Ap1_02.vp 1 Introduction Highway operation and maintenance contribute a variety of pollutant constituents to surface and subsurface water. Numerous factors may affect the presence of these constitu- ents and the quality of highway runoff, including: traffic volume, precipitation characteristics, roadway surface type, the nature of the pollutants themselves, surrounding land use, and seasonal considerations. Highway runoff contains to- tal suspended solids, hydrocarbons, oil and greases, chloride, and other contaminants that are transported in solution and particulate forms to adjacent floodplains, roadside swales, and retention/detention ponds. The use of retention/deten- tion units for storage and attenuation of peak flows is well established, but their effectiveness in removing highway run- off contamination has not been investigated in the Czech Republic. The retention/detention units are of several types, depending on detention time as well as purpose of detention. The suspended solids and other related contaminants can be attenuated in these units. Oil/grit chambers Oil and grit chambers represent a type of retention/deten- tion unit. They are often used in conjunction with highway runoff controls to remove heavy particulates and adsorbed hydrocarbon particulates [5]. Berg (1991) mentions that these structures are intended for small contributing watersheds, usually 1.0 acre or smaller. Maintenance and cleanout are rec- ommended on a quarterly basis, and the associated operating costs are high. If properly maintained, these systems can func- tion as pre-filtering devices for other runoff controls. Silverman and Stenstrom (1989) acknowledge the relative ineffectiveness of oil and grit chambers. They cite studies which showed that 40 % to 60 % of oil and grease associated with urban runoff are in a dissolved or colloidal state. Thus, classic oil and grit separators which are designed to separate free-floating oil and grease products exhibit low removal effi- ciencies for urban and highway runoff. Storage/sediment units The primary purpose of storage/treatment units is to control the peak flow associated with the runoff from a catch- ment. Reduction in the rate of flow can limit the frequency of occurrence of erosion, thereby reducing the sediment load to the receiving waters. The secondary purpose of these units is to store the runoff temporarily and allow the removal of particulate material by settling. The treatment efficiencies depend on the length of the detention time. The length of de- tention time for a particular runoff event is dependent on the size and intensity of the storm. The ideal detention time for pollutant removal is 24 hours, with a minimum of 6 to 12 hours [6]. Storage of runoff for at least 24 hours may reduce the concentration of particulate materials by 90 % or more. Detention ponds are most effective for removing particu- late constituents and associated materials that are sorbed to suspended solids [4]. Detention ponds are less effective in re- moving soluble components of runoff, such as nitrate and some phosphorus species. Observed removal of TSS, BOD, total phosphorus, and trace metals were 80–90 %, 20–30 %, 20–30 %, and 40–80 % respectively after 12 hours of storage [2]. 2 Methodology Various detention/retention units along the Prague-Brno (D1) and Prague-Plzeň (D5) highways in the Czech Republic were selected for monitoring runoff from highways. The Prague-Brno (D1) highway is a divided 6-lane highway with average daily traffic (ADT) in the range 40000–65000 vehi- cles/day/both directions, whereas the Prague-Plzeň (D5) high- way has ADT in the range 16000–22000 vehicles/day/both directions. Various oil/grit chambers and storage/sediment units were identified along the studied highways. These units collect runoff from a 100% impervious area (highway surface). The oil/grit chambers contain Fibroil filters that are used to adsorb hydrocarbons and oil and greases from the runoff. The storage/sediment units allow runoff constituents to set- tle under the effect of gravity to reduce suspended solids and their associated constituents. They sometimes contain a Fibroil filter. The tested sample was collected from the influent high- way runoff into the monitored units. Other samples were collected from the effluent from these units. These samples were collected manually with bottles: metal bottles for sam- ples used in hydrocarbon and solids analysis, and plastic bottles for samples used in chloride and zinc analysis. Runoff 68 Acta Polytechnica Vol. 41 No. 2/2001 Pollutant Removal from Highway Runoff Using Retention/Detention Units Ashraf El-Shahat Elsayed, A. Grünwald, D. Dvořák Highway runoff contains total suspended solids, hydrocarbons, oil and greases, chloride, and other contaminants that are transported in solution and particulate forms to adjacent floodplains, roadside swales, and retention/detention ponds. Oil and grit chambers represent a type of retention/detention unit used for removing heavy particulates and adsorbed hydrocarbon particulates. Storage/sediment units also represent a type of retention/detention unit used for controlling peak flow and removing suspended solids. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of traffic volume and site characteristics on highway runoff quality. The study also aims to evaluate the performance of retention/detention units that collect runoff from the Prague-Brno and Prague-Plzeň highways, Czech Republic. The results of this study indicate no definitive relationship between average daily traffic and concentration of runoff constituents, though the site characteristics have a strong relation to some constituents. The results also show that retention/detention units are effective in treating organic compounds. Keywords: highway runoff, oil/grit chambers, sedimentation, suspended solids, organic. samples for suspended solids and organic analysis were fil- tered through pre-weighed, pre-combusted glass fiber filters. After drying at 105 oC, the filters were re-weighed to deter- mine the amount of suspended solids in each sample. This study aims to determine the contribution of ADT and site characteristics to highway runoff quality. It also aims to evaluate the effect of oil/grit chambers and storage/sediment units in the treatment of highway runoff. 3 Result and discussions The contribution of average daily traffic and land use in the concentration of runoff characteristics will be discussed below. Influence of traffic volume Traffic volume would seem to be an important factor pre- dicting runoff quality. In order to study the effect of traffic vol- ume on highway runoff characteristics, we compare the runoff characteristics collected from the D1 and D5, which have different traffic volumes. The tested runoff samples were taken from two detention units along the D1 at stations 72100 and 81450 km, and from two detention units along the D5 in the Rudná and Drahelčice areas. The data are shown in Table 1. The results indicate no strong or definitive relation- ship between BOD, oil and grease, pH, hydrocarbons, or COD on the one hand, and traffic density, on the other. The result indicates that there is a degree of correlation between VSS, TSS and traffic density, but this remains weak. Influence of site characteristics Site characteristics may also affect the amount of pollut- ants in highway runoff. The effect of parking/washing areas on runoff quality is investigated in this study. Samples from three different sites on the D5 were selected to study the effect of site characteristics on the concentration of runoff constitu- ents. The first site is a detention unit that collects runoff from a washing station, while the second and third sites are de- tention units that collect runoff from normal highway sections in the Rudná area and SSÚD No. 8. The results are shown in Fig. 1. The results shown in the figure indicate that the site characteristics have a significant effect on the values of runoff constituents such as total suspended solids, vola- tile suspended solids, Oil & Greases, and hydrocarbons. The figure indicates that the runoff constituents from car wash- ing stations are higher than the values from other highway surfaces. The above results indicate that there is a problem in influ- ent runoff quality to the collection units. Consequently, these units should be prepared to treat runoff or at least attenuate the concentration of its constituents to the specified limit. The following subsection evaluates oil/grit chambers, which are used mainly in the treatment of organic com- pounds, and storage/sediment units, which are used in the treatment of suspended solids. Oil/grit chambers To evaluate the performance of oil/grit chambers, we studied one unit collecting runoff from the D1 at 72100 km and another unit in the Rudná area collecting runoff from the D5. The collected data are shown in Table 2. The table shows the influent and effluent concentration of some constituents, and the removal efficiencies of the constituents using oil/grit chambers. The results show that an oil/grit chamber is effective in the treatment of organic pollutants such as VSS, BOD, COD, O & G, and hydrocarbons. The results also show that these retention units are not effective in the treatment of TSS and Cl�. The measured efficiency of these oil/grit chambers in the treatment of organic pollutants may be due to the Fibroil filter that is used. The short retention time as well as the high flow rate in these units may be the reason for the increased values © Czech Technical University Publishing House http://ctn.cvut.cz/ap/ 69 Acta Polytechnica Vol. 41 No. 2/2001 Constituents D1 D5 Influent Effluent Removal [%] Influent Effluent Removal [%] TSS [mg/l] 1074 1075 0.0 376 375 0.0 VSS [mg/l] 339 315 7.0 121 105 13.0 BOD5 [mg/l] 5.24 2.98 43.0 7.5 4.7 37.0 COD [mg/l] 36.18 24.00 34.0 46.0 32.0 30.0 pH 7.50 7.50 0.0 7.2 7.3 0.0 Cl� [mg/l] 357 357 0.0 93 92 0.0 Oil & Greases [mg/l] 0.926 0.386 58.0 1.14 0.219 81.0 Hydrocarbons [mg/l] 0.517 0.216 58.0 0.83 0.107 87.0 Table 2: Removal efficiencies using oil/grit chambers for runoff constituents collected from the D1 & D5 at stations 72100 km, and the Rudná area, respectively Constituents D1 With ADT= 40000–65000 D5 With ADT=16000–22000 72100 km 81450 km Rudná area Drahel ic e area TSS [mg/l] 2095 2779 376 1262 VSS [mg/l] 329 299 122 156 BOD5 [mg/l] 7.0 6.65 7.5 15.7 COD [mg/l] 39.3 52 46 77 pH 7.5 7.3 7.2 7.3 Cl� [mg/l] 961 1503 93 533 Oil & Grease [mg/l] 0.394 0.47 1.14 0.99 Hydrocar- bons [mg/l] 0.216 0.236 0.830 0.365 Table 1: Concentration of runoff constituents from two detention units for each HWY 70 © Czech Technical University Publishing House http://ctn.cvut.cz/ap/ Acta Polytechnica Vol. 41 No. 2/2001 Oil & Grease 0 10 20 30 40 Monitoring Date Washing Station SSUD 8 RUDNÁ .0 9 .9 8 .1 1 .9 8 .0 3 .9 9 .0 7 .9 9 .0 9 .9 9 .1 1 .9 9 .0 3 .0 0 .0 5 .0 0 .0 7 .0 0 .0 9 .0 0 .1 2 .0 0 C o n c e n tr a ti o n [m g /l ] TSS 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Monitoring Date Washing Station SSUD 8 RUDNÁ .0 9 .9 8 .1 1 .9 8 .0 3 .9 9 .0 7 .9 9 .0 9 .9 9 .1 1 .9 9 .0 3 .0 0 .0 5 .0 0 .0 7 .0 0 .0 9 .0 0 .1 2 .0 0 .0 1 .0 1 C o n c e n tr a ti o n [m g /l ] VSS 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Monitoring Date Washing Station SSUD 8 RUDNÁ .0 9 .9 8 .1 1 .9 8 .0 3 .9 9 .0 7 .9 9 .0 9 .9 9 .1 1 .9 9 .0 3 .0 0 .0 5 .0 0 .0 7 .0 0 .0 9 .0 0 .1 2 .0 0 .0 1 .0 1 C o n c e n tr a ti o n [m g /l ] Hydrocarbon 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Monitoring Date Washing Station SSUD 8 RUDNÁ .0 9 .9 8 .1 1 .9 8 .0 3 .9 9 .0 7 .9 9 .0 9 .9 9 .1 1 .9 9 .0 3 .0 0 .0 5 .0 0 .0 7 .0 0 .0 9 .0 0 .1 2 .0 0 C o n c e n tr a ti o n [m g /l ] Fig. 1: Runoff constituents collected from various retention/detention units near the D5 © Czech Technical University Publishing House http://ctn.cvut.cz/ap/ 71 Acta Polytechnica Vol. 41 No. 2/2001 TSS 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 . . . . . Monitoring Date Influent Filter Effluent .1 1 .9 8 .0 3 .9 9 .0 7 .9 9 .0 9 .9 9 .1 1 .9 9 .0 3 .0 0 .0 5 .0 0 .0 7 .0 0 .0 9 .0 0 .1 2 .0 0 C o n c e n tr a ti o n [m g /l ] Influent Filter EffluentBOD5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Monitoring Date .1 1 .9 8 .0 3 .9 9 .0 7 .9 9 .0 9 .9 9 .1 1 .9 9 .0 3 .0 0 .0 5 .0 0 .0 7 .0 0 .0 9 .0 0 C o n c e n tr a ti o n [m g /l ] Influent Filter EffluentCOD 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Monitoring Date .1 1 .9 8 .0 3 .9 9 .0 7 .9 9 .0 9 .9 9 .1 1 .9 9 .0 3 .0 0 .0 5 .0 0 .0 7 .0 0 .0 9 .0 0 C o n c e n tr a ti o n [m g /l ] Influent Filter EffluentO & G 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Monitoring Date .1 2 .0 0 C o n c e n tr a ti o n [m g /l ] .1 1 .9 8 .0 3 .9 9 .0 7 .9 9 .0 9 .9 9 .1 1 .9 9 .0 3 .0 0 .0 5 .0 0 .0 7 .0 0 .0 9 .0 0 Fig. 2: Runoff constituents for SSÚD No. 8 Storage/sediment unit along the D5 highway of TSS, because the flow to these units stimulates some accu- mulated solids, which may lead to an increase in suspended solids. Storage/sediment units The runoff concentration of the storage/sediment units which collected stormwater runoff near the management and maintenance center (SSÚD No. 8) on highway D5 are shown in Fig. 2. These units are larger than oil/grit chambers to allow the settling of suspended solids, and they also contain a filter using a Fibroil mesh to adsorb organic pollutants. The figure shows the improvement of runoff quality by measuring the in- fluent and effluent concentration for TSS, BOD, COD, and Oil & Greases. The figure shows that there is a reduction in the concentration of all constituents. The settlement of sus- pended solids under the effect of gravity during the retention time may be the reason for SS removal. The presence of Fibroil in the settling unit adsorbs organic pollutants and fil- ters some of the suspended solids, and this may explain why there is enhancement of organic pollutants. 4 Summary and recommendations Highway runoff contains total suspended solids, hydro- carbons, oil and greases, chloride, and other contaminants that are transported in solution and particulate forms to adja- cent floodplains, roadside swales, and retention/detention ponds. Oil and grit chambers represent a type of the reten- tion/detention unit used for removing heavy particulate and adsorbed hydrocarbon particulates. Storage/sediment units also represent a type of retention/detention unit used to control peak flow and remove suspended solids. This study evaluated the effect of traffic volume and site characteristics on highway runoff quality. It also evaluated the performance of the retention/detention units that collect runoff from the Prague-Brno and Prague-Plzeň highways, Czech Republic. Analysis of the results indicates that there is no definitive relationship between average daily traffic and concentration of runoff constituents, as was concluded in other preceding studies [3], [8]. The results also show that the retention/deten- tion units used in this study are effective in treating organic compounds, but are less effective in treating suspended sol- ids, perhaps due either to the small size of these retention units, or to the short retention time inside it. Consequently this study can make the following recommendations: • decrease the flow rate into the studied units by any suitable method, in order to allow the settling of suspended solids; • use a sand filter or densely vegetative swales before the run- off enters the studied units; • study the effectiveness of a lower flow rate in the treatment of suspended solids. Acknowledgement We would like to thank and express our appreciation to Ing. K. Slavíčková and all members of the sanitary engi- neering department for their help. This Research has been supported by grant No.: VZ J04198: 2111100005. List of abbreviation TSS total suspended solids VSS volatile suspended solids COD chemical oxygen demand BOD biochemical oxygen demand Cl� chloride O & G oil and grease References [1] Berg, V. H.: Water Quality Inlets (Oil/Grit Separators). Maryland Department of the Environment, Sediment and Stormwater Administration, Baltimore, MD, 1991 [2] Dorman, M. E., Hartigan, J., Steg R.: Retention, Deten- tion, and Overland Flow for Pollutant Removal from Highway Stormwater Runoff. Vol. I: Research Report, FHWA-RD- -96-095, Versar Inc., Springfield, VA, 1996 [3] Driscoll, E. D., Shelley, P. E., Strecker, E. W.: Pollutant Loadings and Impacts from Highway Stormwater Runoff. Vol. II: Analytical Investigation and Research Report, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Research and Development Report No. FHWA-RD-88-008, 1990 [4] Schueler, T. R., Kumble, P. A., Heraty, M. A.: A Current Assessment of Urban Best Management Practices, Techniques for Reducing Non-Point Source Pollutant in the Coastal Zone. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, DC, 1992 [5] Schueler, T. R., Kumble, P. A., Heraty, M. A.: A Current Assessment of Urban Best Management Practices, Techniques for Reducing Non-Point Source Pollution in the Coastal Zone. Department of Environmental Programs, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, DC, 1991 [6] Schueler, T. R.: Controlling Urban Runoff: A Practical Manual for Planning and designing Urban BMPs. Depart- ment of Environmental Programs, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, DC, 1987 [7] Silverman, G. S., Stenstrom, M. K.: Source Control of Oil and Grease in an Urban Area. Proceedings of an Engi- neering Foundation Conference on Current Practices and Design Criteria for Urban Quality Control, ASCE, New York, NY, 1989, pp. 403–420 [8] Stotz, G.: Investigations of the Properties of the Surface Water Runoff from a Federal Highway in FRG. The Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 59, 1987, pp. 329–337 Eng. Ashraf El-Shahat Elsayed, MSc. e-mail: ashraf@fsv.cvut.cz Prof. Ing. Alexander Grünwald, CSc. Department of Sanitary Engineering Czech Technical University in Prague Faculty of Civil Engineering Thákurova 7, 16629 Praha 6, Czech Republic Dalibor Dvořák, Road and Motorway Directorate of Czech Republic Na Pankráci 546, 140 00 Praha 4, Czech Republic 72 © Czech Technical University Publishing House http://ctn.cvut.cz/ap/ Acta Polytechnica Vol. 41 No. 2/2001 Table of contents Filling and Recycling Apparatus of a Cyclotron Target with Enriched Krypton for Production of Radiopharmaceuticals 3 M. Vognar, M. Fišer, È. Šimánì, D. Chvátil Actual Optical and Thermal Performance of Photovoltaic Modules 7 Hamdy K. Elminir, V. Benda, I. Kudláèek Effect of Thermal Cycling on the Strength and Texture of Concrete for Nuclear Safety Structures 17 Š. Hošková, O. Kapièková, K. Trtík, F. Vodák Reliability – Based Design of Precast Buildings 20 M. Kalousková, E. Novotná, J. Šejnoha Two-equation Turbulence Model Similarity Solution of the Axisymmetric Fluid Jet 26 V. Tesaø Some Problems of the Integration of Heat Pump Technology into a System of Combined Heat and Electricity Production 42 G. Böszörményi, L. Böszörményi Comparison Between Atmospheric Turbidity Coefficients of Desert and Temperate Climates 46 Hamdy K. Elminir, U. A. Rahuma, V. Benda Determining the Permeable Efficiency of Elements in Transport Networks 58 V. Svoboda, D. Šiktancová Accuracy of Determining Stress Intensity Factors in Some Numerical Programs 60 M. Vorel, E. Leidich Pollutant Removal from Highway Runoff Using Retention/Detention Units 66 Ashraf El-Shahat Elsayed, A. Grünwald, D. Dvoøák << /ASCII85EncodePages false /AllowTransparency false /AutoPositionEPSFiles true /AutoRotatePages /None /Binding /Left /CalGrayProfile (Dot Gain 20%) /CalRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CalCMYKProfile (U.S. Web Coated \050SWOP\051 v2) /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Error /CompatibilityLevel 1.4 /CompressObjects /Tags /CompressPages true /ConvertImagesToIndexed true /PassThroughJPEGImages true /CreateJobTicket false /DefaultRenderingIntent /Default /DetectBlends false /DetectCurves 0.0000 /ColorConversionStrategy /CMYK /DoThumbnails false /EmbedAllFonts true /EmbedOpenType false /ParseICCProfilesInComments true /EmbedJobOptions true /DSCReportingLevel 0 /EmitDSCWarnings false /EndPage -1 /ImageMemory 1048576 /LockDistillerParams false /MaxSubsetPct 100 /Optimize true /OPM 1 /ParseDSCComments true /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true /PreserveCopyPage true /PreserveDICMYKValues true /PreserveEPSInfo true /PreserveFlatness true /PreserveHalftoneInfo false /PreserveOPIComments true /PreserveOverprintSettings true /StartPage 1 /SubsetFonts true /TransferFunctionInfo /Apply /UCRandBGInfo /Preserve /UsePrologue false /ColorSettingsFile () /AlwaysEmbed [ true ] /NeverEmbed [ true ] /AntiAliasColorImages false /CropColorImages true /ColorImageMinResolution 300 /ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleColorImages true /ColorImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /ColorImageResolution 300 /ColorImageDepth -1 /ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1 /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeColorImages true /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterColorImages true /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /ColorACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False /CreateJDFFile false /Description << /ARA /BGR /CHS /CHT /DAN /DEU /ESP /ETI /FRA /GRE /HEB /HRV (Za stvaranje Adobe PDF dokumenata najpogodnijih za visokokvalitetni ispis prije tiskanja koristite ove postavke. Stvoreni PDF dokumenti mogu se otvoriti Acrobat i Adobe Reader 5.0 i kasnijim verzijama.) /HUN /ITA /JPN /KOR /LTH /LVI /NLD (Gebruik deze instellingen om Adobe PDF-documenten te maken die zijn geoptimaliseerd voor prepress-afdrukken van hoge kwaliteit. De gemaakte PDF-documenten kunnen worden geopend met Acrobat en Adobe Reader 5.0 en hoger.) /NOR /POL /PTB /RUM /RUS /SKY /SLV /SUO /SVE /TUR /UKR /ENU (Use these settings to create Adobe PDF documents best suited for high-quality prepress printing. Created PDF documents can be opened with Acrobat and Adobe Reader 5.0 and later.) /CZE >> /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ << /AsReaderSpreads false /CropImagesToFrames true /ErrorControl /WarnAndContinue /FlattenerIgnoreSpreadOverrides false /IncludeGuidesGrids false /IncludeNonPrinting false /IncludeSlug false /Namespace [ (Adobe) (InDesign) (4.0) ] /OmitPlacedBitmaps false /OmitPlacedEPS false /OmitPlacedPDF false /SimulateOverprint /Legacy >> << /AddBleedMarks false /AddColorBars false /AddCropMarks false /AddPageInfo false /AddRegMarks false /ConvertColors /ConvertToCMYK /DestinationProfileName () /DestinationProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /Downsample16BitImages true /FlattenerPreset << /PresetSelector /MediumResolution >> /FormElements false /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles false /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ] >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [2400 2400] /PageSize [612.000 792.000] >> setpagedevice