ap-v2.dvi Acta Polytechnica Vol. 50 No. 2/2010 Injection and Combustion of RME with Water Emulsions in a Diesel Engine J. Cisek Abstract This paper presents ways of using the fully-digitised triggerable AVL VideoScope 513D video system for analysing the injection and combustion inside a diesel engine cylinder fuelled by RME with water emulsions. The research objects were: standard diesel fuel, rapeseed methyl ester (RME) and RME – water emulsions. With the aid of a helical flow reactor, stable emulsions with the water fraction up to 30 % weight were obtained, using an additive to prevent the water from separating out of the emulsion. An investigation was made of the effect of the emulsions on exhaust gas emissions (NOX, CO and HC), particulate matter emissions, smoke and the fuel consumption of a one-cylinder HD diesel engine with direct injection. Additionally, the maximum cylinder pressure rise was calculated from the indicator diagram. The test engine was operated at a constant speed of 1600 rpm and 4 bar BMEP load conditions. The fuel injection and combustion processes were observed and analysed using endoscopes and a digital camera. The temperature distribution in the combustion chamberwas analysed quantitativelyusing the two-colourmethod. The injection and combustion phenomena were described and compared. A way to reduce NOX formation in the combustion chamber of diesel engines by adding water in the combustion zone was presented. Evaporating water efficiently lowers the peak flame temperature and the temperature in the post-flame zone. For diesel engines, there is an exponential relationship between NOX emissions and peak combustion temperatures. The energy needed to vaporize thewater results in lower peak temperatures of the combusted gases, with a consequent reduction in nitrogen oxide formation. The experimental results show up to 50 % NOX emission reduction with the use of 30% water in an RME emulsion, with unchanged engine performance. Keywords: diesel engine, RME – water emulsions, injection, combustion, visualization. 1 Introduction Among power-driving combustion engines, diesel en- gines are the most efficient, and their fuel consump- tion is 30 % lower than in petrol engines. However, one of the major problems with diesel engines con- cerns their exhaust gas emissions, which contain ex- cessive amounts of toxic substances, such as nitrogen oxides NOX and particulate matter PM. In the light of environmental legislation, attempts to reduce these toxic emissions remain a current issue. Given the current state of the engineering knowl- edge, simultaneous reduction of emission levels of the two toxic substances through design modifications to diesel engines is not possible. Recently new gas treat- ment methods have been developed, though the gas can be treated outside the engine only, after leaving the cylinder. A major disadvantage of these methods is their high costs, which preclude their widespread use. Extensive research is being undertaken to investi- gate and modify the conditions for injection and com- bustion of diesel fuels to eliminate, or at least to vastly reduce, the zones of NOX formation (high temperature and rich in oxygen zones) and the zones where condi- tions are ripe for soot formation. Theoretical and experimental data available so far has revealed that NOX emissions can be most effec- tively reduced when a carefully prepared fuel-water emulsion is injected into the cylinder. The PM emis- sions are reduced and, in certain conditions, fuel con- sumption can also be lowered [8]. However, one issue remains unsolved: how to prepare such an emulsion? 2 Preparation of the RME-water emulsion The experimental program uses a helical flow reactor incorporated in the supply system of the engine. The helical flow of fluids in a ring-shaped slit between coax- ial cylinders, the inner one rotating, is interpreted as a combination of Poiseuille’s axial flow and Couette’s rotating flow. Because of the stability loss, the flow- ing fluids begin to develop Taylor vortices, which cause intensive mixing. The dispersion factors in the plane perpendicular to the axis tend to be high, whilst the axial dispersion is insignificant (as the flow is induced by piston motion). So far, research data on the disper- sion of the two mutually insolvent liquids has revealed that the flow reactor can be used to produce an emul- sion in a wide range of fluid flow rates and their actual proportions. 37 Acta Polytechnica Vol. 50 No. 2/2010 Fig. 1: RME – water emulsion (30 % of water – m/m) The helical flow reactor was used to produce stable emulsions of rapeseed methyl ester (RME) and dis- tilled water, the proportion of water being 10 % or 30 % by weight. A surface agent, Rokafenol, was first added to distilled water, in volumetric proportion of 2 %, to ensure stability of the emulsion. The emulsion was prepared directly before fuelling the engine. 3 Experimental setup and methodology The experimental setup incorporates a one-cylinder HD diesel engine with a direct injection system SB3.1 (cylinder diameter D = 127 mm, stroke S = 146 mm) equipped with a 4-nozzle injector, with outlet nozzle diameter 0.34 mm. Measurements were taken at con- stant speed (1 600 rpm and 4 BMEP load conditions), regardless of the fuel type. The engine was fuelled with: diesel fuel (sulphur content < 50 ppm), rapeseed methyl ester RME, RME-water emulsions (in propor- tions: 10 % water – 90 % RME and 30 % water and 70 % of RME, by weight). The setup for the braking tests (see Fig. 2) incorpo- rates the measurement and control apparatus for mea- surements of the fast-changing pressures within the cylinder and in the injection installation (AVL Indime- ter), a set of analysers to measure the concentrations of CO, THC, NOX, (AVL CEB II), an installation to handle the PM emissions and the AVL VideoScope 513D video system for visualising the fuel injection and combustion processes. The system enables archiving of injection and combustion images, registered with frequency approaching 0.1◦ of the crankshaft rotation angle [1]. The measurement was repeated 10 times for each shaft rotation angle, for the purposes of statisti- cal treatment of the images (to define the probability of the occurrence of an injection and/or a flame). In addition, the two-colour method was applied [1] to de- termine the isotherm distribution in the diffusion flame in the function of the shaft rotation angle. Subsequent stages of fuel injection, ignition and combustion were monitored for each fuel type. The effects of the fuel type on the energy-based parameters, toxicity, presence of smoke in the exhaust gas and the maximum rate of pressure rise in the cylin- der are addressed below. Of major interest are other parameters of the indicator diagrams, the heat release rates and the injection characteristics. Fig. 2: Experimental setup 38 Acta Polytechnica Vol. 50 No. 2/2010 4 Energy-based parameters of the diesel engine During all the tests, the engine was operated at a con- stant rate of 1 600 rpm, torque 60 Nm (equivalent to 4 bar BMEP load conditions and effective power N c = 10 kW). Of major interest was the temperature of the exhaust gas at the outlet channel. The indi- cator diagrams yield the retardation of ignition, the maximum rate of combustion pressure rise, and the maximum pressure in the cylinder. Fuel consumption was measured by weight. Diesel Fuel – standard diesel fuel, RME – rapeseed methyl ester, RME+10 % – emulsion 90 % RME+10 % water, RME+30 % – emulsion 70 % RME+30 % water Fig. 3: Fuel consumption Gh and specific fuel consumption ge at 1600 rpm and BMEP=4 bar with different fuels Diesel Fuel – standard diesel fuel, RME – rapeseed methyl ester, RME+10 % – emulsion 90 % RME+10 % water, RME+30 % – emulsion 70 % RME+30 % water Fig. 4: Total efficiency at 1600 rpm and BMEP=4 bar with different fuels The plot in Fig. 3 reveals a major increase in the hourly and specific consumption of rapeseed methyl esters (RME) and its water emulsions. This increase is attributable to the fact that the calorific value of RME (37.5 MJ/kg) is 1 % lower than that of stan- dard diesel fuel (42 MJ/kg). In addition, the calorific value of water emulsions of RME is lower by 10 % and 30 % than that of pure RME, since water has no calorific value at all. Still smaller differences between particular fuel types are revealed in the total efficiency plots ηo as the differences in their calorific value are accounted for. The total efficiency for RME and diesel fuel is al- most identical, approaching 29 %, whereas the use of an emulsion with 30 % water content reduces the total efficiency value slightly, to 28 %. The next plot shows the temperature of the ex- haust gas measured at the outlet channel. It is appar- ent that the use of a water emulsion causes a signifi- cant reduction in the exhaust gas temperature, which is a most favorable feature particularly at higher loads, when the thermal loading of the engine and turbo- compressors becomes critical. Diesel Fuel – standard diesel fuel, RME – rapeseed methyl ester, RME+10 % – emulsion 90 % RME+10 % water, RME+30 % – emulsion 70 % RME+30 % water Fig. 5: Exhaust gases temperature at 1600 rpm and BMEP=4 bar with different fuels Diesel Fuel – standard diesel fuel, RME – rapeseed methyl ester, RME+10 % – emulsion 90 % RME+10 % water, RME+30 % – emulsion 70 % RME+30 % water Fig. 6: Maximum rise of cylinder pressure at 1600 rpm and BMEP=4 bar with different fuels Depending on the fuel type, the retardation of ig- nition also varies (10◦ of the shaft rotation angle for standard diesel fuel and 9◦ for RMR). When the en- 39 Acta Polytechnica Vol. 50 No. 2/2010 gine is fuelled with 10 %- and 30 %-water emulsions of RME, the retardation of ignition reaches a level of 11◦ and 14◦ of the shaft rotation angle, respectively. These reports are corroborated by images of the com- bustion chamber taken at the instant when the self- ignition process begins (see Fig. 14 and Fig. 15). Ad- dition of water in the form of an emulsion increases the ignition delay and causes the combustion process to begin more rapidly, as evidenced by the differences in the maximum rate of pressure rise inside the cylin- der, well apparent in Fig. 6. The reported difference between RME and its 10 % water emulsion seems the most significant, and is accompanied by a slight in- crease in the maximum pressure of combustion pcmax, rising from 69 bar (standard diesel fuel and RME) to 71 bar (for a 30 % water emulsion of RME). 5 Toxicity of the exhaust gas Measurements of the gaseous substances constituting the exhaust gas were taken with the AVL CEB II set of analysers, using the hot gas path. The oxy- gen contents were measured with the PMD param- agnetic analyser, whilst an NDIR infrared nondisper- sive analyser was used to handle the carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. The NOX emissions were mea- sured by a CLD chemo-luminescent analyser equipped with an NO2/NO converter and hydrocarbons HC – with a ionisation analyser with an HFID hot gas path. The plots below show the proportions of toxic sub- stances in the exhaust gas: nitrogen oxides NOX, car- bon monoxide CO and incompletely combusted hydro- carbons HC (re-calculated in terms of propane concen- tration C3H8). The PM emissions were obtained by the gravity (gravimetric) method, using a diluting tunnel provid- ing the partial gas flow PFDS and partial sampling. The Bosch smoke number was measured using an AVL SmokeMeter. Diesel Fuel – standard diesel fuel, RME – rapeseed methyl ester, RME+10 % – emulsion 90 % RME+10 % water, RME+30% – emulsion 70 % RME+30 % water Fig. 7: Nitric Oxides NOX concentration at 1600 rpm and BMEP=4 bar with different fuels This plot shows the NOX emissions in the exhaust gas. Fuelling the engine with RME instead of standard diesel fuel causes a slight increase in NOX emissions, whilst the use of a 10 % water emulsion of RME re- duces the NOX contents by 30 %. When the 30 % emulsion is used, the NOX concentrations are dou- bly reduced, in relation to pure RME and standard diesel fuel. It is worth mentioning that this is so even though the beginnings of the combustion process are more rapid (Fig. 7). Diesel Fuel – standard diesel fuel, RME – rapeseed methyl ester, RME+10 % – emulsion 90 % RME+10 % water, RME+30 % – emulsion 70 % RME+30 % water Fig. 8: Carbon monoxide concentration at 1600 rpm and BMEP=4 bar with different fuels Diesel Fuel – standard diesel fuel, RME – rapeseed methyl ester, RME+10 % – emulsion 90 % RME+10 % water, RME+30 % – emulsion 70 % RME+30 % water Fig. 9: Total Hydro Carbon concentration at 1600 rpm and BMEP=4 bar with different fuels NOX emissions from engines fuelled by emulsions can be significantly reduced due to the reduction in the local peak combustion temperature, as shown in Fig. 9, mainly due to evaporation of the water con- tained in the emulsions. This positive effect is at- tributable to the fact that water droplets injected in the form of an emulsion get directly to the combustion zone. In addition, dilution of gases by water vapour inside the cylinder reduces the local oxygen concentra- tion [8], which causes the thermal formation of NOX 40 Acta Polytechnica Vol. 50 No. 2/2010 to proceed at a lower rate. In accordance with the Zeldowicz’s extended model, the rate of NOX thermal formation is associated with the atomic oxygen con- centration (coming mainly from dissociation of atmo- spheric oxygen molecules), and increases exponentially with temperature and the proportion of oxygen. These two plots show the concentration of carbon monoxide and non-combusted hydrocarbons HC in ex- haust gases. The use of pure RME and its water emulsion causes the CO and HC emissions to increase considerably, but this is of little importance as the emission levels are still relatively low and these toxic substances can be largely neutralised by incorporating catalysers in the exhaust system. Diesel Fuel – standard diesel fuel, RME – rapeseed methyl ester, RME+10 % – emulsion 90 % RME+10 % water, RME+30 % – emulsion 70 % RME+30 % water Fig. 10: Emission and specific emission ofParticulateMat- ters at 1600 rpm and BMEP=4 bar with different fuels Diesel Fuel – standard diesel fuel, RME – rapeseed methyl ester, RME+10 % – emulsion 90 % RME+10 % water, RME+30 % – emulsion 70 % RME+30 % water Fig. 11: Bosch Smoke number at 1600 rpm and BMEP=4 bar with different fuels The plots summarise the Bosch smoke number and the PM hourly and unit emission data. For an en- gine fuelled by emulsions, the PM emission level and the smoke number increases with increased water con- tent, which may be attributable to the reduced rate of soot afterburning during the combustion process, caused by a significant reduction of the combustion temperature. Measurements of the exhaust tempera- ture seem to corroborate this view. A comparison of the exhaust temperature and the smoke number plots reveals that the higher the temperature of the exhaust gas, the lower the smoke number, which may be at- tributed to excessive cooling of the combustion zone under relatively small loads. 6 Visualisation of fuel injection and combustion These images are registered with the use of the AVL VideoScope system for visualisation of fuel injection and combustion inside the cylinder. Accordingly, the images were registered from the instant when fuel in- jection begins right through to the apparent end of the combustion process. The sampling frequency was equal to 1◦ of the shaft rotation angle. To enable im- age recording, the combustion chamber was lit with a stroboscope lamp. The measurement procedure was repeated 10 times for each shaft rotation angle, for the purposes of statistical treatment of the images (to de- fine the probability of the occurrence of an injection and/or a flame). In addition, the two-colour method was applied [1] to determine the isotherm distribution in the diffusion flame in the function of the shaft ro- tation angle. Registered images of the fuel injection and com- bustion process, and measurement data: the rapidly- changing pressure inside the cylinder and the rise of the metering pin for each fuel type were utilised to monitor the subsequent stages of fuel injection, igni- tion and combustion and to compute the fuel injection rate. Figs. 12, 13, 14 show the fuel injection and combus- tion processes registered for the shaft rotation angles corresponding to the selected parameters of the work- ing cycle of the engine. These parameters include: maximum injection rate, commencement of the igni- tion process (ignition timing) and maximum pressure of combustion. Figs. 15, 16, 17 show statistically-treated results of 10 repeated measurements taken for each shaft rota- tion angle, corresponding to the maximum injection rate, the ignition time and the maximum pressure of combustion. Fig. 18 shows measurement data for the shaft ro- tation angle corresponding to the maximum pressure of combustion, and also results of image analysis sup- ported by the dedicated thermovision software. This image was obtained after statistical treatment of 10 data measurements collected for the shaft ro- tation angle corresponding to the maximum injection rate. In the regions marked in red, a fuel jet was regis- tered during each repeated procedure. This should be interpreted as 100 % likelihood of the occurrence of a fuel jet at that point. In regions marked in black, no 41 Acta Polytechnica Vol. 50 No. 2/2010 repeated imaging would reveal a fuel jet. This can be interpreted as 0 % likelihood of the occurrence of a fuel jet. Intermediate colours indicate that a fuel jet was revealed only in some of the repeated measurements. It is readily apparent that the shape and extent of the fuel jet changes with the increased proportion of water in the emulsion, but that the repeatability of the injection process is impaired. Fig. 12: Image taken inside the combustion chamber (one fuel jet) for the shaft rotation angle corresponding to the maximal injection rate αdqmax ON – standard diesel fuel, RME – rapeseed methyl ester, RME+10 % – emulsion 90 % RME+10 % water, RME+30 % – emulsion 70 % RME+30 % water Fig. 13: Probability of the presence of injected fuel in the given region of the combustion zone for the shaft rotation angle corresponding to themaximuminjection rate αdqmax Fig. 14 shows the images taken inside the combus- tion chamber at the instant when ignition begins (first visible flames). It appears that the addition of water in the form of an emulsion retards the ignition timing, which is line with the indicator diagrams. ON – standard diesel fuel, RME – rapeseed methyl ester, RME+10 % – emulsion 90 % RME+10 % water, RME+30 % – emulsion 70 % RME+30 % water Fig. 14: Image taken inside the combustion chamber (one fuel jet) for the shaft rotation angle corresponding to igni- tion timing αps ON – standard diesel fuel, RME – rapeseed methyl ester, RME+10 % – emulsion 90 % RME+10 % water, RME+30 % – emulsion 70 % RME+30 % water Fig. 15: Probability of the occurrence of a injected fuel or a flame in the given region of the combustion zone for the shaft rotation angle corresponding to ignition timing αps 42 Acta Polytechnica Vol. 50 No. 2/2010 The image in Fig. 15 was obtained after statistical treatment of 10 data measurements collected for the shaft rotation angle corresponding to the ignition tim- ing. In the regions marked in red, a fuel jet or a flame was registered during each repeated procedure. This should be interpreted as 100 % likelihood of the occur- rence of a fuel jet at that point. In regions marked in black, no repeated imaging would reveal a fuel jet or a flame. This can be interpreted as 0 % likelihood of the occurrence of a fuel jet or a flame. Intermediate colours indicate that a fuel jet or a flame was revealed only in some of the repeated measurements. The following drawings show the images and the statistically treated results of image analysis regis- tered for the shaft rotation angle corresponding to the maximum pressure of combustion. This stage of the combustion process is of key importance, featuring the local peak temperatures in the post-flame zones, which in turn determine the amounts of NOX being formed [8]. ON – standard diesel fuel, RME – rapeseed methyl ester, RME+10 % – emulsion 90 % RME+10 % water, RME+30 % – emulsion 70 % RME+30 % water Fig. 16: Image taken inside the combustion chamber (one fuel jet) for the shaft rotation angle corresponding to the maximum pressure of combustion αpmax Fig. 16 shows the combustion process in the same part of the chamber as in the previous images (Figs. 12–14). During this stage of the process a dif- fusion flame is registered, and a portion of a piston bottom is revealed. The zone of the high-intensity flame is clearly greatest for pure RME, with standard diesel fuel being next in line. For the water emulsions, particularly the 30 % emulsion, the flame is less in- tense and occupies a smaller portion of the monitored chamber. ON – standard diesel fuel, RME – rapeseed methyl ester, RME+10 % – emulsion 90 % RME+10 % water, RME+30 % – emulsion 70 % RME+30 % water Fig. 17: Probability of the occurrence of a flame in the given region of the combustion chamber for the shaft ro- tation angle corresponding to the maximum pressure of combustion αpmax The shaft rotation angle at which the maximum combustion pressure is registered is similar for all tested fuel types, and the maximum pressures of com- bustion are also similar. The two-colour method was applied, supported by dedicated software, to determine the isotherm distri- bution in the diffusion flame in the function of the shaft rotation angle [1]. The diagrams below show the tem- perature distribution in the monitored section of the combustion chamber for the shaft rotation angle cor- responding to the maximum pressure of combustion. The method is based on an analysis of the diffusion flame radiation spectrum, enabling us to find the tem- perature distribution inside the combustion chamber, provided that it exceeds 1 800 K. In the case considered here, the temperatures would only slightly exceed 1 800 K, because of the rel- atively low loading (BMEP pressure 4 bar). However, a comparison of the combustion chamber regions oc- cupied by the flame with temperatures in excess of 1 800 K reveals that in engines fuelled with RME the maximum local temperatures are higher than in those fuelled with standard diesel fuel. The use of RME- water emulsions leads to a significant reduction in the maximum local temperatures: the larger the propor- tion of water, the more significant the reduction. Ac- cordingly, the NOX concentration in the exhaust gases is significantly reduced, as shown in Fig. 5. For 30 % water emulsions, the NOX emission level is reduced by nearly 50 % in relation to pure RME or standard diesel fuel. 43 Acta Polytechnica Vol. 50 No. 2/2010 ON – ON – standard diesel fuel, RME – rapeseed methyl ester, RME+10 % – emulsion 90 % RME+10 % water, RME+30 % – emulsion 70 % RME+30 % water Fig. 18: Temperature distribution in the flame (in excess of 1800 K) for the shaft rotation angle corresponding to the maximum pressure of combustion αpmax An analysis of the registered images featuring the injection and combustion phenomena leads us to the following conclusions: 1. Fuel injection proceeds differently, depending on the fuel type. For RME, a cloud of well-sprayed fuel is formed around the injected jet (Fig. 11–12), which is then combusted in a large volume (of the chamber). In the case of RME-water emulsions, the situation is entirely different. No straight- forward relationship is available between the pro- portion of water and the extent and angle of the jet cone for the given emulsion type. Larger pro- portions of water encourage a greater extent and greater angles of the jet cone and the process is similar to that observed for pure RME. This is attributable to the fact that a low water content in emulsions (from several to around ten percent) would be revealed by the local viscosity extreme. Stable emulsions with 10 % water content dis- played the highest viscosity by far, followed by the 30 % water emulsion, RME and standard diesel fuel. For fuels with a low water content, high vis- cosity leads to a rapid increase in flow resistance as the fuel has to push through the spray nozzle openings. A further increase in the proportion of water reduces the kinematic viscosity of fuels. For emulsions, the injection process is similar to that observed for pure RME. 2. The zone occupied by the flame at the time of ig- nition is largest for RME and smallest for 30 % water emulsions (Fig. 14–15). This is associated both with the spraying spectrum in the macro- scale and with the latent heat required for evap- oration of the water contained in the emulsion. Ignition becomes retarded with an increase in the proportion of water in the emulsion. 3. For the maximum combustion pressure (Fig. 16–17), the phenomena inside the cylinder pro- ceed differently for the different fuel types. When the engine is fuelled with RME, the maximum combustion temperatures are higher and, as a re- sult, the NOX emissions are higher than when standard diesel fuel is used. Addition of water (to form RME-water emulsions) significantly reduces the “maximum maximorum” temperature of the working medium, both in terms of the duration of the process and the cylinder volume covered by isotherms featuring high combustion tempera- tures. In consequence, the NOX emissions in the exhaust gas are significantly reduced. 7 Conclusions The application of fuel-water emulsions to the fuelling of diesel engines reduces the amounts of toxic sub- stances present in the exhaust gas. The selection of key parameters of the emulsion requires extensive analyses, and the present study is a contribution to the body of research. Research work is now underway in several research centres worldwide [2, 3, 4, 5, 6] and also in Poland [10]. Giving a better insight into the processes, and searching for vital relationships between the prop- erties of water-fuel emulsions and energy-based, en- vironmental and operational parameters of the diesel engine will enable Poland to offer a more substantial contribution to the undergoing research work. References [1] Cisek, J.: Options for the Analysis of Fuel In- jection using Visual Digitized Methods. Journal of Middle European Construction and Design of Cars, No. 3, September 2004. [2] Miyamoto, N., Ogawa, H., Wang, J.: Significant NOX Reductions with Direct Water Injection into the Sub-Chamber of an IDI Diesel Engine. SAE Transactions, 1995, No. 950 609. [3] Miyano, H., Sungawa, T., Tayama, K., Nagae, Y., Yasueda, S.: The Ship Test For Low-NOX By Stratified Fuel-Water Injection System. 21st In- ternational Congress on CombustionEngines. In- terlaken 1995. CIMAC 1995. [4] Murayama, T., Morishima, Y., Tsukahara, M., Miyamoto, N.: Experimental Reduction of NOX, Smoke, and BSFC in a Diesel Engine Using Uniquely Produced Water (0–80 %) to Fuel Emul- sion. SAE Transactions, 1978, No. 780 224. 44 Acta Polytechnica Vol. 50 No. 2/2010 [5] Velji, A., Remmels, W., Schmidt, R. M.: Water to reduce NOX – Emission in Diesel Engines. A Basic Study. 21st InternationalCongress onCom- bustion Engines. Interlaken 1995. CIMAC 1995. [6] Mello, J. P., Mellor, A. M.: NOX Emission from Direct Injection Diesel Engines with Wa- ter/Steam Dilution. SAE Transactions, 1999. [7] Merkisz, J., Piaseczny, L.: Wp lyw zasila- nia emulsją paliwowo-wodną na toksyczność i wskaźniki pracy okrętowego średnioobrotowego silnika spalinowego. Journal of KONES 2001, No. 3–4, p. 294–303. [8] Banot, K.: Wykorzystanie wody w strefie spala- nia oleju napędowego dla obniżenia emisji NOX w silniku wysokoprężnym. KONMOT-AUTOPRO- GRES, Czasopismo Techniczne, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Krakowskiej, 6-M/2004, p. 79–86, 2004. [9] Cisek, J.: Research Project No. 5 T12D 033 25. Politechnika Krakowska. Kraków, 2008. [10] Szlachta, Z., Cisek, J.: Research Project No. 8 T12D 035 20. Politechnika Krakowska. Kraków, 2008. Jerzy Cisek, Ph.D., M.E. Phone: +048 (12) 628 36 75 E-mail: jcisek@pk.edu.pl Cracow University of Technology Institute of Automobiles and Internal Combustion Engines, Division of Diesel Engines 31-864 Kraków, al. Jana Pawla II 37, Poland 45