Proposal: Increasing 1.4 RC/Beta window - Besu - LF Decentralized Trust Atlassian uses cookies to improve your browsing experience, perform analytics and research, and conduct advertising. Accept all cookies to indicate that you agree to our use of cookies on your device. Atlassian cookies and tracking notice, (opens new window) PreferencesOnly necessaryAccept all LF Decentralized Trust LF Decentralized Trust Spaces Apps Templates Create Besu All content Shortcuts Meetings Meetings  This trigger is hidden How-to articles How-to articles  This trigger is hidden Content Results will update as you type. Code of Conduct Contributing Developing and Conventions Besu CLI Style Guide Coding Conventions Changelog Testing Debugging Besu in IntelliJ Releasing Release Rotations 2024 Using CalVer for Besu Releases How to do a Besu Release Off-cycle release process Release Process Obsolete Proposals and Policies Bi-Weekly & Quarterly Release Process Process change proposal: burn-in Proposal for Off-Cycle, Delayed, and Scuttled Releases Proposal: Avoid Cherry Picked Releases Proposal: Create a Release Candidate for every release Proposal: Increasing 1.4 RC/Beta window Proposal: Quarterly releases from main by default Release Philosophy Archive Bug Triage Process Policies Plugin Services Tools we use Advanced Repositories and other projects Archive (Dev) Changelog Improvement Proposal Logging Building from source Documentation Community Governance Programs & Grants Meetings Design Documents Security Audits Start Here Performance & Stability How-to articles Incident Reports Besu Roadmap & Planning How to Contribute You‘re viewing this with anonymous access, so some content might be blocked. Close Besu / Proposal: Increasing 1.4 RC/Beta window More actions Proposal: Increasing 1.4 RC/Beta window Danno Ferrin Owned by Danno Ferrin Nov 27, 2019 Summary: Increase the "beta/RC" window for 1.4 by one to two releases to the left to facilitate testing a large scale change Background We have a fairly large scale change under review (besu#215) that is taking our internal BytesValue values that wrap byte arrays and replacing it with an crypto focused Apache library that does the same handling.  This is a very large (10K+) change and very far reaching. One maintainer raised the point that with such a large change how are we sure that the test cover everything and are stable and performant? In addition to existing unit tests, integration tests, acceptance tests, and reference tests we may want to spend more time just running nodes. This change also opens up the possibility of adding rich byte handling to our plugins API instead of simply passing byte arrays. This cannot be done in a bi-weekly release because it is a breaking change We need to co-ordinate with the authors of all the plugin APIs to validate if this change is good for the particular plugin This may reduce friction between the plugins API and the core of Besu  Proposals: Beta Releases Stop releasing 1.3 releases in December (1.3.7) except for important bug fixes a new 1.3 branch is made if we need fixes Release two 1.4-beta releases in January, this takes over the "master" branch Release the RC in early February (current schedule) Release the 1.4 in late February (current schedule). Ship the Tuweni PR as the first commit after we stop 1.3 support Including Plugin API changes Longer RC Cycle Stop releasing 1.3 releases after first January release (1.3.8) except for important bug fixes a new 1.3 branch is made if we need fixes Release 1.4 RC in mid January (2 weeks earlier) Release more RCs as warranted Release the 1.4 in late February (current schedule). Ship the Tuweni PR as the first commit after we stop 1.3 support Including Plugin API changes Status Quo No schedule changes Ship the Tuweni PR when it is ready with all others in a bi-weekly release Maybe do plugin API changes as part of the 1.4 release The down side of the status quo approach is that it provides a very limited window to co-ordinate the use of the plugin APIs by downstream consumers, about 2 weeks or less.  By going with one of the longer cycles there is more co-ordinating time.  Going with a "beta" release would imply that things may change in response to testing.  However going with a longer RC window reduces the amount of time we are off of bi-weekly agile releases. , multiple selections available, {"serverDuration": 12, "requestCorrelationId": "da674acf3e2b421cb3170f5e0fd611d4"}