the potential is endless for the good and poor uses. it significantly cuts down on first round copyediting and serves as a final set of eyes before our journal goes to print. however, how does one tell, in the classroom, when a student's work is ai generated and not their own. i don't mind it being an idea generator, but if we are to consider it when grading and evaluating skillset and knowledge, it becomes a worry rather than a help. nan concerns: bias; accuracy; disrupts students' writing process. exciting: possibility as a brainstorming partner; quick access for answering questions and solving problems. nan no concerns, just excitement. speeds up work. nan seems like it will settle into a role as a tool, much like word, google, etc. nan concerns: depersonalizing our work and ways of relating to each other; cheapening to the point of meaninglessness our communication with each other; further eroding our confidence in the veracity of sources and our ability to discern truth from fiction nan nan nan biggest concern is ai having access to university data. what excites me is that ai can help to generate a concise message in less time that it take me to. nan i worry about ai taking away the human aspect that's so important and necessary. nan to me it's google on steroids and a great adjunct for my teaching. it's amazing! when or will nd provide subscriptions to paid ai? these tools can be used as a cheap tool to cheat or they can be used as a powerful means to learn and enhance productivity. learning how to leverage these resources responsibly is important. nan my only immediate concern is will this make society less intelligent. already with search engines we do not need to "know" things , just how to look it up. on the flip side, as someone who struggles with typing, can i get, for example, the bulk of a report written for me? nan nan nan concerns: students' overreliance on ai tools (e.g., chatgpt) for homework, potentially plagiarizing other authors' works if these tools are improperly used; excited about learning how to use ai tools for research/teaching i would like to learn more about reliable ai tools for research & teaching. potential for reducing “busywork” and focusing human attention to creative tasks, empathy, and other areas unique to our judgment and more meaningful for our wellbeing. nan nan nan from a teaching perspective, the loss of creativity by students who use generative ai in assignments. use of generative ai in class nan nan ai could be a great tool to help students research and complete certain tasks. nan no concerns, using the tool as information gathering at this point nan i think that ai is an amazing tool but as with most things it can be misused and abused. people are too willing to accept things as facts from the internet, and ai has been given the benefit of the doubt without verification or validation by most. my concern is that it will be misused, and its biases (algorithm and selection bias) will mislead. we are educators whose job is to prepare our students to be competitive in the job market/industry. their competition, from other schools and in the workforce, is using ai to give them a competitive advantage. i think we would do a disservice to our students to not teach them how to use it ethically. teach them about its bias, accuracy issues (hallucinations), privacy concerns, and ethical potholes. i don't think people will lose jobs to ai, but i do believe people will lose jobs to other people who know how to use ai. notre dame policy on ai use. concerns are that people will get complacent and over-rely on it. nan i am worried that we will outsource to ai certain intellectual tasks that are actually good for us to do ourselves, psychologically and mentally. i am not talking about mundane and repetitive tasks, many of which should be delegated to ai tools, but rather those that engage the highest powers of our minds, such as crafting an argument in a writing assignment. data protection and ai tools while it might be good for generating basic thoughts or ideas, it should not be used in place of brainpower to solve problems, code, or perform an analysis. it has limitations in terms of what it can do well. people who think the answers that pop out of ai generators are solid gold are sorely mistaken, especially when it comes to quantitative analysis, current coding procedures, and/or interpretation of information that requires synthesis of components. not sure much excites me about it just yet. nan ai is terrifyingly powerful. it will undoubtedly have, and already has, implications for most fields of work. determining how to use it and not have it use us is the sticking point. i am concerned with students leaning on ai in ways that will stunt their education, and with professionals using it in lieu of their own minds, to their own detriment. given the limitations of systems like chatgpt it is not a search engine, but a large language model it cannot produce information. when a system is limited to predictive regurgitation of human knowledge, we run the risk of making misinformation, or just poor-quality information, even more prevalent. many risks to these technologies. in my view the only clear benefit is that it can make "mindless" tasks quicker and easier (ex: cleaning up and/or expediting coding processes). how will we ensure that students, and professionals, are not using it to write things for themselves? it is necessary for faculty to master. “prompt engineering” courses would be useful. nan nan nan nan other than the whole skynet issue, i think ai will help us work better and faster. as i heard recently, ai won't displace workers, but workers will need to learn how to integrate ai into their work. i would love more opportunities to think about how we can use ai to work smarter. what professions are integrating ai? how are they doing it? how can we think about incorporating it in higher ed. an example steve levitt mentioned in the quinn lecture, how can we use ai in research to observe and report on natural experiments. important to help students understand appropriate use nan nan nan i'm concerned about the ways in which students could use ai improperly to complete assignments. nan teaching students in the age of generative ai is a huge challenge and probably requires a paradigm shift in the way we teach. nan nan nan i don't completely trust the accuracy of ai, so proofreading is always required. i do like the idea of using ai as a resource to polish my words or and work better and quickly. what policies to we foresee in the future surrounding ai at nd? what areas, if any, can we use this tool as a dependable resource? no concerns at all as long as we use it as references wanted to learn more use cases in highed industry i'm 1000% for it. i would incorporate machine learning and analytics in every department if we could. nan nan nan nan helps with programing getting some coding co-pilots i can’t adequately assess student knowledge if they use it to complete deliverables nan efficiency, a different way of looking at something. i like the idea of it spurring ideas but know it must be used carefully for problems of security, bias and accuracy. perhaps an enterprise solution for a paid subscription the college as a whole can take advantage of. what do these companies do with my data. ai allows me to be more productive in my daily administrative tasks. what are other uses that i am not taking advantage of with ai. this is a two-edged sword: great power and creativity on the one edge, destructive, deceptive power on the other. the extent to which code writers will provide users with effective controls. i'm mixed on the benefits and impacts of generative ai. it can help speed and simplify writing projects with high quality. it may inhibit creative or critical thinking amogn some people. nan the ability for ai to gather, sort, and compile information is amazing, but can be flawed. i'm excited to see how ai is to make tasks more efficient, produce art, and change how we work. i follow the caidp and have been following the legal and ethical implications regarding the use of ai including equal rights, universal guidelines, and bias. i'd love any type of info you can offer, as i have missed out on some interesting lectures recently. the possibilities of ai are exciting to me for two main reasons. first, ai has the potential to automate repetitive and mundane tasks, freeing up human time and energy for more creative and meaningful work. second, ai could prove to be a technology on the scale of the microscope's impact in the sciences transforming entire fields like economics by providing powerful new tools for analysis, prediction, and optimization ai in economics, such as developing personalized, individualized savings and providing feedback to individuals. it's an excellent editor. it's extremely helpful when i have quick copy to pump out (on lower visibility web pages which still need to be tight but don't need the level of professional writing a landing page does). i'll get my thoughts on paper and ask it to tie together a sentence i'm struggling to construct or find different phrasing for something that already exists on another page or in a different format. i've given it a brochure of content and asked it to transform it into web copy that's x length with x tone for x audience. i also use it to help phrase emails, especially to high-level stakeholders. that sort of task is time-consuming but important to get right so i'll ask it if it clearly conveys what i'm trying to get across and ask it to improve for grammar and clarity. i usually give it some context about the relationship with the stakeholder or what i know they're concerned about that i want to quell without overpromising. it's a great help for bouncing ideas off of. i have privacy concerns, especially regarding marketing content as i know it learns from my usage (so would it then feed my strategies to competitors as answers to their queries?). i also don't know how much data it tracks and/or if it's being sold. i'm careful not to include any private information but i still feel unsettled about using it in certain contexts. i think it can be invaluable tool to increase productivity if used strategically and safely. i haven't yet explored applications in images and/or anything connected to the internet. i know bard cites sources and i know our paid media team has used it to adapt images but haven't tried it myself. i'd love some best practices on how to structure queries or even to have a consistent brand tone (in chatgpt, you can add custom instructions that are applied to every query such as brand tone, conciseness, etc). i'm also interested in development applications but am leaving that to the it team to explore. no much concerns. ai does improve my productivity. there are emerging tools developed every now and then. it would be great if we can get the information on recent ai productivity tools. nan i think ai could help me look at course content in a new and different way. nan 