Academic Journal of Science and Technology ISSN: 2771-3032 | Vol. 10, No. 3, 2024 219 Exploring the Ethical Implications of AI‐Driven News Production at a Radio and Television Station: Balancing Innovation with Integrity Jingyang Zhao1, *, Nutteera Phakdeephirot1, a 1Rattanakosin International College of Creative Entrepreneurship, Rajamangal University of Technology Rattanakosin, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand *Corresponding author Email: zhao.jingyang@outlook.rmutr.ac.th, anutteera.pha@rmutr.ac.th Abstract: The objectives of this research/study were (1) to investigate the ethical challenges AI has brought to the news production of Chengdu Radio and television station, (2) to explore how the station balances these challenges and innovation needs, and (3) to understand the regulatory needs and challenges of AI in the media. This quantitative research employed surveys distributed to journalists and other broadcast staff as the research tools. The method of collecting data involved the distribution of surveys to gather views and attitudes towards AI in news production. Survey data were analyzed using a statistics package of social science to identify any patterns or trends. Major Findings/Results: (1) The ethical challenges AI has brought to the news production at Chengdu Radio and television station include issues related to accuracy, bias, and control over content, (2) The station balances these challenges and innovation needs by implementing ethical guidelines, training, and human oversight in AI- driven processes, and (3) Understanding the regulatory needs and challenges of AI in the media is crucial for developing appropriate policies and guidelines for AI integration in newsrooms. Keywords: AI Ethics, Media Ethics, News Production, Ethical Impact, Innovation, Quantitative Methods, Regulatory Needs. 1. Introduction 1.1. Background The integration of AI in global news production, especially in Chengdu Radio and Television Station, is becoming common. AI is used for tasks like content generation, data analysis, and audience engagement (CHO et al., 2018). Chengdu station also uses AI for news production, improving efficiency and automating tasks. This sets the stage for examining the ethical implications of AI in news production and balancing innovation with integrity(Fang et al., 2020) . Content analysis is key in assessing the ethical impact of AI in Chengdu's news production. It involves reviewing news articles generated with AI technology to analyze bias, transparency, and accountability (Kim&Yun, 2015). This method systematically evaluates ethical aspects in radio news production. AI has revolutionized news production, enhancing content creation processes in media organizations. Automated systems collect and analyze data, create news articles, and offer personalized content (Carlo gropoulos, 2019). Chatbots and virtual assistants boost audience engagement and provide tailored news recommendations, improving efficiency and expanding audience reach (Kovach, 2018) . Chengdu Radio and Television Station, known for its extensive news coverage and innovative technologies, has embraced AI in news production. AI algorithms analyze data, detect trends, and generate news reports, enhancing efficiency and coverage. This integration enables radio stations to enhance efficiency and broaden their coverage. Understanding the regulatory framework of AI in media is crucial in studying the ethical impact of AI in Chengdu's news production. Debates exist on whether AI integration in newsrooms requires regulation. Some argue that existing ethical standards suffice, while others advocate for specific regulations to ensure responsible and fair AI use in news production (Wu, 2020). 1.2. Research Questions and Objectives 1.2.1 what moral challenges have AI introduced into the news production of Chengdu Radio and television station? 1.2.2 how does the radio station balance these challenges with the need for innovation? 1.2.3 Research Objectives Choosing Chengdu Radio and television station for research is crucial due to its influence in Sichuan Province and experience in AI news production. The unique geographical and cultural aspects of Chengdu provide a valuable perspective for studying AI ethics in the news industry. The city's diverse social groups and technological innovation offer practical cases for examining AI applications in news. Researching Chengdu Radio and television station helps understand the news industry in the western region and improve news ethics. Chengdu Radio and television station emphasizes ethical awareness and news integrity, serving as a case for balancing innovation and integrity in AI news production. Studying its ethical impact can guide the establishment of ethical norms in the news industry. Selecting Chengdu Radio and television station for research supports the industry's ethical construction and innovation, offering theoretical and practical insights. The study is expected to contribute new ideas for the ethical development of AI news production, with significant practical and academic value. 1.3. Research Motivation The study examines the ethical impact of AI in news production at Chengdu Radio and television station. It aims to understand how AI technology is used in the newsroom and its ethical challenges. The research collects data through 220 interviews with stakeholders and content analysis of news articles created using AI. Statistical analysis is used to quantify ethical challenges and provide reliable conclusions. Studying the ethical impact of AI in news production at Chengdu Radio and television station is crucial. Understanding moral challenges of AI integration in media is vital. Chengdu's leading role in AI news production makes it an ideal case study. Exploring these ethical considerations can contribute to the global discourse on AI in news. The study's findings will shed light on how newsrooms can ethically use AI (Chan et al., 2020; diacopoulos, 2019; Zhang and Li, 2018). Ethical issues arise from using AI in news production at Chengdu Radio and television station. Concerns include bias in AI algorithms leading to false information. Transparency is a challenge due to AI algorithms operating as black boxes (Guo and Clarida, 2020). Questions of accountability arise as decisions by algorithms are hard to attribute. Balancing moral challenges with innovation and efficiency in news production is essential (Deloitte, 2020). 1.4. Research Significance This study explores ethical considerations in AI driven news production through analyzing Chengdu Radio and television cases, shedding light on challenges and opportunities of AI integration in media. It adds to existing AI news literature by examining ethical dilemmas faced by Chengdu Radio and television stations, deepening understanding of AI's ethical complexity in news production. Applying ethical concepts to Chinese media like Chengdu Radio and television offers a fresh perspective on AI driven news production, considering unique characteristics and challenges of China's media landscape. Studying AI integration in a Chinese media organization contributes to a comprehensive understanding of AI's ethical implications in journalism, offering insights on adopting AI technology in a specific cultural and regulatory context. The study's findings are significant for the news production practice at Chengdu Radio and television, revealing challenges and opportunities linked to AI integration in the newsroom. It underscores the importance of balancing AI's innovation potential with news practice integrity, potentially influencing AI integration strategies in newsrooms to establish best practices and ethical guidelines. The research may impact policy and regulation by highlighting regulatory needs and challenges posed by AI in the media, advocating for regulations to ensure ethical AI use in news production. Additionally, it aids in understanding AI technology's role and limitations in the news environment, benefiting AI developers and news organizations. The study's focus on Chengdu Radio and television station in the Chinese media context contributes to the global discussion on artificial intelligence in news, offering insights on these issues' local performance. Development of best practices and ethics for AI in news production is crucial for responsible journalism. Guidelines are needed to address ethical challenges as AI technology becomes more prevalent in newsrooms. Implementing ethical standards can help news organizations deal with issues like deviation, accuracy, and transparency in AI-driven news production, improving the quality and credibility of news content (Santos & Lazer, 2018). It is essential for news organizations, such as Chengdu Radio and Television, to adopt ethical standards to ensure responsible and ethical use of AI in news production. Regulation is suggested to ensure the ethical use of AI in news production, particularly in areas that may require oversight. Guidelines should be established for AI algorithms to mitigate bias and ensure diverse perspectives in news content (Esser & Umansky, 2020). Current regulations do not require news organizations to disclose when articles are generated or planned by AI systems, raising concerns about privacy and data security (Inventory, 2021). Supervision is needed to prevent the spread of false news from AI systems that could mislead audiences (Martin, 2019). Understanding AI technology is crucial for improving its integration in news production. Researching the ethical implications of AI-driven news production at Chengdu Radio and Television sheds light on the challenges and opportunities AI presents in the media industry. It emphasizes the importance of developing a responsible and ethical AI integration strategy to maintain the integrity of news production (Bimber, 2020; Wardle, 2017). This research contributes to a broader understanding of AI technology's role and limitations in the news environment, specifically by examining its impact on Chengdu Radio and Television (Lee, 2019). It reveals the ethical challenges faced by media organizations when incorporating AI into their workflow and provides insights into how cultural, political, and regulatory factors influence the adoption of AI in Journalism (Wasserman, 2021). 2. Theoretical Framework The study's theoretical framework combines news production, media ethics, and AI ethics concepts. Deviation in AI algorithms is a key theory discussed by Weiiinfriedler et al. (2019) to address ethical issues in news production. Transparency, accountability in AI decision-making, and understanding AI technology in news environment are included in the framework (lepri et al., 2018; anderson & rainie, 2019). These theories guide research result analysis. Quantitative data collection methods are used in the research design. Stakeholders at Chengdu Radio and Television Station will be interviewed to understand their views on AI's ethical impact. Content of news articles will be analyzed for biases or unethical practices. Statistical analysis will measure ethical issues' popularity in AI-driven news production. The study aims to ensure data validity, reliability, and provide an understanding of ethical considerations at Chengdu Radio and Television Station. The theoretical framework is illustrated in Figure 1. Figure 1. Theoretical Framework 221 Theoretical frameworks in AI ethics, media ethics, and news production offer insights into AI's ethical implications in news production, like the theory of social responsibility and the four principles of AI ethics. These frameworks help analyze ethical challenges in AI-driven news production at Chengdu Radio and Television Station. A theoretical framework combining AI ethics, media ethics, and news production principles is used to analyze research results, considering ethical challenges in journalism, regulatory frameworks, and AI technology limitations. The study aims to comprehensively analyze the ethical impact of AI-driven news production at Chengdu Radio and Television Stations. A questionnaire will gather radio reporters' views on moral challenges and methods for balancing innovation and integrity in AI-driven news production. Data will be analyzed using statistical software to understand the moral impact of AI in news production. Strict sampling techniques and systematic data analysis will ensure research methods' effectiveness and reliability. 3. Literature Review The ethical implications of AI in news production are extensively studied. AI integration in global newsrooms and media technology achievements are highlighted. Ethical concerns in AI journalism like bias and transparency are widely discussed. Case studies examine AI's ethical impact on news quality. Existing regulations and future suggestions for media AI are evaluated. Technical limitations and defects of AI in journalism are explored. Chinese media research focuses on integration and regulation (Kovach, 2019; tandoc et al., 2020). AI integration in news production raises ethical concerns such as bias and lack of transparency. Previous studies call for ethical guidelines in AI journalism(Zeng et al., 2018) . Rapid AI development raises questions about limitations and pitfalls. Chinese media patterns pose unique challenges (Val Jorgensen and Hackett, 2019). The study explores ethical implications of AI in Chengdu Radio and TV station news production. Artificial intelligence is increasingly utilized in news production worldwide. AI technologies revolutionize news practice with data analysis and dissemination at scale (Boggs, Rady Katy and schwinder, 2020). AI algorithms offer personalized news recommendations and assist in fact verification. AI's foundation in journalism transforms news production capabilities. The use of AI in news production is increasing, altering information dissemination. Major media like Washington Post and Reuters use AI for data analysis and news generation. Challenges remain in accuracy and audience involvement (Zhao et al., 2019). AI technology milestones have transformed news production, with NLP enabling human-like text generation. Computer vision allows image and video analysis, impacting news production efficiency (Han et al., 2020). Ethical concerns arise regarding accuracy, transparency, and bias in AI-generated content. Ethical issues in AI news production are a growing concern, particularly regarding bias in AI-generated content. Transparency in AI systems is lacking, making it hard to understand news generation (Lipton, 2018). Guidelines and regulations are needed to ensure transparency and fairness in AI news production practice(Brennan, 2019) . The examination of literature concerning the ethical dilemmas presented by artificial intelligence (AI) in journalism, including issues of bias, accountability, and transparency, has garnered increasing attention from both academic researchers and industry professionals. Scholars and practitioners have identified key concerns related to AI algorithms potentially introducing bias either through their training data or the interpretation and dissemination of information, thus prompting inquiries into the fairness and accuracy of news content (Rosenberg, 2019; tandoc et al., 2020). The opacity and interpretability of decisions made by AI systems further complicate issues of accountability, as attributing responsibility for erroneous or unethical actions becomes challenging. Additionally, the pressing concern of transparency arises due to the common use of AI systems as black boxes, hindering efforts to comprehend decision- making processes and identify potential biases or manipulations (Bilge, 2018). Addressing these ethical challenges is crucial to uphold the fundamental principles of integrity and accuracy in AI-driven journalism. Numerous research studies have explored the effects of AI on the quality and integrity of news reporting. Evidence suggests that AI algorithms may contribute to biased news coverage by favoring specific sources or viewpoints. Furthermore, the automated nature of AI-driven news production raises concerns regarding the dissemination of inaccurate or deceptive information. These findings underscore the ethical dilemmas associated with relying on AI for news creation and its potential implications for the overall standard and credibility of news content. It is imperative to consider these research outcomes when assessing the influence of AI on news production within the context of Chengdu Radio and Television. The analysis of case studies and comparative studies offers valuable insights into the ethical considerations surrounding AI-driven news production. Notable examples include the implementation of AI technologies in newsrooms by prominent media outlets like The Washington Post and The Guardian. These cases showcase the potential advantages of AI in enhancing news production efficiency and engaging audiences, while also highlighting ethical concerns such as algorithmic biases and the necessity for accountability and transparency Harrison and Dylko (2018). Comparative evaluations across various countries or media organizations can further enhance our comprehension of the ethical implications of AI in news reporting. By comparing the strategies for AI integration between Western media entities and Chinese counterparts like Chengdu Radio and Television, we can uncover cultural and contextual disparities in the adoption and governance of AI technologies. 4. Research Methods and Design This study will utilize a hybrid approach to examine the ethical implications of AI-driven news production in Chengdu Radio and television stations by interviewing stakeholders for insights. Content analysis on news from the TV station utilizing AI algorithms will be conducted, followed by statistical analysis to identify patterns and ethical challenges. The research design ensures a thorough investigation of AI's ethical impact in news production at Chengdu Radio and television station. Content analysis will identify potential biases and ethical concerns in news articles produced using AI technology, with quantitative data collected through surveys of reporters and 222 editors from Chengdu Radio and television stations. Analysis of survey data using statistical tools will reveal relationships and patterns, as shown in the research design framework Figure 2. Figure 2. The Research Design Framework Quantitative data will be collected through questionnaires issued to radio employees to comprehend the moral impact of AI in news production, analyzed using statistical software to identify trends and relationships. Purposeful sampling will ensure representative perspectives in the organization, while measures to enhance reliability and accuracy include member inspection and data source analysis. Research methods involve interviewing key personnel, investigating journalists and editors, and analyzing news content from Chengdu Radio and television station to thoroughly explore the moral impact of AI-driven news production. The minimum number of individuals for the study is determined to be 384.16 through a specific formula shown as below. 𝑛 𝑁/ 1 𝑁 ∗ 𝑒^2 5. Results and Discussion In the previous chapter, we made a detailed analysis of the ethical challenges brought by the introduction of AI technology to news production through a questionnaire. Next, we need to analyze the existing problems, and then put forward suggestions, which is conducive to the better operation of AI technology in news production and avoid its disadvantages. 5.1. Change bias and increase transparency As can be seen from figure 5-1 below, the introduction of AI algorithm will introduce bias, lack transparency and undermine accountability in this item, the number of people who fully agree is 125, followed by 115 people who basically agree, and the least is 34 people who basically disagree. From the participants' views on this issue, we can see that most people still agree that AI algorithm will introduce bias and lack of transparency, which will ultimately undermine accountability. On the one hand, AI is highly objective, supported by the code behind it, and has no own subjective consciousness; On the other hand, when the orientation of the news changes, the code is not updated timely and effectively, which will also lead to the continuation of the orientation of the news, thus causing prejudice. Figure 5-1. introduces bias and lack of transparency to the AI algorithm 5.2. Quality control to improve credibility It can be seen from the following Figure 5-2 that the introduction of AI algorithm will reduce the credibility of this item, the number of people who basically agree is up to 177, followed by the general proportion of 114, and the least is basically disagree, only 15. From the views of the subjects on this issue, we can see that most modern people are still 52 34 61 115 125 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Completely disagree Basically disagree same as basically agree in full agreement 223 skeptical about the credibility of the information produced by AI, and have doubts about its quality. This is because, on the one hand, the contemporary people do not have a deep understanding of AI. At present, only the practitioners have access to the core technology of AI. On the other hand, people are used to the news with human color, that is, the news created by people, rather than the product of cold machines. Both reasons lead to the participants' final views on this. Figure 5-2. shows whether the AI algorithm will cause irresponsible reporting views 5.3. Personnel and intelligence balance, reduce layoffs It can be seen from figure 5-3 below that the introduction of AI algorithm will cause a large number of layoffs in this item, the number of people who basically agree is up to 219, followed by 70 generally, and the least is basically disagree, only 7. We can see from the participants' views on this problem: first of all, from the analysis in Chapter 4, we can see that the introduction of AI will save a lot of manpower and material resources, which will lead to the realization of labor surplus in disguise, and then lead to the cutting of employees. Therefore, how to balance the proportion of artificial intelligence and real personnel is one of the problems we need to solve at present. Figure 5-3. View on whether the AI algorithm will cause a lot of layoffs 5.4. Shift code to improve the sense of responsibility It can be seen from the following figure 5-4 that the introduction of AI algorithm will lead to an increase in irresponsible reports in this item, the number of people who fully agree is 125 at most, followed by 115 people who basically agree, and the least is 34 people who basically disagree. We can see from the views of the test population on this issue that most people now believe that AI will cause irresponsible reports, which is mainly affected by the code of the AI controller behind it. Therefore, to improve the sense of responsibility and make the value lead to accuracy, the AI operator needs to update the code in real time. 17 15 114 177 64 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Completely disagree Basically disagree same as basically agree in full agreement 23 7 70 219 68 0 50 100 150 200 250 Completely disagree Basically disagree same as basically agree in full agreement 224 Acknowledgment I extend my deepest appreciation to Nutteera Phakdeephirot, my esteemed research mentor, whose invaluable guidance, perceptive feedback, and steadfast encouragement have been instrumental throughout the progression of this study. Her profound expertise and astute recommendations have significantly influenced the direction of the research, serving as a continual wellspring of inspiration. I am also indebted to the distinguished faculty members of the Ratanakossin Faculty at Rajamangala Polytechnic University, whose provision of a nurturing academic milieu and essential resources has facilitated the advancement of my research endeavors. The university’s conducive learning environment has been pivotal in shaping my scholarly voyage. Gratitude is also extended to the individuals who participated in this study, comprising professionals in the realm of sports management and respondents to the survey. Their generous contribution of time and insights has been indispensable in infusing a practical dimension into this research, enriching its relevance and applicability. Furthermore, heartfelt thanks are due to my cherished family and friends, whose unwavering encouragement, understanding, and support have been a constant source of strength throughout my academic pursuit. Their unwavering belief in my capabilities and continual motivation have served as the bedrock upon which I have embarked on this journey.I am acutely aware that without the collective support and contributions of these remarkable individuals, this research would not have come to fruition. To each and every one of them, I am profoundly grateful. Reference List [1] Anol Bhattacherjee. 'Social Science Research.' Principles, Methods, and Practices, Anol Bhattacherjee, 1/1/2012 [2] Bruce Hanington. 'Universal Methods of Design.' 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions, Bella Martin, Rockport Publishers, 2/1/2012 [3] .Kurt W. Jefferson. 'Contextualizing Security.' A Reader, Tobias T. Gibson, University of Georgia Press, 8/1/2022 [4] UNESCO. 'Reporting on artificial intelligence.' A handbook for journalism educators, UNESCO Publishing, 5/27/2023 [5] Thomas T. Liao. 'Advanced Educational Technology: Research Issues and Future Potential.' Springer Science & Business Media, 12/6/2012 [6] David C. Wilde. 'Property Law: Current Issues and Debates.' Paul Jackson, Routledge, 12/20/2018 [7] Akber Datoo. 'The LegalTech Book.' The Legal Technology Handbook for Investors, Entrepreneurs and FinTech Visionaries, Sophia Adams Bhatti, John Wiley & Sons, 6/1/2020 [8] AlĂ©n-Savikko, Anette. 'Artificial Intelligence and the Media.' Reconsidering Rights and Responsibilities, Pihlajarinne, Taina, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2/22/2022 [9] Paolo Mancini. 'Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World.' Daniel C. Hallin, Cambridge University Press, 11/28/2011 [10] Robert Faris. 'Network Propaganda.' Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics, Yochai Benkler, Oxford University Press, 9/17/2018 [11] Bernd Carsten Stahl. 'Artificial Intelligence for a Better Future.' An Ecosystem Perspective on the Ethics of AI and Emerging Digital Technologies, Springer Nature, 3/17/2021 [12] Computer Science and Telecommunications Board. 'Funding a Revolution.' Government Support for Computing Research, National Research Council, National Academies Press, 2/11/1999 [13] Jason Paul Whittaker. 'Tech Giants, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of Journalism.' Routledge, 2/11/2019 [14] Craig Kuziemsky. 'Handbook of EHealth Evaluation.' An Evidence-Based Approach, Francis Yin Yee Lau, University of Victoria, 11/1/2016 [15] Diana Ridley. 'The Literature Review.' A Step-by-Step Guide for Students, SAGE Publications, 7/31/2012 [16] Matthew Riggan. 'Reason & Rigor.' How Conceptual Frameworks Guide Research, Sharon M. Ravitch, SAGE Publications, 1/4/2016 [17] Gregory A. Borchard. 'The SAGE Encyclopedia of Journalism.' 2nd Edition, SAGE Publications, 1/28/2022 [18] Norma T. Mertz. 'Theoretical Frameworks in Qualitative Research.' Vincent A. Anfara, Jr., SAGE Publications, 10/30/2014 [19] .Posetti, Julie. 'Journalism, fake news & disinformation.' handbook for journalism education and training, Ireton, Cherilyn, UNESCO Publishing, 9/17/2018 [20] Koen de Feyter. 'International Human Rights Law in a Global Context.' Felipe GĂłmez Isa, Universidad de Deusto, 1/1/2009 [21] Eleftherios Alamanos. 'The Role of Digital Technologies in Shaping the Post-Pandemic World.' 21st IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society, I3E 2022, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, September 13–14, 2022, Proceedings, Savvas Papagiannidis, Springer Nature, 9/6/2022 [22] Anjum Razzaque. 'From the Internet of Things to the Internet of Ideas: The Role of Artificial Intelligence.' Proceedings of EAMMIS 2022, Abdalmuttaleb M. A. Musleh Al-Sartawi, Springer Nature, 11/18/2022 [23] Editors of Scientific American. 'Understanding Artificial Intelligence.' Grand Central Publishing, 6/1/2002 [24] Kaveh Memarzadeh. 'Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare.' Adam Bohr, Academic Press, 6/21/2020 [25] Holmes, Wayne. 'AI and education.' A guidance for policymakers, Miao, Fengchun, UNESCO Publishing, 4/8/2021 [26] John Hudson. 'Business Regulation and Public Policy.' The Costs and Benefits of Compliance, AndrĂ© Nijsen, Springer Science & Business Media, 12/3/2008 [27] Dal Yong Jin. 'Artificial Intelligence in Cultural Production.' Critical Perspectives on Digital Platforms, Routledge, 5/26/2021 [28] Carol Azungi Dralega. 'Digitisation, AI and Algorithms in African Journalism and Media Contexts.' Practice, Policy and Critical Literacies, Emerald Group Publishing, 12/14/2023 [29] Julie Firmstone. 'The Shaping of News.' A Framework for Analysis, Springer Nature, 9/23/2023 [30] Lee Chin-Chuan. 'Chinese Media, Global Contexts.' Routledge, 9/2/2003 [31] Mari K. Niemi. 'Futures of Journalism.' Technology-stimulated Evolution in the Audience-News Media Relationship, Ville J. E. Manninen, Springer Nature, 5/4/2022 [32] Stephen J.A. Ward. 'Handbook of Global Media Ethics.' Springer Nature, 9/2/2021 225 [33] John MacInnes. 'Statistical Significance.' SAGE Publishing, 1/1/2021 [34] Anastasia Arynchyna. 'A Guide to the Scientific Career.' Virtues, Communication, Research, and Academic Writing, Mohammadali M. Shoja, John Wiley & Sons, 1/9/2020 [35] Michael Drillings. 'Motivation: Theory and Research.' Harold F. O'Neil, Routledge, 12/6/2012 [36] Ian D Hodges. 'Designing and Managing Your Research Project.' Core Skills for Social and Health Research, David Robert Thomas, SAGE Publications, 10/4/2010 [37] Saradindu Bhaduri. 'Handbook on Frugal Innovation.' AndrĂ© Leliveld, Edward Elgar Publishing, 9/6/2023 [38] Danny Kopec. 'Artificial Intelligence in the 21st Century.' Stephen Lucci, Mercury Learning and Information, 12/10/2015 [39] Jorgen Sandberg. 'Constructing Research Questions.' Doing Interesting Research, Mats Alvesson, SAGE, 2/1/2013 [40] Yu-Wei Chan. 'Data Processing Techniques and Applications for Cyber-Physical Systems (DPTA 2019).' Chuanchao Huang, Springer Nature, 2/3/2020 [41] Diane Patel. 'AI and the News Industry.' Challenges and Opportunities for Journalism, Amazon Digital Services LLC - Kdp, 8/7/2023 [42] Rosemarie S. Stollenmaier. 'Women and Technology.' Urs E. Gattiker, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 10/12/2020