Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings https://doi.org/10.14311/APP.2024.47.0042 Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings 47:42–46, 2024 © 2024 The Author(s). Licensed under a CC-BY 4.0 licence Published by the Czech Technical University in Prague VERIFICATION OF MATERIAL CHARACTERISTIC OF NATURAL FIBERS FOR CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT Jakub Hájek∗, Tomáš Vlach, Jakub Řepka, Vladimír Žďára Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Thákurova 7, 166 29 Prague, Czech Republic ∗ corresponding author: jakub.hajek@cvut.cz Abstract. The topic of the article is the verification of the tensile mechanical characteristics of selected natural fibres commonly available on the Czech market. Due to their high tensile strengths, some natural materials have a certain potential for use in specific engineering applications such as concrete reinforcement. Additionally, natural fibres are renewable materials, making them an environmentally friendly material. Potentially, its use as a reinforcement in the form of technical textiles for textile- reinforced concrete could help create more sustainable reinforced concrete elements. This article deals with tensile tests of chosen available natural fibre materials, such as flax, hemp, jute, and sisal, both pure and impregnated (homogenised) using epoxy resin. In this article, the results and comparisons of tensile strengths and Young’s modulus are presented. Keywords: Natural materials, natural fibres, alternative reinforcement, tensile test, tensile strength. 1. Introduction In recent years, there is great interest and pressure to reduce the environmental impact of structures due to the climatic crisis. Natural materials, which are renewable, are of great interest in many scientific fields. Due to the low price [1] and the relatively good characteristic of the material, natural materials have a great potential in the engineering industry. Today, there are already many applications for use in polymer composites for e.g., the automobile or aviation industry [2]. From the point of view of life- cycle assessment (LCA) [2], natural materials have a low environmental impact, because they are, for instance, renewable and composable [3]. Generally, textile-reinforced concrete (TRC) is rein- forced by technical textiles from inorganic materials such as carbon, AR-glass, or basalt in a form of orien- tated rovings. The rovings are used as either pure or homogenised polymer matrix. The use of natural rov- ings or textiles in concrete could partially substitute the technical textiles, and technically this replacement is simply feasible. There is an option that both types of textiles might be used as hybrid reinforcement [4]. An important parameter for concrete reinforcement is the Young’s modulus. In general, reinforcement should have a higher modulus of elasticity than the concrete matrix (around 20 GPa), because it needs to interact with the concrete matrix and must catch the crack development. Also, the amount of reinforcement in the cross-sectional area of the element should be less than the amount of concrete. Another basic parameter is the tensile strength, which is usually sufficient and thus the principle of composite behaviour of reinforced concrete is fulfilled. According to previous research, as seen in the presented Table 1 below, and according to the availability of the Czech market, four natural materials with the highest potentially mechanical per- formance were chosen for the basic testing of tensile mechanical parameters – flax, hemp, jute, and sisal. For reference, commonly used technical textiles were also experimentally verified – carbon, AR-glass and basalt rovings were used for testing and comparison. 2. Preparation of samples From the Czech company “AGRITEC, výzkum, šlechtění a služby, s.r.o.”, two types of natural fibres were received: flax and hemp. These specimens had to be woven manually by hand, as seen in the left picture of Figure 1. On the other hand, the Czech company “JUTA a.s.” provided finished natural roving bulks of flax, hemp, jute, and sisal, so the work was easier as the rovings just needed to be cut into the required lengths. Specimens were prepared for the tensile test. For the attachment of the sample to the claws of the hy- draulic press, epoxy resin sleeves were required at the ends of the rovings. A silicone mould was created for the preparation of sleeves. There was an approxi- mately 30 cm gap between the sleeves, as seen in the right image of Figure 1. Dimensions and test setup were prepared according to previous experience [6]. All samples were prepared in groups of 6 samples and in two variants – pure rovings without any treat- ment and homogenised rovings by epoxy resin. Ho- mogenised filaments of roving interact between them- selves which leads to better stress distribution through- out the cross-section, and therefore the sample with- stands higher loads. The impregnation was done on a prepared frame to ensure that the rovings will be properly stretched. The linear density of the rovings was around 1 600– 2 500 tex depending on the bought available material. 42 https://doi.org/10.14311/APP.2024.47.0042 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://www.cvut.cz/en vol. 47/2024 Verification of material characteristic of natural fibers Fibre type Annual production Density Tensile Elastic Elongation strength modulus at break [dry metric tons] [g cm−3] [MPa] [GPa] [%] Softwood 1 750 000 000 1.4 100–170 10–50 8.0–14.0 Hardwood 1.4 90–180 10–70 11.0–13.0 Softwood kraft pulp 26 000 000 1.5 1 000 40 4.4 Jute 2 300 000 1.3–1.5 200–770 20–55 2.0–3.0 Sisal 378 000 1.5 100–800 9–22 3.0–7.0 Kenaf 970 000 1.4–1.5 930 53 1.6 Coir 100 000 1.2 180 4–6 30.0 Flax 830 000 1.5 350–1 040 28–70 2.0–4.0 Hemp 214 000 1.5 690 30–70 1.5–4.0 Bamboo 30 000 000 0.6–1.1 140–230 11–17 4.0–7.0 Wheat 720 000 000 0.6–0.8 10–200 1–12 2.7 Rice husk 120 000 000 0.7–1.0 55 22 2.0–5.0 Table 1. Overview of properties of selected natural materials [5]. (a). (b). Figure 1. Hemp and flax fibres arranged in single rovings (A) and poured sleeves with epoxy resin (B). A full overview of the materials used and their char- acteristic is presented in the Table 2. The results were logically calculated in stress so that they can be compared. T ρr Ar [tex] [g cm−3] [mm3] Flax 1 680 1.5 1.12 Flax handmade 1 850 1.5 1.23 Hemp 3 720 1.4 2.66 Hemp handmade 1 800 1.4 1.29 Jute 1 500 1.4 1.07 Sisal 2 000 1.5 1.33 Carbon 1 600 1.8 0.89 AR-glass 2 400 2.7 0.90 Basalt 2 520 2.7 0.94 Table 2. Material characteristic of measured rovings and yarns. 3. Experiment and results The experiment was carried out on a GALDABINI Quasar 100 hydraulic press. The specimens were tested in tension with a constant load speed of 1 mm min−1. The force and displacement of the upper jaw was recorded. Young’s modulus was measured by DIC (Digital Im- age Correlation). A large number of photos are taken during the experiment, and afterwards they are anal- ysed in the software Istra4D. Identified unique areas of pixels are tracked, and deformations are counted. The samples were provided with small spackle pattern targets for a good measurement of the deformations, as seen in Figure 2 and Figure 3. The photos for the DIC analysis were taken in an interval of 0.5 seconds. The impregnated samples were also measured with an extensometer (Figure 3) for validation of the data from DIC. Samples without impregnation could not be measured with the extensometer, because the jaws 43 J. Hájek, T. Vlach, J. Řepka , V. Žďára Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings Figure 2. Scheme of the tensile test setup. of the extensometer would damage the pure roving. The handling of the extensometer is also very time consuming. The pure rovings were twisted 5 times ev- ery time before the specimen was placed into the press jaws. By this the filaments were prestressed a little so that the distribution of force was better throughout the cross-section of the roving due to the mechanical interaction of single fibrils. Then the filaments did not break too much one by one, and some data could be measured. [7] In the Table 3, there are presented the results of measurements. There is a comparison of the Young’s modulus measured by DIC and extensometer on im- pregnated flax specimens. The values of both methods are very similar. The data measured with the exten- someter have slightly lower deformations and therefore higher Young’s modulus. But as seen in Figure 4, some data, such as flax, have bigger differences. This inaccuracy might be caused by the experiment setup. Around loading force of 250 N there was a jump in the data measured by DIC. It was caused by the lower jaws of the press, which were slightly raised. The force of 250 N ap- proximately corresponds to the weight of the steel part (15.6 kg) and friction in placement. Therefore, the data measured with the extensometer are more precise and reliable. On the other hand, if the setup of the experiment is prepared thoroughly, then the DIC method is much easier and faster to handle. (a). (b). Figure 3. Impregnated jute yarn with extensometer and DIC target (left). Pure sisal yarn with DIC target after failure (right). σmax EDIC EEXT [MPa] [MPa] [MPa] Flax epox 522 25 933 28 078 Flax pure 126 8 104 Flax epox handmade 370 40 201 43 418 Flax pure handmade 107 11 706 Hemp epox 315 18 702 20 849 Hemp pure 150 5 390 Hemp epox handmade 275 20 042 21 647 Hemp pure handmade 115 5 913 Jute epox 311 24 794 28 029 Jute pure 161 7 188 Sisal epox 349 21 188 22 905 Sisal pure 231 8 135 Table 3. Measured data of stress and Young’s modu- lus on natural yarns and technical rovings. The results in the Table 3 and Figure 5 clearly state that the impregnated rovings have higher strength and stiffness than the pure ones, because the impreg- nation allows to transfer the stress effectively through 44 vol. 47/2024 Verification of material characteristic of natural fibers Figure 4. Comparison of the flax data measured by DIC and extensometer. Figure 5. Stress-strain chart of representative samples of pure and impregnated samples. the whole cross-section. The filaments of pure rovings break one by one, which makes it very difficult to mea- sure any relevant characteristic data of the material. On the other hand, it shows ductility, which might be potentially useful in the reinforcement of concrete. In addition, only impregnated rovings are evaluated as their values are more relevant to the theme of this paper. In terms of modulus of elasticity, the results are quite similar except for flax. Handmade prepared flax roving shows the best average Young’s modulus with the value of 43.4 GPa. Generally, flax and hemp plants have a better structure of plant cells – microfibrils have a low angle deviation from the direction of growth, which is a good prerequisite for tensile strength and stiffness [8]. The reason behind the large deviation of handmade flax might be a different type of flax plant or also the process of specimen preparation. The filaments of handmade prepared roving were placed parallel one to each other, as seen in Figure 1, but the commercially woven yarn is twisted, and the material might be more damaged by the process of making. 4. Conclusion Generally, it can be said that the theoretical as- sumptions were correct. Flax seems to be the right material to continue the research of concrete rein- forcement in the form of a technical textile. The best was hand-made flax with an average Young’s modulus of 43.4 GPa. The best average tension strength had commercially bought flax with a value 45 J. Hájek, T. Vlach, J. Řepka , V. Žďára Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings of 522 MPa. The differences between the rest of the natural materials were small, and it proba- bly largely depends on the origin of the mate- rial. Two methods of measuring the modulus of elasticity were tested – with DIC and with an extensometer. Both methods showed similar and solid results. The DIC method is faster and easier to deal with, but the setup of the experiment must be well prepared. The extensometer method is more reliable but more demanding. The material characteristics of the chosen natural materials were described in this article. It can be said that measured flax data show good potential as a concrete reinforcement for specific applications, as the Young’s modulus of concrete is around 20–40 GPa. Acknowledgements The work on this paper was supported by Czech Science Foundation Grant No. 22-14942K entitled “Possibilities of using natural fibers for the production of hybrid textile reinforcement in concrete” The authors would like to ac- knowledge all financial assistance provided to support this research. References [1] S. Joshi, L. Drzal, A. Mohanty, S. Arora. Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites? Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 35(3):371–376, 2004. AIChE 2002. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.016 [2] R. K. Malviya, R. K. Singh, R. Purohit, R. Sinha. Natural fibre reinforced composite materials: Environmentally better life cycle assessment – a case study. Materials Today: Proceedings 26:3157–3160, 2020. 10th International Conference of Materials Processing and Characterization. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.651 [3] T. Rousakis. 9 - natural fibre rebar cementitious composites. In M. Fan, F. Fu (eds.), Advanced High Strength Natural Fibre Composites in Construction, pp. 215–234. Woodhead Publishing, 2017. https: //doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100411-1.00009-1 [4] Hybrid composites: A versatile materials for future. Applied Science and Engineering Progress 12(4):223, 2019. https://doi.org/10.14416/j.asep.2019.09.002 [5] T. Väisänen, A. Haapala, R. Lappalainen, L. Tomppo. Utilization of agricultural and forest industry waste and residues in natural fiber-polymer composites: A review. Waste Management 54:62–73, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.04.037 [6] T. Vlach, L. Laiblová, A. Chira, et al. Comparison of different methods for determination of modulus of elasticity of composite reinforcement produced from roving. In Special Concrete and Composites 2014, vol. 1054 of Advanced Materials Research, pp. 104–109. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2014. https://doi.org/ 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1054.104 [7] R. Chudoba, M. Vořechovský, V. Eckers, T. Gries. Effect of twist, fineness, loading rate and length on tensile behavior of multifilament yarns (a multivariate study). Textile Research Journal 77(11):880–891, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517507081280 [8] K. Lau, P. Hung, M.-H. Zhu, D. Hui. Properties of natural fibre composites for structural engineering applications. Composites Part B: Engineering 136:222–233, 2018. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.038 46 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.651 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100411-1.00009-1 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100411-1.00009-1 https://doi.org/10.14416/j.asep.2019.09.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.04.037 https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1054.104 https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1054.104 https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517507081280 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.038 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.038 Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings 47:42–46, 2024 1 Introduction 2 Preparation of samples 3 Experiment and results 4 Conclusion Acknowledgements References