Agaricus chionodermus Pilát, a species new to Bulgaria 199This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, provided that the article is properly cited. © The Author(s) 2014 Published by Polish Botanical Society Acta Mycologica Introduction The genus Agaricus comprises a diverse, cosmopolitan saprotrophic agarics occurring in a variety of ecosystems. Most of them, however, are confined to grasslands [1–4]. There are ca. 200 described Agaricus species worldwide and approximately 60 of them occurring in Europe [4–8]. There have been reported 54 species of the genus from Bulgaria so far [9–17]. Five of the agarics are included in the “Red list of fungi in Bulgaria” [18]. In the course of studies of the diversity of genus Agaricus in Bulgaria, A. chionodermus was found by the author for the first time. It is presumably a rare species for many countries of Europe and yet not well known. Therefore in this paper a detailed description and illustra- tions are presented including features that distinguish A. chionodermus from similar species. ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER Acta Mycol 49(2):199–205 DOI: 10.5586/am.2014.019 Received: 2014-02-21 Accepted: 2014-10-16 Published electronically: 2014-12-11 Agaricus chionodermus Pilát, a species new to Bulgaria Maria Lacheva* Department of Botany and Agrometeorology, Agricultural University-Plovdiv 12, Mendeleev, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria Abstract The article presents the first record of Agaricus chionoderma Pilát in Bulgaria. Basidi- omata of the species were found on June 2004, September 2010, and September 2011 in the Thracian Lowland floristic region. The article brings closer taxonomic profile, ecological requirements and distribution pattern of the species. Differences from similar species are discussed. It also describes macroscopic and microscopic characteristics of the discovered specimens and presents the specification of habitat the fungus concerned. The species are described and illustrated by photographs of macroscopic and microscopic features on the basis of Bulgarian specimens. Keywords: Agaricomycetes; Agaricus sect. Arvenses; Bulgarian mycobiota; fungal diversity; taxonomy * Email: agaricus@abv.bg Handling Editor: Maria Rudawska http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/am.2014.019 mailto:agaricus%40abv.bg?subject=am.2014.019 200© The Author(s) 2014 Published by Polish Botanical Society Acta Mycol 49(2):199–205 Lacheva / Agaricus chionodermus Pilát a species new to Bulgaria This work adds a new species to the Bulgarian agarics, namely A. chionodermus Pilát, one of the about seventy “European” species which, according to Cappelli [4], belong to Agaricus sect. Arvenses. Material and methods Air-dried studied specimens of the fungus are kept in the mycological collection of the Agricultural University-Plovdiv (SOA). Basidiomata of species were photographed with SONY Cyber-shot. Description of morphological characters of basidiomata is based on fresh and dried specimens. Micromorphological features were observed and measured in fresh and dry fragments of tissues dehydrated in water, under an Amplival ML light microscope, with magnification ×1000. Microphotographs were taken on Amplival ML. Drawings were made with the aid of a drawing tube under an oil-immersion objective. Spores were examined in Melzer’s reagent and were taken from the spore print for measurements. Calculated values are based on 50 measurements. The obtained data for length and width of microstructures were examined by standard statistic methods [19,20] and are presented in the text in the following way: (min–) mean ±1σ (–max), n = 50, (l/wmin–max); of the basidia and cheilocystidia: min–max. Schäeffer reaction was tested by aniline and 65% HNO3 acid on dried samples [21]. The abbreviations of the author names of fungal species are given according to Kirk and Ansell [22]. Nomenclature of species follows Kirk et al. [8]. The taxonomic and nomenclature decisions in the article have been made in conformity with the most ap- propriate taxonomic monographs of the Agaricus genera [4,23,24]. The chorological map of the occurrence of the A. chionodermus in the country, have been depicted using the program software dSOA [25]. Results and disscusion Agaricus chionodermus Pilát has never been previously found in Bulgaria [12,26]. The occurrence of first A. chionodermus basidiomata was discovered on 7th June 2004 in Thracian Lowland, Plovdiv distr., above Stryama village (Fig. 1). The area where the fungus occurred is situated along the watercourse of Stryama River and is surrounded by farmland, as well as meadows and pastures. The dominant species of the tree layer at the plant community where basidiomata of A. chionodermus has been found were: Acer campestre, Fraxinus angustifolia, Populus canescens and Tilia cordata. The shrub layer includes mainly: Populus tremula, Salix caprea, Corylus avellana and Sambucus nigra. The herb layer was dominated by cereal grasses, e.g. Carex caryophyllea, Poa pratensis, etc. In the course of the field trial only three specimens of A. chionodermus were found. The basidiomata of the agarics were revealed in grassy vegetation, close to P. canescens (Ait.) Sm. The next finding of basidiomata A. chionodermus was done in the same place in September 2010 and September 2011. The location of the species has been carefully marked and will be monitored in the future. 201© The Author(s) 2014 Published by Polish Botanical Society Acta Mycol 49(2):199–205 Lacheva / Agaricus chionodermus Pilát a species new to Bulgaria Species description Agaricus chionodermus Pilát (Fig. 2, Fig. 3), Acta Mus. Nat. Prag., VII B, 1: 134, 1951. Icones: Pilat (1951: Fig. 60; Tab. 3, Tab. 14–16), Pilat (1953: Fig. 22), Cappelli (1984: Тab. 48). MACROSCOPIC AND MICROSCOPIC FEATURES. Pileus up to 7.5–12(–15) cm in diameter, thick-fleshed, initially hemispherical, subsequently convex to plano-convex, seldom flat or slightly depressed, silky finely fibrillose, sometimes cracked dry in the cen- ter, snow-white, white, sometimes greyish white in the center, slightly yellowish towards the margin. Margin undulate, initially involute, thin, with whitish silky fibrillose scales, 5–7 mm thick, finally with remnants of the partial veil. Pileipellis consisting of whitish thick-walled cylindrical hyphae, with clamps, 5–10 μm in diameter. Gills free, thin, crowded, narrowing toward the margin of pileus, long, with an even edge, whitish-pink, subsequently light pink, gray-pink to dark-brown, with light, sterile edge. Hymenophoral trama in young basidiomata initially regular, latter irregular, consisting of cylindrical, thin-walled hyphae, 5–12 μm in diam. Stipe up to 8–15 × 1.5–3 cm, central, cylindrical, with or without slightly bulbous base, initially white, subsequently ± white, smooth to silky-fibrillose, yellowish at touch. Flesh whitish, on cutting becoming lemon-yellow in the base of the stipe. Ring wide apical, fleecy, free standing, whitish, with touch upper layer yellowish tinge and thick, delicate, sericeous, bottom layer. Context in pileus and stipe fragile, whitish. Smell non-distinctive, very faint, non of almonds. Taste non-distinctive. Spores 7.5–(4.2 ±0.02)–10 × 4.5–(4.1 ±0.02)–6 μm, (n = 50), ellipsoid to ovoid, brown, not ornamented, with fluorescent spots, with an apical germ pore. Spore print dark brown. Basidia 20–28 × 8.5–10.5 μm, clavate, hyaline, 4-sterigmate. Sterigmata 2–3 μm long. Cheilocystidia 17–30 × 6.5–10.5 μm, crowded, clavate to cylindrical, lageniform, thin- walled, hyaline. Macrochemical reactions: cross reaction with Schaeffer’s reagent: positive. Fig. 1 Distribution of Agaricus chionodermus in Bulgaria. 202© The Author(s) 2014 Published by Polish Botanical Society Acta Mycol 49(2):199–205 Lacheva / Agaricus chionodermus Pilát a species new to Bulgaria SPECIMENS EXAMINED. Bulgaria, Thracian Lowland, Plovdiv distr., above Stryama village, right slope, alt. 240 m a.s.l., on mown meadow close to Populus canescens (Ait.) Sm. and Salix caprea L., along the watercourse of Stryama River, near by the bridge to the river, on basic soil, 7 June 2004, coll. & det. M. Lacheva (SOA 60 00292); ibid., on sandy soil, 30 September 2010 (SOA 60 00293), 14 September 2011, coll. & det. M. Lacheva (SOA 60 00367). TAXONOMICAL REMARKS. Nearly identical basidiomata produces A. arvensis Schäeffer known to be common in Europe, which can be separated with certainty from A. chionodermus by the cap being generally snow-white, wide sericeous ring and the slightly larger spores [1,4,23], but mainly on the base of microscopic characters. As emphasized by Cappelli [4], A. chionodermus in contrast to, A. arvensis has round and conspicuous cheilocystidia. Moreover, there is an ecological difference between the two species, i.e. A. chionodermus grows on periphery of deciduous and coniferous forest, or forest meadows, on calcareous and sandy soils, while A. arvensis occurs on humus rich soil, mainly among grasses. Agaricus nivescens (F.H. Møller) F.H. Møller also resembles A. chionodermus, from which it mainly differs by habitat (terrestrial fungus occurs mainly in grasslands on calcareous soil), almonds and fungoid smell, indeterminate taste, and smaller size of spores and basidiomata [4,27]. Metric and macroscopic data of Bulgarian specimens of A. chionodermus agree with the descriptions of [4] and [23]. According to this investigation, A. chionodermus should be considered as a species developing in grassy vegetation on forest meadows at lower elevation, close to poplar, possibly also under other broadleaved tree species. The observations are in accordance with the literature data that A. chionodermus should be considered as species developing mostly on basic to neutral or sandy soil [4]. HABITAT, ECOLOGY, PHENOLOGY, EDIBILITY STATUS. Basidiomata of A. chi- onodermus almost exclusively appears in summer to early fall season (May–October), solitary, in periphery of deciduous forest or forest meadows and grassy vegetation, 200–700 m alt. Humus saprotroph, mostly on basic to neutral or sandy soil. There are some information that this species is edible without gastrointestinal problems [4,28]. There Fig. 2 Basidiomata of Agaricus chionodermus at different stages of development in situ from Bulgaria (photos: M. Lacheva). 203© The Author(s) 2014 Published by Polish Botanical Society Acta Mycol 49(2):199–205 Lacheva / Agaricus chionodermus Pilát a species new to Bulgaria is so far no indication in Bulgaria that its edibility is known and presently the fungus is unlikely to be collected for food, beside if not be confused with other similar species. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION. Agaricus chionodermus has a relatively wide distribu- tion. The species has been recorded in many European countries, but in some regions it is regarded as rare. In Europe, A. chionodermus is reported from Czech Republic [23,29], France [27,30], Italy [4,31], Spain [32,33] and Ukraine [1]. In Asia the species has been recorded in Turkey [34–36]. Conclusion Agaricus chionodermus should be especially sought after in plains and lowlands regions of the country, but its presence in other parts of Bulgaria cannot be excluded. Basidiomata of this fungus might have been misidentified because of its resemblance to other similar Agaricus species from section Arvenses, especially if a spore print was not available. This new finding contributes to the diversity of Bulgarian mycobiota, by adding new Agaricus records and might be useful for creating a database of the Bulgarian sabulicolous Agaricus species. Fig. 3 Microscopic features of Agaricus chionodermus from Bulgaria: basidiospores (a), basidia (b), cheilocystidia (c), generative hyphae of the pileipellis with terminal elements (d). Photos and drawings: M. Lacheva. Scale bars: 2.5 µm (a), 5 μm (b–d). Acknowledgments The author expresses gratitude to Assoc. Prof. Melania Gyosheva (Department of Plant and Fungal Diversity and Resources, Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bul- garia) for critically reading the manuscript. The author thanks two anonymous reviewers for useful comments. References 1. Wasser SP. Flora Fungorum RSS Ucrainicae. Kiev: Naukova Dumka; 1980. 2. Wasser SP. A contribution to the taxonomy and species diversity ofthe Agariceae tribe (Higher Basidio- mycetes) of Israel mycobiota. Flora Mediterr. 2000;10:191–221. 3. Wasser SP. Biodiversity of Cyanoprocaryotes, Algae and Fungi of Israel. Family Agaricaceae (Fr.) Cohn. (Basidiomycetes) of Israel Mycobiota. I. Tribe Agariceae Pat. A.R.A. Ruggell: Gantner Verlag; 2002. 204© The Author(s) 2014 Published by Polish Botanical Society Acta Mycol 49(2):199–205 Lacheva / Agaricus chionodermus Pilát a species new to Bulgaria 4. Cappelli A. Agaricus L.: Fr. ss. Karsten (Psalliota Fr.). Saronno: Libreria editrice Biella Giovanna; 1984. (Fungi Europaei). 5. Bas C. A short introduction to the ecology, taxonomy and nomenclature of the genus Agaricus. In: van Griensven LJLD, editor. Genetics and breeding of Agaricus. Proceedings of the first international seminar on mushroom science. Wageningen: Pudoc; 1991. p. 21–24. 6. Calvo-Bado L, Noble R, Challen M, Dobrovin-Pennington A, Elliott T. Sexuality and genetic identity in the Agaricus section Arvenses. Appl Env Microbiol. 2000;66(2):728–734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ AEM.66.2.728-734.2000 7. Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA, editors. Dictionary of the fungi. 9th ed. Oxon: CABI; 2001. 8. Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA, editors. Dictionary of the fungi. 10th ed. Oxon: CABI; 2008. 9. Stoichev GT, Lacheva MN. New taxa and chorological data for Agaricaceae in Bulgaria. Sci Works High Inst Agric Plovdiv. 2002;47(1):247–252. 10. Lacheva MN, Stoichev GT. New species of the genus Agaricus (Agaricaceae) for Bulgaria. Mycol Balc. 2004;1(1):35–40. 11. Lacheva MN. New species from genus Agaricus L.: Fr., Agaricaceae (section Minores) for Bulgaria. Annu L’Université Sofia “St Kliment Ohridski” 10eme Sess Sci. 2004;96(4):131–135. 12. Lacheva MN. Genus Agaricus L.: Fr. emend. P. Karst. (mushroom) in Bulgaria – taxonomy, ecology, chorology and economical importance [PhD thesis]. Plovdiv: Agricultural University; 2006. 13. Lacheva M. New records of Agaricus (Agaricaceae) for Bulgaria. Mycol Balc. 2008;5(3):123–128. 14. Lacheva M. Genus Agaricus (Agaricales) in Thracian Lowland. In: Third national scientific conference for students, PhD and young researchers. Plovdiv: 2009. p. 49–53. 15. Lacheva M. Rare and threatened taxa of Agaricus in Bulgaria. In: Ivanova E, editor. Jubilee national scien- tific conference with international participation “The man and the universe”. Smolyan: 2011. p. 625–632. 16. Lacheva M. New data of some rare larger fungi of Agaricaceae (Agaricales) in Bulgaria. Sci Technol. 2012;2(6):24–29. 17. Lacheva M. Two sabulicolous species of the genus Agaricus (Agaricomycetes) new to Bulgaria and Balkan Peninsula. Comptes Rendus Acad Bulg Sci. 2013;66(5):691–697. 18. Gyosheva MM, Denchev CM, Dimitrova EG, Assyov B, Petrova RD, Stoichev GT. Red list of fungi in Bulgaria. Mycol Balc. 3(1):81–87. 19. Zaitsev G. Mathematical statistics in eksperimentalnoy botany. Moscow: Nauka; 1984. 20. Lackey GF. Biometrics. ??: ??; 1990. 21. Schäeffer J, Møller FH. Beitrag zur Psalliota Forschung. Ann Mycol. 1938;36:64–82. 22. Kirk PM, Ansell AE. Authors of fungal names. Wallingfort: CABI; 2004. 23. Pilát A. The Bohemian species of the genus Agaricus. Acta Mus Nat Prag. 1951;7B(1):1–142. 24. Parra LA. Nomenclatural study of the genus Agaricus L. (Agaricales, Basidiomycotina) of the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands. Cuad Trab Flora Micolόgica Ibérica. 2005;21:1–101. 25. Stoyanov K. Documentation system in Herbarium of Agricultural University of Plovdiv, Bulgaria. J Balk Ecol. 2003;6(1):28–34. 26. Denchev CM, Assyov B. Checklist of the larger basidiomycetes in Bulgaria. Mycotaxon. 2010;111(1):279– 282. http://dx.doi.org/10.5248/111.279 27. Gerault A. Florule evolutive des Basidiomycotina du Finistere. Homobasidiomycetes. Agaricales. Version 2.1; 2005. 28. Gminder A. Ständerpilze: Blätterpilze III. In: Krieglsteiner GJ, Gminder A, editors. Die Großpilze Baden- Württembergs. Stuttgart: Eugen Ulmer KG; 2010. p. 671. 29. Pilát A. Hymenomycetes novi vel minus cogniti cechoslovakiae: 2. Acta Mus Nat Prag. 1953;9B(2):1–140. 30. Heinemann P. Essai d’une clé de determination des genres Agaricus et Micropsalliota. Sydowia. 1977;30(1–6):6–34. 31. Cappelli A. Il genere Agaricus L. ex Fr. s. Karsten. Sezione “Rubescentes” dei bischi. Boll Grup Micol G Bresadola Trento. 1983;26(1–2):4–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.2.728-734.2000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.2.728-734.2000 http://dx.doi.org/10.5248/111.279 205© The Author(s) 2014 Published by Polish Botanical Society Acta Mycol 49(2):199–205 Lacheva / Agaricus chionodermus Pilát a species new to Bulgaria 32. Fernández JMR. Guía micológica: Tomo 3: Género Agáricus en España. Bilbao: JMR Fernández; 1997. 33. Moreno A, Remondo J. Flora micolόgica de la Rioja. Zubía. 1999;17:11–43. 34. Solak MH, Kalmıs E, Isıloğlu M. New records for the fungi flora of Turkey. Bio-Sci Res Bull. 2001;17:99–103. 35. Solak MH, Isıloğlu M, Kalmıs E, Allı H. Macrofungi of Turkey. Checklist. Bornova: Universiteliler Ofset; 2007. (vol 1). 36. Sesli E, Denchev CM. Checklists of the myxomycetes, larger ascomycetes, and larger basidiomycetes in Turkey. Mycotaxon. 2008;106:65–68. Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results and disscusion Species description Conclusion References 2014-12-31T17:26:38+0000 Polish Botanical Society