Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Entomophthorales (Entomophthoromycota: Entomophthoromycotina) from Argentina Acta Mycologica Article ID: 5522 DOI: 10.5586/am.5522 Publication History Received: 2020-02-27 Accepted: 2020-06-26 Published: 2020-11-27 Handling Editor Malgorzata Ruszkiewicz-Michalska; Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment, Polish Academy of Sciences; University of Łódź; https://orcid.org/0000-0001- 8901-0552 Authors, Contributions RGM and WF conducted the DNA extraction and PCR assays; ABJ, AVT, and LAC conducted the phylogenetic analyses; RGM, CCLL, and LAC wrote the manuscript; CCLL and ABJ secured funding Funding This study was supported by the National Research Council of Argentina (CONICET) and by University of La Plata (UNLP). Competing Interests No competing interests have been declared. Copyright Notice © The Author(s) 2020. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits redistribution, commercial and noncommercial, provided that the article is properly cited. ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER in MICROSCOPIC FUNGI Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Entomophthorales (Entomophthoromycota: Entomophthoromycotina) from Argentina Romina G. Manfrino 1*, Louela A. Castrillo 2, Claudia C. López Lastra 1, Andrea V. Toledo 3, Walter Ferrari 1, Annette B. Jensen 4 1Centro de Estudios Parasitólogicos y de Vectores – CEPAVE (CONICET, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas; UNLP, Universidad Nacional de La Plata), La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina 2Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture & Health, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Ithaca, 14853, NY, USA 3Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales, Centro de Investigacioness de Fitopatología – CIDEFI (CICPBA, Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; UNLP, Universidad Nacional de La Plata), La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina 4Department of Agriculture and Ecology, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, Frederiksberg C, 1871, Denmark *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: manfrino@cepave.edu.ar Abstract We characterized 17 insect-pathogenic entomophthoralean fungal isolates (Entomophthoromycotina: Entomophthorales) using morphological and molecular techniques. We identified four species from various insect hosts: (i) Entomophthora planchoniana, six specimens from aphids; (ii) Pandora neoaphidis, three specimens from aphids; (iii) Zoophthora phalloides from an aphid; and (iv) Z. radicans, seven specimens from insects in the orders Diptera, Hemiptera, and Lepidoptera. Analysis of ITS1 data from E. planchoniana showed clustering in accordance to aphid host species. Entomophthora planchoniana from Macrosiphum euphorbiae clustered together, separate from the isolate from Myzus persicae. The P. neoaphidis specimens clustered with sequences from other aphid-pathogenic Pandora species in GenBank. In this study, Z. phalloides from Brevicoryne brassicae and Z. radicans from an unidentified species of Chironomidae (Diptera) in Argentina were characterized for the first time. The present study was initiated to elucidate the taxonomy of the entomophthoralean fungi in Argentina according to their morphological and molecular characters. The presented results emphasize the significance of the combination of molecular data and information on morphology, ecology, and host range for accurate identification of entomophthoralean and allied genera. Keywords entomopathogens; insect pests; molecular taxonomy; host range 1. Introduction Entomopathogenic fungi in the subphylum Entomophthoromycotina (phylum Entomophthoromycota) (Spatafora et al., 2016) are well-known virulent pathogens infecting many species of arthropod hosts. The subphylum contains over 300 species, most of which belong to the order Entomophthorales, with nearly 290 described species (Hajek et al., 2018). Most of the entomophthoralean species are obligate pathogens of insects and other arthropods (Gryganskyi et al., 2012; Hajek et al., 2018). Likewise, they are relatively host specific and, thus, pose little or no threat to non-target organisms, making these fungi ideal biological control agents against Acta Mycologica / 2020 / Volume 55 / Issue 2 / Article 5522 Publisher: Polish Botanical Society 1 https://doi.org/10.5586/am.5522 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2628-2259 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8138-9764 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6590-0171 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6930-0077 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3995-5122 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2044-2274 mailto:manfrino@cepave.edu.ar Manfrino et al. / Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Entomophthorales insect pests. The host specificities of different entomophthoroid genera within the Entomophthorales are often limited to a given insect order or family; however, individual entomophthoroid species may show a higher level of specificity toward host genera or species (Humber, 2016). However, species or strains selected for commercialization as biological control agents cannot have too narrow a specificity spectrum to be economically profitable. The identification of new strains to the species level is the first step in utilizing the full potential of fungi for specific applications (Lieckfeldt et al., 1999). Entomophthoralean species are identified on the basis of their host insect species and morphological features, primarily the size and shape of the primary conidia and the number of nuclei per conidium. However, in some cases, morphometric studies are insufficient to ascertain whether they represent a single taxon or complexes of morphologically similar species (Barta & Cagáň, 2006). For this purpose, methods based on either biochemical reactions or DNA sequences are used. Various molecular techniques have been used in the systematics of fungi to assess interspecific variation and determine phylogenetic relationships. Up to date molecular phylogenetic studies of Entomophthoromycotina have used molecular markers such as rDNA (i.e., 18S, 28S, or the whole ribosomal operon) and protein coding regions (e.g., actin, β tubulin, and RPB2). In addition, other more variable regions (e.g., ITS) have been used to study closely related taxa (Jensen et al., 2007). Different combinations of these have been used in multiple gene analysis (Gryganskyi et al., 2013). Today, the vast majority of available genomic information within the Entomophthoromycotina is composed of partial gene and intron sequences developed for use in phylogenetic analyses. Most sequences deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank database are from the nuclear ribosomal DNA region, including the large (LSU) and small (SSU) subunits, 5.8S, and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions 1 and 2. Only a few sequences of entomophthoralean fungi from Argentina are available in GenBank (Jensen et al., 2009; Scorsetti et al., 2011), reflecting the paucity of information on the diversity of this fungal group in the region. The present paper reports on the identification of Entomophthora planchoniana Cornu, Pandora neoaphidis (Remaud. & Hennebert) Humber, Zoophthora phalloides A. Batko, and Zoophthora radicans (Bref.) A. Batko from Argentinian insects and provides both morphological and molecular characterizations of these species. The fungal pathogens Z. phalloides and Z. radicans from both Brevicoryne brassicae L. and from an unidentified species of Chironomidae (Diptera), respectively, are recorded for first time in Argentina. 2. Material and Methods 2.1. Specimens and Morphological Characterization Specimens were collected during sampling from crops of economic importance in 2007–2013 (Table 1). The isolates examined in this study, their host taxon, plant host, collection site, date, and GenBank accession numbers are listed in Table 1. Zoophthora isolates were cultivated on Sabouraud dextrose agar plus 1% yeast extract (SDAY 1%), a suitable medium used for the isolation and culture of several species of Entomophthorales (Choi et al., 2016; Feng et al., 1990; Moubasher et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2016). Pandora and Entomophthora specimens were identified directly from infected insect hosts. Specimens were examined under a stereomicroscope and an optical microscope for the presence of rhizoids, cystidia, and/or conidia. Fungal structures were mounted in lactophenol-aceto-orcein (LPAO) (1:1) or stained with 1% aceto-orcein plus glycerine for semipermanent mounts (as preserved material for fungarium) and measured. Fungal species were identified according to taxonomic monographs and the keys of Bałazy (1993), Keller (2007), and Humber (2012). Photographs of the primary and capilliconidia of Z. phalloides and Z. radicans from in vitro cultures were taken with an Olympus BX51 camera (Japan) at ×400 magnification. Aphid host identification to the species level Acta Mycologica / 2020 / Volume 55 / Issue 2 / Article 5522 Publisher: Polish Botanical Society 2 Manfrino et al. / Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Entomophthorales was made using the keys of Blackman and Eastop (2000). Lepidopteran hosts were identified by a taxonomic specialist at the Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) (see Acknowledgments). The specimens were preserved in the Mycological Collections at the Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores (CEPAVE, La Plata, Argentina). The isolates were deposited in the Mycological Collections at CEPAVE and the USDA-ARS Collection of Entomopathogenic Fungal Cultures (ARSEF) in Ithaca, New York. 2.2. Molecular Characterization: DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification Fungus-infected insect cadavers were stored in 96% ethanol, and in vitro cultures were prepared as described by Jensen et al. (2001) until DNA extraction. Genomic DNA was extracted from infected insects (in vivo; for Entomophthora and Pandora specimens) or from in vitro cultures (for Zoophthora spp. specimens) via Chelex extraction (Traugott et al., 2008) or by using a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, MD, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR assays were performed on three loci, the internal transcribed spacer 1 region (ITS1), the 18S gene (SSU), and the first part of the 28S gene (LSU). Because of the low quantity of DNA obtained from infected insects, PCR assays of Entomophthora and Pandora specimens were limited to the ITS1 and LSU only. Universal fungal primers or entomophthoralean- specific primers were used to avoid amplification of insect host DNA. We used the universal fungal primers ITS5 (White et al., 1990) and the single reverse primer Nu- 5.8S-3′ (Jensen & Eilenberg, 2001) the universal fungal primers nu-SSU-0021-58 (Gargas & DePriest, 1996) and nu-SSU-1780-38 (DePriest, 1993) for the SSU rDNA region, and nu-LSU-0018-5 (Jensen & Eilenberg, 2001) and LSU-0805 (Kjøller & Rosendahl, 2000) for LSU amplification. The PCR conditions were: Initial denaturation for 30 seconds at 98 ◦C, followed by 38 cycles of denaturation for 10 seconds at 98 ◦C, annealing for 20 seconds at 55–60 ◦C (ITS1 60 ◦C, SSU 58 ◦C, LSU 55 ◦C), extension for 1 min at 72 ◦C, and a final extension for 10 min at 72 ◦C. The PCR reactions were carried out in 50 µL volumes, with 250 µM of each dNTP, 0.8 µM of each primer, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1× buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8 at 25 ◦C, 50 mM KCl, 0.1% Triton X- 100), 1 unit of DyNazyme II (Finnzymes, Espoo, Finland), and 1 µL of extracted DNA (diluted 1:10). The size of the PCR amplification products was estimated by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel in 0.5× TBE, and the products were visualized with EZ-Vision (AMRESCO, USA). PCR products were purified using the QIAquick Purification kit (Qiagen, MD, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Amplicon sizes were checked by electrophoresis, and purified PCR products were sent to Macrogen (Seoul, Korea) for sequencing in both directions. The sequences obtained were submitted to NCBI GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) for gene annotation. Sequences were edited using BioEdit version 7.0.9.0 (Hall, 1999) and were used to perform a phylogenetic analysis that included some sequences of related species in the genera Entomophthora, Pandora, and Zoophthora available at GenBank. Sequence data for each locus were aligned with the ClustalW tool of Mega5 (Tamura et al., 2011) and trimmed, as needed, using Mesquite version 3.0.2 (Maddison & Maddison, 2009). Aligned and trimmed sequence data were submitted to TreeBASE (http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S27276?x- access-code=5af44733057f582185683187bae29cbf&format=html). Each dataset was analyzed using maximum parsimony (MP) in PAUP version 4.0a142 (Swofford, 2002) to determine the number of MP-informative sites. The phylogenetic analysis was carried out using the maximum likelihood (ML) method. The consensus tree was built using the latest 1,000 trees. Statistical support for the nodes was evaluated using 1,000 replicates. Phylogenetic analysis was limited to each locus; incomplete ITS1, LSU, and SSU sequence data from all specimens prevented presentation of a multilocus tree. Acta Mycologica / 2020 / Volume 55 / Issue 2 / Article 5522 Publisher: Polish Botanical Society 3 M an frin o et al./ M o rp h o lo g icalan d M o lecu larC h aracterizatio n o fEn to m o p h th o rales Table 1 List of species used in the study with information about insect and plant host taxa, location of collection, and GenBank accession numbers. Species/strain number (CEP) or exsiccate number (CEPHe) Insect host Plant host Location GenBank accession numbers ITS1 SSU LSU Town/city Geographical coordinates Latitude S Longitude W Entomophthora planchoniana CEPHe61 Myzus persicae (Sulzer) Capsicum annuum L. Monte Vera 31◦32′58.21′′ 60◦41′34.74′′ MG252293 CEPHe62 Macrosiphum sp. Rosa sp. Sunchales 30◦56′00′′ 61◦34′00′′ MG252624 CEPHe65 Myzus persicae (Sulzer) Solanum melongena L. Monte Vera 31◦32′58.21′′ 60◦41′34.74′′ MG256477 CEPHe63 Macrosiphum sp. Rosa sp. Sunchales 30◦56′00′′ 61◦34′00′′ MG256478 CEPHe64 Macrosiphum sp. Rosa sp. Sunchales 30◦56′00′′ 61◦34′00′′ MG256479 MH366738 CEPHe66 Myzus persicae (Sulzer) Capsicum annuum L. Monte Vera 31◦32′58.21′′ 60◦41′34.74′′ MG256476 Pandora neoaphidis CEPHe72 Myzus persicae (Sulzer) Solanum melongena L. Monte Vera 31◦32′58.21′′ 60◦41′34.74′′ MH366634 CEPHe73 Nasonovia ribisnigri (Mosley) Lactuca sativa L. Monte Vera 31◦32′58.21′′ 60◦41′34.74′′ MH366798 MH366734 CEPHe74 Rhopalosiphum padi L. Avena sativa L. Rafaela 31◦12′6.62′′ 61◦30′11.14′′ MH366739 Zoophthora phalloides CEP 687 (ARSEF 11861) Brevicoryne brassicae L. Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L. Monte Vera 31◦32′58.21′′ 60◦41′34.74′′ MG253005 Z. radicans CEPHe67 Plutella xylostella L. Brassica napus L. Ataliva 30◦59′00′′ 61◦27′00′′ MG256481 MG252955 MG256485 CEPHe68 Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) Medicago sativa L. Monte Vera 31◦32′58.21′′ 60◦41′34.,74′′ MG256480 MG252969 MG256487 CEPHe69 Brevicoryne brassicae L. Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L. Monte Vera 31◦32′58.21′′ 60◦41′34.74′′ MG256482 MG252968 MG256488 CEPHe70 Plutella xylostella L. Brassica napus L. Rafaela 31◦12′6.62′′ 61◦30′11.14′′ MG256486 MG256489 CEPHe71 Plutella xylostella L. Brassica oleracea var. capitata L. Monte Vera 31◦32′58.21′′ 60◦41′34.74′′ MG256483 MG252997 MG256490 CEP 30 (ARSEF 6917) Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) Solanum lycopersicum L. Colonia Urquiza 34◦56′19.2′′ 58◦06′3.8′′ MG256484 MG256492 CEP 320 (ARSEF 8466) Chironomidae unknown La Plata 34◦56′00′′ 57◦57′00′′ MG256491 A cta M ycologica / 2020 / Vo lu m e 55 / Issu e 2 / A rticle 5522 Pu b lish er:Po lish B o tan icalSo ciety 4 Manfrino et al. / Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Entomophthorales 3. Results 3.1. Fungal Identification and Taxonomic Observations Based on morphological characters, four fungal species were identified in the 17 insect specimens: E. planchoniana, P. neoaphidis, Z. phalloides, and Z. radicans (Table 1). 3.1.1. Entomophthora planchoniana Cornu Bull. Soc. bot. Fr. 20: 189 (1873). Hosts. Myzus persicae Sulzer and Macrosiphum sp. (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Description. Primary conidia campanulate, 14.2 ± 2.5 (12.1–16.8) × 12.1 ± 2.3 (9.8– 14.5) µm, with a small apiculus and broad, nearly flattened papilla, and multinuclear (three–five nuclei). Secondary conidia were observed emerging from the primary conidia and were slightly smaller: 11.2 ± 1.72 (9.7–13.5) × 10.5 ± 1.5 (8.7–12.2) µm (Figure 1E). Numerous thin rhizoids (Figure 1F). Cystidia and resting spores not observed. Attempts to obtain fungal isolates were not successful. Fungarium Accession Numbers. CEPHe61, CEPHe66 (M. persicae from Capsicum annuum L.), CEPHe62, CEPHe63, CEPHe64 (Macrosiphum sp. from Rosa sp.), and CEPHe65 (M. persicae from Solanum melongena L.). 3.1.2. Pandora neoaphidis (Remaud. & Hennebert) Humber Mycotaxon 34 (2): 452 (1989). Hosts. Nasonovia ribisnigri (Mosley), M. persicae, and Rhopalosiphum padi L. (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Description. Primary conidia ovoid or elongated, 23.55 ± 2.07 (19.6–27.3) × 12.08 ± 1.55 (9.6–14.3) µm, generally conical papilla connected gently with the body of the conidia Secondary conidia spherical or bell-shaped, 17.33 ± 1.36 (15.2–20.1) × 13.37 ± 1.26 (11.16–15.32) µm (Figure 1G). Capilliconidia absent. Rhizoids with discoid or irregularly branched adhesive disc. Cystidia present. No resting spores were observed. Attempts to obtain fungal isolates were not successful. Fungarium Accession Numbers. CEPHe72 (M. persicae from S. melongena), CEPHe73 (N. ribisnigri from Lactuca sativa L.), and CEPHe74 (R. padi from Avena sativa L.). 3.1.3. Zoophthora phalloides A. Batko Acta Mycologica 2: 8 (1966). Host. Brevicoryne brassicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Description. Primary conidia elongated cylindrical to elongated oval, 33.03 ± 4.89 (24.08–42.16) × 12.3 ± 2.52 (9.92–17.36) µm (Figure 1C). This characterization was in accordance with the original description (Batko, 1966). The presently observed secondary conidia were capilliconidia: 18.40 ± 2.67 (12.4– 22.32) × 7.04 ± 1.22 (4.96–9.92) × 94.63 ± 9.98 (79.36–114.08) µm (Figure 1D). Rhizoids were ramified and forming rhizomorphs. No resting spores were observed. Culture Collection Accession Number. CEP 687 (ARSEF 11861) (B. brassicae from Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.). 3.1.4. Zoophthora radicans (Bref.) A. Batko Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci., Cl. II. sér. sci. biol. 12: 323 (1964). Hosts. Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris, B. brassicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae), Plutella xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), and an unidentified species of Chironomidae (Diptera). Acta Mycologica / 2020 / Volume 55 / Issue 2 / Article 5522 Publisher: Polish Botanical Society 5 Manfrino et al. / Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Entomophthorales Description. Elongated primary conidia uninucleate, 22.63 ± 3.40 (16.36–25.94) × 8.14 ± 0.75 (7.39–9.67), generally conical papilla demarcated with a slight protuberance from the body of the conidia (Figure 1A). Secondary conidia similar to primary ones or capilliconidia: 20.04 ± 1.83 (18.89–24.4) × 7.09 ± 0.54 (6.39– 7.93) × 46.95 ± 9.70 (35.81–60.31) µm, fusiform and formed laterally on slender, capillary conidiophores arising from primary conidia (Figure 1B). Rhizoids mostly in pseudorhizomorphs, particularly abundant in the thoracical part, single or fasciculate with specialized adhesive discs. Conidiophores branched with terminal enlargement. Cystidia 3.69 µm in diameter, tapering uniformly at the base. No resting spores were observed. Fungarium Accession Numbers. CEPHe67 (P. xylostella from Brassica napus L.), CEPHe68 (A. pisum from Medicago sativa L.), CEPHe69 (B. brassicae from B. oleracea var. botrytis), CEPHe70 (P. xylostella from B. napus), and CEPHe71 (P. xylostella from Brassica oleracea var. capitate L.). Culture Collection Accession Numbers. CEP 30 (ARSEF 6917; T. absoluta from Solanum lycopersicum L.) and CEP 320 (ARSEF 8466; indet. Diptera from indet. host plant). Figure 1 Zoophthora radicans from Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) primary conidium (A) and two capilliconidia each on a capilliconidiophore produced from a primary conidium (A,B). Bar: 10 µm. Zoophthora phalloides primary conidia (C) and capilliconidia on capilliconidiophore from primary conidium (D). Bar: 10 µm. Entomophthora planchoniana from Myzus persicae (Sulzer) primary and secondary conidia (E). Bar: 20 µm. Rhizoids of Entomophthora planchoniana from Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (F). Bar: 1 mm. Pandora neoaphidis from Nasonovia ribisnigri (Mosley) primary and secondary conidia (G). Bar: 10 µm. 3.2. Molecular Characterization: DNA Sequencing and Molecular Analyses We successfully amplified DNA samples and obtained sequences of the ITS1 (337 bp for Z. radicans, 259 bp for E. planchoniana, and 308 bp for P. neoaphidis), LSU (755 bp for Z. radicans, 855 bp for P. neoaphidis, and 820 bp for E. planchoniana), and SSU (1,720 bp for Z. radicans and 1,739 bp for Z. phalloides). All sequences were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers given in Table 1. Combined with the GenBank sequences of other entomophthoralean fungi, PAUP analysis showed: ITS1 sequence data (total 733 bp) with 141 variable parsimony- uninformative and 541 parsimony-informative characters, LSU sequence data Acta Mycologica / 2020 / Volume 55 / Issue 2 / Article 5522 Publisher: Polish Botanical Society 6 Manfrino et al. / Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Entomophthorales (total 1,024 bp) with 165 variable parsimony-uninformative and 341 parsimony- informative characters, and SSU sequence data (total 1,863 bp) with 207 variable parsimony-uninformative and 54 parsimony-informative characters. The best tree from the ML analysis of the ITS1 sequences showed that our isolates of E. planchoniana and P. neoaphidis clustered with the same respective entomophthoralean species, with a 67% bootstrap value (Figure 2). All E. planchoniana specimens had the same ITS1 sequence. The ITS1 sequence of P. neoaphidis CEPHe73 clustered with P. neoaphidis ARSEF 835 in another monophyletic group supported by a 99% bootstrap value. Finally, the Z. radicans CEPHe67, CEPHe68, CEPHe69, CEPHe70, CEPHe71, and CEP 30 sequences clustered with Z. radicans NW386 in another monophyletic group supported by a 100% bootstrap value. The ITS sequences of the Z. radicans specimens did not reveal differences between different hosts. Figure 2 Phylogenetic relationships of Zoophthora, Pandora, and Entomophthora and related species inferred from maximum likelihood analysis of ITS1 sequences. The sequences corresponding to this work are marked with asterisks. Bootstrap values are noted above the internodes. The bar at the bottom indicates the number of substitutions per site. In the phylogenetic analyses of the LSU rRNA, P. neoaphidis and Z. radicans were clustered in a monophyletic group with sequences from related entomophthoralean species. This grouping was supported by a 100% bootstrap value. The LSU sequences of six Z. radicans specimens from Diptera, Hemiptera, and Lepidoptera were identical to that of ARSEF 388, which was isolated from a dipteran in Switzerland. Zoophthora radicans specimen 320 had 99% similarity with the group (Figure 3). Entomophthora planchoniana specimen CEPHe64 clustered with E. planchoniana ARSEF 6252 in another monophyletic group, which was supported by a 100% bootstrap value (Figure 3). In the ML tree from the phylogenetic analysis of the SSU rRNA sequences, Z. radicans CEPHe67, CEPHe68, CEPHe69, and CEPHe71 were clustered in a monophyletic group supported by a 65% bootstrap value, which includes representatives of Z. radicans (Z. radicans ARSEF 853) and Z. lanceolata (Z. lanceolata ARSEF 469) (Figure 4). Based on the SSU rRNA sequences, Z. phalloides CEP 687 clustered with representatives of Z. anglica, Z. phalloides, and Z. occidentalis in another monophyletic group supported by a 99% bootstrap value. Likewise, the sequence of Z. phalloides CEP 687 characterized in this work was clustered with Z. phalloides ARSEF 2281 in a same clade supported by a 100% bootstrap value (Figure 4). 4. Discussion In the present study, the initial identification of fungi from various insect hosts was based mainly on the shape and size of the primary and secondary conidia and Acta Mycologica / 2020 / Volume 55 / Issue 2 / Article 5522 Publisher: Polish Botanical Society 7 Manfrino et al. / Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Entomophthorales Figure 3 Phylogenetic relationships of Zoophthora, Pandora, and Entomophthora and related species inferred from maximum likelihood analysis of LSU rDNA sequences. The sequences corresponding to this work are marked with asterisks. Bootstrap values are noted above the internodes. The bar at the bottom indicates the number of substitutions per site. Figure 4 Phylogenetic relationships of Zoophthora and related species inferred from maximum likelihood analysis of SSU rDNA sequences. The sequences corresponding to this work are marked with asterisks. Bootstrap values are noted above the internodes. The bar at the bottom indicates the number of substitutions per site. according to host affinity. These identifications were confirmed by use of molecular data, specifically the DNA sequences of the ITS1, LSU, and SSU. Based on the results obtained in this study, the morphology of the secondary conidia of P. neoaphidis was consistent with the original descriptions reported by Humber (1989). Our results were also consistent with observations made by Scorsetti et al. (2006). These authors previously reported P. neoaphidis from aphids in Argentina, with measurements of both primary and secondary conidia very similar to those observed in this study. With regards to its insect hosts, P. neoaphidis is a common aphid pathogen with a cosmopolitan distribution. In Argentina, it was previously recorded in 17 aphid species (López Lastra & Scorsetti, 2006; López Lastra et al., 2019; Manfrino, Hatting, et al., 2014; Manfrino et al., 2013; Scorsetti et al., 2006) and was reported by Scorsetti et al. (2006) as the most predominant pathogen of aphids in Argentina. We identified six specimens of Entomophthora from aphids as E. planchoniana. The identity of the fungal species was determined based on insect host, number/size of conidial nuclei, and conidial size (Humber, 2012). Compared to the original Acta Mycologica / 2020 / Volume 55 / Issue 2 / Article 5522 Publisher: Polish Botanical Society 8 Manfrino et al. / Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Entomophthorales description of E. planchoniana (Keller, 1991), the materials observed in this study had slightly smaller conidia than those originally described. The results obtained in this study, however, were consistent with those made by López Lastra and Scorsetti (2006) and Scorsetti et al. (2006). These authors previously recorded E. planchoniana as a pathogen of N. ribisnigri, Aphis fabae, Aphis gossypii, Myzus sp., and M. persicae in Argentina and observed that the primary conidia from their specimens were slightly smaller than those described by Keller (1991). For many years, E. chromaphidis was considered to be a synonym for E. planchoniana (Gustafsson, 1965; MacLeod et al., 1976; Waterhouse & Brady, 1982) until these two species were definitely separated and justified (Humber & Feng, 1991). Entomophthora chromaphidis occurs in North America and Australia and is characterized as having smaller primary conidia and larger nuclei, whereas E. planchoniana is more widely distributed (primarily in Europe) and has larger primary conidia and smaller nuclei. In Argentina, E. planchoniana has been recorded as an aphid pathogen on horticultural crops (López Lastra & Scorsetti, 2006; López Lastra et al., 2019; Scorsetti et al., 2006). It has also been recorded causing epizootics in M. persicae on pepper and eggplant crops (Manfrino et al., 2016). Regarding its host affinity, previous studies have already covered Entomophthora species. A study elucidated the host-driven divergence of species within the E. muscae (Cohn) Fresen. species complex and E. planchoniana Cornu (Jensen et al., 2009). Thomsen and Jensen (2002) showed a separation of resting spore isolates of E. muscae species complex at the species level, which is not possible using only morphological characters (i.e., diameter). Freimoser et al. (2001) and Jensen et al. (2009) showed that isolates originating from different specimens of the same host taxa appeared to be strongly clonal, even when they were sampled at different localities in different years. In agreement with these observations, our study showed only minor differences in E. planchoniana specimens from several different aphid species based on ITS1 sequences. In this study, the primary and secondary conidia of Zoophthora radicans specimens were slightly bigger than the original description reported by Keller (1991). Our results are consistent with reports by López Lastra and Scorsetti (2006) regarding the measurements of the primary conidia of Z. radicans from T. absoluta, although we observed bigger capilliconidia. Scorsetti et al. (2006) recorded Z. radicans from six aphid species, and our measurements of the primary and secondary conidia of this species are consistent with their data. Additionally, these authors recorded Zoophthora sp. from only one aphid species and found that its morphological characteristics clearly differed from those of Z. radicans. In this study, measurements of Zoophthora from B. brassicae were different from those of Z. radicans, with primary and secondary conidia of greater values. Based on the original description by Batko (1966), this species corresponds to Z. phalloides. Glare et al. (1987) studied different criteria based on morphological, physiological, and biochemical characters in order to reliably differentiate Z. phalloides from Z. radicans. This allowed the division of isolates broadly defined as Z. radicans and Z. phalloides using shape and spore dimensions, host specificity, growth in vitro, and analyses of isoenzymes and fatty acid composition (Glare et al., 1987). Balazy (1993) conducted thorough studies on the morphology, biology, and particularly host specificity of the genus Zoophthora, which enabled him to distinguish and describe seven new species morphologically similar to Z. radicans. Zoophthora phalloides is very similar morphologically to other aphid pathogenic members of the Zoophthora spp. complex. Zoophthora phalloides was first described as a pathogen of aphids (Hemiptera) in Poland by Batko (1966) and has since been recorded in North America, Britain, Denmark, France, Switzerland, Israel, Korea, New Zealand, and occasionally in Australia (e.g., Barta & Cagáň, 2005; Nielsen et al., 2001; Papierok et al., 2016; Yoon et al., 1998), thus indicating a worldwide distribution. Zoophthora radicans has the broadest host range reported for any species of the Entomophthoraceae. This observation has led some authors to suggest that it is a complex of several species differing in their pathogenicity to different hosts (Bałazy, 1986; Glare, 1988; Humber, 1983; McGuire et al., 1987). It has Acta Mycologica / 2020 / Volume 55 / Issue 2 / Article 5522 Publisher: Polish Botanical Society 9 Manfrino et al. / Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Entomophthorales been collected worldwide from hosts in the insect orders Lepidoptera, Diptera, Coleoptera, Orthoptera, Thysanoptera, Hemiptera, and Hymenoptera (Glare & Milner, 1991; Keller, 1991; Milner & Soper, 1981; Papierok et al., 1984; Soper & Ward, 1981). In Argentina, Z. radicans has been reported as a pathogen of several insect species (Manfrino, Hatting, et al., 2014; Manfrino et al., 2013; Manfrino, Zumoffen, et al., 2014; Scorsetti et al., 2006), but there were no records of dipteran hosts until this study. Milner and Mahon (1985) identified Z. radicans in other species of Diptera (Damaromyia sp., Sciaridae, Psychodidae) in Australia. Our results revealed that the ITS1, LSU, and SSU sequences of Z. radicans specimens from Diptera, Lepidoptera, and Hemiptera show few differences. In analyses of LSU sequences, all specimens clustered as Z. radicans, with a slight difference for the dipteran isolate, in agreement with reports of its wide host range. For species included within a species complex, molecular characters are critical data supplementing analysis at different taxa. In this study, species of Zoophthora in Argentina were characterized by molecular tools for the first time. Molecular analyses based on SSU rDNA sequences confirmed the identity of Z. phalloides, with the Argentinean strain grouped with Z. phalloides strain ARSEF 2281 (gb EF392558) with a 100% bootstrap value. Likewise, with regards to host affinity, the Zoophthora aphid-pathogenic isolate CEP 687 was clustered with isolate ARSEF 2281 (Z. phalloides), which was originally isolated from B. brassicae, in accordance with the host aphid species of our native strain (Figure 4). This study reports the first record of Z. phalloides as a pathogen of B. brassicae and Z. radicans as a pathogen of an unidentified species of Chironomidae (Diptera) in Argentina. The identification and establishment of in vitro cultures of these fungal species would allow further studies determining their potential as microbial biological control agents for the management of insect pests of agricultural crops. Of the four fungi, Zoophthora spp. and Pandora neoaphidis can be grown on SDAY, but Zoophthora spp. are easier to cultivate than P. neoaphidis on this medium. Other entomophthoralean species included in the genus Entomophthora require complex and highly nutritious culture media, which is considered a sign of high specialization and close adaptation to the host (Humber, 1994). Based on these observations, Zoophthora strains would have greater potential to be used as targeted microbial control agents. Acknowledgments We thank Michael Griggs of the USDA-ARS (EPPRU, Ithaca, NY) for technical assistance and César Salto, PhD for the identification of lepidopteran host species. We also thank the reviewers for their helpful comments. References Bałazy, S. (1986). Taxonomic criteria for inter- and intraspecific differentiation in the Entomophthoraceae, exemplified by the subgenus Zoophthora. In R. A. Samson, J. M. Vlak, & D. Peters (Eds.), Fundamental and applied aspects of invertebrate pathology (pp. 201–204). Foundation of the Fourth International Colloquium of Invertebrate Pathology. Bałazy, S. (1993). Flora of Poland, Fungi (Mycota), Vol. 24, Entomophthorales. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences. Barta, M., & Cagáň, L. (2005). Records of aphidophagous Entomophthorales in Slovakia. Insect pathogens and insect parasitic nematodes. IOBC/wprs Bulletin, 28(3), 69–72. Barta, M., & Cagáň, L. (2006). Observations on the occurrence of Entomophthorales infecting aphids (Aphidoidea) in Slovakia. BioControl, 51, 795–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-006-9007-7 Batko, A. (1966). A new aphidicolous fungus from Poland, Zoophthora phalloides sp. nov. (Entomophthoraceae). Acta Mycologica, 2, 7–13. https://doi.org/10.5586/am.1966.002 Blackman, R. L., & Eastop, V. F. (2000). Aphids on the world’s crops: An identification and information guide (2nd ed.). Wiley. Choi, S. W., Lim, J. R., Moon, H. C., Kim, J. H., Song, Y. J., Nai, Y. S., & Kim, J. S. (2016). Aedia leucomelas (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) pathogenic Entomophaga aulicae (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales) in sweet potato fields. Journal of Asia Pacific Entomology, 19, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2015.11.008. Acta Mycologica / 2020 / Volume 55 / Issue 2 / Article 5522 Publisher: Polish Botanical Society 10 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-006-9007-7 https://doi.org/10.5586/am.1966.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2015.11.008. Manfrino et al. / Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Entomophthorales DePriest, P. (1993). Small subunit rDNA variation in a population of lichen fungi due to optional group I introns. Gene, 134, 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378- 1119(93)90175-3 Feng, M. G., Johnson, J. B., & Kish, L. P. (1990). Survey of entomopthogenic fungi naturally infecting cereal aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) of irrigated grain crops in southwestern Idaho. Environmental Entomology, 19, 1534–1542. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/19.5.1534 Freimoser, F. M., Jensen, A. B., Tuor, U., Aebi, M., & Eilenberg, J. (2001). Isolation and in vitro cultivation of the aphid pathogenic fungus Entomophthora planchoniana. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 47, 1082–1087. https://doi.org/10.1139/w01-115 Gargas, A., & DePriest, P. T. (1996). A nomenclature for fungal PCR primers with examples from intron-containing SSU rDNA. Mycologia, 88, 745–748. https://doi.org/10.2307/3760969 Glare, T. R. (1988). Variation in the entomopathogenic fungal genus Zoophthora, with special reference to Z. radicans [Doctoral dissertation, Australian National University]. https:// doi.org/10.25911/5d67b42b6ff00 Glare, T. R., & Milner, R. J. (1991). Ecology of entomopathogenic fungi. In D. K. Arora, L. Ajello, & K. G. Mukerji (Eds.), Handbook of applied mycology (pp. 547–612). Marcel Dekker. Glare, T. R., Milner, R. J., Chilvers, G. A., Mahon, R. J., & Brown, W. V. (1987). Taxonomic implications of intraspecific variation amongst isolates of the aphid-pathogenic fungi Zoophthora radicans Brefeld and Z. phalloides Batko (Zygomycetes: Entomophthoraceae. Australian Journal of Botany, 35, 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT9870049 Gryganskyi, A. P., Humber, R. A., Smith, M. E., Hodge, K., Huang, B., Voigt, K., & Vilgalys, R. (2013). Phylogenetic lineages in Entomophthoromycota. Persoonia, 30, 94–105. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158513X666330 Gryganskyi, A. P., Humber, R. A., Smith, M. E., Miadlikovska, J., Wu, S., Voigt, K., Walther, G., Anishchenko, I. M., & Vilgalys, R. (2012). Molecular phylogeny of the Entomophthoromycota. Molecular Phylogenetics Evolution, 65, 682–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.07.026 Gustafsson, M. (1965). On species of the genus Entomophthora Fres. in Sweden. I. Classification and distribution. Lantburkshogskolans Annaler, 32, 102–212. Hajek, A. E., Steinkraus, D. C., & Castrillo, L. A. (2018). Sleeping beauties: Horizontal transmission via resting spores of species in the Entomophthoromycotina. Insects, 9, Article 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9030102 Hall, T. A. (1999). BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series, 41, 95–98. Humber, R. A. (1983). Species complex in the Entomophthorales: New problems for old species. In Society for Invertebrate Pathology 16th Annual Meeting (pp. 44–45). Cornell University. Humber, R. A. (1989). Synopsis of a revised classification for the Entomophthorales (Zygomycotina). Mycotaxon, 34, 441–460. Humber, R. A. (1994). Special considerations for operating a culture collection of fastidious fungal pathogens. Journal of Industrial Microbiology, 13, 195–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01584009 Humber, R. A. (2012). Fungi: Identification. In L. A. Lacey (Ed.), Manual of techniques in insect pathology (pp. 153–185). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12- 432555-5.X5000-3 Humber, R. A. (2016). Entomophthoromycota: A new overview of some of the oldest terrestrial fungi. In D. Li (Ed.), Biology of microfungi (pp. 127–145). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29137-6_6 Humber, R. A., & Feng, M. G. (1991). Entomophthora chromaphidis (Entomophthorales): The correct identification of an aphid pathogen in the Pacific Northwest and elsewhere. Mycotaxon, 41, 497–504. Jensen, A. B., & Eilenberg, J. (2001). Genetic variation within the insect-pathogenic genus Entomophthora, focusing on the E. muscae complex, using PCR- RFLP of the ITS II and the LSU rDNA. Mycological Research, 105, 307–312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756201003434 Jensen, A. B., Eilenberg, J., & López Lastra, C. C. (2009). Differential divergences of obligately insect-pathogenic Entomophthora species from fly and aphid hosts. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 300, 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01778.x Jensen, A. B., Fournier, A., Widmer, F., Keller, S., Eilenberg, J., & Enkerli, J. (2007). Molecular tools to study natural occurrence, ecology and phylogeny of Entomophthorales. IOBC/wprs Bulletin, 30(1), 99–105. Acta Mycologica / 2020 / Volume 55 / Issue 2 / Article 5522 Publisher: Polish Botanical Society 11 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(93)90175-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(93)90175-3 https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/19.5.1534 https://doi.org/10.1139/w01-115 https://doi.org/10.2307/3760969 https://doi.org/10.25911/5d67b42b6ff00 https://doi.org/10.25911/5d67b42b6ff00 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT9870049 https://doi.org/10.3767/003158513X666330 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.07.026 https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9030102 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01584009 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-432555-5.X5000-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-432555-5.X5000-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29137-6_6 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756201003434 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01778.x Manfrino et al. / Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Entomophthorales Jensen, A. B., Thomsen, L., & Eilenberg, J. (2001). Intraspecific variation and host specificity of Entomophthora muscae sensu stricto isolates revealed by random amplified polymorphic DNA, universal primed PCR, PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism, and conidial morphology. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 78, 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1006/jipa.2002.5079 Keller, S. (1991). Arthropod-pathogenic Entomophthorales of Switzerland. II. Erynia, Eryniopsis, Neozygites, Zoophthora and Tarichium. Sydowia, 43, 39–122. Keller, S. (2007). Arthropod-pathogenic Entomophthorales: Biology, ecology, identification. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Kjøller, R., & Rosendahl, S. (2000). Detection of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomales) in roots by nested PCR and SSCP (single strand conformation polymorphism). Plant and Soil, 226, Article 189. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026499923717 Lieckfeldt, E., Samuels, G. J., Helgard, H. I., & Petrini, O. (1999). A morphological and molecular perspective of Trichoderma viride: Is it one or two species? Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65, 2418–2428. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.65.6.2418- 2428.1999 López Lastra, C. C., & Scorsetti, A. C. (2006). Hongos Entomophthorales patógenos de insectos de la República Argentina [Entomophthorales fungi pathogens of insects from Argentina]. Revista de Biología Tropical, 54, 311–315. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v54i2.13871 López Lastra, C. C., Toledo, A. V., Manfrino, R. G., & Gutierrez, A. C. (2019). Southernmost records of Entomophtoromycotina. Updated review of Entomophthoralean fungal insect pathogens of Argentina. Caldasia, 41, 349–357. https://dx.doi.org/10.15446/caldasia.v41n2.72653 MacLeod, D. M., Muller-Kogler, E., & Wilding, N. (1976). Entomophthora species with E. muscae-like conidia. Mycologia, 68, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1976.12019881 Maddison, W. P., & Maddison, D. R. (2009). Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.7 [Computer software]. http://www.mesquiteproject.org/ Manfrino, R. G., Gutiérrez, A. C., Páramo, M. R., Salto, C. E., & López Lastra, C. C. (2016). Prevalence of entomophthoralean fungi (Entomophthoromycota) of aphids in relation to developmental stages. Pest Management Science, 72, 1566–1571. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4188 Manfrino, R. G., Hatting, J. L., Humber, R., Salto, C. E., & López Lastra, C. C. (2014). Natural occurrence of entomophthoroid fungi (Entomophthoromycota) of aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on cereal crops in Argentina. Annals of Applied Biology, 164, 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12089 Manfrino, R. G., Zumoffen, L., Salto, C. E., & López Lastra, C. C. (2013). Potential plant-aphid-fungal associations aiding conservation biological control of cereal aphids in Argentina. International Journal of Pest Management, 59, 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2013.869372 Manfrino, R. G., Zumoffen, L., Salto, C. E., & López Lastra, C. C. (2014). Natural occurrence of entomophthoroid fungi of aphid pests on Medicago sativa L. in Argentina. Revista Argentina de Microbiología, 46, 49–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0325-7541(14)70048-3 McGuire, M. R., Maddox, J. V., & Ambrust, E. J. (1987). Host range studies of an Erynia radicans strain (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales) isolated from Empoasca fabae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 50, 75–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2011(87)90150-9 Milner, R. J., & Mahon, R. J. (1985). Strain variation in Zoophthora radicans, a pathogen on a variety of insect hosts in Australia. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society, 24, 195–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-6055.1985.tb00225.x Milner, R. J., & Soper, R. S. (1981). Bioassay of Entomophthora against the spotted alfalfa aphid Therioaphis trifolii f. maculata. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 37, 168–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2011(81)90071-9 Moubasher, A. H., Abdel-Rahman, M. A., Abdel-Mallek, A. Y., & Hammam, G. H. (2010). Biodiversity of entomopathogenic fungi infecting wheat and cabbage aphids in Assiut. Egyptian Journal of Basic Applied Mycology, 1, 53–60. Nielsen, C., Eilenberg, J., & Dromph, K. (2001). Entomophthorales on cereal aphids. Characterisation, growth, virulence, epizootiology and potential for microbial control. Frontlinien, Miljøministeriet. Papierok, B., Dedryver, C., & Hullé, M. (2016). First records of aphid-pathogenic Entomophthorales in the sub-Antarctic archipelagos of Crozet and Kerguelen. Polar Research, 35, Article 28765. https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v35.28765 Papierok, B., Torres, B. V. L., & Arnault, M. (1984). Contribution a ľ etude de la specificite parasitaire du champignon entomopathogene Zoophthora radicans (Zygomycetes: Acta Mycologica / 2020 / Volume 55 / Issue 2 / Article 5522 Publisher: Polish Botanical Society 12 https://doi.org/10.1006/jipa.2002.5079 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026499923717 https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.65.6.2418-2428.1999 https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.65.6.2418-2428.1999 https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v54i2.13871 https://dx.doi.org/10.15446/caldasia.v41n2.72653 https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1976.12019881 http://www.mesquiteproject.org/ https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4188 https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12089 https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2013.869372 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0325-7541(14)70048-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2011(87)90150-9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-6055.1985.tb00225.x https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2011(81)90071-9 https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v35.28765 Manfrino et al. / Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Entomophthorales Entomophthorales) [Contribution to the study of the parasitic specificity of the entomopathogenic fungus Zoophthora radicans (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales)]. Entomophaga, 29, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02372215 Scorsetti, A. C., Humber, R., García, J. J., & López Lastra, C. C. (2006). Natural occurrence of entomopathogenic fungi (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales) of aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) pests of horticultural crops in Argentina. BioControl, 52, 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-006-9045-1 Scorsetti, A. C., Jensen, A. B., López Lastra, C. C., & Humber, R. A. (2011). First report of Pandora neoaphidis resting spore formation in vivo in aphid hosts. Fungal Biology, 116, 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2011.11.002 Soper, R. S., & Ward, M. G. (1981). Production, formulation and application of fungi for insect control. In G. C. Papavias (Ed.), Biological control in crop production (pp. 161–180). Allanheld, Osmun & Co. Spatafora, J. W., Chang, Y., Benny, G. L., Lazarus, K., Smith, M. E., Berbee, M. L., Bonito, G., Corradi, N., Grigoriev, I., Gryganskyi, A., James, T. Y., O’Donnell, K., Roberson, R. W., Taylor, T. N., Vehling, J., Vilgalys, R., White, M. M., & Stajich, J. E. (2016). A phylum level phylogenetic classification of zygomycete fungi based on genome-scale data. Mycologia, 108, 1028–1046. https://doi.org/10.3852/16-042 Swofford, D. (2002). PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0. Sinauer Associates. Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2011). MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28, 2731–2739. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121 Thomsen, L., & Jensen, A. B. (2002). Application of nested-PCR technique on resting spores from the Entomophthora muscae species complex: Implications for analyses of host–pathogen population interactions. Mycologia, 94, 794–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2003.11833173 Traugott, M., Bell, J. R., & Broad, G. R. (2008). Endoparasitism in cereal aphids: Molecular analysis of a whole parasitoid community. Molecular Ecology, 17, 3928–3938. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03878.x Waterhouse, G. M., & Brady, B. L. (1982). Key to the species of Entomophthora s. lato. Bulletin of the British Mycological Society, 16, 113–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007- 1528(82)80006-0 White, T. J., Bruns, T. D., Lee, S. B., & Taylor, J. W. (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. S. Sninsky, & T. J. White (Eds.), PCR protocols: A guide to the methods and applications (pp. 315–322). Academic Press. Yoon, C. S., Sung, G. H., Lee, S., Yun, T. Y., & Lee, J. O. (1998). Zoophthora phalloides Batko (Zygomycetes: Entomophthoraceae), a fungal parasite of the aphid Dactynotus species in Korea. Korean Journal of Mycology, 26, 413–415. Zhou, X., Su, X., & Liu, H. (2016). A floatable formulation and laboratory bioassay of Pandora delphacis (Entomophthoromycota: Entomophthorales) for the control of rice pest Nilaparvata lugens Stål (Hemiptera: Delphacidae). Pest Management Science, 72, 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3981 Acta Mycologica / 2020 / Volume 55 / Issue 2 / Article 5522 Publisher: Polish Botanical Society 13 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02372215 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-006-9045-1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2011.11.002 https://doi.org/10.3852/16-042 https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121 https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2003.11833173 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03878.x https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1528(82)80006-0 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1528(82)80006-0 https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3981 Introduction Material and Methods Specimens and Morphological Characterization Molecular Characterization: DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification Results Fungal Identification and Taxonomic Observations Entomophthora planchoniana Cornu Pandora neoaphidis (Remaud. & Hennebert) Humber Zoophthora phalloides A. Batko Zoophthora radicans (Bref.) A. Batko Molecular Characterization: DNA Sequencing and Molecular Analyses Discussion Acknowledgement References