ACTA BOT. CROAT. 81 (2), 2022 197 Acta Bot. Croat. 81 (2), 197–205, 2022 CODEN: ABCRA 25 DOI: 10.37427/botcro-2022-017 ISSN 0365-0588 eISSN 1847-8476 A systematic study of Thlaspi s.l. taxa in the sections Nomisma, Thlaspi and Pterotropis from Turkey based on fruit morphological and molecular data Mehmet Cengiz Karaismailoğlu1*, Behcet İnal2, Osman Erol3 1 Bartın University, Faculty of Science, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Bartın, Turkey 2 Siirt University, Agriculture Faculty, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Siirt, Turkey 3 İstanbul University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, İstanbul, Turkey Abstract – The classification of Thlaspi s.l. is still problematic. Earlier phylogenetic research of the genus focused on several small groups within Thlaspi s.str. and lacked detailed morphological observations. The relationships among Eurasian taxa and the value of fruit morphology in defining them have yet to be studied. The aim of this study was to analyze 22 taxa belonging to the Nomisma, Thlaspi and Pterotropis sections of Thlaspi s.l. from Turkey using maximum likelihood (ML) analysis of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. We also analyzed the morphological features of the fruit. According to the results, the examined taxa fell into 2 main clades. Moreover, clade II showed 3 sub-clus- ters. Thlaspi huetii and T. aghricum were the most distant taxa with a distance of 0.49%; however, T. ochroleucum and T. violascens were found to be 99% similar. According to ITS region data based on multiple populations of each taxon, T. arvense, T. huetii, T. perfoliatum, T. violascens, T. cataonicum, T. elegans, T. rosulare and T. aghricum were placed to- gether in one cluster, which indicates that they are monophyletic. Thlaspi elegans was found to be a polyploid complex based on bootstrap (BS) (a resampling technique that uses replacement sampling to estimate statistics in a population) values, which varied widely among the studied T. elegans taxa (98, 65 and 49%). Fruit morphology also supported the inter-specific relationships based on molecular data, and relationships found by ITS region data were compatible with fruit type and geographic distribution. A diagnostic key based on fruit morphology is provided for the identification of the examined Thlaspi taxa. Keywords: diagnostic key, fruit, ITS region, taxonomy, Thlaspi, Turkey Introduction The genus Thlaspi sensu lato (s.l.) is a large and dynam- ic complex in the Brassicaceae family, which is widespread in Eurasia and North America and represented by more than 75 species (Karaismailoğlu and Erol 2018). In Turkey, it is represented by 36 taxa belonging to 6 sections, 22 of which are endemic. The first comprehensive study of the Nomisma, Thlaspi and Pterotropis sections was conducted by Hedge (1965). Sixteen taxa belonging to the sections specified in the study are included in the Flora of Turkey (Hedge 1965). Subsequent floristic studies have added T. leb- lebicii (Gemici and Görk 1995, Yıldırımlı 2001), T. praecox subsp. praecox Wulfen, T. cariense Carlström, T. syriacum Bornm., T. aghricum P.H. Davis & Kit Tan and T. watsonii P.H. Davis (Davis et al. 1988) to the Flora of Turkey, and to- day the specified sections are represented by 22 taxa. Thlaspi consists of annual, biennial or perennial herba- ceous plants with simple leaves and hairy or papillose stems. Sepals are bulging or non-saccate, the base of the sepals is often inclined and oblique with broad white membrana- ceous margins, while the oval petals are white, rose, lilac or yellowish. Filaments are narrow, straight or slightly curved. Nectar glands are present around the outer short stamens, but not on the long stamens in the middle. The ovary con- tains 2-16 ovules. The fruit is a dehiscent narrowly septate silicula or rarely a silique, strongly or weakly horizontally compressed, winged or not, with 1-8 seeds per loculus. The * Corresponding author e-mail: mkaraismailoglu@bartin.edu.tr KARAİSMAİLOĞLU M. C., İNAL B., EROL O. 198 ACTA BOT. CROAT. 81 (2), 2022 septa is often wavy. Seeds may or may not contain mucilage. The embryonic rootlet is accumbent (resting on the edge of the cotyledons) (Hedge 1965). The genus Thlaspi is a highly variable complex in Eur- asia, which includes Turkey, and several researchers have conducted different types of studies on many of its taxa. First, some important characters that improved the classi- fication of this giant complex were found by Meyer (1973, 1991), who revised Thlaspi based on seed coat anatomy and embryology and transferred many of the taxa previously included in the genus to Noccaea Moench. Meyer (1973, 1991) also divided the genus Thlaspi s.l. into 12 genera (Thlaspi L., Neurotropis (DC.) F.K. Meyer, Microthlaspi F.K. Meyer, Thlaspiceras F.K. Meyer, Noccidium F.K. Meyer, Kotschyella F.K. Meyer, Callothlaspi F.K. Meyer, Raparia F.K. Meyer, Noccaea Moench, Atropatenia F.K. Meyer. Vania F.K. Meyer, Masmenia F.K. Meyer). According to this classification, 6 species remain in Thlaspi sensu stricto (s. str.) (T. arvense L., T. huetii Boiss., T. watsonii P.H. Davis, T. kurdicum Hedge, T. alliaceum and T. ceratocarpon Murray) (Meyer 1973 and 1991). Many scientists do not accept this classification (Hedge 1965, Al-Shehbaz 1986, Karaismailoğlu 2018, Karaismailoğlu and Erol 2018, 2019, 2020) but it has been accepted by others (Greuter and Burdet 1983). Although most of Meyer’s classification was accepted by Greuter and Burdet (1983), this classification and the resulting new taxa were not accepted in the Flora of Turkey. Davis et al. (1988) rejected the genus fragmentation of Meyer (1973, 1991) and evaluated Thlaspi in the broad sense because they found the putative new taxa to be unanalyzable and, as a result, were unable to assess their proper placement. In addition, the Latin descriptions of many taxa were found to be insuffi- cient by Davis et al. (1988). Some more recent studies using molecular markers (RubisCO, Chloroplast DNA, nuclear ribosomal DNA) clearly show that the boundaries of some genera (Callothlaspi, Microthlaspi, Noccaea, Noccidium and Vania) in Meyer’s classification are unnatural (Mummenhoff and Koch 1994, Zunk et al. 1996, Mummenhoff et al. 1997, Koch et al. 1998, Koch and Mummenhoff 2001). According to Al-Shehbaz (2014), the systematic structure of Meyer (1973, 1991) is inherently incorrect and its inter-genus rela- tions cannot be resolved. However, the study partially agreed with Meyer’s classification at the genus level. Accord- ing to Al-Shehbaz (2012), the genus Noccaea, a well-known taxonomic complex, contains most of the species trans- ferred from Thlaspi s.l. Although he accepts that neither the genus boundaries nor the boundaries of the taxa within it can be fully resolved, he estimates the species diversity of Noccaea to be quite high with approximately 85 to 120 taxa (Al-Shehbaz 2012). Family-wide molecular phylogenetic studies place the genus Noccidium in the Camelineae tribe and indicate that the 10 genera (Atropatenia, Callothlaspi, Kotschyella, Masmenia, Microthlaspi, Neurotropis, Raparia, Thlaspiceras, Vania, Noccaeopsis). Meyer (1973, 1991) dis- tinguished from Thlaspi are synonyms of Noccaea (Khosravi et al. 2009). However, almost all of the taxa transferred are lacking adequate field studies, with work most often based on herbarium specimens missing important organs. These studies also include few plants from Turkey, which is a center of diversity with many endemic Thlaspi taxa. It is therefore necessary to re-evaluate morphological characters in light of the intra-genus classification of Meyer (1973) and the transfers made in the following years (Meyer 1973, 1991), using molecular phylogenetic studies based on extensive field work. Thlaspi is a difficult genus to study from a botanical point of view, mainly because it requires individuals with both flowers and ripe fruit for diagnosis. Many of the peren- nial species studied in the past, especially those with alpine distributions, were described from a few individuals, often with neither flowers nor mature fruit. This makes the taxo- nomic status of many species uncertain (Hedge 1965, Karaismailoğlu 2018). Fruits contain many typical morphological characteris- tics distinguishing taxa from each other; for instance, shape, colour, size and microstructure (involving ultrastructure) often offer useful contributions to the taxonomy of angio- sperms (Barthlott 1981, Karaismailoğlu 2017, 2019). Fruit morphology and surface micromorphology have been de- scribed as some of the best identification characters at the species and infra-generic levels in Brassicaceae (Hedge 1965, Davis et al. 1988, Karaismailoğlu 2018, 2019). It is difficult to morphologically distinguish Thlaspi from closely related genera without mature fruits. However, detailed studies of fruit morphology covering the genus as a whole have so far been lacking. DNA sequencing has become one of the most important and widespread methods of investigating the phylogenetic status and taxonomic relationships among taxa in recent years. The ITS (internal transcribed spacer) region is one of the most commonly used genomic regions in plant system- atics, the reasons for which include the presence of several types of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primer sets that can be used in different taxonomic groups (White et al. 1990, Gardes and Bruns 1993, Gültepe 2014, Moorhouse- Gann et al. 2018), as well as the size of the region, fewer than 700 base pairs, which makes it easy to replicate and se- quence (Gernandt et al. 2001). This region provides infor- mation useful in determining the phylogenetic relationships between taxa at the species and subspecies levels (Baldwin and Markos 1998, Gültepe 2014). Although a handful of studies have used different molecular markers to investigate several taxa, no comprehensive study of the ITS region has been conducted for Thlaspi s.l. In this article, we present the most comprehensive sam- pling of Nomisma, Thlaspi and Pterotropis sections of Thlaspi s.l. from Turkey to date. Phylogenetic analyses based on nu- clear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) ITS sequence data using an extensive sample set are used to elucidate relationships be- tween the taxa. We also support molecular data with fruit morphological character data in an attempt the better to explain the fruit variation of Thlaspi s.l. species and to make a diagnostic key utilizing these taxonomically important characteristics. A SYSTEMATIC STUDY OF THLASPI FROM TURKEY ACTA BOT. CROAT. 81 (2), 2022 199 Materials and methods Sampling In the current study, 22 species belonging to the Nomisma, Thlaspi and Pterotropis sections of the Thlaspi genus were col- lected as both flowering and ripe-fruited specimens from var- ious phytogeographic regions in Turkey in March-July be- tween 2013 and 2016. Specimens were numbered, pressed, arranged on herbarium sheets and deposited at Istanbul Uni- versity Science Faculty Herbarium (ISTF) and Siirt Univer- sity Flora and Fauna center (SUFAF) (On-line Suppl. Tab. 1.). Macromorphological characteristics of the fruits such as shape, size, apical sinus, wing and septum structures were analyzed for 100 fruits, from 10 individuals of each species, using an Olympus SZX7 stereomicroscope and Kameram Imaging Software. For micromorphological examination of fruit surface ornamentation, we used a JEOL Neoscope-5000 scanning electron microscope to examine samples fixed to stubs with silver epoxy and coated with platinum-gold mix (Karaismailoğlu and Erol 2018, Karaismailoğlu and Güner 2019). DNA Extractions, ITS region amplification and sequencing process Leaf samples were acquired from the field and ISTF and SUFAF herbaria, for a total of 33 accessions belonging to 22 species representing all three defined sections of Thlaspi. Aethionema speciosum Boiss. & A.Huet subsp. compactum Hartvig & Å.Strid [=Ae. compactum (Hartvig & Å.Strid) Yild.], which is closely related, was selected as the outgroup. Total genomic DNA was isolated according to the cetyl- trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method developed by Karaca et al. (2005). CTAB buffer is a mixture of extrac- tion buffer (EB): (0.35 M sorbitol, 100 mM Tris-HCI (pH 7.5), 5 mM EDTA (pH 7.5), 2% Tween, 1% Triton-X, 1% BME) and lysis buffer (LB): (200 mM Tris-HCI (pH 8.0), 50 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 2M NaCI, 2% PPVP, 2% CTAB, 2% Triton-X, 2% BME). DNA quantitation was performed us- ing a Thermo NanoDrop® Spectrophotometer. The ITS2 region sequences obtained from the genomic DNA was used as a template to amplify the ITS region with a MiniAmp Plus Thermal Cycler device using the primer pairs UniPlantF (5'-TGTGAATTGCARR ATYCMG-3') and UniplantR (5'-CCCGHYTGAYYTGRGGTCDC-3') ( Moorhouse-Gann et al. 2018). PCR was prepared in 25 µL volumes using the following reaction elements: 3 µL template DNA, 11.25 µL water, 2.5 µL 10X buffer, 1 µL each of primers (50 ng μL–1), 4 µL MgCl2 (2.5 mM), 1 µL dNTP mix (0.25 mM), 0.25 µL Taq DNA polymerase and 1 µL bovine serum albumin (BSA). PCR thermal cycle conditions were as follows: pre-de- naturation = 95 °C (1 min.), DNA denaturation = 94 °C Fig. 1. Fruits of the Thlaspi taxa (two images per taxon; 1 – fruit general appearance, 2 – number of seeds per locus): 1 – T. arvense, 2 – T. huetii, 3 – T. orbiculatum, 4 – T. kotschyanum, 5 – T. perfoliatum, 6 – T. microstylum, 7 – T. annuum, 8 – T. bulbosum, 9 – T. leblebicii, 10 – T. ochroleucum, 11 – T. praecox subsp. praecox, 12 – T. cariense, 13 – T. violascens, 14 – T. densiflorum, 15 – T. tatianae, 16 – T. cataonicum, 17 – T. syriacum, 18 – T. elegans, 19 – T. rosulare, 20 – T. lilacinum, 21 – T. aghricum, 22 – T. watsonii. Scale bars: 2 mm. KARAİSMAİLOĞLU M. C., İNAL B., EROL O. 200 ACTA BOT. CROAT. 81 (2), 2022 (1 min.), annealing = 55 °C, extension =72 °C (0.45 h), num- ber of cycles =35 and final extension =72 °C (5 min.). Puri- fication and sequencing were outsourced to Genoks (Istan- bul, Turkey). Bioinformatic analysis of sequences We used ITS region base sequences of 33 accessions in our analyses. Sequences with poor quality reads throughout were sequenced again. Afterward, the first and last 30 bases were removed due to poor quality using the BioEdit pro- gram (Hall 2011) and these sequences were not included in the main analysis. The obtained sequences were analyzed with the NCBI-BLAST algorithm to confirm they belong to the studied material. We then used Mega X version 10.0.05 (Kumar et al. 2018) to perform phylogenetic analyses. The sequences were first loaded and then aligned with the out- group, Ae. speciosum subsp. compactum, which included us- ing the base sequence, and Clustal W (Larkin et al. 2007). After alignment, a phylogenetic tree was constructed to in- terpret the genetic similarities among taxa. All raw sequenc- es were arranged in FASTA format for bioinformatics anal- ysis. After editing of the sequences, statistical analyses were performed in Mega X, using the predictive model algorithm to determine the most appropriate method for our study. Bootstrap values for 1000 replicates were obtained accord- ing to the maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic method. Results Structure of fruit in Thlaspi All examined taxa have siliculae as fruit. Eight fruit shapes were observed: oval-circular, elliptical, oval, obcor- Tab. 1. Fruit macro- and micromorphological features of the Thlaspi taxa (L: length, W: width). The measurements of these features were made on 100 fruits for each taxon. Taxa Fruit shape Fruit sizes Wing Apical sinus Stylus length (mm) Septum sizes Number of seeds in each locus Surface ornamen- tationL (mm) W (mm) W (mm) Tip Veining Structure L (mm) L (mm) W (mm) T. arvense Oval- Circular 10–18 10–16 2–5 Rotundate Reticulate Narrow 2–4 0.1–0.2 7–11 1–2 4–8 Reticulate T. huetii Circular 6–10 5–10 1–2 Rotundate Reticulate Narrow 1.5–2 0.1–0.2 4–7 1.5–2 2–4 Rugose T. orbiculatum Obcordate 10–12 13–15 2–5 Rotundate Parallel Narrow 1–3 0.4–0.5 8–11 1–1.5 4–6 Areolate T. kotschyanum Obcordate 7–14 8–15 2–4 Rotundate Reticulate Narrow 2–3 0.1 6–10 2–3 6 Reticulate T. perfoliatum Obcordate 4–6 4–7 0.5–1.2 Rotundate Reticulate Broad 1–3 0.2–0.4 4–6 1–3 3–5 Favulariate T. microstylum Obcordate 6–10 3–7 1–2.5 Obtuse Reticulate Narrow 1–1.5 1.1–1.5 6–8 0.5–1.5 2–4 Slightly reticulate T. annuum Obcordate 5–8 3–6 1–2 Rotundate Reticulate Broad 0.8–1.1 0.8–1 4.5–7 1–2 3–5 Rugose T. bulbosum Obcordate 8–11 6–10 1–3 Rotundate Reticulate Broad 2–3 2–3 8–11 2–3 2 Rugose T. leblebicii Obcordate 6–12 4–7 1–2 Rotundate Reticulate Narrow 1–2 0.2–0.5 6–8 1.5–2.5 2 Ruminate T. ochroleucum Cuneate- obcordate 5–8 4–6 0.5–1 Acute Reticulate Broad 0.5–1 2–3 5–6 1–2 4 Straight T. praecox subsp. praecox Obcordate 5–8 3–4 1–2 Rotundate Reticulate Broad 0.5–1 0.5–1 5–7 1–2 2–4 Straight T. cariense Obcordate 9–12 4–6 1–2 Rotundate Reticulate Broad 0.4–0.8 1–3 6–8 3 2–4 Rugose T. violascens Obcordate- triangular 8–10 4–6 1–2 Rotundate Reticulate Narrow 1.5–2 1–2 6–7 1.5–2 4–5 Ruminate T. densiflorum Obcordate- triangular 8–9 3.5–4 1–2 Acute Reticulate Narrow 1.5–2.2 1.5–2 7–8 1.5–2 4 Ruminate T. tatianae Cuneate 6–10 2.5–4 0.3–1 Obtuse Reticulate Broad 1–1.8 0.3–0.5 6–7 0.8–1.2 5–6 Lineolate T. cataonicum Oval- obcordate 10–12 3–4 0.5–1 Acute Reticulate Broad 2–2.5 2–2.3 7–8 1.5–2.1 5–6 Rugose T. syriacum Obcordate- triangular 6–8 3–4 0.5–1 Obtuse Reticulate Broad 0.5–0.7 1.5–2 5–6 1–1.5 2–4 Rugose T. elegans Rectangular 5–7 3–4.5 0.5–1.5 Acute Reticulate Broad 0.8–1.1 1–1.5 5–6 1–2 2–4 Ruminate T. rosulare Oval 7–9 5–6 0.7–1.2 Obtuse Reticulate Narrow 1–1.2 0.2–0.5 5–6 2.5–3 2 Ruminate T. lilacinum Elliptical 5–9 3–4.5 – – – – – 2–2.5 5–8 3–4 4–6 Rugose T. aghricum Obcordate 8–12 5–9 1–2.2 Obtuse Reticulate Broad 0.5–0.7 1.5–2 5–6 1–1.5 2–4 Ocellate T. watsonii Oval 5–7 3–4 1–2 Rotundate Reticulate Absent or Narrow 0.1–0.2 3.5–4 5–6 2–2.5 2–6 Ruminate A SYSTEMATIC STUDY OF THLASPI FROM TURKEY ACTA BOT. CROAT. 81 (2), 2022 201 date, cuneate-obcordate, cuneate, obcordate-triangular and rectangular (Fig. 1). The most common type is obcordate (in 10 taxa), while oval-circular (T. arvense), circular (T. huetii), cuneate-obcordate (T. ochroleucum), cuneate (T. tatianae), oval-obcordate (T. cataonicum) and rectangular (T. elegans) types are species specific (Fig. 1). Fruit sizes range from 4 mm (T. perfoliatum) to 18 mm (T. arvense) in length, from 2.5 mm (T. tatianae) to 16 mm (T. arvense) in width. T. perfoliatum has the smallest fruits and T. arvense has the largest. Fruit wing characteristics vary in width, wingtip structure and venation among taxa, except for T. lilacinum, which is not winged. The width of the wings varies between 0.3 mm (T. tatianae) and 5 mm (T. arvense and T. orbiculatum). Wing tips may be rotundate, obtuse or acute. The most common form is rotundate (12 taxa), while acute is the least (4 taxa). The wing tips are the same length in all taxa stud- ied except for T. elegans, which has different sized wing tips. The wings have reticulate surface venation, except for T. orbiculatum, which has parallel venation (Fig. 1, Tab. 1). The apical sinus also differs in terms of structure and size in the taxa studied. It is absent in T. lilacinum. It may be broad or quite narrow, as in T. watsonii. Apical sinus length varies between 0.1 mm (T. watsonii) and 4 mm (T. arvense). The length of the fruit stylus and its relationship to apical sinus length are quite diverse among these taxa. Stylus length is be- tween 0.1 mm (T. arvense, T. huetii and T. kotschyanum) and 4 mm (T. watsonii). Septum sizes vary from 4 mm (T. huetii and T. perfoliatum) to 11 mm (T. arvense, T. orbiculatum and T. bulbosum) in length, and from 0.5 mm (T. microstylum) to 4 mm (T. lilacinum) in width. The number of seeds per locus ranges from 2 (11 taxa) to 8 (T. arvense) (Fig. 1, Tab. 1). Fruit surface ornamentation is categorized into 8 types: reticulate, rugose, areolate, favulariate, ruminate, straight, lineolate and ocellate. The most common types are rugose and ruminate (13 taxa). Areolate (T. orbiculatum), favulari- ate (T. perfoliatum), lineolate (T. tatianae) and ocellate (T. aghricum) ornamentation types are represented by one tax- on each (On-line Suppl. Fig. 1, Tab. 1). Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree for representatives of the examined Thlaspi taxa based on ITS region data. Numbers at nodes show the bootstrap values. Numbers in parentheses indicate accession numbers. See On-line Suppl. Tab. 1 for locality data. KARAİSMAİLOĞLU M. C., İNAL B., EROL O. 202 ACTA BOT. CROAT. 81 (2), 2022 Phylogenetic relation of Thlaspi based on ITS region sequences The ITS gene sequences of the 22 Thlaspi taxa studied were used in analyses, plus that of Ae. speciosum subsp. compactum as the outgroup. The bootstrap values of the phylogenetic tree obtained using the maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic method are shown in Fig. 2. The dendrogram obtained from ITS data shows two dif- ferent clusters, or clades I and II. Clade II has six sub-clus- ters: A, B, C1, C2, C3 and C4 (Fig. 2). Only T. huetii in the Nomisma section was placed in clade I. The other taxon of that section, T. arvense, was found in Cluster A of clade II, meaning that the Nomisma taxa preserve their existing sys- tematic proximity. T. orbiculatum and T. kotschyanum, closely related in the Thlaspi section in the Flora of Turkey, remain closely linked to each other in Cluster B of clade II. Cluster C of clade II included 18 studied species and was further divided into four clusters: C1, C2, C3 and C4. Due to the aggregation of taxa in this cluster, it can be thought that other taxa originate from this cluster. Thlaspi annuum and T. perfoliatum from Thlaspi section are closely associ- ated with each other in C1 cluster. Taxa from the Thlaspi and Pterotropis sections (T. leblebicii, T. rosulare, T. lilacinum and T. watsonii) are in C2. All of these are narrow endem- ics in Turkey. T. ochroleucum, T. cariense, T. densiflorum, T. violascens, T. tatianae, T. cataonicum and T. syriacum taxa are included in the C3 cluster. Common features among taxa in this cluster include generally obcordate-shaped si- liculae and horizontally suppressed fruits. Cluster C4 con- sists of T. bulbosum and T. microstylum, belonging to Thlaspi section, plus T. praecox subsp. praecox, T. elegans and T. aghricum of the Pterotropis section. Although T. bulbosum and T. praecox subsp. praecox taxa are widely found in the European Flora, they have a very limited distribution in Turkey. The dissimilarity matrix based on ITS region data is provided in on-line Suppl. Tab. 2. All examined taxa have differences ranging from 0.01 to 0.49%, except for the out- group. Thlaspi huetii and T. aghricum are the most distinct taxa with a distance of 0.49% between them. Thlaspi violascens and T. ochroleucum-T. violascens had a 99% similarity to each other. The lengths of the nrDNA-ITS region ranged from 260 to 378 bp, and % GC contents varied between 45.91 and 54.73 (On-line Suppl. Tab. 3). Alignment of the ITS re- gions of all examined taxa resulted in a data set consisting of 324 base pairs (bp). We found that 95 of this aligned data consisted of parsimony (informative) nucleotides. Discussion Fruit morphological characters provide valuable infor- mation regarding the evolutionary relationships of flower- ing plants (Corner 1976). In this study, fruit macro- and micromorphology generally varies across Thlaspi species. Meyer (1973, 1991, 2001, 2006) discusses fruit similarities within the genus and argues that the relationships among taxa are masked in fruit-based classification. However, we found ripe fruits do not show this similarity. Instead, ma- ture fruit morphology ranged from broad to narrow, winged to wingless and rounded to acute to obtuse in the wing tips. In addition, the width and length of the apical sinus on the fruit, and the comparative length of the stylus are among characters that distinguish species. A thorough diagnostic key based on fruit characters is found at the end of the dis- cussion section. The examined Thlaspi taxa have overall very high simi- larity rates for the ITS region, which indicates that the genus has not fully completed the differentiation process. Previous studies conducted with various genera have shown that the ITS region contains a considerable number of parsimony informative nucleotides and therefore clearly reveals the re- lationship between taxa (Baldwin and Markos 1998, Alvarez and Wendel 2003, Hughes et al. 2006). We targeted this re- gion specifically because of its parsimony informative nu- cleotides and used the data to generate a phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2). Many studies have shown that the ITS gene region offers remarkable solutions in explaining the relationships be- tween taxa in some species-rich genera (Soltis et al. 1993, Soltis et al. 2008). The ITS region shows significant diver- gence between species but is often highly conserved within taxa, making it one of the most chosen genetic markers for species-level delimitation (Cheng et al. 2016). Moreover, the prospects of amplification from processed or aged plant ma- terials are good due to the ITS region’s large copy number (Balasubramani et al. 2010). ITS has been effectively used to differentiate taxa in diverse plant groups. According to our ITS data, the examined taxa are monophyletic and highly similar, which does not support previous taxa transfers to different genera, and all examined taxa should be evaluated under the same genus. A similar result was reported in a dendrogram created by evaluating 215 macromorphologi- cal, micromorphological and anatomical characters (Karaismailoğlu 2018), as well as a cladogram based on the detailed examination of palynological characters of these taxa (Karaismailoğlu and Erol 2019). Taxa belonging to the Nomisma section are easily dis- tinguished from others by their broad wings and oval, el- liptical or circular fruits. This data supports distinguishing this section from others according to fruit shape, as done by Schulz (1936) and Hedge (1965) in Flora of Turkey, who es- tablished the section using fruit shape and supported it with other classifications. Thlaspi orbiculatum and T. kotschyanum taxa are morphologically very similar in their flower struc- ture and broadly obcordate-shaped fruit; however, a con- trast between the parallel-veined fruit wings of T. orbiculatum and the reticulate venation of T. kotschyanum distinguishes the two. Plant height, leaf size and seed characteristics, used in Karaismailoğlu (2018), also clearly differentiate these taxa. Clusters in this group are consistent with the key char- acters and descriptions in Flora of Turkey described by Hedge (1965) and Davis et al. (1988) (Fig. 2). Thlaspi annuum and T. perfoliatum are morphologically similar in that their petals are in two segments, inner and outer. In the subset A SYSTEMATIC STUDY OF THLASPI FROM TURKEY ACTA BOT. CROAT. 81 (2), 2022 203 formed by T. perfoliatum taxa, the length of the petals in the outer segment is equal to those of the inner segment, while in T. annuum the petals in the outer segment are longer than in the inner segment (Karaismailoğlu 2018). Surprisingly, T. leblebicii and T. watsonii branch from the same place in the dendrogram because these taxa are quite different in ap- pearance and distributed in different phytogeographic re- gions. The dendrogram positions of T. rosulare, T. lilacinum and T. watsonii are compatible with their positions in the Flora of Turkey. Thlaspi ochroleucum, T. densiflorum and T. violascens, which are morphologically similar, are closely related but separated from each other by their BS values. Thlaspi bulbosum and T. praecox subsp. praecox are similar to each other in that they have underground stem metamor- phoses, namely rhizomes and tubers, obcordate-shaped si- licula, narrow or wide fruit wings, rounded wing tips and fruit styluses that generally exceed the apical sinus, all of which are also used as key characters in the Flora of Turkey (Hedge 1965, Davis et al. 1988). On the other hand, T. bulbosum differs from T. praecox subsp. praecox in GC% (51.38 in T. bulbosum, 50.99 in T. praecox subsp. praecox) and ITS region length (323 bp in T. bulbosum, 300 bp in T. praecox subsp. praecox). The rankings and relationships of taxa in the dendro- gram obtained by molecular phylogenetic data are also sup- ported by taxa descriptions in the Flora of Turkey (Fig. 2). On the other hand, we see no parallel between the sections created using morphological data and molecular data. Based on ITS comparisons, the close proximity between the Nomisma section taxa (T. arvense and T. huetii) is preserved. On the other hand, we see a gradual transition in taxa be- longing to the Thlaspi and Pterotropis sections, similar to what has been observed in previous detailed studies on the genus (Karaismailoğlu 2018, Karaismailoğlu and Erol 2018, 2019, 2020, Karaismailoğlu and Fidan 2021). This shows that distinguishing sections based on fruit morphology is artificial and not taxonomically beneficial. According to ITS data, T. elegans is a non-monophylet- ic polyploid complex. The BS values among the studied T. elegans taxa differ considerably (98%, 65%, 49%,). Also, ITS data from more than one population of T. arvense, T. huetii, T. perfoliatum, T. violascens, T. cataonicum, T. elegans, T. rosulare and T. aghricum indicate that they are same-arm taxa, and thus monophyletic. Thlaspi is a systematically problematic genus because of the presence of many morphologically similar species. Thlaspi arvense-T. huetii, T. orbiculatum-T. kotschyanum, T. violascens-T. densiflorum and T. lilacinum-T. watsonii are taxon pairs that are very similar to each other in terms of macromorphology. However, they are easily separated us- ing the BS values of our ITS-based phylogenetic tree, telling us that despite the high morphological similarity among species, they can be differentiated by molecular methods. This study, which includes a phylogenetic comparison of the ITS region, places the studied taxa into a natural sys- tematic group due to high base sequence similarity. As in previous detailed morphological, anatomical, palynological a nd c y tolo g ic a l s t ud ie s (K a r a i sm a i lo ğ lu 2 018 , Karaismailoğlu and Erol 2018, 2019, 2020, Karaismailoğlu and Fidan 2021) on the same taxa, we found that these taxa should be treated as part of Thlaspi s.l. A diagnostic key for taxa studied based on fruit morphological characteristics 1. Fruit shapes are oval, circular, oval-circular, elliptical, cuneate or rectangular ...................................................... 2 2. Oval, oval-circular, circular or elliptical ........................ 3 3. Oval, oval-circular ............................................................. 4 4. Oval-circular ....................................................... T. arvense 4. Oval ...................................................................................... 5 5. Stylus exceeds apical sinus .............................. T. watsonii 5. Stylus does not exceed apical sinus ................. T. rosulare 3. Elliptical ............................................................................... 6 6. Apical sinus absent ......................................... T. lilacinum 6. Apical sinus present .............................................. T. huetii 2. Cuneate or rectangular ...................................................... 7 7. Cuneate ............................................................... T. tatianae 7. Rectangular .......................................................... T. elegans 1. Fruit shapes are obcordate, cuneate-obcordate, oval-ob- cordate or obcordate triangular ....................................... 8 8. Cuneate-obcordate, oval-obcordate or obcordate ........ 9 9. Cuneate-obcordate or oval-obcordate ......................... 10 10. Cuneate-obcordate ................................... T. ochroleucum 10. Oval-obcordate ........................................... T. cataonicum 9. Obcordate ........................................................................... 11 11. Fruit wings with parallel veins ................ T. orbiculatum 11. Fruit wings with reticulate veins ................................... 12 12. Stylus exceeds apical sinus ............................................. 13 13. Wing tips are obtuse; septum width is 1.5-2 mm ............................................................................. T. aghricum 13. Wing tips are rotundate; septum width is 3 mm ................................................................................. T. cariense 12. Stylus does not exceed apical sinus or is the same length ................................................................................................. 14 14. Stylus length >1 mm ........................................................ 15 15. Septum width is 0.5-1.5 mm; ornamentation type is re- ticulate ......................................................... T. microstylum 15. Septum width is 2-3 mm; ornamentation type is rugose ............................................................................ T. bulbosum 14. Stylus length ≤1 mm ........................................................ 16 16. The number of seeds at each locus is 2-6 ...................... 17 17. 6 seeds at each locus .................................. T. kotschyanum 17. 2-5 seeds at each locus ..................................................... 18 18. Ornamentation type is favulariate or straight ........... 19 19. Favulariate ................................................... T. perfoliatum 19. Straight ........................................ T. praecox subsp. praecox KARAİSMAİLOĞLU M. C., İNAL B., EROL O. 204 ACTA BOT. CROAT. 81 (2), 2022 18. Ornamentation type is rugose or ruminate ................ 20 20. Rugose ................................................................. T. annuum 20. Ruminate ........................................................... T. leblebicii 8. Obcordate-triangular ....................................................... 21 21. Wing tips are rotundate or obtuse .................................. 22 22. Ornamentation type is rugose ....................... T. syriacum 22. Ornamentation type is ruminate ................ T. violascens 21. Wing tips are acute ....................................... T. densiflorum Acknowledgments This study was financially supported by İstanbul Uni- versity-Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (Project Number: 33567) and İstanbul University-OYP Unit (Project Number 113.2014-DR-35/26.04). We would like to thank the curators of herbaria ISTE, ISTO, KATO, OUFE, AKDU, VANF, KNYA, ANK, GAZI, HUB, EGE for giving us the opportunity to assess their specimens, and Rachel Mollman for improving the language of the article. References Alvarez, I., Wendel, J.F., 2003: Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29, 417–434. Al-Shehbaz, I.A., 1986: The genera of Lepidieae (Cruciferae; Brassicaceae) in the southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 67, 265–311. Al-Shehbaz, I.A., 2012: A generic and tribal synopsis of the Bras- sicaceae (Cruciferae). Taxon 61, 931–954. Al-Shehbaz, I.A., 2014: A Synopsis of the genus Noccaea (Colu- teocarpeae, Brassicaceae). Harvard Papers in Botany 19, 25– 51. Balasubramani, S.P., Murugan, R., Ravikumar, K., Venkatasub- ramanian, P., 2010: Development of ITS sequence based mo- lecular marker to distinguish, Tribulus terrestris L.(Zygop- hyllaceae) from its adulterants. Fitoterapia 81, 503–508. Baldwin, B.G., Markos, S., 1998: Phylogenetic utility of the ex- ternal transcribed spacer (ETS) of 18S-26S rDNA: congru- ence of ETS and ITS trees of Calycadenia (Compositae). Mo- lecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 10, 449–463. Barthlott, W., 1981: Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: systematic applicability and some evolutionary as- pects. Nordic Journal of Botany 1, 345–355. Cheng, T., Xu, C., Lei, L., Li, C., Zhang, Y., Zhou, S., 2016: Bar- coding the kingdom Plantae: new PCR primers for ITS regi- ons of plants with improved universality and specificity. Mo- lecular Ecology Resources 16, 138–149. Corner, E.J., 1976: The seeds of Dicotyledons. Cambridge Uni- versity Press., Cambridge. Davis, P.H., Mill, R.R., Tan, K., 1988: Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh University Press, Edin- burgh. Gardes, M., Bruns, T.D., 1993: ITS primers with enhanced spec- ificity for basidiomycetes: application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology 2, 113–118. Gemici, Y., Görk, G., 1995: Thlaspi leblebicii. Candollea 50, 43. Gernandt, D.S., Liston, A., Pinero, D., 2001: Variation in the nrDNA ITS of Pinus subsections Cembroides: implications for molecular systematic studies of pine species complexes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 21, 449–467. Greuter, W., Burdet, H., 1983: Ceriosperma (O. E. Schulz) Greuter & Burdet. In: Greuter, W., Raus, T., (eds.) - Med-checklist notulae. Willdenowia 13, 79–99. Gültepe, M., 2014: Biosystematic studies on Tragopogon L. (As- teraceae) distributed in Turkey. PhD Thesis. Institute of Sci- ence and Technology, Karadeniz Technical University, Tra- bzon (in Turkish). Hall, T., 2011: BioEdit: an important software for molecular bi- ology. GERF Bulletin of Biosciences 2, 60–61. Hedge, I.C., 1965: Thlaspi. In: Davis, P.H. (ed,), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, 330–341. Vol. 1. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. Hughes, C., Eastwood, R.J., Bailey, C.D., 2006: From famine to feast? Selecting nuclear DNA sequence loci for plant species- level phylogeny reconstruction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 361, 211–225. Karaca, M., İnce, A.G., Elmasulu, S.Y., Onus, A.N., Turgut, K., 2005: Coisolation of genomic and organelle DNAs from 15 genera and 31 species of plants. Analytical Biochemistry 343, 353–355. Karaismailoğlu, M.C., 2017: Palynological features of eleven Aethionema taxa from Turkey and their systematic implica- tions. Bangladesh Journal of Plant Taxonomy 24, 197–204. Karaismailoğlu, M.C., 2018: Systematic investigations on some taxa of genus Thlaspi L. (Brassicaceae); sections Nomisma DC., Thlaspi L., Pterotropis DC. PhD Thesis. Institute of Sci- ence and Technology, İstanbul University, İstanbul. Karaismailoğlu, M.C., Erol, O., 2018: Seed structure and its tax- onomic implications for genus Thlaspi sensu lato sections Nomisma, Thlaspi, and Pterotropis (Brassicaceae). Turkish Journal of Botany 42, 591–609. Karaismailoğlu, M.C., 2019: Comparative morphology and anat- omy of seeds of some Aethionema WT Aiton (Brassicaceae) taxa from Turkey. Bangladesh Journal of Plant Taxonomy 26, 1–12. Karaismailoğlu, M.C., Erol, O., 2019: Pollen morphology of some taxa of Thlaspi L. sensu lato (Brassicaceae) from Turkey, and its taxonomical importance. Palynology 43, 244–254. Karaismailoğlu, M.C., Güner, Ö., 2019: Nutlet structures of sub- section Fragiles of the genus Stachys (Lamiaceae) from Tur- key and their systematic applications. Turkish Journal of Botany 43, 659–672. Karaismailoğlu, M.C., Erol, O., 2020: Notes on leaf and stem anatomy of Thlaspi sensu lato. Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences 21, 139–150. Karaismailoğlu, M.C., Fidan, M., 2021: Cytotaxonomy of eight Thlaspi L. sensu lato (Brassicaceae) species endemic to Tur- key. Cytologia 86, 345–349. Khosravi, A.R., Mohsenzadeh, S., Mummenhoff, K., 2009: Phy- logenetic relationships of Old World Brassicaceae from Iran based on nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 37, 106–115. Koch, M., Hurka, H., Mummenhoff, K., 1998: Molecular bioge- ography and evolution of the Microthlaspi perfoliatum s.l. polyploid complex (Brassicaceae. chloroplast DNA and nu- clear ribosomal DNA restriction site variation. Canadian Journal of Botany 76, 382–396. Koch, M., Mummenhoff, K., 2001: Thlaspi s.str. (Brassicaceae) versus Thlaspi s.l.: morphological and anatomical characters in the light of ITS nrDNA sequence data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 227, 209–225. Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C., Tamura, K., 2018: MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35, 1547-1549. A SYSTEMATIC STUDY OF THLASPI FROM TURKEY ACTA BOT. CROAT. 81 (2), 2022 205 Larkin, M.A., Blackshields, G., Brown, N.P., Chenna, R., McGettigan, P.A., McWilliam, H., Valentin, F., Wallace, I.M., Wilm, A., Lopez, R., Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Higgins, D.G., 2007: Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23, 2947–2948. Meyer, F.K., 1973: Conspectus der “Thlaspi”-Arten Europas, Afrikas und Vorderasiens. Feddes Repertorium 84, 449–470. Meyer, F.K., 1991: Seed-coat anatomy as a character for a new classification of Thlaspi. Flora et Vegetation Mundi 9, 9–15. Meyer, F.K., 2001: Kritische Revision der “Thlaspi”-Arten Euro- pas, Afrikas und Vorderasiens, Spezieller Tiel, II. Thlaspi L. Haussknechtia 8, 3–42. Meyer, F.K., 2006: Kritische Revision der “Thlaspi”-Arten Euro- pas, Afrikas und Vorderasiens. Spezieller Teil. IX. Noccaea Moench. Haussknechtia 12, 343. Moorhouse-Gann, R.J., Dunn, J.C., de Vere, N., Goder, M., Cole, N., Hipperson, H., Symondson, W.O.C, 2018: New universal ITS2 primers for high-resolution herbivory analyses using DNA metabarcoding in both tropical and temperate zones. Scientific Reports 8, 8542. Mummenhoff, K., Koch, M., 1994: Chloroplast DNA restriction site variation and phylogenetic relationships in the genus Thlaspi sensu lato (Brassicaceae). Systematic Botany 19, 73– 88. Mummenhoff, K., Franzke, A., Koch, M., 1997: Molecular data reveal convergence in fruit characters, traditionally used in the classification of Thlaspi s.l. (Brassicaceae)-Evidence from ITS-DNA sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean So- ciety 125, 183–199. Schulz, O.E., 1936: Cruciferae, Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. W. Engelmann, Leipzig. Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Rieseberg, L.H., 1993: Molecular data and the dynamic nature of polyploidy. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 12, 243–273. Soltis, D.E., Mavrodiev, E.V., Doyle, J.J., Rauscher, J., Soltis, P.S., 2008: ITS and ETS sequence data and phylogenetic recon- struction in allopolyploids and hybrids. Systematic Botany 33, 7–20. White, T.J., Bruns, T., Lee, S., Taylor, J., 1990: Amplication and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phy- logenetics. In: Innis, M., Gelfand, D., Sninsky, J., White, T. (eds.), PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications, 315–322. Academic Press, London. Yıldırımlı, Ş., 2001: Thlaspi L. In: Güner, A., Özhatay, N., Ekim, T., Başer, K.H.C., (eds.), 52–23. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vol. 11. (Suppl. 2). Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. Zunk, K.K., Mummenhoff, K., Koch, M., Hurka, H., 1996: Phy- logenetic relationships of Thlaspi s. l. (subtribe Thlaspidinae, Lepidieae) and allied genera based on chloroplast DNA re- striction-site variation. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 92, 375–381.