ap-4-12.dvi Acta Polytechnica Vol. 52 No. 4/2012 The Effect of Temperature on the Gasification Process Marek Baláš1, Martin Lisý1, Ota Štelcl1 1 Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Energy Institute, Technická 2, 616 69 Brno, Czech Republic Correspondence to: balas.m@fme.vutbr.cz Abstract Gasification is a technology that uses fuel to produce power and heat. This technology is also suitable for biomass conversion. Biomass is a renewable energy source that is being developed to diversify the energy mix, so that the Czech Republic can reduce its dependence on fossil fuels and on raw materials for energy imported from abroad. During gasification, biomass is converted into a gas that can then be burned in a gas burner, with all the advantages of gas combustion. Alternatively, it can be used in internal combustion engines. The main task during gasification is to achieve maximum purity and maximum calorific value of the gas. The main factors are the type of gasifier, the gasification medium, biomass quality and, last but not least, the gasification mode itself. This paper describes experiments that investigate the effect of temperature and pressure on gas composition and low calorific value. The experiments were performed in an atmospheric gasifier in the laboratories of the Energy Institute at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology. Keywords: biomass, gasification, temperature effect. 1 Introduction Biomass is one of the most significant renewable en- ergy sources worldwide. Biomass technology has many advantages, e.g. there is a comparatively low negative impact on the environment, and it can be grown on surplus agricultural land that is not suitable for, or is not required for, food production purposes. In recent times, renewable energy sources have covered almost 4 % of power production in the Czech Republic, and biomass is a major contributor to these sources. There are various ways in which biomass can be used for heat and power production, ranging from oil esterification, biogas production and biogas uti- lization to thermal processes such as pyrolysis, com- bustion and gasification. At the present time, di- rect combustion is the most widely used method for producing power from biomass. It is the oldest method, with well-mastered technologies. However, low-capacity processing lines are mostly suitable for heat production from biomass, and not for more de- sirable power production. Fuel gasification, with subsequent utilization of the generated gas in a cogeneration unit, is another technology for producing power from biomass. Gasi- fication is a relatively new method that offers many advantages. Increased efficiency of energy utilization from biomass, especially power production, is a ma- jor advantage of the gasification process. Combustion of the gas that is produced is a more easily controlled process than combustion of solid biomass. Gasifi- cation therefore decreases the production of harm- ful emissions. Higher power production efficiency is achieved using gas in gas turbines and steam-gas cy- cles. Gasification also achieves lower heat loss and better energy production than biogas combustion [1]. Gasification is the thermo-chemical conversion of organic mass with a limited oxygen supply into a lower calorific value gas (4–15 MJ/m3n) whose main components include: CO, CO2, H2, CH4, more com- plex hydrocarbons, N2 and pollutants. The operating temperatures are rather high, commonly from 750 up to 1 000 ◦C. The gas that is produced is then com- busted in a boiler or in combustion engines (and/or combustion turbines). The use of air as the gasifi- cation medium results in a low calorific value of the gas (4–7 MJ/m3n) due to dilution of the gas with ni- trogen (more than 50 %). The use of mixtures of air and oxygen and/or steam as the gasification medium produces gas of lower calorific value, ranging from 10–15 MJ/m3n [2]. Heat for endothermic reactions is most commonly produced by partial oxidation of the gasified material (air or oxygen as the gasifica- tion medium), or is supplied from external sources. The main purpose of the gasification process is to transform as much energy as possible from fuel into gas [3]. The most monitored characteristics of the gas that is produced include quality (lower calorific value, composition), the amount produced by means of gasi- fication, and also the amount of pollutants in the gas, 7 Acta Polytechnica Vol. 52 No. 4/2012 and their composition. Our study focuses on the ef- fect of temperature and pressure on the quality and composition of the gas that is produced. 2 Methodology for measurements at the biofluid 100 gasification fluid generator The study was performed at the Biofluid 100 stand (see Figure 1), which is equipped with a stationary fluidized bed. Figure 1: Biofluid 100 experimental equipment Figure 2: Scheme of the Biofluid gasifier A simplified scheme of the experimental equip- ment is presented in Figure 2. Fuel is supplied from a fuel storage tank equipped with a shovel, and is intro- duced via a dosing screw with a frequency converter into the reactor. The primary supply of blower com- pressed air is led into the reactor under the bed, and secondary and tertiary supplies are located at two high-rise levels. The energogas that is produced is stripped of its solid particulate matter in the cyclone. The output gas is combusted in a burner equipped with a stabilization burner for natural gas and an in- dividual air supply. The ash from the reactor can be removed from the tank located beneath the bed. The power-based heater for primary air supply is placed behind the blower to enable the impact of air pre- heating to be monitored. In recent years, filters for a study of the efficiency of various gas cleaning meth- ods have been attached to basic part of stand. Reactor parameters: • Capacity (in produced gas) 100 kWt • Fuel demand (consumption, requirement) 150 kWt • Wood consumption 40 kg · h−1 • Air flow rate 50 m3n · h−1 The basic fluid generator operation characteris- tics are described below: • Operation of the fluid generator – after ig- nition, the fluid generator is operated in combus- tion mode, so that its heating is quickit heats up quickly. After the required gasification temper- atures are achieved, secondary and tertiary air is supplied to the generator, and thus the gas is immediately combusted and consequently heats up the generator. The air supplies are then shut off, and the generator is introduced into stable mode for a specific and preset gasification tem- perature. A stable mode is achieved when the amount of fuel that is dosed remains unaltered, the amount of gasified air is even, and the tem- perature swings in middle section of the gasi- fication generator are stable within the narrow range specified by the gasification temperature. • Data entry for the gasification process – the monitored data is continuously recorded by a computer at time intervals of 10 seconds for each measurement. The following values are moni- tored: • The frequency of the converter of the dosing screw, for determining the mass flow rate; • The temperature in various parts of equip- ment, which is measured by thermocouples; the positions of the thermocouples are given in detail in the scheme in Figure 2. There are 3 thermocouples along the top of the generator, 1 thermocouple in the cyclone and 2 thermocouples in the semi-coke pipe. 8 Acta Polytechnica Vol. 52 No. 4/2012 One thermocouple is in the output gas pipe. One thermocouple measures the tempera- ture of the primary air supply. • The pressure difference between the upper and lower sections of the fluid generator (fluid bed); • The pressure difference at the orifice plate, for determining the gas flow rate; • The pressure of the generated gas, at the generator outlet and at the fuel storage tank. Other values, e.g. temperature and air moisture, primary air flow rate and primary air tempera- ture, have to be recorded manually. 3 Course of the experiments The main purpose of the experiments was to deter- mine the dependency of gas quality on pressure and temperature changes in the gasifier. The quality of the gas was assessed by analyzing its composition and its lower calorific value. A device based on in- frared spectrometry monitored the gas composition (CO and H2 components) online after the stand had stabilized. Gas was also sampled into a test-glass at regular intervals. These gas samples were later an- alyzed in a gas chromatograph (H2, CO, CO2, CH4 components). Further required parameters for the samples were set later. 4 Results and discussion The dependency of the gas composition on the tem- perature and pressure in the gasification generator was experimentally monitored. No dependency of gas composition on fluid bed temperatures (T 101 and T 102) or on other values was proved. On the con- trary, the experimental results showed that the tem- perature in the freeboard section (T 103), where the chemical balance reactions take place, is the key tem- perature for gas composition (see Figure 3 through Figure10). The charts show that an increase in tem- perature results in an increase in the proportion of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, and a decrease in the proportion of carbon dioxide and methane. This is due to the decreasing speed of the methanizing re- actions, and the higher probability of reactions of wa- ter gas (C + H2O → CO + H2). The available equip- ment places limitations on analyses of dependency on pressure. While the temperature can be set within a range of 100 ◦C, the pressure can be regulated only within the range from ca. 2.5 to 19 kPa. This is a rather narrow range. However, an increased propor- tion of methane is seen to be dependent on pressure, i.e. this dependency contrasts with the temperature trends. Figure 3: Chart of the dependency of H2 content on T 103 temperature Figure 4: Chart of the dependency of H2 content on pressure Figure 5: Chart of the dependency of CO2 content on T 103 temperature Figure 6: Chart of the dependency of CO2 content on pressure 9 Acta Polytechnica Vol. 52 No. 4/2012 Figure 7: Chart of the dependency of CH4 content on T 103 temperature Figure 8: Chart of the dependency of CH4 content on pressure Figure 9: Chart of the dependency of CO content on T 103 temperature Figure 10: Chart of the dependency of CO content on pressure Subsequent analyses of the generated gas focused on its lower calorific value. As Figure 11 shows, an increase in temperature results in a slight decrease in the proportion of nitrogen in the gas. Thus, we see an increase in the proportion the combustible com- ponent in the gas, and therefore an increase in the lower calorific value of the gas (see Figure 13). The dependency on pressure again contrasts with the de- pendency on temperature (see Figures 12 and 14). Figure 11: Chart of the dependency of N2 content on T 103 temperature Figure 12: Chart of the dependency of N2 content on pressure Figure 13: Chart of the dependency of lower calorific value on T 103 temperature Figure 14: Chart of the dependency of lower calorific value on pressure 5 Conclusion This paper has analyzed the effect of gasification tem- perature and pressure on the quality of the gas gen- 10 Acta Polytechnica Vol. 52 No. 4/2012 erated from biomass. The results show that the tem- perature in the fluid bed of a gasification reactor has no effect whatsoever on the final composition of the gas. However, T 103, i.e. the temperature in free- board, has a direct impact on the final composition of the gas. An increase in temperature results in an increase in the proportion of CO and H2, a decrease in the proportion of CH4 and CO2, and an increase in the lower calorific value of the gas. A change in pressure has the opposite effect. Acknowledgement Financial support from GAČR project No. 101/09/1464 is gratefully acknowledged. References [1] Lisý, M., Baláš, M., Moskalik, J., Posṕı̌sil, J.: Research into biomass and waste gasification in atmospheric fluidized bed, 2009, Proceed- ings of the 3rd WSEAS International Conference on Renewable Energy Sources, RES ’09. ISBN 978-960-474-093-2. [2] Baláš, M., Lisý, M.: Vliv vodńı páry na proces zplyňováńı biomasy, Acta Metallurgica Slovaca, Vol. 11, No. 1, Košice, 2005. ISSN 1335-1532. [3] Ochrana, L., Skála, Z., Dvořák, P., Kub́ıček, J., Najser, J.: Gasification of Solid Waste and Biomass, VGB PowerTech, 2004, Vol. 84, No. 6, p. 70–74. ISSN 1435-3199. 11