Remarks to the ecology of the boreo-montane polypore Amylocystis lapponica based on data from the Czech Republic and Poland Jan Holec1 and Tomáš Kučera2 1national Museum, Mycological Department, Václavské nám. 68, cZ-115 79 Praha 1, jan_holec@nm.cz 2Institute of Systems Biology and ecology, academy of Sciences of the Czech republic Na Sádkách 7, CZ-370 05 české Budějovice, kucera@usbe.cas.cz H o l e c J., K u č e r a T.: Remarks to the ecology of the boreo-montane polypore Amylocystis lapponica based on data from the Czech Republic and Poland. acta mycol. 42 (2):161-168, 2007. In the Czech republic, the rare polypore Amylocystis lapponica (romell) Singer continuously occurs in the Boubínský prales virgin forest (southern Bohemia: šumava mts) where it has been documented for more than 60 years. Similarly, in Poland it has been known only from the Puszcza Białowieska virgin forest (northeastern Poland) for more than 50 years. Generally, it is considered a species of boreal coniferous forests of northern europe (taiga) and montane coniferous forests in central and Southern europe. However, the data from the Czech republic, Slovakia and western ukraine show that it also grows in mixed montane forests composed mainly of Fagus sylvatica, Picea abies and Abies alba. In Poland, the locality is situated in a lowland forest consisting mostly of Carpinus betulus, Quercus robur and Tilia cordata. In central europe, A. lapponica occurs only in virgin forest refuges with the following habitat conditions: vegetation continuity (never cut), natural tree species composition, multi- aged structure, rich presence of dead wood in various stages of decay, relatively large area of the virgin forest surrounded by near-natural forests, stable, cold and humid meso- and microclimate. consequently, A. lapponica may be considered an indicator of long-term vegetation continuity and stable habitat conditions. Key words: fungi, Central europe, habitats, virgin forests, vegetation continuity INTroDuCTIoN Amylocystis lapponica (romell) Singer (Basidiomycetes, Polyporales, Fomitopsi- daceae) is a polypore typical of northern boreal forests (taiga) (r y v a r d e n , G i l - b e r t s o n 1993; D a h l b e r g , C r o n e b o r g 2003). In europe, the species has a boreo-montane distribution and is extremely rare outside boreal forests. This also relates to its occurrence in the Czech republic (Cr) and Poland (PL). In each of these countries, A. lapponica occurs only at one large locality, representing the best- preserved virgin (primeval) forest of the country: Boubínský prales (National Nature reserve) and its vicinity in the mt. Boubín complex (Cr) and Puszcza Białowieska acTa MYcoloGIca Vol. 42 (2): 161-168 2007 Dedicated to Professor Alina Skirgiełło on the occasion of her ninety-fifth birthday 162 J. Holec and T. Kučera virgin forest (Białowieża National Park, PL). The occurrence in the Czech republic was summarised by K o t l a b a (1984) and K o t l a b a et al. (1995), who used data from older publications by K o t l a b a and P o u z a r (1963) and P i l á t (1965), labels of her- barium collections and field notes. more recent collections from the Boubín area were published on-line by V l a s á k (2005). In Poland, the occurrence of A. lapponica was recently evaluated by P i ą t e k (2005). From the conservational viewpoint, Amylocystis lapponica is considered a criti- cally endangered species, included both in the red Book (K o t l a b a et al. 1995) and red List of fungi of the Czech republic (H o l e c , B e r a n 2006). Consequently, it is protected by law in the country (a n t o n í n , B i e b e r o v á 1995). In Poland, the species is also included in the national red List as a critically endangered species (Wo j e w o d a , Ł a w r y n o w i c z 2006) and also protected by law (Ł a w r y n o w i c z 2004; also see K a r a s i ń s k i 2007: http://grzyby.strefa.pl/chronione.html). recently, D a h l b e r g and C r o n e b o r g (2003) summarised data on habitats of Amylocystis lapponica in europe. unfortunately, the habitats present in the Boubín- ský prales and Puszcza Białowieska virgin forests are not mentioned. The aims of this paper are (1) to summarise older data and publish new data on the occurrence of Amylocystis lapponica in the Boubínský prales virgin forest, (2) to compare the habitats of A. lapponica in the Czech republic and Poland, and (3) to add data on habitat preferences of A. lapponica in these countries to the incomplete habitat characteristics published by D a h l b e r g and C r o n e b o r g (2003). maTerIaL aND meTHoDS The search for Amylocystis lapponica in the Boubínský prales virgin forest by J. Holec was not intensive and not focused only on this species. It was carried out as part of a study of mycobiota in the šumava mts in the years 1996-2006 (see e.g. H o l e c 2000; H o l e c , B e r a n 2007). Consequently, his find of A. lapponica is rather accidental. However, when combined with published and herbarium data and pro- vided with a phytosociological analysis, it can be used for an ecological synthesis. This paper is a reply to a request from the agency for nature conservation and Landscape Protection of the Czech republic for monitoring protected species of fungi. The habitat of the recent stand of Amylocystis lapponica is characterised by a phytosociological relevé. The relevé was made according to the Braun-Blanquet phytosociological approach with the cover being estimated by using the extended Braun-Blanquet scale: r (rare), + (less then 1 % cover), 1 (2-4 %), 2m (5 %), 2a (6-15 %), 2b (16-25 %), 3 (26-50 %), 4 (51-75 %), 5 (76-100 %). Nomenclature of vascular plants follows K u b á t et al. (2002). Voucher specimens are deposited in Prm (National museum, Prague, Czech republic) and BrNu (masaryk university, Brno, Czech republic). abbreviations: BPVF: Boubínský prales virgin forest, Cr: Czech republic, PL: Poland. remarks to the ecology of Amylocystis lapponica 163 reSuLTS Amylocystis lApponicA, occurrence and ecology in the czech republic Geographic position of the locality. Czech republic, southern Bohemia, former Prachatice District, Šumava Mts (=Bohemian Forest, Böhmerwald), Šumava Pro- tected Landscape area, 9 km NW of the town of Volary, mt. Boubín complex: Boubínský prales virgin forest (BPVF) and adjacent slopes of Basumský hřbet ridge and mt. červený vrch. Habitat of Boubínský prales. mixed montane forest composed of Fagus sylvatica, Picea abies and Abies alba, with admixed Acer pseudoplatanus and Ulmus glabra, phytosociologically a mosaic of herb-rich beech forests, montane sycamore beech forests, acidophilous beech forests and montane spruce forests with Calamagrostis villosa (a l b r e c h t et al. 2003), with some trees aged 400-500 years. The core area (46.67 ha) has never been cut nor managed by foresters. It represents a remnant of original natural vegetation, with a high amount of dead and fallen decaying trunks. It has been protected as a nature reserve since 1858. Forest surrounding the core area is also natural. The total area of the reserve is 677 ha, its altitude ranges from 874 to 1362 m, the core area (enclosed by a palisade) from 930 to 1100 m. Coordinates of the centre of the core area are 48° 58´ 39´́ n, 13° 48´ 41´́ e. Mycological characteristics of Boubínský prales. See K u b i č k a (1960, 1973), partial data are present in dozens of publications on taxonomy, biodiversity and ecology of fungi both in Czech and foreign literature. Records of Amylocystis lapponica in the Boubínský prales. For details see Table 1. on mt. Boubín, the species is known from several microlocalities. most of them are situated in the core area (enclosed by a palisade, see below) of the Boubínský prales National Nature reserve. The exact geographic position of older finds by J. Herink and J. Kubička is not known, but it is highly probable that they originate from the core area of BPVF which was traditionally visited by mycologists at that time. However, finds of A. lapponica are known from more microlocalities in the mt. Boubín complex. The exact loca- tion of finds by V l a s á k (2005) is not clear from data published by him but it is probable that those indicated by a question mark in Table 1 are from BPVF (core area enclosed by a palisade plus surrounding parts of the National Nature reserve). However, Vlasák mentions also two finds from mt. červený vrch which is situated in the mt. Boubín complex but approximately 3.5 km S of the summit of mt. Boubín and outside of the Boubínský prales National Nature reserve. There are also near- natural forests on slopes of mt. červený vrch which resemble those in the BPVF. The well-documented find by Holec published here (see below) is situated in the National Nature reserve but outside the core area. Good colour photographs of A. lapponica from Boubínský prales were published by P a p o u š e k (2004: no. 237). Habitat conditions of the recent find by J. Holec. Boubínský prales National Na- ture reserve, approximately 100 m WSW of the Boubínské (Kaplické) jezírko water reservoir, 10 m S of the palisade enclosing the core area close to the forest path (nature trail) around the core area, eNe slope (for details on location and substrate, see Table 1). 164 J. Holec and T. Kučera T a b le 1 Su m m ar y of r ec or ds o f A m yl oc ys tis la pp on ic a in m t. B ou bí n co m pl ex ( šu m av a m ts , C ze ch r ep ub lic ) vo uc he r sp ec im en lo ca lit y m ic ro lo ca lit y su bs tr at e pa rt al ti tu de da y m on th ye ar le g. P r m 8 07 43 0, P r m 9 30 47 0 B P V F ? ? ? ? 12 9 19 46 J. H er in k P r m 6 18 50 4 m t. B ou bí n ? P ic ea ? A bi es ? de ca ye d tr un k ? 4 7 19 54 J. K ub ič ka P r m 8 70 78 3 B P V F co re a re a (e nc lo se d by pa lis ad e) P ic ea a bi es fa lle n tr un k ? 28 9 19 67 Z . P ou za r P r m 6 84 42 0 B P V F co re a re a (e nc lo se d by pa lis ad e) P ic ea a bi es fa lle n tr un k ? 28 9 19 67 Z . P ou za r ? B P V F ? P ic ea a bi es ? ? 19 9 19 81 J. V la sá k he rb . V la sá k m t. B ou bí n m t. č er ve ný v rc h in m t. B ou bí n co m pl ex P ic ea a bi es ? 9 19 81 J. V la sá k he rb . V la sá k B P V F ? P ic ea a bi es ? 9 19 82 J. V la sá k he rb . V la sá k B P V F ? P ic ea a bi es ? 9 19 83 J. V la sá k ? (p ho to gr ap h) ? P ic ea a bi es lo g of a fa lle n de ca yi ng tr un k 10 50 9 10 19 88 J. V la sá k ab se nt B P V F co re a re a (e nc lo se d by pa lis ad e) ? ? ? 25 10 19 90 fo un d by F . K ot la ba , s ee n in th e fie ld b y J. H ol ec he rb . V la sá k m t. B ou bí n m t. č er ve ný v rc h in m t. B ou bí n co m pl ex co ni fe r 10 19 94 J. V la sá k he rb . V la sá k B P V F ? P ic ea a bi es 9 20 01 J. V la sá k B r N u : D vo řá k 17 0/ 03 B P V F co re a re a (e nc lo se d by p al is ad e) ; n 4 8° 58 ´2 8. 2´́ e 1 3° 49 ´0 0. 6´́ P ic ea a bi es fa lle n tr un k, w it ho ut b ar k bu t w it h ra th er h ar d w oo d ? 27 9 20 03 D . D vo řá k P r m 8 98 86 7 (J H 2 35 /2 00 4) B P V F S of c or e ar ea , cl os e to p al is ad e; n 4 8° 58 ´2 2. 44 ´́ e 1 3° 49 ´0 3. 44 ´́ P ic ea a bi es fa lle n de ca yi ng tr un k (d ia m et er 4 0 cm ), fe lle d at ba se , w it ho ut ba rk , w it h so ft w oo d 95 0 9 10 20 04 J. H ol ec remarks to the ecology of Amylocystis lapponica 165 Phytosociological relevé (made by T. Kučera 13 June 2007): Total area 400 m2 (20 x 20 m), alt. 950 m, eNe slope, inclination 15 °. Tree layer (e3) – total cover 50 %: Picea abies 3+. Shrub layer (e2) – total cover 10 %: Fagus sylvatica 1+, Sorbus aucuparia +, Picea abies 1. Herb layer (e1) – total cover 15 %: Vaccinium myrtillus 1+, Prenanthes purpurea 1, Dryopteris dilatata 1, Oxalis acetosella +, Luzula luzuloides +, Carex pilulifera +, Polygonatum verticillatum +, Athyrium filix-femina +, Rubus idaeus +, Senecio ovatus +, Lycopodium annoti- num +, Gymnocarpium dryopteris r, Abies alba juv. r. Moss layer (e0) – total cover 5 %: Polytrichum commune 1, Dicranum scoparium +, D. undulatum +. Species outside the relevé: Actaea spicata, Cardamine impatiens, Carex sylvatica, Chaerophyllum hirsutum, Circaea alpina, Dentaria enneaphyllos, Galeobdolon mon- tanum, Galium odoratum, Impatiens noli-tangere, Myosotis nemorosa, Petasites albus, Stellaria nemorosa. The plant community belongs to the association Dentario enneaphylli-Fagetum oberdorfer ex W. et a. matuszkiewicz 1960, the neighbouring stands to the subas- sociation impatientetosum (H a r t m a n n , J a h n 1967) M o r a v e c 1974. It falls under N a t u r a 2000 habitat 9130, Asperulo-Fagetum beech forests (C h y t r ý et al. 2001). This is a potential natural vegetation type, which would be present if the site were free of human influence. In fact, the site is a high-grown (approximately 100 years old) man-influenced forest with dominance of Picea abies and admixed Fagus syl- vatica. It is not a virgin forest (trees are of the same age, dominance of Picea instead of Fagus, low amount of dead wood). However, natural forest almost untouched by man (virgin forest) is situated at 10 m distance (behind the palisade enclosing the core area of the Nature reserve). DIScuSSIon Occurrence in the Czech Republic. To the present date, Boubínský prales virgin forest is the only locality of Amylocystis lapponica in the Czech republic. The spe- cies has not been found in other virgin forests of the country (e.g. Žofínský prales in south-eastern Bohemia, mionší, Salajka and razula in north-eastern moravia) in spite of a long and intensive study of polypores in the Czech republic (e.g., P i l á t 1936-1942; K o t l a b a 1984; K o t l a b a , P o u z a r , Va m p o l a in H o l e c , B e r a n 2006). The data document continuous occurrence of Amylocystis lapponica on Mt. Boubín for more than 60 years. The vitality of the local population is illustrated by the fact that the species is known from several microlocalities. The following habitat conditions (which are unique in the Central european landscape) seem to be deci- sive: vegetation continuity (never cut), natural tree species composition, multi-aged structure, rich presence of dead wood in various stages of decay, relatively large area of the virgin forest surrounded by near-natural forest (the importance of larger reserves for maintaining sensitive species was stressed by S i i t o n e n et al. 2005), and a stable, cold and humid meso- and microclimate. as it was illustrated in another paper (H o l e c , B e r a n 2007), these ”virgin forest conditions” of BPVF enable the occurrence of other fungi preferring natural forests (e.g., Phellinus pouzarii Kotlaba, Phellinus ferrugineofuscus (P. Karst.) Bourdot et Galzin, Pseudoplectania melaena (Fr.) Sacc., Baeospora myriadophylla (Peck) Singer, Rigidoporus crocatus (Pat.) ry- 166 J. Holec and T. Kučera varden, Multiclavula mucida (Pers.) r.H. Petersen; see H o l e c 2003, H o l e c , B e - r a n 2006). Some rare species occurring in BPVF have a boreo-montane distribution (e.g., Laurilia sulcata (Burt) Pouzar, Phellinus ferrugineofuscus (P. Karst.) Bourdot et Galzin, Perenniporia subacida (Peck) Donk). all these data show the uniqueness of the habitat conditions of BPVF, which is the best-preserved montane virgin forest of the Czech republic. Occurrence in Poland. In Poland, Amylocystis lapponica is known only from the Puszcza Białowieska virgin forest in north-eastern Poland (P i ą t e k 2005) where it is rather common. although P i ą t e k (2005) wrote that the last find was made in 1973, photographs of A. lapponica were taken in 2005 and 2006 (K a r a s i ń s k i 2007, S n o w a r s k i 2007), which document its continuous occurrence since its first find in 1956 (D o m a ń s k i 1959). Similarly like in Boubínský prales virgin forest in the Czech republic, Puszcza Białowieska in Poland is an important remnant of natural vegetation which is unique not only from the Polish but also the european point of view. Comparison of Czech and Polish habitats. The following habitats of Amylocystis lapponica in the Puszcza Białowieska virgin forest are given by P i ą t e k (2005): Vac- cinio uliginosi-Pinetum Kleist 1929, Tilio cordatae-Carpinetum betuli Tracz. 1962, and the grouping association Querco-Carpinetum medioeuropaeum Tüxen 1936. In all cases, the species was found on fallen trunks or branches of Picea abies. Puszcza Białowieska virgin forest is a lowland forest (mean altitude 170 m), where spruce grows in wet depressions, the microclimatological conditions are colder than in the surrounding. In the Czech republic, the locality is surrounded by the natural montane spruce- fir beech forests of the very large coniferous complex of the šumava mts (mon- tane spruce forests in upper, and spruce cultural forests in lower position, dozens of square kilometres). In contrast, the Polish locality is situated in a lowland deciduous forest complex with a higher proportion of pine and spruce forests in wet depres- sions near the bog. Therefore both localities are especially similar in their historical management (minimal influence by man) rather than habitat. Remarks to habitats and occurrence in Europe. D a h l b e r g and C r o n e b o r g (2003) compiled the following data on habitats of Amylocystis lapponica in europe: western taiga (Natura 2000 priority habitat 9010) and Fennoscandian herb-rich forests with Picea abies (9050) in nordic countries and estonia, acidophilous Picea forest of the montane to the alpine levels (9410) in Slovenia and alpine Larix decidua and/or Pinus cembra forests (9420) in Italy. It is clear that habitats known from the Czech republic and Poland are not included. These differ e.g. by a high percent- age of broad-leaved trees (esp. Fagus sylvatica, Carpinus betulus, Quercus robur, and Tilia cordata) forming the habitats Asperulo-Fagetum beech forests (9130, Boubínský prales) and Galio-Carpinetum oak hornbeam forests (9170, Puszcza Białowieska), respectively. The number of localities in various european countries is very different. While hundreds of localities in Sweden and Finland and dozens in Norway (D a h l b e r g , C r o n e b o r g 2003) are known, in countries of Central and Southern europe the species is extremely rare and mostly occupies only one locality per country. It clearly shows that localities in central and Southern europe represent refuges of A. lap- remarks to the ecology of Amylocystis lapponica 167 ponica outside the zone of boreal forests of northern europe. These refuges are formed by azonal soil or topoclimatic conditions in the temperate forest zone. In northern europe, Amylocystis lapponica is considered as a good indicator of old-growth and species-rich spruce forests which are in special need of conservation (Norway: B r e d e s e n et al. 1997; r ø s o k 1998; Finland: S i i t o n e n et al. 2005). However, J o n s s o n and J o n s e l l (1999) showed in Swedish spruce forests that if indicator species are to be used for evaluation of their biodiversity, these should be chosen from several groups of organisms (e.g. vascular plants, bryophytes, epiphytic lichens and wood-inhabiting fungi). This is certainly true but at least in Central eu- rope, A. lapponica indicates high continuity of forest vegetation which has never been cut. Supporting data from the Czech republic and Poland are summarised here. Data from Slovakia (K o t l a b a , P o u z a r 1963; P i l á t 1965; K o t l a b a 1984; Va r j ú 1994; š k u b l a 2003) and eastern Carpathians in western ukraine (P i l á t 1936-1942, 1940; for current names of his localities, see H o l e c 2002) are almost identical. Amylocystis lapponica occurs there exclusively in virgin forests (central Slovakia: Dobročský prales, voucher specimens in Prm and herb. Vlasák; eastern Carpathians: altogether 19 collections from several localities, voucher specimens in Prm). These forests are composed mainly of Fagus sylvatica, Abies alba and Picea abies and have the same „virgin forest character“ as was specified in the first chapter of the Discussion. Acknowledgements. We thank Daniel Dvořák (masaryk university, Brno, Czech republic) for providing data on his collection of A. lapponica. Jan Holec was financially supported by the ministry of Culture of the Czech republic (mK00002327201), Tomáš Kučera by institutional research plan aV0Z60870520. reFereNCeS a n t o n í n V., B i e b e r o v á Z. 1995. Chráněné houby čr (Fungi protected by law in the Czech repub- lic). ministerstvo životního prostředí čr, Praha. B r e d e s e n B., H a u g a n r., a a n d e r a a r., L i n d b l a d I., Ø k l a n d B., r ø s o k Ø. 1997. Wood- inhabiting fungi as indicators on ecological continuity within spruce forests of southeastern Norway. Blyttia 54: 131–140. Da h l b e r g a., C r o n e b o r g H. (eds). 2003. 33 threatened fungi in europe. Complementary and re-33 threatened fungi in europe. complementary and re- vised information on candidates for listing in appendix I of the Bern Convention. Swedish Species Information centre, uppsala. D o m a ń s k i S. 1959. Dwa rzadkie gatunki grzybów: Leptoporus lapponicus (rom.) Pil. i Phaeolus albolu- teus (ell. et ev.) Pil. w Puszczy Białowieskiej (Deux rares porés: Leptoporus lapponicus (rom.) Pil. et Phaeolus alboluteus (ell. et ev.) Pil. dans la forêt vierge de Białowieża en Pologne). monogr. Bot. 8: 171–181. H o l e c J. 2000. mykoflóra šumavy - základní literární prameny a shrnutí biodiverzity makromycetů v nejvýznamnějších biotopech (mycoflora of the Bohemian Forest - basic literature and biodiversity of macrofungi in the main habitats). Silva Gabreta 5: 6–82. H o l e c J. 2002. Fungi of the eastern Carpathians (ukraine) – important works by albert Pilát, and loca- J. 2002. Fungi of the eastern Carpathians (ukraine) – important works by albert Pilát, and loca- tions of his collecting sites. mycotaxon 83: 1–17. H o l e c J. 2003. auf natürliche, vom menschen nur minimal beeinflusste Vegetation beschränkte Groß- pilze. Fritschiana 42: 25–27. H o l e c J., B e r a n m. (eds). 2006. červený seznam hub (makromycetů) české republiky (red list of fungi (macromycetes) of the Czech republic). Příroda 24: 1–282. H o l e c J., B e r a n m. 2007. Distribution, ecology and fructification of a rare ascomycete, Pseudorhizina sphaerospora, in the Czech republic and its habitats in europe. Czech mycol. 59 (1): 51–66. C h y t r ý m., K u č e r a T., K o č í m. (eds). 2001: Katalog biotopů české republiky (Habitat catalogue of the Czech republic). agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny čr, Praha. 168 J. Holec and T. Kučera K a r a s i ń s k i D. 2007. Grzyby polskie. ostatnia aktualizacja 27.03.2007. http://grzyby.strefa.pl/ (accessed 20 June 2007). K o t l a b a F. 1984. Zeměpisné rozšíření a ekologie chorošů (Polyporales s. l.) v československu (Geo- graphical distribution and ecology of polypores (Polyporales s. l.) in czechoslovakia). academia, Praha. K o t l a b a F. et al. 1995. červená kniha ohrozených a vzácnych druhov rastlín a živočíchov Sr a čr. 4. Sinice a riasy. Huby. Lišajníky. machorasty (red book of threatened and rare species of the Slovak and Czech republics). Príroda, Bratislava. K o t l a b a F., P o u z a r Z. 1963. Tři význačné choroše slovenských Karpat (Three noteworthy polypores of the Slovak Carpathians). čes. mykol. 17: 174–185. K u b á t K., H r o u d a L., C h r t e k J. jun., K a p l a n Z., K i r s c h n e r J., š t ě p á n e k J. (eds). 2002. Klíč ke květeně české republiky (Key to the flora of the Czech republic). academia, Praha. Ł a w r y n o w i c z m. 2004. ochrona gatunkowa grzybów (Protection of fungi in Poland). Chrońmy Przyr. ojcz. 60 (5): 51–61. P a p o u š e k T. (ed.). 2004. Velký fotoatlas hub z jižních čech (Large atlas of mushroom photographs from southern Bohemia). české Budějovice. P i ą t e k m. 2005. Amylocystis lapponica (romell) Singer. (In:) W. W o j e w o d a (ed.). atlas of the geo- graphical distribution of fungi in Poland 3: 5-8. W. Szafer Institute of Botany of the Polish academy of Sciences, Kraków: 5–8. P i l á t a. 1936-1942. Polyporaceae I., II. (In:) K. K a v i n a , a. P i l á t (eds). atlas des champignons de l’europe. 3. Praha. P i l á t a. 1940. Hymenomycetes Carpatorum orientalium. Sborn. Nár. mus. v Praze, Řada B, Přír. Vědy. acta musei Nationalis Pragae, Ser. B. 2 (3): 37–80. P i l á t a. 1965. Modralka laponská – Amylocystis lapponica (romell) Bond. et Sing. čes. mykol. 19: 9-10, tab. 56. r ø s o k Ø. 1998. Amylocystis lapponica in norway, an indicator species for species-rich continuity forests. Blyttia 56: 154-165. r y v a r d e n L., G i l b e r t s o n r. L. 1993. european Polypores. Part 1. Fungiflora, oslo. S i i t o n e n P., L e h t i n e n a., S i i t o n e n m. 2005. effects of forest edges on the distribution, abun-effects of forest edges on the distribution, abun- dance, and regional persistence of wood-rotting fungi. Conserv. Biol. 19 (1): 250–260. S n o w a r s k i m. 2007. atlas grzybów Polski. Fungi of Poland. Wersja 2007.05.27w. http://www.grzyby.pl/ (accessed 18 June 2007). š k u b l a P. 2003. mycoflora Slovaca. mycelium, šaľa. Va r j ú L. 1994. Zoznam trúdnikotvarých húb nájdených v Dobročskom pralese 9.-10. októbra 1993. Spravodajca slovenských mykológov 2 (3): 25. V l a s á k J. 2005. Polypores. Collection of Dr. Josef Vlasák, Hluboká nad Vltavou, Czech republic. edi- tion XI.05. http://botanika.bf.jcu.cz/mykologie/polypores/ (accessed 15 June 2007). W o j e w o d a W., Ł a w r y n o w i c z m. 2006. red list of the macrofungi in Poland. (In:) Z. m i r e k , K. Z a r z y c k i , W. W o j e w o d a , Z. S z e l ą g (eds). red list of plants and fungi in Poland. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish academy of Sciences, Kraków: 53–70. 2014-01-01T11:45:56+0100 Polish Botanical Society