ap-3-12.dvi Acta Polytechnica Vol. 52 No. 3/2012 Experimental Investigation of Radial Gas Dispersion Coefficients in a Fluidized Bed Jǐŕı Štefanica1, Jan Hrdlička1 1 CTU in Prague, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Energy Engineering, Technická 4, 166 07 Praha, Czech Republic Correspondence to: jiri.stefanica@seznam.cz Abstract In a fluidized bed boiler, the combustion efficiency, the NOX formation rate, flue gas desulphurization and fluidized bed heat transfer are all ruled by the gas distribution. In this investigation, the tracer gas method is used for evaluating the radial gas dispersion coefficient. CO2 is used as a tracer gas, and the experiment is carried out in a bubbling fluidized bed cold model. Ceramic balls are used as the bed material. The effect of gas velocity, radial position and bed height is investigated. Keywords: fluidized bed, gas mixing, radial dispersion. 1 Introduction Fluidized bed combustion technology is an efficient and ecological way of combusting low quality fuels. The fuel is combusted in a bed of inert material that is brought to a fluidized state by passing through air. In a fluidized state, the bed particles are in force equi- librium, resulting in fluid-like behaviour of the bed. Extensive gas and solid mixing inside the fluidized bed provides a large active surface for all chemical reactions, and also for heat transfer. As a result, the combustion temperature can be lower than for other types of combustion, while high combustion efficiency is achieved. A temperature range of 800–950◦C is usually used, providing ideal conditions for in-situ desulphurisation and reduction of NOX. This tem- perature is also necessary to prevent agglomeration of the bed material. A detailed fluidized bed behaviour description is needed for the design and control of a fluidized bed boiler. There are many quantities for characterizing a fluidized bed. One of the most important charac- teristics is the extent of mixing, because it rules the intensity of all mass and heat transport processes. Gas and solid dispersion coefficients in axial and ra- dial direction are used to describe the extent of mix- ing in the bed. This paper will present an exper- imental evaluation of the gas dispersion coefficient in radial direction Dgr for a bed of ceramic balls. Ceramic balls are not a typical inert bed material; quartz sand and coal ash are more widely used. Ce- ramic balls have recently come under consideration for use in combustion of biomass and waste derived fuels [1]. The most widely used method for dispersion co- efficient evaluation is the tracer gas method. This method uses a suitable tracer gas, which is injected in a fluidized bed at one point. The concentration of the tracer gas in the primary fluidization gas is then measured at other points of the bed. Gas dispersion coefficients can be determined using an appropriate model. The tracer gas experiment methodology is presented in detail in [2]. The step response tracer gas method is suitable for evaluating the axial dis- persion coefficient Dga. Some authors have used the tracer gas method with steady state to determine also Dgr, the radial dispersion coefficient [3–5]. Consider- ing the similarities of the two types of experiments, all tracer gas related studies have been taken into account. Some authors (e.g. [5,7]) consider axial dis- persion to be less important than radial dispersion. In this work the steady state tracer gas method was used to determine the gas dispersion coefficients in radial direction Dgr. 2 Theory The radial gas dispersion coefficient has been evalu- ated by the steady state tracer gas method. Various tracer gases have been described in the literature. We selected CO2 for our experiment. After setting the tracer gas flow rate, it was necessary to wait for the tracer gas concentration to stabilize and achieve a steady state. The tracer gas concentration was then measured at the investigated height, at points with different radial positions, see the concentration pro- files for heights 5–20 cm and fluidization velocity of 0.44 m/s in Figure 1. 97 Acta Polytechnica Vol. 52 No. 3/2012 Figure 1: Radial dispersion profiles for ceramic balls, 0.44 m/s The dispersed plug flow model from equation (1) can be used for the evaluation. Assuming dispersed plug flow, the concentration profiles should agree with equation (2), where x is the radial position and xm is the radial position where the tracer gas concen- tration reaches half of the maximum value. Accord- ing to [5], the solution for sufficiently distant bound- aries is given by equation (3), and Dgr can be calcu- lated by equation (4). u ∂Cg ∂h = Dgr [ 1 x ∂ ∂x ( x ∂Cg ∂h )] + dga ∂2Cg ∂h2 (1) Cg Ca = ( 1 2 )( x2 x2m ) (2) Ca C∞ = uR2 HDgr (3) Dgr = u · R · C∞ H · Cg (4) The results can also be seen in terms of dimen- sionless numbers as the dependence of the Peclet number from equation (5) and the Reynolds parti- cle number from equation (6). Pe = L · u D (5) Rep = Dp · u · �g μ (6) 3 Experimental The experiment was carried out in a bubbling flu- idized bed cold model, see Figure 2. Considering the ambient temperature of the investigated bed, the model was made out of a 220 mm plexiglass cylinder to enable visual observation of the experiment. The body of the model was supported by a steel tripod stand 1. The fluidization air was supplied by an air fan in the lower section 2. Tracer gas was injected by pipe 3 in the middle of the perforated plate dis- tributor 5 (open area of 2.51 %) that was supporting the fluidized bed. CO2 was used as a tracer gas, for safety reasons and also as a readily available detec- tion method. In the wind-box section 4 between the fluidization air inlet and the distributor plate, the air flow became steady. The tracer gas concentration was measured through the access points 6. Figure 2: Experimental apparatus The tracer gas concentration was measured us- ing an ASEKO Air CmHn non-dispersive infrared gas analyser. A bed of ceramic balls was used for the Dgr in- vestigation. The material properties are presented in Table 1. The dependence of Dgr on mean fluidization velocity and bed height was investigated. Table 1: Material properties Ceramic balls ρ [kg/m3] 800 ε [–] 0.34 Φ [–] 0.95 Dp [mm] 3.11 umf [m/s] 0.49 During the experiment, the tracer gas flow rate was kept below 1.5 % of the primary fluidization air flow rate. Bed heights of 5, 10, 15 and 20 cm were measured. Fluidization velocities of 0.44 m/s, 0.58 m/s, 0.73 m/s and 0.88 m/s were used, repre- senting (1 − 2) · umf. The velocities were chosen in accordance with the flow rate measurement capabili- ties. 98 Acta Polytechnica Vol. 52 No. 3/2012 4 Results and discussion The Dgr values that were obtained are shown in Fig- ures 3–6. The values varied between 0.26–4.68 cm2/s, which is in agreement with the findings of other au- thors. The measurements showed the same trend for all conditions. Regardless of bed height or fluidiza- tion velocity, two peak values were observed, marking the regions where the radial gas mixing is most in- tensive. The first peak is the region in centre of the bed, and the second peak region is near the wall. It can also be observed that, while the extent of mix- ing decreases with increasing fluidization velocity in the centre of the bed, the situation is reversed near the wall. With increasing gas velocity the wall re- gion gains in significance, due to the enhanced gas and solid back mixing that takes place in the region near the walls. It can also be observed that radial gas mixing de- creases with increasing bed height. In the course of varying the bed height, the most significant difference was observed when the bed height was increased from 5 cm to 10 cm. The drop in the extent of mixing was less significant for further increases in bed height. The results in terms of dimensionless numbers are shown in Figure 7. The expected linear increase of Pe with Rep was observed. For higher beds, the depen- dence on Rep increased. For lower bed heights, only a slight increase or even stagnation was observed. Figure 3: Dgr for ceramic balls, 1 · umf Figure 4: Dgr for ceramic balls, 1.33 · umf Figure 5: Dgr for ceramic balls, 1.66 · umf Figure 6: Dgr for ceramic balls, 2 · umf Figure 7: Dimensionless parameters 5 Conclusion This paper has described how the experimental appa- ratus for radial gas dispersion coefficient evaluation was designed and how a steady state tracer gas ex- periment was conducted. Ceramic balls were used as the bed material. The effects of fluidization gas velocity and bed height were investigated. For the conditions that were used, the radial gas dispersion coefficient values were determined to be 0.26–4.68 cm2/s. This is in agreement with previous experiments for a bubbling bed, where Dgr values of 1–5 cm2/s were mostly found. The highest value on each level was found either in the centre of the bed or at the wall. With in- creasing velocity, the peak near the wall was found 99 Acta Polytechnica Vol. 52 No. 3/2012 to increase, while the peak in the bed centre was de- creased. The radial gas dispersion coefficients were found to decrease with bed height. Linear depen- dence of Pe on Rep was found. For higher beds, the dependence on Rep increased. For lower bed heights, the Pe value could be considered to be independent from Rep taking into account the measurement un- certainty. Legend ε [–] void fraction Φ [–] sphericity μ [Pa · s] dynamical viscosity ρ [kg/m3] density of the bed material ρg [kg/m 3] fluidization gas density ca [vol. %] maximal concentration of the tracer gas for a given height measured at the centre of the bed cg [vol. %] concentration of tracer gas at a given point c∞ [vol. %] concentration of tracer gas after perfect mixing with the fluidization gas D [m] bed diameter Dga [m 2/s, cm2/s] gas dispersion coefficient in axial direction Dgr [m 2/s, cm2/s] gas dispersion coefficient in radial direction Dp [m] particle diameter L [m] characteristic dimension x [m] radial distance from the vertical axis of the bed xm [m] value of x where Cg Ca = 1 2 u [m/s] mean gas velocity umf [m/s] gas velocity for minimal fluidization Pe [–] Peclet number Rep [–] Reynolds number for particles References [1] Hrdlička, J., Obšil, M., Hrdlička, F.: Field Test of Waste Wood Combustion Using Two Different Bed Materials, In Proceedings of the 16th SCEJ Symposium on Fluidization and Particle Process- ing. Tokyo : The Society of Chemical Engineers, Japan, 2010, p. 40–43. [2] Kunii, D.: LEVENSPIEL Fluidization Engineer- ing, Butterworth – Heinemann, 1991. [3] Namkung, W., Kim, S. D.: Radial Gas Mixing in a Circulating Fluidized Bed, Powder Technology, 113, 2000, p. 23–29. [4] Sternéus, J., Johnsson, F., Leckner, B.: Charac- teristics of Gas Mixing in a Circulating Fluidised Bed, Powder Technology, 126, 2002, p. 28–41. [5] Chyang, C.-S., Han, Y.-L., Chien, C.-H.: Gas Dis- persion in a Rectangular Bubbling Fluidized Bed, Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical En- gineers, 41, 2010, p. 195–202. [6] Sane, S. U. et al.: An experimental and mod- elling investigation of gas mixing in bubbling flu- idized beds. Chemical engineering science, 51, 1996, p. 1 133–1147. [7] Atimtay, A., Cakaloz, T.: An Investigation on Gas Mixing in a Fluidized Bed, Powder Technol- ogy, 20, 1978, p. 1–7. 100