Acta Polytechnica doi:10.14311/AP.2017.57.0089 Acta Polytechnica 57(2):89–96, 2017 © Czech Technical University in Prague, 2017 available online at http://ojs.cvut.cz/ojs/index.php/ap USE OF DISC SPRINGS IN A PELLET FUEL MACHINE Ebubekı̇r Can Güneş, İsmet Çelı̇k∗ Mechanical Engineering Department, Dumlupınar University, Kütahya 43270, Turkey ∗ corresponding author: ismet.celik@dpu.edu.tr Abstract. The use of biomass fuel pellets is becoming widespread as a renewable and environment- friendly energy. Pellet fuels are produced in various pellet machine types. Pellet machines encounter problems such as pressure irregularities and choke at the initial start for different kinds of biomass feedstock. In this study, disc springs are integrated into a vertical axis pellet machine for a pressure regulation and design optimization. Force-deformation and stress-deformation relations of disc springs are investigated using analytical and finite element methods. Pelletizing pressures were calculated based on disc spring force values using the Hertzian stress formula. Utilized disc springs ensured the pressure regulation, production efficiency increase and damage prevention on the die-roller mechanism. Keywords: biomass pellet; pellet machine; disc spring; Almen–Laszlo; FEA; pelletizing pressure. 1. Introduction Biomass is one of the alternative and renewable en- ergy sources in today’s world where fossil fuel sources rapidly decrease and environmental effects increase. Biomass is defined as a renewable energy source that consists of organic materials as wood, plant, manure and sewage sludge residues and has a capacity to be utilized as fuel [1]. Carbon dioxide emitted during biomass combustion is absorbed by green plants and is used in photosynthesis and its natural cycle is main- tained [2]. Moreover, in contrast to fossil fuels such as coal, its nitrous and sulphur based gas emission is very low. Thus, biomass is considered as a valuable energy source today. Biomass needs to be processed to be utilized as solid fuel. This process is listed in three main stages: dehumidification/humidification, grinding, and press- ing. Pressing stage has a major importance, because it is the last step of the process, during which the Figure 1. (a) Briquetting press [16] and briquettes. (b) Pelletizing press and pellets. final product is obtained. There are two types of common solid biomass pressing techniques - briquet- ting and pelletizing. For briquetting technique, fuel pieces produced in various dimensions and geometries, such as prismatic, cylindrical along a continuous line, spherical and pillow-shaped, are also bigger than pel- letized end-products. In pelletizing technique, only compressed cylindrical pieces are produced in particu- lar lengths, which is more common and efficient than briquetting. Examples of briquetting and pelletizing presses and end-products are shown in Figure 1. Pelletizing machines work on the basis of pressing grinded biomass through a perforated die by the com- pression of rotating cylindrical rollers (commonly 2 or 3). Pellet presses are classified into two groups (ring die press, disc die pellet press) based on the type of the dies, as shown in Figure 2. Both types have cylindrical channels on dies and have rotating rollers on them. Also, it is possible to classify pellet presses Figure 2. (I) Disc die (vertical axis) pellet press; (II) ring die (horizontal axis) pellet press; (a) rollers, (b) die, (c) Pellet outlet. 89 http://dx.doi.org/10.14311/AP.2017.57.0089 http://ojs.cvut.cz/ojs/index.php/ap Ebubekı̇r Can Güneş, İsmet Çelı̇k Acta Polytechnica according to the die/roller motion. For the first type, the die rotates and rollers remain in a constant posi- tion and merely rotate on their axis. For the latter, the die remains in constant position and both of the rollers rotate on their axis and move around the die. In pellet presses, various kinds of feedstock can be processed and pelletized. Each biomass kind has its own pelletizing parameters. These parameters are feedstock moisture, grinded particle size, pelletizing pressure and binder addition. Working with precise parameters is vital for obtaining durable and combus- tion efficient pellets. For instance, when the pressure and moisture of the feedstock is too low, biomass will not be able to be pelletized, or the produced pellets will be too loose and non-durable. There are many studies on pelletizing various biomass feedstocks. Some of the current studies are summarized below. Serrano et al. [4], have examined the effects of the feedstock moisture ratio, particle size and pine saw- dust addition on barley straw pellets. For dense bar- ley straw pellets, optimum feedstock moisture rate is indicated in the range of 19–23 %, and within this interval, the obtained pellet durability was 95.5 %. Adding a pine sawdust at a rate of 2, 7 and 12 % improved the pellet durability up to 97–98 %. Their study has unveiled that addition of a woody biomass to a herbaceous biomass feedstock can improve the pellet quality. Gilbert et al. [5] have studied the effects of pelletiz- ing pressure and temperature on the pellet density, mechanical strength and durability using a switchgrass biomass. The effects of temperature on the pellet density were observed only between 14 °C and 50 °C. Increasing pelletizing pressure from 55 to 552 bar en- hanced the pellet density and durability. Mani et al. [6] have observed the effects of the par- ticle size reduction, compressive force and moisture ratio on pelletization of wheat straw, barley straw, corn stover and switchgrass at 100 °C using a labora- tory scale pellet press. Except for wheat straw, with a reducing particle size, denser pellets were obtained. However, the moisture ratio and compressive force are more effective on pellet density. Increasing the moisture ratio from 12 to 15 % and increase of the compressive force have resulted in denser pellets. Relova et al. [7] have revealed that the pelletizing pressure is the most important factor affecting the pellets’ drop resistance by using statistical data from 32 kinds of pine sawdust pelletization. Moisture ratio is less effective than the pelletizing pressure and the particle size is less effective than the moisture ratio on determining the pellets’ drop resistance. Larsson et al. [8] have examined the effects of the moisture ratio, bulk density after pre-compaction, steam addition and die temperature on pelletizing of reed canarygrass. The factor that has the biggest impact on the durability and density of pellets was found out to be the moisture ratio. Using binders in pelletizing process provides a dura- bility and resistance to outer factors. Various organic and inorganic binders are preferred in pelletizing pro- cesses. Binders are used necessarily, or sometimes optionally, to maintain a superior pellet quality. Kong et al. [9] have pelletized a spruce sawdust under 6 MPa pressure and 25 °C using binders of lignin, Ca(OH)2, NaOH, CaCl2, and CaO. Among these binders, com- bination of 5 % Ca(OH)2 + 10 % Lignin by mass in- creased the pellets’ water resistance. Furthermore, catalysis of hydroxide, contained within Ca(OH)2, pro- vided polymer chain growth into three-dimensional cross-linking that strengthened the bonds in pellet microstructure. Puig–Arnavat et al. [10] have pelletized six different biomasses using a single pellet press. For all types of biomass, the optimum moisture ratio they determined for pelletizing is 10 %. Higher moisture ratios have deteriorated pellet quality. They observed that the friction in the die increases when the die temperature increases from the room temperature to 60–90 °C. In higher temperatures, friction decreases. Biomass is subjected to a pre-treatment before pel- letizing, which, in some studies, consists of heating up to 200–300 °C in inert gas atmosphere. Thus, low moisture, volatile-free and high energy density biomass is obtained. Also pre-treated biomass has a better grinding performance [12, 13]. Larsson et al. [14] have pre-heated spruce sawdust to high temperatures (270– 300 °C) and pelletized it in a small scale pellet press. Produced pellets had comparable bulk densities (630– 710 kg/m3), but lower pellet durability (80–90 %) in comparison to conventional pellets. Also, the energy consumption for pelletizing was 100 % higher. It was observed that pellet production speed is positively correlated with the die temperature. The feedstock moisture rate was not significantly effective on pellet quality and the production speed; however, adding wa- ter to the feedstock worsened the flow properties and did not provide a benefit. The same effect was also observed in coal powder by Abou–Chakra et al. [15]. Water addition to coal powder decreases flowability while free water particles increases this impact. Different biomass kinds have their own pelletizing parameters due to their characteristic bulk/particle density and microstructure. For instance, the woody biomass has a higher content of the lignin component than the herbaceous biomass. Lignin is a vital con- stituent providing inner pellet bonding. The biomass feedstock, which is pressed in die channel layer by layer, has a frictional movement relation with the wall of the die channel. Depending on temperature, every kind of biomass forms its own pelletizing character- istic in a frictional material-machine relation. This is shown in Figure 3, the effective forces F1, F2, and F3 on the biomass under pelletizing pressure in a cylindrical channel. Kováčová et al. [16] have derived pressure relation equations of a pressed biomass through a cylindrical 90 vol. 57 no. 2/2017 Use of Disc Springs in a Pellet Fuel Machine Figure 3. Effective forces on biomass in a die chan- nel [16]. die channel based on the force equation in Figure 3. Pa(L) = Pape− 4µλ d L, (1) Pap(L) = Pae+ 4µλ d L. (2) In equations (1) and (2), symbols are defined as µ — friction coefficient between the biomass and die, λ — radial/axial pressure ratio on biomass, d — hole diameter, L — die length, Pa — outlet pressure, Pap — internal pressure. In the equations, d/L parame- ter, which is dependent on die geometry, stands out. Choosing a convenient die according to the biomass type is important. Friction force in die channel is a temperature de- pendent parameter, which is determined by Stelte et al. [17]. They have observed that when the tempera- ture increases the pelletizing pressure drops. In high temperatures, they identified hydrophobic extractives on the pellet surface by monitoring the infrared spec- trum. These extractives act as lubricants between the biomass and die and reduce the needed pelletizing pressure. One of the common faced problems in pellet pro- duction is the choking of the machine. This condition is instructed in many pellet machine manufacturers’ handbooks. For instance, an animal feed pellet ma- chine manufacturer company gives a rule of thumb about the moisture ratio being 18 % and this is ac- cepted as a limit value for the choking of the machine. Moisture ratios greater than this value cause the ma- chine to choke. Particularly, moisture addition to the herbaceous biomass increases pelletizing temperature to 20 °C per 1 % increase [18]. Naturally high mois- ture containing biomass types may not reach required pelletizing temperature in pellet press due to the effect of heat absorption of high moisture. In pellet fuel literature, there are numerous studies conducted about the pelletizing pressure, temperature, moisture ratio, feedstock species, particle size, heat values and environmental effects. One of the most important problems for commercial presses used in the pellet fuel production is the pressure irregularity and consequent choke. In this study, a pressure regulation of vertical axis pellet machines was performed by utilizing disc springs inside them. An improved design of pellet fuel machines for an effective and quality pellet production was established. 2. Material and method In this study, a pellet press driven by a 35 kW power and with a capacity of 400 kg/h production rate was employed. Pressure regulation of the pellet press was maintained by integrating disc springs into the fixed die- rotating rollers system. Disc springs are able to bare high loads with small deformations. Their simple and modular geometry promotes their use in many areas where a damping of high forces is necessary. A novel usage of this element was unveiled in this study. Optimum conditions for pellet production are ob- tained after while after the first start, especially when the die and related components reach a particular temperature. This is because; the friction between biomass and die lowers and enters a regular regime at high temperatures. Furthermore, components in inter- nal structure of biomass activate with high tempera- tures for bonding mechanism. The moisture extracted from biomass at high temperatures reduces the friction between the biomass and die [17]. Also, lignin, a main constituent of woody/herbaceous biomass, gains flowa- bility above the glass-transition temperature, thus maintains internal bonds for mechanically durable pellets [5]. It is known that lignin polymer’s glass- transition temperature is 65–75 °C at 8 % moisture ratio. After this temperature, lignin in biomass softens and its binding effect increases [19]. Pellet presses are exposed to an overloading at ini- tial start of the system. This may cause choking of the system at the beginning of the process or a high Figure 4. (a) Broken roller teeth. (b) Deformed washers that got into the press. 91 Ebubekı̇r Can Güneş, İsmet Çelı̇k Acta Polytechnica Figure 5. Integrating disc springs to pellet press. Figure 6. Disc springs: (a) single, (b) parallel, (c) in series. consumption of energy. The biomass type is an im- portant factor in determining the system’s operating pressure. For high-hardness valued biomass, friction between the feedstock and die wall is high, thus the system overloads and may choke at first. The biomass may contain foreign matters that may escape when collected from its natural environment. Impurities like small stones and metal pieces having high-hardness may damage the system by getting stuck between the roller and die (see Figure 4). In this case, disc springs are deformed and system protects itself from irreversible damage. In our study, disc springs are utilized in pellet presses as shown in Figure 5. This provides rollers to press on the die. Disc springs are positioned un- der the tightening nuts and pre-deformed to maintain a constant contact and pre-load between the roller and die. In conventional pellet presses, the gap be- tween the roller and die is set to 0.5–1 mm as a rule of thumb. This gap partially protects the system from unexpected pressure rises. Disc springs constantly push down rollers on the die; however, in unexpected pressure rises (stone/metal gets into the machine, feed- stock change, system choke) they are deformed and prevent the system from damage. In the case of impu- rities getting into the machine, system is to be stopped and cleaned so that the spring flexed system is not damaged. The pelletizing pressure required for different bio- mass species is automatically regulated by flexion of disc springs. In this particular study, pine tree residues (branch, needle, cone, bark etc.) that require high pelletizing pressure were pelletized. 2.1. Disc spring selection and calculations Disc springs’ outer diameters may vary between 8– 600 mm according to the DIN 2093 standard. Custom disc springs can be manufactured in desired dimen- sions when needed. In this study, in accordance with press dimensions, a standard sized disc spring with 125 mm outer diam- eter and 71 mm inner diameter is used. In Table 1, all parameters of the disc spring are demonstrated. Depending on the operating conditions, disc springs may be used as a single piece, combined in parallel or in series (see Figure 6). When stacked in series, the total deformation of springs increase and the load carrying capacity remains constant. Accordingly, the deformation of springs remains constant, load carry- ing capacity is positively proportional with the spring number. The first and still-used calculation method for disc springs was developed in 1936 by Almen and Las- zlo [20]. Including DIN 2093 standard, among many manufacturers and users, the Almen–Laszlo (A-L) algorithm for disc springs is widely used. The force- deformation relation for a disc spring according to A-L algorithm is formulated as F = 4E 1 −ν2 δ mD2 ( (h− δ)(h− δ/2)s + s3 ) . (3) When the disc spring becomes flat, the needed force is described as a critical force Fcr = 4E 1 −ν2 hs3 mD2 . (4) 92 vol. 57 no. 2/2017 Use of Disc Springs in a Pellet Fuel Machine Outer diamter Inner diameter Cone height Thickness Total height D [mm] d [mm] h [mm] s [mm] h + s [mm] D/d h/s 125 71 2.9 8 10.9 1.76 0.3625 Table 1. Dimensions of used disc spring and related parameters. F [kN] σcomp. [MPa]Deformation [mm] A-L FEA Dev. A-L FEA Dev. 0.25h 0.725 74.16 85.74 13.5 % 881.78 977.04 9.7 % 0.50h 1.45 143.28 166.93 14.1 % 1707.31 1942.5 12.1 % 0.75h 2.175 209.03 264.04 20.8 % 2476.60 2976 16.8 % h 2.9 273.1 354.06 22.8 % 3189.62 3990 20 % Table 2. A-L method and FEA results for parallel stacked two disc springs. The compression stress at the inner edge of the spring is σc = 4E 1 −ν2 δ mD2 ( m1(h− δ/2) + m2s ) . (5) Tension stress at the outer edge of spring is σt = 4E 1 −ν2 hs3 mD2 ( m1(h−δ/2) −m2s ) , (6) where m = 6 π ln D/d (D/d− 1 D/d )2 , (7) m1 = 6 π ln D/d (D/d− 1 ln D/d ) , (8) m2 = 6 π ln D/d (D/d− 1 2 ) , (9) Calculations based on given formulae are compared with Finite Element Analysis (FEA), results of disc springs will be given in tables in the next chapter. Cal- culations were made for deformations of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 fold of cone heights and presented in Table 2. Practically, the disc spring deformation should not exceed 0.75 of cone height. In our study, it is assumed that this value will not be exceeded. Parallel-stacked two disc springs were used to maintain sufficient pel- letizing pressure on the die. Calculations and analysis were made based on parallel disc springs. FEA analysis was made on the scanned CAD data of disc springs. Material is modelled as a spring steel with 206 GPa Young’s Modulus and 0.3 poisson ratio. Meshing was made using 20-node hexahedrons, con- stituent of 5695 nodes and 938 elements. Two disc springs stacked in parallel, defining contact region between one spring’s convex surface and other’s con- cave surface. Friction coefficient (µ) is defined as 0.4 between spring surfaces [21]. As boundary conditions, displacement of the bottom circle of the lower spring is restricted in the vertical axis and set free in the horizontal axis. Deformations of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 fold of cone height is given at the top circle of the upper disc. Force reactions at the top circle and max- imum equivalent von-Mises stress values are analysed and shown in Table 2. 3. Results and discussion The analytical calculation (A-L method), FEA results and comparison of them are given in Table 2. Differ- ence between the A-L method and FEA force values increases with the deformation ratio. Maximum stress is formed on the inner edge of the disc spring’s top surface as seen in Figure 7. Likewise, for force values and inner edge stress values the difference increases with deformation. Based on these values, it can be concluded that the A-L method is more effective on small deformations. This arose from neglecting ra- dial stresses while only considering tangential stresses when forming the A-L equations. With increasing de- formation, radial stress on disc spring becomes more effective. In high deformations the A-L method gives more erroneous results. Friction forces occur in contact areas of the disc springs when used in parallel. Thus, in frictional con- ditions, springs bear more loads than in the frictionless conditions for the same deformation value. In Table 3, both conditions are compared in force and stress values. Friction coefficient (µ) is defined as 0.4 by Ozaki et al. [21] in a similar study. In force 93 Ebubekı̇r Can Güneş, İsmet Çelı̇k Acta Polytechnica F [kN] σcomp. [MPa]Deformation [mm] Frictionless Frictional Dev. Frictionless Frictional Dev. 0.25h 0.725 81 85.74 5.8 % 926.89 977.04 5.4 % 0.50h 1.45 162 166.93 3 % 1853.8 1942.5 4.8 % 0.75h 2.175 243 264.04 8.6 % 2780.7 2976 7 % h 2.9 324 354.06 9.3 % 3707.6 3990 7.6 % Table 3. Frictional/frictionless FEA results for parallel stacked two disc springs. Figure 7. FEA stress distribution on parallel stacked two disc springs (for 0.75h deformation). values, there is a deviation between 3–9 %, in stress values, the deviation is 5–8 %. 3.1. Pelletizing pressure calculation via Hertzian stress Pressures occurring when a cylindrical surface con- tacts a planar surface can be calculated with Hertzian stress calculations. As seen in Figure 8, a contacting cylinder-plane model is considered for the roller-die relation. Hertzian stress calculation is made based on material properties and dimensions of contacting surfaces and the applied force. Hertzian stress is calculated by the following for- mula [22]: b = √ 2F πl (1 −ν21/E1) + (1 −ν22/E2) 1/d1 + 1/d2 , (10) Pmax = 2F πbl . (11) Material properties are: E1 = E2 = 210 GPa, ν1 = ν2 = 0.3 and the roller dimensions are d1 = 145 mm, l = 110 mm. Equation (11) results Pmax = 2.146 √ F. (12) Disc springs work in the interval of 0.25h–0.75h deformation. There are two rollers employed in the pelletizing system. Thus, the force applied by disc Figure 8. Hertzian stress between die and roller and defining parameters: b — contact surface half-width, d1 — cylinder diameter, l — cylinder length, F — applied force. springs is divided in two. Hertzian stresses given in deformation intervals are calculated as Pmax = 444.33 MPa for 0.25h, (13) Pmax = 779.74 MPa for 0.75h. (14) The calculated pressure is the maximum value of stress formed in between the die and roller. The pelletizing pressure of biomass may be considered as a half of this value as a practical and easy-applicable approach. Thus, the pelletizing pressure is between 220–390 MPa in the operating range of disc springs. 4. Conclusion Although there are various studies about pellet pro- duction parameters (biomass kind, temperature, mois- ture) and the final product quality, there is no signifi- cant study about improvement of pellet mills, preven- tion of damage and production process. Regarding pellet presses, mostly encountered prob- lems are choking, pressure irregularity and determin- ing optimum gap between the die and roller during the production process. In this study, these problems are aimed to be solved by integrating disc springs into presses. Disc springs maintain the required com- pression for rollers and also deflect adequately to pro- tect the system from undesired damage by impurities (stone and metal particles etc.). Also, the pelletizing pressure can be estimated by hertzian pressure occurring between the roller and die, which is calculated through the disc spring force. A pellet press of 35 kW having a capacity of 400 kg/h production was used in this study. Two disc springs with 125 mm outer diameter, 71 mm inner diameter, 8 mm in thickness and 2.9 mm cone height were stacked 94 vol. 57 no. 2/2017 Use of Disc Springs in a Pellet Fuel Machine in parallel and integrated in the pelletizing system. A commonly used analytical A-L method and the FEA were used to analyse disc springs’ force/stress- deformation relations. With increasing deformation, differences between the A-L method and FEA results increase. Radial stresses, which are neglected in the A-L method, become more effective on disc springs with increasing deformation. Thus, the A-L method gives more accurate results for small deformations. Disc springs are preloaded by tightening nuts, ini- tially deforming at 0.25 of its cone height. In operating conditions, the occurring maximum deformation was assumed as 0.75 of its cone height. For 0.25 deforma- tion 75 kN (A-L) and 85 kN (FEA) force values were obtained. For 0.75 deformation 209 kN (A-L) and 264 kN (FEA) force values were obtained. Hertzian stress was calculated under roller cylinders based on the FEA force values. While pelletizing operation comes to approximately 444–780 MPa, maximum pres- sure occurs under each roller. For the mean pelletizing pressure, half of this value (222–390 MPa) may be con- sidered as a practical and easy-calculated value. Maximum stress is formed on the inner edge of the top surface of disc spring during compression. Based on the FEA, stresses of 977.04 MPa and 2976 MPa occurred for the 0.25h and 0.75h deformations respec- tively. When stacked in parallel, friction forces occur be- tween the springs. These forces help damping the vibrations during the machine operation. In frictional conditions, springs’ load should be greater than in fric- tionless conditions to reach same deformation value. A novel utilization of disc springs was realized in this study. In this way, common problems of pellet presses, such as choke, roller damage and pressure regulation, were eliminated. List of symbols F Force P Pressure σcomp. Compression stress E Young’s modulus ν Poisson ratio δ Deformation D Outer diameter of disc spring d Inner diameter of disc spring s Thickness m Auxiliary coefficient Acknowledgements This work has been made in collaboration with the Repub- lic of Turkey Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology (Project 0823.TGSD.2015) and the Scientific Research Projects Organization (BAP) of Dumlupınar University, Turkey (Project 2012/28). References [1] Chiew, Y.L., Iwata, T., Shimada, S.: System analysis for effective use of palm oil waste as energy resources, Biomass and Bioenergy, 35, 2011, p. 2925-2935. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.03.027 [2] Jones, J.C.: Biomass-peat blends and carbon neutrality, Fuel, 158, 2015, p. 1016. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.06.005 [3] Herbert, G.M., Krishnan, A.U.: Quantifying environmental performance of biomass energy, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 2016, p. 292-308. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.254 [4] Serrano, C., Monedero, E., Lapuerta, M., Portero, H.: Effect of moisture content, particle size and pine addition on quality parameters of barley straw pellets, Fuel Processing Technology, 92, 2013, p. 699–706. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.11.031 [5] Gilbert, P., Ryu, C., Sharifi, V., Swithenbank, J.: Effect of process parameters on pelletisation of herbaceous crops, Fuel, 88, 2009, p. 1491-1497. doi:0.1016/j.fuel.2009.03.015 [6] Mani, S., Tabil, L.G., Sokhansanj, S.: Effects of compressive force, particle size and moisture content on mechanical properties of biomass pellets from grasses, Biomass and Bioenergy, 30, 2006, p. 648–654. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.01.004 [7] Relova, I., Vignote, S., Leon, M.A., Ambrosio, Y.: Optimisation of the manufacturing variables of sawdust pellets from the bark of Pinus caribaea Morelet: Particle size, moisture and pressure, Biomass and Bioenergy, 33, 2009, p. 1351-1357. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.05.005 [8] Larsson, S.H., Thyrel, M., Geladi, P., Lestander, P.A.: High quality biofuel pellet production from pre-compacted low density raw materials, Bioresource Technology, 99, 2008, p. 7176-7182. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.065 [9] Kong, L., Tian, S., Li, Z., Luo, R., Chen, D., Tu, Y., Xiong, Y.: Conversion of recycled sawdust into high HHV and low NOx emission bio-char pellets using lignin and calcium hydroxide blended binders, Renewable Energy, 60, 2013, p. 559-565. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2013.06.004 [10] Puig-Arnavat, M., Shang, L., Sarossy, Z., Ahrenfeldt, J., Henriksen, U.B.: From a single pellet press to a bench scale pellet mill — Pelletizing six different biomass feedstocks, Fuel Processing Technology, 142, 2016, p. 27-33. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.09.022 [11] Tumuluru, J.S.: Effect of process variables on the density and durability of the pellets made from high moisture corn stover, Biosystems Engineering, 119, 2014, p. 44-57. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.11.012 [12] Bridgeman, T.G., Jones, J.M., Shield, I., Williams, P.T.: Torrefaction of reed canary grass, wheat straw and willow to enhance solid fuel qualities and combustion properties, Fuel, 87, 2008, p. 844–856. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2007.05.041 [13] Prins, M.J., Ptasinski, K.J., Janssen, F.J.J.G.: More efficient biomass gasification via torrefaction, Energy, 31, 2006, p. 3458–3470. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.11.018 [14] Larsson, S.H., Rudolfsson, M. Nordwaeger, M., Olofsson, I., Samuelsson, R.: Effects of moisture content, torrefaction temperature, and die temperature in pilot scale pelletizing of torrefied Norway spruce, Applied Energy, 102, 2013, p. 827-832. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.08.046 95 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.03.027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.06.005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.11.031 http://dx.doi.org/0.1016/j.fuel.2009.03.015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.01.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.05.005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.06.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.09.022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.11.012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2007.05.041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.11.018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.08.046 Ebubekı̇r Can Güneş, İsmet Çelı̇k Acta Polytechnica [15] Abou-Chakra, H., Tüzün, U.: Microstructural blending of coal to enhance flowability Powder Technol, 111, 2000, p. 200–209. doi:10.1016/S0032-5910(99)00285-5 [16] Kováčová, M., Matus, M., Krizan, P., Beniak, J.: Design theory for the pressing chamber in the solid biofuel production process, Acta Polytechnica, 54(1), 2014, p. 28-34. doi:10.14311/AP.2014.54.0028 [17] Stelte, W., Holm, J.K., Sanadi, A.R., Barsberg, S., Ahrenfeldt, J., Henriksen, U.B.: Fuel pellets from biomass: The importance of the pelletizing pressure and its dependency on the processing conditions, Fuel, 90, 2011, p. 3285-3290. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2011.05.011 [18] California Pellet Mill, http://www.cpm.net [2016-18-10]. [19] Stelte, W., Clemons, C., Holm, J.K., Ahrenfeldt, J., Henriksen, U.B., Sanadi, A.R.: Thermal transitions of the amorphous polymers in wheat straw, Industiral Crops and Products, 34, 2011, p. 1053-1056. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.03.014 [20] Almen, J.O., Laszlo, A.: The Uniform-Section Disk Spring, Transactions of the ASME, Research Papers, 58-10, 1936, p. 305-314. [21] Ozaki, S., Tsuda, K., Tominaga, J.: Analyses of static and dynamic behavior of coned disk springs: Effects of friction boundaries, Thin-Walled Structures, 59, 2012, p. 132-143. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2012.06.001 [22] Budynas, R.G., Nisbett, J.K.: Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design, McGraw-Hill, 2008, p.118-119. ISBN: 0-390-76487-6 96 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0032-5910(99)00285-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.14311/AP.2014.54.0028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.05.011 http://www.cpm.net http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.03.014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2012.06.001 Acta Polytechnica 57(2):89–96, 2017 1 Introduction 2 Material and method 2.1 Disc spring selection and calculations 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Pelletizing pressure calculation via Hertzian stress 4 Conclusion List of symbols Acknowledgements References