Acta Herpetologica 13(1): 75-82, 2018 ISSN 1827-9635 (print) © Firenze University Press ISSN 1827-9643 (online) www.fupress.com/ah DOI: 10.13128/Acta_Herpetol-21192 How effectively do European skinks thermoregulate? Evidence from Chalcides ocellatus, a common but overlooked Mediterranean lizard Grigoris Kapsalas*, Aris Deimezis-Tsikoutas, Thanos Georgakopoulos, Ismini Gkourtsouli-Antoniadou, Kallirroi Papadaki, Katerina Vassaki, Panayiotis Pafilis Department of Zoology and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Ilis- sia, 15784, Greece. *Correspondence author. E-mail: gkapsalas@gmail.com Submitted on: 2017, 7th September; revised on: 2018, 28th February; accepted on: 2018, 6th March Editor: Marco Sannolo Abstract. Effective thermoregulation is of vital importance since body temperature affects virtually all physiological and biochemical processes. Yet, our current knowledge in reptilian thermoregulation is largely based on a few, well- studied taxonomic groups. This is especially true in Europe, where our insights derive primarily from studies on the numerous lacertids of the continent. Skinks on the other hand remain understudied despite being abundant around the Mediterranean. In this paper we examine the thermoregulation effectiveness of the Ocellated Skink, a common lizard whose thermal biology has been overlooked, focusing on a population from a typical Mediterranean habitat in mainland Greece. We recorded body temperatures in the field and the lab and assessed the thermal quality of the habitat through operative temperatures. Our findings suggest that Chalcides ocellatus is a poor thermoregulator that stands very close to thermoconformity. The high thermal quality of the habitat allows the Ocellated Skink to regulate its temperature with less effort and lower accuracy. This indicates that C. ocellatus may have adopted a distinct ther- moregulation strategy, most probably due to the particular life style of skinks. Keywords. Lizard, Scincidae, temperature, habitat quality, thermal biology, Greece. INTRODUCTION The regulation of body temperature is arguably one of the most vital processes in reptilian life since most physiological and biochemical processes are tempera- ture-dependent (Angilletta et al., 2002; Angilletta, 2009). Unlike endotherms, reptiles do not rely on metabolism for thermoregulation but utilise their thermal environ- ment instead: most species shuttle constantly within vari- ous microhabitats in search of favourable temperatures, while others move slowly between microhabitats and per- form within a wide range of body temperatures (Pough and Gans, 1982; Stevenson, 1985). The question of “how effectively does a lizard ther- moregulate?” preoccupies herpetological research for decades (e.g., Baldwin, 1925; Sagonas et al., 2017). Limi- tations in assessing reptilian thermoregulation were described in detail by Hertz et al. (1993), who proposed an index of effectiveness using three variables: field body temperatures (Tb), i.e., temperatures that lizards achieve in the field, operative temperatures (Te), i.e., tempera- tures that non-regulating animals would achieve in the field, and preferred temperatures (Tpref), i.e., the tempera- ture (or range of temperatures, the set-point range Tset) that animals select in the lab in an unconstrained ther- mal experimental setting. This approach, taken together with more recent modifications (e.g., Blouin-Demers and Weatherhead, 2001) is widely accepted as the most accu- rate and exhaustive methodology and has been applied in numerous lizard species. In Europe, lacertids comprise the largest lizard group (Arnold and Ovenden, 2002; Uetz, 2017) and studies on 76 Grigoris Kapsalas et alii their thermoregulation have been on the front line for the past 30 years, yielding valuable insights. Case studies that include viviparous (Van Damme et al., 1986; Gvoždík and Castilla, 2001) or oviparous species (Díaz et al., 2005; Sag- onas et al., 2013a), gravid or non-gravid females (Braña, 1993; Veríssimo and Carretero, 2009), populations that live on tiny islets (Ortega et al., 2014; Pafilis et al., 2016) or in alpine habitats (Monasterio et al., 2009; Ortega et al., 2016) describe in detail various alternative thermoregu- latory patterns. However, in a striking contrast, all the other European lizard families remain largely understud- ied in terms of their thermal biology, and this applies to Scincidae as well. The reason for this discrepancy should be sought primarily in the number of species: of the more than 1600 skinks currently described, only eight species occur in Europe (Uetz, 2017). Additionally, the cryptic lifestyle of skinks and their low population densities limit thermoregulatory studies even more. As a result, only a handful of papers provide some, mostly descriptive, data on European skinks’ temperatures (Al-Sadoon and Spell- erberg, 1985; Hailey et al., 1987; Daut and Andrews, 1993; Herczeg et al., 2007) and, to the best of our knowledge, there are no works investigating their thermoregulation effectiveness sensu Hertz et al. (1993). In this study we examine for the first time the ther- moregulation of a European skink, the Ocellated Skink (Chalcides ocellatus), the species with the widest range within the genus (Schneider, 1997; Lymberakis et al., 2009). Taking into account that the species’ biology devi- ates in many ways from that of the lacertids (e.g., mainly fossorial life style with limited climbing abilities, vivipar- ity) it would be presumable that its thermal physiology would also differ. Our aim was on the one hand to pro- vide the first systematically collected field and lab ther- mal data for a European skink, filling a knowledge gap on the ecophysiology of a common but understudied lizard group, and on the other hand to quantitatively assess the species’ thermoregulatory effectiveness (Hertz et al., 1993; Blouin-Demers and Weatherhead, 2001). MATERIAL AND METHODS Study system Chalcides ocellatus (Forskål, 1775) (Squamata, Scincidae) is a common viviparous skink of the Mediterranean. Though its distribution is wide, including large parts of Africa and south- western Asia, in Europe it occurs mainly on Mediterranean islands such as Sardinia, Sicily and Malta and their surrounding islets (Schneider, 1997). Its distribution in Greece comprises a few disconnected areas in the mainland and many islands (e.g., Crete, Rhodes, Karpathos, Chios) (Valakos et al., 2008). Inter- estingly, new records come to enhance the insular range of the species (Belasen et al., 2012; Itescu et al., 2016), most probably due to human transportation (Kornilios et al., 2010). Chalcides ocellatus is a fairly robust lizard, with a cylindrical body, a thick tail, short limbs, a relatively small head and a snout to vent length (SVL) of up to 15 cm. It inhabits a variety of habitats including shrublands, sandy areas and farmlands and mainly feeds on Coleoptera, Formicidae, various larvae and snails (Val- akos et al., 2008; Carretero et al., 2010). It is active during the day, but usually hides underneath rocks or buries itself in the sand (Al-Sadoon and Spellerberg, 1985; Valakos et al., 2008). On 23 April 2016, field work was conducted on the cam- pus of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens in Greece (37°58’01”N, 23°47’20”E). Located at the foothills of Mount Hymettus, the study site consists of an extensive area of maquis vegetation dominated by kermes oak (Quercus coc- cifera), Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis), gum tree (Eucalyptus sp.) and green olive tree (Phillyrea latifolia), as well as patches of open grassland and phrygana. The terrain is fairly rough and rocky, providing ideal hiding spots for the skinks. Apart from C. ocellatus, two more lizards are present on the site, the Balkan green lizard (Lacerta trilineata) and the European snake-eyed skink (Ablepharus kitaibelii). Adult male lizards were captured by hand after overturn- ing stones, rocks and tree trunks, and were subsequently taken to the facilities of the Faculty of Biology at the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. Female lizards were not used in the experiment to avoid possible effects of gravidity on thermoregulation (Daut and Andrews, 1993; Corso et al., 2000; Carretero et al., 2005). The captured lizards were housed for one week in individual glass terraria (80 × 30 × 40 cm) with a sand substrate before the experiment started. Stones and bricks were placed on the substrate to serve as hiding spots. Access to water was provided ad libitum and mealworms (Tenebrio molitor) were fed to the lizards every other day. The lizards were held at 25°C under a controlled photoperiod (12L:12D). A 60 W incan- descent lamp over each terrarium allowed the animals to ther- moregulate for 8 hours per day. The animals were released back to the study site after the end of the experiment. Field temperatures (Tb and Te) We measured the body temperature of 14 males in the field. Tbs were measured to the nearest 0.1 °C, using a quick- reading cloacal thermometer (T-4000, Miller & Weber Inc., Queens, NY) within 10 sec after capture (Veríssimo and Car- retero, 2009; Osojnik et al., 2013). Air temperature (Tair) at the capture point of each individual was also recorded. The relative- ly small sample size reflects the sparse population density of C. ocellatus on the site and its cryptic lifestyle. We recorded operative temperatures using 28 hollow cop- per models that approximated the size and reflectance of C. ocellatus (Bakken, 1992; Dzialowski, 2005). The models were closed at both ends and filled with 2.5-3 ml of water in order to replicate the heat storage capacity of the lizards (Grbac and Bauwens, 2001; Lutterschmidt and Reinert, 2012). At one end of the models a narrow slot was left open where the log- 77Thermoregulation effectiveness of Chalcides ocellatus ger probes (HOBO U12-008 4-Channel External Data Logger) were plugged in (Díaz, 1997). The models were placed to cover as many of the microhabitat types available to lizards as possi- ble (Huey, 1991), which in this case were grouped in four differ- ent microhabitats: open ground, on relatively flat medium-sized rocks (Vasconcelos et al., 2012), inside shrubs and underneath rocks. Operative temperatures were recorded at 30 min intervals from 10:30 to 17:30 on the same day that field body tempera- tures (Tb) were measured. To ensure the similarity of the temperature responses between models and lizards (Hertz, 1992), we performed a lab- oratory experiment comparing their heating rates, before plac- ing the models in the field (Lutterschmidt and Reinert, 2012). A lizard and a model were placed side-by-side under a 150 W lamp. We then measured their temperature every 5 min for a 45 min period. A linear regression of Tb on Te (slope = 0.84 ± 0.14, intercept = 4.68 ± 4.59, R2 = 0.83, n = 10) suggests that the cop- per model temperature is a significant predictor of the animal body temperature (F1,8 = 38.04, P = 0.0003). Lab measurements (Tpref and Tset) We measured the preferred temperature and set-point range of 12 males in a specially designed terrarium (100 × 25 × 25 cm) that had two ice bags at one end and a 150 Watt heat- ing lamp at the other end, thus providing a thermal gradient ranging from 15 to 50 °C (Van Damme et al., 1986). Prior to the experiment, the SVL of each individual was recorded using a digital caliper (Silverline 380244, accurate to 0.01 mm). Each lizard was then allowed to acclimate inside the thermal gradi- ent for 60 min prior to the actual measurements (Sagonas et al., 2013a) and subsequently its body temperature was recorded every 30 min for an 180 min period (Hertz et al., 1993). The measurements took place from 09:00 to 13:00, which coincides with the animal’s activity period based on our observations in the field. We calculated Tpref for each individual as the mean of the body temperatures that the individual selected in the ther- mal gradient and then calculated the population Tpref as the mean of individual Tprefs. We estimated Tset for each individual by using the low- er and upper bounds of the central 50% of values (1st and 3rd quartile respectively) of the body temperatures that each indi- vidual selected in the thermal gradient. The Tset for the popula- tion was subsequently calculated as the mean lower and mean upper bound of individual Tsets (Hertz et al., 1993; Christian and Weavers, 1996). Effectiveness of thermoregulation The effectiveness of thermoregulation was assessed with the formula proposed by Hertz et al. (1993), E = 1 – , where is the mean deviation of field Tb from Tset and denotes the accuracy of thermoregulation and is the mean deviation of Te from Tset and describes the thermal quality of the habitat. The values of E range from zero (perfect thermoconformers) to one (perfect thermoregulators) (Hertz et al., 1993). E has some limitations though: being a ratio, the index is sensitive to extreme values and, additionally, different and combinations may yield equivalent estimates of thermoregu- lation effectiveness (Christian and Weavers, 1996; Blouin-Dem- ers and Weatherhead, 2001). Thus, we implemented a comple- mentary method proposed by Blouin-Demers and Weatherhead (2001) to quantify the extent of departure from perfect thermo- conformity . In this approach, a value of zero indicates a perfect thermoconformer, positive values describe a thermoreg- ulator, whereas negative values denote animals that actively avoid habitats of high thermal quality. The magnitude of the dif- ference between and provides an index of the effectiveness of thermoregulation (Blouin-Demers and Weatherhead, 2001). Statistics The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test for normality. The non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was used to test Te differences between microhabitats, since the assumption of normality was violated (P < 0.05). The relationship between Tb and Tair was assessed using linear regression. 95% confidence intervals for E were determined using bootstrap resampling: 1000 values of E were computed using random sampling with replacement from the observed Tb and Te distributions and subsequently the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles were used as confi- dence interval limits (percentile method, Hertz et al., 1993). The same procedure was also applied to the index (Blouin- Demers and Weatherhead, 2001). All tests were performed in R 3.3.2 (R Core Team, 2016). RESULTS The mean preferred temperature was 31.8°C, ranging from 27.9 to 34.6 °C (Table 1). Set-point range was esti- mated at 30.4 to 33.6 °C. The mean field body tempera- ture was 27.2°C, ranging from 23.1 to 30.6 °C (Table 1). and were 3.2 and 4.6 °C respectively (Table 1). The placement of the lizard models in the field cov- ered successfully the thermal diversity of the habitat, as revealed by the Tes (Table 2) recorded across different microhabitat types (Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, χ2 = 39.229, df = 3, P < 10-6). The mean operative temperature was 30.1 °C, ranging from 18.2 °C at 11:00 (lowest Te) to 57.0 °C at 15:30 (highest Te) (Table 1). Field body temperature (Tb) was positively corre- lated with air temperature (Tair) at the point of capture (Pearson’s r = 0.709) and the linear model that describes the relationship between the two variables had a strong fit (Tb = 1.04 * Tair + 2.6, R2 = 0.502, F(1,12) = 12.1, P = 0.0046, Fig. 1). The effectiveness of thermoregulation sen- su Hertz et al. (1993) was estimated as E = 0.31 (boot- straped mean: 0.31, 95% confidence intervals: 0.03-0.56, n = 1000). Thermoregulation effectiveness sensu Blouin- 78 Grigoris Kapsalas et alii Demers and Weatherhead (2001) was evaluated at 1.44 (bootstraped mean: 1.44, 95% confidence intervals: 0.21- 2.72, n = 1000). DISCUSSION In this study we assessed for the first time the ther- moregulatory profile of a European skink. We recorded body temperatures in the field and the lab and, taking into account the thermal availability of the environment (Te), we estimated the accuracy, precision and effective- ness of thermoregulation. Only a few descriptive studies have dealt with aspects of the thermal biology of C. ocel- latus: to the best of our knowledge this is the first time that thermoregulation effectiveness (Hertz et al., 1993) was assessed for this species. Because of the scarcity of thermal data for C. ocellatus from Europe, we also com- pare our findings with conspecific populations outside Europe and with other European Chalcides as well. Body temperatures in the field reached a mean value of 27.2 °C (Table 1). Lo Cascio and Corti (2008) report- ed similar Tbs from an insular population in Italy in the springtime (Lampedusa Island: 26.9 ± 1.7 °C), with Tbs rising higher in the summer (Lampedusa Island: 32.0 ± 0.6 °C, Isola dei Conigli: 31.3 ± 1.2 °C). The congeneric Chalcides bedriagai from Spain achieved higher Tbs and a wider range (mean Tb = 30.5 °C, range = 25-35 °C; Hai- ley et al., 1987). Since there are no other Tb measurements for C. ocellatus, it is hard to estimate the nature of these results. However, the diel variation of Tbs was limited, a finding that suggests high precision in thermoregulation. Table 1. Variables used in this paper for the study of thermoregu- lation. Tb: field body temperatures, Te: operative temperatures, Tpref: preferred temperatures, db: deviation of Tb from Tset, de: deviation of Te from Tset. Variable n Mean Range SD SE Tb 14 27.23 23.10-30.60 2.41 0.64 Te 28 30.05 18.22-56.98 7.24 0.35 Tpref 12 31.83 27.93-34.58 2.03 0.59 db 14 3.19 0-7.30 2.39 0.64 de 28 4.62 0-23.41 4.21 0.21 Table 2. Operative temperatures (Te) across microhabitat types within the study site. Microhabitat n Mean Range SD SE Open ground 6 33.18 21.82-56.98 9.23 0.97 Rock surface 9 31.18 19.39-44.38 6.27 0.54 Inside shrubs 9 28.14 20.48-53 6.33 0.54 Under rocks 4 27.06 18.22-36.47 5.29 0.68 Fig. 2. Relative frequency of field body temperatures (Tb, grey shade), operative temperatures (Te, solid line) and set-point range (Tset, dotted lines) for the Ocellated Skink. Fig. 1. Linear regression of field body temperature (Tb) on air tem- perature (Tair). Shaded area denotes 95% confidence intervals. 79Thermoregulation effectiveness of Chalcides ocellatus Preferred temperatures were higher than Tbs and achieved a mean value of 31.8 °C (Table 1). Interest- ingly, Tpref had a wider range of variation compared to lacertids. Nonetheless, the Tprefs of the Greek popula- tion were lower than the values reported from Egyptian populations. Al-Sadoon (1986) measured a mean Tpref of 34°C, similarly to Pough and Andrews (1985) who found a mean Tpref of 34.4 °C. Also, the range of Tpref has been reported to vary from 28 to 37 °C (Al-Sadoon and Spellerberg, 1985). These deviations in Tpref between the European and African populations could be attributed to environmental conditions. Preferred temperatures depend on the particular conditions of the habitat (Scheers and Van Damme, 2002; Pafilis et al., 2016). Populations from warmer habitats are known to achieve higher Tpref (Sag- onas et al., 2013b), though thermal optima have been also reported to show resilience despite environmental divergence in temperature (Osojnik et al., 2013; Clusel- la-Trullas and Chown, 2014). We believe that the lower Tpref of the Ocellated Skink in Greece is due to the tem- perate, cooler climate of the north Mediterranean costs. Nonetheless, we cannot rule out that methodological dif- ferences (e.g. sex, size class, time, season) with the above- mentioned papers might be responsible for the observed deviations. Operative temperatures ranged within a broad ther- mal window, varying from 18.2 to 57.0 °C (Table 1). This wide range indicates high thermal heterogeneity, in other words a diverse thermal mosaic where lizards can shut- tle between different microhabitats (Table 2). The mean Te was 30.1 °C, which lies within the values that have been reported from other Greek habitats (Adamopoulou and Valakos, 2005; Sagonas et al., 2013 a, b; Kapsalas et al., 2016; Pafilis et al. 2016; Belasen et al., 2017; Sagonas et al., 2017). Based on these operative temperatures, the thermal quality index (sensu Hertz et al., 1993) received a low value ( = 4.6), which is actually among the lowest ever reported in the north Mediterranean (see Table 1 at Pafilis et al., 2016). The low indicates a habitat of high quality (Hertz et al., 1993) that provides many thermal opportunities for successful thermoregulation. Contrary to the low , received a value of 3.2, which is rather medial according to Hertz et al., (1993). Low implies high accuracy, since most of the observed field body temperatures fall within the animal’s preferred temperature range. In the case of the Ocellated Skink, Tbs fell outside the set-point range in 93% of the cases (all of which were below Tset) (Fig. 2), resulting in the observed . This value suggests low accuracy in thermoregulation. However, we have to stress out the relativity of the latter notion. The lack of thermoregulatory studies on Euro- pean skinks or within the genus Chalcides, precludes us from understanding the magnitude of the observed value. For instance, a of 3.2 is rather high for lacer- tids (Díaz et al., 2006; Monasterio et al., 2009; Ortega et al., 2016; Sagonas et al., 2017) but not particularly high for certain anoles (Hertz et al., 1993, Woolrich-Pina et al 2015), monitor lizards (Christian and Weavers, 1996) or geckos (Rock et al., 2002, Hitchcock and McBrayer, 2006). The wide spectrum of operative temperatures and the low sketch out a rather benign thermal habitat. This fact is reflected in the low index of thermoregulation (E = 0.31). According to theory, E values close to zero stand for animals that do not thermoregulate actively whereas values close to one describe animals that thermoregulate carefully (Hertz et al., 1993). Chalcides ocellatus appears to be a poor thermoregulator, at least during this given period of the year. This finding is further supported by the alternative approach proposed by Blouin-Demers and Weatherhead (2001). Although their index does not take values within a specific range (contrary to E, Hertz et al., 1993), the value reported here (1.44) points to a poor thermoregulator as well. Low thermoregulato- ry effectiveness might be the norm for Chalcides lizards. Hailey et al. (1987) categorized the congeneric Chalcides bedriagai as a thermoconformer, interpreting the high correlation between field body temperatures and sub- strate temperatures. This finding is in agreement with the observed thermoregulatory behaviour of the Ocellated Skink in our study, as seen both by the correlation of the Ocellated Skink’s Tb with air temperature, as well as by the values of E and . According to our results, the focal population lives in a habitat of high thermal quality and heterogeneity. Thermally challenging habitats dictate high thermoregu- latory effectiveness to guarantee survival under extreme conditions (Hertz et al., 1993; Ortega et al., 2016; Pafilis et al., 2016). This is not the case for C. ocellatus, which thanks to the aforementioned favourable habitat, can afford a less effective thermoregulation. Its thermoregu- lation is also characterized by high precision and low accuracy. Further studies that would include more spe- cies and populations and different seasons are required to thoroughly understand the thermal biology of European skinks. Thermoregulation may vary with season (Huey and Pianka, 1977; Hertz et al., 1993; Díaz and Cabezas- Díaz, 2004), altitude (Spencer and Grimmond, 1994; Zamora-Camacho et al., 2016), insularity (Sagonas et al., 2013b) and body size (Sagonas et al., 2013a). It may also change according to organism needs depending on inter- nal factors (e.g. pregnancy, body condition and water loss rate) (Carretero et al., 2005). Thus, the species’ ther- moregulation strategy on Mediterranean islands, in high- 80 Grigoris Kapsalas et alii er altitudes, in different latitudes or even at our study site during different seasons, may deviate from the present results. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to Anna Karelou, Konstantina Lentza, Evdokia Gigiza and Nikos Kargopoulos, for their valuable help during fieldwork. Field sampling, animal handling and housing was conducted according to the provisions of Greek legislation (Presidential Decree 67/1981 and Law 3937/2011). REFERENCES Adamopoulou, C., Valakos, E.D. (2005): Thermal ecol- ogy and activity cycle of Podarcis milensis in a sandy coastal area. Israel J. Zool. 51: 39-52. Al-Sadoon, M.K. (1986): Contribution of aerobic and anaerobic scope to the total metabolic scope of the desert skink, Chalcides ocellatus (Forskål). Comp. Bio- chem. Phys. A 83: 745-749. Al-Sadoon, M.K., Spellerberg, I.F. (1985): Comparison of thermal acclimation effects on the metabolism of Chalcides ocellatus (desert lizard) and Lacerta vivipara (cool-temperate lizard). Comp. Biochem. Phys. A 81: 939-943. Angilletta, M.J. (2009): Thermal Adaptation: A Theoreti- cal and Empirical Synthesis. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Angilletta, M.J., Niewiarowski, P.H., Navas, C.A. (2002): The evolution of thermal physiology in ectotherms. J. Therm. Biol. 27: 249-268. Arnold, N., Ovenden, D. (2002): A Field Guide to the Reptiles and Amphibians of Britain and Europe. Harper Collins, London. Bakken, G.S. (1992): Measurement and application of operative and standard operative temperatures in ecology. Am. Zool. 32: 194-216. Baldwin, F.M. (1925): The relation of body to environ- mental temperatures in turtles, Chrysemys marginata belli (Gray) and Chelydra serpentina (Linn.). Biol. Bull. 48: 432-445. Belasen, A., Brock, K., Li, B., Chremoy, D., Valakos, E.D., Pafilis, P., Sinervo, B., Foufopoulos, J. (2017): Fine with heat, problems with water: microclimate alters water loss in a thermally adapted insular lizard. Oikos 126: 447-457. Belasen, A., Li, B., Foufopoulos, J. (2012): Chalcides ocel- latus (Ocellated Skink). Herpetol. Rev. 43: 102. Blouin-Demers, G., Weatherhead, P.J. (2001): Thermal ecology of black rat snakes (Elaphe obsoleta) in a ther- mally challenging environment. Ecology 82: 3025- 3043. Braña, F. (1993): Shifts in body temperature and escape behaviour of female Podarcis muralis during pregnan- cy. Oikos 66: 216-222. Carretero, M.A., Lo Cascio, P., Corti, C., Pasta, S. (2010): Sharing resources in a tiny Mediterranean island? Comparative diets of Chalcides ocellatus and Podarcis filfolensis in Lampione. Bonn Zool. Bull. 57: 111-118. Carretero, M.A., Roig, J.M., Llorente, G.A. (2005): Vari- ation in preferred body temperature in an oviparous population of Lacerta (Zootoca) vivipara. Herpetol. J. 15: 51-55. Christian, K.A., Weavers, B.W. (1996): Thermoregulation of monitor lizards in Australia: an evaluation of meth- ods in thermal biology. Ecol. Monogr. 66: 139-157. Clusella-Trullas, S., Chown, S.L. (2014): Lizard thermal trait variation at multiple scales: a review. J. Comp. Physiol. B 184: 5-21. Corso, G., Delitala, G.M., Carcupino, M. (2000): Uterine morphology during the annual cycle in Chalcides ocel- latus tiligugu (Gmelin) (Squamata: Scincidae). J. Mor- phol. 243: 153-165. Daut, E.F., Andrews, R.M. (1993): The effect of pregnancy on thermoregulatory behavior of the viviparous lizard Chalcides ocellatus. J. Herpetol. 27: 6-13. Díaz, J.A. (1997): Ecological correlates of the ther- mal quality of an ectotherm’s habitat: a comparison between two temperate lizard populations. Funct. Ecol. 11: 79-89. Díaz, J.A., Cabezas-Díaz, S. (2004): Seasonal variation in the contribution of different behavioural mechanisms to lizard thermoregulation. Funct. Ecol. 18: 867-875. Díaz, J.A., Cabezas-Díaz, S., Salvador, A. (2005): Season- al changes in the thermal environment do not affect microhabitat selection by Psammodromus algirus liz- ards. Herpetol. J. 15: 295-298. Díaz, J.A., Iraeta, P., Monasterio, C. (2006): Seasonality provokes a shift of thermal preferences in a temperate lizard, but altitude does not. J. Therm. Biol. 31: 237- 242. Dzialowski, E.M. (2005): Use of operative and standard operative temperature models in thermal biology. J. Therm. Biol. 30: 317-334. Grbac, I., Bauwens, D. (2001): Constraints on tempera- ture regulation in two sympatric Podarcis lizards dur- ing autumn. Copeia 2001: 178-186. Gvoždík, L., Castilla, A.M. (2001): A comparative study of preferred body temperatures and critical thermal tolerance limits among populations of Zootoca vivipa- 81Thermoregulation effectiveness of Chalcides ocellatus ra (Squamata: Lacertidae) along an altitudinal gradi- ent. J. Herpetol. 35: 486-492. Hailey, A., Rose, C.A., Pulford, E. (1987): Food consump- tion, thermoregulation and ecology of the skink Chal- cides bedriagai. Herpetol. J. 1: 144-153. Herczeg, G., Török, J., Korsós, Z. (2007): Size-dependent heating rates determine the spatial and temporal dis- tribution of small-bodied lizards. Amphibia-Reptilia 28: 347-356. Hertz, P.E. (1992): Temperature regulation in Puerto- Rican Anolis lizards: a field test using null hypothesis. Ecology 73: 1405-1417. Hertz, P.E., Huey, R.B., Stevenson, R.D. (1993): Evaluat- ing temperature regulation by field-active ectotherms: the fallacy of the inappropriate question. Am. Nat. 142: 796-818. Hitchcock, M.A., McBrayer, L.D. (2006): Thermoregula- tion in nocturnal ecthotherms: seasonal and intraspe- cific variation in the Mediterranean gecko (Hemidac- tylus turcicus). J. Herpetol. 40: 185-195. Huey, R.B. (1991): Physiological consequences of habitat selection. Am. Nat. 137: S95-S115. Huey, R.B., Pianka, E.R. (1977): Seasonal variation in thermoregulatory behavior and body temperature of diurnal Kalahari lizards. Ecology 58: 1066-1075. Itescu, Y., Slavenko, A., Schwarz, R., Meiri, S., Pafilis, P. (2016): A new island record for Chalcides ocellatus (FORSKÅL, 1775) from Kythnos, Greece. Herpetozoa 29: 98-100. Kapsalas, G., Gavriilidi, I., Adamopoulou, C., Foufopou- los, J., Pafilis, P. (2016): Effective thermoregulation in a newly established population of Podarcis siculus in Greece: a possible advantage for a successful invader. Acta Herpetol. 11: 111-118. Kornilios, P., Kyriazi, P., Poulakakis, N., Kumlutaş, Y., Ilgaz, Ç., Mylonas, M., Lymberakis, P. (2010): Phy- logeography of the ocellated skink Chalcides ocel- latus (Squamata, Scincidae), with the use of mtDNA sequences: A hitch-hiker’s guide to the Mediterrane- an. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 54: 445-456. Lo Cascio, P., Corti, C. (2008): Indagini sull’ecologia dei Rettili Sauri della R.N.O. e del S.I.C. “Isola di Lampe- dusa”. Naturalista sicili. 32: 319-354. Lutterschmidt, W.I., Reinert, H.K. (2012): Modeling body temperature and thermal inertia of large-bodied rep- tiles: Support for water-filled biophysical models in radiotelemetric studies. J. Therm. Biol. 37: 282-285. Lymberakis, P., Agasyan, A., Tuniyev, B., Cogalniceanu, D., Wilkinson, J., Ananjeva, N., Orlov, N., Slimani, T., Mateo Miras, J.A., Joger, U., El Mouden, E.H. Geniez, P., El Din, S.D., Tok, C.V., Sindaco, R. (2009): Chal- cides ocellatus. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2009: e.T157283A5069634 [Accessed on 4 July 2017]. Monasterio, C., Salvador, A., Iraeta, P., Díaz, J.A. (2009): The effects of thermal biology and refuge availabil- ity on the restricted distribution of an alpine lizard. J. Biogeogr. 36: 1673-1684. Ortega, Z., Mencía, A., Pérez-Mellado, V. (2016): The peak of thermoregulation effectiveness: thermal biol- ogy of the Pyrenean rock lizard, Iberolacerta bonnali (Squamata, Lacertidae). J. Therm. Biol. 56: 77-83. Ortega, Z., Pérez-Mellado, V., Garrido, M., Guerra, C., Villa-García, A., Alonso-Fernández, T. (2014): Sea- sonal changes in thermal biology of Podarcis lilfordi (Squamata, Lacertidae) consistently depend on habitat traits. J. Therm. Biol. 39: 32-39. Osojnik, N., Žagar, A., Carretero, M.A., García-Muñoz, E., Vrezec, A. (2013): Ecophysiological dissimilarities of two sympatric lizards. Herpetologica 69: 445-454. Pafilis, P., Lymberakis, P., Sagonas, K., Valakos, E. (2016): The particularities of a remote islet shape the ther- moregulatory profile of an endemic Mediterranean lizard. J. Therm. Biol. 61: 55-60. Pough, F.H., Andrews, R.M. (1985): Energy costs of sub- duing and swallowing prey for a lizard. Ecology 66: 1525-1533. Pough, F.H., Gans, C. (1982): The vocabulary of reptilian thermoregulation. In: Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 12, Physiology C, Physiological Ecology, pp. 17-23. Gans, C., Pough, F.H., Eds, Academic Press, London. R Core Team (2016): R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Austria, Vienna. Rock, J., Cree, A., Andrews, R.M. (2002): The effect of reproductive condition on thermoregulation in a viviparous gecko from a cool climate. J. Therm. Biol. 27: 17-27. Sagonas, K., Kapsalas, G., Valakos, E., Pafilis, P. (2017): Living in sympatry: the effect of habitat partitioning on the thermoregulation of three Mediterranean liz- ards. J. Therm. Biol. 65: 130-137. Sagonas, K., Meiri, S., Valakos, E.D., Pafilis, P. (2013a): The effect of body size on the thermoregulation of lizards on hot, dry Mediterranean islands. J. Therm. Biol. 38: 92-97. Sagonas, K., Valakos, E.D., Pafilis, P. (2013b): The impact of insularity on the thermoregulation of a Mediterra- nean lizard. J. Therm. Biol. 38: 480-486. Scheers, H., Van Damme, R. (2002): Micro-scale differ- ences in thermal habitat quality and a possible case of evolutionary flexibility in the thermal physiology of lacertid lizards. Oecologia 132: 323-331. Schneider, B. (1997): Chalcides ocellatus (Forskål, 1775). 82 Grigoris Kapsalas et alii In: Atlas of amphibians and reptiles in Europe, pp. 312-313. Gasc, J.-P., Cabela, A., Crnobrnja-Isailovic, J., Dolmen, D., Grossenbacher, K., Haffner, P., Les- cure, J., Martens, H., Martinez Rica, J.P., Maurin, H., Oliveira, M.E., Sofianidou, T.S., Veith, M., Zuiderwijk, A., Eds, Societas Europaea Herpetologica & Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (IEGB/SPN), Paris. Spencer, N.J., Grimmond, N.M. (1994): Influence of ele- vation on the thermoregulation of two sympatric liz- ards. New Zeal. J. Zool. 21: 379-385. Stevenson, R.D. (1985): The relative importance of behav- ioral and physiological adjustments controlling body temperature in terrestrial ectotherms. Am. Nat. 126: 362-386. Uetz, P. (2017): The Reptile Database. Ed. Available at: http://www.reptile-database.org [Accessed on 20 May 2017]. Valakos, E.D., Pafilis, P., Lymberakis, P., Maragou, P., Soti- ropoulos, K., Foufopoulos, J. (2008): The Amphibians and Reptiles of Greece. Edition Chimaira, Frankfurt am Main. Van Damme, R., Bauwens, D., Verheyen, R.F. (1986): Selected body temperatures in the lizard Lacerta vivipara: Variation within and between populations. J. Therm. Biol. 11: 219-222. Vasconcelos, R., Santos, X., Carretero, M.A. (2012): High temperatures constrain microhabitat selection and activity patterns of the insular Cape Verde wall gecko. J. Arid Environ. 81: 18-25. Veríssimo, C.V., Carretero, M.A. (2009): Preferred temperatures of Podarcis vaucheri from Morocco: intraspecific variation and interspecific comparisons. Amphibia-Reptilia 30: 17-23. Woolrich-Piña, G.A., Smith, G.R., Lemos-Espinal, J.A., Ramírez-Silva, J.P. (2015): Do gravid female Anolis nebulosus thermoregulate differently than males and non-gravid females? J. Therm. Biol. 52: 84-89. Zamora-Camacho, F.J., Reguera, S., Moreno-Rueda, G. (2016): Thermoregulation in the lizard Psammodro- mus algirus along a 2200-m elevational gradient in Sierra Nevada (Spain). Int. J. Biometeorol. 60: 687- 697. Acta Herpetologica Vol. 13, n. 1 - June 2018 Firenze University Press Species diversity and distribution of lizards in Montenegro Katarina Ljubisavljević1,2,*, Ljiljana Tomović3, Aleksandar Urošević1, Slađana Gvozdenović2, Vuk Iković2, Vernes Zagora2, and Nenad Labus4 The first demographic data and body size of the southern banded newt, Ommatotriton vittatus (Caudata: Salamandridae) Abdullah Altunişik Diet and helminth parasites of freshwater turtles Mesoclemmys tuberculata, Phrynops geoffroanus (Pleurodira: Chelidae) and Kinosternon scorpioides (Criptodyra: Kinosternidae) in a semiarid region, Northeast of Brazil Antonio Marcos Alves Pereira*, Samuel Vieira Brito, João Antonio de Araujo Filho, Adonias Aphoena Martins Teixeira, Diêgo Alves Teles, Daniel Oliveira Santana, Vandeberg Ferreira Lima, Waltécio de Oliveira Almeida Electric circuit theory applied to alien invasions: a connectivity model predicting the Balkan frog expansion in Northern Italy Mattia Falaschi1,2,*, Marco Mangiacotti3, Roberto Sacchi3, Stefano Scali2, Edoardo Razzetti4 First report of Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758) from Sardinia (Italy) Ilaria Maria Cossu1, Salvatore Frau1, Massimo Delfino2,3, Alice Chiodi4, Claudia Corti1,5*, Adriana Bellati4 Natural history and conservation of the Nurse Frog of the Serranía del Perijá Allobates ignotus (Dendrobatoidea: Aromobatidae) in northeastern Colombia Hernán Darío Granda-Rodríguez1,2, Andrés Camilo Montes-Correa3,*, Juan David Jiménez-Bolaño3, Marvin Anganoy-Criollo4,5 Exploring body injuries in the horseshoe whip snake, Hemorrhois hippocrepis Juan M Pleguezuelos*, Esmeralda Alaminos, Mónica Feriche How effectively do European skinks thermoregulate? Evidence from Chalcides ocellatus, a common but overlooked Mediterranean lizard Grigoris Kapsalas, Aris Deimezis-Tsikoutas, Thanos Georgakopoulos, Ismini Gkourtsouli-Antoniadou, Kallirroi Papadaki, Katerina Vassaki, Panayiotis Pafilis Thermal tolerance for two cohorts of a native and an invasive freshwater turtle species Jun Geng, Wei Dang, Qiong Wu, Hong-Liang Lu* Diet of a restocked population of the European pond turtle Emys orbicularis in NW Italy Dario Ottonello1, Fabrizio Oneto1,2, Monica Vignone2, Anita Rizzo2, Sebastiano Salvidio2,* Helminths of the lizard Colobosauroides cearensis (Squamata, Gymnophthalmidae) in an area of Caatinga, Northeastern Brazil Aldenir F. da Silva Neta*, Robson W. Ávila