Wentiomyces sp. from plant litter on poor fen in northeastern Poland 237This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, provided that the article is properly cited. © The Author(s) 2014 Published by Polish Botanical Society Acta Mycologica Introduction The results of the extensive literature survey published by Thormann and Rice [1] have shown that more than 600 species of fungi were already recorded from various types of peatland habitats. Peatlands are one of the major carbon-sequestrating ecosystems (e.g. [2]), and the apparent negative influence of various anthropogenic disturbances, e.g. global warming and water-level drawdown on decomposition processes, has stimulated research on many interconnected ecological aspects, including interactions with microbial decomposers, and especially fungi (e.g. [3]). ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER Acta Mycol 49(2):237–247 DOI: 10.5586/am.2014.021 Received: 2014-04-15 Accepted: 2014-10-14 Published electronically: 2014-12-01 Wentiomyces sp. from plant litter on poor fen in northeastern Poland Mateusz Wilk1,2*, Julia Pawłowska3, Marta Wrzosek3 1 Department of Plant Ecology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland 2 College of Inter-faculty Individual Studies in Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Warsaw, Żwirki i Wigury 93, 00-089 Warsaw, Poland 3 Department of Plant Systematics and Geography, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland Abstract During research carried on peatlands in northeastern Poland, small leaf-litter asco- mycete identified as Wentiomyces sp. was found on decaying litter of Sphagnum sp. and Vaccinium oxycoccos. The taxonomy of this genus remains obscure, and there are still few and incidental published records in the mycological literature. This taxon is there- fore described in the present paper in more detail and a short overview on the current knowledge regarding ecology and systematics of Wentiomyces spp. is provided. Keywords: leaf-litter ascomycetes; peatlands; Pseudoperisporiaceae; Sphagnum; Vaccinium oxycoccos; Oxycoccus palustris * Corresponding author. Email: mwilk@student.uw.edu.pl Handling Editor: Maria Rudawska http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/am.2014.021 mailto:mwilk%40student.uw.edu.pl?subject=am.2014.016 238© The Author(s) 2014 Published by Polish Botanical Society Acta Mycol 49(2):237–247 Wilk et al. / Wentiomyces sp. from plant litter Fungi are described to be the most important group of decomposers in these ecosys- tems [4,5], and growing interest regarding different aspects of fungal diversity and role on peatlands can be observed (e.g. [6,7]). However, still surprisingly few of those studies concern the diversity and potential role of the leaf-litter microfungal communities (e.g. [8]). Our knowledge and understanding of the factors involved in the decomposition processes on peatlands and the possible interactions of these with climate change and anthropogenic disturbances are therefore incomplete without more research on peatland mycobiota. During our research on leaf-litter microfungi from peatlands, interesting specimens were found, which were identified as Wentiomyces sp. The concept of this genus is still little understood, therefore the aim of this paper was to provide some details concerning our findings and review the current knowledge regarding the taxonomy and biology of the genus Wentiomyces. Material and methods Findings described in this paper originate from a research project carried in 2010–2014 on peatlands in the Szeroki Bór mire complex, near town of Pisz, the Warmińsko- Mazurskie Voivodeship, northeastern Poland. The study site, where the presented fungal specimens were found, was located on open poor fen, being in fact a small lake completely overgrown by dense cover of Sphagnum spp. with Carex limosa L., Eriophorum vagina- tum L., Vaccinium oxycoccos L. and Drosera rotundifolia L.; dead pine trees occur on the banks. The material collected in October 2010 for preliminary screening, comprised of mixed litter of moribund and healthy Sphagnum spp. fragments with addition of dead leaves and stems of Vaccinium oxycoccos. The method of incubation of plant litter samples in damp chambers was employed for the study [9]. Material was observed under dissecting microscope SMZ800, and semi- permanent prep-slides were made in lactophenol-blue or glycerin, and observed under Nikon Eclipse E200 light microscope. All prep-slides and photographs are housed in the mycological laboratory of the Department of Plant Systematics and Geography, Faculty of Biology, The University of Warsaw. Taxonomic system and nomenclature for fungi follow MycoBank [10], and for plants follow Integrated Taxonomic Information System [11] except for the table, where they are given as in original publications. Descriptions of specimens Wentiomyces Koorders, Pseudoperisporiaceae, Dothideomycetidae, Dothideomycetes. Wentiomyces sp., specimen A (Fig. 1a). Superficial spherical pseudothecium, ca. 42 μm in diameter, brown; peridium composed of polyhedral cells, often 4–6 μm in diameter; around conspicuous ostiole few characteristic, rigid, dark brown and thick walled setae, ca. 10–11 μm long, 3–4 μm wide, mostly twice dichotomously branched and blunt at the apices. Setae have one septum, and are paler to hyaline towards the tips. Pseudothecium grows on sparse, superficial, melanized mycelium; on the bottom part of ascomata mela- nized, thread-like hyphae emerge, ca. 2–5 μm in diameter. No asci or ascospores observed. HABITAT. On moribund Sphagnum spp. leaves collected in October 2010; poor fen in Szeroki Bór peatland complex, 53°36'20.77"N, 21°37'56.79"E. First record from this host. 239© The Author(s) 2014 Published by Polish Botanical Society Acta Mycol 49(2):237–247 Wilk et al. / Wentiomyces sp. from plant litter Wentiomyces sp., specimen B (Fig. 1b). Pseudothecium superficial, spherical, ca. 50 μm in diameter, brown, peridium composed of polyhedral cells. Ostiole conspicuous, sur- rounded by eight characteristic, rigid, dark brown and thick walled setae, ca. 11–14 μm long, 4–5 μm wide, with one septum, at the apex mostly twice dichotomously branched, paler to hyaline towards the tips. On the bottom part of the ascomata, melanized thread- like hyphae emerge, ca. 2–5 μm in diameter. No asci or ascospores observed. HABITAT. On dead leaf of Vaccinium oxycoccos collected in October 2010; Szeroki Bór peatland complex, 53°36'20.77"N, 21°37'56.79"E. First published record from this host. Discussion Despite of more than a century since its discovery, the taxonomy of the genus Wen- tiomyces remains extremely complicated. It was raised by Koorders [12], to encompass a single species, W. javanicus Koord., characterized by superficial, hypophyllous mycelium with superficial pseudothecia (perithecia in original description) possessing in the upper part characteristic, melanized, dichotomously branched at the apex setae, and on the lower part of the ascomata brownish, long hair-like hyphal appendages (although called setae in the original description); asci clavate with eight ascospores; ascospores hyaline, with median septa; no paraphyses. Koorders himself mentions, however, that his material is sparse, and mostly immature, and that the color of mature ascospores could potentially change to brownish, although he states this was unlikely [12]. The original herbarium material of the type is unavailable [13,14], and this is the cause for several taxonomical rearrangements of this genus, of which none can still be considered final, because epitypification was never conducted. Hansford [15] first mentioned the possible synonymy of the Wentiomyces and Dimeriella Speg., but it was Müller and Arx [13], who finally concluded that these two genera are in fact synonymous, and have given the name Wentiomyces priority over Dimeriella, and eleven other generic names Fig. 1 Specimens of Wentiomyces sp. collected on poor fen. Pseudothecium with characteristic dichotomously lobed setae around ostiole; specimen from Sphagnum sp. (a). Specimen from Vac- cinium oxycoccos (b). Scale bars: 20 μm. 240© The Author(s) 2014 Published by Polish Botanical Society Acta Mycol 49(2):237–247 Wilk et al. / Wentiomyces sp. from plant litter considered synonymous. It has to be noted, that in their understanding of the genus, the shape of the setae was no longer considered specific, therefore Wentiomyces fide Müller and Arx [13] included also species with simple, acute or blunt setae; in addition some taxa included have sparse paraphysoids. Farr [16] however claimed Wentiomyces to be a doubtful genus, which should not be used in favor of Dimeriella. This was further ap- plied and expanded by Barr [17], who rejected Wentiomyces, and transferred six species (including two subspecies) with dichotomously branched setae to Neocoleroa Petrak, and one lichenicolous species with straight, acute setae to Raciborskiomyces Siemaszko. To further complicate the situation, this rearrangement is not widely and uniformly accepted. In addition, Etayo and Sancho [18], transferred two lichenicolous taxa with straight setae to Niesslia Auersw. Because of this chaos, it is even difficult to estimate the correct number of the species included in Wentiomyces. After their treatment from 1962 [13], Arx and Müller [19] concluded that Wentiomyces contains “about 50 species”, the large number being of course due to synonimization of Dimeriella with Wentiomyces, and this was later adopted by Kirk et al. [20]. Search in Index Fungorum database [21], however, brings only 21 records, with 20 species and two subspecies. Of these, Wentiomyces fuliginosus (Woron.) E. Müll. is treated as a synonym of Antenulariella fuliginosa Woron., Wentiomyces hirtulus (Speg.) E. Müll. as a synonym of Dimeriella hirtula Speg., and Wentiomyces peltigericola D. Hawksw. as a synonym of Niesslia peltigericola (D. Hawksw.) Etayo. Search in the MycoBank database [10] brings the same number of results, but without clear statements on the status of the abovementioned three species, suggesting 20 existing species for Wentiomyces. That is due to the fact, that no formal combinations were created for the vast majority of Dimeriella species to be included in Wentiomyces, even in the abovementioned studies by Müller and Arx [13], and Arx and Müller [19]. This situation clearly indicates that the genus Wentiomyces is in urgent need for revision, and the chaos here is corroborated by the fact, that there are no molecular sequences of any of the described species [22]. It is also worth noting, that the names Wentiomyces and Dimeriella are on the preliminary draft of the list of protected generic names for fungi [23], and therefore the taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships between and within them will have to be resolved. If the MycoBank classification system is adopted, the genus Wentiomyces comprises species, which grow as saprotrophs and/or biotrophs on plants, and as specialized lichenicolous fungi (Tab. 1). Most plant-associated taxa grow hypophyllously, with only few recorded also from plant stems. Some authors label Wentiomyces spp. as pathogens, causing leaf spot diseases ([24] for W. javanicus). It appears, that some taxa can also penetrate leaf cuticle [e.g. W. clavisetus (Doidge) Arx] [15]; in case of lichenicolous taxa, Hansford [25] mentions that W. lichenicola (Hansf.) D. Hawksw. penetrates the thallus of a lichen. Lichenicolous species occur on terrestrial lichens (W. peltigericola on Peltigera spp.), but also on epiphyllous lichens (W. lichenicola on Fellhanera and Bacidina). Accord- ing to the USDA fungus-host database [26], there are 38 published reports on 14 species of Wentiomyces from 16 countries; half of the reports are from tropical countries; these are however incomplete data, because many other reports, especially for lichenicolous species, exist (Tab. 1). There is a recent finding of Wentiomyces sp. from Poland [27] on dead leaves of Rhododendron tomentosum Harmaja from poor fen. We know also on the findings on other Ericaceae from raised bog in Siberia (N.V. Filippova, personal 241© The Author(s) 2014 Published by Polish Botanical Society Acta Mycol 49(2):237–247 Wilk et al. / Wentiomyces sp. from plant litter Sp ec ie s Su bs tr at um Lo ca lit y R ef er en ce s W en tio m yc es a lp iv ag us N og ra se k Sy n. N eo co le ro a al pi va ga (N og ra se k) M .E . B ar r Si le ne a ca ul is (A ); C ar ex fi rm a (B ); Sa xi fr ag a ca es ia (C ); Sa xi fr ag a pa ni cu la ta (D ) (A ) S w ed en ; ( B –D ) A us tr ia (A –D ) [ 32 ] W . c la vi se tu s ( D oi dg e) A rx Sy n. D im er ie lla c la vi se ta D oi dg e; C ol er oa cl av is et a (D oi dg e) H an sf . A st er ac ea e, e .g . V er no ni a an ul ifo lia (A ); Er la ng ea m ar gi na ta (B ); C or di a sp . ( C ); Va rr on ia s p. (D ); M ik an ia s p. (E ) (A ) U ga nd a; (B ) M al aw i; (C ,D ) W es t I nd ie s, C os ta R ic a, n or th er n So ut h A m er ic a; (E ) E as t an d So ut h A fr ic a, G ha na (A ) [ 13 ,1 5] ; ( B ) [ 26 ]; (C –E ) [ 33 ] W . c lu si ae J. L. B ez er ra & P or oc a Le av es o f C lu si a m el ch io ri V en ez ue la , B ra zi l [2 6, 34 ] W . d ry ad is K . H ol m & L . H ol m Sy n. N eo co le ro a dr ya di s ( K . H ol m & L . H ol m ) M .E . B ar r D ea d le av es o f D ry as o ct op et al a (A ); C as si op e te tr ag on a (B ) (A ,B ) N or w ay (S va lb ar d) [3 5] W . fi m br ia tu s ( D ea rn . & H ou se ) M .E . B ar r Sy n. V en tu ri a fim br ia ta D ea rn . & H ou se ; La si os te m m a fim br ia tu m (D ea rn . & H ou se ) M .E . B ar r; N eo co le ro a fim br ia ta (D ea rn . & H ou se ) M .E . B ar r O n la ng ui sh in g le av es o f A nt en na ri a sp . ( A ); A ch ill ea m ill ef ol iu m (B ); Fi lip en du la u lm ar ia (C ); Sa xi fr ag a ca es pi to sa (D ); Si le ne a ca ul is (E ) (A ) U SA ; ( B, D ,E ) C an ad a; (C ) S w ed en (A ) [ 36 ]; (C ) [ 26 ]; (B ,D ,E ) [ 37 ,3 8] W . f ul ig in os us (W or on .) E. M ül l. Sy n. A nt en nu la ri el la fu lig in os a W or on . Li ve le av es o f I le x aq ui fo lia L . C au ca su s [1 3] W . h an sf or di i ( Sy d. ) E . M ül l. Sy n. A ca ro th al liu m h an sf or di i S yd . Le av es o f R ub ia ce ae (c f. C an th iu m s p. ) U ga nd a [3 9] W . h ir tu lu s ( Sp eg .) E. M ül l. Sy n. D im er ie lla h ir tu la S pe g. ; A st er om yx a hi rt ul a (S pe g. ) Th ei ss . & S yd . Li ve le av es o f B ac ch ar is s pp . Br az il, E cu ad or [1 3, 33 ,4 0– 42 ] W . i nc on sp ic uu s S po on er Le af li tt er o f P oa fl ab el la ta So ut h G eo rg ia (A nt ar ct ic a) [4 3] W . i nd ic us T ila k, S .B . K al e & S .V .S . K al e Le af li tt er o f I xo ra p ar vi flo ra In di a [4 4] W . j av an ic us K oo rd . Sy n. D ic ha et is ja va ni ca (K oo rd .) C le m . & S he ar D ea d le av es o f F ic us e la st ic a (A ); de ad le av es of K en tia fo rs te ri an a (B ); le af s po t o n le af o f C yn od on d ac ty lo n (C ); le af s po t o n le af o f Fi cu s e la st ic a (D ); le af s po t o n le af o f P er se a gr at is si m a (E ); So rg hu m v ul ga re (F ) (A ) I nd on es ia ( Ja va ); (B ) F ra nc e (p ot p la nt ); (C –E ) B ur m a; (F ) P ap ua N ew G ui ne a (A ) [ 12 ,1 3] ; ( B ) [ 29 ]; (C –E ) [ 24 ]; (F ) [ 26 ] Ta b. 1 Su m m ar y of th e di st ri bu tio n an d su bs tr at um c ol on iz ed b y al l k no w n W en tio m yc es s pp . 242© The Author(s) 2014 Published by Polish Botanical Society Acta Mycol 49(2):237–247 Wilk et al. / Wentiomyces sp. from plant litter Sp ec ie s Su bs tr at um Lo ca lit y R ef er en ce s W . c fr . j av an ic us D ec om po si ng le av es o f P is ta ci a le nt is cu s, Ph ill yr ea a ng us tif ol ia a nd C is tu s s pp . It al y [4 5] W . l ic he ni co la (H an sf .) D . H aw ks w . Sy n. D im er ie lla li ch en ic ol a H an sf .; N eo co le ro a lic he ni co la (H an sf .) M .E . B ar r A st er ot hy ri um le uc op ht ha lm um o n le av es o f A ca ly ph a fr ut ic os a (A ) (A ) U ga nd a; (B ) U ni te d K in gd om (A ) [ 25 ,4 6] ; B [4 7] W . l ic he ni co la s ub sp . b ou te ill ei B ri ca ud , C l. R ou x & S ér us . Sy n. N eo co le ro a lic he ni co la s ub sp . b ou te ill ei (B ri ca ud , C l. R ou x & S ér us .) M .E . B ar r Fe llh an er a bo ut ei lle i o n le av es o f B ux us se m pe rv ir en s ( A ); Ba ci di na s p. o n le av es o f Bu xu s s em pe rv ir en s ( B ); Ba ci di na c f. va sa ki i o n le av es o f B ux us se m pe rv ir en s ( C ); W oe ss ia s p. o n tr un k of S or bu s s p. (D ) (A –C ) S pa in ; ( A ) F ra nc e; (D ) L ux em bo ur g; (E ) U ni te d K in gd om ; ( F) U SA ; ( G ) A us tr ia (A –C ) [ 46 ]; (D ) [ 48 ]; (E –G ) [ 47 ] W . c f. lic he ni co la s ub sp . b ou te ill ei Le ca ni a cu pr ea Li th ua ni a [4 9] W . m el io lo id es (B er k. & M .A . C ur tis ) E . M ül l. Sy n. A st er in a m el io lo id es B er k. & M .A . C ur tis ; D im er os po ri um m el io lo id es (B er k. & M .A . C ur tis ) G . M ar tin ; P ar od io ps is m el io lo id es (G . W in te r) M au bl .; C ha et os tig m e m el io lo id es (B er k. & M .A . C ur tis ) S yd . Ba cc ha ri s h al im ifo lia (A ); le av es o f L ag en op ho ra pu m ila (B ); L. h ue ge lii (C ); L. st ip ita ta (D ); Ba cc ha ri s s p. (E ); C on yz a sp . ( F) ; E ri ge ro n sp . (G ) (A ) U SA ; ( B ) N ew Z ea la nd ; ( C ,D ) A us tr al ia ; (E –G ) N or th a nd S ou th A m er ic a, B er m ud a; (H ) B ra zi l (A ) [ 50 ]; (B ) [ 51 ]; (C ,D ) [ 26 ]; (E –G ) [3 3] ; H [4 7] W . m ol ar ife r Sc he ue r Sy n. N eo co le ro a m ol ar ife ra (S ch eu er ) M .E . B ar r D ea d le av es a nd s te m s of C ar ex d av al lia na (A ); C ar ex b al de ns is (B ) (A ) A us tr ia ; ( B ) G er m an y [5 2] W . o re op hi lu s ( Sp eg .) E. M ül l. Sy n. D im er os po ri um o re op hi lu m S pe g. ; V en tu ri a or eo ph ila (S pe g. ) Th ei ss .; D im er ie lla o re op hi la (S pe g. ) E . M ül l. & A rx D ea d le av es o f R ho do de nd ro n fe rr ug in eu m A us tr ia , G er m an y [5 3, 54 ] W . p an de i S .K . B os e Le av es o f C ra ta eg us c re nu la ta In di a [2 1] W . p el tig er ic ol a D . H aw ks w . Sy n. R ac ib or sk io m yc es p el tig er ic ol a (D . H aw ks w .) M .E . B ar r; N ie ss lia p el tig er ic ol a (D . H aw ks w .) Et ay o Pe lti ge ra a ph th os a (A ); on d ea d po rt io ns o f th al li of P . l eu co ph le bi a (B ); P. r uf es ce ns (C ); P. br ita nn ic a (D ); Pe lti ge ra s p. (E ); P. p ra et ex ta ta (F ); St er eo ca ul on d ep re ss um (G ); S. r iv ul ar is (H ); Pe lti ge ra sc ab ro sa (I ); P. d id ac ty la ( J) (A ,C ,D ) N or w ay ; ( A ,D ,E ) G re en la nd ; ( A ) t he Fa ro es ; ( A ,C ,H –J ) R us si a; (A ) A us tr ia ; ( A ,D ,G ) C an ad a; (A ,D ,F ) S pa in ; ( A ) S w ed en ; ( B ) G re at Br ita in ; ( D ) U SA ; ( A ) I ce la nd (A ) [ 55 –7 1] ; ( B ) [7 2] ; ( C ) [ 57 ,6 3] ; ( D ) [6 5, 66 ,7 3– 75 ]; (E ) [7 3] ; ( F) [6 6] ; ( G ) [6 4] ; ( H ) [ 63 ,6 4] ; (I ,J) [6 3] Ta b. 1 (c on tin ue d) 243© The Author(s) 2014 Published by Polish Botanical Society Acta Mycol 49(2):237–247 Wilk et al. / Wentiomyces sp. from plant litter Sp ec ie s Su bs tr at um Lo ca lit y R ef er en ce s W . s ib ir ic us (P et r.) E . M ül l. Sy n. N eo co le ro a si bi ri ca P et r. D ry s te m s of V ac ci ni um m yr til lu s ( A ); de ad st em s of F ili pe nd ul a sp . ( B ); le av es o f L ar ix de ci du a (C ); Va cc in iu m s p. (D ) (A ) R us si a (S ib er ia ); (B –D ) G re at B ri ta in (A ) [ 13 ,7 6] ; ( B, C ) [1 4] ; ( D ) [ 26 ] W . t at ja na e S. Y. K on dr . Sy n. N ie ss lia ta tja na e (S .Y . K on dr .) Et ay o Pa ra sy m bi ot ic o n Ps eu do cy ph el la ri a co ro na ta (A ); St ic ta c f. bo sc hi an a (B ); Lo ba ri a sp . ( C ) (A ) T as m an ia , N ew Z ea la nd ; ( B ) P ap ua N ew G ui ne a; (C ) n ot in di ca te d [7 7] W . v an en si s T ila k & T al de D ea d le av es o f F ic us b en gh al en si s In di a [2 1] W en tio m yc es s p. Pa rm el ia c ap er at a (A ); de ad le av es o f R ho do de nd ro n to m en to su m (B ); C ro to n an tis yp hi lit ic us (C ); D ia ne lla re vo lu ta (D ); H ev ea b ra si lie ns is (E ); H ib is cu s e la tu s ( F) ; La ge no ph or a hu eg el ii (G ); Pa nd an us s p. (H ); de ad le af o f E uc al yp tu s co cc ife ra (I ); de ad s te m o f C ha m er io n an gu st ifo liu m ( J) (A ) S pa in ; ( B ) P ol an d; (C ) B ra zi l; (D ,G ) A us tr al ia ; ( E) B ru ne i; (F ) V en ez ue la ; ( H ) M au ri tiu s; (I ,J) G re at B ri ta in (A ) [ 46 ]; (B ) [ 27 ]; (C –G ) [ 26 ]; (H ) [ 78 ]; (I ,J) [7 9] Ta b. 1 (c on tin ue d) 244© The Author(s) 2014 Published by Polish Botanical Society Acta Mycol 49(2):237–247 Wilk et al. / Wentiomyces sp. from plant litter communication, 2014). Distribution of Wentiomyces spp., together with substrata on which they were recorded, as compiled from the literature, is given in the Tab. 1. Strik- ingly, some species or specimens [e.g. W. alpivagus Nograsek and W. fimbriatus (Dearn. & House) M.E. Barr, or W. fimbriatus and W. sibiricus (Petr.) E. Müller] were recorded from identical plant host species, raising a question about their true taxonomic status. There is an interesting suggestion about possible anamorph genus drawn by de Hoog et al. [28], who have examined a herbarium material of W. javanicus deposited by Joly [29]. Joly [29] depicted anamorphic fungus, which he had isolated in pure culture from ascospores of his specimen of W. javanicus; de Hoog et al. [28] noted the resemblance of this anamorph to Rhinocladiella anceps (Sacc. & Ellis) S. Hughes (recalled also by Arzanlou et al. [30]). Unequivocal link between these two morphs was however not demonstrated; moreover, according to molecular analyses species from the genus Rhinocladiella and similar Ramichloridium are placed predominantly within Chaetothyriales and Capnodiales, with possible teleomorphs for Rhinocladiella in Capronia spp. [30,31]. Our specimens could not be identified to the species level, because we have not ob- served asci and ascospores, and the sole gross morphology of pseudothecia and setae, or host species, do not provide firm characters. Wentiomyces oreophilus (Speg.) E. Müll. described from Rhododendron ferrugineum L. has straight setae, and therefore cannot be considered conspecific with our finding (as was incorrectly assumed by Wilk et al. [27] regarding another specimen from poor fen). Wentiomyces sibiricus (Petr.) E. Müll., described from Vaccinium myrtillus L. could be one possibility. Worth noting is the fact, that the specimens presented here differ greatly from the specimen presented by Wilk et al. [27], being in all respects smaller (42–50 μm versus 87.5–170 μm) and having less ramified setae. We cannot even state for sure, that both specimens reported here repre- sent the same or different species, and therefore further research aimed specifically at habitat- and host- preferences of non-lichenicolous Wentiomyces spp. is certainly needed. Acknowledgments This work was partially financed by MNiSW grant No. N305 052 240. Funding from EU through the Euro- pean Social Fund, contract number UDA-POKL.04.01.01-00-072/09-00 to first author is also acknowledged. First author would like to express sincere thanks to B. Pawlik (Cracow), A. Chlebicki (Cracow), Ch. Scheuer (Graz), N.V. Filippova (Khanty Mansiysk), A. Pierotti (AscoFrance), B. Wergen (AscoFrance), M. Bemmann (AscoFrance), D.P. Di Lonardo (Wageningen), M.M. Thaung (Los Angeles) for invaluable help with obtain- ing important publications. Two anonymous reviewers are acknowledged for invaluable comments greatly improving quality of the manuscript. Authors’ contributions The following declarations about authors’ contributions to the research have been made: collected material, performed final identification, conducted literature study, prepared drawings and wrote the manuscript: MW; helped writing the manuscript: JP; designed the methods, performed initial identification, and helped writing the manuscript: MWr. References 1. Thormann MN, Rice AV. Fungi from peatlands. Fungal Divers. 2007;24:241–299. 2. Gorham E, Lehman C, Dyke A, Clymo D, Janssens J. Long-term carbon sequestration in North American peatlands. Quat Sci Rev. 2012;58:77–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.09.018 3. Peltoniemi K, Fritze H, Laiho R. Response of fungal and actinobacterial communities to water-level http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.09.018 245© The Author(s) 2014 Published by Polish Botanical Society Acta Mycol 49(2):237–247 Wilk et al. / Wentiomyces sp. from plant litter drawdown in boreal peatland sites. Soil Biol Biochem. 2009;41(9):1902–1914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. soilbio.2009.06.018 4. Thormann MN. Diversity and function of fungi in peatlands: a carbon cycling perspective. Can J Soil Sci. 2006;86:281–293. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/S05-082 5. Thormann MN. The role of fungi in decomposition dynamics in peatlands. In: Wieder RK, Vitt DH, editors. Boreal peatland ecosystems. Berlin: Springer; 2006. p. 101–123. (Ecological studies; vol 188). 6. Myers B, Webster KL, Mclaughlin JW, Basiliko N. Microbial activity across a boreal peatland nutrient gradient: the role of fungi and bacteria. Wetl Ecol Manag. 2012;20(2):77–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11273-011-9242-2 7. Golovchenko AV, Kurakov AV, Semenova TA, Zvyagintsev DG. Abundance, diversity, viability, and factorial ecology of fungi in peatbogs. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2013;46(1):74–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/ S1064229313010031 8. Peltoniemi K, Straková P, Fritze H, Iráizoz PA, Pennanen T, Laiho R. How water-level drawdown modi- fies litter-decomposing fungal and actinobacterial communities in boreal peatlands. Soil Biol Biochem. 2012;51:20–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.013 9. Krug J. Moist chambers for the development of fungi. In: Foster MS, Bills GF, Mueller GM, editors. Biodiversity of fungi. New York, NY: Academic Press; 2004. p. 589–593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ B978-012509551-8/50030-1 10. MycoBank fungal databases [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2014 Apr 15]; Available from: http://www.mycobank.org 11. Integrated Taxonomic Information System [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2014 Apr 15]; Available from: http:// www.itis.gov 12. Koorders SH. Botanische Untersuchungen über einige in Java vorkommende Pilze, besonders über Blätter bewohnende, parasitisch auftretende Arten. Amsterdam: J. Müller; 1907. [Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen; vol 13(4)]. 13. Müller E, von Arx JA. Die Gattungen der didymosporen Pyrenomyceten. Wabern-Bern: Kommissionsverlag Buchdr. Büchler; 1962. (Beiträge zur Kryptogamenfiora der Schweiz, Bd. 11, Heft 2). 14. Hawksworth DL, Sivanesan A. New and interesting microfungi from Slapton, South Devonshire: Asco- mycotina III. Mycol Res. 1976;67(3):477–483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(76)80175-1 15. Hansford CG. The foliicolous Ascomycetes, their parasites and associated fungi: especially as illustrated by Uganda specimens. Kew: Imperial Mycological Institute; 1946. (Mycological papers; vol 15). 16. Farr ML. Dimeriella, Wentiomyces, Episphaerella, and Epipolaeum (fungi: Pyrenomycetes). Taxon. 1965;14(1):18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1216705 17. Barr ME. Notes on some “dimeriaceous” fungi. Mycotaxon. 1997;64:149–172. 18. Etayo J, Sancho LG. Hongos liquenícolas del sur de Sudamérica, especialmente de Isla Navarino (Chile). Bibl Lichenol. 2008;98:1–302. 19. von Arx JA, Müller E. A re-evaluation of the bitunicate ascomycetes with keys to families and genera. Stud Mycol. 1975;9:1–159. 20. Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA, editors. Dictionary of the fungi. 10th ed. Wallingford: CABI; 2008. 21. Index Fungorum database [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2014 Apr 15]; Available from: http://www.indexfun- gorum.org 22. NCBI database [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2014 Apr 15]; Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ 23. Kirk PM, Stalpers JA, Braun U, Crous PW, Hansen K, Hawksworth DL, et al. A without-prejudice list of generic names of fungi for protection under the “International code of nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants.” IMA Fungus. 2013;4(2):381–443. http://dx.doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2013.04.02.17 24. Thaung MM. Pathologic and taxonomic analysis of leaf spot and tar spot diseases in a tropical dry to wet monsoon ecosystem of lowland Burma. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2008;37(2):180–197. http://dx.doi. org/10.1071/AP08007 25. Hansford CG. Contributions towards the fungus flora of uganda. VIII. New records (continued). Linnean. 1946;157(3):138–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1946.tb00424.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.06.018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.06.018 http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/S05-082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11273-011-9242-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11273-011-9242-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1064229313010031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1064229313010031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-012509551-8/50030-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-012509551-8/50030-1 http://www.mycobank.org http://www.itis.gov http://www.itis.gov http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(76)80175-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1216705 http://www.indexfungorum.org http://www.indexfungorum.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ http://dx.doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2013.04.02.17 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AP08007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AP08007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1946.tb00424.x 246© The Author(s) 2014 Published by Polish Botanical Society Acta Mycol 49(2):237–247 Wilk et al. / Wentiomyces sp. from plant litter 26. Farr DF, Rossman AY. Fungal databases, systematic mycology and microbiology laboratory, ARS, USDA [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2014 Nov 4]; Available from: http://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/ 27. Wilk M, Banach A, Pawłowska J, Wrzosek M. Leaf-litter microfungal community on poor fen plant debris in Torfy Lake area (Central Poland). Acta Mycol. 2014;49(1):31–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/am.2014.003 28. de Hoog GS, Rahman MA, Boekhout T. Ramichloridium, Veronaea and Stenella: generic delimitation, new combinations and two new species. Trans Br Mycol Soc. 1983;81(3):485–490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0007-1536(83)80116-8 29. Joly P. Sur quelques champignons foliicoles du Kentia forsteriana. Rev. Mycol. 1965;30:42–51. 30. Arzanlou M, Groenewald JZ, Gams W, Braun U, Shin H-D, Crous PW. Phylogenetic and morphotaxonomic revision of Ramichloridium and allied genera. Stud Mycol. 2007;58:57–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.3114/ sim.2007.58.03 31. Untereiner WA. Taxonomy of selected members of the ascomycete genus Capronia with notes on anamorph- teleomorph connections. Mycologia. 1997;89(1):120. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3761181 32. Nograsek A. Ascomyceten auf Gefässpflanzen der Polsterseggenrasen in den Ostalpen. Bibl Mycol. 1990;133:271. 33. Farr ML. The didymosporous dimeriaceous fungi described on Asteraceae. Mycologia. 1979;71(2):243. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3759151 34. Bezerra JL, Poroca DJM, Leal FB. Algumas novas espécies de Ascomycotina. Publicações Inst Micol Universidade Fed Pernamb. 1972;640:1–15. 35. Holm K, Holm L. Dryadicolous ascomycetes from Svalbard. Bibl Mycol. 1993;15:53–62. 36. Dearness J, House HD. New or noteworthy species of fungi. II. Bull NY State Mus. 1921;233–234:32–43. 37. Barr ME. The Venturiaceae in North America. Can J Bot. 1968;46(6):799–864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/ b68-111 38. Ginns JH. Compendium of plant disease and decay fungi in Canada, 1960–1980. Ottawa: Research Branch, Agriculture Canada; 1986. 39. Sydow H. Novae fungorum species. XXV. Ann Mycol. 1937;35(3–4):244–286. 40. Spegazzini C. Fungi aliquot paulistani. Rev Mus Plata. 1908;15(2):7–48. 41. Theissen F, Sydow H. Synoptische Tafeln. Ann Mycol. 1917;15(6):389–491. 42. Petrak F. Beiträge zur Pilzflora von Ekuador. Sydowia. 1950;4(1–6):450–587. 43. Pegler DN, Spooner BM, Smith RIL. Higher fungi of Antarctica, the subantarctic zone and Falkland Islands. Kew Bull. 1980;35(3):499. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4110020 44. Tilak ST. Contribution to our knowledge of Ascomycetes of India. XXVI. Sydowia. 1970;24(1–6):97–102. 45. Lunghini D, Granito VM, Di Lonardo DP, Maggi O, Persiani AM. Fungal diversity of saprotrophic lit- ter fungi in a Mediterranean maquis environment. Mycologia. 2013;105(6):1499–1515. http://dx.doi. org/10.3852/13-103 46. Roux C, Bricaud O, Sérusiaux E, Coste C. Wentiomyces lichenicola subsp. nov. bouteillei. Champignon lichénicole non lichénisé (Dothideales, Dimeriaceae). Mycotaxon. 1994;50:459–474. 47. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2014 Mar 21]; Available from: http://www.gbif.org 48. Boom van den P, Diederich P, Serusiaux E. Lichens et champignons lichenicoles nouveaux ou interessants pour la flore de la Belgique et des regions voisines. VII. Bull Soc Nat Luxemb. 1996;97:81–92. 49. Motjejūnaitė J, Brackel von W, Stončius D, Preikša Z. Contribution to the Lithuanian flora of lichens and allied fungi. III. Bot Lith. 2011;17(1):39–46. 50. Berkeley MJ. Notices of North American fungi [cont.]. Grevillea. 1875;4(29):1–16. 51. Sydow H. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Pilzflora Neu-Seelands – 1. Ann Mycol. 1924;22:293–317. 52. Scheuer C. Ascomyceten auf Cyperaceen und Juncaceen im Ostalpenraum. Bibl Mycol. 1988;123:1–274. 53. Remler P. Ascomyceten auf Ericaceen in den Ostalpen. Bibl Mycol. 1979;68:1–321. 54. Schmid-Heckel H. Pilze in den Berchtesgadener Alpen. Forschungsberichte Natl Berchtesgad. 1988;15:1–136. http://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/ http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/am.2014.003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(83)80116-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(83)80116-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.3114/sim.2007.58.03 http://dx.doi.org/10.3114/sim.2007.58.03 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3761181 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3759151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b68-111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b68-111 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4110020 http://dx.doi.org/10.3852/13-103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3852/13-103 http://www.gbif.org 247© The Author(s) 2014 Published by Polish Botanical Society Acta Mycol 49(2):237–247 Wilk et al. / Wentiomyces sp. from plant litter 55. Alstrup V, Olech M. Lichenicolous fungi from Spitsbergen. Pol Polar Res. 1993;14(1):33–42. 56. Alstrup V, Elvebakk A. Part 5. Fungi III. Lichenicolous fungi. In: Elvebakk A, Prestrud P, editors. A catalogue of Svalbard plants, fungi, algae, and cyanobacteria. Oslo: Norsk polarinstitutt; 1996. p. 261–270. (Norsk Polarintitutt Skrifter; vol 198). 57. Øvstedal DO. Nordisk lichenologisk forenings ekskursjon til Norge 1985. Graph Scr. 1992;1:14–25. 58. Kummerling H, Alstrup V. Some peltigericolous fungi, mainly from Scandinavia. Graph Scr. 1992;3:120–121. 59. Alstrup V, Hawksworth DL. The lichenicolous fungi of Greenland. Copenhagen: Kommissionen for Videnskabelige Undersøgelseri Grønland; 1990. 60. Alstrup V, Hansen ES, Daniels FJA. Lichenized, lichenicolous and other fungi from North and North-East Greenland. Folia Cryptogam. Est. 2000;37:1–20. 61. Zhurbenko M. Lichens and lichenicolous fungi of the northern Krasnoyarsk Territory, Central Siberia. Mycotaxon. 1996;58:185–232. 62. Zhurbenko M. Lichenicolous and some interesting lichenized fungi from the Northern Ural, Komi Republic of Russia. Herzogia. 2004;17:77–86. 63. Zhurbenko M. The lichenicolous fungi of Russia: geographical overview and a first checklist. Mycol Balc. 2007;4:105–124. 64. Zhurbenko M. Lichenicolous fungi and lichens growing on Stereocaulon from the Holarctic, with a key to the known species. Opusc Philolichenum. 2010;8:9–39. 65. Alstrup V, Cole MS. Lichenicolous fungi of British Columbia. Bryologist. 1998;101(2):221. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/3244200 66. Moreno MIM. Taxonomia del genero Peltigera Willd. (Ascomycetes liquenizados) en la Peninsula Iberica y studio de sus hongos liquenicolas. Ruizia Monogr Real Jardín Botánico. 1999;15:1–200. 67. Santesson R. Fungi Lichenicoli Exsiccati. Fasc. 5–6. Thunbergia. 1988;6:1–18. 68. Thor G. The 9-th meeting of the Nordic Lichen Society, Sweden 1991. Graph Scr. 1992;4:19–29. 69. Hafellner J, Türk R. Über Funde lichenicoler Pilze und Flechten im Nationalpark Hohe Tauern (Kärntner Anteil, Österreich). Carinth. II. 1995;185(105):599–635. 70. Berger F. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Flechten und lichenicolen Pilze Islands. Acta Bot Isl. 2000;13:69–82. 71. Ihlen PG, Wedin M. An annotated key to the lichenicolous Ascomycota (including mitosporic morphs) of Sweden. Nova Hedw. 2008;86(3):275–365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0029-5035/2008/0086-0275 72. Hawksworth DL. Notes on some fungi occurring on Peltigera, with a key to accepted species. Trans Br Mycol Soc. 1980;74(2):363–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(80)80167-7 73. Alstrup V. New records in distribution of lichens and lichenicolous fungi. Graph Scr. 2004;16:46–57. 74. Diederich P. New species and new records of American lichenicolous fungi. Herzogia. 2003;16:41–90. 75. Holien H, Tonsberg T. The 10th meeting of the Nordic Lichen Society in Nord-Trondelag, Norway, 1993. Graph Scr. 1994;6:67–75. 76. Petrak F. Mykologische Beiträge zur Flora von Sibirien. II. Hedwigia. 1934;74:30–78. 77. Kondratyuk SY. New species of Pronectria, Vouauxiomyces, Wentiomyces and Zwackiomyces from Aus- tralasia. Muelleria. 1996;9:93–104. 78. Dulymamode R, Cannon PF, Peerally A. Fungi on endemic plants of Mauritius. Mycol Res. 2001;105(12):1472–1479. 79. The fungal records database of Britain and Ireland (FRDBI) [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2014 Mar 21]; Available from: http://www.gbif.orgwww.fieldmycology.net/FRDBI/FRDBI.asp http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3244200 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3244200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0029-5035/2008/0086-0275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(80)80167-7 http://www.gbif.orgwww.fieldmycology.net/FRDBI/FRDBI.asp Abstract Introduction Material and methods Descriptions of specimens Discussion Acknowledgments Authors’ contributions References 2014-12-31T17:35:00+0000 Polish Botanical Society