from the tyranny of the british government, and who, while they continue under it, must expect to share in those calamities, which its present infatuation must, sooner or later, bring upon it. but let us all join in supplications to the great parent of the universe, that for the sake of the many excellent characters in our native country its government may be reformed, and the judgments impending over it prevented. the hearty reception accorded dr. priestley met in due course with a cruel attack upon him by william cobbett, known under the pen-name of peter porcupine, an englishman, who after arrival in this country enjoyed a rather prosperous life by formulating scurrilous literature--attacks upon men of prominence, stars shining brightly in the human firmament. an old paper, the _argus_, for the year 1796, said of this peter porcupine: when this political caterpillar was crawling about at st. john's, nova scotia, in support of his britannic majesty's glorious cause, against the united states, and holding the rank of serjeant major in the 54th regiment, then quartered in that land, "flowing with milk and honey," and grindstones, and commanded by colonel bruce; it was customary for some of the officers to hire out the soldiers to the country people, instead of keeping them to military duty, and to pocket the money themselves. peter found he could make a _speck_ out of this, and therefore kept a watchful eye over the sins of his superiors. when the regiment was recalled and had returned to england--peter, brimful of amor patriã¦, was about to prefer a complaint against the officers, when they came down with a round sum of the ready rino, and a promise of his discharge, in case of secrecy.--this so staggered our incorruptible and independent hero and quill driver, that he agreed to the terms, received that very honorable discharge, mentioned with so much emphasis, in the history of his important life--got cash enough to come to america, by circuitous route and to set himself up with the necessary implements of scandal and abuse. this flea, this spider, this corporal, has dared to point his impotent spleen at the memory of that illustrious patriot, statesman and philosopher, benjamin franklin. let the buzzing insect reflect on this truth--that "succeeding times great franklin's works shall quote, when 'tis forgot--this peter ever wrote." and the _advertiser_ declared: peter porcupine is one of those writers who attempt to deal in wit--and to bear down every republican principle by satire--but he miserably fails in both, for his wit is as stale as his satire, and his satire as insipid as his wit. he attempts to ridicule dr. franklin, but can any man of sense conceive any poignancy in styling this great philosopher, "poor richard," or "the old lightning rod." franklin, whose researches in philosophy have placed him preeminent among the first characters in this country, or in europe: is it possible then that such a contemptible wretch as peter porcupine, (who never gave any specimen of his philosophy, but in bearing with christian patience a severe whipping at the public post) can injure the exalted reputation of this great philosopher? the folly of the editor of the centinal, is the more conspicuous, in inserting his billingsgate abuse in a boston paper, when this town, particularly the tradesman of it are reaping such advantages from franklin's liberality. the editor of the centinal ought to blush for his arrogance in vilifying this tradesmen's friend, by retailing the scurrility of so wretched a puppy as peter porcupine. as to dr. priestley, the editor was obliged to apologise in this particular--but colours it over as the effusions of genius--poor apology, indeed to stain his columns with scurrility and abuse, and after finding the impression too notoriously infamous, attempts to qualify it, sycophantic parenthesis. the names of franklin and priestley will be enrolled in the catalogue of worthies, while the wretched peter porcupine, and his more wretched supporters, will sink into oblivion, unless the register of newgate should be published, and their memories be raked from the loathsome rubbish as spectres of universal destestation. and the london monthly review (august 10, 1796) commented as follows on porcupine's animadversions upon priestley: frequently as we have differed in opinion from dr. priestley, we should think it an act of injustice to his merit, not to say that the numerous and important services which he has rendered to science, and the unequivocal proofs which he has given of at least honest intention towards religion and christianity ought to have protected him from such gross insults as are poured upon him in this pamphlet. of the author's literary talent, we shall say but little: the phrases, "setting down to count the cost"--"the rights of the man the greatest bore in nature"--the appellation of rigmarole ramble, given to a correct sentence of dr. priestley--which the author attempts to criticise--may serve as specimens of his language. the pitiful attempt at wit, in his vulgar fable of the pitcher haranguing the pans and jordans, will give him little credit as a writer, with readers of an elegant taste.--no censure, however, can be too severe for a writer who suffers the rancour of party spirit to carry him so far beyond the bounds of justice, truth and decency, as to speak of dr. priestley as an admirer of the massacres of france, and who would have wished to have seen the town of birmingham like that of lyons, razed, and all its industrious and loyal inhabitants butchered as a man whose conduct proves that he has either an understanding little superior to that of an idiot, or the heart of marat: in short, as a man who fled into banishment covered with the universal destestation of his countrymen. the spirit, which could dictate such outrageous abuse, must disgrace any individual and any party. even before porcupine began his abuse of priestley, there appeared efforts intended no doubt to arouse opposition to him and dislike for him. one such, apparently very innocent in its purpose, appeared shortly after priestley's settlement in northumberland. it may be seen in _the advertiser_, and reads thus: the divinity of jesus christ proved in a publication to be sold by francis bayley in market street, between 3rd and 4th streets, at the sign of the _yorick's head_--being a reply to dr. joseph priestley's appeal to the serious and candid professors of christianity. the new york addresses clearly indicated the generous sympathy of hosts of americans for priestley. they were not perfunctory, but genuinely genuine. this brought joy to the distinguished emigrant, and a sense of fellowship, accompanied by a feeling of security. more than a century has passed since these occurrences, and the reader of today is scarcely stirred by their declarations and appeals. changes have come, in the past century, on both sides of the great ocean. almost everywhere reigns the freedom so devoutly desired by the fathers of the long ago. it is so universal that it does not come as a first thought. other changes, once constantly on men's minds have gradually been made. how wonderful has been the development of new york since priestley's brief sojourn in it. how marvelously science has grown in the great interim. what would priestley say could he now pass up and down the famous avenues of our greatest city? his decision to live in america, his labors for science in this land, have had a share in the astounding unfolding of the dynamical possibilities of america's greatest municipality. the priestleys were delighted with new york. they were frequent dinner guests of governor clinton, whom they liked very much and saw often, and they met with pleasure dr. samuel l. mitchill, the professor of chemistry in columbia. amidst the endless fetes, attendant upon their arrival, there existed a desire to go forward. the entire family were eager to arrive at their real resting place--the home prepared by the sons who had preceded them to this western world. accordingly, on june 18, 1794, they left new york, after a fortnight's visit, and the _advertiser_ of philadelphia, june 21, 1794, contained these lines: last thursday evening arrived in town from new york the justly celebrated philosopher dr. joseph priestley. thus was heralded his presence in the city of his esteemed, honored friend, franklin, who, alas! was then in the spirit land, and not able to greet him as he would have done had he still been a living force in the city of brotherly love. however, a very prompt welcome came from the american philosophical society, founded (1727) by the immortal savant, franklin. the president of this venerable society, the oldest scientific society in the western hemisphere, was the renowned astronomer, david rittenhouse, who said for himself and his associates: the american philosophical society, held at philadelphia for promoting useful knowledge, offer you their sincere congratulations on your safe arrival in this country. associated for the purposes of extending and disseminating those improvements in the sciences and the arts, which most conduce to substantial happiness of man, the society felicitate themselves and their country, that your talents and virtues, have been transferred to this republic. considering you as an illustrious member of this institution: your colleagues anticipate your aid, in zealously promoting the objects which unite them; as a virtuous man, possessing eminent and useful acquirements, they contemplate with pleasure the accession of such worth to the american commonwealth, and looking forward to your future character of a citizen of this, your adopted country, they rejoice in greeting, as such, an enlightened republican. in this free and happy country, those unalienable rights, which the author of nature committed to man as a sacred deposit, have been secured: here, we have been enabled, under the favour of divine providence, to establish a government of laws, and not of men; a government, which secures to its citizens equal rights, and equal liberty, and which offers an asylum to the good, to the persecuted, and to the oppressed of other climes. may you long enjoy every blessing which an elevated and highly cultivated mind, a pure conscience, and a free country are capable of bestowing. and, in return, priestley remarked. it is with peculiar satisfaction that i receive the congratulations of my brethren of the philosophical society in this city, on my arrival in this country. it is, in great part, for the sake of pursuing our common studies without molestation, though for the present you will allow, with far less advantage, that i left my native country, and have come to america; and a society of philosophers, who will have no objection to a person on account of his political or religious sentiments, will be as grateful, as it will be new to me. my past conduct, i hope, will show, that you may depend upon my zeal in promoting the valuable objects of your institution; but you must not flatter yourself, or me, with supposing, that, at my time of life, and with the inconvenience attending a new and uncertain settlement, i can be of much service to it. i am confident, however, from what i have already seen of the spirit of the people of this country, that it will soon appear that republican governments, in which every obstruction is removed to the exertion of all kinds of talent, will be far more favourable to science, and the arts, than any monarchical government has ever been. the patronage to be met with there is ever capricious, and as often employed to bear down merit as to promote it, having for its real object, not science or anything useful to mankind, but the mere reputation of the patron, who is seldom any judge of science. whereas a public which neither flatters nor is to be flattered will not fail in due time to distinguish true merit and to give every encouragement that it is proper to be given in the case. besides by opening as you generously do an asylum to the persecuted and "oppressed of all climes," you will in addition to your own native stock, soon receive a large accession of every kind of merit, philosophical not excepted, whereby you will do yourselves great honour and secure the most permanent advantage to the community. doubtless in the society of so many worthy philadelphians, the priestleys were happy, for they had corresponded with not a few of them. the longing for northumberland became very great and one smiles on reading that the good doctor thought "philadelphia by no means so agreeable as new york ... philadelphia would be very irksome to me.... it is only a place for business and to get money in." but in this city he later spent much of his time. it was about the middle of july, 1794, that the journey to northumberland began, and on september 14, 1794, priestley wrote of northumberland "nothing can be more delightful, or more healthy than this place." safely lodged among those dear to him one finds much pleasure in observing the great philosopher's activities. the preparation of a home for himself and his wife and the unmarried members of the family was uppermost in his mind. but much time was given to correspondence with loyal friends in england. chief among these were the reverends lindsey and belsham. the letters to these gentlemen disclose the plans and musings of the exile. for instance, in a communication to the former, dated september 14, 1794, he wrote: the professor of chemistry in the college of philadelphia is supposed to be on his death-bed ... in the case of a vacancy, dr. rush thinks i shall be invited to succeed him. in this case i must reside four months in one year in philadelphia, and one principal inducement with me to accept of it will be the opportunity i shall have of forming an unitarian congregation.... and a month later he observed to the same friend: philadelphia is unpleasant, unhealthy, and intolerably expensive.... every day i do something towards the continuation of my church history.... i have never read so much hebrew as i have since i left england.... he visited freely in the vicinity of northumberland, spending much time in the open. davy, a traveler, made this note: dr. priestley visited us at sunbury, looks well and cheerful, has left off his perriwig, and combs his short grey locks, in the true style of the simplicity of the country.... dined very pleasantly with him. he has bought a lot of eleven acres (exclusively of that which he is building on), which commands a delightful view of all the rivers, and both towns, i.e. sunbury and northumberland and the country. it cost him 100⣠currency. it was also to mr. lindsey that he communicated, on november 12, 1794, a fact of no little interest, even today, to teachers of chemistry in america. it was: i have just received an invitation to the professorship of chemistry at philadelphia ... when i considered that i must pass four months of every year from home, my heart failed me; and i declined it. if my books and apparatus had been in philadelphia, i might have acted differently, but part of them are now arrived here, and the remainder i expect in a few days, and the expense and risk of conveyance of such things from philadelphia hither is so great, that i cannot think of taking them back ... and in a year or two, i doubt not, we shall have a college established here. it was about this time that his youngest son, harry, in whom he particularly delighted, began clearing 300 acres of cheap land, and in this work the philosopher was greatly interested; indeed, on occasions he actually participated in the labor of removing the timber. despite this manual labor there were still hours of every day given to the church history, and to his correspondence which grew in volume, as he was advising inquiring english friends, who thought of emigrating, and very generally to them he recommended the perusal of dr. thomas cooper's "advice to those who would remove to america--" through this correspondence, now and then, there appeared little animadversions on the quaint old town on the delaware, such as i never saw a town i liked less than philadelphia. could this dislike have been due to the fact that- probably in no other place on the continent was the love of bright colours and extravagance in dress carried to such an extreme. large numbers of the quakers yielded to it, and even the very strict ones carried gold-headed canes, gold snuff-boxes, and wore great silver buttons on their drab coats and handsome buckles on their shoes. and nowhere were the women so resplendant in silks, satins, velvets, and brocades, and they piled up their hair mountains high. furthermore- the descriptions of the banquets and feasts ... are appalling. john adams, when he first came down to philadelphia, fresh from boston, stood aghast at this life into which he was suddenly thrown and thought it must be sin. but he rose to the occasion, and, after describing in his diary some of the "mighty feasts" and "sinful feasts" ... says he drank madeira "at a great rate and found no inconvenience." it would only be surmise to state what were the doctor's reasons for his frequent declaration of dislike for philadelphia. the winter of 1794-1795 proved much colder "than ever i knew it in england," but he cheerfully requested samuel parker to send him a hygrometer, shades or bell-glasses, jars for electrical batteries, and a set of glass tubes with large bulbs at the end, such as i used in the experiments i last published on the generation of _air_ from water. most refreshing is this demand upon a friend. it indicates the keen desire in priestley to proceed with experimental studies, though surroundings and provisions for such undertakings were quite unsatisfactory. the spirit was there and very determined was its possessor that his science pursuits should not be laid totally aside. his attitude and course in this particular were admirable and exemplary. too often the lack of an abundance of equipment and the absence of many of the supposed essentials, have been deterrents which have caused men to abandon completely their scientific investigations. however, such was not the case with the distinguished exile, and for this he deserved all praise. from time to time, in old papers and books of travel, brief notes concerning priestley appear. these exhibit in a beautiful manner the human side of the man. they cause one to wish that the privilege of knowing this worthy student of chemical science might have been enjoyed by him. for example, a mr. bakewell chanced upon him in the spring of 1795 and recorded: i found him (priestley) a man rather below the middle size, straight and plain, wearing his own hair; and in his countenance, though you might discern the philosopher, yet it beamed with so much simplicity and freedom as made him very easy of access. it is also stated in davy's "journal of voyage, etc."- the doctor enjoys a game at whist; and although he never hazards a farthing, is highly diverted with playing good cards, but never ruffled by bad ones. in may, 1795, priestley expressed himself as follows: as to the experiments, i find i cannot do much till i get my own house built. at present i have all my books and instruments in one room, in the house of my son. this is the first time in all his correspondence that reference is made to experimental work. it was in 1795. as a matter of course every american chemist is interested to know when he began experimentation in this country. in the absence of proper laboratory space and the requisite apparatus, it is not surprising that he thought much and wrote extensively on religious topics, and further he would throw himself into political problems, for he addressed mr. adams on restriction "in the naturalization of foreigners." he remarked that- party strife is pretty high in this country, but the constitution is such that it cannot do any harm. to friends, probably reminding him of being "unactive, which affects me much," he answered: as to the chemical lectureship (in philadelphia) i am convinced i could not have acquitted myself in it to proper advantage. i had no difficulty in giving a general course of chemistry at hackney (england), lecturing only once a week; but to give a lecture every day for four months, and to enter so particularly into the subject as a course of lectures in a medical university (pennsylvania) requires, i was not prepared for; and my engagements there would not, at my time of life, have permitted me to make the necessary preparations for it; if i could have done it at all. for, though i have made discoveries in some branches of chemistry, i never gave much attention to the common routine of it, and know but little of the common processes. is not this a refreshing confession from the celebrated discoverer of oxygen? the casual reader would not credit such a statement from one who august 1, 1774, introduced to the civilized world so important an element as oxygen. because he did not know the "common processes" of chemistry and had not concerned himself with the "common routine" of it, led to his blazing the way among chemical compounds in his own fashion. many times since the days of priestley real researchers after truth have proceeded without compass and uncovered most astonishing and remarkable results. they had the genuine research spirit and were driven forward by it. priestley knew little of the labyrinth of analysis and cared less; indeed, he possessed little beyond an insatiable desire to unfold nature's secrets. admiration for priestley increases on hearing him descant on the people about him--on the natives- here every house-keeper has a garden, out of which he raises almost all he wants for his family. they all have cows, and many have horses, the keeping of which costs them little or nothing in the summer, for they ramble with bells on their necks in the woods, and come home at night. almost all the fresh meat they have is salted in the autumn, and a fish called _shads_ in the spring. this salt shad they eat at breakfast, with their tea and coffee, and also at night. we, however, have not yet laid aside our english customs, and having made great exertion to get fresh meat, it will soon come into general use. proudly must he have said- my youngest son, harry, works as hard as any farmer in the country and is as attentive to his farm, though he is only eighteen.... two or three hours i always work in the fields along with my son.... and, then as a supplement, for it was resting heavily on his mind, he added- what i chiefly attend to now is my church history ... but i make some experiments every day (july 12, 1795), and shall soon draw up a paper for the philosophical society at philadelphia. early in december of 1795 he entrusted a paper, intended for the american philosophical society to the keeping of dr. young, a gentleman from northumberland en route for europe. acquainting his friend lindsey of this fact, he took occasion to add- i have much more to do in my laboratory, but i am under the necessity of shutting up for the winter, as the frost will make it impossible to keep my water fit for use, without such provision as i cannot make, till i get my own laboratory prepared on purpose, when i hope to be able to work alike, winter and summer. dr. young carried two papers to philadelphia. the first article treated of "experiments and observations relating to the analysis of atmospherical air," and the second "further experiments relating to the generation of air from water." they filled 20 quarto pages of volume 4 of the transactions of the american philosophical society. on reading them the thought lingers that these are the first contributions of the eminent philosopher from his american home. hence, without reference to their value, they are precious. they represent the results of inquiries performed under unusual surroundings. it is very probable that priestley's english correspondents desired him to concentrate his efforts upon experimental science. they were indeed pleased to be informed of his church history, and his vital interest in religion, but they cherished the hope that science would in largest measure displace these literary endeavors. priestley himself never admitted this, but must have penetrated their designs, and, recognizing the point of their urging, worked at much disadvantage to get the results presented in these two pioneer studies. present day students would grow impatient in their perusal, because of the persistent emphasis placed on phlogiston, dephlogisticated air, phlogisticated air, and so forth. in the very first paper, the opening lines show this: it is an essential part of the antiphlogistic theory, that in all the cases of what i have called _phlogistication_ of _air_, there is simply an absorption of the dephlogisticated air, or, as the advocates of that theory term it, the oxygen contained in it, leaving the _phlogisticated_ part, which they call _azote_, as it originally existed in the atmosphere. also, according to this system, _azote_ is a simple substance, at least not hitherto analyzed into any other. no matter how deeply one venerates priestley, or how great honor is ascribed to him, the question continues why the simpler french view was not adopted by this honest student. further, as an ardent admirer one asks why should priestley pen the next sentence: they, therefore, suppose that there is a determinate proportion between the quantities of oxygen, and azote in every portion of atmospherical air, and that all that has hitherto been done has been to separate them from one another. this proportion they state to be 27 parts of oxygen and 73 parts of azote, in 100 of atmospherical air. priestley knew that there was a "determinate proportion." he was not, however, influenced by quantitative data. sir oliver lodge said[4]- priestley's experiments were admirable, but his perception of their theoretical relations was entirely inadequate and, as we now think, quite erroneous.... in theory he had no instinct for guessing right ... he may almost be said to have had a predilection for the wrong end. at present the french thought is so evident that it seems incomprehensible that priestley failed to grasp it, for he continues- in every case of the diminution of atmospherical air in which this is the result, there appears to me to be something emitted from the substance, which the antiphlogistians suppose to act by simple absorption, and therefore that it is more probable that there is some substance, and the same that has been called _philogiston_, or the _principle of inflammability_ ... emitted, and that this phlogiston uniting with part of the dephlogisticated air forms with it part of the phlogisticated air, which is found after the process. subsequently (1798), he advised the society that he had executed other experiments which corroborated those outlined in his first two papers, adding- had the publication of your _transactions_ been more frequent, i should with much pleasure have submitted to the society a full account of these and other experiments which appear to me to prove, that metals are compound substances, and that water has not yet been decomposed by any process that we are acquainted with. still, however, i would not be very positive, as the contrary is maintained by almost all the chemists of the age.... and thus he proceeds, ever doing interesting things, but blind to the patent results because he had phlogiston constantly before him. he looked everywhere for it, followed it blindly, and consequently overlooked the facts regarded as most significant by his opponents, which in the end led them to correct conclusions. the experimental results in the second paper also admit of an interpretation quite the opposite of that deduced by priestley. he confidently maintained that air was invariably generated from water, because he discovered it and liberated it from water which he was certain did not contain it in solution. he was conscientious in his inferences. deeply did his friends deplore his inability to see more than a single interpretation of his results! the papers were read before the american philosophical society on the 19th of february, 1796. their author as they appear in print, is the rev. dr. j. priestley. it is doubtful whether he affixed this signature. more probable is it that the secretary of the society was responsible, and, because he thought of priestley in the rã´le of a reverend gentleman rather than as a scientific investigator. here, perhaps, it may be mentioned that the first, the very first communication from priestley's pen to the venerable philosophical society, was read in 1784. it was presented by a friend--a mr. w. vaughan, whose family in england were always the staunchest of priestley's supporters. and it is not too much to assume that it was the same influence which one year later (1785) brought about priestley's election to membership in the society, for he was one of "28 new members" chosen in january of that year. there are evidences of marked friendliness to priestley all about the hall of the society, for example his profile in plaster of paris, "particularly valuable for the resemblance" to the doctor, which was presented in 1791; a second "profile in black leather" given by robert patterson, a president of the society, and an oil portrait of him from mrs. dr. caspar wistar. his appearance in person, when for the first time he sat among his colleagues of the society, was on the evening of february 19, 1796--the night upon which the two papers, commented upon in the last few paragraphs were presented, although he probably did not read them himself, this being done by a friend or by the secretary. sixteen members were present. among these were some whose names have become familiar elsewhere, such as barton, woodhouse and others. today, the presence in the same old hall of a renowned scientist, from beyond the seas, would literally attract crowds. then it was not the fashion. but probably he had come unannounced and unheralded. further, he was speaking at other hours on other topics in the city. it is not recorded that he spoke before the philosophers. perhaps he quietly absorbed their remarks and studied them, although he no doubt was agreeably aroused when mr. peale presented to the society a young son of four months and four days old, being the first child born in the philosophical hall, and requested that the society would give him a name. on which the society unanimously agreed that, after the name of the chief founder and late president of the society, he should be called franklin. in anticipation of any later allusion to priestley's sojourn in philadelphia be it observed that he attended meetings of the american philosophical society three times in 1796, twice in 1797, three times in 1801 and once in 1803, and that on february 3rd, 1797, he was chosen to deliver the annual oration before the society, but the committee reported that they waited on dr. priestley last monday afternoon, who received the information with great politeness, but declined accepting of the appointment. this lengthy digression must now be interrupted. it has gone almost too far, yet it was necessary in order that an account of the early experimental contributions of the exile might be introduced chronologically. as already remarked, americans are most deeply interested in everything priestley did during his life in this country and particularly in his scientific activities. on resuming the story of the routine at northumberland in the closing months of the year 1795, there comes the cry from an agonized heart,- we have lost poor harry! this was the message to a philadelphia resident--a friend from old england. the loss, for such it emphatically was, affected the doctor and mrs. priestley very deeply. this particular son was a pride to them and though only eighteen years old had conducted his farm as if he had been bred a farmer. he was uncommonly beloved by all that worked under him. his home was just outside of the borough of northumberland. it was the gift of his father. his interment in "a plot of ground" belonging to the society of friends is thus described by mr bakewell: i attended the funeral to the lonely spot, and there i saw the good old father perform the service over the grave of his son. it was an affecting sight, but he went through it with fortitude, and after praying, addressed the attendants in a few words, assuring them that though death had separated them here, they should meet again in another and a better life. the correspondence to friends in england was replete with accounts of lectures which were in process of preparation. they were discourses on the evidences of revelation and their author was most desirous of getting to philadelphia that he might there deliver them. at that time this city was full of atheism and agnosticism. then, too, the hope of establishing a unitarian church was ever in priestley's thoughts. how delightful it is to read, february 12th, 1796- i am now on my way to philadelphia. when he left it in 1794 he was rather critical of it, but now after three days he arrived there. it was a very good journey, accompanied by my daughter-in-law, in my son's yarmouth waggon, which by means of a seat constructed of straw, was very easy. yes, back again to the city which was the only city in this country ever visited by him. although at times he considered going to new york, and even to boston, philadelphia was to become his mecca. in it he was to meet the most congenial scientific spirits, and to the younger of these he was destined to impart a new inspiration for science, and for chemical science in particular. at the close of the three days' journey he wrote- i am a guest with mr. russell.... we found him engaged to drink tea with president washington, where we accompanied him and spent two hours as in any private family. he (washington) invited me to come at any time, without ceremony. everything is the reverse of what it is with you. this was his first meeting with washington. the spirit of the occasion impressed him. the democratic behavior of the great federalist must have astonished him, if he ever entertained, as lord brougham would have us believe, a hostile opinion and thought him ungrateful because he would not consent to make america dependent upon france. priestley's eagerness to preach was intense, and happy must he have been on the day following his arrival, when his heart's wish was gratified. he preached in the church of mr. winchester- to a very numerous, respectable, and very attentive audience. many were members of congress, and according to one witness- the congregation that attended were so numerous that the house could not contain them, so that as many were obliged to stand as sit, and even the doorways were crowded with people. mr. vice-president adams was among the regular attendants. all this greatly encouraged the doctor. his expectations for the establishment of a unitarian congregation were most encouraging. he declared himself ready to officiate every winter without salary if he could lodge somewhere with a friend. the regular and punctual attendance of mr. adams pleased him so much that he resolved on printing his sermons, for they were in great demand, and to dedicate the same to the vice-president. he was also gratified to note that the "violent prejudice" to him was gradually being overcome. today we smile on recalling the reception accorded the good doctor in his early days in philadelphia. we smile and yet our hearts fail to understand just why he should have been so ostracised. to confirm this it may be noted that on one occasion priestley preached in a presbyterian chapel, very probably in northumberland, when one of the ministers was so displeased- that he declared if they permitted him any more, he would never enter the puplit again. and in 1794 on coming the first time to philadelphia he wrote there is much jealousy and dread of me. how shameful and yet it was most real. bakewell narrates that "i went several times to the baptist meeting in second street, under the care of dr. rogers. this man burst out, and bade the people beware, for 'a priestley had entered the land;' and then, crouching down in a worshiping attitude, exclaimed, 'oh, lamb of god! how would they pluck thee from thy throne!'" the public prints flayed rogers, and even the staid old philosophical society indicated to him that such conduct ill became a member of that august body. accordingly humiliated he repented his error and in time became strongly attached to priestley, concerning whom he told this story to a mr. taylor whose language is here given: the doctor (priestley) would occasionally call on dr. rogers, and without any formal invitation, pass an evening at his house. one afternoon he was there when dr. rogers was not at home, having been assured by mrs. rogers that her husband would soon be there. meanwhile, mr. ----, a baptist minister, called on dr. rogers, and being a person of rough manners, mrs. rogers was a good deal concerned lest he should say something disrespectful to dr. priestley in case she introduced the doctor to him. at last, however, she ventured to announce dr. priestley's name, who put out his hand; but instead of taking it the other immediately drew himself back, saying, as if astonished to meet with dr. priestley in the home of one of his brethren, and afraid of being contaminated by having any social intercourse with him, 'dr. priestley! i can't be cordial.' it is easy to imagine that by this speech mrs. rogers was greatly embarrassed. dr. priestley, observing this, instantly relieved her by saying, and with all that benevolent expression of countenance and pleasantness of manner for which he was remarkable, 'well, well, madam, you and i can be cordial; and dr. rogers will soon be with us, mr. ---and he can converse together, so that we shall all be very comfortable.' thus encouraged, mrs. rogers asked dr. priestley some questions relative to the scripture prophecies, to which he made suitable replies; and before dr. rogers arrived, mr. ---was listening with much attention, sometimes making a remark or putting in a question. the evening was passed in the greatest harmony, with no inclination on the part of mr. ---to terminate the conversation. at last dr. priestley, pulling out his watch, informed mr. ---that as it was _ten_ o'clock it was time that two old men like them were at their quarters. the other at first was not willing to believe that dr. priestley's watch was accurate; but finding that it was correct, he took his leave with apparent regret, observing that he had never spent a shorter and more pleasant evening. he then went away, dr. priestley accompanying him, until it became necesary to separate. next morning he called on his friend, dr. rogers, when he made the following frank and manly declaration: 'you and i well know that dr. priestley is quite wrong in regard to his theology, but notwithstanding this, he is a great and good man, and i behaved to him at our first coming together like a fool and a brute.' many additional evidences might be introduced showing that the doctor was slowly winning his way among the people. it must also be remembered that not all of his associates were of the clerical group but that he had hosts of scientists as sincere and warm supporters. in woodhouse's laboratory he was ever welcome and there must have met many congenial spirits who never discussed politics or religion. this was after the manner of the lunar society in birmingham in which representatives of almost every creed came together to think of scientific matters. hence, it is quite probable that priestley's visit to philadelphia was on the whole full of pleasure. he was also in habits of close intimacy with dr. ewing, provost of the university of pennsylvania, and with the vice-provost, dr. john andrews, as well as with dr. benjamin rush who had long been his friend and with whom he corresponded at frequent intervals after his arrival in america. to him priestley had confided his hope of getting a college in northumberland and inquired,- would the state give any encouragement to it? to rush he also wrote excusing my weakness (for such you will consider it) when, after giving you reason to expect that i would accept the professorship of chemistry, if it was offered to me, i now inform you that i must decline it. now and then he also advised him of such experiments as he was able to do; for example- i made trial of the air of northumberland by the test of nitrous air, but found it not sensibly different from that of england. in the leisure he enjoyed his figure was often seen in congress. he relished the debates which at the time were on the treaty with england. he declared he heard as good speaking there as in the house of commons. he observed- a mr. amos speaks as well as mr. burke; but in general the speakers are more argumentative, and less rhetorical. and whereas there are with you not more than ten or a dozen tolerable speakers, here every member is capable of speaking. while none of the letters to priestley's friends mention a family event of some importance the _american advertiser_, february 13, 1796, announced that mr. william priestley, second son of the celebrated dr. joseph priestley, was married to the agreeable miss peggy foulke, a young lady possessed with every quality to render the marriage state happy. this occurred very probably just before the doctor set forth from northumberland to make his first philadelphia visit. it is singular that little is said of the son william by the doctor. could it be that, in some way, he may have offended his parent? in his _memorial_ rush, writing in the month of march, 1796, noted: saw dr. priestley often this month. attended him in a severe pleurisy. he once in his sickness spoke of his second son, william, and wept very much. busy as he was in spreading his religious tenets, in fraternizing with congenial scientific friends, his thoughts would involuntarily turn back to england: here, though i am as happy as this country can make me ... i do not feel as i did in england. by may, 1796, he had finished his discourses, although he proposed concluding with one emphatically unitarian in character. this was expected by his audience, which had been quietly prepared for it and received it with open minds and much approval. on his return to northumberland he promptly resumed his work on the "church history," but was much disturbed because of the failure of his correspondents in writing him regularly, so he became particularly active in addressing them. but better still he punctuated his composition of sermons, the gradual unfolding of his church history, and religious and literary studies in general, with experimental diversions, beginning with the publication (1796) of an octavo brochure of 39 pages from the press of dobson in philadelphia, in which he addressed himself more especially to berthollet, de la place, monge, morveau, fourcroy and others on "considerations on the doctrine of phlogiston and the decomposition of water." it is the old story in a newer dress. its purpose was to bring home to americans afresh his particular ideas. the reviewer of the _medical repository_ staff was evidently impressed by it, for he said: it must give pleasure to every philosophical mind to find the united states becoming the theatre of such interesting discussion, and then adds that the evidence which was weighty enough to turn such men as black and others from the phlogiston idea to that of lavoisier- has never yet appeared to dr. priestley considerable enough to influence his judgment, or gain his assent. priestley, as frequently observed, entertained grave doubts in regard to the constitution of metals. he thought they were "compounded" of a certain earth, or calx, and phlogiston. further he believed that when the phlogiston flew away, "the splendour, malleability, and ductility" of the metal disappeared with it, leaving behind a calx. again, he contended that when metals dissolved in acids the liberated "inflammable air" (hydrogen) did not come from the 'decompounded water' but from the phlogiston emitted by the metal. also, on the matter of the composition and decomposition of water, he held very opposite ideas. the french school maintained "that hydrogenous and oxygenous airs, incorporated by drawing through them the electrical spark turn to _water_," but priestley contended that "they combine into _smoking nitrous acid_." and thus the discussion proceeded, to be answered most intelligently, in 1797, by adet,[5] whose arguments are familiar to all chemists and need not therefore be here repeated. of more interest was the publication of two lectures on combustion by maclean of princeton. they filled a pamphlet of 71 pages. it appeared in 1797, and was, in brief, a refutation of priestley's presentations, and was heartily welcomed as evidence of the "growing taste in america for this kind of inquiry." among other things maclean said of the various ideas regarding combustion--"becker's is incomplete, stahl's though ingenious, is defective; the antiphlogistic is simple, consistent and sufficient, while priestley's resembling stahl's but in name, is complicated, contradictory and inadequate." not all american chemists were ready to side track the explanations of priestley. the distinguished dr. mitchill wrote priestley on what he designated "an attempt to accommodate the disputes among chemists concerning phlogiston." this was in november, 1797. it is an ingenious effort which elicited from priestley (1798) his sincere thanks, and the expressed fear that his labours "will be in vain." and so it proved. present day chemists would acquiesce in this statement after reading mitchill's "middle-of-the-road" arguments. they were not satisfactory to maclean and irritated priestley. in june 1798 a second letter was written by priestley to mitchill. in it he emphasized the substitution of zinc for "finery cinder." from it he contended inflammable air could be easily procured, and laid great stress on the fact that the "inflammable air" came from the metal and not from the water. he wondered why berthollet and maclean had not answered his first article. to this, a few days later, mitchill replied that he felt there was confusion in terms and that the language employed by the various writers had introduced that confusion; then for philological reasons and to clarify thoughts mitchill proposed to strike out _azote_ from the nomenclature of the day and take _septon_ in its place; he also wished to expunge hydrogene and substitute phlogiston. he admitted that priestley's experiments on zinc were difficult to explain by the antiphlogistic doctrine, adding- it would give me great satisfaction that we could settle the points of variance on this subject; though, even as it is, i am flattered by your (priestley's) allowing my attempt 'to reconcile the two theories to be ingenious, plausible and well-meant.... your idea of carrying on a philosophical discussion in an amicable manner is charming'.... but the peace-maker was handling a delicate problem. he recognized this, but desired that the pioneer studies, then in progress might escape harsh polemics. this was difficult of realization for less than a month later fuel was added to the fire by maclean, when in writing mitchill, who had sent him priestley's printed letter, he emphatically declared that the experiment with the zinc does not seem to be of more consequence than that with the iron and admits of an easy explanation on antiphlogistic principles. and he further insisted that the experiments of priestley proved water to be composed "of hydrogene and oxygene." four days later (july 20, 1798) priestley wrote mitchill that he had replaced zinc by red precipitate and did not get water on decomposing inflammable air with the precipitate. again, august 23, 1798, he related to mitchill that the modern doctrine of water consisting of _oxygene_ and _hydrogene_ is not well founded ... water is the basis of all kinds of air, and without it no kind of air can be produced ... not withstanding the great use that the french chemists make of scales and weights, they do not pretend to weigh either their _calorique_ or _light_; and why may not _phlogiston_ escape their researches, when they employ the same instruments in that investigation? there were in all eight letters sent by priestley to mitchill. they continued until february, 1799. their one subject was phlogiston and its rã´le in very simple chemical operations. the observations were the consequence of original and recent experiments, to which i have given a good part of the leisure of the last summer; and i do not propose to do more on the subject till i hear from the great authors of the theory that i combat in america; but adds,- i am glad ... to find several advocates of the system in this country, and some of them, i am confident, will do themselves honour by their candour, as well as by their ability. this very probably was said as a consequence of the spirited reply james woodhouse[6] made to the papers of maclean. as known, woodhouse worked unceasingly to overthrow the doctrine of phlogiston, but was evidently irritated by maclean, whom he reminds- you are not yet, doctor, the conqueror of this veteran in philosophy. this was a singularly magnanimous speech on woodhouse's part, for he had been hurling sledgehammer blows without rest at the structure priestley thought he had reared about phlogiston and which, he believed, most unassailable, so when in 1799 (july) priestley began his reply to his "antiphlogistian opponents" he took occasion to remark: i am happy to find in dr. woodhouse one who is equally ingenious and candid; so that i do not think the cause he has undertaken will soon find a more able champion, and i do not regret the absence of m. berthollet in egypt. noble words these for his young adversary who, in consequence of strenuous laboratory work, had acquired a deep respect and admiration for priestley's achievements, though he considered he had gone far astray. the various new, confirmatory ideas put forth by priestley need not be here enumerated. they served their day. dr. mitchill evidently enjoyed this controversial chemical material, for he wrote that he hoped the readers of the _medical repository_, in which the several papers appeared, would participate the pleasure we feel on taking a retrospect of our pages, and finding the united states the theatre of so much scientific disquisition. and yet, when in 1800, a pamphlet of 90 pages bearing the title "the doctrine of phlogiston established, etc." appeared there was consternation in the ranks of american chemists. woodhouse was aroused. he absolutely refuted every point in it experimentally, and dr. mitchill avowed- we decline entering into a minute examination of his experiments, as few of his recitals of them are free from the _triune_ mystery of phlogiston, which exceeds the utmost stretch of our faith; for according to it, _carbon is phlogiston_, and _hydrogen is phlogiston_, and _azote is phlogiston_; and yet there are not _three_ phlogistons, but _one_ phlogiston! it was imperative to submit the preceding paragraphs on chemical topics, notwithstanding they have, in a manner, interrupted the chronological arrangement of the activities of the doctor in his home life. they were, it is true, a part of that life--a part that every chemist will note with interest and pleasure. they mean that he was not indifferent to chemistry, and that it is not to be supposed that he ever could be, especially as his visits to philadelphia brought to his attention problems which he would never suffer to go unanswered or unsolved because of his interest in so many other things quite foreign to them. however, a backward look may be taken before resuming the story of his experimental studies. it has already been said that the non-appearance of letters caused him anxiety. for instance he wrote lindsey, july 28, 1796- it is now four months since i have received any letter from you, and it gives me most serious concern. but finally the longed-for epistle arrived and he became content, rejoicing in being able to return the news- i do not know that i have more satisfaction from anything i ever did, than from the lay unitarian congregation i have been the means of establishing in philadelphia. for the use of this group of worshipers he had engaged the common hall in the college (university of pennsylvania). but amidst this unceasing activity of body and mind--very evidently extremely happy in his surroundings--he was again crushed to earth by the death of his noble wife- always caring for others and never for herself. this occurred nine months after the departure of harry. it was a fearful blow. for more than thirty-four years they had lived most happily together. the following tribute, full of deep feeling and esteem attests this- my wife being a woman of an excellent understanding much improved by reading, of great fortitude and strength of mind, and of a temper in the highest degree affectionate and generous.... also excelling in everything relating to household affairs, she entirely relieved me of all concern of that kind, which allowed me to give all my time to the prosecution of my studies. she was not only a true helpmate--courageous and devoted--but certainly most desirous that the husband in whom she absolutely believed should have nothing to interrupt or arrest the pursuits dear to him and in which she herself must have taken great but quiet pride, for she was extremely intelligent and original. madam belloc has mentioned it is a tradition in the family that mrs. priestley once sent her famous husband to market with a large basket and that he so acquitted himself that she never sent him again! the new house, partly planned by her, at the moment well advanced and to her fancy, was not to be her home for which she had fondly dreamed. priestley was deeply depressed but his habitual submission carried him through, although all this is pathetically concealed in his letters. there were rumours flitting about that priestley purposed returning to england. that his friends might be apprised of his real intentions the following letter was permitted to find its way into the newspapers: northumberland oct. 4, 1796 my dear sir, every account i have from england makes me think myself happy in this peaceful retirement, where i enjoy almost everything i can wish in this life, and where i hope to close it, though i find it is reported, both here and in england that i am about to return. the two heavy afflictions i have met with here, in the death of a son, and of my wife, rather serve to attract me to the place. though dead and buried, i would not willingly leave them, and hope to rest with them, when the sovereign disposer of all things shall put a period to my present labours and pursuits. the advantages we enjoy in this country are indeed very great. here we have no poor; we never see a beggar, nor is there a family in want. we have no church establishment, and hardly any taxes. this particular state pays all its officers from a treasure in the public funds. there are very few crimes committed and we travel without the least apprehension of danger. the press is perfectly free, and i hope we shall always keep out of war. i do not think there ever was any country in a state of such rapid improvement as this at present; but we have not the same advantages for literary and philosophical pursuits that you have in europe, though even in this respect we are every day getting better. many books are now printed here, but what scholars chiefly want are old books, and these are not to be had. we hope, however, that the troubles of europe will be the cause of sending us some libraries and they say that it is an ill wind that blows no profit. i sincerely wish, however, that your troubles were at an end, and from our last accounts we think there must be a peace, at least from the impossibility of carrying on the war. with every good wish to my country and to yourself, i am, dear sir, yours sincerely, j. priestley. gradually the news went forth that the doctor contemplated a second visit to the metropolis--philadelphia, the capital of the young republic. he wrote- having now one tie, and that a strong one, to this place (northumberland) less than i have had i propose to spend more time in philadelphia. as long as he was capable of public speaking it was his desire to carry forward his missionary work, but the loss of my fore teeth (having now only two in the upper jaw) together with my tendency to stammering, which troubles me sometimes, is much against me. accordingly in early january of 1797 he might have been found there. he alludes in his correspondence to the presence in the city of c. volney, a french philosopher and historian, who had been imprisoned but regained liberty on the overthrow of robespierre when he became professor of history in the _ecole normal_. volney was not particularly pleased with priestley's discourses, and took occasion some weeks later to issue volney's answer to priestley which was advertised by the _aurora_ as on sale by the principal booksellers, price 6 cents. he was exceedingly rejoiced at the flourishing state of the unitarian society and the manner in which its services were conducted. on the occasion of his first discourse the english ambassador, mr. lister, was in the audience and priestley dined with him the day following. friends had prevailed upon priestley to preach a charity sermon on his next sunday, in one of the episcopal churches, but in the end it was "delivered at the university hall." his mind was much occupied with plans for controverting infidelity, the progress of which here is independent of all reasoning,-so he published the third edition of his "observations on the increase of infidelity" and an "outline of the evidences of revealed religion." in the first of them he issued a challenge to volney who was much looked up to by unbelievers here. volney's only reply was that he would not read the pamphlet. it was in these days that priestley saw a great deal of thomas jefferson; indeed, the latter attended several of his sermons. the intercourse of these friends was extremely valuable to both. jefferson welcomed everything which priestley did in science and consulted him much on problems of education. at the election in the american philosophical society in the closing days of 1796 there was openly discussed whether to choose me (priestley) or mr. jefferson, president of the society,-which prompted the doctor to give his informant good reasons why they should not choose _me_. naturally he listened to the political talk. he worried over the apparent dislike observed generally to france. he remarked the rich not only wish for alliance offensive and defensive with england ... but would have little objection to the former dependence upon it, and the disposition of the lower orders of the people ... for the french ... is not extinguished. he was much annoyed by peter porcupine. the latter was publishing a daily paper (1799) and in it frequently brought forward priestley's name in the most opprobrious manner, although priestley in his own words- had nothing to do with the politics of the country. the doctor advised friend lindsey that he (porcupine) every day, advertizes his pamphlet against me, and after my name adds, "commonly known by the name of the fire-brand philosopher." however, he flattered himself that he would soon be back in northumberland, where he would be usefully engaged, as i have cut myself out work for a year at least ... besides attending to my experiments. mr. adams had come into the presidency, so priestley very properly went to pay his respects and take leave of the late president (washington) whom he thought in not very good spirits, although he invited me to mount vernon and said he thought he should hardly go from home twenty miles as long as he lived. priestley's fame was rapidly spreading through the land. thoughtful men were doing him honor in many sections of the country, as is evident from the following clipping from a portland (me.) paper for march 27, 1797:- on friday the twenty-fourth a number of gentlemen, entertaining a high sense of the character, abilities and services of the reverend doctor joseph priestley, as a friend and promoter of true science dined together at the columbian tavern, in commemoration of his birth. the following toasts were given. 1. that illustrious christian and philosopher, joseph priestley: may the world be as grateful to him for his services as his services are beneficial to the world. 2. may the names of locke, newton, montesquieu, hartley and franklin be had in everlasting remembrance. 3. the great gift of god to man, reason! may it influence the world in policy, in laws, and in religion. 4. truth: may the splendour of her charms dissipate the gloom of superstition, and expel hypocricy from the heart of man. 5. may our laws be supported by religion: but may religion never be supported by law. 6. white-robed charity: may she accompany us in all our steps and cover us with a mantle of love. 7. christians of all denominations: may they "love one another." as it was a "feast of reason" the purest philanthrophy dignified the conversation; and moderation and temperance bounded every effusion of the heart. it was in the summer of 1797 that he carried forward his work on phlogiston, alluded to on p. 81. he understood quite well that the entire chemical world was against him but he was not able to find good reasons to despair of the old system. it must be remembered that in these days, also, he had thomas cooper with him. with this gentleman he discussed his scientific studies and with him also he carried on many arguments upon the burning subject of infidelity, about which he continuously wrote his friends in this country and in england. it was quite generally believed that cooper was an infidel. never, however, did their intimacy suffer in the slightest by their conflicting views. the _church history_ continued to hold priestley's first thought. he was a busy student, occupied with a diversity of interests and usually cheerful and eager to follow up new lines of endeavor. the arrival of vessels from the home country was closely watched. books and apparatus were brought by them. while, as observed, he was singularly cheerful and happy, he confessed at times that my character as a philosopher is under a cloud. yet, this was but a momentary depression, for he uttered in almost the same breath- everything will be cleared up in a reasonable time. amid the constant daily duties he found real solace in his scientific pursuits; indeed when he was quite prepared to abandon all his activities he declared of his experiments that he could not stop them for i consider them as that study of the works of the great creator, which i shall resume with more advantage hereafter. he advised his friends lindsey and belsham- i cannot express what _i_ feel on receiving your letters. they set my thoughts afloat, so that i can do nothing but ruminate a long time; but it is a most pleasing melancholy. far removed from european events he was nevertheless ever keen and alert concerning them. then the winter of 1797 appears to have been very severe. his enforced confinement to home probably gave rise to an introspection, and a slight disappointment in matters which had formerly given him pleasure. for example, he puzzled over the fact that on his second visit to philadelphia, mr. adams was present but once at his lectures, and remarks- when my lectures were less popular, and he was near his presidentship, he left me, making a kind of apology, from the members of the principal presbyterian church having offered him a pew there. he seemed to interest himself in my favour against m. volney, but did not subscribe to my church history ... i suppose he was not pleased that i did not adopt his dislike of the french. when january of 1798 arrived his joy was great. a box of books had come. among them was a general dictionary which he regarded as a real treasure. reading was now his principal occupation. he found the making of many experiments irksome and seemed, all at once, "quite averse to having his hands so much in water." presumably these were innocent excuses for his devotion to the church history which had been brought up to date. furthermore he was actually contemplating transplanting himself to france. but with it all he wrote assiduously on religious topics, and was highly pleased with the experimental work he had sent to dr. mitchill (p. 85). he advised his friends of the "intercepted letters" which did him much harm when they were published. they called down upon him severest judgement and suspicion, and made him- disliked by all the friends of the ruling power in this country. it may be well to note that these "intercepted letters" were found on a danish ship, inclosed in a cover addressed to dr. priestley, in america they came from friends, english and french, living in paris. they abounded with matter of the most serious reflection.... if the animosity of these apostate englishmen against their own country, their conviction that no submissions will avert our danger, and their description of the engines employed by the directory for our destruction, were impressed as they ought to be, upon the minds of all our countrymen, we should certainly never again be told of the innocent designs of these traitors, or their associates-the preceding quotation is from a booklet containing exact copies of the "intercepted letters." in the first of the letters, dated feb. 12, 1798, the correspondent of priestley tells that he had met a young frenchman who had visited northumberland and we all rejoiced at the aggreeable information that at the peace you would not fail to revisit europe; and that he hoped you would fix yourself in this country (france). whether you fix yourself here or in england, (_as england will then be_) is probably a matter of little importance ... but we all think you are misplaced where you are, though, no doubt, in the way of _usefulness_-the editor of the letters annotates _usefulness_ thus: dr. priestley is _in the way of usefulness_ in america, because he is labouring there, as his associates are in europe, to disunite the people from their government, and to introduce the blessings of french anarchy. these "intercepted letters" in no way prove that dr. priestley was engaged in any movement against his native land or against his adopted country. however, the whole world was in an uproar. people were ready to believe the worst regarding their fellows, so it is not surprising that he should have declared himself "disliked." he alludes frequently to the marvelous changes taking place in the states. everything was in rapid motion. taxes were the topic of conversation on all sides. to divert his philosophizing he busied himself in his laboratory where many "original experiments were made." he avoided the crowd. there was too great a party spirit. indeed, there was violence, so he determined not to visit philadelphia. he sought to escape the "rancorous abuse" which was being hurled at him- as a citizen of france. one must read his correspondence to fully appreciate priestley during the early days of 1799. what must have been his mental condition when he wrote lindsey- as to a public violent death the idea of that does not affect me near so much and i cannot express what i feel when i receive and read your letters. i generally shed many tears over them. there was no assurance in financial and commercial circles. the hopes of neither the more sober, nor of the wild and fanatic reformers of humanity could be realized, and they got into such a war of hate and abuse that they themselves stamped their doctrines false. priestley was out of patience with the public measures of the country. he disliked them as much as he did those of england, but added here the excellence of the constitution provides a remedy, if the people will make use of it, and if not, they deserve what they suffer. the constitution was a favorite instrument with him. a most interesting lecture upon it will be found among the _discourses_ which he proposed delivering in philadelphia. this never occurred. the academy he expected to see in operation failed for support. the walls were raised and he feared it would go no further. the legislature had voted it $3000, but the senate negatived this act. he thought of giving up the presidency of it. he wrote dr. rush that he was quite busy with replies to dr. woodhouse's attack on his confirmation of the existence of phlogiston, (p. 88). he relished his discussions with woodhouse and was confident that eventually he would "overturn the french system of chemistry." he further remarked to rush- were you at liberty to make an excursion as far as these _back woods_ i shall be happy to see you, and so would many others. but at that particular moment rush was too much engaged in combating yellow fever, which again ravaged philadelphia, and all who could, fled, and the streets were "lifeless and dead." the prevalence of this fearful plague was a potent factor in priestley's failure to visit the city during the year--the last year of a closing century which did not end in the prosperity anticipated for it in the hopeful months and years following the war. it seemed, in many ways, to be the end of an era. washington died december 14, 1799, and the federalists' tenure of power was coming to a close. the jeffersonians, aided by eight of the electoral votes of pennsylvania, won the victory, amid outbursts of unprecedented political bitterness. it was, therefore, very wise that the doctor remained quietly at home in northumberland with his experiments and church history. the new century--the 19th--found our beloved philosopher at times quite proud of the success he had with his experiments and full of genuine hope that "phlogiston" was established; and again dejected because of the "coarse and low articles" directed against him by the prints of the day. to offset, in a measure, the distrust entertained for him because of the "intercepted letters" he addressed a series of _letters_ to the inhabitants of northumberland and vicinity. these were explanatory of his views. at home they were most satisfying but in the city they brought upon him "more abuse." and, so, he translated a passage from petrarch which read- by civil fueds exiled my native home, resign'd, though injured, hither i have come. here, groves and streams, delights of rural ease; yet, where the associates, wont to serve and please; the aspect bland, that bade the heart confide? absent from these, e'en here, no joys abide. and these were incorporated in his brochure. having alluded to the _letters_ addressed to the northumberland folks, it may be proper to introduce a letter which priestley received from mr. jefferson, whom the former was disposed to hold as "in many respects the first man in this country:" philadelphia, jan. 18, 1800. dear sir- i thank you for the pamphlets (letters) you were so kind as to send me. you will know what i thought of them by my having before sent a dozen sets to virginia, to distribute among my friends; yet i thank you not the less for these, which i value the more as they came from yourself. the papers of political arithmetic, both in yours and mr. cooper's pamphlets, are the most precious gifts that can be made to us; for we are running navigation-mad, and commerce-mad, and navy-mad, which is worst of all. how desirable it is that you should pursue that subject for us. from the porcupines of our country you will receive no thanks, but the great mass of our nation will edify, and thank you. how deeply have i been chagrined and mortified at the persecutions which fanaticism and monarchy have excited against you, even here! at first, i believed it was merely a continuance of the english persecution; but i observe that, on the demise of porcupine, and the division of his inheritance between fenno and brown, the latter (though succeeding only to the federal portion of porcupinism, not the anglican, which is fenno's part) serves up for the palate of his sect dishes of abuse against you as high-seasoned as porcupine's were. you have sinned against church and king, and therefore can never be forgiven. how sincerely i have regretted that your friend, before he fixed a choice of position, did not visit the valleys on each side of the blue range in virginia, as mr. madison and myself so much wished. you would have found there equal soil, the finest climate, and the most healthy air on the earth, the homage of universal reverence and love, and the power of the country spread over you as a shield; but, since you would not make it your country by adoption, you must now do it by your good offices. mr. livingston, the chancellor of new york, so approved the "letters" that he got a new edition of them printed at albany. the following letter to this same gentleman, although upon another subject than the "letters" is not devoid of interest. it has come into the writer's hands through the kind offices of dr. thomas l. montgomery, state librarian of pennsylvania: sir, i think myself much honoured by your letter, and should have thought myself singularly happy if my situation had been near to such a person as you. persons engaged in scientific pursuits are few in this country. indeed, they are not very numerous anywhere. in other respects i think myself very happy where i am. i have never given much attention to machines of any kind, and therefore cannot pretend to decide concerning your proposal for the improvement of the fire engine. it appears to me to deserve attention. but i do not for want of a drawing see in what manner the steam is to be let into the cylinder, or discharged from it. there would be, i fear, an objection to it from the force necessary to raise the column of mercury, and from the evaporation of the mercury in the requisite heat. i have found that it loses weight in 70â° fahrenheit. if the mercury was pure, i should not apprehend much from the calcination of it, though, as i have observed, the agitation of it in water, converts a part of it into a black powder, which i propose to examine farther. if travelling was attended with no fewer inconveniences here than it is in england, i should certainly wait upon you and some other friends at new york. but this, and my age, render it impossible, and it would be unreasonable to expect many visitors in this _back woods_. i shall be very happy to be favoured with your correspondence, and am, sir, yours sincerely, j. priestley northumberland april 16, 1799. in this period thomas cooper was convicted of libel. he was thrown into prison. priestley regarded him as a rising man in the country.[7] he said the act was the last blow of the federal party "which is now broke up." priestley's daughter, in england, was ill at this time. her life was despaired of and tidings from her were few and most distressing, but the doctor maintained a quiet and calm assurance of her recovery. subsequent correspondence between mr. jefferson and priestley had much in it about the new college which the former contemplated for the state of virginia. indeed, the thought was entertained that priestley himself might become a professor in it, but his advanced age, he contended forbade this, although he was agreeable to the idea of getting professors from europe. here, perhaps, may well be included several letters, now in possession of the library of congress, which reveal the attitude of dr. priestley toward president jefferson, who was indeed most friendly to him: dear sir- i am flattered by your thinking so favourably of my _pamphlets_, which were only calculated to give some satisfaction to my suspicious neighbours. chancellor livingston informs me that he has got an edition of them printed at albany, for the information of the people in the back country, where, he says, it is so much wanted. indeed, it seems extraordinary, that in such a country as this, where there is no court to dazzle men's eyes a maxim as plain as that 2 and 2 make 4 should not be understood, and acted upon. it is evident that the bulk of mankind are governed by something very different from reasoning and argument. this principle must have its influence even in your congress, for if the members are not convinced by the excellent speeches of mr. gallatin and nicolas, neither would they be persuaded tho one should rise from the dead. it is true that i had more to do with colleges, and places of education, than most men in europe; but i would not pretend to advise in this country. i will, however, at my leisure, propose such _hints_ as shall occur to me; and if you want tutors from england, i can recommend some very good ones. were i a few years younger, and more moveable, i should make interest for some appointment in your institution myself; but age and inactivity are fast approaching, and i am so fixed here, that a remove is absolutely impossible, unless you were possessed of _aladin's lamp_, and could transport my house, library, and laboratory, into virginia without trouble or expense. on my settlement here the gentlemen in the neighbourhood, thinking to make me of some use, set on foot a college, of which i gave them the plan, and they got it incorporated, and made me the president; but tho i proposed to give lectures _gratis_, and had the disposal of a valuable library at the decease of a learned friend (new, near so), and had it in my power to render them important service in various ways, yet, owing i suspect, in part at least, to religious and political prejudices, nothing more has been done, besides marking the site of a building these five years, so that i have told them i shall resign. i much wish to have some conversation with you on social subjects; but i cannot expect that the vice president of the united states should visit me in my _shed_ at northumberland, and i cannot come to you. i intended on my settling here to have spent a month or so every winter at philadelphia, but the state of the times, and various accidents, have a little deranged my finances, and i prefer to spend what i can spare on my experiments, and publication, rather than in travelling and seeing my friends. with the greatest respect, i am, dear sir, yours sincerely, j. priestley. northumberland jan. 30, 1800. dear sir- i enclose my thoughts on the subject you did me the honour to propose to me. your own better judgment will decide concerning their value, or their fitness for the circumstances of your college. this may require a very different distribution of the business from that which i here recommend. i thank you for your care to transmit a copy of my works to bp. madison. he, as well as many others, speaks of the increasing spread of republican principles in this country. i wish i could see the effects of it. but i fear we flatter ourselves, and if i be rightly informed, my poor _letters_ have done more harm than good. i can only say that i am a sincere well wisher to this country, and the purity and stability of its constitution. yours sincerely, j. priestley. northumberland may 8, 1800. hints concerning public education persons educated at public seminaries are of two classes. one is that of professional men, and physicians and divines who are to be qualified for entering upon their professions immediately after leaving the college or university. the other is that of gentlemen, and those who are designed for offices of civil and active life. the former must be minutely instructed in everything adding to their several professions, whereas to the latter a general knowledge of the several branches of science is sufficient. to the former, especially that of medicine, several professors are necessary, as the business must be subdivided, in order to be taught to advantage. for the purpose of the latter fewer professors are wanted, as it is most advisable to give them only the elements of the several branches of knowledge, to which they may afterwards give more particular attention, as they may have a disposition or convenience for it. lawyers are not supposed to be qualified for entering upon their professions at any place of public education. they are therefore to be considered as gentlemen to whom a general knowledge is sufficient. it is advisable, however, that when any subject, as that of medicine, is much divided, and distributed among a number of professors, lectures of a more general and popular nature be provided for the other classes of students, to whom some knowledge of the subject may be very useful. a general knowledge, for example, of anatomy and of medicine, too, is useful to all persons, and therefore ought not to be omitted in any scheme of liberal education. and if in a regular school of medicine any of the professors would undertake this, it might serve as an useful introduction to that more particular and accurate knowledge which is necessary for practiced physicians. the branches of knowledge which are necessary to the teachers of religion are not so many, or so distinct from each other, but that they may all be taught by one professor, as far as is necessary to qualify persons for commencing preachers. to acquire more knowledge, as that of the scriptures, ecclesistical history, etc. must be the business of their future lives. but every person liberally educated should have a general knowledge of metaphysics, the theory of morals, and religion; and therefore some popular lectures of this kind should be provided for the students in general. one professor of antient languages may be sufficient for a place of liberal education, and i would not make any provision for instruction in the modern languages, for tho the knowledge of them, as well as skill in fencing, dancing and riding, is proper for gentlemen liberally educated, instruction in them may be procured on reasonable terms without burdening the funds of the seminary with them. abstract mathematics, and natural philosophy, are so distinct, that they require different teachers. one is sufficient for the former, but the latter must be subdivided, one for natural history, another for experimental philosophy in general and a third for chemistry; in consequence of the great extension of this branch of experimental philosophy of late years. the botany, mineralogy, and other branches of natural history are sufficiently distinct to admit of different professors, nothing more than a general knowledge of each of them, and directions for acquiring a more extended knowledge of them is necessary at any place of education. two or three schools of medicine i should think sufficient for all the united states for some years to come, but with respect to these i do not pretend to give any opinion not having sufficient knowledge of the subject. places of liberal education in general should be made more numerous, and for each of them i should think the following professors (if the funds of the society will admit of it) should be engaged, _viz._ (1) for the antient languages. (2) the belles lettres, including universal grammar, oratory, criticism and bibliography. (3) mathematics. (4) natural history. (5) experimental philosophy. (6) chemistry, including the theory of agriculture. (7) anatomy and medicine. (8) geography and history, law, and general policy. (9) metaphysics, morals, and theology. a course of liberal education should be as comprehensive as possible. for this purpose a large and well chosen _library_ will be of great use. not that the students should be encouraged to read books while they are under tuition, but an opportunity of seeing books, and looking into them, will give them a better idea of the value of them than they could get by merely hearing of them, and they would afterwards better know what books to purchase when they should have the means and the leisure for the perusal of them. a large collection of books will also be useful to the lecturer in _bibliography_ and would recommend the seminary to the professors in general, and make it a desirable place of residence for gentlemen of a studious turn. 2. in order to engage able professors, some fixed salaries are necessary; but they should not be much more than a bare subsistence. they will then have a motive to exert themselves, and by the fees of students their emoluments may be ample. the professorships in the english universities, which are largely endowed, are sinecures; while those in scotland, to which small stipends are annexed, are filled by able and active men. 3. it is not wise to engage any persons who are much advanced in life, or of established reputation for efficient teachers. they will not be so active as younger men who have a character to acquire. they will also better accommodate their lectures to the increasing light of the age, whereas old men will be attached to old systems, tho ever so imperfect. besides, they are the most expert in teaching who have lately learned, and the minutae of science, which are necessary to a teacher, are generally forgotten by good scholars who are advanced in life, and it is peculiarly irksome to relearn them. 4. i would not without necessity have recourse to any foreign country for professors. they will expect too much deference, and the natives will be jealous of them. 5. three things must be attended to in the education of youth. they must be _taught_, _fed_ and _governed_ and each of these requires very different qualifications. they who are the best qualified to teach are often the most unfit to govern, and it is generally advisable that neither of these have anything to do with providing victuals. in the english universities all these affairs are perfectly distinct. the _tutors_ only teach, the _proctors_ superintend the discipline, and the _cooks_ provide the victuals. philadelphia, apr. 10, 1801. dear sir- your kind letter, which, considering the numerous engagements incident to your situation, i had no right to expect, was highly gratifying to me, and i take the first opportunity of acknowledging it. for tho i believe i am completely recovered from my late illness, i am advised to write as little as possible. your invitation to pay you a visit is flattering to me in the highest degree, and i shall not wholly despair of some time or other availing myself of it, but for the present i must take the nearest way home. your resentment of the treatment i have met with in this country is truly generous, but i must have been but little impressed with the principles of the religion you so justly commend, if they had not enabled me to bear much more than i have yet suffered. do not suppose that, after the much worse treatment to which i was for many years exposed in england (of which the pamphlet i take the liberty to inclose will give you some idea) i was much affected by this. my _letters to the inhabitants of northumberland_ were not occasioned by any such thing, tho it served me as a pretense for writing them, but the threatenings of mr. pickering, whose purpose to send me out of the country mr. adams (as i conclude from a circuitous attempt that he made to prevent it) would not, in the circumstances in which he then was, have been able to directly oppose. my publication was of service to me in that and other respects and i hope, in some measure, to the common cause. but had it not been for the extreme absurdity and violence of the late administration, i do not know how far the measures might not have been carried. i rejoice more than i can express in the glorious reverse that has taken place, and which has secured your election. this i flatter myself will be the permanent establishment of truly republican principles in this country, and also contribute to the same desirable event in more distant ones. i beg you would not trouble yourself with any answer to this. the knowledge of your good opinion and good wishes, is quite sufficient for me. i feel for the difficulties of your situation, but your spirit and prudence will carry you thro them, tho not without paying the tax which the wise laws of nature have imposed upon preeminence and celebrity of every kind, a tax which, for want of true greatness of mind, neither of your predecessors, if i estimate their characters aright, paid without much reluctance. with every good wish, i am, dear sir, yours sincerely, j. priestley. p.s. as i trust that _politics_ will not make you forget what is due to _science_, i shall send you a copy of some articles that are just printed for the _transactions of the philosophical society_ in this place. no. (5) p. 36 is the most deserving of your notice. i should have sent you my _defence of phlogiston_, but that i presume you have seen it. june, 1802. to thomas jefferson, president of the united states of america. sir, my high respect for your character, as a politician, and a man, makes me desirous of connecting my name, in some measure with yours while it is in my power, by means of some publication, to do it. the first part of this work, which brought the history to the fall of the western empire, was dedicated to a zealous friend of civil and religious liberty, but in a private station. what he, or any other friend of liberty in europe, could only do by their good wishes, by writing, or by patriot suffering, you, sir, are actually accomplishing, and upon a theatre of great and growing extent. it is the boast of this country to have a constitution the most favourable to political liberty, and private happiness, of any in the world, and all say that it was yourself, more than any other individual, that planned and established it; and to this opinion your conduct in various public offices, and now in the highest, gives the clearest attestation. many have appeared the friends of the rights of man while they were subject to the power of others, and especially when they were sufferers by it; but i do not recollect one besides yourself who retained the same principles, and acted by them, in a station of real power. you, sir, have done more than this; having proposed to relinquish some part of the power which the constitution gave you; and instead of adding to the burden of the people, it has been your endeavour to lighten those burdens tho the necessary consequence must be the diminution of your influence. may this great example, which i doubt not will demonstrate the practicability of truly republican principles, by the actual existence of a form of government calculated to answer all the useful purposes of government (giving equal protection to all, and leaving every man in the possession of every power that he can exercise to his own advantage, without infringing on the equal liberty of others) be followed in other countries, and at length become universal. another reason why i wish to prefix your name to this work, and more appropriate to the subject of it, is that you have ever been a strenuous and uniform advocate of religious no less than civil liberty, both in your own state of virginia, and in the united states in general, seeing in the clearest light the various and great mischiefs that have arisen from any particular form of religion being favoured by the state more than any other; so that the profession or practice of religion is here as free as that of philosophy, or medicine. and now the experience of more than twenty years leaves little room to doubt but that it is a state, of things the most favourable to mutual candour, which is of great importance to domestic peace and good neighbourhood and to the cause of all truth, religious truth least of all excepted. when every question is thus left to free discussion, there cannot be a doubt but that truth will finally prevail, and establish itself by its own evidence; and he must know little of mankind, or of human nature, who can imagine that truth of any kind will be ultimately unfavourable to general happiness. that man must entertain a secret suspicion of his own principles who wishes for any exclusive advantage in his defence or profession of them. having fled from a state of persecution in england, and having been exposed to some degree of danger in the late administration here, i naturally feel the greater satisfaction in the prospect of passing the remainder of an active life (when i naturally wish for repose) under your protection. tho arrived at the usual term of human life it is now only that i can say i see nothing to fear from the hand of power, the government under which i live being for the first time truly favourable to me. and tho it will be evident to all who know me that i have never been swayed by the mean principle of fear, it is certainly a happiness to be out of the possibility of its influence, and to end ones days in peace, enjoying some degree of rest before the state of more perfect rest in the grave, and with the hope of rising to a state of greater activity, security and happiness beyond it. this is all that any man can wish for, or have; and this, sir, under your administration, i enjoy. with the most perfect attachment, and every good wish i subscribe myself not your subject, or humble servant, but your sincere admirer. j. priestley. dear sir, as there are some particulars in a letter i have lately received from mr. stone at paris which i think it will give you pleasure to have, and mr. cooper has been so obliging as to translate them for me, i take the liberty to send them, along with a copy of my _dedication_, with the correction that you suggested, and a note from the latter with which you favoured me concerning what you did with respect to the _constitution_, and which is really more than i had ascribed to you. for almost everything of importance to political liberty in that instrument was, as it appears to me, suggested by you, and as this was unknown to myself, and i believe is so with the world in general, i was unwilling to omit this opportunity of noticing it. i shall be glad if you will be so good as to engage any person sufficiently qualified to draw up such an account of the _constitutional forms_ of this country as my friends say will be agreeable to the emperor, and i will transmit it to mr. stone. not knowing any certain method of sending a letter to france and presuming that you do i take the liberty to inclose my letter to mr. stone. it is, however, so written that no danger can arise to him from it, into whatever hands it may fall. the state of my health, though, i thank god, much improved, will not permit me to avail myself of your kind invitation to pay you a visit. where ever i am, you may depend upon my warmest attachment and best wishes. j. priestley. northumberland oct. 29, 1802. p.s. i send a copy of the _preface_ as well as of the _dedication_, that you may form some idea of the work you are pleased to patronize. northumberland jan. 25, 1803. dear sir, as you were pleased to think favourably of my pamphlet entitled _socrates and jesus compared_, i take the liberty to send you a _defence_ of it. my principal object, you will perceive, was to lay hold of the opportunity, given me by mr. b. linn, to excite some attention to doctrines which i consider as of peculiar importance in the christian system, and which i do not find to have been discussed in this country. the church history is, i hope, by this time in the hands of the bookseller at philadelphia, so that you will soon, if my directions have been attended to, receive a copy of the work which i have the honour to dedicate to you. with the greatest respect and attachment, i am dear sir, yours sincerely, j. priestley. dear sir, i take the liberty to send you _a second defence of my pamphlet about socrates_, on the 16th page of which you will find that i have undertaken the task you were pleased to recommend to me. on giving more attention to it, i found, as the fox did with respect to the lion, that my apprehensions entirely vanished. indeed, i have already accomplished a considerable part of the work, and in about a year from this time i hope to finish the whole, provided my health, which is very precarious, be continued in the state in which it now is. i directed a copy of the _tract on phlogiston_ to be sent to you from philadelphia, and i shall order another, which, together with the inclosed papers, i shall be much obliged to you if you will convey to. mr. livingston. please also to cast an eye over them yourself; and if you can with propriety promote my interest by any representation of yours, i am confident you will do it. when you wrote to me at the commencement of your administration, you said "the only dark speck in our horizon is in louisiana." by your excellent conduct it is now the brightest we have to look to. mr. vaughan having applied to me for a copy of my harmony of the evangelists, which was not to be had in philadelphia, and intimated that it was for you, my son, whose copy is more perfect than mine, begs the honour of your acceptance of it, as a mark of his high esteem, in which he has the hearty concurrence of dear sir, yours sincerely, j. priestley. northumberland dec. 12, 1803. his european correspondents were informed that he was much engaged with religious matters. while his theological views were not received very graciously yet he found some young men of a serious and inquisitive turn, who read my works, and are confirmed unitarians. in one of his communications to lindsey, written in april 1800, he expresses himself in the following most interesting way relative to his scientific engagements. american men of science will welcome it: this is the message: i send along with this an account of a course of experiments of as much importance as almost any that i have ever made. please to shew it to mr. kirwan, and give it either to mr. nicholson for his journal, or to mr. phillips for his magazine, as you please. i was never more busy or more successful in this way, when i was in england; and i am very thankful to providence for the means and the leisure for these pursuits, which next to theological studies, interest me the most. indeed, there is a natural alliance between them, as there must be between the word and the works of god. he was now at work apparently in his own little laboratory adjacent to his dwelling place. for more than a century this structure has remained practically as it was in the days of priestley. in it he did remarkable things, in his judgment; thus refuting the general idea that after his arrival in america nothing of merit in the scientific direction was accomplished by him. the satisfactory results, mentioned to lindsey, were embodied in a series of "six chemical essays" which eventually found their way into the transactions of the american philosophical society. it is a miscellany of observations. in it are recorded the results found on passing the "vapour of spirit of nitre" over iron turnings, over copper, over perfect charcoal, charcoal of bones, melted lead, tin and bismuth; and there appears a note to the effect that in papin's digester "a solution of caustic alkali, aided by heat, made a _liquor silicum_ with pounded flint glass." there is also given a description of a pyrophorus obtained from iron and sulphur. more interesting, however, was the account of the change of place in different kinds of air, "through several interposing substances," in which priestley recognized distinctly for the first time, the phenomena of gaseous diffusion. there are also references to the absorption of air by water, and of course, as one would expect from the doctor, for it never failed, there is once more emphasized "certain facts pertaining to phlogiston." his friends were quite prepared for such statements. they thought of joseph priestley and involuntarily there arose the idea of phlogiston. the little workshop or laboratory, in northumberland, where these facts were gathered, will soon be removed to the campus of pennsylvania state college. it will be preserved with care and in it, it is hoped, will be gradually assembled everything to be found relating to the noble soul who once disclosed nature's secrets in this simple primitive structure, which american chemists should ever cherish, and hold as a mecca for all who would look back to the beginnings of chemical research in our beloved country. how appropriate it would be could there be deposited in the little laboratory, the apparatus owned and used by priestley, which at present constitutes and for many years past has formed an attractive collection in dickinson college, (pa.) there would be the burning lens, the reflecting telescope, the refracting telescope (probably one of the first achromatic telescopes made), the air-gun, the orrery, and flasks with heavy ground necks, and heavy curved tubes with ground stoppers--all brought (to dickinson) through the instrumentality of thomas cooper, "the greatest man in america in the powers of his mind and acquired information and that without a single exception" according to thomas jefferson. and how the library would add to the glory of the place, but, alas! it has been scattered far and wide, for in 1816, thomas dobson advertised the same for sale in a neatly printed pamphlet of 96 pages. in it were many scarce and valuable books. the appended prices ranged quite widely, reaching in one case the goodly sum of two hundred dollars! and as future chemists visit this unique reminder of dr. priestley it should be remembered that on the piazza of the dwelling house there assembled august 1, 1874, a group of men who planned then and there for the organization of the present american chemical society. the "essays," previously mentioned, will be found intensely interesting but they are somewhat difficult to read because of their strange nomenclature. here is priestley's account of the method pursued by him to get nitrogen: pure phlogisticated air (nitrogen) may be procured in the easiest and surest manner by the use of iron only--to do this i fill phials with turnings of malleable iron, and having filled them with water, pour it out, to admit the air of the atmosphere, and in six or seven hours it will be diminished ... what remains of the air in the phials will be the purest phlogisticated air (nitrogen). among his contributions to the scientific periodicals of the times there was one relating to the sense of hearing. it is a curious story. one may properly ask whether the singular facts in it were not due to defects in priestley's own organs of hearing. the paper did not arouse comment. it was so out of the ordinary experimental work which he was carrying forward with such genuine pleasure and intense vigour. strong appeals were steadily coming from english friends that he return. while commenting on the pleasure he should have in seeing them he firmly declared that the step would not be wise. in short, despite all arguments he had determined to remain where i am for life. the prejudices against him were abating, although he said that many things are against me; and though they do not _shake_ my faith, they _try_ it. there had gathered a class of fourteen young men about him in the northumberland home. they had adopted his unitarian ideas. to them he lectured regularly on theology and philosophy. those must have been inspiring moments. it was in this wise that the aged philosopher felt he was doing good and was most useful. he said that it was a pretty good class of young men to lecture to. much time was given to his english correspondents. them he advised of the rapid development of the states. he sent to some pictures of the country about him, and with much delight he referred to the fact that jefferson, whom he ardently admired, was now, in the closing weeks of 1800, the president, and his associate--aaron burr, vice-president. he announced to english friends that the late administration, that of john adams, was almost universally reprobated. mr. jefferson, he insisted, "will do nothing rashly," his being president may induce me to visit the federal city, and perhaps his seat in virginia. the seat of government, as may be inferred, had been removed to washington from philadelphia. but to the latter center, which still offered many attractions, priestley journeyed for the third time early in 1801. he was not especially desirous of making this third visit, but as his son and daughter came down a distance of 130 miles on business, he determined to accompany them. true, congress was no longer there, but there were many interesting people about with whom he had great pleasure. with bishop white, who was most orthodox and whom he saw frequently, he enjoyed much "christian and edifying conversation." john andrews was another favorite. he was a violent federalist and informed priestley that the latter had done them (the federalists) more mischief than any other man, yet these two noble spirits lived in amity, and priestley several times announced that dr. andrews was a unitarian, which is not the thought today in regard to the latter. it was an eventful year--this year of 1801. much that was unexpected happened. it brought joy and it brought sorrow. perhaps it would be just as well to note the scientific progress of the doctor during this year, for he gave forth the statement that he had succeeded in producing air by freezing water. this production of air was one of his earlier ideas (p. 62), and now he wrote- the harder the frost was the more air i procured. further, he announced that on heating manganese (dioxide) in inflammable air no water is formed, and what is rather astounding, he was certain that _azote_ consisted of hydrogen and oxygen. to the _medical repository_, which he regarded highly, there was sent a rather thoughtful disquisition on dreams. in it the idea was expressed that dreams have their seat in some region of the brain more deeply seated than that which is occupied by our waking thoughts. a "pile of volta" had been sent out from england. it amused him and he studied it carefully when he was led to remark upon the theory of this curious process as follows: the operation wholly depends on the calcination of the zinc, which suffers a great diminution in weight, while the silver is little affected, and all metals lose their phlogiston in calcination, therefore what remains of the zinc in metallic form in the pile and everything connected with that end of it, is supersaturated with phlogiston. more need not be quoted. it was phlogiston and that only which occasioned the electric current. it may properly be added that in this connection he wrote: it is said the inventor of the galvanic pile discovered the conducting power of charcoal, whereas it was one of my first observations in electricity, made in 1766. some additional attention to air was also given by him, and in so doing he reached the conclusion that the diamond and charcoal of copper are, as nearly as possible, pure phlogiston. one wonders how he could so persuade himself, for these bodies surely possessed weight. why did he not rely more upon his balance? with woodhouse he discussed the product from passing water over heated charcoal. he had been endeavoring to refute certain statements made by cruikshank. there is no question but that he had carbon monoxide in hand, and had it as early as 1799, and that he had obtained it in several different ways. observe this statement: i always found that the first portion of the heavy inflammable air, resulting from the passage of steam over heated charcoal was loaded with fixed air (co_2), but that in the course of the process this disappeared, the remaining air (co) burning with a lambent flame. scarcely had priestley set foot in philadelphia on his third visitation than the _port folio_, devoted usually to literature and biography, printed the following unkind words: the tricks of dr. priestley to embroil the government, and disturb the religion of his own country, have not the merit of novelty. to which the _aurora_ replied: when porcupine rioted in the filth of a debauched and corrupt faction in this city, no person experienced so much of his obscene and vulgar abuse as dr. priestley. there is not a single fact on record or capable of being shewn, to prove that dr. priestley was guilty of any other crime than being a dissenter from the church of england, and a warm friend of american independence. for this he was abused by porcupine--and denny is only porcupine with a little more tinsel to cover his dirt. it is worthy of remark, that after a whole sheet of promises of "literary lore" and "products of the master of spirits" of the nation--the first and second numbers of the _portable foolery_, are stuffed with extracts from british publications of an ordinary quality. the attack of the port folio was most ungracious. it may have been due to irritation caused by the appearance of a second edition of priestley's "letters to the inhabitants of northumberland." nevertheless the thoughtful and dignified men of the city--men who admired priestley's broad catholic spirit and brave attitude upon all debatable questions, men who appreciated his scientific attainments, invited him to the following subscription dinner, as announced in the _aurora_, march, 6th: at 4 o'clock in the afternoon about one hundred citizens sat down to an elegant entertainment prepared by mr. francis to celebrate the commencement of the administration of mr. jefferson. the governor honored the company with his presence. several respectable foreigners were invited to partake of the festival.... a variety of patriotic songs were admirably sung; and the following toasts were drank with unanimous applause. 1. the governor of pennsylvania 2. dr. priestley: the philosopher and philanthropist.... he was present and enjoyed himself, and sad must it have been to read on march 30th: some weeks ago, dr. priestley having caught cold by attending a meeting of the philosophical society on a wet evening, was taken ill of a violent inflammatory complaint which rendered his recovery for a long time dubious. we announce with sincere pleasure the returning health of a man, whose life hath hitherto been sedulously and successfully devoted to the interests of mankind. he had, indeed, been very ill. the trouble was pleurisy. dr. rush was his physician. by his order the patient was bled profusely seven times. during this trying and doubtful period there came to him a cheery letter from president jefferson who had only learned of his illness. among other things the president wrote- yours is one of the few lives precious to mankind, and for the continuance of which every thinking man is solicitous. bigots may be an exception.... but i have got into a long disquisition on politics when i only meant to express my sympathy in the state of your health, and to tender you all the affections of public and private hospitality. i should be very happy to see you here (washington). i leave this about the 30th to return about the 25th of april. if you do not leave philadelphia before that, a little excursion hither would help your health. i should be much gratified with the possession of a guest i so much esteem, and should claim a right to lodge you, should you make such an excursion. but priestley journeyed homeward on april 13th, and en route wrote the following letter, addressed to john vaughan, esq. 179 walnut street, philadelphia, pa.: april 17, 1801 reading, friday evening dear sir, i have the pleasure to inform you, agreeably to your kind request, that we are safely arrived at this place, my daughter better than when we left philadelphia, and as to myself, i feel just as well, and as able to bear any fatigue, as before my late illness. this, however, will always remind me of your friendly attentions, and those of your sister, if a thousand and other circumstances did not do the same, and of them all i hope i shall ever retain a grateful remembrance. along the whole road i am struck with the marks of an astonishing degree of improvement since i came this way four years ago. i do not think that any part of england is better cultivated, and at present the wheat is in a very promising state. i wish we may hear of that of england promising as well. three years of such a scarcity is more than any country could bear, and you will believe me when i say that, if it was in my power, i would guard it not only from famine, but from every other calamity. with my daughter's kindest remembrance, i am, as ever dear sir yours sincerely, j. priestley.[8] resuming his correspondence with his numerous friends in england, he said: my chief resource is my daily occupation. he also wrote dr. rush his thanks for having advised him to read noah webster's _pestilential disorders_ which follow the appearance of meteors and earthquakes, taking occasion also to excuse his opposition to blood-letting,- i believe that i owe my life to your judicious direction of it. i shall never forget your so readily forgiving my suspicion, and my requesting the concurrence of dr. wistar after the third bleeding. it was his opinion as well as yours and dr. caldwell's, that my disorder required several more; and the completeness of my cure, and the speediness of my recovery, prove that you were right. in the future i shall never be afraid of the lancet when so judiciously directed. to rush he confided his doubts about his paper on dreams. he cannot account for them, hence he has offered merely an hypothesis, and continues- i frequently think with much pleasure and regret on the many happy hours i spent in your company, and wish we were not at so great distance. such society would be the value of life to me. but i must acquiesce in what a wise providence has appointed. his friends continued sending him books. and how joyously he received them. at times he would mention special works, as for example,- please to add gate's answer to wall, and wall's reply; sir john pringle's discourses and life by dr. kippis; chandler's life of king david; colin milne's botanical dictionary, botanic dialogues, and other books of natural history; kirwan's analysis of mineral waters; crosby's history of english baptists. in one of his letters he observed- a person must be in my situation ... to judge of my feelings when i receive new books. strangely enough a _box_ of books was sent him to carlisle (pa.) and had been there for two years before he learned of it. perhaps a word more may be allowed in regard to the paper on _pestilential disorders_ by noah webster. this was the lexicographer. priestley thought the work curious and important, but the philosophy in it wild and absurd in the extreme. and of rush he asks- pray is he (webster) a believer in revelation or not? i find several atheists catch at everything favourable to the doctrine of _equivocal generation_; but it must be reprobated by all who are not. chemists will be glad to hear that the annual expense of my laboratory will hardly exceed 50 pounds, and i think i may have done more in proportion to my expenses than any other man. what i have done here, and with little expense, will in time be thought very considerable; but on account of the almost universal reception of the new theory, what i do is not, at present, attended to; but mr. watt and mr. kier, as good chemists as any in europe, approve of my tract on _phlogiston_, and truth will in time prevail over any error. and to another he said, having had great success in my experiments in this country ... i shall never desert philosophy. the following year (1802) had several points of interest in connection with the good doctor; for one, who has followed his career thus far, will wish to call him that. communications from the home country and from france, while not so numerous, were yet full of interesting news. his friend belsham brought out his elements of philosophy of the mind, and although priestley paid it a most gracious tribute he did not hesitate to suggest alterations and additions of various kinds. his dearest friend lindsey fell seriously ill this year. this gave him inexpressible anxiety and grief. as soon as lindsey was, in a measure, restored the fraternal correspondence was resumed. much time was given by the doctor to reading and preparing for the press the volumes of his _church history_ and _notes on the scriptures_. the printing was to be done in northumberland. some doubt was entertained as to whether he would have funds sufficient to pay for the publication, and when the urgent letters from friends tempted him to undertake a european trip he generally replied that he was too far advanced in life, that the general debility produced by pernicious ague rendered him unfit for extended travel, and then he offset the disappointment by saying that the expense of the voyage would more than suffice for the printing of one of his proposed four volumes of the _church history_. this was a most complete, interesting and instructive work. even today one profits by its perusal and an immense fund of worthwhile information and knowledge may be derived from even a cursory study of his _notes on the scriptures_. the monotony of village life was broken by occasional letters from president jefferson. these were most affectionate and also illuminating on national matters. copies of these were sent to english friends with the injunction not to show them or permit them to fall into other hands. dr. thomas cooper was not with priestley in this year (1802), being detained at lancaster where the assembly sat. naturally cooper made himself conspicuous, and priestley prophesied a great future for him, providing that the jealousy entertained for foreigners did not prove too serious an obstacle. priestley took much pleasure at this period in his garden, and wrote, plants, as well as other objects, engage more of my attention than they ever did before.... i wish i knew a little more botany; but old, as i am, i learn something new continually. now and then he mentions a considerable degree of deafness, and sent to philadelphia for a speaking trumpet, but cheerily adds, i am, however, thankful that my eyes do not fail me. here and there occur plaints like these: though my philosophical labours are nearly over, i am glad to hear what is passing in that region in which i once moved, though what i then did seems for the present to be overlooked and forgotten. i am confident, however, as much as i can be of anything, that notwithstanding the almost universal reception of the new theory, which is the cause of it, it is purely chimerical, and cannot keep its ground after a sufficient scrutiny, which may be deferred, but which must take place in time. i am glad to find that mr. cruikshank in england, as well as chemists in france, begin to attend to my objections, though the principal of them have been published many years; but, as you say, many will not read, and therefore they cannot know anything that makes against the opinions they have once adopted. bigotry is not confined to theology. the experimental work for the year was not very great. probably this was the result of his general physical weakness and in part it was due to his preoccupation with literary labours. however, he did write out his results, obtained on heating "finery cinders and charcoal" and thus emphasized the gaseous product of which he observes- it cannot be denied, however, that this gaseous oxyd of carbon (co) is _inflammable_ ... and is essentially different from all other oxyds, none of which are combustible. along in the month of november he wrote a vigorous protest against cruikshank's explanation of the mode of formation of carbon monoxide. in this polemic he of course threw into prominence his precious phlogiston, the presence of which seemed unnecessary--but this was not so thought by the doctor, who also favored the _medical repository_ with observations on the conversion of iron into steel, in which there is but a single reference to phlogiston, but unfortunately this single reference spoils the general argument and the correct and evident interpretation of the reaction. it reads as follows: iron is convertible into steel by imbibing only _phlogiston_ from the charcoal with which it is cemented. there are abundant correct observations. their interpretation sadly enough is very false, all because of the persistent introduction of phlogiston where it was not essential. priestley advised rush that because of an unhealthy season he had suffered very much from ague, and said,- tho' i was never robust, i hardly knew what sickness was before my seizure in philadelphia, but the old building has since that had so many shocks, that i am apprehensive it will ere long give way. but i have abundant reason to be satisfied, and shall retire from life _conviva satur_. devotion to work was on the part of priestley, something marvelous. as his son and daughter-in-law were drawn to philadelphia in february, 1803, they carried their father with them. he was rather indisposed to this, yet he disliked remaining alone at home notwithstanding the printing of the church history required considerable personal attention. the marvelous part of it all was that while in philadelphia, on this his fourth and last visit, while he fraternized with congenial souls and even presented himself at various social functions, he yet found leisure to print his little volume entitled "socrates and jesus compared," which gave much pleasure to president jefferson, so much indeed that he hoped priestley would,- take up the subject on a more extended scale, and show that jesus was truly the most innocent, most benevolent, the most eloquent and sublime character that has ever been exhibited to man. jefferson's genuine approval of his effort was balm to priestley's soul. he, of course, wrote lindsey and belsham about it; yes, copied the letter of jefferson and sent the same to them with the comment,- he is generally considered as an unbeliever. if so, however, he cannot be far from us, and i hope in the way to be not only _almost_, but _altogether_ what we are. it was february 28, 1803, that the august members of the american philosophical society resolved: that this society will dine together on saturday next, and that j. b. smith, wistar, williams, hewson & vaughan be a committee to make the necessary arrangements for that purpose and to request dr. priestley's company, informing him that the society are induced to make the request from their high respect for his philosophical labours & discoveries, & to enjoy the more particular pleasure of a social meeting--the dinner to be prepared at the city tavern or farmer's hotel. it was this resolution which caused notices, such as the following to go out to the distinguished membership of the venerable society- philadelphia, march 2, 1803 sir: you are hereby invited to join the other members of the american philosophical society, in giving a testimony of respect, to their venerable associate dr. joseph priestley, who dines with them on saturday next at francis' hotel--dinner on table at 3 o'clock. c. wistar j. williams j. r. smith t. t. hewson j. vaughan committee an answer will be called for tomorrow morning. dr. rush it was a very dignified and brilliant company. law, medicine, theology, science, commerce represented by very worthy and excellent gentlemen. and, among them sat the modest, unassuming, versatile priestley. that he was happy in his surroundings there is ample reason to believe. he loved to be among men. he, too, was appreciated and eagerly sought because of his winning ways, his tolerance and liberality. he was moderately convivial though he said that one glass of wine at dinner was enough for an old man, but he did not prescribe his own practice as an universal rule. about eight weeks were spent in the city. on return to the dear country home the doctor took up his various duties and burdens, but the infirmities of age were often alluded to by him, and they no doubt delayed all of his work, which was further aggravated by a dangerous fall on his left hip and strain of the muscles of the thigh. he was extremely lame and for some time went about on crutches, which held him out of his laboratory. to him this was very trying. but he persisted. he was truly a splendid example for the younger aspirants for scientific honors. during the year he entered on a controversial article with his old friend erasmus darwin upon the subject of _spontaneous combustion_, and subsequently communicated to the _medical repository_ an account of the conversion of salt into nitre. he had positive knowledge of this fact for quite a little while, and upon the occasion of a visit by dr. wistar, told the latter concerning this with the request that no mention be made of it, evidently that he might have opportunity for additional confirmation. however, very unexpectedly, dr. mitchill published something of a similar character, therefore priestley believing that he ought "to acquaint experimentalists in general with all that i know of the matter," announced that in 1799 when experimenting on the formation of air from water, having made use of the same salt, mixed with snow, in every experiment, always evaporating the mixture the salt was recovered dry. i collected the salt when i had done with it, and put it into a glass bottle, with a label expressing what it was, and what use had been made of it. subsequently he treated this salt, after many applications of it, with sulphuric acid, when he remarked- i was soon surprized to observe that _red vapours_ rose from it. an examination of another portion of the salt showed- that when it was thrown upon hot coals ... it burned exactly like nitre. so it was a conversion of sodium chloride into sodium nitrate. that this change must have come from the _snow_ with which it had been dissolved, could not be doubted, and he further observed- now in the upper regions of the atmosphere ... there may be a redundancy of inflammable air ... and a proportion of dephlogisticated air. in that region there are many electrical appearances, as the _aurora borealis_, falling stars &c; in the lower parts of it thunder and lightening, and by these means the two kinds of air may be decomposed, and a highly dephlogisticated nitrous acid, as mine always was, produced. this being formed, will of course, attach itself to any _snow_ or _hail_ that may be forming ... confirming in this unexpected manner, the vulgar opinion of nitre being contained in snow. this seems to be the last communication of this character which came from the doctor's pen. he was in despair relative to the academy which had ever been his hope for the college which in his early years in northumberland he prayed might arise and in which he would be at liberty to particularly impart his unitarian doctrines. an interesting item relative to the academy appeared in the _aurora_ for april 1st, 1803. it shows that state aid for education was sought in those early days. it is a report, and reads- a report of the committee to whom was referred the petition of thomas cooper, on behalf of the northumberland academy, praying legislative aid. the report states that thomas cooper appeared before the committee and stated that upward of $4000 had been expended on the building appropriated to that institution. that the debts due thereon amounted in the whole to near $2000. that dr. joseph priestley had the power of disposing of a very valuable library consisting of near 4000 volumes of scarce and well chosen books in various branches of literature and science, to any public seminary of learning in the united states, which library, the said dr. priestley was desirous of procuring as a gift to the northumberland academy, provided that institution was likely to receive substantial assistance from the legislature, so as to be enabled to fulfil the purposes of its establishment, that the trustees would have no occasion to ask of the legislature on behalf of that academy, a subscription greater than a few individuals had expended, and were still ready and desirous of contributing thereto; and suggest it to your committee, that if out of the monies due from the county of northumberland to the state a sufficient sum was granted to exonerate the academy from debt, no more would be wanted in the future to effect the purposes of that institution, than a sum equal in amount to the value of the library proposed to be furnished by dr. priestley; such value to be fixed by a person appointed for the purpose by the legislature. the committee was of the opinion that it would be expedient for the legislature to coincide with the suggestion of thomas cooper and so recommended to the legislature. their report was adopted, 39 to 31. it was strongly advocated by jesse moore, esq., general mitchell and n. ferguson from the city. it was opposed by jacob alter from cumberland, who declared that although there were a great many public schools and colleges and places of that kind scattered over the state, he never knew any good they did, except to breed up a set of idle and odious lawyers to plague the people! at this particular time there still existed confiscated land from the sale of which revenue was derived, and this income it had been agreed upon should be devoted to the erection and support of academies throughout the state. later this scheme was discontinued. but, dr. priestley was not so enthusiastic as formerly. he was occupied with the church history, three volumes of which were in print, and it was expected that the fourth volume would follow shortly thereafter. however, his health was precarious. he could not eat meats, and lived chiefly on broths and soups, saying,- the defect is in the stomach and liver, and of no common kind. if i hold out till i have finished what i have now on hand, i shall retire from the scene, satisfied and thankful. this was written in august, and the doctor stuck bravely to his literary labors. a few months later he wrote lindsey,- i really do not expect to survive you. yet, he also entertained the thought that he might,- assist in the publication of a whole bible, from the several translations of particular books, smoothing and correcting them where i can. january of 1804 brought him many interesting, splendid and valuable books from friends in london. he was overjoyed on their arrival. promptly he gave himself to their perusal because his deafness confined him to home and his extreme weakness forbade any excursions. then the winter kept him from his laboratory, and his sole occupation was reading and writing. he entertained a variety of plans, proceeding with some but in the midst of these tasks of love--in the very act of correcting proof, he quietly breathed his last! it was monday, february 6, 1804, that thomas cooper, the devoted friend of priestley, wrote benjamin rush:- dear sir: mr. joseph priestley is not at present in spirits to write to his friends, and it falls to my lot therefore to acquaint you that dr. priestley died this morning about 11 o'clock without the slightest degree of apparent pain. he had for some time previous foreseen his dissolution, but he kept up to the last his habitual composure, cheerfulness and kindness. he would have been 71 the 24th of next month. for about a fortnight there were symptoms of dropsy owing to general debility: about two days before his death, these symptoms disappeared, and a troublesome cough came on perhaps from a translation to the chest. yesterday he had strength enough to look over a revise of the _annotations_ he was publishing on the old and new testament, and this morning he dictated in good language some notices which he wished his son mr. priestley to add to his unpublished works. i am sure you will sincerely regret the decease of a man so highly eminent and useful in the literary and philosophical world, and so much presumably your friend. yes, the valiant old champion of a lost cause was no more. two days before his death "he went to his laboratory"--but, finding his weakness too great, with difficulty returned to his room. loyal to his science to the very end! to american chemists he appeals strongly because of his persistent efforts in research. his coming to this country aroused a real interest in the science which has not waned in the slightest since his demise. when the sad news reached the hall of the american philosophical society, dr. benjamin smith barton was chosen to eulogize priestley. this notable event took place on january 3rd, 1805. the _aurora_ reported: dr. benjamin smith barton, one of the vice-presidents of the american philosophical society, having been previously appointed by the society to deliver an eulogium to the memory of their late associate, dr. joseph priestley, the same was accordingly delivered in the first presbyterian church in this city, on thursday the 3rd inst. before the society, who went in a body from their hall to the church, preceded by their patron, the governor of the state. invitations were given on this occasion to the revd. clergy of the city; the college of physicians; the medical society; the gentlemen of the bar, with the students at law; the trustees and faculty of the university of pennsylvania, with their students in the arts and in medicine; the judges and officers of the federal and state courts; the foreign ministers and other public characters then in the city; the mayor; aldermen and city councils: the trustees and session of the first presbyterian church; the directors of the city library; the directors and physicians of the pennsylvania hospital, of the alms house, and of the dispensary; the proprietor and director of the philadelphia museum; and the contributors towards the cabinet and library of the society. after the conclusion of a very interesting eulogium, the society returned their thanks to the orator, and requested a copy for the purpose of publication. one's curiosity is quickened on thinking what barton said in his address. search in many directions failed to bring forth the eulogium. it had been ordered to be printed in the transactions of the society. this was never done. but there was a minute (seven years later) in the meeting of the society (nov. 6, 1812) to the effect that dr. barton's request for permission to withdraw it (eulogium) to be enlarged and published separately was referred for consideration to the next meeting. the request was granted at the next meeting, but nowhere among barton's literary remains was the precious document to be found. lost very probably--when it might have revealed so much. priestley's death was deeply mourned throughout the land. the public prints brought full and elaborate accounts of his life, and touching allusions to the fullness of his brilliant career. such expressions as these were heard,- as a metaphysician he stands foremost among those who have attempted the investigation of its abstruse controversies. as a politician he assiduously and successfully laboured to extend and illustrate those general principles of civil liberty which are happily the foundation of the constitution of his adopted country,- his profound attention to the belles-lettres, and to the other departments of general literature, has been successfully exemplified among his other writings, by his lectures on oratory and criticism, and on general history and policy,- of the most important and fashionable study of _pneumatic chemistry_ he may fairly be said to be the father. he was a man of restless activity, but he uniformly directed that activity to what seemed to him the public good, seeking neither emolument nor honour from men. dr. priestley was possessed of great ardour and vivacity of intellect.... his integrity was unimpeachable; and even malice itself could not fix a stain on his private character. and what a splendid tribute is contained in the following passages from cuvier: priestley, loaded with glory, was modest enough to be astonished at his good fortune, and at the multitude of beautiful facts, which nature seemed to have revealed to him alone. he forgot that her favours were not gratuitous, and if she had so well explained herself, it was because he had known how to oblige her to do so by his indefatigable perseverance in questioning her, and by the thousand ingenious means he had taken to snatch her answers from her. others carefully hide that which they owe to chance; priestley seemed to wish to ascribe all his merit to fortuitous circumstances, remarking, with unexampled candour, how many times he had profited by them, without knowing it, how many times he was in possession of new substances without having perceived them; and he never dissimulated the erroneous views which sometimes directed his efforts, and from which he was only undeceived by experience. these confessions did honour to his modesty, without disarming jealousy. those to whom their own ways and methods had never discovered anything called him a simple worker of experiments, without method and without an object "it is not astonishing," they added, "that among so many trials and combinations, he should find some that were fortunate." but real natural philosophers were not duped by these selfish criticisms. many encomiums like the preceding--yes, a thousandfold--could easily be gathered if necessary to show the regard and confidence held for this remarkable man to whom america is truly very deeply indebted. some years ago the writer paid a visit to the god's acre of northumberland. he arrived after dark and was conveyed to the sacred place in an automobile. soon the car stopped. its headlights illuminated the upright flat stone which marked the last resting place of the great chemist, and in that light not only was the name of the sleeper clearly read but the less distinct but legible epitaph: return unto thy rest, o my soul, for the lord hath dealt bountifully with thee. i will lay me down in peace and sleep till i wake in the morning of the resurrection. pondering on these lines there slowly returned to mind the words of franklin's epitaph,--franklin, who, years before, had encouraged and aided the noble exile, who was ever mindful of the former's goodness to him: the body of benjamin franklin printer (like the cover of an old book its contents torn out and stript of its lettering and gilding) lies here food for worms but the work shall not be lost for it will (as he believed) appear once more in a new and more elegant edition revised and corrected by the author and then, by some strange mental reaction, there floated before the writer the paragraph uttered by professor huxley, when in 1874 a statue to priestley was unveiled in the city of birmingham: our purpose is to do honour ... to priestley the peerless defender of national freedom in thought and in action; to priestley the philosophical thinker; to that priestley who held a foremost place among the 'swift runners who hand over the lamp of life,' and transmit from one generation to another the fire kindled, in the childhood of the world, at the promethean altar of science. footnotes: [footnote 1: chemistry in old philadelphia, j. b. lippincott co., phila., pa.] [footnote 2: correspondence of priestley by h. c. bolton, new york, 1892.] [footnote 3: mr. berthollet discovered that oxygenated muriatic gas, received in a ley of caustic potash, forms a chrystallizable neutral salt, which detonates more strongly than nitre.] [footnote 4: nine famous birmingham men--cornish brothers, publishers, 1909.] [footnote 5: james woodhouse--a pioneer in chemistry--j. c. winston co., phila.--1918.] [footnote 6: james woodhouse--a pioneer in chemistry--j. c. winston co., phila.--1918.] [footnote 7: see _chemistry in america_, appleton & co. and _chemistry in old philadelphia_, the j. b. lippincott co., philadelphia, pa.] [footnote 8: the original of this letter is now the property of dr. c. a. browne, new york. he graciously permitted it to be inserted here.] transcriber's notes: ==================== formatting, fixed in text: ========== a few inconsistencies in the layout and formatting of the book have been corrected (an extra blank line in a quoted paragraph, for example). most notably, the "hints concerning public education" is an essay by priestley quoted verbatim in the text. the original layout did not make a clear distinction between smith's text and this quoted essay; i have remedied this with an indent for that section. typos, fixed in text: ===== it was an interesting fact (text reads inter-resting, broken across a line) that germ which might once have been supposed (text reads beeen) september 14, 1794 (text reads september, 14 1794) the doctor remained quietly at home (text reads quitely) on behalf of the northumberland academy, praying legislative aid (text reads lesiglative) science which has not waned in the slightest (text reads slighest) he uniformly directed that activity (text reads uniformily) from the rod of lawless power (text reads of of) almost all the fresh meat they have (text reads flesh meat) diversions, beginning with the publication (text reads begining) rather thoughtful disquisition on dreams (text reads disquisiton) footnote 6: j. c. winston co. (text reads wintson) apparent errata, but could be as appearing in the original letters: =============== (left as-is in text). conduct will evince that i have been to that of great {great} britain. contributes so much as ours do to the cummunication {communication} of useful knowledge sense of security which scientificial {scientific?} pursuits require the same that has been called _philogiston_ {phlogiston} he would never enter the puplit {pulpit} again. until it became necesary {necessary} to separate. we all rejoiced at the aggreeable {agreeable} information by civil fueds {feuds} exiled my native home unless you were possessed of _aladin's {aladdin's} lamp_ familiar letters on chemistry, and its relation to commerce, physiology, and agriculture, by justus liebig, m.d., ph. d., f.r.s., professor of chemistry in the university of giessen. edited by john gardner, m.d., member of the chemical society. second edition, corrected. london: mdcccxliv. preface the letters contained in this little volume embrace some of the most important points of the science of chemistry, in their application to natural philosophy, physiology, agriculture, and commerce. some of them treat of subjects which have already been, or will hereafter be, more fully discussed in my larger works. they were intended to be mere sketches, and were written for the especial purpose of exciting the attention of governments, and an enlightened public, to the necessity of establishing schools of chemistry, and of promoting, by every means, the study of a science so intimately connected with the arts, pursuits, and social well-being of modern civilised nations. for my own part i do not scruple to avow the conviction, that ere long, a knowledge of the principal truths of chemistry will be expected in every educated man, and that it will be as necessary to the statesman, the political economist, and the practical agriculturist, as it is already indispensable to the physician, and the manufacturer. in germany, such of these letters as have been already published, have not failed to produce some of the results anticipated. new professorships have been established in the universities of goettingen and wuertzburg, for the express purpose of facilitating the application of chemical truths to the practical arts of life, and of following up the new line of investigation and research--the bearing of chemistry upon physiology, medicine, and agriculture,--which may be said to be only just begun. my friend, dr. ernest dieffenbach, one of my first pupils, who is well acquainted with all the branches of chemistry, physics, natural history, and medicine, suggested to me that a collection of these letters would be acceptable to the english public, which has so favourably received my former works. i readily acquiesced in the publication of an english edition, and undertook to write a few additional letters, which should embrace some conclusions i have arrived at, in my recent investigations, in connection with the application of chemical science to the physiology of plants and agriculture. my esteemed friend, dr. gardner, has had the kindness to revise the manuscript and the proof sheets for publication, for which i cannot refrain expressing my best thanks. it only remains for me to add a hope, that this little offering may serve to make new friends to our beautiful and useful science, and be a remembrancer to those old friends who have, for many years past, taken a lively interest in all my labours. justus liebig giessen, aug. 1843. contents letter i the subject proposed. materials employed for chemical apparatus:-glass--caoutchouc--cork--platinum. the balance. the "elements" of the ancients, represent the forms of matter. lavoisier and his successors. study of the materials composing the earth. synthetic production of minerals--lapis lazuli. organic chemistry. letter ii changes of form which every kind of matter undergoes. conversion of gases into liquids and solids. carbonic acid--its curious properties in a solid state. condensation of gases by porous bodies. by spongy platinum. importance of this property in nature. letter iii the manufacture of soda from culinary salt; its importance in the arts and in commerce. glass--soap--sulphuric acid. silver refining. bleaching. trade in sulphur. letter iv connection of theory with practice. employment of magnetism as a moving power--its impracticability. relation of coals and zinc as economic sources of force. manufacture of beet-root sugar--its impolicy. gas for illumination. letter v isomerism, or identity of composition in bodies with different chemical and physical properties. crystallisation. amorphism. isomorphism, or similarity of properties in bodies totally different in composition. letter vi alliance of chemistry with physiology. division of food into nourishment, and materials for combustion. effects of atmospheric oxygen. balance of carbon and oxygen. letter vii animal heat, its laws and influence on the animal functions. loss and supply. influence of climate. fuel of animal heat. agency of oxygen in disease. respiration. letter viii aliments. constituents of the blood. fibrine, albumen. inorganic substances. isomerism of fibrine, albumen, and elements of nutrition. relation of animal and vegetable organisms. letter ix growth of animals. uses of butter and milk. metamorphoses of tissues. food of carnivora, and of the horse. letter x application of the preceding facts to man. division of human food. uses of gelatine. letter xi circulation of matter in the animal and vegetable kingdoms. the ocean. agriculture. restitution of an equilibrium in the soil. causes of the exhaustion of land. virginia. england. relief gained by importation of bones. empirical farming unsatisfactory. necessity for scientific principles. influence of the atmosphere. of saline and earthy matters of the soil. letter xii science and art of agriculture. necessity of chemistry. rationale of agricultural processes. washing for gold. letter xiii illustration of the necessity of chemistry to advance and perfect agriculture. manner in which fallow ameliorates the soil. uses of lime. effects of burning. of marl. letter xiv nature and effects of manures. animal bodies subject to constant waste. parts separating--exuviae--waste vegetable matters--together contain all the elements of the soil and of food. various value of excrements of different animals as manure. letter xv source of the carbon and nitrogen of plants. produce of carbon in forests and meadows supplied only with mineral aliments prove it to be from the atmosphere. relations between mineral constituents, and carbon and nitrogen. effects of the carbonic acid and ammonia of manures. necessity of inorganic constituents to the formation of aliments, of blood, and therefore of nutrition. necessity of inquiries by analysis to advance agriculture. letter xvi results of the author's latest inquiries. superlative importance of the phosphates of lime and alkalies to the cultivation of the cerealia. sources of a supply of these materials. letters on chemistry letter i my dear sir, the influence which the science of chemistry exercises upon human industry, agriculture, and commerce; upon physiology, medicine, and other sciences, is now so interesting a topic of conversation everywhere, that it may be no unacceptable present to you if i trace in a few familiar letters some of the relations it bears to these various sciences, and exhibit for you its actual effect upon the present social condition of mankind. in speaking of the present state of chemistry, its rise and progress, i shall need no apology if, as a preliminary step, i call your attention to the implements which the chemist employs--the means which are indispensable to his labours and to his success. these consist, generally, of materials furnished to us by nature, endowed with many most remarkable properties fitting them for our purposes; if one of them is a production of art, yet its adaptation to the use of mankind,--the qualities which render it available to us,--must be referred to the same source as those derived immediately from nature. cork, platinum, glass, and caoutchouc, are the substances to which i allude, and which minister so essentially to modern chemical investigations. without them, indeed, we might have made some progress, but it would have been slow; we might have accomplished much, but it would have been far less than has been done with their aid. some persons, by the employment of expensive substances, might have successfully pursued the science; but incalculably fewer minds would have been engaged in its advancement. these materials have only been duly appreciated and fully adopted within a very recent period. in the time of lavoisier, the rich alone could make chemical researches; the necessary apparatus could only be procured at a very great expense. and first, of glass: every one is familiar with most of the properties of this curious substance; its transparency, hardness, destitution of colour, and stability under ordinary circumstances: to these obvious qualities we may add those which especially adapt it to the use of the chemist, namely, that it is unaffected by most acids or other fluids contained within it. at certain temperatures it becomes more ductile and plastic than wax, and may be made to assume in our hands, before the flame of a common lamp, the form of every vessel we need to contain our materials, and of every apparatus required to pursue our experiments. then, how admirable and valuable are the properties of cork! how little do men reflect upon the inestimable worth of so common a substance! how few rightly esteem the importance of it to the progress of science, and the moral advancement of mankind!--there is no production of nature or art equally adapted to the purposes to which the chemist applies it. cork consists of a soft, highly elastic substance, as a basis, having diffused throughout a matter with properties resembling wax, tallow, and resin, yet dissimilar to all of these, and termed suberin. this renders it perfectly impermeable to fluids, and, in a great measure, even to gases. it is thus the fittest material we possess for closing our bottles, and retaining their contents. by its means, and with the aid of caoutchouc, we connect our vessels and tubes of glass, and construct the most complicated apparatus. we form joints and links of connexion, adapt large apertures to small, and thus dispense altogether with the aid of the brassfounder and the mechanist. thus the implements of the chemist are cheaply and easily procured, immediately adapted to any purpose, and readily repaired or altered. again, in investigating the composition of solid bodies,--of minerals,--we are under the necessity of bringing them into a liquid state, either by solution or fusion. now vessels of glass, of porcelain, and of all non-metallic substances, are destroyed by the means we employ for that purpose,--are acted upon by many acids, by alkalies and the alkaline carbonates. crucibles of gold and silver would melt at high temperatures. but we have a combination of all the qualities we can desire in platinum. this metal was only first adapted to these uses about fifty years since. it is cheaper than gold, harder and more durable than silver, infusible at all temperatures of our furnaces, and is left intact by acids and alkaline carbonates. platinum unites all the valuable properties of gold and of porcelain, resisting the action of heat, and of almost all chemical agents. as no mineral analysis could be made perfectly without platinum vessels, had we not possessed this metal, the composition of minerals would have yet remained unknown; without cork and caoutchouc we should have required the costly aid of the mechanician at every step. even without the latter of these adjuncts our instruments would have been far more costly and fragile. possessing all these gifts of nature, we economise incalculably our time--to us more precious than money! such are our instruments. an equal improvement has been accomplished in our laboratory. this is no longer the damp, cold, fireproof vault of the metallurgist, nor the manufactory of the druggist, fitted up with stills and retorts. on the contrary, a light, warm, comfortable room, where beautifully constructed lamps supply the place of furnaces, and the pure and odourless flame of gas, or of spirits of wine, supersedes coal and other fuel, and gives us all the fire we need; where health is not invaded, nor the free exercise of thought impeded: there we pursue our inquiries, and interrogate nature to reveal her secrets. to these simple means must be added "the balance," and then we possess everything which is required for the most extensive researches. the great distinction between the manner of proceeding in chemistry and natural philosophy is, that one weighs, the other measures. the natural philosopher has applied his measures to nature for many centuries, but only for fifty years have we attempted to advance our philosophy by weighing. for all great discoveries chemists are indebted to the "balance"--that incomparable instrument which gives permanence to every observation, dispels all ambiguity, establishes truth, detects error, and guides us in the true path of inductive science. the balance, once adopted as a means of investigating nature, put an end to the school of aristotle in physics. the explanation of natural phenomena by mere fanciful speculations, gave place to a true natural philosophy. fire, air, earth, and water, could no longer be regarded as elements. three of them could henceforth be considered only as significative of the forms in which all matter exists. everything with which we are conversant upon the surface of the earth is solid, liquid, or aeriform; but the notion of the elementary nature of air, earth, and water, so universally held, was now discovered to belong to the errors of the past. fire was found to be but the visible and otherwise perceptible indication of changes proceeding within the, so called, elements. lavoisier investigated the composition of the atmosphere and of water, and studied the many wonderful offices performed by an element common to both in the scheme of nature, namely, oxygen: and he discovered many of the properties of this elementary gas. after his time, the principal problem of chemical philosophers was to determine the composition of the solid matters composing the earth. to the eighteen metals previously known were soon added twenty-four discovered to be constituents of minerals. the great mass of the earth was shown to be composed of metals in combination with oxygen, to which they are united in one, two, or more definite and unalterable proportions, forming compounds which are termed metallic oxides, and these, again, combined with oxides of other bodies, essentially different to metals, namely, carbon and silicium. if to these we add certain compounds of sulphur with metals, in which the sulphur takes the place of oxygen, and forms sulphurets, and one other body,--common salt,--(which is a compound of sodium and chlorine), we have every substance which exists in a solid form upon our globe in any very considerable mass. other compounds, innumerably various, are found only in small scattered quantities. the chemist, however, did not remain satisfied with the separation of minerals into their component elements, i.e. their analysis; but he sought by synthesis, i.e. by combining the separate elements and forming substances similar to those constructed by nature, to prove the accuracy of his processes and the correctness of his conclusions. thus he formed, for instance, pumice-stone, feldspar, mica, iron pyrites, &c. artificially. but of all the achievements of inorganic chemistry, the artificial formation of lapis lazuli was the most brilliant and the most conclusive. this mineral, as presented to us by nature, is calculated powerfully to arrest our attention by its beautiful azure-blue colour, its remaining unchanged by exposure to air or to fire, and furnishing us with a most valuable pigment, ultramarine, more precious than gold! the analysis of lapis lazuli represented it to be composed of silica, alumina, and soda, three colourless bodies, with sulphur and a trace of iron. nothing could be discovered in it of the nature of a pigment, nothing to which its blue colour could be referred, the cause of which was searched for in vain. it might therefore have been supposed that the analyst was here altogether at fault, and that at any rate its artificial production must be impossible. nevertheless, this has been accomplished, and simply by combining in the proper proportions, as determined by analysis, silica, alumina, soda, iron, and sulphur. thousands of pounds weight are now manufactured from these ingredients, and this artificial ultramarine is as beautiful as the natural, while for the price of a single ounce of the latter we may obtain many pounds of the former. with the production of artificial lapis lazuli, the formation of mineral bodies by synthesis ceased to be a scientific problem to the chemist; he has no longer sufficient interest in it to pursue the subject. he may now be satisfied that analysis will reveal to him the true constitution of minerals. but to the mineralogist and geologist it is still in a great measure an unexplored field, offering inquiries of the highest interest and importance to their pursuits. after becoming acquainted with the constituent elements of all the substances within our reach and the mutual relations of these elements, the remarkable transmutations to which the bodies are subject under the influence of the vital powers of plants and animals, became the principal object of chemical investigations, and the highest point of interest. a new science, inexhaustible as life itself, is here presented us, standing upon the sound and solid foundation of a well established inorganic chemistry. thus the progress of science is, like the development of nature's works, gradual and expansive. after the buds and branches spring forth the leaves and blossoms, after the blossoms the fruit. chemistry, in its application to animals and vegetables, endeavours jointly with physiology to enlighten us respecting the mysterious processes and sources of organic life. letter ii my dear sir, in my former letter i reminded you that three of the supposed elements of the ancients represent the forms or state in which all the ponderable matter of our globe exists; i would now observe, that no substance possesses absolutely any one of those conditions; that modern chemistry recognises nothing unchangeably solid, liquid, or aeriform: means have been devised for effecting a change of state in almost every known substance. platinum, alumina, and rock crystal, it is true, cannot be liquified by the most intense heat of our furnaces, but they melt like wax before the flame of the oxy-hydrogen blowpipe. on the other hand, of the twenty-eight gaseous bodies with which we are acquainted, twenty-five may be reduced to a liquid state, and one into a solid. probably, ere long, similar changes of condition will be extended to every form of matter. there are many things relating to this condensation of the gases worthy of your attention. most aeriform bodies, when subjected to compression, are made to occupy a space which diminishes in the exact ratio of the increase of the compressing force. very generally, under a force double or triple of the ordinary atmospheric pressure, they become one half or one third their former volume. this was a long time considered to be a law, and known as the law of marriotte; but a more accurate study of the subject has demonstrated that this law is by no means of general application. the volume of certain gases does not decrease in the ratio of the increase of the force used to compress them, but in some, a diminution of their bulk takes place in a far greater degree as the pressure increases. again, if ammoniacal gas is reduced by a compressing force to one-sixth of its volume, or carbonic acid is reduced to one thirty-sixth, a portion of them loses entirely the form of a gas, and becomes a liquid, which, when the pressure is withdrawn, assumes again in an instant its gaseous state--another deviation from the law of marriotte. our process for reducing gases into fluids is of admirable simplicity. a simple bent tube, or a reduction of temperature by artificial means, have superseded the powerful compressing machines of the early experimenters. the cyanuret of mercury, when heated in an open glass tube, is resolved into cyanogen gas and metallic mercury; if this substance is heated in a tube hermetically sealed, the decomposition occurs as before, but the gas, unable to escape, and shut up in a space several hundred times smaller than it would occupy as gas under the ordinary atmospheric pressure, becomes a fluid in that part of the tube which is kept cool. when sulphuric acid is poured upon limestone in an open vessel, carbonic acid escapes with effervescence as a gas, but if the decomposition is effected in a strong, close, and suitable vessel of iron, we obtain the carbonic acid in the state of liquid. in this manner it may be obtained in considerable quantities, even many pounds weight. carbonic acid is separated from other bodies with which it is combined as a fluid under a pressure of thirty-six atmospheres. the curious properties of fluid carbonic acid are now generally known. when a small quantity is permitted to escape into the atmosphere, it assumes its gaseous state with extraordinary rapidity, and deprives the remaining fluid of caloric so rapidly that it congeals into a white crystalline mass like snow: at first, indeed, it was thought to be really snow, but upon examination it proved to be pure frozen carbonic acid. this solid, contrary to expectation, exercises only a feeble pressure upon the surrounding medium. the fluid acid inclosed in a glass tube rushes at once, when opened, into a gaseous state, with an explosion which shatters the tube into fragments; but solid carbonic acid can be handled without producing any other effect than a feeling of intense cold. the particles of the carbonic acid being so closely approximated in the solid, the whole force of cohesive attraction (which in the fluid is weak) becomes exerted, and opposes its tendency to assume its gaseous state; but as it receives heat from surrounding bodies, it passes into gas gradually and without violence. the transition of solid carbonic acid into gas deprives all around it of caloric so rapidly and to so great an extent, that a degree of cold is produced immeasurably great, the greatest indeed known. ten, twenty, or more pounds weight of mercury, brought into contact with a mixture of ether and solid carbonic acid, becomes in a few moments firm and malleable. this, however, cannot be accomplished without considerable danger. a melancholy accident occurred at paris, which will probably prevent for the future the formation of solid carbonic acid in these large quantities, and deprive the next generation of the gratification of witnessing these curious experiments. just before the commencement of the lecture in the laboratory of the polytechnic school, an iron cylinder, two feet and a half long and one foot in diameter, in which carbonic acid had been developed for experiment before the class, burst, and its fragments were scattered about with the most tremendous force; it cut off both the legs of the assistant and killed him on the spot. this vessel, formed of the strongest cast-iron, and shaped like a cannon, had often been employed to exhibit experiments in the presence of the students. we can scarcely think, without shuddering, of the dreadful calamity such an explosion would have occasioned in a hall filled with spectators. when we had ascertained the fact of gases becoming fluid under the influence of cold or pressure, a curious property possessed by charcoal, that of absorbing gas to the extent of many times its volume,--ten, twenty, or even as in the case of ammoniacal gas or muriatic acid gas, eighty or ninety fold,--which had been long known, no longer remained a mystery. some gases are absorbed and condensed within the pores of the charcoal, into a space several hundred times smaller than they before occupied; and there is now no doubt they there become fluid, or assume a solid state. as in a thousand other instances, chemical action here supplants mechanical forces. adhesion or heterogeneous attraction, as it is termed, acquired by this discovery a more extended meaning; it had never before been thought of as a cause of change of state in matter; but it is now evident that a gas adheres to the surface of a solid body by the same force which condenses it into a liquid. the smallest amount of a gas,--atmospheric air for instance,--can be compressed into a space a thousand times smaller by mere mechanical pressure, and then its bulk must be to the least measurable surface of a solid body, as a grain of sand to a mountain. by the mere effect of mass,--the force of gravity,--gaseous molecules are attracted by solids and adhere to their surfaces; and when to this physical force is added the feeblest chemical affinity, the liquifiable gases cannot retain their gaseous state. the amount of air condensed by these forces upon a square inch of surface is certainly not measurable; but when a solid body, presenting several hundred square feet of surface within the space of a cubic inch, is brought into a limited volume of gas, we may understand why that volume is diminished, why all gases without exception are absorbed. a cubic inch of charcoal must have, at the lowest computation, a surface of one hundred square feet. this property of absorbing gases varies with different kinds of charcoal: it is possessed in a higher degree by those containing the most pores, i.e. where the pores are finer; and in a lower degree in the more spongy kinds, i.e. where the pores are larger. in this manner every porous body--rocks, stones, the clods of the fields, &c.,--imbibe air, and therefore oxygen; the smallest solid molecule is thus surrounded by its own atmosphere of condensed oxygen; and if in their vicinity other bodies exist which have an affinity for oxygen, a combination is effected. when, for instance, carbon and hydrogen are thus present, they are converted into nourishment for vegetables,--into carbonic acid and water. the development of heat when air is imbibed, and the production of steam when the earth is moistened by rain, are acknowledged to be consequences of this condensation by the action of surfaces. but the most remarkable and interesting case of this kind of action is the imbibition of oxygen by metallic platinum. this metal, when massive, is of a lustrous white colour, but it may be brought, by separating it from its solutions, into so finely divided a state, that its particles no longer reflect light, and it forms a powder as black as soot. in this condition it absorbs eight hundred times its volume of oxygen gas, and this oxygen must be contained within it in a state of condensation very like that of fluid water. when gases are thus condensed, i.e. their particles made to approximate in this extraordinary manner, their properties can be palpably shown. their chemical actions become apparent as their physical characteristic disappears. the latter consists in the continual tendency of their particles to separate from each other; and it is easy to imagine that this elasticity of gaseous bodies is the principal impediment to the operation of their chemical force; for this becomes more energetic as their particles approximate. in that state in which they exist within the pores or upon the surface of solid bodies, their repulsion ceases, and their whole chemical action is exerted. thus combinations which oxygen cannot enter into, decompositions which it cannot effect while in the state of gas, take place with the greatest facility in the pores of platinum containing condensed oxygen. when a jet of hydrogen gas, for instance, is thrown upon spongy platinum, it combines with the oxygen condensed in the interior of the mass; at their point of contact water is formed, and as the immediate consequence heat is evolved; the platinum becomes red hot and the gas is inflamed. if we interrupt the current of the gas, the pores of the platinum become instantaneously filled again with oxygen; and the same phenomenon can be repeated a second time, and so on interminably. in finely pulverised platinum, and even in spongy platinum, we therefore possess a perpetuum mobile--a mechanism like a watch which runs out and winds itself up--a force which is never exhausted--competent to produce effects of the most powerful kind, and self-renewed ad infinitum. many phenomena, formerly inexplicable, are satisfactorily explained by these recently discovered properties of porous bodies. the metamorphosis of alcohol into acetic acid, by the process known as the quick vinegar manufacture, depends upon principles, at a knowledge of which we have arrived by a careful study of these properties. letter iii my dear sir, the manufacture of soda from common culinary salt, may be regarded as the foundation of all our modern improvements in the domestic arts; and we may take it as affording an excellent illustration of the dependence of the various branches of human industry and commerce upon each other, and their relation to chemistry. soda has been used from time immemorial in the manufacture of soap and glass, two chemical productions which employ and keep in circulation an immense amount of capital. the quantity of soap consumed by a nation would be no inaccurate measure whereby to estimate its wealth and civilisation. of two countries, with an equal amount of population, the wealthiest and most highly civilised will consume the greatest weight of soap. this consumption does not subserve sensual gratification, nor depend upon fashion, but upon the feeling of the beauty, comfort, and welfare, attendant upon cleanliness; and a regard to this feeling is coincident with wealth and civilisation. the rich in the middle ages concealed a want of cleanliness in their clothes and persons under a profusion of costly scents and essences, whilst they were more luxurious in eating and drinking, in apparel and horses. with us a want of cleanliness is equivalent to insupportable misery and misfortune. soap belongs to those manufactured products, the money value of which continually disappears from circulation, and requires to be continually renewed. it is one of the few substances which are entirely consumed by use, leaving no product of any worth. broken glass and bottles are by no means absolutely worthless; for rags we may purchase new cloth, but soap-water has no value whatever. it would be interesting to know accurately the amount of capital involved in the manufacture of soap; it is certainly as large as that employed in the coffee trade, with this important difference as respects germany, that it is entirely derived from our own soil. france formerly imported soda from spain,--spanish sodas being of the best quality--at an annual expenditure of twenty to thirty millions of francs. during the war with england the price of soda, and consequently of soap and glass, rose continually; and all manufactures suffered in consequence. the present method of making soda from common salt was discovered by le blanc at the end of the last century. it was a rich boon for france, and became of the highest importance during the wars of napoleon. in a very short time it was manufactured to an extraordinary extent, especially at the seat of the soap manufactories. marseilles possessed for a time a monopoly of soda and soap. the policy of napoleon deprived that city of the advantages derived from this great source of commerce, and thus excited the hostility of the population to his dynasty, which became favourable to the restoration of the bourbons. a curious result of an improvement in a chemical manufacture! it was not long, however, in reaching england. in order to prepare the soda of commerce (which is the carbonate) from common salt, it is first converted into glauber's salt (sulphate of soda). for this purpose 80 pounds weight of concentrated sulphuric acid (oil of vitriol) are required to 100 pounds of common salt. the duty upon salt checked, for a short time, the full advantage of this discovery; but when the government repealed the duty, and its price was reduced to its minimum, the cost of soda depended upon that of sulphuric acid. the demand for sulphuric acid now increased to an immense extent; and, to supply it, capital was embarked abundantly, as it afforded an excellent remuneration. the origin and formation of sulphuric acid was studied most carefully; and from year to year, better, simpler, and cheaper methods of making it were discovered. with every improvement in the mode of manufacture, its price fell; and its sale increased in an equal ratio. sulphuric acid is now manufactured in leaden chambers, of such magnitude that they would contain the whole of an ordinary-sized house. as regards the process and the apparatus, this manufacture has reached its acme--scarcely is either susceptible of improvement. the leaden plates of which the chambers are constructed, requiring to be joined together with lead (since tin or solder would be acted on by the acid), this process was, until lately, as expensive as the plates themselves; but now, by means of the oxy-hydrogen blowpipe, the plates are cemented together at their edges by mere fusion, without the intervention of any kind of solder. and then, as to the process: according to theory, 100 pounds weight of sulphur ought to produce 306 pounds of sulphuric acid; in practice 300 pounds are actually obtained; the amount of loss is therefore too insignificant for consideration. again; saltpetre being indispensable in making sulphuric acid, the commercial value of that salt had formerly an important influence upon its price. it is true that 100 pounds of saltpetre only are required to 1000 pounds of sulphur; but its cost was four times greater than an equal weight of the latter. travellers had observed near the small seaport of yquiqui, in the district of atacama, in peru, an efflorescence covering the ground over extensive districts. this was found to consist principally of nitrate of soda. advantage was quickly taken of this discovery. the quantity of this valuable salt proved to be inexhaustible, as it exists in beds extending over more than 200 square miles. it was brought to england at less than half the freight of the east india saltpetre (nitrate of potassa); and as, in the chemical manufacture neither the potash nor the soda were required, but only the nitric acid, in combination with the alkali, the soda-saltpetre of south america soon supplanted the potash-nitre of the east. the manufacture of sulphuric acid received a new impulse; its price was much diminished without injury to the manufacturer; and, with the exception of fluctuations caused by the impediments thrown in the way of the export of sulphur from sicily, it soon became reduced to a minimum, and remained stationary. potash-saltpetre is now only employed in the manufacture of gunpowder; it is no longer in demand for other purposes; and thus, if government effect a saving of many hundred thousand pounds annually in gunpowder, this economy must be attributed to the increased manufacture of sulphuric acid. we may form an idea of the amount of sulphuric acid consumed, when we find that 50,000 pounds weight are made by a small manufactory, and from 200,000 to 600,000 pounds by a large one annually. this manufacture causes immense sums to flow annually into sicily. it has introduced industry and wealth into the arid and desolate districts of atacama. it has enabled us to obtain platina from its ores at a moderate and yet remunerating price; since the vats employed for concentrating this acid are constructed of this metal, and cost from 1000l. to 2000l. sterling. it leads to frequent improvements in the manufacture of glass, which continually becomes cheaper and more beautiful. it enables us to return to our fields all their potash--a most valuable and important manure--in the form of ashes, by substituting soda in the manufacture of glass and soap. it is impossible to trace, within the compass of a letter, all the ramifications of this tissue of changes and improvements resulting from one chemical manufacture; but i must still claim your attention to a few more of its most important and immediate results. i have already told you, that in the manufacture of soda from culinary salt, it is first converted into sulphate of soda. in this first part of the process, the action of sulphuric acid produces muriatic acid to the extent of one-and-a-half the amount of the sulphuric acid employed. at first, the profit upon the soda was so great, that no one took the trouble to collect the muriatic acid: indeed it had no commercial value. a profitable application of it was, however, soon discovered: it is a compound of chlorine, and this substance may be obtained from it purer than from any other source. the bleaching power of chlorine has long been known; but it was only employed upon a large scale after it was obtained from this residuary muriatic acid, and it was found that in combination with lime it could be transported to distances without inconvenience. thenceforth it was used for bleaching cotton; and, but for this new bleaching process, it would scarcely have been possible for the cotton manufacture of great britain to have attained its present enormous extent,--it could not have competed in price with france and germany. in the old process of bleaching, every piece must be exposed to the air and light during several weeks in the summer, and kept continually moist by manual labour. for this purpose, meadow land, eligibly situated, was essential. now a single establishment near glasgow bleaches 1400 pieces of cotton daily, throughout the year. what an enormous capital would be required to purchase land for this purpose! how greatly would it increase the cost of bleaching to pay interest upon this capital, or to hire so much land in england! this expense would scarcely have been felt in germany. besides the diminished expense, the cotton stuffs bleached with chlorine suffer less in the hands of skilful workmen than those bleached in the sun; and already the peasantry in some parts of germany have adopted it, and find it advantageous. another use to which cheap muriatic acid is applied, is the manufacture of glue from bones. bone contains from 30 to 36 per cent. of earthy matter--chiefly phosphate of lime, and the remainder is gelatine. when bones are digested in muriatic acid they become transparent and flexible like leather, the earthy matter is dissolved, and after the acid is all carefully washed away, pieces of glue of the same shape as the bones remain, which are soluble in hot water and adapted to all the purposes of ordinary glue, without further preparation. another important application of sulphuric acid may be adduced; namely, to the refining of silver and the separation of gold, which is always present in some proportion in native silver. silver, as it is usually obtained from mines in europe, contains in 16 ounces, 6 to 8 ounces of copper. when used by the silversmith, or in coining, 16 ounces must contain in germany 13 ounces of silver, in england about 14 1/2. but this alloy is always made artificially by mixing pure silver with the due proportion of the copper; and for this purpose the silver must be obtained pure by the refiner. this he formerly effected by amalgamation, or by roasting it with lead; and the cost of this process was about 2l. for every hundred-weight of silver. in the silver so prepared, about 1/1200 to 1/2000th part of gold remained; to effect the separation of this by nitrio-hydrochloric acid was more expensive than the value of the gold; it was therefore left in utensils, or circulated in coin, valueless. the copper, too, of the native silver was no use whatever. but the 1/1000th part of gold, being about one and a half per cent. of the value of the silver, now covers the cost of refining, and affords an adequate profit to the refiner; so that he effects the separation of the copper, and returns to his employer the whole amount of the pure silver, as well as the copper, without demanding any payment: he is amply remunerated by that minute portion of gold. the new process of refining is a most beautiful chemical operation: the granulated metal is boiled in concentrated sulphuric acid, which dissolves both the silver and the copper, leaving the gold nearly pure, in the form of a black powder. the solution is then placed in a leaden vessel containing metallic copper; this is gradually dissolved, and the silver precipitated in a pure metallic state. the sulphate of copper thus formed is also a valuable product, being employed in the manufacture of green and blue pigments. other immediate results of the economical production of sulphuric acid, are the general employment of phosphorus matches, and of stearine candles, that beautiful substitute for tallow and wax. twenty-five years ago, the present prices and extensive applications of sulphuric and muriatic acids, of soda, phosphorus, &c., would have been considered utterly impossible. who is able to foresee what new and unthought-of chemical productions, ministering to the service and comforts of mankind, the next twenty-five years may produce? after these remarks you will perceive that it is no exaggeration to say, we may fairly judge of the commercial prosperity of a country from the amount of sulphuric acid it consumes. reflecting upon the important influence which the price of sulphur exercises upon the cost of production of bleached and printed cotton stuffs, soap, glass, &c., and remembering that great britain supplies america, spain, portugal, and the east, with these, exchanging them for raw cotton, silk, wine, raisins, indigo, &c., &c., we can understand why the english government should have resolved to resort to war with naples, in order to abolish the sulphur monopoly, which the latter power attempted recently to establish. nothing could be more opposed to the true interests of sicily than such a monopoly; indeed, had it been maintained a few years, it is highly probable that sulphur, the source of her wealth, would have been rendered perfectly valueless to her. science and industry form a power to which it is dangerous to present impediments. it was not difficult to perceive that the issue would be the entire cessation of the exportation of sulphur from sicily. in the short period the sulphur monopoly lasted, fifteen patents were taken out for methods to obtain back the sulphuric acid used in making soda. admitting that these fifteen experiments were not perfectly successful, there can be no doubt it would ere long have been accomplished. but then, in gypsum, (sulphate of lime), and in heavy-spar, (sulphate of barytes), we possess mountains of sulphuric acid; in galena, (sulphate of lead), and in iron pyrites, we have no less abundance of sulphur. the problem is, how to separate the sulphuric acid, or the sulphur, from these native stores. hundreds of thousands of pounds weight of sulphuric acid were prepared from iron pyrites, while the high price of sulphur consequent upon the monopoly lasted. we should probably ere long have triumphed over all difficulties, and have separated it from gypsum. the impulse has been given, the possibility of the process proved, and it may happen in a few years that the inconsiderate financial speculation of naples may deprive her of that lucrative commerce. in like manner russia, by her prohibitory system, has lost much of her trade in tallow and potash. one country purchases only from absolute necessity from another, which excludes her own productions from her markets. instead of the tallow and linseed oil of russia, great britain now uses palm oil and cocoa-nut oil of other countries. precisely analogous is the combination of workmen against their employers, which has led to the construction of many admirable machines for superseding manual labour. in commerce and industry every imprudence carries with it its own punishment; every oppression immediately and sensibly recoils upon the head of those from whom it emanates. letter iv my dear sir, one of the most influential causes of improvement in the social condition of mankind is that spirit of enterprise which induces men of capital to adopt and carry out suggestions for the improvement of machinery, the creation of new articles of commerce, or the cheaper production of those already in demand; and we cannot but admire the energy with which such men devote their talents, their time, and their wealth, to realise the benefits of the discoveries and inventions of science. for even when these are expended upon objects wholly incapable of realisation,--nay, even when the idea which first gave the impulse proves in the end to be altogether impracticable or absurd, immediate good to the community generally ensues; some useful and perhaps unlooked-for result flows directly, or springs ultimately, from exertions frustrated in their main design. thus it is also in the pursuit of science. theories lead to experiments and investigations; and he who investigates will scarcely ever fail of being rewarded by discoveries. it may be, indeed, the theory sought to be established is entirely unfounded in nature; but while searching in a right spirit for one thing, the inquirer may be rewarded by finding others far more valuable than those which he sought. at the present moment, electro-magnetism, as a moving power, is engaging great attention and study; wonders are expected from its application to this purpose. according to the sanguine expectations of many persons, it will shortly be employed to put into motion every kind of machinery, and amongst other things it will be applied to impel the carriages of railroads, and this at so small a cost, that expense will no longer be matter of consideration. england is to lose her superiority as a manufacturing country, inasmuch as her vast store of coals will no longer avail her as an economical source of motive power. "we," say the german cultivators of this science, "have cheap zinc, and, how small a quantity of this metal is required to turn a lathe, and consequently to give motion to any kind of machinery!" such expectations may be very attractive, and yet they are altogether illusory! they will not bear the test of a few simple calculations; and these our friends have not troubled themselves to institute. with a simple flame of spirits of wine, under a proper vessel containing boiling water, a small carriage of 200 to 300 pounds weight can be put into motion, or a weight of 80 to 100 pounds may be raised to a height of 20 feet. the same effects may be produced by dissolving zinc in dilute sulphuric acid in a certain apparatus. this is certainly an astonishing and highly interesting discovery; but the question to be determined is, which of the two processes is the least expensive? in order to answer this question, and to judge correctly of the hopes entertained from this discovery, let me remind you of what chemists denominate "equivalents." these are certain unalterable ratios of effects which are proportionate to each other, and may therefore be expressed in numbers. thus, if we require 8 pounds of oxygen to produce a certain effect, and we wish to employ chlorine for the same effect, we must employ neither more nor less than 35 1/2 pounds weight. in the same manner, 6 pounds weight of coal are equivalent to 32 pounds weight of zinc. the numbers representing chemical equivalents express very general ratios of effects, comprehending for all bodies all the actions they are capable of producing. if zinc be combined in a certain manner with another metal, and submitted to the action of dilute sulphuric acid, it is dissolved in the form of an oxide; it is in fact burned at the expense of the oxygen contained in the fluid. a consequence of this action is the production of an electric current, which, if conducted through a wire, renders it magnetic. in thus effecting the solution of a pound weight, for example, of zinc, we obtain a definite amount of force adequate to raise a given weight one inch, and to keep it suspended; and the amount of weight it will be capable of suspending will be the greater the more rapidly the zinc is dissolved. by alternately interrupting and renewing the contact of the zinc with the acid, and by very simple mechanical arrangements, we can give to the iron an upward and downward or a horizontal motion, thus producing the conditions essential to the motion of any machinery. this moving force is produced by the oxidation of the zinc; and, setting aside the name given to the force in this case, we know that it can be produced in another manner. if we burn the zinc under the boiler of a steam-engine, consequently in the oxygen of the air instead of the galvanic pile, we should produce steam, and by it a certain amount of force. if we should assume, (which, however, is not proved,) that the quantity of force is unequal in these cases,--that, for instance, we had obtained double or triple the amount in the galvanic pile, or that in this mode of generating force less loss is sustained,--we must still recollect the equivalents of zinc and coal, and make these elements of our calculation. according to the experiments of despretz, 6 pounds weight of zinc, in combining with oxygen, develops no more heat than 1 pound of coal; consequently, under equal conditions, we can produce six times the amount of force with a pound of coal as with a pound of zinc. it is therefore obvious that it would be more advantageous to employ coal instead of zinc, even if the latter produced four times as much force in a galvanic pile, as an equal weight of coal by its combustion under a boiler. indeed it is highly probable, that if we burn under the boiler of a steam-engine the quantity of coal required for smelting the zinc from its ores, we shall produce far more force than the whole of the zinc so obtained could originate in any form of apparatus whatever. heat, electricity, and magnetism, have a similar relation to each other as the chemical equivalents of coal, zinc, and oxygen. by a certain measure of electricity we produce a corresponding proportion of heat or of magnetic power; we obtain that electricity by chemical affinity, which in one shape produces heat, in another electricity or magnetism. a certain amount of affinity produces an equivalent of electricity in the same manner as, on the other hand, we decompose equivalents of chemical compounds by a definite measure of electricity. the magnetic force of the pile is therefore limited to the extent of the chemical affinity, and in the case before us is obtained by the combination of the zinc and sulphuric acid. in the combustion of coal, the heat results from, and is measured by, the affinity of the oxygen of the atmosphere for that substance. it is true that with a very small expense of zinc, we can make an iron wire a magnet capable of sustaining a thousand pounds weight of iron; let us not allow ourselves to be misled by this. such a magnet could not raise a single pound weight of iron two inches, and therefore could not impart motion. the magnet acts like a rock, which while at rest presses with a weight of a thousand pounds upon a basis; it is like an inclosed lake, without an outlet and without a fall. but it may be said, we have, by mechanical arrangements, given it an outlet and a fall. true; and this must be regarded as a great triumph of mechanics; and i believe it is susceptible of further improvements, by which greater force may be obtained. but with every conceivable advantage of mechanism, no one will dispute that one pound of coal, under the boiler of a steam-engine, will give motion to a mass several hundred times greater than a pound of zinc in the galvanic pile. our experience of the employment of electro-magnetism as a motory power is, however, too recent to enable us to foresee the ultimate results of contrivances to apply it; and, therefore, those who have devoted themselves to solve the problem of its application should not be discouraged, inasmuch as it would undoubtedly be a most important achievement to supersede the steam-engine, and thus escape the danger of railroads, even at double their expense. professor weber of gottingen has thrown out a suggestion, that if a contrivance could be devised to enable us to convert at will the wheels of the steam-carriage into magnets, we should be enabled to ascend and descend acclivities with great facility. this notion may ultimately be, to a certain extent, realised. the employment of the galvanic pile as a motory power, however, must, like every other contrivance, depend upon the question of its relative economy: probably some time hence it may so far succeed as to be adopted in certain favourable localities; it may stand in the same relation to steam power as the manufacture of beet sugar bears to that of cane, or as the production of gas from oils and resins to that from mineral coal. the history of beet-root sugar affords us an excellent illustration of the effect of prices upon commercial productions. this branch of industry seems at length, as to its processes, to be perfected. the most beautiful white sugar is now manufactured from the beet-root, in the place of the treacle-like sugar, having the taste of the root, which was first obtained; and instead of 3 or 4 per cent., the proportion obtained by achard, double or even treble that amount is now produced. and notwithstanding the perfection of the manufacture, it is probable it will ere long be in most places entirely discontinued. in the years 1824 to 1827, the prices of agricultural produce were much lower than at present, while the price of sugar was the same. at that time one malter [1] of wheat was 10s., and one klafter [2] of wood 18s., and land was falling in price. thus, food and fuel were cheap, and the demand for sugar unlimited; it was, therefore, advantageous to grow beet-root, and to dispose of the produce of land as sugar. all these circumstances are now different. a malter of wheat costs 18s.; a klafter of wood, 30s. to 36s. wages have risen, but not in proportion, whilst the price of colonial sugar has fallen. within the limits of the german commercial league, as, for instance, at frankfort-on-the-maine, a pound of the whitest and best loaf sugar is 7d.; the import duty is 31/d., or 30s. per cwt., leaving 31/d. as the price of the sugar. in the year 1827, then, one malter of wheat was equal to 40 lbs. weight of sugar, whilst at present that quantity of wheat is worth 70 lbs. of sugar. if indeed fuel were the same in price as formerly, and 70 lbs. of sugar could be obtained from the same quantity of the root as then yielded 40 lbs., it might still be advantageously produced; but the amount, if now obtained by the most approved methods of extraction, falls far short of this; and as fuel is double the price, and labour dearer, it follows that, at present, it is far more advantageous to cultivate wheat and to purchase sugar. there are, however, other elements which must enter into our calculations; but these serve to confirm our conclusion that the manufacture of beet-root sugar as a commercial speculation must cease. the leaves and residue of the root, after the juice was expressed, were used as food for cattle, and their value naturally increased with the price of grain. by the process formerly pursued, 75 lbs. weight of juice were obtained from 100 lbs. of beet-root, and gave 5 lbs. of sugar. the method of schutzenbach, which was eagerly adopted by the manufacturers, produced from the same quantity of root 8 lbs. of sugar; but it was attended with more expense to produce, and the loss of the residue as food for cattle. the increased expense in this process arises from the larger quantity of fuel required to evaporate the water; for instead of merely evaporating the juice, the dry residue is treated with water, and we require fuel sufficient to evaporate 106 lbs. of fluid instead of 75 lbs., and the residue is only fit for manure. the additional 3 lbs. of sugar are purchased at the expense of much fuel, and the loss of the residue as an article of food. if the valley of the rhine possessed mines of diamonds as rich as those of golconda, visiapoor, or the brazils, they would probably not be worth the working: at those places the cost of extraction is 28s. to 30s. the carat. with us it amounts to three or four times as much--to more, in fact, than diamonds are worth in the market. the sand of the rhine contains gold; and in the grand duchy of baden many persons are occupied in gold-washing when wages are low; but as soon as they rise, this employment ceases. the manufacture of sugar from beet-root, in the like manner, twelve to fourteen years ago offered advantages which are now lost: instead, therefore, of maintaining it at a great sacrifice, it would be more reasonable, more in accordance with true natural economy, to cultivate other and more valuable productions, and with them purchase sugar. not only would the state be the gainer, but every member of the community. this argument does not apply, perhaps, to france and bohemia, where the prices of fuel and of colonial sugar are very different to those in germany. the manufacture of gas for lighting, from coal, resin, and oils, stands with us on the same barren ground. the price of the materials from which gas is manufactured in england bears a direct proportion to the price of corn: there the cost of tallow and oil is twice as great as in germany, but iron and coal are two-thirds cheaper; and even in england the manufacture of gas is only advantageous when the other products of the distillation of coal, the coke, &c., can be sold. it would certainly be esteemed one of the greatest discoveries of the age if any one could succeed in condensing coal gas into a white, dry, solid, odourless substance, portable, and capable of being placed upon a candlestick, or burned in a lamp. wax, tallow, and oil, are combustible gases in a solid or fluid form, which offer many advantages for lighting, not possessed by gas: they furnish, in well-constructed lamps, as much light, without requiring the expensive apparatus necessary for the combustion of gas, and they are generally more economical. in large towns, or such establishments as hotels, where coke is in demand, and where losses in stolen tallow or oil must be considered, together with the labour of snuffing candles and cleaning lamps, the higher price of gas is compensated. in places where gas can be manufactured from resin, oil of turpentine, and other cheap oils, as at frankfort, this is advantageous so long as it is pursued on small scale only. if large towns were lighted in the same manner, the materials would rise in price: the whole amount at present produced would scarcely suffice for two such towns as berlin and munich. but no just calculation can be made from the present prices of turpentine, resin, &c., which are not produced upon any large scale. [footnote 1: malter--a measure containing several bushels, but varying in different countries.] [footnote 2: klafter--a cord, a stack, measuring six feet every way.] letter v my dear sir, until very recently it was supposed that the physical qualities of bodies, i.e. hardness, colour, density, transparency, &c., and still more their chemical properties, must depend upon the nature of their elements, or upon their composition. it was tacitly received as a principle, that two bodies containing the same elements in the same proportion, must of necessity possess the same properties. we could not imagine an exact identity of composition giving rise to two bodies entirely different in their sensible appearance and chemical relations. the most ingenious philosophers entertained the opinion that chemical combination is an inter-penetration of the particles of different kinds of matter, and that all matter is susceptible of infinite division. this has proved to be altogether a mistake. if matter were infinitely divisible in this sense, its particles must be imponderable, and a million of such molecules could not weigh more than an infinitely small one. but the particles of that imponderable matter, which, striking upon the retina, give us the sensation of light, are not in a mathematical sense infinitely small. inter-penetration of elements in the production of a chemical compound, supposes two distinct bodies, a and b, to occupy one and the same space at the same time. if this were so, different properties could not consist with an equal and identical composition. that hypothesis, however, has shared the fate of innumerable imaginative explanations of natural phenomena, in which our predecessors indulged. they have now no advocate. the force of truth, dependent upon observation, is irresistible. a great many substances have been discovered amongst organic bodies, composed of the same elements in the same relative proportions, and yet exhibiting physical and chemical properties perfectly distinct one from another. to such substances the term isomeric (from 1/ao1/ equal and aei1/o1/ part) is applied. a great class of bodies, known as the volatile oils, oil of turpentine, essence of lemons, oil of balsam of copaiba, oil of rosemary, oil of juniper, and many others, differing widely from each other in their odour, in their medicinal effects, in their boiling point, in their specific gravity, &c., are exactly identical in composition,--they contain the same elements, carbon and hydrogen, in the same proportions. how admirably simple does the chemistry of organic nature present itself to us from this point of view! an extraordinary variety of compound bodies produced with equal weights of two elements! and how wide their dissimilarity! the crystallised part of the oil of roses, the delicious fragrance of which is so well known, a solid at ordinary temperatures, although readily volatile, is a compound body containing exactly the same elements, and in the same proportions, as the gas we employ for lighting our streets; and, in short, the same elements, in the same relative quantities, are found in a dozen other compounds, all differing essentially in their physical and chemical properties. these remarkable truths, so highly important in their applications, were not received and admitted as sufficiently established, without abundant proofs. many examples have long been known where the analysis of two different bodies gave the same composition; but such cases were regarded as doubtful: at any rate, they were isolated observations, homeless in the realms of science: until, at length, examples were discovered of two or more bodies whose absolute identity of composition, with totally distinct properties, could be demonstrated in a more obvious and conclusive manner than by mere analysis; that is, they can be converted and reconverted into each other without addition and without subtraction. in cyanuric acid, hydrated cyanic acid, and cyamelide, we have three such isomeric compounds. cyanuric acid is crystalline, soluble in water, and capable of forming salts with metallic oxides. hydrated cyanic acid is a volatile and highly blistering fluid, which cannot be brought into contact with water without being instantaneously decomposed. cyamelide is a white substance very like porcelain, absolutely insoluble in water. now if we place the first,--cyanuric acid,--in a vessel hermetically sealed, and apply a high degree of heat, it is converted by its influence into hydrated cyanic acid; and, then, if this is kept for some time at the common temperature, it passes into cyamelide, no other element being present. and, again inversely, cyamelide can be converted into cyanuric acid and hydrated cyanic acid. we have three other bodies which pass through similar changes, in aldehyde, metaldehyde, and etaldehyde; and, again two, in urea and cyanuret of ammonia. further, 100 parts of aldehyde hydrated butyric acid and acetic ether contain the same elements in the same proportion. thus one substance may be converted into another without addition or subtraction, and without the participation of any foreign bodies in the change. the doctrine that matter is not infinitely divisible, but on the contrary, consists of atoms incapable of further division, alone furnishes us with a satisfactory explanation of these phenomena. in chemical combinations, the ultimate atoms of bodies do not penetrate each other, they are only arranged side by side in a certain order, and the properties of the compound depend entirely upon this order. if they are made to change their place--their mode of arrangement--by an impulse from without, they combine again in a different manner, and another compound is formed with totally different properties. we may suppose that one atom combines with one atom of another element to form a compound atom, while in other bodies two and two, four and four, eight and eight, are united; so that in all such compounds the amount per cent. of the elements is absolutely equal; and yet their physical and chemical properties must be totally different, the constitution of each atom being peculiar, in one body consisting of two, in another of four, in a third of eight, and in a fourth of sixteen simple atoms. the discovery of these facts immediately led to many most beautiful and interesting results; they furnished us with a satisfactory explanation of observations which were before veiled in mystery,--a key to many of nature's most curious recesses. again; solid bodies, whether simple or compound, are capable of existing in two states, which are known by the terms amorphous and crystalline. when matter is passing from a gaseous or liquid state slowly into a solid, an incessant motion is observed, as if the molecules were minute magnets; they are seen to repel each other in one direction, and to attract and cohere together in another, and in the end become arranged into a regular form, which under equal circumstances is always the same for any given kind of matter; that is, crystals are formed. time and freedom of motion for the particles of bodies are necessary to the formation of crystals. if we force a fluid or a gas to become suddenly solid, leaving no time for its particles to arrange themselves, and cohere in that direction in which the cohesive attraction is strongest, no crystals will be formed, but the resulting solid will have a different colour, a different degree of hardness and cohesion, and will refract light differently; in one word, will be amorphous. thus we have cinnabar as a red and a jet-black substance; sulphur a fixed and brittle body, and soft, semitransparent, and ductile; glass as a milk-white opaque substance, so hard that it strikes fire with steel, and in its ordinary and well-known state. these dissimilar states and properties of the same body are occasioned in one case by a regular, in the other by an irregular, arrangement of its atoms; one is crystalline, the other amorphous. applying these facts to natural productions, we have reason to believe that clay-slate, and many kinds of greywacke, are amorphous feldspar, as transition limestone is amorphous marble, basalt and lava mixtures of amorphous zeolite and augite. anything that influences the cohesion, must also in a certain degree alter the properties of bodies. carbonate of lime, if crystallised at ordinary temperatures, possesses the crystalline form, hardness, and refracting power of common spar; if crystallised at a higher temperature, it has the form and properties of arragonite. finally, isomorphism, or the equality of form of many chemical compounds having a different composition, tends to prove that matter consists of atoms the mere arrangement of which produces all the properties of bodies. but when we find that a different arrangement of the same elements gives rise to various physical and chemical properties, and a similar arrangement of different elements produces properties very much the same, may we not inquire whether some of those bodies which we regard as elements may not be merely modifications of the same substance?--whether they are not the same matter in a different state of arrangement? we know in fact the existence of iron in two states, so dissimilar, that in the one, it is to the electric chain like platinum, and in the other it is like zinc; so that powerful galvanic machines have been constructed of this one metal. among the elements are several instances of remarkable similarity of properties. thus there is a strong resemblance between platinum and iridium; bromine and iodine; iron, manganese, and magnesium; cobalt and nickel; phosphorus and arsenic; but this resemblance consists mainly in their forming isomorphous compounds in which these elements exist in the same relative proportion. these compounds are similar, because the atoms of which they are composed are arranged in the same manner. the converse of this is also true: nitrate of strontia becomes quite dissimilar to its common state if a certain proportion of water is taken into its composition. if we suppose selenium to be merely modified sulphur, and phosphorus modified arsenic, how does it happen, we must inquire, that sulphuric acid and selenic acid, phosphoric and arsenic acid, respectively form compounds which it is impossible to distinguish by their form and solubility? were these merely isomeric, they ought to exhibit properties quite dissimilar! we have not, i believe, at present the remotest ground to suppose that any one of those substances which chemists regard as elements can be converted into another. such a conversion, indeed, would presuppose that the element was composed of two or more ingredients, and was in fact not an element; and until the decomposition of these bodies is accomplished, and their constituents discovered, all pretensions to such conversions deserve no notice. dr. brown of edinburgh thought he had converted iron into rhodium, and carbon or paracyanogen into silicon. his paper upon this subject was published in the transactions of the royal society of edinburgh, and contained internal evidence, without a repetition of his experiments, that he was totally unacquainted with the principles of chemical analysis. but his experiments have been carefully repeated by qualified persons, and they have completely proved his ignorance: his rhodium is iron, and his silicon an impure incombustible coal. letter vi my dear sir, one of the most remarkable effects of the recent progress of science is the alliance of chemistry with physiology, by which a new and unexpected light has been thrown upon the vital processes of plants and animals. we have now no longer any difficulty in understanding the different actions of aliments, poisons, and remedial agents--we have a clear conception of the causes of hunger, of the exact nature of death; and we are not, as formerly, obliged to content ourselves with a mere description of their symptoms. it is now ascertained with positive certainty, that all the substances which constitute the food of man must be divided into two great classes, one of which serves for the nutrition and reproduction of the animal body, whilst the other ministers to quite different purposes. thus starch, gum, sugar, beer, wine, spirits, &c., furnish no element capable of entering into the composition of blood, muscular fibre, or any part which is the seat of the vital principle. it must surely be universally interesting to trace the great change our views have undergone upon these subjects, as well as to become acquainted with the researches from which our present knowledge is derived. the primary conditions of the maintenance of animal life, are a constant supply of certain matters, animal food, and of oxygen, in the shape of atmospheric air. during every moment of life, oxygen is absorbed from the atmosphere in the organs of respiration, and the act of breathing cannot cease while life continues. the observations of physiologists have demonstrated that the body of an adult man supplied abundantly with food, neither increases nor diminishes in weight during twenty-four hours, and yet the quantity of oxygen absorbed into his system, in that period, is very considerable. according to the experiments of lavoisier, an adult man takes into his system from the atmosphere, in one year, no less than 746 pounds weight of oxygen; the calculations of menzies make the quantity amount even to 837 pounds; but we find his weight at the end of the year either exactly the same or different one way or the other by at most a few pounds. what, it may be asked, has become of the enormous amount of oxygen thus introduced into the human system in the course of one year? we can answer this question satisfactorily. no part of the oxygen remains in the body, but is given out again, combined with carbon and hydrogen. the carbon and hydrogen of certain parts of the animal body combine with the oxygen introduced through the lungs and skin, and pass off in the forms of carbonic acid and vapour of water. at every expiration and every moment of life, a certain amount of its elements are separated from the animal organism, having entered into combination with the oxygen of the atmosphere. in order to obtain a basis for the approximate calculation, we may assume, with lavoisier and seguin, that an adult man absorbs into his system 32 1/2 ounces of oxygen daily,--that is, 46,037 cubic inches = 15,661 grains, french weight; and further, that the weight of the whole mass of his blood is 24 pounds, of which 80 per cent. is water. now, from the known composition of the blood, we know that in order to convert its whole amount of carbon and hydrogen into carbonic acid and water, 64.102 grains of oxygen are required. this quantity will be taken into the system in four days and five hours. whether the oxygen enters into combination directly with the elements of the blood, or with the carbon and hydrogen of other parts of the body, it follows inevitably--the weight of the body remaining unchanged and in a normal condition--that as much of these elements as will suffice to supply 24 pounds of blood, must be taken into the system in four days and five hours; and this necessary amount is furnished by the food. we have not, however, remained satisfied with mere approximation: we have determined accurately, in certain cases, the quantity of carbon taken daily in the food, and of that which passes out of the body in the faeces and urine combined--that is, uncombined with oxygen; and from these investigations it appears that an adult man taking moderate exercise consumes 13.9 ounces of carbon, which pass off through the skin and lungs as carbonic acid gas. [1] it requires 37 ounces of oxygen to convert 13 9/10 of carbon into carbonic acid. again; according to the analysis of boussingault, (annales de chim. et de phys., lxx. i. p.136), a horse consumes 79 1/10 ounces of carbon in twenty-four hours, a milch cow 70 3/4 ounces; so that the horse requires 13 pounds 3 1/2 ounces, and the cow 11 pounds 10 3/4 ounces of oxygen. [2] as no part of the oxygen taken into the system of an animal is given off in any other form than combined with carbon or hydrogen, and as in a normal condition, or state of health, the carbon and hydrogen so given off are replaced by those elements in the food, it is evident that the amount of nourishment required by an animal for its support must be in a direct ratio with the quantity of oxygen taken in to its system. two animals which in equal times take up by means of the lungs and skin unequal quantities of oxygen, consume an amount of food unequal in the same ratio. the consumption of oxygen in a given time may be expressed by the number of respirations; it is, therefore, obvious that in the same animal the quantity of nourishment required must vary with the force and number of respirations. a child breathes quicker than an adult, and, consequently, requires food more frequently and proportionably in larger quantity, and bears hunger less easily. a bird deprived of food dies on the third day, while a serpent, confined under a bell, respires so slowly that the quantity of carbonic acid generated in an hour can scarcely be observed, and it will live three months, or longer, without food. the number of respirations is fewer in a state of rest than during labour or exercise: the quantity of food necessary in both cases must be in the same ratio. an excess of food, a want of a due amount of respired oxygen, or of exercise, as also great exercise (which obliges us to take an increased supply of food), together with weak organs of digestion, are incompatible with health. but the quantity of oxygen received by an animal through the lungs not only depends upon the number of respirations, but also upon the temperature of the respired air. the size of the thorax of an animal is unchangeable; we may therefore regard the volume of air which enters at every inspiration as uniform. but its weight, and consequently the amount of oxygen it contains, is not constant. air is expanded by heat, and contracted by cold--an equal volume of hot and cold air contains, therefore, an unequal amount of oxygen. in summer atmospheric air contains water in the form of vapour, it is nearly deprived of it in winter; the volume of oxygen in the same volume of air is smaller in summer than in winter. in summer and winter, at the pole and at the equator, we inspire an equal volume of air; the cold air is warmed during respiration and acquires the temperature of the body. in order, therefore, to introduce into the lungs a given amount of oxygen, less expenditure of force is necessary in winter than in summer, and for the same expenditure of force more oxygen is inspired in winter. it is also obvious that in an equal number of respirations we consume more oxygen at the level of the sea than on a mountain. the oxygen taken into the system is given out again in the same form, both in summer and winter: we expire more carbon at a low than at a high temperature, and require more or less carbon in our food in the same proportion; and, consequently, more is respired in sweden than in sicily, and in our own country and eighth more in winter than in summer. even if an equal weight of food is consumed in hot and cold climates, infinite wisdom has ordained that very unequal proportions of carbon shall be taken in it. the food prepared for the inhabitants of southern climes does not contain in a fresh state more than 12 per cent. of carbon, while the blubber and train oil which feed the inhabitants of polar regions contain 66 to 80 per cent. of that element. from the same cause it is comparatively easy to be temperate in warm climates, or to bear hunger for a long time under the equator; but cold and hunger united very soon produce exhaustion. the oxygen of the atmosphere received into the blood in the lungs, and circulated throughout every part of the animal body, acting upon the elements of the food, is the source of animal heat. [footnote 1: this account is deduced from observations made upon the average daily consumption of about 30 soldiers in barracks. the food of these men, consisting of meat, bread, potatoes, lentils, peas, beans, butter, salt, pepper, &c., was accurately weighed during a month, and each article subjected to ultimate analysis. of the quantity of food, beer, and spirits, taken by the men when out of barracks, we have a close approximation from the report of the sergeant; and from the weight and analysis of the faeces and urine, it appears that the carbon which passes off through these channels may be considered equivalent to the amount taken in that portion of the food, and of sour-crout, which was not included in the estimate.] [footnote 2: 17.5 ounces = 0.5 kilogramme.] letter vii my dear sir, the source of animal heat, its laws, and the influence it exerts upon the functions of the animal body, constitute a curious and highly interesting subject, to which i would now direct your attention. all living creatures, whose existence depends upon the absorption of oxygen, possess within themselves a source of heat, independent of surrounding objects. this general truth applies to all animals, and extends to the seed of plants in the act of germination, to flower-buds when developing, and fruits during their maturation. in the animal body, heat is produced only in those parts to which arterial blood, and with it the oxygen absorbed in respiration, is conveyed. hair, wool, and feathers, receive no arterial blood, and, therefore, in them no heat is developed. the combination of a combustible substance with oxygen is, under all circumstances, the only source of animal heat. in whatever way carbon may combine with oxygen, the act of combination is accompanied by the disengagement of heat. it is indifferent whether this combination takes place rapidly or slowly, at a high or at a low temperature: the amount of heat liberated is a constant quantity. the carbon of the food, being converted into carbonic acid within the body, must give out exactly as much heat as if it had been directly burnt in oxygen gas or in common air; the only difference is, the production of the heat is diffused over unequal times. in oxygen gas the combustion of carbon is rapid and the heat intense; in atmospheric air it burns slower and for a longer time, the temperature being lower; in the animal body the combination is still more gradual, and the heat is lower in proportion. it is obvious that the amount of heat liberated must increase or diminish with the quantity of oxygen introduced in equal times by respiration. those animals, therefore, which respire frequently, and consequently consume much oxygen, possess a higher temperature than others, which, with a body of equal size to be heated, take into the system less oxygen. the temperature of a child (102 deg) is higher than that of an adult (99 1/2 deg). that of birds (104 deg to 105.4 deg) is higher than that of quadrupeds (98 1/2 deg to 100.4 deg) or than that of fishes or amphibia, whose proper temperature is from 2.7 to 3.6 deg higher than that of the medium in which they live. all animals, strictly speaking, are warm-blooded; but in those only which possess lungs is the temperature of the body quite independent of the surrounding medium. the most trustworthy observations prove that in all climates, in the temperate zones as well as at the equator or the poles, the temperature of the body in man, and in what are commonly called warm-blooded animals, is invariably the same; yet how different are the circumstances under which they live! the animal body is a heated mass, which bears the same relation to surrounding objects as any other heated mass. it receives heat when the surrounding objects are hotter, it loses heat when they are colder, than itself. we know that the rapidity of cooling increases with the difference between the temperature of the heated body and that of the surrounding medium; that is, the colder the surrounding medium the shorter the time required for the cooling of the heated body. how unequal, then, must be the loss of heat in a man at palermo, where the external temperature is nearly equal to that of the body, and in the polar regions, where the external temperature is from 70 deg to 90 deg lower! yet, notwithstanding this extremely unequal loss of heat, experience has shown that the blood of the inhabitant of the arctic circle has a temperature as high as that of the native of the south, who lives in so different a medium. this fact, when its true significance is perceived, proves that the heat given off to the surrounding medium is restored within the body with great rapidity. this compensation must consequently take place more rapidly in winter than in summer, at the pole than at the equator. now, in different climates the quantity of oxygen introduced into the system by respiration, as has been already shown, varies according to the temperature of the external air; the quantity of inspired oxygen increases with the loss of heat by external cooling, and the quantity of carbon or hydrogen necessary to combine with this oxygen must be increased in the same ratio. it is evident that the supply of the heat lost by cooling is effected by the mutual action of the elements of the food and the inspired oxygen, which combine together. to make use of a familiar, but not on that account a less just illustration, the animal body acts, in this respect, as a furnace, which we supply with fuel. it signifies nothing what intermediate forms food may assume, what changes it may undergo in the body; the last change is uniformly the conversion of its carbon into carbonic acid, and of its hydrogen into water. the unassimilated nitrogen of the food, along with the unburned or unoxidised carbon, is expelled in the urine or in the solid excrements. in order to keep up in the furnace a constant temperature, we must vary the supply of fuel according to the external temperature, that is, according to the supply of oxygen. in the animal body the food is the fuel; with a proper supply of oxygen we obtain the heat given out during its oxidation or combustion. in winter, when we take exercise in a cold atmosphere, and when consequently the amount of inspired oxygen increases, the necessity for food containing carbon and hydrogen increases in the same ratio; and by gratifying the appetite thus excited, we obtain the most efficient protection against the most piercing cold. a starving man is soon frozen to death. the animals of prey in the arctic regions, as every one knows, far exceed in voracity those of the torrid zone. in cold and temperate climates, the air, which incessantly strives to consume the body, urges man to laborious efforts in order to furnish the means of resistance to its action, while, in hot climates, the necessity of labour to provide food is far less urgent. our clothing is merely an equivalent for a certain amount of food. the more warmly we are clothed the less urgent becomes the appetite for food, because the loss of heat by cooling, and consequently the amount of heat to be supplied by the food, is diminished. if we were to go naked, like certain savage tribes, or if in hunting or fishing we were exposed to the same degree of cold as the samoyedes, we should be able with ease to consume 10 lbs. of flesh, and perhaps a dozen of tallow candles into the bargain, daily, as warmly clad travellers have related with astonishment of these people. we should then also be able to take the same quantity of brandy or train oil without bad effects, because the carbon and hydrogen of these substances would only suffice to keep up the equilibrium between the external temperature and that of our bodies. according to the preceding expositions, the quantity of food is regulated by the number of respirations, by the temperature of the air, and by the amount of heat given off to the surrounding medium. no isolated fact, apparently opposed to this statement, can affect the truth of this natural law. without temporary or permanent injury to health, the neapolitan cannot take more carbon and hydrogen in the shape of food than he expires as carbonic acid and water; and the esquimaux cannot expire more carbon and hydrogen than he takes in the system as food, unless in a state of disease or of starvation. let us examine these states a little more closely. the englishman in jamaica perceives with regret the disappearance of his appetite, previously a source of frequently recurring enjoyment; and he succeeds, by the use of cayenne pepper, and the most powerful stimulants, in enabling himself to take as much food as he was accustomed to eat at home. but the whole of the carbon thus introduced into the system is not consumed; the temperature of the air is too high, and the oppressive heat does not allow him to increase the number of respirations by active exercise, and thus to proportion the waste to the amount of food taken; disease of some kind, therefore, ensues. on the other hand, england sends her sick to southern regions, where the amount of the oxygen inspired is diminished in a very large proportion. those whose diseased digestive organs have in a greater or less degree lost the power of bringing the food into the state best adapted for oxidation, and therefore are less able to resist the oxidising influence of the atmosphere of their native climate, obtain a great improvement in health. the diseased organs of digestion have power to place the diminished amount of food in equilibrium with the inspired oxygen, in the mild climate; whilst in a colder region the organs of respiration themselves would have been consumed in furnishing the necessary resistance to the action of the atmospheric oxygen. in our climate, hepatic diseases, or those arising from excess of carbon, prevail in summer; in winter, pulmonary diseases, or those arising from excess of oxygen, are more frequent. the cooling of the body, by whatever cause it may be produced, increases the amount of food necessary. the mere exposure to the open air, in a carriage or on the deck of a ship, by increasing radiation and vaporisation, increases the loss of heat, and compels us to eat more than usual. the same is true of those who are accustomed to drink large quantities of cold water, which is given off at the temperature of the body, 98 1/2 deg. it increases the appetite, and persons of weak constitution find it necessary, by continued exercise, to supply to the system the oxygen required to restore the heat abstracted by the cold water. loud and long continued speaking, the crying of infants, moist air, all exert a decided and appreciable influence on the amount of food which is taken. we have assumed that carbon and hydrogen especially, by combining with oxygen, serve to produce animal heat. in fact, observation proves that the hydrogen of the food plays a no less important part than the carbon. the whole process of respiration appears most clearly developed, when we consider the state of a man, or other animal, totally deprived of food. the first effect of starvation is the disappearance of fat, and this fat cannot be traced either in the urine or in the scanty faeces. its carbon and hydrogen have been given off through the skin and lungs in the form of oxidised products; it is obvious that they have served to support respiration. in the case of a starving man, 32 1/2 oz. of oxygen enter the system daily, and are given out again in combination with a part of his body. currie mentions the case of an individual who was unable to swallow, and whose body lost 100 lbs. in weight during a month; and, according to martell (trans. linn. soc., vol. xi. p.411), a fat pig, overwhelmed in a slip of earth, lived 160 days without food, and was found to have diminished in weight, in that time, more than 120 lbs. the whole history of hybernating animals, and the well-established facts of the periodical accumulation, in various animals, of fat, which, at other periods, entirely disappears, prove that the oxygen, in the respiratory process, consumes, without exception, all such substances as are capable of entering into combination with it. it combines with whatever is presented to it; and the deficiency of hydrogen is the only reason why carbonic acid is the chief product; for, at the temperature of the body, the affinity of hydrogen for oxygen far surpasses that of carbon for the same element. we know, in fact, that the graminivora expire a volume of carbonic acid equal to that of the oxygen inspired, while the carnivora, the only class of animals whose food contains fat, inspire more oxygen than is equal in volume to the carbonic acid expired. exact experiments have shown, that in many cases only half the volume of oxygen is expired in the form of carbonic acid. these observations cannot be gainsaid, and are far more convincing than those arbitrary and artificially produced phenomena, sometimes called experiments; experiments which, made as too often they are, without regard to the necessary and natural conditions, possess no value, and may be entirely dispensed with; especially when, as in the present case, nature affords the opportunity for observation, and when we make a rational use of that opportunity. in the progress of starvation, however, it is not only the fat which disappears, but also, by degrees all such of the solids as are capable of being dissolved. in the wasted bodies of those who have suffered starvation, the muscles are shrunk and unnaturally soft, and have lost their contractibility; all those parts of the body which were capable of entering into the state of motion have served to protect the remainder of the frame from the destructive influence of the atmosphere. towards the end, the particles of the brain begin to undergo the process of oxidation, and delirium, mania, and death close the scene; that is to say, all resistance to the oxidising power of the atmospheric oxygen ceases, and the chemical process of eremacausis, or decay, commences, in which every part of the body, the bones excepted, enters into combination with oxygen. the time which is required to cause death by starvation depends on the amount of fat in the body, on the degree of exercise, as in labour or exertion of any kind, on the temperature of the air, and finally, on the presence or absence of water. through the skin and lungs there escapes a certain quantity of water, and as the presence of water is essential to the continuance of the vital motions, its dissipation hastens death. cases have occurred, in which a full supply of water being accessible to the sufferer, death has not occurred till after the lapse of twenty days. in one case, life was sustained in this way for the period of sixty days. in all chronic diseases death is produced by the same cause, namely, the chemical action of the atmosphere. when those substances are wanting, whose function in the organism is to support the process of respiration, when the diseased organs are incapable of performing their proper function of producing these substances, when they have lost the power of transforming the food into that shape in which it may, by entering into combination with the oxygen of the air, protect the system from its influence, then, the substance of the organs themselves, the fat of the body, the substance of the muscles, the nerves, and the brain, are unavoidably consumed. the true cause of death in these cases is the respiratory process, that is, the action of the atmosphere. a deficiency of food, and a want of power to convert the food into a part of the organism, are both, equally, a want of resistance; and this is the negative cause of the cessation of the vital process. the flame is extinguished, because the oil is consumed; and it is the oxygen of the air which has consumed it. in many diseases substances are produced which are incapable of assimilation. by the mere deprivation of food, these substances are removed from the body without leaving a trace behind; their elements have entered into combination with the oxygen of the air. from the first moment that the function of the lungs or of the skin is interrupted or disturbed, compounds, rich in carbon, appear in the urine, which acquires a brown colour. over the whole surface of the body oxygen is absorbed, and combines with all the substances which offer no resistance to it. in those parts of the body where the access of oxygen is impeded; for example, in the arm-pits, or in the soles of the feet, peculiar compounds are given out, recognisable by their appearance, or by their odour. these compounds contain much carbon. respiration is the falling weight--the bent spring, which keeps the clock in motion; the inspirations and expirations are the strokes of the pendulum which regulate it. in our ordinary time-pieces, we know with mathematical accuracy the effect produced on their rate of going, by changes in the length of the pendulum, or in the external temperature. few, however, have a clear conception of the influence of air and temperature on the health of the human body; and yet the research into the conditions necessary to keep it in the normal state is not more difficult than in the case of a clock. letter viii my dear sir, having attempted in my last letter to explain to you the simple and admirable office subserved by the oxygen of the atmosphere in its combination with carbon in the animal body, i will now proceed to present you with some remarks upon those materials which sustain its mechanisms in motion, and keep up their various functions,--namely, the aliments. if the increase in mass in an animal body, the development and reproduction of its organs depend upon the blood, then those substances only which are capable of being converted into blood can be properly regarded as nourishment. in order then to ascertain what parts of our food are nutritious, we must compare the composition of the blood with the composition of the various articles taken as food. two substances require especial consideration as the chief ingredients of the blood; one of these separates immediately from the blood when it is withdrawn from the circulation. it is well known that in this case blood coagulates, and separates into a yellowish liquid, the serum of the blood, and a gelatinous mass, which adheres to a rod or stick in soft, elastic fibres, when coagulating blood is briskly stirred. this is the fibrine of the blood, which is identical in all its properties with muscular fibre, when the latter is purified from all foreign matters. the second principal ingredient of the blood is contained in the serum, and gives to this liquid all the properties of the white of eggs, with which it is indeed identical. when heated, it coagulates into a white elastic mass, and the coagulating substance is called albumen. fibrine and albumen, the chief ingredients of blood, contain, in all, seven chemical elements, among which nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulphur are found. they contain also the earth of bones. the serum retains in solution sea salt and other salts of potash and soda, in which the acids are carbonic, phosphoric, and sulphuric acids. the globules of the blood contain fibrine and albumen, along with a red colouring matter, in which iron is a constant element. besides these, the blood contains certain fatty bodies in small quantity, which differ from ordinary fats in several of their properties. chemical analysis has led to the remarkable result, that fibrine and albumen contain the same organic elements united in the same proportion,--i.e., that they are isomeric, their chemical composition--the proportion of their ultimate elements--being identical. but the difference of their external properties shows that the particles of which they are composed are arranged in a different order. (see letter v). this conclusion has lately been beautifully confirmed by a distinguished physiologist (denis), who has succeeded in converting fibrine into albumen, that is, in giving it the solubility, and coagulability by heat, which characterise the white of egg. fibrine and albumen, besides having the same composition, agree also in this, that both dissolve in concentrated muriatic acid, yielding a solution of an intense purple colour. this solution, whether made with fibrine or albumen, has the very same re-actions with all substances yet tried. both albumen and fibrine, in the process of nutrition, are capable of being converted into muscular fibre, and muscular fibre is capable of being reconverted into blood. these facts have long been established by physiologists, and chemistry has merely proved that these metamorphoses can be accomplished under the influence of a certain force, without the aid of a third substance, or of its elements, and without the addition of any foreign element, or the separation of any element previously present in these substances. if we now compare the composition of all organised parts with that of fibrine and albumen, the following relations present themselves:-all parts of the animal body which have a decided shape, which form parts of organs, contain nitrogen. no part of an organ which possesses motion and life is destitute of nitrogen; all of them contain likewise carbon and the elements of water; the latter, however, in no case in the proportion to form water. the chief ingredients of the blood contain nearly 17 per cent. of nitrogen, and from numerous analyses it appears that no part of an organ contains less than 17 per cent. of nitrogen. the most convincing experiments and observations have proved that the animal body is absolutely incapable of producing an elementary body, such as carbon or nitrogen, out of substances which do not contain it; and it obviously follows, that all kinds of food fit for the production either of blood, or of cellular tissue, membranes, skin, hair, muscular fibre, &c., must contain a certain amount of nitrogen, because that element is essential to the composition of the above-named organs; because the organs cannot create it from the other elements presented to them; and, finally, because no nitrogen is absorbed from the atmosphere in the vital process. the substance of the brain and nerves contains a large quantity of albumen, and, in addition to this, two peculiar fatty acids, distinguished from other fats by containing phosphorus (phosphoric acid?). one of these contains nitrogen (fremy). finally, water and common fat are those ingredients of the body which are destitute of nitrogen. both are amorphous or unorganised, and only so far take part in the vital process as that their presence is required for the due performance of the vital functions. the inorganic constituents of the body are, iron, lime, magnesia, common salt, and the alkalies. the nutritive process is seen in its simplest form in carnivorous animals. this class of animals lives on the blood and flesh of the graminivora; but this blood and flesh are, in all their properties, identical with their own. neither chemical nor physiological differences can be discovered. the nutriment of carnivorous animals is derived originally from blood; in their stomach it becomes dissolved, and capable of reaching all other parts of the body; in its passage it is again converted into blood, and from this blood are reproduced all those parts of their organisation which have undergone change or metamorphosis. with the exception of hoofs, hair, feathers, and the earth of bones, every part of the food of carnivorous animals is capable of assimilation. in a chemical sense, therefore, it may be said that a carnivorous animal, in supporting the vital process, consumes itself. that which serves for its nutrition is identical with those parts of its organisation which are to be renewed. the process of nutrition in graminivorous animals appears at first sight altogether different. their digestive organs are less simple, and their food consists of vegetables, the great mass of which contains but little nitrogen. from what substances, it may be asked, is the blood formed, by means of which of their organs are developed? this question may be answered with certainty. chemical researches have shown, that all such parts of vegetables as can afford nutriment to animals contain certain constituents which are rich in nitrogen; and the most ordinary experience proves that animals require for their support and nutrition less of these parts of plants in proportion as they abound in the nitrogenised constituents. animals cannot be fed on matters destitute of these nitrogenised constituents. these important products of vegetation are especially abundant in the seeds of the different kinds of grain, and of peas, beans, and lentils; in the roots and the juices of what are commonly called vegetables. they exist, however, in all plants, without exception, and in every part of plants in larger or smaller quantity. these nitrogenised forms of nutriment in the vegetable kingdom may be reduced to three substances, which are easily distinguished by their external characters. two of them are soluble in water, the third is insoluble. when the newly-expressed juices of vegetables are allowed to stand, a separation takes place in a few minutes. a gelatinous precipitate, commonly of a green tinge, is deposited, and this, when acted on by liquids which remove the colouring matter, leaves a grayish white substance, well known to druggists as the deposite from vegetable juices. this is one of the nitrogenised compounds which serves for the nutrition of animals, and has been named vegetable fibrine. the juice of grapes is especially rich in this constituent, but it is most abundant in the seeds of wheat, and of the cerealia generally. it may be obtained from wheat flour by a mechanical operation, and in a state of tolerable purity; it is then called gluten, but the glutinous property belongs, not to vegetable fibrine, but to a foreign substance, present in small quantity, which is not found in the other cerealia. the method by which it is obtained sufficiently proves that it is insoluble in water; although we cannot doubt that it was originally dissolved in the vegetable juice, from which it afterwards separated, exactly as fibrine does from blood. the second nitrogenised compound remains dissolved in the juice after the separation of the fibrine. it does not separate from the juice at the ordinary temperature, but is instantly coagulated when the liquid containing it is heated to the boiling point. when the clarified juice of nutritious vegetables, such as cauliflower, asparagus, mangelwurzel, or turnips, is made to boil, a coagulum is formed, which it is absolutely impossible to distinguish from the substance which separates as a coagulum, when the serum of blood, or the white of an egg, diluted with water, are heated to the boiling point. this is vegetable albumen. it is found in the greatest abundance in certain seeds, in nuts, almonds, and others, in which the starch of the gramineae is replaced by oil. the third nitrogenised constituent of the vegetable food of animals is vegetable caseine. it is chiefly found in the seeds of peas, beans, lentils, and similar leguminous seeds. like vegetable albumen, it is soluble in water, but differs from it in this, that its solution is not coagulated by heat. when the solution is heated or evaporated, a skin forms on its surface, and the addition of an acid causes a coagulum, just as in animal milk. these three nitrogenised compounds, vegetable fibrine, albumen, and caseine, are the true nitrogenised constituents of the food of graminivorous animals; all other nitrogenised compounds occurring in plants, are either rejected by animals, as in the case of the characteristic principles of poisonous and medicinal plants, or else they occur in the food in such very small proportion, that they cannot possibly contribute to the increase of mass in the animal body. the chemical analysis of these three substances has led to the very interesting result that they contain the same organic elements, united in the same proportion by weight; and, what is still more remarkable, that they are identical in composition with the chief constituents of blood, animal fibrine, and albumen. they all three dissolve in concentrated muriatic acid with the same deep purple colour, and even in their physical characters, animal fibrine and albumen are in no respect different from vegetable fibrine and albumen. it is especially to be noticed, that by the phrase, identity of composition, we do not here intend mere similarity, but that even in regard to the presence and relative amount of sulphur, phosphorus, and phosphate of lime, no difference can be observed. how beautifully and admirably simple, with the aid of these discoveries, appears the process of nutrition in animals, the formation of their organs, in which vitality chiefly resides! those vegetable principles, which in animals are used to form blood, contain the chief constituents of blood, fibrine and albumen, ready formed, as far as regards their composition. all plants, besides, contain a certain quantity of iron, which reappears in the colouring matter of the blood. vegetable fibrine and animal fibrine, vegetable albumen and animal albumen, hardly differ, even in form; if these principles be wanting in the food, the nutrition of the animal is arrested; and when they are present, the graminivorous animal obtains in its food the very same principles on the presence of which the nutrition of the carnivora entirely depends. vegetables produce in their organism the blood of all animals, for the carnivora, in consuming the blood and flesh of the graminivora, consume, strictly speaking, only the vegetable principles which have served for the nutrition of the latter. vegetable fibrine and albumen take the form in the stomach of the graminivorous animal as animal fibrine and albumen do in that of the carnivorous animal. from what has been said, it follows that the development of the animal organism and its growth are dependent on the reception of certain principles identical with the chief constituents of blood. in this sense we may say that the animal organism gives to the blood only its form; that it is incapable of creating blood out of other substances which do not already contain the chief constituents of that fluid. we cannot, indeed, maintain that the animal organism has no power to form other compounds, for we know that it is capable of producing an extensive series of compounds, differing in composition from the chief constituents of blood; but these last, which form the starting-point of the series, it cannot produce. the animal organism is a higher kind of vegetable, the development of which begins with those substances with the production of which the life of an ordinary vegetable ends. as soon as the latter has borne seed, it dies, or a period of its life comes to a termination. in that endless series of compounds, which begins with carbonic acid, ammonia, and water, the sources of the nutrition of vegetables, and includes the most complex constituents of the animal brain, there is no blank, no interruption. the first substance capable of affording nutriment to animals is the last product of the creative energy of vegetables. the substance of cellular tissue and of membranes, of the brain and nerves, these the vegetable cannot produce. the seemingly miraculous in the productive agency of vegetables disappears in a great degree, when we reflect that the production of the constituents of blood cannot appear more surprising than the occurrence of the fat of beef and mutton in cocoa beans, of human fat in olive-oil, of the principal ingredient of butter in palm-oil, and of horse fat and train-oil in certain oily seeds. letter ix my dear sir, the facts detailed in my last letter will satisfy you as to the manner in which the increase of mass in an animal, that is, its growth, is accomplished; we have still to consider a most important question, namely, the function performed in the animal system by substances destitute of nitrogen; such as sugar, starch, gum, pectine, &c. the most extensive class of animals, the graminivora, cannot live without these substances; their food must contain a certain amount of one or more of them, and if these compounds are not supplied, death quickly ensues. this important inquiry extends also to the constituents of the food of carnivorous animals in the earliest periods of life; for this food also contains substances, which are not necessary for their support in the adult state. the nutrition of the young of carnivora is obviously accomplished by means similar to those by which the graminivora are nourished; their development is dependent on the supply of a fluid, which the body of the mother secretes in the shape of milk. milk contains only one nitrogenised constituent, known under the name of caseine; besides this, its chief ingredients are butter (fat), and sugar of milk. the blood of the young animal, its muscular fibre, cellular tissue, nervous matter, and bones, must have derived their origin from the nitrogenised constituent of milk--the caseine; for butter and sugar of milk contain no nitrogen. now, the analysis of caseine has led to the result, which, after the details i have given, can hardly excite your surprise, that this substance also is identical in composition with the chief constituents of blood, fibrine and albumen. nay more--a comparison of its properties with those of vegetable caseine has shown--that these two substances are identical in all their properties; insomuch, that certain plants, such as peas, beans, and lentils, are capable of producing the same substance which is formed from the blood of the mother, and employed in yielding the blood of the young animal. the young animal, therefore, receives in the form of caseine,--which is distinguished from fibrine and albumen by its great solubility, and by not coagulating when heated,--the chief constituent of the mother's blood. to convert caseine into blood no foreign substance is required, and in the conversion of the mother's blood into caseine, no elements of the constituents of the blood have been separated. when chemically examined, caseine is found to contain a much larger proportion of the earth of bones than blood does, and that in a very soluble form, capable of reaching every part of the body. thus, even in the earliest period of its life, the development of the organs, in which vitality resides, is, in the carnivorous animal, dependent on the supply of a substance, identical in organic composition with the chief constituents of its blood. what, then, is the use of the butter and the sugar of milk? how does it happen that these substances are indispensable to life? butter and sugar of milk contain no fixed bases, no soda nor potash. sugar of milk has a composition closely allied to that of the other kinds of sugar, of starch, and of gum; all of them contain carbon and the elements of water, the latter precisely in the proportion to form water. there is added, therefore, by means of these compounds, to the nitrogenised constituents of food, a certain amount of carbon; or, as in the case of butter, of carbon and hydrogen; that is, an excess of elements, which cannot possibly be employed in the production of blood, because the nitrogenised substances contained in the food already contain exactly the amount of carbon which is required for the production of fibrine and albumen. in an adult carnivorous animal, which neither gains nor loses weight, perceptibly, from day to day, its nourishment, the waste of organised tissue, and its consumption of oxygen, stand to each other in a well-defined and fixed relation. the carbon of the carbonic acid given off, with that of the urine; the nitrogen of the urine, and the hydrogen given off as ammonia and water; these elements, taken together, must be exactly equal in weight to the carbon, nitrogen, and hydrogen of the metamorphosed tissues, and since these last are exactly replaced by the food, to the carbon, nitrogen, and hydrogen of the food. were this not the case, the weight of the animal could not possibly remain unchanged. but, in the young of the carnivora, the weight does not remain unchanged; on the contrary, it increases from day to day by an appreciable quantity. this fact presupposes, that the assimilative process in the young animal is more energetic, more intense, than the process of transformation in the existing tissues. if both processes were equally active, the weight of the body could not increase; and were the waste by transformation greater, the weight of the body would decrease. now, the circulation in the young animal is not weaker, but, on the contrary, more rapid; the respirations are more frequent; and, for equal bulks, the consumption of oxygen must be greater rather than smaller in the young than in the adult animal. but, since the metamorphosis of organised parts goes on more slowly, there would ensue a deficiency of those substances, the carbon and hydrogen of which are adapted for combination with oxygen; because, in the carnivora, nature has destined the new compounds, produced by the metamorphosis of organised parts, to furnish the necessary resistance to the action of the oxygen, and to produce animal heat. what is wanting for these purposes an infinite wisdom has supplied to the young in its natural food. the carbon and hydrogen of butter, and the carbon of the sugar of milk, no part of either of which can yield blood, fibrine, or albumen, are destined for the support of the respiratory process, at an age when a greater resistance is opposed to the metamorphosis of existing organisms; or, in other words, to the production of compounds, which, in the adult state, are produced in quantity amply sufficient for the purpose of respiration. the young animal receives the constituents of its blood in the caseine of the milk. a metamorphosis of existing organs goes on, for bile and urine are secreted; the materials of the metamorphosed parts are given off in the form of urine, of carbonic acid, and of water; but the butter and sugar of milk also disappear; they cannot be detected in the faeces. the butter and sugar of milk are given out in the form of carbonic acid and water, and their conversion into oxidised products furnishes the clearest proof that far more oxygen is absorbed than is required to convert the carbon and hydrogen of the metamorphosed tissues into carbonic acid and water. the change and metamorphosis of organised tissues going on in the vital process in the young animal, consequently yield, in a given time, much less carbon and hydrogen in the form adapted for the respiratory process than correspond to the oxygen taken up in the lungs. the substance of its organised parts would undergo a more rapid consumption, and would necessarily yield to the action of the oxygen, were not the deficiency of carbon and hydrogen supplied from another source. the continued increase of mass, or growth, and the free and unimpeded development of the organs in the young animal, are dependent on the presence of foreign substances, which, in the nutritive process, have no other function than to protect the newly-formed organs from the action of the oxygen. the elements of these substances unite with the oxygen; the organs themselves could not do so without being consumed; that is, growth, or increase of mass in the body,--the consumption of oxygen remaining the same,--would be utterly impossible. the preceding considerations leave no doubt as to the purpose for which nature has added to the food of the young of carnivorous mammalia substances devoid of nitrogen, which their organism cannot employ for nutrition, strictly so called, that is, for the production of blood; substances which may be entirely dispensed with in their nourishment in the adult state. in the young of carnivorous birds, the want of all motion is an obvious cause of diminished waste in the organised parts; hence, milk is not provided for them. the nutritive process in the carnivora thus presents itself under two distinct forms; one of which we again meet with in the graminivora. in graminivorous animals, we observe, that during their whole life, their existence depends on a supply of substances having a composition identical with that of sugar of milk, or closely resembling it. everything that they consume as food contains a certain quantity of starch, gum, or sugar, mixed with other matters. the function performed in the vital process of the graminivora by these substances is indicated in a very clear and convincing manner, when we take into consideration the very small relative amount of the carbon which these animals consume in the nitrogenised constituents of their food, which bears no proportion whatever to the oxygen absorbed through the skin and lungs. a horse, for example, can be kept in perfectly good condition, if he obtain as food 15 lbs. of hay and 4 1/2 lbs. of oats daily. if we now calculate the whole amount of nitrogen in these matters, as ascertained by analysis (1 1/2 per cent. in the hay, 2.2 per cent. in the oats), in the form of blood, that is, as fibrine and albumen, with the due proportion of water in blood (80 per cent.), the horse receives daily no more than 4 1/2 oz. of nitrogen, corresponding to about 8 lbs. of blood. but along with this nitrogen, that is, combined with it in the form of fibrine or albumen, the animal receives only about 14 1/2 oz. of carbon. without going further into the calculation, it will readily be admitted, that the volume of air inspired and expired by a horse, the quantity of oxygen consumed, and, as a necessary consequence, the amount of carbonic acid given out by the animal, are much greater than in the respiratory process in man. but an adult man consumes daily abut 14 oz. of carbon, and the determination of boussingault, according to which a horse expires 79 oz. daily, cannot be very far from the truth. in the nitrogenised constituents of his food, therefore, the horse receives rather less than the fifth part of the carbon which his organism requires for the support of the respiratory process; and we see that the wisdom of the creator has added to his food the four-fifths which are wanting, in various forms, as starch, sugar, &c. with which the animal must be supplied, or his organism will be destroyed by the action of the oxygen. it is obvious, that in the system of the graminivora, whose food contains so small a portion, relatively, of the constituents of the blood, the process of metamorphosis in existing tissues, and consequently their restoration or reproduction, must go on far less rapidly than in the carnivora. were this not the case, a vegetation a thousand times more luxuriant than the actual one would not suffice for their nourishment. sugar, gum, and starch, would no longer be necessary to support life in these animals, because, in that case, the products of the waste, or metamorphosis of the organised tissues, would contain enough carbon to support the respiratory process. letter x my dear sir, let me now apply the principles announced in the preceding letters to the circumstances of our own species. man, when confined to animal food, requires for his support and nourishment extensive sources of food, even more widely extended than the lion and tiger, because, when he has the opportunity, he kills without eating. a nation of hunters, on a limited space, is utterly incapable of increasing its numbers beyond a certain point, which is soon attained. the carbon necessary for respiration must be obtained from the animals, of which only a limited number can live on the space supposed. these animals collect from plants the constituents of their organs and of their blood, and yield them, in turn, to the savages who live by the chase alone. they, again, receive this food unaccompanied by those compounds, destitute of nitrogen, which, during the life of the animals, served to support the respiratory process. in such men, confined to an animal diet, it is the carbon of the flesh and of the blood which must take the place of starch and sugar. but 15 lbs. of flesh contain no more carbon than 4 lbs. of starch, and while the savage with one animal and an equal weight of starch should maintain life and health for a certain number of days, he would be compelled, if confined to flesh alone, in order to procure the carbon necessary for respiration, during the same time, to consume five such animals. it is easy to see, from these considerations, how close the connection is between agriculture and the multiplication of the human species. the cultivation of our crops has ultimately no other object than the production of a maximum of those substances which are adapted for assimilation and respiration, in the smallest possible space. grain and other nutritious vegetables yield us, not only in starch, sugar, and gum, the carbon which protects our organs from the action of oxygen, and produces in the organism the heat which is essential to life, but also in the form of vegetable fibrine, albumen, and caseine, our blood, from which the other parts of our body are developed. man, when confined to animal food, respires, like the carnivora, at the expense of the matters produced by the metamorphosis of organised tissues; and, just as the lion, tiger, hyaena, in the cages of a menagerie, are compelled to accelerate the waste of the organised tissues by incessant motion, in order to furnish the matter necessary for respiration, so, the savage, for the very same object, is forced to make the most laborious exertions, and go through a vast amount of muscular exercise. he is compelled to consume force merely in order to supply matter for respiration. cultivation is the economy of force. science teaches us the simplest means of obtaining the greatest effect with the smallest expenditure of power, and with given means to produce a maximum of force. the unprofitable exertion of power, the waste of force in agriculture, in other branches of industry, in science, or in social economy, is characteristic of the savage state, or of the want of knowledge. in accordance with what i have already stated, you will perceive that the substances of which the food of man is composed may be divided into two classes; into nitrogenised and non-nitrogenised. the former are capable of conversion into blood; the latter are incapable of this transformation. out of those substances which are adapted to the formation of blood, are formed all the organised tissues. the other class of substances, in the normal state of health, serve to support the process of respiration. the former may be called the plastic elements of nutrition; the latter, elements of respiration. among the former we reckon- vegetable fibrine. vegetable albumen. vegetable caseine. animal flesh. animal blood. among the elements of respiration in our food, are- fat. pectine. starch. bassorine. gum. wine. cane sugar. beer. grape sugar. spirits. sugar of milk. the most recent and exact researches have established as a universal fact, to which nothing yet known is opposed, that the nitrogenised constituents of vegetable food have a composition identical with that of the constituents of the blood. no nitrogenised compound, the composition of which differs from that of fibrine, albumen, and caseine, is capable of supporting the vital process in animals. the animal organism unquestionably possesses the power of forming, from the constituents of its blood, the substance of its membranes and cellular tissue, of the nerves and brain, and of the organic part of cartilages and bones. but the blood must be supplied to it perfect in everything but its form--that is, in its chemical composition. if this be not done, a period is rapidly put to the formation of blood, and consequently to life. this consideration enables us easily to explain how it happens that the tissues yielding gelatine or chondrine, as, for example, the gelatine of skin or of bones, are not adapted for the support of the vital process; for their composition is different from that of fibrine or albumen. it is obvious that this means nothing more than that those parts of the animal organism which form the blood do not possess the power of effecting a transformation in the arrangement of the elements of gelatine, or of those tissues which contain it. the gelatinous tissues, the gelatine of the bones, the membranes, the cells and the skin suffer, in the animal body, under the influence of oxygen and moisture, a progressive alteration; a part of these tissues is separated, and must be restored from the blood; but this alteration and restoration are obviously confined within very narrow limits. while, in the body of a starving or sick individual, the fat disappears and the muscular tissue takes once more the form of blood, we find that the tendons and membranes retain their natural condition, and the limbs of the dead body their connections, which depend on the gelatinous tissues. on the other hand, we see that the gelatine of bones devoured by a dog entirely disappears, while only the bone earth is found in his excrements. the same is true of man, when fed on food rich in gelatine, as, for example, strong soup. the gelatine is not to be found either in the urine or in the faeces, and consequently must have undergone a change, and must have served some purpose in the animal economy. it is clear that the gelatine must be expelled from the body in a form different from that in which it was introduced as food. when we consider the transformation of the albumen of the blood into a part of an organ composed of fibrine, the identity in composition of the two substances renders the change easily conceivable. indeed we find the change of a dissolved substance into an insoluble organ of vitality, chemically speaking, natural and easily explained, on account of this very identity of composition. hence the opinion is not unworthy of a closer investigation, that gelatine, when taken in the dissolved state, is again converted, in the body, into cellular tissue, membrane and cartilage; that it may serve for the reproduction of such parts of these tissues as have been wasted, and for their growth. and when the powers of nutrition in the whole body are affected by a change of the health, then, even should the power of forming blood remain the same, the organic force by which the constituents of the blood are transformed into cellular tissue and membranes must necessarily be enfeebled by sickness. in the sick man, the intensity of the vital force, its power to produce metamorphoses, must be diminished as well in the stomach as in all other parts of the body. in this condition, the uniform experience of practical physicians shows that gelatinous matters in a dissolved state exercise a most decided influence on the state of the health. given in a form adapted for assimilation, they serve to husband the vital force, just as may be done, in the case of the stomach, by due preparation of the food in general. brittleness in the bones of graminivorous animals is clearly owing to a weakness in those parts of the organism whose function it is to convert the constituents of the blood into cellular tissue and membrane; and if we can trust to the reports of physicians who have resided in the east, the turkish women, in their diet of rice, and in the frequent use of enemata of strong soup, have united the conditions necessary for the formation both of cellular tissue and of fat. letter xi my dear sir, in the immense, yet limited expanse of the ocean, the animal and vegetable kingdoms are mutually dependent upon, and successive to each other. the animals obtain their constituent elements from the plants, and restore them to the water in their original form, when they again serve as nourishment to a new generation of plants. the oxygen which marine animals withdraw in their respiration from the air, dissolved in sea water, is returned to the water by the vital processes of sea plants; that air is richer in oxygen than atmospheric air, containing 32 to 33 per cent. oxygen, also, combines with the products of the putrefaction of dead animal bodies, changes their carbon into carbonic acid, their hydrogen into water, and their nitrogen assumes again the form of ammonia. thus we observe in the ocean a circulation takes place without the addition or subtraction of any element, unlimited in duration, although limited in extent, inasmuch as in a confined space the nourishment of plants exists in a limited quantity. we well know that marine plants cannot derive a supply of humus for their nourishment through their roots. look at the great sea-tang, the fucus giganteus: this plant, according to cook, reaches a height of 360 feet, and a single specimen, with its immense ramifications, nourishes thousands of marine animals, yet its root is a small body, no larger than the fist. what nourishment can this draw from a naked rock, upon the surface of which there is no perceptible change? it is quite obvious that these plants require only a hold,--a fastening to prevent a change of place,--as a counterpoise to their specific gravity, which is less than that of the medium in which they float. that medium provides the necessary nourishment, and presents it to the surface of every part of the plant. sea-water contains not only carbonic acid and ammonia, but the alkaline and earthy phosphates and carbonates required by these plants for their growth, and which we always find as constant constituents of their ashes. all experience demonstrates that the conditions of the existence of marine plants are the same which are essential to terrestrial plants. but the latter do not live like sea-plants, in a medium which contains all their elements and surrounds with appropriate nourishment every part of their organs; on the contrary, they require two media, of which one, namely the soil, contains those essential elements which are absent from the medium surrounding them, i.e. the atmosphere. is it possible that we could ever be in doubt respecting the office which the soil and its component parts subserve in the existence and growth of vegetables?--that there should have been a time when the mineral elements of plants were not regarded as absolutely essential to their vitality? has not the same circulation been observed on the surface of the earth which we have just contemplated in the ocean,--the same incessant change, disturbance and restitution of equilibrium? experience in agriculture shows that the production of vegetables on a given surface increases with the supply of certain matters, originally parts of the soil which had been taken up from it by plants--the excrements of man and animals. these are nothing more than matters derived from vegetable food, which in the vital processes of animals, or after their death, assume again the form under which they originally existed, as parts of the soil. now, we know that the atmosphere contains none of these substances, and therefore can replace none; and we know that their removal from a soil destroys its fertility, which may be restored and increased by a new supply. is it possible, after so many decisive investigations into the origin of the elements of animals and vegetables, the use of the alkalies, of lime and the phosphates, any doubt can exist as to the principles upon which a rational agriculture depends? can the art of agriculture be based upon anything but the restitution of a disturbed equilibrium? can it be imagined that any country, however rich and fertile, with a flourishing commerce, which for centuries exports its produce in the shape of grain and cattle, will maintain its fertility, if the same commerce does not restore, in some form of manure, those elements which have been removed from the soil, and which cannot be replaced by the atmosphere? must not the same fate await every such country which has actually befallen the once prolific soil of virginia, now in many parts no longer able to grow its former staple productions--wheat and tobacco? in the large towns of england the produce both of english and foreign agriculture is largely consumed; elements of the soil indispensable to plants do not return to the fields,--contrivances resulting from the manners and customs of english people, and peculiar to them, render it difficult, perhaps impossible, to collect the enormous quantity of the phosphates which are daily, as solid and liquid excrements, carried into the rivers. these phosphates, although present in the soil in the smallest quantity, are its most important mineral constituents. it was observed that many english fields exhausted in that manner immediately doubled their produce, as if by a miracle, when dressed with bone earth imported from the continent. but if the export of bones from germany is continued to the extent it has hitherto reached, our soil must be gradually exhausted, and the extent of our loss may be estimated, by considering that one pound of bones contains as much phosphoric acid as a hundred-weight of grain. the imperfect knowledge of nature and the properties and relations of matter possessed by the alchemists gave rise, in their time, to an opinion that metals as well as plants could be produced from a seed. the regular forms and ramifications seen in crystals, they imagined to be the leaves and branches of metal plants; and as they saw the seed of plants grow, producing root, stem and leaves, and again blossoms, fruit and seeds, apparently without receiving any supply of appropriate material, they deemed it worthy of zealous inquiry to discover the seed of gold, and the earth necessary for its development. if the metal seeds were once obtained, might they not entertain hopes of their growth? such ideas could only be entertained when nothing was known of the atmosphere, and its participation with the earth, in administering to the vital processes of plants and animals. modern chemistry indeed produces the elements of water, and, combining them, forms water anew; but it does not create those elements--it derives them from water; the new-formed artificial water has been water before. many of our farmers are like the alchemists of old,--they are searching for the miraculous seed,--the means, which, without any further supply of nourishment to a soil scarcely rich enough to be sprinkled with indigenous plants, shall produce crops of grain a hundred-fold. the experience of centuries, nay, of thousands of years, is insufficient to guard men against these fallacies; our only security from these and similar absurdities must be derived from a correct knowledge of scientific principles. in the first period of natural philosophy, organic life was supposed to be derived from water only; afterwards, it was admitted that certain elements derived from the air must be superadded to the water; but we now know that other elements must be supplied by the earth, if plants are to thrive and multiply. the amount of materials contained in the atmosphere, suited to the nourishment of plants, is limited; but it must be abundantly sufficient to cover the whole surface of the earth with a rich vegetation. under the tropics, and in those parts of our globe where the most genial conditions of fertility exist,--a suitable soil, a moist atmosphere, and a high temperature,--vegetation is scarcely limited by space; and, where the soil is wanting, it is gradually supplied by the decaying leaves, bark and branches of plants. it is obvious there is no deficiency of atmospheric nourishment for plants in those regions, nor are these wanting in our own cultivated fields: all that plants require for their development is conveyed to them by the incessant motions of the atmosphere. the air between the tropics contains no more than that of the arctic zones; and yet how different is the amount of produce of an equal surface of land in the two situations! this is easily explicable. all the plants of tropical climates, the oil and wax palms, the sugar cane, &c., contain only a small quantity of the elements of the blood necessary to the nutrition of animals, as compared with our cultivated plants. the tubers of the potato in chili, its native country, where the plant resembles a shrub, if collected from an acre of land, would scarcely suffice to maintain an irish family for a single day (darwin). the result of cultivation in those plants which serve as food, is to produce in them those constituents of the blood. in the absence of the elements essential to these in the soil, starch, sugar and woody fibre, are perhaps formed; but no vegetable fibrine, albumen, or caseine. if we intend to produce on a given surface of soil more of these latter matters than the plants can obtain from the atmosphere or receive from the soil of the same surface in its uncultivated and normal state, we must create an artificial atmosphere, and add the needed elements to the soil. the nourishment which must be supplied in a given time to different plants, in order to admit a free and unimpeded growth, is very unequal. on pure sand, on calcareous soil, on naked rocks, only a few genera of plants prosper, and these are, for the most part, perennial plants. they require, for their slow growth, only such minute quantities of mineral substances as the soil can furnish, which may be totally barren for other species. annual, and especially summer plants, grow and attain their perfection in a comparatively short time; they therefore do not prosper on a soil which is poor in those mineral substances necessary to their development. to attain a maximum in height in the short period of their existence, the nourishment contained in the atmosphere is not sufficient. if the end of cultivation is to be obtained, we must create in the soil an artificial atmosphere of carbonic acid and ammonia; and this surplus of nourishment, which the leaves cannot appropriate from the air, must be taken up by the corresponding organs, i.e. the roots, from the soil. but the ammonia, together with the carbonic acid, are alone insufficient to become part of a plant destined to the nourishment of animals. in the absence of the alkalies, the phosphates and other earthy salts, no vegetable fibrine, no vegetable caseine, can be formed. the phosphoric acid of the phosphate of lime, indispensable to the cerealia and other vegetables in the formation of their seeds, is separated as an excrement, in great quantities, by the rind and barks of ligneous plants. how different are the evergreen plants, the cacti, the mosses, the ferns, and the pines, from our annual grasses, the cerealia and leguminous vegetables! the former, at every time of the day during winter and summer, obtain carbon through their leaves by absorbing carbonic acid which is not furnished by the barren soil on which they grow; water is also absorbed and retained by their coriaceous or fleshy leaves with great force. they lose very little by evaporation, compared with other plants. on the other hand, how very small is the quantity of mineral substances which they withdraw from the soil during their almost constant growth in one year, in comparison with the quantity which one crop of wheat of an equal weight receives in three months! it is by means of moisture that plants receive the necessary alkalies and salts from the soil. in dry summers a phenomenon is observed, which, when the importance of mineral elements to the life of a plant was unknown, could not be explained. the leaves of plants first developed and perfected, and therefore nearer the surface of the soil, shrivel up and become yellow, lose their vitality, and fall off while the plant is in an active state of growth, without any visible cause. this phenomenon is not seen in moist years, nor in evergreen plants, and but rarely in plants which have long and deep roots, nor is it seen in perennials in autumn and winter. the cause of this premature decay is now obvious. the perfectly-developed leaves absorb continually carbonic acid and ammonia from the atmosphere, which are converted into elements of new leaves, buds, and shoots; but this metamorphosis cannot be effected without the aid of the alkalies, and other mineral substances. if the soil is moist, the latter are continually supplied to an adequate amount, and the plant retains its lively green colour; but if this supply ceases from a want of moisture to dissolve the mineral elements, a separation takes place in the plant itself. the mineral constituents of the juice are withdrawn from the leaves already formed, and are used for the formation of the young shoots; and as soon as the seeds are developed, the vitality of the leaves completely ceases. these withered leaves contain only minute traces of soluble salts, while the buds and shoots are very rich in them. on the other hand, it has been observed, that where a soil is too highly impregnated with soluble saline materials, these are separated upon the surface of the leaves. this happens to culinary vegetables especially, whose leaves become covered with a white crust. in consequence of these exudations the plant sickens, its organic activity decreases, its growth is disturbed; and if this state continues long, the plant dies. this is most frequently seen in foliaceous plants, the large surfaces of which evaporate considerable quantities of water. carrots, pumpkins, peas, &c., are frequently thus diseased, when, after dry weather, the plant being near its full growth, the soil is moistened by short showers, followed again by dry weather. the rapid evaporation carries off the water absorbed by the root, and this leaves the salts in the plant in a far greater quantity than it can assimilate. these salts effloresce upon the surface of the leaves, and if they are herbaceous and juicy, produce an effect upon them as if they had been watered with a solution containing a greater quantity of salts than their organism can bear. of two plants of the same species, this disease befalls that which is nearest its perfection; if one should have been planted later, or be more backward in its development, the same external cause which destroys the one will contribute to the growth of the other. letter xii my dear sir, having now occupied several letters with the attempt to unravel, by means of chemistry, some of the most curious functions of the animal body, and, as i hope, made clear to you the distinctions between the two kinds of constituent elements in food, and the purposes they severally subserve in sustaining life, let me now direct your attention to a scarcely less interesting and equally important subject--the means of obtaining from a given surface of the earth the largest amount of produce adapted to the food of man and animals. agriculture is both a science and an art. the knowledge of all the conditions of the life of vegetables, the origin of their elements, and the sources of their nourishment, forms its scientific basis. from this knowledge we derive certain rules for the exercise of the art, the principles upon which the mechanical operations of farming depend, the usefulness or necessity of these for preparing the soil to support the growth of plants, and for removing every obnoxious influence. no experience, drawn from the exercise of the art, can be opposed to true scientific principles, because the latter should include all the results of practical operations, and are in some instances solely derived therefrom. theory must correspond with experience, because it is nothing more than the reduction of a series of phenomena to their last causes. a field in which we cultivate the same plant for several successive years becomes barren for that plant in a period varying with the nature of the soil: in one field it will be in three, in another in seven, in a third in twenty, in a fourth in a hundred years. one field bears wheat, and no peas; another beans or turnips, but no tobacco; a third gives a plentiful crop of turnips, but will not bear clover. what is the reason that a field loses its fertility for one plant, the same which at first flourished there? what is the reason one kind of plant succeeds in a field where another fails? these questions belong to science. what means are necessary to preserve to a field its fertility for one and the same plant?--what to render one field fertile for two, for three, for all plants? these last questions are put by art, but they cannot be answered by art. if a farmer, without the guidance of just scientific principles, is trying experiments to render a field fertile for a plant which it otherwise will not bear, his prospect of success is very small. thousands of farmers try such experiments in various directions, the result of which is a mass of practical experience forming a method of cultivation which accomplishes the desired end for certain places; but the same method frequently does not succeed, it indeed ceases to be applicable to a second or third place in the immediate neighbourhood. how large a capital, and how much power, are wasted in these experiments! very different, and far more secure, is the path indicated by science; it exposes us to no danger of failing, but, on the contrary, it furnishes us with every guarantee of success. if the cause of failure--of barrenness in the soil for one or two plants--has been discovered, means to remedy it may readily be found. the most exact observations prove that the method of cultivation must vary with the geognostical condition of the subsoil. in basalt, graywacke, porphyry, sandstone, limestone, &c., are certain elements indispensable to the growth of plants, and the presence of which renders them fertile. this fully explains the difference in the necessary methods of culture for different places; since it is obvious that the essential elements of the soil must vary with the varieties of composition of the rocks, from the disintegration of which they originated. wheat, clover, turnips, for example, each require certain elements from the soil; they will not flourish where the appropriate elements are absent. science teaches us what elements are essential to every species of plants by an analysis of their ashes. if therefore a soil is found wanting in any of those elements, we discover at once the cause of its barrenness, and its removal may now be readily accomplished. the empiric attributes all his success to the mechanical operations of agriculture; he experiences and recognises their value, without inquiring what are the causes of their utility, their mode of action: and yet this scientific knowledge is of the highest importance for regulating the application of power and the expenditure of capital,--for insuring its economical expenditure and the prevention of waste. can it be imagined that the mere passing of the ploughshare or the harrow through the soil--the mere contact of the iron--can impart fertility miraculously? nobody, perhaps, seriously entertains such an opinion. nevertheless, the modus operandi of these mechanical operations is by no means generally understood. the fact is quite certain, that careful ploughing exerts the most favourable influence: the surface is thus mechanically divided, changed, increased, and renovated; but the ploughing is only auxiliary to the end sought. in the effects of time, in what in agriculture are technically called fallows--the repose of the fields--we recognise by science certain chemical actions, which are continually exercised by the elements of the atmosphere upon the whole surface of our globe. by the action of its oxygen and its carbonic acid, aided by water, rain, changes of temperature, &c., certain elementary constituents of rocks, or of their ruins, which form the soil capable of cultivation, are rendered soluble in water, and consequently become separable from all their insoluble parts. these chemical actions, poetically denominates the "tooth of time," destroy all the works of man, and gradually reduce the hardest rocks to the condition of dust. by their influence the necessary elements of the soil become fitted for assimilation by plants; and it is precisely the end which is obtained by the mechanical operations of farming. they accelerate the decomposition of the soil, in order to provide a new generation of plants with the necessary elements in a condition favourable to their assimilation. it is obvious that the rapidity of the decomposition of a solid body must increase with the extension of its surface; the more points of contact we offer in a given time to the external chemical agent, the more rapid will be its action. the chemist, in order to prepare a mineral for analysis, to decompose it, or to increase the solubility of its elements, proceeds in the same way as the farmer deals with his fields--he spares no labour in order to reduce it to the finest powder; he separates the impalpable from the coarser parts by washing, and repeats his mechanical bruising and trituration, being assured his whole process will fail if he is inattentive to this essential and preliminary part of it. the influence which the increase of surface exercises upon the disintegration of rocks, and upon the chemical action of air and moisture, is strikingly illustrated upon a large scale in the operations pursued in the gold-mines of yaquil, in chili. these are described in a very interesting manner by darwin. the rock containing the gold ore is pounded by mills into the finest powder; this is subjected to washing, which separates the lighter particles from the metallic; the gold sinks to the bottom, while a stream of water carries away the lighter earthy parts into ponds, where it subsides to the bottom as mud. when this deposit has gradually filled up the pond, this mud is taken out and piled in heaps, and left exposed to the action of the atmosphere and moisture. the washing completely removes all the soluble part of the disintegrated rock; the insoluble part, moreover, cannot undergo any further change while it is covered with water, and so excluded from the influence of the atmosphere at the bottom of the pond. but being exposed at once to the air and moisture, a powerful chemical action takes place in the whole mass, which becomes indicated by an efflorescence of salts covering the whole surface of the heaps in considerable quantity. after being exposed for two or three years, the mud is again subjected to the same process of washing, and a considerable quantity of gold is obtained, this having been separated by the chemical process of decomposition in the mass. the exposure and washing of the same mud is repeated six or seven times, and at every washing it furnishes a new quantity of gold, although its amount diminishes every time. precisely similar is the chemical action which takes place in the soil of our fields; and we accelerate and increase it by the mechanical operations of our agriculture. by these we sever and extend the surface, and endeavour to make every atom of the soil accessible to the action of the carbonic acid and oxygen of the atmosphere. we thus produce a stock of soluble mineral substances, which serves as nourishment to a new generation of plants, materials which are indispensable to their growth and prosperity. letter xiii my dear sir, having in my last letter spoken of the general principles upon which the science and art of agriculture must be based, let me now direct your attention to some of those particulars between chemistry and agriculture, and demonstrate the impossibility of perfecting the important art of rearing food for man and animals, without a profound knowledge of our science. all plants cultivated as food require for their healthy sustenance the alkalies and alkaline earths, each in a certain proportion; and in addition to these, the cerealia do not succeed in a soil destitute of silica in a soluble condition. the combinations of this substance found as natural productions, namely, the silicates, differ greatly in the degree of facility with which they undergo decomposition, in consequence of the unequal resistance opposed by their integral parts to the dissolving power of the atmospheric agencies. thus the granite of corsica degenerates into a powder in a time which scarcely suffices to deprive the polished granite of heidelberg of its lustre. some soils abound in silicates so readily decomposable, that in every one or two years, as much silicate of potash becomes soluble and fitted for assimilation as is required by the leaves and straw of a crop of wheat. in hungary, extensive districts are not uncommon where wheat and tobacco have been grown alternately upon the same soil for centuries, the land never receiving back any of those mineral elements which were withdrawn in the grain and straw. on the other hand, there are fields in which the necessary amount of soluble silicate of potash for a single crop of wheat is not separated from the insoluble masses in the soil in less than two, three, or even more years. the term fallow, in agriculture, designates that period in which the soil, left to the influence of the atmosphere, becomes enriched with those soluble mineral constituents. fallow, however, does not generally imply an entire cessation of cultivation, but only an interval in the growth of the cerealia. that store of silicates and alkalies which is the principal condition of their success is obtained, if potatoes or turnips are grown upon the same fields in the intermediate periods, since these crops do not abstract a particle of silica, and therefore leave the field equally fertile for the following crop of wheat. the preceding remarks will render it obvious to you, that the mechanical working of the soil is the simplest and cheapest method of rendering the elements of nutrition contained in it accessible to plants. but it may be asked, are there not other means of decomposing the soil besides its mechanical subdivision?--are there not substances, which by their chemical operation will equally well or better render its constituents suitable for entering into vegetable organisms? yes: we certainly possess such substances, and one of them, namely, quick-lime, has been employed for the last century past in england for this purpose; and it would be difficult to find a substance better adapted to this service, as it is simple, and in almost all localities cheap and easily accessible. in order to obtain correct views respecting the effect of quick-lime upon the soil, let me remind you of the first process employed by the chemist when he is desirous of analysing a mineral, and for this purpose wishes to bring its elements into a soluble state. let the mineral to be examined be, for instance, feldspar; this substance, taken alone, even when reduced to the finest powder, requires for its solution to be treated with an acid for weeks or months; but if we first mix it with quick-lime, and expose the mixture to a moderately strong heat, the lime enters into chemical combination with certain elements of the feldspar, and its alkali (potass) is set free. and now the acid, even without heat, dissolves not only the lime, but also so much of the silica of the feldspar as to form a transparent jelly. the same effect which the lime in this process, with the aid of heat, exerts upon the feldspar, it produces when it is mixed with the alkaline argillaceous silicates, and they are for a long time kept together in a moist state. common potters' clay, or pipe-clay, diffused through water, and added to milk of lime, thickens immediately upon mixing; and if the mixture is kept for some months, and then treated with acid, the clay becomes gelatinous, which would not occur without the admixture with the lime. the lime, in combining with the elements of the clay, liquifies it; and, what is more remarkable, liberates the greater part of its alkalies. these interesting facts were first observed by fuchs, at munich: they have not only led to a more intimate knowledge of the nature and properties of the hydraulic cements, but, what is far more important, they explain the effects of caustic lime upon the soil, and guide the agriculturist in the application of an invaluable means of opening it, and setting free its alkalies--substances so important, nay, so indispensable to his crops. in the month of october the fields of yorkshire and oxfordshire look as it they were covered with snow. whole square miles are seen whitened over with quicklime, which during the moist winter months, exercises its beneficial influence upon the stiff, clayey soil, of those counties. according to the humus theory, quick-lime ought to exert the most noxious influence upon the soil, because all organic matters contained in it are destroyed by it, and rendered incapable of yielding their humus to a new vegetation. the facts are indeed directly contrary to this now abandoned theory: the fertility of the soil is increased by the lime. the cerealia require the alkalies and alkaline silicates, which the action of the lime renders fit for assimilation by the plants. if, in addition to these, there is any decaying organic matter present in the soil supplying carbonic acid, it may facilitate their development; but it is not essential to their growth. if we furnish the soil with ammonia, and the phosphates, which are indispensable to the cerealia, with the alkaline silicates, we have all the conditions necessary to ensure an abundant harvest. the atmosphere is an inexhaustible store of carbonic acid. a no less favourable influence than that of lime is exercised upon the soil of peaty land by the mere act of burning it: this greatly enhances its fertility. we have not long been acquainted with the remarkable change which the properties of clay undergo by burning. the observation was first made in the process of analysing the clay silicates. many of these, in their natural state, are not acted on by acids, but they become perfectly soluble if heated to redness before the application of the acid. this property belongs to potters' clay, pipe-clay, loam, and many different modifications of clay in soils. in their natural state they may be boiled in concentrated sulphuric acid, without sensible change; but if feebly burned, as is done with the pipe-clay in many alum manufactories, they dissolve in the acid with the greatest facility, the contained silica being separated like jelly in a soluble state. potters' clay belongs to the most sterile kinds of soil, and yet it contains within itself all the constituent elements essential to a most luxurious growth of plants; but their mere presence is insufficient to secure this end. the soil must be accessible to the atmosphere, to its oxygen, to its carbonic acid; these must penetrate it, in order to secure the conditions necessary to a happy and vigorous development of the roots. the elements present must be brought into that peculiar state of combination which will enable them to enter into plants. plastic clay is wanting in these properties; but they are imparted to it by a feeble calcination. at hardwicke court, near gloucester, i have seen a garden (mr. baker's) consisting of a stiff clay, which was perfectly sterile, become by mere burning extremely fertile. the operation was extended to a depth of three feet. this was an expensive process, certainly; but it was effectual. the great difference in the properties of burnt and unburnt clay is illustrated by what is seen in brick houses, built in moist situations. in the town of flanders, for instance, where most buildings are of brick, effloresences of salts cover the surfaces of the walls, like a white nap, within a few days after they are erected. if this saline incrustation is washed away by the rain, it soon re-appears; and this is even observed on walls which, like the gateway of lisle, have been erected for centuries. these saline incrustations consist of carbonates and sulphates, with alkaline bases; and it is well known these act an important part in vegetation. the influence of lime in their production is manifested by their appearing first at the place where the mortar and brick come into contact. it will now be obvious to you, that in a mixture of clay with lime, all the conditions exist for the solution of the silicated clay, and the solubility of the alkaline silicates. the lime gradually dissolving in water charged with carbonic acid, acts like milk of lime upon the clay. this explains also the favourable influence which marl (by which term all those varieties of clay rich in chalk are designated) exerts upon most kinds of soil. there are marly soils which surpass all others in fertility for all kinds of plants; but i believe marl in a burnt state must be far more effective, as well as other materials possessing a similar composition; as, for instance, those species of limestone which are adapted to the preparation of hydraulic cements,--for these carry to the soil not only the alkaline bases useful to plants, but also silica in a state capable of assimilation. the ashes of coals and lignite are also excellent means of ameliorating the soil, and they are used in many places for this purpose. the most suitable may be readily known by their property of forming a gelatinous mass when treated with acids, or by becoming, when mixed with cream of lime, like hydraulic cement,--solid and hard as stone. i have now, i trust, explained to your satisfaction, that the mechanical operations of agriculture--the application of lime and chalk to lands, and the burning of clay--depend upon one and the same scientific principle: they are means of accelerating the decomposition of the alkaline clay silicates, in order to provide plants, at the beginning of a new vegetation, with certain inorganic matters indispensable for their nutrition. letter xiv my dear sir, i treated, in my last letter, of the means of improving the condition of the soil for agricultural purposes by mechanical operations and mineral agents. i have now to speak of the uses and effects of animal exuviae, and vegetable matters or manures--properly so called. in order to understand the nature of these, and the peculiarity of their influence upon our fields, it is highly important to keep in mind the source whence they are derived. it is generally known, that if we deprive an animal of food, the weight of its body diminishes during every moment of its existence. if this abstinence is continued for some time, the diminution becomes apparent to the eye; all the fat of the body disappears, the muscles decrease in firmness and bulk, and, if the animal is allowed to die starved, scarcely anything but skin, tendon, and bones, remain. this emaciation which occurs in a body otherwise healthy, demonstrates to us, that during the life of an animal every part of its living substance is undergoing a perpetual change; all its component parts, assuming the form of lifeless compounds, are thrown off by the skin, lungs, and urinary system, altered more or less by the secretory organs. this change in the living body is intimately connected with the process of respiration; it is, in truth, occasioned by the oxygen of the atmosphere in breathing, which combines with all the various matters within the body. at every inspiration a quantity of oxygen passes into the blood in the lungs, and unites with its elements; but although the weight of the oxygen thus daily entering into the body amounts to 32 or more ounces, yet the weight of the body is not thereby increased. exactly as much oxygen as is imbibed in inspiration passes off in expiration, in the form of carbonic acid and water; so that with every breath the amount of carbon and hydrogen in the body is diminished. but the emaciation--the loss of weight by starvation--does not simply depend upon the separation of the carbon and hydrogen; but all the other substances which are in combination with these elements in the living tissues pass off in the secretions. the nitrogen undergoes a change, and is thrown out of the system by the kidneys. their secretion, the urine, contains not only a compound rich in nitrogen, namely urea, but the sulphur of the tissues in the form of a sulphate, all the soluble salts of the blood and animal fluids, common salt, the phosphates, soda and potash. the carbon and hydrogen of the blood, of the muscular fibre, and of all the animal tissues which can undergo change, return into the atmosphere. the nitrogen, and all the soluble inorganic elements are carried to the earth in the urine. these changes take place in the healthy animal body during every moment of life; a waste and loss of substance proceeds continually; and if this loss is to be restored, and the original weight and substance repaired, an adequate supply of materials must be furnished, from whence the blood and wasted tissues may be regenerated. this supply is obtained from the food. in an adult person in a normal or healthy condition, no sensible increase or decrease of weight occurs from day to day. in youth the weight of the body increases, whilst in old age it decreases. there can be no doubt that in the adult, the food has exactly replaced the loss of substance: it has supplied just so much carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and other elements, as have passed through the skin, lungs, and urinary organs. in youth the supply is greater than the waste. part of the elements of the food remain to augment the bulk of the body. in old age the waste is greater than the supply, and the body diminishes. it is unquestionable, that, with the exception of a certain quantity of carbon and hydrogen, which are secreted through the skin and lungs, we obtain, in the solid and fluid excrements of man and animals, all the elements of their food. we obtain daily, in the form of urea, all the nitrogen taken in the food both of the young and the adult; and further, in the urine, the whole amount of the alkalies, soluble phosphates and sulphates, contained in all the various aliments. in the solid excrements are found all those substances taken in the food which have undergone no alteration in the digestive organs, all indigestible matters, such as woody fibre, the green colouring matter of leaves ( chlorophyle), wax, &c. physiology teaches us, that the process of nutrition in animals, that is, their increase of bulk, or the restoration of wasted parts, proceeds from the blood. the purpose of digestion and assimilation is to convert the food into blood. in the stomach and intestines, therefore, all those substances in the food capable of conversion into blood are separated from its other constituents; in other words, during the passage of the food through the intestinal canal there is a constant absorption of its nitrogen, since only azotised substances are capable of conversion into blood; and therefore the solid excrements are destitute of that element, except only a small portion, in the constitution of that secretion which is formed to facilitate their passage. with the solid excrements, the phosphates of lime and magnesia, which were contained in the food and not assimilated, are carried off, these salts being insoluble in water, and therefore not entering the urine. we may obtain a clear insight into the chemical constitution of the solid excrements without further investigation, by comparing the faeces of a dog with his food. we give that animal flesh and bones--substances rich in azotised matter--and we obtain, as the last product of its digestion, a perfectly white excrement, solid while moist, but becoming in dry air a powder. this is the phosphate of lime of the bones, with scarcely one per cent. of foreign organic matter. thus we see that in the solid and fluid excrements of man and animals, all the nitrogen--in short, all the constituent ingredients of the consumed food, soluble and insoluble, are returned; and as food is primarily derived from the fields, we possess in those excrements all the ingredients which we have taken from it in the form of seeds, roots, or herbs. one part of the crops employed for fattening sheep and cattle is consumed by man as animal food; another part is taken directly--as flour, potatoes, green vegetables, &c.; a third portion consists of vegetable refuse, and straw employed as litter. none of the materials of the soil need be lost. we can, it is obvious, get back all its constituent parts which have been withdrawn therefrom, as fruits, grain and animals, in the fluid and solid excrements of man, and the bones, blood and skins of the slaughtered animals. it depends upon ourselves to collect carefully all these scattered elements, and to restore the disturbed equilibrium of composition in the soil. we can calculate exactly how much and which of the component parts of the soil we export in a sheep or an ox, in a quarter of barley, wheat or potatoes, and we can discover, from the known composition of the excrements of man and animals, how much we have to supply to restore what is lost to our fields. if, however, we could procure from other sources the substances which give to the exuviae of man and animals their value in agriculture, we should not need the latter. it is quite indifferent for our purpose whether we supply the ammonia (the source of nitrogen) in the form of urine, or in that of a salt derived from coal-tar; whether we derive the phosphate of lime from bones, apatite, or fossil excrements (the coprolithes). the principal problem for agriculture is, how to replace those substances which have been taken from the soil, and which cannot be furnished by the atmosphere. if the manure supplies an imperfect compensation for this loss, the fertility of a field or of a country decreases; if, on the contrary, more are given to the fields, their fertility increases. an importation of urine, or of solid excrements, from a foreign country, is equivalent to an importation of grain and cattle. in a certain time, the elements of those substances assume the form of grain, or of fodder, then become flesh and bones, enter into the human body, and return again day by day to the form they originally possessed. the only real loss of elements we are unable to prevent is of the phosphates, and these, in accordance with the customs of all modern nations, are deposited in the grave. for the rest, every part of that enormous quantity of food which a man consumes during his lifetime ( say in sixty or seventy years), which was derived from the fields, can be obtained and returned to them. we know with absolute certainty, that in the blood of a young or growing animal there remains a certain quantity of phosphate of lime and of the alkaline phosphates, to be stored up and to minister to the growth of the bones and general bulk of the body, and that, with the exception of this very small quantity, we receive back, in the solid and fluid excrements, all the salts and alkaline bases, all the phosphate of lime and magnesia, and consequently all the inorganic elements which the animal consumes in its food. we can thus ascertain precisely the quantity, quality, and composition of animal excrements, without the trouble of analysing them. if we give a horse daily 4 1/2 pounds' weight of oats, and 15 pounds of hay, and knowing that oats give 4 per cent. and hay 9 per cent. of ashes, we can calculate that the daily excrements of the horse will contain 21 ounces of inorganic matter which was drawn from the fields. by analysis we can determine the exact relative amount of silica, of phosphates, and of alkalies, contained in the ashes of the oats and of the hay. you will now understand that the constituents of the solid parts of animal excrements, and therefore their qualities as manure, must vary with the nature of the creature's food. if we feed a cow upon beetroot, or potatoes, without hay, straw or grain, there will be no silica in her solid excrements, but there will be phosphate of lime and magnesia. her fluid excrements will contain carbonate of potash and soda, together with compounds of the same bases with inorganic acids. in one word, we have, in the fluid excrements, all the soluble parts of the ashes of the consumed food; and in the solid excrements, all those parts of the ashes which are insoluble in water. if the food, after burning, leaves behind ashes containing soluble alkaline phosphates, as is the case with bread, seeds of all kinds, and flesh, we obtain from the animal by which they are consumed a urine holding in solution these phosphates. if, however, the ashes of food contain no alkaline phosphates, but abound in insoluble earthy phosphates, as hay, carrots, and potatoes, the urine will be free from alkaline phosphates, but the earthy phosphates will be found in the faeces. the urine of man, of carnivorous and graminivorous animals, contains alkaline phosphates; that of herbivorous animals is free from these salts. the analysis of the excrements of man, of the piscivorous birds (as the guano), of the horse, and of cattle, furnishes us with the precise knowledge of the salts they contain, and demonstrates, that in those excrements, we return to the fields the ashes of the plants which have served as food,--the soluble and insoluble salts and earths indispensable to the development of cultivated plants, and which must be furnished to them by a fertile soil. there can be no doubt that, in supplying these excrements to the soil, we return to it those constituents which the crops have removed from it, and we renew its capability of nourishing new crops: in one word, we restore the disturbed equilibrium; and consequently, knowing that the elements of the food derived from the soil enter into the urine and solid excrements of the animals it nourishes, we can with the greatest facility determine the exact value of the different kinds of manure. thus the excrements of pigs which we have fed with peas and potatoes are principally suited for manuring crops of potatoes and peas. in feeding a cow upon hay and turnips, we obtain a manure containing the inorganic elements of grasses and turnips, and which is therefore preferable for manuring turnips. the excrement of pigeons contains the mineral elements of grain; that of rabbits, the elements of herbs and kitchen vegetables. the fluid and solid excrements of man, however, contain the mineral elements of grain and seeds in the greatest quantity. letter xv my dear sir, you are now acquainted with my opinions respecting the effects of the application of mineral agents to our cultivated fields, and also the rationale of the influence of the various kinds of manures; you will, therefore, now readily understand what i have to say of the sources whence the carbon and nitrogen, indispensable to the growth of plants, are derived. the growth of forests, and the produce of meadows, demonstrate that an inexhaustible quantity of carbon is furnished for vegetation by the carbonic acid of the atmosphere. we obtain from an equal surface of forest, or meadow-land, where the necessary mineral elements of the soil are present in a suitable state, and to which no carbonaceous matter whatever is furnished in manures, an amount of carbon, in the shape of wood and hay, quite equal, and oftimes more than is produced by our fields, in grain, roots, and straw, upon which abundance of manure has been heaped. it is perfectly obvious that the atmosphere must furnish to our cultivated fields as much carbonic acid, as it does to an equal surface of forest or meadow, and that the carbon of this carbonic acid is assimilated, or may be assimilated by the plants growing there, provided the conditions essential to its assimilation, and becoming a constituent element of vegetables, exist in the soil of these fields. in many tropical countries the produce of the land in grain or roots, during the whole year, depends upon one rain in the spring. if this rain is deficient in quantity, or altogether wanting, the expectation of an abundant harvest is diminished or destroyed. now it cannot be the water merely which produces this enlivening and fertilising effect observed, and which lasts for weeks and months. the plant receives, by means of this water, at the time of its first development, the alkalies, alkaline earths, and phosphates, necessary to its organization. if these elements, which are necessary previous to its assimilation of atmospheric nourishment, be absent, its growth is retarded. in fact, the development of a plant is in a direct ratio to the amount of the matters it takes up from the soil. if, therefore, a soil is deficient in these mineral constituents required by plants, they will not flourish even with an abundant supply of water. the produce of carbon on a meadow, or an equal surface of forest land, is independent of a supply of carbonaceous manure, but it depends upon the presence of certain elements of the soil which in themselves contain no carbon, together with the existence of conditions under which their assimilation by plants can be effected. we increase the produce of our cultivated fields, in carbon, by a supply of lime, ashes, and marl, substances which cannot furnish carbon to the plants, and yet it is indisputable,--being founded upon abundant experience,--that in these substances we furnish to the fields elements which greatly increase the bulk of their produce, and consequently the amount of carbon. if we admit these facts to be established, we can no longer doubt that a deficient produce of carbon, or in other words, the barrenness of a field does not depend upon carbonic acid, because we are able to increase the produce, to a certain degree, by a supply of substances which do not contain any carbon. the same source whence the meadow and the forest are furnished with carbon, is also open to our cultivated plants. the great object of agriculture, therefore, is to discover the means best adapted to enable these plants to assimilate the carbon of the atmosphere which exists in it as carbonic acid. in furnishing plants, therefore, with mineral elements, we give them the power to appropriate carbon from a source which is inexhaustible; whilst in the absence of these elements the most abundant supply of carbonic acid, or of decaying vegetable matter, would not increase the produce of a field. with an adequate and equal supply of these essential mineral constituents in the soil, the amount of carbonic acid absorbed by a plant from the atmosphere in a given time is limited by the quantity which is brought into contact with its organs of absorption. the withdrawal of carbonic acid from the atmosphere by the vegetable organism takes place chiefly through its leaves; this absorption requires the contact of the carbonic acid with their surface, or with the part of the plant by which it is absorbed. the quantity of carbonic acid absorbed in a given time is in direct proportion to the surface of the leaves and the amount of carbonic acid contained in the air; that is, two plants of the same kind and the same extent of surface of absorption, in equal times and under equal conditions, absorb one and the same amount of carbon. in an atmosphere containing a double proportion of carbonic acid, a plant absorbs, under the same condition, twice the quantity of carbon. boussingault observed, that the leaves of the vine, inclosed in a vessel, withdrew all the carbonic acid from a current of air which was passed through it, however great its velocity. (dumas lecon, p.23.) if, therefore, we supply double the quantity of carbonic acid to one plant, the extent of the surface of which is only half that of another living in ordinary atmospheric air, the former will obtain and appropriate as much carbon as the latter. hence results the effects of humus, and all decaying organic substances, upon vegetation. if we suppose all the conditions for the absorption of carbonic acid present, a young plant will increase in mass, in a limited time, only in proportion to its absorbing surface; but if we create in the soil a new source of carbonic acid, by decaying vegetable substances, and the roots absorb in the same time three times as much carbonic acid from the soil as the leaves derive from the atmosphere, the plant will increase in weight fourfold. this fourfold increase extends to the leaves, buds, stalks, &c., and in the increased extent of the surface, the plant acquires an increased power of absorbing nourishment from the air, which continues in action far beyond the time when its derivation of carbonic acid through the roots ceases. humus, as a source of carbonic acid in cultivated lands, is not only useful as a means of increasing the quantity of carbon--an effect which in most cases may be very indifferent for agricultural purposes--but the mass of the plant having increased rapidly in a short time, space is obtained for the assimilation of the elements of the soil necessary for the formation of new leaves and branches. water evaporates incessantly from the surface of the young plant; its quantity is in direct proportion to the temperature and the extent of the surface. the numerous radical fibrillae replace, like so many pumps, the evaporated water; and so long as the soil is moist, or penetrated with water, the indispensable elements of the soil, dissolved in the water, are supplied to the plant. the water absorbed by the plant evaporating in an aeriform state leaves the saline and other mineral constituents within it. the relative proportion of these elements taken up by a plant, is greater, the more extensive the surface and more abundant the supply of water; where these are limited, the plant soon reaches its full growth, while if their supply is continued, a greater amount of elements necessary to enable it to appropriate atmospheric nourishment being obtained, its development proceeds much further. the quantity, or mass of seed produced, will correspond to the quantity of mineral constituents present in the plant. that plant, therefore, containing the most alkaline phosphates and earthy salts will produce more or a greater weight of seeds than another which, in an equal time has absorbed less of them. we consequently observe, in a hot summer, when a further supply of mineral ingredients from the soil ceases through want of water, that the height and strength of plants, as well as the development of their seeds, are in direct proportion to its absorption of the elementary parts of the soil in the preceding epochs of its growth. the fertility of the year depends in general upon the temperature, and the moisture or dryness of the spring, if all the conditions necessary to the assimilation of the atmospheric nourishment be secured to our cultivated plants. the action of humus, then, as we have explained it above, is chiefly of value in gaining time. in agriculture, this must ever be taken into account and in this respect humus is of importance in favouring the growth of vegetables, cabbages, &c. but the cerealia, and plants grown for their roots, meet on our fields, in the remains of the preceding crop, with a quantity of decaying vegetable substances corresponding to their contents of mineral nutriment from the soil, and consequently with a quantity of carbonic acid adequate to their accelerated development in the spring. a further supply of carbonic acid, therefore, would be quite useless, without a corresponding increase of mineral ingredients. from a morgen of good meadow land, 2,500 pounds weight of hay, according to the best agriculturists, are obtained on an average. this amount is furnished without any supply of organic substances, without manure containing carbon or nitrogen. by irrigation, and the application of ashes or gypsum, double that amount may be grown. but assuming 2,500 pounds weight of hay to be the maximum, we may calculate the amount of carbon and nitrogen derived from the atmosphere by the plants of meadows. according to elementary analysis, hay, dried at a temperature of 100 deg reaumur, contains 45.8 per cent. of carbon, and 1 1/2 per cent. of nitrogen. 14 per cent. of water retained by the hay, dried at common temperatures, is driven off at 100 deg. 2,500 pounds weight of hay, therefore, corresponds to 2,150 pounds, dried at 100 deg. this shows us, that 984 pounds of carbon, and 32.2 pounds weight of nitrogen, have been obtained in the produce of one morgen of meadow land. supposing that this nitrogen has been absorbed by the plants in the form of ammonia, the atmosphere contains 39.1 pounds weight of ammonia to every 3640 pounds weight of carbonic acid (=984 carbon, or 27 per cent.), or in other words, to every 1,000 pounds weight of carbonic acid, 10.7 pounds of ammonia, that is to about 1/100,000, the weight of the air, or 1/60,000 of its volume. for every 100 parts of carbonic acid absorbed by the surface of the leaves, the plant receives from the atmosphere somewhat more than one part of ammonia. with every 1,000 pounds of carbon, we obtain- from a meadow . 32 7/10 pounds of nitrogen. from cultivated fields, in wheat . 21 1/2 " " oats . 22.3 " " rye . 15.2 " " potatoes . 34.1 " " beetroot . 39.1 " " clover . 44 " " peas . 62 " " boussingault obtained from his farm at bechelbronn, in alsace, in five years, in the shape of potatoes, wheat, clover, turnips, and oats, 8,383 of carbon, and 250.7 nitrogen. in the following five years, as beetroot, wheat, clover, turnips, oats, and rye, 8,192 of carbon, and 284.2 of nitrogen. in a further course of six years, potatoes, wheat, clover, turnips, peas, and rye, 10,949 of carbon, 356.6 of nitrogen. in 16 years, 27,424 carbon, 858 1/2 nitrogen, which gives for every 1,000 carbon, 31.3 nitrogen. from these interesting and unquestionable facts, we may deduce some conclusions of the highest importance in their application to agriculture. 1. we observe that the relative proportions of carbon and nitrogen, stand in a fixed relation to the surface of the leaves. those plants, in which all the nitrogen may be said to be concentrated in the seeds, as the cerealia, contain on the whole less nitrogen than the leguminous plants, peas, and clover. 2. the produce of nitrogen on a meadow which receives no nitrogenised manure, is greater than that of a field of wheat which has been manured. 3. the produce of nitrogen in clover and peas, which agriculturists will acknowledge require no nitrogenised manure, is far greater than that of a potato or turnip field, which is abundantly supplied with such manures. lastly. and this is the most curious deduction to be derived from the above facts,--if we plant potatoes, wheat, turnips, peas, and clover, (plants containing potash, lime, and silex,) upon the same land, three times manured, we gain in 16 years, for a given quantity of carbon, the same proportion of nitrogen which we receive from a meadow which has received no nitrogenised manure. on a morgen of meadow-land, we obtain in plants, containing silex, lime, and potash, 984 carbon, 32.2 nitrogen. on a morgen of cultivated land, in an average of 16 years, in plants containing the same mineral elements, silex, lime, and potash, 857 carbon, 26.8 nitrogen. if we add the carbon and nitrogen of the leaves of the beetroot, and the stalk and leaves of the potatoes, which have not been taken into account, it still remains evident that the cultivated fields, notwithstanding the supply of carbonaceous and nitrogenised manures, produced no more carbon and nitrogen than an equal surface of meadow-land supplied only with mineral elements. what then is the rationale of the effect of manure,--of the solid and fluid excrements of animals? this question can now be satisfactorily answered: that effect is the restoration of the elementary constituents of the soil which have been gradually drawn from it in the shape of grain and cattle. if the land i am speaking of had not been manured during those 16 years, not more than one-half, or perhaps than one-third part of the carbon and nitrogen would have been produced. we owe it to the animal excrements, that it equalled in production the meadow-land, and this, because they restored the mineral ingredients of the soil removed by the crops. all that the supply of manure accomplished, was to prevent the land from becoming poorer in these, than the meadow which produces 2,500 pounds of hay. we withdraw from the meadow in this hay as large an amount of mineral substances as we do in one harvest of grain, and we know that the fertility of the meadow is just as dependent upon the restoration of these ingredients to its soil, as the cultivated land is upon manures. two meadows of equal surface, containing unequal quantities of inorganic elements of nourishment,--other conditions being equal,--are very unequally fertile; that which possesses most, furnishes most hay. if we do not restore to a meadow the withdrawn elements, its fertility decreases. but its fertility remains unimpaired, with a due supply of animal excrements, fluid and solid, and it not only remains the same, but may be increased by a supply of mineral substances alone, such as remain after the combustion of ligneous plants and other vegetables; namely, ashes. ashes represent the whole nourishment which vegetables receive from the soil. by furnishing them in sufficient quantities to our meadows, we give to the plants growing on them the power of condensing and absorbing carbon and nitrogen by their surface. may not the effect of the solid and fluid excrements, which are the ashes of plants and grains, which have undergone combustion in the bodies of animals and of man, be dependent upon the same cause? should not the fertility, resulting from their application, be altogether independent of the ammonia they contain? would not their effect be precisely the same in promoting the fertility of cultivated plants, if we had evaporated the urine, and dried and burned the solid excrements? surely the cerealia and leguminous plants which we cultivate must derive their carbon and nitrogen from the same source whence the graminea and leguminous plants of the meadows obtain them! no doubt can be entertained of their capability to do so. in virginia, upon the lowest calculation, 22 pounds weight of nitrogen were taken on the average, yearly, from every morgen of the wheat-fields. this would amount, in 100 years, to 2,200 pounds weight. if this were derived from the soil, every morgen of it must have contained the equivalent of 110,000 pounds weight of animal excrements (assuming the latter, when dried, at the temperature of boiling water, to contain 2 per cent.). in hungary, as i remarked in a former letter, tobacco and wheat have been grown upon the same field for centuries, without any supply of nitrogenised manure. is it possible that the nitrogen essential to, and entering into, the composition of these crops, could have been drawn from the soil? every year renews the foliage and fruits of our forests of beech, oak, and chesnuts; the leaves, the acorns, the chesnuts, are rich in nitrogen; so are cocoa-nuts, bread-fruit, and other tropical productions. this nitrogen is not supplied by man, can it indeed be derived from any other source than the atmosphere? in whatever form the nitrogen supplied to plants may be contained in the atmosphere, in whatever state it may be when absorbed, from the atmosphere it must have been derived. did not the fields of virginia receive their nitrogen from the same source as wild plants? is the supply of nitrogen in the excrements of animals quite a matter of indifference, or do we receive back from our fields a quantity of the elements of blood corresponding to this supply? the researches of boussingault have solved this problem in the most satisfactory manner. if, in his grand experiments, the manure which he gave to his fields was in the same state, i.e. dried at 110 deg in a vacuum, as it was when analysed, these fields received, in 16 years, 1,300 pounds of nitrogen. but we know that by drying all the nitrogen escapes which is contained in solid animal excrements, as volatile carbonate of ammonia. in this calculation the nitrogen of the urine, which by decomposition is converted into carbonate of ammonia, has not been included. if we suppose it amounted to half as much as that in the dried excrements, this would make the quantity of nitrogen supplied to the fields 1,950 pounds. in 16 years, however, as we have seen, only 1,517 pounds of nitrogen, was contained in their produce of grain, straw, roots, et cetera--that is, far less than was supplied in the manure; and in the same period the same extent of surface of good meadow-land (one hectare = a hessian morgen), which received no nitrogen in manure, 2,062 pounds of nitrogen. it is well known that in egypt, from the deficiency of wood, the excrement of animals is dried, and forms the principal fuel, and that the nitrogen from the soot of this excrement was, for many centuries, imported into europe in the form of sal ammoniac, until a method of manufacturing this substance was discovered at the end of the last century by gravenhorst of brunswick. the fields in the delta of the nile are supplied with no other animal manures than the ashes of the burnt excrements, and yet they have been proverbially fertile from a period earlier than the first dawn of history, and that fertility continues to the present day as admirable as it was in the earliest times. these fields receive, every year, from the inundation of the nile, a new soil, in its mud deposited over their surface, rich in those mineral elements which have been withdrawn by the crops of the previous harvest. the mud of the nile contains as little nitrogen as the mud derived from the alps of switzerland, which fertilises our fields after the inundations of the rhine. if this fertilising mud owed this property to nitrogenised matters; what enormous beds of animal and vegetable exuviae and remains ought to exist in the mountains of africa, in heights extending beyond the limits of perpetual snow, where no bird, no animal finds food, from the absence of all vegetation! abundant evidence in support of the important truth we are discussing, may be derived from other well known facts. thus, the trade of holland in cheese may be adduced in proof and illustration thereof. we know that cheese is derived from the plants which serve as food for cows. the meadow-lands of holland derive the nitrogen of cheese from the same source as with us; i.e. the atmosphere. the milch cows of holland remain day and night on the grazing-grounds, and therefore, in their fluid and solid excrements return directly to the soil all the salts and earthy elements of their food: a very insignificant quantity only is exported in the cheese. the fertility of these meadows can, therefore, be as little impaired as our own fields, to which we restore all the elements of the soil, as manure, which have been withdrawn in the crops. the only difference is, in holland they remain on the field, whilst we collect them at home and carry them, from time to time, to the fields. the nitrogen of the fluid and solid excrements of cows, is derived from the meadow-plants, which receive it from the atmosphere; the nitrogen of the cheese also must be drawn from the same source. the meadows of holland have, in the lapse of centuries, produced millions of hundredweights of cheese. thousands of hundredweights are annually exported, and yet the productiveness of the meadows is in no way diminished, although they never receive more nitrogen than they originally contained. nothing then can be more certain than the fact, that an exportation of nitrogenised products does not exhaust the fertility of a country; inasmuch as it is not the soil, but the atmosphere, which furnishes its vegetation with nitrogen. it follows, consequently, that we cannot increase the fertility of our fields by a supply of nitrogenised manure, or by salts of ammonia, but rather that their produce increases or diminishes, in a direct ratio, with the supply of mineral elements capable of assimilation. the formation of the constituent elements of blood, that is, of the nitrogenised principles in our cultivated plants, depends upon the presence of inorganic matters in the soil, without which no nitrogen can be assimilated even when there is a most abundant supply. the ammonia contained in animal excrements exercises a favourable effect, inasmuch as it is accompanied by the other substances necessary to accomplish its transition into the elements of the blood. if we supply ammonia associated with all the conditions necessary to its assimilation, it ministers to the nourishment of the plants; but if this artificial supply is not given they can derive all the needed nitrogen from the atmosphere--a source, every loss from which is restored by the decomposition of the bodies of dead animals and the decay of plants. ammonia certainly favours, and accelerates, the growth of plants in all soils, wherein all the conditions of its assimilation are united; but it is altogether without effect, as respects the production of the elements of blood where any of these conditions are wanting. we can suppose that asparagin, the active constituent of asparagus, the mucilaginous root of the marsh-mallow, the nitrogenised and sulphurous ingredients of mustard-seed, and of all cruciferous plants, may originate without the aid of the mineral elements of the soil. but if the principles of those vegetables, which serve as food, could be generated without the co-operation of the mineral elements of blood, without potash, soda, phosphate of soda, phosphate of lime, they would be useless to us and to herbivorous animals as food; they would not fulfil the purpose for which the wisdom of the creator has destined them. in the absence of alkalies and the phosphates, no blood, no milk, no muscular fibre can be formed. without phosphate of lime our horses, sheep and cattle, would be without bones. in the urine and in the solid excrements of animals we carry ammonia, and, consequently, nitrogen, to our cultivated plants, and this nitrogen is accompanied by all the mineral elements of food exactly in the same proportions, in which both are contained in the plants which served as food to the animals, or what is the same, in those proportions in which both can serve as nourishment to a new generation of plants, to which both are essential. the effect of an artificial supply of ammonia, as a source of nitrogen, is, therefore, precisely analogous to that of humus as a source of carbonic acid--it is limited to a gain of time; that is, it accelerates the development of plants. this is of great importance, and should always be taken into account in gardening, especially in the treatment of the kitchen-garden; and as much as possible, in agriculture on a large scale, where the time occupied in the growth of the plants cultivated is of importance. when we have exactly ascertained the quantity of ashes left after the combustion of cultivated plants which have grown upon all varieties of soil, and have obtained correct analyses of these ashes, we shall learn with certainty which of the constituent elements of the plants are constant and which are changeable, and we shall arrive at an exact knowledge of the sum of all the ingredients we withdraw from the soil in the different crops. with this knowledge the farmer will be able to keep an exact record, of the produce of his fields in harvest, like the account-book of a well regulated manufactory; and then by a simple calculation he can determine precisely the substances he must supply to each field, and the quantity of these, in order to restore their fertility. he will be able to express, in pounds weight, how much of this or that element he must give in order to augment its fertility for any given kind of plants. these researches and experiments are the great desideratum of the present time. to the united efforts of the chemists of all countries we may confidently look for a solution of these great questions, and by the aid of enlightened agriculturists we shall arrive at a rational system of gardening, horticulture, and agriculture, applicable to every country and all kinds of soil, and which will be based upon the immutable foundation of observed facts and philosophical induction. letter xvi my dear sir, my recent researches into the constituent ingredients of our cultivated fields have led me to the conclusion that, of all the elements furnished to plants by the soil and ministering to their nourishment, the phosphate of lime--or, rather, the phosphates generally--must be regarded as the most important. in order to furnish you with a clear idea of the importance of the phosphates, it may be sufficient to remind you of the fact, that the blood of man and animals, besides common salt, always contains alkaline and earthy phosphates. if we burn blood and examine the ashes which remain, we find certain parts of them soluble in water, and others insoluble. the soluble parts are, common salt and alkaline phosphates; the insoluble consist of phosphate of lime, phosphate of magnesia, and oxide of iron. these mineral ingredients of the blood--without the presence of which in the food the formation of blood is impossible--both man and animals derive either immediately, or mediately through other animals, from vegetable substances used as food; they had been constituents of vegetables, they had been parts of the soil upon which the vegetable substances were developed. if we compare the amount of the phosphates in different vegetable substances with each other, we discover a great variety, whilst there is scarcely any ashes of plants altogether devoid of them, and those parts of plants which experience has taught us are the most nutritious, contain the largest proportion. to these belong all seeds and grain, especially the varieties of bread-corn, peas, beans, and lentils. it is a most curious fact that if we incinerate grain or its flour, peas, beans, and lentils, we obtain ashes, which are distinguished from the ashes of all other parts of vegetables by the absence of alkaline carbonates. the ashes of these seeds when recently prepared, do not effervesce with acids; their soluble ingredients consist solely of alkaline phosphates, the insoluble parts of phosphate of lime, phosphate of magnesia, and oxide of iron: consequently, of the very same salts which are contained in blood, and which are absolutely indispensable to its formation. we are thus brought to the further indisputable conclusion that no seed suitable to become food for man and animals can be formed in any plant without the presence and co-operation of the phosphates. a field in which phosphate of lime, or the alkaline phosphates, form no part of the soil, is totally incapable of producing grain, peas, or beans. an enormous quantity of these substances indispensable to the nourishment of plants, is annually withdrawn from the soil and carried into great towns, in the shape of flour, cattle, et cetera. it is certain that this incessant removal of the phosphates must tend to exhaust the land and diminish its capability of producing grain. the fields of great britain are in a state of progressive exhaustion from this cause, as is proved by the rapid extension of the cultivation of turnips and mangel wurzel--plants which contain the least amount of the phosphates, and therefore require the smallest quantity for their development. these roots contain 80 to 92 per cent. of water. their great bulk makes the amount of produce fallacious, as respects their adaptation to the food of animals, inasmuch as their contents of the ingredients of the blood, i.e. of substances which can be transformed into flesh, stands in a direct ratio to their amount of phosphates, without which neither blood nor flesh can be formed. our fields will become more and more deficient in these essential ingredients of food, in all localities where custom and habits do not admit the collection of the fluid and solid excrements of man, and their application to the purposes of agriculture. in a former letter i showed you how great a waste of phosphates is unavoidable in england, and referred to the well-known fact that the importation of bones restored in a most admirable manner the fertility of the fields exhausted from this cause. in the year 1827 the importation of bones for manure amounted to 40,000 tons, and huskisson estimated their value to be from l 100,000 to l 200,000 sterling. the importation is still greater at present, but it is far from being sufficient to supply the waste. another proof of the efficacy of the phosphates in restoring fertility to exhausted land is afforded by the use of the guano--a manure which, although of recent introduction into england, has found such general and extensive application. we believe that the importation of one hundred-weight of guano is equivalent to the importation of eight hundred-weight of wheat--the hundred-weight of guano assumes in a time which can be accurately estimated the form of a quantity of food corresponding to eight hundred-weight of wheat. the same estimate is applicable in the valuation of bones. if it were possible to restore to the soil of england and scotland the phosphates which during the last fifty years have been carried to the sea by the thames and the clyde, it would be equivalent to manuring with millions of hundred-weights of bones, and the produce of the land would increase one-third, or perhaps double itself, in five to ten years. we cannot doubt that the same result would follow if the price of the guano admitted the application of a quantity to the surface of the fields, containing as much of the phosphates as have been withdrawn from them in the same period. if a rich and cheap source of phosphate of lime and the alkaline phosphates were open to england, there can be no question that the importation of foreign corn might be altogether dispensed with after a short time. for these materials england is at present dependent upon foreign countries, and the high price of guano and of bones prevents their general application, and in sufficient quantity. every year the trade in these substances must decrease, or their price will rise as the demand for them increases. according to these premises, it cannot be disputed, that the annual expense of great britain for the importation of bones and guano is equivalent to a duty on corn: with this difference only, that the amount is paid to foreigners in money. to restore the disturbed equilibrium of constitution of the soil,--to fertilise her fields,--england requires an enormous supply of animal excrements, and it must, therefore, excite considerable interest to learn, that she possesses beneath her soil beds of fossil guano, strata of animal excrements, in a state which will probably allow of their being employed as a manure at a very small expense. the coprolithes discovered by dr. buckland, (a discovery of the highest interest to geology,) are these excrements; and it seems extremely probable that in these strata england possesses the means of supplying the place of recent bones, and therefore the principal conditions of improving agriculture--of restoring and exalting the fertility of her fields. in the autumn of 1842, dr. buckland pointed out to me a bed of coprolithes in the neighbourhood of clifton, from half to one foot thick, inclosed in a limestone formation, extending as a brown stripe in the rocks, for miles along the banks of the severn. the limestone marl of lyme regis consists, for the most part, of one-fourth part of fossil excrements and bones. the same are abundant in the lias of bath, eastern and broadway hill, near evesham. dr. buckland mentions beds, several miles in extent, the substance of which consists, in many places, of a fourth part of coprolithes. pieces of the limestone rock in clifton, near bristol, which is rich in coprolithes and organic remains, fragments of bones, teeth, &c., were subjected to analysis, and were found to contain above 18 per cent. of phosphate of lime. if this limestone is burned and brought in that state to the fields, it must be a perfect substitute for bones, the efficacy of which as a manure does not depend, as has been generally, but erroneously supposed, upon the nitrogenised matter which they contain, but on their phosphate of lime. the osseous breccia found in many parts of england deserves especial attention, as it is highly probable that in a short time it will become an important article of commerce. what a curious and interesting subject for contemplation! in the remains of an extinct animal world, england is to find the means of increasing her wealth in agricultural produce, as she has already found the great support of her manufacturing industry in fossil fuel,--the preserved matter of primeval forests,--the remains of a vegetable world. may this expectation be realised! and may her excellent population be thus redeemed from poverty and misery! the chemical history of a candle a course of lectures delivered before a juvenile audience at the royal institution by michael faraday, d.c.l., f.r.s. edited by william crookes, f.c.s. a new impression, with illustrations london chatto & windus 1908 preface from the primitive pine-torch to the paraffin candle, how wide an interval! between them how vast a contrast! the means adopted by man to illuminate his home at night, stamp at once his position in the scale of civilisation. the fluid bitumen of the far east, blazing in rude vessels of baked earth; the etruscan lamp, exquisite in form, yet ill adapted to its office; the whale, seal, or bear fat, filling the hut of the esquimaux or lap with odour rather than light; the huge wax candle on the glittering altar, the range of gas lamps in our streets,--all have their stories to tell. all, if they could speak (and, after their own manner, they can), might warm our hearts in telling, how they have ministered to man's comfort, love of home, toil, and devotion. surely, among the millions of fire-worshippers and fire-users who have passed away in earlier ages, _some_ have pondered over the mystery of fire; perhaps some clear minds have guessed shrewdly near the truth. think of the time man has lived in hopeless ignorance: think that only during a period which might be spanned by the life of one man, has the truth been known. atom by atom, link by link, has the reasoning chain been forged. some links, too quickly and too slightly made, have given way, and been replaced by better work; but now the great phenomena are known--the outline is correctly and firmly drawn--cunning artists are filling in the rest, and the child who masters these lectures knows more of fire than aristotle did. the candle itself is now made to light up the dark places of nature; the blowpipe and the prism are adding to our knowledge of the earth's crust; but the torch must come first. among the readers of this book some few may devote themselves to increasing the stores of knowledge: the lamp of science _must_ burn. "_alere flammam._" w. crookes. contents. lecture i. a candle: the flame--its sources--structure--mobility--brightness lecture ii. brightness of the flame--air necessary for combustion--production of water lecture iii. products: water from the combustion--nature of water--a compound--hydrogen lecture iv. hydrogen in the candle--burns into water--the other part of water--oxygen lecture v. oxygen present in the air--nature of the atmosphere--its properties--other products from the candle--carbonic acid--its properties lecture vi. carbon or charcoal--coal gas--respiration and its analogy to the burning op a candle--conclusion lecture on platinum. notes. the chemical history of a candle lecture i. a candle: the flame--its sources--structure--mobility--brightness. i purpose, in return for the honour you do us by coming to see what are our proceedings here, to bring before you, in the course of these lectures, the chemical history of a candle. i have taken this subject on a former occasion; and were it left to my own will, i should prefer to repeat it almost every year--so abundant is the interest that attaches itself to the subject, so wonderful are the varieties of outlet which it offers into the various departments of philosophy. there is not a law under which any part of this universe is governed which does not come into play, and is touched upon in these phenomena. there is no better, there is no more open door by which you can enter into the study of natural philosophy, than by considering the physical phenomena of a candle. i trust, therefore, i shall not disappoint you in choosing this for my subject rather than any newer topic, which could not be better, were it even so good. and before proceeding, let me say this also--that though our subject be so great, and our intention that of treating it honestly, seriously, and philosophically, yet i mean to pass away from all those who are seniors amongst us. i claim the privilege of speaking to juveniles as a juvenile myself. i have done so on former occasions--and, if you please, i shall do so again. and though i stand here with the knowledge of having the words i utter given to the world, yet that shall not deter me from speaking in the same familiar way to those whom i esteem nearest to me on this occasion. and now, my boys and girls, i must first tell you of what candles are made. some are great curiosities. i have here some bits of timber, branches of trees particularly famous for their burning. and here you see a piece of that very curious substance taken out of some of the bogs in ireland, called _candle-wood_,--a hard, strong, excellent wood, evidently fitted for good work as a resister of force, and yet withal burning so well that where it is found they make splinters of it, and torches, since it burns like a candle, and gives a very good light indeed. and in this wood we have one of the most beautiful illustrations of the general nature of a candle that i can possibly give. the fuel provided, the means of bringing that fuel to the place of chemical action, the regular and gradual supply of air to that place of action--heat and light--all produced by a little piece of wood of this kind, forming, in fact, a natural candle. but we must speak of candles as they are in commerce. here are a couple of candles commonly called dips. they are made of lengths of cotton cut off, hung up by a loop, dipped into melted tallow, taken out again and cooled, then re-dipped until there is an accumulation of tallow round the cotton. in order that you may have an idea of the various characters of these candles, you see these which i hold in my hand--they are very small, and very curious. they are, or were, the candles used by the miners in coal mines. in olden times the miner had to find his own candles; and it was supposed that a small candle would not so soon set fire to the fire-damp in the coal mines as a large one; and for that reason, as well as for economy's sake, he had candles made of this sort--20, 30, 40, or 60 to the pound. they have been replaced since then by the steel-mill, and then by the davy-lamp, and other safety-lamps of various kinds. i have here a candle that was taken out of the _royal george_[1], it is said, by colonel pasley. it has been sunk in the sea for many years, subject to the action of salt water. it shews you how well candles may be preserved; for though it is cracked about and broken a good deal, yet, when lighted, it goes on burning regularly, and the tallow resumes its natural condition as soon as it is fused. mr. field, of lambeth, has supplied me abundantly with beautiful illustrations of the candle and its materials. i shall therefore now refer to them. and, first, there is the suet--the fat of the ox--russian tallow, i believe, employed in the manufacture of these dips, which gay lussac, or some one who entrusted him with his knowledge, converted into that beautiful substance, stearin, which you see lying beside it. a candle, you know, is not now a greasy thing like an ordinary tallow candle, but a clean thing, and you may almost scrape off and pulverise the drops which fall from it without soiling anything. this is the process he adopted[2]:--the fat or tallow is first boiled with quick-lime, and made into a soap, and then the soap is decomposed by sulphuric acid, which takes away the lime, and leaves the fat re-arranged as stearic acid, whilst a quantity of glycerin is produced at the same time. glycerin--absolutely a sugar, or a substance similar to sugar--comes out of the tallow in this chemical change. the oil is then pressed out of it; and you see here this series of pressed cakes, shewing how beautifully the impurities are carried out by the oily part as the pressure goes on increasing, and at last you have left that substance which is melted, and cast into candles as here represented. the candle i have in my hand is a stearin candle, made of stearin from tallow in the way i have told you. then here is a sperm candle, which comes from the purified oil of the spermaceti whale. here also are yellow bees-wax and refined bees-wax, from which candles are made. here, too, is that curious substance called paraffin, and some paraffin candles made of paraffin obtained from the bogs of ireland. i have here also a substance brought from japan, since we have forced an entrance into that out-of-the-way place--a sort of wax which a kind friend has sent me, and which forms a new material for the manufacture of candles. and how are these candles made? i have told you about dips, and i will shew you how moulds are made. let us imagine any of these candles to be made of materials which can be cast. "cast!" you say. "why, a candle is a thing that melts; and surely if you can melt it, you can cast it." not so. it is wonderful, in the progress of manufacture, and in the consideration of the means best fitted to produce the required result, how things turn up which one would not expect beforehand. candles cannot always be cast. a wax candle can never be cast. it is made by a particular process, which i can illustrate in a minute or two: but i must not spend much time on it. wax is a thing which, burning so well, and melting so easily in a candle, cannot be cast. however, let us take a material that can be cast. here is a frame, with a number of moulds fastened in it. the first thing to be done is to put a wick through them. here is one--a plaited wick, which does not require snuffing[3]--supported by a little wire. it goes to the bottom, where it is pegged in--the little peg holding the cotton tight, and stopping the aperture, so that nothing fluid shall run out. at the upper part there is a little bar placed across, which stretches the cotton and holds it in the mould. the tallow is then melted, and the moulds are filled. after a certain time, when the moulds are cool, the excess of tallow is poured off at one corner, and then cleaned off altogether, and the ends of the wick cut away. the candles alone then remain in the mould, and you have only to upset them, as i am doing, when out they tumble, for the candles are made in the form of cones, being narrower at the top than at the bottom; so that what with their form and their own shrinking, they only need a little shaking, and out they fall. in the same way are made these candles of stearin and of paraffin. it is a curious thing to see how wax candles are made. a lot of cottons are hung upon frames, as you see here, and covered with metal tags at the ends to keep the wax from covering the cotton in those places. these are carried to a heater, where the wax is melted. as you see, the frames can turn round; and as they turn, a man takes a vessel of wax and pours it first down one, and then the next and the next, and so on. when he has gone once round, if it is sufficiently cool, he gives the first a second coat, and so on until they are all of the required thickness. when they have been thus clothed, or fed, or made up to that thickness, they are taken off, and placed elsewhere. i have here, by the kindness of mr. field, several specimens of these candles. here is one only half-finished. they are then taken down, and well rolled upon a fine stone slab, and the conical top is moulded by properly shaped tubes, and the bottoms cut off and trimmed. this is done so beautifully that they can make candles in this way weighing exactly four, or six, to the pound, or any number they please. we must not, however, take up more time about the mere manufacture, but go a little further into the matter. i have not yet referred you to luxuries in candles (for there is such a thing as luxury in candles). see how beautifully these are coloured: you see here mauve, magenta, and all the chemical colours recently introduced, applied to candles. you observe, also, different forms employed. here is a fluted pillar most beautifully shaped; and i have also here some candles sent me by mr. pearsall, which are ornamented with designs upon them, so that as they burn you have as it were a glowing sun above, and a bouquet of flowers beneath. all, however, that is fine and beautiful is not useful. these fluted candles, pretty as they are, are bad candles; they are bad because of their external shape. nevertheless, i shew you these specimens sent to me from kind friends on all sides, that you may see what is done, and what may be done in this or that direction; although, as i have said, when we come to these refinements, we are obliged to sacrifice a little in utility. now, as to the light of the candle. we will light one or two, and set them at work in the performance of their proper functions. you observe a candle is a very different thing from a lamp. with a lamp you take a little oil, fill your vessel, put in a little moss or some cotton prepared by artificial means, and then light the top of the wick. when the flame runs down the cotton to the oil, it gets extinguished, but it goes on burning in the part above. now, i have no doubt you will ask, how is it that the oil, which will not burn of itself, gets up to the top of the cotton, where it will burn? we shall presently examine that; but there is a much more wonderful thing about the burning of a candle than this. you have here a solid substance with no vessel to contain it; and how is it that this solid substance can get up to the place where the flame is? how is it that this solid gets there, it not being a fluid? or, when it is made a fluid, then how is it that it keeps together? this is a wonderful thing about a candle. we have here a good deal of wind, which will help us in some of our illustrations, but tease us in others; for the sake, therefore, of a little regularity, and to simplify the matter, i shall make a quiet flame--for who can study a subject when there are difficulties in the way not belonging to it? here is a clever invention of some costermonger or street stander in the market-place for the shading of their candles on saturday nights, when they are selling their greens, or potatoes, or fish. i have very often admired it. they put a lamp-glass round the candle, supported on a kind of gallery, which clasps it, and it can be slipped up and down as required. by the use of this lamp-glass, employed in the same way, you have a steady flame, which you can look at, and carefully examine, as i hope you will do, at home. you see, then, in the first instance, that a beautiful cup is formed. as the air comes to the candle it moves upwards by the force of the current which the heat of the candle produces, and it so cools all the sides of the wax, tallow, or fuel, as to keep the edge much cooler than the part within; the part within melts by the flame that runs down the wick as far as it can go before it is extinguished, but the part on the outside does not melt. if i made a current in one direction, my cup would be lop-sided, and the fluid would consequently run over,--for the same force of gravity which holds worlds together holds this fluid in a horizontal position, and if the cup be not horizontal, of course the fluid will run away in guttering. you see, therefore, that the cup is formed by this beautifully regular ascending current of air playing upon all sides, which keeps the exterior of the candle cool. no fuel would serve for a candle which has not the property of giving this cup, except such fuel as the irish bogwood, where the material itself is like a sponge, and holds its own fuel. you see now why you would have had such a bad result if you were to burn these beautiful candles that i have shewn you, which are irregular, intermittent in their shape, and cannot therefore have that nicely-formed edge to the cup which is the great beauty in a candle. i hope you will now see that the perfection of a process--that is, its utility--is the better point of beauty about it. it is not the best looking thing, but the best acting thing, which is the most advantageous to us. this good-looking candle is a bad burning one. there will be a guttering round about it because of the irregularity of the stream of air and the badness of the cup which is formed thereby. you may see some pretty examples (and i trust you will notice these instances) of the action of the ascending current when you have a little gutter run down the side of a candle, making it thicker there than it is elsewhere. as the candle goes on burning, that keeps its place and forms a little pillar sticking up by the side, because, as it rises higher above the rest of the wax or fuel, the air gets better round it, and it is more cooled and better able to resist the action of the heat at a little distance. now, the greatest mistakes and faults with regard to candles, as in many other things, often bring with them instruction which we should not receive if they had not occurred. we come here to be philosophers; and i hope you will always remember that whenever a result happens, especially if it be new, you should say, "what is the cause? why does it occur?" and you will in the course of time find out the reason. then, there is another point about these candles which will answer a question,--that is, as to the way in which this fluid gets out of the cup, up the wick, and into the place of combustion. you know that the flames on these burning wicks in candles made of beeswax, stearin, or spermaceti, do not run down to the wax or other matter, and melt it all away, but keep to their own right place. they are fenced off from the fluid below, and do not encroach on the cup at the sides. i cannot imagine a more beautiful example than the condition of adjustment under which a candle makes one part subserve to the other to the very end of its action. a combustible thing like that, burning away gradually, never being intruded upon by the flame, is a very beautiful sight; especially when you come to learn what a vigorous thing flame is--what power it has of destroying the wax itself when it gets hold of it, and of disturbing its proper form if it come only too near. but how does the flame get hold of the fuel? there is a beautiful point about that--_capillary attraction_[4]. "capillary attraction!" you say,--"the attraction of hairs." well, never mind the name: it was given in old times, before we had a good understanding of what the real power was. it is by what is called capillary attraction that the fuel is conveyed to the part where combustion goes on, and is deposited there, not in a careless way, but very beautifully in the very midst of the centre of action which takes place around it. now, i am going to give you one or two instances of capillary attraction. it is that kind of action or attraction which makes two things that do not dissolve in each other still hold together. when you wash your hands, you wet them thoroughly; you take a little soap to make the adhesion better, and you find your hand remains wet. this is by that kind of attraction of which i am about to speak. and, what is more, if your hands are not soiled (as they almost always are by the usages of life), if you put your finger into a little warm water, the water will creep a little way up the finger, though you may not stop to examine it. i have here a substance which is rather porous--a column of salt--and i will pour into the plate at the bottom, not water, as it appears, but a saturated solution of salt which cannot absorb more; so that the action which you see will not be due to its dissolving anything. we may consider the plate to be the candle, and the salt the wick, and this solution the melted tallow. (i have coloured the fluid, that you may see the action better.) you observe that, now i pour in the fluid, it rises and gradually creeps up the salt higher and higher; and provided the column does not tumble over, it will go to the top. [illustration: fig. 1.] if this blue solution were combustible, and we were to place a wick at the top of the salt, it would burn as it entered into the wick. it is a most curious thing to see this kind of action taking place, and to observe how singular some of the circumstances are about it. when you wash your hands, you take a towel to wipe off the water; and it is by that kind of wetting, or that kind of attraction which makes the towel become wet with water, that the wick is made wet with the tallow. i have known some careless boys and girls (indeed, i have known it happen to careful people as well) who, having washed their hands and wiped them with a towel, have thrown the towel over the side of the basin, and before long it has drawn all the water out of the basin and conveyed it to the floor, because it happened to be thrown over the side in such a way as to serve the purpose of a syphon.[5] that you may the better see the way in which the substances act one upon another, i have here a vessel made of wire gauze filled with water, and you may compare it in its action to the cotton in one respect, or to a piece of calico in the other. in fact, wicks are sometimes made of a kind of wire gauze. you will observe that this vessel is a porous thing; for if i pour a little water on to the top, it will run out at the bottom. you would be puzzled for a good while if i asked you what the state of this vessel is, what is inside it, and why it is there? the vessel is full of water, and yet you see the water goes in and runs out as if it were empty. in order to prove this to you, i have only to empty it. the reason is this,--the wire, being once wetted, remains wet; the meshes are so small that the fluid is attracted so strongly from the one side to the other, as to remain in the vessel although it is porous. in like manner the particles of melted tallow ascend the cotton and get to the top; other particles then follow by their mutual attraction for each other, and as they reach the flame they are gradually burned. here is another application of the same principle. you see this bit of cane. i have seen boys about the streets, who are very anxious to appear like men, take a piece of cane, and light it and smoke it, as an imitation of a cigar. they are enabled to do so by the permeability of the cane in one direction, and by its capillarity. if i place this piece of cane on a plate containing some camphin (which is very much like paraffin in its general character), exactly in the same manner as the blue fluid rose through the salt will this fluid rise through the piece of cane. there being no pores at the side, the fluid cannot go in that direction, but must pass through its length. already the fluid is at the top of the cane: now i can light it and make it serve as a candle. the fluid has risen by the capillary attraction of the piece of cane, just as it does through the cotton in the candle. now, the only reason why the candle does not burn all down the side of the wick is, that the melted tallow extinguishes the flame. you know that a candle, if turned upside down, so as to allow the fuel to run upon the wick, will be put out. the reason is, that the flame has not had time to make the fuel hot enough to burn, as it does above, where it is carried in small quantities into the wick, and has all the effect of the heat exercised upon it. there is another condition which you must learn as regards the candle, without which you would not be able fully to understand the philosophy of it, and that is the vaporous condition of the fuel. in order that you may understand that, let me shew you a very pretty, but very common-place experiment. if you blow a candle out cleverly, you will see the vapour rise from it. you have, i know, often smelt the vapour of a blown-out candle--and a very bad smell it is; but if you blow it out cleverly, you will be able to see pretty well the vapour into which this solid matter is transformed. i will blow out one of these candles in such a way as not to disturb the air around it, by the continuing action of my breath; and now, if i hold a lighted taper two or three inches from the wick, you will observe a train of fire going through the air till it reaches the candle. i am obliged to be quick and ready, because, if i allow the vapour time to cool, it becomes condensed into a liquid or solid, or the stream of combustible matter gets disturbed. now, as to the shape or form of the flame. it concerns us much to know about the condition which the matter of the candle finally assumes at the top of the wick--where you have such beauty and brightness as nothing but combustion or flame can produce. [illustration: fig. 2.] you have the glittering beauty of gold and silver, and the still higher lustre of jewels, like the ruby and diamond; but none of these rival the brilliancy and beauty of flame. what diamond can shine like flame? it owes its lustre at night-time to the very flame shining upon it. the flame shines in darkness, but the light which the diamond has is as nothing until the flame shine upon it, when it is brilliant again. the candle alone shines by itself, and for itself, or for those who have arranged the materials. now, let us look a little at the form of the flame as you see it under the glass shade. it is steady and equal; and its general form is that which is represented in the diagram, varying with atmospheric disturbances, and also varying according to the size of the candle. it is a bright oblong--brighter at the top than towards the bottom--with the wick in the middle, and besides the wick in the middle, certain darker parts towards the bottom, where the ignition is not so perfect as in the part above. [illustration: fig. 3.] i have a drawing here, sketched many years ago by hooke, when he made his investigations. it is the drawing of the flame of a lamp, but it will apply to the flame of a candle. the cup of the candle is the vessel or lamp, the melted spermaceti is the oil, and the wick is common to both. upon that he sets this little flame, and then he represents what is true--a certain quantity of matter rising about it which you do not see, and which, if you have not been here before, or are not familiar with the subject, you will not know of. he has here represented the parts of the surrounding atmosphere that are very essential to the flame, and that are always present with it. there is a current formed, which draws the flame out--for the flame which you see is really drawn out by the current, and drawn upward to a great height--just as hooke has here shewn you by that prolongation of the current in the diagram. you may see this by taking a lighted candle, and putting it in the sun so as to get its shadow thrown on a piece of paper. how remarkable it is that that thing which is light enough to produce shadows of other objects, can be made to throw its own shadow on a piece of white paper or card, so that you can actually see streaming round the flame something which is not part of the flame, but is ascending and drawing the flame upwards. now, i am going to imitate the sunlight, by applying the voltaic battery to the electric lamp. you now see our sun, and its great luminosity; and by placing a candle between it and the screen, we get the shadow of the flame. [illustration: fig. 4.] you observe the shadow of the candle and of the wick; then there is a darkish part, as represented in the diagram, and then a part which is more distinct. curiously enough, however, what we see in the shadow as the darkest part of the flame is, in reality, the brightest part; and here you see streaming upwards the ascending current of hot air, as shewn by hooke, which draws out the flame, supplies it with air, and cools the sides of the cup of melted fuel. i can give you here a little further illustration, for the purpose of shewing you how flame goes up or down; according to the current. i have here a flame--it is not a candle flame--but you can, no doubt, by this time, generalise enough to be able to compare one thing with another. what i am about to do is to change the ascending current that takes the flame upwards into a descending current. this i can easily do by the little apparatus you see before me. the flame, as i have said, is not a candle flame, but it is produced by alcohol, so that it shall not smoke too much. i will also colour the flame with another substance[6], so that you may trace its course; for with the spirit alone you could hardly see well enough to have the opportunity of tracing its direction. by lighting this spirit-of-wine, we have then a flame produced; and you observe that when held in the air, it naturally goes upwards. [illustration: fig. 5] you understand now easily enough why flames go up under ordinary circumstances--it is because of the draught of air by which the combustion is formed. but now, by blowing the flame down, you see i am enabled to make it go downwards into this little chimney--the direction of the current being changed. before we have concluded this course of lectures, we shall shew you a lamp in which the flame goes up and the smoke goes down, or the flame goes down and the smoke goes up. you see, then, that we have the power in this way of varying the flame in different directions. there are now some other points that i must bring before you. many of the flames you see here vary very much in their shape by the currents of air blowing around them in different directions; but we can, if we like, make flames so that they will look like fixtures, and we can photograph them--indeed, we have to photograph them--so that they become fixed to us, if we wish to find out everything concerning them. that, however, is not the only thing i wish to mention. if i take a flame sufficiently large, it does not keep that homogeneous, that uniform condition of shape, but it breaks out with a power of life which is quite wonderful. i am about to use another kind of fuel, but one which is truly and fairly a representative of the wax or tallow of a candle. i have here a large ball of cotton, which will serve as a wick. and, now that i have immersed it in spirit and applied a light to it, in what way does it differ from an ordinary candle? why, it differs very much in one respect, that we have a vivacity and power about it, a beauty and a life entirely different from the light presented by a candle. you see those fine tongues of flame rising up. you have the same general disposition of the mass of the flame from below upwards; but, in addition to that, you have this remarkable breaking out into tongues which you do not perceive in the case of a candle. now, why is this? i must explain it to you, because when you understand that perfectly, you will be able to follow me better in what i have to say hereafter. i suppose some here will have made for themselves the experiment i am going to shew you. am i right in supposing that anybody here has played at snapdragon? i do not know a more beautiful illustration of the philosophy of flame, as to a certain part of its history, than the game of snapdragon. first, here is the dish; and let me say, that when you play snapdragon properly, you ought to have the dish well-warmed; you ought also to have warm plums and warm brandy, which, however, i have not got. when you have put the spirit into the dish, you have the cup and the fuel; and are not the raisins acting like the wicks? i now throw the plums into the dish, and light the spirit, and you see those beautiful tongues of flame that i refer to. you have the air creeping in over the edge of the dish forming these tongues. why? because, through the force of the current and the irregularity of the action of the flame, it cannot flow in one uniform stream. the air flows in so irregularly that you have what would otherwise be a single image, broken up into a variety of forms, and each of these little tongues has an independent existence of its own. indeed, i might say, you have here a multitude of independent candles. you must not imagine, because you see these tongues all at once, that the flame is of this particular shape. a flame of that shape is never so at any one time. never is a body of flame, like that which you just saw rising from the ball, of the shape it appears to you. it consists of a multitude of different shapes, succeeding each other so fast that the eye is only able to take cognisance of them all at once. in former times, i purposely analysed a flame of that general character, and the diagram shews you the different parts of which it is composed. they do not occur all at once: it is only because we see these shapes in such rapid succession, that they seem to us to exist all at one time. [illustration: fig. 6.] it is too bad that we have not got further than my game of snapdragon; but we must not, under any circumstances, keep you beyond your time. it will be a lesson to me in future to hold you more strictly to the philosophy of the thing, than to take up your time so much with these illustrations. lecture ii. a candle: brightness of the flame--air necessary for combustion--production of water. we were occupied the last time we met in considering the general character and arrangement as regards the fluid portion of a candle, and the way in which that fluid got into the place of combustion. you see, when we have a candle burning fairly in a regular, steady atmosphere, it will have a shape something like the one shewn in the diagram, and will look pretty uniform, although very curious in its character. and now, i have to ask your attention to the means by which we are enabled to ascertain what happens in any particular part of the flame--why it happens, what it does in happening, and where, after all, the whole candle goes to: because, as you know very well, a candle being brought before us and burned, disappears, if burned properly, without the least trace of dirt in the candlestick--and this is a very curious circumstance. in order, then, to examine this candle carefully, i have arranged certain apparatus, the use of which you will see as i go on. here is a candle: i am about to put the end of this glass tube into the middle of the flame--into that part which old hooke has represented in the diagram as being rather dark, and which you can see at any time, if you will look at a candle carefully, without blowing it about. we will examine this dark part first. [illustration: fig. 7.] now, i take this bent glass tube, and introduce one end into that part of the flame, and you see at once that something is coming from the flame, out at the other end of the tube; and if i put a flask there, and leave it for a little while, you will see that something from the middle part of the flame is gradually drawn out, and goes through the tube and into that flask, and there behaves very differently from what it does in the open air. it not only escapes from the end of the tube, but falls down to the bottom of the flask like a heavy substance, as indeed it is. we find that this is the wax of the candle made into a vaporous fluid--not a gas. (you must learn the difference between a gas and a vapour: a gas remains permanent, a vapour is something that will condense.) if you blow out a candle, you perceive a very nasty smell, resulting from the condensation of this vapour. that is very different from what you have outside the flame; and, in order to make that more clear to you, i am about to produce and set fire to a larger portion of this vapour--for what we have in the small way in a candle, to understand thoroughly, we must, as philosophers, produce in a larger way, if needful, that we may examine the different parts. and now mr. anderson will give me a source of heat, and i am about to shew you what that vapour is. here is some wax in a glass flask, and i am going to make it hot, as the inside of that candle-flame is hot, and the matter about the wick is hot. [the lecturer placed some wax in a glass flask, and heated it over a lamp.] now, i dare say that is hot enough for me. you see that the wax i put in it has become fluid, and there is a little smoke coming from it. we shall very soon have the vapour rising up. i will make it still hotter, and now we get more of it, so that i can actually pour the vapour out of the flask into that basin, and set it on fire there. this, then, is exactly the same kind of vapour as we have in the middle of the candle; and that you may be sure this is the case, let us try whether we have not got here, in this flask, a real combustible vapour out of the middle of the candle. [taking the flask into which the tube from the candle proceeded, and introducing a lighted taper.] see how it burns. now, this is the vapour from the middle of the candle, produced by its own heat; and that is one of the first things you have to consider with respect to the progress of the wax in the course of its combustion, and as regards the changes it undergoes. i will arrange another tube carefully in the flame, and i should not wonder if we were able, by a little care, to get that vapour to pass through the tube to the other extremity, where we will light it, and obtain absolutely the flame of the candle at a place distant from it. now, look at that. is not that a very pretty experiment? talk about laying on gas--why, we can actually lay on a candle! and you see from this that there are clearly two different kinds of action--one the _production_ of the vapour, and the other the _combustion_ of it--both of which take place in particular parts of the candle. [illustration: fig. 8] i shall get no vapour from that part which is already burnt. if i raise the tube (fig. 7) to the upper part of the flame, so soon as the vapour has been swept out, what comes away will be no longer combustible: it is already burned. how burned? why, burned thus:--in the middle of the flame, where the wick is, there is this combustible vapour; on the outside of the flame is the air which we shall find necessary for the burning of the candle; between the two, intense chemical action takes place, whereby the air and the fuel act upon each other, and at the very same time that we obtain light the vapour inside is destroyed. if you examine where the heat of a candle is, you will find it very curiously arranged. suppose i take this candle, and hold a piece of paper close upon the flame, where is the heat of that flame? do you not see that it is _not_ in the inside? it is in a ring, exactly in the place where i told you the chemical action was; and even in my irregular mode of making the experiment, if there is not too much disturbance, there will always be a ring. this is a good experiment for you to make at home. take a strip of paper, have the air in the room quiet, and put the piece of paper right across the middle of the flame (i must not talk while i make the experiment), and you will find that it is burnt in two places, and that it is not burnt, or very little so, in the middle; and when you have tried the experiment once or twice, so as to make it nicely, you will be very interested to see where the heat is, and to find that it is where the air and the fuel come together. this is most important for us as we proceed with our subject. air is absolutely necessary for combustion; and, what is more, i must have you understand that _fresh_ air is necessary, or else we should be imperfect in our reasoning and our experiments. here is a jar of air. i place it over a candle, and it burns very nicely in it at first, shewing that what i have said about it is true; but there will soon be a change. see how the flame is drawing upwards, presently fading, and at last going out. and going out, why? not because it wants air merely, for the jar is as full now as it was before; but it wants pure, fresh air. the jar is full of air, partly changed, partly not changed; but it does not contain sufficient of the fresh air which is necessary for the combustion of a candle. these are all points which we, as young chemists, have to gather up; and if we look a little more closely into this kind of action, we shall find certain steps of reasoning extremely interesting. for instance, here is the oil-lamp i shewed you--an excellent lamp for our experiments--the old argand lamp. i now make it like a candle [obstructing the passage of air into the centre of the flame]; there is the cotton; there is the oil rising up it; and there is the conical flame. it burns poorly, because there is a partial restraint of air. i have allowed no air to get to it, save round the outside of the flame, and it does not burn well. i cannot admit more air from the outside, because the wick is large; but if, as argand did so cleverly, i open a passage to the middle of the flame, and so let air come in there, you will see how much more beautifully it burns. if i shut the air off, look how it smokes; and why? we have now some very interesting points to study. we have the case of the combustion of a candle; we have the case of a candle being put out by the want of air; and we have now the case of imperfect combustion; and this is to us so interesting, that i want you to understand it as thoroughly as you do the case of a candle burning in its best possible manner. i will now make a great flame, because we need the largest possible illustrations. here is a larger wick [burning turpentine on a ball of cotton]. all these things are the same as candles, after all. if we have larger wicks, we must have a larger supply of air, or we shall have less perfect combustion. look now at this black substance going up into the atmosphere; there is a regular stream of it. i have provided means to carry off the imperfectly burned part, lest it should annoy you. look at the soots that fly off from the flame: see what an imperfect combustion it is, because it cannot get enough air. what, then, is happening? why, certain things which are necessary to the combustion of a candle are absent, and very bad results are accordingly produced; but we see what happens to a candle when it is burnt in a pure and proper state of air. at the time when i shewed you this charring by the ring of flame on the one side of the paper, i might have also shewn you, by turning to the other side, that the burning of a candle produces the same kind of soot--charcoal or carbon. but, before i shew that, let me explain to you--as it is quite necessary for our purpose--that, though i take a candle and give you, as the general result, its combustion in the form of a flame, we must see whether combustion is always in this condition, or whether there are other conditions of flame; and we shall soon discover that there are, and that they are most important to us. i think, perhaps, the best illustration of such a point to us, as juveniles, is to shew the result of strong contrast. here is a little gunpowder. you know that gunpowder burns with flame--we may fairly call it flame. it contains carbon and other materials, which altogether cause it to burn with a flame. and here is some pulverised iron, or iron filings. now, i purpose burning these two things together. i have a little mortar in which i will mix them. (before i go into these experiments, let me hope that none of you, by trying to repeat them, for fun's sake, will do any harm. these things may all be very properly used if you take care; but without that, much mischief will be done.) well, then, here is a little gunpowder, which i put at the bottom of that little wooden vessel, and mix the iron filings up with it, my object being to make the gunpowder set fire to the filings and burn them in the air, and thereby shew the difference between substances burning with flame and not with flame. here is the mixture; and when i set fire to it, you must watch the combustion, and you will see that it is of two kinds. you will see the gunpowder burning with a flame, and the filings thrown up. you will see them burning too, but without the production of flame. they will each burn separately. [the lecturer then ignited the mixture.] there is the gunpowder, which burns with a flame; and there are the filings--they burn with a different kind of combustion. you see, then, these two great distinctions; and upon these differences depend all the utility and all the beauty of flame which we use for the purpose of giving out light. when we use oil, or gas, or candle, for the purpose of illumination, their fitness all depends upon these different kinds of combustion. there are such curious conditions of flame, that it requires some cleverness and nicety of discrimination to distinguish the kinds of combustion one from another. for instance, here is a powder which is very combustible, consisting, as you see, of separate little particles. it is called _lycopodium_[7], and each of these particles can produce a vapour, and produce its own flame; but, to see them burning, you would imagine it was all one flame. i will now set fire to a quantity, and you will see the effect. we saw a cloud of flame, apparently in one body; but that rushing noise [referring to the sound produced by the burning] was a proof that the combustion was not a continuous or regular one. this is the lightning of the pantomimes, and a very good imitation. [the experiment was twice repeated by blowing lycopodium from a glass tube through a spirit-flame.] this is not an example of combustion like that of the filings i have been speaking of, to which we must now return. suppose i take a candle, and examine that part of it which appears brightest to our eyes. why, there i get these black particles, which already you have seen many times evolved from the flame, and which i am now about to evolve in a different way. i will take this candle and clear away the gutterage, which occurs by reason of the currents of air; and if i now arrange a glass tube so as just to dip into this luminous part, as in our first experiment, only higher, you see the result. in place of having the same white vapour that you had before, you will now have a black vapour. there it goes, as black as ink. it is certainly very different from the white vapour; and when we put a light to it, we shall find that it does not burn, but that it puts the light out. well, these particles, as i said before, are just the smoke of the candle; and this brings to mind that old employment which dean swift recommended to servants for their amusement, namely, writing on the ceiling of a room with a candle. but what is that black substance? why, it is the same carbon which exists in the candle. how comes it out of the candle? it evidently existed in the candle, or else we should not have had it here. and now i want you to follow me in this explanation. you would hardly think that all those substances which fly about london, in the form of soots and blacks, are the very beauty and life of the flame, and which are burned in it as those iron filings were burned here. here is a piece of wire gauze, which will not let the flame go through it; and i think you will see, almost immediately, that when i bring it low enough to touch that part of the flame which is otherwise so bright, that it quells and quenches it at once, and allows a volume of smoke to rise up. i want you now to follow me in this point,--that whenever a substance burns, as the iron filings burnt in the flame of gunpowder, without assuming the vaporous state (whether it becomes liquid or remains solid), it becomes exceedingly luminous. i have here taken three or four examples apart from the candle, on purpose to illustrate this point to you; because what i have to say is applicable to all substances, whether they burn or whether they do not burn,--that they are exceedingly bright if they retain their solid state, and that it is to this presence of solid particles in the candle-flame that it owes its brilliancy. here is a platinum-wire, a body which does not change by heat. if i heat it in this flame, see how exceedingly luminous it becomes. i will make the flame dim, for the purpose of giving a little light only, and yet you will see that the heat which it can give to that platinum-wire, though far less than the heat it has itself, is able to raise the platinum-wire to a far higher state of effulgence. this flame has carbon in it; but i will take one that has no carbon in it. there is a material, a kind of fuel--a vapour, or gas, whichever you like to call it--in that vessel, and it has no solid particles in it; so i take that because it is an example of flame itself burning without any solid matter whatever; and if i now put this solid substance in it, you see what an intense heat it has, and how brightly it causes the solid body to glow. this is the pipe through which we convey this particular gas, which we call hydrogen, and which you shall know all about next time we meet. and here is a substance called oxygen, by means of which this hydrogen can burn; and although we produce, by their mixture, far greater heat[8] than you can obtain from the candle, yet there is very little light. if, however, i take a solid substance, and put that into it, we produce an intense light if i take a piece of lime, a substance which will not burn, and which will not vaporise by the heat (and because it does not vaporise, remains solid, and remains heated), you will soon observe what happens as to its glowing. i have here a most intense heat, produced by the burning of hydrogen in contact with the oxygen; but there is as yet very little light--not for want of heat, but for want of particles which can retain their solid state; but when i hold this piece of lime in the flame of the hydrogen as it burns in the oxygen, see how it glows! this is the glorious lime-light, which rivals the voltaic-light, and which is almost equal to sunlight. i have here a piece of carbon or charcoal, which will burn and give us light exactly in the same manner as if it were burnt as part of a candle. the heat that is in the flame of a candle decomposes the vapour of the wax, and sets free the carbon particles--they rise up heated and glowing as this now glows, and then enter into the air. but the particles when burnt never pass off from a candle in the form of carbon. they go off into the air as a perfectly invisible substance, about which we shall know hereafter. is it not beautiful to think that such a process is going on, and that such a dirty thing as charcoal can become so incandescent? you see it comes to this--that all bright flames contain these solid particles; all things that burn and produce solid particles, either during the time they are burning, as in the candle, or immediately after being burnt, as in the case of the gunpowder and iron-filings,--all these things give us this glorious and beautiful light. i will give you a few illustrations. here is a piece of phosphorus, which burns with a bright flame. very well; we may now conclude that phosphorus will produce, either at the moment that it is burning or afterwards, these solid particles. here is the phosphorus lighted, and i cover it over with this glass for the purpose of keeping in what is produced. what is all that smoke? that smoke consists of those very particles which are produced by the combustion of the phosphorus. here, again, are two substances. this is chlorate of potassa, and this other sulphuret of antimony. i shall mix these together a little, and then they may be burnt in many ways. i shall touch them with a drop of sulphuric acid, for the purpose of giving you an illustration of chemical action, and they will instantly burn[9]. [the lecturer then ignited the mixture by means of sulphuric acid.] now, from the appearance of things, you can judge for yourselves whether they produce solid matter in burning. i have given you the train of reasoning which will enable you to say whether they do or do not; for what is this bright flame but the solid particles passing off? [illustration: fig. 9.] mr. anderson has in the furnace a very hot crucible,--i am about to throw into it some zinc filings, and they will burn with a flame like gunpowder. i make this experiment because you can make it well at home. now, i want you to see what will be the result of the combustion of this zinc. here it is burning--burning beautifully like a candle, i may say. but what is all that smoke, and what are those little clouds of wool which will come to you if you cannot come to them, and make themselves sensible to you in the form of the old philosophic wool, as it was called? we shall have left in that crucible, also, a quantity of this woolly matter. but i will take a piece of this same zinc and make an experiment a little more closely at home, as it were. you will have here the same thing happening. here is the piece of zinc, there [pointing to a jet of hydrogen] is the furnace, and we will set to work and try and burn the metal. it glows, you see: there is the combustion, and there is the white substance into which it burns. and so, if i take that flame of hydrogen as the representative of a candle, and shew you a substance like zinc burning in the flame, you will see that it was merely during the action of combustion that this substance glowed--while it was kept hot; and if i take a flame of hydrogen, and put this white substance from the zinc into it, look how beautifully it glows, and just because it is a solid substance. i will now take such a flame as i had a moment since, and set free from it the particles of carbon. here is some camphine, which will burn with a smoke; but if i send these particles of smoke through this pipe into the hydrogen flame, you will see they will burn and become luminous, because we heat them a second time. there they are. those are the particles of carbon re-ignited a second time. they are those particles which you can easily see by holding a piece of paper behind them, and which, whilst they are in the flame, are ignited by the heat produced, and, when so ignited, produce this brightness. when the particles are not separated, you get no brightness. the flame of coal-gas owes its brightness to the separation, during combustion, of these particles of carbon, which are equally in that as in a candle. i can very quickly alter that arrangement. here, for instance, is a bright flame of gas. supposing i add so much air to the flame as to cause it all to burn before those particles are set free, i shall not have this brightness; and i can do that in this way:--if i place over the jet this wire-gauze cap, as you see, and then light the gas over it, it burns with a non-luminous flame, owing to its having plenty of air mixed with it before it burns; and if i raise the gauze, you see it does not burn below[10]. there is plenty of carbon in the gas; but, because the atmosphere can get to it, and mix with it before it burns, you see how pale and blue the flame is. and if i blow upon a bright gas-flame, so as to consume all this carbon before it gets heated to the glowing point, it will also burn blue: [the lecturer illustrated his remarks by blowing on the gas-light.] the only reason why i have not the same bright light when i thus blow upon the flame is, that the carbon meets with sufficient air to burn it before it gets separated in the flame in a free state. the difference is solely due to the solid particles not being separated before the gas is burnt. you observe that there are certain products as the result of the combustion of a candle, and that of these products one portion may be considered as charcoal, or soot; that charcoal, when afterwards burnt, produces some other product; and it concerns us very much now to ascertain what that other product is. we shewed that something was going away; and i want you now to understand how much is going up into the air; and for that purpose we will have combustion on a little larger scale. from that candle ascends heated air, and two or three experiments will shew you the ascending current; but, in order to give you a notion of the quantity of matter which ascends in this way, i will make an experiment by which i shall try to imprison some of the products of this combustion. for this purpose i have here what boys call a fire-balloon. i use this fire-balloon merely as a sort of measure of the result of the combustion we are considering; and i am about to make a flame in such an easy and simple manner as shall best serve my present purpose. this plate shall be the "cup," we will so say, of the candle; this spirit shall be our fuel; and i am about to place this chimney over it, because it is better for me to do so than to let things proceed at random. [illustration: fig. 10.] mr. anderson will now light the fuel, and here at the top we shall get the results of the combustion. what we get at the top of that tube is exactly the same, generally speaking, as you get from the combustion of a candle; but we do not get a luminous flame here, because we use a substance which is feeble in carbon. i am about to put this balloon--not into action, because that is not my object--but to shew you the effect which results from the action of those products which arise from the candle, as they arise here from the furnace. [the balloon was held over the chimney, when it immediately commenced to fill.] you see how it is disposed to ascend; but we must not let it up, because it might come in contact with those upper gas-lights, and that would be very inconvenient. [the upper gas-lights were turned out, at the request of the lecturer, and the balloon was allowed to ascend.] does not that shew you what a large bulk of matter is being evolved? now, there is going through this tube [placing a large glass tube over a candle] all the products of that candle, and you will presently see that the tube will become quite opaque. suppose i take another candle, and place it under a jar, and then put a light on the other side, just to shew you what is going on. you see that the sides of the jar become cloudy, and the light begins to burn feebly. it is the products, you see, which make the light so dim, and this is the same thing which makes the sides of the jar so opaque. if you go home and take a spoon that has been in the cold air, and hold it over a candle--not so as to soot it--you will find that it becomes dim, just as that jar is dim. if you can get a silver dish, or something of that kind, you will make the experiment still better. and now, just to carry your thoughts forward to the time we shall next meet, let me tell you that it is _water_ which causes the dimness; and when we next meet. i will shew you that we can make it, without difficulty, assume the form of a liquid. lecture iii. products: water from the combustion--nature of water--a compound--hydrogen. i dare say you will remember that when we parted we had just mentioned the word "products" from the candle. for when a candle burns we found we were able, by nice adjustment, to get various products from it. there was one substance which was not obtained when the candle was burning properly, which was charcoal or smoke; and there was some other substance that went upwards from the flame which did not appear as smoke, but took some other form, and made part of that general current which, ascending from the candle upwards, becomes invisible, and escapes. there were also other products to mention. you remember that in that rising current having its origin at the candle, we found that one part was condensable against a cold spoon, or against a clean plate, or any other cold thing, and another part was incondensable. we will first take the condensable part, and examine it; and, strange to say, we find that that part of the product is just water--nothing but water. on the last occasion i spoke of it incidentally, merely saying that water was produced among the condensable products of the candle; but to-day i wish to draw your attention to water, that we may examine it carefully, especially in relation to this subject, and also with respect to its general existence on the surface of the globe. now, having previously arranged an experiment for the purpose of condensing water from the products of the candle, my next point will be to shew you this water; and perhaps one of the best means that i can adopt for shewing its presence to so many at once, is to exhibit a very visible action of water, and then to apply that test to what is collected as a drop at the bottom of that vessel. i have here a chemical substance, discovered by sir humphrey davy, which has a very energetic action upon water, which i shall use as a test of the presence of water. if i take a little piece of it--it is called potassium, as coming from potash,--if i take a little piece of it, and throw it into that basin, you see how it shews the presence of water by lighting up and floating about, burning with a violent flame. i am now going to take away the candle which has been burning beneath the vessel containing ice and salt, and you see a drop of water--a condensed product of the candle--hanging from under the surface of the dish. [illustration: fig. 11.] i will shew you that potassium has the same action upon it as upon the water in that basin in the experiment we have just tried. see, it takes fire, and burns in just the same manner. i will take another drop upon this glass slab, and when i put the potassium on to it, you see at once, from its taking fire, that there is water present. now, that water was produced by the candle. in the same manner, if i put this spirit-lamp under that jar, you will soon see the latter become damp, from the dew which is deposited upon it--that dew being the result of combustion; and i have no doubt you will shortly see by the drops of water which fall upon the paper below, that there is a good deal of water produced from the combustion of the lamp. i will let it remain, and you can afterwards see how much water has been collected. so, if i take a gas-lamp, and put any cooling arrangement over it, i shall get water--water being likewise produced from the combustion of gas. here, in this bottle, is a quantity of water--perfectly pure, distilled water, produced from the combustion of a gas-lamp--in no point different from the water that you distil from the river, or ocean, or spring, but exactly the same thing. water is one individual thing--it never changes. we can add to it by careful adjustment, for a little while, or we can take it apart, and get other things from it; but water, as water, remains always the same, either in a solid, liquid, or fluid state. here, again [holding another bottle], is some water produced by the combustion of an oil-lamp. a pint of oil, when burnt fairly and properly, produces rather more than a pint of water. here, again, is some water, produced by a rather long experiment from a wax candle. and so we can go on with almost all combustible substances, and find that if they burn with a flame, as a candle, they produce water. you may make these experiments yourselves. the head of a poker is a very good thing to try with, and if it remains cold long enough over the candle, you may get water condensed in drops on it; or a spoon or ladle, or anything else may be used, provided it be clean, and can carry off the heat, and so condense the water. and now--to go into the history of this wonderful production of water from combustibles, and by combustion--i must first of all tell you that this water may exist in different conditions; and although you may now be acquainted with all its forms, they still require us to give a little attention to them for the present, so that we may perceive how the water, whilst it goes through its protean changes, is entirely and absolutely the same thing, whether it is produced from a candle, by combustion, or from the rivers or ocean. first of all, water, when at the coldest, is ice. now, we philosophers---i hope that i may class you and myself together in this case--speak of water as water, whether it be in its solid, or liquid, or gaseous state,--we speak of it chemically as water. water is a thing compounded of two substances, one of which we have derived from the candle, and the other we shall find elsewhere. water may occur as ice; and you have had most excellent opportunities lately of seeing this. ice changes back into water--for we had on our last sabbath a strong instance of this change, by the sad catastrophe which occurred in our own house, as well as in the houses of many of our friends,--ice changes back into water when the temperature is raised: water also changes into steam when it is warmed enough. the water which we have here before us is in its densest state[11], and although it changes in weight, in condition, in form, and in many other qualities, it still is water; and whether we alter it into ice by cooling, or whether we change it into steam by heat, it increases in volume,--in the one case very strangely and powerfully, and in the other case very largely and wonderfully. for instance, i will now take this tin cylinder, and pour a little water into it; and seeing how much water i pour in, you may easily estimate for yourselves how high it will rise in the vessel: it will cover the bottom about two inches. i am now about to convert the water into steam, for the purpose of shewing to you the different volumes which water occupies in its different states of water and steam. let us now take the case of water changing into ice: we can effect that by cooling it in a mixture of salt and pounded ice[12]; and i shall do so to shew you the expansion of water into a thing of larger bulk when it is so changed. these bottles [holding one] are made of strong cast iron, very strong and very thick--i suppose they are the third of an inch in thickness; they are very carefully filled with water, so as to exclude all air, and then they are screwed down tight. we shall see that when we freeze the water in these iron vessels, they will not be able to hold the ice, and the expansion within them will break them in pieces as these [pointing to some fragments] are broken, which have been bottles of exactly the same kind. i am about to put these two bottles into that mixture of ice and salt, for the purpose of shewing that when water becomes ice, it changes in volume in this extraordinary way. in the mean time look at the change which has taken place in the water to which we have applied heat--it is losing its fluid state. you may tell this by two or three circumstances. i have covered the mouth of this glass flask, in which water is boiling, with a watch-glass. do you see what happens? it rattles away like a valve chattering, because the steam rising from the boiling water sends the valve up and down, and forces itself out, and so makes it clatter. you can very easily perceive that the flask is quite full of steam, or else it would not force its way out. you see, also, that the flask contains a substance very much larger than the water, for it fills the whole of the flask over and over again, and there it is blowing away into the air; and yet you cannot observe any great diminution in the bulk of the water, which shews you that its change of bulk is very great when it becomes steam. i have put our iron bottles containing water into this freezing mixture, that you may see what happens. no communication will take place, you observe, between the water in the bottles and the ice in the outer vessel. but there will be a conveyance of heat from the one to the other; and if we are successful--we are making our experiment in very great haste--i expect you will by-and-by, so soon as the cold has taken possession of the bottles and their contents, hear a pop on the occasion of the bursting of the one bottle or the other; and, when we come to examine the bottles, we shall find their contents masses of ice, partly enclosed by the covering of iron which is too small for them, because the ice is larger in bulk than the water. you know very well that ice floats upon water: if a boy falls through a hole into the water, he tries to get on the ice again to float him up. why does the ice float?--think of that, and philosophise. because the ice is larger than the quantity of water which can produce it; and therefore the ice weighs the lighter, and the water is the heavier. to return now to the action of heat on water. see what a stream of vapour is issuing from this tin vessel! you observe, we must have made it quite full of steam to have it sent out in that great quantity. and now, as we can convert the water into steam by heat, we convert it back into liquid water by the application of cold. and if we take a glass, or any other cold thing, and hold it over this steam, see how soon it gets damp with water; it will condense it until the glass is warm--it condenses the water which is now running down the sides of it. i have here another experiment to shew the condensation of water from a vaporous state back into a liquid state, in the same way as the vapour, one of the products of the candle, was condensed against the bottom of the dish, and obtained in the form of water; and to shew you how truly and thoroughly these changes take place, i will take this tin flask, which is now full of steam, and close the top. we shall see what takes place when we cause this water or steam to return back to the fluid state by pouring some cold water on the outside. [the lecturer poured the cold water over the vessel, when it immediately collapsed.] you see what has happened. if i had closed the stopper, and still kept the heat applied to it, it would have burst the vessel; yet, when the steam returns to the state of water, the vessel collapses, there being a vacuum produced inside by the condensation of the steam. i shew you these experiments for the purpose of pointing out that in all these occurrences there is nothing that changes the water into any other thing--it still remains water; and so the vessel is obliged to give way, and is crushed inwards, as in the other case, by the further application of heat, it would have been blown outwards. [illustration: fig. 12.] and what do you think the bulk of that water is when it assumes the vaporous condition? you see that cube [pointing to a cubic foot]. there, by its side, is a cubic inch, exactly the same shape as the cubic foot, and that bulk of water [the cubic inch] is sufficient to expand into that bulk [the cubic foot] of steam; and, on the contrary, the application of cold will contract that large quantity of steam into this small quantity of water. [illustration: fig. 13.] [one of the iron bottles burst at that moment.] ah! there is one of our bottles burst, and here you see is a crack down one side an eighth of an inch in width. [the other now exploded, sending the freezing mixture in all directions.] this other bottle is also broken; although the iron was nearly half-an-inch thick, the ice has burst it asunder. these changes always take place in water: they do not require to be always produced by artificial means,--we only use them here because we want to produce a small winter round that little bottle, instead of a long and severe one. but if you go to canada, or to the north, you will find the temperature there out of doors will do the same thing as has been done here by the freezing mixture. to return to our quiet philosophy. we shall not in future be deceived, therefore, by any changes that are produced in water. water is the same everywhere, whether produced from the ocean or from the flame of the candle. where, then, is this water which we get from a candle? i must anticipate a little, and tell you. it evidently comes, as to part of it, from the candle; but is it within the candle beforehand? no. it is not in the candle; and it is not in the air round about the candle which is necessary for its combustion. it is neither in one nor the other, but it comes from their conjoint action, a part from the candle, a part from the air; and this we have now to trace, so that we may understand thoroughly what is the chemical history of a candle when we have it burning on our table. how shall we get at this? i myself know plenty of ways, but i want _you_ to get at it from the association in your own minds of what i have already told you. i think you can see a little in this way. we had just now the case of a substance which acted upon the water in the way that sir humphrey davy shewed us[13], and which i am now going to recall to your minds by making again an experiment upon that dish. it is a thing which we have to handle very carefully, for you see, if i allow a little splash of water to come upon this mass, it sets fire to part of it; and if there were free access of air, it would quickly set fire to the whole. now, this is a metal--a beautiful and bright metal--which rapidly changes in the air, and, as you know, rapidly changes in water. i will put a piece on the water, and you see it burns beautifully, making a floating lamp, using the water in the place of air. again, if we take a few iron filings or turnings, and put them in water, we find that they likewise undergo an alteration. they do not change so much as this potassium does, but they change somewhat in the same way; they become rusty, and shew an action upon the water, though in a different degree of intensity to what this beautiful metal does: but they act upon the water in the same manner generally as this potassium. i want you to put these different facts together in your minds. i have another metal here [zinc], and when we examined it with regard to the solid substance produced by its combustion, we had an opportunity of seeing that it burned; and i suppose, if i take a little strip of this zinc and put it over the candle, you will see something half-way, as it were, between the combustion of potassium on the water and the action of iron,--you see there is a sort of combustion. it has burned, leaving a white ash or residuum, and here also we find that the metal has a certain amount of action upon water. by degrees we have learned how to modify the action of these different substances, and to make them tell us what we want to know. and now, first of all, i take iron. it is a common thing in all chemical reactions, where we get any result of this kind, to find that it is increased by the action of heat; and if we want to examine minutely and carefully the action of bodies one upon another, we often have to refer to the action of heat. you are aware, i believe, that iron-filings burn beautifully in the air; but i am about to shew you an experiment of this kind, because it will impress upon you what i am going to say about iron in its action on water. if i take a flame and make it hollow;--you know why, because i want to get air to it and into it, and therefore i make it hollow--and then take a few iron-filings and drop them into the flame, you see how well they burn. that combustion results from the chemical action which is going on when we ignite those particles. and so we proceed to consider these different effects, and ascertain what iron will do when it meets with water. it will tell us the story so beautifully, so gradually and regularly, that i think it will please you very much. i have here a furnace with a pipe going through it like an iron gun-barrel, and i have stuffed that barrel full of bright iron-turnings, and placed it across the fire, to be made red-hot. we can either send air through the barrel to come in contact with the iron, or we can send steam from this little boiler at the end of the barrel. here is a stop-cock which shuts off the steam from the barrel until we wish to admit it. there is some water in these glass jars, which i have coloured blue, so that you may see what happens. now, you know very well that any steam i might send through that barrel, if it went through into the water, would be condensed; for you have seen that steam cannot retain its gaseous form if it be cooled down. [illustration: fig. 14.] you saw it here [pointing to the tin flask] crushing itself into a small bulk, and causing the flask holding it to collapse; so that if i were to send steam through that barrel, it would be condensed--supposing the barrel were cold: it is, therefore, heated to perform the experiment i am now about to shew you. i am going to send the steam through the barrel in small quantities; and you shall judge for yourselves, when you see it issue from the other end, whether it still remains steam. steam is condensible into water, and when you lower the temperature of steam, you convert it back into fluid water; but i have lowered the temperature of the gas which i have collected in this jar, by passing it through water after it has traversed the iron barrel, and still it does not change back into water. i will take another test and apply to this gas. (i hold the jar in an inverted position, or my substance would escape.) if i now apply a light to the mouth of the jar, it ignites with a slight noise. that tells you that it is not steam. steam puts out a fire--it does not burn; but you saw that what i had in that jar burnt. we may obtain this substance equally from water produced from the candle-flame as from any other source. when it is obtained by the action of the iron upon the aqueous vapour, it leaves the iron in a state very similar to that in which these filings were after they were burnt. it makes the iron heavier than it was before. so long as the iron remains in the tube and is heated, and is cooled again without the access of air or water, it does not change in its weight; but after having had this current of steam passed over it, it then comes out heavier that it was before, having taken something out of the steam, and having allowed something else to pass forth, which we see here. and now, as we have another jar full, i will shew you something most interesting. it is a combustible gas; and i might at once take this jar and set fire to the contents, and shew you that it is combustible; but i intend to shew you more if i can. it is also a very light substance. steam will condense: this body will rise in the air, and not condense. [illustration: fig. 15] suppose i take another glass jar, empty of all but air: if i examine it with a taper, i shall find that it contains nothing but air. i will now take this jar full of the gas that i am speaking of, and deal with it as though it were a light body. i will hold both upside-down, and turn the one up under the other; and that which did contain the gas procured from the steam, what does it contain now? you will find it now only contains air. but look! here is the combustible substance [taking the other jar] which i have poured out of the one jar into the other. it still preserves its quality, and condition, and independence, and therefore is the more worthy of our consideration, as belonging to the products of a candle. now, this substance which we have just prepared by the action of iron on the steam or water, we can also get by means of those other things which you have already seen act so well upon the water. if i take a piece of potassium, and make the necessary arrangements, it will produce this gas; and if, instead, a piece of zinc, i find, when i come to examine it very carefully, that the main reason why this zinc cannot act upon the water continuously as the other metal does, is because the result of the action of the water envelopes the zinc in a kind of protecting coat. we have learned in consequence, that if we put into our vessel only the zinc and water, they by themselves do not give rise to much action, and we get no result. but suppose i proceed to dissolve off this varnish--this encumbering substance--which i can do by a little acid; the moment i do this, i find the zinc acting upon the water exactly as the iron did, but at the common temperature. the acid in no way is altered, except in its combination with the oxide of zinc, which is produced. i have now poured the acid into the glass, and the effect is as though i were applying heat to cause this boiling up. there is something coming off from the zinc very abundantly, which is not steam. there is a jar full of it; and you will find that i have exactly the same combustible substance remaining in the vessel, when i hold it upside-down, that i produced during the experiment with the iron barrel. this is what we get from water--the same substance which is contained in the candle. [illustration: fig. 16.] let us now trace distinctly the connection between these two points. this is hydrogen--a body classed among those things which in chemistry we call elements, because we can get nothing else out of them. a candle is not an elementary body, because we can get carbon out of it; we can get this hydrogen out of it, or at least out of the water which it supplies. and this gas has been so named hydrogen, because it is that element which, in association with another, generates water. [footnote: [greek: hudos], "water," and [greek: gennao], "i generate."] mr. anderson having now been able to get two or three jars of gas, we shall have a few experiments to make, and i want to shew you the best way of making these experiments. i am not afraid to shew you, for i wish you to make experiments, if you will only make them with care and attention, and the assent of those around you. as we advance in chemistry, we are obliged to deal with substances which are rather injurious, if in their wrong places--the acids, and heat, and combustible things we use, might do harm if carelessly employed. if you want to make hydrogen, you can make it easily from bits of zinc, and sulphuric or muriatic acid. here is what in former times was called the "philosopher's candle." it is a little phial with a cork, and a tube or pipe passing through it. [illustration: fig. 17.] and i am now putting a few little pieces of zinc into it. this little instrument i am going to apply to a useful purpose in our demonstrations--for i want to shew you that you can prepare hydrogen, and make some experiments with it as you please at your own homes. let me here tell you why i am so careful to fill this phial nearly, and yet not quite full. i do it because the evolved gas, which, as you have seen, is very combustible, is explosive to a considerable extent when mixed with air, and might lead to harm, if you were to apply a light to the end of that pipe before all the air had been swept out of the space above the water. i am now about to pour in the sulphuric acid. i have used very little zinc, and more sulphuric acid and water, because i want to keep it at work for some time. i therefore take care in this way to modify the proportions of the ingredients, so that i may have a regular supply--not too quick, and not too slow. supposing i now take a glass and put it upside-down over the end of the tube, because the hydrogen is light i expect that it will remain in that vessel a little while. we will now test the contents of our glass to see if there be hydrogen in it. i think i am safe in saying we have caught some [applying a light]. there it is, you see. i will now apply a light to the top of the tube. there is the hydrogen burning. there is our philosophical candle. it is a foolish feeble sort of a flame, you may say; but it is so hot that scarcely any common flame gives out so much heat. it goes on burning regularly, and i am now about to put that flame to burn under a certain arrangement, in order that we may examine its results and make use of the information which we may thereby acquire. inasmuch as the candle produces water, and this gas comes out of the water, let us see what this gives us by the same process of combustion that the candle went through when it burnt in the atmosphere; and for that purpose i am going to put the lamp under this apparatus, in order to condense whatever may arise from the combustion within it in the course of a short time you will see moisture appearing in the cylinder, and you will get the water running down the side; and the water from this hydrogen flame will have absolutely the same effect upon all our tests, being obtained by the same general process as in the former case. this hydrogen is a very beautiful substance. it is so light that it carries things up: it is far lighter than the atmosphere; and i dare say i can shew you this by an experiment which, if you are very clever, some of you may even have skill enough to repeat. here is our generator of hydrogen, and here are some soap-suds. i have an india-rubber tube connected with the hydrogen generator, and at the end of the tube is a tobacco-pipe. [illustration: fig. 18.] i can thus put the pipe into the suds, and blow bubbles by means of the hydrogen. you observe how the bubbles fall downwards when i blow them with my warm breath; but notice the difference when i blow them with hydrogen. [the lecturer here blew bubbles with hydrogen, which rose to the roof of the theatre.] it shews you how light this gas must be in order to carry with it not merely the ordinary soap-bubble, but the larger portion of a drop hanging to the bottom of it. i can shew its lightness in a better way than this; larger bubbles than these may be so lifted up; indeed, in former times balloons used to be filled with this gas. mr. anderson will fasten this tube on to our generator, and we shall have a stream of hydrogen here with which we can charge this balloon made of collodion. i need not even be very careful to get all the air out, for i know the power of this gas to carry it up. [two collodion balloons were inflated, and sent up, one being held by a string.] here is another larger one made of thin membrane, which we will fill and allow to ascend. you will see they will all remain floating about until the gas escapes. what, then, are the comparative weights of these substances? i have a table here which will shew you the proportion which their weights bear to each other. i have taken a pint and a cubic foot as the measures, and have placed opposite to them the respective figures. a pint measure of this hydrogen weighs three-quarters of our smallest weight (a grain), and a cubic foot weighs one-twelfth of an ounce; whereas a pint of water weighs 8,750 grains, and a cubic foot of water weighs almost 1,000 ounces. you see, therefore, what a vast difference there is between the weight of a cubic foot of water and a cubic foot of hydrogen. hydrogen gives rise to no substance that can become solid, either during combustion or afterwards as a product of its combustion. but when it burns, it produces water only; and if we take a cold glass and put it over the flame, it becomes damp, and you have water, produced immediately in appreciable quantity; and nothing is produced by its combustion but the same water which you have seen the flame of the candle produce. it is important to remember that this hydrogen is the only thing in nature which furnishes water as the sole product of combustion. and now we must endeavour to find some additional proof of the general character and composition of water; and for this purpose i will keep you a little longer, so that at our next meeting we may be better prepared for the subject. we have the power of arranging the zinc which you have seen acting upon the water by the assistance of an acid, in such a manner as to cause all the power to be evolved in the place where we require it i have behind me a voltaic pile, and i am just about to shew you, at the end of this lecture, its character and power, that you may see what we shall have to deal with when next we meet. i hold here the extremities of the wires which transport the power from behind me, and which i shall cause to act on the water. we have previously seen what a power of combustion is possessed by the potassium, or the zinc, or the iron-filings; but none of them shew such energy as this. [the lecturer here made contact between the two terminal wires of the battery, when a brilliant flash of light was produced.] this light is, in fact, produced by a forty-zinc power of burning: it is a power that i can carry about in my hands, through these wires, at pleasure--although, if i applied it wrongly to myself, it would destroy me in an instant, for it is a most intense thing, and the power you see here put forth while you count five [bringing the poles in contact, and exhibiting the electric light] is equivalent to the power of several thunder-storms, so great is its force[14]. and that you may see what intense energy it has, i will take the ends of the wires which convey the power from the battery, and with it i dare say i can burn this iron file. now, this is a chemical power, and one which, when we next meet, i shall apply to water, and shew you what results we are able to produce. lecture iv. hydrogen in the candle--burns into water--the other part of water--oxygen. i see you are not tired of the candle yet, or i am sure you would not be interested in the subject in the way you are. when our candle was burning, we found it produced water exactly like the water we have around us; and by further examination of this water we found in it that curious body, hydrogen--that light substance of which there is some in this jar. we afterwards saw the burning powers of that hydrogen, and that it produced water. and i think i introduced to your notice an apparatus which i very briefly said was an arrangement of chemical force, or power, or energy, so adjusted as to convey its power to us in these wires; and i said i should use that force to pull the water to pieces, to see what else there was in the water besides hydrogen; because, you remember, when we passed the water through the iron tube, we by no means got the weight of water back which we put in, in the form of steam, though we had a very large quantity of gas evolved. we have now to see what is the other substance present. that you may understand the character and use of this instrument, let us make an experiment or two. let us put together, first of all, some substances, knowing what they are, and then see what that instrument does to them. there is some copper (observe the various changes which it can undergo), and here is some nitric acid, and you will find that this, being a strong chemical agent, will act very powerfully when i add it to the copper. it is now sending forth a beautiful red vapour; but as we do not want that vapour, mr. anderson will hold it near the chimney for a short time, that we may have the use and beauty of the experiment without the annoyance. the copper which i have put into the flask will dissolve: it will change the acid and the water into a blue fluid, containing copper and other things; and i propose then shewing you how this voltaic battery deals with it; and in the mean-time we will arrange another kind of experiment for you to see what power it has. this is a substance which is to us like water--that is to say, it contains bodies which we do not know of as yet, as water contains a body which we do not know as yet. now, this solution of a salt[15] i will put upon paper, and spread about, and apply the power of the battery to it, and observe what will happen. three or four important things will happen which we shall take advantage of. i place this wetted paper upon a sheet of tinfoil, which is convenient for keeping all clean, and also for the advantageous application of the power; and this solution, you see, is not at all affected by being put upon the paper or tinfoil, nor by anything else i have brought in contact with it yet, and which, therefore, is free to us to use as regards that instrument. but first let us see that our instrument is in order. here are our wires. let us see whether it is in the state in which it was last time. we can soon tell. as yet, when i bring them together, we have no power, because the conveyers--what we call the electrodes--the passages or ways for the electricity--are stopped; but now mr. anderson by that [referring to a sudden flash at the ends of the wires] has given me a telegram to say that it is ready. before i begin our experiment i will get mr. anderson to break contact again at the battery behind me, and we will put a platinum-wire across to connect the poles, and then if i find i can ignite a pretty good length of this wire, we shall be safe in our experiment. now you will see the power. [the connection was established, and the intermediate wire became red-hot.] there is the power running beautifully through the wire, which i have made thin on purpose to shew you that we have those powerful forces; and now, having that power, we will proceed with it to the examination of water. i have here two pieces of platinum, and if i lay them down upon this piece of paper [the moistened paper on the tinfoil], you will see no action; and if i take them up, there is no change that you can see, but the arrangement remains just as it was before. but, now, see what happens: if i take these two poles and put either one or the other of them down separately on the platinum-plates, they do nothing for me, both are perfectly without action; but if i let them both be in contact at the same moment, see what happens [a brown spot appeared under each pole of the battery]. look here at the effect that takes place, and see how i have pulled something apart from the white--something brown; and i have no doubt, if i were to arrange it thus, and were to put one of the poles to the tinfoil on the other side of the paper--why, i get such a beautiful action upon the paper, that i am going to see whether i cannot write with it--a telegram, if you please. [the lecturer here traced the word "juvenile" on the paper with one of the terminal wires.] see there how beautifully we can get our results! you see we have here drawn something, which we have not known about before, out of this solution. let us now take that flask from mr. andersen's hands, and see what we can draw out of that. this, you know, is a liquid which we have just made up from copper and nitric acid, whilst our other experiments were in hand; and though i am making this experiment very hastily, and may bungle a little, yet i prefer to let you see what i do rather than prepare it beforehand. now, see what happens. these two platinum-plates are the two ends (or i will make them so immediately) of this apparatus; and i am about to put them in contact with that solution just as we did a moment ago on the paper. it does not matter to us whether the solution be on the paper or whether it be in the jar, so long as we bring the ends of the apparatus to it. if i put the two platinums in by themselves, they come out as clean and as white as they go in [inserting them into the fluid without connecting them with the battery]; but when we take the power and lay that on [the platinums were connected with the battery and again dipped into the solution], this, you see [exhibiting one of the platinums], is at once turned into copper, as it were: it has become like a plate of copper; and that [exhibiting the other piece of platinum] has come out quite clean. if i take this coppered piece and change sides, the copper will leave the right-hand side and come over to the left side; what was before the coppered plate comes out clean, and the plate which was clean comes out coated with copper; and thus you see that the same copper we put into this solution we can also take out of it by means of this instrument. putting that solution aside, let us now see what effect this instrument will have upon water. here are two little platinum-plates which i intend to make the ends of the battery, and this (c) is a little vessel so shaped as to enable me to take it to pieces, and shew you its construction. in these two cups (a and b) i pour mercury, which touches the ends of the wires connected with the platinum-plates. in the vessel (c) i pour some water containing a little acid (but which is put only for the purpose of facilitating the action; it undergoes no change in the process), and connected with the top of the vessel is a bent glass tube (d), which may remind you of the pipe which was connected with the gun barrel in our furnace experiment, and which now passes under the jar (f). i have now adjusted this apparatus, and we will proceed to affect the water in some way or other. in the other case, i sent the water through a tube which was made red-hot; i am now going to pass the electricity through the contents of this vessel. perhaps i may boil the water; if i do boil the water, i shall get steam; and you know that steam condenses when it gets cold, and you will therefore see by that whether i do boil the water or not. perhaps, however, i shall not boil the water, but produce some other effect. you shall have the experiment and see. there is one wire which i will put to this side (a), and here is the other wire which i will put to the other side (b), and you will soon see whether any disturbance takes place. here it is seeming to boil up famously; but does it boil? let us see whether that which goes out is steam or not. i think you will soon see the jar (f) will be filled with vapour, if that which rises from the water is steam. but can it be steam? why, certainly not; because there it remains, you see, unchanged. there it is standing over the water, and it cannot therefore be steam, but must be a permanent gas of some sort what is it? is it hydrogen? is it anything else? well, we will examine it. if it is hydrogen, it will burn. [the lecturer then ignited a portion of the gas collected, which burnt with an explosion.] [illustration: fig. 19] it is certainly something combustible, but not combustible in the way that hydrogen is. hydrogen would not have given you that noise; but the colour of that light, when the thing did burn, was like that of hydrogen: it will, however, burn without contact with the air. that is why i have chosen this other form of apparatus, for the purpose of pointing out to you what are the particular circumstances of this experiment. in place of an open vessel i have taken one that is closed (our battery is so beautifully active that we are even boiling the mercury, and getting all things right--not wrong, but vigorously right); and i am going to shew you that that gas, whatever it may be, can burn without air, and in that respect differs from a candle, which cannot burn without the air. and our manner of doing this is as follows:--i have here a glass vessel (g) which is fitted with two platinum-wires (ik), through which i can apply electricity; and we can put the vessel on the air-pump and exhaust the air, and when we have taken the air out we can bring it here and fasten it on to this jar (f), and let into the vessel that gas which was formed by the action of the voltaic battery upon the water, and which we have produced by changing the water into it,--for i may go as far as this, and say we have really, by that experiment, changed the water into that gas. we have not only altered its condition, but we have changed it really and truly into that gaseous substance, and all the water is there which was decomposed by the experiment. as i screw this vessel (gh) on here (h), and make the tubes well connected, and when i open the stop-cocks (hhh), if you watch the level of the water (in f), you will see that the gas will rise. i will now close the stop-cocks, as i have drawn up as much as the vessel can hold, and being safely conveyed into that chamber, i will pass into it an electric spark from this leyden jar (l), when the vessel, which is now quite clear and bright, will become dim. there will be no sound, for the vessel is strong enough to confine the explosion. [a spark was then passed through the jar, when the explosive mixture was ignited.] did you see that brilliant light? if i again screw the vessel on to the jar, and open these stop-cocks, you will see that the gas will rise a second time. [the stop-cocks were then opened.] those gases [referring to the gases first collected in the jar, and which had just been ignited by the electric spark] have disappeared, as you see: their place is vacant, and fresh gas has gone in. water has been formed from them; and if we repeat our operation [repeating the last experiment], i shall have another vacancy, as you will see by the water rising. i always have an empty vessel after the explosion, because the vapour or gas into which that water has been resolved by the battery explodes under the influence of the spark, and changes into water; and by-and-by you will see in this upper vessel some drops of water trickling down the sides and collecting at the bottom. we are here dealing with water entirely, without reference to the atmosphere. the water of the candle had the atmosphere helping to produce it; but in this way it can be produced independently of the air. water, therefore, ought to contain that other substance which the candle takes from the air, and which, combining with the hydrogen, produces water. just now you saw that one end of this battery took hold of the copper, extracting it from the vessel which contained the blue solution. it was effected by this wire; and surely we may say, if the battery has such power with a metallic solution which we made and unmade, may we not find that it is possible to split asunder the component parts of the water, and put them into this place and that place? suppose i take the poles--the metallic ends of this battery--and see what will happen with the water in this apparatus (fig. 20), where we have separated the two ends far apart. [illustration: fig. 20.] i place one here (at a), and the other there (at b), and i have little shelves with holes which i can put upon each pole, and so arrange them that whatever escapes from the two ends of the battery will appear as separate gases; for you saw that the water did not become vaporous, but gaseous. the wires are now in perfect and proper connection with the vessel containing the water; and you see the bubbles rising: let us collect these bubbles and see what they are. here is a glass cylinder (o); i fill it with water and put it over one end (a) of the pile; and i will take another (h) and put it over the other end (b) of the pile. and so now we have a double apparatus, with both places delivering gas. both these jars will fill with gas. there they go, that to the right (h) filling very rapidly; the one to the left (o) filling not so rapidly; and though i have allowed some bubbles to escape, yet still the action is going on pretty regularly; and were it not that one is rather smaller than the other, you would see that i should have twice as much in this (h) as i have in that (o). both these gases are colourless; they stand over the water without condensing; they are alike in all things--i mean in all _apparent_ things; and we have here an opportunity of examining these bodies and ascertaining what they are. their bulk is large, and we can easily apply experiments to them. i will take this jar (h) first, and will ask you to be prepared to recognise hydrogen. think of all its qualities--the light gas which stood well in inverted vessels, burning with a pale flame at the mouth of the jar--and see whether this gas does not satisfy all these conditions. if it be hydrogen, it will remain here while i hold this jar inverted. [a light was then applied, when the hydrogen burnt] what is there now in the other jar? you know that the two together made an explosive mixture. but what can this be which we find as the other constituent in water, and which must therefore be that substance which made the hydrogen burn? we know that the water we put into the vessel consisted of the two things together. we find one of these is hydrogen: what must that other be which was in the water before the experiment, and which we now have by itself? i am about to put this lighted splinter of wood into the gas. the gas itself will not burn, but it will make the splinter of wood burn. [the lecturer ignited the end of the wood, and introduced it into the jar of gas.] see how it invigorates the combustion of the wood, and how it makes it burn far better than the air would make it burn; and now you see by itself that every other substance which is contained in the water, and which, when the water was formed by the burning of the candle, must have been taken from the atmosphere. what shall we call it, a, b, or c? let us call it o--call it "oxygen:" it is a very good distinct-sounding name. this, then, is the oxygen which was present in the water, forming so large a part of it. we shall now begin to understand more clearly our experiments and researches; because, when we have examined these things once or twice, we shall soon see why a candle burns in the air. when we have in this way analysed the water--that is to say, separated, or electrolysed its parts out of it--we get two volumes of hydrogen, and one of the body that burns it. and these two are represented to us on the following diagram, with their weights also stated; and we shall find that the oxygen is a very heavy body by comparison with the hydrogen. it is the other element in water. i had better, perhaps, tell you now how we get this oxygen abundantly, having shewn you how we can separate it from the water. oxygen, as you will immediately imagine, exists in the atmosphere; for how should the candle burn to produce water without it? _____________________ | | | | 1 | 8 | | | | | | oxygen. | oxygen, . . . . 88.9 | | | | |_________| hydrogen, . . . 11.1 | hydrogen. | ----| | 9 water,. . . . . 100.0 | | | | | | |___________| such a thing would be absolutely impossible, and chemically impossible, without oxygen. [illustration: fig. 21.] can we get it from the air? well, there are some very complicated and difficult processes by which we can get it from the air; but we have better processes. there is a substance called the black oxide of manganese: it is a very black-looking mineral, but very useful, and when made red-hot it gives out oxygen. here is an iron bottle which has had some of this substance put into it, and there is a tube fixed to it, and a fire ready made, and mr. anderson will put that retort into the fire, for it is made of iron, and can stand the heat. here is a salt called chlorate of potassa, which is now made in large quantities for bleaching, and chemical and medical uses, and for pyrotechnic and other purposes. i will take some and mix it with some of the oxide of manganese (oxide of copper, or oxide of iron would do as well); and if i put these together in a retort, far less than a red heat is sufficient to evolve this oxygen from the mixture. i am not preparing to make much, because we only want sufficient for our experiments; only, as you will see immediately, if i use too small a charge, the first portion of the gas will be mixed with the air already in the retort, and i should be obliged to sacrifice the first portion of the gas, because it would be so much diluted with air; the first portion must therefore be thrown away. you will find in this case, that a common spirit-lamp is quite sufficient for me to get the oxygen, and so we shall have two processes going on for its preparation. see how freely the gas is coming over from that small portion of the mixture. we will examine it, and see what are its properties. now, in this way we are producing, as you will observe, a gas just like the one we had in the experiment with the battery, transparent, undissolved by water, and presenting the ordinary visible properties of the atmosphere. (as this first jar contains the air, together with the first portions of the oxygen set free during the preparation, we will carry it out of the way, and be prepared to make our experiments in a regular, dignified manner.) and, inasmuch as that power of making wood, wax, or other things burn, was so marked in the oxygen we obtained by means of the voltaic battery from water, we may expect to find the same property here. we will try it you see there is the combustion of a lighted taper in air, and here is its combustion in this gas [lowering the taper into the jar]. see how brightly and how beautifully it burns! you can also see more than this,--you will perceive it is a heavy gas, whilst the hydrogen would go up like a balloon, or even faster than a balloon, when not encumbered with the weight of the envelope. [illustration: fig. 22.] you may easily see that although we obtained from water twice as much in volume of the hydrogen as of oxygen, it does not follow that we have twice as much in weight--because one is heavy, and the other a very light gas. we have means of weighing gases or air; but without stopping to explain, that, let me just tell you what their respective weights are. the weight of a pint of hydrogen is three-quarters of a grain; the weight of the same quantity of oxygen is nearly twelve grains. this is a very great difference. the weight of a cubit foot of hydrogen is one-twelfth of an ounce; and the weight of a cubit foot of oxygen is one ounce and a third. and so on we might come to masses of matter which may be weighed in the balance, and which we can take account of as to hundredweights and as to tons, as you will see almost immediately. now, as regards this very property of oxygen supporting combustion, which we may compare to air, i will take a piece of candle to shew it you in a rough way, and the result will be rough. there is our candle burning in the air: how will it burn in oxygen? i have here a jar of this gas, and i am about to put it over the candle for you to compare the action of this gas with that of the air. why, look at it: it looks something like the light you saw at the poles of the voltaic battery. think how vigorous that action must be! and yet, during all that action, nothing more is produced than what is produced by the burning of the candle in air. we have the same production of water, and the same phenomena exactly, when we use this gas instead of air, as we have when the candle is burnt in air. but now we have got a knowledge of this new substance, we can look at it a little more distinctly, in order to satisfy ourselves that we have got a good general understanding of this part of the product of a candle. it is wonderful how great the supporting powers of this substance are as regards combustion. for instance, here is a lamp which, simple though it be, is the original, i may say, of a great variety of lamps which are constructed for divers purposes--for light-houses, microscopic illuminations, and other uses; and if it were proposed to make it burn very brightly, you would say, "if a candle burnt better in oxygen, will not a lamp do the same?" why, it will do so. mr. anderson will give me a tube coming from our oxygen reservoir, and i am about to apply it to this flame, which i will previously make burn badly on purpose. there comes the oxygen: what a combustion that makes! but if i shut it off, what becomes of the lamp? [the flow of oxygen was stopped, and the lamp relapsed to its former dimness.] it is wonderful how, by means of oxygen, we get combustion accelerated. but it does not affect merely the combustion of hydrogen, or carbon, or the candle; but it exalts all combustions of the common kind. we will take one which relates to iron, for instance, as you have already seen iron burn a little in the atmosphere. here is a jar of oxygen, and this is a piece of iron wire; but if it were a bar as thick as my wrist, it would burn the same. [illustration: fig. 23.] i first attach a little piece of wood to the iron, i then set the wood on fire and let them both down together into the jar. the wood is now alight, and there it burns as wood should burn in oxygen; but it will soon communicate its combustion to the iron. the iron is now burning brilliantly, and will continue so for a long time. as long as we supply oxygen, so long can we carry on the combustion of the iron, until the latter is consumed. we will now put that on one side, and take some other substance; but we must limit our experiments, for we have not time to spare for all the illustrations you would have a right to if we had more time. we will take a piece of sulphur--you know how sulphur burns in the air--well, we put it into the oxygen, and you will see that whatever can burn in air, can burn with a far greater intensity in oxygen, leading you to think that perhaps the atmosphere itself owes all its power of combustion to this gas. the sulphur is now burning very quietly in the oxygen; but you cannot for a moment mistake the very high and increased action which takes place when it is so burnt, instead of being burnt merely in common air. [illustration: fig. 24.] i am now about to shew you the combustion of another substance--phosphorus. i can do it better for you here than you can do it at home. this is a very combustible substance; and if it be so combustible in air, what might you expect it would be in oxygen? i am about to shew it to you not in its fullest intensity, for if i did so we should almost blow the apparatus up--i may even now crack the jar, though i do not want to break things carelessly. you see how it burns in the air. but what a glorious light it gives out when i introduce it into oxygen! [introducing the lighted phosphorus into the jar of oxygen.] there you see the solid particles going off which cause that combustion to be so brilliantly luminous. thus far we have tested this power of oxygen, and the high combustion it produces by means of other substances. we must now, for a little while longer, look at it as respects the hydrogen. you know, when we allowed the oxygen and the hydrogen derived from the water to mix and burn together, we had a little explosion. you remember, also, that when i burnt the oxygen and the hydrogen in a jet together, we got very little light, but great heat. i am now about to set fire to oxygen and hydrogen, mixed in the proportion in which they occur in water. here is a vessel containing one volume of oxygen and two volumes of hydrogen. this mixture is exactly of the same nature as the gas we just now obtained from the voltaic battery: it would be far too much to burn at once; i have therefore arranged to blow soap-bubbles with it, and burn those bubbles, that we may see by a general experiment or two how this oxygen supports the combustion of the hydrogen. first of all, we will see whether we can blow a bubble. well, there goes the gas [causing it to issue through a tobacco-pipe into some soap-suds]. here i have a bubble. i am receiving them on my hand: and you will perhaps think i am acting oddly in this experiment; but it is to shew you that we must not always trust to noise and sounds, but rather to real facts. [exploding a bubble on the palm of his hand.] i am afraid to fire a bubble from the end of the pipe, because the explosion would pass up into the jar and blow it to pieces. this oxygen then will unite with the hydrogen, as you see by the phenomena, and hear by the sound, with the utmost readiness of action, and all its powers are then taken up in its neutralisation of the qualities of the hydrogen. so now i think you will perceive the whole history of water with reference to oxygen and the air, from what we have before said. why does a piece of potassium decompose water? because it finds oxygen in the water. what is set free when i put it in the water, as i am about to do again? it sets free hydrogen, and the hydrogen burns; but the potassium itself combines with oxygen; and this piece of potassium, in taking the water apart--the water, you may say, derived from the combustion of the candle--takes away the oxygen which the candle took from the air, and so sets the hydrogen free; and even if i take a piece of ice, and put a piece of potassium upon it, the beautiful affinities by which the oxygen and the hydrogen are related are such, that the ice will absolutely set fire to the potassium. i shew this to you to-day, in order to enlarge your ideas of these things, and that you may see how greatly results are modified by circumstances. there is the potassium on the ice, producing a sort of volcanic action. it will be my place, when next we meet, having pointed out these anomalous actions, to shew you that none of these extra and strange effects are met with by us--that none of these strange and injurious actions take place when we are burning, not merely a candle, but gas in our streets, or fuel in our fireplaces, so long as we confine ourselves within the laws that nature has made for our guidance. lecture v. oxygen present in the air--nature of the atmosphere--its properties--other products from the candle--carbonic acid--its properties. we have now seen that we can produce hydrogen and oxygen from the water that we obtained from the candle. hydrogen, you know, comes from the candle, and oxygen, you believe, comes from the air. but then you have a right to ask me, "how is it that the air and the oxygen do not equally well burn the candle?" if you remember what happened when i put a jar of oxygen over a piece of candle, you recollect there was a very different kind of combustion to that which took place in the air. now, why is this? it is a very important question, and one i shall endeavour to make you understand: it relates most intimately to the nature of the atmosphere, and is most important to us. we have several tests for oxygen besides the mere burning of bodies. you have seen a candle burnt in oxygen, or in the air; you have seen phosphorus burnt in the air, or in oxygen; and you have seen iron-filings burnt in oxygen. but we have other tests besides these, and i am about to refer to one or two of them for the purpose of carrying your conviction and your experience further. here we have a vessel of oxygen. i will shew its presence to you: if i take a little spark and put it into that oxygen, you know, by the experience you gained the last time we met, what will happen; if i put that spark into the jar, it will tell you whether we have oxygen here or not. yes! we have proved it by combustion; and now here is another test for oxygen, which is a very curious and useful one. i have here two jars full of gas, with a plate between them to prevent their mixing; i take the plate away, and the gases are creeping one into the other. "what happens?" say you: "they together produce no such combustion as was seen in the case of the candle." but see how the presence of oxygen is told by its association with this other substance[14]. what a beautifully coloured gas i have obtained in this way, shewing me the presence of the oxygen! in the same way we can try this experiment by mixing common air with this test-gas. here is a jar containing air--such air as the candle would burn in--and here is a jar or bottle containing the test-gas. i let them come together over water, and you see the result: the contents of the test-bottle are flowing into the jar of air, and you see i obtain exactly the same kind of action as before, and that shews me that there is oxygen in the air--the very same substance that has been already obtained by us from the water produced by the candle. but then, beyond that, how is it that the candle does not burn in air as well as in oxygen? we will come to that point at once. i have here two jars; they are filled to the same height with gas, and the appearance to the eye is alike in both, and i really do not know at present which of these jars contains oxygen and which contains air, although i know they have previously been filled with these gases. but here is our test-gas, and i am going to work with the two jars, in order to examine whether there is any difference between them in the quality of reddening this gas. i am now going to turn this test-gas into one of the jars, and observe what happens. there is reddening, you see; there is then oxygen present. we will now test the other jar; but you see this is not so distinctly red as the first: and, further, this curious thing happens,--if i take these two gases and shake them well together with water, we shall absorb the red gas; and then, if i put in more of this test-gas and shake again, we shall absorb more; and i can go on as long as there be any oxygen present to produce that effect. if i let in air, it will not matter; but the moment i introduce water, the red gas disappears; and i may go on in this way, putting in more and more of the test-gas, until i come to something left behind which will not redden any longer by the use of that particular body that rendered the air and the oxygen red. why is that? you see in a moment it is because there is, besides oxygen, something else present which is left behind. i will let a little more air into the jar, and if it turns red you will know that some of that reddening gas is still present, and that consequently it was not for the want of this producing body that that air was left behind. now, you will begin to understand what i am about to say. you saw that when i burnt phosphorus in a jar, as the smoke produced by the phosphorus and the oxygen of the air condensed, it left a good deal of gas unburnt, just as this red gas left something untouched,--there was, in fact, this gas left behind, which the phosphorus cannot touch, which the reddening gas cannot touch, and this something is not oxygen, and yet is part of the atmosphere. so that is one way of opening out air into the two things of which it is composed--oxygen, which burns our candles, our phosphorus, or anything else; and this other substance--nitrogen--which will not burn them. this other part of the air is by far the larger proportion, and it is a very curious body, when we come to examine it; it is remarkably curious, and yet you say, perhaps, that it is very uninteresting. it is uninteresting in some respects because of this--that it shews no brilliant effects of combustion. if i test it with a taper as i do oxygen and hydrogen, it does not burn like hydrogen, nor does it make the taper burn like oxygen. try it in any way i will, it does neither the one thing nor the other: it will not take fire; it will not let the taper burn; it puts out the combustion of everything. there is nothing that will burn in it in common circumstances. it has no smell; it is not sour; it does not dissolve in water; it is neither an acid nor an alkali; it is as indifferent to all our organs as it is possible for a thing to be. and you might say, "it is nothing; it is not worth chemical attention; what does it do in the air?" ah! then come our beautiful and fine results shewn us by an observant philosophy. suppose, in place of having nitrogen, or nitrogen and oxygen, we had pure oxygen as our atmosphere; what would become of us? you know very well that a piece of iron lit in a jar of oxygen goes on burning to the end. when you see a fire in an iron grate, imagine where the grate would go to if the whole of the atmosphere were oxygen. the grate would burn up more powerfully than the coals--for the iron of the grate itself is even more combustible than the coals which we burn in it. a fire put into the middle of a locomotive would be a fire in a magazine of fuel, if the atmosphere were oxygen. the nitrogen lowers it down and makes it moderate and useful for us, and then, with all that, it takes away with it the fumes that you have seen produced from the candle, disperses them throughout the whole of the atmosphere, and carries them away to places where they are wanted to perform a great and glorious purpose of good to man, for the sustenance of vegetation; and thus does a most wonderful work, although you say, on examining it, "why, it is a perfectly indifferent thing." this nitrogen in its ordinary state is an inactive element; no action short of the most intense electric force, and then in the most infinitely small degree, can cause the nitrogen to combine directly with the other element of the atmosphere, or with other things round about it; it is a perfectly indifferent, and therefore to say, a safe substance. but before i take you to that result, i must tell you about the atmosphere itself. i have written on this diagram the composition of one hundred parts of atmospheric air:- bulk. weight. oxygen, . . . . . 20 22.3 nitrogen, . . . . 80 77.7 --- ---- l00 100.0 it is a true analysis of the atmosphere, so far as regards the quantity of oxygen and the quantity of nitrogen present. by our analysis, we find that 5 pints of the atmosphere contain only 1 pint of oxygen, and 4 pints, or 4 parts, of nitrogen by bulk. that is our analysis of the atmosphere. it requires all that quantity of nitrogen to reduce the oxygen down, so as to be able to supply the candle properly with fuel, so as to supply us with an atmosphere which our lungs can healthily and safely breathe; for it is just as important to make the oxygen right for us to breathe, as it is to make the atmosphere right for the burning of the fire and the candle. but now for this atmosphere. first of all, let me tell you the weight of these gases. a pint of nitrogen weighs 10-4/10 grains, or a cubic foot weighs 1-1/6 ounce. that is the weight of the nitrogen. the oxygen is heavier: a pint of it weighs 11-9/10 grains, and a cubic foot weighs 1-3/4 ounce. a pint of air weighs about 10-7/10 grains, and a cubic foot 1-1/5 ounce. [illustration: fig. 25.] you have asked me several times, and i am very glad you have, "how do you weigh gases?" i will shew you; it is very simple, and easily done. here is a balance, and here a copper bottle, made as light as we can consistent with due strength, turned very nicely in the lathe, and made perfectly air-tight, with a stop-cock, which we can open and shut, which at present is open, and therefore allows the bottle to be full of air. i have here a nicely-adjusted balance, in which i think the bottle, in its present condition, will be balanced by the weight on the other side. and here is a pump by which we can force the air into this bottle, and with it we will force in a certain number of volumes of air, as measured by the pump. [twenty measures were pumped in.] we will shut that in and put it in the balance. see how it sinks: it is much heavier than it was. by what? by the air that we have forced into it by the pump. there is not a greater _bulk_ of air, but there is the same bulk of _heavier_ air, because we have forced in air upon it. and that you may have a fair notion in your mind as to how much this air measures, here is a jar full of water. we will open that copper vessel into this jar, and let the air return to its former state. all i have to do now is to screw them tightly together, and to turn the taps, when there, you see, is the bulk of the twenty pumps of air which i forced into the bottle; and to make sure that we have been quite correct in what we have been doing, we will take the bottle again to the balance, and, if it is now counterpoised by the original weight, we shall be quite sure we have made our experiment correctly. [illustration: fig. 26.] it is balanced; so, you see, we can find out the weight of the extra volumes of air forced in, in that way, and by that means we are able to ascertain that a cubic foot of air weighs 1-1/5 ounce. but that small experiment will by no means convey to your mind the whole literal truth of this matter. it is wonderful how it accumulates when you come to larger volumes. this bulk of air [a cubic foot] weighs 1-1/5 ounce. what do you think of the contents of that box above there, which i have had made for the purpose? the air which is within that box weighs one pound--a full pound; and i have calculated the weight of the air in this room,--you would hardly imagine it, but it is above a ton. so rapidly do the weights rise up, and so important is the presence of the atmosphere, and of the oxygen and the nitrogen in it, and the use it performs in conveying things to and fro from place to place, and carrying bad vapours to places where they will do good instead of harm. having given you that little illustration with respect to the weight of the air, let me shew you certain consequences of it. you have a right to them, because you would not understand so much without it. do you remember this kind of experiment? have you ever seen it? suppose i take a pump somewhat similar to the one i had a little while ago to force air into the bottle, and suppose i place it in such a manner that by certain arrangements i can apply my hand to it: my hand moves about in the air so easily that it seems to feel nothing, and i can hardly get velocity enough by any motion of my own in the atmosphere to make sure that there is much resistance to it. [illustration: fig. 27.] but, when i put my hand here [on the air-pump receiver, which was afterwards exhausted], you see what happens. why is my hand fastened to this place, and why am i able to pull this pump about? and see! how is it that i can hardly get my hand away? why is this? it is the weight of the air--the weight of the air that is above. i have another experiment here, which i think will explain to you more about it. when the air is pumped from underneath the bladder which is stretched over this glass, you will see the effect in another shape: the top is quite flat at present, but i will make a very little motion with the pump, and now look at it--see how it has gone down, see how it is bent in. you will see the bladder go in more and more, until at last i expect it will be driven in and broken by the force of the atmosphere pressing upon it. [illustration: fig. 28.] [the bladder at last broke with a loud report.] now, that was done entirely by the weight of the air pressing on it, and you can easily understand how that is. the particles that are piled up in the atmosphere stand upon each other, as these five cubes do. you can easily conceive that four of these five cubes are resting upon the bottom one, and if i take that away, the others will all sink down. so it is with the atmosphere: the air that is above is sustained by the air that is beneath; and when the air is pumped away from beneath them, the change occurs which you saw when i placed my hand on the air-pump, and which you saw in the case of the bladder, and which you shall see better here. i have tied over this jar a piece of sheet india-rubber, and i am now about to take away the air from the inside of the jar; and if you will watch the india-rubber--which acts as a partition between the air below and the air above--you will see, when i pump, how the pressure shews itself. see where it is going to--i can actually put my hand into the jar; and yet this result is only caused by the great and powerful action of the air above. how beautifully it shews this curious circumstance! here is something that you can have a pull at, when i have finished to-day. it is a little apparatus of two hollow brass hemispheres, closely fitted together, and having connected with it a pipe and a cock, through which we can exhaust the air from the inside; and although the two halves are so easily taken apart, while the air is left within, yet you will see, when we exhaust it by-and-by, no power of any two of you will be able to pull them apart. every square inch of surface that is contained in the area of that vessel sustains fifteen pounds by weight, or nearly so, when the air is taken out; and you may try your strength presently in seeing whether you can overcome that pressure of the atmosphere. here is another very pretty thing--the boys' sucker, only refined by the philosopher. we young ones have a perfect right to take toys, and make them into philosophy, inasmuch as now-a-days we are turning philosophy into toys. here is a sucker, only it is made of india-rubber: if i clap it upon the table, you see at once it holds. why does it hold? i can slip it about, and yet if i try to pull it up, it seems as if it would pull the table with it i can easily make it slip about from place to place; but only when i bring it to the edge of the table can i get it off. it is only kept down by the pressure of the atmosphere above. we have a couple of them; and if you take these two and press them together, you will see how firmly they stick. and, indeed, we may use them as they are proposed to be used, to stick against windows, or against walls, where they will adhere for an evening, and serve to hang anything on that you want. i think, however, that you boys ought to be shewn experiments that you can make at home; and so here is a very pretty experiment in illustration of the pressure of the atmosphere. here is a tumbler of water. suppose i were to ask you to turn that tumbler upside-down, so that the water should not fall out, and yet not be kept in by your hand, but merely by using the pressure of the atmosphere. could you do that? take a wine-glass, either quite full or half-full of water, and put a flat card on the top, turn it upside-down, and then see what becomes of the card and of the water. the air cannot get in because the water by its capillary attraction round the edge keeps it out. i think this will give you a correct notion of what you may call the materiality of the air; and when i tell you that the box holds a pound of it, and this room more than a ton, you will begin to think that air is something very serious. i will make another experiment, to convince you of this positive resistance. there is that beautiful experiment of the popgun, made so well and so easily, you know, out of a quill, or a tube, or anything of that kind,--where we take a slice of potato, for instance, or an apple, and take the tube and cut out a pellet, as i have now done, and push it to one end. i have made that end tight; and now i take another piece and put it in: it will confine the air that is within the tube perfectly and completely for our purpose; and i shall now find it absolutely impossible by any force of mine to drive that little pellet close up to the other. it cannot be done. i may press the air to a certain extent, but if i go on pressing, long before it comes to the second, the confined air will drive the front one out with a force something like that of gunpowder; for gunpowder is in part dependent upon the same action that you see here exemplified. i saw the other day an experiment which pleased me much, as i thought it would serve our purpose here. (i ought to have held my tongue for four or five minutes before beginning this experiment, because it depends upon my lungs for success.) by the proper application of air i expect to be able to drive this egg out of one cup into the other by the force of my breath; but if i fail, it is in a good cause; and i do not promise success, because i have been talking more than i ought to do to make the experiment succeed. [the lecturer here tried the experiment, and succeeded in blowing the egg from one egg-cup to the other.] you see that the air which i blow goes downwards between the egg and the cup, and makes a blast under the egg, and is thus able to lift a heavy thing--for a full egg is a very heavy thing for air to lift. if you want to make the experiment, you had better boil the egg quite hard first, and then you may very safely try to blow it from one cup to the other, with a little care. i have now kept you long enough upon this property of the weight of the air, but there is another thing i should like to mention. you saw the way in which, in this popgun, i was able to drive the second piece of potato half or two-thirds of an inch before the first piece started, by virtue of the elasticity of the air--just as i pressed into the copper bottle the particles of air by means of the pump. now, this depends upon a wonderful property in the air, namely, its elasticity; and i should like to give you a good illustration of this. if i take anything that confines the air properly, as this membrane, which also is able to contract and expand so as to give us a measure of the elasticity of the air, and confine in this bladder a certain portion of air; and then, if we take the atmosphere off from the outside of it, just as in these cases we put the pressure on--if we take the pressure off, you will see how it will then go on expanding and expanding, larger and larger, until it will fill the whole of this bell-jar, shewing you that wonderful property of the air, its elasticity, its compressibility, and expansibility, to an exceedingly large extent, and which is very essential for the purposes and services it performs in the economy of creation. we will now turn to another very important part of our subject, remembering that we have examined the candle in its burning, and have found that it gives rise to various products. we have the products, you know, of soot, of water, and of something else which you have not yet examined. we have collected the water, but have allowed the other things to go into the air. let us now examine some of these other products. here is an experiment which i think will help you in part in this way. we will put our candle there, and place over it a chimney, thus. i think my candle will go on burning, because the air-passage is open at the bottom and the top. in the first place, you see the moisture appearing--that you know about. it is water produced from the candle by the action of the air upon its hydrogen. but, besides that, something is going out at the top: it is not moisture--it is not water--it is not condensible; and yet, after all, it has very singular properties. you will find that the air coming out of the top of our chimney is nearly sufficient to blow the light out i am holding to it; and if i put the light fairly opposed to the current, it will blow it quite out. you will say that is as it should be; and i am supposing that you think it ought to do so, because the nitrogen does not support combustion, and ought to put the candle out, since the candle will not burn in nitrogen. [illustration: fig. 29.] but is there nothing else there than nitrogen? i must now anticipate--that is to say, i must use my own knowledge to supply you with the means that we adopt for the purpose of ascertaining these things, and examining such gases as these. i will take an empty bottle--here is one--and if i hold it over this chimney, i shall get the combustion of the candle below sending its results into the bottle above; and we shall soon find that this bottle contains, not merely an air that is bad as regards the combustion of a taper put into it, but having other properties. let me take a little quick-lime and pour some common water on to it--the commonest water will do. i will stir it a moment, then pour it upon a piece of filtering paper in a funnel, and we shall very quickly have a clear water proceeding to the bottle below, as i have here. i have plenty of this water in another bottle; but, nevertheless, i should like to use the lime-water that was prepared before you, so that you may see what its uses are. if i take some of this beautiful clear lime-water, and pour it into this jar, which has collected the air from the candle, you will see a change coming about. do you see that the water has become quite milky? observe, that will not happen with air merely. here is a bottle filled with air; and if i put a little lime-water into it, neither the oxygen nor the nitrogen, nor anything else that is in that quantity of air, will make any change in the lime-water. it remains perfectly clear, and no shaking of that quantity of lime-water with that quantity of air in its common state will cause any change; but if i take this bottle with the lime-water, and hold it so as to get the general products of the candle in contact with it, in a very short time we shall have it milky. there is the chalk, consisting of the lime which we used in making the lime-water, combined with something that came from the candle--that other product which we are in search of, and which i want to tell you about to-day. this is a substance made visible to us by its action, which is not the action of the lime-water either upon the oxygen or upon the nitrogen, nor upon the water itself, but it is something new to us from the candle. and then we find this white powder, produced by the lime-water and the vapour from the candle, appears to us very much like whitening or chalk, and, when examined, it does prove to be exactly the same substance as whitening or chalk. so we are led, or have been led, to observe upon the various circumstances of this experiment, and to trace this production of chalk to its various causes, to give us the true knowledge of the nature of this combustion of the candle--to find that this substance, issuing from the candle, is exactly the same as that substance which would issue from a retort, if i were to put some chalk into it with a little moisture, and make it red-hot: you would then find that exactly the same substance would issue from it as from the candle. but we have a better means of getting this substance, and in greater quantity, so as to ascertain what its general characters are. we find this substance in very great abundance in a multitude of cases where you would least expect it. all limestones contain a great deal of this gas which issues from the candle, and which we call _carbonic acid_. all chalks, all shells, all corals contain a great quantity of this curious air. we find it fixed in these stones; for which reason dr. black called it "fixed air"--finding it in these fixed things like marble and chalk. he called it fixed air, because it lost its quality of air, and assumed the condition of a solid body. we can easily get this air from marble. here is a jar containing a little muriatic acid, and here is a taper which, if i put it into that jar, will shew only the presence of common air. there is, you see, pure air down to the bottom; the jar is full of it here is a substance--marble[17], a very beautiful and superior marble--and if i put these pieces of marble into the jar, a great boiling apparently goes on. that, however, is not steam--it is a gas that is rising up; and if i now search the jar by a candle, i shall have exactly the same effect produced upon the taper as i had from the air which issued from the end of the chimney over the burning candle. it is exactly the same action, and caused by the very same substance that issued from the candle; and in this way we can get carbonic acid in great abundance--we have already nearly filled the jar. we also find that this gas is not merely contained in marble. here is a vessel in which i have put some common whitening--chalk, which has been washed in water and deprived of its coarser particles, and so supplied to the plasterer as whitening. here is a large jar containing this whitening and water, and i have here some strong sulphuric acid, which is the acid you might have to use if you were to make these experiments (only, in using this acid with limestone, the body that is produced is an insoluble substance, whereas the muriatic acid produces a soluble substance that does not so much thicken the water). and you will seek out a reason why i take this kind of apparatus for the purpose of shewing this experiment. i do it because you may repeat in a small way what i am about to do in a large one. you will have here just the same kind of action; and i am evolving in this large jar carbonic acid, exactly the same in its nature and properties as the gas which we obtained from the combustion of the candle in the atmosphere. and no matter how different the two methods by which we prepare this carbonic acid, you will see, when we get to the end of our subject, that it is all exactly the same, whether prepared in the one way or in the other. we will now proceed to the next experiment with regard to this gas. what is its nature? here is one of the vessels full, and we will try it, as we have done so many other gases, by combustion. you see it is not combustible, nor does it support combustion. neither, as we know, does it dissolve much in water, because we collect it over water very easily. then, you know that it has an effect, and becomes white in contact with lime-water; and when it does become white in that way, it becomes one of the constituents to make carbonate of lime or limestone. the next thing i must shew you is, that it really does dissolve a little in water, and therefore that it is unlike oxygen and hydrogen in that respect i have here an apparatus by which we can produce this solution. in the lower part of this apparatus is marble and acid, and in the upper part cold water. the valves are so arranged that the gas can get from one to the other. i will set it in action now, and you can see the gas bubbling up through the water, as it has been doing all night long, and by this time we shall find that we have this substance dissolved in the water. if i take a glass and draw off some of the water, i find that it tastes a little acid to the mouth: it is impregnated with carbonic acid; and if i now apply a little lime-water to it, that will give us a test of its presence. this water will make the lime-water turbid and white, which is proof of the presence of carbonic acid. then it is a very weighty gas--it is heavier than the atmosphere. i have put their respective weights at the lower part of this table, along with, for comparison, the weights of the other gases we have been examining:- pint. cubic foot. hydrogen, . . . . 3/4 grains. 1/12 ounce. oxygen, . . . . 11-9/10 " 1-1/2 " nitrogen, . . . . 10-1/10 " 1-1/4 " air,. . . . . . 10-7/16 " 1-3/8 " carbonic acid, . . 16-1/3 " 1-9/10 " a pint of it weighs 16-1/3 grains, and a cubic foot weighs 1-9/10 ounce, almost two ounces. you can see by many experiments that this is a heavy gas. suppose i take a glass containing nothing else but air, and from this vessel containing the carbonic acid i attempt to pour a little of this gas into that glass; i wonder whether any has gone in or not. i cannot tell by the appearance, but i can in this way [introducing the taper]. yes, there it is, you see; and if i were to examine it by lime-water, i should find it by that test also. i will take this little bucket, and put it down into the well of carbonic acid--indeed, we too often have real wells of carbonic acid--and now, if there is any carbonic acid, i must have got to it by this time, and it will be in this bucket, which we will examine with a taper. there it is, you see; it is full of carbonic acid. [illustration: fig. 30.] there is another experiment by which i will shew you its weight. i have here a jar suspended at one end of a balance--it is now equipoised; but when i pour this carbonic acid into the jar on the one side which now contains air, you will see it sink down at once, because of the carbonic acid that i pour into it. and now, if i examine this jar with the lighted taper, i shall find that the carbonic acid has fallen into it, and it no longer has any power of supporting the combustion. if i blow a soap-bubble, which of course will be filled with air, and let it fall into this jar of carbonic acid, it will float. [illustration: fig. 31.] but i shall first of all take one of these little balloons filled with air. i am not quite sure where the carbonic acid is; we will just try the depth, and see whereabouts is its level. there, you see, we have this bladder floating on the carbonic acid; and if i evolve some more of the carbonic acid, the bladder will be lifted up higher. there it goes--the jar is nearly full; and now i will see whether i can blow a soap-bubble on that, and float it in the same way. [the lecturer here blew a soap-bubble, and allowed it to fall into the jar of carbonic acid, when it floated in it midway.] it is floating, as the balloon floated, by virtue of the greater weight of the carbonic acid than of the air. and now, having so far given you the history of the carbonic acid--as to its sources in the candle, as to its physical properties and weight--when we next meet i shall shew you of what it is composed, and where it gets its elements from. lecture vi. carbon or charcoal--coal gas--respiration and its analogy to the burning of a candle--conclusion. a lady, who honours me by her presence at these lectures, has conferred a still further obligation by sending me these two candles, which are from japan, and, i presume, are made of that substance to which i referred in a former lecture. you see that they are even far more highly ornamented than the french candles; and, i suppose, are candles of luxury, judging from their appearance. they have a remarkable peculiarity about them--namely, a hollow wick,--that beautiful peculiarity which argand introduced into the lamp, and made so valuable. to those who receive such presents from the east, i may just say that this and such like materials gradually undergo a change which gives them on the surface a dull and dead appearance; but they may easily be restored to their original beauty, if the surface be rubbed with a clean cloth or silk handkerchief, so as to polish the little rugosity or roughness: this will restore the beauty of the colours. i have so rubbed one of these candles, and you see the difference between it and the other which has not been polished, but which may be restored by the same process. observe, also, that these moulded candles from japan are made more conical than the moulded candles in this part of the world. i told you, when we last met, a good deal about carbonic acid. we found, by the lime-water test, that when the vapour from the top of the candle or lamp was received into bottles, and tested by this solution of lime-water (the composition of which i explained to you, and which you can make for yourselves), we had that white opacity which was in fact calcareous matter, like shells and corals, and many of the rocks and minerals in the earth. but i have not yet told you fully and clearly the chemical history of this substance--carbonic acid--as we have it from the candle, and i must now resume that subject. we have seen the products, and the nature of them, as they issue from the candle. we have traced the water to its elements, and now we have to see where are the elements of the carbonic acid supplied by the candle. a few experiments will shew this. you remember that when a candle burns badly, it produces smoke; but if it is burning well, there is no smoke. and you know that the brightness of the candle is due to this smoke, which becomes ignited. here is an experiment to prove this: so long as the smoke remains in the flame of the candle and becomes ignited, it gives a beautiful light, and never appears to us in the form of black particles. i will light some fuel, which is extravagant in its burning. this will serve our purpose--a little turpentine on a sponge. you see the smoke rising from it, and floating into the air in large quantities; and, remember now, the carbonic acid that we have from the candle is from such smoke as that. to make that evident to you, i will introduce this turpentine burning on the sponge into a flask where i have plenty of oxygen, the rich part of the atmosphere, and you now see that the smoke is all consumed. this is the first part of our experiment; and now, what follows? the carbon which you saw flying off from the turpentine flame in the air is now entirely burned in this oxygen, and we shall find that it will, by this rough and temporary experiment, give us exactly the same conclusion and result as we had from the combustion of the candle. the reason why i make the experiment in this manner is solely that i may cause the steps of our demonstration to be so simple that you can never for a moment lose the train of reasoning, if you only pay attention. all the carbon which is burned in oxygen, or air, comes out as carbonic acid, whilst those particles which are not so burned shew you the second substance in the carbonic acid--namely, the carbon--that body which made the flame so bright whilst there was plenty of air, but which was thrown off in excess when there was not oxygen enough to burn it. i have also to shew you a little more distinctly the history of carbon and oxygen, in their union to make carbonic acid. you are now better able to understand this than before, and i have prepared three or four experiments by way of illustration. this jar is filled with oxygen, and here is some carbon which has been placed in a crucible, for the purpose of being made red-hot. i keep my jar dry, and venture to give you a result imperfect in some degree, in order that i may make the experiment brighter. i am about to put the oxygen and the carbon together. that this is carbon (common charcoal pulverised), you will see by the way in which it burns in the air [letting some of the red-hot charcoal fall out of the crucible]. i am now about to burn it in oxygen gas, and look at the difference. it may appear to you at a distance as if it were burning with a flame; but it is not so. every little piece of charcoal is burning as a spark, and whilst it so burns it is producing carbonic acid. i specially want these two or three experiments to point out what i shall dwell upon more distinctly by-and-by--that carbon burns in this way, and not as a flame. instead of taking many particles of carbon to burn, i will take a rather large piece, which will enable you to see the form and size; and to trace the effects very decidedly. here is the jar of oxygen, and here is the piece of charcoal, to which i have fastened a little piece of wood, which i can set fire to, and so commence the combustion, which i could not conveniently do without. you now see the charcoal burning, but not as a flame (or if there be a flame, it is the smallest possible one, which i know the cause of--namely, the formation of a little carbonic oxide close upon the surface of the carbon). it goes on burning, you see, slowly producing carbonic acid by the union of this carbon or charcoal (they are equivalent terms) with the oxygen. i have here another piece of charcoal, a piece of bark, which has the quality of being blown to pieces--exploding as it burns. by the effect of the heat, we shall reduce the lump of carbon into particles that will fly off; still every particle, equally with the whole mass, burns in this peculiar way: it burns as a coal, and not like a flame. you observe a multitude of little combustions going on, but no flame. i do not know a finer experiment than this, to shew that carbon burns with a spark. here, then, is carbonic acid formed from its elements. it is produced at once; and if we examined it by lime-water, you will see that we have the same substance which i have previously described to you. by putting together 6 parts of carbon by weight (whether it comes from the flame of a candle or from powdered charcoal) and 16 parts of oxygen by weight, we have 22 parts of carbonic acid; and, as we saw last time, the 22 parts of carbonic acid, combined with 28 parts of lime, produced common carbonate of lime. if you were to examine an oyster-shell, and weigh the component parts, you would find that every 50 parts would give 6 of carbon and 16 of oxygen, combined with 28 of lime. however, i do not want to trouble you with these minutiâ¾--it is only the general philosophy of the matter that we can now go into. see how finely the carbon is dissolving away [pointing to the lump of charcoal burning quietly in the jar of oxygen]. you may say that the charcoal is actually dissolving in the air round about; and if that were perfectly pure charcoal, which we can easily prepare, there would be no residue whatever. when we have a perfectly cleansed and purified piece of carbon, there is no ash left. the carbon burns as a solid dense body, that heat alone cannot change as to its solidity, and yet it passes away into vapour that never condenses into solid or liquid under ordinary circumstances; and what is more curious still, is the fact that the oxygen does not change in its bulk by the solution of the carbon in it. just as the bulk is at first, so it is at last, only it has become carbonic acid. there is another experiment which i must give you before you are fully acquainted with the general nature of carbonic acid. being a compound body, consisting of carbon and oxygen, carbonic acid is a body that we ought to be able to take asunder. and so we can. as we did with water, so we can with carbonic acid--take the two parts asunder. the simplest and quickest way is to act upon the carbonic acid by a substance that can attract the oxygen from it, and leave the carbon behind. you recollect that i took potassium and put it upon water or ice, and you saw that it could take the oxygen from the hydrogen. now, suppose we do something of the same kind here with this carbonic acid. you know carbonic acid to be a heavy gas. i will not test it with lime-water, as that will interfere with our subsequent experiments; but i think the heaviness of the gas and the power of extinguishing flame will be sufficient for our purpose. i introduce a flame into the gas, and you will see whether it will be put out. you see the light is extinguished. indeed, the gas may, perhaps, put out phosphorus, which, you know, has a pretty strong combustion. here is a piece of phosphorus heated to a high degree. i introduce it into gas, and you observe the light is put out; but it will take fire again in the air, because there it re-enters into combustion. now, let me take a piece of potassium, a substance which, even at common temperatures, can act upon carbonic acid, though not sufficiently for our present purpose, because it soon gets covered with a protecting coat; but if we warm it up to the burning point in air, as we have a fair right to do, and as we have done with phosphorus, you will see that it can burn in carbonic acid; and if it burns, it will burn by taking oxygen, so that you will see what is left behind. i am going, then, to burn this potassium in the carbonic acid, as a proof of the existence of oxygen in the carbonic acid. [in the preliminary process of heating, the potassium exploded.] sometimes we get an awkward piece of potassium that explodes, or something like it, when it burns. i will take another piece; and now that it is heated, i introduce it into the jar, and you perceive that it burns in the carbonic acid--not so well as in the air, because the carbonic acid contains the oxygen combined; but it does burn, and takes away the oxygen. if i now put this potassium into water, i find that, besides the potash formed (which you need not trouble about), there is a quantity of carbon produced. i have here made the experiment in a very rough way; but i assure you that if i were to make it carefully, devoting a day to it, instead of five minutes, we should get all the proper amount of charcoal left in the spoon, or in the place where the potassium was burned, so that there could be no doubt as to the result. here, then, is the carbon obtained from the carbonic acid, as a common black substance; so that you have the entire proof of the nature of carbonic acid as consisting of carbon and oxygen. and now, i may tell you, that _whenever_ carbon burns under common circumstances, it produces carbonic acid. suppose i take this piece of wood, and put it into a bottle with lime-water. i might shake that lime-water up with wood and the atmosphere as long as i pleased, it would still remain clear as you see it; but suppose i burn the piece of wood in the air of that bottle. you, of course, know i get water. do i get carbonic acid? [the experiment was performed.] there it is, you see--that is to say, the carbonate lime, which results from carbonic acid, and that carbonic acid must be formed from the carbon which comes from the wood, from the candle, or any other thing. indeed, you have yourselves frequently tried a very pretty experiment, by which you may see the carbon in wood. if you take a piece of wood, and partly burn it, and then blow it out, you have carbon left. there are things that do not shew carbon in this way. a candle does not shew it, but it contains carbon. here also is a jar of coal-gas, which produces carbonic acid abundantly. you do not see the carbon, but we can soon shew it to you. i will light it, and as long as there is any gas in this cylinder it will go on burning. you see no carbon, but you see a flame; and because that is bright, it will lead you to guess that there is carbon in the flame. but i will shew it to you by another process. i have some of the same gas in another vessel, mixed with a body that will burn the hydrogen of the gas, but will not burn the carbon. i will light them with a burning taper, and you perceive the hydrogen is consumed, but not the carbon, which is left behind as a dense black smoke. i hope that by these three or four experiments you will learn to see when carbon is present, and understand what are the products of combustion, when gas or other bodies are thoroughly burned in the air. before we leave the subject of carbon, let us make a few experiments and remarks upon its wonderful condition as respects ordinary combustion. i have shewn you that the carbon in burning burns only as a solid body, and yet you perceive that, after it is burned, it ceases to be a solid. there are very few fuels that act like this. it is, in fact, only that great source of fuel, the carbonaceous series, the coals, charcoals, and woods, that can do it. i do not know that there is any other elementary substance besides carbon that burns with these conditions; and if it had not been so, what would happen to us? suppose all fuel had been like iron, which, when it burns, burns into a solid substance. we could not then have such a combustion as you have in this fire-place. here also is another kind of fuel which burns very well--as well as, if not better, than carbon--so well, indeed, as to take fire of itself when it is in the air, as you see [breaking a tube full of lead pyrophorus]. this substance is lead, and you see how wonderfully combustible it is. it is very much divided, and is like a heap of coals in the fireplace; the air can get to its surface and inside, and so it burns. but why does it not burn in that way now, when it is lying in a mass? [emptying the contents of the tube in a heap on to a plate of iron]. simply because the air cannot get to it. though it can produce a great heat, the great heat which we want in our furnaces and under our boilers, still that which is produced cannot get away from the portion which remains unburned underneath, and that portion, therefore, is prevented from coming in contact with the atmosphere, and cannot be consumed. how different is that from carbon. carbon burns just in the same way as this lead does, and so gives an intense fire in the furnace, or wherever you choose to burn it; but then the body produced by its combustion passes away, and the remaining carbon is left clear. i shewed you how carbon went on dissolving in the oxygen, leaving no ash; whereas here [pointing to the heap of pyrophorus] we have actually more ash than fuel, for it is heavier by the amount of the oxygen which has united with it. thus you see the difference between carbon and lead or iron: if we choose iron, which gives so wonderful a result in our application of this fuel, either as light or heat. if, when the carbon burnt, the product went off as a solid body, you would have had the room filled with an opaque substance, as in the case of the phosphorus; but when carbon burns, everything passes up into the atmosphere. it is in a fixed, almost unchangeable condition before the combustion; but afterwards it is in the form of gas, which it is very difficult (though we have succeeded) to produce in a solid or a liquid state. now, i must take you to a very interesting part of our subject--to the relation between the combustion of a candle and that living kind of combustion which goes on within us. in every one of us there is a living process of combustion going on very similar to that of a candle; and i must try to make that plain to you. for it is not merely true in a poetical sense--the relation of the life of man to a taper; and if you will follow, i think i can make this clear. in order to make the relation very plain, i have devised a little apparatus which we can soon build up before you. here is a board and a groove cut in it, and i can close the groove at the top part by a little cover. i can then continue the groove as a channel by a glass tube at each end, there being a free passage through the whole. suppose i take a taper or candle (we can now be liberal in our use of the word "candle," since we understand what it means), and place it in one of the tubes; it will go on, you see, burning very well. you observe that the air which feeds the flame passes down the tube at one end, then goes along the horizontal tube, and ascends the tube at the other end in which the taper is placed. [illustration: fig. 32] if i stop the aperture through which the air enters, i stop combustion, as you perceive. i stop the supply of air, and consequently the candle goes out. but, now, what will you think of this fact? in a former experiment i shewed you the air going from one burning candle to a second candle. if i took the air proceeding from another candle, and sent it down by a complicated arrangement into this tube, i should put this burning candle out. but what will you say when i tell you that my breath will put out that candle? i do not mean by blowing at all, but simply that the nature of my breath is such that a candle cannot burn in it. i will now hold my mouth over the aperture, and without blowing the flame in any way, let no air enter the tube but what comes from my mouth. you see the result. i did not blow the candle out. i merely let the air which i expired pass into the aperture, and the result was that the light went out for want of oxygen, and for no other reason. something or other--namely, my lungs--had taken away the oxygen from the air, and there was no more to supply the combustion of the candle. it is, i think, very pretty to see the time it takes before the bad air which i throw into this part of the apparatus has reached the candle. the candle at first goes on burning, but so soon as the air has had time to reach it, it goes out. and, now, i will shew you another experiment, because this is an important part of our philosophy. here is a jar which contains fresh air, as you can see by the circumstance of a candle or gas-light burning it. i make it close for a little time, and by means of a pipe i get my mouth over it so that i can inhale the air. by putting it over water, in the way that you see, i am able to draw up this air (supposing the cork to be quite tight), take it into my lungs, and throw it back into the jar. [illustration: fig. 33.] we can then examine it, and see the result. you observe, i first take up the air, and then throw it back, as is evident from the ascent and descent of the water; and now, by putting a taper into the air, you will see the state in which it is, by the light being extinguished. even one inspiration, you see, has completely spoiled this air, so that it is no use my trying to breathe it a second time. now, you understand the ground of the impropriety of many of the arrangements among the houses of the poorer classes, by which the air is breathed over and over again, for the want of a supply, by means of proper ventilation, sufficient to produce a good result. you see how bad the air becomes by a single breathing; so that you can easily understand how essential fresh air is to us. to pursue this a little further, let us see what will happen with lime-water. here is a globe which contains a little lime-water, and it is so arranged as regards the pipes, as to give access to the air within, so that we can ascertain the effect of respired or unrespired air upon it. of course, i can either draw in air (through a), and so make the air that feeds my lungs go through the lime-water, or i can force the air out of my lungs through the tube (b), which goes to the bottom, and so shew its effect upon the lime-water. [illustration: fig. 34.] you will observe that, however long i draw the external air into the lime-water, and then through it to my lungs, i shall produce no effect upon the water--it will not make the lime-water turbid; but if i throw the air _from_ my lungs through the lime-water, several times in succession, you see how white and milky the water is getting, shewing the effect which expired air has had upon it; and now you begin to know that the atmosphere which we have spoiled by respiration is spoiled by carbonic acid, for you see it here in contact with the lime-water. i have here two bottles, one containing lime-water and the other common water, and tubes which pass into the bottles and connect them. the apparatus is very rough, but it is useful notwithstanding. [illustration: fig. 35.] if i take these two bottles, inhaling here and exhaling there, the arrangement of the tubes will prevent the air going backwards. the air coming in will go to my mouth and lungs, and in going out, will pass through the lime-water, so that i can go on breathing and making an experiment, very refined in its nature, and very good in its results. you will observe that the good air has done nothing to the lime-water; in the other case nothing has come to the lime-water but my respiration, and you see the difference in the two cases. let us now go a little further. what is all this process going on within us which we cannot do without, either day or night, which is so provided for by the author of all things that he has arranged that it shall be independent of all will? if we restrain our respiration, as we can to a certain extent, we should destroy ourselves. when we are asleep, the organs of respiration, and the parts that are associated with them, still go on with their action--so necessary is this process of respiration to us, this contact of the air with the lungs. i must tell you, in the briefest possible manner, what this process is. we consume food: the food goes through that strange set of vessels and organs within us, and is brought into various parts of the system, into the digestive parts especially; and alternately the portion which is so changed is carried through our lungs by one set of vessels, while the air that we inhale and exhale is drawn into and thrown out of the lungs by another set of vessels, so that the air and the food come close together, separated only by an exceedingly thin surface: the air can thus act upon the blood by this process, producing precisely the same results in kind as we have seen in the case of the candle. the candle combines with parts of the air, forming carbonic acid, and evolves heat; so in the lungs there is this curious, wonderful change taking place. the air entering, combines with the carbon (not carbon in a free state, but, as in this case, placed ready for action at the moment), and makes carbonic acid, and is so thrown out into the atmosphere, and thus this singular result takes place: we may thus look upon the food as fuel. let me take that piece of sugar, which will serve my purpose. it is a compound of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, similar to a candle, as containing the same elements, though not in the same proportion--the proportions being as shewn in this table:-sugar. carbon, . . . . 72 _ hydrogen, . . . 11 | | 99 oxygen, . . . . 88_| this is, indeed, a very curious thing, which you can well remember, for the oxygen and hydrogen are in exactly the proportions which form water, so that sugar may be said to be compounded of 72 parts of carbon and 99 parts of water; and it is the carbon in the sugar that combines with the oxygen carried in by the air in the process of respiration--so making us like candles--producing these actions, warmth, and far more wonderful results besides, for the sustenance of the system, by a most beautiful and simple process. to make this still more striking, i will take a little sugar; or, to hasten the experiment, i will use some syrup, which contains about three-fourths of sugar and a little water. if i put a little oil of vitriol on it, it takes away the water, and leaves the carbon in a black mass. [the lecturer mixed the two together.] you see how the carbon is coming out, and before long we shall have a solid mass of charcoal, all of which has come out of sugar. sugar, as you know, is food, and here we have absolutely a solid lump of carbon where you would not have expected it. and if i make arrangements so as to oxidize the carbon of sugar, we shall have a much more striking result here is sugar, and i have here an oxidizer--a quicker one than the atmosphere; and so we shall oxidize this fuel by a process different from respiration in its form, though not different in its kind. it is the combustion of the carbon by the contact of oxygen which the body has supplied to it. if i set this into action at once, you will see combustion produced. just what occurs in my lungs--taking in oxygen from another source, namely, the atmosphere--takes place here by a more rapid process. you will be astonished when i tell you what this curious play of carbon amounts to. a candle will burn some four, five, six, or seven hours. what, then, must be the daily amount of carbon going up into the air in the way of carbonic acid! what a quantity of carbon must go from each of us in respiration! what a wonderful change of carbon must take place under these circumstances of combustion or respiration! a man in twenty-four hours converts as much as seven ounces of carbon into carbonic acid; a milch cow will convert seventy ounces, and a horse seventy-nine ounces, solely by the act of respiration. that is, the horse in twenty-four hours burns seventy-nine ounces of charcoal, or carbon, in his organs of respiration, to supply his natural warmth in that time. all the warm-blooded animals get their warmth in this way, by the conversion of carbon, not in a free state, but in a state of combination. and what an extraordinary notion this gives us of the alterations going on in our atmosphere. as much as 5,000,000 pounds, or 548 tons, of carbonic acid is formed by respiration in london alone in twenty-four hours. and where does all this go? up into the air. if the carbon had been like the lead which i shewed you, or the iron which, in burning, produces a solid substance, what would happen? combustion could not go on. as charcoal burns, it becomes a vapour and passes off into the atmosphere, which is the great vehicle, the great carrier for conveying it away to other places. then, what becomes of it? wonderful is it to find that the change produced by respiration, which seems so injurious to us (for we cannot breathe air twice over), is the very life and support of plants and vegetables that grow upon the surface of the earth. it is the same also under the surface, in the great bodies of water; for fishes and other animals respire upon the same principle, though not exactly by contact with the open air. such fish as i have here [pointing to a globe of gold-fish] respire by the oxygen which is dissolved from the air by the water, and form carbonic acid; and they all move about to produce the one great work of making the animal and vegetable kingdoms subservient to each other. and all the plants growing upon the surface of the earth, like that which i have brought here to serve as an illustration, absorb carbon. these leaves are taking up their carbon from the atmosphere, to which we have given it in the form of carbonic acid, and they are growing and prospering. give them a pure air like ours, and they could not live in it; give them carbon with other matters, and they live and rejoice. this piece of wood gets all its carbon, as the trees and plants get theirs, from the atmosphere, which, as we have seen, carries away what is bad for us and at the same time good for them,--what is disease to the one being health to the other. so are we made dependent, not merely upon our fellow-creatures, but upon our fellow-existers, all nature being tied together by the laws that make one part conduce to the good of another. there is another little point which i must mention before we draw to a close--a point which concerns the whole of these operations, and most curious and beautiful it is to see it clustering upon and associated with the bodies that concern us--oxygen, hydrogen, and carbon, in different states of their existence. i shewed you just now some powdered lead, which i set burning[18]; and you saw that the moment the fuel was brought to the air, it acted, even before it got out of the bottle--the moment the air crept in, it acted. now, there is a case of chemical affinity by which all our operations proceed. when we breathe, the same operation is going on within us. when we burn a candle, the attraction of the different parts one to the other is going on. here it is going on in this case of the lead; and it is a beautiful instance of chemical affinity. if the products of combustion rose off from the surface, the lead would take fire, and go on burning to the end; but you remember that we have this difference between charcoal and lead--that, while the lead can start into action at once, if there be access of air to it, the carbon will remain days, weeks, months, or years. the manuscripts of herculaneum were written with carbonaceous ink, and there they have been for 1,800 years or more, not having been at all changed by the atmosphere, though coming in contact with it under various circumstances. now, what is the circumstance which makes the lead and carbon differ in this respect? it is a striking thing to see that the matter which is appointed to serve the purpose of fuel _waits_ in its action: it does not start off burning, like the lead and many other things that i could shew you; but which i have not encumbered the table with; but it waits for action. this waiting is a curious and wonderful thing. candles--those japanese candles, for instance--do not start into action at once, like the lead or iron (for iron finely divided does the same thing as lead), but there they wait for years, perhaps for ages, without undergoing any alteration. i have here a supply of coal-gas. the jet is giving forth the gas, but you see it does not take fire--it comes out into the air, but it waits till it is hot enough before it burns. if i make it hot enough, it takes fire. if i blow it out, the gas that is issuing forth waits till the light is applied to it again. it is curious to see how different substances wait--how some will wait till the temperature is raised a little, and others till it is raised a good deal. i have here a little gunpowder and some gun-cotton; even these things differ in the conditions under which they will burn. the gunpowder is composed of carbon and other substances, making it highly combustible; and the gun-cotton is another combustible preparation. they are both waiting, but they will start into activity at different degrees of heat, or under different conditions. by applying a heated wire to them, we shall see which will start first [touching the gun-cotton with the hot iron]. you see the gun-cotton has gone off, but not even the hottest part of the wire is now hot enough to fire the gunpowder. how beautifully that shews you the difference in the degree in which bodies act in this way! in the one case the substance will wait any time until the associated bodies are made active by heat; but in the other, as in the process of respiration, it waits no time. in the lungs, as soon as the air enters, it unites with the carbon; even in the lowest temperature which the body can bear short of being frozen, the action begins at once, producing the carbonic acid of respiration: and so all things go on fitly and properly. thus you see the analogy between respiration and combustion is rendered still more beautiful and striking. indeed, all i can say to you at the end of these lectures (for we must come to an end at one time or other) is to express a wish that you may, in your generation, be fit to compare to a candle; that you may, like it, shine as lights to those about you; that, in all your actions, you may justify the beauty of the taper by making your deeds honourable and effectual in the discharge of your duty to your fellow-men. lecture on platinum. [_delivered before the_ royal institution, _on friday, february 22, 1861._] whether i was to have the honour of appearing before you this evening or not, seemed to be doubtful upon one or two points. one of these i will mention immediately; the other may or may not appear during the course of the hour that follows. the first point is this. when i was tempted to promise this subject for your attention this evening, it was founded upon a promise, and a full intent of performing that promise, on the part of my friend deville, of paris, to come here to shew before you a phenomenon in metallurgic chemistry not common. in that i have been disappointed. his intention was to have fused here some thirty or forty pounds of platinum, and so to have made manifest, through my mouth and my statement, the principles of a new process in metallurgy, in relation to this beautiful, magnificent, and valuable metal; but circumstances over which neither he nor i, nor others concerned, have sufficient control, have prevented the fulfilment of that intention; and the period at which i learned the fact was so recent, that i could hardly leave my place here to be filled by another, or permit you, who in your kindness have come to hear what might be said, to remain unreceived in the best manner possible to me under the circumstances. i therefore propose to state, as well as i can, what the principles are on which m. deville proceeds, by means of drawings, and some subordinate or inferior experiments. the metal platinum, of which you see some very fine specimens on the table, has been known to us about a hundred years. it has been wrought in a beautiful way in this country, in france, and elsewhere, and supplied to the consumer in ingots of this kind, or in plates, such as we have here, or in masses, that by their very fall upon the table indicate the great weight of the substance, which is, indeed, nearly at the head of all substances in that respect. this substance has been given to us hitherto mainly through the philosophy of dr. wollaston, whom many of us know, and it is obtained in great purity and beauty. it is a very remarkable metal in many points, besides its known special uses. it usually comes to us in grains. here is a very fine specimen of native platinum in grains. here is also a nugget or ingot, and here are some small pieces gathered out of certain alluvial soils in brazil, mexico, california, and the uralian districts of russia. it is strange that this metal is almost always found associated with some four or five other metals, most curious in their qualities and characteristics. they are called platiniferous metals; and they have not only the relation of being always found associated in this manner, but they have other relations of a curious nature, which i shall point out to you by a reference to one of the tables behind me. this substance is always native--it is always in the metallic state; and the metals with which it is found connected, and which are rarely found elsewhere, are palladium, rhodium, iridium, osmium, and ruthenium. we have the names in one of the tables arranged in two columns, representing, as you see, two groups--platinum, iridium, and osmium constituting one group; and ruthenium, rhodium, and palladium the other. three of these have the chemical equivalent of 98-1/2, and the others a chemical equivalent of about half that number. then the metals of one group have an extreme specific gravity--platinum being, in fact, the lightest of the three, or as light as the lightest. osmium has a specific gravity of 21.4, and is the heaviest body in nature; platinum is 21.15, and iridium the same; the specific gravity of the other three being only about half that, namely, 11.3, 12.1, and 11.8. then there is this curious relation, that palladium and iridium are very much alike, so that you would scarcely know one from the other, though one has only half the weight of the other, and only half the equivalent power. so with iridium and rhodium, and osmium and ruthenium, which are so closely allied that they make pairs, being separated each from its own group. then these metals are the most infusible that we possess. osmium is the most difficult to fuse: indeed, i believe it never has been fused, while every other metal has. ruthenium comes next, iridium next, rhodium next, platinum next (so that it ranks here as a pretty fusible metal, and yet we have been long accustomed to speak of the infusibility of platinum), and next comes palladium, which is the most fusible metal of the whole. it is a curious thing to see this fine association of physical properties coming out in metals which are grouped together somehow or other in nature, but, no doubt, by causes which are related to analogous properties in their situation on the surface of the earth, for it is in alluvial soils that these things are found. now, with regard to this substance, let me tell you briefly how we get it. the process used to be this. the ore which i shewed you just now was taken, and digested in nitro-muriatic acid of a certain strength, and partly converted into a solution, with the leaving behind of certain bodies that i have upon the table. the platinum being dissolved with care in acids, to the solution the muriate of ammonia was added, as i am about to add it here. a yellow precipitate was then thrown down, as you perceive is the case now; and this, carefully washed and cleansed, gave us that body [pointing to a specimen of the chloride of platinum and ammonium], the other elements, or nearly all, being ejected. this substance being heated, gave us what we call platinum sponge, or platinum in the metallic state, so finely divided as to form a kind of heavy mass or sponge, which, at the time that dr. wollaston first sent it forth, was not fusible for the market or in the manufacturers' workshops, inasmuch as the temperature required was so high, and there were no furnaces that could bring the mass into a globule, and cause the parts to adhere together. most of our metals that we obtain from nature, and work in our shops, are brought at last into a mass by fusion. i am not aware that there is in the arts or sciences any other than iron which is not so. soft iron we do not bring together by fusion, but by a process which is analogous to the one that was followed in the case of platinum, namely, welding; for these divided grains of spongy platinum having been well washed and sunk in water for the purpose of excluding air, and pressed together, and heated, and hammered, and pressed again, until they come into a pretty close, dense, compact mass, did so cohere, that when the mass was put into the furnace of charcoal, and raised to a high temperature, the particles, at first infinitely divided--for they were chemically divided--adhered the one to the other, each to all the rest, until they made that kind of substance which you see here, which will bear rolling and expansion of every kind. no other process than that has hitherto been adopted for the purpose of obtaining this substance from the particles by solution, precipitation, ignition, and welding. it certainly is a very fine thing to see that we may so fully depend upon the properties of the various substances we have to deal with; that we can, by carrying out our processes, obtain a material like this, allowing of division and extension under a rolling mill--a material of the finest possible kind, the parts being held together, not with interstices, not with porosity, but so continuous that no fluids can pass between them; and, as dr. wollaston beautifully shewed, a globule of platinum fused by the voltaic battery and the oxy-hydrogen blowpipe, when drawn into a wire, was not sounder or stronger than this wire made by the curious coalescence of the particles by the sticking power that they had at high temperatures. this is the process adopted by messrs. johnson and matthey, to whose great kindness i am indebted for these ingots and for the valuable assistance i have received in the illustrations. the treatment, however, that i have to bring before you is of another kind; and it is in the hope that we shall be able before long to have such a thing as the manufacture of platinum of this kind, that i am encouraged to come before you, and tell you how far deville has gone in the matter, and to give you illustrations of the principles on which he proceeds. i think it is but fair that you should see an experiment shewing you the way in which we get the adhesion of platinum. probably you all know of the welding of iron: you go into the smith's shop, and you see him put the handle of a poker on to the stem, and by a little management and the application of heat he makes them one. you have no doubt seen him put the iron into the fire and sprinkle a little sand upon it. he does not know the philosophy he calls into play when he sprinkles a little sand over the oxide of iron, but he has a fine philosophy there, or practises it, when he gets his welding. i can shew you here this beautiful circumstance of the sticking together of the particles up to the fullest possible intensity of their combination. if you were to go into the workshops of mr. matthey, and see them hammering and welding away, you would see the value of the experiment i am about to shew you. i have here some platinum-wire. this is a metal which resists the action of acids, resists oxidation by heat, and change of any sort; and which, therefore, i may heat in the atmosphere without any flux. i bend the wire so as to make the ends cross: these i make hot by means of the blowpipe, and then, by giving them a tap with a hammer, i shall make them into one piece. now that the pieces are united, i shall have great difficulty in pulling them apart, though they are joined only at the point where the two cylindrical surfaces came together. and now i have succeeded in pulling the wire apart, the division is not at the point of welding, but where the force of the pincers has cut it, so that the junction we have effected is a complete one. this, then, is the principle of the manufacture and production of platinum in the old way. the treatment which deville proposes to carry out, and which he has carried out to a rather large extent in reference to the russian supply of platinum, is one altogether by heat, having little or no reference to the use of acids. that you may know what the problem is, look at this table, which gives you the composition of such a piece of platinum ore as i shewed you just now. wherever it comes from, the composition is as complicated, though the proportions vary:-platinum, . . . . . 76.4 iridium,. . . . . . 4.3 rhodium,. . . . . . 0.3 palladium,. . . . . 1.4 gold, . . . . . . . 0.4 copper, . . . . . . 4.1 iron, . . . . . . . 11.7 osmide of iridium,. 0.5 sand, . . . . . . . 1.4 ---- 100.5 this refers to the uralian ore. in that state of combination, as shewn in the table, the iridium and osmium are found combined in crystals, sometimes to the amount of 0.5 per cent., and sometimes 3 or 4 per cent. now, this deville proposes to deal with in the dry way, in the place of dealing with it by any acid. i have here another kind of platinum; and i shew it to you for this reason. the russian government, having large stores of platinum in their dominions, have obtained it in a metallic state, and worked it into coin. the coin i have in my hand is a twelve silver rouble piece. the rouble is worth three shillings, and this coin is, therefore, of the value of thirty-six shillings. the smaller coin is worth half that sum; and the other, half of that. the metal, however, is unfit for coinage. when you have the two metals, gold and silver, used for coinage, you have a little confusion in the value of the two in the market; but when you have three precious metals (for you may call platinum a precious metal) worked into coin, they will be sure to run counter to one another. indeed, the case did happen, that the price of platinum coin fixed by the government was such, that it was worth while to purchase platinum in other countries, and make coin of it, and then take it into that country and circulate it. the result was, that the russian government stopped the issue. the composition of this coin is--platinum, 97.0; iridium, 1.2; rhodium, 0.5; palladium, 0.25; a little copper, and a little iron. it is, in fact, bad platinum: it scales, and it has an unfitness for commercial use and in the laboratory, which the other well-purified platinum has not. it wants working over again. now, deville's process depends upon three points,--upon intense heat, blowpipe action, and the volatility of certain metals. we know that there are plenty of metals that are volatile; but this, i think, is the first time that it has been proposed to use the volatility of certain metals--such as gold and palladium--for the purpose of driving them off and leaving something else behind. he counts largely upon the volatility of metals which we have not been in the habit of considering volatile, but which we have rather looked upon as fixed; and i must endeavour to illustrate these three points by a few experiments. perhaps i can best show you what is required in the process of heating platinum by using that source of heat which we have here, and which seems to be almost illimitable--namely, the voltaic battery; for it is only in consequence of the heat that the voltaic battery affects the platinum. by applying the two extremities of the battery to this piece of platinum-wire, you will see what result we shall obtain. you perceive that we can take about this heating agent wherever we like, and deal with it as we please, limiting it in any way. i am obliged to deal carefully with it; but even that circumstance will have an interest for you in watching the experiment. contact is now made. the electric current, when compressed into thin conducting-wires offering resistance, evolves heat to a large extent; and this is the power by which we work. you see the intense glow immediately imparted to the wire; and if i applied the heat continuously, the effect of the current would be to melt the wire. as soon as the contact is broken, the wire resumes its former appearance; and now that we make contact again, you perceive the glow as before. [the experiment was repeated several times in rapid succession.] you can see a line of light, though you can scarcely perceive the wire; and now that it has melted with the great heat, if you examine it, you will perceive that it is indeed a set of irregularities from end to end--a set of little spheres, which are strung upon an axis of platinum running through it. it is that wire which mr. grove described as being produced at the moment when fusion of the whole mass is commencing. in the same manner, if i take a tolerably thick piece of platinum, and subject it to the heat that can be produced by this battery, you will see the brilliancy of the effect produced. i shall put on a pair of spectacles for the experiment, as there is an injurious effect of the voltaic spark upon the eyes, if the action is continued; and it is neither policy nor bravery to subject any organ to unnecessary danger; and i want, at all events, to keep the full use of my eyes to the end of the lecture. you now see the action of the heat upon the piece of platinum--heat so great as to break in pieces the plate on which the drops of metal fall. you perceive, then, that we have sufficiently powerful sources of heat in nature to deal with platinum. i have here an apparatus by which the same thing can be shewn. here is a piece of platinum, which is put into a crucible of carbon made at the end of one pole of the battery, and you will see the brilliant light that will be produced. there is our furnace, and the platinum is rapidly getting heated; and now you perceive that it is melted, and throwing off little particles. what a magnificent philosophical instrument this is. when you look at the result, which is lying upon the charcoal, you will see a beautifully fused piece of platinum. it is now a fiery globule, with a surface so bright, and smooth, and reflecting, that i cannot tell whether it is transparent, or opaque, or what. this, then, will give you an idea of what has to be done by any process that pretends to deal with thirty, or forty, or fifty pounds of platinum at once. let me now tell you briefly what deville proposes to do. first of all, he takes this ore, with its impurities, and mixes it (as he finds it essential and best) with its own weight of sulphuret of lead--lead combined with sulphur. both the lead and the sulphur are wanted; for the iron that is there present, as you see by the table, is one of the most annoying substances in the treatment that you can imagine, because it is not volatile; and while the iron remains adhering to the platinum, the platinum will not flow readily. it cannot be sent away by a high temperature--sent into the atmosphere so as to leave the platinum behind. well, then, a hundred parts of ore and a hundred parts of sulphuret of lead, with about fifty parts of metallic lead, being all mingled together in a crucible, the sulphur of the sulphuret takes the iron, the copper, and some of the other metals and impurities, and combines with them to form a slag; and as it goes on boiling and oxidising, it carries off the iron, and so a great cleansing takes place. now, you ought to know that these metals, such as platinum, iridium, and palladium, have a strong affinity for such metals as lead and tin, and upon this a great deal depends. very much depends upon the platinum throwing out its impurities of iron and so forth, by being taken up with the lead present in it. that you may have a notion of the great power that platinum has of combining with other metals, i will refer you to a little of the chemist's experience--his bad experience. he knows very well that if he takes a piece of platinum-foil, and heats a piece of lead upon it, or if he takes a piece of platinum-foil, such as we have here, and heats things upon it that have lead in them, his platinum is destroyed. i have here a piece of platinum, and if i apply the heat of the spirit-lamp to it, in consequence of the presence of this little piece of lead which i will place on it, i shall make a hole in the metal. the heat of the lamp itself would do no harm to the platinum, nor would other chemical means; but because there is a little lead present, and there is an affinity between the two substances, the bodies fuse together at once. you see the hole i have made. it is large enough to put your finger in, though the platinum itself was, as you saw, almost infusible, except by the voltaic battery. for the purpose of shewing this fact in a more striking manner, i have taken pieces of platinum-foil, tin-foil, and lead-foil, and rolled them together; and if i apply the blowpipe to them, you will have, in fact, a repetition on a larger scale of the experiment you saw just now when the lead and platinum came together, and one spoiled the other. when the metals are laid one upon the other, and folded together and heat applied, you will not only see that the platinum runs to waste, but that at the time when the platinum and lead are combined there is ignition produced--there is a power of sustaining combustion. i have taken a large piece, that you may see the phenomenon on a large scale. you saw the ignition and the explosion which followed, of which we have here the results--the consequence of the chemical affinity between the platinum and the metals combined with it, which is the thing upon which deville founds his first result. when he has melted these substances and stirred them well up, and so obtained a complete mixture, he throws in air upon the surface to burn off all the sulphur from the remaining sulphuret of lead; and at last he gets an ingot of lead with platinum--much lead, comparatively, and little platinum. he gets that in the crucible with a lot of scori㦠and other things, which he treats afterwards. it is that platiniferous lead which we have to deal with in our future process. now, let me tell you what he does with it. his first object is to get rid of the lead. he has thrown out all the iron, and a number of other things, and he has got this kind of compound indicated in the table. he may get it as high as 78 per cent. of platinum, and 22 of lead; or 5, or 10, or 15 of platinum, and 95, or 90, or 85 of lead (which he calls weak platinum), and he then places it in the kind of vessel that you see before you. suppose we had the mixture here; we should have to make it hot, and then throw in air upon the surface. the combustible metal--that is, the lead--and the part that will oxidise, are thoroughly oxidised; the litharge would flow out in a fused state into a vessel placed to receive it, and the platinum remains behind. [illustration: fig. 36.] here is the process which deville adopts for the purpose of casting off the lead, after he has got out the platinum from the ore. (having made use of your friend, you get rid of him as quickly as you can.) he gets his heat by applying the combination of oxygen and hydrogen, or of carburetted fuel, for the purpose of producing a fire. i have here a source of coal-gas; there i have a source of hydrogen; and here i have a source of oxygen. i have here also one of the blowpipes used by deville in his process for working platinum in the way i have spoken of. there are two pipes, and one of them goes to the source of coal-gas, and the other to the supply of oxygen. [illustration: fig. 37.] by uniting these we obtain a flame of such a heat as to melt platinum. you will, perhaps, hardly imagine what the heat is, unless you have some proof of it; but you will soon see that i have actually the power of melting platinum. here is a piece of platinum-foil running like wax under the flame which i am bringing to bear against it. the question, however, is whether we shall get heat enough to melt, not this small quantity, but large masses--many pounds of the metal. having obtained heat like this, the next consideration is what vessel is he to employ which could retain the platinum when so heated, or bear the effects of the flame? such vessels are happily well supplied at paris, and are formed of a substance which surrounds paris; it is a kind of chalk (called, i believe, by geologists, _calcaire grossiã¨re_), and it has the property of enduring an extreme degree of heat. i am now going to get the highest heat that we can obtain. first, i shew you the combustion of hydrogen by itself. i have not a large supply, because the coal-gas is sufficient for most of our purposes. if i put a piece of lime obtained from this chalk into the gas, you see we get a pretty hot flame, which would burn one's fingers a good deal but now let me subject a piece of it to the joint action of oxygen and hydrogen. i do this for the purpose of shewing you the value of lime as a material for the furnaces and chambers that are to contain the substances to be operated on, and that are consequently to sustain the action of this extreme heat. here we have the hydrogen and the oxygen, which will give the most intense heat that can be obtained by chemical action; and if i put a piece of lime into the flame, we get what is called the lime-light. now, with all the beauty and intensity of action which you perceive, there is no sensible deterioration of the lime except by the mechanical force of the current of gases rushing from the jet against the lime, sweeping away such particles as are not strongly aggregated. "vapour of lime" some call it; and it may be so, but there is no other change of the lime than that under the action of heat of this highly-exalted chemical condition, though almost any other substance would melt at once. then, as to the way in which the heat is applied to the substance. it is all very well for me to take a piece of antimony, and fuse it in the flame of a blowpipe. but if i tried this piece in the ordinary lamp flame, i should do nothing; if i tried a smaller piece, i should do little or nothing; and if i tried a still smaller piece, i should do little or nothing; yet i have a condition which will represent what deville carries to the highest possible extent, and which we all carry to the highest extent, in the use of the blowpipe. suppose i take this piece of antimony: i shall not be able to melt it in that flame of the candle by merely holding it there; yet, by taking pains, we can even melt a piece of platinum there. this is a preparation which i made for the purpose of proving the fusibility of platinum in a common candle. there is a piece of wire, drawn by that ingenious process of dr. wollaston's, not more than the three-thousandth part of an inch in diameter. he put the wire into the middle of a cylinder of silver, and drew both together until the whole compound was exceedingly thin; and then he dissolved away the silver by nitric acid. there was left in the centre a substance which i can scarcely see with an eye-glass, but which i know is there, and which i can make visible, as you see, by putting it into the candle, where the heat makes it glow like a spark. i have again and again tried this experiment up-stairs in my own room, and have easily fused this platinum-wire by a common candle. you see we have, therefore, heat enough in the candle, as in the voltaic battery, or in the highly-exalted combustion of the blowpipe, but we do not supply a continuous source of heat. in the very act of this becoming ignited, the heat radiates so fast that you cannot accumulate enough to cause the fusion of the wire, except under the most careful arrangement. thus i cannot melt that piece of antimony by simply putting it into the candle; but if i put it upon charcoal, and drive the fiery current against it, there will be heat enough to melt it. the beauty of the blowpipe is, that it sends hot air (making hot air by the combustion of the flame) against the thing to be heated. i have only to hold the antimony in the course of that current, and particle by particle of the current impinges upon the antimony, and so we get it melted. you now see it red-hot, and i have no doubt it will continue to burn if i withdraw it from the flame and continue to force the air on it. now, you see it burning without any heat but that of its own combustion, which i am keeping up by sending the air against it. it would go out in a moment if i took away the current of air from it; but there it is burning, and the more air i give it, by this or any other action, the better it is. so, then, we have here not merely a mighty source of heat, but a means of driving the heat forcibly against substances. let me shew you another experiment with a piece of iron. it will serve two purposes--shewing you what the blowpipe does as a source of heat, and what it does by sending that heat where it is wanted. i have taken iron in contrast with silver or other metals, that you may see the difference of action, and so be more interested in the experiment. here is our fuel, the coal-gas; and here our oxygen. having thus my power of heat, i apply it to the iron, which, as you see, soon gets red-hot. it is now flowing about like a globule of melted mercury. but observe, i cannot raise any vapour: it is now covered with a coat of melted oxide, and unless i have a great power in my blowpipe, it is hardly possible to break through it. now, then, you see these beautiful sparks: you have not only a beautiful kind of combustion, but you see the iron is being driven off, not producing smoke, but burning in a fixed condition. how different this is from the action of some other metals--that piece of antimony, for instance, which we saw just now throwing off abundance of fumes. we can, of course, burn away this iron by giving plenty of air to it; but with the bodies which deville wants to expose to this intense heat he has not that means: the gas itself must have power enough to drive off the slag which forms on the surface of the metal, and power to impinge upon the platinum so as to get the full contact that he wants for the fusion to take place. we see here, then, the means to which he resorts--oxygen, and either coal-gas or water-gas[19], or pure hydrogen, for producing heat, and the blowpipe for the purpose of impelling the heated current upon the metals. i have two or three rough drawings here, representing the kind of furnaces which he employs. they are larger, however, than the actual furnaces he uses. even the furnace in which he carries on that most serious operation of fusing fifty pounds of platinum at once is not much more than half the size of the drawing. it is made of a piece of lime below and a piece of lime above. you see how beautifully lime sustains heat without altering in shape; and you may have thought how beautifully it prevents the dissipation of the heat by its very bad conducting powers. [illustration: fig. 38] while the front part of the lime which you saw here was so highly ignited, i could at any moment touch the back of it without feeling any annoyance from the heat so, by having a chamber of lime of this sort, he is able to get a vessel to contain these metals with scarcely any loss of heat. he puts the blowpipes through these apertures, and sends down these gases upon the metals, which are gradually melted. he then puts in more metal through a hole at the top. the results of the combustion issue out of the aperture which you see represented. if there be strips of platinum, he pushes them through the mouth out of which the heated current is coming, and there they get red-hot and white-hot before they get into the bath of platinum. so he is able to fuse a large body of platinum in this manner. when the platinum is melted, he takes off the top and pours out from the bottom piece, like a crucible, and makes his cast. this is the furnace by which he fuses his forty pounds or fifty pounds of platinum at once. the metal is raised to a heat that no eye can bear. there is no light and shadow, no chiaro-oscuro there; all is the same intensity of glow. you look in, and you cannot see where the metal or the lime is; it is all as one. we have, therefore, a platform with a handle, which turns upon an axis, that coincides with the gutter that is formed for the pouring of the metal; and when all is known to be ready, by means of dark glasses, the workmen take off the top piece and lift up the handle, and the mould being then placed in a proper position, he knows that the issue of the metal will be exactly in the line of the axis. no injury has ever happened from the use of this plan. you know with what care it is necessary to carry such a vessel of mercury as we have here, for fear of turning it over on one side or the other; but if it be a vessel of melted platinum, the very greatest care must be used, because the substance is twice as heavy: yet no injury has been done to any of the workmen in this operation. i have said that deville depends upon intense heat for carrying off vapour; and this brings me to the point of shewing how vapours are carried off. here is a basin of mercury, which boils easily, as you know, and gives us the opportunity of observing the facts and principles which are to guide us. i have here two poles of the battery, and if i bring them into contact with the mercury, see what a development of vapour we have. the mercury is flying off rapidly; and i might, if i pleased, put all the company around me in a bath of mercury vapour. and so, if we take this piece of lead and treat it in the same way, it will also give off vapour. observe the fumes that rise from it; and even if it was so far enclosed from the air that you could not form any litharge, you would still have those abundant fumes flying off. i may also take a piece of gold, and shew you the same thing. i have here a piece of gold which i put upon a clean surface of paris limestone. applying the heat of the blowpipe to it, you see how the heat drives off the vapour; and if you notice at the end of the lecture, you will observe on the stone a purple patch of condensed gold. thus you see a proof of the volatilisation of gold. it is the same with silver. you will not be startled if i sometimes use one agent and sometimes another to illustrate a particular point. the volatility of gold and silver is the same thing, whether it be effected by the voltaic battery or by the blowpipe. [a lump of silver was placed in a charcoal crucible between the poles of a voltaic battery.] now, look at the fumes of silver, and observe the peculiar and beautiful green colour which they produce. we shall now shew you this same process of boiling the silver, cast on a screen from the electric lamp which you have before you; and while dr. tyndall is kindly getting the lamp ready for this purpose, let me tell you that deville proposes to throw out in this way all these extraneous things that i have spoken of, except two--namely, iridium and rhodium. it so happens, as he says, that iridium and rhodium do make the metal more capable of resisting the attacks of acids than platinum itself. alloys are compounded up to 25 per cent. of rhodium and iridium, by which the chemical inaction of the platinum is increased, and also its malleability and other physical properties. [the image of the voltaic discharge through vapour of silver was now thrown upon the screen.] what you have now on the screen is an inverted image of what you saw when we heated the silver before. the fine stream that you see around the silver is the discharge of the electric force that takes place, giving you that glorious green light which you see in the ray; and if dr. tyndall will open the top of the lamp, you will see the quantity of fumes that will come out of the aperture, shewing you at once the volatility of silver. i have now finished this imperfect account. it is but an apology for not having brought the process itself before you. i have done the best i could under the circumstances; and i know your kindness well, for if i were not aware that i might trust to it, i would not appear here so often as i have done. the gradual loss of memory and of my other faculties is making itself painfully evident to me, and requires, every time i appear before you, the continued remembrance of your kindness to enable me to get through my task. if i should happen to go on too long, or should fail in doing what you might desire, remember it is yourselves who are chargeable, by wishing me to remain. i have desired to retire, as i think every man ought to do before his faculties become impaired; but i must confess that the affection i have for this place, and for those who frequent this place, is such, that i hardly know when the proper time has arrived. notes. [footnote 1: page 16. the royal george sunk at spithead on the 29th of august, 1782. colonel pasley commenced operations for the removal of the wreck by the explosion of gunpowder, in august, 1839. the candle which professor faraday exhibited must therefore have been exposed to the action of salt water for upwards of fifty-seven years.] [footnote 2: page 17. the fat or tallow consists of a chemical combination of fatty acids with glycerine. the lime unites with the palmitic, oleic, and stearic acids, and separates the glycerine. after washing, the insoluble lime soap is decomposed with hot dilute sulphuric acid. the melted fatty acids thus rise as an oil to the surface, when they are decanted. they are again washed and cast into thin plates, which, when cold, are placed between layers of cocoa-nut matting, and submitted to intense hydraulic pressure. in this way the soft oleic acid is squeezed out, whilst the hard palmitic and stearic acids remain. these are further purified by pressure at a higher temperature, and washing in warm dilute sulphuric acid, when they are ready to be made into candles. these acids are harder and whiter than the fats from which they were obtained, whilst at the same time they are cleaner and more combustible.] [footnote 3: page 19. a little borax or phosphorus salt is sometimes added, in order to make the ash fusible.] [footnote 4: page 27. capillary attraction or repulsion is the cause which determines the ascent or descent of a fluid in a capillary tube. if a piece of thermometer tubing, open at each end, be plunged into water, the latter will instantly rise in the tube considerably above its external level. if, on the other hand, the tube be plunged into mercury, a repulsion instead of attraction will be exhibited, and the level of the mercury will be lower in the tube than it is outside.] [footnote 5: page 29. the late duke of sussex was, we believe, the first to shew that a prawn might be washed upon this principle. if the tail, after pulling off the fan part, be placed in a tumbler of water, and the head be allowed to hang over the outside, the water will be sucked up the tail by capillary attraction, and will continue to run out through the head until the water in the glass has sunk so low that the tail ceases to dip into it.] [footnote 6: page 37. the alcohol had chloride of copper dissolved in it: this produces a beautiful green flame.] [footnote 7: page 54. lycopodium is a yellowish powder found in the fruit of the club moss (_lycopodium clavatum_). it is used in fireworks.] [footnote 8: page 58. bunsen has calculated that the temperature of the oxyhydrogen blowpipe is 8061â° centigrade. hydrogen burning in air has a temperature of 3259â° c., and coal-gas in air, 2350â° c.] [footnote 9: page 60. the following is the action of the sulphuric acid in inflaming the mixture of sulphuret of antimony and chlorate of potassa. a portion of the latter is decomposed by the sulphuric acid into oxide of chlorine, bisulphate of potassa, and perchlorate of potassa. the oxide of chlorine inflames the sulphuret of antimony, which is a combustible body, and the whole mass instantly bursts into flame.] [footnote 10: page 63. the "air-burner," which is of such value in the laboratory, owes its advantage to this principle. it consists of a cylindrical metal chimney, covered at the top with a piece of rather coarse iron-wire gauze. this is supported over an argand burner, in such a manner that the gas may mix in the chimney with an amount of air sufficient to burn the carbon and hydrogen simultaneously, so that there may be no separation of carbon in the flame with consequent deposition of soot. the flame, being unable to pass through the wire gauze, burns in a steady, nearly invisible manner above.] [footnote 11: page 74. water is in its densest state at a temperature of 39.1â° fahrenheit] [footnote 12: page 74. a mixture of salt and pounded ice reduces the temperature from 32â° f. to zero--the ice at the same time becoming fluid.] [footnote 13: page 82. potassium, the metallic basis of potash, was discovered by sir humphrey davy in 1807, who succeeded in separating it from potash by means of a powerful voltaic battery. its great affinity for oxygen causes it to decompose water with evolution of hydrogen, which takes fire with the heat produced.] [footnote 14: page 98. professor faraday has calculated that there is as much electricity required to decompose one grain of water as there is in a very powerful flash of lightning.] [footnote 15: page 101. a solution of acetate of lead submitted to the action of the voltaic current, yields lead at the negative pole, and brown peroxide of lead at the positive pole. a solution of nitrate of silver, under the same circumstances, yields silver at the negative pole, and peroxide of silver at the positive pole.] [footnote 16: page 129. the gas which is thus employed as a test for the presence of oxygen, is the binoxide of nitrogen, or nitrous oxide. it is a colourless gas, which, when brought in contact with oxygen, unites with it, forming hyponitric acid, the red gas referred to.] [footnote 17: page 152. _marble_ is a compound of carbonic acid and lime. the muriatic acid being the stronger of the two, takes the place of the carbonic acid, which escapes as a gas, the residue forming muriate of lime or chloride of calcium.] [footnote 18: page 186. _lead pyrophorus_ is made by heating dry tartrate of lead in a glass tube (closed at one end, and drawn out to a fine point at the other) until no more vapours are evolved. the open end of the tube is then to be sealed before the blowpipe. when the tube is broken and the contents shaken out into the air, they burn with a red flash.] [footnote 19: page 216. _water-gas_ is formed by passing vapour of water over red-hot charcoal or coke. it is a mixture of hydrogen and carbonic oxide; each of which is an inflammable gas.] poster's note: "combustion that makes!" was corrected from a misprint "combusion that makes!" in the original. note: project gutenberg also has an html version of this file which includes the original illustrations. see 14218-h.htm or 14218-h.zip: (http://www.gutenberg.net/dirs/1/4/2/1/14218/14218-h/14218-h.htm) or (http://www.gutenberg.net/dirs/1/4/2/1/14218/14218-h.zip) the story of alchemy and the beginnings of chemistry by m. m. pattison muir, m.a. fellow and formerly prælector in chemistry of gonville and caius college, cambridge with eighteen illustrations new and enlarged edition hodder and stoughton london, new york, toronto [illustration: an alchemical laboratory] "it is neither religious nor wise to judge that of which you know nothing." _a brief guide to the celestial ruby_, by philalethes (17th century) * * * * * the useful knowledge series cloth, one shilling net each list of the first thirty-four volumes issued in the new style with pictorial wrappers:- wireless telegraphy. by alfred t. story. a piece of coal. by k.a. martin, f.g.s. architecture. by p.l. waterhouse. the cotton plant. by f. wilkinson, f.g.s. plant life. by grant allen. wild flowers. by rev. prof. g. henslow, f.l.s., f.g.s. the solar system. by g.f. chambers, f.r.a.s. eclipses. by g.f. chambers, f.r.a.s. the stars. by g.f.chambers, f.r.a.s. the weather. by g.f. chambers, f.r.a.s. animal life. by b. lindsay. geographical discovery. by joseph jacobs. the atmosphere. by douglas archibald, m.a. alpine climbing. by francis gribble forest and stream. by james rodway, f.l.s. fish life. by w.p. pycraft, f.z.s. bird life. by w.p. pycraft, f.z.s. primitive man. by edward clodd. ancient egypt. by robinson souttar, m.a., d.c.l. story of locomotion. by beckles willson. the earth in past ages. by h.g. seeley, f.r.s. the empire. by e. salmon. king alfred. by sir walter besant. lost england. by beckles willson. alchemy, or the beginnings of chemistry. by m.m. pattison muir, m.a. the chemical elements. by m.m. pattison muir, m.a. the wanderings of atoms. by m.m. pattison muir, m.a. germ life: bacteria. by h.w. conn. life in the seas. by sidney j. hickson f.r.s. life's mechanism. by h.w. conn. reptile life. by w.p. pycraft, f.z.s. the grain of wheat. by william c. edgar. the potter. by c.f. binns. * * * * * preface. the story of alchemy and the beginnings of chemistry is very interesting in itself. it is also a pregnant example of the contrast between the scientific and the emotional methods of regarding nature; and it admirably illustrates the differences between well-grounded, suggestive, hypotheses, and baseless speculations. i have tried to tell the story so that it may be intelligible to the ordinary reader. m.m. pattison muir. cambridge, november 1902. * * * * * note to new edition. a few small changes have been made. the last chapter has been re-written and considerably enlarged. m.m.p.m. farnham, september 1913. * * * * * contents. chapter i. the explanation of material changes given by greek thinkers ii. a sketch of alchemical theory iii. the alchemical notion of the unity and simplicity of nature iv. the alchemical elements and principles v. the alchemical essence vi. alchemy as an experimental art vii. the language of alchemy viii. the degeneracy of alchemy ix. paracelsus, and some other alchemists x. summary of the alchemical doctrine--the replacement of the three principles of the alchemists by the single principle of phlogiston xi. the examination of the phenomena of combustion xii. the recognition of chemical changes as the interactions of definite substances xiii. the chemical elements contrasted with the alchemical principles xiv. the modern form of the alchemical quest of the one thing index list of illustrations fig. an alchemical laboratory (frontispiece) 1. the mortification of metals presented by the image of a king devouring his son 2 and 3. the mortification of metals presented by images of death and burial 4 and 5. two must be conjoined to produce one 6. hermetically sealing the neck of a glass vessel 7. sealing by means of a mercury trap 8. an alchemical common cold still 9. a _balneum mariæ_ 10. alchemical distilling apparatus 11. a pelican 12. an alchemist with a retort 13. an alchemist preparing oil of vitriol 14. alchemical apparatus for rectifying spirits 15. purifying gold presented by the image of a salamander in the fire 16. priestley's apparatus for working with gases 17. apparatus used by lavoisier in his experiments on burning mercury in air chapter i the explanation of material changes given by the greek thinkers. for thousands of years before men had any accurate and exact knowledge of the changes of material things, they had thought about these changes, regarded them as revelations of spiritual truths, built on them theories of things in heaven and earth (and a good many things in neither), and used them in manufactures, arts, and handicrafts, especially in one very curious manufacture wherein not the thousandth fragment of a grain of the finished article was ever produced. the accurate and systematic study of the changes which material things undergo is called chemistry; we may, perhaps, describe alchemy as the superficial, and what may be called subjective, examination of these changes, and the speculative systems, and imaginary arts and manufactures, founded on that examination. we are assured by many old writers that adam was the first alchemist, and we are told by one of the initiated that adam was created on the sixth day, being the 15th of march, of the first year of the world; certainly alchemy had a long life, for chemistry did not begin until about the middle of the 18th century. no branch of science has had so long a period of incubation as chemistry. there must be some extraordinary difficulty in the way of disentangling the steps of those changes wherein substances of one kind are produced from substances totally unlike them. to inquire how those of acute intellects and much learning regarded such occurrences in the times when man's outlook on the world was very different from what it is now, ought to be interesting, and the results of that inquiry must surely be instructive. if the reader turns to a modern book on chemistry (for instance, _the story of the chemical elements_, in this series), he will find, at first, superficial descriptions of special instances of those occurrences which are the subject of the chemist's study; he will learn that only certain parts of such events are dealt with in chemistry; more accurate descriptions will then be given of changes which occur in nature, or can be produced by altering the ordinary conditions, and the reader will be taught to see certain points of likeness between these changes; he will be shown how to disentangle chemical occurrences, to find their similarities and differences; and, gradually, he will feel his way to general statements, which are more or less rigorous and accurate expressions of what holds good in a large number of chemical processes; finally, he will discover that some generalisations have been made which are exact and completely accurate descriptions applicable to every case of chemical change. but if we turn to the writings of the alchemists, we are in a different world. there is nothing even remotely resembling what one finds in a modern book on chemistry. here are a few quotations from alchemical writings [1]: [1] most of the quotations from alchemical writings, in this book, are taken from a series of translations, published in 1893-94, under the supervision of mr a.e. waite. "it is necessary to deprive matter of its qualities in order to draw out its soul.... copper is like a man; it has a soul and a body ... the soul is the most subtile part ... that is to say, the tinctorial spirit. the body is the ponderable, material, terrestrial thing, endowed with a shadow.... after a series of suitable treatments copper becomes without shadow and better than gold.... the elements grow and are transmuted, because it is their qualities, not their substances which are contrary." (stephanus of alexandria, about 620 a.d.) "if we would elicit our medecine from the precious metals, we must destroy the particular metalic form, without impairing its specific properties. the specific properties of the metal have their abode in its spiritual part, which resides in homogeneous water. thus we must destroy the particular form of gold, and change it into its generic homogeneous water, in which the spirit of gold is preserved; this spirit afterwards restores the consistency of its water, and brings forth a new form (after the necessary putrefaction) a thousand times more perfect than the form of gold which it lost by being reincrudated." (philalethes, 17th century.) "the bodily nature of things is a concealing outward vesture." (michael sendivogius, 17th century.) "nothing of true value is located in the body of a substance, but in the virtue ... the less there is of body, the more in proportion is the virtue." (paracelsus, 16th century.) "there are four elements, and each has at its centre another element which makes it what it is. these are the four pillars of the world.... it is their contrary action which keeps up the harmony and equilibrium of the mundane machinery." (michael sendivogius.) "nature cannot work till it has been supplied with a material: the first matter is furnished by god, the second matter by the sage." (michael sendivogius.) "when corruptible elements are united in a certain substance, their strife must sooner or later bring about its decomposition, which is, of course, followed by putrefaction; in putrefaction, the impure is separated from the pure; and if the pure elements are then once more joined together by the action of natural heat, a much nobler and higher form of life is produced.... if the hidden central fire, which during life was in a state of passivity, obtain the mastery, it attracts to itself all the pure elements, which are thus separated from the impure, and form the nucleus of a far purer form of life." (michael sendivogius.) "cause that which is above to be below; that which is visible to be invisible; that which is palpable to become impalpable. again let that which is below become that which is above; let the invisible become visible, and the impalpable become palpable. here you see the perfection of our art, without any defect or diminution." (basil valentine, 15th century.) "think most diligently about this; often bear in mind, observe and comprehend, that all minerals and metals together, in the same time, and after the same fashion, and of one and the same principal matter, are produced and generated. that matter is no other than a mere vapour, which is extracted from the elementary earth by the superior stars, or by a sidereal distillation of the macrocosm; which sidereal hot infusion, with an airy sulphurous property, descending upon inferiors, so acts and operates as that there is implanted, spiritually and invisibly, a certain power and virtue in those metals and minerals; which fume, moreover, resolves in the earth into a certain water, wherefrom all metals are thenceforth generated and ripened to their perfection, and thence proceeds this or that metal or mineral, according as one of the three principles acquires dominion, and they have much or little of sulphur and salt, or an unequal mixture of these; whence some metals are fixed--that is, constant or stable; and some are volatile and easily changeable, as is seen in gold, silver, copper, iron, tin, and lead." (basil valentine.) "to grasp the invisible elements, to attract them by their material correspondences, to control, purify, and transform them by the living power of the spirit--this is true alchemy." (paracelsus.) "destruction perfects that which is good; for the good cannot appear on account of that which conceals it.... each one of the visible metals is a concealment of the other six metals." (paracelsus.) these sayings read like sentences in a forgotten tongue. humboldt tells of a parrot which had lived with a tribe of american indians, and learnt scraps of their language; the tribe totally disappeared; the parrot alone remained, and babbled words in the language which no living human being could understand. are the words i have quoted unintelligible, like the parrot's prating? perhaps the language may be reconstructed; perhaps it may be found to embody something worth a hearing. success is most likely to come by considering the growth of alchemy; by trying to find the ideas which were expressed in the strange tongue; by endeavouring to look at our surroundings as the alchemists looked at theirs. do what we will, we always, more or less, construct our own universe. the history of science may be described as the history of the attempts, and the failures, of men "to see things as they are." "nothing is harder," said the latin poet lucretius, "than to separate manifest facts from doubtful, what straightway the mind adds on of itself." observations of the changes which are constantly happening in the sky, and on the earth, must have prompted men long ago to ask whether there are any limits to the changes of things around them. and this question must have become more urgent as working in metals, making colours and dyes, preparing new kinds of food and drink, producing substances with smells and tastes unlike those of familiar objects, and other pursuits like these, made men acquainted with transformations which seemed to penetrate to the very foundations of things. can one thing be changed into any other thing; or, are there classes of things within each of which change is possible, while the passage from one class to another is not possible? are all the varied substances seen, tasted, handled, smelt, composed of a limited number of essentially different things; or, is each fundamentally different from every other substance? such questions as these must have pressed for answers long ago. some of the greek philosophers who lived four or five hundred years before christ formed a theory of the transformations of matter, which is essentially the theory held by naturalists to-day. these philosophers taught that to understand nature we must get beneath the superficial qualities of things. "according to convention," said democritus (born 460 b.c.), "there are a sweet and a bitter, a hot and a cold, and according to convention there is colour. in truth there are atoms and a void." those investigators attempted to connect all the differences which are observed between the qualities of things with differences of size, shape, position, and movement of atoms. they said that all things are formed by the coalescence of certain unchangeable, indestructible, and impenetrable particles which they named atoms; the total number of atoms is constant; not one of them can be destroyed, nor can one be created; when a substance ceases to exist and another is formed, the process is not a destruction of matter, it is a re-arrangement of atoms. only fragments of the writings of the founders of the atomic theory have come to us. the views of these philosophers are preserved, and doubtless amplified and modified, in a latin poem, _concerning the nature of things_, written by lucretius, who was born a century before the beginning of our era. let us consider the picture given in that poem of the material universe, and the method whereby the picture was produced.[2] [2] the quotations from lucretius are taken from munro's translation (4th edition, 1886). all knowledge, said lucretius, is based on "the aspect and the law of nature." true knowledge can be obtained only by the use of the senses; there is no other method. "from the senses first has proceeded the knowledge of the true, and the senses cannot be refuted. shall reason, founded on false sense, be able to contradict [the senses], wholly founded as it is on the senses? and if they are not true, then all reason as well is rendered false." the first principle in nature is asserted by lucretius to be that "nothing is ever gotten out of nothing." "a thing never returns to nothing, but all things after disruption go back to the first bodies of matter." if there were not imperishable seeds of things, atoms, "first-beginnings of solid singleness," then, lucretius urges, "infinite time gone by and lapse of days must have eaten up all things that are of mortal body." the first-beginnings, or atoms, of things were thought of by lucretius as always moving; "there is no lowest point in the sum of the universe" where they can rest; they meet, clash, rebound, or sometimes join together into groups of atoms which move about as wholes. change, growth, decay, formation, disruption--these are the marks of all things. "the war of first-beginnings waged from eternity is carried on with dubious issue: now here, now there, the life-bringing elements of things get the mastery, and are o'ermastered in turn; with the funeral wail blends the cry which babies raise when they enter the borders of light; and no night ever followed day, nor morning night, that heard not, mingling with the sickly infant's cries, the attendants' wailings on death and black funeral." lucretius pictured the atoms of things as like the things perceived by the senses; he said that atoms of different kinds have different shapes, but the number of shapes is finite, because there is a limit to the number of different things we see, smell, taste, and handle; he implies, although i do not think he definitely asserts, that all atoms of one kind are identical in every respect. we now know that many compounds exist which are formed by the union of the same quantities by weight of the same elements, and, nevertheless, differ in properties; modern chemistry explains this fact by saying that the properties of a substance depend, not only on the kind of atoms which compose the minute particles of a compound, and the number of atoms of each kind, but also on the mode of arrangement of the atoms.[3] the same doctrine was taught by lucretius, two thousand years ago. "it often makes a great difference," he said, "with what things, and in what positions the same first-beginnings are held in union, and what motions they mutually impart and receive." for instance, certain atoms may be so arranged at one time as to produce fire, and, at another time, the arrangement of the same atoms may be such that the result is a fir-tree. the differences between the colours of things are said by lucretius to be due to differences in the arrangements and motions of atoms. as the colour of the sea when wind lashes it into foam is different from the colour when the waters are at rest, so do the colours of things change when the atoms whereof the things are composed change from one arrangement to another, or from sluggish movements to rapid and tumultuous motions. [3] see the chapter _molecular architecture_ in the _story of the chemical elements_. lucretius pictured a solid substance as a vast number of atoms squeezed closely together, a liquid as composed of not so many atoms less tightly packed, and a gas as a comparatively small number of atoms with considerable freedom of motion. essentially the same picture is presented by the molecular theory of to-day. to meet the objection that atoms are invisible, and therefore cannot exist, lucretius enumerates many things we cannot see although we know they exist. no one doubts the existence of winds, heat, cold and smells; yet no one has seen the wind, or heat, or cold, or a smell. clothes become moist when hung near the sea, and dry when spread in the sunshine; but no one has seen the moisture entering or leaving the clothes. a pavement trodden by many feet is worn away; but the minute particles are removed without our eyes being able to see them. another objector urges--"you say the atoms are always moving, yet the things we look at, which you assert to be vast numbers of moving atoms, are often motionless." him lucretius answers by an analogy. "and herein you need not wonder at this, that though the first-beginnings of things are all in motion, yet the sum is seen to rest in supreme repose, unless when a thing exhibits motions with its individual body. for all the nature of first things lies far away from our senses, beneath their ken; and, therefore, since they are themselves beyond what you can see, they must withdraw from sight their motion as well; and the more so, that the things which we can see do yet often conceal their motions when a great distance off. thus, often, the woolly flocks as they crop the glad pastures on a hill, creep on whither the grass, jewelled with fresh dew, summons or invites each, and the lambs, fed to the full, gambol and playfully butt; all which objects appear to us from a distance to be blended together, and to rest like a white spot on a green hill. again, when mighty legions fill with their movements all parts of the plains, waging the mimicry of war, the glitter lifts itself up to the sky, and the whole earth round gleams with brass, and beneath a noise is raised by the mighty tramplings of men, and the mountains, stricken by the shouting, echo the voices to the stars of heaven, and horsemen fly about, and suddenly wheeling, scour across the middle of the plains, shaking them with the vehemence of their charge. and yet there is some spot on the high hills, seen from which they appear to stand still and to rest on the plains as a bright spot." the atomic theory of the greek thinkers was constructed by reasoning on natural phenomena. lucretius constantly appeals to observed facts for confirmation of his theoretical teachings, or refutation of opinions he thought erroneous. besides giving a general mental presentation of the material universe, the theory was applied to many specific transmutations; but minute descriptions of what are now called chemical changes could not be given in terms of the theory, because no searching examination of so much as one such change had been made, nor, i think, one may say, could be made under the conditions of greek life. more than two thousand years passed before investigators began to make accurate measurements of the quantities of the substances which take part in those changes wherein certain things seem to be destroyed and other totally different things to be produced; until accurate knowledge had been obtained of the quantities of the definite substances which interact in the transformations of matter, the atomic theory could not do more than draw the outlines of a picture of material changes. a scientific theory has been described as "the likening of our imaginings to what we actually observe." so long as we observe only in the rough, only in a broad and general way, our imaginings must also be rough, broad, and general. it was the great glory of the greek thinkers about natural events that their observations were accurate, on the whole, and as far as they went, and the theory they formed was based on no trivial or accidental features of the facts, but on what has proved to be the very essence of the phenomena they sought to bring into one point of view; for all the advances made in our own times in clear knowledge of the transformations of matter have been made by using, as a guide to experimental inquiries, the conception that the differences between the qualities of substances are connected with differences in the weights and movements of minute particles; and this was the central idea of the atomic theory of the greek philosophers. the atomic theory was used by the great physicists of the later renaissance, by galileo, gassendi, newton and others. our own countryman, john dalton, while trying (in the early years of the 19th century) to form a mental presentation of the atmosphere in terms of the theory of atoms, rediscovered the possibility of differences between the sizes of atoms, applied this idea to the facts concerning the quantitative compositions of compounds which had been established by others, developed a method for determining the relative weights of atoms of different kinds, and started chemistry on the course which it has followed so successfully. instead of blaming the greek philosophers for lack of quantitatively accurate experimental inquiry, we should rather be full of admiring wonder at the extraordinary acuteness of their mental vision, and the soundness of their scientific spirit. the ancient atomists distinguished the essential properties of things from their accidental features. the former cannot be removed, lucretius said, without "utter destruction accompanying the severance"; the latter may be altered "while the nature of the thing remains unharmed." as examples of essential properties, lucretius mentions "the weight of a stone, the heat of fire, the fluidity of water." such things as liberty, war, slavery, riches, poverty, and the like, were accounted accidents. time also was said to be an accident: it "exists not by itself; but simply from the things which happen, the sense apprehends what has been done in time past, as well as what is present, and what is to follow after." as our story proceeds, we shall see that the chemists of the middle ages, the alchemists, founded their theory of material changes on the difference between a supposed essential substratum of things, and their qualities which could be taken off, they said, and put on, as clothes are removed and replaced. how different from the clear, harmonious, orderly, greek scheme, is any picture we can form, from such quotations as i have given from their writings, of the alchemists' conception of the world. the greeks likened their imaginings of nature to the natural facts they observed; the alchemists created an imaginary world after their own likeness. while christianity was superseding the old religions, and the theological system of the christian church was replacing the cosmogonies of the heathen, the contrast between the power of evil and the power of good was more fully realised than in the days of the greeks; a sharper division was drawn between this world and another world, and that other world was divided into two irreconcilable and absolutely opposite parts. man came to be regarded as the centre of a tremendous and never-ceasing battle, urged between the powers of good and the powers of evil. the sights and sounds of nature were regarded as the vestments, or the voices, of the unseen combatants. life was at once very real and the mere shadow of a dream. the conditions were favourable to the growth of magic; for man was regarded as the measure of the universe, the central figure in an awful tragedy. magic is an attempt, by thinking and speculating about what we consider must be the order of nature, to discover some means of penetrating into the secret life of natural things, of realising the hidden powers and virtues of things, grasping the concealed thread of unity which is supposed to run through all phenomena however seemingly diverse, entering into sympathy with the supposed inner oneness of life, death, the present, past, and future. magic grows, and gathers strength, when men are sure their theory of the universe must be the one true theory, and they see only through the glasses which their theory supplies. "he who knows himself thoroughly knows god and all the mysteries of his nature," says a modern writer on magic. that saying expresses the fundamental hypothesis, and the method, of all systems of magic and mysticism. of such systems, alchemy was one. chapter ii. a sketch of alchemical theory. the system which began to be called _alchemy_ in the 6th and 7th centuries of our era had no special name before that time, but was known as _the sacred art, the divine science, the occult science, the art of hermes_. a commentator on aristotle, writing in the 4th century a.d., calls certain instruments used for fusion and calcination "_chuika organa_," that is, instruments for melting and pouring. hence, probably, came the adjective _chyic_ or _chymic_, and, at a somewhat later time, the word _chemia_ as the name of that art which deals with calcinations, fusions, meltings, and the like. the writer of a treatise on astrology, in the 5th century, speaking of the influences of the stars on the dispositions of man, says: "if a man is born under mercury he will give himself to astronomy; if mars, he will follow the profession of arms; if saturn, he will devote himself to the science of alchemy (_scientia alchemiae_)." the word _alchemia_ which appears in this treatise, was formed by prefixing the arabic _al_ (meaning _the_) to _chemia_, a word, as we have seen, of greek origin. it is the growth, development, and transformation into chemistry, of this _alchemia_ which we have to consider. alchemy, that is, _the_ art of melting, pouring, and transforming, must necessarily pay much attention to working with crucibles, furnaces, alembics, and other vessels wherein things are fused, distilled, calcined, and dissolved. the old drawings of alchemical operations show us men busy calcining, cohobating, distilling, dissolving, digesting, and performing other processes of like character to these. the alchemists could not be accused of laziness or aversion to work in their laboratories. paracelsus (16th century) says of them: "they are not given to idleness, nor go in a proud habit, or plush and velvet garments, often showing their rings on their fingers, or wearing swords with silver hilts by their sides, or fine and gay gloves on their hands; but diligently follow their labours, sweating whole days and nights by their furnaces. they do not spend their time abroad for recreation, but take delight in their laboratories. they put their fingers among coals, into clay and filth, not into gold rings. they are sooty and black, like smiths and miners, and do not pride themselves upon clean and beautiful faces." in these respects the chemist of to-day faithfully follows the practice of the alchemists who were his predecessors. you can nose a chemist in a crowd by the smell of the laboratory which hangs about him; you can pick him out by the stains on his hands and clothes. he also "takes delight in his laboratory"; he does not always "pride himself on a clean and beautiful face"; he "sweats whole days and nights by his furnace." why does the chemist toil so eagerly? why did the alchemists so untiringly pursue their quest? i think it is not unfair to say: the chemist experiments in order that he "may liken his imaginings to the facts which he observes"; the alchemist toiled that he might liken the facts which he observed to his imaginings. the difference may be put in another way by saying: the chemist's object is to discover "how changes happen in combinations of the unchanging"; the alchemist's endeavour was to prove the truth of his fundamental assertion, "that every substance contains undeveloped resources and potentialities, and can be brought outward and forward into perfection." looking around him, and observing the changes of things, the alchemist was deeply impressed by the growth and modification of plants and animals; he argued that minerals and metals also grow, change, develop. he said in effect: "nature is one, there must be unity in all the diversity i see. when a grain of corn falls into the earth it dies, but this dying is the first step towards a new life; the dead seed is changed into the living plant. so it must be with all other things in nature: the mineral, or the metal, seems dead when it is buried in the earth, but, in reality, it is growing, changing, and becoming more perfect." the perfection of the seed is the plant. what is the perfection of the common metals? "evidently," the alchemist replied, "the perfect metal is gold; the common metals are trying to become gold." "gold is the intention of nature in regard to all metals," said an alchemical writer. plants are preserved by the preservation of their seed. "in like manner," the alchemist's argument proceeded, "there must be a seed in metals which is their essence; if i can separate the seed and bring it under the proper conditions, i can cause it to grow into the perfect metal." "animal life, and human life also," we may suppose the alchemist saying, "are continued by the same method as that whereby the life of plants is continued; all life springs from seed; the seed is fructified by the union of the male and the female; in metals also there must be the two characters; the union of these is needed for the production of new metals; the conjoining of metals must go before the birth of the perfect metal." "now," we may suppose the argument to proceed, "now, the passage from the imperfect to the more perfect is not easy. it is harder to practise virtue than to acquiesce in vice; virtue comes not naturally to man; that he may gain the higher life, he must be helped by grace. therefore, the task of exalting the purer metals into the perfect gold, of developing the lower order into the higher, is not easy. if nature does this, she does it slowly and painfully; if the exaltation of the common metals to a higher plane is to be effected rapidly, it can be done only by the help of man." so far as i can judge from their writings, the argument of the alchemists may be rendered by some such form as the foregoing. a careful examination of the alchemical argument shows that it rests on a (supposed) intimate knowledge of nature's plan of working, and the certainty that simplicity is the essential mark of that plan. that the alchemists were satisfied of the great simplicity of nature, and their own knowledge of the ways of nature's work, is apparent from their writings. the author of _the new chemical light_ (17th century) says: "simplicity is the seal of truth.... nature is wonderfully simple, and the characteristic mark of a childlike simplicity is stamped upon all that is true and noble in nature." in another place the same author says: "nature is one, true, simple, self-contained, created of god, and informed with a certain universal spirit." the same author, michael sendivogius, remarks: "it may be asked how i come to have this knowledge about heavenly things which are far removed beyond human ken. my answer is that the sages have been taught by god that this natural world is only an image and material copy of a heavenly and spiritual pattern; that the very existence of this world is based upon the reality of its heavenly archetype.... thus the sage sees heaven reflected in nature as in a mirror, and he pursues this art, not for the sake of gold or silver, but for the love of the knowledge which it reveals." the _only true way_ advises all who wish to become true alchemists to leave the circuitous paths of pretended philosophers, and to follow nature, which is simple; the complicated processes described in books are said to be the traps laid by the "cunning sophists" to catch the unwary. in _a catechism of alchemy_, paracelsus asks: "what road should the philosopher follow?" he answers, "that exactly which was followed by the great architect of the universe in the creation of the world." one might suppose it would be easier, and perhaps more profitable, to examine, observe, and experiment, than to turn one's eyes inwards with the hope of discovering exactly "the road followed by the great architect of the universe in the creation of the world." but the alchemical method found it easier to begin by introspection. the alchemist spun his universe from his own ideas of order, symmetry, and simplicity, as the spider spins her web from her own substance. a favourite saying of the alchemists was, "what is above is as what is below." in one of its aspects this saying meant, "processes happen within the earth like those which occur on the earth; minerals and metals live, as animals and plants live; all pass through corruption towards perfection." in another aspect the saying meant "the human being is the world in miniature; as is the microcosm, so is the macrocosm; to know oneself is to know all the world." every man knows he ought to try to rise to better things, and many men endeavour to do what they know they ought to do; therefore, he who feels sure that all nature is fashioned after the image of man, projects his own ideas of progress, development, virtue, matter and spirit, on to nature outside himself; and, as a matter of course, this kind of naturalist uses the same language when he is speaking of the changes of material things as he employs to express the changes of his mental states, his hopes, fears, aspirations, and struggles. the language of the alchemists was, therefore, rich in such expressions as these; "the elements are to be so conjoined that the nobler and fuller life may be produced"; "our arcanum is gold exalted to the highest degree of perfection to which the combined action of nature and art can develop it." such commingling of ethical and physical ideas, such application of moral conceptions to material phenomena, was characteristic of the alchemical method of regarding nature. the necessary results were; great confusion of thought, much mystification of ideas, and a superabundance of _views_ about natural events. when the author of _the metamorphosis of metals_ was seeking for an argument in favour of his view, that water is the source and primal element of all things, he found what he sought in the biblical text: "in the beginning the spirit of god moved upon the face of the waters." similarly, the author of _the sodic hydrolith_ clenches his argument in favour of the existence of the philosopher's stone, by the quotation: "therefore, thus saith the lord; behold i lay in zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation. he that has it shall not be confounded." this author works out in detail an analogy between the functions and virtues of the _stone_, and the story of man's fall and redemption, as set forth in the old and new testaments. the same author speaks of "satan, that grim pseudo-alchemist." that the attribution, by the alchemists, of moral virtues and vices to natural things was in keeping with some deep-seated tendency of human nature, is shown by the persistence of some of their methods of stating the properties of substances: we still speak of "perfect and imperfect gases," "noble and base metals," "good and bad conductors of electricity," and "laws governing natural phenomena." convinced of the simplicity of nature, certain that all natural events follow one course, sure that this course was known to them and was represented by the growth of plants and animals, the alchemists set themselves the task, firstly, of proving by observations and experiments that their view of natural occurrences was correct; and, secondly, of discovering and gaining possession of the instrument whereby nature effects her transmutations and perfects her operations. the mastery of this instrument would give them power to change any metal into gold, the cure of all diseases, and the happiness which must come from the practical knowledge of the supreme secret of nature. the central quest of alchemy was the quest of an undefined and undefinable something wherein was supposed to be contained all the powers and potencies of life, and whatever makes life worth living. the names given to this mystical something were as many as the properties which were assigned to it. it was called _the one thing, the essence, the philosopher's stone, the stone of wisdom, the heavenly balm, the divine water, the virgin water, the carbuncle of the sun, the old dragon, the lion, the basilisk, the phoenix_; and many other names were given to it. we may come near to expressing the alchemist's view of the essential character of the object of their search by naming it _the soul of all things_. "alchemy," a modern writer says, "is the science of the soul of all things." the essence was supposed to have a material form, an ethereal or middle nature, and an immaterial or spiritual life. no one might hope to make this essence from any one substance, because, as one of the alchemists says, "it is the attribute of god alone to make one out of one; you must produce one thing out of two by natural generation." the alchemists did not pretend to create gold, but only to produce it from other things. the author of _a brief guide to the celestial ruby_ says: "we do not, as is sometimes said, profess to create gold and silver, but only to find an agent which ... is capable of entering into an intimate and maturing union with the mercury of the base metals." and again: "our art ... only arrogates to itself the power of developing, through the removal of all defects and superfluities, the golden nature which the baser metals possess." bonus, in his tract on _the new pearl of great price_ (16th century), says: "the art of alchemy ... does not create metals, or even develop them out of the metallic first-substance; it only takes up the unfinished handicraft of nature and completes it.... nature has only left a comparatively small thing for the artist to do--the completion of that which she has already begun." if the essence were ever attained, it would be by following the course which nature follows in producing the perfect plant from the imperfect seed, by discovering and separating the seed of metals, and bringing that seed under the conditions which alone are suitable for its growth. metals must have seed, the alchemists said, for it would be absurd to suppose they have none. "what prerogative have vegetables above metals," exclaims one of them, "that god should give seed to the one and withhold it from the other? are not metals as much in his sight as trees?" as metals, then, possess seed, it is evident how this seed is to be made active; the seed of a plant is quickened by descending into the earth, therefore the seed of metals must be destroyed before it becomes life-producing. "the processes of our art must begin with dissolution of gold; they must terminate in a restoration of the essential quality of gold." "gold does not easily give up its nature, and will fight for its life; but our agent is strong enough to overcome and kill it, and then it also has power to restore it to life, and to change the lifeless remains into a new and pure body." the application of the doctrine of the existence of seed in metals led to the performance of many experiments, and, hence, to the accumulation of a considerable body of facts established by experimental inquiries. the belief of the alchemists that all natural events are connected by a hidden thread, that everything has an influence on other things, that "what is above is as what is below," constrained them to place stress on the supposed connexion between the planets and the metals, and to further their metallic transformations by performing them at times when certain planets were in conjunction. the seven principal planets and the seven principal metals were called by the same names: _sol_ (gold), _luna_ (silver), _saturn_ (lead), _jupiter_ (tin), _mars_ (iron), _venus_ (copper), and _mercury_ (mercury). the author of _the new chemical light_ taught that one metal could be propagated from another only in the order of superiority of the planets. he placed the seven planets in the following descending order: saturn, jupiter, mars, sol, venus, mercury, luna. "the virtues of the planets descend," he said, "but do not ascend"; it is easy to change mars (iron) into venus (copper), for instance, but venus cannot be transformed into mars. although the alchemists regarded everything as influencing, and influenced by, other things, they were persuaded that the greatest effects are produced on a substance by substances of like nature with itself. hence, most of them taught that the seed of metals will be obtained by operations with metals, not by the action on metals of things of animal or vegetable origin. each class of substances, they said, has a life, or spirit (an essential character, we might say) of its own. "the life of sulphur," paracelsus said, "is a combustible, ill-smelling, fatness.... the life of gems and corals is mere colour.... the life of water is its flowing.... the life of fire is air." grant an attraction of like to like, and the reason becomes apparent for such directions as these: "nothing heterogeneous must be introduced into our magistery"; "everything should be made to act on that which is like it, and then nature will perform her duty." although each class of substances was said by the alchemists to have its own particular character, or life, nevertheless they taught that there is a deep-seated likeness between all things, inasmuch as the power of _the essence_, or _the one thing_, is so great that under its influence different things are produced from the same origin, and different things are caused to pass into and become the same thing. in _the new chemical light_ it is said: "while the seed of all things is one, it is made to generate a great variety of things." it is not easy now--it could not have been easy at any time--to give clear and exact meanings to the doctrines of the alchemists, or the directions they gave for performing the operations necessary for the production of the object of their search. and the difficulty is much increased when we are told that "the sage jealously conceals [his knowledge] from the sinner and the scornful, lest the mysteries of heaven should be laid bare to the vulgar gaze." we almost despair when an alchemical writer assures us that the sages "set pen to paper for the express purpose of concealing their meaning. the sense of a whole passage is often hopelessly obscured by the addition or omission of one little word, for instance the addition of the word _not_ in the wrong place." another writer says: "the sages are in the habit of using words which may convey either a true or a false impression; the former to their own disciples and children, the latter to the ignorant, the foolish, and the unworthy." sometimes, after descriptions of processes couched in strange and mystical language, the writer will add, "if you cannot perceive what you ought to understand herein, you should not devote yourself to the study of philosophy." philalethes, in his _brief guide to the celestial ruby_, seems to feel some pity for his readers; after describing what he calls "the generic homogeneous water of gold," he says: "if you wish for a more particular description of our water, i am impelled by motives of charity to tell you that it is living, flexible, clear, nitid, white as snow, hot, humid, airy, vaporous, and digestive." alchemy began by asserting that nature must be simple; it assumed that a knowledge of the plan and method of natural occurrences is to be obtained by thinking; and it used analogy as the guide in applying this knowledge of nature's design to particular events, especially the analogy, assumed by alchemy to exist, between material phenomena and human emotions. chapter iii. the alchemical conception of the unity and simplicity of nature. in the preceding chapter i have referred to the frequent use made by the alchemists of their supposition that nature follows the same plan, or at any rate a very similar plan, in all her processes. if this supposition is accepted, the primary business of an investigator of nature is to trace likenesses and analogies between what seem on the surface to be dissimilar and unconnected events. as this idea, and this practice, were the foundations whereon the superstructure of alchemy was raised, i think it is important to amplify them more fully than i have done already. mention is made in many alchemical writings of a mythical personage named _hermes trismegistus_, who is said to have lived a little later than the time of moses. representations of hermes trismegistus are found on ancient egyptian monuments. we are told that alexander the great found his tomb near hebron; and that the tomb contained a slab of emerald whereon thirteen sentences were written. the eighth sentence is rendered in many alchemical books as follows: "ascend with the greatest sagacity from the earth to heaven, and then again descend to the earth, and unite together the powers of things superior and things inferior. thus you will obtain the glory of the whole world, and obscurity will fly away from you." this sentence evidently teaches the unity of things in heaven and things on earth, and asserts the possibility of gaining, not merely a theoretical, but also a practical, knowledge of the essential characters of all things. moreover, the sentence implies that this fruitful knowledge is to be obtained by examining nature, using as guide the fundamental similarity supposed to exist between things above and things beneath. the alchemical writers constantly harp on this theme: follow nature; provided you never lose the clue, which is simplicity and similarity. the author of _the only way_ (1677) beseeches his readers "to enlist under the standard of that method which proceeds in strict obedience to the teaching of nature ... in short, the method which nature herself pursues in the bowels of the earth." the alchemists tell us not to expect much help from books and written directions. when one of them has said all he can say, he adds--"the question is whether even this book will convey any information to one before whom the writings of the sages and the open book of nature are exhibited in vain." another tells his readers the only thing for them is "to beseech god to give you the real philosophical temper, and to open your eyes to the facts of nature; thus alone will you reach the coveted goal." "follow nature" is sound advice. but, nature was to be followed with eyes closed save to one vision, and the vision was to be seen before the following began. the alchemists' general conception of nature led them to assign to every substance a condition or state natural to it, and wherein alone it could be said to be as it was designed to be. each substance, they taught, could be caused to leave its natural state only by violent, or non-natural, means, and any substance which had been driven from its natural condition by violence was ready, and even eager, to return to the condition consonant with its nature. thus norton, in his _ordinal of alchemy_, says: "metals are generated in the earth, for above ground they are subject to rust; hence above ground is the place of corruption of metals, and of their gradual destruction. the cause which we assign to this fact is that above ground they are not in their proper element, and an unnatural position is destructive to natural objects, as we see, for instance, that fishes die when they are taken out of the water; and as it is natural for men, beasts, and birds to live in the air, so stones and metals are naturally generated under the earth." in his _new pearl of great price_ (16th century), bonus says:--"the object of nature in all things is to introduce into each substance the form which properly belongs to it; and this is also the design of our art." this view assumed the knowledge of the natural conditions of the substances wherewith experiments were performed. it supposed that man could act as a guide, to bring back to its natural condition a substance which had been removed from that condition, either by violent processes of nature, or by man's device. the alchemist regarded himself as an arbiter in questions concerning the natural condition of each substance he dealt with. he thought he could say, "this substance ought to be thus, or thus," "that substance is constrained, thwarted, hindered from becoming what nature meant it to be." in ben jonson's play called _the alchemist_, subtle (who is the alchemist of the play) says, " ... metals would be gold if they had time." the alchemist not only attributed ethical qualities to material things, he also became the guardian and guide of the moral practices of these things. he thought himself able to recall the erring metal to the path of metalline virtue, to lead the extravagant mineral back to the moral home-life from which it had been seduced, to show the doubting and vacillating salt what it was ignorantly seeking, and to help it to find the unrealised object of its search. the alchemist acted as a sort of conscience to the metals, minerals, salts, and other substances he submitted to the processes of his laboratory. he treated them as a wise physician might treat an ignorant and somewhat refractory patient. "i know what you want better than you do," he seems often to be saying to the metals he is calcining, separating, joining and subliming. but the ignorant alchemist was not always thanked for his treatment. sometimes the patient rebelled. for instance, michael sendivogius, in his tract, _the new chemical light drawn from the fountain of nature and of manual experience_ (17th century), recounts _a dialogue between mercury, the alchemist, and nature_. "on a certain bright morning a number of alchemists met together in a meadow, and consulted as to the best way of preparing the philosopher's stone.... most of them agreed that mercury was the first substance. others said, no, it was sulphur, or something else.... just as the dispute began to run high, there arose a violent wind, which dispersed the alchemists into all the different countries of the world; and as they had arrived at no conclusion, each one went on seeking the philosopher's stone in his own old way, this one expecting to find it in one substance, and that in another, so that the search has continued without intermission even unto this day. one of them, however, had at least got the idea into his head that mercury was the substance of the stone, and determined to concentrate all his efforts on the chemical preparation of mercury.... he took common mercury and began to work with it. he placed it in a glass vessel over the fire, when it, of course, evaporated. so in his ignorance he struck his wife, and said: 'no one but you has entered my laboratory; you must have taken my mercury out of the vessel.' the woman, with tears, protested her innocence. the alchemist put some more mercury into the vessel.... the mercury rose to the top of the vessel in vaporous steam. then the alchemist was full of joy, because he remembered that the first substance of the stone is described by the sages as volatile; and he thought that now at last he _must_ be on the right track. he now began to subject the mercury to all sorts of chemical processes, to sublime it, and to calcine it with all manner of things, with salts, sulphur, metals, minerals, blood, hair, aqua fortis, herbs, urine, and vinegar.... everything he could think of was tried; but without producing the desired effect." the alchemist then despaired; after a dream, wherein an old man came and talked with him about the "mercury of the sages," the alchemist thought he would charm the mercury, and so he used a form of incantation. the mercury suddenly began to speak, and asked the alchemist why he had troubled him so much, and so on. the alchemist replied, and questioned the mercury. the mercury makes fun of the philosopher. then the alchemist again torments the mercury by heating him with all manner of horrible things. at last mercury calls in the aid of nature, who soundly rates the philosopher, tells him he is grossly ignorant, and ends by saying: "the best thing you can do is to give yourself up to the king's officers, who will quickly put an end to you and your philosophy." as long as men were fully persuaded that they knew the plan whereon the world was framed, that it was possible for them to follow exactly "the road which was followed by the great architect of the universe in the creation of the world," a real knowledge of natural events was impossible; for every attempt to penetrate nature's secrets presupposed a knowledge of the essential characteristics of that which was to be investigated. but genuine knowledge begins when the investigator admits that he must learn of nature, not nature of him. it might be truly said of one who held the alchemical conception of nature that "his foible was omniscience"; and omniscience negatives the attainment of knowledge. the alchemical notion of a natural state as proper to each substance was vigorously combated by the honourable robert boyle (born 1626, died 1691), a man of singularly clear and penetrative intellect. in _a paradox of the natural and supernatural states of bodies, especially of the air_, boyle says:--"i know that not only in living, but even in inanimate, bodies, of which alone i here discourse, men have universally admitted the famous distinction between the natural and preternatural, or violent state of bodies, and do daily, without the least scruple, found upon it hypotheses and ratiocinations, as if it were most certain that what they call nature had purposely formed bodies in such a determinate state, and were always watchful that they should not by any external violence be put out of it. but notwithstanding so general a consent of men in this point, i confess, i cannot yet be satisfied about it in the sense wherein it is wont to be taken. it is not, that i believe, that there is no sense in which, or in the account upon which, a body may he said to be in its natural state; but that i think the common distinction of a natural and violent state of bodies has not been clearly explained and considerately settled, and both is not well grounded, and is oftentimes ill applied. for when i consider that whatever state a body be put into, or kept in, it obtains or retains that state, assenting to the catholic laws of nature, i cannot think it fit to deny that in this sense the body proposed is in a natural state; but then, upon the same ground, it will he hard to deny but that those bodies which are said to be in a violent state may also be in a natural one, since the violence they are presumed to suffer from outward agents is likewise exercised no otherwise than according to the established laws of universal nature." there must be something very fascinating and comforting in the alchemical view of nature, as a harmony constructed on one simple plan, which can be grasped as a whole, and also in its details, by the introspective processes of the human intellect; for that conception prevails to-day among those who have not investigated natural occurrences for themselves. the alchemical view of nature still forms the foundation of systems of ethics, of philosophy, of art. it appeals to the innate desire of man to make himself the measure of all things. it is so easy, so authoritative, apparently so satisfactory. no amount of thinking and reasoning will ever demonstrate its falsity. it can be conquered only by a patient, unbiassed, searching examination of some limited portion of natural events. chapter iv. the alchemical elements and principles. the alchemists were sure that the intention of nature regarding metals was that they should become gold, for gold was considered to be the most perfect metal, and nature, they said, evidently strains after perfection. the alchemist found that metals were worn away, eaten through, broken, and finally caused to disappear, by many acid and acrid liquids which he prepared from mineral substances. but gold resisted the attacks of these liquids; it was not changed by heat, nor was it affected by sulphur, a substance which changed limpid, running mercury into an inert, black solid. hence, gold was more perfect in the alchemical scale than any other metal. since gold was considered to be the most perfect metal, it was self-evident to the alchemical mind that nature must form gold slowly in the earth, must transmute gradually the inferior metals into gold. "the only thing that distinguishes one metal from another," writes an alchemist who went under the name of philalethes, "is its degree of maturity, which is, of course, greatest in the most precious metals; the difference between gold and lead is not one of substance, but of digestion; in the baser metal the coction has not been such as to purge out its metallic impurities. if by any means this superfluous impure matter could be organically removed from the baser metals, they would become gold and silver. so miners tell us that lead has in many cases developed into silver in the bowels of the earth, and we contend that the same effect is produced in a much shorter time by means of our art." stories were told about the finding of gold in deserted mines which had been worked out long before; these stories were supposed to prove that gold was bred in the earth. the facts that pieces of silver were found in tin and lead mines, and gold was found in silver mines, were adduced as proofs that, as the author of _the new pearl of great price_ says, "nature is continually at work changing other metals into gold, because, though in a certain sense they are complete in themselves, they have not yet reached the highest perfection of which they are capable, and to which nature has destined them." what nature did in the earth man could accomplish in the workshop. for is not man the crown of the world, the masterpiece of nature, the flower of the universe; was he not given dominion over all things when the world was created? in asserting that the baser metals could be transmuted into gold, and in attempting to effect this transmutation, the alchemist was not acting on a vague; haphazard surmise; he was pursuing a policy dictated by his conception of the order of nature; he was following the method which he conceived to be that used by nature herself. the transmutation of metals was part and parcel of a system of natural philosophy. if this transmutation were impossible, the alchemical scheme of things would be destroyed, the believer in the transmutation would be left without a sense of order in the material universe. and, moreover, the alchemist's conception of an orderly material universe was so intimately connected with his ideas of morality and religion, that to disprove the possibility of the great transmutation would be to remove not only the basis of his system of material things, but the foundations of his system of ethics also. to take away his belief in the possibility of changing other metals into gold would be to convert the alchemist into an atheist. how, then, was the transmutation to be accomplished? evidently by the method whereby nature brings to perfection other living things; for the alchemist's belief in the simplicity and unity of nature compelled him to regard metals as living things. plants are improved by appropriate culture, by digging and enriching the soil, by judicious selection of seed; animals are improved by careful breeding. by similar processes metals will be encouraged and helped towards perfection. the perfect state of gold will not be reached at a bound; it will be gained gradually. many partial purifications will be needed. as _subtle_ says in _the alchemist_- 'twere absurd to think that nature in the earth bred gold perfect in the instant; something went before, there must be remote matter.... nature doth first beget the imperfect, then proceeds she to the perfect. at this stage the alchemical argument becomes very ultra-physical. it may, perhaps, be rendered somewhat as follows:-man is the most perfect of animals; in man there is a union of three parts, these are body, soul, and spirit. metals also may be said to have a body, a soul, and a spirit; there is a specific bodily, or material, form belonging to each metal; there is a metalline soul characteristic of this or that class of metals; there is a spirit, or inner immaterial potency, which is the very essence of all metals. the soul and spirit of man are clogged by his body. if the spiritual nature is to become the dominating partner, the body must be mortified: the alchemists, of course, used this kind of imagery, and it was very real to them. in like manner the spirit of metals will be laid bare and enabled to exercise its transforming influences, only when the material form of the individual metal has been destroyed. the first thing to do, then, is to strip off and cast aside those properties of metals which appeal to the senses. "it is necessary to deprive matter of its qualities in order to draw out its soul," said stephanus of alexandria in the 7th century; and in the 17th century paracelsus said, "nothing of true value is located in the body of a substance, but in the virtue ... the less there is of body the more in proportion is the virtue." but the possession of the soul of metals is not the final stage: mastery of the soul may mean the power of transmuting a metal into another like itself; it will not suffice for the great transmutation, for in that process a metal becomes gold, the one and only perfect metal. hence the soul also must be removed, in order that the spirit, the essence, the kernel, may be obtained. and as it is with metals, so, the alchemists argued, it is with all things. there are a few _principles_ which may be thought of as conditioning the specific bodily and material forms of things; beneath these, there are certain _elements_ which are common to many things whose principles are not the same; and, hidden by the wrappings of elements and principles, there is the one _essence_, the spirit, the mystic uniting bond, the final goal of the philosopher. i propose in this chapter to try to analyse the alchemical conceptions of elements and principles, and in the next chapter to attempt some kind of description of the essence. in his _tract concerning the great stone of the ancient sages_, basil valentine speaks of the "three principles," salt, sulphur, and mercury, the source of which is the elements. "there are four elements, and each has at its centre another element which makes it what it is. these are the four pillars of the earth." of the element _earth_, he says:--"in this element the other three, especially fire, are latent.... it is gross and porous, specifically heavy, but naturally light.... it receives all that the other three project into it, conscientiously conceals what it should hide, and brings to light that which it should manifest.... outwardly it is visible and fixed, inwardly it is invisible and volatile." of the element _water_, basil valentine says:--"outwardly it is volatile, inwardly it is fixed, cold, and humid.... it is the solvent of the world, and exists in three degrees of excellence: the pure, the purer, and the purest. of its purest substance the heavens were created; of that which is less pure the atmospheric air was formed; that which is simply pure remains in its proper sphere where ... it is guardian of all subtle substances here below." concerning the element _air_, he writes:--"the most noble element of air ... is volatile, but may be fixed, and when fixed renders all bodies penetrable.... it is nobler than earth or water.... it nourishes, impregnates, conserves the other elements." finally, of the element _fire_:--"fire is the purest and noblest of all elements, full of adhesive unctuous corrosiveness, penetrant, digestive, inwardly fixed, hot and dry, outwardly visible, and tempered by the earth.... this element is the most passive of all, and resembles a chariot; when it is drawn, it moves; when it is not drawn, it stands still." basil valentine then tells his readers that adam was compounded of the four pure elements, but after his expulsion from paradise he became subject to the various impurities of the animal creation. "the pure elements of his creation were gradually mingled and infected with the corruptible elements of the outer world, and thus his body became more and more gross, and liable, through its grossness, to natural decay and death." the process of degeneration was slow at first, but "as time went on, the seed out of which men were generated became more and more infected with perishable elements. the continued use of corruptible food rendered their bodies more and more gross; and human life was soon reduced to a very brief span." basil valentine then deals with the formation of the three _principles_ of things, by the mutual action of the four elements. fire acting on air produced _sulphur_; air acting on water produced _mercury_; water acting on earth produced _salt_. earth having nothing to act on produced nothing, but became the nurse of the three principles. "the three principles," he says, "are necessary because they are the immediate substance of metals. the remoter substance of metals is the four elements, but no one can produce anything out of them but god; and even god makes nothing of them but these three principles." to endeavour to obtain the four pure elements is a hopeless task. but the sage has the three principles at hand. "the artist should determine which of the three principles he is seeking, and should assist it so that it may overcome its contrary." "the art consists in an even mingling of the virtues of the elements; in the natural equilibrium of the hot, the dry, the cold, and the moist." the account of the elements given by philalethes differs from that of basil valentine. philalethes enumerates three elements only: air, water, and earth. things are not formed by the mixture of these elements, for "dissimilar things can never really unite." by analysing the properties of the three elements, philalethes reduced them finally to one, namely, water. "water," he says, "is the first principle of all things." "earth is the fundamental element in which all bodies grow and are preserved. air is the medium into which they grow, and by means of which the celestial virtues are communicated to them." according to philalethes, _mercury_ is the most important of the three principles. although gold is formed by the aid of mercury, it is only when mercury has been matured, developed, and perfected, that it is able to transmute inferior metals into gold. the essential thing to do is, therefore, to find an agent which will bring about the maturing and perfecting of mercury. this agent, philalethes calls "our divine arcanum." although it appears to me impossible to translate the sayings of the alchemists concerning elements and principles into expressions which shall have definite and exact meanings for us to-day, still we may, perhaps, get an inkling of the meaning of such sentences as those i have quoted from basil valentine and philalethes. take the terms _fire_ and _water_. in former times all liquid substances were supposed to be liquid because they possessed something in common; this hypothetical something was called the _element, water_. similarly, the view prevailed until comparatively recent times, that burning substances burn because of the presence in them of a hypothetical imponderable fluid, called "_caloric_"; the alchemists preferred to call this indefinable something an element, and to name it _fire_. we are accustomed to-day to use the words _fire_ and _water_ with different meanings, according to the ideas we wish to express. when we say "do not touch the fire," or "put your hand into the water," we are regarding fire and water as material things; when we say "the house is on fire," or speak of "a diamond of the first water," we are thinking of the condition or state of a burning body, or of a substance as transparent as water. when we say "put out the fire," or "his heart became as water," we are referring to the act of burning, or are using an image which likens the thing spoken of to a substance in the act of liquefying. as we do to-day, so the alchemists did before us; they used the words _fire_ and _water_ to express different ideas. such terms as hardness, softness, coldness, toughness, and the like, are employed for the purpose of bringing together into one point of view different things which are alike in, at least, one respect. hard things may differ in size, weight, shape, colour, texture, &c. a soft thing may weigh the same as a hard thing; both may have the same colour or the same size, or be at the same temperature, and so on. by classing together various things as hard or soft, or smooth or rough, we eliminate (for the time) all the properties wherein the things differ, and regard them only as having one property in common. the words hardness, softness, &c., are useful class-marks. similarly the alchemical elements and principles were useful class-marks. we must not suppose that when the alchemists spoke of certain things as formed from, or by the union of, the same elements or the same principles, they meant that these things contained a common substance. their elements and principles were not thought of as substances, at least not in the modern meaning of the expression, _a substance_; they were qualities only. if we think of the alchemical elements earth, air, fire, and water, as general expressions of what seemed to the alchemists the most important properties of all substances, we may be able to attach some kind of meaning to the sayings of basil valentine, which i have quoted. for instance, when that alchemist tells us, "fire is the most passive of all elements, and resembles a chariot; when it is drawn, it moves; when it is not drawn, it stands still"--we may suppose he meant to express the fact that a vast number of substances can be burnt, and that combustion does not begin of itself, but requires an external agency to start it. unfortunately, most of the terms which the alchemists used to designate their elements and principles are terms which are now employed to designate specific substances. the word _fire_ is still employed rather as a quality of many things under special conditions, than as a specific substance; but _earth_, _water_, _air_, _salt_, _sulphur_, and _mercury_, are to-day the names applied to certain groups of properties, each of which is different from all other groups of properties, and is, therefore, called, in ordinary speech, a definite kind of matter. as knowledge became more accurate and more concentrated, the words _sulphur_, _salt_, _mercury_, &c., began to be applied to distinct substances, and as these terms were still employed in their alchemical sense as compendious expressions for certain qualities common to great classes of substances, much confusion arose. kunckel, the discoverer of phosphorus, who lived between 1630 and 1702, complained of the alchemists' habit of giving different names to the same substance, and the same name to different substances. "the sulphur of one," he says, "is not the sulphur of another, to the great injury of science. to that one replies that everyone is perfectly free to baptise his infant as he pleases. granted. you may if you like call an ass an ox, but you will never make anyone believe that your ox is an ass." boyle is very severe on the vague and loose use of words practised by so many writers of his time. in _the sceptical chymist_ (published 1678-9) he says: "if judicious men, skilled in chymical affairs, shall once agree to write clearly and plainly of them, and thereby keep men from being stunned, as it were, or imposed upon by dark and empty words; it is to be hoped that these [other] men finding, that they can no longer write impertinently and absurdly, without being laughed at for doing so, will be reduced either to write nothing, or books that may teach us something, and not rob men, as formerly, of invaluable time; and so ceasing to trouble the world with riddles or impertinences, we shall either by their books receive an advantage, or by their silence escape an inconvenience." most of the alchemists taught that the elements produced what they called _seed_, by their mutual reactions, and the principles matured this seed and brought it to perfection. they supposed that each class, or kind, of things had its own seed, and that to obtain the seed was to have the power of producing the things which sprung from that seed. some of them, however, asserted that all things come from a common seed, and that the nature of the products of this seed is conditioned by the circumstances under which it is caused to develop. thus michael sendivogius writes as follows in _the new chemical light, drawn from the fountain of nature and of manual experience_ (17th century):- "wherever there is seed, nature will work through it, whether it be good or bad." "the four elements, by their continued action, project a constant supply of seed to the centre of the earth, where it is digested, and whence it proceeds again in generative motions. now the centre of the earth is a certain void place where nothing is at rest, and upon the margin or circumference of this centre the four elements project their qualities.... the magnetic force of our earth-centre attracts to itself as much as is needed of the cognate seminal substance, while that which cannot be used for vital generation is thrust forth in the shape of stones and other rubbish. this is the fountain-head of all things terrestrial. let us illustrate the matter by supposing a glass of water to be set in the middle of a table, round the margin of which are placed little heaps of salt, and of powders of different colours. if the water be poured out, it will run all over the table in divergent rivulets, and will become salt where it touches the salt, red where it touches the red powder, and so on. the water does not change the '_places_,' but the several '_places_' differentiate the water.[4] in the same way, the seed which is the product of the four elements is projected in all directions from the earth-centre, and produces different things, according to the quality of the different places. thus, while the seed of all things is one, it is made to generate a great variety of things.... so long as nature's seed remains in the centre it can indifferently produce a tree or a metal, a herb or a stone, and in like manner, according to the purity of the place, it will produce what is less or more pure." [4] the author i am quoting had said--"nature is divided into four '_places_' in which she brings forth all things that appear and that are in the shade; and according to the good or bad quality of the '_place_,' she brings forth good or bad things.... it is most important for us to know her '_places_' ... in order that we may join things together according to nature." chapter v. the alchemical essence. in the last chapter i tried to describe the alchemical view of the interdependence of different substances. taking for granted the tripartite nature of man, the co-existence in him of body, soul, and spirit (no one of which was defined), the alchemists concluded that all things are formed as man is formed; that in everything there is a specific bodily form, some portion of soul, and a dash of spirit. i considered the term _soul_ to be the alchemical name for the properties common to a class of substances, and the term _spirit_ to mean the property which was thought by the alchemists to be common to all things. the alchemists considered it possible to arrange all substances in four general classes, the marks whereof were expressed by the terms hot, cold, moist, and dry; they thought of these properties as typified by what they called the four elements--fire, air, water, and earth. everything, they taught, was produced from the four elements, not immediately, but through the mediation of the three principles--mercury, sulphur, and salt. these principles were regarded as the tools put into the hands of him who desired to effect the transmutation of one substance into another. the principles were not thought of as definite substances, nor as properties of this or that specified substance; they were considered to be the characteristic properties of large classes of substances. the chemist of to-day places many compounds in the same class because all are acids, because all react similarly under similar conditions. it used to be said that every acid possesses more or less of _the principle of acidity_. lavoisier changed the language whereby certain facts concerning acids were expressed. he thought that experiments proved all acids to be compounds of the element oxygen; and for many years after lavoisier, the alchemical expression _the principle of acidity_ was superseded by the word _oxygen_. although lavoisier recognised that not every compound of oxygen is an acid, he taught that every acid is a compound of oxygen. we know now that many acids are not compounds of oxygen, but we have not yet sufficient knowledge to frame a complete definition of the term _acid_. nevertheless it is convenient, indeed it is necessary, to place together many compounds which react similarly under certain defined conditions, and to give a common name to them all. the alchemists also classified substances, but their classification was necessarily more vague than ours; and they necessarily expressed their reasons for putting different substances in the same class in a language which arose out of the general conceptions of natural phenomena which prevailed in their time. the primary classification of substances made by the alchemists was expressed by saying; these substances are rich in the principle _sulphur_, those contain much of the principle _mercury_, and this class is marked by the preponderance of the principle _salt_. the secondary classification of the alchemists was expressed by saying; this class is characterised by dryness, that by moisture, another by coldness, and a fourth by hotness; the dry substances contain much of the element _earth_, the moist substances are rich in the element _water_, in the cold substances the element _air_ preponderates, and the hot substances contain more of the element _fire_ than of the other elements. the alchemists went a step further in their classification of things. they asserted that there is one thing present in all things; that everything is a vehicle for the more or less perfect exhibition of the properties of the one thing; that there is a primal element common to all substances. the final aim of alchemy was to obtain the one thing, the primal element, the soul of all things, so purified, not only from all specific substances, but also from all admixture of the four elements and the three principles, as to make possible the accomplishment of any transmutation by the use of it. if a person ignorant of its powers were to obtain the essence, he might work vast havoc and cause enormous confusion; it was necessary, therefore, to know the conditions under which the potencies of the essence became active. hence there was need of prolonged study of the mutual actions of the most seemingly diverse substances, and of minute and patient examination of the conditions under which nature performs her marvellous transmutations. the quest of the one thing was fraught with peril, and was to be attempted only by those who had served a long and laborious apprenticeship. in _the chemical treatise of thomas norton, the englishman, called believe-me, or the ordinal of alchemy_ (15th century), the adept is warned not to disclose his secrets to ordinary people. "you should carefully test and examine the life, character, and mental aptitudes of any person who would be initiated in this art, and then you should bind him, by a sacred oath, not to let our magistery be commonly or vulgarly known. only when he begins to grow old and feeble, he may reveal it to one person, but not to more, and that one man must be virtuous.... if any wicked man should learn to practise the art, the event would be fraught with great danger to christendom. for such a man would overstep all bounds of moderation, and would remove from their hereditary thrones those legitimate princes who rule over the peoples of christendom." the results of the experimental examination of the compositions and properties of substances, made since the time of the alchemists, have led to the modern conception of the chemical element, and the isolation of about seventy or eighty different elements. no substance now called an element has been produced in the laboratory by uniting two, or more, distinct substances, nor has any been separated into two, or more, unlike portions. the only decided change which a chemical element has been caused to undergo is the combination of it with some other element or elements, or with a compound or compounds. but it is possible that all the chemical elements may be combinations of different quantities of one primal element. certain facts make this supposition tenable; and some chemists expect that the supposition will be proved to be correct. if the hypothetical primal element should be isolated, we should have fulfilled the aim of alchemy, and gained the one thing; but the fulfilment would not be that whereof the alchemists dreamed. inasmuch as the alchemical essence was thought of as the universal spirit to whose presence is due whatever degree of perfection any specific substance exhibits, it followed that the more perfect a substance the greater is the quantity of the essence in it. but even in the most perfect substance found in nature--which substance, the alchemists said, is gold--the essence is hidden by wrappings of specific properties which prevent the ordinary man from recognising it. remove these wrappings from some special substance, and you have the perfect form of that thing; you have some portion of the universal spirit joined to the one general property of the class of things whereof the particular substance is a member. then remove the class-property, often spoken of by the alchemists as _the life_, of the substance, and you have the essence itself. the alchemists thought that to every thing, or at any rate to every class of things, there corresponds a more perfect form than that which we see and handle; they spoke of gold, and the _gold of the sages_; mercury, and the _mercury of the philosophers_; sulphur, and the _heavenly sulphur of him whose eyes are opened_. to remove the outer wrappings of ordinary properties which present themselves to the untrained senses, was regarded by the alchemists to be a difficult task; to tear away the soul (the class-property) of a substance, and yet retain the essence which made that substance its dwelling place, was possible only after vast labour, and by the use of the proper agent working under the proper conditions. an exceedingly powerful, delicate, and refined agent was needed; and the mastery of the agent was to be acquired by bitter experience, and, probably, after many disappointments. "gold," an alchemist tells us, "does not easily give up its nature, and will fight for its life; but our agent is strong enough to overcome and kill it, and then it also has the power to restore it to life, and to change the lifeless remains into a new and pure body." thomas norton, the author of _the ordinal of alchemy_, writing in the 15th century, says the worker in transmutations is often tempted to be in a hurry, or to despair, and he is often deceived. his servants will be either stupid and faithful, or quick-witted and false. he may be robbed of everything when his work is almost finished. the only remedies are infinite patience, a sense of virtue, and sound reason. "in the pursuit of our art," he says, "you should take care, from time to time, to unbend your mind from its sterner employments with some convenient recreation." the choice of workmen to aid in the mechanical parts of the quest was a great trouble to the alchemists. on this subject norton says--"if you would be free from all fear over the gross work, follow my counsel, and never engage married men; for they soon give in and pretend they are tired out.... hire your workmen for certain stipulated wages, and not for longer periods than twenty-four hours at a time. give them higher wages than they would receive elsewhere, and be prompt and ready in your payments." many accounts are given by alchemical writers of the agent, and many names are bestowed on it. the author of _a brief guide to the celestial ruby_ speaks thus of the agent--"it is our doorkeeper, our balm, our honey, oil, urine, maydew, mother, egg, secret furnace, oven, true fire, venomous dragon, theriac, ardent wine, green lion, bird of hermes, goose of hermogenes, two-edged sword in the hand of the cherub that guards the tree of life.... it is our true secret vessel, and the garden of the sages in which our sun rises and sets. it is our royal mineral, our triumphant vegetable saturnia, and the magic rod of hermes, by means of which he assumes any shape he likes." sometimes we are told that the agent is mercury, sometimes that it is gold, but not common mercury or common gold. "supplement your common mercury with the inward fire which it needs, and you will soon get rid of all superfluous dross." "the agent is gold, as highly matured as natural and artificial digestion can make it, and a thousand times more perfect than the common metal of that name. gold, thus exalted, radically penetrates, tinges, and fixes metals." the alchemists generally likened the work to be performed by their agent to the killing of a living thing. they constantly use the allegory of death, followed by resurrection, in describing the steps whereby the essence was to be obtained, and the processes whereby the baser metals were to be partially purified. they speak of the mortification of metals, the dissolution and putrefaction of substances, as preliminaries to the appearance of the true life of the things whose outward properties have been destroyed. for instance, paracelsus says: "destruction perfects that which is good; for the good cannot appear on account of that which conceals it." the same alchemist speaks of rusting as the mortification of metals; he says: "the mortification of metals is the removal of their bodily structure.... the mortification of woods is their being turned into charcoal or ashes." paracelsus distinguishes natural from artificial mortification, "whatever nature consumes," he says, "man cannot restore. but whatever man destroys man can restore, and break again when restored." things which had been mortified by man's device were considered by paracelsus not to be really dead. he gives this extraordinary illustration of his meaning: "you see this is the case with lions, which are all born dead, and are first vitalised by the horrible noise of their parents, just as a sleeping person is awakened by a shout." the mortification of metals is represented in alchemical books by various images and allegories. fig. i. is reduced from a cut in a 16th century work, _the book of lambspring, a noble ancient philosopher, concerning the philosophical stone_. [illustration: here the father devours the son; the soul and spirit flow forth from the body. fig. i.] the image used to set forth the mortification of metals is a king swallowing his son. figs. ii. and iii. are reduced from basil valentine's _twelve keys_. both of these figures represent the process of mortification by images connected with death and burial. [illustration: fig. ii.] in his explanation (?) of these figures, basil valentine says:- "neither human nor animal bodies can be multiplied or propagated without decomposition; the grain and all vegetable seed, when cast into the ground, must decay before it can spring up again; moreover, putrefaction imparts life to many worms and other animalculæ.... if bread is placed in honey, and suffered to decay, ants are generated ... maggots are also developed by the decay of nuts, apples, and pears. the same thing may be observed in regard to vegetable life. nettles and other weeds spring up where no such seed has ever been sown. this occurs only by putrefaction. the reason is that the soil in such places is so disposed, and, as it were, impregnated, that it produces these fruits; which is a result of the properties of sidereal influences; consequently the seed is spiritually produced in the earth, and putrefies in the earth, and by the operation of the elements generates corporeal matter according to the species of nature. thus the stars and the elements may generate new spiritual, and ultimately, new vegetable seed, by means of putrefaction.... know that, in like manner, no metallic seed can develop, or multiply, unless the said seed, by itself alone, and without the introduction of any foreign substance, be reduced to a perfect putrefaction." [illustration: fig. iii.] the action of the mineral agent in perfecting substances is often likened by the alchemists to the conjoining of the male and the female, followed by the production of offspring. they insist on the need of a union of two things, in order to produce something more perfect than either. the agent, they say, must work upon something; alone it is nothing. the methods whereby the agent is itself perfected, and the processes wherein the agent effects the perfecting of the less perfect things, were divided into stages by the alchemists. they generally spoke of these stages as _gates_, and enumerated ten or sometimes twelve of them. as examples of the alchemical description of these gates, i give some extracts from _a brief guide to the celestial ruby_. the first gate is _calcination_, which is "the drying up of the humours"; by this process the substance "is concocted into a black powder which is yet unctuous, and retains its radical humour." when gold passes through this gate, "we observe in it two natures, the fixed and the volatile, which we liken to two serpents." the fixed nature is likened to a serpent without wings; the volatile, to a serpent with wings: calcination unites these two into one. the second gate, _dissolution_, is likened to death and burial; but the true essence will appear glorious and beautiful when this gate is passed. the worker is told not to be discouraged by this apparent death. _the mercury of the sages_ is spoken of by this author as the queen, and gold as the king. the king dies for love of the queen, but he is revived by his spouse, who is made fruitful by him and brings forth "a most royal son." figs. iv. and v. are reduced from _the book of lambspring_; they express the need of the conjunction of two to produce one. [illustration: here you behold a great marvel- two lions are joined into one. the spirit and soul must be united in their body. fig. iv.] after dissolution came _conjunction_, wherein the separated elements were combined. then followed _putrefaction_, necessary for the germination of the seed which had been produced by calcination, dissolution, and conjunction. putrefaction was followed by _congelation_ and _citation_. the passage through the next gate, called _sublimation_, caused the body to become spiritual, and the spiritual to be made corporal. _fermentation_ followed, whereby the substance became soft and flowed like wax. finally, by _exaltation_, the stone was perfected. [illustration: here are two birds, great and strong--the body and spirit; one devours the other. let the body be placed in horse-dung, or a warm bath, the spirit having been extracted from it. the body has become white by the process, the spirit red by our art. all that exists tends towards perfection, and thus is the philosopher's stone prepared. fig. v.] the author of _the open entrance_ speaks of the various stages in the perfecting of the agent as _regimens_. the beginning of the heating of gold with mercury is likened to the king stripping off his golden garments and descending into the fountain; this is the _regimen of mercury_. as the heating is continued, all becomes black; this is the _regimen of saturn_. then is noticed a play of many colours; this is the _regimen of jupiter_: if the heat is not regulated properly, "the young ones of the crow will go back to the nest." about the end of the fourth month you will see "the sign of the waxing moon," and all becomes white; this is the _regimen of the moon_. the white colour gives place to purple and green; you are now in the _regimen of venus_. after that, appear all the colours of the rainbow, or of a peacock's tail; this is the _regimen of mars_. finally the colour becomes orange and golden; this is the _regimen of the sun_. the reader may wish to have some description of the essence. the alchemists could describe it only in contraries. it had a bodily form, but its method of working was spiritual. in _the sodic hydrolith, or water stone of the wise_ we are told:- "the stone is conceived below the earth, born in the earth, quickened in heaven, dies in time, and obtains eternal glory.... it is bluish-grey and green.... it flows like water, yet it makes no wet; it is of great weight, and is small." philalethes says, in _a brief guide to the celestial ruby_: "the philosopher's stone is a certain heavenly, spiritual, penetrative, and fixed substance, which brings all metals to the perfection of gold or silver (according to the quality of the medicine), and that by natural methods, which yet in their effects transcend nature.... know then that it is called a stone, not because it is like a stone, but only because, by virtue of its fixed nature, it resists the action of fire as successfully as any stone. in species it is gold, more pure than the purest; it is fixed and incombustible like a stone, but its appearance is that of very fine powder, impalpable to the touch, sweet to the taste, fragrant to the smell, in potency a most penetrative spirit, apparently dry and yet unctuous, and easily capable of tinging a plate of metal.... if we say that its nature is spiritual, it would be no more than the truth; if we described it as corporeal, the expression would be equally correct." the same author says: "there is a substance of a metalline species which looks so cloudy that the universe will have nothing to do with it. its visible form is vile; it defiles metalline bodies, and no one can readily imagine that the pearly drink of bright phoebus should spring from thence. its components are a most pure and tender mercury, a dry incarcerate sulphur, which binds it and restrains fluxation.... know this subject, it is the sure basis of all our secrets.... to deal plainly, it is the child of saturn, of mean price and great venom.... it is not malleable, though metalline. its colour is sable, with intermixed argent which mark the sable fields with veins of glittering argent." in trying to attach definite meanings to the alchemical accounts of principles, elements, and the one thing, and the directions which the alchemists give for changing one substance into others, we are very apt to be misled by the use of such an expression as _the transmutation of the elements_. to a chemist that phrase means the change of an element into another element, an element being a definite substance, which no one has been able to produce by the combination of two or more substances unlike itself, or to separate into two or more substances unlike itself. but whatever may have been the alchemical meaning of the word _element_, it was certainly not that given to the same word to-day. nor did the word _transmutation_ mean to the alchemist what it means to the chemist. the facts which are known at present concerning the elements make unthinkable such a change as that of lead into silver; but new facts _may_ be discovered which will make possible the separation of lead into things unlike itself, and the production of silver by the combination of some of these constituents of lead. the alchemist supposed he knew such facts as enabled him not only to form a mental picture of the change of lead into silver, or tin into gold, but also to assert that such changes must necessarily happen, and to accomplish them. although we are quite sure that the alchemist's facts were only imaginings, we ought not to blame him for his reasoning on what he took to be facts. every metal is now said to be an element, in the modern meaning of that word: the alchemist regarded the metals as composite substances; but he also thought of them as more simple than many other things. hence, if he was able to transmute one metal into another, he would have strong evidence in support of his general conception of the unity of all things. and, as transmutation meant, to the alchemist, the bringing of a substance to the condition of greatest perfection possible for that substance, his view of the unity of nature might be said to be proved if he succeeded in changing one of the metals, one of these comparatively simple substances, into the most perfect of all metals, that is, into gold. the transmutation of the baser metals into gold thus came to be the practical test of the justness of the alchemical scheme of things. some alchemists assert they had themselves performed the great transmutation; others tell of people who had accomplished the work. the following story is an example of the accounts given of the making of gold. it is taken from _john frederick helvetius' golden calf, which the world worships and adores_ (17th century):- "on the 27th december 1666, in the forenoon, there came to my house a certain man, who was a complete stranger to me, but of an honest grave countenance, and an authoritative mien, clothed in a simple garb.... he was of middle height, his face was long and slightly pock-marked, his hair was black and straight, his chin close-shaven, his age about forty-three or forty-four, and his native province, as far as i could make out, north holland. after we had exchanged salutations, he asked me whether he might have some conversation with me. he wished to say something to me about the pyrotechnic art, as he had read one of my tracts (directed against the sympathetic powder of dr digby), in which i hinted a suspicion whether the grand arcanum of the sages was not after all a gigantic hoax. he, therefore, took that opportunity of asking me whether i could not believe that such a grand mystery might exist in the nature of things, by means of which a physician could restore any patient whose vitals were not irreparably destroyed. i answered, 'such a medicine would be a most desirable acquisition for any physician; nor can any man tell how many secrets there may be hidden in nature; yet, though i have read much about the truth of this art, it has never been my good fortune to meet with a real master of the alchemical science.' ... after some further conversation, the artist elias (for it was he) thus addressed me: 'since you have read so much in the works of the alchemists about this stone, its substance, its colour and its wonderful effects, may i be allowed the question, whether you have not prepared it yourself?' on my answering his question in the negative, he took out of his bag a cunningly-worked ivory box, in which were three large pieces of substance resembling glass, or pale sulphur, and informed me that here was enough of the tincture for the production of twenty tons of gold. when i had held the precious treasure in my hand for a quarter of an hour (during which time i listened to a recital of its wonderful curative properties), i was compelled to restore it to its owner, which i could not help doing with a certain degree of reluctance.... my request that he would give me a piece of his stone (though it were no larger than a coriander seed), he somewhat brusquely refused, adding, in a milder tone, that he could not give it me for all the wealth i possessed, and that not on account of its great preciousness, but for some other reason which it was not lawful for him to divulge.... then he inquired whether i could not show him into a room at the back of the house, where we should be less liable to the observation of passers-by. on my conducting him into the state parlour (which he entered without wiping his dirty boots), he demanded of me a gold coin, and while i was looking for it, he produced from his breast pocket a green silk handkerchief, in which were folded up five medals, the gold of which was infinitely superior to that of my gold piece." here follows the inscriptions on the medals. "i was filled with admiration, and asked my visitor whence he had obtained that wonderful knowledge of the whole world. he replied that it was a gift freely bestowed on him by a friend who had stayed a few days at his house." here follows the stranger's account of this friend's experiments. "when my strange visitor had concluded his narrative, i besought him to give me a proof of his assertion, by performing the transmutatory operation on some metals in my presence. he answered evasively, that he could not do so then, but that he would return in three weeks, and that, if he was then at liberty to do so, he would show me something that would make me open my eyes. he appeared punctually to the promised day, and invited me to take a walk with him, in the course of which we discoursed profoundly on the secrets of nature in fire, though i noticed that my companion was very chary in imparting information about the grand arcanum.... at last i asked him point blank to show me the transmutation of metals. i besought him to come and dine with me, and to spend the night at my house; i entreated; i expostulated; but in vain. he remained firm. i reminded him of his promise. he retorted that his promise had been conditional upon his being permitted to reveal the secret to me. at last, however, i prevailed upon him to give me a piece of his precious stone--a piece no larger than a grain of rape seed.... he bid me take half an ounce of lead ... and melt it in the crucible; for the medicine would certainly not tinge more of the base metal than it was sufficient for.... he promised to return at nine o'clock the next morning.... but at the stated hour on the following day he did not make his appearance; in his stead, however, there came, a few hours later, a stranger, who told me that his friend the artist was unavoidably detained, but that he would call at three o'clock in the afternoon. the afternoon came; i waited for him till half-past seven o'clock. he did not appear. thereupon my wife came and tempted me to try the transmutation myself. i determined however to wait till the morrow. on the morrow ... i asked my wife to put the tincture in wax, and i myself ... prepared six drachms of lead; i then cast the tincture, enveloped as it was in wax, on the lead; as soon as it was melted, there was a hissing sound and a slight effervescence, and after a quarter of an hour i found that the whole mass of lead had been turned into the finest gold.... we immediately took it to the goldsmith, who at once declared it the finest gold he had ever seen, and offered to pay fifty florins an ounce for it." he then describes various tests which were made to prove the purity of the gold. "thus i have unfolded to you the whole story from beginning to end. the gold i still retain in my possession, but i cannot tell you what has become of the artist elias." chapter vi. alchemy as an experimental art. a modern writer, mr a.e. waite, in his _lives of the alchemystical philosophers_, says: "the physical theory of transmutation is based on the composite character of the metals, on their generation in the bowels of the earth, and on the existence in nature of a pure and penetrating matter which applied to any substance exalts and perfects it after its own kind." it must he admitted that the alchemists could cite many instances of transmutations which seemed to lead to the conclusion, that there is no difference of kind between the metals and other substances such as water, acids, oils, resins, and wood. we are able to-day to effect a vast number of transformations wherein one substance is exchanged for another, or made to take the place of another. we can give fairly satisfactory descriptions of these changes; and, by comparing them one with another, we are able to express their essential features in general terms which can be applied to each particular instance. the alchemists had no searching knowledge of what may be called the mechanism of such changes; they gave an explanation of them which we must call incorrect, in the present state of our knowledge. but, as hoefer says in his _histoire de la chimie_, "to jeer at [the alchemical] theory is to commit at once an anachronism and an injustice.... unless the world should finish to-morrow, no one can have the pretension to suppose that our contemporaries have said the last word of science, and nothing will remain for our descendants to discover, no errors for them to correct, no theories for them to set straight." [illustration: fig. vi. _see p. 90._] [illustration: fig. vii. _see p. 90._] [illustration: fig. viii. _see p. 91._] what kind of experimental evidence could an alchemist furnish in support of his theory of transmutation? in answering this question, i cannot do better than give a condensed rendering of certain pages in hoefer's _histoire de la chimie_. the reader is supposed to be present at experiments conducted in the laboratory of a grand master of the sacred art in the 5th or 6th century. _experiment_.--ordinary water is boiled in an open vessel; the water is changed to a vapour which disappears, and a white powdery earth remains in the vessel. _conclusion_.--water is changed into air and earth. did we not know that ordinary water holds certain substances in solution, and that boiling water acts on the vessel wherein it is boiled, we should have no objection to urge against this conclusion. it only remained to transmute fire that the transmutation of the four elements might be completed. _experiment._--a piece of red-hot iron is placed in a bell-jar, filled with water, held over a basin containing water; the volume of the water decreases, and the air in the bell-jar takes fire when a lighted taper is brought into it. _conclusion._--water is changed into fire. that interpretation was perfectly reasonable at a time when the fact was unknown that water is composed of two gaseous substances; that one of these (oxygen) is absorbed by the iron, and the other (hydrogen) collects in the bell-jar, and ignites when brought into contact with a flame. _experiment_.--lead, or any other metal except gold or silver, is calcined in the air; the metal loses its characteristic properties, and is changed into a powdery substance, a kind of cinder or calx. when this cinder, which was said to be the result of the _death of the metal_, is heated in a crucible with some grains of wheat, one sees the metal revive, and resume its original form and properties. _conclusion._--the metal which had been destroyed is revivified by the grains of wheat and the action of fire. is this not to perform the miracle of the resurrection? no objection can he raised to this interpretation, as long as we are ignorant of the phenomena of oxidation, and the reduction of oxides by means of carbon, or organic substances rich in carbon, such as sugar, flour, seeds, etc. grains of wheat were the symbol of life, and, by extension, of the resurrection and eternal life. [illustration: fig. ix. _see p. 91._] _experiment_.--ordinary lead is calcined in a cupel made of cinders or powdered bones; the lead is changed to a cinder which disappears into the cupel, and a button of silver remains. _conclusion_.--the lead has vanished; what more natural than the conclusion that it has been transformed into silver? it was not known then that all specimens of lead contain more or less silver. [illustration: fig. x. _see p. 92._] _experiment._-the vapour of arsenic bleaches copper. this fact gave rise to many allegories and enigmas concerning the means of transforming copper into silver. sulphur, which acts on metals and changes many of them into black substances, was looked on as a very mysterious thing. it was with sulphur that the coagulation (solidification) of mercury was effected. _experiment_.--mercury is allowed to fall, in a fine rain, on to melted sulphur; a black substance is produced; this black substance is heated in a closed vessel, it is volatilised and transformed into a beautiful red solid. one could scarcely suppose that the black and the red substances are identical, if one did not know that they are composed of the same quantities of the same elements, sulphur and mercury. how greatly must this phenomenon have affected the imagination of the chemists of ancient times, always so ready to be affected by everything that seemed supernatural! black and red were the symbols of darkness and light, of the evil and the good principle; and the union of these two principles represented the moral order. at a later time the idea helped to establish the alchemical doctrine that sulphur and mercury are the principles of all things. _experiment._--various organic substances are analysed by heating in a distillation-apparatus; the products are, in each case, a solid residue, liquids which distil off, and certain spirits which are disengaged. the results supported the ancient theory which asserted that _earth_, _water_, _air_, and _fire_ are the four elements of the world. the solid residue represented _earth_; the liquid products of the distillation, _water_; and the spirituous substances, _air_. _fire_ was regarded sometimes as the means of purification, sometimes as the soul, or invisible part, of all substances. _experiment_.-a strong acid is poured on to copper. the metal is attacked, and at last disappears, giving place to a green liquid, as transparent as water. a thin sheet of iron is plunged into the liquid; the copper re-appears, and the iron vanishes. what more simple than to conclude that the iron has been transformed into copper? had lead, silver, or gold been used in place of copper, one would have said that the iron was transformed into lead, silver, or gold. in their search for "the pure and penetrating matter which applied to any substance exalts and perfects it after its own kind," the alchemists necessarily made many inventions, laid the foundation of many arts and manufactures, and discovered many facts of importance in the science of chemistry. the practitioners of the _sacred art_ of egypt must have been acquainted with many operations which we now class as belonging to applied chemistry; witness, their jewellery, pottery, dyes and pigments, bleaching, glass-making, working in metals and alloys, and their use of spices, essential oils, and soda in embalming, and for other purposes. during the centuries when alchemy flourished, gunpowder was invented, the art of printing was established, the compass was brought into use, the art of painting and staining glass was begun and carried to perfection, paper was made from rags, practical metallurgy advanced by leaps and bounds, many new alloys of metals came into use, glass mirrors were manufactured, and considerable advances were made in practical medicine and sanitation. [illustration: fig. xi. _see p. 92._] basil valentine, who was one of the greatest alchemists of the 16th century, discovered many of the properties of the metal antimony, and prepared and examined many compounds of that metal; he made green vitriol from pyrites, brandy from fermented grape-juice, fulminating gold, sulphide of potash, and spirits of salt; he made and used baths of artificial mineral waters, and he prepared various metals by what are now called _wet methods_, for instance, copper, by immersing plates of iron in solutions of bluestone. he examined the air of mines, and suggested practical methods for determining whether the air in a mine was respirable. hoefer draws attention to a remarkable observation recorded by this alchemist. speaking of the "spirit of mercury," basil valentine says it is "the origin of all the metals; that spirit is nothing else than an air flying here and there without wings; it is a moving wind, which, after it has been chased from its home of vulcan (that is, fire), returns to the chaos; then it expands and passes into the region of the air from whence it had come." as hoefer remarks, this is perhaps one of the earliest accounts of the gas discovered by priestley and studied by lavoisier, the gas we now call oxygen, and recognise as of paramount importance in chemical reactions. [illustration: fig. xii. _see p. 92._] besides discovering and recording many facts which have become part and parcel of the science of chemistry, the alchemists invented and used various pieces of apparatus, and conducted many operations, which are still employed in chemical laboratories. i shall reproduce illustrations of some of these processes and pieces of apparatus, and quote a few of the directions, given in a book, published in 1664, called _the art of distillation_, by john french, dr. in physick. the method recommended by french for hermetically sealing the neck of a glass vessel is shown in fig. vi. p. 80. the neck of the vessel is surrounded by a tray containing burning coals; when the glass melts it is cut off by shears, and then closed by tongs, which are made hot before use. fig. vii. p. 81, represents a method for covering an open vessel, air-tight, with a receptacle into which a substance may be sublimed from the lower vessel. the lettering explains the method of using the apparatus. french gives very practical directions and much sound advice for conducting distillations of various kinds. the following are specimens of his directions and advice:- "when you put water into a seething balneum wherein there are glasses let it be hot, or else thou wilt endanger the breaking of the glasses. "when thou takest any earthen, or glass vessel from the fire, expose it not to the cold aire too suddenly for fear it should break. "in all your operations diligently observe the processes which you read, and vary not a little from them, for sometimes a small mistake or neglect spoils the whole operation, and frustrates your expectations. "try not at first experiments of great cost, or great difficulty; for it will be a great discouragement to thee, and thou wilt be very apt to mistake. "if any one would enter upon the practices of chymistry, let him apply himself to some expert artist for to be instructed in the manual operation of things; for by this means he will learn more in two months, than he can by his practice and study in seven years, as also avoid much pains and cost, and redeem much time which else of necessity he will lose." fig. viii. p. 82, represents a common cold still, and fig. ix. p. 84, is a sketch of an apparatus for distilling by the aid of boiling water. the bath wherein the vessels are placed in fig. ix. was called by the alchemists _balneum mariae_, from mary the jewess, who is mentioned in the older alchemical writings, and is supposed to have invented an apparatus of this character. nothing definite is known of mary the jewess. a writer of the 7th century says she was initiated in the sacred art in the temple of memphis; a legend prevailed among some of the alchemists that she was the sister of moses. fig. x. p. 85, represents methods of distilling with an apparatus for cooling the volatile products; the lower vessel is an _alembic_, with a long neck, the upper part of which passes through a vessel containing cold water. [illustration: fig xiii. _see p. 94._] fig. xi. p. 88, shows a _pelican_, that is a vessel wherein a liquid might be heated for a long time, and the volatile products be constantly returned to the original vessel. fig. xii. p. 89, represents a retort with a receiver. some of the pieces of apparatus for distilling, which are described by french, are shown in the following figures. besides describing apparatus for distilling, subliming, and other processes in the laboratory, french gives directions for making tinctures, essences, essential oils, spirits of salt, and pure saltpetre, oil of vitriol, butter of antimony, calces (or as we now say, oxides) of metals, and many other substances. he describes processes for making fresh water from salt, artificial mineral water, medicated hot baths for invalids (one of the figures represents an apparatus very like those advertised to-day as "turkish baths at home"), and artificial precious stones; he tells how to test minerals, and make alloys, and describes the preparation of many substances made from gold and silver. he also gives many curious receipts; for instance, "to make firre-trees appear in turpentine," "to make a plant grow in two or three hours," "to make the representation of the whole world in a glass," "to extract a white milkie substance from the raies of the moon." [illustration: fig. xiv. _see p. 94._] the process of making oil of vitriol, by burning sulphur under a hood fitted with a side tube for the outflow of the oil of vitriol, is represented in fig. xiii. p. 92. fig. xiv. p. 93, is interesting; it is an apparatus for rectifying spirits, by distilling, and liquefying only the most volatile portions of the distillate. the spirituous liquor was heated, and the vapours caused to traverse a long zigzag tube, wherein the less volatile portions condensed to liquid, which flowed back into the vessel; the vapour then passed into another vessel, and then through a second zigzag tube, and was finally cooled by water, and the condensed liquid collected. this apparatus was the forerunner of that used to-day, for effecting the separation of liquids which boil at different temperatures, by the process called _fractional distillation_. we should never forget that the alchemists were patient and laborious workers, their theories were vitally connected with their practice, and there was a constant action and reaction between their general scheme of things and many branches of what we now call chemical manufactures. we may laugh at many of their theories, and regret that much useless material was accumulated by them; we may agree with boyle (end of 17th century) when he likens the "hermetick philosophers," in their search for truth, to "the navigators of solomon's tarshish fleet, who brought home from their long and tedious voyages, not only gold, and silver, and ivory, but apes and peacocks too; for so the writings of several of your hermetick philosophers present us, together with divers substantial and noble experiments, theories, which either like peacocks' feathers make a great show but are neither solid nor useful; or else like apes, if they have some appearance of being rational, are blemished with some absurdity or other, that, when they are attentively considered make them appear ridiculous." but however we may condemn their method, because it rested on their own conception of what the order of nature must be, we cannot but praise their assiduity in conducting experiments and gathering facts. as bacon says, in _de augmentis scientiarum_: "alchemy may be compared to the man who told his sons that he had left them gold buried somewhere in his vineyard; where they by digging found no gold, but by turning up the mould about the roots of the vines, procured a plentiful vintage. so the search and endeavours to make gold have brought many useful inventions and instructive experiments to light." chapter vii. the language of alchemy the vagueness of the general conceptions of alchemy, and the attribution of ethical qualities to material things by the alchemists, necessarily led to the employment of a language which is inexact, undescriptive, and unsuggestive to modern ears. the same name was given to different things, and the same thing went under many names. in chapter iv. i endeavoured to analyse two terms which were constantly used by the alchemists to convey ideas of great importance, the terms _element_ and _principle_. that attempt sufficed, at any rate, to show the vagueness of the ideas which these terms were intended to express, and to make evident the inconsistencies between the meanings given to the words by different alchemical writers. the story quoted in chapter iii., from michael sendivogius, illustrates the difficulty which the alchemists themselves had in understanding what they meant by the term _mercury_; yet there is perhaps no word more often used by them than that. some of them evidently took it to mean the substance then, and now, called mercury; the results of this literal interpretation were disastrous; others thought of mercury as a substance which could be obtained, or, at any rate, might be obtained, by repeatedly distilling ordinary mercury, both alone and when mixed with other substances; others used the word to mean a hypothetical something which was liquid but did not wet things, limpid yet capable of becoming solid, volatile yet able to prevent the volatilisation of other things, and white, yet ready to cause other white things to change their colour; they thought of this something, this soul of mercury, as having properties without itself being tangible, as at once a substance and not a substance, at once a bodily spirit and a spiritual body. it was impossible to express the alchemical ideas in any language save that of far-fetched allegory. the alchemical writings abound in such allegories. here are two of them. the first allegory is taken from _the twelve keys_, of basilius valentinus, the benedictine:- "the eleventh key to the knowledge of the augmentation of our stone i will put before you in the form of a parable. "there lived in the east a gilded knight, named orpheus, who was possessed of immense wealth, and had everything that heart can wish. he had taken to wife his own sister, euridice, who did not, however, bear him any children. this he regarded as the punishment of his sin in having wedded his own sister, and was instant in prayer to god both by day and by night, that the curse might be taken from him. one night when he was buried in a deep sleep, there came to him a certain winged messenger, named phoebus, who touched his feet, which were very hot, and said: 'thou noble knight, since thou hast wandered through many cities and kingdoms and suffered many things at sea, in battle, and in the lists, the heavenly father has bidden me make known to thee the following means of obtaining thy prayer: take blood from thy right side, and from the left side of thy spouse. for this blood is the heart's blood of your parents, and though it may seem to be of two kinds, yet, in reality, it is only one. mix the two kinds of blood, and keep the mixture tightly enclosed in the globe of the seven wise masters. then that which is generated will be nourished with its own flesh and blood, and will complete its course of development when the moon has changed for the eighth time. if thou repeat this process again and again, thou shalt see children's children, and the offspring of thy body shall fill the world.' when phoebus had thus spoken, he winged his flight heavenward. in the morning the knight arose and did the bidding of the celestial messenger, and god gave to him and to his wife many children, who inherited their father's glory, wealth, and knightly honours from generation to generation." in the "dedicatory epistle" to his _triumphal chariot of antimony_, basil valentine addresses his brother alchemists as follows:- "mercury appeared to me in a dream, and brought me back from my devious courses to the one way. 'behold me clad not in the garb of the vulgar, but in the philosopher's mantle.' so he said, and straightway began to leap along the road in headlong bounds. then, when he was tired, he sat down, and, turning to me, who had followed him in the spirit, bade me mark that he no longer possessed that youthful vigour with which he would at the first have overcome every obstacle, if he had not been allowed a free course. encouraged by his friendly salutation, i addressed him in the following terms: 'mercury, eloquent scion of atlas, and father of all alchemists, since thou hast guided me hitherto, shew me, i pray thee, the way to those blessed isles, which thou hast promised to reveal to all thine elect children. 'dost thou remember,' he replied, that when i quitted thy laboratory, i left behind me a garment so thoroughly saturated with my own blood, that neither the wind could efface it, nor all-devouring time destroy its indelible essence? fetch it hither to me, that i may not catch a chill from the state of perspiration in which i now am; but let me clothe myself warmly in it, and be closely incited thereto, so that i may safely reach my bride, who is sick with love. she has meekly borne many wrongs, being driven through water and fire, and compelled to ascend and descend times without number--yet has she been carried through it all by the hope of entering with me the bridal chamber, wherein we expect to beget a son adorned from his birth with the royal crown which he may not share with others. yet may he bring his friends to the palace, where sits enthroned the king of kings, who communicates his dignity readily and liberally to all that approach him.' "i brought him the garment, and it fitted him so closely, that it looked like an iron skin securing him against all the assaults of vulcan. 'let us proceed,' he then said, and straightway sped across the open field, while i boldly strove to keep up with my guide. "thus we reached his bride, whose virtue and constancy were equal to his own. there i beheld their marvellous conjugal union and nuptial consummation, whence was born the son crowned with the royal diadem. when i was about to salute him as king of kings and lord of lords, my genius stood by me and warned me not to be deceived, since this was only the king's forerunner, but not the king himself whom i sought. "when i heard the admonition, i did not know whether to be sad or joyful. 'depart,' then said mercury, 'with this bridal gift, and when you come to those disciples who have seen the lord himself, show them this sign.' and therewith he gave me a gold ring from his son's finger. 'they know the golden branch which must be consecrated to proserpina before you can enter the palace of pluto. when he sees this ring, perhaps one will open to you with a word the door of that chamber, where sits enthroned in his magnificence the desire of all nations, who is known only to the sages.' "when he had thus spoken, the vision vanished, but the bridal gift which i still held in my hand shewed me that it had not been a mere dream. it was of gold, but to me more precious than the most prized of all metals. unto you i will shew it when i am permitted to see your faces, and to converse with you freely. till that earnestly wished-for time, i bid you farewell." one result of the alchemical modes of expression was, that he who tried to follow the directions given in alchemical books got into dire confusion. he did not know what substances to use in his operations; for when he was told to employ "the homogeneous water of gold," for example, the expression might mean anything, and in despair he distilled, and calcined, and cohobated, and tried to decompose everything he could lay hands on. those who pretended to know abused and vilified those who differed from them. in _a demonstration of nature_, by john a. mehung (17th century), nature addresses the alchemical worker in the following words:- "you break vials, and consume coals, only to soften your brains still more with the vapours. you also digest alum, salt, orpiment, and altrament; you melt metals, build small and large furnaces, and use many vessels; nevertheless i am sick of your folly, and you suffocate me with your sulphurous smoke.... you would do better to mind your own business, than to dissolve and distil so many absurd substances, and then to pass them through alembics, cucurbits, stills, and pelicans." henry madathanas, writing in 1622, says:- "then i understood that their purgations, sublimations, cementations, distillations, rectifications, circulations, putrefactions, conjunctions, calcinations, incinerations, mortifications, revivifications, as also their tripods, athanors, reverberatory alembics, excrements of horses, ashes, sand, stills, pelican-viols, retorts, fixations, etc., are mere plausible impostures and frauds." the author of _the only way_ (1677) says: "surely every true artist must look on this elaborate tissue of baseless operations as the merest folly, and can only wonder that the eyes of those silly dupes are not at last opened, that they may see something besides such absurd sophisms, and read something besides those stupid and deceitful books.... i can speak from bitter experience, for i, too, toiled for many years ... and endeavoured to reach the coveted goal by sublimation, distillation, calcination, circulation, and so forth, and to fashion the stone out of substances such as urine, salt, atrament, alum, etc. i have tried hard to evolve it out of hairs, wine, eggs, bones, and all manner of herbs; out of arsenic, mercury, and sulphur, and all the minerals and metals.... i have spent nights and days in dissolving, coagulating, amalgamating, and precipitating. yet from all these things i derived neither profit nor joy." another writer speaks of many would-be alchemists as "floundering about in a sea of specious book-learning." if alchemists could speak of their own processes and materials as those authors spoke whom i have quoted, we must expect that the alchemical language would appear mere jargon to the uninitiated. in ben jonson's play _the alchemist_, _surley_, who is the sceptic of the piece, says to subtle, who is the alchemist- ... alchemy is a pretty kind of game, somewhat like tricks o' the cards, to cheat a man with charming ... what else are all your terms, whereon no one of your writers 'grees with other? of your elixir, your _lac virginis_, your stone, your med'cine, and your chrysosperme, your sal, your sulphur, and your mercury, your oil of height, your tree of life, your blood, your marchesite, your tutie, your magnesia, your toad, your crow, your dragon, and your panther; your sun, your moon, your firmament, your adrop, your lato, azoch, zernich, chibrit, heutarit, and then your red man, and your white woman, with all your broths, your menstrues, and materials, of lye and egg-shells, women's terms, man's blood, hair o' the head, burnt clout, chalk, merds, and clay, powder of bones, scalings of iron, glass, and moulds of other strange ingredients, would burst a man to name? to which _subtle_ answers, and all these named intending but one thing; which art our writers used to obscure their art. was not all the knowledge of the egyptians writ in mystic symbols? speak not the scriptures oft in parables? are not the choicest fables of the poets, that were the fountains and first springs of wisdom, wrapp'd in perplexed allegories? the alchemists were very fond of using the names of animals as symbols of certain mineral substances, and of representing operations in the laboratory by what may be called animal allegories. the _yellow lion_ was the alchemical symbol of yellow sulphides, the _red lion_ was synonymous with cinnabar, and the _green lion_ meant salts of iron and of copper. black sulphides were called _eagles_, and sometimes _crows_. when black sulphide of mercury is strongly heated, a red sublimate is obtained, which has the same composition as the black compound; if the temperature is not kept very high, but little of the red sulphide is produced; the alchemists directed to urge the fire, "else the black crows will go back to the nest." [illustration: a salamander lives in the fire, which imparts to it a most glorious hue. this is the reiteration, gradation, and amelioration of the tincture, or philosopher's stone; and the whole is called its augmentation. fig. xv.] the salamander was called the king of animals, because it was supposed that he lived and delighted in fire; keeping a strong fire alight under a salamander was sometimes compared to the purification of gold by heating it. fig. xv., reduced from _the book of lambspring_ represents this process. the alchemists employed many signs, or shorthand expressions, in place of writing the names of substances. the following are a few of the signs which were used frequently. [symbol: saturn] saturn, also lead; [symbol: jupiter] jupiter, also tin; [symbol: mars-1] and [symbol: mars-2] mars, also iron; [symbol: sun] sol, also gold; [symbol: venus] venus, also copper; [symbol: mercury-1], [symbol: mercury-2] and [symbol: mercury-3] mercury; [symbol: moon] luna, also silver; [symbol: sulphur] sulphur; [symbol: vitriol] vitriol; [symbol: fire] fire; [symbol: air] air; [symbol: water] and [symbol: aquarius] water; [symbol: earth] earth; [symbol: aqua fortis] aqua fortis; [symbol: aqua regis] aqua regis; [symbol: aqua vitæ] aqua vitæ; [symbol: day] day; [symbol: night] night; [symbol: amalgam] amalgam; [symbol: alembic] alembic. chapter viii. the degeneracy of alchemy. i have tried to show that alchemy aimed at giving experimental proof of a certain theory of the whole system of nature, including humanity. the practical culmination of the alchemical quest presented a threefold aspect; the alchemists sought the stone of wisdom, for by gaining that they gained the control of wealth; they sought the universal panacea, for that would give them the power of enjoying wealth and life; they sought the soul of the world, for thereby they could hold communion with spiritual existences, and enjoy the fruition of spiritual life. the object of their search was to satisfy their material needs, their intellectual capacities, and their spiritual yearnings. the alchemists of the nobler sort always made the first of these objects subsidiary to the other two; they gave as their reason for desiring to make gold, the hope that gold might become so common that it would cease to be sought after by mankind. the author of _an open substance_ says: "would to god ... all men might become adepts in our art, for then gold, the common idol of mankind, would lose its value, and we should prize it only for its scientific teaching." but the desire to make gold must always have been a very powerful incentive in determining men to attempt the laborious discipline of alchemy; and with them, as with all men, the love of money was the root of much evil. when a man became a student of alchemy merely for the purpose of making gold, and failed to make it--as he always did--it was very easy for him to pretend he had succeeded in order that he might really make gold by cheating other people. such a man rapidly degenerated into a charlatan; he used the language of alchemy to cover his frauds, and with the hope of deluding his dupes by high-sounding phrases. and, it must be admitted, alchemy lent itself admirably to imposture. it promised unlimited wealth; it encouraged the wildest dreams of the seeker after pleasure; and over these dreams it cast the glamour of great ideas, the idea of the unity of nature, and the idea of communion with other spheres of life, of calling in the help of 'inheritors of unfulfilled renown,' and so it seemed to touch to fine issues the sordidness of unblushing avarice. moreover, the working with strange ingredients and odd-fashioned instruments, and the employment of mouth-filling phrases, and scraps of occult learning which seemed to imply unutterable things, gave just that pleasing dash of would-be wickedness to the process of consulting the alchemist which acts as a fascination to many people. the earnest person felt that by using the skill and knowledge of the alchemists, for what he deemed a good purpose, he was compelling the powers of evil to work for him and his objects. it was impossible that such a system as alchemy should appear to the plain man of the middle ages, when the whole scheme of life and the universe rested on a magical basis, to be more than a kind of magic which hovered between the black magic of the sorcerer and the white magic of the church. nor is it to be wondered at that a system which lends itself to imposture so easily as alchemy did, should be thought of by the plain man of modern times as having been nothing but a machinery of fraud. it is evident from the _canon's yeoman's tale_ in chaucer, that many of those who professed to turn the base metals into gold were held in bad repute as early as the 14th century. the "false chanoun" persuaded the priest, who was his dupe, to send his servant for quicksilver, which he promised to make into "as good silver and as fyn, as ther is any in youre purse or myn"; he then gave the priest a "crosselet," and bid him put it on the fire, and blow the coals. while the priest was busy with the fire, this false chanoun--the foulè feend hym fecche!- out of his bosom took a bechen cole, in which ful subtilly was maad an hole, and therinne put was of silver lemaille an ounce, and stoppéd was withouten faille the hole with wex, to kepe the lemaille in. the "false chanoun" pretended to be sorry for the priest, who was so busily blowing the fire:- ye been right hoot, i se wel how ye swete; have heer a clooth, and wipe awey the we't. and whylès that the preest wipèd his face, this chanoun took his cole with hardè grace, and leyde it above, upon the middèward of the crosselet, and blew wel afterward. til that the colès gonnè fastè brenne. as the coal burned the silver fell into the "crosselet." then the canon said they would both go together and fetch chalk, and a pail of water, for he would pour out the silver he had made in the form of an ingot. they locked the door, and took the key with them. on returning, the canon formed the chalk into a mould, and poured the contents of the crucible into it. then he bade the priest, look what ther is, put in thin hand and grope, thow fyndè shalt ther silver, as i hope. what, devel of hellè! sholde it ellis be? shavyng of silver silver is, _parde!_ he putte his hand in, and took up a teyne of silver fyn, and glad in every veyne was this preest, when he saugh that it was so. the conclusion of the _canon's yeoman's tale_ shows that, in the 14th century, there was a general belief in the possibility of finding the philosopher's stone, and effecting the transmutation, although the common practitioners of the art were regarded as deceivers. a disciple of plato is supposed to ask his master to tell him the "namè of the privee stoon." plato gives him certain directions, and tells him he must use _magnasia_; the disciple asks- 'what is magnasia, good sire, i yow preye?' 'it is a water that is maad, i seye, of elementés fourè,' quod plato. 'telle me the rootè, good sire,' quod he tho, of that water, if it be yourè wille.' 'nay, nay,' quod plato, 'certein that i nylle; the philosophres sworn were everychoon that they sholden discovers it unto noon, ne in no book it write in no manere, for unto crist it is so lief and deere, that he wol nat that it discovered bee, but where it liketh to his deitee man for tenspire, and eek for to deffende whom that hym liketh; lo, this is the ende.' the belief in the possibility of alchemy seems to have been general sometime before chaucer wrote; but that belief was accompanied by the conviction that alchemy was an impious pursuit, because the transmutation of baser metals into gold was regarded as trenching on the prerogative of the creator, to whom alone this power rightfully belonged. in his _inferno_ (which was probably written about the year 1300), dante places the alchemists in the eighth circle of hell, not apparently because they were fraudulent impostors, but because, as one of them says, "i aped creative nature by my subtle art." in later times, some of those who pretended to have the secret and to perform great wonders by the use of it, became rich and celebrated, and were much sought after. the most distinguished of these pseudo-alchemists was he who passed under the name of cagliostro. his life bears witness to the eagerness of human beings to be deceived. joseph balsamo was born in 1743 at palermo, where his parents were tradespeople in a good way of business.[5] in the memoir of himself, which he wrote in prison, balsamo seeks to surround his birth and parentage with mystery; he says, "i am ignorant, not only of my birthplace, but even of the parents who bore me.... my earliest infancy was passed in the town of medina, in arabia, where i was brought up under the name of acharat." [5] the account of the life of cagliostro is much condensed from mr a.e. waite's _lives of the alchemystical philosophers_. when he was thirteen years of age, balsamo's parents determined he should be trained for the priesthood, but he ran away from his school. he was then confined in a benedictine monastery. he showed a remarkable taste for natural history, and acquired considerable knowledge of the use of drugs; but he soon tired of the discipline and escaped. for some years he wandered about in different parts of italy, living by his wits and by cheating. a goldsmith consulted him about a hidden treasure; he pretended to invoke the aid of spirits, frightened the goldsmith, got sixty ounces of gold from him to carry on his incantations, left him in the lurch, and fled to messina. in that town he discovered an aged aunt who was sick; the aunt died, and left her money to the church. balsamo assumed her family name, added a title of nobility, and was known henceforward as the count alessandro cagliostro. in messina he met a mysterious person whom he calls altotas, and from whom, he says in his memoir, he learnt much. the following account of the meeting of balsamo and the stranger is taken from waite's book: "as he was promenading one day near the jetty at the extremity of the port he encountered an individual singularly habited and possessed of a most remarkable countenance. this person, aged apparently about fifty years, seemed to be an armenian, though, according to other accounts, he was a spaniard or greek. he wore a species of caftan, a silk bonnet, and the extremities of his breeches were concealed in a pair of wide boots. in his left hand he held a parasol, and in his right the end of a cord, to which was attached a graceful albanian greyhound.... cagliostro saluted this grotesque being, who bowed slightly, but with satisfied dignity. 'you do not reside in messina, signor?' he said in sicilian, but with a marked foreign accent. cagliostro replied that he was tarrying for a few days, and they began to converse on the beauty of the town and on its advantageous situation, a kind of oriental imagery individualising the eloquence of the stranger, whose remarks were, moreover, adroitly adorned with a few appropriate compliments." although the stranger said he received no one at his house he allowed cagliostro to visit him. after various mysterious doings the two went off to egypt, and afterwards to malta, where they performed many wonderful deeds before the grand master, who was much impressed. at malta altotas died, or, at anyrate, vanished. cagliostro then travelled for some time, and was well received by noblemen, ambassadors, and others in high position. at rome he fell in love with a young and beautiful lady, lorenza feliciani, and married her. cagliostro used his young wife as a decoy to attract rich and foolish men. he and his wife thrived for a time, and accumulated money and jewels; but a confederate betrayed them, and they fled to venice, and then wandered for several years in italy, france, and england. they seem to have made a living by the sale of lotions for the skin, and by practising skilful deceptions. about the year 1770 cagliostro began to pose as an alchemist. after another period of wandering he paid a second visit to london and founded a secret society, based on (supposed) egyptian rites, mingled with those of freemasonry. the suggestion of this society is said to have come from a curious book he picked up on a second-hand stall in london. the society attracted people by the strangeness of its initiatory rites, and the promises of happiness and wellbeing made by its founder to those who joined it. lodges were established in many countries, many disciples were obtained, great riches were amassed, and cagliostro flourished exceedingly. in his _histoire du merveilleux dans les temps modernes_, figuier, speaking of cagliostro about this period of his career, says: "he proclaimed himself the bearer of the mysteries of isis and anubis from the far east.... he obtained numerous and distinguished followers, who on one occasion assembled in great force to hear joseph balsamo expound to them the doctrines of egyptian freemasonry. at this solemn convention he is said to have spoken with overpowering eloquence;... his audience departed in amazement and completely converted to the regenerated and purified masonry. none doubted that he was an initiate of the arcana of nature, as preserved in the temple of apis at the era when cambyses belaboured that capricious divinity. from this moment the initiations into the new masonry were numerous, albeit they were limited to the aristocracy of society. there are reasons to believe that the grandees who were deemed worthy of admission paid exceedingly extravagantly for the honour." cagliostro posed as a physician, and claimed the power of curing diseases simply by the laying on of hands. he went so far as to assert he had restored to life the dead child of a nobleman in paris; the discovery that the miracle was effected by substituting a living child for the dead one caused him to flee, laden with spoil, to warsaw, and then to strassburg. cagliostro entered strassburg in state, amid an admiring crowd, who regarded him as more than human. rumour said he had amassed vast riches by the transmutation of base metals into gold. some people in the crowd said he was the wandering jew, others that he had been present at the marriage feast of cana, some asserted he was born before the deluge, and one supposed he might be the devil. the goldsmith whom he had cheated of sixty ounces of gold many years before was in the crowd, and, recognising him, tried to stop the carriage, shouting: "joseph balsamo! it is joseph! rogue, where are my sixty ounces of gold?" "cagliostro scarcely deigned to glance at the furious goldsmith; but in the middle of the profound silence which the incident occasioned among the crowd, a voice, apparently in the clouds, uttered with great distinctness the following words: 'remove this lunatic, who is possessed by infernal spirits.' some of the spectators fell on their knees, others seized the unfortunate goldsmith, and the brilliant cortege passed on" (waite). from strassburg cagliostro* went to paris, where he lived in great splendour, curing diseases, making gold and diamonds, mystifying and duping people of all ranks by the splendid ritual and gorgeous feasting of his secret society, and amassing riches. he got entangled in the affair of the diamond necklace, and left paris. trying to advance his society in italy he was arrested by the agents of the inquisition, and imprisoned, then tried, and condemned to death. the sentence was commuted to perpetual imprisonment. after two years in the prison of san angelo he died at the age of fifty. *transcriber's note: original "cagliosto". chapter ix. paracelsus and some other alchemists. the accounts which have come to us of the men who followed the pursuit of the _one thing_ are vague, scrappy, and confusing. alchemical books abound in quotations from the writings of _geber_. five hundred treatises were attributed to this man during the middle ages, yet we have no certain knowledge of his name, or of the time or place of his birth. hoefer says he probably lived in the middle of the 8th century, was a native of mesopotamia, and was named _djabar al-konfi_. waite calls him _abou moussah djafar al-sofi_. some of the mediæval adepts spoke of him as the king of india, others called him a prince of persia. most of the arabian writers on alchemy and medicine, after the 9th century, refer to geber as their master. all the mss. of writings attributed to geber which have been examined are in latin, but the library of leyden is said to possess some works by him written in arabic. these mss. contain directions for preparing many metals, salts, acids, oils, etc., and for performing such operations as distillation, cupellation, dissolution, calcination, and the like. of the other arabian alchemists, the most celebrated in the middle ages were _rhasis_, _alfarabi_, and _avicenna_, who are supposed to have lived in the 9th and 10th centuries. the following story of alfarabi's powers is taken from waite's _lives of the alchemystical philosophers_:- "alfarabi was returning from a pilgrimage to mecca, when, passing through syria, he stopped at the court of the sultan, and entered his presence, while he was surrounded by numerous sage persons, who were discoursing with the monarch on the sciences. alfarabi ... presented himself in his travelling attire, and when the sultan desired he should be seated, with astonishing philosophical freedom he planted himself at the end of the royal sofa. the prince, aghast at his boldness, called one of his officers, and in a tongue generally unknown commanded him to eject the intruder. the philosopher, however, promptly made answer in the same tongue: 'oh, lord, he who acts hastily is liable to hasty repentance.' the prince was equally astounded to find himself understood by the stranger as by the manner in which the reply was given. anxious to know more of his guest he began to question him, and soon discovered that he was acquainted with seventy languages. problems for discussion were then propounded to the philosophers, who had witnessed the discourteous intrusion with considerable indignation and disgust, but alfarabi disputed with so much eloquence and vivacity that he reduced all the doctors to silence, and they began writing down his discourse. the sultan then ordered his musicians to perform for the diversion of the company. when they struck up, the philosopher accompanied them on a lute with such infinite grace and tenderness that he elicited the unmeasured admiration of the whole distinguished assembly. at the request of the sultan he produced a piece of his own composing, sang it, and accompanied it with great force and spirit to the delight of all his hearers. the air was so sprightly that even the gravest philosopher could not resist dancing, but by another tune he as easily melted them to tears, and then by a soft unobtrusive melody he lulled the whole company to sleep." the most remarkable of the alchemists was he who is generally known as _paracelsus_. he was born about 1493, and died about 1540. it is probable that the place of his birth was einsiedeln, near zurich. he claimed relationship with the noble family of bombast von hohenheim; but some of his biographers doubt whether he really was connected with that family. his name, or at any rate the name by which he was known, was aureolus philippus theophrastus bombast von hohenheim. his father in alchemy, trimethius, abbot of spannheim and then of wurzburg, who was a theologian, a poet, an astronomer, and a necromancer, named him _paracelsus_; this name is taken by some to be a kind of græco-latin paraphrase of von hohenheim (of high lineage), and to mean "belonging to a lofty place"; others say it signifies "greater than celsus," who was a celebrated latin writer on medicine of the 1st century. paracelsus studied at the university of basle; but, getting into trouble with the authorities, he left the university, and for some years wandered over europe, supporting himself, according to one account, by "psalm-singing, astrological productions, chiromantic soothsaying, and, it has been said, by necromantic practices." he may have got as far as constantinople; as a rumour floated about that he received the stone of wisdom from an adept in that city. he returned to basle, and in 1527 delivered lectures with the sanction of the rector of the university. he made enemies of the physicians by abusing their custom of seeking knowledge only from ancient writers and not from nature; he annoyed the apothecaries by calling their tinctures, decoctions, and extracts, mere _soup-messes_; and he roused the ire of all learned people by delivering his lectures in german. he was attacked publicly and also anonymously. of the pamphlets published against him he said, "these vile ribaldries would raise the ire of a turtle-dove." and paracelsus was no turtle-dove. the following extract from (a translation of) the preface to _the book concerning the tinctures of the philosophers written against those sophists born since the deluge_, shews that his style of writing was abusive, and his opinion of himself, to say the least, not very humble:- "from the middle of this age the monarchy of all the arts has been at length derived and conferred on me, theophrastus paracelsus, prince of philosophy and medicine. for this purpose i have been chosen by god to extinguish and blot out all the phantasies of elaborate and false works, of delusive and presumptuous words, be they the words of aristotle, galen, avicenna, mesva, or the dogmas of any among their followers. my theory, proceeding as it does from the light of nature, can never, through its consistency, pass away or be changed; but in the fifty-eighth year after its millennium and a half it will then begin to flourish. the practice at the same time following upon the theory will be proved by wonderful and incredible signs, so as to be open to mechanics and common people, and they will thoroughly understand how firm and immovable is that paracelsic art against the triflings of the sophists; though meanwhile that sophistical science has to have its ineptitude propped up and fortified by papal and imperial privileges.... so then, you wormy and lousy sophist, since you deem the monarch of arcana a mere ignorant, fatuous, and prodigal quack, now, in this mid age, i determine in my present treatise to disclose the honourable course of procedure in these matters, the virtues and preparation of the celebrated tincture of the philosophers for the use and honour of all who love the truth, and in order that all who despise the true arts may be reduced to poverty." the turbulent and restless spirit of paracelsus brought him into open conflict with the authorities of basle. he fled from that town in 1528, and after many wanderings, he found rest at salzburg, under the protection of the archbishop. he died at salzburg in 1541, in his forty-eighth year. the character and abilities of paracelsus have been vastly praised by some, and inordinately abused by others. one author says of him: "he lived like a pig, looked like a drover, found his greatest enjoyment in the company of the most dissolute and lowest rabble, and throughout his glorious life he was generally drunk." another author says: "probably no physician has grasped his life's task with a purer enthusiasm, or devoted himself more faithfully to it, or more fully maintained the moral worthiness of his calling than did the reformer of einsiedeln." he certainly seems to have been loved and respected by his pupils and followers, for he is referred to by them as "the noble and beloved monarch," "the german hemes," and "our dear preceptor and king of arts." there seems no doubt that paracelsus discovered many facts which became of great importance in chemistry: he prepared the inflammable gas we now call hydrogen, by the reaction between iron filings and oil of vitriol; he distinguished metals from substances which had been classed with metals but lacked the essential metalline character of ductility; he made medicinal preparations of mercury, lead and iron, and introduced many new and powerful drugs, notably laudanum. paracelsus insisted that medicine is a branch of chemistry, and that the restoration of the body of a patient to a condition of chemical equilibrium is the restoration to health. paracelsus trusted in his method; he was endeavouring to substitute direct appeal to nature for appeal to the authority of writers about nature. "after me," he cries, "you avicenna, galen, rhasis, montagnana and the others. you after me, not i after you. you of paris, you of montpellier, you of swabia, of meissen and vienna; you who come from the countries along the danube and the rhine; and you, too, from the islands of the ocean. follow me. it is not for me to follow you, for mine is the monarchy." but the work was too arduous, the struggle too unequal. "with few appliances, with no accurate knowledge, with no help from the work of others, without polished and sharpened weapons, and without the skill that comes from long handling of instruments of precision, what could paracelsus effect in his struggle to wrest her secrets from nature? of necessity, he grew weary of the task, and tried to construct a universe which should be simpler than that most complex order which refused to yield to his analysis." and so he came back to the universe which man constructs for himself, and exclaimed- "each man has ... all the wisdom and power of the world in himself; he possesses one kind of knowledge as much as another, and he who does not find that which is in him cannot truly say that he does not possess it, but only that he was not capable of successfully seeking for it." we leave a great genius, with his own words in our ears: "have no care of my misery, reader; let me bear my burden myself. i have two failings: my poverty and my piety. my poverty was thrown in my face by a burgomaster who had perhaps only seen doctors attired in silken robes, never basking in tattered rags in the sunshine. so it was decreed i was not a doctor. for my piety i am arraigned by the parsons, for ... i do not at all love those who teach what they do not themselves practise." chapter x. summary of the alchemical doctrine.--the replacement of the three principles of the alchemists by the single principle of phlogiston. the _sacred art_, which had its origin and home in egypt, was very definitely associated with the religious rites, and the theological teaching, recognised by the state. the egyptian priests were initiated into the mysteries of the divine art: and as the initiated claimed to imitate the work of the deity, the priest was regarded by the ordinary people as something more than a representative, as a mirror, of the divinity. the sacred art of egypt was transmuted into alchemy by contact with european thought and handicrafts, and the tenets and mysticism of the catholic church; and the conception of nature, which was the result of this blending, prevailed from about the 9th until towards the end of the 18th century. like its predecessor, alchemy postulated an orderly universe; but alchemy was richer in fantastic details, more picturesquely embroidered, more prodigal of strange fancies, than the sacred art of egypt. the alchemist constructed his ordered scheme of nature on the basis of the supposed universality of life. for him, everything lived, and the life of things was threefold. the alchemist thought he recognised the manifestation of life in the form, or body, of a thing, in its soul, and in its spirit. things might differ much in appearance, in size, taste, smell, and other outward properties, and yet be intimately related, because, according to the alchemist, they were produced from the same principles, they were animated by the same soul. things might resemble one another closely in their outward properties and yet differ widely in essential features, because, according to the alchemist, they were formed from different elements, in their spiritual properties they were unlike. the alchemists taught that the true transformation, in alchemical language the transmutation, of one thing into another could be effected only by spiritual means acting on the spirit of the thing, because the transmutation consisted essentially in raising the substance to the highest perfection whereof it was capable; the result of this spiritual action might become apparent in the material form of the substance. in attempting to apply such vague conceptions as these, alchemy was obliged to use the language which had been developed for the expression of human emotions and desires, not only for the explanation of the facts it observed, but also for the bare recital of these facts. the outlook of alchemy on the world outside human beings was essentially anthropomorphic. in the image of man, the alchemist created his universe. in the times when alchemy was dominant, the divine scheme of creation, and the place given to man in that scheme, were supposed to be thoroughly understood. everything had its place, designed for it from the beginning, and in that place it remained unless it were forced from it by violent means. a great part of the business of experimental alchemy was to discover the natural position, or condition, of each substance; and the discovery was to be made by interpreting the facts brought to light by observation and experiment by the aid of hypotheses deduced from the general scheme of things which had been formed independently of observation or experiment. alchemy was a part of magic; for magic interprets and corrects the knowledge gained by the senses by the touchstone of generalisations which have been supplied, partly by the emotions, and partly by extra-human authority, and accepted as necessarily true. the conception of natural order which regulates the life of the savage is closely related to that which guided the alchemists. the essential features of both are the notion that everything is alive, and the persuasion that things can be radically acted on only by using life as a factor. there is also an intimate connexion between alchemy and witchcraft. witches were people who were supposed to make an unlawful use of the powers of life; alchemists were often thought to pass beyond what is permitted to the creature, and to encroach on the prerogative of the creator. the long duration of alchemy shows that it appealed to some deep-seated want of human beings. was not that want the necessity for the realisation of order in the universe? men were unwilling to wait until patient examination of the facts of their own nature, and the facts of nature outside themselves, might lead them to the realisation of the interdependence of all things. they found it easier to evolve a scheme of things from a superficial glance at themselves and their surroundings; naturally they adopted the easier plan. alchemy was a part of the plan of nature produced by this method. the extraordinary dominancy of such a scheme is testified to by the continued belief in alchemy, although the one experiment, which seems to us to be the crucial experiment of the system, was never accomplished. but it is also to be remembered that the alchemists were acquainted with, and practised, many processes which we should now describe as operations of manufacturing and technical chemistry; and the practical usefulness of these processes bore testimony, of the kind which convinces the plain man, to the justness of their theories. i have always regarded two facts as most interesting and instructive: that the doctrine of the essential unity of all things, and the simplicity of natural order, was accepted for centuries by many, i think one may say, by most men, as undoubtedly a true presentation of the divine scheme of things; and, secondly, that in more recent times people were quite as certain of the necessary truth of the doctrine, the exact opposite of the alchemical, that the creator had divided his creation into portions each of which was independent of all the others. both of these schemes were formed by the same method, by introspection preceding observation; both were overthrown by the same method, by observation and experiment proceeding hand in hand with reasoning. in each case, the humility of science vanquished the conceit of ignorance. the change from alchemy to chemistry is an admirable example of the change from a theory formed by looking inwards, and then projected on to external facts, to a theory formed by studying facts, and then thinking about them. this change proceeded slowly; it is not possible to name a time when it may be said, here alchemy finishes and chemistry begins. to adapt a saying of one of the alchemists, quoted in a former chapter; alchemy would not easily give up its nature, and fought for its life; but an agent was found strong enough to overcome and kill it, and then that agent also had the power to change the lifeless remains into a new and pure body. the agent was the accurate and imaginative investigation of facts. the first great step taken in the path which led from alchemy to chemistry was the substitution of one principle, the principle of phlogiston, for the three principles of salt, sulphur, and mercury. this step was taken by concentrating attention and investigation, by replacing the superficial examination of many diverse phenomena by the more searching study of one class of occurrences. that the field of study should be widened, it was necessary that it should first be narrowed. lead, tin, iron, or copper is calcined. the prominent and striking feature of these events is the disappearance of the metal, and the formation of something very unlike it. but the original metal is restored by a second process, which is like the first because it also is a calcination, but seems to differ from the first operation in that the burnt metal is calcined with another substance, with grains of wheat or powdered charcoal. led thereto by their theory that destruction must precede re-vivification, death must come before resurrection, the alchemists confined their attention to one feature common to all calcinations of metals, and gave a superficial description of these occurrences by classing them together as processes of mortification. sulphur, wood, wax, oil, and many other things are easily burned: the alchemists said, these things also undergo mortification, they too are killed; but, as "man can restore that which man has destroyed," it must be possible to restore to life the thing which has been mortified. the burnt sulphur, wood, wax, or oil, is not really dead, the alchemists argued; to use the allegory of paracelsus, they are like young lions which are born dead, and are brought to life by the roaring of their parents: if we make a sufficiently loud noise, if we use the proper means, we shall bring life into what seems to be dead material. as it is the roaring of the parents of the young lions which alone can cause the still-born cubs to live, so it is only by the spiritual agency of life, proceeded the alchemical argument, that life can be brought into the mortified sulphur, wood, wax, and oil. the alchemical explanation was superficial, theoretical, in the wrong meaning of that word, and unworkable. it was superficial because it overlooked the fact that the primary calcination, the mortification, of the metals, and the other substances, was effected in the air, that is to say, in contact with something different from the thing which was calcined; the explanation was of the kind which people call theoretical, when they wish to condemn an explanation and put it out of court, because it was merely a re-statement of the facts in the language of a theory which had not been deduced from the facts themselves, or from facts like those to be explained, but from what were supposed to be facts without proper investigation, and, if facts, were of a totally different kind from those to which the explanation applied; and lastly, the explanation was unworkable, because it suggested no method whereby its accuracy could be tested, no definite line of investigation which might be pursued. that great naturalist, the honourable robert boyle (born in 1626, died in 1691), very perseveringly besought those who examined processes of calcination to pay heed to the action of everything which might take part in the processes. he was especially desirous they should consider what part the air might play in calcinations; he spoke of the air as a "menstruum or additament," and said that, in such operations as calcination, "we may well take the freedom to examine ... whether there intervene not a coalition of the parts of the body wrought upon with those of the menstruum, whereby the produced concrete may be judged to result from the union of both." it was by examining the part played by the air in processes of calcination and burning that men at last became able to give approximately complete descriptions of these processes. boyle recognised that the air is not a simple or elementary substance; he spoke of it as "a confused aggregate of effluviums from such differing bodies, that, though they all agree in constituting by their minuteness and various motions one great mass of fluid matter, yet perhaps there is scarce a more heterogeneous body in the world." clement of alexandria who lived in the end of the 2nd, and the early part of the 3rd, century a.d., seems to have regarded the air as playing a very important part in combustions; he said--"airs are divided into two categories; an air for the divine flame, which is the soul; and a material air which is the nourisher of sensible fire, and the basis of combustible matter." sentences like that i have just quoted are found here and there in the writings of the earlier and later alchemists; now and again we also find statements which may be interpreted, in the light of the fuller knowledge we now have, as indicating at least suspicions that the atmosphere is a mixture of different kinds of air, and that only some of these take part in calcining and burning operations. those suspicions were confirmed by experiments on the calcination of metals and other substances, conducted in the 17th century by jean rey a french physician, and by john mayow of oxford. but these observations and the conclusions founded on them, did not bear much fruit until the time of lavoisier, that is, towards the close of the 18th century. they were overshadowed and put aside by the work of stahl (1660-1724). some of the alchemists of the 14th, 15th and 16th centuries taught that combustion and calcination are processes wherein _the igneous principle_ is destroyed, using the word "destroyed" in its alchemical meaning. this description of processes of burning was much more in keeping with the ideas of the time than that given by boyle, rey and mayow. it was adopted by stahl, and made the basis of a general theory of those changes wherein one substance disappears and another, or others, very unlike it, are produced. that he might bring into one point of view, and compare the various changes effected by the agency of fire, stahl invented a new principle, which he named _phlogiston_, and constructed an hypothesis which is generally known as the phlogistic theory. he explained, and applied, this hypothesis in various books, especially in one published at halle in 1717. stahl observed that many substances which differed much from one another in various respects were alike in one respect; they were all combustible. all the combustible substances, he argued, must contain a common principle; he named this supposed principle, _phlogiston_ (from the greek word _phlogistos_ = burnt, or set on fire). stahl said that the phlogiston of a combustible thing escapes as the substance burns, and, becoming apparent to the senses, is named fire or flame. the phlogiston in a combustible substance was supposed to be so intimately associated with something else that our senses cannot perceive it; nevertheless, the theory said, it is there; we can see only the escaping phlogiston, we can perceive only the phlogiston which is set free from its combination with other things. the theory thought of phlogiston as imprisoned in the thing which can be burnt, and as itself forming part of the prison; that the prisoner should be set free, the walls of the prison had to be removed; the freeing of the prisoner destroyed the prison. as escaping, or free, phlogiston was called fire, or flame, so the phlogiston in a combustible substance was sometimes called combined fire, or flame in the state of combination. a peculiarity of the strange thing called phlogiston was that it preferred to be concealed in something, hidden, imprisoned, combined; free phlogiston* was supposed to be always ready to become combined phlogiston. *transcriber's note: original "phlogstion". the phlogistic theory said that what remains when a substance has been burnt is the original substance deprived of phlogiston; and, therefore, to restore the phlogiston to the product of burning is to re-form the combustible substance. but how is such a restoration of phlogiston to be accomplished? evidently by heating the burnt thing with something which is very ready to burn. because, according to the theory, everything which can be burnt contains phlogiston, the more ready a substance is to burn the richer it is in phlogiston; burning is the outrush of phlogiston, phlogiston prefers to be combined with something; therefore, if you mix what remains after burning, with something which is very combustible, and heat the mixture, you are bringing the burnt matter under conditions which are very favourable for the reception of phlogiston by it, for you are bringing it into intimate contact with something from which freedom-hating phlogiston is being forced to escape. charcoal, sulphur, phosphorus, oils and fats are easily burnt; these substances were, therefore, chosen for the purpose of changing things which had been burnt into things which could again be burnt; these, and a few other substances like these, were classed together, and called _phlogisticating agents_. very many of the substances which were dealt with by the experimenters of the last quarter of the 17th, and the first half of the 18th, century, were either substances which could be burned, or those which had been produced by burning; hence the phlogistic theory brought into one point of view, compared, and emphasised the similarities between, a great many things which had not been thought of as connected before that theory was promulgated. moreover, the theory asserted that all combustible, or incinerable, things are composed of phlogiston, and another principle, or, as was often said, another element, which is different in different kinds of combustible substances. the metals, for instance, were said to be composed of phlogiston and an earthy principle or element, which was somewhat different in different metals. the phlogisteans taught that the earthy principle of a metal remains in the form of ash, cinders, or calx, when the metal is calcined, or, as they expressed it, when the metal is deprived of its phlogiston. the phlogistic theory savoured of alchemy; it postulated an undefined, undefinable, intangible principle; it said that all combustible substances are formed by the union of this principle with another, which is sometimes of an earthy character, sometimes of a fatty nature, sometimes highly volatile in habit. nevertheless, the theory of stahl was a step away from purely alchemical conceptions towards the accurate description of a very important class of changes. the principle of phlogiston could be recognised by the senses as it was in the act of escaping from a substance; and the other principle of combustible things was scarcely a principle in the alchemical sense, for, in the case of metals at any rate, it remained when the things which had contained it were burnt, and could be seen, handled, and weighed. to say that metals are composed of phlogiston and an earthy substance, was to express facts in such a language that the expression might be made the basis of experimental inquiry; it was very different from the assertion that metals are produced by the spiritual actions of the three principles, salt, mercury and sulphur, the first of which is not salt, the second is not mercury, and the third is not sulphur. the followers of stahl often spoke of metals as composed of phlogiston and an _element_ of an earthy character; this expression also was an advance, from the hazy notion of _element_ in purely alchemical writings, towards accuracy and fulness of description. an element was now something which could he seen and experimented with; it was no longer a semi-spiritual existence which could not be grasped by the senses. the phlogistic theory regarded the calcination of a metal as the separation of it into two things, unlike the metal, and unlike each other; one of these things was phlogiston, the other was an earth-like residue. the theory thought of the re-formation of a metal from its calx, that is, the earthy substance which remains after combustion, as the combination of two things to produce one, apparently homogeneous, substance. metals appeared to the phlogisteans, as they appeared to the alchemists, to be composite substances. processes of burning were regarded by alchemists and phlogisteans alike, as processes of simplification. the fact had been noticed and recorded, during the middle ages, that the earth-like matter which remains when a metal is calcined is heavier than the metal itself. from this fact, modern investigators of natural phenomena would draw the conclusion, that calcination of a metal is an addition of something to the metal, not a separation of the metal into different things. it seems impossible to us that a substance should be separated into portions, and one of these parts should weigh as much as, or more than, the whole. the exact investigation of material changes called chemistry rests on the statement that _mass_, and mass is practically measured by _weight_, is the one property of what we call matter, the determination whereof enables us to decide whether a change is a combination, or coalescence, of different things, or a separation of one thing into parts. that any part of a material system can be removed without the weight of the portion which remains being less than the original weight of the whole system, is unthinkable, in the present state of our knowledge of material changes. but in the 17th century, and throughout most of the 18th, only a few of those who examined changes in the properties of substances paid heed to changes of weight; they had not realised the importance of the property of mass, as measured by weight. the convinced upholder of the phlogistic theory had two answers to the argument, that, because the earth-like product of the calcination of a metal weighs more than the metal itself, therefore the metal cannot have lost something in the process; for, if one portion of what is taken away weighs more than the metal from which it has been separated, it is evident that the weight of the two portions into which the metal is said to have been divided must be considerably greater than the weight of the undivided metal. the upholders of the theory sometimes met the argument by saying, "of course the calx weighs more than the metal, because phlogiston tends to lighten a body which contains it; and therefore the body weighs more after it has lost phlogiston than it did when the phlogiston formed part of it;" sometimes, and more often, their answer was--"loss or gain of weight is an accident, the essential thing is change of qualities." if the argument against the separation of a metal into two constituents, by calcination, were answered to-day as it was answered by the upholders of the phlogistic theory, in the middle of the 18th century, the answers would justly be considered inconsequent and ridiculous. but it does not follow that the statements were either far-fetched or absurd at the time they were made. they were expressed in the phraseology of the time; a phraseology, it is true, sadly lacking in consistency, clearness, and appropriateness, but the only language then available for the description of such changes as those which happen when metals are calcined. one might suppose that it must always have sounded ridiculous to say that the weight of a thing can be decreased by adding something to it, that part of a thing weighs more than the whole of it. but the absurdity disappears if it can be admitted that mass, which is measured by weight, may be a property like colour, or taste, or smell; for the colour, taste, or smell of a thing may certainly be made less by adding something else, and the colour, taste, or smell of a thing may also be increased by adding something else. if we did not know that what we call _quantity of substance_ is measured by the property named _mass_, we might very well accept the proposition that the entrance of phlogiston into a substance decreases the quantity, hence the mass, and, therefore, the weight, of the substance. although stahl and his followers were emerging from the trammels of alchemy, they were still bound by many of the conceptions of that scheme of nature. we have learned, in previous chapters, that the central idea of alchemy was expressed in the saying: "matter must be deprived of its properties in order to draw out its soul." the properties of substances are everything to the modern chemist--indeed, such words as iron, copper, water, and gold are to him merely convenient expressions for certain definable groups of properties--but the phlogisteans regarded the properties of things, including mass, as of secondary importance; they were still trying to get beneath the properties of a thing, to its hypothetical essence, or substance. looking back, we cannot think of phlogiston as a substance, or as a thing, in the modern meanings of these terms as they are used in natural science. nowadays we think, we are obliged to think, of the sum of the quantities of all the things in the universe as unchanging, and unchangeable by any agency whereof we have definite knowledge. the meaning we give to the word _thing_ rests upon the acceptance of this hypothesis. but the terms _substance_, _thing_, _properties_ were used very vaguely a couple of centuries ago; and it would be truly absurd to carry back to that time the meanings which we give to these terms to-day, and then to brand as ridiculous the attempts of the men who studied, then, the same problems which we study now, to express the results of their study in generalisations which employed the terms in question, in what seems to us a loose, vague, and inexact manner. by asserting, and to some extent experimentally proving, the existence of one principle in many apparently very different substances (or, as would be said to-day, one property common to many substances), the phlogistic theory acted as a very useful means for collecting, and placing in a favourable position for closer inspection, many substances which would probably have remained scattered and detached from one another had this theory not been constructed. a single assumption was made, that all combustible substances are alike in one respect, namely, in containing combined fire, or phlogiston; by the help of this assumption, the theory of phlogiston emphasised the fundamental similarity between all processes of combustion. the theory of phlogiston was extraordinarily simple, compared with the alchemical vagaries which preceded it. hoefer says, in his _histoire de la chimie_, "if it is true that simplicity is the distinctive character of verity, never was a theory so true as that of stahl." the phlogistic theory did more than serve as a means for bringing together many apparently disconnected facts. by concentrating the attention of the students of material changes on one class of events, and giving descriptions of these events without using either of the four alchemical elements, or the three principles, stahl, and those who followed him, did an immense service to the advancement of clear thinking about natural occurrences. the principle of phlogiston was more tangible, and more readily used, than the salt, sulphur, and mercury of the alchemists; and to accustom people to speak of the material substance which remained when a metal, or other combustible substance, was calcined or burnt, as one of the _elements_ of the thing which had been changed, prepared the way for the chemical conception of an element as a definite substance with certain definite properties. in addition to these advantages, the phlogistic theory was based on experiments, and led to experiments, the results of which proved that the capacity to undergo combustion might be conveyed to an incombustible substance, by causing it to react with some other substance, itself combustible, under definite conditions. the theory thus prepared the way for the representation of a chemical change as an interaction between definite kinds of substances, marked by precise alterations both of properties and composition. the great fault of the theory of phlogiston, considered as a general conception which brings many facts into one point of view, and leads the way to new and exact knowledge, was its looseness, its flexibility. it was very easy to make use of the theory in a broad and general way; by stretching it here, and modifying it there, it seemed to cover all the facts concerning combustion and calcination which were discovered during two generations after the publication of stahl's books. but many of the subsidiary hypotheses which were required to make the theory cover the new facts were contradictory, or at any rate seemed to be contradictory, of the primary assumptions of the theory. the addition of this ancillary machinery burdened the mechanism of the theory, threw it out of order, and finally made it unworkable. the phlogistic theory was destroyed by its own cumbersomeness. a scientific theory never lasts long if its fundamental assumptions are stated so loosely that they may be easily modified, expanded, contracted, and adjusted to meet the requirements of newly discovered facts. it is true that the theories which have been of the greatest service in science, as summaries of the relations between established facts, and suggestions of lines of investigation, have been stated in terms whose full meaning has gradually unfolded itself. but the foundations of these theories have been at once so rigidly defined and clearly stated as to be incapable of essential modification, and so full of meaning and widely applicable as to cover large classes of facts which were unknown when the theories were constructed. of the founders of the lasting and expansible theories of natural science, it may be said, that "thoughts beyond their thoughts to those high bards were given." chapter xi. the examination of the phenomena of combustion. the alchemists thought that the most effectual method of separating a complex substance into more simple substances was to subject it to the action of heat. they were constantly distilling, incinerating, subliming, heating, in order that the spirit, or inner kernel of things, might be obtained. they took for granted that the action of fire was to simplify, and that simplification proceeded whatever might be the nature of the substance which was subjected to this action. boyle insisted that the effect of heating one substance may be, and often is, essentially different from the effect of heating another substance; and that the behaviour of the same substance when heated, sometimes varies when the conditions are changed. he takes the example of heating sulphur or brimstone: "exposed to a moderate fire in subliming pots, it rises all into dry, and almost tasteless, flowers; whereas being exposed to a naked fire, it affords store of a saline and fretting liquor." boyle thought that the action of fire was not necessarily to separate a thing into its principles or elements, but, in most cases, was either to rearrange the parts of the thing, so that new, and it might be, more complex things, were produced, or to form less simple things by the union of the substance with what he called, "the matter of fire." when the product of heating a substance, for example, tin or lead, weighed more than the substance itself, boyle supposed that the gain in weight was often caused by the "matter of fire" adding itself to the substance which was heated. he commended to the investigation of philosophers this "subtil fluid," which is "able to pierce into the compact and solid bodies of metals, and add something to them that has no despicable weight upon the balance, and is able for a considerable time to continue fixed in the fire." boyle also drew attention to the possibility of action taking place between a substance which is heated and some other substance, wherewith the original thing may have been mixed. in a word, boyle showed that the alchemical assumption--fire simplifies--was too simple; and he taught, by precept and example, that the only way of discovering what the action of fire is, on this substance or on that, is to make accurate experiments. "i consider," he says, "that, generally speaking, to render a reason of an effect or phenomenon, is to deduce it from something else in nature more known than itself; and that consequently there may be divers kinds of degrees of explication of the same thing." boyle published his experiments and opinions concerning the action of fire on different substances in the seventies of the 17th century; stahl's books, which laid the foundation of the phlogistic theory, and confirmed the alchemical opinion that the action of fire is essentially a simplifying action, were published about forty years later. but fifty years before boyle, a french physician, named jean rey, had noticed that the calcination of a metal is the production of a more complex, from a less complex substance; and had assigned the increase in weight which accompanies that operation to the attachment of particles of the air to the metal. a few years before the publication of boyle's work, from which i have quoted, john mayow, student of oxford, recounted experiments which led to the conclusion that the air contains two substances, one of which supports combustion and the breathing of animals, while the other extinguishes fire. mayow called the active component of the atmosphere _fiery air_; but he was unable to say definitely what becomes of this fiery air when a substance is burnt, although he thought that, in some cases, it probably attaches itself to the burning substances, by which, therefore, it may be said to be fixed. mayow proved that the air wherein a substance is burnt, or an animal breathes, diminishes in volume during the burning, or the breathing. he tried, without much success, to restore to air that part of it which disappears when combustion, or respiration, proceeds in it. what happens when a substance is burnt in the air? the alchemists answered this question by asserting that the substance is separated or analysed into things simpler than itself. boyle said: the process is not necessarily a simplification; it may be, and certainly sometimes is, the formation of something more complicated than the original substance, and when this happens, the process often consists in the fixation of "the matter of fire" by the burning substance. rey said: calcination, of a metal at anyrate, probably consists in the fixation of particles of air by the substance which is calcined. mayow answered the question by asserting, on the ground of the results of his experiments, that the substance which is being calcined lays hold of a particular constituent of the air, not the air as a whole. now, it is evident that if mayow's answer was a true description of the process of calcination, or combustion, it should be possible to separate the calcined substance into two different things, one of which would be the thing which was calcined, and the other would be that constituent of the air which had united with the burning, or calcining, substance. it seems clear to us that the one method of proving the accuracy of mayow's supposition must be, to weigh a definite, combustible, substance--say, a metal; to calcine this in a measured quantity of air; to weigh the product, and to measure the quantity of air which remains; to separate the product of calcination into the original metal, and a kind of air or gas; to prove that the metal thus obtained is the same, and has the same weight, as the metal which was calcined; and to prove that the air or gas obtained from the calcined metal is the same, both in quality and quantity, as the air which disappeared in the process of calcination. this proof was not forthcoming until about a century after the publication of mayow's work. the experiments which furnished the proof were rendered possible by a notable discovery made on the 1st of august 1774, by the celebrated joseph priestley. priestley prepared many "airs" of different kinds: by the actions of acids on metals, by allowing vegetables to decay, by heating beef, mutton, and other animal substances, and by other methods. he says: "having procured a lens of twelve inches diameter and twenty inches focal distance, i proceeded with great alacrity to examine, by the help of it, what kind of air a great variety of substances, natural and factitious, would yield.... with this apparatus, after a variety of other experiments.... on the 1st of august, 1774, i endeavoured to extract air from _mercurius calcinatus per se_; and i presently found that, by means of this lens, air was expelled from it very readily. having got about three or four times as much as the bulk of my materials, i admitted water to it, and found that it was not imbibed by it. but what surprised me more than i can well express was, that a candle burned in this air with a remarkably vigorous flame.... i was utterly at a loss how to account for it." [illustration: fig. xvi.] the apparatus used by priestley, in his experiments on different kinds of air, is represented in fig. xvi., which is reduced from an illustration in priestley's book on _airs_. priestley had made a discovery which was destined to change alchemy into chemistry. but he did not know what his discovery meant. it was reserved for the greatest of all chemists, antoine lavoisier, to use the fact stumbled on by priestley. after some months priestley began to think it possible that the new "air" he had obtained from calcined mercury might be fit for respiration. to his surprise he found that a mouse lived in this air much longer than in common air; the new air was evidently better, or purer, than ordinary air. priestley measured what he called the "goodness" of the new air, by a process of his own devising, and concluded that it was "between four and five times as good as common air." priestley was a thorough-going phlogistean. he seems to have been able to describe the results of his experiments only in the language of the phlogistic theory; just as the results of most of the experiments made to-day on the changes of compounds of the element carbon cannot be described by chemists except by making use of the conceptions and the language of the atomic and molecular theory.[6] [6] i have given numerous illustrations of the truth of this statement in the book, in this series, entitled _the story of the wanderings of atoms_. the upholder of the phlogistic theory could not think of burning as possible unless there was a suitable receptacle for the phlogiston of the burning substance: when burning occurred in the air, the part played by the air, according to the phlogistic chemist, was to receive the expelled phlogiston; in this sense the air acted as the _pabulum_, or nourishment, of the burning substance. inasmuch as substances burned more vigorously and brilliantly in the new air than in common air, priestley argued that the new air was more ready, more eager, than ordinary air, to receive phlogiston; and, therefore, that the new air contained less phlogiston than ordinary air, or, perhaps, no phlogiston. arguing thus, priestley, of course, named the new aeriform substance _dephlogisticated air_, and thought of it as ordinary air deprived of some, or it might be all, of its phlogiston. the breathing of animals and the burning of substances were supposed to load the atmosphere with phlogiston. priestley spoke of the atmosphere as being constantly "vitiated," "rendered noxious," "depraved," or "corrupted" by processes of respiration and combustion; he called those processes whereby the atmosphere is restored to its original condition (or "depurated," as he said), "dephlogisticating processes." as he had obtained his _dephlogisticated air_ by heating the calx of mercury, that is the powder produced by calcining mercury in the air, priestley was forced to suppose that the calcination of mercury in the air must be a more complex occurrence than merely the expulsion of phlogiston from the mercury: for, if the process consisted only in the expulsion of phlogiston, how could heating what remained produce exceedingly pure ordinary air? it seemed necessary to suppose that not only was phlogiston expelled from mercury during calcination, but that the mercury also imbibed some portion, and that the purest portion, of the surrounding air. priestley did not, however, go so far as this; he was content to suppose that in some way, which he did not explain, the process of calcination resulted in the loss of phlogiston by the mercury, and the gain, by the dephlogisticated mercury, of the property of yielding exceedingly pure or dephlogisticated air when it was heated very strongly. priestley thought of properties in much the same way as the alchemists thought of them, as wrappings, or coverings of an essential something, from which they can be removed and around which they can again be placed. the protean principle of phlogiston was always at hand, and, by skilful management, was ready to adapt itself to any facts. before the phenomena of combustion could be described accurately, it was necessary to do two things; to ignore the theory of phlogiston, and to weigh and measure all the substances which take part in some selected processes of burning. looking back at the attempts made in the past to describe natural events, we are often inclined to exclaim, "why did investigators bind themselves with the cords of absurd theories; why did they always wear blinkers; why did they look at nature through the distorting mists rising from their own imaginations?" we are too ready to forget the tremendous difficulties which beset the path of him who is seeking accurate knowledge. "to climb steep hills requires slow pace at first." forgetting that the statements wherein the men of science of our own time describe the relations between natural events are, and must be, expressed in terms of some general conception, some theory, of these relations; forgetting that the simplest natural occurrence is so complicated that our powers of description are incapable of expressing it completely and accurately; forgetting the uselessness of disconnected facts; we are inclined to overestimate the importance of our own views of nature's ways, and to underestimate the usefulness of the views of our predecessors. moreover, as naturalists have not been obliged, in recent times, to make a complete renunciation of any comprehensive theory wherein they had lived and moved for many years, we forget the difficulties of breaking loose from a way of looking at natural events which has become almost as real as the events themselves, of abandoning a language which has expressed the most vividly realised conceptions of generations of investigators, of forming a completely new mental picture of natural occurrences, and developing a completely new language for the expression of those conceptions and these occurrences. the younger students of natural science of to-day are beginning to forget what their fathers told them of the fierce battle which had to be fought, before the upholders of the darwinian theory of the origin of species were able to convince those for whom the older view, that species are, and always have been, absolutely distinct, had become a matter of supreme scientific, and even ethical, importance. a theory which has prevailed for generations in natural science, and has been accepted and used by everyone, can be replaced by a more accurate description of the relations between natural facts, only by the determination, labour, and genius of a man of supreme power. such a service to science, and humanity, was rendered by darwin; a like service was done, more than three-quarters of a century before darwin, by lavoisier. antoine laurent lavoisier was born in paris in 1743. his father, who was a merchant in a good position, gave his son the best education which was then possible, in physical, astronomical, botanical, and chemical science. at the age of twenty-one, lavoisier gained the prize offered by the government for devising an effective and economical method of lighting the public streets. from that time until, on the 8th of may 1794, the government of the revolution declared, "the republic has no need of men of science," and the guillotine ended his life, lavoisier continued his researches in chemistry, geology, physics, and other branches of natural science, and his investigations into the most suitable methods of using the knowledge gained by naturalists for advancing the welfare of the community. in chapter vi., i said that when an alchemist boiled water in an open vessel, and obtained a white earthy solid, in place of the water which disappeared, he was producing some sort of experimental proof of the justness of his assertion that water can be changed into earth. lavoisier began his work on the transformations of matter by demonstrating that this alleged transmutation does not happen; and he did this by weighing the water, the vessel, and the earthy solid. lavoisier had constructed for him a pelican of white glass (see fig. xi., p. 88), with a stopper of glass. he cleaned, dried, and weighed this vessel; then he put into it rain-water which he had distilled eight times; he heated the vessel, removing the stopper from time to time to allow the expanding air to escape, then put in the stopper, allowed the vessel to cool, and weighed very carefully. the difference between the second and the first weighing was the weight of water in the vessel. he then fastened the stopper securely with cement, and kept the apparatus at a temperature about 30° or 40° below that of boiling water, for a hundred and one days. at the end of that time a fine white solid had collected on the bottom of the vessel. lavoisier removed the cement from the stopper, and weighed the apparatus; the weight was the same as it had been before the heating began. he removed the stopper; air rushed in, with a hissing noise. lavoisier concluded that air had not penetrated through the apparatus during the process of heating. he then poured out the water, and the solid which had formed in the vessel, set them aside, dried, and weighed the pelican; it had lost 17-4/10 grains. lavoisier concluded that the solid which had formed in the water was produced by the solvent action of the water on the glass vessel. he argued that if this conclusion was correct, the weight of the solid must be equal to the loss of weight suffered by the vessel; he therefore separated the solid from the water in which it was suspended, dried, and weighed it. the solid weighed 4-9/10 grains. lavoisier's conclusion seemed to be incorrect; the weight of the solid, which was supposed to be produced by the action of the water on the vessel, was 12-1/2 grains less than the weight of the material removed from the vessel. but some of the material which was removed from the vessel might have remained dissolved in the water: lavoisier distilled the water, which he had separated from the solid, in a glass vessel, until only a very little remained in the distilling apparatus; he poured this small quantity into a glass basin, and boiled until the whole of the water had disappeared as steam. there remained a white, earthy solid, the weight of which was 15-1/2 grains. lavoisier had obtained 4-9/10 + 15-1/2 = 20-2/5 grains of solid; the pelican had lost 17-2/5 grains. the difference between these weights, namely, 3 grains, was accounted for by lavoisier as due to the solvent action of the water on the glass apparatus wherein it had been distilled, and on the glass basin wherein it had been evaporated to dryness. lavoisier's experiments proved that when distilled water is heated in a glass vessel, it dissolves some of the material of the vessel, and the white, earthy solid which is obtained by boiling down the water is merely the material which has been removed from the glass vessel. his experiments also proved that the water does not undergo any change during the process; that at the end of the operation it is what it was at the beginning--water, and nothing but water. by this investigation lavoisier destroyed part of the experimental basis of alchemy, and established the one and only method by which chemical changes can be investigated; the method wherein constant use is made of the balance. lavoisier now turned his attention to the calcination of metals, and particularly the calcination of tin. boyle supposed that the increase in weight which accompanies the calcination of a metal is due to the fixation of "matter of fire" by the calcining metal; rey regarded the increase in weight as the result of the combination of the air with the metal; mayow thought that the atmosphere contains two different kinds of "airs," and one of these unites with the heated metal. lavoisier proposed to test these suppositions by calcining a weighed quantity of tin in a closed glass vessel, which had been weighed before, and should be weighed after, the calcination. if boyle's view was correct, the weight of the vessel and the tin would be greater at the end than it was at the beginning of the operation; for "matter of fire" would pass through the vessel and unite with the metal. if there was no change in the total weight of the apparatus and its contents, and if air rushed in when the vessel was opened after the calcination, and the total weight was then greater than at the beginning of the process, it would be necessary to adopt either the supposition of rey or that of mayow. lavoisier made a series of experiments. the results were these: there was no change in the total weight of the apparatus and its contents; when the vessel was opened after the calcination was finished, air rushed in, and the whole apparatus now weighed more than it did before the vessel was opened; the weight of the air which rushed in was exactly equal to the increase in the weight of the tin produced by the calcination, in other words, the weight of the inrushing air was exactly equal to the difference between the weights of the tin and the calx formed by calcining the tin. lavoisier concluded that to calcine tin is to cause it to combine with a portion of the air wherein it is calcined. the weighings he made showed that about one-fifth of the whole weight of air in the closed flask wherein he calcined tin had disappeared during the operation. other experiments led lavoisier to suspect that the portion of the air which had united with the tin was different from the portion which had not combined with that metal. he, therefore, set himself to discover whether there are different kinds of "airs" in the atmosphere, and, if there is more than one kind of "air," what is the nature of that "air" which combines with a metal in the process of calcination. he proposed to cause a metallic calx (that is, the substance formed by calcining a metal in the air) to give up the "air" which had been absorbed in its formation, and to compare this "air" with atmospheric air. about this time priestley visited paris, saw lavoisier, and told him of the new "air" he had obtained by heating calcined mercury. lavoisier saw the great importance of priestley's discovery; he repeated priestley's experiment, and concluded that the air, or gas, which he refers to in his laboratory journal as "l'air dephlogistique de m. priestley" was nothing else than the purest portion of the air we breathe. he prepared this "air" and burned various substances in it. finding that very many of the products of these combustions had the properties of acids, he gave to the new "air" the name _oxygen_, which means _the acid-producer_. at a later time, lavoisier devised and conducted an experiment which laid bare the change of composition that happens when mercury is calcined in the air. he calcined a weighed quantity of mercury for many days in a measured volume of air, in an apparatus arranged so that he was able to determine how much of the air disappeared during the process; he collected and weighed the red solid which formed on the surface of the heated mercury; finally he heated this red solid to a high temperature, collected and measured the gas which was given off, and weighed the mercury which was produced. the sum of the weights of the mercury and the gas which were produced by heating the calcined mercury was equal to the weight of the calcined mercury; and the weight of the gas produced by heating the calcined mercury was equal to the weight of the portion of the air which had disappeared during the formation of the calcined mercury. this experiment proved that the calcination of mercury in the air consists in the combination of a constituent of the air with the mercury. fig. xvii. (reduced from an illustration in lavoisier's memoir) represents the apparatus used by lavoisier. mayow's supposition was confirmed. [illustration: fig. xvii.] lavoisier made many more experiments on combustion, and proved that in every case the component of the atmosphere which he had named oxygen combined with the substance, or with some part of the substance, which was burned. by these experiments the theory of phlogiston was destroyed; and with its destruction, the whole alchemical apparatus of principles and elements, essences and qualities, souls and spirits, disappeared. chapter xii. the recognition of chemical changes as the interactions of definite substances. the experimental study of combustion made by lavoisier proved the correctness of that part of stahl's phlogistic theory which asserted that all processes of combustion are very similar, but also proved that this likeness consists in the combination of a distinct gaseous substance with the material undergoing combustion, and not in the escape therefrom of the _principle of fire_, as asserted by the theory of stahl. after about the year 1790, it was necessary to think of combustions in the air as combinations of a particular gas, or _air_, with the burning substances, or some portions of them. this description of processes of burning necessarily led to a comparison of the gaseous constituent of the atmosphere which played so important a part in these processes, with the substances which were burned; it led to the examination of the compositions of many substances, and made it necessary to devise a language whereby these compositions could be stated clearly and consistently. we have seen, in former chapters, the extreme haziness of the alchemical views of composition, and the connexions between composition and properties. although boyle[7] had stated very lucidly what he meant by the composition of a definite substance, about a century before lavoisier's work on combustion, nevertheless the views of chemists concerning composition remained very vague and incapable of definite expression, until the experimental investigations of lavoisier enabled him to form a clear mental picture of chemical changes as interactions between definite quantities of distinct substances. [7] boyle said, in 1689, "i mean by elements ... certain primitive and simple, or perfectly unmixed bodies; which not being made of any other bodies, or of one another, are the ingredients of which all those called perfectly mixt bodies are immediately compounded, and into which they are ultimately resolved." let us consider some of the work of lavoisier in this direction. i select his experimental examination of the interactions of metals and acids. many experimenters had noticed that gases (or airs, as they were called up till near the end of the 18th century) are generally produced when metals are dissolving in acids. most of those who noticed this said that the gases came from the dissolving metals; lavoisier said they were produced by the decomposition of the acids. in order to study the interaction of nitric acid and mercury, lavoisier caused a weighed quantity of the metal to react with a weighed quantity of the acid, and collected the gas which was produced; when all the metal had dissolved, he evaporated the liquid until a white solid was obtained; he heated this solid until it was changed to the red substance called, at that time, _red precipitate_, and collected the gas produced. finally, lavoisier strongly heated the red precipitate; it changed to a gas, which he collected, and mercury, which he weighed. the weight of the mercury obtained by lavoisier at the end of this series of changes was the same, less a few grains, as the weight of the mercury which he had caused to react with the nitric acid. the gas obtained during the solution of the metal in the acid, and during the decomposition of the white solid by heat, was the same as a gas which had been prepared by priestley and called by him _nitrous air_; and the gas obtained by heating the red precipitate was found to be oxygen. lavoisier then mixed measured volumes of oxygen and "nitrous air," standing over water; a red gas was formed, and dissolved in the water, and lavoisier proved that the water now contained nitric acid. the conclusions regarding the composition of nitric acid drawn by lavoisier from these experiments was, that "nitric acid is nothing else than _nitrous air_, combined with almost its own volume of the purest part of atmospheric air, and a considerable quantity of water." lavoisier supposed that the stages in the complete reaction between mercury and nitric acid were these: the withdrawal of oxygen from the acid by the mercury, and the union of the compound of mercury and oxygen thus formed with the constituents of the acid which remained when part of its oxygen was taken away. the removal of oxygen from nitric acid by the mercury produced _nitrous air_; when the product of the union of the oxide of mercury and the nitric acid deprived of part of its oxygen was heated, more nitrous air was given off, and oxide of mercury remained, and was decomposed, at a higher temperature, into mercury and oxygen. lavoisier thought of these reactions as the tearing asunder, by mercury, of nitric acid into definite quantities of its three components, themselves distinct substances, nitrous air, water, and oxygen; and the combination of the mercury with a certain measurable quantity of one of these components, namely, oxygen, followed by the union of this compound of mercury and oxygen with what remained of the components of nitric acid. lavoisier had formed a clear, consistent, and suggestive mental picture of chemical changes. he thought of a chemical reaction as always the same under the same conditions, as an action between a fixed and measurable quantity of one substance, having definite and definable properties, with fixed and measurable quantities of other substances, the properties of each of which were definite and definable. lavoisier also recognised that certain definite substances could be divided into things simpler than themselves, but that other substances refused to undergo simplification by division into two or more unlike portions. he spoke of the object of chemistry as follows:--[8] "in submitting to experiments the different substances found in nature, chemistry seeks to decompose these substances, and to get them into such conditions that their various components may be examined separately. chemistry advances to its end by dividing, sub-dividing, and again sub-dividing, and we do not know what will be the limits of such operations. we cannot be certain that what we regard as simple to-day is indeed simple; all we can say is, that such a substance is the actual term whereat chemical analysis has arrived, and that with our present knowledge we cannot sub-divide it." [8] i have given a free rendering of lavoisier's words. in these words lavoisier defines the chemical conception of _elements_; since his time an element is "the actual term whereat chemical analysis has arrived," it is that which "with our present knowledge we cannot sub-divide"; and, as a working hypothesis, the notion of _element_ has no wider meaning than this. i have already quoted boyle's statement that by _elements_ he meant "certain primitive and simple bodies ... not made of any other bodies, or of one another." boyle was still slightly restrained by the alchemical atmosphere around him; he was still inclined to say, "this _must_ be the way nature works, she _must_ begin with certain substances which are absolutely simple." lavoisier had thrown off all the trammels which hindered the alchemists from making rigorous experimental investigations. if one may judge from his writings, he had not struggled to free himself from these trammels, he had not slowly emerged from the quagmires of alchemy, and painfully gained firmer ground; the extraordinary clearness and directness of his mental vision had led him straight to the very heart of the problems of chemistry, and enabled him not only calmly to ignore all the machinery of elements, principles, essences, and the like, which the alchemists had constructed so laboriously, but also to construct, in place of that mechanism which hindered inquiry, genuine scientific hypotheses which directed inquiry, and were themselves altered by the results of the experiments they had suggested. lavoisier made these great advances by applying himself to the minute and exhaustive examination of a few cases of chemical change, and endeavouring to account for everything which took part in the processes he studied, by weighing or measuring each distinct substance which was present when the change began, and each which was present when the change was finished. he did not make haphazard experiments; he had a method, a system; he used hypotheses, and he used them rightly. "systems in physics," lavoisier writes, "are but the proper instruments for helping the feebleness of our senses. properly speaking, they are methods of approximation which put us on the track of solving problems; they are the hypotheses which, successively modified, corrected, and changed, by experience, ought to conduct us, some day, by the method of exclusions and eliminations, to the knowledge of the true laws of nature." in a memoir wherein he is considering the production of carbonic acid and alcohol by the fermentation of fruit-juice, lavoisier says, "it is evident that we must know the nature and composition of the substances which can be fermented and the products of fermentation; for nothing is created, either in the operations of art or in those of nature; and it may be laid down that the quantity of material present at the beginning of every operation is the same as the quantity present at the end, that the quality and quantity of the principles[9] are the same, and that nothing happens save certain changes, certain modifications. on this principle is based the whole art of experimenting in chemistry; in all chemical experiments we must suppose that there is a true equality between the principles[10] of the substances which are examined and those which are obtained from them by analysis." [9, 10] lavoisier uses the word _principle_, here and elsewhere, to mean a definite homogeneous substance; he uses it as synonymous with the more modern terms element and compound. if lavoisier's memoirs are examined closely, it is seen that at the very beginning of his chemical inquiries he assumed the accuracy, and the universal application, of the generalisation "nothing is created, either in the operations of art or in those of nature." naturalists had been feeling their way for centuries towards such a generalisation as this; it had been in the air for many generations; sometimes it was almost realised by this or that investigator, then it escaped for long periods. lavoisier seems to have realised, by what we call intuition, that however great and astonishing may be the changes in the properties of the substances which mutually react, there is no change in the total quantity of material. not only did lavoisier realise and act on this principle, he also measured quantities of substances by the one practical method, namely, by weighing; and by doing this he showed chemists the only road along which they could advance towards a genuine knowledge of material changes. the generalisation expressed by lavoisier in the words i have quoted is now known as the _law of the conservation of mass_; it is generally stated in some such form as this:--the sum of the masses of all the homogeneous substances which take part in a chemical (or physical) change does not itself change. the science of chemistry rests on this law; every quantitative analysis assumes the accuracy, and is a proof of the validity, of it.[11] [11] i have considered the law of the conservation of mass in some detail in chapter iv. of _the story of the chemical elements_. by accepting the accuracy of this generalisation, and using it in every experiment, lavoisier was able to form a clear mental picture of a chemical change as the separation and combination of homogeneous substances; for, by using the balance, he was able to follow each substance through the maze of changes, to determine when it united with other substances, and when it separated into substances simpler than itself. chapter xiii. the chemical elements contrasted with the alchemical principles. it was known to many observers in the later years of the 17th century that the product of the calcination of a metal weighs more than the metal; but it was still possible, at that time, to assert that this fact is of no importance to one who is seeking to give an accurate description of the process of calcination. weight, which measures mass or quantity of substance, was thought of, in these days, as a property like colour, taste, or smell, a property which was sometimes decreased, and sometimes increased, by adding one substance to another. students of natural occurrences were, however, feeling their way towards the recognition of some property of substances which did not change in the haphazard way wherein most properties seemed to alter. lavoisier reached this property at one bound. by his experimental investigations, he taught that, however greatly the properties of one substance may be masked, or altered, by adding another substance to it, yet the property we call mass, and measure by weight, is not affected by these changes; for lavoisier showed, that the mass of the product of the union of two substances is always exactly the sum of the masses of these two substances, and the sum of the masses of the substances whereinto one substance is divided is always exactly equal to that mass of the substance which is divided. for the undefined, ever-changing, protean essence, or soul, of a thing which the alchemists thought of as hidden by wrappings of properties, the exact investigations of lavoisier, and those of others who worked on the same lines as he, substituted this definite, fixed, unmodifiable property of mass. lavoisier, and those who followed in his footsteps, also did away with the alchemical notion of the existence of an essential substratum, independent of changes in those properties of a substance which can be observed by the senses. for the experimental researches of these men obliged naturalists to recognise, that a change in the properties of a definite, homogeneous substance, such as pure water, pure chalk, or pure sulphur, is accompanied (or, as we generally say, is caused) by the formation of a new substance or substances; and this formation, this apparent creation, of new material, is effected, either by the addition of something to the original substance, or by the separation of it into portions which are unlike it, and unlike one another. if the change is a combination, or coalescence, of two things into one, then the mass, and hence the weight, of the product is equal to the sum of those masses, and hence those weights, of the things which have united to form it; if the change is a separation of one distinct substance into several substances, then the sum of the masses, and hence the weights, of the products is equal to that mass, and hence that weight, of the substance which has been separated. consider the word _water_, and the substance represented by this word. in chapter iv., i gave illustrations of the different meanings which have been given to this word; it is sometimes used to represent a material substance, sometimes a quality more or less characteristic of that substance, and sometimes a process to which that substance, and many others like it, may be subjected. but when the word _water_ is used with a definite and exact meaning, it is a succinct expression for a certain group, or collocation, of measurable properties which are always found together, and is, therefore, thought of as a distinct substance. this substance can be separated into two other substances very unlike it, and can be formed by causing these to unite. one hundred parts, by weight, of pure water are always formed by the union of 11.11 parts of hydrogen, and 88.89 parts of oxygen, and can be separated into these quantities of those substances. when water is formed by the union of hydrogen and oxygen, in the ratio of 11.11 parts by weight of the former to 88.89 of the latter, the properties of the two substances which coalesce to form it disappear, except their masses. it is customary to say that water _contains_ hydrogen and oxygen; but this expression is scarcely an accurate description of the facts. what we call _substances_ are known to us only by their properties, that is, the ways wherein they act on our senses. hydrogen has certain definite properties, oxygen has other definite properties, and the properties of water are perfectly distinct from those of either of the substances which it is said to contain. it is, therefore, somewhat misleading to say that water _contains_ substances the properties whereof, except their masses, disappeared at the moment when they united and water was produced. nevertheless we are forced to think of water as, in a sense, containing hydrogen and oxygen. for, one of the properties of hydrogen is its power to coalesce, or combine, with oxygen to form water, and one of the properties of oxygen is its ability to unite with hydrogen to form water; and these properties of those substances cannot be recognised, or even suspected, unless certain definite quantities of the two substances are brought together under certain definite conditions. the properties which characterise hydrogen, and those which characterise oxygen, when these things are separated from all other substances, can be determined and measured in terms of the similar properties of some other substance taken as a standard. these two distinct substances disappear when they are brought into contact, under the proper conditions, and something (water) is obtained whose properties are very unlike those of hydrogen or oxygen; this new thing can be caused to disappear, and hydrogen and oxygen are again produced. this cycle of changes can be repeated as often as we please; the quantities of hydrogen and oxygen which are obtained when we choose to stop the process are exactly the same as the quantities of those substances which disappeared in the first operation whereby water was produced. hence, water is an intimate union of hydrogen and oxygen; and, in this sense, water may be said to contain hydrogen and oxygen. the alchemist would have said, the properties of hydrogen and oxygen are destroyed when these things unite to form water, but the essence, or substratum, of each remains. the chemist says, you cannot discover all the properties of hydrogen and oxygen by examining these substances apart from one another, for one of the most important properties of either is manifested only when the two mutually react: the formation of water is not the destruction of the properties of hydrogen and oxygen and the revelation of their essential substrata, it is rather the manifestation of a property of each which cannot be discovered except by causing the union of both. there was, then, a certain degree of accuracy in the alchemical description of the processes we now call chemical changes, as being the removal of the outer properties of the things which react, and the manifestation of their essential substance. but there is a vast difference between this description and the chemical presentment of these processes as reactions between definite and measurable quantities of elements, or compounds, or both, resulting in the re-distribution, of the elements, or the separation of the compounds into their elements, and the formation of new compounds by the re-combination of these elements. let us contrast the two descriptions somewhat more fully. the alchemist wished to effect the transmutation of one substance into another; he despaired of the possibility of separating the elements whereof the substance might be formed, but he thought he could manipulate what he called the _virtues_ of the elements by a judicious use of some or all of the three principles, which he named sulphur, salt, and mercury. he could not state in definite language what he meant by these principles; they were states, conditions, or qualities, of classes of substances, which could not be defined. the directions the alchemist was able to give to those who sought to effect the change of one thing into another were these. firstly, to remove those properties which characterised the thing to be changed, and leave only the properties which it shared with other things like it; secondly, to destroy the properties which the thing to be changed possessed in common with certain other things; thirdly, to commingle the essence of the thing with the essence of something else, in due proportion and under proper conditions; and, finally, to hope for the best, keep a clear head, and maintain a sense of virtue. if he who was about to attempt the transmutation inquired how he was to destroy the specific properties, and the class properties, of the thing he proposed to change, and by what methods he was to obtain its essence, and cause that essence to produce the new thing, he would be told to travel along "the road which was followed by the great architect of the universe in the creation of the world." and if he demanded more detailed directions, he would be informed that the substance wherewith his experiments began must first be mortified, then dissolved, then conjoined, then putrefied, then congealed, then cibated, then sublimed, and fermented, and, finally, exalted. he would, moreover, be warned that in all these operations he must use, not things which he could touch, handle, and weigh, but the _virtues_, the _lives_, the _souls_, of such things. when the student of chemistry desires to effect the transformation of one definite substance into another, he is told to determine, by quantitative experiments, what are the elements, and what the quantities of these elements, which compose the compound which he proposes to change, and the compound into which he proposes to change it; and he is given working definitions of the words _element_ and _compound_. if the compound he desires to produce is found to be composed of elements different from those which form the compound wherewith his operations begin, he is directed to bring about a reaction, or a series of reactions, between the compound which is to be changed, and some other collocation of elements the composition of which is known to be such that it can supply the new elements which are needed for the production of the new compound. since lavoisier realised, for himself, and those who were to come after him, the meaning of the terms _element_ and _compound_, we may say that chemists have been able to form a mental picture of the change from one definite substance to another, which is clear, suggestive, and consistent, because it is an approximately accurate description of the facts discovered by careful and penetrative investigations. this presentment of the change has been substituted for the alchemical conception, which was an attempt to express what introspection and reasoning on the results of superficial investigations, guided by specious analogies, suggested ought to be the facts. lavoisier was the man who made possible the more accurate, and more far-reaching, description of the changes which result in the production of substances very unlike those which are changed; and he did this by experimentally analysing the conceptions of the element and the compound, giving definite and workable meanings to these conceptions, and establishing, on an experimental foundation, the generalisation that the sum of the quantities of the substances which take part in any change is itself unchanged. a chemical element was thought of by lavoisier as "the actual term whereat analysis has arrived," a definite substance "which we cannot subdivide with our present knowledge," but not necessarily a substance which will never be divided. a compound was thought of by him as a definite substance which is always produced by the union of the same quantities of the same elements, and can be separated into the same quantities of the same elements. these conceptions were amplified and made more full of meaning by the work of many who came after lavoisier, notably by john dalton, who was born in 1766 and died in 1844. in chapter i., i gave a sketch of the atomic theory of the greek thinkers. the founder of that theory, who flourished about 500 b.c., said that every substance is a collocation of a vast number of minute particles, which are unchangeable, indestructible, and impenetrable, and are therefore properly called _atoms_; that the differences which are observed between the qualities of things are due to differences in the numbers, sizes, shapes, positions, and movements of atoms, and that the process which occurs when one substance is apparently destroyed and another is produced in its place, is nothing more than a rearrangement of atoms. the supposition that changes in the properties of substances are connected with changes in the numbers, movements, and arrangements of different kinds of minute particles, was used in a general way by many naturalists of the 17th and 18th centuries; but dalton was the first to show that the data obtained by the analyses of compounds make it possible to determine the relative weights of the atoms of the elements. dalton used the word _atom_ to denote the smallest particle of an element, or a compound, which exhibits the properties characteristic of that element or compound. he supposed that the atoms of an element are never divided in any of the reactions of that element, but the atoms of a compound are often separated into the atoms of the elements whereof the compound is composed. apparently without knowing that the supposition had been made more than two thousand years before his time, dalton was led by his study of the composition and properties of the atmosphere to assume that the atoms of different substances, whether elements or compounds, are of different sizes and have different weights. he assumed that when two elements unite to form only one compound, the atom of that compound has the simplest possible composition, is formed by the union of a single atom of each element. dalton knew only one compound of hydrogen and nitrogen, namely, ammonia. analyses of this compound show that it is composed of one part by weight of hydrogen and 4.66 parts by weight of nitrogen. dalton said one atom of hydrogen combines with one atom of nitrogen to form an atom of ammonia; hence an atom of nitrogen is 4.66 times heavier than an atom of hydrogen; in other words, if the _atomic weight_ of hydrogen is taken as unity, the _atomic weight_ of nitrogen is expressed by the number 4.66. dalton referred the atomic weights of the elements to the atomic weight of hydrogen as unity, because hydrogen is lighter than any other substance; hence the numbers which tell how much heavier the atoms of the elements are than an atom of hydrogen are always greater than one, are always positive numbers. when two elements unite in different proportions, by weight, to form more than one compound, dalton supposed that (in most cases at any rate) one of the compounds is formed by the union of a single atom of each element; the next compound is formed by the union of one atom of the element which is present in smaller quantity with two, three, or more, atoms of the other element, and the next compound is formed by the union of one atom of the first element with a larger number (always, necessarily, a whole number) of atoms of the other element than is contained in the second compound; and so on. from this assumption, and the daltonian conception of the atom, it follows that the quantities by weight of one element which are found to unite with one and the same weight of another element must always be expressible as whole multiples of one number. for if two elements, a and b, form a compound, that compound is formed, by supposition, of one atom of a and one atom of b; if more of b is added, at least one atom of b must be added; however much of b is added the quantity must be a whole number of atoms; and as every atom of b is the same in all respects as every other atom of b, the weights of b added to a constant weight of a must be whole multiples of the atomic weight of b. the facts which were available in dalton's time confirmed this deduction from the atomic theory within the limits of experimental errors; and the facts which have been established since dalton's time are completely in keeping with the deduction. take, for instance, three compounds of the elements nitrogen and oxygen. that one of the three which contains least oxygen is composed of 63.64 _per cent._ of nitrogen, and 36.36 _per cent._ of oxygen; if the atomic weight of nitrogen is taken to be 4.66, which is the weight of nitrogen that combines with one part by weight of hydrogen, then the weight of oxygen combined with 4.66 of nitrogen is 2.66 (63.64:36.36 = 4.66:2.66). the weights of oxygen which combine with 4.66 parts by weight of nitrogen to form the second and third compounds, respectively, must be whole multiples of 2.66; these weights are 5.32 and 10.64. now 5.32 = 2.66 x 2, and 10.64 = 2.66 x 4. hence, the quantities by weight of oxygen which combine with one and the same weight of nitrogen are such that two of these quantities are whole multiples of the third quantity. dalton's application of the greek atomic theory to the facts established by the analyses of compounds enabled him to attach to each element a number which he called the atomic weight of the element, and to summarise all the facts concerning the compositions of compounds in the statement, that the elements combine in the ratios of their atomic weights, or in the ratios of whole multiples of their atomic weights. all the investigations which have been made into the compositions of compounds, since dalton's time, have confirmed the generalisation which followed from dalton's application of the atomic theory. even if the theory of atoms were abandoned, the generalisation would remain, as an accurate and exact statement of facts which hold good in every chemical change, that a number can be attached to each element, and the weights of the elements which combine are in the ratios of these numbers, or whole multiples of these numbers. since chemists realised the meaning of dalton's book, published in 1808, and entitled, _a new system of chemical philosophy_, elements have been regarded as distinct and definite substances, which have not been divided into parts different from themselves, and unite with each other in definite quantities by weight which can be accurately expressed as whole multiples of certain fixed quantities; and compounds have been regarded as distinct and definite substances which are formed by the union of, and can be separated into, quantities of various elements which are expressible by certain fixed numbers or whole multiples thereof. these descriptions of elements and compounds are expressions of actual facts. they enable chemists to state the compositions of all the compounds which are, or can be, formed by the union of any elements. for example, let a, b, c, and d represent four elements, and also certain definite weights of these elements, then the compositions of all the compounds which can be formed by the union of these elements are expressed by the scheme a_{_n_} b_{_m_} c_{_p_} d_{_q_}, where _m_ _n_ _p_ and _q_ are whole numbers. these descriptions of elements and compounds also enable chemists to form a clear picture to themselves of any chemical change. they think of a chemical change as being; (1) a union of those weights of two, or more, elements which are expressed by the numbers attached to these elements, or by whole multiples of these numbers; or (2) a union of such weights of two, or more, compounds as can be expressed by certain numbers or by whole multiples of these numbers; or (3) a reaction between elements and compounds, or between compounds and compounds, resulting in the redistribution of the elements concerned, in such a way that the complete change of composition can be expressed by using the numbers, or whole multiples of the numbers, attached to the elements. how different is this conception of a change wherein substances are formed, entirely unlike those things which react to form them, from the alchemical presentment of such a process! the alchemist spoke of stripping off the outer properties of the thing to be changed, and, by operating spiritually on the soul which was thus laid bare, inducing the essential virtue of the substance to exhibit its powers of transmutation. but he was unable to give definite meanings to the expressions which he used, he was unable to think clearly about the transformations which he tried to accomplish. the chemist discards the machinery of virtues, souls, and powers. it is true that he substitutes a machinery of minute particles; but this machinery is merely a means of thinking clearly and consistently about the changes which he studies. the alchemist thought, vaguely, of substance as something underlying, and independent of, properties; the chemist uses the expression, this or that substance, as a convenient way of presenting and reasoning about certain groups of properties. it seems to me that if we think of _matter_ as something more than properties recognised by the senses, we are going back on the road which leads to the confusion of the alchemical times. the alchemists expressed their conceptions in what seems to us a crude, inconsistent, and very undescriptive language. chemists use a language which is certainly symbolical, but also intelligible, and on the whole fairly descriptive of the facts. a name is given to each elementary substance, that is, each substance which has not been decomposed; the name generally expresses some characteristic property of the substance, or tells something about its origin or the place of its discovery. the names of compounds are formed by putting together the names of the elements which combine to produce them; and the relative quantities of these elements are indicated either by the use of latin or greek prefixes, or by variations in the terminal syllables of the names of the elements. chapter xiv. the modern form of the alchemical quest of the one thing. the study of the properties of the elements shows that these substances fall into groups, the members of each of which are like one another, and form compounds which are similar. the examination of the properties and compositions of compounds has shown that similarity of properties is always accompanied by similarity of composition. hence, the fact that certain elements are very closely allied in their properties suggests that these elements may also be allied in their composition. now, to speak of the composition of an element is to think of the element as formed by the union of at least two different substances; it implies the supposition that some elements at any rate are really compounds. the fact that there is a very definite connexion between the values of the atomic weights, and the properties, of the elements, lends some support to the hypothesis that the substances we call, and are obliged at present to call, elements, may have been formed from one, or a few, distinct substances, by some process of progressive change. if the elements are considered in the order of increasing atomic weights, from hydrogen, whose atomic weight is taken as unity because it is the lightest substance known, to uranium, an atom of which is 240 times heavier than an atom of hydrogen, it is found that the elements fall into periods, and the properties of those in one period vary from element to element, in a way which is, broadly and on the whole, like the variation of the properties of those in other periods. this fact suggests the supposition--it might be more accurate to say the speculation--that the elements mark the stable points in a process of change, which has not proceeded continuously from a very simple substance to a very complex one, but has repeated itself, with certain variations, again and again. if such a process has occurred, we might reasonably expect to find substances exhibiting only minute differences in their properties, differences so slight as to make it impossible to assign the substances, definitely and certainly, either to the class of elements or to that of compounds. we find exactly such substances among what are called the _rare earths_. there are earth-like substances which exhibit no differences of chemical properties, and yet show minute differences in the characters of the light which they emit when they are raised to a very high temperature. the results of analysis by the spectroscope of the light emitted by certain elements at different temperatures may be reasonably interpreted by supposing that these elements are separated into simpler substances by the action on them of very large quantities of thermal energy. the spectrum of the light emitted by glowing iron heated by a bunsen flame (say, at 1200° c. = about 2200° f.) shows a few lines and flutings; when iron is heated in an electric arc (say, to 3500° c. = about 6300° f.) the spectrum shows some two thousand lines; at the higher temperature produced by the electric spark-discharge, the spectrum shows only a few lines. as a guide to further investigation, we may provisionally infer from these facts that iron is changed at very high temperatures into substances simpler than itself. sir norman lockyer's study of the spectra of the light from stars has shown that the light from those stars which are presumably the hottest, judging by the general character of their spectra, reveals the presence of a very small number of chemical elements; and that the number of spectral lines, and, therefore, the number of elements, increases as we pass from the hottest to cooler stars. at each stage of the change from the hottest to cooler stars certain substances disappear and certain other substances take their places. it may be supposed, as a suggestive hypothesis, that the lowering of stellar temperature is accompanied by the formation, from simpler forms of matter, of such elements as iron, calcium, manganese, and other metals. in the year 1896, the french chemist becquerel discovered the fact that salts of the metal uranium, the atomic weight of which is 240, and is greater than that of any other element, emit rays which cause electrified bodies to lose their electric charges, and act on photographic plates that are wrapped in sheets of black paper, or in thin sheets of other substances which stop rays of light. the _radio-activity_ of salts of uranium was proved not to be increased or diminished when these salts had been shielded for five years from the action of light by keeping them in leaden boxes. shortly after becquerel's discovery, experiments proved that salts of the rare metal thorium are radio-active. this discovery was followed by madame curie's demonstration of the fact that certain specimens of _pitchblende_, a mineral which contains compounds of uranium and of many other metals, are extremely radio-active, and by the separation from pitchblende, by monsieur and madame curie, of new substances much more radio-active than compounds of uranium or of thorium. the new substances were proved to be compounds chemically very similar to salts of barium. their compositions were determined on the supposition that they were salts of an unknown metal closely allied to barium. because of the great radio-activity of the compounds, the hypothetical metal of them was named _radium_. at a later time, radium was isolated by madame curie. it is described by her as a white, hard, metal-like solid, which reacts with water at the ordinary temperature, as barium does. since the discovery of radium compounds, many radio-active substances have been isolated. only exceedingly minute quantities of any of them have been obtained. the quantities of substances used in experiments on radio-activity are so small that they escape the ordinary methods of measurement, and are scarcely amenable to the ordinary processes of the chemical laboratory. fortunately, radio-activity can be detected and measured by electrical methods of extraordinary fineness, methods the delicacy of which very much more exceeds that of spectroscopic methods than the sensitiveness of these surpasses that of ordinary chemical analysis. at the time of the discovery of radio-activity, about seventy-five substances were called elements; in other words, about seventy-five different substances were known to chemists, none of which had been separated into unlike parts, none of which had been made by the coalescence of unlike substances. compounds of only two of these substances, uranium and thorium, are radio-active. radio-activity is a very remarkable phenomenon. so far as we know at present, radio-activity is not a property of the substances which form almost the whole of the rocks, the waters, and the atmosphere of the earth; it is not a property of the materials which constitute living organisms. it is a property of some thirty substances--of course, the number may be increased--a few of which are found widely distributed in rocks and waters, but none of which is found anywhere except in extraordinarily minute quantity. radium is the most abundant of these substances; but only a very few grains of radium chloride can be obtained from a couple of tons of pitchblende. in chapter x. of _the story of the chemical elements_ i have given a short account of the outstanding phenomena of radio-activity; for the present purpose it will suffice to state a few facts of fundamental importance. radio-active substances are stores of energy, some of which is constantly escaping from them; they are constantly changing without external compulsion, and are constantly radiating energy: all explosives are storehouses of energy which, or part of which, can be obtained from them; but the liberation of their energy must be started by some kind of external shock. when an explosive substance has exploded, its existence as an explosive is finished; the products of the explosion are substances from which energy cannot be obtained: when a radio-active substance has exploded, it explodes again, and again, and again; a time comes, sooner or later, when it has changed into substances that are useless as sources of energy. the disintegration of an explosive, started by an external force, is generally completed in a fraction of a second; change of condition changes the rate of explosion: the "half-life period" of each radio-active substance is a constant characteristic of it; if a gram of radium were kept for about 1800 years, half of it would have changed into radio-inactive substances. conditions may be arranged so that an explosive remains unchanged--wet gun-cotton is not exploded by a shock which would start the explosion of dry gun-cotton--in other words, the explosion of an explosive can be regulated: the explosive changes of a radio-active substance, which are accompanied by the radiation of energy, cannot be regulated; they proceed spontaneously in a regular and definable manner which is not influenced by any external conditions--such as great change of temperature, presence or absence of other substances--so far as these conditions have been made the subject of experiment: the amount of activity of a radio-active substance has not been increased or diminished by any process to which the substance has been subjected. explosives are manufactured articles; explosiveness is a property of certain arrangements of certain quantities of certain elements: so far as experiments have gone, it has not been found possible to add the property of radio-activity to an inactive substance, or to remove the property of radio-activity from an active substance; the cessation of the radio-activity of an active substance is accompanied by the disappearance of the substance, and the production of inactive bodies altogether unlike the original active body. radio-active substances are constantly giving off energy in the form of heat, sending forth _rays_ which have definite and remarkable properties, and producing gaseous _emanations_ which are very unstable, and change, some very rapidly, some less rapidly, into other substances, and emit _rays_ which are generally the same as the rays emitted by the parent substance. in briefly considering these three phenomena, i shall choose radium compounds as representative of the class of radio-active substances. radium compounds spontaneously give off energy in the form of heat. a quantity of radium chloride which contains 1 gram of radium continuously gives out, per hour, a quantity of heat sufficient to raise the temperature of 1 gram of water through 100° c., or 100 grams of water through 1° c. the heat given out by 1 gram of radium during twenty-four hours would raise the temperature of 2400 grams of water through 1° c.; in one year the temperature of 876,000 grams of water would be raised through 1° c.; and in 1800 years, which is approximately the half-life period of radium, the temperature of 1,576,800 _kilograms_ of water would be raised through 1° c. these results may be expressed by saying that if 1 gram (about 15 grains) of radium were kept until half of it had changed into inactive substances, and if the heat spontaneously produced during the changes which occurred were caused to act on water, that quantity of heat would raise the temperature of about 15½ tons of water from its freezingto its boiling-point. radium compounds send forth three kinds of rays, distinguished as _alpha_, _beta_, and _gamma_ rays. experiments have made it extremely probable that the [alpha]-rays are streams of very minute particles, somewhat heavier than atoms of hydrogen, moving at the rate of about 18,000 miles per second; and that the [beta]-rays are streams of much more minute particles, the mass of each of which is about one one-thousandth of the mass of an atom of hydrogen, moving about ten times more rapidly than the [alpha]-particles, that is, moving at the rate of about 180,000 miles per second. the [gamma]-rays are probably pulsations of the ether, the medium supposed to fill space. the emission of [alpha]-rays by radium is accompanied by the production of the inert elementary gas, helium; therefore, the [alpha]-rays are, or quickly change into, rapidly moving particles of helium. the particles which constitute the [beta]-rays carry electric charges; these electrified particles, each approximately a thousand times lighter than an atom of hydrogen, moving nearly as rapidly as the pulsations of the ether which we call light, are named _electrons_. the rays from radium compounds discharge electrified bodies, ionise gases, that is, cause them to conduct electricity, act on photographic plates, and produce profound changes in living organisms. the radium emanation is a gas about 111 times heavier than hydrogen; to this gas sir william ramsay has given the name _niton_. the gas has been condensed to a colourless liquid, and frozen to an opaque solid which glows like a minute arc-light. radium emanation gives off [alpha]-particles, that is, very rapidly moving atoms of helium, and deposits exceedingly minute quantities of a solid, radio-active substance known as radium a. the change of the emanation into helium and radium a proceeds fairly rapidly: the half-life period of the emanation is a little less than four days. this change is attended by the liberation of much energy. the only satisfactory mental picture which the facts allow us to form, at present, of the emission of [beta]-rays from radium compounds is that which represents these rays as streams of electrons, that is, particles, each about a thousand times lighter than an atom of hydrogen, each carrying an electric charge, and moving at the rate of about 180,000 miles per second, that is, nearly as rapidly as light. when an electric discharge is passed from a plate of metal, arranged as the kathode, to a metallic wire arranged as the anode, both sealed through the walls of a glass tube or bulb from which almost the whole of the air has been extracted, rays proceed from the kathode, in a direction at right angles thereto, and, striking the glass in the neighbourhood of the anode, produce a green phosphorescence. facts have been gradually accumulated which force us to think of these _kathode rays_ as streams of very rapidly moving electrons, that is, as streams of extraordinarily minute electrically charged particles identical with the particles which form the [beta]-rays emitted by compounds of radium. the phenomena of radio-activity, and also the phenomena of the kathode rays, have obliged us to refine our machinery of minute particles by including therein particles at least a thousand times lighter than atoms of hydrogen. the term _electron_ was suggested, a good many years ago, by dr johnstone stoney, for the unit charge of electricity which is carried by an atom of hydrogen when hydrogen atoms move in a liquid or gas under the directing influence of the electric current. some chemists speak of the electrons, which are the [beta]-rays from radium, and the kathode rays produced in almost vacuous tubes, as non-material particles of electricity. non-material means devoid of mass. the method by which approximate determinations have been made of the charges on electrons consists in measuring the ratio between the charges and the masses of these particles. if the results of the determinations are accepted, electrons are not devoid of mass. electrons must be thought of as material particles differing from other minute material particles in the extraordinary smallness of their masses, in the identity of their properties, including their mass, in their always carrying electric charges, and in the vast velocity of their motion. we must think of an electron either as a unit charge of electricity one property of which is its minute mass, or as a material particle having an extremely small mass and carrying a unit charge of electricity: the two mental pictures are almost, if not quite, identical. electrons are produced by sending an electric discharge through a glass bulb containing a minute quantity of air or other gas, using metallic plates or wires as kathode and anode. experiments have shown that the electrons are identical in all their properties, whatever metal is used to form the kathode and anode, and of whatever gas there is a minute quantity in the bulb. the conclusion must be drawn that identical electrons are constituents of, or are produced from, very different kinds of chemical elements. as the facts about kathode rays, and the facts of radio-activity are (at present) inexplicable except on the supposition that these phenomena are exhibited by particles of extraordinary minuteness, and as the smallest particles with which chemists are concerned in their everyday work are the atoms of the elements, we seem obliged to think of many kinds of atoms as structures, not as homogeneous bodies. we seem obliged to think of atoms as very minute material particles, which either normally are, or under definite conditions may be, associated with electrically charged particles very much lighter than themselves, all of which are identical, whatever be the atoms with which they are associated or from which they are produced. in their study of different kinds of matter, chemists have found it very helpful to place in one class those substances which they have not been able to separate into unlike parts. they have distinguished this class of substances from other substances, and have named them _elements_. the expression _chemical elements_ is merely a summary of certain observed facts. for many centuries chemists have worked with a conceptual machinery based on the notion that matter has a grained structure. for more than a hundred years they have been accustomed to think of atoms as the ultimate particles with which they have had to deal. working with this order-producing instrument, they have regarded the properties of elements as properties of the atoms, or of groups of a few of the atoms, of these substances. that they might think clearly and suggestively about the properties of elements, and connect these with other chemical facts, they have translated the language of sense-perceptions into the language of thought, and, for _properties of those substances which have not been decomposed_, have used the more fertile expression _atomic properties_. when a chemist thinks of an atom, he thinks of the minutest particle of one of the substances which have the class-mark _have-not-been-decomposed_, and the class-name _element_. the chemist does not call these substances elements because he has been forced to regard the minute particles of them as undivided, much less because he thinks of these particles as indivisible; his mental picture of their structure as an atomic structure formed itself from the fact that they had not been decomposed. the formation of the class _element_ followed necessarily from observed facts, and has been justified by the usefulness of it as an instrument for forwarding accurate knowledge. the conception of the elementary atom as a particle which had not been decomposed followed from many observed facts besides those concerning elements, and has been justified by the usefulness of it as an instrument for forwarding accurate knowledge. investigations proved radio-activity to be a property of the very minute particles of certain substances, and each radio-active substance to have characteristic properties, among which were certain of those that belong to elements, and to some extent are characteristic of elements. evidently, the simplest way for a chemist to think about radio-activity was to think of it as an atomic property; hence, as atomic properties had always been regarded, in the last analysis, as properties of elements, it was natural to place the radio-active substances in the class _elements_, provided that one forgot for the time that these substances have not the class-mark _have-not-been-decomposed_. as the facts of radio-activity led to the conclusion that some of the minute particles of radio-active substances are constantly disintegrating, and as these substances had been labelled _elements_, it seemed probable, or at least possible, that the other bodies which chemists have long called elements are not true elements, but are merely more stable collocations of particles than the substances which are classed as compounds. as compounds can be changed into certain other compounds, although not into any other compounds, a way seemed to be opening which might lead to the transformation of some elements into some other elements. the probability that one element might be changed into another was increased by the demonstration of the connexions between uranium and radium. the metal uranium has been classed with the elements since it was isolated in 1840. in 1896, becquerel found that compounds of uranium, and also the metal itself, are radio-active. in the light of what is now known about radio-activity, it is necessary to suppose that some of the minute particles of uranium emit particles lighter than themselves, and change into some substance, or substances, different from uranium; in other words, it is necessary to suppose that some particles of uranium are spontaneously disintegrating. this supposition is confirmed by the fact, experimentally proved, that uranium emits [alpha]-rays, that is, atoms of helium, and produces a substance known as uranium x. uranium x is itself radio-active; it emits [beta]-rays, that is, it gives off electrons. inasmuch as all minerals which contain compounds of uranium contain compounds of radium also, it is probable that radium is one of the disintegration-products of uranium. the rate of decay of radium may be roughly expressed by saying that, if a quantity of radium were kept for ten thousand years, only about one per cent. of the original quantity would then remain unchanged. even if it were assumed that at a remote time the earth's crust contained considerable quantities of radium compounds, it is certain that they would have completely disappeared long ago, had not compounds of radium been reproduced from other materials. again, the most likely hypothesis is that compounds of radium are being produced from compounds of uranium. uranium is a substance which, after being rightly classed with the elements for more than half a century, because it had not been separated into unlike parts, must now be classed with the radium-like substances which disintegrate spontaneously, although it differs from other radio-active substances in that its rate of change is almost infinitively slower than that of any of them, except thorium.[12] thorium, a very rare metal, is the second of the seventy-five or eighty elements known when radio-activity was discovered, which has been found to undergo spontaneous disintegration with the emission of rays. the rate of change of thorium is considerably slower than that of uranium.[13] none of the other substances placed in the class of elements is radio-active. [12] the life-period of uranium is probably about eight thousand million years. [13] the life-period of thorium is possibly about forty thousand million years. on p. 192 i said, that when the radio-active substances had been labelled _elements_, the facts of radio-activity led some chemists to the conclusion that the other bodies which had for long been called by this class-name, or at any rate some of these bodies, are perhaps not true elements, but are merely more stable collocations of particles than the substances called compounds. it seems to me that this reasoning rests on an unscientific use of the term _element_; it rests on giving to that class-name the meaning, _substances asserted to be undecomposable_. a line of demarcation is drawn between _elements_, meaning thereby forms of matter said to be undecomposable but probably capable of separation into unlike parts, and _true elements_, meaning thereby groups of identical undecomposable particles. if one names the radio-active substances _elements_, one is placing in this class substances which are specially characterised by a property the direct opposite of that the possession of which by other substances was the reason for the formation of the class. to do this may be ingenious; it is certainly not scientific. since the time of lavoisier, since the last decade of the eighteenth century, careful chemists have meant by an element a substance which has not been separated into unlike parts, and they have not meant more than that. the term _element_ has been used by accurate thinkers as a useful class-mark which connotes a property--the property of not having been decomposed--common to all substances placed in the class, and differentiating them from all other substances. whenever chemists have thought of elements as the ultimate kinds of matter with which the physical world is constructed--and they have occasionally so thought and written--they have fallen into quagmires of confusion. of course, the elements may, some day, be separated into unlike parts. the facts of radio-activity certainly suggest some kind of inorganic evolution. whether the elements are decomposed is to be determined by experimental inquiry, remembering always that no number of failures to simplify them will justify the assertion that they cannot be simplified. chemistry neither asserts or denies the decomposability of the elements. at present, we have to recognise the existence of extremely small quantities, widely distributed in rocks and waters, of some thirty substances, the minute particles of which are constantly emitting streams of more minute, identical particles that carry with them very large quantities of energy, all of which thirty substances are characterised, and are differentiated from all other classes of substances wherewith chemistry is concerned, by their spontaneous mutability, and each is characterised by its special rate of change and by the nature of the products of its mutations. we have now to think of the minute particles of two of the seventy-five or eighty substances which until the other day had not been decomposed, and were therefore justly called elements, as very slowly emitting streams of minuter particles and producing characteristic products of their disintegration. and we have to think of some eighty substances as particular kinds of matter, at present properly called elements, because they are characterised, and differentiated from all other substances, by the fact that none of them has been separated into unlike parts. the study of radio-activity has introduced into chemistry and physics a new order of minute particles. dalton made the atom a beacon-light which revealed to chemists paths that led them to wider and more accurate knowledge. avogadro illuminated chemical, and also physical, ways by his conception of the molecule as a stable, although separable, group of atoms with particular properties different from those of the atoms which constituted it. the work of many investigators has made the old paths clearer, and has shown to chemists and physicists ways they had not seen before, by forcing them to think of, and to make use of, a third kind of material particles that are endowed with the extraordinary property of radio-activity. dalton often said: "thou knowest thou canst not cut an atom"; but the fact that he applied the term _atom_ to the small particles of compounds proves that he had escaped the danger of logically defining the atom, the danger of thinking of it as a particle which never can be cut. the molecule of avogadro has always been a decomposable particle. the peculiarity of the new kind of particles, the particles of radio-active bodies, is, not that they can be separated into unlike parts by the action of external forces, but that they are constantly separating of their own accord into unlike parts, and that their spontaneous disintegration is accompanied by the production of energy, the quantity of which is enormous in comparison with the minuteness of the material specks which are the carriers of it. the continued study of the properties of the minute particles of radio-active substances--a new name is needed for those most mutable of material grains--must lead to discoveries of great moment for chemistry and physics. that study has already thrown much light on the phenomena of electric conductivity; it has given us the electron, a particle at least a thousand times lighter than an atom of hydrogen; it has shown us that identical electrons are given off by, or are separated from, different kinds of elementary atoms, under definable conditions; it has revealed unlooked-for sources of energy; it has opened, and begun the elucidation of, a new department of physical science; it has suggested a new way of attacking the old problem of the alchemists, the problem of the transmutation of the elements. the minute particles of two of the substances for many years classed as elements give off electrons; uranium and thorium are radio-active. electrons are produced by sending an electric discharge through very small traces of different gases, using electrodes of different metals. electrons are also produced by exposing various metals to the action of ultra-violet light, and by raising the temperature of various metals to incandescence. electrons are always identical, whatever be their source. three questions suggest themselves. can the atoms of all the elements be caused to give off electrons? are electrons normal constituents of all elementary atoms? are elementary atoms collocations of electrons? these questions are included in the demand--is it possible "to imagine a model which has in it the potentiality of explaining" radio-activity and other allied phenomena, as well as all other chemical and physical properties of elements and compounds? these questions are answerable by experimental investigation, and only by experimental investigation. if experimental inquiry leads to affirmative answers to the questions, we shall have to think of atoms as structures of particles much lighter than themselves; we shall have to think of the atoms of all kinds of substances, however much the substances differ chemically and physically, as collocations of identical particles; we shall have to think of the properties of atoms as conditioned, in our final analysis, by the number and the arrangement of their constitutive electrons. now, if a large probability were established in favour of the view that different atoms are collocations of different numbers of identical particles, or of equal numbers of differently arranged identical particles, we should have a guide which might lead to methods whereby one collocation of particles could be formed from another collocation of the same particles, a guide which might lead to methods whereby one element could be transformed into another element. to attempt "to imagine a model which has in it the potentiality of explaining" radio-activity, the production of kathode rays, and the other chemical and physical properties of elements and compounds, might indeed seem to be a hopeless undertaking. a beginning has been made in the mental construction of such a model by professor sir j.j. thomson. to attempt a description of his reasoning and his results is beyond the scope of this book.[14] [14] the subject is discussed in sir j.j. thomson's _electricity and matter_. the facts that the emanation from radium compounds spontaneously gives off very large quantities of energy, and that the emanation can easily be brought into contact with substances on which it is desired to do work, suggested to sir william ramsay that the transformation of compounds of one element into compounds of another element might possibly be effected by enclosing a solution of a compound along with radium emanation in a sealed tube, and leaving the arrangement to itself. under these conditions, the molecules of the compound would be constantly bombarded by a vast number of electrons shot forth at enormous velocities from the emanation. the notion was that the molecules of the compound would break down under the bombardment, and that the atoms so produced might be knocked into simpler groups of particles--in other words, changed into other atoms--by the terrific, silent shocks of the electrons fired at them incessantly by the disintegrating emanation. sir william ramsay regards his experimental results as establishing a large probability in favour of the assertion that compounds of copper were transformed into compounds of lithium and sodium, and compounds of thorium, of cerium, and of certain other rare metals, into compounds of carbon. the experimental evidence in favour of this statement has not been accepted by chemists as conclusive. a way has, however, been opened which may lead to discoveries of great moment. let us suppose that the transformation of one element into another element or into other elements has been accomplished. let us suppose that the conception of elementary atoms as very stable arrangements of many identical particles, from about a thousand to about a quarter of a million times lighter than the atoms, has been justified by crucial experiments. let us suppose that the conception of the minute grains of radio-active substances as particular but constantly changing arrangements of the same identical particles, stable groups of which are the atoms of the elements, has been firmly established. one result of the establishment of the electronic conception of atomic structure would be an increase of our wonder at the complexity of nature's ways, and an increase of our wonder that it should be possible to substitute a simple, almost rigid, mechanical machinery for the ever-changing flow of experience, and, by the use of that mental mechanism, not only to explain very many phenomena of vast complexity, but also to predict occurrences of similar entanglement and to verify these predictions. the results which have been obtained in the examination of radio-activity, of kathode rays, of spectra at different temperatures, and of phenomena allied to these, bring again into prominence the ancient problem of the structure of what we call matter. is matter fundamentally homogeneous or heterogeneous? chemistry studies the relations between the changes of composition and the changes of properties which happen simultaneously in material systems. the burning fire of wood, coal, or gas; the preparation of food to excite and to satisfy the appetite; the change of minerals into the iron, steel, copper, brass, lead, tin, lighting burning and lubricating oils, dye-stuffs and drugs of commerce; the change of the skins, wool, and hair of animals, and of the seeds and fibres of plants, into clothing for human beings; the manufacture from rags, grass, or wood of a material fitted to receive and to preserve the symbols of human hopes, fears, aspirations, love and hate, pity and aversion; the strange and most delicate processes which, happening without cessation, in plants and animals and men, maintain that balanced equilibrium which we call life; and, when the silver cord is being loosed and the bowl broken at the cistern, the awful changes which herald the approach of death; not only the growing grass in midsummer meadows, not only the coming of autumn "in dyed garments, travelling in the glory of his apparel," but also the opening buds, the pleasant scents, the tender colours which stir our hearts in "the spring time, the only pretty ring time, when birds do sing, ding-a--dong-ding": these, and a thousand other changes have all their aspects which it is the business of the chemist to investigate. confronted with so vast a multitude of never-ceasing changes, and bidden to find order there, if he can--bidden, rather compelled by that imperious command which forces the human mind to seek unity in variety, and, if need be, to create a cosmos from a chaos; no wonder that the early chemists jumped at the notion that there must be, that there is, some _one thing_, some _universal essence_, which binds into an orderly whole the perplexing phenomena of nature, some _water of paradise_ which is for the healing of all disorder, some "well at the world's end," a draught whereof shall bring peace and calm security. the alchemists set forth on the quest. their quest was barren. they made the great mistake of fashioning _the one thing, the essence, the water of paradise_, from their own imaginings of what nature ought to be. in their own likeness they created their goal, and the road to it. if we are to understand nature, they cried, her ways must be simple; therefore, her ways are simple. chemists are people of a humbler heart. their reward has been greater than the alchemists dreamed. by selecting a few instances of material changes, and studying these with painful care, they have gradually elaborated a general conception of all those transformations wherein substances are produced unlike those by the interaction of which they are formed. that general conception is now both widening and becoming more definite. to-day, chemists see a way opening before them which they reasonably hope will lead them to a finer, a more far-reaching, a more suggestive, at once a more complex and a simpler conception of material changes than any of those which have guided them in the past. index air, ancient views regarding, 129. ---views of mayow and rey regarding, 129. alchemical account of changes contrasted with chemical account, 169. ---agent, the, 64. ---allegories, examples of, 41, 97. ---classification, 59. ---doctrine of body, soul, and spirit of things, 48. ---doctrine of transmutation, 47, 74, 123, 170. ---language, 36, 96, 101, 102. ---quest of the one thing, modern form of, 179. ---signs, 105. ---theory, general sketch of, 26. alchemists, character of, according to paracelsus, 25. ---made many discoveries, 87. ---sketches of lives of some, 115. ---their use of fanciful analogies, 31. alchemy, beginnings of, 23. ---change of, to chemistry, 126. ---contrasted with chemistry, 202. ---general remarks on, 123. ---lent itself to imposture, 106. ---object of, 9, 26, 32, 105. ---probable origin of word, 25. ---quotations to illustrate aims and methods of, 11-14. alembic, 92. apparatus and operations of alchemists, 90. art, the sacred, 122. atom, meaning given to word by dalton, 173. atomic theory of greeks, 16. ---additions made to, by dalton, 21. ---as described by lucretius, 19. atomic weight, 174. atoms and electrons, 190, 198. bacon's remarks on alchemy, 95. balsamo, joseph, 110. basil valentine, his description of the three principles, 51. ---his description of the four elements, 49. ---some of his discoveries, 88. becquerel, his discovery of radiation of uranium, 181. body, soul, and spirit of things, alchemical doctrine of, 48. boyle, on calcination, 128. ---on combustion, 141. ---on elements, 161. ---on the "hermetick philosophers," 95. ---on the language of the alchemists, 55. ---on the natural state of bodies, 43. cagliostro, 110. calcination, 129, 132, 135, 140, 142, 151, 155. chaucer's _canon's yeoman's tale_, 107. chemical conception of material changes, 177. chemistry, aim of, 9, 26, 160. ---change from alchemy to, 126. ---methods of, 10. ---probable origin of word, 24. classification, alchemical methods of, 59. colours, lucretius' explanation of differences between, 18. combustion, 141. compounds, chemical conception of, 171. conservation of mass, 164. curie, her discovery of radium, 182. dalton's additions to the greek atomic theory, 21, 172. democritus, his saying about atoms, 15. dephlogisticated air, 147. destruction, thought by alchemists to precede restoration, 65, 127. electrons, 187-189, 197, 198. elements, alchemical, contrasted with chemical, 165; radio-active substances contrasted with, 190-192. ---the alchemical, 49, 54, 60. ---the chemical, 61, 62, 161. ---use of word, by phlogisteans, 133. essence, the alchemical, 32, 35, 49, 58, 72. fire, different meanings of the word, 53. gates, the alchemical, 69. gold, considered by alchemists to be the most perfect metal, 40, 45. greek thinkers, their atomic theory, 15. hermes trismegistus, 37. kathode rays, 188. language of alchemy, 96. ---purposely made misleading, 36. lavoisier on calcination, 153, 155. ---his use of word _element_, 194. ---his use of word _principle_, 163, _note_. ---on object of chemistry, 160. ---on oxygen, 155. ---on systems in science, 163. ---on the principle of acidity, 59, 155. ---on the reactions of metals with acids, 158. ---on the transmutation of water to earth, 152. lockyer, on spectra of elements, 181. lucretius, his theory of nature, 16. magic, characteristics of, 23, 24. material changes, greek theory of, 15. metals, alchemical connexion between, and plants, 34. ---compared by alchemists with vegetables, 33. ---mortification of, 65. ---seed of, 34. ---their desire to become gold, 40. ---transmutation of, 33, 39, 46. natural state of bodies, 39, 43. oxygen, 144, 145. paracelsus, his description of alchemists, 25. ---his distinction between natural and artificial mortification, 65. ---sketch of life of, 117. pelican, 92. perfection, alchemical teaching regarding, 27, 40. phlogistic theory, 133, 139. phlogiston, 126, 130, 137. priestley, his discovery of oxygen, 144. principles, the alchemical, 49, 51, 54, 60, 133. ---lavoisier's use of the word, 163, _note_. radio-active substances, are they elements? 191, 194, 195; properties of, 185-187. radio-activity, characteristics of, 183, 184; of radium, 186; of thorium, 193; of uranium, 193. radium, emanation of, 187; heat from, 186; rays from, 186. ramsay, on transmutation of elements, 199. regimens, the alchemical, 72. sacred art, the, 122. scientific theories, general characters of, 21, 150. seed, alchemical doctrine of, 56. seeds of metals, 34. simplicity, asserted by alchemists to be the mark of nature, 28, 38. ---is not necessarily the mark of verity, 138. solids, liquids, and gases, atomic explanation of, 19. stahl, his phlogistic theory, 130. stone, the philosopher's, 32, 35, 49, 58, 72. thorium, radio-activity of, 183, 193. transmutation, alchemical doctrine of, 47, 74, 123. ---character of him who would attempt, 63. ---of metals, 33, 39, 46, 74. ---of metals into gold, alchemical account of, 75. ---of water to earth, 151. transmutations, apparent examples of, 82. uranium, radio-activity of, 183, 192; relation of, to radium, 192, 193. vegetables compared with metals by alchemists, 33. water contains hydrogen and oxygen, examination of this phrase, 167. water, different meanings of the word, 53, 167. (this file was produced from images generously made available by the internet archive/million book project). researches on cellulose 1895-1900 by cross & bevan (c. f. cross and e. j. bevan) _second edition_ longmans, green, and co. 39 paternoster row, london new york, bombay, and calcutta 1907 all rights reserved * * * * * transcriber's note: for text: a word surrounded by a cedilla such as ~this~ signifies that the word is bolded in the text. a word surrounded by underscores like _this_ signifies the word is italics in the text. the italic and bold markup for single italized letters (such as variables in equations) and "foreign" abbreviations are deleted for easier reading. for numbers and equations: parentheses have been added to clarify fractions. underscores before bracketed numbers in equations denote a subscript. superscripts are designated with a caret and brackets, e.g. 11.1^{3} is 11.1 to the third power. greek letters in equations are translated to their english version. the sections in the table of contents are not used in the actual text. they have been added for clarity. minor typos have been corrected and footnotes moved to the end of the sections * * * * * preface to second edition this edition is a _reprint_ of the first in response to a continuous demand for the book. the matter, consisting as it does largely of records, does not call for any revision, and, as a contribution to the development of theory, any particular interest which it has is associated with the date at which it was written. the volume which has since appeared is the sequel, and aims at an exposition of the subject "to date". preface this volume, which is intended as a supplement to the work which we published in 1895, gives a brief account of researches which have been subsequently published, as well as of certain of our own investigations, the results of which are now for the first time recorded. we have not attempted to give the subject-matter the form of a connected record. the contributions to the study of 'cellulose' which are noticed are spread over a large area, are mostly 'sectional' in their aim, and the only cohesion which we can give them is that of classifying them according to the plan of our original work. their subject-matter is reproduced in the form of a _précis_, as much condensed as possible; of the more important papers the original title is given. in all cases we have endeavoured to reproduce the author's main conclusions, and in most cases without comment or criticism. specialists will note that the basis of investigation is still in a great measure empirical; and of this the most obvious criterion is the confusion attaching to the use of the very word 'cellulose.' this is due to various causes, one of which is the curious specialisation of the term in germany as the equivalent of 'wood cellulose.' the restriction of this general or group term has had an influence even in scientific circles. another influence preventing the recognition of the obvious and, as we think, inevitable basis of classification of the 'celluloses' is the empiricism of the methods of agricultural chemistry, which as regards cellulose are so far chiefly concerned with its negative characteristics and the analytical determination of the indigestible residue of fodder plants. physiologists, again, have their own views and methods in dealing with cellulose, and have hitherto had but little regard to the work of the chemist in differentiating and classifying the celluloses on a systematic basis. there are many sides to the subject, and it is only by a sustained effort towards centralisation that the general recognition of a systematic basis can be secured. we may, we hope usefully, direct attention to the conspicuous neglect of the subject in this country. to the matter of the present volume, excluding our own investigations, there are but two contributions from english laboratories. we invite the younger generation of students of chemistry to measure the probability of finding a working career in connection with the cellulose industries. they will not find this invitation in the treatment accorded to the subject in text-books and lectures. it is probable, indeed, that the impression produced by their studies is that the industries in coal-tar products largely exceed in importance those of which the carbohydrates are the basis; whereas the former are quite insignificant by comparison. a little reflection will prove that cellulose, starch, and sugar are of vast industrial moment in the order in which they are mentioned. if it is an open question to what extent science follows industry, or _vice versa_, it is not open to doubt that scientific men, and especially chemists, are called in these days to lead and follow where industrial evolution is most active. there is ample evidence of activity and great expansion in the cellulose industries, especially in those which involve the chemistry of the raw material; and the present volume should serve to show that there is rapid advance in the science of the subject. hence our appeal to the workers not to neglect those opportunities which belong to the days of small beginnings. we have especially to acknowledge the services of mr. j. f. briggs in investigations which are recorded on pp. 34-40 and pp. 125-133 of the text. contents the matter of this volume may be divided into the following sections page introduction--dealing with the subject in general outline 1 section i. general chemistry of the typical cotton cellulose 13 ii. synthetical derivatives--sulphocarbonates and esters 27 iii. decompositions of cellulose such as throw light on the problem of its constitution 67 iv. cellulose group, including hemicelluloses and tissue constituents of fungi 97 v. furfuroids, i.e. pentosanes and furfural-yielding constituents generally 114 vi. the lignocelluloses 125 vii. pectic group 152 viii. industrial and technical. general review 155 index of authors 177 index of subjects 178 cellulose introduction in the period 1895-1900, which has elapsed since the original publication of our work on 'cellulose,' there have appeared a large number of publications dealing with special points in the chemistry of cellulose. so large has been the contribution of matter that it has been considered opportune to pass it under review; and the present volume, taking the form of a supplement to the original work, is designed to incorporate this new matter and bring the subject as a whole to the level to which it is thereby to be raised. some of our critics in reviewing the original work have pronounced it 'inchoate.' for this there are some explanations inherent in the matter itself. it must be remembered that every special province of the science has its systematic beginning, and in that stage of evolution makes a temporary 'law unto itself.' in the absence of a dominating theory or generalisation which, when adopted, gives it an organic connection with the general advance of the science, there is no other course than to classify the subject-matter. thus 'the carbohydrates' may be said to have been in the inchoate condition, qualified by a certain classification, prior to the pioneering investigations of fischer. in attacking the already accumulated and so far classified material from the point of view of a dominating theory, he found not only that the material fell into systematic order and grew rapidly under the stimulus of fruitful investigation, but in turn contributed to the firmer establishment of the theoretical views to which the subject owed its systematic new birth. on the other hand, every chemist knows that it is only the simpler of the carbohydrates which are so individualised as to be connoted by a particular formula in the stereoisomeric system. leaving the monoses, there is even a doubt as to the constitution of cane sugar; and the elements of uncertainty thicken as we approach the question of the chemical structure of starch. this unique product of plant life has a literature of its own, and how little of this is fully known to what we may term the 'average chemist' is seen by the methods he will employ for its quantitative estimation. in one particular review of our work where we are taken to task for producing 'an aggravating book, inchoate in the highest degree ... disfigured by an obscurity of diction which must materially diminish its usefulness' ['nature,' 1897, p. 241], the author, who is a well-known and competent critic, makes use of the short expression in regard to the more complex carbohydrates, 'above cane sugar, higher in the series, all is chaos,' and in reference to starch, 'the subject is still enshrouded in mystery.' this 'material' complexity is at its maximum with the most complex members of the series, which are the celluloses, and we think accounts in part for the impatience of our critic. 'obscurity of diction' is a personal quantity, and we must leave that criticism to the fates. we find also that many workers whose publications we notice in this present volume quite ignore the _plan_ of the work, though they make use of its matter. we think it necessary to restate this plan, which, we are satisfied, is systematic, and, in fact, inevitable. cellulose is in the first instance a _structure_, and the anatomical relationships supply a certain basis of classification. next, it is known to us and is defined by the negative characteristics of resistance to hydrolytic actions and oxidations. these are dealt with in the order of their intensity. next we have the more positive definition by ultimate products of hydrolysis, so far as they are known, which discloses more particularly the presence of a greater or less proportion of furfural-yielding groups. putting all these together as criteria of function and composition we find they supply common or general dividing lines, within which groups of these products are contained. the classification is natural, and in that sense inevitable; and it not only groups the physiological and chemical facts, but the industrial also. we do not propose to argue the question whether the latter adds any cogency to a scientific scheme. we are satisfied that it does, and we do not find any necessity to exclude a particular set of phenomena from consideration, because they involve 'commercial' factors. we have dealt with this classification in the original work (p. 78), and we discuss its essential basis in the present volume (p. 28) in connection with the definition of a 'normal' cellulose. but the 'normal' cellulose is not the only cellulose, any more than a primary alcohol or an aliphatic alcohol are the only alcohols. this point is confused or ignored in several of the recent contributions of investigators. it will suffice to cite one of these in illustration. on p. 16 we give an account of an investigation of the several methods of estimating cellulose, which is full of valuable and interesting matter. the purpose of the author's elaborate comparative study is to decide which has the strongest claims to be regarded as the 'standard' method. they appear to have a preference for the method of lange--viz. that of heating at high temperatures (180°) with alkaline hydrates, but the investigation shows that (as we had definitely stated in our original work, p. 214) this is subject to large and variable errors. the adverse judgment of the authors, we may point out, is entirely determined on the question of aggregate weight or yield, and without reference to the ultimate composition or constitution of the final product. none of the available criteria are applied to the product to determine whether it is a cellulose (anhydride) or a hydrate or a hydrolysed product. after these alkali-fusion processes the method of chlorination is experimentally reviewed and dismissed for the reason that the product retains furfural-yielding groups, which is, from our point of view, a particular recommendation, i.e. is evidence of the selective action of the chlorine and subsequent hydrolysis upon the lignone group. as a matter of fact it is the only method yet available for isolating the cellulose from a lignocellulose by a treatment which is quantitatively to be accounted for in every detail of the reactions. it does not yield a 'normal' cellulose, and this is the expression which, in our opinion, the authors should have used. it should have been pointed out, moreover, that, as the cellulose is separated from actual condensed combination with the lignone groups, it may be expected to be obtained in a hydrated form, and also not as a homogeneous substance like the normal cotton cellulose. the product is a cellulose of the second group of the classification. another point in this investigation which we must criticise is the ultimate selection of the schulze method of prolonged maceration with nitric acid and a chlorate, followed by suitable hydrolysis of the non-cellulose derivatives to soluble products. apart from its exceptional inconvenience, rendering it quite impracticable in laboratories which are concerned with the valuation of cellulosic raw materials for industrial purposes, the attack of the reagent is complex and ill-defined. this criticism we would make general by pointing out that such processes quite ignore the specific characteristics of the non-cellulose components of the compound celluloses. the second division of the plan of our work was to define these constituents by bringing together all that had been established concerning them. these groups are widely divergent in chemical character, as are the compound celluloses in function in the plant. consequently there is for each a special method of attack, and it is a reversion to pure empiricism to expect any one treatment to act equally on the pectocelluloses, lignocelluloses, and cutocelluloses. processes of isolating cellulose are really more strictly defined as methods of selective and regulated attack of the groups with which they occur, combined or mixed. a chemist familiar with such types as rhea or ramie (pectocellulose), jute (lignocellulose), and raffia (cutocellulose) knows exactly the specific treatment to apply to each for isolating the cellulose, and must view with some surprise the appearance at this date of such 'universal prescriptions' as the process in question. the third division of our plan of arrangement comprised the synthetical derivatives of the celluloses, the sulphocarbonates first, as peculiarly characteristic, and then the esters, chiefly the acetates, benzoates, and nitrates. to these, investigators appear to have devoted but little attention, and the contribution of new matter in the present volume is mainly the result of our own researches. it will appear from this work that an exhaustive study of the cellulose esters promises to assist very definitely in the study of constitutional problems. this brings us to the fourth and, to the theoretical chemist, the most important aspect of the subject, the problem of the actual molecular structure of the celluloses and compound celluloses. it is herein we are of opinion that the subject makes a 'law unto itself.' if the constitution of starch is shrouded in mystery and can only be vaguely expressed by generalising a complex mass of statistics of its successive hydrolyses, we can only still more vaguely guess at the distance which separates us from a mental picture of the cellulose unit. we endeavour to show by our later investigations that this problem merges into that of the actual structure of cellulose in the mass. it is definitely ascertained that a change in the molecule, or reacting unit, of a cellulose, proportionately affects the structural properties of the derived compounds, both sulphocarbonates and esters. this is at least an indication that the properties of the visible aggregates are directly related to the actual configuration of the chemical units. but it appears that we are barred from the present discussion of such a problem in absence of any theory of the solid state generally, but more particularly of those forms of matter which are grouped together as 'colloids.' cellulose is distinguished by its inherent constructive functions, and these functions take effect in the plastic or colloidal condition of the substance. these properties are equally conspicuous in the synthetical derivatives of the compound. without reference, therefore, to further speculations, and not deterred by any apparent hopelessness of solving so large a problem, it is clear that we have to exhaust this field by exact measurements of all the constants which can be reduced to numerical expression. it is most likely that the issue may conflict with some of our current views of the molecular state which are largely drawn from a study of the relatively dissociated forms of matter. but such conflicts are only those of enlargement, and we anticipate that all chemists look for an enlargement of the molecular horizon precisely in those regions where the forces of cell-life manifest themselves. the _cellulose group_ has been further differentiated by later investigations. the fibrous celluloses of which the typical members receive important industrial applications, graduate by insensible stages into the hemicelluloses which may be regarded as a well-established sub-group. in considering their morphological and functional relationships it is evident that the graduation accords with their structure and the less permanent functions which they fulfil. they are aggregates of monoses of the various types, chiefly mannose, galactose, dextrose, &c., so far as they have been investigated. closely connected with this group are the constituents of the tissues of fungi. the recent researches of winterstein and gilson, which are noted in this present volume, have established definitely that they contain a nitrogenous group in intimate combination with a carbohydrate complex. this group is closely related to chitin, yielding glucosamin and acetic acid as products of ultimate hydrolysis. special interest attaches to these residues, as they are in a sense intermediate products between the great groups of the carbohydrates and proteids (e. fischer, ber. 19, 1920), and their further investigation by physiological methods may be expected to disclose a genetic connection. the _lignocelluloses_ have been further investigated. certain new types have been added, notably a soluble or 'pectic' form isolated from the juice of the white currant (p. 152), and the pith-like wood of the æschynomene (p. 135). further researches on the typical fibrous lignocellulose have given us a basis for correcting some of the conclusions recorded in our original work, and a study of the esters has thrown some light on the constitution of the complex (p. 130). of importance also is the identification of the hydroxyfurfurals as constituents of the lignocelluloses generally, and the proof that the characteristic colour-reactions with phenols (phloroglucinol) may be ascribed to the presence of these compounds (p. 116). the _pectocelluloses_ have not been the subject of systematic chemical investigation, but the researches of gilson ('la cristallisation de la cellulose et la composition chimique de la membrane cellulaire végétale,' 'la revue,' 'la cellule,' i. ix.) are an important contribution to the natural history of cellulose, especially in relation to the 'pectic' constituents of the parenchymatous celluloses. indirectly also the researches of tollens on the 'pectins' have contributed to the subject in correcting some of the views which have had a text-book currency for a long period. these are dealt with on p. 151. the results establish that the pectins are rather the soluble hydrated form of cellulosic aggregates in which acid groups may be represented; but such groups are not to be regarded as essentially characteristic of this class of compounds. ~furfural-yielding substances~ (furfuroids).--this group of plant products has been, by later investigations, more definitely and exclusively connected with the celluloses--i.e. with the more permanent of plant tissues. from the characteristic property of yielding furfural, which they have in common with the pentoses, they have been assumed to be the anhydrides of these c_{5} sugars or pentosanes; but the direct evidence for this assumption has been shown to be wanting. in regard to their origin the indirect evidences which have accumulated all point to their formation in the plant from hexoses. of special interest, in its bearings on this point, is the direct transformation of levulose into furfural derivatives, which takes place under the action of condensing agents. the most characteristic is that produced by the action of anhydrous hydrobromic acid in presence of ether [fenton], yielding a brommethyl furfural c_{6}h_{12}o_{6} 4h_{2}o + hbr = c_{5}h_{3}.o_{2}.ch_{2}br with a br atom in the methyl group. these researches of fenton's appear to us to have the most obvious and direct bearings upon the genetic relationships of the plant furfuroids and not only _per se_. to give them their full significance we must recall the later researches of brown and morris, which establish that cane sugar is a primary or direct product of assimilation, and that starch, which had been assumed to be a species of universal _matière première_, is probably rather a general reserve for the elaborating work of the plant. if now the aldose groups tend to pass over into the starch form, representing a temporary overflow product of the assimilating energy, it would appear that the ketose or levulose groups are preferentially used up in the elaboration of the permanent tissue. we must also take into consideration the researches of lobry de bruyn showing the labile functions of the typical co group in both aldoses and hexoses, whence we may conclude that in the plant-cell the transition from dextrose to levulose is a very simple and often occurring process. we ourselves have contributed a link in this chain of evidence connecting the furfuroids of the plant with levulose or other keto-hexose. we have shown that the hydroxyfurfurals are constituents of the lignocelluloses. the proportion present in the free state is small, and it is not difficult to show that they are products of breakdown of the lignone groups. if we assume that such groups are derived ultimately from levulose, we have to account for the detachment of the methyl group. this, however, is not difficult, and we need only call to mind that the lignocelluloses are characterised by the presence of methoxy groups and a residue which is directly and easily hydrolysed to acetic acid. moreover, the condensation need not be assumed to be a simple dehydration with attendant rearrangement; it may very well be accompanied or preceded by fixation of oxygen. leaving out the hypothetical discussion of minor variations, there is a marked convergence of the evidence as to the main facts which establish the general relationships of the furfuroid group. this group includes both saturated and unsaturated or condensed compounds. the former are constituents of celluloses, the latter of the lignone complex of the lignocelluloses. the actual production of furfural by boiling with condensing acids is a quantitative measure of only a portion, i.e. certain members of the group. the hydroxyfurfurals, not being volatile, are not measured in this way. by secondary reactions they may yield some furfural, but as they are highly reactive compounds, and most readily condensed, they are for the most part converted into complex 'tarry' products. hence we have no means, as yet, of estimating those tissue constituents which yield hydroxyfurfurals; also we have no measure of the furfurane-rings existing performed in such a condensed complex as lignone. but, chemists having added in the last few years a large number of facts and well-defined probabilities, it is clear that the further investigation of the furfuroid group will take its stand upon a much more adequate basis than heretofore. on the view of 'furfural-yielding' being co-extensive with 'pentose or pentosane,' not only were a number of important facts obscured or misinterpreted, but there was a barrenness of suggestion of genetic relationships. as the group has been widened very much beyond these limits, it is clear that if any group term or designation is to be retained that of 'furfuroid' is 'neutral' in character, and equally applicable to saturated substances of such widely divergent chemical character as pentoses, hexosones, glycuronic acid, and perhaps, most important of all, levulose itself, all of which are susceptible of condensation to furfural or furfurane derivatives, as well as to those unsaturated compounds, constituents of plant tissues which are already furfurane derivatives. from the chemical point of view such terms are perhaps superfluous. but physiological relationships have a significance of their own; and there is a physiological or functional cohesion marking this group which calls for recognition, at least for the time, and we therefore propose to retain the term furfuroid.[1] ~general experimental methods.~--in the investigation of the cellulose group it is clear that methods of ultimate hydrolysis are of first importance. none are so convenient as those which are based on the action of sulphuric acid, more or less concentrated (h_{2}so_{4}.3h_{2}o h_{2}so_{4}h_{2}o). such methods have been frequently employed in the investigations noted in this volume. we notice a common deficiency in the interpretation of the results. it appears to be sufficient to isolate and identify a crystalline monose, without reference to the yield or proportion to the parent substance, to establish some main point in connection with its constitution. on the other hand, it is clear that in hydrolysing a given cellulose-complex we ought to aim at complete, i.e. _quantitative, statistics_. the hydrolytic transformation of starch to dextrins and maltose has been followed in this way, and the methods may serve as a model to which cellulose transformations should be approximated. in fact, what is very much wanted is a systematic re-examination of the typical celluloses in which all the constants of the terms between the original and the ultimate monose groups shall be determined. such constants are similar to those for the starch-dextrose series, viz. opticity and cupric reduction. various methods of fractionation are similarly available, chiefly the precipitation of the intermediate 'dextrins' by alcohol. where the original celluloses are homogeneous we should thus obtain transformation series, similarly expressed to those of starch. in the case of the celluloses which are mixtures, or of complex constitution, there are various methods of either fractionating the original, or of selectively attacking particular monoses resulting from the transformation. by methods which are approximately quantitative a mixture of groups, such as we have, for instance, in jute cellulose, could be followed through the several stages of their resolution into monoses. to put the matter generally, in these colloidal and complex carbohydrates the ordinary physical criteria of molecular weight are wanting. therefore, we cannot determine the relationship of a given product of decomposition to the parent molecule save by means of a quantitative mass-proportion. physical criteria are only of determining value when associated with such constants as cupric reduction, and these, again, must be referred to some arbitrary initial weight, such as, for convenience, 100 parts of the original. instead of adopting these methods, without which, as a typical case, the mechanism of starch conversions could not have been followed, we have been content with a purely qualitative study of the analogous series obtainable from the celluloses under the action of sulphuric acid. a very important field of investigation lies open, especially to those who are generally familiar with the methods of studying starch conversions; and we may hope in this direction for a series of valuable contributions to the problem of the actual constitution of the celluloses. footnotes: [1] in this we are confirmed by other writers. see tollens, _j. für landw._ 1901, p. 27. section i. general chemistry of the typical cotton cellulose (p. 3)[2] ~ash constituents.~--it is frequently asserted that silica has a structural function _sui generis_ in the plant skeleton, having a relationship to the cellulosic constituents of the plant, distinct from that of the inorganic ash components with which it is associated. it should be noted that the matter has been specifically investigated in two directions. in berl. ber. 5, 568 (a. ladenburg), and again in 11, 822 (w. lange), appear two papers 'on the nature of plant constituents containing silicon,' which contain the results of experimental investigations of equisetum species--distinguished for their exceptionally high 'ash' with large proportion of silica--to determine whether there are any grounds for assuming the existence of silicon-organic compounds in the plant, the analogues of carbon compounds. the conclusions arrived at are entirely negative. in reference to the second assumption that the cuticular tissues of cereal straws, of esparto, of the bamboo, owe their special properties to siliceous components, it has been shown by direct experiment upon the former that their rigidity and resistance to water are in no way affected by cultivation in a silica-free medium. in other words, the structural peculiarities of the gramineæ in these respects are due to the physical characteristics chiefly of the (lignified) cells of the hypodermal tissue, and to the composition and arrangement of the cells of the cuticle. _'swedish' filter papers_ of modern make are so far freed from inorganic constituents that the weight of the ash may be neglected in nearly all quantitative experiments [fresenius, ztschr. anal chem. 1883, 241]. it represents usually about 1/1000 mgr. per 1 sq. cm. of area of the paper. _the form of an 'ash'_ derived from a fibrous structure, is that of the 'organic' original, more or less, according to its proportion and composition. the proportion of 'natural ash' is seldom large enough, nor are the components of such character as to give a coherent ash, but if in the case of a fibrous structure it is combined or intimately mixed with inorganic compounds deposited within the fibres from solution, the latter may be made to yield a perfect skeleton of the fibre after burning off the organic matter. it is by such means that the mantles used in the welsbach system of incandescent lighting are prepared. a purified cotton fabric--or yarn--is treated with a concentrated solution of the mixed nitrates of thorium and cerium, and, after drying, the cellulose is burned away. a perfect and coherent skeleton of the fabric is obtained, composed of the mixed oxides. such mantles have fulfilled the requirements of the industry up to the present time, but later experiments forecast a notable improvement. it has been found that artificial cellulose fibres can be spun with solutions containing considerable proportions of soluble compounds of these oxides. such fibres, when knitted into mantles and ignited, yield an inorganic skeleton of the oxides of homogeneous structure and smooth contour. de mare in 1894, and knofler in 1895, patented methods of preparing such cellulose threads containing the salts of thorium and cerium, by spinning a collodion containing the latter in solution. when finally ignited, after being brought into the suitable mantle form, there results a structure which proves vastly more durable than the original welsbach mantle. the cause of the superiority is thus set forth by v. h. lewes in a recent publication (j. soc. of arts, 1900, p. 858): 'the alteration in physical structure has a most extraordinary effect upon the light-giving life of the mantle, and also on its strength, as after burning for a few hundred hours the constant bombardment of the mantle by dust particles drawn up by the rush of air in the chimney causes the formation of silicates on the surface of the mantle owing to silica being present in the air, and this seems to affect the welsbach structure far more than it does the "clamond" type, with the result that when burned continuously the welsbach mantle falls to so low a pitch of light emissivity after 500 to 600 hours, as to be a mere shadow of its former self, giving not more than one-third of its original light, whilst the knofler mantle keeps up its light-emitting power to a much greater extent, and the lehner fabric is the most remarkable of all. two lehner mantles which have now been burning continuously in my laboratory for over 3,000 hours give at this moment a brighter light emissivity than most of the welsbachs do in their prime.' ...'the new developments of the clamond process form as important a step in the history of incandescent gas lighting as the discoveries which gave rise to the original mantles.' it has further been found that the oxides themselves can be dissolved in the cellulose alkaline sulphocarbonate (viscose) solution, and artificial threads have been spun containing from 25 to 30 p.ct. of the oxides in homogeneous admixture with the cellulose. this method has obvious advantages over the collodion method both in regard to the molecular relationship of the oxides to the cellulose and to cheapness of production. untersuchungen über verschiedene bestimmungsmethoden der cellulose. h. suringar and b. tollens (ztschr. angew. chem. 1896, no. 23). ~investigation of methods of determining cellulose.~ _introduction._--this is an exhaustive bibliography of the subject, describing also the various methods of cellulose estimation, noted in historical sequence. first, the weende 'crude fibre' method (henneberg) with modifications of wattenberg, holdefleiss, and others is dealt with. the product of this treatment, viz. 'crude fibre' is a mixture, containing furfuroids and lignone compounds. next follows a group of processes which aim at producing a 'pure cellulose' by eliminating lignone constituents, for which the merely hydrolytic treatments of the weende method are ineffectual. the method of f. schulze--prolonged digestion with dilute nitric acid, with addition of chlorate--has been largely employed, though the composition of the product is more or less divergent from a 'pure cellulose.' dilute nitric acid at 60-80° (cross and bevan) and a dilute mixture of nitric and sulphuric acids (lifschutz) have been employed for isolating cellulose from the lignocelluloses. hoffmeister modifies the method of schulze by substituting hydrochloric acid for the nitric acid. treatment with the halogens associated with alkaline processes of hydrolysis is the basis of the methods of hugo muller (bromine water) and cross and bevan (chlorine gas). lastly, the authors notice the methods based upon the action of the alkaline hydrates at high temperatures (180°) in presence of water (lange), or of glycerin (gabriel). the process of heating to 210° with glycerin only (hönig) yields a very impure and ill-defined product. for comparative investigation of these processes certain celluloses and cellulosic materials were prepared as follows: (a) _'rag' cellulose._--a chemical filter paper, containing only cotton and linen celluloses, was further purified by boiling with dilute acid and dilute alkali. after thorough washing it was air-dried. (b) _wood cellulose._--pine wood sawdust was treated by digestion for fourteen days with dilute nitric acid with addition of chlorate (schulze). the mass was washed and digested with alkaline lye (1.25 p.ct. koh), and exhaustively washed, treated with dilute acetic acid; again washed, and finally air-dried. this product was found to yield 2.3 p.ct. furfural on distillation with hcl (1.06 sp.gr.). (c) _purified wood._--pine wood sawdust was treated in succession with dilute alkalis and acids, in the cold, and with alcohol and ether until exhausted of products soluble in these liquids and reagents. in addition to the above the authors have also employed jute fibre and raw cotton wool in their investigations. they note that the yield of cellulose is in many cases sensibly lowered by treating the material after drying at the temperature of 100°. the material for treatment is therefore weighed in the air-dry condition, and a similar sample weighed off for drying at 100° for determination of moisture. the main results of the experimental investigation are as follows:-_weende process_ further attacks the purified celluloses as follows: wood cellulose losing in weight 8-9 p.ct.; filter paper, 6-7.5 p.ct., and the latter treated a second time loses a further 4-5 p.ct. it is clear, therefore, that the process is of purely empirical value. _schulze._--this process gave a yield of 47.6 p.ct. cellulose from pine wood. the celluloses themselves, treated by the process, showed losses of 1-3 p.ct. in weight, much less therefore than in the preceding case. _hönig's_ method of heating with glycerin to 210° was found to yield products very far removed from 'cellulose.' the process may have a certain value in estimations of 'crude fibre,' but is dismissed from further consideration in relation to cellulose. _lange._--the purpose of the investigation was to test the validity of the statement that the celluloses are not attacked by alkaline hydrates at 180°. experiments with pine wood yielded a series of percentages for cellulose varying from 36 to 41; the 'purified wood' gave also variable numbers, 44 to 49 per cent. it was found possible to limit these variations by altering the conditions in the later stages of isolating the product; but further experiments on the celluloses themselves previously isolated by other processes showed that they were profoundly and variably attacked by the 'lange' treatment, wood cellulose losing 50 per cent. of its weight, and filter paper (cellulose) losing 15 per cent. further, a specimen of jute yielded 58 per cent. of cellulose by this method instead of the normal 78 per cent. it was also found that the celluloses isolated by the process, when subjected to a second treatment, underwent a further large conversion into soluble derivatives, and in a third treatment further losses of 5-10 per cent were obtained. the authors attach value, notwithstanding, to the process which they state to yield an 'approximately pure cellulose,' and they describe a modified method embodying the improvements in detail resulting from their investigation. _gabriel's_ method of heating with a glycerin solution of alkaline hydrate is a combination of 'hönig' and 'lange.' an extended investigation showed as in the case of the latter that the celluloses themselves are more or less profoundly attacked by the treatment--further that the celluloses isolated from lignocelluloses and other complex raw materials are much 'less pure' than those obtained by the lange process. thus, notably in regard to furfural yielding constituents, the latter yield 1-2 p.ct. furfural, whereas _specimens of 'jute cellulose'_ obtained by the gabriel process were found to yield _9 to 13 p.ct. furfural_. _cross and bevan._--chlorination process yielded in the hands of the authors results confirming the figures given in 'cellulose' for yield of cellulose. investigation of the products for yield of furfural, gave 9 p.ct. of this aldehyde showing the presence of celluloses, other than the normal type. _conclusions._--the subjoined table gives the mean numerical results for yield of end-product or 'cellulose' by the various methods. in the case of the 'celluloses' the results are those of the further action of the several processes on the end-product of a previous process. | methods | f. schulze | weende | lange | gabriel | cross | | | | | and bevan -------------------------------------------------------------------------wood cellulose | 98.51 | 91.52 | 48.22 | 55.93 | -filter paper cellulose | 99.62 | 95.63 | 78.17 | 79.77 | -swedish filter paper | 96.58 | - | 84.76 | - | -ordinary filter paper | 98.17 | 93.39 | 86.58 | - | -cotton ('wool') | 98.38 | 89.98 | 63.96 | 67.88 | -jute | - | - | 57.93 | 71.64 | 75.27 purified wood | - | - |{49.27 | - | - | | |{46.56 | | raw wood | 47.60 | - |{40.82 | - | - | | |{38.87 | | -------------------------------------------------------------------------the final conclusion drawn from the results is that none of the processes fulfil the requirements of an ideal method. those which may be carried out in a reasonably short time are deficient in two directions: (1) they yield a 'cellulose' containing more or less oxycellulose; (2) the celluloses themselves are attacked under the conditions of treatment, and the end product or cellulose merely represents a particular and at the same time variable equilibrium, as between the resistance of the cellulose and the attack of the reagents employed; this attack being by no means confined to the non-cellulose constituents. schulze's method appears to give the nearest approximation to the 'actual cellulose' of the raw material. * * * * * (p. 8) ~solutions of cellulose~--(1) ~zinc chloride.~--to prepare a homogeneous solution of cellulose by means of the neutral chloride, a prolonged digestion at or about 100° with the concentrated reagent is required. the dissolution of the cellulose is not a simple phenomenon, but is attended with hydrolysis and a certain degree of condensation. the latter result is evidenced by the formation of furfural, the former by the presence of soluble carbohydrates in the solution obtained by diluting the original solution and filtering from the reprecipitated cellulose. the authors have observed that in carefully conducted experiments cotton cellulose may be dissolved in the reagent, and reprecipitated with a loss of only 1 p.ct. in weight. this, however, is a 'net' result, and leaves undetermined the degree of hydration of the recovered cellulose as of hydrolysis of the original to groups of lower molecular weights. bronnert finds that a previous hydration of the cellulose--e.g. by the process of alkaline mercerisation and removal of the alkali by washing--enables the zinc chloride to effect its dissolution by digestion in the cold. (u.s. patent, 646,799/1900. see also p. 59.) _industrial applications._--(a) _vulcanised fibre_ is prepared by treating paper with four times its weight of the concentrated aqueous solution (65-75° b.), and in the resulting gelatinised condition is worked up into masses, blocks, sheets, &c., of any required thickness. the washing of these masses to remove the zinc salt is a very lengthy operation. to render the product waterproof the process of nitration is sometimes superadded [d.r.p. 3181/1878]. further details of manufacture are given in prakt. handbuch d. papierfabrikation, p. 1703 [c. hofmann]. (b) _calico-printing._--the use of the solution as a thickener or colour vehicle, more especially as a substitute for albumen in pigment styles, was patented by e. b. manby, but the process has not been industrially developed [e.p. 10,466/1894]. (c) _artificial silk._--this is a refinement of the earlier applications of the solution in spinning cellulose threads for conversion into carbon filaments for electrical glow-lamps. this section will be found dealt with on p. 59. (p. 13) (2) ~cuprammonium solution.~--the application of the solution of cellulose in cuprammonium to the production of a fine filament in continuous length, 'artificial silk,' has been very considerably studied and developed in the period 1897-1900, as evidenced by the series of patents of fremery and urban, pauly, bronnert, and others. the subject will also be found dealt with on p. 58. * * * * * (p. 15) ~reactions of cellulose with iodine.~--in a recent paper, f. mylius deals with the reaction of starch and cellulose with iodine, pointing out that the blue colouration depends upon the presence of water and iodides. in absence of the latter, and therefore in presence of compounds which destroy or absorb hydriodic acid--e.g. iodic acid--there results a _brown_ addition product. the products in question have the characteristics of _solid solutions_ of the halogen. (berl. ber. 1895, 390.) (24) ~mercerisation~--notwithstanding the enormous recent developments in the industrial application of the mercerising reaction, there have been no noteworthy contributions to the theoretical aspects of the subject. the following abstract gives an outline of the scope of an important technical work on the subject. die mercerisation der baumwolle. paul gardner (berlin: 1898. j. springer). ~the mercerisation of cotton.~ this monograph of some 150 pages is chiefly devoted to the patent literature of the subject. the chemical and physical modifications of the cotton substance under the action of strong alkaline lye, were set forth by mercer in 1844-5, and there has resulted from subsequent investigations but little increase in our knowledge of the fundamental facts. the treatment was industrially developed by mercer in certain directions, chiefly (1) for preparing webs of cloth required to stand considerable strain, and (2) for producing crêpon effects by local or topical action of the alkali. but the results achieved awakened but a transitory interest, and the matter passed into oblivion; so much so, indeed, that a german patent [no. 30,966] was granted in 1884 to the messrs. depouilly for crêpon effects due to the differential shrinkage of fabrics under mercerisation, by processes and treatments long previously described by mercer. such effects have had a considerable vogue in recent years, but it was not until the discovery of the lustreing effect resulting from the association of the mercerising actions with the condition of strain or tension of the yarn or fabric that the industry in 'mercerised' goods was started on the lines which have led to the present colossal development. the merit of this discovery is now generally recognised as belonging to thomas and prevost of crefeld, notwithstanding that priority of patent right belongs to the english technologist, h. a. lowe. the author critically discusses the grounds of the now celebrated patent controversy, arising out of the conflict of the claims of german patent 85,564/1895 of the former, and english patent 4452/1890 of the latter. the author concludes that lowe's specification undoubtedly describes the lustreing effect of mercerising in much more definite terms than that of thomas and prevost. these inventors, on the other hand, realised the effect industrially, which lowe certainly failed to do, as evidenced by his allowing the patent to lapse. as an explanation of his failure, the author suggests that lowe did not sufficiently extend his observations to goods made from egyptian and other long-stapled cottons, in which class only are the full effects of the added lustre obtained. following these original patents are the specifications of a number of inventions which, however, are of insignificant moment so far as introducing any essential variation of the mercerising treatment. the third section of the work describes in detail the various mechanical devices which have been patented for carrying out the treatment on yarn and cloth. the fourth section deals with the fundamental facts underlying the process and effects summed up in the term 'mercerisation.' these are as follows:-(a) although all forms of fibrous celluloses are similarly affected by strong alkaline solutions, it is only the egyptian and other long-stapled cottons--i.e. the goods made from them--which under the treatment acquire the special high lustre which ranks as 'silky.' goods made from american cottons acquire a certain 'finish' and lustre, but the effects are not such as to have an industrial value--i.e. a value proportional to the cost of treatment. (b) the lustre is determined by exposing the goods to strong tension, either when under the action of the alkali, or subsequently, but only when the cellulose is in the special condition of hydration which is the main chemical effect of the mercerising treatment. (c) the degree of tension required is approximately that which opposes the shrinkage in dimensions, otherwise determined by the action of the alkali. the following table exhibits the variations of shrinkage of egyptian when mercerised without tension, under varying conditions as regards the essential factors of the treatment--viz. (1) concentration of the alkaline lye, (2) temperature, and (3) duration of action (the latter being of subordinate moment):- _______________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | concentration | | | | | | of lye (naoh) | 5°b. | 10°b. | 15°b | 25°b | | | | | | | | | | | | | | duration of | | | | | | | | | | | | action in | 1 | 10 | 30 | 1 | 10 | 30 | 1 | 10 | 30 | | | minutes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | temperatures | percentage shrinkages (egyptian yarns) as under:- | | as under:- | | | | | | | | | | | | 2° | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 12.2 | 15.2 | 15.8 | 19.2 | | 18° | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.0 | 8.8 | 11.8 | 19.8 | | 30° | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 6.0 | 19.0 | | 80° | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 9.8 | 13.4 | |_______________|___|____|____|___|____|____|______|______|______|______| _______________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | concentration | | | | | of lye (naoh) | 25°b | 30°b | 35°b | | | | | | | | | | | | duration of | | | | | | | | | | action in | 10 | 30 | 1 | 10 | 30 | 1 | 10 | 30 | | minutes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | temperatures | percentage shrinkages (egyptian yarns) as under:- | | as under:- | | | | | | | | | | 2° | 19.8 | 21.5 | 22.7 | 22.7 | 22.7 | 24.2 | 24.5 | 24.7 | | 18° | 20.1 | 21.0 | 21.2 | 22.0 | 22.3 | 23.5 | 23.8 | 24.7 | | 30° | 19.5 | 19.0 | 18.5 | 19.5 | 19.8 | 20.7 | 21.0 | 21.1 | | 80° | 13.7 | 14.2 | 15.0 | 15.1 | 15.5 | 15.0 | 15.2 | 15.4 | |_______________|______|______|______|______|______|______|______|______| the more important general indications of the above results are--(1) the mercerisation action commences with a lye of 10°b., and increases with increased strength of the lye up to a maximum at 35°b. there is, however, a relatively slight increase of action with the increase of caustic soda from 30-40°b. (2) for optimum action the temperature should not exceed 15-20°c. (3) the duration of action is of proportionately less influence as the concentration of the lye increases. as the maximum effect is attained the action becomes practically instantaneous, the only condition affecting it being that of penetration--i.e. actual contact of cellulose and alkali. (d) the question as to whether the process of 'mercerisation' involves chemical as well as physical effects is briefly discussed. the author is of opinion that, as the degree of lustre obtained varies with the different varieties of cotton, the differentiation is occasioned by differences in chemical constitution of these various cottons. the influence of the chemical factors is also emphasised by the increased dyeing capacity of the mercerised goods, which effect, moreover, is independent of those conditions of strain or tension under mercerisation which determine lustre. it is found in effect that with a varied range of dye stuffs a given shade is produced with from 10 to 30 p.ct. less colouring matter than is required for the ordinary, i.e. unmercerised, goods. in reference to the constants of strength and elasticity, buntrock gives the following results of observations upon a 40^{5} twofold yarn, five threads of 50 cm. length being taken for each test(prometheus, 1897, p. 690): (a) the original yarn broke under a load of 1440 grms.; (b) after mercerisation without tension the load required was 2420 grms.; (c) after mercerisation under strain, 1950 grms. mercerisation, therefore, increases the strength of the yarn from 30 to 66 p.ct., the increase being lessened proportionately to the strain accompanying mercerisation. _elasticity_, as measured by the extension under the breaking load, remains about the same in yarns mercerised under strain, but when allowed to shrink under mercerisation there is an increase of 30-40 p.ct. over the original. the _change of form_ sustained by the individual fibres has been studied by h. lange [farberzeitung, 1898, 197-198], whose microphotographs of the cotton fibres, both in length and cross-section, are reproduced. in general terms, the change is from the flattened riband of the original fibre to a cylindrical tube with much diminished and rounded central canal. the effect of strain under mercerisation is chiefly seen in the contour of the surface, which is smooth, and the obliteration at intervals of the canal. hence the increased transparency and more complete reflection of the light from the surface, and the consequent approximation to the optical properties of the silk fibre. the work concludes with a section devoted to a description of the various practical systems of mercerisation of yarns in general practice in germany, and an account of the methods adopted in dyeing the mercerised yarns. researches on mercerised cotton. a. fraenkel and p. friedlaender (mitt. k.-k. techn. gew. mus., wien, 1898, 326). the authors, after investigation, are inclined to attribute the lustre of mercerised cotton to the absence of the cuticle, which is destroyed and removed in the process, partly by the chemical action of the alkali, and partly by the stretching at one or other stage of the process. the authors have investigated the action of alcoholic solutions of soda also. the lustre effects are not obtained unless the action of water is associated. in conclusion, the authors give the following particulars of breaking strains and elasticity:--------------------------------------------------------------------------treatment | experiments | breaking strain | elasticity ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | | elongation | | grammes | in mm. | | | cotton unmercerised. | 1 | 360 | 20 | 2 | 356 | 20 | 3 | 360 | 22 | | | mercerised with | | | soda 35°b. | 1 | 530 | 44 | 2 | 570 | 40 | 3 | 559 | 35 | | | alcoholic soda 10 p.ct. | 1 | 645 | 24 cold | 2 | 600 | 27 | 3 | 610 | 33 | | | alcoholic soda 10 p.ct. | 5 | 740 | 33 hot | 2 | 730 | 38 | 3 | 690 | 30 -------------------------------------------------------------------------footnotes: [2] this and other similar references are to the matter of the original volume (1895). section ii. synthetical derivatives--sulphocarbonates and esters (p. 25) ~cellulose sulphocarbonate.~--further investigations of the reaction of formation as well as the various reactions of decomposition of the compound, have not contributed any essential modification or development of the subject as originally described in the author's first communications. a large amount of experimental matter has been accumulated in view of the ultimate contribution of the results to the general theory of colloidal solutions. but viscose is a complex product and essentially variable, through its pronounced tendency to progressive decomposition with reversion of the cellulose to its insoluble and uncombined condition. the solution for this reason does not lend itself to exact measurement of its physical constants such as might elucidate in some measure the progressive molecular aggregation of the cellulose in assuming spontaneously the solid (hydrate) form. reserving the discussion of these points, therefore, we confine ourselves to recording results which further elucidate special points. _normal and other celluloses._--we may certainly use the sulphocarbonate reaction as a means of defining a normal cellulose. as already pointed out, cotton cellulose passes quantitatively through the cycle of treatments involved in solution as sulphocarbonate and decomposition of the solution with regeneration as structureless or amorphous cellulose (hydrate). analysis of this cellulose shows a fall of carbon percentage from 44.4 to 43.3, corresponding with a change in composition from c_{6}h_{10}o_{5} to 4c_{6}h_{10}o_{5}.h_{2}o. the partial hydrolysis affects the whole molecule, and is limited to this effect, whereas, in the case of celluloses of other types, there is a fractionation of the mass, a portion undergoing a further hydrolysis to compounds of lower molecular weight and permanently soluble. thus in the case of the wood celluloses the percentage recovered from solution as viscose is from 93 to 95 p.ct. it is evident that these celluloses are not homogeneous. a similar conclusion results from the presence of furfural-yielding compounds with the observation that the hydrolysis to soluble derivatives mainly affects these derivatives. in the empirical characterisation of a normal cellulose, therefore, we may include the property of quantitative regeneration or recovery from its solution as sulphocarbonate. in the use of the word 'normal' as applied to a 'bleached' cotton, we have further to show in what respects the sulphocarbonate reaction differentiates the bleached or purified cotton cellulose from the raw product. the following experiments may be cited: specimens of american and egyptian cottons in the raw state, freed from mechanical, i.e. non-fibrous, impurities, were treated with a mercerising alkali, and the alkali-cotton subsequently exposed to carbon disulphide. the product of reaction was further treated as in the preparation of the ordinary solution; but in place of the usual solution, structureless and homogeneous, it was observed to retain a fibrous character, and the fibres, though enormously swollen, were not broken down by continued vigorous stirring. after large dilution the solutions were filtered, and the fibres then formed a gelatinous mass on the filters. after purification, the residue was dried and weighed. the american cotton yielded 90.0 p.ct., and the egyptian 92.0 p.ct. of its substance in the form of this peculiar modification. the experiment was repeated, allowing an interval of 24 hours to elapse between the conversion into alkali-cotton and exposure of this to the carbon disulphide. the quantitative results were identical. there are many observations incidental to chemical treatments of cotton fabrics which tend to show that the bleaching process produces other effects than the mere removal of mechanical impurities. in the sulphocarbonate reaction the raw cotton, in fact, behaves exactly as a compound cellulose. whether the constitutional difference between raw and bleached cotton, thus emphasised, is due to the group of components of the raw cotton, which are removed in the bleaching process, or to internal constitutional changes determined by the bleaching treatments, is a question which future investigation must decide. _the normal sulphocarbonate (viscose)._--in the industrial applications of viscose it is important to maintain a certain standard of composition as of the essential physical properties of the solution, notably viscosity. it may be noted first that, with the above-mentioned exception, the various fibrous celluloses show but slight differences in regard to all the essential features of the reactions involved. in the mercerising reaction, or alkali-cellulose stage, it is true the differences are considerable. with celluloses of the wood and straw classes there is a considerable conversion into soluble alkali-celluloses. if treated with water these are dissolved, and on weighing back the cellulose, after thorough washing, treatment with acid, and finally washing and drying, it will be found to have lost from 15 to 20 p.ct. in weight. the lower grade of celluloses thus dissolved are only in part precipitated in acidifying the alkaline solution. on the other hand, after conversion into viscose, the cellulose when regenerated re-aggregates a large proportion of these lower grade celluloses, and the final loss is as stated above, from 5 to 7 p.ct. only. secondly, it is found that all the conditions obtaining in the alkali-cellulose stage affect the subsequent viscose reaction and the properties of the final solution. the most important are obviously the proportion of alkali to cellulose and the length of time they are in contact before being treated with carbon disulphide. an excess of alkali beyond the 'normal' proportion--viz. 2naoh per 1 mol. c_{6}h_{10}o_{5}--has little influence upon the viscose reaction, but lowers the viscosity of the solution of the sulphocarbonate prepared from it. but this effect equally follows from addition of alkali to the viscose itself. the alkali-cellulose changes with age; there is a gradual alteration of the molecular structure of the cellulose, of which the properties of the viscose when prepared are the best indication. there is a progressive loss of viscosity of the solution, and a corresponding deterioration in the structural properties of the cellulose when regenerated from it--especially marked in the film form. in regard to viscosity the following observations are typical:- (a) a viscose of 1.8 p.ct. cellulose prepared from an alkali-cellulose (cotton) fourteen days old. (b) viscose of 1.8 p.ct. cellulose from an alkali-cellulose (cotton) three days old. (c) glycerin diluted with 1/3 vol. water. a b b c diluted with equal vol. water times of flow of equal volumes from 112 321 103 170 narrow orifice in seconds similarly the cellulose in reverting to the solid form from these 'degraded' solutions presents a proportionate loss of cohesion and aggregating power expressed by the inferior strength and elasticity of the products. hence, in the practical applications of the product where the latter properties are of first importance, it is necessary to adopt normal standards, such as above indicated, and to carefully regulate all the conditions of treatment in each of the two main stages of reaction, so that a product of any desired character may be invariably obtained. incidentally to these investigations a number of observations have been made on the alkali-cellulose (cotton) after prolonged storage in closed vessels. it is well known that starch undergoes hydrolysis in contact with aqueous alkalis of a similar character to that determined by acids [béchamp, annalen, 100, 365]. the recent researches of lobry de bruyn [rec. trav. chim. 14, 156] upon the action of alkaline hydrates in aqueous solution on the hexoses have established the important fact of the resulting mobility of the co group, and the interchangeable relationships of typical aldoses and ketoses. it was, therefore, not improbable that profound hydrolytic changes should occur in the cellulose molecule when kept for prolonged periods as alkali-cellulose. we may cite an extreme case. a series of products were examined after 12-18 months' storage. they were found to contain only 3-5 p.ct. 'soluble carbohydrates'; these were precipitated by fehling's solution but without reduction on boiling. they were, therefore, of the cellulose type. on acidifying with sulphuric acid and distilling, traces only of volatile acid were produced. it is clear, therefore, that the change of molecular weight of the cellulose, the disaggregation of the undoubtedly large molecule of the original 'normal' cellulose--which effects are immediately recognised in the viscose reactions of such products--are of such otherwise limited character that they do not affect the constitution of the unit groups. we should also conclude that the cellulose type of constitution covers a very wide range of minor variations of molecular weight or aggregation. the resistance of the normal cellulose to the action of alkalis under these hydrolysing conditions should be mentioned in conjunction with the observations of lange, and the results of the later investigations of tollens, on its resistance to 'fusion' with alkaline hydrates at high temperatures (180°). the degree of resistance has been established only on the empirical basis of weighing the product recovered from such treatment. the product must be investigated by conversion into typical cellulose derivatives before we can pronounce upon the constitutional changes which certainly occur in the process. but for the purpose of this discussion it is sufficient to emphasise the extraordinary resistance of the normal cellulose to the action of alkalis, and to another of the more significant points of differentiation from starch. _chemical constants of cellulose sulphocarbonate (solution)._--in investigations of the solutions we make use of various analytical methods, which may be briefly described, noting any results bearing upon special points. _total alkali._--this constant is determined by titration in the usual way. the cellulose ratio, c_{6}h_{10}o_{5} : 2naoh, is within the ordinary error of observation, 2 : 1 by weight. a determination of alkali therefore determines the percentage of cellulose. _cellulose_ may be regenerated in various ways--viz. by the action of heat, of acids, of various oxidising compounds. it is purified for weighing by boiling in neutral sulphite of soda (2 p.ct. solution) to remove sulphur, and in very dilute acids (0.33 p.ct. hcl) to decompose residues of 'organic' sulphur compounds. it may also be treated with dilute oxidants. after weighing it may be ignited to determine residual inorganic compounds. _sulphur._--it has been proved by lindemann and motten [bull. acad. r. belg. (3), 23, 827] that the sulphur of sulphocarbonates (as well as of sulphocyanides) is fully oxidised (to so_{3}) by the hypochlorites (solutions at ordinary temperatures). the method may be adapted as required for any form of the products or by-products of the viscose reaction to be analysed for _total sulphur_. the sulphur present in the form of dithiocarbonates, including the typical cellulose xanthogenic acid, is approximately isolated and determined as cs_{2} by adding a zinc salt in excess, and distilling off the carbon disulphide from a water bath. from freshly prepared solutions a large proportion of the disulphide originally interacting with the alkali and cellulose is recovered, the result establishing the general conformity of the reaction to that typical of the alcohols. on keeping the solutions there is a progressive interaction of the bisulphide and alkali, with formation of trithiocarbonates and various sulphides. in decomposing these products by acid reagents hydrogen sulphide and free sulphur are formed, the estimation of which presents no special difficulties. in the spontaneous decomposition of the solution a large proportion of the sulphur resumes the form of the volatile disulphide. this is approximately measured by the loss in total sulphur in the following series of determinations, in which a viscose of 8.5 p.ct. strength (cellulose) was dried down as a thin film upon glass plates, and afterwards analysed: (a) proportion of sulphur to cellulose (100 pts.) in original. (b) after spontaneous drying at ordinary temperature. (c) after drying at 40°c. (d) as in (c), followed, by 2 hours' heating at 98°. (e) as in (c), followed by 5 hours' heating at 98°. a b c d e total sulphur 40.0 25.0 31.0 23.7 10.4 the dried product in (b) and (c) was entirely resoluble in water; in (d) and (e), on the other hand, the cellulose was fully regenerated, and obtained as a transparent film. _iodine reaction._--fresh solutions of the sulphocarbonate show a fairly constant reaction with normal iodine solution. at the first point, where the excess of iodine visibly persists, there is complete precipitation of the cellulose as the bixanthic sulphide; and this occurs when the proportion of iodine added reaches 3i_{2} : 4na_{2}o, calculated to the total alkali. _other decompositions._--the most interesting is the interaction which occurs between the cellulose xanthogenate and salts of ammonia, which is taken advantage of by c. h. stearn in his patent process of spinning artificial threads from viscose. the insoluble product which is formed in excess of the solution of ammonia salt is free from soda, and contains 9-10 p.ct. total sulphur. the product retains its solubility in water for a short period. the solution may be regarded as containing the ammonium cellulose xanthate. this rapidly decomposes with liberation of ammonia and carbon disulphide, and separation of cellulose (hydrate). as precipitated by ammonium-chloride solution the gelatinous thread contains 15 p.ct. of cellulose, with a sp.gr. 1.1. the process of 'fixing'--i.e. decomposing the xanthic residue--consists in a short exposure to the boiling saline solution. the further dehydration, with increase of gravity and cellulose content, is not considerable. the thread in its final air-dry state has a sp.gr. 1.48. * * * * * ~cellulose benzoates.~--these derivatives have been further studied by the authors. the conditions for the formation of the monobenzoate [c_{6}h_{9}o_{4}.o.co.ph] are very similar to those required for the sulphocarbonate reaction. the fibrous cellulose (cotton), treated with a 10 p.ct. solution naoh, and subsequently with benzoyl chloride, gives about 50 p.ct. of the theoretical yield of monobenzoate. converted by 20 p.ct. solution naoh into alkali-cellulose, and with molecular proportions as below, the following yields were obtained:- calc. for monobenzoate (a) c_{6}h_{10}o_{5} : 2.0-2.5 naoh : c_{6}h_{5}.cocl- 150.8} }164.0 (b) c_{6}h_{10}o_{5} : 2.0-2.5 naoh : 1.5 mol. c_{6}h_{5}cocl 159.0} an examination of (a) showed that some dibenzoate (about 7 p.ct.) had been formed. the product () was exhaustively treated with cuprammonium solution, to which it yielded about 20 p.ct. of its weight, which was therefore unattacked cellulose. under conditions as above, but with 2.5 mol. c_{6}h_{5}cocl, a careful comparison was made of the behaviour of the three varieties of cotton, which were taken in the unspun condition and previously fully bleached and purified. ___________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | sea island | egyptian | american | |________________________________|____________|__________|__________| | | | | | | aggregate yield of benzoate | 153 | 148 | 152 | | moisture in air dry state | 5.28 | 5.35 | 5.15 | | proportion of dibenzoate p.ct. | 8.30 | 13.70 | 9.4 | | yield of cellulose by | 58.0 | 54.0 | 58.3 | | saponification | | | | |________________________________|____________|__________|__________| it appears from these results that the benzoate reaction may proceed to a higher limit (dibenzoate) in the case of egyptian cotton. this would necessarily imply a higher limit of 'mercerisation,' under equal conditions of treatment with the alkaline hydrate. it must be noted that in the conversion of the fibrous cellulose into these (still) fibrous monobenzoates, there are certain mechanical conditions imported by the structural features of the ultimate fibres. for the elimination of the influence of this factor a large number of quantitative comparisons will be necessary. the above results are therefore only cited as typical of a method of comparative investigation, more especially of the still open questions of the cause of the superior effects in mercerisation of certain cottons (see p. 23). it is quite probable that chemical as well as structural factors co-operate in further differentiating the cottons. further investigation of the influence upon the benzoate reaction, of increase of concentration of the soda lye, used in the preliminary alkali cellulose reaction, from 20 to 33 p.ct. naoh, established (1) that there is no corresponding increase in the benzoylation, and (2) that this ester reaction and the sulphocarbonate reaction are closely parallel, in that the degree and limit of reaction are predetermined by the conditions of formation of the alkali cellulose. _monobenzoate_ prepared as above described is resistant to all solvents of cellulose and of the cellulose esters, and is therefore freed from cellulose by treatment with the former, and from the higher benzoate by treatment with the latter. several of these, notably pyridine, phenol and nitrobenzene, cause considerable swelling and gelatinisation of the fibres, but without solution. _structureless celluloses_ of the 'normal' type, and insoluble therefore in alkaline lye, treated under similar conditions to those described above for the fibrous celluloses, yield a higher proportion of dibenzoate. the following determinations were made with the cellulose (hydrate) regenerated from the sulphocarbonate:-mol. proportions of reagents yield dibenzoate p.ct. c_{6}h_{10}o_{5} : 2naoh : 2bzcl 145 34.7 [caustic soda at 10 per cent. naoh] c_{6}h_{10}o_{5} : 4naoh : 2bzcl 162 62.7 [caustic soda at 20 per cent. naoh] _limit of reaction._--the cellulose in this form having shown itself more reactive, it was taken as the basis for determining the maximum proportion of oh groups yielding to this later reaction. the systematic investigations of skraup [monatsh. 10, 389] have determined that as regards the interacting groups the molecular proportions 1 oh : 7 naoh : 5 bzcl, ensure complete or maximum esterification. the maximum of oh groups in cellulose being 4, the reagents were taken in the proportion c_{6}h_{10}o_{5} : 4 [7 naoh : 5 bzcl]. the yield of crude product, after purifying as far as possible from the excess of benzoic acid, was 240 p.ct. [calculated for dibenzoate 227 p.ct.]. on further investigating the crude product by treatment with solvents, it was found to have still retained benzoic acid. there was also present a proportion of only partially attacked cellulose (monobenzoate). the soluble benzoate amounted to 90 p.ct. of the product. it may be generally concluded that the dibenzoate represents the normal maximum but that with the hydrated and partly hydrolysed cellulose molecule, as obtained by regeneration from the sulphocarbonate, other oh groups may react, but they are only a fractional proportion in relation to the unit group c_{6}h_{10}o_{5}. in this respect again there is a close parallelism between the sulphocarbonate and benzoyl-ester reactions. _the dibenzoate_, even when prepared from the fibrous celluloses, is devoid of structure, and its presence in admixture with the fibrous monobenzoate is at once recognised as it constitutes a structureless incrustation. under the microscope its presence in however minute proportion is readily observed. as stated it is soluble in certain of the ordinary solvents of the cellulose esters, e.g. chloroform, acetic acid, nitrobenzene, pyridine, and phenol. it is not soluble in ether or alcohol. _hygroscopic moisture of benzoates._--the crude monobenzoate retains 5.0-5.5 p.ct. moisture in the air-dry condition. after removal of the residual cellulose this is reduced to 3.3 p.ct. under ordinary atmospheric conditions. the purified dibenzoates retain 1.6 p.ct. under similar conditions. _analysis of benzoates._--on saponification of these esters with alcoholic sodium hydrate, anomalous results are obtained. the acid numbers, determined by titration in the usual way, are 10-20 p.ct. in excess of the theoretical, the difference increasing with the time of boiling. similarly the residual cellulose shows a deficiency of 5-9 p.ct. it is by no means improbable that in the original ester reaction there is a constitutional change in the cellulose molecule causing it to break down in part under the hydrolysing treatment with formation of acid products. this point is under investigation. normal results as regards acid numbers, on the other hand, are obtained by saponification with sodium ethylate in the cold, the product being digested with the half-saturated solution for 12 hours in a closed flask. the following results with specimens of monoand dibenzoate, purified, as far as possible, may be cited: combustion results saponification results calc. c_{6}h_{5}.cooh calc. cellulose calc. monobenzoate c 56.60 58.65} h 5.06 5.26} 46.0 45.9 58.0 60.8 dibenzoate c 63.10 64.86} h 3.40 4.86} 65.5 66.6 34.3 40.3 the divergence of the numbers, especially for the dibenzoate, in the case of the hydrogen, and yield of cellulose on hydrolysis are noteworthy. they confirm the probability of the occurrence of secondary changes in the ester reactions. _action of nitrating acid upon the benzoates._--from the benzoates above described, mixed nitro-nitric esters are obtained by the action of the mixture of nitric and sulphuric acids. the residual oh groups of the cellulose are esterified and substitution by an no_{2} group takes place in the aromatic residue, giving a mixed nitric nitrobenzoic ester. the analysis of the products points to the entrance of 1 no_{2} group in the benzoyl residue in either case; in the cellulose residue 1 oh readily reacts. higher degrees of nitration are attained by the process of solution in concentrated nitric acid and precipitation by pouring into sulphuric acid. in describing these mixed esters we shall find it necessary to adopt the c_{12} unit formula. in analysing these products we have employed the dumas method for _total nitrogen_. for the o.no_{2} groups we have found the nitrometer and the schloesing methods to give concordant results. for the no_{2} groups it was thought that limpricht's method, based upon reduction with stannous chloride in acid solution (hcl), would be available. the quantitative results, however, were only approximate, owing to the difficulty of confining the reduction to the no_{2} groups of the nitrobenzoyl residue. by reduction with ammonium sulphide the o.no_{2} groups were entirely removed as in the case of the cellulose nitrates; the no_{2} was reduced to nh_{2} and there resulted a cellulose amidobenzoate, which was diazotised and combined with amines and phenols to form yellow and red colouring matters, the reacting residue remaining more or less firmly combined with the cellulose. _cellulose dinitrate-dinitrobenzoate, and cellulose trinitrate-dinitrobenzoate._--on treating the fibrous benzoate--which is a dibenzoate on the c_{12} basis--with the acid mixture under the usual conditions, a yellowish product is obtained, with a yield of 140-142 p.ct. the nitrobenzoate is insoluble in ether alcohol, but is soluble in acetone, acetic acid, and nitrobenzene. in purifying the product the former solvent is used to remove any cellulose nitrates. to obtain the maximum combination with nitroxy-groups, the product was dissolved in concentrated nitric acid, and the solution poured into sulphuric acid. the following analytical results were obtained (a) for the product obtained directly from the fibrous benzoate and purified as indicated, (b) for the product from the further treatment of (a) as described: found calc. for (a) (b) dinitrate trinitrate dinitrobenzoate dinitrobenzoate total nitrogen 7.84 8.97 7.99 9.24 o.no_{2} " 5.00 5.45 4.00 5.54 no_{2} (aromatic) 2.84 3.52 3.99 3.70 with the two benzoyl groups converted into nitro-benzoyl in each product, the limit of the ester reaction with the cellulose residue is reached at the third oh group. the nitrogen in the amidobenzoate resulting from the reduction with ammonium sulphide was 4.5 p.ct.--as against 5.0 p.ct. calculated. the moisture retained by the fibrous nitrate--nitrobenzoate--in the air-dry state was found to be 1.97 p.ct. the product from the structureless dibenzoate or tetrabenzoate on the c_{12} formula, was prepared and analysed with the following results: calc. for mononitrate tetranitrobenzoate total nitrogen 6.76 7.25 o.no_{2} " 1.30 1.45 no_{2} " (aromatic) 5.46 5.80 the results were confirmed by the yield of product, viz. 131 p.ct. as against the calculated 136 p.ct. they afford further evidence of the generally low limit of esterification of the cellulose molecule. from the formation of a 'normal' tetracetate--i.e. octacetate of the c_{12} unit--we conclude that 4/5 of the oxygen atoms are hydroxyl oxygen. of the 8 oh groups five only react in the mixed esters described above, and six only in the case of the simple nitric esters. the ester reactions are probably not simple, but accompanied by secondary reactions within the cellulose molecule. * * * * * (p. 34) ~cellulose acetates.~--in the first edition (p. 35) we have committed ourselves to the statement that 'on boiling cotton with acetic anhydride and sodium acetate no reaction occurs.' this is erroneous. the error arises, however, from the somewhat vague statements of schutzenberger's researches which are current in the text-books [e.g. beilstein, 1 ed. p. 586] together with the statement that reaction only occurs at elevated temperatures (180°). as a matter of fact, reaction takes place at the boiling temperature of the anhydride. we have obtained the following results with bleached cotton: yield calc. for monoacetate c_{6}h_{7}o_{4}o.c_{2}h_{3}o ester reaction 121 p.ct. 125 p.ct. {cellulose 79.9 79.9 saponification { {acetic acid 29.9 29.4 this product is formed without apparent structural alteration of the fibre. it is entirely insoluble in all the ordinary solvents of the higher acetates. moreover, it entirely resists the actions of the special solvents of cellulose--e.g. zinc chloride and cuprammonium. the compound is in other respects equally stable and inert. the hygroscopic moisture under ordinary atmospheric conditions is 3.2 p.ct. _tetracetate._--this product is now made on the manufacturing scale: it has yet to establish its industrial value. nitrirung von kohlenhydraten. w. will und p. lenze (berl. ber., 1898, 68). ~nitrates of carbohydrates.~ (p. 38) the authors have studied the nitric esters of a typical series of the now well-defined carbohydrates--pentoses, hexoses, both aldoses and ketoses--bioses and trioses, the nitrates being prepared under conditions designed to produce the highest degree of esterification. starch, wood, gum, and cellulose were also included in the investigations. the products were analysed and their physical properties determined. they were more especially investigated in regard to temperatures of decomposition, which were found to lie considerably lower than that of the cellulose nitrates. they also show marked and variable instability at 50° c. a main purpose of the inquiry was to throw light upon a probable cause of the instability of the cellulose nitrates, viz. the presence of nitrates of hydrolysed products or carbohydrates of lower molecular weight. the most important results are these: _monoses._--the _aldoses_ are fully esterified, in the pentoses 4 oh, in the hexoses 5 oh groups reacting. the pentose nitrates are comparatively stable at 50°; the hexose nitrates on the other hand are extremely unstable, showing a loss of weight of 30-40 p.ct. when kept 24 hours at this temperature. xylose is differentiated by tending to pass into an anhydride form (c_{5}h_{10}o_{5}-h_{2}o) under this esterification. when treated in fact with the mixed acids, instead of by the process usually adopted by the authors of solution in nitric acid and subsequent addition of the sulphuric acid, it is converted into the dinitrate c_{5}h_{6}o_{2}.(no_{3})_{2}. _ketoses_ (c_{6}).--these are sharply differentiated from the corresponding aldoses by giving _tri_nitrates c_{6}h_{7}o_{2}(no_{3})_{3} instead of _penta_nitrates, the remaining oh groups probably undergoing internal condensation. the products are, moreover, _extremely stable_. it is also noteworthy that levulose gave this same product, the trinitrate of the anhydride (levulosan) by both methods of nitration (_supra_). _the bisaccharides or bioses_ all give the octonitrates. the degree of instability is variable. cane-sugar gives a very unstable nitrate. the lactose nitrate is more stable. thus at 50° it loses only 0.7 p.ct. in weight in eight days; at 75° it loses 1 p.ct. in twenty-four hours, but with a rapid increase to 23 p.ct. in fifty-four hours. the maltose octonitrate melts (with decomposition) at a relatively high temperature, 163°-164°. at 50°-75° it behaves much like the lactose nitrate. _trisaccharide._--raffinose yielded the product c_{18}h_{21}o_{5}.(no_{3})_{11}. _starch_ yields the hexanitrate (c_{12}) by both methods of nitration. the product has a high melting and decomposing point, viz. 184°, and when thoroughly purified is quite stable. it is noted that a yield of 157 p.ct. of this nitrate was obtained, and under identical conditions cellulose yielded 170 p.ct. _wood gum_, from beech wood, gave a tetranitrate (c_{10} formula) insoluble in all the usual solvents for this group of esters. the authors point out in conclusion that the conditions of instability and decomposition of the nitrates of the monose-triose series are exactly those noted with the cellulose nitrates as directly prepared and freed from residues of the nitrating acids. they also lay stress upon the superior stability of the nitrates of the anhydrides, especially of the ketoses. nitrated carbohydrates as food material for moulds. thomas bokorny (chem. zeit., 1896, 20, 985-986). (p. 38) cellulose trinitrate (nitrocellulose) will serve as a food supply for moulds when suspended in distilled water containing the requisite mineral matter and placed in the dark. the growth is rapid, and a considerable quantity of the vegetable growth accumulates round the masses of cellulose nitrate, but no growth is observed if mineral matter is absent. cellulose itself cannot act as a food supply, and it seems probable that if glycerol is present cellulose nitrate is no longer made use of. nitration of cellulose, hydrocellulose, and oxycellulose. leo vignon (compt. rend., 1898, 126, 1658-1661). (p. 38) repeated treatment of cellulose, hydrocellulose, and oxycellulose with a mixture of sulphuric and nitric acids in large excess, together with successive analyses of the compounds produced, showed that the final product of the reaction corresponded, in each case, with the fixation of 11 no groups by a molecule containing 24 atoms of carbon. on exposure to air, nitrohydrocellulose becomes yellow and decomposes; nitro-oxycellulose is rather more stable, whilst nitrocellulose is unaffected. the behaviour of these nitro-derivatives with schiff's reagent, fehling's solution, and potash show that all three possess aldehydic characters, which are most marked in the case of nitro-oxycellulose. the latter also, when distilled with hydrochloric acid, yields a larger proportion of furfuraldehyde than is obtained from nitrocellulose and nitrohydrocellulose. * * * * * ~cellulose nitrates-explosives.~ (p. 38) the uses of the cellulose nitrates as a basis for explosives are limited by their fibrous character. the conversion of these products into the structureless homogeneous solid or semi-solid form has the effect of controlling their combustion. the use of nitroglycerin as an agent for this purpose gives the curious result of the admixture of two high or blasting explosives to produce a new explosive capable of extended use for military purposes. the leading representatives of this class of propulsive explosives, or 'smokeless powders' are ballistite and cordite, the technology of which will be found fully discussed in special manuals of the subject. since the contribution of these inventions to the development of cellulose chemistry does not go beyond the broad, general facts above mentioned, we must refer the reader for technical details to the manuals in question. there are, however, other means of arriving at structureless cellulose nitrates. one of these has been recently disclosed, and as the results involve chemical and technical points of novelty, which are dealt with in a scientific communication, we reproduce the paper in question, viz.:-a re-investigation of the cellulose nitrates. a. luck and c. f. cross (j. soc. chem. ind., 1900). the starting-point of these investigations was a study of the nitrates obtained from the structureless cellulose obtained from the sulphocarbonate (viscose). this cellulose in the form of a fine meal was treated under identical conditions with a sample of pure cotton cellulose, viz. digested for 24 hours in an acid mixture containing in 100 parts hno_{3}--24 : h_{2}so_{4}--70 : h_{2}o--6: the proportion of acid to cellulose being 60 : 1--. after careful purification the products were analysed with the following results: soluble in nitrogen ether alcohol fibrous nitrate 13.31 4.3 p.ct. structureless nitrate 13.35 5.6 " examined by the 'heat test' (at 80°) and the 'stability test' (at 135°) they exhibited the usual instability, and in equal degrees. nor were the tests affected by exhaustive treatment with ether, benzene, and alcohol. from this it appears that the process of solution as sulphocarbonate and regeneration of the cellulose, though it eliminates certain constituents of an ordinary bleached cellulose, which might be expected to cause instability, has really no effect in this direction. it also appears that instability may be due to by-products of the esterification process derived from the cellulose itself. the investigation was then extended to liquids having a direct solvent action on these higher nitrates, more especially acetone. it was necessary, however, to avoid this solvent action proper, and having observed that dilution with water in increasing proportions produced a graduated succession of physical changes in the fibrous ester, we carried out a series of treatments with such diluted acetones. quantities of the sample (a), purified as described, but still unstable, were treated each with five successive changes of the particular liquid, afterwards carefully freed from the acetone and dried at 40°c. the products, which were found to be more or less disintegrated, were then tested by the ordinary heat test, stability test, and explosion test, with the results shown in the table on next page. in this series of trials the sample 'a' was used in the condition of pulp, viz. as reduced by the process of wet-beating in a hollander. a similar series was carried out with the guncotton in the condition in which it was directly obtained from the ester reaction. the results were similar to above, fully confirming the progressive character of the stabilisation with increasing proportions of acetone. these results prove that washing with the diluted acetone not only rendered the nitrate perfectly stable, but that the product was more stable than that obtained by the ordinary process of purification, viz. long-continued boiling and washing in water. we shall revert to this point after briefly dealing with the associated phenomenon of structural disintegration. this begins to be well marked when the proportion of acetone exceeds 80 p.ct. the optimum effect is obtained with mixtures of 90 to 93 acetone and 10 to 7 water (by volume). in a slightly diluted acetone of such composition, the guncotton is instantly attacked, the action being quite different from the gelatinisation which precedes solution in the undiluted solvent. the fibrous character disappears, and the product assumes the form of a free, bulky, still opaque mass, which rapidly sinks to the bottom of the containing vessel. the disintegration of the bulk of the nitrate is associated with __________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | proportions by volume | | | | | |________________________| temperature | heat | heat | | | | | of | test | test | | | acetone | water | explosion | 80° | 134° | |___________________|______________|_________|_____________|_______|_______| | | | | | | | | __| | | deg. | mins. | mins. | | | 20 | 80 | 137 | 3 | 4 | | | 30 | 70 | 160 | 3 | 4 | | | 40 | 60 | 180 | 7 | 18 | | | | | | | no | | | | | | | fumes | | | | | | | after | | from 'a' sample. | 50 | 50 | 187.5 | 55 | 100 | | | 60 | 40 | 187 | 45 | 100 | | | 70 | 30 | 185 | 45 | 100 | | | 80 | 20 | | 50 | 100 | | __| 92 | 8 | 185 | 50 | 100 | | | structure | | | | | | | less powder. | | | | | | " 'b' sample __| 50 | 50 | 183 | 35 | 100 | | " 'c' sample | ordinary service | 185 | 10 | 41 | | | guncotton | | | | |___________________|______________|_________|_____________|_______|_______| a certain solvent action, and on adding an equal bulk of water, the dissolved nitrate for the most part is precipitated, at the same time that the undissolved but disintegrated and swollen product undergoes further changes in the direction of increase of hardness and density. the product being now collected on a filter, freed from acetone by washing with water and dried, is a hard and dense powder the fineness of which varies according to the attendant conditions of treatment. with the main product in certain cases there is found associated a small proportion of nitrate retaining a fibrous character, which may be separated by means of a fine sieve. on examining such a residue, we found it to contain only 5.6 p.ct. n, and as it was insoluble in strong acetone, it may be regarded as a low nitrate or a mixture of such with unaltered cellulose. confirming this we found that the product passing through the sieve showed an increase of nitrogen to 13.43 p.ct. from the 13.31 p.ct. in the original. tested by the heat test (50 minutes) and stability test (no fumes after 100 minutes), we found the products to have the characteristics previously noticed. it is clear, therefore, that this specifically regulated action of acetone produces the effects (a) of disintegration, and (b) stabilisation. it remains to determine whether the latter effect was due, as might be supposed, to the actual elimination of a compound or group of compounds present in the original nitrate, and to be regarded as the effective cause of instability. it is to be noted first that as a result of the treatment with the diluted acetone and further dilution after the specific action is completed, collecting the disintegrated product on a filter and washing with water, the loss of weight sustained amounts to 3 to 4 p.ct. this loss is due, therefore, to products remaining dissolved in the filtrate--that is to say, in the much diluted acetone. these filtrates are in fact opalescent from the presence of a portion of nitrate in a colloidal (hydrated) form. on distilling off the acetone, a precipitation is determined. the precipitates are nitrates of variable composition, analysis showing from 9 to 12 p.ct. of nitric nitrogen. the filtrate from these precipitates containing only fractional residues of acetone still shows opalescence. on long-continued boiling a further precipitation is determined, the filtrates from which are clear. it was in this final clear filtrate that the product assumed to cause the instability of the original nitrate would be present. the quantity, however, is relatively so small that we have only been able to obtain and examine it as residue from evaporation to dryness. an exhaustive qualitative examination established a number of negative characteristics, with the conclusion that the products were not direct derivatives of carbohydrates nor aromatic compounds. on the other hand the following positive points resulted. although the original diluted acetone extract was neutral to test papers, yet the residue was acid in character. it contained combined nitric groups, fused below 200° giving off acid vapours, and afterwards burning with a smoky flame. on adding lead acetate to the original clear solution, a well-marked precipitation was determined. the lead compounds thus isolated are characteristic. they have been obtained in various ways and analysed. the composition varies with the character of the solution in which the lead compound is formed. thus in the opalescent or milky solutions in which a proportion of cellulose nitrate is held in solution or semi-solution by the acetone still present, the lead acetate causes a dense coagulation. the precipitates dried and analysed showed 16-20 p.ct. pbo and 11-9 p.ct. n. it is clear that the cellulose nitrates are associated in these precipitates with the lead salts of the acid compounds in question. when the latter are obtained from clear solutions, i.e. in absence of cellulose nitrates, they contain 60-63 p.ct. pbo and 3.5 p.ct. n (obtained as no). in further confirmation of the conclusion from these results, viz. that the nitrocelluloses with no tendency to combine with pbo are associated with acid products or by-products of the ester reaction combining with the oxide, the lead reagent was allowed to react in the presence of 90 p.ct. acetone. water was added, the disintegrated mass collected, washed with dilute acetic acid, and finally with water. various estimations of the pbo fixed in this way have given numbers varying from 2 to 2.5 p.ct. such products are perfectly stable. this particular effect of stabilisation appears, therefore, to depend upon the combination of certain acid products present in ordinary nitrocelluloses with metallic oxides. in order to further verify this conclusion, standard specimens of cellulose nitrates have been treated with a large number of metallic salts under varying conditions of action. it has been finally established (1) that the effects in question are more particularly determined by treatment with salts of lead and zinc, and (2) that the simplest method of treatment is that of boiling the cellulose nitrates with dilute aqueous solutions of salts of these metals, preferably the acetates. the following results may be cited, obtained by boiling a purified 'service' guncotton (sample c) with a 1 p.ct. solution of lead acetate and of zinc acetate respectively. after boiling 60 minutes the nitrates were washed free from the soluble metallic salts, dried and tested. __________________________________________________ | | | | | | heat test | heat test | | | at 80° | at 134° | |__________________________|___________|___________| | | | | | original sample c | 10 | 41 | |treated with lead acetate | 67 | 45 | | " zinc " | 91 | 45 | |__________________________|___________|___________| in conclusion we may briefly resume the main points arrived at in these investigations. _causes of instability of cellulose nitrates._--the results of our experiments so far as to the causes of instability in cellulose nitrates may be summed up as follows:-(1) traces of free nitrating acids, which can only occur in the finished products through careless manufacture, will undoubtedly cause instability, indicated strongly by the ordinary heat test at 80°, and to a less extent by the heat test at 134°. (2) other compounds exist in more intimate association with the cellulose nitrates causing instability which cannot be removed by exhaustive washing with either hot or cold water, by digestion in cold dilute alkaline solutions such as sodium carbonate, or by extracting with ether, alcohol, benzene, &c.; these compounds, however, are soluble in the solvents of highly nitrated cellulose such as acetone, acetic ether, pyridine, &c., even when these liquids are so diluted with water or other non-solvent liquids to such an extent that they have little or no solvent action upon the cellulose nitrate itself. these solutions containing the bodies causing instability are neutral to test paper, but become acid upon evaporation by heating. (this probably explains the presence of free acid when guncotton is purified by long-continued boiling in water without any neutralising agent being present.) (3) the bodies causing instability are products or by-products of the original ester reaction, acid bodies containing nitroxy-groups, but otherwise of ill-defined characteristics. they combine with the oxides of zinc or lead, giving insoluble compounds. they are precipitated from their solutions in diluted acetone upon the addition of soluble salts of these metals. (4) cellulose nitrates are rendered stable either by eliminating these compounds, or by combining them with the oxides of lead or zinc whilst still in association with cellulose nitrates. (5) even the most perfectly purified nitrocellulose will slowly decompose with formation of unstable acid products by boiling for a long time in water. this effect is much more apparent at higher temperatures. _dense structureless or non-fibrous cellulose nitrates_ can be industrially prepared (1) by nitrating the amorphous forms of cellulose obtained from its solution as sulphocarbonate (viscose). the cellulose in this condition reacts with the closest similarity to the original fibrous cellulose; the products are similar in composition and properties, including that of instability. (2) by treating the fibrous cellulose nitrates with liquid solvents of the high nitrate diluted with non-solvent liquids, and more especially water. the optimum effect is a specific disintegration or breaking down of their fibrous structure quite distinct from the gelatinisation which precedes solution in the undiluted solvent, and occurring within narrow limits of variation in the proportion of the diluting and non-solvent liquid--for industrial work the most convenient solution to employ is acetone diluted with about 10 p.ct. of water by volume. the industrial applications of these results are the basis of english patents 5286 (1898), 18,868 (1898), 18,233 (1898), luck and cross (this journal, 1899, 400, 787). the structureless guncotton prepared as above described is of quite exceptional character, and entirely distinct from the ordinary fibrous nitrate or the nitrate prepared by precipitation from actual solution in an undiluted solvent.[3] by the process described, the nitrate is obtained at a low cost in the form of a very fine, dense, structureless, white powder of great purity and stability, entirely free from all mechanical impurities. the elimination of these mechanical impurities, and also to a very great extent of coloured compounds contained in the fibrous nitrate, makes the product also useful in the manufacture of celluloids, artificial silk, &c., whilst its very dense form gives it a great advantage over ordinary fibrous guncotton for use in shells and torpedoes, and for the manufacture of gelatinised gunpowders, &c. it can be compressed with ease into hard masses; and experiments are in progress with a view of producing from it, in admixture with 'retaining' ingredients, a military explosive manufactured by means of ordinary black gunpowder machinery and processes. _manufacture of sporting powder._--the fact that the fibrous structure of ordinary guncotton or other cellulose nitrate can be completely or partially destroyed by treatment with diluted acetone and without attendant solution, constitutes a process of value for the manufacture of sporting powder having a base of cellulose nitrate of any degree of nitration. the following is a description of the hardening process. 'soft grains' are manufactured from ordinary guncotton or other cellulose nitrate either wholly or in combination with other ingredients, the process employed being the usual one of revolving in a drum in the damp state and sifting out the grains of suitable size after drying. these grains are then treated with diluted acetone, the degree of dilution being fixed according to the hardness and bulk of the finished grain it is desired to produce (j. soc. chem. ind., 1899, 787). owing to the wide limits of dilution and corresponding effect, the process allows of the production of either a 'bulk' or a 'condensed' powder. we prefer to use about five litres of the liquid to each one kilo. of grain operated upon, as this quantity allows of the grains being freely suspended in the liquid upon stirring. the grains are run into the liquid, which is then preferably heated to the boiling-point for a few minutes whilst the whole is gently stirred. under this treatment the grains assume a more or less rounded gelatinous condition according to the strength of the liquid. there is, however, no solution of the guncotton and practically no tendency of the grains to cohere. each grain, however, is acted upon _throughout_ and perfectly _equally_. after a few minutes' treatment, water is gradually added, when the grains rapidly harden. they are then freed from acetone and certain impurities by washing with water, heating, and drying. the process is of course carried out in a vessel provided with any means for gentle stirring and heating, and with an outlet for carrying off the volatilised solvent which is entirely recovered by condensation, the grains parting with the acetone with ease. _stabilising cellulose nitrates._--the process is of especial value in rendering stable and inert the traces of unstable compounds which always remain in cellulose nitrate after the ordinary boiling and washing process. it is of greatest value in the manufacture of collodion cotton used for the preparation of gelatinous blasting explosives and all explosives composed of nitroglycerin and cellulose nitrates. such mixtures seem peculiarly liable to decomposition if the cellulose nitrate is not of exceptional stability (j. soc. chem. ind., 1899, 787). emploi de la cellulose pour la fabrication de fils brillants imitant la soie. e. bronnert (1) (rev. mat. col., 1900, september, 267). v. ~use of cellulose in the manufacture of imitations of silk (lustra-cellulose).~ (p. 45) _introduction._--the problem of spinning a continuous thread of cellulose has received in later years several solutions. mechanically all resolve themselves into the preparation of a structureless filtered solution of cellulose or a cellulose derivative, and forcing through capillary orifices into some medium which either absorbs or decomposes the solvent. the author notes here that the fineness and to a great extent the softness of the product depends upon the dimensions of the capillary orifice and concentration of the solution. the technical idea involved in the spinning of artificial fibres is an old one. réaumur (2) forecast its possibility, audemars of lausanne took a patent as early as 1855 (3) for transforming nitrocellulose into fine filaments which he called 'artificial silk.' the idea took practical shape only when it came to be used in connection with filaments for incandescent lamps. in this connection we may mention the names of the patentees:--swinburne (4), crookes, weston (5), swan (6), and wynne and powell (7). these inventors prepared the way for chardonnet's work, which has been followed since 1888 with continually increasing success. at this date the lustra-celluloses known may be divided into four classes. 1. 'artificial silks' obtained from the nitrocelluloses. 2. 'lustra-cellulose' made from the solution of cellulose in cuprammonium. 3. 'lustra-cellulose' prepared from the solution of cellulose in chloride of zinc. 4. 'viscose silks,' by the decomposition of sulphocarbonate of cellulose (cross and bevan). group 1. the early history of the chardonnet process is discussed and some incidental causes of the earlier failures are dealt with. the process having been described in detail in so many publications the reader is referred to these for details. [see bibliography, (1) and (2), (3) and (4).] the denitrating treatment was introduced in the period 1888-90 and of course altogether changed the prospects of the industry; not only does it remove the high inflammability, but adds considerably to softness, lustre, and general textile quality. in table i will be found some important constants for the nitrocellulose fibre; also the fibre after denitration and the comparative constants for natural silk. table 1. _______________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | tenacity | elasticity | | | (grammes) | (% elongation) | |__________________________________________|___________|________________| | | | | | nitrocellulose according to chardonnet | | | | german patent no. 81,599 | 150 | 23 | | the same after denitration | 110 | 8 | | denitrated fibre moistened with water | 25 | - | | nitrocellulose: bronnert's german patent | | | | no. 93,009 | 125 | 28 | | the same after denitration (dry) | 115 | 13 | | the same after denitration (wetted) | 32 | - | | natural silk | 300 | 18 | |__________________________________________|___________|________________| 1. tenacity is the weight in grammes required to break the thread. 2. elasticity is the elongation per cent. at breaking. the numbers are taken for thread of 100 deniers (450 metres of 0.05 grammes = 1 denier). it must be noted that according to the concentration of the solution and variations in the process of denitration the constants for the yarn are subject to very considerable variation. in regard to the manufacture a number of very serious difficulties have been surmounted. first, instead of drying the nitrated cellulose, which often led to fires, &c., it was found better to take it moist from the centrifugal machine, in which condition it is dissolved (5). it was next found that with the concentrated collodion the thread could be spun direct into the air, and the use of water as a precipitant was thus avoided. with regard to denitration which is both a delicate and disagreeable operation: none of the agents recommended to substitute the sulphydrates have proved available. of these the author mentions ferrous chloride (6), ferrous chloride in alcohol (7), formaldehyde (8), sulphocarbonates. the different sulphydrates (9) have very different effects. the calcium compound tends to harden and weaken the thread. the ammonia compound requires great care and is costly. the magnesium compound works rapidly and gives the strongest thread. investigations have established the following point. in practice it is not necessary to combine the saponification of cellulose ester with complete reduction of the nitric acid split off. the latter requires eight molecules of hydrogen sulphide per one molecule tetranitrocellulose, but with precautions four molecules suffice. it is well known that the denitration is nearly complete, traces only of nitric groups surviving. their reactions with diphenylamine allow a certain identification of artificial silks of this class. various other inventors, e.g. du vivier (10), cadoret (11), lehner (12), have attempted the addition of other substances to modify the thread. these have all failed. lehner, who persisted in his investigations, and with success, only attained this success, however, by leaving out all such extraneous matters. lehner works with 10 p.ct. solutions; chardonnet has continually aimed at higher concentration up to 20 p.ct. lehner has been able very much to reduce his pressures of ejection in consequence; chardonnet has had to increase up to pressures of 60 k. per cm. and higher. the latter involves very costly distributing apparatus. lehner made next considerable advance by the discovery of the fact that the addition of sulphuric acid to the collodion caused increase of fluidity (13), which lehner attributes to molecular change. chardonnet found similar results from the addition of aldehyde and other reagents (14), but not such as to be employed for the more concentrated collodions. the author next refers to his discoveries (15) that alcoholic solutions of a number of substances, organic and inorganic, freely dissolve the lower cellulose nitrates. the most satisfactory of these substances is chloride of calcium (16). it is noted that acetate of ammonia causes rapid changes in the solution, which appear to be due to a species of hydrolysis. the result is sufficiently remarkable to call for further investigation. the chloride of calcium, it is thought possible, produces a direct combination of the alcohol with a reactive group of the nitrocellulose. the fluidity of this solution using one mol. cacl_{2} per 1 mol. tetranitrate (17) reaches a maximum in half an hour's heating at 60°-70°c. the fluidity is increased by starting from a cotton which has been previously mercerised. after nitration there is no objection to a chlorine bleach. chardonnet has found on the other hand that in bleaching before nitration there is a loss of spinning quality in the collodion. the author considers that the new collodion can be used entirely in place of the ordinary ether-alcohol collodion. with regard to the properties of the denitrated products they fix all basic colours without mordant and may be regarded as oxycellulose therefore. the density of the thread is from 1.5 to 1.55. the thread of 100 deniers shows a mean breaking strain of 120 grammes with an elasticity of 8-12 p.ct. the cardinal defect of these fibres is their property of combination with water. many attempts have been made to confer water-resistance (18), but without success. strehlenert has proposed the addition of formaldehyde (19), but this is without result (20). in reference to these effects of hydration, the author has made observations on cotton thread, of which the following table represents the numerical results: breaking strain mean of 20 experiments skein of bleached cotton without treatment 825 skein of bleached cotton without treatment, but wetted 942 ditto after conversion into hexanitrate, dry 884 the above, wetted 828 the cotton denitrated from above, dry 529 the cotton denitrated as above and wetted 206 the author considers that other patents which have been taken for spinning nitrocellulose are of little practical account (21) and (22). the same conclusion also applies to the process of _langhans_, who proposes to spin solutions of cellulose in sulphuric acid (23) (24) and mixtures of sulphuric acid and phosphoric acid. group 2. _lustra-cellulose._--thread prepared by spinning solutions of cellulose in cuprammonium. this product is made by the vereinigte glanzstoff-fabriken, aachen, according to a series of patents under the names of h. pauly, m. fremery and urban, consortium mulhousien pour la fabrication de fils brillants, e. bronnert, and e. bronnert and fremery and urban (1). the first patent in this direction was taken by despeissis in 1890 (2). it appears this inventor died shortly after taking the patent (3) the matter was later developed by pauly (4) especially in overcoming the difficulty of preparing a solution of sufficient concentration. (it is to be noted that pauly's patents rest upon a very slender foundation, being anticipated in every essential detail by the previous patent of despeissis.) for this very great care is required, especially, first, the condition of low temperature, and, secondly, a regulated proportion of copper and ammonia to cellulose. the solution takes place more rapidly if the cellulose has been previously oxidised. such cellulose gives an 8 p.ct. solution, and the thread obtained has the character of an oxycellulose, specially seen in its dyeing properties. the best results are obtained, it appears, by the preliminary mercerising treatment and placing the alkali cellulose in contact with copper and ammonia. (all reagents employed in molecular proportions.) the author notes that the so-called hydrocellulose (girard) (5) is almost insoluble in cuprammonium, as is starch. it is rendered soluble by alkali treatment. group 3. _lustra-cellulose_ prepared by spinning a solution of cellulose in concentrated chloride of zinc. this solution has been known for a long time and used for making filaments for incandescent lamps. the cellulose threads, however, have very little tenacity. this is no doubt due to the conditions necessary for forming the solution, the prolonged digestion causing powerful hydrolysis (1). neither the process of wynne and powell (2) nor that of dreaper and tompkins (3), who have endeavoured to bring the matter to a practical issue, are calculated to produce a thread taking a place as a textile. the author has described in his american patent (4) a method of effecting the solution in the cold, viz. again by first mercerising the cellulose and washing away the caustic soda. this product dissolves in the cold and the solution remains unaltered if kept at low temperature. experiments are being continued with these modifications of the process, and the author anticipates successful results. the modifications having the effect of maintaining the high molecular weight of the cellulose, it would appear that these investigations confirm the theory of cross and bevan that the tenacity of a film or thread of structureless regenerated cellulose is directly proportional to the molecular weight of the cellulose, i.e. to its degree of molecular aggregation (5). group 4. 'viscose' silks obtained by spinning solutions of xanthate of cellulose. in 1892, cross and bevan patented the preparation of a new and curious compound of cellulose, the thiocarbonate (1) (2) (3). great hopes were based upon this product at the time of its discovery. it was expected to yield a considerable industrial and financial profit and also to contribute to the scientific study of cellulose. the later patents of c. h. stearn (4) describe the application of viscose to the spinning of artificial silk. the viscose is projected into solutions of chloride of ammonium and washed in a succession of saline solutions to remove the residual sulphur impurities. the author remarks that though it has a certain interest to have succeeded in making a thread from this compound and thus adding another to the processes existing for this purpose, he is not of opinion that it shows any advance on the lustra-cellulose (2) and (3). he also considers that the bisulphide of carbon, which must be regarded as a noxious compound, is a serious bar to the industrial use of the process, and for economic work he considers that the regeneration of ammonia from the precipitating liquors is necessary and would be as objectionable as the denitration baths in the collodion process. the final product not being on the market he does not pronounce a finally unfavourable opinion. the author and the vereinigte glanzstoff-fabriken after long investigation have decided to make nothing but the lustra-cellulose (2) and (3). a new factory at niedermorschweiler, near mulhouse, is projected for this last production. bibliography _introduction_ (1) bull. de la soc. industr. de mulhouse, 1900. (2) réaumur, mémoire pour servir à l'histoire des insectes, 1874, 1, p. 154. (3) english pat. no. 283, feb. 6, 1855. (4) swinburne, electrician, 18, 28, 1887, p. 256. (5) weston (swinburne), electrician, 18, 1887, p. 287. eng. pat. no. 22866, sept. 12, 1882. (6) german pat. no. 3029. english pat. no. 161780, april 28, 1884 (swan). (7) wynne-powell, english pat. no. 16805, dec. 22, 1884. _group i_ (1) german pat no. 38368, dec. 20, 1885. german pat. no. 46125, march 4, 1888. german pat. no. 56331, feb. 6, 1890. german pat. no. 81599, oct. 11, 1893. german pat. no. 56655, april 23, 1890. french pat. no. 231230, june 30, 1893. (2) industrie textile, 1899, 1892. wyss-noef, zeitschrift für angewandte chemie, 1899, 30, 33. la nature, jan. 1, 1898, no. 1283. revue générale des sciences, june 30, 1898. (3) german pat. no. 46125, march 4, 1888. german pat. no. 56655, april 23, 1890. (4) swan, english pat. 161780, june 28, 1884. see also béchamp, dict. de chimie de wurtz. (5) german pat. no. 81599, oct 11, 1893. (6) béchamp, art. cellulose, dict. de chimie de wurtz, p. 781. (7) chardonnet, addit. march 3, 1897, to the french pat. 231230, may 30, 1893. (8) knofler, french pat. 247855, june 1, 1895. german pat. 88556, march 28, 1894. (9) béchamp, art. cellulose, dict. de chimie de wurtz. blondeau, ann. chim. et phys. (3), 1863, 68, p. 462. (10) revue industrielle, 1890, p. 194. german pat. 52977, march 7, 1889. (11) french pat. 256854, june 2, 1896. (12) german pat. 55949, nov. 9, 1889. german pat. 58508, sept. 16, 1890. german pat. 82555, nov. 15, 1894. (13) german pat. 58508, sept. 16, 1900. (14) french pat. 231230, june 30, 1893. (15) german pat. 93009, nov. 19, 1895. french pat. 254703, march 12, 1896. english pat. 6858, march 28, 1896. (16) american pat. 573132, dec. 15, 1896. (17) this proportion is the most advantageous, and furnishes the best liquid collodions that can be spun. (18) french pat. 259422, sept. 3, 1896. (19) english pat. 22540, 1896. (20) application for german pat. not granted, 4933 iv. 296, mar. 16, 1897. (21) german pat. 96208, feb. 10, 1897. addit. pat. 101844 and 102573, dec. 10, 1897. (22) oberle et newbold, french pat. 25828, july 22, 1896. granquist, engl. applic. 2379, nov. 28, 1899. (23) german pat. 72572, june 17, 1891. (24) voy. stern, ber., 28, ch. 462. _group ii_ (1) german pat. 98642, dec. 1, 1897 (pauly). french pat. 286692, march 10, 1899, and addition of october 14, 1899 (fremery and urban). french pat. 286726, march 11, 1899, and addition of december 4, 1899. german pat. 111313, march 16, 1899 (fremery and urban). english pat. 18884, sept. 19, 1899 (bronnert). english pat. 13331, june 27, 1899 (consort. mulhousien). (2) french pat. 203741, feb. 12, 1890. (3) the actual lapse of this patent is due to the death of despeissis shortly after it was taken. (4) without questioning the good faith of pauly, it is nevertheless a fact that the original patent remains as a document, and therefore that the value of the pauly patents is very questionable. (5) girard, ann. chim. et phys, 1881 (5), 24, p. 337-384. _group iii_ (1) cross and bevan, cellulose, 1895, p. 8. (2) english pat. 16805, dec. 22, 1884. (3) english pat. 17901, july 30, 1897. (4) bronnert, american pat. 646799, april 3, 1900. (5) cross and bevan, cellulose, 1895, p. 12. _group iv_ (1) english pat. 8700, 1892. german pat. 70999, jan. 13, 1893. (2) english pat. 4713, 1896. german pat. 92590, nov. 21, 1896. (3) comptes rendus (loc. cit.). berichte, c. 9, 65a. (4) english pat. 1020, 1898. german pat. 108511, oct. 18, 1898. ~artificial silk--lustra-cellulose.~ c. f. cross and e. j. bevan (j. soc. chem. ind., 1896, 317). the object of this paper is mainly to correct current statements as to the artificial or 'cellulose silks' being explosive or highly inflammable (ibid., 1895, 720). a specimen of the 'lehner' silk was found to retain only 0.19 p.ct. total nitrogen, showing that the denitration is sufficiently complete to dispose of any suggestion of high inflammability. the product yielded traces only of furfural; on boiling with a 1 p.ct. solution of sodium hydrate, the loss of weight was 9.14 p.ct.; but the solution had no reducing action on fehling's solution. the product in denitration had therefore reverted completely to a cellulose (hydrate), no oxy-derivative being present. * * * * * the authors enter a protest against the term 'artificial silk' as applied to these products, and suggest 'lustra-cellulose.' die künstliche seide-ihre herstellung, eigenschaften und verwendung. carl süvern, berlin, 1900, j. springer. ~artificial silk--its production, properties, and applications.~ this work of some 130 pages is an important monograph on the subject of the preparation of artificial cellulose threads--so far as the technical elements of the problems involved are discussed and disclosed in the patent literature. the first section, in fact, consists almost exclusively of the several patent specifications in chronological order and ranged under the sub-sections: (a) the spinning of nitrocellulose (collodion); (b) the spinning of other solutions of cellulose; (c) the spinning of solutions of the nitrogenous colloids. in the second section the author deals with the physical and chemical proportions of the artificial threads. _chardonnet 'silk'_ is stated to have a mean diameter of 35µ, but with considerable variations from the mean in the individual fibres; equally wide variations in form are observed in cross-section. the general form is elliptical, but the surface is marked by deep striæ, and the cross-section is therefore of irregular outline. this is due to irregular conditions of evaporation of the solvents, the thread being 'spun' into the air from cylindrical orifices of regulated dimensions. chardonnet states that when the collodion is spun into alcohol the resultant thread is a perfect cylinder (compt. rend. 1889, 108, 962). the strength of the fibre is variously stated at from 50-80 p.ct. that of 'boiled off' china tram; the true elasticity is 4-5 p.ct., the elongation under the breaking strain 15-17 p.ct. the sp.gr. is 1.49, i.e. 3-5 p.ct. in excess of boiled off silk. _lehner 'silk'_ exhibits the closest similarity to the chardonnet product. in cross-section it is seen to be more regular in outline, and a round, pseudo-tubular form prevails, due to the conditions of shrinkage and collapse of the fibre in parting with the solvents, and in then dehydrating. the constants for 'breaking strain,' both in the original and moistened condition, for elasticity, &c., are closely approximate to those for the chardonnet product. _pauly 'silk'._--the form of the ultimate fibres is much more regular and the contour of the cross-section is smooth. the product shows more resistance to moisture and to alkaline solutions. _viscose 'silk'_ is referred to in terms of a communication appearing in 'papier-zeitung,' 1898, 2416. in the above section the following publications are referred to: chardonnet, 'compt. rend.,' 1887, 105, 900; and 1889, 108, 962; silbermann, 'die seide,' 1897, v. 2, 143; herzog, 'farber-zeitung,' 1894/5, 49-50; thiele, ibid. 1897, 133; o. schlesinger, 'papier-zeitung,' 1895, 1578-81, 1610-12. _action of reagents upon natural and artificial silks._ 1. _potassium hydrate_ in solution of maximum concentration dissolves the silks proper, (a) china silk on slight warming, (b) tussah silk on boiling. the cellulose 'silks' show swelling with discolouration, but the fibrous character is not destroyed even on boiling. 2. _potassium hydrate_ 40 p.ct. china silk dissolves completely at 65°-85°; tussah silk swells considerably at 75° and dissolves at 100°-120°. the cellulose 'silks' are attacked with discolouration; at 140° (boiling-point of the solution) there is progressive solvent action, but the action is incomplete. the pauly product is most resistant. 3. _zinc chloride_, 40 p.ct. solution. both the natural silks and lustra-celluloses are attacked at 100°, and on raising the temperature the further actions are as follows: china silk is completely dissolved at 110-120°; tussah silk at 130-135°; the collodion products at 140-145°; the pauly product was again most resistant, dissolving at 180°. 4. _alkaline cupric oxide_ (glycerin) solution was prepared by dissolving 10 grs. of the sulphate in 100 c.c. water, adding 5 grs. glycerin and 10 c.c. of 40 p.ct. koh. in this solution the china silk dissolved at the ordinary temperature; tussah silk and the lustra-celluloses were not appreciably affected. 5. _cuprammonium solution_ was prepared by dissolving the precipitated cupric hydrate in 24 p.ct. ammonia. in this reagent also the china silk dissolved, and the tussah silk as well as the lustra-celluloses underwent no appreciable change. 6. _an ammoniacal solution of nickel oxide_ was prepared by dissolving the precipitated hydrated oxide in concentrated ammonia. the china silk was dissolved by this reagent; tussah silk and the lustra-celluloses entirely resisted its action. 7. _fehling's solution_ is a solvent of the natural silks, but is without action on the lustra-celluloses. 8. _chromic acid_--20 p.ct. cro_{3}--solution dissolves both the natural silks and the lustra-celluloses at the boiling temperature of the solution. 9. _millon's reagent_, at the boiling solution, colours the natural silks violet: the lustra-celluloses give no reaction. 10. _concentrated nitric acid_ attacks the natural silks powerfully in the cold; the lustra-celluloses dissolve on heating. 11. _iodine solution_ (i in ki) colours the china silk a deep brown, tussah a pale brown; the celluloses from collodion are coloured at first brown, then blue. the pauly product, on the other hand, does not react. 12. _diphenylamine sulphate._--a solution of the base in concentrated sulphuric acid colours the natural silks a brown; the collodion 'silks' give a strong blue reaction due to the presence of residual nitro-groups. the pauly product is not affected. 13. _brucin sulphate_ in presence of concentrated sulphuric acid colours the natural silks only slightly (brown); the collodion 'silks' give a strong red colouration. the pauly product again is without reaction. 14. _water._--the natural silks do not soften in the mouth as do the lustra-celluloses. 15. _water of condition_ was determined by drying at 100°; the following percentages resulted (a). the percentages of water (b) taken up from the atmosphere after forty-three hours' exposure were: (a) (b) china (raw) silk 7.97 2.24 tussah silk 8.26 5.00 lustra-celluloses: chardonnet (besançon) 10.37 5.64 " spreitenbach 11.17 5.77 lehner 10.71 5.97 pauly 10.04 6.94 16. _behaviour on heating at 200°._--after two hours' heating at this temperature the following changes were noted: china silk much discoloured (brown). tussah silk scarcely affected. lustra-celluloses: chardonnet converted into a blue-black charcoal, retaining the lehner form ofthe fibres. pauly a bright yellow-brown colouration, without carbonisation. 17. the _losses of weight_ accompanying these changes and calculated per 100 parts of fibre dried at 100° were: china silk 3.18 tussah silk 2.95 lustra-celluloses: chardonnet 33.70 lehner 26.56 pauly 1.61 18. _inorganic constituents._--determinations of the total ash gave for the first five of the above, numbers varying from 1.0 to 1.7 p.ct. the only noteworthy point in the comparison was the exceptionally small ash of the pauly product, viz. 0.096 p.ct. 19. _total nitrogen._--the natural silks contain the 16-17 p.ct. n characteristic of the proteids. the lustra-celluloses contain 0.05-0.15 p.ct. n which in those spun from collodion is present in the form of nitric groups. the points of chemical differentiation which are established by the above scheme of comparative investigation are summed up in tabular form. _methods of dyeing._--the lustra-celluloses are briefly discussed. the specific relationship of these forms of cellulose to the colouring matters are in the main those of cotton, but they manifest in the dye-bath the somewhat intensified attraction which characterises mercerised cotton, or more generally the cellulose hydrates. _industrial applications_ of the lustra-celluloses are briefly noticed in the concluding section of the book. footnotes: [3] with these products it is easy to observe that they have a definite fusion point 5°-10° below the temperature of explosion. section iii. decompositions of cellulose such as throw light on the problem of its constitution ueber cellulose. g. bumcke und r. wolffenstein (berl. ber., 1899, 2493). (p. 54) _theoretical preface._--the purpose of these investigations is the closer characterisation of the products known as 'oxycellulose' and 'hydracellulose,' which are empirical aggregates obtained by various processes of oxidation and hydrolysis; these processes act concurrently in the production of the oxycelluloses. the action of hydrogen peroxide was specially investigated. an oxycellulose resulted possessing strongly marked aldehydic characteristics. the authors commit themselves to an explanation of this paradoxical result, i.e. the production of a body of strongly 'reducing' properties by the action of an oxidising agent upon the inert cellulose molecule (? aggregate) as due to the _hydrolytic_ action of the peroxide: following wurster (ber. 22, 145), who similarly explained the production of reducing sugars from cane sugar by the action of the peroxide. the product in question is accordingly termed _hydralcellulose_. by the action of alkalis this is resolved into two bodies of alcoholic (cellulose) and acid ('acid cellulose') characteristics respectively. the latter in drying passes into a lactone. the acid product is also obtained from cellulose by the action of alkaline lye (boiling 30 p.ct. naoh) and by solution in schweizer's reagent. it is considered probable that the cellulose nitrates are hydrocellulose derivatives, and experimental evidence in favour of this conclusion is supplied by the results of 'nitrating' the celluloses and their oxyand hydroderivatives. identical products were obtained. _experimental investigations._--the filter paper employed as 'original cellulose,' giving the following numbers on analysis: c 44.56 44.29 44.53 44.56 h 6.39 6.31 6.46 6.42 was exposed to the action of pure distilled h_{2}o_{2} at 4-60 p.ct. strength, at ordinary temperatures until disintegrated: a result requiring from nineteen to thirty days. the series of products gave the following analytical results: c 43.61 43.61 43.46 43.89 44.0 43.87 43.92 43.81 h 6.00 6.29 6.28 6.26 6.13 6.27 6.24 6.27 results lying between the requirements of the formulæ: 5 c_{6}h_{10}o_{5}.h_{2}o and 8 c_{6}h_{10}o_{5}.h_{2}o. hydrazones were obtained with 1.7-1.8 p.ct. n. treated with caustic soda solution the hydrazones were dissolved in part: on reprecipitation a hydrazone of unaltered composition was obtained. the original product shows therefore a uniform distribution of the reactive cogroups. the hydralcellulose boiled with fehling's solution reduced 1/12 of the amount required for an equal weight of glucose. digested with caustic soda solution it yielded 33 p.ct. of its weight of the soluble 'acid cellulose.' this product was purified and analysed with the following result: c 43.35 h 6.5. for the direct production of the 'acid' derivative, cellulose was boiled with successive quantities of 30 p.ct. naoh until _dissolved_. it required eight treatments of one hour's duration. on adding sulphuric acid to the solutions the product was precipitated. yield 40 p.ct. analyses: c 43.8 43.8 43.7 h 6.2 6.2 6.3 the cellulose reprecipitated from solution in schweizer's reagent gave similar analytical results: c 43.9 43.8 44.0 h 6.5 6.3 6.4 _conversion into nitrates._--the original cellulose, hydraland acid cellulose were each treated with 10 times their weight of hno_{3} of 1.48 sp.gr. and heated at 85° until the solution lost its initial viscosity. the products were precipitated by water and purified by solution in acetone from which two fractions were recovered, the one being relatively insoluble in ethyl alcohol. the various nitrates from the several original products proved to be of almost identical composition, c 32.0 h 4.2 n 8.8 with a molecular weight approximately 1350. the conclusion is that these products are all derivatives of a 'hydralcellulose' 6c_{6}h_{10}o_{5}h_{2}o. formation of furfuraldehyde from cellulose, oxycellulose, and hydrocellulose. by leo vignon (compt. rend., 1898, 126, 1355-1358). (p. 54) hydrocellulose, oxycellulose, and 'reduced' cellulose, the last named being apparently identical with hydrocellulose, were obtained by heating carefully purified cotton wool (10 grams) in water (1,000 c.c.), with (1) 65 c.c. of hydrochloric acid (1.2 sp.gr.), (2) 65 c.c. of hydrochloric acid and 80 grams of potassium chlorate, (3) 65 c.c. of hydrochloric acid and 50 grams of stannous chloride. from these and some other substances, the following percentage yields of furfuraldehyde were obtained: hydrocellulose, 0.854; oxycellulose, 2.113; reduced cellulose, 0.860; starch, 0.800; bleached cotton, 1.800; oxycellulose, prepared by means of chromic acid, 3.500. two specimens of oxycellulose were prepared by treating cotton wool with hydrochloric acid and potassium chlorate (a), and with sulphuric acid and potassium dichromate (b), and 25 grams of each product digested with aqueous potash. of the product a, 16.20 grams were insoluble in potash, 2.45 grams were precipitated on neutralisation of the alkaline solution, and 6.35 grams remained in solution, whilst b yielded 11.16 grams of insoluble matter, 1.42 grams were precipitated by acid, and 12.42 grams remained in solution. the percentage yields of furfuraldehyde obtained from these fractions were as follows: a, insoluble, 0.86; precipitated, 4.35; dissolved, 1.10. b, insoluble, 0.76; precipitated, 5.11; dissolved, 1.54. it appears, from the foregoing results, that the cellulose molecule, after oxidation, is easily decomposed by potash, the insoluble and larger portion having all the characters of the original cellulose, whilst the soluble portion is of an aldehydic nature, and contains a substance, precipitable by acids, which yields a relatively large amount of furfuraldehyde. untersuchungen über die oxycellulose. o. v. faber und b. tollens (berl. ber., 1899, 2589). ~investigations of oxycellulose.~ (p. 61) the author's results are tersely summed up in the following conclusions set forth at the end of the paper: the oxycelluloses are mixtures of cellulose and a derivative oxidised compound which contains one more atom o than cellulose (cellulose = c_{6}h_{10}o_{5}), and for which the special designation _celloxin_ is proposed. celloxin may be formulated c_{8}h_{6}o_{6} or c_{6}h_{10}o_{6}, of which the former is the more probable. the various oxycelluloses may be regarded as containing one celloxin group to 1-4 cellulose groups, according to the nature of the original cellulose, and the degree of oxidation to which subjected. these groups are in chemical union. celloxin has not been isolated. on boiling the oxycelluloses with lime-milk it is converted into isosaccharinic and dioxybutyric acids. the insoluble residue from the treatment is cellulose. the following oxycelluloses were investigated: a. _product of action of nitric acid upon pine wood_ (lindsey and tollens, ann. 267, 366).--the oxycelluloses contained 1 mol celloxin: {2 mol. cellulose on 6 hours' heating {3 mol. cellulose on 3 hours' heating with a ratio h : o = 1 : 9 and 1 : 8.7 respectively: they yielded 7 p.ct. furfural. b. _by action of bromine in presence of water and_ caco_{3} _upon cotton_.--yield, (air-dry) 85 p.ct. empirical composition c_{12}h_{20}o_{11} = c_{6}h_{10}o_{5}.c_{6}h_{10}o_{6}: yielded furfural 1.7 p.ct. c. _cotton and nitric acid at_ 100°, two and a half hours (cross and bevan).--yield, 70 p.ct. composition 4 c_{6}h_{10}o_{5}.c_{6}h_{8}o_{6} yielded furfural 2.3 p.ct. d. _cotton and nitric acid at_ 100° (four hours).--a more highly oxidised product resulted, viz. 3 c_{6}h_{10}o_{5}.c_{6}h_{8}o_{6}: yielded furfural 3.2 p.ct. _by-products of oxidation._--the liquors from b were found to contain saccharic acid: the acid from c and b contained a dibasic acid which appeared to be tartaric acid. the isolation of (1) isosaccharinic and (2) dioxybutyric acid from the products of digestion of the oxycelluloses with lime-milk at 100° was effected by the separation of their respective calcium salts, (1) by direct crystallisation, (2) by precipitation alcohol after separation of the former. celluloses, hydroand oxycelluloses, and cellulose esters. l. vignon (bull. soc. chim., 1901 [3], 25, 130). (a) _oxycelluloses from cotton, hemp, flax, and ramie._--the comparative oxidation of these celluloses, by treatment with hclo_{3} at 100°, gave remarkably uniform results, as shown by the following numbers, showing extreme variations: yields, 68-70 p.ct.; hydrazine reaction, n fixed 1.58-1.69; fixation of basic colouring matters (relative numbers), saffranine, 100-200, methylene blue, 100-106. the only points of difference noted were (1) hemp is somewhat more resistant to the acid oxidation; (2) the cotton oxycellulose shows a somewhat higher (25 p.ct.) cupric reduction. (b) _'saccharification' of cellulose, cellulose hydrates, and hydrocellulose._--the products were digested with dilute hydrochloric acid six hours at 100°, and the cupric reduction of the soluble products determined and calculated to dextrose. 100 grms. of gave reducing products equal to dextrose purified cotton 3.29 " hydrocellulose 9.70 cotton mercerised (naoh 30° b.) 4.39 cotton mercerised (naoh 40° b.) 3.51 cellulose reprecipitated from cuprammonium 4.39 oxycellulose 14.70 starch 98.6 these numbers show that cellulose may be hydrated both by mercerisation and solution, without affecting the constitutional relationships of the co groups. the results also differentiate the cellulose series from starch in regard to hydrolysis. (c) _cellulose and oxycellulose nitrates._--the nitric esters of cellulose have a strong reducting action on alkaline copper solutions. the author has studied this reaction quantitatively for the esters both of cellulose and oxycellulose, at two stages of 'nitration,' represented by 8.2-8.6 p.ct. and 13.5-13.9 p.ct. total nitrogen in the ester-products, respectively. the results are expressed in terms (c.c.) of the cupric reagent (pasteur) reduced per 100 grs. compared with dextrose (=17767). cellulose maximum nitration (13.5 p.ct. n) 3640 oxycellulose maximum nitration (13.9 p.ct. n) 3600 cellulose minimum nitration (8.19 p.ct. n) 3700 oxycellulose minimum nitration (8.56 p.ct. n) 3620 the author concludes that, since the reducing action is independent of the degree of nitration, and is the same for cellulose and the oxycelluloses, the ester reaction in the case of the normal cellulose is accompanied by oxidation, the product being an oxycellulose ester. _products of 'denitration'._--the esters were treated with ferrous chloride in boiling aqueous solution. the products were oxycelluloses, with a cupric reduction equal to that of an oxycellulose directly prepared by the action of hclo_{3}. on the other hand, by treatment with ammonium sulphide at 35°-40° 'denitrated' products were obtained without action on alkaline copper solutions. oxycelluloses and the molecular weight of cellulose. h. nastukoff (berl. ber. 33 [13] 2237). (p. 61) the author continues his investigations of the oxidation of cellulose. [compare bull. mulhouse, 1892.] the products described were obtained by the action of hypochlorites and permanganates upon swedish filter paper (schleicher and schüll). 4. _oxidation by hypochlorites._--(1) the cellulose was digested 24 hrs. with 35 times its weight of a filtered solution of bleaching power of 4°b.; afterwards drained and exposed for 24 hrs. to the atmosphere. these treatments were then repeated. after washing, treatment with dilute acetic acid and again washing, the product was treated with a 10 p.ct. naoh solution. the oxycellulose was precipitated from the filtered solution: yield 45 p.ct. the residue when purified amounted to 30 p.ct. of the original cellulose, with which it was identical in all essential properties. the oxycellulose, after purification, dried at 110°, gave the following analytical numbers: c 43.64 43.78 43.32 43.13 h 6.17 6.21 5.98 6.08 its compound with phenylhydrazine (_loc. cit._) gave the following analytical numbers: n 0.78 0.96 0.84 (2) the reagents were as in (1), but the conditions varied by passing a stream of carbonic acid gas through the solution contained in a flask, until cl compounds ceased to be given off. the analysis of the purified oxycellulose gave c 43.53, h 6.13. (3) the conditions were as in (2), but a much stronger hypochlorite solution--viz. 12°b.--was employed. the yield of oxycellulose precipitated from solution in soda lye (10 p.ct. naoh) was 45 p.ct. there was only a slight residue of unattacked cellulose. the analytical numbers obtained were: oxycellulose c 43.31 43.74 43.69 " h 6.47 6.42 6.51 ________________________ phenylhydrazine compound n 0.62 0.81 b. _oxidation by permanganate_ (kmno_{4}). (1) the cellulose 16 grms. was treated with 1100 c.c. of a 1 p.ct. solution of kmno_{4} in successive portions. the mno_{2} was removed from time to time by digesting the product with a dilute sulphuric acid (10 p.ct. h_{2}so_{4}). the oxycellulose was purified as before, yield 40 p.ct. analytical numbers: oxycellulose c 42.12 42.9 " h 6.20 6.11 ________________________ phenylhydrazine compound n 1.35 1.08 1.21 (2) the cellulose (16 grms.) was digested 14 days with 2500 c.c. of 1 p.ct. kmno_{4} solution. the purified oxycellulose was identical in all respects with the above: yield 40 p.ct. c 42.66, h 6.19. (3) the cellulose (16 grms.) was heated in the water-bath with 1600 c.c. of 15 p.ct. h_{2}so_{4} to which were added 18 grms. kmno_{4}. the yield and composition of the oxycellulose was identical with the above. it appears from these results that the oxidation with hypochlorites acids 1 atom of o to 4-6 of the unit groups c_{6}h_{10}o_{5}; and the oxidation with permanganate 2 atoms o per 4-6 units of c_{6}h_{10}o_{5}. the molecular proportion of n in the phenylhydrazine residue combining is fractional, representing 1 atom o, i.e. 1 co group reacting per 4 c_{36}h_{60}o_{31} and 6 c_{24}h_{49}o_{21} respectively, assuming the reaction to be a hydrazone reaction. further investigations of the oxycelluloses by treatment with (a) sodium amalgam, (b) bromine (water), and (c) dilute nitric acid at 110°, led to no positive results. by treatment with alcoholic soda (naoh) the products were resolved into a soluble and insoluble portion, the properties of the latter being those of a cellulose (hydrate). _molecular weight of cellulose and oxycellulose._--the author endeavours to arrive at numbers expressing these relations by converting the substances into acetates by schutzenberger's method, and observing the boiling-points of their solution in nitrobenzene. fermentation of cellulose v. omelianski (compt. rend., 1897, 125, 1131-1133). pure paper was allowed to ferment in the presence of calcium carbonate at a temperature of 35° for 13 months. the products obtained from 3.4743 grams of paper were: acids of the acetic series, 2.2402 grams; carbonic anhydride, 0.9722 grams; and hydrogen, 0.0138 gram. the acids were chiefly acetic and butyric acid, the ratio of the former to the latter being 1.7 : 1. small quantities of valeric acid, higher alcohols, and odorous products were formed. the absence of methane from the products of fermentation is remarkable, but the formation of this gas seems to be due to a special organism readily distinguishable from the ferment that produces the fatty acids. this organism is at present under investigation. * * * * * (p. 75) ~constitution of cellulose.~--it may be fairly premised that the problem of the constitution of cellulose cannot be solved independently of that of molecular aggregation. we find in effect that the structural properties of cellulose and its derivatives are directly connected with their constitution. so far we have only a superficial perception of this correlation. we know that a fibrous cellulose treated with acids or alkalis in such a way that only hydrolytic changes can take place is converted into a variety of forms of very different structural characteristics, and these products, while still preserving the main chemical characteristics of the original, show when converted into derivatives by simple synthesis, _e.g._ esters and sulphocarbonates, a corresponding differentiation of the physical properties of these derivatives, from the normal standard, and therefore that the new reacting unit determines a new physical aggregate. thus the sulphocarbonate of a 'hydrocellulose' is formed with lower proportions of alkaline hydrate and carbon disulphide, gives solutions of relatively low viscosity, and, when decomposed to give a film or thread of the regenerated cellulose, these are found to be deficient in strength and elasticity. similarly with the acetate. the normal acetate gives solutions of high viscosity, films of considerable tenacity, and when those are saponified the cellulose is regenerated as an unbroken film. the acetates of hydrolysed celluloses manifest a retrogradation in structural and physical properties, proportioned to the degree of hydrolysis of the original. we may take this opportunity of pointing out that the celluloses not only suggest with some definiteness the connection of the structural properties of visible aggregates--that is, of matter in the mass--with the configuration of the chemical molecule or reacting unit, but supply unique material for the actual experimental investigation of the problems involved. of all the 'organic' colloids cellulose is the only one which can be converted into a variety of derivative forms, from each of which a regular solid can be produced in continuous length and of any prescribed dimensions. thus we can compare the structural properties of cellulose with those of its hydrates, nitrates, acetates, and benzoates, in terms of measurements of breaking strain, extensibility, elasticity. investigations in this field are being prosecuted, but the results are not as yet sufficiently elaborated for reduction to formulæ. one striking general conclusion is, however, established, and that is that the structural properties of cellulose are but little affected by esterification and appear therefore to be a function of the special arrangement of the carbon atoms, i.e. of the molecular constitution. also it is established that the molecular aggregate which constitutes a cellulose is of a resistant type, and undoubtedly persists in the solutions of the compounds. it may be urged that it is superfluous to import these questions of mass-aggregation into the problem of the chemical constitution of cellulose. but we shall find that the point again arises in attempting to define the reacting unit, which is another term for the molecule. in the majority of cases we rely for this upon physical measurements; and in fact the purely chemical determination of such quantities is inferential. attempts have been made to determine the molecular weights of the cellulose esters in solution, by observations of depression of solidifying and boiling-points. but the numbers have little value. the only other well-defined compound is the sulphocarbonate. it has been pointed out that, by successive precipitations of this compound, there occurs a continual aggregation of the cellulose with dissociation of the alkali and cs residues and it has been found impossible to assign a limit to the dissociation, i.e. to fix a point at which the transition from soluble sulphocarbonate to insoluble cellulose takes place. on these grounds it will be seen we are reduced to a somewhat speculative treatment of the hypothetical ultimate unit group, which is taken as of c_{6} dimensions. as there has been no addition of experimental facts directly contributing to the solution of the problem, the material available for a discussion of the probabilities remains very much as stated in the first edition, pp. 75-77. it is now generally admitted that the tetracetate _n_ [c_{6}h_{6}o.(oac)_{4}] is a normal cellulose ester; therefore that four of the five o atoms are hydroxylic. the fifth is undoubtedly carbonyl oxygen. the reactions of cellulose certainly indicate that the cogroup is ketonic rather than aldehydic. even when attacked by strong sulphuric acid the resolution proceeds some considerable way before products are obtained reducing fehling's solution. this is not easily reconcilable with any polyaldose formula. nor is the resistance of cellulose to very severe alkaline treatments. the probability may be noted here that under the action of the alkaline hydrates there occurs a change of configuration. lobry de bruyn's researches on the change of position of the typical cogroup of the simple hexoses, in presence of alkalis, point very definitely in this direction. it is probable that in the formation of alkali cellulose there is a constitutional change of the cellulose, which may in effect be due to a migration of a coposition within the unit group. again also we have the interesting fact that structural changes accompany the chemical reaction. it is surprising that there should have been no investigation of these changes of external form and structure, otherwise than as mass effects. we cannot, therefore, say what may be the molecular interpretation of these effects. it has not yet been determined whether there are any intrinsic volume changes in the cellulose substance itself: and as regards what changes are determined in the reacting unit or molecule, we can only note a fruitful subject for future investigation. _a priori_ our views of the probable changes depend upon the assumed constitution of the unit group. if of the ordinary carbohydrate type, formulated with an open chain, there is little to surmise beyond the change of position of a cogroup. but alternative formulæ have been proposed. thus the tetracetate is a derivative to be reckoned with in the problem. it is formed under conditions which preclude constitutional changes within the unit groups. the temperature of the main reaction is 30°-40°, the reagents are used but little in excess of the quantitative proportions, and the yields are approximately quantitative. if now the derivative is formed entirely without the hydrolysis the empirical formula c_{6}h_{6}o.(oac)_{4} justifies a closed-ring formula for the original viz. co<[choh]_{4}>ch_{2}; and the preference for this formula depends upon the explanation it affords of the aggregation of the groups by way of co-ch_{2} synthesis. the exact relationship of the tetracetate to the original cellulose is somewhat difficult to determine. the starting-point is a cellulose hydrate, since it is the product obtained by decomposition of the sulphocarbonate. the degree of _hydrolysis_ attending the cycle of reactions is indicated by the formula 4 c_{6}h_{10}o_{5}.h_{2}o. it has been already shown that this degree of hydrolysis does not produce molecular disaggregation. if this hydrate survived the acetylation it would of course affect the empirical composition, i.e. chiefly the carbon percentage, of the product. it may be here pointed out that the extreme variation of the carbon in this group of carbohydrate esters is as between c_{14}h_{20}o_{10} (c = 48.3 p.ct.) and c_{14}h_{18}o_{9} (c = 50.8 p.ct.) i.e. a tetracetate of c_{6}h_{12}o_{6} and c_{6}h_{10}o_{5} respectively. in the fractional intermediate terms it is clear that we come within the range of ordinary experimental errors, and to solve this critical point by way of ultimate analysis must involve an extended series of analyses with precautions for specially minimising and quantifying the error. the determination of the acetyl by saponification is also subject to an error sufficiently large to preclude the results being applied to solve the point. while, therefore, we must defer the final statement as to whether the tetracetate is produced from or contains a partly hydrolysed cellulose molecule, it is clear that at least a large proportion of the unit groups must be acetylated in the proportion c_{6}h_{6}o.(oac)_{4}. it has been shown that by the method of franchimont a higher proportion of acetyl groups can be introduced; but this result involves a destructive hydrolysis of the cellulose: the acetates are not derivatives of cellulose, but of products of hydrolytic decomposition. it appears, therefore, that with the normal limit of acetylation at the tetracetate the aggregation of the unit groups must depend upon the cogroups and a ring formula of the general form co<[choh]_{4}>ch_{2} is consistent with the facts. vignon has proposed for cellulose the constitutional formula o------ch | | \ | o \[choh]_{3} | | / ch_{2}-ch/ with reference to the highest nitrate, and the decomposition of the nitrate by alkalis with formation of hydroxypyruvic acid. while these reactions afford no very sure ground for deductions as to constitutional relationships, it certainly appears that, if the aldose view of the unit group is to be retained, this form of the anhydride contains suggestions of the general tendency of the celluloses on treatment with condensing acids to split off formic acid in relatively large quantity [ber. 1895, 1940]; the condensation of the oxycelluloses to furfural; the non-formation of the normal hydroxy-dicarboxylic acids by nitric acid oxidations. indirectly we may point out that any hypothesis which retains the polyaldose view of cellulose, and so fails to differentiate its constitution from that of starch, has little promise of progress. the above formula, moreover, concerns the assumed unit group, with no suggestion as to the mode of aggregation in the cellulose complex. also there is no suggestion as to how far the formula is applicable to the celluloses considered as a group. in extending this view to the oxycelluloses, vignon introduces the derived oxidised group cho.(choh)_{3}.ch . co |_o__| --of which one is apportioned to three or four groups of the cellulose previously formulated: these groups in condensed union together constitute an oxycellulose. these views are in agreement with the experimental results obtained by faber and tollens (p. 71). they regard the oxycelluloses as compounds of 'celloxin' c_{6}h_8{o}_{6} with 1-4 mols. unaltered cellulose; and the former they particularly refer to as a lactone of glycuronic acid. but on boiling with lime they obtain dioxybutyric and isosaccharinic acids; both of which are not very obviously related to the compounds formulated by vignon. we revert with preference to a definitely ketonic formula, for which, moreover, some farther grounds remain to be mentioned. in the systematic investigation of the nitric esters of the carbohydrates (p. 41) will and lenze have definitely differentiated the ketoses from the aldoses, as showing an internal condensation accompanying the ester reaction. not only are the oh groups taking part in the latter consequently less by two than in the corresponding aldoses, but the nitrates show a much increased stability. this would give a simple explanation of the well-known facts obtaining in the corresponding esters of the normal cellulose. we may note here that an important item in the quantitative factors of the cellulose nitric ester reaction has been overlooked: that is, the yield calculated to the no_{3} groups fixed. the theoretical yields for the higher nitrates are yield p.ct. n p.ct. of cellulose of nitrate pentanitrate 169 12.7 hexanitrate 183 14.1 from such statistics as are recorded the yields are not in accordance with the above. there is a sensible deficiency. thus will and lenze record a yield of 170 p.ct. for a product with 13.8 p.ct. n, indicating a deficiency of about 10 p.ct. as the by-products soluble in the acid mixture are extremely small, the deficiency represents approximately the water split off by an internal reaction. in this important point the celluloses behave as ketoses. in the lignocelluloses the condensed constituents of the complex are of well-marked ketonic, i.e. quinonic, type. in 'nitrating' the lignocelluloses this phenomenon of internal condensation is much more pronounced (see p. 131). as the reaction is mainly confined to the cellulose of the fibre, we have this additional evidence that the typical carbonyl is of ketonic function. it is still an open question whether the cellulose constituents of the lignocelluloses are progressively condensed--with progress of 'lignification'--to the unsaturated or lignone groups. there is much in favour of this view, the evidence being dealt with in the first edition, p. 180. the transition from a cellulose-ketone to the lignone-ketone involves a simple condensation without rearrangement; from which we may argue back to the greater probability of the ketonic structure of the cellulose. we must note, however, that the celluloses of the lignocelluloses are obtained as residues of various reactions, and are not homogeneous. they yield on boiling with condensing acids from 6 to 9 p.ct. furfural. it is usual to regard furfural as invariably produced from a pentose residue. but this interpretation ignores a number of other probable sources of the aldehyde. it must be particularly remembered that lævulose is readily condensed (a) to a methylhydroxyfurfural c_{6}h_{1}o_{6} 3h_{2}o = c_{6}h_{6}o_{3} = c_{5}(oh).h_{2}.(ch_{3})o_{2} and (b) by hbr, with further loss of oh, as under: c_{6}h_{12}o_{6} 4h_{2}o + hbr = c_{5}h_{3}(ch_{2}br)o and generally the ketoses are distinguished from the aldoses by their susceptibility to condensation. such condensation of lævulose has been effected by two methods: (a) by heating the concentrated aqueous solution with a small proportion of oxalic acid at 3 atm. pressure [kiermayer, chem. ztg. 19, 100]; (b) by the action of hydrobromic acid (gas) in presence of anhydrous ether; the actual compound obtained being the omega-brommethyl derivative [fenton, j. chem. soc. 1899, 423]. this latter method is being extended to the investigation of typical celluloses, and the results appear to confirm the view that cellulose may be of ketonic constitution. the evidence which is obtainable from the synthetical side of the question rests of course mainly upon the physiological basis. there are two points which may be noted. since the researches of brown and morris (j. chem. soc. 1893, 604) have altered our views of the relationships of starch and cane sugar to the assimilation process, and have placed the latter in the position of a primary product with starch as a species of overflow and reserve product, it appears that lævulose must play an important part in the elaboration of cellulose. moreover, a. j. brown, in studying the cellulosic cell-collecting envelope produced by the _bacterium xylinum_, found that the proportion of this product to the carbohydrate disappearing under the action of the ferment was highest in the case of lævulose. these facts being also taken into consideration there is a concurrence of suggestion that the typical co group in the celluloses is of ketonic character. that the typical cotton cellulose breaks down finally under the action of sulphuric acid to dextrose cannot be held to prove the aldehydic position of the carbonyls in the unit groups of the actual cellulose molecule or aggregate. we again are confronted with the problem of the aggregate and as to how far it may affect the constitution of the unit groups. that it modifies the functions or reactivity of the ultimate constituent groups we have seen from the study of the esters. thus with the direct ester reactions the normal fibrous cellulose (c_{6}h_{16}o_{5}) yields a monoacetate, dibenzoate, and a trinitrate respectively under conditions which determine, with the simple hexoses and anhydrides, the maximum esterification, i.e. all the oh groups reacting. if the oh groups are of variable function, we should expect the co groups _a fortiori_ to be susceptible of change of function, i.e. of position within the unit groups. but as to how far this is a problem of the constitution or phases of constitution of the unit groups or of the aggregate under reaction we have as yet no grounds to determine. the subjoined communication, appearing after the completion of the ms. of the book, and belonging to a date subsequent to the period intended to be covered, is nevertheless included by reason of its exceptional importance and special bearing on the constitutional problem above discussed. ~the action of hydrogen bromine on carbohydrates.~[4] h. j. h. fenton and mildred gostling (j. chem. soc., 1901, 361). the authors have shown in a previous communication (trans., 1898, 73, 554) that certain classes of carbohydrates when acted upon at the ordinary temperature with dry hydrogen bromide in ethereal solution give an intense and beautiful purple colour.[5] it was further shown (trans., 1899, 75, 423) that this purple substance, when neutralised with sodium carbonate and extracted with ether, yields golden-yellow prisms of omega-brommethylfurfural, ch:c.ch_{2}br | | | o | | ch:c.cho. this reaction is produced by lævulose, sorbose, cane sugar, and inulin, an intense colour being given within an hour or two. dextrose, maltose, milk sugar, galactose, and the polyhydric alcohols give, if anything, only insignificant colours, and these only after long standing. the authors therefore suggested that the reaction might be employed as a means of distinguishing these classes of carbohydrates, the rapid production of the purple colour being indicative of _ketohexoses_, or of substances which produce these by hydrolysis. by relying only on the production of the purple colour, however, a mistake might possibly arise, owing to the fact that _xylose_ gives a somewhat similar colour after standing for a few hours. hence, the observations should be confirmed by isolation of the crystals of brommethylfurfural. no trace of this substance is obtained from the xylose product. in order to identify the substance, the ether extract, after neutralisation, is allowed to evaporate to a syrup, and crystallisation promoted either by rubbing with a glass rod, or by the more certain and highly characteristic method of 'sowing' with the most minute trace of omega-brommethylfurfural, when crystals are almost instantly formed. these are recrystallised from ether, or a mixture of ether and light petroleum, and further identified by the melting-point (59.5-60.5°), and, if considered desirable, by estimation of the bromine. it is now found, so reactive is the bromine atom in this compound, that the estimation may be accurately made by titration with silver nitrate according to volhard's process, the crystals for this purpose being dissolved in dilute alcohol: 0.1970 gram required 10.5 c.c. _n_/10 agno_{3}. br = 42.63 p.ct., calculated 42.32 p.ct. this method of applying hydrogen bromide in ethereal solution is, of course, unsuitable for investigations where a higher temperature has to be employed, or where long standing is necessary, since, under such circumstances, the ether itself is attacked. wishing to make investigations under these conditions, the authors have tried several solvents, and, at present, find that chloroform is best suited to the purpose. in each of the following experiments, 10 grms. of the substance were covered with 250 c.c. of chloroform which had been saturated at 0° with dry hydrogen bromide. the mixture was contained in an accurately stoppered bottle, firmly secured with an iron clamp, and heated in a water-bath to about the boiling temperature for two hours. after standing for several hours, the mixture was treated with sodium carbonate (first anhydrous solid, and afterwards a few drops of strong solution), filtered, and the solution dried over calcium chloride. most of the chloroform was then distilled off, and the remaining solution allowed to evaporate to a thick syrup in a weighed dish. the product was then tested for omega-brommethylfurfural by 'sowing' with the most minute trace of the substance, as described above. it was then warmed on a water-oven, kept in a vacuum desiccator over solid paraffin, and the weight estimated. when necessary, the product was recrystallised from ether, and further identified by the tests mentioned. the following results were obtained: weight of crude residue. swedish filter paper 3.0 crystallised at once by 'sowing.' ordinary cotton 3.3 " " mercerised cotton 2.1 " " straw cellulose[6] 2.3 " " lævulose 2.2 " " inulin 1.3 " " potato starch 0.37 " " cane sugar 0.85 " " dextrose 0.33 uncrystallisable. milk sugar 0.37 " glycogen 0.34 " galactose 0.34 " the products from _dextrose_, _milk sugar_, and _galactose_ absolutely refused to crystallise even when extracted with ether and again evaporated, or by 'sowing,' stirring, &c. the _glycogen_ product deposited a very small amount of crystalline matter on standing, but the quantity was too minute for examination; moreover, it refused altogether to crystallise in contact with the aldehyde. it may fairly be stated, therefore, that these last four substances give absolutely negative results as regards the formation of omega-brommethylfurfural; if any is formed, its quantity is altogether too small to be detected. the specimen of _starch_ examined was freshly prepared from potato, and purified by digestion for twenty-four hours each with _n_/10 koh, _n_/4 hcl, and strong alcohol; it was then washed with water and allowed to dry in the air. it will be seen that this substance gave a positive result, but that the yield was extremely small, and might yet be due to impurity. considering the importance of the behaviour of starch, for the purpose of drawing general conclusions from these observations, it was thought advisable to make further experiments with specimens which could be relied upon, and also to investigate the behaviour of dextrin. this the authors have been enabled to do upon a series of specimens specially prepared by c. o'sullivan, and thus described by him: 1. rice starch, specially purified by the permanganate method. 2. wheat starch " " " 3. oat starch, contains traces of oil, washed with dilute koh and dilute hcl. 4. pea starch, first crop, washed with alkali, acid (hcl), and strong alcohol. 5. natural dextrin, d = 3.87, alpha_{d} = 194.7; k = 0.95, (c 2.628). 6. alpha-dextrin, c equation purified without fermentation, 30 precipitations with alcohol (trans., 1879, 35, 772). the examination of these specimens was conducted on a smaller scale, but under the same conditions as before, _one gram_ of the substance being treated with 12.5 c.c. of the saturated chloroform solution and heated in sealed tubes for two hours as above. the results were as follows: weight of crude residue. 1. rice starch 0.046 crystallised at once by 'sowing.' 2. wheat starch 0.044 " " 3. oat starch 0.049 " " 4. pea starch 0.064 " " 5. natural dextrin 0.088 " " 6. alpha-dextrin 0.055 " " the results may therefore be summarised as follows:--treated under these particular conditions all forms of cellulose give large yields of omega-brommethylfurfural, some varieties giving as much as 33 per cent. lævulose, inulin, and cane sugar give yields varying from 22 to 8.5 per cent.; various starches give small yields (average about 4.5 per cent.); and dextrins 5 to 8 per cent., whereas dextrose, milk sugar, and galactose give, apparently, none at all. the yields represent the solid crystalline residue; this when purified by recrystallisation gives, probably, about three-quarters of its weight of pure crystals. (in the case of dextrose, &c., the yields represent the weight of syrup.) these numbers, however, by no means represent the maximum yields obtainable, owing to the comparatively slight solubility of hydrogen bromide in chloroform. the process was conducted in the above manner only for the sake of uniform comparison. the ether method previously described gives much larger yields; for example, 12 grms. of inulin treated with only 60 c.c. of the saturated ether gave 2.5 grms. of substance. for the purpose of obtaining larger yields, other methods are being investigated. the facts recorded above, taken in conjunction with those given in our previous communications, appear to point definitely to the following general conclusions. first, that the various forms of _cellulose_ contain one or more groups or nuclei identical with that contained in _lævulose_, and that such groups constitute the main or essential part of the molecule. secondly, that similar groupings are contained in _starches_ and _dextrins_, but that the proportion of such groupings represents a relatively small part of the whole structure. the nature of this grouping is, according to the generally accepted constitution of _lævulose_, the six-carbon chain with a ketonic group: c·c·c·c·c·c || . o but the results might, on the other hand, be considered indicative of the anhydride or 'lacton' grouping, which tollens suggested for lævulose: c·c·c·c·c·c \ / \ / . o the latter very simply represents the formation of omega-brommethylfurfural from lævulose,[7] ------o---- | h h | | | | | oh·c-----c---c---c--c-----ch_{2}·oh h_{2} oh oh oh h giving h h hc·c:c·c:c·ch_{2}br || \ / , o \ / o although by a little further 'manipulation' of the symbols the change could, of course, be represented by reference to the ketonic formula. ~the ketonic constitution of cellulose.~ c. f. cross and e. j. bevan (j. chem. soc., 1901, 366). in this paper the authors discuss more fully the theoretical bearings of the observations of fenton and gostling, the two papers being simultaneously communicated. the paper is mainly devoted to a review of the antecedent evidence, chemical and physiological, and to a general summing up in favour of the view that cellulose is a polyketose (anhydride). * * * * * (p. 79) ~composition of the seed hair of eriodendron~ (~anf.~)--some interest attaches to the results of an analytical investigation which we have made of this silky floss. there is little doubt that cotton is entirely exceptional in its characteristics: both in structure and chemical composition it fails to show any adaptation to what we may regard as the _more obvious_ functions of a seed hair--which certainly do not demand either structural strength or chemical resistance. the following numbers determined for the kapok differentiate it widely from the cottons: ash, 1.3; moisture, 9.3; alkaline hydrolysis (loss) (a) 16.7, (b) 21.8. cellulose, by chlorination, &c., 71.1. in reacting with chloride it shows the presence of unsaturated groups, similar to the lignone of the woods. this was confirmed by a well-marked reaction with ferric ferricyanide with increase of weight due to the fixation of the blue cyanide. but the most characteristic feature is the high yield of furfural on boiling with condensing acids. the following numbers were determined: total furfural from original fibre 14.84 in residue from alkali hydrolysis 11.5 in cellulose isolated by cl method 10.4 treated with sulphuric acids of concentration, (a) 92.1 grs. h_{2}so_{4} per 100 c.c., (b) 105.8 grs. per 100 c.c., the fibres dissolve, and diluted immediately after complete solution it was resolved into (a) (b) reprecipitated fraction 68.7 43.7 soluble fraction yielding furfural 13.2 14.3 by these observations it is established that the furfuroids are of the cellulose type and behave very much as the furfuroids of the cereal celluloses. this group of seed hairs invites exhaustive investigation. the furfuroid constituents are easily isolated, and as they constitute at least one-third of the fibre substance it is especially from this point of view that they invite study. recherches sur l'oxycellulose. l. vignon. ~résumé of investigations (1898-1900) of oxycellulose, published as a brochure~ (rey, lyon, 1900). (a) a typical oxycellulose prepared from cotton cellulose by the action of hclo_{3} (hcl + kclo_{3}) in dilute solution at 100° for one hour gave the following numbers: c h o elementary composition 43.55 6.03 50.42 oxycellulose original cellulose analysis by lange's method soluble in koh (at 180°) 87.6 12.0 insoluble in koh (at 180°) 12.4 88.0 oxycellulose original cellulose heat of combustion 4124-4133 4190-4224 heat evolved in contact with 50 times wt.} normal koh per 100 grms. } 1.3 cal. 0.74 cal. oxycellulose cellulose absorption of colouring } saffranine 0.7 0.0 matters at 100° per 100 grms. } methylene blue 0.6 0.2 (b) _yield of furfural from cellulose, oxyand hydro-cellulose._--from the hydrocelluloses variously prepared the author obtains 0.8 p.ct. furfural; from bleached cotton 1.8 p.ct.; and from the oxycelluloses variously prepared 2.0-3.5 p.ct. the 'furfuroid' is relatively more soluble in alkaline solutions (koh) in the cold. the insoluble residue is a normal cellulose. (c) _nitrates of cellulose, oxyand hydro-cellulose._--treated with the usual acid mixture (h_{2}so_{4} 3 p., hno_{3} 1 p.) under conditions for maximum action, the resulting esters showed uniformly a fixation of 11.0 no_{2} groups per unit mol. of c_{24}. the oxycellulose nitrate was treated directly with dilute solution of potassium hydrate in the cold. from the products of decomposition the author obtained the osazone of hydroxypyruvic acid [will, ber. 24, 400]. (d) _osazones of the oxycelluloses._--oxycelluloses prepared by various methods are found to fix varying proportions of phenylhydrazine (residue), viz. from 3.4-8.5 p.ct. of the cellulose derivative reacting, corresponding with, i.e. calculated from, the nitrogen determined in the products (0.87-2.2 p.ct.). the reaction is assumed to be that of osazone formation. the author has also established a relation between the phenylhydrazine fixed and the furfural which the substance yields on boiling with condensing acids. this is illustrated by the subjoined series of numbers: phenylhydrazine furfural fixed p.ct. formed p.ct. cotton (bleached) 1.73 1.60 oxycellulose (hclo_{3}) 7.94 2.09 " (hclo) 3.37 1.79 " (cro_{3}) (1) 7.03 3.00 " (cro_{3}) (2) 7.71 3.09 " (cro_{3}) (3) 8.48 3.50 (e) _constitution of cellulose and oxycellulose._--the results of these investigations are generalised as regards cellulose (c_6) by the constitutional formula ch--ch_{2} / | | (choh)_{3} o | \ | | ch--o . the oxycelluloses contain the characteristic group coh / (choh)_{3} \ ch--co \ / o in union with varying proportions of residual cellulose. quantitative separation of cellulose-like carbohydrates in vegetable substances. wilhelm hoffmeister (landw. versuchs-stat., 1897, 48, 401-411). to separate the hemicelluloses, celluloses, and the constituents of lignin without essential change, the substance, after being freed from fat, is extracted with dilute hydrochloric acid and ammonia, and the residue frequently agitated for a day or two with 5-6 p.ct. caustic soda solution. it is then diluted, the extract poured off, neutralised with hydrochloric acid, treated with sufficient alcohol, and the hemicellulose filtered, dried, and weighed. the residue from the soda extract is washed on a filter with hot water, and extracted with schweizer's reagent. when the final residue (lignin) is subjected to prolonged extraction with boiling dilute ammonia (a suitable apparatus is described, with sketch) until the ammonia is no longer coloured, a residue is obtained which mostly dissolves in schweizer's reagent, and on repeating the process the residue is found to consist largely of mineral matter. the dissolved cellulose-like substances often contain considerable amounts of pentosanes. according to the nature of the substance, the extraction with ammonia may take weeks, or months, or even longer; the ammonia extracts of hard woods (as lignum vitæ) and of cork are dark brown, and give an odour of vanilla when evaporated down. the residues, which are insoluble in water, but redissolve in ammonia, have the properties of humic acids. other vegetable substances, when extracted, yielded, besides humic acids, a compound, c_{6}h_{7}o_{2}, soluble in alcohol and chloroform, but insoluble in water, ether, and benzene; preparations from different sources melted between 200° and 210°. footnotes: [4] the original paper is reproduced with slight alterations. [5] this purple colour would appear to be due to a highly dissociable compound of omega-brommethylfurfural with hydrogen bromide. the aldehyde gives yellow or colourless solutions in various solvents, which are turned purple by a sufficient excess of hydrogen bromide. dilution, or addition of water, at once discharges the colour. [6] other forms of cellulose were also examined--for example, pinewood cellulose--and the substances separated from solution as thiocarbonate (powder and film). all of these gave good yields of omega-brommethylfurfural. [7] the change is empirically represented as c_{6}h_{12}o_{6} + hbr 4h_{2}o = c_{6}h_{5}o_{2}br. section iv. cellulose group, including hemicelluloses and tissue constituents of fungi versuche zur bestimmung des gehalts einiger pflanzen und pflanzenteile an zellwandbestandteilen an hemicellulosen und an cellulose. a. kleiber (landw. vers.-stat., 1900, 54, 161). ~on the determination of cell-wall constituents, hemicelluloses and cellulose in plants and plant tissues.~ in a preliminary discussion the author critically compares the results of various of the methods in practice for the isolation and estimation of cellulose. the method of f. schulze [digestion with dil. hno_{3} with kclo_{3}--14 days, and afterwards treating the product with ammonia, &c.] is stated to be the 'best known' (presumably the most widely practised); w. hoffmeister's modification of the above, in which the nitric acid is replaced by hydrochloric acid (10 p.ct. hcl) is next noted as reducing the time of digestion from 14 days to 1-2 days, and giving in many cases higher yields of cellulose. the methods of treating with the halogens, viz. bromine water (h. müller), chlorine gas (cross and bevan), and chlorine water, are dismissed with a bare mention, apparently on the basis of the conclusions of suringar and tollens (_q.v._). the method of lange, the basis of which is a 'fusion' with alkaline hydrates at 180°, and the modified method of gabriel, in which the 'fusion' with alkali takes place in presence of glycerin, are favourably mentioned. these methods were applied to a range of widely different raw materials to determine, by critical examination of the products, both as regards yield and composition, what title these latter have to be regarded as 'pure cellulose.' this portion of the investigation is an extension of that of suringar and tollens, these latter confining themselves to celluloses of the 'normal' groups, i.e. textile and paper-making celluloses. the present communication is a study of the tissue and cell-wall constituents of the following types:- 1. green plants of false oat grass (_arrhenatherium, e._). 2. green plants of lucerne (_medicago sativa_). 3. leaves of the ash (_fraxinus_). 4. leaves of the walnut (_juglans_). 5. roots of the purple melic grass (_molinia cærulea_). 6. roots of dandelion (_taraxacum officinale_). 7. roots of comfrey. 8. coffee berries. 9. wheat bran. these raw materials were treated for the quantitative estimation of cellulose by the method of lange (b), hoffmeister (c), and schulze (d), and the numbers obtained are referred for comparison to the corresponding yields of 'crude fibre' (rohfaser) by the standard method (a). as a first result the author dismisses lange's method as hopeless: the results in successive determinations on the same materials showing variations up to 60 p.ct. the results by c and d are satisfactorily concordant: the yields of cellulose are higher than of 'crude fibre.' this is obviously due to the conservation of 'hemicellulose' products, which are hydrolysed and dissolved in the treatments for 'crude fibre' estimation. a modified method was next investigated, in which the process of digestion with acid chloroxycompounds (c and d) was preceded by a treatment with boiling dilute acid. the yields of cellulose by this method (e) are more uniform, and show less divergence from the numbers for 'crude fibre.' the author's numerical results are given in a series of tables which include determinations of proteids and ash constituents, and the corresponding deductions from the crude weight in calculating to 'pure cellulose.' the subjoined extract will illustrate these main lines of investigation. ___________________________________________________________ | | | | | | crude fibre | pure cellulose | | |_____________|____________________________| | | | | | | raw material | weende | hoffmeister | hoffmeister, | | | method. | method. | modified by | | | (a) | (c) | author. | | | | | (e) | |________________|_____________|_____________|______________| | | | | | | oat grass | 30.35 | 34.9 | 31.5 | | lucerne | 25.25 | 28.7 | 20.5 | | leaves of ash | 13.05 | 15.4 | 13.8 | | roots of melic | 21.60 | 29.1 | 21.4 | | coffee beans | 18.30 | 35.1 | 23.3 | | bran | 8.2 | 19.3 | 9.3 | |________________|_____________|_____________|______________| the final conclusion drawn from these results is that the method of hoffmeister yields a product containing variable proportions of hemicelluloses. these are eliminated by boiling with a dilute acid (1.25 p.ct. h_{2}so_{4}), which treatment may be carried out on the raw material--i.e. before exposure to the acid chlorate, or on the crude cellulose as ordinarily isolated. ~determination of tissue-constituents.~--by the regulated action of certain solvents applied in succession, it appears that such constituents of the plant-complex can be removed as have no organic connection with the cellular skeleton: the residue from such treatments, conversely, fairly represents the true tissue-constituents. the author employs the method of digestion with cold dilute alkaline solutions (0.15 to 0.5 p.ct. naoh), followed by exhaustive washing with cold and hot water, afterwards with cold and hot alcohol, and finally with ether. the residue is dried and weighed as crude product. when necessary, the proportions of ash and proteid constituents are determined and deducted from the 'crude product' which, thus corrected, may be taken as representing the 'carbohydrate' tissue constituents. ~determination of hemicelluloses.~--by the process of boiling with dilute acids (1.25 p.ct. h_{2}so_{4}) the hemicelluloses are attacked--i.e. hydrolysed and dissolved. the action of the acid though selective is, of course, not exclusively confined to these colloidal carbohydrates. the proteid and mineral constituents are attacked more or less, and the celluloses themselves are not entirely resistant to the action. the loss due to the latter may be neglected, but in calculating the hemicellulose constants from the gross loss the proteids and mineral constituents require to be taken into account in the usual way. quantitative separation of hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin. presence of pentosanes in these substances. wilhelm hoffmeister (landw. versuchs-stat, 1898, 50, 347-362). (p. 88) the separation of the cellulose-like carbohydrates of sunflower husks is described. in order to ascertain the effect of dilute ammonia on the cellulose substances of lignin, a dried 5 p.ct. caustic soda extract was extracted successively with 1, 2, 3, and 4 p.ct. sodium hydroxide solution. five grams of the 2 p.ct. extract were then subjected to the action of ammonia vapour; the cellulose did not completely dissolve in six weeks. cellulose insoluble in caustic soda (32 grms.) was next extracted with ammonia, in a similar manner, for 10 days, dried, and weighed. 30.46 grms. remained, which, when treated with 5 p.ct. aqueous caustic soda, yielded 0.96 grm. (3 per cent.) of hemicellulose. when cellulose is dissolved in schweizer's solution, the residue is, by repeated extraction with aqueous sodium hydroxide, completely converted into the soluble form. on evaporating the ammonia from the schweizer's extract, at the ordinary temperature and on a water-bath respectively, different amounts of cellulose are obtained; more hemicellulose is obtained, by caustic soda, from the heated solution than from that which was not heated. in this operation the pentosanes are more influenced than the hexosanes; pentosanes are not always readily dissolved by caustic soda, and hexosanes are frequently more or less readily dissolved. both occur in lignin, and are then undoubtedly indigestible. these points have to be considered in judging the digestibility of these carbohydrates. a comparison of analyses of clover, at different periods, in the first and second years of growth, shows that both cellulose (schweizer's extract) and lignin increase in both constituents. in the second year the lignin alone increased to the end; the cellulose decreased at the end of june. in the first year it seemed an absolutely as well as relatively greater amount of cellulose, and lignin was produced in the second year; this, however, requires confirmation. the amount of pentosanes in the schweizer extract was relatively greater in the second than in the first year, but decreased in the lignin more in the second year than in the first: this result is also given with reserve. die constitution der cellulosen der cerealien. c. f. cross, e. j. bevan, and c. smith (berl. ber., 1896, 1457). ~the constitution of the cereal celluloses.~ (p. 84) straw cellulose is resolved by two methods of acid hydrolysis into a soluble furfural-yielding fraction, and an insoluble fraction closely resembling the normal cellulose. (a) the cellulose is dissolved in sulphuric acids of concentration, h_{2}so_{4}.2h_{2}o, h_{2}so_{4}.3h_{2}o. as soon as solution is complete, the acid is diluted. a precipitate of cellulose hydrate (60-70 p.ct.) is obtained, and the filtered solution contains 90-95 p.ct. of the furfuroids of the original cellulose. the process is difficult to control, however, in mass, and to obtain the latter in larger quantity the cellulose (b) is digested with six times its weight of 1 p.ct. h_{2}so_{4} at 3 atm. pressure, the products of the action being (1) a disintegrated cellulose retaining only a small fraction (1/12) of the furfural-yielding groups, and (2) a slightly coloured solution of the hydrolised furfuroids. an investigation of the latter gave the following results: by oxidation with nitric acid no saccharic acid was obtained; showing the absence of dextrose. the numbers for cupric reduction were in excess of those obtained with the hexoses. the yield of ozazone was high, viz. 30 to 40 p.ct. of the weight of the carbohydrate in solution. on fractionating, the melting-points of the fractions were found to lie between 146° and 153°. ultimate analysis gave numbers for c, h, and n identical with those of a pentosazone. the product of hydrolysis appears, therefore, to be xylose or a closely related derivative. all attempts to obtain a crystallisation of xylose from the solution neutralised (baco_{3}), filtered, and evaporated, failed. the reaction with phloroglucol and hcl, moreover, was not the characteristic red of the pentoses, but a deep violet. the product was then isolated as a dry residue by evaporating further and drying at 105°. elementary analysis gave the numbers c 44.2, 44.5, and h 6.7, 6.3. determinations of furfural gave 39.5 to 42.5 p.ct. on treating the original solution with hydrogen peroxide, and warming, oxidation set in, with evolution of co_{2}. this was estimated (by absorption), giving numbers for co_{2}, 19.5, 20.5, 20.1 p.ct. of the substance. the sum of these quantitative data is inconsistent with a pentose or pentosane formula; it is more satisfactorily expressed by the empirical formula o / \ c_{5}h_{8}o_{3} ch_{2}, \ / o which represents a pentose monoformal. attempts to synthesise a compound of this formula have been so far without success. ueber einige chemische vorgänge in der gerstenpflanze. c. f. cross, e. j. bevan, and c. smith (berl. ber., 1895, 2604). ~the chemical life-history of the barley plant.~ (p. 84) owing to the presence of 'furfuroids' in large proportion as constituents of the tissues of the stems of cereals, these plants afford convenient material for studying the problem of the constitution of the tissue-furfuroids, as well as their relationship to the normal celluloses. the growing barley plant was investigated at successive periods of growth. yield of furfural was estimated on the whole plant and on the residue from a treatment with alkaline and acid solvents in the cold such as to remove all cell contents. this residue is described as 'permanent tissue.' the observations were carried out through two growing seasons--1894-5--which were very different in character, the former being rainy with low temperature, the latter being abnormal in the opposite direction, i.e. minimum rainfall and maximum sunshine. the barley selected for observation was that of two experimental plots of the royal agricultural society's farm, one (no. 1) remaining permanently unmanured, and showing minimum yield, the other (no. 6) receiving such fertilising treatment as to give maximum yields. the numerical results are given in the annexed tables: table headings: a: date b: age of crop c: plot d: dry weight e: furfural p.ct. of dry weight (a) f: permanent tissue p.ct. dry weight g: furfural from permanent tissue h: p.ct. of tissue i: p.ct. of entire plant j: ratio a : c barley crop, woburn, 1894. ________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [g] | | | | | | | | |_____________| | | | | | | | | | | | | [a] | [b] | [c] | [d] | [e] | [f] | [h] | [i] | [j] | |_________|__________|_____|______|______|______|______|______|__________| | | | | | | | | | | | may 7 | 6 weeks | 1 | 19.4 | 7.0 | 53.4 | 12.7 | 6.8 | 1.03 : 1 | | | | 6 | 14.7 | 7.0 | 55.9 | 10.3 | 5.7 | 1.23 : 1 | | june 4 | 10 weeks | 1 | 17.6 | 7.7 | 52.9 | 11.6 | 6.1 | 1.26 : 1 | | | | 6 | 13.5 | 8.1 | 58.5 | 13.4 | 7.8 | 1.04 : 1 | | july 10 | 15 weeks | 1 | 42.0 | 9.0 | 65.7 | 9.8 | 6.4 | 1.40 : 1 | | | | 6 | 32.9 | 10.6 | 65.7 | 12.5 | 8.2 | 1.30 : 1 | | cut | 21 weeks | 1 | 64.0 | 11.9 | 70.0 | 14.5 | 10.1 | 1.18 : 1 | | aug. 21 | | 6 | 64.6 | 13.4 | 70.5 | 15.0 | 10.6 | 1.26 : 1 | | carried | 22 weeks | 1 | 84.0 | 12.7 | 75.0 | 16.5 | 12.4 | 1.02 : 1 | | aug. 31 | | 6 | 86.4 | 12.4 | 78.4 | 15.1 | 11.8 | 1.05 : 1 | | | | barley crop, woburn, 1895. | | | | may 15 | 7 weeks | 1 | 20.6 | 6.6 | 53.9 | 10.2 | 5.5 | 1.20 : 1 | | | | 6 | 17.8 | 5.8 | 56.7 | 9.6 | 5.4 | 1.07 : 1 | | june 18 | 12 weeks | 1 | 34.6 | 8.0 | 38.2 | 14.7 | 5.6 | 1.42 : 1 | | | | 6 | 33.4 | 7.6 | 44.5 | 15.0 | 6.7 | 1.14 : 1 | | july 16 | 16 weeks | 1 | 52.8 | 12.1 | 55.6 | 16.3 | 9.1 | 1.33 : 1 | | | | 6 | 54.4 | 10.6 | 46.2 | 19.1 | 8.8 | 1.20 : 1 | | aug. 16 | 20 weeks | 1 | 66.8 | 9.2 | 49.1 | 17.0 | 8.3 | 1.10 : 1 | | | | 6 | 65.0 | 9.8 | 49.8 | 19.1 | 9.4 | 1.04 : 1 | | sept. 3 | 22 weeks | 1 | 84.3 | 10.4 | 45.7 | 17.6 | 8.0 | 1.31 : 1 | | | | 6 | 86.3 | 10.2 | 45.3 | 17.3 | 7.8 | 1.30 : 1 | |_________|__________|_____|______|______|______|______|______|__________| the variations exhibited by these numbers are significant. it is clear, on the other hand, that the assimilation of the furfuroids does not vary in any important way with variations in conditions of atmosphere and soil nutrition. they are essentially _tissue_-constituents, and only at the flowering period is there any accumulation of these compounds in the alkali-soluble form. it has been previously shown (ibid. 27, 1061) that the proportion of furfuroids in the straw-celluloses of the paper-maker differs but little from that of the original straws. for the isolation of the celluloses the straws are treated by a severe process of alkaline hydrolysis, to which, therefore, the furfuroid groups offer equal resistance with the normal hexose groups with which they are associated in the complex. the furfuroids of the cereal straws are therefore not pentosanes. they are original products of assimilation, and not subject to secondary changes after elaboration such as to alter either their constitution or their relationship to the normal hexose groups of the tissue-complex. (1) constitution of the cereal celluloses (chem. soc. j. 1896, 804). (2) the carbohydrates of barley straw (chem. soc. j. 1896, 1604). (3) the carbohydrates of the cereal straws (chem. soc. j. 1897, 1001). (4) the carbohydrates of barley straw (chem. soc. j. 1898, 459). c. f. cross, e. j. bevan, and claud smith. these are a series of investigations mainly devoted to establishing the identity of the furfural-yielding group which is a characteristic constituent. this 'furfuroid' while equally resistant to alkalis as the normal cellulose group with which it is associated, is selectively hydrolysed by acids. thus straw cellulose dissolves in sulphuric acids of concentration h_{2}so_{4}.2h_{2}o h_{2}so_{4}.3h_{2}o, and on diluting the normal cellulose is precipitated as a hydrate, and the furfuroid remains in solution. but this sharp separation is difficult to control in mass. by heating with a very dilute acid (1 p.ct. h_{2}so_{4}) the conditions are more easily controlled, the most satisfactory results being obtained with 15 mins. heating at 3 atm. pressure. (1) operating in this way upon brewers' grains the furfuroid was obtainable as the chief constituent of a solution for which the following experimental numbers were determined:--total dissolved solids, 28.0 p.ct. of original 'grains'; furfural, 39.5 p.ct. of total dissolved solids, as compared with 12.5 p.ct. of total original grains; cupric reduction (calc. to total solids), 110 (dextrose = 100) osazone; yield in 3 p.ct. solution, 35 p.ct. of weight of total solids. pentosazone analysis n 17.1 17.3 17.07 c 62.5 62.3 62.2 h 6.4 6.5 6.1 melting-point 146°-153° from these numbers it is seen that of the total furfuroids of the original 'grains' 84 p.ct. are thus obtained in solution in the fully hydrolysed form, which is that of a pentose or pentose derivative. it was, however, found impossible to obtain any crystallisation from the neutralised (baco_{3}) and concentrated solution, the syrup being kept for some weeks in a desiccator. it was noted at the same time that the colour reaction of the original solution with phloroglucol and hydrochloric acid was a deep violet, in contradistinction to the characteristic red of the pentoses. on oxidation with hydrogen peroxide, in the proportion of 1 mol. h_{2}o_{2} to 1 mol. of the carbohydrate in solution, carbonic anhydride was formed in quantity = 20.0 p.ct. of the latter. fermentation (yeast) experiments also showed a divergence from the resistant behaviour of the pentoses, a considerable proportion of the furfuroid disappearing in a normal fermentation. (2) the quantitative methods above described were employed in investigating the barley plant at different stages of its growth. the green plant was extracted with alcohol, the residue freed from alcohol and subjected to acid hydrolysis. the hydrolysed extract was neutralised and fermented. in the early stages of growth the furfuroids were completely fermented, i.e. disappeared in the fermentation. in the later stages this proportion fell to 50 p.ct. in the earlier stages, moreover, the normal hexose constituents of the permanent tissue were hydrolysed in large proportion by the acid, whereas in the matured straw the hydrolysis is chiefly confined to the furfuroids. in the early stages also the permanent tissue yields an extract with relatively low cupric reduction, showing that the carbohydrates are dissolved by the acid in a more complex molecular condition. these observations confirm the view that the furfuroids take origin in a hexose-pentose series of transformations. the proportion of furfuroid groups to total carbohydrates varies but little, viz. from 1/3 in the early stages to a maximum of 1/4 at the flowering period. at this period the differentiation of the groups begins to be marked. taking all the facts of (1) and (2), they are not inconsistent with the hypothesis of an internal transformation of a hexose to a pentose-monoformal. such a change of position and function of oxygen from oh to co within the group --ch.oh-is a species of internal oxidation which reverses the reduction of formaldehyde groups in synthesising to sugars, and appears therefore of probable occurrence. these constitutional problems are followed up in (3) by the indirect method of differentiating the relationships of these furfuroids to yeast fermentation, from those of the pentoses. straw and esparto celluloses are subjected to the processes of acid hydrolysis, and the neutralised extracts fermented. with high furfural numbers indicating that the furfuroids are the chief constituents of the extract, there is an active fermentation with production of alcohol. the cupric reduction falls in greater ratio to the original (unfermented) than the furfural. observations on the pure pentoses--xylose and arabinose added to dextrose solutions, and then exposed to yeast action--show that in a vigorous fermentation not unduly prolonged the pentoses are unaffected, but that they do come within the influence of the yeast-cell when the latter is in a less vigorous condition, and when the hexoses are not present in relatively large proportion. (4) the observations on the growing plant were resumed with the view of artificially increasing the differentiation of the two main groups of carbohydrates. from a portion of a barley crop the inflorescence was removed as soon as it appeared. the crop was allowed to mature, and a full comparison instituted between the products of normal and abnormal growth. with a considerable difference in 'permanent tissue' (13 p.ct. less) and a still greater defect in cellulose (24 p.ct.), the constants for the furfuroids in relation to total carbohydrates were unaffected by the arrested development. this was also true of the behaviour of the hydrolysed extracts (acid processes) to yeast fermentation. (5) the extract obtained from the brewers' grains by the process described in (2) was investigated in relation to animal digestion. it has been now generally established that the furfuroids as constituents of fodder plants are digested and assimilated in large proportion in passing through animal digestive tracts, and in this respect behave differently from the pentoses. the furfuroids being obtained, as described, in a fully hydrolysed condition (monoses) the digestion problem presented itself in a new aspect, and was therefore attacked. the result of the comparative feeding experiments upon rabbits was to show that in this previously hydrolysed form the furfuroids are almost entirely digested and assimilated, no pentoses, moreover, appearing in the urine. generally we may sum up the present solution of the problem of the relationship of the furfuroids to plant assimilation and growth as follows:--the pentoses are not produced as such in the process of assimilation; but furfural-yielding carbohydrates are produced directly and in approximately constant ratio to the total carbohydrates; they are mainly located in the permanent tissue; in the secondary changes of dehydration, &c., accompanying maturation they undergo such differentiation that they become readily separable by processes of acid hydrolysis from the more resistant normal celluloses; but in relation to alkaline treatments they maintain their intimate union with the latter. they are finally converted into pentoses by artificial treatments, and into pentosanes in the plant, with loss of 1 c atom in an oxidised form. the mechanism of this transformation of hexoses into pentoses is not cleared up. it is independent of external conditions, e.g. fertilisation and atmospheric oxidations, and is probably therefore a process of internal rearrangement of the character of an oxidation. zur kenntniss der in den membranen der pilze enthaltenen bestandtheile. e. winterstein (ztschr. physiol. chem., 1894, 521; 1895, 134). ~on the constituents of the tissue of fungi.~ (p. 87) these two communications are a contribution of fundamental importance, and may be regarded as placing the question of the composition of the celluloses of these lowest types on a basis of well-defined fact. in the first place the author gives an exhaustive bibliography, beginning with the researches of braconnot (1811), who regarded the cellular tissue of these organisms as a specialised substance, which he termed 'fungin.' payen rejects this view, and regards the tissue, fully purified by the action of solvents, as a cellulose (c_{6}h_{10}o_{5}). this view is successively supported by fromberg [mulder, allg. phys. chem., braunschweig, 1851], schlossberger and doepping [annalen, 52, 106], and kaiser. de bary, on a review of the evidence, adopts this view, but, as the purified substance fails to give the characteristic colour-reactions with iodine, he uses the qualifying term 'pilzcellulose' [morph. u. biol. d. pilze u. flechten, leipzig, 1884]. c. richter, on the other hand, shows that these reactions are merely a question of methods of purification or preparation [sitzungsber. acad. wien, 82, 1, 494], and considers that the tissue-substance is an ordinary cellulose, with the ordinary reactions masked by the presence of impurities. in regard to the lower types of fungoid growth, such as yeast, the results of investigators are more at variance. the researches of salkowski (p. 113) leave little doubt, however, that the cell-membrane is of the cellulosic type. the author's researches extend over a typical range of products obtained from _boletus edulis, agaricus campestris, cantharellus cibarius, morchella esculenta, polyporus officinalis, penicillium glaucum_, and certain undetermined species. the method of purification consisted mainly in (a) exhaustive treatments with ether and boiling alcohol, (b) digestion with alkaline hydrate (1-2 p.ct. naoh) in the cold, (c) acid hydrolysis (2-3 p.ct. h_{2}so_{4}) at 95°-100°, followed by a chloroxidation treatment by the processes of schulze or hoffmeister, and final alkaline hydrolysis. the products, i.e. residues, thus obtained were different in essential points from the celluloses isolated from the tissues of phanerogams similarly treated. only in exceptional cases do they give blue reactions with iodine in presence of zinc chloride or sulphuric acid. the colourations are brown to red. they resist the action of cuprammonium solutions. they are for the most part soluble in alkaline hydrate solution (5-10 p.ct. naoh) in the cold. they give small yields (1-2 p.ct.) of furfural on boiling with 10 p.ct. hcl.aq. elementary analyses gave the following results, which are important in establishing the presence of a notable proportion of nitrogen, which has certainly been overlooked by the earlier observers:- _________________________________________________________ | | | | | | 'cellulose' or residue from | c | h | n | |______________________________________|______|_____|_____| | | | | | | boletus edulis (schulze process) | 42.4 | 6.5 | 3.9 | | boletus edulis (hoffmeister process) | 44.6 | 6.3 | 3.6 | | polyporus off. | 43.7 | 6.5 | 0.7 | | cantharellus cib. | 44.9 | 6.8 | 3.0 | | agaricus campestris | 44.3 | 6.6 | 3.6 | | botrytis | 42.1 | 6.3 | 3.9 | | penicillium glaucum | | | 3.3 | | morchella esculenta | | | 2.5 | |______________________________________|______|_____|_____| it is next shown that this residual nitrogen is not in the form of residual proteids (1) by direct tests, all of which gave negative results, and (2) indirectly by the high degree of resistance to both alkaline and acid hydrolysis. the 'celluloses' are attacked by boiling dilute acids (1 p.ct. h_{2}so_{4}), losing in weight from 10 to 23 p.ct., the dissolved products having a cupric reduction value about 50 p.ct. that of an equal weight of dextrose. as an extreme hydrolytic treatment the products were dissolved in 70 p.ct. h_{2}so_{4}, allowed to stand 24 hours, then considerably diluted (to 3 p.ct. h_{2}so_{4}) and boiled to complete the inversion. the yields of glucose, calculated from the cupric reduction, were as follows:- boletus edulis 65.2 p.ct. polyporus off. 94.7 " agaricus campestris 59.1 " morchella esculenta 60.1 " cantharellus cib. 64.9 " botrytis 60.8 " it will be noted that the exceptionally high yield from the polyporus cellulose is correlated with its exceptionally low nitrogen. by actual isolation of a crystalline dextrorotary sugar, by preparations of osazone and conversion into saccharic acid, it was proved that dextrose was the main product of hydrolysis. the second main product was shown to be acetic acid, the yield of which amounted to 8 p.ct. in several cases. generally, therefore, it is proved that the more resistant tissue constituents of the fungi are not cellulose, but a complex of carbohydrates and nitrogenous groups in combination, the former being resolved into glucoses by acid hydrolysis, and the latter yielding acetic acid as a characteristic product of resolution together with the nitrogenous groups in the form of an uncrystallisable syrup. in the further prosecution of these investigations (2) the author proceeded from the supposition of the identity of the nitrogenous complex of the original with chitin, and adopted the method of ledderhose (ztschr. physiol. chem. 2, 213) for the isolation of glucosamin hydrochloride, which he succeeded in obtaining in the crystalline form. in the meantime e. gilson had shown that these tissue substances in 'fusion' with alkaline hydrates yield a residue of a nitrogenous product (c_{14}h_{28}n_{2}o_{10}), which is soluble in dilute acids [recherches chim. sur la membrane cellulaire des champignons, la cellule, v. ii, pt. 1]. this residue, which was termed mycosin by gilson, has been similarly isolated by the author. it is proved, therefore, that the tissues of the fungi do contain a product resembling chitin. [see also gilson, compt. rend. 120, 1000.] this constituent is in intimate union with the carbohydrate complex, which is resolved similarly to the hemicelluloses. various intermediate terms of the hydrolytic series have been isolated. but the only fully identified product of resolution is the dextrose which finally results. ueber die kohlenhydrate d. hefe. e. salkowski (berl. ber., 27, 3325). ~on the carbohydrates of yeast.~ the author has isolated the more resistant constituents of the cell-membrane by boiling with dilute alkalis, and exhaustively purifying with alcohol and ether. the residue was only a small percentage (3-4 p.ct) of the original, and retained only 0.45 p.ct. n. it was heated in a digester with water at 2-3 atm. steam-pressure, and thus resolved into approximately equal portions of soluble cellulose (a) and insoluble (b). the latter, giving no colour-reaction with iodine, is termed achroocellulose; the former reacts, and is therefore termed erythrocellulose. the former is easily separated from its opalescent solution. it has the empirical composition of cellulose. in the soluble form it resembles glycogen. the achroocellulose is isolated in the form of horny or agglomerated masses. it appears to be resolved by ultimate hydrolysis into dextrose and mannose. section v. furfuroids, i.e. pentosanes and furfural-yielding constituents generally (1) ~reactions of the carbohydrates with hydrogen peroxide.~ c. f. cross, e. j. bevan, and claud smith (j. chem. soc., 1898, 463). (2) ~action of hydrogen peroxide on carbohydrates in the presence of ferrous salts.~ r. s. morrell and j. m. crofts (j. chem. soc., 1899, 786). (3) ~oxidation of furfuraldehyde by hydrogen peroxide.~ c. f. cross, e. j. bevan, and t. heiberg (j. ch. soc., 1899, 747). (4) einwirkung von wasserstoffhyperoxid auf ungesättigte kohlenwasserstoffe. c. f. cross, e. j. bevan, and t. heiberg (berl. ber., 1900, 2015). ~action of hydrogen peroxide on unsaturated hydrocarbons.~ the above series of researches grew out of the observations incidental to the use of the peroxide on an oxidising agent in investigating the hydrolysed furfuroids (102). certain remarkable observations had previously been made by h. j. h. fenton (ch. soc. j., 1894, 899; 1895, 774; 1896, 546) on the oxidation of tartaric acid by the peroxide, acting in presence of ferrous salts, the --choh--choh-residue losing h_{2} with production of the unsaturated group, --oh.c=c.oh--. these investigations have subsequently been considerably developed and generalised by fenton, but as the results have no immediate bearing on our main subject we must refer readers to the j. chem. soc., 1896-1900. from the mode of action diagnosed by fenton it was to be expected that the choh groups of the carbohydrates would be oxidised to co groups, and it has been established by the above investigations (1) and (2) that the particular group to be so affected in the hexoses is that contiguous to the typical | --co group. there results, therefore, a dicarbonyl derivative ('osone'), which reacts directly with 2 mol. phenyl hydrazine in the cold to form an osazone. this was directly established for glucose, lævulose, galactose, and arabinose (2). while this is the main result, the general study of the product shows that the oxidation is not simple nor in direct quantitative relationship to the h_{2}o_{2} employed. the molecular proportion of the aldoses affected appears to be in considerable excess, and the reaction is probably complicated by interior rearrangement. in the main, the original aldehydic group resists the oxidation. but a certain proportion of acid products are formed, probably tartronic acid. on distillation with condensing acids a large proportion of volatile monobasic acids (chiefly formic) are obtained. the proportion of furfural obtained amounts to 3-4 per cent. of the weight of the original carbohydrate. since the general result of these oxidations is the substitution of an oh group for an h atom, it was of interest to determine the behaviour of furfural with the peroxide. the oxidation was carried out in dilute aqueous solution of the aldehyde at 20°-40°, using 2-3 mols. h_{2}o_{2} per 1 mol. c_{5}h_{4}o_{2}. the main product is a hydroxyfurfural, which was separated as a hydrazone. a small quantity of a monobasic acid was formed, which was identified as a hydroxypyromucic acid. both aldehyde and acid appear to be the alpha beta derivatives. the aldehyde gives very characteristic colour reactions with phloroglucinol and resorcinol in presence of hydrochloric acid, which so closely resemble those of the lignocelluloses that there is little doubt that these particular reactions must be referred to the presence of the hydroxyfurfural as a normal constituent. the study of these oxidations was then extended to typical unsaturated hydrocarbons--viz. acetylene and benzene. (4) from the former the main product was acetic acid, but the attendant formation of traces of ethyl alcohol indicates that the hydrogen of the peroxide may take a direct part in this and other reactions. this view receives some support from the fact that the interaction of the h_{2}o_{2} with permanganates has now been established to be an oxidation of the h_{2} of the peroxide by the permanganate oxidation, with liberation, therefore, of the o_{2} of the peroxide as an unresolved molecule [baeyer]. benzene itself is also powerfully attacked by the peroxide when shaken with a dilute solution in presence of iron salts. the products are phenol and pyrocatechol, with some quantity of an amorphous product probably formed by condensation of a quinone with the phenolic products of reaction. * * * * * these types of oxidation effects now established give a definite significance to the physiological functions of the peroxide, which is a form of 'active oxygen' of extremely wide distribution. it would have been difficult _a priori_ to devise an oxidant without sensible action on aldehydic groups, yet delivering a powerful attack on hydrocarbon rings; or to have suggested a synthesis of the sugars from tartaric acid with a powerful oxidising treatment as the first and essential stage in the transformation. our present knowledge of such actions and effects suggests a number of new clues to genetic relationships of carbon compounds within the plant. the conclusion is certainly justified that the origin of the pentoses is referable to oxidations of the hexoses, in which this form of 'active oxygen' plays an important part. we must note here the researches of o. ruff, who has applied these oxidations with important results in the systematic investigation of the carbohydrates. ueber die verwandlung der _d_-gluconsäure in _d_-arabinose (berl. ber., 1898, 1573). ~conversion of _d_-gluconic acid into _d_-arabinose.~ * * * * * _d_ und _l_ arabinose (_ibid._ 1899, 550). * * * * * zur kenntniss der oxygluconsäure (_ibid._ 1899, 2269). ~on oxygluconic acid.~ ruff in these researches has realised a simple and direct transition from the hexoses to the pentoses. by oxidising gluconic acid with the peroxide the beta --choh-group is converted into carbonyl at the same time that the terminal cooh [alpha] is oxidised to co_{2}. the yields of the resulting pentose are large. simultaneously there is formed an oxygluconic acid, which appears to be a ketonic acid of formula --ch_{2}oh.co.(choh)_{3}.cooh--. from these results we see a further range of physiological probabilities; and with the concurrent actions of oxygen in the forms of or related to hydrogen peroxide on the one side, and ozone on the other, we are able to account in a simple way for the relationships of the 'furfuroid' group, which may include a number of intermediate terms in the hexose-pentose series. following in this direction of development of the subject is a study of the action of persulphuric acid upon furfural. einwirkung des caro'schen reagens auf furfural. c. f. cross, e. j. bevan, and j. f. briggs (berl. ber., 1900, 3132). regarding this reagent as another form of 'active oxygen,' it is important to contrast its actions with those of the hydrogen peroxide. instead of the beta-hydroxyfurfural (_ante_, 115) we obtain the delta-aldehyde as the first product. the aldehydic group is then oxidised, and as a result of attendant hydrolysis the ring is broken down and succinic acid is formed, the original aldehydic group of the furfural being split off in the form of formic acid. the reactions take place at the ordinary temperature and with the dilute form of the reagent described by baeyer and villiger (ber. 32, 3625). these results have some special features of interest. the alpha delta-hydroxyfurfural has similar colour reactions to those of the alpha beta-derivative, and may also therefore be present as a constituent of the lignocelluloses. the tendency to attack in the 1·4 position in relation to an aldehydic group further widens the capabilities of 'active oxygen' in the plant cell. lastly, this is the simplest transition yet disclosed from the succinyl to furfural grouping, being effected by a regulated proportion of oxygen, and under conditions of reaction which may be described as of the mildest. in regard to the wide-reaching functions of asparagin in plant life, we have a new suggestion of genetic connections with the furfuroids. vergleich der pentosen-bestimmungsmethoden vermittelst phenylhydrazin und phloroglucin. m. krüger (inaug.-diss., göttingen, 1895). ~comparison of methods of estimating furfural as hydrazone and phloroglucide.~ the author traces the development of processes of estimating furfural (1) by precipitation with ammonia (furfuramide), (2) by volumetric estimation with standardised phenylhydrazine, (3) by weighing the hydrazone. in 1893 (chem. ztg. 17, 1745) hotter described a method of quantitative condensation with pyrogallol requiring a temperature of 100°-110° for two hours. the insoluble product collected, washed, dried at 103°, and weighed, gives a weight of 1.974 grm. per 1 grm. furfural. councler substitutes phloroglucinol for pyrogallol, with the advantage of doing away with the digestion at high temperature. (_ibid._ 18, 966.) this process, requiring the presence of strong hcl, has the advantage of being applied directly to the acid distillate, in which form furfural is obtained as a product of condensation of pentoses, &c. a comparative investigation was made, precipitating furfural (a) as hydrazone in presence of acetic acid, and (b) as phloroglucide in presence of hcl (12 p.ct). in (a) by varying the weights of known quantities of furfural, and using the factor, hydrazone × 0.516 [+ 0.0104] in calculating from the weights of precipitates obtained, the maximum variations from the theoretical number were +1.71 and -1.74. in (b) it was found necessary to vary the factor from 0.52 to 0.55 in calculating from phloroglucide to furfural. the greatest _total_ range of variation was found to be 2.5 p.ct. the phenol process is therefore equally accurate, has the advantages above noted, and, in addition, is less liable to error from the pressure in the distillates obtained from vegetable substances of volatile products, e.g. ketonic compounds, accompanying the furfural. this method has been criticised by helbel and zeisel [sitz.-ber, wiener akad. 1895, 104, ii. p. 335] on two grounds of error, viz. (1) the presence of diresorcinol in all ordinary preparations of phloroglucinol, and (2) changes in weight of the precipitate of phloroglucide on drying. the process was carried out comparatively with ordinary preparations, and with specially pure preparations of the phenol. the quantitative results were identical. the criticisms in question are therefore dismissed. although the process is to be recommended for its simplicity and the satisfactory concordance of results it is to be noted that it rests upon an empirical basis, since the phloroglucide is not formed by the simple reaction 2 [c_{5}h_{4}o_{2} + c_{6}h_{6}o_{3}] h_{2}o = c_{22}h_{18}o_{9}, but appears to have the composition c_{16}h_{12}o_{6}. in part ii. of this paper the author discusses the question of the probable extent in the sense of diversity of constitution of furfural-yielding constituents of plant-tissues. glucoson was isolated from glucosazon, and found to yield 2.9-3.6 p.ct. furfural. gluconic acid distilled with hydrochloric acid gave traces of furfural; so also with sulphuric acid and manganic oxide. starch was oxidised with permanganate, and a mixture of products obtained of which one gave a characteristic violet colouration with phloroglucol, with an absorption-band at the d line. on distilling with hcl furfural was obtained in some quantity. the product in question was found to be very sensitive to the action of bases, and was destroyed by the incidental operation of neutralising the mixture of oxidised products with calcium carbonate. it was found impossible to isolate the compound. untersuchungen ueber die pentosanbestimmung mittelst der salzsäure-phloro-glucin-methode.[8] e. kröber (journ. f. landwirthschaft, 1901, 357). ~investigation of the hydrochloric acid-phloroglucinol method of determining pentosanes.~ this paper is the most complete investigation yet published of the now well-known method of precipitating and estimating furfural in acid solution by means of the trihydric phenol. in the last section of the paper is contained the most important result, the proof that the insoluble phloroglucide is formed according to the reaction c_{5}h_{4}o_{2} + c_{6}h_{6}o_{3} 2h_{2}o = c_{11}h_{6}o_{3}, also, by varying the proportions of the pure reagents interacting, that the condensation takes place invariably according to this equation. incidentally the following points were also established:--the solubility of the phloroglucide, under the conditions of finally separating in a condition for drying and weighing, is 1 mgr. per 100 c.c. of total solution, made up of the original acid solution, in which the precipitation takes place, and the wash-water required to purify from the acid. the phloroglucide is hygroscopic, and must be weighed out of contact with the air. the presence of diresorcinol is without influence on the result, provided a sufficient excess of actual phloroglucinol is employed. thus even with a preparation containing 30 p.ct. of its weight of diresorcinol the influence of the latter is eliminated, provided a weight be taken equal to twice that of the furfural to be precipitated. the phenol must be perfectly dissolved by warming with dilute hcl (1.06 sp.gr.) before adding to the furfural solution. for collecting the precipitate of phloroglucide the author employs the gooch crucible. the paper contains a large number of quantitative results in proof of the various points established, and concludes with elaborate tables, giving the equivalents in the known pentoses and their anhydrides for any given weight of phloroglucide from 0.050 to 0.300 grm. ueber den pentosan-gehalt verschiedener materialien. b. tollens and h. glaubitz (j. für landwirthschaft, 1897, 97). ~on the pentosane constituents of fodder-plants and malt.~ (p. 171) (a) the authors have re-determined the yield of furfural from a large range of plant-products, using the phloroglucol method. the numbers approximate closely to those obtained by the hydrazone method. the following may be cited as typical: substance furfural p.ct. rye (göttingen) 6.03 wheat (square head) 4.75 barley (peacock) 4.33 oats (göttingen) 7.72 maize (american) 3.17 meadow hay 11.63 bran (wheat) 13.06 malt 6.07 malt-sprouts 8.56 sugar-beet (exhausted) 14.95 (b) a comparison of wheat with wheat bran, &c. was made by grinding in a mortar and 'bolting' the flour through a fine silk sieve. the results showed: furfural p.ct. original wheat 4.75 fine flour 1.73 bran (24 p.ct. of wheat) 11.25 wheat-bran of commerce 13.06 it is evident that the pentosanes of wheat are localised in the more resistant tissues of the grain. (c) an investigation of the products obtained in the analytical process for 'crude fibre' gave the following: (1) in the case of brewers' grains: 100 grms. grains gave furfural = 29.43 pentosane -------------- 20 " crude fibre " = 2.52 acid extract " = 22.76 alkali " " = 1.20 deficiency from total of original grains 2.95 ---- 29.43 (2) in the case of meadow hay: the crude fibre (30 p.ct.) obtained retained about one fourth (23.63 p.ct.) of the total original pentosanes. (d) an investigation of barley-malt, malt-extract or wort, and finished beer showed the following: an increase of furfuroids in the process of malting, 100 pts. barley with 7.97 of 'pentosane' yielding 82 of malt with 11.18 p.ct. 'pentosane'; confirming the observations of cross and bevan (ber. 28, 2604). of the total furfuroids of malt about 1/4 are dissolved in the mashing process. in a fermentation for lager beer it was found that about /10 of the total furfuroids of the malt finally survive in the beer; the yield of furfural being 2.92 p.ct. of the 'total solids' of the beer. in a 'schlempe' or 'pot ale,' from a distillery using to 1 part malt 4 parts raw grain (rye), yield of furfural was 9 p.ct. of the total solids. in a general review of the relationships of this group of plant-products it is pointed out that they are largely digested by animals, and probably have an equal 'assimilation' value to starch. they resist alcoholic fermentation, and must consequently be taken into account as constituents of beers and wines. ueber das verhalten der pentosane der samen beim keimen.[9] a. schöne and b. tollens (jour. f. landwirthschaft, 1901, 349). ~behaviour of pentosanes of seeds in germination.~ the authors have investigated the germination of barley, wheat, and peas, in absence of light, and generally with exclusion of assimilating activity, to determine whether the oxidation with attendant loss of weight, which is the main chemical feature of the germination proper, affects the pentosanes of the seeds. the following are typical of the quantitative results obtained, which are stated in absolute weights, and not percentages. _____________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | original seed | malt or | pentosane in | | | | germinated product | | | | | |_______________| | | | | | | | | a | b | a | b | |________|_______________|____________________|_______|_______| | | | | | | | barley | 500.00 | 434.88 | 39.58 | 40.38 | | " | 500.00 | 442.26 | 40.52 | 41.17 | | peas | 300.00 | 286.60 | 15.25 | 15.97 | |________|_______________|____________________|_______|_______| the authors conclude generally that there is a slight absolute increase in the pentosanes, and that the pentosanes do not belong to those reserve materials which undergo destructive oxidation during germination. in this they confirm the previously published results of de chalmot, cross and bevan, and gotze and pfeiffer. ueber den gehalt der baumwolle an pentosan. h. suringar and b. tollens (ztschr. angew. chem., 1897, i). ~pentosane constituents of cotton.~ (p. 290) it has been stated by link and voswinkel (pharm. centralhalle, 1893, 253), that raw cotton yields 'wood gum' as a product of hydrolysis. the authors were unable to obtain any pentoses as products of acid hydrolysis of raw cotton, and traces only of furfural-yielding carbohydrates. they conclude that raw cotton contains no appreciable quantity of pentosane. footnotes: [8] this paper appears during the printing of the author's original ms. [9] this paper appears during the printing of the author's original ms. section vi. the lignocelluloses (p. 131) ~lignocellulose esters.~--by a fuller study of the ester reactions of the normal celluloses we have been able to throw some light on the constitutional problems involved; and we have extended the investigations to the jute fibre as a type of the lignocelluloses, from the results of which we get a clearer idea of the relationships of the constituent groups. taking the empirical expression for the complex, i.e. the entire lignocellulose, the formula c_{12}h_{18}o_{9}, we shall be able to compare the ester derivatives with those of the celluloses, which we have also referred to a c_{12} unit. but we shall require also to deal with the constituent groups of the complex, which for the purposes of this discussion may be regarded as (a) a cellulose of normal characteristics--cellulose alpha; (b) a cellulose yielding furfural on boiling with condensing acids--cellulose beta; and (c) a much condensed, and in part benzenoid, group which we may continue to term the lig_none_ group. the latter has been specially examined with regard to its proportion of oh groups, as a necessary preliminary to the investigation of esters, in producing which the entire complex is employed. it will be shown that the ester groups can be actually localised in various ways, as in the main entering the cellulose residues alpha and beta. but that the lignone group takes little part in the reactions may be generally concluded on the evidence of its non-reactivity as an isolated derivative, (1) by chlorination, &c. it is isolated in the form of an amorphous body, but of constant composition, represented by the formula c_{19}h_{18}cl_{4}o_{9}. this compound, soluble in acetic anhydride, was boiled with it for six hours after adding fused sodium acetate, and the product separated by pouring into water. the dilute acid filtered from the product contained no hydrochloric acid nor by-products of action. the product showed an increase of weight of 7.5 p.ct. for one acetyl per 1 mol. c_{19}h_{18}cl_{4}o the calculated increase is 8.0 p.ct. it is evident from the nature of the derivative that this result cannot be further verified by the usual analytical methods. (2) the chlorinated derivative is entirely soluble in sodium sulphite solution. this solution, shaken with benzoyl chloride, with addition of sodium hydrate in successive portions, shows only a small formation of insoluble benzoate, which separates as a tarry precipitate. (3) the empirical formula of the lignone complex in its isolated forms indicates that very little hydrolysis occurs in the processes of isolation. thus the chlorinated product we may assume to be derived from the complex c_{19}h_{22}o_{9}. in the soluble by-products from the bisulphite processes of pulping wood the lignone exists as a sulphonated derivative, c_{24}h_{23}(och_{3})_{2}.(so_{3}h).o_{7}. the original lignone may be regarded as passing into solution as a still condensed complex derived from c_{24}h_{26}o_{12} (tollens). there is evidently little attendant hydroxylation, and another essential feature is the small molecular proportion of groups showing the typical sulphonation. it appears that in the lignone the elements are approximately in the relation c_{6} : h_{6} : o_{3}, and it may assist this discussion to formulate the main constitutional types consistent with this ratio, viz.: (1) the trihydroxybenzenes c_{6}h_{3}(oh)_{3}. (2) methylhydroxyfurfural c_{5}h_{2}o.(oh)(ch_{3}). (ch_{3}) / \ (3) methylhydroxypyrone co