Xerophiles and other fungi associated with cereal baby foods locally produced in Uganda MADY A. ISMAIL1,2, HANNINGTON K. TALIGOOLA2 and REBECCA NAKAMYA2 1Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, P. O. Box 71516, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt, madyismail@yahoo.com 2Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Makerere University P. O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda Ismail M.A., Taligoola H.K., Nakamya R.: Xerophiles and other fungi associated with cereal baby foods locally produced in Uganda. Acta Mycol. 47 (1): 75–89, 2012. Fifty samples from five baby food products mainly made of cereal flour(s) were analyzed. The moisture contents of these products were between 11.14% and 11.9%, a level below 14.0%, the recommended level for safe storage of cereal grains and their products. The mycological analysis was carried out using the dilution plate method and two isolation media (DG18 for isolation of xerophilic fungi and DRBC for fungi in general). A total of 80 species related to 37 genera in addition to some unidentified fungal and yeast species were recorded on both media from the five products. The products were contaminated abundantly by xerophilic fungi which were occurring in 88% of food samples and accounting for 18.1% of the total CFU as recorded on DG18. The highest contamination level by xerophiles was registered in Mwebaza rice porridge (a component of rice flour) and the lowest in Mukuza (a product of maize, soyabean and sorghum flours). 11 xerophilic species were recorded of which Aspergillus and Eurotium (4 species each) were the predominant giving rise to 9.1% and 8.9% of the total CFU, with A. wentii, A. candidus, E. cristatum and E. repens were the most contaminating species. Of the fungi recorded other than xerophiles, species of Aspergillus (particularly A. flavus followed by A. niger), Penicillium (P. citrinum, P. oxalicum), Fusarium (F. solani, F. tricinctum), Cladosporium (C. sphaerospermum) and yeasts were the most predominant. Contamination of such foods is a matter of health hazard as these foods are for babies. So, the use of fresh, well-dried and uncontaminated flours for production of such foods is recommended. Key words: mycobiota, spoilage, contamination, food products, DG18, DRBC ACTA MYCOLOGICA Vol. 47 (1): 75–89 2012 76 M.A. Ismail et al. INTRODUCTION Baby foods rich in carbohydrates and proteins are being produced from dried cereal and leguminous grains/seeds. The manufacture of baby foods involves mixing the ce- real flour with some additional ingredients such as powders of soya beans, dried fish or fruits. Since these dried foods possessed low moisture content levels, they are subject to contamination and spoilage by microorganisms. Fungi probably contaminate and spoil more foods than any other group of microorganisms. They render contaminated foods not only unpalatable, but also unsafe for consumption by producing mycotoxins (Munimbazi, Bullerman 1996). Sanchis et al. (1982) noted that certain species if humid- ity reaches a sufficient level would start producing toxic metabolites. The presence of aflatoxins in foods is of great concern in terms of food safety since they are among the most active ingested carcinogens (Pitt, Hocking 2009). Spoilage of such foods is due to a group of fungi termed as xerophiles that are capable of rapid growth above 0.77 aw and of slow growth at 0.75 aw and below-down to about 0.68 aw. Taligoola et al. (2004); Pitt, Hocking (2009) stated that the most common causes of spoilage of dried cereals are species of Eurotium particularly E. chevalieri, E. repens, E. rubrum and E. amstelodami L. Mangin. A variety of yeasts are also common on cereal grains and flour (Kurtzman et al. 1970; Aran, Eke 1987; Pitt, Hocking 2009). Other ingredients such as powders of soya beans, milk, dried fish and fruits were also found to be contaminated with a wide variety of fungal species (Mislivec, Bruce 1977; Sutic et al. 1979; Bullerman 1979; Jarchovska et al. 1980; Ito, Abu 1985; Pitt et al. 1994; Ismail, Saad 1997; Pitt, Hocking 2009). Many reports have been published earlier at different localities of the world on the microbiological quality of baby foods (Jarchovská et al. 1980; Moustafa et al. 1984; Abdel-Sater, Ismail 1993; Zohri et al. 1995; Munimbazi, Bullerman 1996) or their ingredients such as wheat (Aran, Eke 1987; Mills et al. 1995), milk powder (Ismail, Saad 1997), rice (Pitt et al. 1994; Taligoola et al. 2004, 2010), maize (Ismail et al. 2003), sorghum (Pitt et al. 1994), millet (Mishra, Daradhiyar 1991), corn chips, breakfast cereal (Bullerman, Tsai 1994; Zohri et al. 1995), and baby foods imported into Uganda (Ismail et al. 2008, 2010). In Uganda, knowledge about fungi contaminating locally produced foods is needed. Henceforth, this work was designed to survey the xerophilic and other fungi associated with baby foods locally manufactured in Uganda. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty samples of five baby food products manufactured locally (10 packets each) were randomly collected from different shops at five towns of Uganda (Kampala, Jinja, Mbarara, Masaka and Mbale). Most of these products are made in these towns. Each of these foods contained at least one or more cereal flour. The names, components and the producing companies of these products are shown in Table 1. Determination of moisture content. Three sub-samples of 50 g each were taken from each food sample and put in aluminium foil dish. These were dried in an oven Xerophiles and other fungi 77 at 110°C for 24 hours, and reweighed (Magan, Lacey 1985; Pitt, Hocking 2009). The moisture content of each sample was expressed as the average percentage of the weight loss of the three replicates. Mycological analysis. All food samples were analyzed mycologically on two isola- tion media: (1) Dichloran 18% glycerol agar (DG18) which contains glycerol and glu- cose needed for the growth of xerophilic fungi (Hocking, Pitt 1980) and (2) dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar, DRBC (King et al. 1979). Dilutions were prepared by shaking 10 g of each sample in 90 ml diluent of 0.1% peptone water (Kurtzman et al. 1971). Serial tenfold dilutions were prepared and 1 ml aliquots of the appropriate dilution were placed in sterile Petri dishes. Eight plates were used for each food sample (4 plates for each isolation medium) i.e. 80 plates for each type of food products and in total 400 plates for the fifty food samples. Plates were incubated at room temperature (25-27°C) in day and night cycle of light conditions for 10-14 days for DG18 and for 10 days for DRBC plates. The growing fungi were enumerated, isolated and identified. Identification of fungi. The identification of different fungal groups was carried out based on their macroscopic and microscopic features using the methods and keys described by Raper, Fennell (1965) for Aspergillus and its teleomorphs; Booth (1971) and Leslie, Summerell (2006) for species of Fusarium; Pitt (1979) for species of Penicillium; Ellis (1971), Moubasher (1993), Domsch et al. (2007), and Pitt & Hocking (2009) for other fungi. Statistical analysis. Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA), us- ing the Statistical Analysis System, (SAS institute Inc., 1996). Means were compared with L.S.D. test at P ≤ 0.05 levels. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Each of the five baby foods investigated contained at least one or more cereal prod- ucts (Tab. 1). Moisture content of the products investigated. All samples of the five baby food products were characterized by the average moisture contents ranging from 11.14 % Table 1 Food products investigated, their ingredients, producing companies and their mean moisture contents No Product Ingredients Producing company Mean moisture content (n=10) 1 Baby soya Maize flour, soya bean flour, carrot flour East African Basic Food, Ltd 11.47±0.23 2 Kayebe Maize flour, powdered Enkejje (Haplochromis fish), soya bean flour Kayebe Sauce Packers, Ltd 11.14±0.38 3 Mwebaza rice porridge Rice flour Ebenezer Packers, Ltd 11.9±0.23 4 Jacinta millet flour Millet flour Mahimba Company, Ltd 11.6±0.09 5 Mukuza Maize flour, Sorghum flour, soya bean flour Hodeco, Ltd 11.52±0.09 78 M.A. Ismail et al. ± 0.38 % in Kayebe to 11.9 ± 0.23 % in Mwebeza rice porridge (Tab. 1). However, all the products had moisture contents below 14.0%, the recommended level for safe storage of cereal grains and their products (Christensen, Kaufman 1974; Taligoola et al. 2004, 2010; Ismail et al. 2003, 2008, 2010). Incidence of xerophilic fungi in baby food products (recovered mainly on DG18%). Baby foods locally manufactured in Uganda were abundantly contami- nated by xerophilic fungi which occurred in 88% of food samples and accounted for 18.08% of the total CFU as recovered on DG18 (Tab. 2). The contamination level with xerophiles ranged from 2.62% of the total CFU in Mukuza to 60.44% in Mwebaza rice porridge (Tab. 3). These high contamination levels with xerophiles indicate that the baby foods may have stayed in shops and supermarkets for a long time where they might have been invaded by storage fungi. Bullerman (1979) re- ported that, food stuffs in shops and markets are actually under storage, hence fun- gal contamination is likely to occur. Ten xerophilic species belonging to four genera were recovered from the five products. Aspergillus (72% of 50 food samples) and Eurotium (64%) were isolated in high incidences while Wallemia Johan-Olsen and Xeromyces L. R. Fraser were infrequent (Tab. 2). The levels of contamination by xerophilic fungi in locally produced foods (88% of the food samples) were higher than those reported by Ismail et al. (2010) in imported ones (54%), however similar species of the genera Aspergillus, Eurotium and Wallemia were reported from both foods though in different frequencies. Eurotium (4 species) occurred in 64% of the food samples and constituted the majority of xerophilic CFU (48.89%) from the 5 products. The highest level of con- tamination with Eurotium species was found in Mwebaza rice porridge (24.56% of the total CFU), and the lowest in Mukuza (1.58%) (Tab. 3). Eurotium species have been reported on cereal baby foods imported into Uganda (Ismail et al. 2010), maize, rice, soya beans and dried fish (El-Kady, Youssef 1993; Pitt et al. 1994; Taligoola et al. 2004). Among the Eurotium species reported, E. cristatum and E. repens were the most predominant, accounting for 21.17% and 17.98% of the total xerophiles CFU. This finding agrees with earlier reports by Kurata et al. (1968) who found these two species to be common spoilage fungi in many cereals (rice, maize, sorghum, wheat and barley) in storage. The observation of E. repens in high occurrence on the foods analysed is inconsistent with the findings whereby E. repens and other unidentified Eurotium species were recovered in rare frequency on Turkish cereals and cereal products (Aran, Eke 1987). E. chevalieri and E. rubrum were infrequently encoun- tered, however, these two species were reported earlier as frequent on maize and rice (Kurata et al. 1968; Taligoola et al. 2004) and on baby foods imported to Uganda (Ismail et al. 2010). Xerophilic aspergilli (4 species) accounted for 50.13% of the xerophiles CFU and 9.06% of the total fungi CFU (Tab. 2). They were recovered in 72% of food samples from the five products. The highest level of contamination was found in Mwebaza rice porridge (35.87% of the total CFU) and the lowest was registered in Mukuza (1.04%). A. wentii was the most prevalent species, accounting for 25.95% of the xerophiles CFU. It was found most heavily contaminating Kayebe and Baby soya (major components: maize and soyabeans). In this respect, low levels of infection by A. wentii were recorded on soya beans, maize, paddy rice and sorghum in Thailand and Indonesia (Pitt et al. 1994) and on maize (Ismail et al. 2003) and rice (Taligoola Xerophiles and other fungi 79 Ta bl e 2 In ci de nc e of fu ng i i n lo ca l b ab y fo od p ro du ct s on d ic hl or an 1 8% g ly ce ro l a ga r (D G 18 ) an d di ch lo ra n ro se B en ga l c hl or am ph en ic ol a ga r (D R B C ) Ta xa D G 18 D R B C C F U C F U % F % O R So ur ce C F U C F U % F % O R So ur ce X er op hi lic fu ng i 28 22 5 18 .0 8 88 H 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 18 25 1. 08 25 M 1, 2, 3, 5 A sp er gi llu s (T ot al ) 14 15 0 9. 06 72 H 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 12 50 0. 74 20 L A . c an di du s L in k 65 50 4. 20 16 L 1 15 0 0. 09 6 R 5 A . p en ic ill io id es S pe ga zz in i 17 5 0. 11 8 R 1, 3, 5 50 0. 03 4 R 1, 2 re st ri ct us S m it h 10 0 0. 06 8 R 1, 2, 3 75 0. 04 4 R 1, 2 A . w en tii W eh m er 73 25 4. 71 72 H 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 97 5 0. 58 14 L 2 E ur ot iu m ( To ta l) 13 80 0 8. 87 64 H 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 50 0 0. 30 10 R 1, 2, 3 E . c he va lie ri M an gi n 24 75 1. 59 18 L 2, 3, 4, 5 20 0 0. 10 6 R 3 E . c ri st at um ( R ap er & F en ne ll) M al lo ch & C ai n 59 75 3. 84 56 H 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 30 0 0. 20 4 R 1, 2 E . r ep en s de B ar y 50 75 3. 26 34 M 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 E . r ub ru m K on ig , S pi ec ke rm an n & B re m er 27 5 0. 18 8 R 1, 3 Po ly pa ec ilu m p is ce A . D . H oc ki ng & P it t 25 0. 01 4 2 R 1 W al le m ia s eb i ( Fr ie s) v on A rx 15 0 0. 09 4 R 1 50 0. 03 2 R 1 X er om yc es b is po ru s L . R . F ra se r 12 5 0. 08 2 R 1 X er ot ol er an t f un gi 12 79 00 81 .9 2 10 0 H 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 16 74 15 98 .9 2 10 0 H 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 A cr em on iu m s tr ic tu m W . G am s 25 0. 02 2 R 5 20 0 0. 12 10 R 1, 3 A cr op hi al op ho ra s p. 75 25 4. 4 4 R 3 A lte rn ar ia a lte rn at e (F ri es ) K ei ss le r 75 0. 04 2 R 2 A sp er gi llu s (T ot al ) 32 70 0 20 .9 5 82 H 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 39 01 0 23 .0 5 84 H 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 A . a eg yp tia cu s M ou ba sh er & M ou st af a 50 0. 03 2 R 1 A . c ar bo na ri us ( B ai ni er ) T ho m 12 5 0. 08 2 R 1 75 0. 04 2 R 1 A . d efl ec tu s Fe nn el l & R ap er 25 0. 01 4 2 R 1 A . fl av us L in k 23 72 5 15 .1 9 64 H 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 30 43 5 18 .0 74 H 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 A . f um ig at es F re se ni us 10 00 0. 64 20 L 1 97 5 0. 5 16 L 2, 3 A . n ig er v an T ie gh em 15 75 1. 01 42 M 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 18 00 1. 1 32 M 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 A . n om iu s K ur tz m an , H or n & H es se lt in e 25 0. 02 2 R 1 A . o ch ra ce us W ilh el m 80 0 0. 51 30 M 1, 2. 3, 4 45 0 0. 3 12 R 2, 3, 5 A . o ry za e (A hl bu rg ) C oh n 18 00 1. 15 22 L 2, 3, 4 52 5 0. 3 14 L L ,2 ,3 A . p ar as iti cu s Sp ea re 50 0. 03 4 R 2 22 5 0. 13 10 R 1, 2 A . p ho en ic is ( C or da ) T ho m 25 0. 01 4 2 R 3 A . s yd ow ii (B ai ni er & S ar to ry ) T ho m & C hu rc h 72 5 0. 46 12 R 1, 3, 5 37 5 0. 2 8 R 2, 3 A . t am ar i K it a 20 75 1. 33 22 L 2, 3, 4 30 50 1. 8 24 L 1, 2, 3 A . t er re us T ho m 12 5 0. 08 6 R 1, 3 55 0 0. 3 8 R 2, 3 A . v er si co lo r ( V ui lle m in ) T ir ab os ch i 67 5 0. 43 22 L 1, 2, 3, 5 45 0 0. 3 18 L 1, 3 80 M.A. Ismail et al. B ot ry ot ri ch um p ilu lif er um S ac ca rd o & M ar ch al 50 0. 03 2 R 1 B ys so ch la m ys fu lv a S . L . O lli vr & G . M . S m it h 52 5 0. 34 6 R 3 C ha et om iu m s p. 25 0. 01 4 2 R 1, 5 C la do sp or iu m ( To ta l) 61 75 3. 95 68 H 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 26 55 1. 6 46 M 1, 2, 3, 5 C . c la do sp or io id es ( Fr es en iu s) d e V ri es 37 00 2. 37 34 M 1, 2, 3, 5 42 5 0. 14 8 R 1, 3, 5 C . h er ba ru m ( Pe rs oo n) L in k 25 0. 02 2 R 1 C . s ph ae ro sp er m um P en zi g 24 50 1. 57 40 M 1, 3, 4, 5 22 30 1. 3 40 M 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 C oc hl io bo lu s lu na tu s R . N el so n & H aa si s 50 0. 03 4 R 1 C ur vu la ri a sp . 25 0. 01 4 2 R 3 D or at om yc es s p. 25 0. 01 4 2 R 3 E m er ic el la n id ul an s (E id am ) V ui lle m in 15 0 0. 09 2 R 3 E pi co cc um n ig ru m L in k 25 0. 01 4 2 R 1 E up en ic ill iu m s p. 15 0 0. 09 8 R 2, 5 Fe nn el lia fl av ip es W ile y & S im m on s 25 0. 01 4 2 R 1 Fu sa ri el la s p. 50 0. 03 2 R 1 Fu sa ri um ( To ta l) 13 55 0 8. 68 42 M 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 43 30 0 25 .6 56 H 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 F. e qu is et i ( C or da ) Sa cc ar do 50 0. 03 4 R 4 F. la te ri tiu m N ee s 31 25 2. 0 16 L 4 F. o xy sp or um S ch le ch te nd al 25 0. 02 2 R 1 F. p oa e (P ec k) W ol le nw . 25 0. 02 2 R 3 F. s ol an i ( M ar ti us ) Sa cc ar do 25 0. 02 2 R 4 24 10 0 14 .2 5 26 M 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 F. tr ic in ct um ( C or da ) Sa cc ar do 98 50 6. 31 12 R 5 17 77 5 10 .5 20 L 1, 5 F. v er tic ill io id es ( Sa cc ar do ) N ir en be rg 42 5 0. 02 10 R 2, 3 13 75 0. 8 32 M 1, 3, 4, 5 Fu sa ri um s p. 75 0. 05 2 R 3 G eo tr ic hu m c an di du m L in k 25 0. 01 4 2 R 5 H yp om yc es c hr ys os pe rm us T ul . 75 0. 04 4 R 1 L as io di pl od ia th eo br om ae ( Pa t.) G ri ff on & M au bl . 50 0. 03 2 R 1 M ic ro do ch iu m n iv al e (F ri es ) Sa m ue ls & H al le tt 15 0 0. 09 6 R 5 12 5 0. 07 6 R 1, 3 M on ili a sp . 20 0 0. 1 2 R 1 M uc or ( To ta l) 42 75 2. 5 20 L 1, 2, 3, 5 M . p lu m be us B on or d. 19 50 1. 2 12 R 1, 2, 3, 5 M . r ac em os us F re se ni us 20 0 0. 13 8 R 1, 3 15 0 0. 09 6 R 2, 3 M uc or s p. 21 75 1. 3 14 L 2, 3 N eo sr to ry a fis ch er ii (W eh m er ) M al lo ch & C ai n 10 0 0. 06 2 R 3 43 25 2. 6 2 R 3 N eu ro sp or a cr as sa ( Sh ea r & D od ge ) v. A rx 23 47 5 15 .0 4 30 M 3, 4, 5 81 75 4. 8 28 M 2, 3, 4, 5 Pa ec ilo m yc es v ar io tii B ai ni er 40 0 0. 26 10 R 1, 3 35 0 0. 2 12 L 1, 2, 3 Ta bl e 2 – co nt . Xerophiles and other fungi 81 Pe ni ci lli um ( To ta l) 16 62 5 10 .6 5 80 H 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 13 40 0 7. 9 58 H 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 P. c he rm es in um B io ur ge 15 0 0. 09 6 R 5 P. c hr ys og en um T ho m 65 0 0. 42 8 R 2 P. c itr in um T ho m 40 25 2. 58 28 M 1, 2, 3, 5 59 50 3. 5 40 M 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 P. c or yl op hi lu m D ie rc kx 75 25 4. 82 18 L 2, 3, 4, 5 25 0 0. 15 8 R 1, 2, 3 P. is la nd ic um S op p 50 0. 03 2 R 3 P. o xa lic um C ur ri e & T ho m 41 25 2. 64 44 M 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 60 75 3. 50 24 L 2, 3, 4 P. p in op hi lu m H ed gc oc k 75 0. 04 6 R 3 P. p ub er ul um B ai ni er 25 0. 01 4 2 R 3 P. p ur pu ro ge nu m S to ll 50 0. 03 2 R 1 P. v ar ia bi le S op p 75 0. 04 4 R 1, 3 P. v ir id ic at um W es tl in g 95 0 0. 5 16 L 1, 2 Pe ni ci lli um s p. 50 0. 03 2 R 3 P ho m a sp . 32 5 0. 2 2 R 1 R hi zo pu s st ol on ife r ( E hr en be rg ) V ui lle m in 41 00 2. 63 22 L 3, 4, 5 50 75 3. 0 36 M 1, 3, 4, 5 Sc op ul ar io ps is c an di da ( G ue gu en ) V ui lle m in 50 0. 03 2 R 1 T he rm oa sc us a ur an tia cu s M ie he 25 0. 01 4 2 R 2 Tr ic ho de rm a ha rz ia nu m R if ai 50 0. 03 4 R 1, 2 O th er u ni de nt ifi ed fu ng i 12 50 0. 74 18 L 1, 3, 5 Y ea st s 29 37 5 18 .8 1 22 L 1, 2, 3 35 77 5 21 .2 34 M 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 R ho do to ru la m uc ila gi no sa ( Jö rg en se n) H ar ri so n 25 0 0. 16 2 R 2 97 5 0. 6 20 L 2, 3 Y ea st s (b ro w n) 12 5 0. 07 4 R 1, 4 Y ea st s ( w hi te ) 29 12 5 18 .6 5 22 L 1, 2, 3, 5 34 75 0 20 .5 14 L 3, 4, 5 Y ea st s (y el lo w ) 25 0. 01 4 2 R 3 To ta l f un gi 15 61 25 10 0 10 0 H 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 16 92 40 10 0 10 0 H 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 N o. o f g en er a (3 7) 16 36 N o. o f s pe ci es ( 80 ) 48 65 A bb re vi at io ns : C F U = C ol on y fo rm in g un it s (c al cu la te d /g b ab y fo od p ro du ct in 5 0 sa m pl es ); C F U % = P er ce nt ag e co lo ny fo rm in g un it s (c al cu la te d pe r to ta l f un ga l C F U ); F % = p er ce nt ag e fr eq ue nc y (c al cu la te d pe r 50 s am pl es in ve st ig at ed ); O R = o cc ur re nc e re m ar ks ; H ig h (H ) = 5 0- 10 0 % , M od er at e (M ) = 2 5- 49 % , L ow ( L ) = 13 -2 4 % , R ar e (R ) = le ss th an 1 3 % ; S ou rc e: 1 = B ab y so ya , 2 = K ay eb e, 3 = M w eb az a ri ce p or ri dg e, 4 = J ac in ta m ill et fl ou r, 5 = M uk uz a. 82 M.A. Ismail et al. Ta bl e 3 C ol on y fo rm in g un it s an d pe rc en ta ge fr eq ue nc y of m os t c om m on fu ng i, an d th e nu m be r of g en er a an d sp ec ie s re co ve re d fr om th e fiv e ba by fo od pr od uc ts o n D G 18 a nd D R B C Pr od uc t B ab y so ya K ay eb e M w eb az a ri ce p or ri dg e Ja ci nt a m ill et fl ou r M uk uz a. M ed iu m D G 18 D R B C D G 18 D R B C D G 18 D R B C D G 18 D R B C D G 18 D R B C C om m on fu ng i C F U F % C F U F % C F U F % C F U F % C F U F % C F U F % C F U F % C F U F % C F U F % C F U F % X er op hi le s 15 00 70 37 5 50 92 75 10 0 11 25 50 11 20 0 10 0 20 0 30 51 75 90 10 75 80 10 0 20 E ur ot iu m cr is ta tu m 37 5 70 25 10 29 25 60 27 5 10 21 50 50 30 0 40 22 5 60 E . r ep en s 37 5 70 12 00 30 27 5 40 31 00 20 12 5 20 A sp er gi llu s w en tii 32 5 60 15 0 30 50 25 10 0 82 5 40 15 0 40 15 25 80 30 0 80 X er ot ol er an ts 29 00 10 0 45 05 10 0 35 20 0 10 0 47 91 0 10 0 73 25 10 0 21 40 0 10 0 42 00 0 10 0 47 27 5 10 0 39 97 5 10 0 46 35 0 10 0 A . fl av us 27 5 50 40 0 60 21 07 5 10 0 26 66 0 10 0 40 0 70 17 50 70 11 25 40 57 5 70 85 0 60 10 50 70 A . n ig er 12 5 20 22 5 40 52 5 70 70 0 60 17 5 30 80 0 30 62 5 60 25 10 12 5 30 50 20 A . o ch ra ce us 10 0 30 25 0 50 75 20 37 5 50 35 0 30 75 20 25 10 C la do sp or iu m cl ad os po rio id es 62 5 40 50 10 27 50 60 25 0 60 35 0 20 75 10 25 10 C . s ph ae ro s- pe rm um 27 5 30 80 5 80 75 40 60 0 40 50 0 30 11 00 60 55 0 10 47 5 70 30 0 40 Fu sa ri um so la ni 10 0 20 25 10 23 92 5 10 0 75 10 F. v er tic il- lio id es 32 5 30 12 5 10 20 0 10 30 0 40 35 0 60 27 5 20 22 5 40 N eu ro sp or a cr as sa 75 10 30 0 30 10 0 20 23 05 0 10 0 78 25 10 0 12 5 20 17 5 10 Pe ni ci lli um ci tr in um 10 0 20 25 0 40 28 50 50 41 25 80 57 5 30 12 50 30 17 5 40 50 0 40 15 0 10 P. o xa lic um 75 20 47 5 50 58 75 90 90 0 30 15 0 10 26 25 10 0 50 20 50 20 R hi zo pu s st ol on ife r 25 10 32 5 40 30 0 40 37 25 50 45 50 90 50 20 15 0 40 Y ea st s (T ot al ) 75 10 25 10 60 0 50 35 0 50 12 5 10 72 5 20 34 07 5 40 C F U s of a ll fu ng i 44 00 10 0 48 80 10 0 44 47 5 10 0 49 03 5 10 0 18 52 5 10 0 21 60 0 10 0 47 17 5 10 0 47 27 5 10 0 41 05 0 10 0 46 45 0 10 0 N o. o f g en er a 8 24 4 11 12 18 7 6 7 8 N o. o f s pe ci es 25 39 19 27 35 34 16 10 20 16 Fo r ab br ev ia ti on s ee T ab le 2 ; A = P ro du ct , B = M ed iu m , C = C om m on fu ng i; A *B *C L .S .D a t P ≤ 0 .0 5 = 2 10 .5 2 Xerophiles and other fungi 83 et al. 2004) in Uganda. A. candidus was the second most common xerophilic Asper- gillus species. It was recovered in 16% of the samples, however giving rise to high percentages of CFU (23.21% of xerophiles) and found only in Baby soya. A. penicil- lioides and A. restrictus occurred infrequently in Baby soya, Kayebe, Mwebaza rice porridge or Mukuza. These two species were also uncommon in maize and rice in Uganda (Ismail et al. 2003; Taligoola et al. 2004), and in baby foods imported to Uganda (Ismail et al. 2010), while A. restrictus was predominant on cereal grains in Iran (Lacey 1988) and A. penicillioides was isolated in high frequency from soya beans in Thailand (Pitt et al. 1994) and dried fish in Indonesia (Wheeler et al. 1986). The presence of A. restrictus on Baby soya and Kayebe (products of soya beans), is in agreement with the finding where A. restrictus was found invading soya beans whose moisture contents were between 12.5%-13% (Christensen, Kaufmann 1965). This fungus was first reported in stored grains by Tuite, Christensen (1955) and since then has been found to be a common cause of deterioration in all kinds of stored grains and seeds (Christensen, Kaufmann 1965). Wallemia sebi and Xeromyces bisporus were infrequently encountered and only from Baby soya. W. sebi was earlier reported in maize and soya beans from Thailand, and on peanuts, maize, paddy and milled rice, and soya beans from Indonesia (Pitt et al. 1994) and on Pakistani and Ugandan rice (Taligoola et al. 2004), while X. bispo- rus was reported from dried prunes, spice powders, nutmegs, dates, fruit cakes and cookies (Pitt, Hocking 2009). It is worthy to mention that 7 of these xerophilic species in addition to Polypaeci- lum pisce were reported on DRBC but infrequently, accounting for a minor propor- tion of total CFU (1.08%). Incidence of fungi other than xerophiles in baby food products (recovered on both DG18 and DRBC). Apart from the 11 xerophilic species, baby food products yielded a total of 33 genera and 69 species of xerotolerant fungi on both DG18 (38 species and 12 genera) and dichloran rose Bengal chloramphenicol agar (DRBC) (57 species belonging to 32 genera). The broadest spectrum of species was recorded in Mwebaza rice porridge (35 species on DG18) and in Baby soya (39 species on DRBC), while the narrowest was recorded in Jacinta millet flour (16 species on DG18 and 10 spe- cies on DRBC). The current results revealed that the diversity of fungi was higher in locally produced foods (36 genera and 65 species on DRBC) than in imported ones (21 and 42) analysed by Ismail et al. (2008). Aspergillus, Penicillium, Fusarium and Cladosporium were the most predominant genera on both isolation media (Tab. 2). Penicillium and Aspergillus were reported earlier as the most commonly isolated genera on starches (potatoes, rice, maize and wheat) intended for human consump- tion (Suarez et al. 1981), on wheat, maize, sorghum and barley in Egypt (Moubasher et al. 1972; El-Maghraby 1989). In a study on baby foods imported into Uganda, the most common fungal genera were found to be similar to those reported in the current study from the local foods, however, species of Aspergillus and Penicillium were more dominant in locally produced foods, while species of Cladosporium and Fusarium were more common in imported ones (Ismail et al. 2008). Aspergillus was the most frequent genus. It emerged from 82% and 84% of food samples accounting for 20.95% and 23.05% of the total CFU on DG18 and DRBC respectively. It was represented by 15 species of which A. flavus was the most com- mon. A. flavus accouned for 15.19% and 18.0% of the total fungi CFU on DG18 and 84 M.A. Ismail et al. DRBC, respectively (Tab. 2). It was recovered in high frequency from all products on both media but had its highest level of contamination in Kayebe (Tab. 3). The high incidence of A. flavus on Kayebe whose major components are maize, soya beans and fish flours, is in agreement with earlier reports on maize (El-Maghraby 1989; Sebunya, Yourtee 1990, Munimbazi, Bullerman 1996, Ismail et al. 2003), on dried fish (Ito, Abu 1985) and on soya beans (El-Kady, Youssef 1993). Contrary to the above findings, A. flavus was reported with low occurrence in maize and sorghum in Egypt (El-Kady et al. 1982) and soya beans in Uganda (Sebunya, Yourtee 1990). A. niger came second and was found contaminating 42% and 32% of food sam- ples from the five products, accounting for 1.01% and 1.1% of the total fungi CFU on DG18 and DRBC, respectively. It was recovered in moderate frequency and most heavily contaminating Kayebe and Baby soya (products of maize and soya beans). This is in agreement with the findings of Suarez et al. (1981), who recovered A. niger from starches intended for human consumption, where rice and maize were among these starches. Also, Sanchis et al. (1982) fond that A. niger caused severe deterioration to corn and sorghum. Other four Aspergillus species were recovered in low frequency of occurrence on both media, accounting collectively for 3.55% and 4.75% of the total fungi CFU on DG18 and DRBC media, respectively, and these were: A. fumigatus, A. oryzae, A. tamarii and A. versicolor (Tab. 2). Earlier reports mentioned these species to occur less commonly on freshly ground mouldy maize meal (Marasas, Smalley 1972). A. ochraceus was reported moderately on DG18 but rarely on DRBC giving rise to 0.51% and 0.3% of the total CFU respectively. On the other hand, 8 species of Aspergillus were isolated in rare incidence on one or both media: A. aegyptiacus, A. carbonarius, A. deflectus, A. nomius, A. parasiticus, A. phoenicis, A. sydowii and A. terreus (Tab. 2). A. carbonarius and A. parasiticus have been reported as rare species in food products imported into Uganda (Ismail et al. 2008, 2010), though some of the above species have been reported to be common on barley e.g., A. sydowii, A. ochraceus, A. terreus (Moubasher et al. 1972) and A. terreus on maize (Ismail et al. 2003), paddy rice (Abdel-Hafez et al. 1987) and flour (Augustine et al. 1984). Penicillium was the second most frequent genus, recovered from 80% and 58% of the total food samples on DG18 and DRBC respectively, accounting for 10.65% and 7.9% of the total CFU. The highest levels of contamination with penicillia were recorded in maize flour-containing products (Kayebe and Baby soya), and Mwebaza rice porridge and the least was found in Mukuza (Tabs 2 and 3). The above find- ings agree with earlier observation where Penicillium was among the most common genera recovered from corn snacks (Zohri et al. 1995) and starches (Suarez et al. 1981). Similarly, corn was found to be highly contaminated with Penicillium species, while rice was found to be penicillia free (Munimbazi, Bullerman 1996). In contrast to our finding, whereby Mukuza (a product of sorghum) had a low contamination level with Penicillium species, Diener et al. (1981) found Penicillium to be among the most dominant genera on sorghum. P. citrinum (2.58% and 3.5%) and P. ox- alicum (2.64% and 3.5% of the total CFU on DG18 and DRBC respectively), the most common species in the present study, have been reported earlier to occur on starches (Suarez et al. 1981), and barley (Abdel-Kader et al. 1979). P. oxalicum was also one of the chief species isolated from unstored corn kernels (Mislivic, Tuite 1970) and in preharvest corn from Valencia, Spain (Jimenez et al. 1985). P. citrinum, Xerophiles and other fungi 85 a nephrotoxigenic fungus, is known as citrinin-producer (Mislivec, Tuite 1970; Fris- vad 1983). P. viridicatum, a well known nephrotoxigenic species (Frisvad 1983) and P. corylophilum were also isolated though in low frequency, respectively on DRBC and DG18, constituting 0.5% and 4.82% of the total CFU. P. viridicatum was earlier recovered from starches intended for human consumption (Suarez et al. 1981). Carl- ton et al. (1968) found that P. viridicatum, P. oxalicum and P. multicolor Grig.-Manoil. & Porad, all isolated from corn kernels in Indiana were toxic to mice when included in their diets. Other 7 Penicillium species: P. chermesinum, P. chrysogenum, P. islandi- cum, P. pinophilum, P. puberulum, P. purpurogenum and P. variabile were rarely iso- lated from only one or two products (Tab. 2). Of these, P. variabile has been reported to cause severe deterioration in wheat, corn and sorghum (Moubasher et al. 1972) and P. aurantiogriseum, P. chrysogenum, P. corylophilum, P. citrinum, P. expansum, P. islandicum, P. oxalicum, P. verrucosum, P. viridicatum from baby foods imported into Uganda (Ismail et al. 2008, 2010). Fusarium occupied the third place with regard to its frequency, occurring in 42% and 56% of the samples on DG18 and DRBC respectively. However its count (25.6% of the total CFU) was more than that of Aspergillus and Penicillium on DRBC while lower than that of both genera on DG18 (Tab. 2).This result agrees with the earlier finding that species of Fusarium are field fungi (Moubasher et al. 1972; Christensen 1987) less tolerating the low water activity medium, DG18. The results revealed that Fusarium represented the highest and the major food-contaminant. Among the five products investigated, Jacinta millet flour and Mukuza were the most heavily contaminated having Fusarium CFU in all their samples. It is possible that fusaria infected the cereals while still in the field and persisted even after the cereals were processed and stored. Of eight species encountered, F. solani (0.02% and 14.24% of the total CFU) and F. tricinctum (6.31% and 10.5%) were the most contaminat- ing on both DG18 and DRBC respectively, though these were recovered in rare to moderate frequency. F. solani was found most heavily contaminating Jacinta millet flour while F. tricinctum in Mukuza (a product of sorghum and maize). This finding disagreed with earlier reports where F. solani and F. tricinctum were absent on millet and sorghum (Diener et al. 1981; Munimbazi, Bullerman 1996). F. verticillioides con- stituted low percentages of the total CFU and was found most heavily contaminating Baby soya and Mwebaza rice porridge (products of maize and rice flour, respective- ly). F. verticillioides and F. tricinctum were registered earlier in maize meal (Marasas, Smalley 1972), maize stalks and grains (Logrieco et al. 1988), and sorghum (Diener et al. 1981). F. verticillioides is a major producer of moniliformin and fumonisins toxins that cause liver cancer in rats and oesophageal cancer in humans (Lacey 1988, Logrieco et al. 1988; Sydenham et al. 1990). The remaining Fusarium species were recorded infrequently either on DG18 (F. lateritium from 8 food samples from Jaci- neta millet flour, F. oxysporum from one Baby soya sample, F. poae from one sample of Mukuza and unidentified Fusarium species from one sample of Mwebaza) or on DRBC (F. equiseti from only 2 samples of Baby soya). Cladosporium (3 species) was also isolated from all products in high frequency (68% of food samples) on DG18 and moderate frequency (46%) on DRBC, con- stituting 3.95% and 1.6% of the total CFU on DG18 and DRBC, respectively. C. sphaerospermum was moderately isolated on both media with 1.57% and 1.3% of the total CFU while C. cladosporioides was moderate on DG18 and rare on DRBC 86 M.A. Ismail et al. (Tab. 2). C. herbarum was rare and recovered only from 1 sample of Kayebe. In this respect, Mazen et al. (1984) found C. sphaerospermum in low frequency on maize. Neurospora crassa, Rhizopus stolonifer and yeasts (with Rhodotorula mucilaginosa being the most common) were all isolated in moderate or low frequency on DG18 and in moderate frequency on DRBC. These species were reported earlier as food spoilage fungi (Pitt, Hocking 2009). R. stolonifer had also been reported earlier from soya beans (El-Kady, Youssef 1993) and barley (Abdel-Kader et al. 1979). Some other fungal species were isolated infrequently either in low or rare fre- quency from one or more food products on DG18 or DRBC or both (Tab. 2). Analysis of variance. Analysis of variance was computed on baby food products using Anova test at 5% significance level (Tab. 3). The calculated value of Ftest = 8.84 at df 4. This is greater than the tabulated value Fcritical = 1.96316, hence there is a significant difference in the total count of the different species recovered from the different food products on DRBC and DG18. The type and the CFU of most fungal species recovered on DRBC and DG18 from food products are probably dependent on the type of that product. This may also be due to the different ingredients includ- ing cereal flours involved in these products. CONCLUSIONS The current results revealed that Kayebe (a product of maize, fish and soya bean) and Jacinta millet flour (a product of millet) were the most heavily contaminated by fungi CFU of the five products investigated, while Baby soya was the lowest as de- termined on both isolation media. However, the highest contamination level by xe- rophiles was registered in Mwebaza rice porridge and the lowest in Mukuza. Among eleven xerophilic species recorded on these baby foods, species of Aspergillus and Eurotium were the most common. In addition, a high incidence of Aspergillus flavus, Yeasts, Fusarium solani, F. tricinctum, Penicillium citrinum, P. corylophilum, P. oxali- cum and Cladosporium sphaerospermum on one or both isolation media were also recorded. Many of these fungi are capable of producing mycotoxins. Contamination of such foods (especially those for babies) is a matter of health hazard for human consumption. However their safety can be insured and improved greatly by using quality raw materials. As contamination occurs for cereal grains before, during or after harvesting, during drying process, or even during food production and this con- tamination could also be due to long-term storage, marketing under non-hygienic conditions of the food products. We suggest that monitoring fungal contaminations as well as mycotoxins should be carried out periodically and procedures to prevent mould contamination should be developed. Acknowledgements. The authors are indebted to Prof. Bukenya-Ziraba, the head of Botany Department, Makerere University, Kampala for the facilities he provided during this research. Grateful acknowledge- ment is due to the Egyptian Fund for Technical Cooperation with Africa for sponsoring Prof. M. A. Ismail at Makerere University, giving him the opportunity to act as a supervisor of Mrs. Rebbecca Nakamya. Xerophiles and other fungi 87 REFERENCES Abdel-Hafez S.I.I., El-Kady I.A., Mazen M.B., El-Maghraby O.M. 1987. Mycoflora and trichothecene toxins of paddy grains from Egypt. Mycopathologia 100 (2): 103–112. Abdel-Kader M.I.A., Moubasher A.H., Abdel-Hafez S.I.I. 1979. Survey of the mycoflora of barley grains in Egypt. Mycopathologia 69 (3): 143–147. Abdel-Sater M.A., Ismail M.A. 1993. Enzymatic studies on fungi associated with biscuits in Egypt. Inter- national Biodeterioration and Biodegradation 31 (4): 277–292. Aran N., Eke D. 1987. Mould mycoflora of some Turkish cereals and cereal products. MIRCEN Journal of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 3 (3): 281–287. Augustine B., Parvathi M., Kalyanasundaram I. 1984. Potential mycotoxigens in wheat and wheat prod- ucts. Journal of Food Science and Technology, India 21 (5): 312–316. Booth C. 1971. The genus Fusarium. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, Surrey, England, pp. 237. Bullerman L.B. 1979. Significance of mycotoxins to food safety and human health. Journal of Food Pro- tection 42 (1): 65–86. Bullerman L.B., Tsai W.Y.J. 1994. Incidence and levels of Fusarium moniliforme, Fusarium proliferatum and fumonisins in corn and corn-based foods and feeds. Journal of Food Protection 57 (6): 541–546. Carlton W.W., Tuite J., Mislivec P. 1968. Investigations of the toxic effects in mice of certain species of Penicillium. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacolology 13 (3): 372–387. Christensen C.M. 1987. Field and storage fungi. In: Food and Beverage Mycology, 2nd edition, Beuchat L.R. (Ed), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. Christensen C.M., Kaufmann H.H. 1965. Deterioration of stored grains by fungi. Annual Review of Phy- topathology 3 (1): 69–84. Christensen C.M., Kaufman H.H. 1974. Microflora: In Storage of cereal grains and their products. C.M. Christensen (ed.). American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul Minnesota, pp. 159–191. Diener U.L., Morgan-Jones G., Wagener R.E., Davis N.D. 1981. Toxigenicity of fungi from grain sor- ghum. Mycopathologia 75 (1): 23–26. Domsch K.H., Gams W. and Anderson T.-H. 2007. Compendium of soil fungi. 2nd edition IHW-Verlag, Eching, Germany, 672 pp. El-Kady I.A., Youssef M.A. 1993. Survey of mycoflora and mycotoxins in Egyptian soybean seeds. Journal of Basic Microbiology 33 (6): 371–378. El-Kady I.A., Abdel-Hafez S.I.I., El-Maraghy S.S. 1982. Contribution to the fungal flora of cereal grains in Egypt. Mycopathologia 77 (2): 103–109. Ellis M.B. 1971. Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, Surrey, Eng- land, 608 pp. El-Maghraby O.M. 1989. The fungal flora and natural occurrence of mycotoxins in cereal grains varieties and hybrids. Bulletin of the Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Egypt 18 (1-D): 131–142. Frisvad J.C. 1983. A selective and indicative medium for groups of Penicillium viridicatum producing dif- ferent mycotoxins in cereals. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 54 (3): 409–416. Hocking A.D., Pitt J.I. 1980. Dichloran glycerol medium for enumeration of xerophilic fungi from low moisture foods. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 39 (3): 488–492. Ismail M.A., Saad N.M. 1997. Studies on the mycological quality of milk powder. Journal of Food Science and Technology, India 34 (6): 488–493. Ismail M.A., Taligoola H.K., Ssebukyu E.K. 2003. Mycobiota associated with maize grains in Uganda with special reference to aflatoxigenic Aspergilli. Journal of Tropical Microbiology 2 (1): 17–26. Ismail M.A., Taligoola H.K., Rebecca Nakamya 2008. Mycobiota associated with baby food products imported into Uganda with special reference to aflatoxigenic aspergilli and aflatoxins. Czech Mycol- ogy 60 (1): 75–89. Ismail M.A., Taligoola H.K., Rebecca Nakamya 2010. Incidence of xerophilic/xerotolerant mycobiota, fusaria, and nephrotoxigenic penicillia in some cereal baby foods imported to Uganda. Journal of Basic and Applied Mycology, Egypt 1 (1): 23–33. Ito H., Abu M.Y. 1985. Study of microflora in Malaysian dried fishes and their decontamination by gam- ma-irradiation. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 49 (4): 1047–1051. Jarchovska H., Koudelka J., Lukasova J. 1980. Microbiological quality of infant foods made from dried milk in Czechoslovakia. Veterinarni Medicina 25 (11): 691–695. 88 M.A. Ismail et al. Jimenez M., Sanchis V.M., Santamarina P., Hernandez E. 1985. Penicillium in pre-harvest corn from Va- lencia (Spain): Influence of different factors on the contamination. Mycopathologia 92 (1):53–57. King A.D., Hocking A.D., Pitt J.I. (1979): Dichloran-rosebengal medium for enumeration and isolation of moulds from foods. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 37 (5): 959–964. Kurata H., Udagawa S., Ichinoe M., Kawasaki M., Takoda M., Tazawa M., Koizurni A., Tanabe H. 1968. Studies on the population of toxigenic fungi in foodstuffs. III. Mycoflora of milled rice harvested in 1965. Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan 9: 23–28. Kurtzman C.P., Wickerham L.J., Hesseltine C.W. 1970. Yeasts from wheat and flour. Mycologia 62 (3):542–547. Kurtzman C.P., Rogers R., Hesseltine C.W. 1971. Microbiological spoilage of mayonnaise and salad dress- ings. Applied Microbiology 21 (5): 870–874. Lacey J. 1988. The microbiology of cereal grain from area of Iran with high incidence of oesophageal cancer. Journal of Stored Production and Research 24 (1): 30–50. Leslie J.F., Summerrell B.A. 2006. The Fusarium laboratory manual. Blackwell Publishing, pp.388. Logrieco A.M.A., Bottalico A., Altomare C. 1988. Chemataxonomic observations on zearalenone and trichothecene production by Gibberella zeae from cereals in Southeren Italy. Mycologia 80 (6): 892–895. Magan N., Lacey J. 1985. Interactions between field and storage fungi on wheat grains. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 85 (1): 29–37. Marasas W.F.O., Smalley E.B. 1972. Mycoflora, toxicity and nutritive value of mouldy maize. Onderste- poort Journal of Veterinary Research 39 (1): 1–10. Mazen M.B., Abdel-Hafez S.I.I., Shaban G.M.M. 1984. Survey on the mycoflora of Egyptian wheat grains and their lemmae and paleae. Mycopathologia 85 (3): 155–159. Mills J.T., Seifert K.A., Frisvad J.C., Abramson D. 1995. Nephrotoxigenic Penicillium species occurring on farm-stored cereal grains in western Canada. Mycopathologia 130 (1): 23–28. Mishra N.K., Daradhiyar S.K. 1991. Mold flora and aflatoxin contamination of stored and cooked sam- ples of pearl millet in the Paharia tribal belt of Santhal Pargana, Bihar, India. Applied and Environ- mental Microbiology 57 (4): 1223–1226. Mislivec P.B., Tuite J. 1970. Species of Penicilium occurring in freshly harvested and in stored dent corn kernels. Mycologia 62 (1): 67–74. Mislivec P.B., Bruce V.R. 1977. Incidence of toxic and other mold species and genera in soyabeans. Jour- nal of Food Protection 40: 309–312. Moubasher A.H. 1993. Soil fungi of Qatar and other Arab countries. The Sientific and Applied Research Centre, University of Qatar, Doha, Qatar, 566 pp. Moubasher A.H., Elnaghy M.A., Abdel-Hafez S.I. 1972. Studies of fungus flora of three grains in Egypt. Mycopathologia et Mycolgia Applicata 47 (3): 261–274. Moustafa M.K., Ahmed A.A.H., El-Bassiony T.A., Aboul-Khier F. 1984. Microbiological quality of infant milk foods. Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal 12: 163–167. Munimbazi C., Bullerman L.B. 1996. Moulds and mycotoxins in foods from Burundi. Journal of Food Protection 59 (8): 869–875. Pitt J.I. 1979. The genus Penicillium and its teleomorphic states Eupenicillium and Talaromyces. Academic Press, London, 634 pp. Pitt J.I., Hocking A.D. 2009. Fungi and food spoilage. 3rd ed, Springer, 519 pp. Pitt J.I., Hocking A.D., Bhudhasamai K., Miscamble B.F., Wheeler K.A., Tanboon-Ek P. 1994. The nor- mal mycoflora of commodities from Thailand. 2. Beans, rice, small grains and other commodities. International Journal of Food Microbiology 23 (1): 35–53. Raper K.B., Fennell D.I. 1965. The genus Aspergillus. The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, pp. 686. Sanchis V., Vinas I., Jimenez M., Calvo M.A., Hernandez E. 1982. Mycotoxin-producing fungi isolated from bin-stored corn. Mycopathologia 80 (2): 89–93. SAS Institute Inc. 1996. SAS/C Compiler and Library User’s Guide, Fourth Edition, Release 6.00, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 433 pp. Sebunya T.K., Yourtee D.M. 1990. Aflatoxigenic Aspergillus in foods and feeds in Uganda. Journal of Food Quality 13 (2): 97–107. Suarez G., Guarro J., Calvo M.A. 1981. Toxicological study of fungi isolated from starches intended for human consumption. Mycopathologia 75 (1): 27–31. Sutic M., Mitic S., Svilar N. 1979. Aflatoxin in milk and milk products. Mljekarstvo 29 (4): 74–80. Xerophiles and other fungi 89 Sydenham E.W., Theil F.G., Marasas W.F.O., Shepard G.S., van Schalkwyk D.J., Koch K.R. 1990. Natural occurrence of some Fusarium mycotoxins in corn from low to high esophageal cancer prevalence ar- eas of the Transkei, Southern Africa. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 38(10): 1900-1903. Taligoola H.K., Ismail M.A., Chebon S.K. 2004. Mycobiota associated with rice grains marketed in Ugan- da. Journal of Biological Science 4 (1): 271–278. Taligoola H.K., Ismail M.A., Chebon S.K. 2010. Toxigenic fungi and aflatoxins associated with marketed rice grains in Uganda. Journal of Basic and Applied Mycology, Egypt 1 (1): 45–52. Tuite J.F., Christensecn M. 1955. Grain storage studies. 16: Influence of storage conditions upon the fun- gus flora of barley seed. Cereal Chemistry 32: 1–11. Wheeler K.A., Hocking A.D., Pitt J.L., Anggawati A. 1986. Fungi associated with Indonesian dried fish. Food Microbiololgy 3 (4): 351–357. Zohri A.A., Abdel-Sater M.A., Ismail M.A. 1995. Incidence of aflatoxins and mould flora in corn snacks. Journal of Food Science and Technology, India 32 (4): 289–294. 2014-01-02T12:04:10+0100 Polish Botanical Society