Results of study of quantization and discretization error of digital tachometers with encoder ACTA IMEKO ISSN: 2221-870X June 2023, Volume 12, Number 2, 1 - 6 ACTA IMEKO | www.imeko.org June 2023 | Volume 12 | Number 2 | 1 Results of study of quantization and discretization error of digital tachometers with encoder Vasyl Kukharchuk1, Oleksandr Vasilevskyi2, Volodymyr Holodiuk1 1 Vinnytsia National Technical University, 95 Khmelnitsky Shose str., 21021, Vinnytsia, Ukraine 2 University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA Section: RESEARCH PAPER Keywords: angular velocity; encoder; quantization; sampling; microprocessor tachometer; quantization and sampling error equation; "adjoining interval" Citation: Vasyl Kukharchuk, Oleksandr Vasilevskyi, Volodymyr Holodiuk, Results of study of quantization and discretization error of digital tachometers with encoder, Acta IMEKO, vol. 12, no. 2, article 19, June 2023, identifier: IMEKO-ACTA-12 (2023)-02-19 Section Editor: Francesco Lamonaca, University of Calabria, Italy Received January 20, 2023; In final form February 19, 2023; Published June 2023 Copyright: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Corresponding author: Vasyl Kukharchuk, e-mail: BKuch@ukr.net 1. INTRODUCTION Currently, to intensify the testing of electric machines, the vast majority of research is focused on the acceleration of tests carried out in the no-load experiment [1]-[4]. The main one here is the transient characteristic (variable angular velocity over time 𝑛(𝑑)), which is obtained in the dynamic mode of operation of the measuring object (electric machine) with practically zero moment of resistance on its shaft (МБ β‰… 0). To ensure the maximum number of measured values of angular velocity 𝑛 during the transition process (3 Γ· 5) 𝜏, most researchers [5]-[8] focused their choice on digital measuring channels with encoders, the main components of which are the following: measurements object OB, coupling shaft MC, encoder E, shaper F, device for the period selection T, f0 frequency generator G, "AND" logic gate for the TX period quantization, binary counter CT2, programmable PI interface (parallel or serial), MPS microprocessor system. In the generalized structural diagram shown in Figure 1, the hardware sequence of measurement data transformations is carried out in the vast majority [9]-[12]. 1. Encoder E converts the non-electric value angular velocity n into a sequence of electrical signals, the frequency of which is determined as 𝑓π‘₯ = 𝑛 𝑍 60 , (1) Figure 1. Generalized structural diagram of the angular velocity measuring channel. ABSTRACT The analysis of measuring channels of angular velocity with an encoder given by the authors made it possible for the first time to obtain an equation for estimating the quantization and sampling error for an exponential mathematical model describing the transient process of operation of electrical machines. The components of the mathematical model of this dynamic error are the sampling step and the derivative, which characterizes the rate of change of the measured value over time. It was found that the errors of quantization and sampling significantly depend on the value of the resolution z of the encoder. Moreover, an increase in z leads to a decrease in the sampling error, but the relative quantization error increases. To reconcile these components of errors, the laws of change in the distinguishing ability z of the encoder are adaptive to the dynamic properties of the change in angular velocity over time. Proved that to ensure the maximum speed of measuring the angular velocity during the transient process, it is advisable to implement the method of changing the distinguishing ability of the encoder on the internal timers of the microcontroller proposed adapt ive to its dynamic properties, and the quantization of informative periods proportional to the measured angular velocity should be carried out in "adjoining intervals". mailto:BKuch@ukr.net ACTA IMEKO | www.imeko.org June 2023 | Volume 12 | Number 2 | 2 where 𝑍 is the resolution of the encoder. 2. The shaper F from the output quasi-sinusoidal encoder output signals forms pulses of a rectangular shape, the logic levels of which correspond to the levels of TTL logic. 3. The counting trigger T from the output frequency signals 𝑓π‘₯ of the encoder, selects informative periods 𝑇π‘₯ , proportional to the angular velocity 𝑛. 4. In the logical "AND" gate, quantization takes place [10] by comparing the measured physical value of the period 𝑇π‘₯ and the sample period 𝑇0. As a result of a such comparison, conversion equations for the frequency measurement channel of the instantaneous values given by such a transformation function are obtained 𝑁 = 𝑇π‘₯ 𝑇0 = 𝑇π‘₯ βˆ™ 𝑓0 = 𝑓0 𝑓π‘₯ . (2) 5. Binary counter CT2 carries out the procedure of counting the number of 𝑁 sample periods 𝑇0, which were quantized by periods 𝑇π‘₯ . 6. The programmable interface provides the transfer of binary codes of the number of pulses 𝑁[00. . .15] from the parallel outputs of the binary counter CT2 to the accumulator of the MPS microprocessor system, the main components of which are the MCU microcontroller, RAM, and permanent ROM memory. The exchange of measurement information between the programmable interface and the microprocessor system accumulator is implemented in program mode, interrupt mode or direct memory access. 7. An array of measurement information about the transient characteristic of the measurement object is accumulated and memorized in the operational RAM of the MPS in the form of binary codes N, proportional to the instantaneous values of the periods 𝑇π‘₯ of the frequency 𝑓π‘₯ from the output of the encoder E. 8. To present the measured information in angular velocity values, the conversion equation for this type of non-electric quantity measuring channel is obtained by substituting the 𝑓π‘₯ value from equation (1) into (2), which unambiguously links the input angular velocity 𝑛𝑋 with the output value, the number of pulses N on digital outputs of binary counter CT2 𝑁 = 60 β‹… 𝑓0 𝑛π‘₯ 𝑧 . (3) 9. From the conversion equation (3), the array of instantaneous angular velocity values is calculated by software 𝑛π‘₯ = 60 β‹… 𝑓0 𝑁 𝑧 . (4) The imperfection of the given approach is explained by the shortcomings [13]-[17] inherent in digital measuring devices, the circuitry of which is implemented according to a "hard" control scheme. 2. MEASURING CHANNELS WITH MICROPROCESSOR CONTROL The duality of the hardware and software implementation of microprocessor devices (Figure 2) potentially provides greater flexibility and adaptability to the dynamic properties of measurement objects [10], [16], [18], which significantly expands their functional capabilities and improves static and dynamic metrological characteristics. The disadvantage of this development direction of microprocessor tachometers is the quantization of only even 𝑇π‘₯ or only odd periods. In the above "quasi-instantaneous" means, measurement information is obtained not in each period, but after a period, which does not allow for the transient characteristic 𝑛(𝑑) with the required accuracy: - determine the numerical values of the amplitude and duration of synchronous dips in angular velocity; - to differentiate the experimentally obtained numerical values of the periods to construct the functional dependence of the change in acceleration over time; - to indirectly determine the value of the dynamic moment and dynamic mechanical characteristic - the phase "portrait" of the object of measurement. The solution to the problems highlighted above is the implementation of quantization [10], [12], [19]-[21] of each even 𝑇π‘₯ and each odd periods (Figure 3), which are proportional to the instantaneous value of the angular velocity, which is implemented by the hardware and software of the microcontroller. It is advisable to implement the quantization method in "adjacent" intervals on two internal timers of the microcontroller, and the analysis of metrological characteristics will allow to determine the parameter, knowledge of which will ensure its adaptation to the dynamic properties of the measurement object. 3. MAIN METROLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS For further research, as an initial mathematical model of the angular velocity of electric machines, we will use a trivial (Figure 4) exponential model 𝑛(𝑑) = β€ˆΞ© βˆ™ (1 βˆ’ e βˆ’ 𝑑 𝜏), (5) where Ξ© – synchronous speed of the electric motor rotation, 𝜏 – electromechanical constant. As a result of the interaction of the hardware and software of the microcontroller, the analogue value 𝑛 is replaced, which has Figure 2. Generalized structural diagram of the microprocessor tachometer. Figure 3. To the issue of quantization in "adjacent" intervals. ACTA IMEKO | www.imeko.org June 2023 | Volume 12 | Number 2 | 3 an infinite number of values in the specified measurement range (from 𝑛min to 𝑛max), due to the limited number of its instantaneous values (because 𝑇Д β‰  0), a discretization error occurs [22] π›₯Π”(𝑑) = 1 2 𝑇Д β‹… d𝑛 d𝑑 (6) Thus, obtain a mathematical model for estimating the sampling error. The angular acceleration of the shaft movement of the object of measurement in the transient mode of its operation is determined as Ξ΅(𝑑) = d𝑛 d𝑑 = Ξ© β‹… e βˆ’ 𝑑 𝜏 𝜏 (7) The sampling step for a digital tachometer with microprocessor control is determined as follows [10] 𝑇Д = 𝑑ADC + 𝑑FL + 𝑑DR . Here, 𝑑ADC is the duration of the analog-to-digital conversion, which is equal to the measured period 𝑑ADC = 𝑇𝑋 , 𝑑FL is the time required to execute the Flag subroutine waiting for the flag, 𝑑DR is the time to execute the Driver software driver. Considering the fact that during the measurement of the angular velocity in the "adjacent" intervals, the waiting subroutines for the flag and the Driver software driver are executed after the completion of 𝑇π‘₯ quantization, then 𝑇Д = 𝑑ADC = 𝑇π‘₯ . (8) In this regard, the sampling frequency [23] of the angular velocity measuring channel is defined as 𝑓Д = 1 𝑇Д = 1 𝑇𝑋 . (9) Now present the encoder conversion equation (1) in the following form: 𝑓Д = Ξ© βˆ™ 𝑧 60 (10) and the discretization step, respectively 𝑇Д(𝑑) = 60 𝛺 βˆ™ 𝑧 = 60 𝛺 βˆ™ (1 βˆ’ e βˆ’ 𝑑 𝜏) βˆ™ 𝑧 . (11) Substitute (7), (8), (11) into (6) and obtain a mathematical model for estimating (Figure 5) the sampling error of the digital angular velocity measurement channel in "adjacent" intervals π›₯Π”(𝑑) = 1 2 𝑇Д β‹… dπœ” d𝑑 = 30 e βˆ’ 𝑑 𝜏 (1 βˆ’ e βˆ’ 𝑑 𝜏) βˆ™ 𝑧 𝜏 (12) To analyse the relative error of quantization, we will first obtain the transfer function of the microprocessor tachometer 𝑁(𝑑) = 𝑓0 𝑓π‘₯ = 60 βˆ™ 𝑓0 𝛺 βˆ™ (1 βˆ’ e βˆ’ 𝑑 𝜏) 𝑧 (13) Considering (13), the mathematical model for estimating the quantization error in the transient mode of operation of the measurement object will have the form π›ΏΠš(𝑑) = 1 𝑁 βˆ™ 100% = 5 βˆ™ 𝛺 βˆ™ (1 βˆ’ e βˆ’ 𝑑 𝜏) βˆ™ 𝑧 3 βˆ™ 𝑓0 . (14) Analysis of the quantization error equation (Figure 6) shows that its reduction can be ensured by two methods: 1. Reducing resolution z of the encoder; 2. Increasing the quantization frequency 𝑓0 of the quartz resonator G. The second approach has the limitation 𝑓0 ≀ π‘“π‘”π‘Ÿ . The quantization frequency is limited by the limit frequency of the crystal resonator of the microcontroller MCU. In turn, decreasing in the resolution z of the encoder leads to an increasing in the sampling error (Figure 6), which is not acceptable for dynamic measurements. The following conclusion can be drawn from the above graphic dependences of quantization and discretization errors: Quantization and discretization errors significantly depend on the resolution value z of the encoder. Moreover, increasing z leads to decreasing in the sampling error, but the relative quantization error increases. To reconcile these component errors, it is necessary to obtain the laws of change of the encoder’s resolution z, adapted to the law of angular velocity change in time. Using (12), we obtain the law of change in the resolution of the encoder in the process of increasing the angular velocity from 0 to Ξ©, compliance with which will ensure the value of the dynamic sampling error, which does not exceed the normalized value βˆ†Π”β‰€ βˆ†Π”Π ZΠ”(t) = 30 e βˆ’ 𝑑 𝜏 βˆ†Π”Π 𝜏 βˆ™ (1 βˆ’ e βˆ’ 𝑑 𝜏) . (15) Figure 4. Dependence 𝑛 = (𝑑): 𝜏 = 0.5; 𝛺 = 1500 rpm. Figure 5. Laws of encoder resolution changing. ACTA IMEKO | www.imeko.org June 2023 | Volume 12 | Number 2 | 4 Similarly, from (14) we will get the law of the encoder resolution changing, which implementation will ensure the normalization π›ΏΠš ≀ π›ΏΠšΠ of the quantization error π‘Πš(𝑑) = 3 βˆ™ π›ΏΠšΠ βˆ™ 𝑓0 5 βˆ™ 𝛺 (1 βˆ’ e βˆ’ 𝑑 𝜏) . (16) Graphic dependences of the change in encoder resolution 𝑧 = 𝑓(𝑑) during dynamic measurements of angular velocity 𝑛 = 𝑓(𝑑) during the transient process of the measurement object are shown in Figure 5. To present the quality of measurement results based on the concept of measurement uncertainty, which is currently recommended by international standards [24]-[28], the following method of calculating the standard uncertainty of type B, which arises due to the existence of the discredit error 𝑒Bd(𝑑), is proposed in the assumption on the normal distribution law of the components of the digital angular velocity measurement channel 𝑒Bd(𝑑) = π›₯Π”(𝑑) π‘˜p = 1 2 𝑇Д dπœ” d𝑑 π‘˜p βˆ’1, (17) where π‘˜p is the coverage coefficient, which for a normal distribution law is taken as equal to 1.96 at a confidence level of p=0.95 [29], [30]; π›₯Π”(𝑑) is the discrediting error of the digital angular velocity measurement channel. Substituting the maximum value of the sampling error βˆ†Π”Π ≀ 0.2 rpm (Figure 6, b) into equation (17), we obtain the standard sampling uncertainty of type B, which is equal to 𝑒Bd(𝑑) = 0.1 rpm for a confidence level of 0.95. The relative standard uncertainty of discretization can be estimated by the expression [29], [31] 𝑒�̃� = 𝑒Bd(𝑑) 𝑛(𝑑) 100 % = 0.1 1500 100 % β‰ˆ 0.01 % . (18) As follows from the conducted studies of the quantization error (Figure 6, a), its value does not exceed 0.5 % at an angular speed of 1500 rpm. The standard uncertainty of type B, due to the presence of the quantization error [32], assuming its uniform distribution law, is calculated using the expression π‘’π΅π‘˜ (𝑑) = π›Ώπ‘˜ (𝑑) 100 % √12 𝑛max(𝑑) = 0.5 % 346 % 1500 rpm = 2.17 rpm . (19) For the given object of measurement (for example, a three- phase asynchronous motor UAD-34 with a nominal rotation speed Ξ© = 1500 rpm and 𝜏 = 0.5, a coupling of the membrane type, an encoder LIR-120A (z=65536) and a debugging a board based on a dual-core 32-bit microcontroller TMS320F28379D, containing 1 MB of flash memory, 128 kB of RAM and having a sample frequency 𝑓0=8 MHz formed from the clock frequency of a quartz resonator, a method of normalizing the error [22] of the 𝑍Д(𝑑) discretization and a method of normalization is proposed [33], [34] quantization errors 𝑍K(𝑑) by determining the change in resolution 𝑧 of the encoder, which corresponds to the change in the time coordinate 𝑑 in the transient process of measurement object: 𝑍Д(𝑑) = 300 e βˆ’ 2 𝑑 𝜏 (1 βˆ’ e βˆ’ 2 𝑑 𝜏 ) (20) π‘Πš(𝑑) = 1600 (1 βˆ’ e βˆ’ 2 𝑑 𝜏 ) . (21) A microcontroller such as the TMS320F28379D has twelve 32-bit general-purpose timers in its structure, which is quite enough to carry out this kind of dynamic measurements with the adaptation of the z resolution of the encoder to the dynamic properties of the measurement object: - timer 𝑇0 is programmed to the mode of the real-time counter, which every 0.01 s generates a control signal at its output, according to which the value of the binary code of the coefficient k of its list is recorded in the counter of timer 𝑇1; - every 0.01 s, the value of the list coefficient k is recorded in timer 𝑇1 to form at its output a frequency signal 𝑓𝑋 π‘˜ ⁄ , proportional to the resolution 𝑍Д(𝑑) or π‘Πš(𝑑) according to (20) or (21); - in timer 𝑇2, even 𝑇π‘₯ periods of the frequency signal 𝑓𝑋 π‘˜ ⁄ from the direct output of timer 𝑇1 are quantized. - in timer 𝑇3, odd 𝑇π‘₯ periods of the frequency signal 𝑓𝑋 π‘˜ ⁄ from the inverse output of timer 𝑇1 are quantized. Therefore, the method of quantization in "adjacent" intervals takes place in two timers 𝑇2 and 𝑇3 of the microcontroller. Quantization of 𝑇π‘₯ and 𝑇π‘₯ periods occurs in both timers. First, as a result of counting the periods 𝑇0 of the sample frequency of the quartz resonator 𝑓0 from the leading edge to the trailing edge of the even period 𝑇π‘₯ in the second 𝑇2 timer, and then from the leading edge to the trailing edge of the odd period 𝑇π‘₯ in the third 𝑇3 timer. Thus, each of the programmable timers of the microcontroller works in two modes: - Quantization (from rising edge to falling edge); - Transfer and memorization of measurement information (from falling edge to rising edge); - Additional speed of the proposed method is provided by the transfer and recording of measured information to the RAM in DMA mode (direct access to memory) without the participation of the computing core, freeing its resources for other, priority tasks during the measurement process. This hardware and software implementation of quantization in " adjacent " intervals ensures maximum speed of measurement and guarantees sufficient time for transferring and memorizing a Figure 6. To the issue of quantization and discretization error. ACTA IMEKO | www.imeko.org June 2023 | Volume 12 | Number 2 | 5 large volume of quantization results in the MPS RAM. And the implementation of the method of error normalization [22] of discretization 𝑍Д(𝑑) or the quantization error [23], [34] π‘Πš(𝑑) by changing the resolution z of the encoder in the real-time measuring mode of operation allows to increase the accuracy of dynamic angular velocity measurements. 4. CONCLUSIONS The analysis of well-known digital angular velocity measurement channels with an encoder made it possible to solve two extremely important tasks for metrology - increasing the accuracy and speed of dynamic measurements of the angular velocity of the measurement object operating in real time. For the first time, an equation for estimating the quantization and discretization error was obtained for an exponential mathematical model that describes the transient process of the electric machines operation. The components of the mathematical model of these dynamic errors are the quantization and discretization steps and the derivative, which characterizes the rate of change of the measured quantity over time. It is proved that quantization and discretization errors significantly depend on the value of encoder resolution z. Moreover, an increasing in z leads to a decreasing in the sampling error, but the relative quantization error increases. In order to reconcile these component errors, the laws of changing the resolution z of the encoder were obtained, which make it possible to adapt to the dynamic properties of the change in angular velocity over time For the selected object of measurement (for example, a three- phase asynchronous machine UAD-34 with a nominal speed of rotation Ξ© = 1500 π‘Ÿπ‘π‘š and Ο„ = 0.5), a coupling coupling of the membrane type, an encoder LIR-120 (z=65536) and dual- core 32-bit microcontroller TMS320F28379D, methods of normalizing the value of the sampling error βˆ†Π”Π and the quantization error π›ΏΠšΠ are proposed. The normalization of these error components is carried out in the process of dynamic measurements of the angular velocity n during the transient process of the measurement object, changing the resolution z of the encoder, thus ensuring the fulfilment of the condition: βˆ†Π”β‰€ βˆ†Π”Π or π›ΏΠš ≀ π›ΏΠšΠ It was established that in order to ensure the maximum speed of the angular velocity measuring during the transient process of the measurement object, it is advisable to implement the proposed adaptive to its dynamic properties method of changing the resolution of encoder on the internal timers of the microcontroller, and to carry out the quantization of informative periods proportional to the measured angular velocity in "adjacent intervals". REFERENCES [1] M. Zhao J. Lin, Health Assessment of Rotating Machinery Using a Rotary Encoder, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 65, no. 3, March 2018, pp. 2548-2556. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2017.2739689 [2] H. Li, G. Cheng, A Comparative Study of Speed Estimation Methods for Motor Rotor. In: Y. Jia, W. Zhang, Y. Fu, Z. Yu, S. Zheng (eds), Proc. of the 17th Chinese Intelligent Systems Conference, Fuzhou, China, 16-17 October 2021. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 803. Springer, Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-6328-4_86 [3] V. V. Kukharchuk, Elements of the control theory of electric machines dynamic parameters: Monograph, Vinnytsia: Universum-Vinnytsia, 1998, 125 p. [4] Yamini Nagaratnam, Sudanthiraveeran Rooban, A modified truncation and rounding-based scalable approximate multiplier with minimum error measurement, Acta IMEKO, vol. 11, no. 2, article 37, June 2022, pp. 1-6. DOI: 10.21014/acta_imeko.v11i2.1245 [5] Y. VΓ‘zquez-GutiΓ©rrez, D. L. O'Sullivan, R. C. Kavanagh, Small- Signal Modeling of the Incremental Optical Encoder for Motor Control, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 67, no. 5, , May 2020 pp. 3452-3461. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2916307 [6] V. V. Kukharchuk, Y. G. Vedmitskyi, Measurement of rotational movement parameters of electromechanical energy converters in transient operation mode: Monograph, Vinnytsia: UNIVERSUM- Vinnytsia, 2018, 155 p. [7] Yi Huang, Clemens GΓΌhmann, Wireless Sensor Network for Temperatures Estimation in an Asynchronous Machine Using a Kalman Filter, Acta IMEKO, vol. 7, no. 1, article 3, March 2018, pp. 5-12. DOI: 10.21014/acta_imeko.v7i1.509 [8] V. V. Kukharchuk, V. S. Holodiuk, A tool for dynamic measurements of electric machines rotary motion parameters in transient operation modes, Integrated intelligent robotic complexes, IIRTK-2021 13th Int. Scientific and Practical Conference, Kyiv, Ukraine, 18-19 May 2021, p. 87. [9] N. K. Boggarpu, R. C. Kavanagh, New Learning Algorithm for High-Quality Velocity Measurement and Control When Using Low-Cost Optical Encoders, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 59, no. 3, 2010, pp. 565- 574. DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2009.2025064 [10] V. O. Podzharenko, V. V. Kukharchuk, Measurement and computer-measuring equipment: Study guide, 1991, 240 p. [11] Giulio D’Emilia, Antonella Gaspari, Emanuela Natale, Dynamic calibration uncertainty of three‐axis low frequency accelerometers, Acta IMEKO, vol. 4, no. 4, art. 14, December 2015, pp. 75-81. DOI: 10.21014/acta_imeko.v4i4.239 [12] V. V. Kukharchuk, Fundamentals of metrology and electrical measurements, Outline of lectures. Part II: Vinnytsia: VNTU, 2020, 155 p. [13] Alexander Schuler, Albert Weckenmann, Tino Hausotte, Enhanced measurement of high aspect ratio surfaces by applied sensor tilting, Acta IMEKO, vol. 3, no. 3, art. 6, September 2014, pp. 22-27. DOI: 10.21014/acta_imeko.v3i3.124 [14] V. V. Kukharchuk, V. Y. Kucheruk, Analysis of dynamic properties of tachometric converters, Technical electrodynamics, 2000, Part 1, pp. 103-107. [15] J. Zhu, T. Hayashi, A. Nishino, K. Ogushi, New microforce generating machine using electromagnetic force. Acta IMEKO, vol 9, no. 5, December 2020, pp. 109-112. DOI: 10.21014/acta_imeko.v9i5.950 [16] V. Y. Kucheruk, V. V. Kukharchuk, Analysis and practical implementation of a microprocessor tool for measuring the angular speed of rotation of electric machines, Visnyk VPI, 1995, number 2, pp. 12-16. [17] L. Pecly, K. Hashtrudi-Zaad, Model Transformation for Enhanced Parameter Identification of Linear Dynamic Systems, 2020 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA), Montreal, QC, Canada, 24-26 August 2020, pp. 242-247. DOI: 10.1109/CCTA41146.2020.9206281 [18] V. V. Kukharchuk, S. V. Pavlov, V. S. Holodiuk, V. E. Kryvonosov, K. Skorupski, A. Mussabekova, G. Karnakova Information Conversion in Measuring Channels with Optoelectronic Sensors. Sensors 2022, 22, 271. DOI: 10.3390/s22010271 [19] M. Kaliuzhnyi Generalizing the sampling theorem for a frequency- time domain to sample signals under the conditions of a priori https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2017.2739689 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6328-4_86 https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v11i2.1245 https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2019.2916307 https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v7i1.509 https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2009.2025064 https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v4i4.239 https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v3i3.124 https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v9i5.950 https://doi.org/10.1109/CCTA41146.2020.9206281 https://doi.org/10.3390/s22010271 ACTA IMEKO | www.imeko.org June 2023 | Volume 12 | Number 2 | 6 uncertainty, Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(9), 111, 2021, pp. 6–15. DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2021.235844 [20] B. K. Ashley, U. Hassan, Frequency-Time Domain (FTD) Impedance Data Analysis to Improve Accuracy of Microparticle Enumeration in a Microfluidic Electronic Counter., 2021 43rd Annual Int. Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), Mexico, 01-05 November 2021, pp. 1201-1204. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630635 [21] M. Morawiec, A. Lewicki, Speed Observer Structure of Induction Machine Based on Sliding Super-Twisting and Backstepping Techniques, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 17, no. 2, , Feb. 2021, pp. 1122-1131. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2020.2974507 [22] V. V. Kukharchuk, V. F. Hraniak, S. Sh. Katsyv, V. S. Holodiuk, Torque measuring channels: dynamic and static metrological characteristics, Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska, 10(3), 2020, pp. 82–85. DOI: 10.35784/iapgos.2080 [23] V. V. Kukharchuk, V. S. Holodiuk, Results of studies of the quantization and discretization error of digital tachometers with an encoder, Integrated intelligent robotic complexes (IIRTK- 2022), 15th Int. Scientific and Practical Conference May 17-18 2022, Kyiv, Ukraine, K.: NAU, 2022, 241 p. (a collection of theses), pp. 98-100. [24] O. Vasilevskyi, M. Koval, S. Kravets, Indicators of reproducibility and suitability for assessing the quality of production services, Acta IMEKO, vol. 10, no. 4, art. 11, December 2021, pp. 54-61. DOI: 10.21014/acta_imeko.v10i4.814 [25] BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML, Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, JCGM 100:2008, 2008, 120. [26] ISO/IEC Guide 98-1:2009, Uncertainty of measurement – Part 1: Introduction to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (ISO, Switzerland, 2009). [27] Oleksandr Vasilevskyi, Assessing the level of confidence for expressing extended uncertainty through control errors on the example of a model of a means of measuring ion activity, Acta IMEKO, vol. 10, no. 2, art. 27, June 2021, pp. 199-203. DOI: 10.21014/acta_imeko.v10i2.810 [28] ISO/IEC 17025:2005, General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories (ISO, Switzerland, 2005). [29] O. M. Vasilevskyi, Metrological characteristics of the torque measurement of electric motors, International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 8, 7, 2017, 9 p. DOI: 10.1051/ijmqe/2017005 [30] R. Trishch, O. Nechuiviter, K. Dyadyura, O. Vasilevskyi, I. Tsykhanovska, M. Yakovlev, Qualimetric method of assessing risks of low quality products, MM Science Journal, 2021, October, pp. 4769-4774. DOI: 10.17973/MMSJ.2021_10_2021030 [31] O. Vasilevskyi, P. Kulakov, D. Kompanets, O. Lysenko, V. Prysyazhnyuk, W. WΓ³jcik, D. Baitussupov, A new approach to assessing the dynamic uncertainty of measuring devices, Proc. SPIE 10808, Photonics Applications in Astronomy, Communications, Industry, and High-Energy Physics Experiments 2018, 108082E, 2018, 8 p. DOI: 10.1117/12.2501578 [32] O. Kupriyanov, R. Trishch, D. Dichev, T. Bondarenko, Mathematic, Model of the General Approach to Tolerance Control in Quality Assessment, In: V. Tonkonogyi, V. Ivanov, J. Trojanowska, G. Oborskyi, I. Pavlenko (eds), Advanced Manufacturing Processes III. InterPartner 2021. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham, pp. 415–423. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-91327-4_41 [33] O. Vasilevskyi, V. Kucheruk, V. Bogachuk, K. Gromaszek, W. WΓ³jcik, S. Smailova, N. Askarova, The method of translation additive and multiplicative error in the instrumental component of the measurement uncertainty, Proc. SPIE 10031, Photonics Applications in Astronomy, Communications, Industry, and High-Energy Physics Experiments, 2016, 1003127, 2016, 11 p. DOI: 10.1117/12.2249195 [34] Vasilevskyi O. M., Kulakov P. I., Ovchynnykov K. V., Didych V. M., Evaluation of dynamic measurement uncertainty in the time domain in the application to high speed rotating machinery, International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 8, 2017, 25. DOI: 10.1051/ijmqe/2017019 https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.235844 https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630635 https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.2974507 https://doi.org/10.35784/iapgos.2080 https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v10i4.814 https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v10i2.810 https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2017005 https://doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2021_10_2021030 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2501578 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91327-4_41 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2249195 https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2017019