ACTA BOT. CROAT. 84 (2), 2025 193 Acta Bot. Croat. 84 (2), 193–201, 2025 CODEN: ABCRA 25 DOI 10.37427/botcro-2025-017 ISSN 0365-0588 eISSN 1847-8476 Past, present and future of an alien fungus Clathrus archeri in Croatia Sven D. Jelaska*, Damjana Levačić University of Zagreb, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Marulićev trg 20, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia Abstract – Clathrus archeri (Berk.) Dring, an alien saprotrophic fungus originating from Australia and New Zealand has been present in Europe for over 100 years. From its first observation in 1920 in France, it has spread all over Europe, and is among the better surveyed alien saprotrophic fungi with respect to its spread and distribution. Despite this, data about C. archeri in Croatia in the scientific literature are very scarce. To fill the current gap on the presence and distribu- tion of C. archeri in Croatia, we collected reliable available data on its presence, analysed several environmental factors (climate, soil acidity, topography) on those localities, and developed habitat suitability models using Maxent software. We found out that the fungus has been present in Croatia for over 20 years, so we synthesized information on 25 obser- vations, which were all but one placed in the Continental NATURA 2000 biogeographical region of the country. Locali- ties were situated between 104 and 532 m a.s.l., with mean annual temperatures ranging from 8.1 to 10.9 °C, and annual precipitation ranging between 815 and 1620 mm. On all localities acid soil reactions were present with pH values below 6.8. Although the current number of observations is moderate, in terms of its spatial distribution we can consider C.  archeri a widespread alien fungus in Croatia. Based on the habitat suitability models developed here, and data about its ecology from the literature, we can expect more and spatially broader observations of C. archeri in the future. Keywords: GBIF, iNaturalist, octopus stinkhorn, Phallaceae, stinkhorns, velika polipovka Introduction For a long time, fungi have been overlooked in the inva- sion science literature, apart from the fungal pathogens that have strong negative impacts on biodiversity and the econ- omy (e.g. in the agriculture). Symbiotic fungi have been to some extent surveyed, but saprotrophic fungi rarely ( Desprez-Loustau et al. 2007, 2010). According to Desprez- Loustau et al. (2007), lack of the quantification of the im- pacts of non-pathogenic alien fungi may be a major reason for the scarcity of surveys and the data on them. In last 15 years, a number of European countries have compiled lists of alien fungi (see Voglmayr et al. 2023, for countries and references), but as shown from the example of Austria in which they expanded their first checklist (Voglmayr and Krisai-Greilhuber 2002) with an almost five-fold increase in the second edition (Voglmayr et al. 2023), it is an ongo- ing process. As highlighted by Voglmayr et al. (2023) plant pathogens are the dominant ecofunctional group in the list of Austrian alien fungi, which is the case in other countries as well. Saprobionts are still generally underrepresented in alien fungi lists. It should be noted that biogeography of fungi is much less known and clear than that of plants and animals (Desprez-Loustau et al. 2007). Among the alien saprotrophic fungi in Europe, Clathrus archeri (Berk.) Dring is one of the better known, with lots of papers reporting on its distribution across Europe (see the review by Parent and Thoen 1986, and Parent et al. 2000). One reason for this may be the peculiar appearance of its sporocarps (Fig. 1), making it easier for identification, and attracting more attention, even from non-fungi experts and the general public. According to Parent and Thoen (1986) the first record in Europe of this fungus, originating from Australia and New Zealand, is from 1920 in Vosges, France (Lemasson 1923 in Parent and Thoen 1986), where it is believed to have most probably arrived with wool products. From there it gradually spread all over Europe. It has been recorded in great variety of habitats including different types of forests (deciduous, co- niferous – natural and plantations, mixed coniferous-decid- uous), grasslands, orchards, disturbed habitats, gardens ( Parent and Thoen 1986, Bîrsan et al. 2014, Pietras et al. 2016, Brännhage and Gross 2020). However, although it can be found in a diversity of habitats it does prefer humid and acidic soil (Parent and Thoen 1986, Pietras et al. 2016). Published data on C. archeri in Croatia are extremely scarce and to our knowledge, with respect to the scientific lit- * Corresponding author e-mail: sven.jelaska@biol.pmf.unizg.hr mailto:sven.jelaska@biol.pmf.unizg.hr JELASKA S. D., LEVAČIĆ D. 194 ACTA BOT. CROAT. 84 (2), 2025 erature, these are: Tkalčec et al. (2005) in which the species is mentioned for Croatia for the first time in the scientific lit- erature; Kranjčev (2008) who reports on its presence in two locations in northwest Croatia; Pietras et al. (2021) who in- cluded in their analysis one locality (out of four) on the fungus’s presence in Croatia deposited on GBIF.org on Octo- ber 26th, 2018. Apart from the scientific literature, C. archeri was included in all three editions of the “Ordinance on Pro- tection of Fungi” (Official Gazette 1998–2002), but was omit- ted from the subsequent “Ordinance on Designation of Wild Taxa as Protected or Strictly Protected” (Official Gazette 2006) and “Red Book of Croatian Fungi” (Tkalčec et al. 2008). Preliminary inclusion of C. archeri on the list of protected fungi was probably a result of a lack of data and information on the fungus’ origin, which happened in other countries as well, in the Eastern part of Europe where C. archeri arrived and was observed later (e.g. Romania – Tănase and Pop 2005, Bulgaria – Gyosheva et al. 2006, Ukraine – Didukh 2009). Increased knowledge and data collected resulted in its remov- al from the Red Book of Ukraine (Heluta et al. 2022). To fill the current gap in the knowledge of the presence and distribution of C. archeri in Croatia, we collected reli- able available data on its presence, based on which we ana- lysed the ecological preferences of the species. Furthermore, we developed habitat suitability models to get some indica- tion on its potential overall distribution in Croatia, which can be also used for planning future research on the species. Material and methods To gather information on the presence of C. archeri in Croatia we have searched for fungus’s records in GBIF.org (https://www.gbif.org/); iNaturalist.org (https://www.inat- uralist.org/), Mushroomobserver.org (https://mush- roomobserver.org/) and Wood (2008). Furthermore, we have used several query terms in different combinations (“Clathrus”, “archeri”, “Anthurus”, “Devil’s fingers”, “Octo- pus stinkhorn”, “velika polipovka”, “Croatia”, “Hrvatska”) in the following sources: – Portal of Croatian scientific and professional journals (https://hrcak.srce.hr/en) – Croatian Research Information System (https://www. croris.hr/) – Scopus (https://www.scopus.com) – Internet web pages Queryings scientific literature sources revealed just two publications in which C. archeri was mentioned: Tkalčec et al. (2005) and Kranjčev (2008). Only the latter gave locations (two) for the fungus in Croatia. GBIF.org did not contain all the localities present in iNaturalist, because of licensing re- strictions assigned to some observation records. We have contacted owners of these observations and obtained per- mission to use their observations in this analysis. They are presented in Tab. 1 with corresponding links, while data present in GBIF on April, 24th 2024 can be found in the GBIF.org (2024) downloaded data set. From the Internet web pages search, we have included three results (No. 1, 5, and 19 in Tab. 1) that mentioned month and year of observation, in addition to a locality that could be georeferenced. For such location in the Karlovac City area (No. 1 in Tab. 1) there was an observation in GBIF. org (2024) with exact coordinates, hence we used that loca- tion but kept the web source presented in Tab. 1 for being among the first data of the presence of the fungus in Croa- tia. Descriptions of two locations of C. archeri in Kranjčev (2008) were sufficiently precise in just one case, the presence of which we confirmed in November 2023 (No. 3 in Tab. 1) and assigned coordinates using the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). Overall, we have synthesized data on 25 locations of C. archeri in Croatia (Fig. 2) with the oldest data originating in 2004. To develop habitat suitability models, we used Maxent software (Phillips et al. 2024), 22 data with exact coordi- nates on the occurrences of C. archeri in Croatia (Tab. 1) and two sets of environmental variables. In the first itera- tion, we used eight climatic variables (mean temperature and amount of precipitation per meteorological season) based on a 30-year period (1960–1990, Croatian Meteoro- logical and Hydrological Service). In the second iteration, in addition to climatic variables, pH value (in H2O) of the topsoil (0–5 cm depth) was used. For latter we used a data- set available for Europe (Poggio et al. 2021). All environ- mental variables were prepared as 300 m resolution grids. Fig. 1. Clathrus archeri observed by authors in November 2023 in Donji Stupnik (left image – eggs; middle image – sporocarp) and Donje Ladanje (right image – sporocarp). Pen in the left image is 14 cm long. Photo: Sven D. Jelaska. https://www.gbif.org/ https://www.inaturalist.org/ https://www.inaturalist.org/ https://mushroomobserver.org/ https://mushroomobserver.org/ https://hrcak.srce.hr/en https://www.croris.hr/ https://www.croris.hr/ https://www.scopus.com ALIEN FUNGUS CLATHRUS ARCHERI IN CROATIA ACTA BOT. CROAT. 84 (2), 2025 195 Given the number of occurrence data, we have used all as a training set. Consequently, only Area Under Curve (AUC) for the training set was available. Three localities to which exact coordinates could not be assigned (No. 2, 5, and 19 in Tab. 1), were used as an independent test data set to evalu- ate the habitat suitability models developed. Tab. 1. Localities of Clathrus archeri in Croatia with WGS84 coordinates, month and year of observation, and source of data (all web sources accessed on April 24, 2024.). * localities observed by the Authors, ** – coordinates approximated, localities not used for the Maxent models No. X-coordinate Y-coordinate Month Year Source 1 15.59496 45.52655 December October 2019 2004 GBIF.org (2024) https://www.svijet-gljiva.com/katalog-gljiva/item/91-clathrus-archeri 2** 16.91227 46.14785 October 2007 Kranjčev (2008) 3* 16.14177 46.28702 November October 2023 2007 GBIF.org (2024) Kranjčev (2008) 4 16.13286 46.26402 September 2010 https://mushroomobserver.org/52525 5** 16.12500 45.63459 June 2012 https://www.24sata.hr/ reporteri/u-sumi-kod-busevca-pronasao-je-rijetku-vrstu-smrdljive-gljive-271077 6 15.59853 45.52442 October 2012 GBIF.org (2024) 7 16.03694 45.66291 October 2017 GBIF.org (2024) 8 17.60421 45.35970 September 2018 https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/193238448 9 17.60344 45.35771 September 2018 https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/193238557 10 15.20384 45.27234 October 2018 GBIF.org (2024) 11 15.74351 45.63000 September 2019 GBIF.org (2024) 12 17.49942 45.55693 November 2019 https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/36022378 13 17.63949 45.57991 August 2020 GBIF.org (2024) 14 17.31514 45.41640 September 2022 https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/134201619 15 16.31555 46.43399 October 2022 https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/197127579 16 15.78877 45.76543 October 2022 https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/139409586 17 15.91247 45.31635 October 2022 GBIF.org (2024) 18 15.91247 45.31624 October 2022 GBIF.org (2024) 19** 16.01816 45.56576 October 2022 https://institutzeleni.wordpress.com/2022/10/09/prica-iz-vukomerickih-gorica/ 20 17.69796 45.55104 November 2022 https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/141909715 21 17.67791 45.62665 November 2022 https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/142387360 22 14.31846 45.08774 April 2023 GBIF.org (2024) 23 16.15927 46.29094 August 2023 GBIF.org (2024) 24* 15.82043 45.72737 November 2023 GBIF.org (2024) 25 15.99926 45.66489 November 2023 https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/206601927 Fig. 2. Distribution of Clathrus archeri in Croatia (details of localities in Tab. 1), with NATURA2000 biogeographical regions indi- cated. Background map is OpenStreetMap (Base map and data from OpenStreetMap and OpenStreetMap Foundation (CC-BY-SA). https://www.openstreetmap.org and contributors) JELASKA S. D., LEVAČIĆ D. 196 ACTA BOT. CROAT. 84 (2), 2025 In addition to climatic and pH variables mentioned above, we assigned values of elevation and slope (based on a 300 meter resolution digital elevation model of Croatia) to all 25 localities, and calculated several descriptive statistical measures (minimum, maximum, mean, 10th and 90th per- centile) to get some insight into the ecological preferences of C. archeri in Croatia. Elevation and slope were not in- cluded in habitat suitability modelling since elevation is cor- related to climate (positively with precipitation, and nega- tively with temperature) and value of slope can vary significantly on short distances, and hence could increase uncertainty of the habitat suitability model. At two locations (No. 3 and 24 in Tab. 1, Donje Ladanje and Donji Stupnik respectively) where we observed C. archeri in November 2023 we collected soil samples. After remov- ing the leaf litter, upper 5 cm of the soil was sampled with a cylindrical corer (8 cm in diameter) in triplicates around the observed sporocarp (with a distance of 1 m between the subsamples) and stored as a composite sample representa- tive for the location. Samples were transported to the laboratory where they were air dried at room temperature. To measure pH values, a combined electrode pH meter ( HANNA HI 99121, Direct soil pH meter) was used on sus- pensions composed of 10 g of soil and 25 mL of distilled wa- ter. Prior to measuring, the suspensions were covered for 30 min with occasional stirring. Organic matter content was determined by annealing in a muffle furnace (INKO LP-08). According to the NRM Laboratories methodology (Davies 1974) ground soil samples were first dried in an oven at 110 °C for 24 h, then weighed for 5 g samples, transferred to porcelain bowls, and heated in the muffle furnace at 430 °C for 2 h. After annealing, the samples were transferred into a desiccator for cooling and weighed again the next day. The organic matter content was determined using mass differ- ences. Both pH and organic matter content measurements were made of three random subsamples from the composite soil sample of each locality, and expressed as mean values. Results Except for one in the Mediterranean region, all localities of C. archeri were situated in the Continental NATURA 2000 biogeographical region, with no localities recorded in the Alpine region (Fig. 2). Localities were situated between 104 and 532 m a.s.l., with 10th and 90th inter-percentile rang- ing from 109 to 381 m a.s.l. (Tab. 2). The 10–90 inter-percentile range for mean annual tem- perature was 9.6 to 10.8 oC, and for annual precipitation 831 Tab. 2. Environmental variables values for Clathrus archeri localities (Tab. 1) in Croatia. pH – pH value of topsoil in 0 – 5 cm depth, elevation (m a.s.l.), slope (°), –prec – precipitation (mm) and –temp – temperature (°C) for four seasons (sp – spring, su – summer, a – autumn, w – winter) and annual (y–). min – minimum, max – maximum, mean – average, perc10 and perc90 – 10% and 90% per- centiles for each environmental variable. No. Approximate locality pH eleva- tion slope spprec suprec aprec wprec yprec sptemp sutemp atemp wtemp ytemp 1 Karlovac 5.4 108 0.0 242 282 312 230 1066 10.7 19.8 11.2 1.7 10.8 2 Podravski bregi 5.5 125 0.0 199 273 221 157 850 10.7 19.4 10.4 0.4 10.2 3 Donje Ladanje 5.4 217 3.8 216 298 247 174 935 10.1 18.9 10.1 0.3 9.9 4 Veliki Novaki 6.2 215 1.0 218 300 249 176 943 10.1 18.8 10.1 0.3 9.8 5 Buševec, Velika Gorica 5.5 104 0.0 207 262 259 182 909 10.9 20.0 11.1 1.3 10.8 6 Karlovac 5.3 108 0.0 241 282 311 230 1063 10.7 19.8 11.2 1.7 10.8 7 Gudci 5.4 121 0.0 208 264 262 184 917 10.7 19.8 11.0 1.2 10.7 8 Jaguplije 6.0 214 5.1 192 257 216 150 815 10.4 19.5 10.4 0.3 10.2 9 Jaguplije 5.9 213 5.1 192 257 216 150 815 10.5 19.5 10.4 0.3 10.2 10 Sveti Petar (Ogulin) 6.2 365 7.4 368 380 484 387 1620 9.0 18.2 10.1 0.8 9.5 11 Donja Zdenčina 5.7 111 0.4 218 267 280 200 966 10.8 19.9 11.2 1.6 10.9 12 Brestovac 5.8 509 5.5 248 338 253 181 1021 8.5 17.6 8.7 –1.1 8.4 13 Sekulinci 6.0 229 4.4 199 270 217 153 840 10.3 19.3 10.2 0.1 10.0 14 Gornja Šumetlica 5.5 532 10.1 253 338 265 190 1046 8.1 17.2 8.4 –1.4 8.1 15 Gornji Mihaljevec 6.3 231 0.8 207 292 230 162 891 10.2 18.8 10.0 0.1 9.8 16 Mala Gorica 6.3 151 0.7 224 284 282 201 991 10.4 19.4 10.7 1.0 10.4 17 Blatuša 5.8 149 2.8 248 286 317 237 1088 10.3 19.5 10.8 1.2 10.5 18 Blatuša 5.8 149 2.8 248 286 317 237 1088 10.3 19.5 10.8 1.2 10.5 19 Gornji Hruševec 5.4 153 2.4 214 269 272 192 947 10.4 19.5 10.7 1.0 10.4 20 Čačinci 6.1 235 5.9 198 270 216 152 835 10.3 19.3 10.1 0.1 9.9 21 Bokane 6.1 165 4.1 196 264 215 153 828 10.7 19.7 10.5 0.4 10.4 22 Dragozetići, Cres 6.8 392 5.3 339 281 493 410 1524 9.8 19.1 11.6 2.8 10.8 23 Maruševec 6.0 202 3.7 213 294 244 172 923 10.3 19.0 10.2 0.4 10.0 24 Donji Stupnik 5.1 128 0.0 218 275 276 196 964 10.6 19.7 10.9 1.2 10.6 25 Donja Lomnica 5.3 120 1.0 208 264 262 184 919 10.6 19.7 10.9 1.1 10.6 min 5.1 104 0.0 192 257 215 150 815 8.1 17.2 8.4 –1.4 8.1 max 6.8 532 10.1 368 380 493 410 1620 10.9 20.0 11.6 2.8 10.9 mean 5.8 209.9 2.9 228.6 285.3 276.6 201.6 992.1 10.2 19.2 10.5 0.7 10.2 perc10 5.3 109 0.0 197 262 216 152 831 9.3 18.4 10.1 0.1 9.6 perc90 6.3 381 5.7 251 323 317 237 1088 10.7 19.8 11.2 1.6 10.8 ALIEN FUNGUS CLATHRUS ARCHERI IN CROATIA ACTA BOT. CROAT. 84 (2), 2025 197 to 1088 mm. With respect to the seasonal precipitation amounts, there were no seasons with less than 150 mm at any locality (Tab. 2). Soil reaction ranged from 5.1 to 6.8, with 10–90 inter-percentile range being 5.3 to 6.3 (Tab. 2), both corresponding to the acidic part of the pH scale. Our measurements of soil reaction sampled at two localities in a stand of planted Eastern White Pine Pinus strobus L. (No. 3 in Tab. 1) and in the Epimedio-Carpinetum betuli (Horvat 1938) Borhidi 1963 forest (No. 24 in Tab. 1) have shown an even lower pH, of 4.3 and 4.1, respectively. Regarding or- ganic matter content, the mean value for Donje Ladanje (No. 3 in Tab. 1) was 19.14% and for Donji Stupnik (No. 24 in Tab. 1) 16.75%, indicating that soils at both localities were rich in organic matter. Climate-only habitat suitability model (Fig. 3) and Cli- mate-pH habitat suitability model (Fig. 4) yielded a very Fig. 3. Maxent habitat suitability model for Clathrus archeri in Croatia based on eight climatic variables (mean temperature and amount of precipitation per meteorological season). Colours on the map, with corresponding number indicates habitat suitability for C. archeri in range from 1 (red – presumed 100% suitable habitat) to 0 (blue – 0% suitable habitat). White circles indicate C. archeri occurrences in Croatia used to build the model, NATURA 2000 biogeographical regions indicated. Fig. 4. Maxent habitat suitability model for Clathrus archeri in Croatia based on eight climatic variables (mean temperature and amount of precipitation per meteorological season) and pH value of soil in 0–5 cm depth. Colours on the map, with corresponding number indicates habitat suitability for C. archeri in range from 1 (red – presumed 100% suitable habitat) to 0 (blue – 0% suitable habitat). White circles indicate C. archeri occurrences in Croatia used to build the model, NATURA 2000 biogeographical regions indicated. JELASKA S. D., LEVAČIĆ D. 198 ACTA BOT. CROAT. 84 (2), 2025 similar general spatial pattern at country level, with Cli- mate-pH based model seemingly being spatially more spe- cific in terms of areas with high suitability. The latter model also contains some no-data areas, as a consequence of the lack of pH data for water body areas and human settlements. The majority of predicted suitable hab- itats are in the Continental biogeographical region where most of the recorded localities are situated. There are some moderately suitable areas in the Alpine region, in which, however, there are currently no records of C. archeri. Those areas are mostly in parts adjacent to the Continental region around the Kupa, Dobra and Una rivers, and in lower eleva- tion parts corresponding to the presence of flat depressions within the karst known as “polje” (e.g. Cerničko polje, Gacko polje, Krbavsko polje). Within the Mediterranean region, very low habitat suitability was predicted by both Maxent models, with slightly higher values in the Northern Adriatic where one locality exists (No. 22 in Tab. 1). For both habitat suitability models, area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating curve (ROC) had similar values, AUC = 0.817 for Climate-only and AUC = 0.827 for Climate-pH model (Tab. 3). Precipitation variables contributed more to the models than the temperature variables. Summer precipitation had the highest percentage of contribution to the Climate-only model, while the pH of topsoil had the highest percentage to the Climate-pH model. Winter precipitation was second best in terms of the percentage of the contribution to the models, but had by far the highest permutation importance indicating that models were heavily dependent on it (Tab. 3). On three localities that were not used for habitat suitabil- ity modelling (No. 2, 5 and 20 in Tab. 1), both models pre- dicted high values of suitability: 0.68, 0.67 and 0.75, respec- tively, for Climate-only model; 0.75, 0.79 and 0.89 for Climate-pH model. Discussion The history and introduction of C. archeri in Croatia re- main unclear. Its first mention in Božac (1984) in his popu- lar guide to fungi cannot be considered the first evidence of its presence in Croatia because the exact geographical extent covered by the guide is not defined. At that time Croatia was a part of former Socialist Federative Republic of Yugoslavia. Furthermore, in the book’s preface the author explains that the most frequently used criterion for inclusion of fungi spe- cies in the book was their high frequency in “our regions” (which could be referred to other constituent republics of the former country beside Croatia) and in Central Europe. The latter could mean that C. archeri found its place in the book without actually being present in Croatia. However, at that time C. archeri had already been recorded (1966) in Slo- venia (also part of the former country) for quite a long time (Vrščaj et al. 2004, Stanič 2024). In 1998, C. archeri was in- cluded in the first list of protected fungi in Croatia (Official Gazette 1998), and remained there in the second (published also in 1998) and third edition (published in 2002). We could not trace back the background for this inclusion, since the first mention of C. archeri in the literature is that of Tkalčec et al. (2005) in their paper on gasteral Basidiomy- cota of Croatia in which they note that their reference for C. archeri was the first for Croatia. Tkalčec (personal commu- nication) found it in 1999 in two locations in the western part of Croatia. Without new evidence, this could be regard- ed as the year of the fungus’s first observation in Croatia. Nevertheless, given the pace of spread eastward from its initial introduction to France in 1920 (Lemasson 1923 in Parent and Thoen 1986), and subsequent first observations in Switzerland in 1942 (Vischer 1943), Austria in 1948 ( Lohwag 1948) and Slovenia in 1966 (Vrščaj et al. 2004, Stanič 2024), it is possible that the fungus was present in Croatia from the 1980s or early 1990s, but remained unno- ticed. Although we cannot be sure of the exact time of its arrival, with a fair amount of certainty we can consider that it arrived from the Slovenia. The data given here show that C. archeri is much more widespread in Croatia than was considered previously, ac- cording to the scientific literature. Both habitat suitability models imply that it could occupy even larger areas than presently, at least across the majority of the NATURA 2000 Continental biogeographical region in Croatia. High values of predicted habitat suitability models at locations that were not used in building the models, as well as reasonably high AUC values work in favour of the predicted models’ reli- Tab. 3. Variable contributions to Maxent habitat suitability models for Clathrus archeri in Croatia. Abbreviations: w – winter, a – autumn, su – summer, sp – spring, temp – mean temperature, prec – total amount of precipitation, pH – pH value of topsoil in 0 – 5 cm depth. Model with climate data Model with climate data and pH value of topsoil Variable Percent contribution Permutation importance Variable Percent contribution Permutation importance pH 53.1 12.5 suprec 48.9 9.2 wprec 19.4 58.8 wprec 22.5 47.5 spprec 8.5 11.5 aprec 19.3 12.6 aprec 8.4 0 sptemp 5.4 0 suprec 7.2 1.4 spprec 2.2 14.5 wtemp 3.2 13.5 wtemp 1.7 16.2 sptemp 0.3 2.4 atemp 0 0 atemp 0 0 sutemp 0 0 sutemp 0 0 ALIEN FUNGUS CLATHRUS ARCHERI IN CROATIA ACTA BOT. CROAT. 84 (2), 2025 199 abilities. In both models, precipitation turned out to be more important than temperature in defining the suitabil- ity for C. archeri. In habitat suitability models for Romania (Bîrsan et al. 2021) and on a global level (Pietras et al. 2021) there were the same findings, with the coldest quarter of the year’s precipitation contributing the most to their models. Here, winter precipitation (which corresponds to the pre- cipitation of the coldest quarter) was the most important among the climate variables in the Climate-pH model, while it was second most important, after summer precipi- tation, in the Climate-only model (Tab. 3). The Mediterra- nean part of Croatia has a distinct dry season during the summer, hence this could play an important role in defining potential niche of the species in Croatia. Pietras et al. (2016) found that in Poland C. archeri is mostly present in areas with annual precipitation greater than 600 mm. They con- firmed its presence in part of Poland with low mean annual precipitation (550 mm), but during the year with an excep- tionally wet season. The only location so far known in the Mediterranean part of Croatia is in the Northern Adriatic, which does not have such dry summer periods as those in Central and Southern parts of the Adriatic, where summer precipitation is mostly below 150 mm, which in combina- tion with highly permeable limestone bedrock leads to dry soil conditions. Another important aspect that could limit C. archeri in the Mediterranean part of Croatia is the soil reaction. In their review of the fungus’s presence in Europe, Parent and Thoen (1986) found it to favour acidic soils, reporting a pH range in France from 4.5 to 6, which matches our own mea- surements from two localities having pH value of 4.1 and 4.3, and pH values (Tab. 2) obtained from the dataset avail- able for Europe (Poggio et al. 2021). The Croatian coast is characterised by limestone bedrock and the consequent al- kaline soil reaction. In Giovanetti et al. (2014), soil reactions measured across the Croatian part of Adriatic coast, except for one sample with a pH value of 6.2, ranged from 7.7 to 8.1. The importance of the soil reaction for C. archeri is sup- ported by the fact that it was the most important variable in the Climate-pH model. Nevertheless, given the fact that the fungus is present in the Mediterranean region, and that there is one observation (iNaturalist. org 2018) from May 2018 in the Slovenian part of the Istria peninsula very close (1.2 km) to the Croatian border, it is reasonable to expect the fungus’ presence in Istria, although neither of the mod- els (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4) predicted high suitability there. Con- sequently, both models seem to underestimate the suitabil- ity in the Mediterranean region, although we believe that only the Northern part of the Adriatic, which is not char- acterised by as low summer precipitation and alkaline soil reaction as the more Southern areas, is concerned. The presence of highly suitable areas in the Alpine re- gion in which there are no known localities, does not nec- essarily mean that the models overestimate the suitability for C. archeri in these parts of Croatia. Indeed, there are no ecological constraints for the fungus there, since that area has a lot of precipitation as well as parts with acid soils. Al- though the maximum elevation of localities of C. archeri presented here is just 532 m a.s.l., with 90% of locations ap- pearing below 400 m a.s.l. (Tab. 2), the species can be found at much higher elevations e.g. 1200 m a.s.l. in Romania (Bîrsan et al. 2014), or as reported by Parent and Thoen (1986) even up to 2000 m a.s.l. The fact that currently known localities in Croatia are mostly below 400 m a.s.l., could be merely a consequence of prevalence of incident ob- servations during field visits that were not targeted specifi- cally to survey the presence of C. archeri. Some of those ob- servations could be from edible fungi collectors who prefer this elevation belt that corresponds to distribution of pe- dunculate (Quercus robur L.) and sessile (Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) oak forests, known for their fungi richness. An ad- ditional explanation could be the very short duration of the fungus’ visible presence which lasts approximately just one week per individual sporocarp. This includes the egg phase, which can be observed up to 5 days. However, without dis- section it is impossible to record an observation, since oth- er stinkhorn fungi also develop eggs. We expect that sam- pling effort (in this case actually simply the number of field days, given the non-targeted nature of it) is much higher in lower elevations, hence the higher probability of observing C. archeri there. In the future, we could expect an increase in the pres- ence of C. archeri in Croatia in terms of its abundance and occupancy area. Even at present, on various social networks photographs of the fungus from Croatia can be found, but without details on its geographical origin, hence they could not be used here. It is not easy to predict how much this in- crease might be, and how long it would last. In their analy- sis of the impact of climate change on C. archeri, Pietras et al. (2021) used three scenarios for the year 2080 expecting the fungus’ range contraction in Central Europe, including the Continental region of Croatia from which currently the majority of observations derive. Depending on the climate change scenario employed, there could be some range ex- pansion in the areas that overlap with the Mediterranean region in Croatia. However, Pietras et al. (2021) developed their models exclusively with bioclimatic variables, without data on soil acidity, which could play a significant role in shaping the future of C. archeri distribution. Almost 20 years after its first mention for Croatia in the scientific literature (Tkalčec et al. 2005) and just one short note in the meantime reporting on two localities (Kranjčev 2008) we reveal that C. archeri is nowadays, in terms of its spatial distribution, a widespread alien fungus in Croatia. Open access data provided by international networks like GBIF and iNaturalist were indispensable for this analysis. Consequently, these data should be an integral part in fur- ther efforts in increasing our knowledge on alien fungi, and other taxa, presence and distribution in Croatia, that are otherwise poorly covered in the scientific literature. In ad- dition, efforts to raise the awareness of such species among colleagues and the general public, as well as of the impor- tance of observations being deposited on platforms like GBIF and/or iNaturalist could significantly contribute to JELASKA S. D., LEVAČIĆ D. 200 ACTA BOT. CROAT. 84 (2), 2025 the amount of available observational records. Habitat suit- ability models can help in planning field surveys, which is especially useful for taxa with low cost-efficiency field work, as C. archeri is, due to its short sporocarp longevity. Acknowledgements This paper was published on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of Acta Botanica Croatica. We would like to thank iNaturalist observers Nevio Biškupić, Marko Doboš, Eva Janeković, Sara Srša and Edi Thür for granting permission to use their data in this paper. The editor and two reviewers have provided constructive and valuable comments that helped us improve the manu- script, for which we are grateful. This research was funded by the University of Zagreb, Croatia, grant number 20286538–Distribution and ecological profiles of invasive plants. References Bîrsan, C., Cojocariu, A., Cenuşă, E., 2014: Distribution and ecol- ogy of Clathrus archeri in Romania. Notulae Scientia Biolog- icae 6(3), 288–291. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb639389 Bîrsan, C., Mardari, C., Copoţ, O., Tănase, C., 2021: Modelling the potential distribution and habitat suitability of the alien fungus Clathrus archeri in Romania. Botanica Serbica 45(2), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.2298/BOTSERB2102241B Božac, R., 1984: Šest stotina gljiva naših krajeva (Six hundred mushrooms of our regions). Mladost, Zagreb. Brännhage, J., Gross, A., 2020: Factsheet Neomyceten. Tintenfis- chpilz und Roter Gitterling. Eidg. Forschungsanstalt WSL, Birmensdorf, 3 S. Davies, B. E., 1974: Loss-on-ignition as an estimate of soil matter. Soil Science of America. Proceedings, 38, 150‒151. Desprez-Loustau, M. L., Robin, C., Buée, M., Courtecuisse, R., Garbaye, J., Suffert, F., Sache, I., Rizzo, D. M., 2007: The fun- gal dimension of biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22(9), 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tree.2007.04.005 Desprez-Loustau, M. L., Courtecuisse, R., Robin, C., Husson, C., Moreau, P., Blancard, D., Selosse, M., Lung-Escarmant, B., Piou, D., Sache, I., 2010: Species diversity and drivers of spread of alien fungi (sensu lato) in Europe with a particular focus on France. Biological Invasions 12, 157–172. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10530-009-9439-y Didukh, Y. P., 2009: The Red Data Book of Ukraine Flora. Glob- al consulting, Kyiv. GBIF.org, 2024: GBIF Occurrence Download. Retrieved April 24, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.6mreqj Giovanetti, M., Vuković, N., Jelaska, S. D., 2014: Australian aca- cias across eastern Adriatic – abundant but not aggressive. Periodicum Biologorum 116(3), 275–283. Gyosheva, M. M., Denchev, C. M., Dimitrova, E. G., Assyov, B., Petrova, D. R., Stoichev, G. T., 2006: Red List of fungi in Bul- garia. Mycologia Balcanica 3, 81‒87. Heluta, V. P., Zykova, M. O., Hayova, V. P., Prydiuk, M. P., Shevchenko, M. V., 2022: An update to the species list of fun- gi in the Red Data Book of Ukraine. Ukrainian Botanical Journal 79(3), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.15407/ ukrbotj79.03.154 iNaturalist.org, 2018: Devil's-Fingers (Clathrus archeri). Re- trieved April 24, 2024 from https://www.inaturalist.org/ob- servations/12907117 Kranjčev, R., 2008: Velika polipovka, Čekinjava pločašica, Viju- gavo-mesnata mirisnica (Devil’s fingers, Eyelash cup, White false truffle). Šumarski list 9–10, 492. Lohwag, K., 1948: Anthurus muellerianus Kalchbr., var. aseroë- formis Ed. Fischer, ein neuer Pilz für Österreich. Öster- reichische Mykologische Gesellschaft. 20. Official Gazette, 1998–2002: Pravilnik o zaštiti gljiva (Ordinance on protection of fungi). NN 79/1998, NN 115/1998, NN 34/2002. Official Gazette, 2006: Pravilnik o proglašavanju divljih svojti zaštićenim i strogo zaštićenim (Ordinance on designation of wild taxa as protected or strictly protected). NN 7/2006. Parent, G. H., Thoen, D., 1986: État actuel de l’extension de Clath- rus archeri (Berkeley) Dring (syn.: Anthurus archeri (Berk.) Ed. Fischer) en Europe et particulièrement en France et au BÉnÉlux. Bulletin trimestriel de la Société mycologique de France 102(3), 237–272. Parent, G. H., Thoen, D., Calonge, F. D., 2000: Nouvelles données sur la répartition de Clathrus archeri en particulier dans l’Ouest et le Sud-Ouest de l’Europe. Bulletin trimestriel de la Société mycologique de France 116(3), 241–266. Phillips, S. J., Dudík, M., Schapire, R. E., 2024: Maxent software for modelling species niches and distributions (ver. 3.4.1). Re- trieved April 24, 2024 from http://biodiversityinformatics. amnh.org/open_source/maxent/ Pietras, M., Rudawska, M., Iszkuło, G., Kujawa, A., Leski, T., 2016: Distribution and molecular characterization of an alien fun- gus Clathrus archeri in Poland. Polish Journal of Environ- mental Studies 25(3), 1197–1204. https://doi.org/10.15244/ pjoes/61230 Pietras, M., Kolanowska, M., Selosse, M., 2021: Quo vadis? His- torical distribution and impact of climate change on the worldwide distribution of the Australasian fungus Clathrus archeri (Phallales, Basidiomycota). Mycological Progress 20, 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-021-01669-w Poggio, L., de Sousa, L. M., Batjes, N. H., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Kempen, B., Ribeiro, E., Rossiter, D., 2021: SoilGrids 2.0: pro- ducing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty. SOIL 7(1), 217–240. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil- 7-217-2021 Stanič, I., 2024: Karta razširjenosti za Clathrus archeri. Podat- kovna zbirka gliv Slovenije Boletus informaticus (Distribu- tion map of Clathrus archeri. Data collection of Slovenian fungi Boletus informaticus). In: Ogris, N. (ed.), Web portal Boletus informaticus. Retrieved April 24, 2024 from https:// boletusinformaticus.si/sre_karta.aspx?idorg=b59ac192-6ef6- 4504-b0e6-234c1643c481 Tănase, C., Pop, A., 2005: Red List of Romanian Macrofungi Spe- cies. In: Mihăilescu, S. (ed.), Bioplatform – Romanian Na- tional Platform for Biodiversity, 101‒107. Academiei Române, Bucureşti. Tkalčec, Z., Mešić, A., Antonić, O., 2005: Survey of the Gasteral Basidiomycota (Fungi) of Croatia. Natura Croatica 14(2), 99– 120. Tkalčec, Z., Mešić, A., Matočec, N., Kušan, I., 2008: Crvena knji- ga gljiva Hrvatske (Red Book of Croatian fungi). Ministry of Culture, State Institute for Nature Protection, Zagreb. Vischer, W., 1943: Ein für die Schweiz neuer Pilz Anthurus aser- oeformis Ed. Fischer. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Pilz- kunde 21, 17–20. Voglmayr, H., Krisai‐Greilhuber, I., 2002: Pilze. In: Essl, F., Rabitsch, W. (eds.), Neobiota in Österreich, 181–195. Umwelt- bundesamt, Vienna. ALIEN FUNGUS CLATHRUS ARCHERI IN CROATIA ACTA BOT. CROAT. 84 (2), 2025 201 Voglmayr, H., Schertler, A., Essl, F., Krisai-Greilhuber, I., 2023: Alien and cryptogenic fungi and oomycetes in Austria: an annotated checklist (2nd edition). Biological Invasions 25, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02896-2 Vrščaj, D., Erjavec, Š., Boh, A., Stanič, I., Piltaver, A., Seljak, G., Tratnik, B., Malovrh, B., Tortić, M., Čebulec, M., Šerod, S., Vrhovnik, F., Arko, J., Dolenc, F., Oblak, V., Vrhovec, B., Kavčič, Z., Seršen, J., Kavrečič, B., Bertosi, M., Hočevar, S., Haas, H., Ivanovič, A., Kaiser, S., Ujčič, M., Moser, M., Kosec, J., Koprek, F., Munda, A., Šmauc, A., Dolenc, A., Hudoklin, V., Mohorčič, V., Arzenšek, B., Kovač, A., Velikonja, P., Markovič, D., Kelhar, M., Podgornik, G., Lekše, J., Jurc, M., Goršak, B., Hudohmet, M., Jurc, D., Poličnik, M., Grebenc, T., Bertoncelj, F., Bračko, B., Bohte, T., Gerhold, A., Voss, W., Oblak, F., Kovše, J., Miller, O., Tkalčeč, Z., Došler, B., Fink, A., Pirnat, F., Kalchbrenner, K., Krajnc, J., Škulj, M., Hrovatič, M., Klemenčič, J., Jenko, V., Knoll, L., Tratnik, V., Dolšak, F., Kraigher, H., Kranjc, M., Breitenbach, J., Kotlaba,F., Petkovšek, M., Wettstein, R., Agerer, R., Loose A., Pec, M., Potokar, A., Beenken, L., Cortese, D., Černigoj, F., Klun, J., Oblak, N., Rozman, J., Schild, E., Šajn, V., Šarič, Zaletel, A., Arko, V., Babšek, J., Batič, F., Bech, W., Berden, J., Bračun, F., Celič, I., Cesar, M., Cetto, B., Doganoc, N., Godec, B., Goleš, L., von Höhnel, F. X. R., Hvastja, C., Jurc, B., Kocjančič, K., Korošec, V., Kovačič, F., Lindtner, V., Ljubič, F., Novak, J., Palfner, G., Pavlič, J., Perušek, R., Petkovšek, V., Pilat, A., Pouzar, Z., Rižnar, I., Rupel, M., Schinner, F., Sonc, M., Svrček, M., Toplak, I., 2004: Priloga Glive v Sloveniji (Contri- bution to Fungi in Slovenia). In: Jurc, D. (ed.), Seznam vrst in razširjenost makromicet v Sloveniji z analizo stopnje ogroženosti, 52–52. Gozdarski inštitut Slovenije, Ljubljana.