Addressing barriers in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: the transformative role of lipid nanoparticulate drug delivery doi: https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 403 ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429; doi: https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 Open Access : ISSN : 1848-7718 http://www.pub.iapchem.org/ojs/index.php/admet/index Review Addressing barriers in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: the transformative role of lipid nanoparticulate drug delivery Zenab Presswala, Sheetal Acharya* and Shreeraj Shah Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, L.J Institute of Pharmacy, Lok Jagruti University, L.J Campus, Near Sarkhej- Sanand Circle, Off. S.G. Road, Ahmedabad-382 210, India *Corresponding Author: E-mail: sheetaltarak@gmail.com; Tel.: +91 9967117481 Received: December 4, 2023; Revised: June 27, 2024; Published: July 23, 2024 Abstract Background and purpose: The brainstem tumour known as diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), also known as pontine glioma, infiltrative brainstem glioma is uncommon and virtually always affects children. A pontine glioma develops in the brainstem's most vulnerable region (the "pons"), which regulates a number of vital processes like respiration and blood pressure. It is particularly challenging to treat due to its location and how it invades healthy brain tissue. The hunt for a solution is continually advancing thanks to advances in modern medicine, but the correct approach is still elusive. With a particular focus on brain tumours that are incurable or recur, research is ongoing to discover fresh, practical approaches to target particular areas of the brain. Experimental approach: To successfully complete this task, a thorough literature search was carried out in reputable databases like Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. Key results: The present article provides a comprehensive analysis of the notable advantages of lipid nanoparticles compared to alternative nanoparticle formulations. The article delves into the intricate realm of diverse lipid-based nanoparticulate delivery systems, which are used in Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma (DIPG) which thoroughly examines preclinical and clinical studies, providing a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness and potential of lipid nanoparticles in driving therapeutic advancements for DIPG. Conclusion: There is strong clinical data to support the promising method of using lipid-based nanoparticulate drug delivery for brain cancer treatment, which shows improved outcomes. ©2024 by the authors. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Keywords Brain cancer, child cancer, nanoparticles, liposomes, nano lipid carriers, solid lipid nanocarriers, preclinical studies, clinical studies Introduction A diverse subset of gliomas called brainstem gliomas (BGs) most frequently affects young children. These tumors are known as gliomas because they develop from glial cells, a type of supporting cell in the brain. On the basis of their anatomical structure and clinical behaviour, they can be divided into groups [1,2]. Gliomas are divided into four grades by the World Health Organization (WHO) based on histopathologic charac- teristics like necrosis, micro vascular proliferation, cytological atypia, anaplasia and mitotic index, as shown in Figure 1 [3,4]. https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 http://www.pub.iapchem.org/ojs/index.php/admet/index mailto:sheetaltarak@gmail.com http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Z. Presswala et al. ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 404 Figure 1. Classification of brain gliomas according to the World Health Organization In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) implemented a significant update to the diagnostic criteria for infiltrating gliomas. This update introduced molecular markers into the classification system, including histone alterations, 1p/19q chromosome status, and isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations. Despite the remarkable progress made in the field, it is disheartening to acknowledge that the outlook for individuals diagnosed with malignant or high-grade (III and IV) gliomas remains exceedingly bleak [3,5]. Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a pediatric malignant tumour that develops widely in the stem region of the brain, which is called pons. The usual age at diagnosis for this unsettling illness is 6-7 years old, and adults are rarely diagnosed with it. Less than 10% of patients remain alive following their delay in diagnoses for more than two years due to the location and existing treatment choices. Approximately 80% of all kinds of pediatric brain tumours that develop in the brainstem are DIPGs [6-9]. Unfortunately, DIPG has a dismal prognosis and, regardless of the type of treatment used, the median survival time is typically less than 16-24 months [1]. History of DIPG Since the name "glioma" was first used over 150 years ago, numerous gliomas have been identified and described [10]. Although DIPG has existed throughout human history, it wasn't until the 1920s that it was first mentioned in English medical literature. At the time, there was no neuroimaging, thus, a patient with the classic DIPG symptoms (in-turned eye, weakness on one side) was diagnosed with the disease solely by physical examination. Radiation was increasingly used to treat cancer from the 1930s through the 1950s, and it was ultimately discovered to be effective against several CNS tumours. Further, we have discussed a few DIPG facts in Figure 2 [11]. Epidemiology and diagnosis The tumor is aggressive, as evidenced by the fact that the majority of children survive for less than a year. Figure 3a explains cancer arising from pons and Figure 3b shows the pictorial image of cancer cells. DIPGs cannot be surgically resected due to their infiltrative nature and localization in the brainstem. In the Unites States, roughly 300-350 new cases of DIPG are identified each year [12]. Patients typically exhibit brainstem syndromes, which can occur singly or in combination and include ataxia, long tract symptoms, and cranial nerve dysfunction [1,6,13]. ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 Addressing barriers in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma doi: https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 405 Figure 2. History and facts of DIPG a b Figure 3. a - cancer arising from pons; b - pictorial image of cancer cells. The preferred diagnostic method is MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), with as well as without an intra- venous agent. A high-signal lesion that occupies at least two-thirds of the pons and frequently spreads laterally into the cerebellar hemispheres and peduncles as well as vertically into the midbrain and medulla [1,14]. Contrast enhancement often only accounts for 0 to 25 % of the tumour volume, making it a less noticeable feature. Cysts are small bumps found uncommon; however, necrosis, a premature cell death, can occur. Diffusion-weighted MRI often does not reveal restricted water diffusion. Advanced neuroimaging reveals that DIPGs have low cerebral blood volume and hypoperfusion, and MRI reveals a moderate rise in choline levels and a fall in acetylaspartate levels [15]. Because of the associated risk of morbidity and lack of therapeutic ef- ficacy, a tissue biopsy is typically not necessary in cases where the MRI appearance of DIPG is so distinctive [1]. Molecular characterization H3K27M, MYCN, and silent are the three molecular defines groups of DIPGSs [6,16]. Nearly 80 % of DIPGs carry H3 mutations, as depicted in Figure 4, compared to around 35 % of other brain tumours [17]. H3.1 and H3.3 are the isoforms, which are expressed by the genes HIST1H3B and H3F3A, respectively, and have methionine in place of lysine as a result of the histone mutation H3K27M [18,19]. The survival, phenotype, and clinical effects of the histone mutations in H3.1 and H3.3 differ slightly from each other [20]. Histone alterations in the H3.1 subunit are frequently linked to marginally increased survival and decreased https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 Z. Presswala et al. ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 406 metastases. Regardless of the isoform affected, the H3K27M is generally linked to significantly inferior results compared to other H3 wild-type cases [21,22]. By inhibiting polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), a gene belonging to the Polycomb group that directly and indirectly controls the DNA damage response and functions as an anticancer barrier, this mutation results in the loss of histone trimethylation and, as a result, epigenetic silencing [18,19]. DIPGs have MYC and MYCN mutations, which function as transcriptional regulators to improve gene expression throughout the genome [6,17]. Apart from this, other mutations were found, such as ACVR1, TP53, PIK3RI, and PIK3CA [6]. Figure 4. The K27M mutation in histone H3 is a characteristic feature of DIPGs. All relevant information about DIPG, including its ongoing treatments, new understandings, mutations, and diagnostic methods, has been compiled in Table 1. Table 1. Clinical, pathological, and genetic characteristics of DIPG are summarized in the following table [1,6,23,24] Location Pons Prognosis Median Overall Survival is 8-12 Months Age of diagnosis 6-7 years Prevelance 10-20 % of all paderaite brain tumours, 80 % of all pediatric brainstem tumors Clinical presentation >50 % classic symptoms: Long tract and Cerebellar signs, Cranial nerve palsies. Cranial nerve VI and VII dysfunction Obstructive hydrocephalus Diagnostic Tools MRI (Common) Stereotactic biopsy and histological review, molecular testing. Symptom Onset Rapid, usually 1 month before symptoms are noticed. Molecular testing Next generation sequencing, DNA microarrays Molecular subgroups H3K27M, MYCN and Silent Mutations Histone 3 (H3) - 80 % - significantly worse outcomes vs H3 wild-type H3K27M - Isoforms H3.1 and H3.3 ACVR1 – 30 % - co segregates with H3.1, facilitates early tumor progression TP53 - 20-40 % - often coincident with PDGFRA amplification PIK3RI and PIK3CA - PI3K pathway oncogenes MYC and MYCN aberrations - transcriptional regulators, enhance overall gene expression Histology Common: high-grade astrocytic, increased mitotic activity, microvascular proliferation and /or necrosis Rare: lower-grade histology, overall bland cytology. Immunohistochemistry GFAP, ATRX, p53, neurofilament, ki-67 immunostains Targeted antibodies for H3K27M, IDHIR132H Current treatment Only fractionated radiation at the dose of 54-59 gy or in combination of radiation therapy and chemotherapy Treatment roadblocks Monotherapy and combination chemotherapy- no substantial benefit Location- does not allow for meaningful surgical resection Medication delivery failure in crossing blood-brain barrier Ongoing trials Histone deacetylase (HDAC) and demethylase inhibitors Transcriptional regulators Immunotherapy - immune cell recruitment and/or introduction to tumour Drug delivery enhancement . ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 Addressing barriers in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma doi: https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 407 Study screening for formulations/ methodology In order to complete this task, an extensive literature search was conducted in well-established databases such as Science Direct, ResearchGate, MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Taylor & Francis, and Clinicaltrials.org. The examination of titles and abstracts of published articles, which were identified during the search, was conducted in accordance with the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Within this context, this article presents a thorough investigation and analysis of several formulations intended for the treatment of brain cancer. To fully comprehend the various therapy modalities, a thorough evaluation of the body of research, clinical trials, and scholarly articles was conducted. A variety of formulations, such as immune- therapies, targeted therapies, chemotherapeutic drugs, and combination medicines, have been included. The methods of action, efficacy profiles, possible adverse effects, and overall impact on patient outcomes have all been covered by systemic analysis. The outline of our screening using different tools is described in Figure 5. Figure 5. Pictorial representation of study screening in formulations available for treatment of DIPG Treatment options Based on our literature, many treatment options are available for DIPG, as shown in Figure 6, and continuous research is ongoing to find a cure. Conventional therapeutic drugs are limited in their application due to their non-selectivity, unfavorable side effects, low efficacy, and inadequate biodistribution. Figure 6. Overview of treatment options for DIPG. Therefore, creating delivery systems that are versatile and well-controlled is the main goal of current research efforts [25,26]. Delivering a variety of compounds to specific parts of the body through the association of therapeutic medicines with nanoparticles that have distinctive physicochemical and biological properties and https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 Z. Presswala et al. ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 408 engineering their paths for appropriate targeting is a promising strategy [25,27]. The utilization of carriers in protecting sensitive drugs from enzymatic degradation and the subsequent enhancement of drug bioavailability by promoting their diffusion through biological membranes is a significant area of research. A developing method for using nanotechnological systems in illness diagnosis and treatment is called nanomedicine. Nanomaterials and Nanodevices are the two primary categories into which this area of nanotechnology can be divided. Nanodevices are tiny, nanoscale devices, such as respirocytes and microarrays, capable of intelligence. Particles smaller than 100 nm in at least one dimension are found in nanomaterials [28-30]. Figure 7 describes different classes of nanoparticles. Figure 7. Classification of nanoparticles How nanoparticles can cross the blood-brain barrier Nanoparticles (NP) are suitable carriers for drug delivery to brain tissues as they can enhance drug permeation through the blood-brain barrier (BBB) by both active (through receptor and carrier transport) and passive diffusion (through paracellular and transcellular pathways). Figure 8 shows various pathways for NP to enter the brain [31]. Figure 8. Different mechanisms of drug crossing from blood into the brain ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 Addressing barriers in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma doi: https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 409 Role of size, surface charge and ligands of nanoparticles influencing BBB permeation Several aspects influence the effectiveness of NP systemic circulation, BBB penetration, and cellular delivery. These aspects have been outlined in Figure 9. Multiple studies have demonstrated a distinct negative link between the size of nanoparticles (NPs) and their ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) [32-35]. NP can be anywhere between 1 and 1000 nm in size, and they can entrap, adsorb, or covalently bind drugs to cells. Zeta potential is a significant factor that influences the movement of nanoparticles through the blood- brain barrier (BBB). Research has demonstrated that nanoparticles (NPs) possessing a high zeta potential (indicating a strong positive charge) induce rapid toxicity at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) [32,36]. Thus, most NP formulations discussed in the literature regarding brain administration have a moderate charge ranging from -1 to -15 mV or high (between -15 and -45 mV) [37,38]. Figure 9. Main nanoparticle (NP) features influencing systemic delivery and blood-brain barrier (BBB) passage Ligand targeting is the process of adding particular ligands to the surface of NMs to enable better interaction with BBB receptors or transporters [39]. Several ligands have been attached to nanoparticles (NPs) to enhance their ability to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). These molecules can be classified into four distinct categories: (i) ligands that facilitate the binding of proteins from the bloodstream to specific receptors or transporters in the blood-brain barrier (BBB); (ii) ligands that directly interact with BBB receptors or transporters; (iii) ligands that enhance the electrical charge and hydrophobic properties and (iv) ligands that enhance the duration of blood circulation [32,40,41]. In the first scenario, we can incorporate poly(sorbate 80) (often referred to as Tween 80), which has the ability to adsorb apolipoprotein E and/or A-I. The surfactant facilitates the attachment of apolipoproteins, which then engage with lipoprotein receptors in the brain endothelium, allowing passage through the blood- brain barrier (BBB). In the second scenario, we have the option to incorporate multiple targeting ligands, such as those designed for the transferrin receptor (transferrin peptide, transferrin protein, or antibody against transferrin), insulin receptor, glucose transporter, and various others [40,42,43]. In the third scenario, nanoparticles (NPs) have been covered with amphiphilic peptides to enhance their absorption by blood-brain barrier (BBB) endothelial cells. Furthermore, the quantity of ligands and their receptor affinity significantly influence the transportation of nanoparticles across the blood-brain barrier (avidity). The density of ligands https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 Z. Presswala et al. ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 410 is determined by both the surface area of the nanoparticles and the size of the ligands. Usually, the binding strength between the ligand and its receptor decreases when the ligand is attached to nanoparticles (NPs). The avidity and selectivity of the targeted ligands are enhanced when numerous ligands are conjugated. Nevertheless, NP attraction's intensity must be adjusted to achieve efficient BBB transcytosis [44,45]. In the fourth scenario, for instance, PEGylated NPs accumulate more efficiently in the brain, which results in improved blood circulation time [45,46]. In conclusion, various factors affect the transportation of nanoparticles (NPs) via the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to varying degrees. Role of nanocarriers in DIPG To boost the brain penetration of nanocarriers carrying chemotherapeutic medicines against glioma tumours, several strategies involve changing the BBB. Only those nanocarriers that can carry anticancer medications to brain tumours without disrupting the BBB are included in the subsequent discussion of nanocarriers. However, the primary justification for using nanocarriers in high-grade glioma treatment is that over 98% of medicines fail to cross the BBB [3]. Role of nanoparticles as a diagnostic agent in DIPG Currently, with morphological investigation of tissues or cells and with the help of imaging tools, early cancer can be diagnosed. Most imaging techniques, such as X-rays, MRIs, computed tomography (CT), endo- scopies, and ultrasounds, can only detect cancer when the tissue has undergone a conspicuous change [47]. Although nanotechnology has not yet been used in clinical settings to diagnose cancer, it is presently available in a number of medical screenings and testing [48]. Nanoparticles are used to collect cancer biomarkers for cancer detection, including cancer-associated proteins, circulating tumour DNA, circulating tumour cells, and exosomes [49]. Promising nanotechnology diagnostic techniques are being created to provide on-demand, practical, and affordable cancer detection and diagnosis tools. As a result of their superior volume-to-surface ratio when compared to bulk materials, many nanotechnologies, including quantum dots, gold nanoparticles, magnetic nanoparticles, and polymer dots, are used for cancer detection. This property enables the dense coating of antibodies, small molecules, peptides, aptamers, and other substances on nanoparticle surfaces. Such compounds can bind to and identify particular cancer molecules [47]. Role of nano formulations as a therapeutic agent in DIPG As is common knowledge, the BBB protects against harmful substances entering the brain. Endothelial cells are arranged closely together and are found along the brain's capillaries. BBB is a filter for passive transport and is selectively permeable to water, nutrients, and hydrophobic compounds [50]. Its defense mechanism comprises the facilitated efflux of bacteria and poisons with lipid solubility via P-gp. Tight junctions are fundamental structural elements necessary for endothelial cells to function. These tight connections of endothelial cells are absent from normal capillaries of blood circulation, but the BBB endothelial cells' tight junctions shield the brain [51]. Most medications fail to pass this barrier and lose their therapeutic benefits, rendering neurological patients incurable. The most extensively researched delivery systems for BBB translocation, nanocarriers are effective in targeting or utilizing specific biological substances, receptors, carriers, or processes of the brain. Due to their promising properties and extensive uses in neurological illnesses, the class of polymeric nanoparticles and lipid nanocarriers such as liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles, micelles, and others are receiving particular attention from neuroscientists [52]. Various invasive and non-invasive techniques focused on getting past the BBB's impediment and focusing on the necessary sick areas of the brain have been developed in recent years [53]. Hydrophilic or lipophilic ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 Addressing barriers in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma doi: https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 411 neuropharmaceutical substances can be loaded into nanoscopic formulations of biodegradable/ Biocom- patible/ synthetic/ natural polymers in solid or solution form, protecting them against biological and chemical risks [54]. The unique advantages of Nano formulations for neurotherapeutic drug transportation include size in the nanometer range, morphological characterization, efficient targeting by surface modification using ligands, a variety of administration routes, and stimuli-sensitive neurotherapeutic release [55]. Role of lipid-based nanoparticles in DIPG In exploring the various types of nanoparticles discussed above, it is noteworthy to highlight the efficacy of lipid-based nanoparticles, such as liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles and nano lipid carriers, in delivering hydrophilic and lipophilic drugs [56,57]. In nanoparticle-based formulations, lipids are often used to encapsulate or carry active ingredients such as phospholipids, triglycerides, phytosterols, and fatty acids. Different categories of lipid-based nanoparticles with detailed structures are shown in Figures 10 and 11. Figure 10. The diagram illustrates three distinct categories of lipid-based nanoparticles: i) liposomes, ii) solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), iii) nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs), and iv) hybrid lipid-polymeric nanoparticles. Figure 11. An illustrative depiction of various categories of SLNs (solid lipid nanoparticles) and NLCs (nanostructured lipid carriers). SLNs refer to solid lipid nanoparticles that can be categorized into three models: solid solution, drug-filled shell, and lipid-filled shell, where as NLCs subclasses are characterized by imperfections, types lacking a definite shape, types consisting of numerous components Role of liposomes in DIPG Originally identified in 1965, liposomes are spherical entities comprising an internal aqueous core and an amphipathic phospholipid bilayer [58]. Liposomes possess a core-shell nanostructure that enables the loading of hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds. Typically, pharmaceuticals that repel water are enclosed within the fatty layers of the outer shell, whereas drugs that dissolve in water are retained within the watery part of the inner core [59,60]. In the realm of liposome preparation, a multitude of techniques have been employed. These include mechanical dispersion, solvent dispersion, detergent removal, sonication, French https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 Z. Presswala et al. ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 412 Pressure cell (extrusion), freeze drying, micro-emulsification, membrane extrusion, and dried reconstituted vesicles [61-63]. The table presented herein offers a comprehensive summary of preclinical investigations centered around the utilization of liposomes in the context of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma (DIPG). These studies aim to elucidate the potential therapeutic interventions and advancements in the field of DIPG research, thereby shedding light on this intriguing area of study. Preclinical studies of liposomes in DIPG have been illustrated in Table 2. Table 2. Preclinical studies of Liposomes in DIPG Drug Formulation Excipients Overview Method of Preparation Evaluation parameters Outcome Docetaxel [64,65] Gold liposomes via Intravenous route Glutathione, transferrin, cholesterol, egg phosphatidylcho line, vitamin E The goal of this research was to create gold-based theranostic liposomes that target the transferrin (Tf) receptor containing docetaxel (DCX) and glutathione (AuGSH). The carboxylated Vit-E TPGS (TPGS-COOH) was used as linker. Using the solvent injection technique, a therapeutic agent (DCX) and a diagnostic agent (AuGSH) were added to the lipophilic bilayer and core of liposomes, respectively. Additionally, gold liposomes were decorated with Tf. TEM, FTIR, NMR, Particle size, PDI In vitro cytotoxicity, Atomic force micro- scopy. Drug encapsu- lation. In vitro cellular uptake study The results of these investigations suggest that Tf coated liposomes loaded with DC and AnGSH could be a useful platform for custo- mised nano-thera- nostics. A medication loading level of around 70 % was reached for both Nano formulations. Docotexal [66] Liposomes via Intravenous route Transferrin D-alphatocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate mono-ester (TPGS), cholesterol The creation of transferrin conjugated TPGScoated theronostic liposomes for brain cancer imaging and treatment was the goal of this study. Solvent Injection method Particle size, polydis- persity, morphology, drug encapsulation ef- ficiency, in-vitro release study and brain thera- nostic, In vivo study Methotrexate [67,68] Liposomes via Intravenous route Hydrogenated soy phosphatidy- lcholine (HSPC), egg-yolk phospha- tidylcholine (EYPC), and 1,2-distearo- ylsn-glycero-3-pho- sphoethanolamine- conjugated poly- ethylene glycol MW 2000 (mPEG- DSPE), cholesterol, acetonitrile, methanol and formic acid This study involved quantitative evaluation of the effects of liposome formulations on the in vivo release and brain delivery of methotrexate (MTX) in rats. On the basis of egg-yolk phosphati- dylcholine (EYPC) or hydrogenated soy phosphatidylcholine (HSPC), two PEGylated liposomal MTX formu- lations were created. By measuring the released, unbound MTX in brain and plasma using microdialysis, the drug release and uptake into the brain following intravenous admini- stration of both formu- lations were compared to unformulated MTX. The ethanol injection method, which involves the pre- insertion of PEG lipid, is a notable technique in the field. Liposome stability study in vitro, In vivo micro dialysis, Size, PDI, EE, lipid levels, The findings presented in this study highlight the significant influence of the phospholipid used in the formulation of PEGylated liposomes on the in vivo release and brain delivery of MTX. Irinotecan s [69,70] Nanoliposomes via Intranasal route 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-gly- cero-3-phospho- choline, 1ʹ,3ʹ- bis[1,2dioleoyl-sn- glycero-3-phos- pho]-glycerol, cholesterol, and 1,2-dist earoyl-sn- glycero-3-phospho- ethanolamine-N- -[methoxy(polyeth- ylene glycol)-2000] The effectiveness of nanoliposomal (LS) irinotecan (CPT-11) and its active metabolite, 7-ethyl- 10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), in DIPG patient- derived xenograft models was examined in this work. Thin film hydration by solvent rotary evaporator. Final the solution underwent additional homogenization through the use of an ultrasonified homogenizer. Cell viability and colony formation assays, apoptosis assay, in vitro cellular uptake and distribution, xenograft models, analysis of drug concentration in the brainstem tumor, in vivo therapy response study, immunohisto- chemistry, statistical analysis ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 Addressing barriers in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma doi: https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 413 Drug Formulation Excipients Overview Method of Preparation Evaluation parameters Outcome Limonene [71] Liposomes Trypsin-EDTA, Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS), 3-(4,5- dimethylthiazol-2- yl)-2,5-diphenyltet- razolium bromide salt, Dimethyl sulfoxide. This study set out to assess the effectiveness of liposomes loaded with d- limonene on U87MG cells as well as the signaling pathways connected to cell death. Not disclosed Not disclosed The outcomes demonstrate that human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells were not able to internalize the drug- loaded liposomes; instead, they could only do so in glioma (U87MG) cells. Paclitaxel, Berberine [72] Liposomes Folic acid, Tween 80, Folic acid, Soybean Phospholipids, Cholesterol. A formulation that is both intelligent and responsive to the tumor microen- vironment (TME) using folic acid (FA) derivatives and mitochondria was created.PTX-Tween 80- BBR + FA-Lip, a co- modified liposome coated with Tween 80 that targets berberine (BBR) derivatives, was created. Not disclosed Not disclosed Based on highly specific tumor targeting and mito- chondrial targeting, the results demon- strated that PTX- Tween 80-BBR + FA- Lip can observably improve the thera- peutic efficacy of chemotherapy. This can lead to new con- cepts and approaches for the targeted therapy of gliomas. Octarginine [73] Liposomes 1,2-distearoyl-sn- glycero-3-phospho- choline, Rhodami- ne- 1,2-dioleoyl-sn- glycero-3-phospho- ethanolamine-N, PEG2K-DSPE. The current study aims to create new PEGylated liposomes grafted with octaarginine (R8) peptide- HFQ lipid for targeting glioma cells. Not disclosed Particle size , zeta potential and polydispersity index TEM, In vitro studies. The study's findings suggest that ligand- HFQ-lipid liposomes could potentially serve as a suitable alternative to ligand- PEG2K-lipid-modified liposomes for drug delivery in tumor targeting. Artesunate, Temozolamide [74] Liposomes mPEG2k-DSPE, fluorescein isothiocyanate isomer I-dextran, Target ApoE- peptide with thiol Adistinct mixture Artesunate-phosphati- dylcholine (ARTPC) encap- sulated with temozolo- mide (ApoE-ARTPC@TMZ) is the basis of an ApoE- functionalized liposomal nanoplatform that has been shown to effectively co-deliver dual therape- utic drugs to TMZ-resist- ant U251-TR GBM in vivo. Not disclosed Not disclosed The preclinical pro- mise of this innova- tive integrative tech- nique to deliver com- bination medicines to brain tumors was demonstrated through the use of combination lipo- somes. By reducing the effective dosage of TMZ and thereby mitigating systemic TMZ-induced toxicity, this approach shows great potential. Role of solid lipid nanoparticles in DIPG Drug-incorporated, highly ordered crystalline structure with emulsifiers characterises SLNs made up of fully crystallised lipid components. The first SLNs were created in the mid-1990s using lipids, including triglycerides, fatty acids, and waxes, with melting points greater than both body and room temperature [75,76]. SLNs offer numerous benefits, including enhanced drug protection, better nanoparticle stability, and controlled release characteristics that can be adjusted by changing the lipid composition [77]. SLNs, however, have two main issues: low drug loading capacity and poor long-term drug retention. During the storage process, a remarkable phenomenon takes place: lipids undergo a polymorphic transition from a very high- energy phase to a low-energy phase. This transition leads to the development of a meticulously well-formed crystalline structure, adding an intriguing dimension to the overall process. Additionally, it is worth noting that this transition also has an impact on the encapsulated pharmaceuticals, gradually causing them to leak out over time. Hence, the polymorphism severely restricts the amount of drug loading capability, particularly https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 Z. Presswala et al. ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 414 for highly pure lipids [78,79]. Various methods are used for preparing solid lipid nanoparticles, such as High shear homogenization, High-speed homogenization or ultra-sonication, Solvent emulsification/evaporation, Micro emulsions, Double emulsion, Spray drying, SLN preparation by using super critical fluid [80]. The following table highlights the preclinical studies on solid lipid nanoparticles conducted in DIPG. Preclinical studies of solid lipid nanoparticles in DIPG has been illustrated in Table 3. Table 3. Preclinical studies of solid lipid nanoparticles in DIPG Drug Formulation Excipients Overview Method of preparation Evaluation parameters Outcome Carmiustine (BCNU) Temozolamide (TMZ) [81] Solid lipid nanoparticles Cetyl palmitate, β-hydroxybutyric acid The objective of this study was to formulate and develop solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) with the intention of enhancing their anti- proliferative effects against glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Not disclosed size, morphology, chemical structure, zeta potential, drug encapsulation efficacy, drug release, Biocom- patibility, stability were determined, and in vitro studies The BCNU and TMZ loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) demonstrated a noteworthy increase in their antitumor activity when compared to the free-drugs. Additionally, these SLNs were found to induce apoptosis on U87MG cells, further highlighting their potential therapeutic efficacy. Furthermore, it was observed that brain cells expressing MCT-1 exhibited a higher uptake of the specifically targeted nanoparticles. Asiatic acid [82] Solid lipid nanoparticles Glyceryl tristearate, chloroform, acetic acid, L-glutamine, Poloxamer 188 The present study aimed to evaluate the effectti- veness of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) loaded with AA in comba- ting glioblastoma, a type of cancer. Additionally, the study sought to investigate the cellular uptake mechanism of these SLNs in comparison to SVG P12 cells, which are human fetal glial cells. Solvent eva- poration and Hot homoge- nisation technique Size analysis and zeta potential, entrapment efficiency, HPLC, XRD, % In-vitro drug release, Cell uptake study, Apoptosis study, y fluorescence imaging and flow cell cytometry Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) may cure glioma, a brain tumor. Delivery of the drug to its target site is efficient due to these nanoparticles' drug encapsulation effectiveness. SLNs also have low toxicity to healthy cells, which is important for safe and successful therapeutic development. For glioma treatment, SLNs supplemented with ascorbic acid are promising. These SLNs are promising candidates for treating this difficult condition due to their excellent drug encapsulation efficiency and minimal toxicity. Emodin [83] Solid lipid nanoparticles via Poloxamer 188, Tween 80 This study prepared and characterized solid lipid nanoparticles loaded with emodin (E-SLNs) and tested their in vitro anticancer efficacy. High pressure homogenizati on (HPH) Particle size analysis, zeta potential mea- surement, drug entrapment efficiency (EE), stability and in vitro drug release behavior Results suggest lipid nanoparticle administration of EMO may be a potential cancer treatment. Folic acid- doxorubicin (FAD) [84] Solid lipid nanoparticles Tween 80 The objective of this study was to establish the formulation of tween 80- coated solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) that would effectively encapsulate the folic acid- doxorubicin (FAD) conjugate. The ultimate goal was to achieve a targeted drug delivery system specifically designed to target brain cancer cells. Solvent injection method Particle size, zeta potential, surface morphology, entrap- ment efficiency, cytotoxicity and cellular uptake study The results of the study have confirmed that the use of tween 80-coated solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) holds promise for targeted delivery of doxorubicin specifically to brain cancer cells. ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 Addressing barriers in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma doi: https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 415 Drug Formulation Excipients Overview Method of preparation Evaluation parameters Outcome Paclitaxel (PTX) [85] Solid lipid nanoparticles PEG 600, Poloxamer 188, lecithin, stearic acid, (1,2- dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3- phosphoethanolamine. The objective of this study was to develop solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) that have been modified with tyrosine 3 octreotide (TOC) and loaded with paclitaxel (PTX). The aim was to enable a dual- targeting approach for the treatment of tumor cells and necrosis vessels. Self assembly Morphology done by AFM, SEM and TEM, hydrodynamic diameter (Z average, nm), polydispersity index (PDI) and zeta potential,D rug loading and entrapment efficiency, In vitro drug release, In vitro cell culture study, In vitro tube formation study, Hemolysis test, Glioma models, Scintigraphic imaging studies, In vivo anti-tumor efficacy assay, In vivo anti- angiogenic, antipro- liferative, and anti- glioma activity. The findings of this study hold significant potential for guiding the development of future DDS designs. Specifically, the utilization of diverse somatostatin analogs, including but not limited to Tyr-3-octreotate, which exhibit a heightened affinity for SSTR2, could be explored. Such an approach may pave the way for enhanced therapeutic outcomes in the field of DDS. Zidovudine [86] Solid lipid nanoparticles Stearic acid, polyvinyl alcohol, aloevera gel, MTT, polyethyleneimine, trypsin. This study develops aloe vera-modified stearic acid solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs). Zidovudine, a common antiretroviral, was put into these SLNs. The simple and successful emulsion solvent evaporation method was used to make these SLNs. These SLNs were durable at ambient temperature and in a refrigerated environment. This suggests that SLNs could deliver drugs reliably. Overall, this study advances nanotechnology by developing SLNs utilizing stearic acid modified with aloe vera. Zidovudine's encap- sulation and stability in these SLNs enable new delivery methods for this antiretroviral medication. Emulsion solvent evaporation The hydrodynamic size, zeta potential, TEM, entrapment efficiency and drug loading, Blood compatibility studies, Drug release, Cell culture studies, In-vitro cytotoxicity studies, In vitro cellular uptake studies. According to the cellular absorption investigation, these nanoparticles may improve brain cell uptake of antiviral drugs and be a good drug carrier system for Glioma treatment. Nutlin [87] Magnetic solid lipid nanopar- ticles Cetyl palmitate, ethylene glycol, The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate solid lipid nanoparticles loaded with Nutlin for treatment of glioblastoma. Solvent evaporation technique. Zeta potential, SEM, TEM, encapsulation efficiency and drug loading, In-vitro release, Cell culture, Static in vitro blood-brain barrier model, BBB crossing investigation, Nut-Mag-SLNs had great colloidal stability, stronger pro-apoptotic activity against glioblastoma cells than the free drug, and the ability to cross the blood- brain barrier. Nut-mag-SLNs are promising multifunctional nanoplatforms for glioblastoma multiforme treatment. Role of nano lipid carriers in DIPG Through the substitution of fractional solid lipid components of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) with liquid lipids, the formulation of nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) was advanced. This modification allowed for a larger drug-loading capacity within the NLCs [88]. The NLC (nanostructured lipid carrier) exhibits remarkable benefits as a drug delivery system, offering notable advancements in drug retention and enhanced drug loading capacity. However, it is worth noting that the limited solubility of medications in solid lipids poses a challenge, resulting in a comparatively low encapsulation efficiency (EE). The induction of phase separation https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 Z. Presswala et al. ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 416 in numerous nematic liquid crystals (NLCs) is achieved by the deliberate combination of a solid lipid with a higher oil concentration. The solubility of drugs experiences a notable increase when drug-encapsulated oily nano compartments are formed. This occurrence holds the potential to greatly enhance the drug's encapsulation efficiency [89]. Nano lipid carriers are basically of three types, which are named as (i) imperfect type, (ii) amorphous type and (iii) multiple oil in solid fat in water type [90]. All the three types have been explained in Figure 12 Figure 12. The diagram illustrates three distinct categories of nano lipid carriers. Nanolipid carriers are prepared using the same methods as solid lipid nanoparticles. According to the authors in [91], it was demonstrated that Temozolamide (TMZ) could be administered to U87MG cells more successfully through Nano lipid carriers rather than through Polymeric Nanoparticles and Solid Lipid Nanoparticles when they were created. The following table highlights the preclinical studies on nano lipid carriers conducted in DIPG. Preclinical studies of nano lipid carriers in DIPG are illustrated in Table 4. Table 4. Preclinical studies of nano lipid carriers in DIPG Drug Formulation Excipients Overview Method of preparation Evaluation parameters Outcome Temozolamide Reservetol [92] Nano lipid carriers via intranasal route Lactoferin The work's goal was to create NLC co-loaded with resveratrol and lactoferrin conjugated temozolomide for the treatment of glioblastoma via intranasal delivery for brain targeting. Not disclosed Particle size, Transmittance, Entrapment efficiency, Polydispersity index, TEM, SEM, Ex-vivo permeation studies. According to ex-vivo expe- riments on permeation, at 24 hours, the percentage of resveratrol and temozolomide that permeated was 76.43 %, 88.55 % from LTR-NLC, and 25.76 and 31.10% from suspension, respect- tively.Based on the results of this study, it can be said that LTR-NLC might be a useful formulation for the treatment of glioblastoma. Temozolamide [91] Polymeric Nanoparticles, Solid lipid nanoparticles, Nano lipid carriers. Stearic acid, poly- (lactic-co-glycolic acid, Tween 80, polyvinyl alcohol, soyabean phosphotadylcholine, injectable soyalecithin, polyoxyl castor oil. The delivery of Temozolomide (TMZ) has been ingeniously designed to utilize polymeric nanoparticles , solid lipid nanoparticles, and nanostructured lipid carriers. These advanced delivery systems offer promising avenues for enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of TMZ. In order to ascertain the most suitable nanocarrier for the treatment of gliomatosis cerebri, an evaluation was conducted to assess the anticancer effects of three distinct types. T-PNPs were prepared by a solvent displacement technique, T-SLNs were prepared following the solvent displacement technique, T-NLCs were prepared by solvent diffusion method. Particle size, zeta potential, drug encapsulation efficiency (EE), drug loading (DL) capacity, Anti- tumor efficacies. In the realm of in vivo and in vitro experiments, it has been observed that T-NLCs have demonstrated superior performance compared to other formulations in relation to their anti-tumor activity. The NLC formulations exhibited superior glioma inhibition in comparison to both PNPs and SLNs. The findings of this study demonstrate that the delivery of TMZ to U87MG cells can be significantly enhanced through the use of NLCs, as compared to PNPs or SLNs. Moreover, this enhanced delivery method exhibits superior inhibitory efficacy. The potential utilization of T-NLCs as a promising modality for delivering chemotherapy to treat glioblastoma is worth exploring. Imperfect type The structure of lipids in this type is known to have the potential to distort crystal order. The distortion in question can be effectively ad- dressed through the manipulation of satu- ration levels and the number of carbon atoms present in lipids. These modifications have the potential to enhance the drug loading capacity, thereby offering a promising solution. Amorphous type In this particular formulation, the incorporation of lipids such as hydroxy octacosanyl hydroxy- stearate with solid lipids leads to the formation of nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) in an amorphous state. This amorphous structure plays a crucial role in preventing the expulsion of the drug. Multiple oil in slid fat in water type The specimen under investigation exhibits a substantial presence of nanosized oil droplets that are uniformly distributed within the solid matrix. This unique characteristic leads to enhanced drug loading capacity and an extended release profile of the drug. ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 Addressing barriers in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma doi: https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 417 Drug Formulation Excipients Overview Method of preparation Evaluation parameters Outcome Docetaxel [93] Nano lipid carriers Propylene glycol monolaurate (Lauroglycol 90), capryolpropylene glycol monocarpyla- te, caprylocaproylma- crogol-8-glycerides (Labrasol ), polyoxyl- 15-hydroxystearate (Kolliphor® HS15) The primary aim of this study was to create Nano lipid carriers of Docetaxel that possess enhanced permeation across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This was achieved by investigating the impact of four different liquid lipids on the carrier's efficacy. Melt emulsification method REM, SEM, Particle size, Zeta potential, Drug entrapment study, Permeation studies using 3D In-vitro model. In a 3D in-vitro model of BBTB/GB, NLCs showed great permeability and were able to cross the blood-brain tumor barrier (BBTB). NLCs then accumulated in glioblastoma cells. Patient-derived cells absorbed NLCs 2.4 times better than U87MG cells. The authors give a persuasive view of a prospective nanomedicine technique that they envision as simple and commercially viable. The approach has potential for further development and investigation. Bortezomib [94] Nano lipid carriers Precirol ATO® 5, glycerol monooleate, coumarin 6, polyoxyethylene (10) cetyl ether, MTT, hematoxylin and eosin. For targeted distribution, nanostructured lipid carriers were loaded with two proteolytically stable D- peptides, D8 and RI-VAP (Dual NLCs). Not disclosed REM, SEM, Particle size, Zeta potential, Drug entrapment study, In-vivo and Ex-vivo animal imaging, In-vitro cytotoxicity, apoptosis. Dual NLCs had the greatest therapeutic efficacy because to their improved in vitro cytotoxicity and apoptosis, longer survival rate, and excellent anti-glioma behavior in mice with intracranial gliomas. Overall, the targeting platform created for this work can deliver BTZ to glioma cells and overcome several difficulties to treat advanced brain cancer with potential therapeutic results. SN38 (Active metabolite of Irinotecan)[95] Nano lipid carriers Polyvinyl alcohol, Vitamin E TPGS, MTT, Oleic acid, Cetyl palmitate. Irinotecan's active metabolite, SN38, is 1000- fold more hazardous. However, its low solubility and stability limit its application. This study produced SN38-loaded NLCs and examined their cytotoxicity on glioma cells to overcome these factors. Two methods were selected. Probe ultrasonicca- tion hot homogeni- zation method. Modified emulsi- fication solvent evaporation technique Size and Morphology, Entrapment efficiency, Drug loading capacity, In vitro drug release, In vitro cell viability assay, In vitro cellular uptake, Evaluation of SN38 extraction yield from the release samples. The average loading efficiency was 9.5 % and entrapment 81 %. The MTT test revealed that NLCs had significantly higher cytotoxicity on U87MG human glioma cells than the free drug. Thus, the study found promising NLC therapy potential for glioma. Etoposide [96] Nano lipid carriers Folate, Glyceryl monostearate, Soybean phosphatidylcholine, Oleic acid, MTT, PEGDSPE This study developed Etoposide-loaded NLCs coated with Folate for targeted delivery to FA receptor-overexpressing malignancies. Solvent Injection tecnhique SEM, TEM, particle size, zeta potential, poly- dispersity index, serum stability, in vitro drug re- lease, tissues distribution as- say, cell viability study, anti-tumor effects in vivo, FA-ETP-NLCs were received by CT26, SGC790, and NCI-H209 cells overexpressing FA receptors. FA-ETP-NLCs also carry ETP to cancer cells, enhancing their anticancer potential. FA-ETP-NLCs may be a better tumor nanomedicine. Role of hybrid nano lipid carriers in DIPG In order to accomplish several roles and to overcome the drawbacks of single-component nanomaterials, hybrid nanolipid carriers were developed as a mixed system made up of a minimum of two different categories of materials, combining the benefits of the two separate components [97]. Hybrid NLCs usually consist of a polymeric core containing a therapeutic agent enveloped by an inner lipid layer and a PEGylated outer layer [98]. Benefiting the characteristics of both lipids and polymers, hybrid NLCs were made with greater stability, sustained release and high compatibility [98-100]. Table 5 highlights the preclinical studies done on hybrid nano lipid carriers conducted in DIPG. https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 Z. Presswala et al. ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 418 Table 5. Preclinical studies of hybrid nano lipid carriers in DIPG Drug Formulation Excipients Overview Method of preparation Evaluation parameters Outcome Paclitaxel [101] Hydrogel hybrid system Not disclosed The aim of this study was to design in situ sustained-release hydrogel delivery device for glioma that combines immunoadjuvant and chemotherapeutic medication for local distribution into the resection cavity. A thermosensitive hydrogel framework (PLGA1750-PEG1500- PLGA1750) was used to embed mannitolated immunoadjuvant CpG targeting nanoparticles (MNPCpG) and glioma homing peptide modi- fied paclitaxel targeting nano- particles (PNPPTX&MNPCpG@Gel). Not disclosed Not disclosed The study findings indicate that the utilization of a targeting nanoparticles-hydrogel hybrid system has demonstrated the ability to form a gel drug reservoir upon injection into the glioma resection cavity. This conclusion is supported by in vitro as well as in vivo results. The potential targeting of residual infiltration glioma cells by the sustained-release PNPPTX, leading to the production of tumor antigens, is an intriguing avenue of investigation. Therefore, this gel has the potential to augment the therapeutic efficacy for glioma. Docetaxel [102] Lipid polymer hybrid nanoparticles PLGA, soybean lecithin, caumarin- 6, arginine-glyci- ne-aspartic (RGD) The primary aim of this study was to develop a targeted delivery system for the anticancer drug docetaxel. To achieve this, a novel approach involving the synthesis of hybrid nanoparticles composed of lipids and the biodegradable polymer poly (D,L-lactide-co- glycolide) (PLGA) was employed. Solvent extraction evaporation method Size, zeta poten- tial, encapsula- tion efficiency, in vitro drug release, in vitro cellular uptake, tumor spheroid penetration, growth inhi- bition of tumor spheroid, cyto- toxicity of doce- taxel, in vivo anti GBM effects, in vivo imaging Upon administration of docetaxel-loaded arginineglycine- aspartic acid lipid nanoparticles (RGD-L-P), a noteworthy observation was made regarding the median survival time of rats afflicted with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The recorded median survival time was documented to be 57 days. The results demonstrate a notable fold increase of 1.43, 1.78, 3.35, and 3.56 in comparison to rats treated with L-P (P < 0.05), PLGA- P (P < 0.05), Taxotere (P < 0.01), and saline (P < 0.01), respectively. Apart from brain delivery, lipid-based nanoparticles are widely used in oral delivery, pulmonary delivery, topical delivery, and ocular delivery. Toxicity of lipid-based nanoparticles Lipid-based nanoparticles have several benefits compared to other types of nanoparticles. Lipid nanocarriers such as liposomes, SLNs, and NLCs are ideal for incorporating both hydrophilic and lipophilic drugs, one of the major advantages of a combination of drugs that give dual targeting. They also have other advantages in terms of biocompatibility, shielding bioactive compounds from chemical deterioration, site- specific controlled drug delivery, and high drug loading capacity, these nanocarriers are superior to the others in many ways. Stability during sterilization and ease of scaling up are two more benefits. At last, there is no reported toxicity for SLNs and NLCs up to date. Physiological lipids, generally accepted as safe (GRAS) excipients, make up the majority of these nanocarriers [75]. Before getting marketing authorization for these nanocarriers, their toxicity profile must be studied [103]. Further, we discuss the role of lipid-based nanoparticles in cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and hepatotoxicity. Cytotoxicity The biocompatibility of all lipid-based nanoparticles is tested by determining their cell viability or cytotoxicity. A cytotoxicity assay is conducted to determine the potency of the anticancer molecule. Cell viability is tested as evidence in cytotoxicity assay [75]. In lipid-based nanoparticles, different cell lines tolerate the lipids used at high dose levels [104]. It is reported that most of the cell lines tolerate 1 mg/ml lipid SLNs/LNCs [105]. Additionally, surfactants are crucial to the stabilization of SLNs. Cell viability is ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 Addressing barriers in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma doi: https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 419 unaffected by the use of 1 mg/ml of the cationic surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). However, some studies have indicated that cationic surfactants impact the cell membrane's integrity [106]. Genotoxicity The most important model in this case is the induction of DNA damage because exemplary genotoxins can cause genetic alterations without causing cell death, which can initiate carcinogenesis. However, there are many studies reporting that lipid-based nanoparticles produce no genotoxicity. One study reported that No DNA damage was observed in A549 cells by the negatively charged SLNs [107,108]. However, the drug and drug- loaded SLNs reduced cell viability below 50% at the concentration chosen for genotoxicity testing [109]. Hepatotoxicity When a formulation enters the bloodstream, it is very important to check whether the RBC cells are damaged and to ensure this hemolysis assay is performed, which determines the damage of RBC that a foreign material causes [75]. A study revealed that even at a dose of 1 mg/ml, the SLNs made of polysorbate 80 and glycerol monostearate exhibit minimal hemolysis [110]. Nano-based drug approved for cancer therapy by regulatory authorities. The first drug delivery systems to be launched in the market for cancer treatment were liposomes and are still most widely used due to their several positive points such as biocompatibility, biodegradability and non-immuno- genicity [111,112]. The approved nano-based formulations for brain cancer treatment are listed in Table 6. Table 6. Approved nano-based products for brain cancer ProductTM Drug Dosage form Company Approval year Doxil [113] Doxorubiicn Liposome Ortho Biotech 1995 (FDA) Caelyx [114] Doxorubicin Liposome Schering-Plough 1996 (EMA) DaunoXome [115] Daunorubicin Liposome Galen 1996 (FDA) Myocet [114] Doxorubicin Liposome Teva UK 2000 (EMA) Mepact [116] Mifamurtide Liposome Millenium 2009 (EMA) Ameluz [117] 5-aminolevulinic acid Nanoemulsion Biofrontra GmbH 2011 (EMA) Marquibo [118] Vincristine Liposome Spectrum 2012 (FDA) NanoTherm Iron oxide/Ferric oxide Metallic Nanoparticles Magforce 2013 (EMA) Onivyde [119] Irinotecan Liposome Merrimack 2015(FDA) Vyxeos Daunorubicin, Cytarabine Liposome Jazz Pharmaceuticals 2018 (EMA) Clinical trials for DIPG As per clinicaltrials.org (Last accessed on 20/10/2023, there are 116 studies conducted for DIPG, out of which only 34 no. of studies are completed up to date and 40 studies are found to be recruiting, presented in Figure 13 [120]. Figure 13. Graphical representation of clinical trials going on for DIPG https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 Z. Presswala et al. ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 420 Table 7, provided below, presents a comprehensive overview of the studies that have been completed since 2020. Table 7. Clinical studies completed in DIPG Description Drug Formulation ClinicalTrials.gov identifier In this phase I/II trial, patients with a recently diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma are treated, and the side effects of the panobinostat nanoparticle formulation MTX110 (MTX110) are investigated. Through the inhibition of certain enzymes required for cell growth, the panobino- stat nanoparticle formulation MTX110 may be able to stop the proliferation of tumor cells. Panobinostat Convection enhanced delivery Nanoparticles NCT03566199 In children with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma who have finished focused radiation therapy, this is a Phase I and Early Efficacy Study using Convection Enhanced Delivery (CED) of irinotecan liposome injection (nal-IRI) Using Real Time Imaging with Gadolinium. Irinotecan Convection enhanced delivery Liposomes NCT03086616 Table 8 presents a comprehensive overview of ongoing studies that have been actively recruiting parti- cipants since the year 2020. Table 8. On going clinical studies completed in DIPG Description Drug ClinicalTrials.gov identifier In children recently diagnosed with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), the purpose of this prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter clinical research is to evaluate the safety and therapeutic efficacy of combining Nimotuzumab with concurrent radiochemotherapy. The objective response rate serves as the main outcome, while the 1- year overall survival rate is a seconddary observation. The study tackles the necessity of assessing the combination therapy's possible advantages and safety in treating juvenile DIPG patients. Nimotuzumab+ CRT (concurrent IMRT and TMZ) NCT04532229 This work investigates gemcitabine, which has been shown to effectively penetrate the blood-brain barrier and inhibit DIPG cell lines. Gemcitabine presence in DIPG tissue after systemic treatment is the main aim, whereas intratumoral gemcitabine concentrations are the secondary objective. Before undergoing routine surgery, participants receive a single IV dose that makes it easier to analyze biopsy samples and measure gemcitabine penetration. The purpose of this research is to overcome the difficulties associated with treating this aggressive pediatric brain tumor by gaining understanding into gemcitabine's effectiveness against DIPG. Gemcitabine NCT02992015 The goal of this study is to determine whether treating DIPG patients according to the aforementioned methodology and stratifying them based on their MR perfusion score improves their survival outcomes. In addition to the standard MRI performed upon diagnosis, newly diagnosed DIPG patients will have an MRI perfusion scan, which will allow them to be categorized as having hyperperfused or hypoperfused tumors. Weekly low-dose Bevacizumab treatments will be administered to the hyperperfused individuals along with traditional routine radiation therapy. Patients with hypoperfusion will be administered ultra- low-dose radiation fractionation, which is the same as a biological dosage of standard RT. Drug: bevacizumab injection radiation: ultra-low-dose RT NCT04250064 In children with progressing diffuse midline gliomas (DMG), this study intends to evaluate the safety and viability of employing focused ultrasound with microbubbles and neuro- navigator-controlled sonication to temporarily break the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Through the use of this non-invasive method, the BBB can be opened at particular points surrounding the tumor, improving the way oral etoposide is delivered. The prognosis for diffuse midline gliomas is poor, especially for Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Gliomas (DIPG). This study investigates a unique strategy to maximize systemic adverse effects while optimizing drug delivery and treatment success. The BBB's successful opening and shutting will be confirmed by routine MRIs. Etoposide; oral, 50 Mg, focused ultrasound therapy NCT05762419 In this pilot trial, children with recently diagnosed high-grade gliomas (HGG) with TRK fusion are evaluated for disease control and survival rates. After two cycles of larotrectinib monotherapy, patients receive maintenance medication for responders. Patients who show a steady course of illness or a partial response receive combination therapy or focused radiotherapy. Pre-surgery effects of larotrectinib are investigated in a surgical cohort. In addition to evaluating the safety of larotrectinib monotherapy, combination therapy, and radiation therapy, the trial intends to enroll 15 patients for disease control and safety assessment. Larotrectinib NCT04655404 ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 Addressing barriers in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma doi: https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 421 Description Drug ClinicalTrials.gov identifier In children and adolescents with glioblastoma, diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), anaplastic astrocytoma, and gliomatosis cerebri, the HIT-HGG-2013 study investigates the possibility of valproic acid, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, augmenting the effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy (temozolomide). It attempts to compare the results with the HIT-HGG-2007 study in order to assess the safety and therapeutic efficacy of valproic acid in treating these aggressive brain tumors. Originally, an autophagy inhibitor (chloroquine) was included in the trial, but it was later canceled since Resochin junior was not available. Temozolomide + valproic acid NCT03243461 In this phase I trial, patients with primary central nervous system (CNS) cancers that have returned (recurrent) or are resistant to treatment (refractory) are being treated for the adverse effects and optimal dose of volitinib. By inhibiting some of the enzymes required for cell growth, volitinib may be able to stop the proliferation of tumor cells. Savolitinib NCT03598244 For pediatric patients (ages 3 to 21) with progressing brain cancer or newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), indoximod-based chemo-radio-immunotherapy is being investigated in the GCC1949 project, an open-label phase 2 trial funded by the NCI. When paired with conventional therapy, inhibiting the IDO pathway—which is essential for immune regulation—is thought to improve antitumor immune responses and may lead to better results. Up to 140 patients may be included in the Johnson and Munn-led study, which is categorized according to the patients' receipt of radiation therapy and focuses on glioblastoma, medulloblastoma, and ependymoma. iRANO standards will evaluate results. Indoximod, temozolamide, cyclophosmphamide, etoposide, lomustine NCT04049669 In this phase I/II trial, mebendazole is being investigated in conjunction with conventional treatments for juvenile gliomas. Mebendazole is prescribed with vincristine, carboplatin, and temozolomide for patients with low-grade gliomas, and with bevacizumab and irinotecan for patients with high-grade/diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. Gross complete resection without significant neurologic deficit is the goal of surgical resection. Doses of metronidazole increase from 50 to 200 mg/kg per day. A "3+3" design is used to monitor safety. The most tolerable dose is established, effectiveness is assessed, and patients proceed with maintenance treatment while having their overall survival and lack of progression observed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Mebendazole vincristine carboplatin temozolomide bevacizumab irinotecan NCT01837862 Conclusion Patients with DIPG still have a bad prognosis. Contrary to other malignant gliomas for which active chemotherapeutic medicines have been identified, the only established treatment for this illness is chemotherapy administered in conjunction with radiation. As a result of the clinical manifestations, molecular characterization, formulation improvements, and drug delivery system discussions in this article, it can be concluded that the use of nanoparticulate drug delivery systems is a possible tactics for the treatment of DIPG. The lipid-based nanoparticulate drug delivery system for brain cancer demonstrates remarkable efficacy owing to its unique capability to traverse the blood-brain barrier, thereby facilitating precise and targeted drug delivery. The utilization of nanoparticles presents a promising avenue for achieving controlled release kinetics, thereby mitigating potential side effects and augmenting the therapeutic efficacy of various treatments. The superiority of these agents is underscored by their exceptional biocompatibility and safety profile, as well as their remarkable specificity for targeting cancer cells. The promising strategy of utilizing lipid-based nanoparticulate drug delivery for brain cancer treatment is supported by robust clinical evidence, demonstrating improved outcomes. The scalability and cost-effectiveness of this approach further strengthen its potential in the field. Acknowledgements: Not applicable. Funding: No fund was received for this review. References [1] S.A. Grimm, M.C. Chamberlain. Brainstem glioma. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 13(5) (2013) 13:346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-013-0346-3 https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-013-0346-3 Z. Presswala et al. ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 422 [2] A.D. Forman, W.C. Black, M.A. Smith, B. Freidlin, L.A. Gloeckler Ries, R. Simon. Re: Trends in reported incidence of primary malignant brain tumors in children in the United States [4] (multiple letters). Journal of the National Cancer Institute 91 (1999) 648-64910. https://doi.org/1093/jnci/91.7.648 [3] C. Ferraris, R. Cavalli, P.P. Panciani, L. Battaglia. Overcoming the blood-brain barrier: Successes and challenges in developing nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery systems for the treatment of brain tumours. International Journal of Nanomedicine 15 (2020) 2999-3022 https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S231479 [4] D.N. Louis, A. Perry, G. Reifenberger, A. von Deimling, D. Figarella-Branger, W.K. Cavenee, H. Ohgaki, O.D. Wiestler, P. Kleihues, D.W. Ellison. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathologica 131 (2016) 803-820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1 [5] R. Chen, M. Smith-Cohn, A.L. Cohen, H. Colman. Glioma Subclassifications and Their Clinical Significance. Neurotherapeutics 14 (2017) 284-297 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-017-0519-x [6] D. Srikanthan, M.S. Taccone, R. Van Ommeren, J. Ishida, S.L. Krumholtz, J.T. Rutka. Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: current insights and future directions. Chinese Neurosurgical Journal 7 (2021) 6 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-020-00218-w [7] K.E. Warren. Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: poised for progress. Frontiers in Oncology 2 (2012) 205 https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2012.00205 [8] D. Hargrave, U. Bartels, E. Bouffet. Diffuse brainstem glioma in children: Critical review of clinical trials. Lancet Oncology 7 (2006) 241-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70615-5 [9] P.K. Duffner, M.E. Cohen, A.I. Freeman. Pediatric brain tumors: an overview. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 35(5) (1985) 287-301. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.35.5.287 [10] C. Kolsteeg, E. Hulleman, J. Bianco. Emerging nanomedical strategies for direct targeting of pediatric and adult diffuse gliomas. British Journal of Cancer 127 (2022) 1193-1200 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01884-6 [11] DIPG: A definition and brief history. https://mithilprasadfoundation.org/blog/dipg-definition-and- history (accessed on 20/10/2023). [12] J.E. Pellot, O, De Jesus. Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing (2023). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560640/ [13] J. Fangusaro. Pediatric high-grade gliomas and diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. Journal of Child Neurology 24 (2009) 1409-1417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073809338960 [14] U. Bartels, C. Hawkins, G. Vézina, L. Kun, M. Souweidane, E. Bouffet. Proceedings of the diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) Toronto Think Tank: Advancing basic and translational research and cooperation in DIPG. Journal of Neuro-Oncology 105 (2011) 119-125 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-011-0704-4 [15] S.N. Krieger, M.N. Streicher, R. Trampel, R. Turner. Cerebral blood volume changes during brain activation. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 32 (2012) 1618-1631. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2012.63. [16] P. Buczkowicz, C. Hoeman, P. Rakopoulos, S. Pajovic, L. Letourneau, M. Dzamba, A. Morrison, P. Lewis, E. Bouffet, U. Bartels, J. Zuccaro, S. Agnihotri, S. Ryall, M. Barszczyk, Y. Chornenkyy, M. Bourgey, G. Bourque, A. Montpetit, F. Cordero, P. Castelo-Branco, J. Mangerel, U. Tabori, K.C. Ho, A. Huang, K.R. Taylor, A. Mackay, A.E. Bendel, J. Nazarian, J.R. Fangusaro, M.A. Karajannis, D. Zagzag, N.K. Foreman, A. Donson, J. V. Hegert, A. Smith, J. Chan, L. Lafay-Cousin, S. Dunn, J. Hukin, C. Dunham, K. Scheinemann, J. Michaud, S. Zelcer, D. Ramsay, J. Cain, C. Brennan, M.M. Souweidane, C. Jones, C.D. Allis, M. Brudno, O. Becher, C. Hawkins. Genomic analysis of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas identifies three molecular subgroups and recurrent activating ACVR1 mutations. Nature Genetics 46 (2014) 451-456. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2936 [17] P. Buczkowicz, C. Hawkins. Pathology, molecular genetics, and epigenetics of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Frontiers in Oncology 5 (2015) 147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00147 https://doi.org/1093/jnci/91.7.648 https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S231479 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-017-0519-x https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-020-00218-w https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70615-5 https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.35.5.287 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01884-6 https://mithilprasadfoundation.org/blog/dipg-definition-and-history https://mithilprasadfoundation.org/blog/dipg-definition-and-history https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560640/ https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073809338960 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-011-0704-4 https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2012.63 https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2936 https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00147 ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 Addressing barriers in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma doi: https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 423 [18] P.W. Lewis, M.M. Müller, M.S. Koletsky, F. Cordero, S. Lin, L.A. Banaszynski, B.A. Garcia, T.W. Muir, O.J. Becher, C.D. Allis. Inhibition of PRC2 activity by a gain-of-function H3 mutation found in pediatric glioblastoma. Science 340 (6134), (2013) 857-861. https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1232245 [19] D. Castel, C. Philippe, R. Calmon, L. Le Dret, N. Truffaux, N. Boddaert, M. Pagès, K.R. Taylor, P. Saulnier, L. Lacroix, A. Mackay, C. Jones, C. Sainte-Rose, T. Blauwblomme, F. Andreiuolo, S. Puget, J. Grill, P. Varlet, M.A. Debily. Histone H3F3A and HIST1H3B K27M mutations define two subgroups of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas with different prognosis and phenotypes. Acta Neuropathologica 130 (2015) 815-827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-015-1478-0 [20] D.A. Khuong-Quang, P. Buczkowicz, P. Rakopoulos, X.Y. Liu, A.M. Fontebasso, E. Bouffet, U. Bartels, S. Albrecht, J. Schwartzentruber, L. Letourneau, M. Bourgey, G. Bourque, A. Montpetit, G. Bourret, P. Lepage, A. Fleming, P. Lichter, M. Kool, A. Von Deimling, D. Sturm, A. Korshunov, D. Faury, D.T. Jones, J. Majewski, S.M. Pfister, N. Jabado, C. Hawkins. K27M mutation in histone H3.3 defines clinically and biologically distinct subgroups of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. Acta Neuropathologica 124 (2012) 439-447 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-012-0998-0 [21] C. Jones, S.J. Baker. Unique genetic and epigenetic mechanisms driving paediatric diffuse high- grade glioma. Nature Reviews Cancer 14 (2014) 651-661. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3811 [22] C.S. Grasso, Y. Tang, N. Truffaux, N.E. Berlow, L. Liu, M.A. Debily, M.J. Quist, L.E. Davis, E.C. Huang, P.J. Woo, A. Ponnuswami, S. Chen, T.B. Johung, W. Sun, M. Kogiso, Y. Du, L. Qi, Y. Huang, M. Hütt- Cabezas, K.E. Warren, L. Le Dret, P.S. Meltzer, H. Mao, M. Quezado, D.G. Van Vuurden, J. Abraham, M. Fouladi, M.N. Svalina, N. Wang, C. Hawkins, J. Nazarian, M.M. Alonso, E.H. Raabe, E. Hulleman, P.T. Spellman, X.N. Li, C. Keller, R. Pal, J. Grill, M. Monje. Functionally defined therapeutic targets in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Nature Medicine 21 (2015) 555-559 https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3855 [23] P.F. Recinos, D.M. Sciubba, G.I. Jallo. Brainstem tumors: Where are we today? Pediatric Neurosurgery 43 (2007) 192-201. https://doi.org/10.1159/000098831 [24] A. Perry, C.R. Miller, M. Gujrati, B.W. Scheithauer, S.C. Zambrano, S.C. Jost, R. Raghavan, J. Qian, E.J. Cochran, J.T. Huse, E.C. Holland, P.C. Burger, M.K. Rosenblum. Malignant gliomas with primitive neuroectodermal tumor-like components: A clinicopathologic and genetic study of 53 cases. Brain Pathology 19 (2009) 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00167.x [25] A.A. Yetisgin, S. Cetinel, M. Zuvin, A. Kosar, O. Kutlu. Therapeutic nanoparticles and their targeted delivery applications. Molecules 25(9) (2020) 2193. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25092193 [26] R.S. Kadam, D.W.A. Bourne, U.B. Kompella. Nano-advantage in enhanced drug delivery with biodegradable nanoparticles: Contribution of reduced clearance. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 40 (2012) 1380-1388. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.112.044925 [27] S.T. Jahan, S.M.A. Sadat, M. Walliser, A. Haddadi. Targeted Therapeutic Nanoparticles: An Immense Promise to Fight against Cancer. Journal of Drug Delivery 2017 (2017) 9090325. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9090325 [28] S. Chandrasekhar, L.K. Iyer, J.P. Panchal, E.M. Topp, J.B. Cannon, V. V. Ranade. Microarrays and microneedle arrays for delivery of peptides, proteins, vaccines and other applications. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery 10 (2013) 1155-1170. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2013.797405 [29] P. Rabl, S.J. Kolkowitz, F.H.L. Koppens, J.G.E. Harris, P. Zoller, M.D. Lukin. A quantum spin transducer based on nanoelectromechanical resonator arrays. Nature Physics 6 (2010) 602-608. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1679 [30] P.S. Shabnashmi, S. Naga Kani, V. Vithya, B. Vijaya Lakshmi, R. Jasmine. Therapeutic applications of nanorobots-respirocytes and microbivores. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research 8(5) (2016) 605-609. https://www.jocpr.com/articles/therapeutic-applications-of-nanorobots- respirocytes-and-microbivores.pdf [31] J. Garg, K. Pathania, S.P. Sah, S. V. Pawar. Nanostructured lipid carriers: a promising drug carrier for targeting brain tumours. Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 8 (2022) 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-022-00414-8 https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232245 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232245 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-015-1478-0 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-012-0998-0 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3811 https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3855 https://doi.org/10.1159/000098831 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00167.x https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25092193 https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.112.044925 https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9090325 https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2013.797405 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1679 https://www.jocpr.com/articles/therapeutic-applications-of-nanorobots-respirocytes-and-microbivores.pdf https://www.jocpr.com/articles/therapeutic-applications-of-nanorobots-respirocytes-and-microbivores.pdf https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-022-00414-8 Z. Presswala et al. ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 424 [32] C. Saraiva, C. Praça, R. Ferreira, T. Santos, L. Ferreira, L. Bernardino. Nanoparticle-mediated brain drug delivery: Overcoming blood-brain barrier to treat neurodegenerative diseases. Journal of Controlled Release 235 (2016) 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.05.044 [33] A.B. Etame, C.A. Smith, W.C.W. Chan, J.T. Rutka. Design and potential application of PEGylated gold nanoparticles with size-dependent permeation through brain microvasculature. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine 7 (2011) 992-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2011.04.004 [34] S. Hanada, K. Fujioka, Y. Inoue, F. Kanaya, Y. Manome, K. Yamamoto. Cell-based in vitro blood-brain barrier model can rapidly evaluate nanoparticles’ brain permeability in association with particle size and surface modification. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15 (2014) 1812-1825. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15021812 [35] G. Sonavane, K. Tomoda, K. Makino. Biodistribution of colloidal gold nanoparticles after intravenous administration: Effect of particle size. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 66 (2008) 274-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.07.004 [36] P.R. Lockman, J.M. Koziara, R.J. Mumper, D. Allen. Nanoparticle surface charges alter blood-brain barrier integrity and permeability. Journal of Drug Targeting 12 (2004) 635-641 https://doi.org/10.1080/10611860400015936 [37] X. Huang, L. Li, T. Liu, N. Hao, H. Liu, D. Chen, F. Tang. The shape effect of mesoporous silica nanoparticles on biodistribution, clearance, and biocompatibility in vivo. ACS Nano 5 (2011) 5390- 5399. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn200365a [38] J. Kreuter, T. Hekmatara, S. Dreis, T. Vogel, S. Gelperina, K. Langer. Covalent attachment of apolipoprotein A-I and apolipoprotein B-100 to albumin nanoparticles enables drug transport into the brain. Journal of Controlled Release 118 (2007) 54-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.12.012 [39] M. Kulkarni, K. Patel, A. Patel, S. Patel, J. Desai, M. Patel, U. Shah, A. Patel, N. Solanki. Nanomaterials as drug delivery agents for overcoming the blood-brain barrier: A comprehensive review. ADMET and DMPK 12 (2024) 63-105. https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2043 [40] M. Shilo, M. Motiei, P. Hana, R. Popovtzer. Transport of nanoparticles through the blood-brain barrier for imaging and therapeutic applications. Nanoscale 6 (2014) 2146-2152. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr04878k [41] S. Guerrero, E. Araya, J.L. Fiedler, J.I. Arias, C. Adura, F. Albericio, E. Giralt, J.L. Arias, M.S. Fernndez, M.J. Kogan. Improving the brain delivery of gold nanoparticles by conjugation with an amphipathic peptide. Nanomedicine 5 (2010) 897-913. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.10.74 [42] R.M. Hochstrasser. Two-dimensional spectroscopy at infrared and optical frequencies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 (2007) 14190-14196. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704079104 [43] M. Biondi, P. D’Alessandro. Genus-group names of Afrotropical flea beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Alticinae): Annotated catalogue and biogeographical notes. European Journal of Entomology 107 (2010) 401-424. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2010.049 [44] C.H.J. Choi, C.A. Alabi, P. Webster, M.E. Davis. Mechanism of active targeting in solid tumors with transferrin-containing gold nanoparticles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 (2010) 1235-1240. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914140107 [45] F.J. Martinez-Veracoechea, D. Frenkel. Designing super selectivity in multivalent nanoparticle binding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108 (2011) 10963-10968. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1105351108 [46] E.A. Nance, G.F. Woodworth, K.A. Sailor, T.Y. Shih, Q. Xu, G. Swaminathan, D. Xiang, C. Eberhart, J. Hanes. A dense poly(ethylene glycol) coating improves penetration of large polymeric nanoparticles within brain tissue. Science Translational Medicine 4 (2012) 149ra119 https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3003594 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.05.044 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2011.04.004 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15021812 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.07.004 https://doi.org/10.1080/10611860400015936 https://doi.org/10.1021/nn200365a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.12.012 https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2043 https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr04878k https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.10.74 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704079104 https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2010.049 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914140107 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1105351108 https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3003594 ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 Addressing barriers in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma doi: https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 425 [47] Y. Zhang, M. Li, X. Gao, Y. Chen, T. Liu. Nanotechnology in cancer diagnosis: Progress, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Hematology and Oncology 12 (2019) 137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-019-0833-3 [48] W. Zhou, X. Gao, D. Liu, X. Chen. Gold Nanoparticles for in Vitro Diagnostics. Chemical Reviews 115 (2015) 10575-10636 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00100 [49] S. Jia, R. Zhang, Z. Li, J. Li. Clinical and biological significance of circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor DNA, and exosomes as biomarkers in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 8 (2017) 55632-55645 https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17184 [50] S. Stamatovic, R. Keep, A. Andjelkovic. Brain Endothelial Cell-Cell Junctions: How to “Open” the Blood Brain Barrier. Current Neuropharmacology 6 (2008) 179-192. https://doi.org/10.2174/157015908785777210 [51] H.E. De Vries, M.C.M. Blom-Roosemalen, M. Van Oosten, A.G. De Boer, T.J.C. Van Berkel, D.D. Breimer, J. Kuiper. The influence of cytokines on the integrity of the blood-brain barrier in vitro. Journal of Neuroimmunology 64 (1996) 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-5728(95)00148-4 [52] A.R. Khan, X. Yang, M. Fu, G. Zhai. Recent progress of drug nanoformulations targeting to brain. Journal of Controlled Release 291 (2018) 37-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.10.004 [53] A.R. Khan, M. Liu, M.W. Khan, G. Zhai. Progress in brain targeting drug delivery system by nasal route. Journal of Controlled Release 268 (2017) 364-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.09.001 [54] K.K. Jain. Nanobiotechnology-based drug delivery to the central nervous system. Neurodegenerative Diseases 4 (2007) 287-291. https://doi.org/10.1159/000101884 [55] R.R. Wakaskar. Promising effects of nanomedicine in cancer drug delivery. Journal of Drug Targeting 26 (2018) 319-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1061186X.2017.1377207 [56] W.C. Luo, X. Lu. Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.) 2622 (2023) 139-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2954-3_12 [57] P. Yingchoncharoen, D.S. Kalinowski, D.R. Richardson. Lipid-based drug delivery systems in cancer therapy: What is available and what is yet to come. Pharmacological Reviews 68 (2016) 701-787. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.115.012070 [58] A.D. Bangham, M.M. Standish, J.C. Watkins. Diffusion of univalent ions across the lamellae of swollen phospholipids. Journal of Molecular Biology 13 (1965) 238-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(65)80093-6 [59] G. Yang, Y. Liu, S. Jin, C.X. Zhao. Development of Core-Shell Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Systems Based on Biomimetic Mineralization. ChemBioChem 21 (2020) 2871-2879. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202000105 [60] C. Has, P. Sunthar. A comprehensive review on recent preparation techniques of liposomes. Journal of Liposome Research 30 (2020) 336-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982104.2019.1668010 [61] L. Maja, K. Željko, P. Mateja. Sustainable technologies for liposome preparation. Journal of Supercritical Fluids 165 (2020) 104984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2020.104984 [62] R. Ran, A.P.J. Middelberg, C.X. Zhao. Microfluidic synthesis of multifunctional liposomes for tumour targeting. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 148 (2016) 402-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.09.016 [63] R. Ran, H. Wang, Y. Liu, Y. Hui, Q. Sun, A. Seth, D. Wibowo, D. Chen, C.X. Zhao. Microfluidic self- assembly of a combinatorial library of single- and dual-ligand liposomes for in vitro and in vivo tumor targeting. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 130 (2018) 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.06.017 [64] R. Sonkar, Sonali, A. Jha, M.K. Viswanadh, A.S. Burande, Narendra, D.M. Pawde, K.K. Patel, M. Singh, B. Koch, M.S. Muthu. Gold liposomes for brain-targeted drug delivery: Formulation and brain distribution kinetics. Materials Science and Engineering C 120 (2021) 111652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111652 https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-019-0833-3 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00100 https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17184 https://doi.org/10.2174/157015908785777210 https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-5728(95)00148-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.10.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.09.001 https://doi.org/10.1159/000101884 https://doi.org/10.1080/1061186X.2017.1377207 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2954-3_12 https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.115.012070 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(65)80093-6 https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202000105 https://doi.org/10.1080/08982104.2019.1668010 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2020.104984 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.09.016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.06.017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111652 Z. Presswala et al. ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 426 [65] X. Wei, X. Chen, M. Ying, W. Lu. Brain tumor-targeted drug delivery strategies. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 4 (2014) 193-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2014.03.001 [66] Sonali, R.P. Singh, N. Singh, G. Sharma, M.R. Vijayakumar, B. Koch, S. Singh, U. Singh, D. Dash, B.L. Pandey, M.S. Muthu. Transferrin liposomes of docetaxel for brain-targeted cancer applications: formulation and brain theranostics. Drug Delivery 23 (2016) 1261-1271. https://doi.org/10.3109/10717544.2016.1162878 [67] Y. Hu, J. Rip, P.J. Gaillard, E.C.M. de Lange, M. Hammarlund-Udenaes. The Impact of Liposomal Formulations on the Release and Brain Delivery of Methotrexate: An In Vivo Microdialysis Study. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 106 (2017) 2606-2613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2017.03.009 [68] A.M. Grabrucker, B. Ruozi, D. Belletti, F. Pederzoli, F. Forni, M.A. Vandelli, G. Tosi. Nanoparticle transport across the blood brain barrier. Tissue Barriers 4 (2016) e1153568. https://doi.org/10.1080/21688370.2016.1153568 [69] T. Sasaki, J. Watanabe, X. He, H. Katagi, A. Suri, Y. Ishi, K. Abe, M. Natsumeda, W.H. Frey, P. Zhang, R. Hashizume. Intranasal delivery of nanoliposomal SN-38 for treatment of diffuse midline glioma. Journal of Neurosurgery 138(6) (2022) 1570–1579. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.9.jns22715 [70] J. Clymer, M.W. Kieran. The integration of biology into the treatment of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: A review of the North American clinical trial perspective. Frontiers in Oncology 8 (2018) 169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00169 [71] N.E. Helwig, S. Hong, E.T. Hsiao-wecksler. d-limonene-loaded liposomes target malignant glioma cells via the downregulation of angiogenic growth factors. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 82 (2023) 104358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104358 [72] V. É. Berberine and folic acid co-modified pH-sensitive cascade-targeted PTX-liposomes coated with Tween 80 for treating glioma. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 69 (2022) 185-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2022.116893 [73] N.E. Helwig, S. Hong, E.T. Hsiao-wecksler. Synthesis and Evaluation of High Functionality and Quality Cell-penetrating Peptide Conjugated Lipid for Octaarginine Modified PEGylated Liposomes In U251 and U87 Glioma Cells. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 111 (2022) 1719-1727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2021.11.022 [74] B.S. 3 Muhammad Ismail 1, Wen Yang 1, Yanfei Li 1, Tianran Chai 1, Dongya Zhang 1, Qiuli Du 1, Pir Muhammad 1, Sumaira Hanif 1, Meng Zheng 2. Targeted liposomes for combined delivery of artesunate and temozolomide to resistant glioblastoma. Biomaterials 287 (2022) 121608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121608 [75] N. Dhiman, R. Awasthi, B. Sharma, H. Kharkwal, G.T. Kulkarni. Lipid Nanoparticles as Carriers for Bioactive Delivery. Frontiers in Chemistry 9 (2021) 580118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.580118 [76] K. Westesen, H. Bunjes. Do nanoparticles prepared from lipids solid at room temperature always possess a solid lipid matrix? International Journal of Pharmaceutics 115 (1995) 129-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5173(94)00347-8 [77] N. Naseri, H. Valizadeh, P. Zakeri-Milani. Solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers: Structure preparation and application. Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin 5 (2015) 305-313 https://doi.org/10.15171/apb.2015.043 [78] Y. Dong, W.K. Ng, S. Shen, S. Kim, R.B.H. Tan. Solid lipid nanoparticles: Continuous and potential large-scale nanoprecipitation production in static mixers. Colloids and Surfaces B 94 (2012) 68-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.01.018 [79] V.H.S. Araujo, L. Delello Di Filippo, J.L. Duarte, L. Spósito, B.A.F. de Camargo, P.B. da Silva, M. Chorilli. Exploiting solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers for drug delivery against cutaneous fungal infections. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 47 (2021) 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040841X.2020.1843399 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2014.03.001 https://doi.org/10.3109/10717544.2016.1162878 https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.9.jns22715 https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00169 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104358 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2022.116893 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2021.11.022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121608 https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.580118 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5173(94)00347-8 https://doi.org/10.15171/apb.2015.043 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.01.018 https://doi.org/10.1080/1040841X.2020.1843399 ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 Addressing barriers in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma doi: https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 427 [80] S. Mukherjee, S. Ray, R.S. Thakur. Solid lipid nanoparticles: a modern formulation approach in drug delivery system. Indian Journal of Pharmceutical Science 71(4) (2009) 349. https://doi.org/10.4103/0250-474X.57282 [81] G. Ak, A. Ünal, T. Karakayalı, B. Özel, N. Selvi Günel, Ş. Hamarat Şanlıer. Brain-targeted, drug-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles against glioblastoma cells in culture. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 206 (2021) 111946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111946 [82] J.I.D.S. Alexandre, S.M.D. Santos Neto, A.P. Coutinho, T.D.A.T.D. Melo, , E.A.P. Gonçalves, M.V.S. Gondim, A.C.D. Antonino, A.E.C.D.G.D.C. Rabelo, A.L.D. Oliveira. Sorption of the Direct Black 22 dye in alluvial soil. Revista Ambiente & Água, 15 (2020) e2483. https://doi.org/10.4136/ambi-agua.2483 [83] S. Wang, T. Chen, R. Chen, Y. Hu, M. Chen, Y. Wang. Emodin loaded solid lipid nanoparticles: Preparation, characterization and antitumor activity studies. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 430 (2012) 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.03.027 [84] V.S. 1 Priyanka Jain 1, Vikas Pandey 1. Bioconjugate-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles for enhanced anticancer drug delivery to brain cancer cells: An in vitro evaluation. Indian Journal of Medical Research 159(1) (2022) 139-148. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_514_19 [85] I. Banerjee, K. De, D. Mukherjee, G. Dey, S. Chattopadhyay, M. Mukherjee, M. Mandal, A.K. Bandyopadhyay, A. Gupta, S. Ganguly, M. Misra. Paclitaxel-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles modified with Tyr-3-octreotide for enhanced anti-angiogenic and anti-glioma therapy. Acta Biomaterialia 38 (2016) 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.04.026 [86] K.S. Joshy, C.P. Sharma, N. Kalarikkal, K. Sandeep, S. Thomas, L.A. Pothen. Evaluation of in-vitro cytotoxicity and cellular uptake efficiency of zidovudine-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles modified with Aloe Vera in glioma cells. Materials Science and Engineering C 66 (2016) 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.03.031 [87] A. Grillone, M. Battaglini, S. Moscato, L. Mattii, C. De Julián Fernández, A. Scarpellini, M. Giorgi, E. Sinibaldi, G. Ciofani. Nutlin-loaded magnetic solid lipid nanoparticles for targeted glioblastoma treatment. Nanomedicine 14 (2019) 727-752. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2018-0436 [88] M. Elmowafy, M.M. Al-Sanea. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) as drug delivery platform: Advances in formulation and delivery strategies. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 29 (2021) 999-1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2021.07.015 [89] M. Aliofkhazraei. Handbook of Nanoparticles. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15338-4 [90] A. Khosa, S. Reddi, R.N. Saha. Nanostructured lipid carriers for site-specific drug delivery. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy 103 (2018) 598-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.04.055 [91] J. Qu, L. Zhang, Z. Chen, G. Mao, Z. Gao, X. Lai, X. Zhu, J. Zhu. Nanostructured lipid carriers, solid lipid nanoparticles, and polymeric nanoparticles: which kind of drug delivery system is better for glioblastoma chemotherapy? Drug Delivery 23 (2016) 3408-3416. https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2016.1189465 [92] S.B. 6 Saurabh Mittal 1, Sadia Shah 2, Harlokesh Narayan Yadav 3, Javed Ali 4, Madan Mohan Gupta 5. Quality by design engineered, enhanced anticancer activity of temozolomide and resveratrol coloaded NLC and brain targeting via lactoferrin conjugation in treatment of glioblastoma. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 191 (2023) 175-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2023.08.018 [93] T. Zwain, J.E. Alder, B. Sabagh, A. Shaw, A.J. Burrow, K.K. Singh. Tailoring functional nanostructured lipid carriers for glioblastoma treatment with enhanced permeability through in-vitro 3D BBB/BBTB models. Materials Science and Engineering: C 121 (2021) 111774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111774 [94] H.V. b d Masoud Farshbaf a b c, Solmaz Mojarad-Jabali b d, Salar Hemmati b, Ahmad Yari Khosroushahi a b, Hamidreza Motasadizadeh e f, Amir Zarebkohan a. Enhanced BBB and BBTB penetration and improved anti-glioma behavior of Bortezomib through dual-targeting https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 https://doi.org/10.4103/0250-474X.57282 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111946 https://doi.org/10.4136/ambi-agua.2483 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.03.027 https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_514_19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.04.026 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.03.031 https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2018-0436 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2021.07.015 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15338-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.04.055 https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2016.1189465 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2023.08.018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111774 Z. Presswala et al. ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 428 nanostructured lipid carriers. Journal of Controlled Release 345 (2022) 371-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.03.019 [95] A.S. Shirazi, R. Varshochian, M. Rezaei, Y.H. Ardakani, R. Dinarvand. SN38 loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs); preparation and in vitro evaluations against glioblastoma. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 32 (2021) 78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-021-06538-2 [96] S. Zhang, C. Lu, X. Zhang, J. Li, H. Jiang. Targeted delivery of etoposide to cancer cells by folate- modified nanostructured lipid drug delivery system. Drug Delivery 23 (2016) 1838-1845. https://doi.org/10.3109/10717544.2016.1141258 [97] D.C.F. Soares, F. Poletto, M.J. Eberhardt, S.C. Domingues, F.B. De Sousa, M.L. Tebaldi. Polymer- hybrid nanosystems for antiviral applications: Current advances. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy 146 (2022) 112249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112249 [98] A. Mukherjee, A.K. Waters, P. Kalyan, A.S. Achrol, S. Kesari, V.M. Yenugonda. Lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles as a nextgeneration drug delivery platform: State of the art, emerging technologies, and perspectives. International Journal of Nanomedicine 14 (2019) 1937-1952 https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S198353 [99] K. Hadinoto, A. Sundaresan, W.S. Cheow. Lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles as a new generation therapeutic delivery platform: A review. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 85 (2013) 427-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.07.002 [100] V. Dave, K. Tak, A. Sohgaura, A. Gupta, V. Sadhu, K.R. Reddy. Lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles: Synthesis strategies and biomedical applications. Journal of Microbiological Methods 160 (2019) 130-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2019.03.017 [101] H.X. 5 Xiaoqi Wang , Lu Ye , Weichong He , Chuanhui Teng , Shanbo Sun , Hongdan Lu , Shengnan Li , Lingyan Lv , Xiang Cao , Haoyuan Yin , Wei Lv . In situ targeting nanoparticles-hydrogel hybrid system for combined chemo-immunotherapy of glioma. Journal of Controlled Release (2022) 786- 797 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.03.050 [102] K. Shi, J. Zhou, Q. Zhang, H. Gao, Y. Liu, T. Zong, Q. He. Arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-modified lipid- polymer hybrid nanoparticles for docetaxel delivery in glioblastoma multiforme. Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology 11 (2015) 382-391. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbn.2015.1965 [103] R. Marchan, R. Reif, J.G. Hengstler. Toxicology of magnetic nanoparticles: Disturbed body iron ho- meostasis? Archives of Toxicology 86 (2012) 683-684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-012-0850-2 [104] S. Doktorovová, A.B. Kovačević, M.L. Garcia, E.B. Souto. Preclinical safety of solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers: Current evidence from in vitro and in vivo evaluation. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 108 (2016) 235-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.08.001 [105] S. Doktorovova, E.B. Souto, A.M. Silva. Nanotoxicology applied to solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers - A systematic review of in vitro data. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 87 (2014) 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2014.02.005 [106] H.Y. Xue, S. Liu, H.L. Wong. Nanotoxicity: A key obstacle to clinical translation of sirna-based nanomedicine. Nanomedicine 9 (2014) 295-312. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.13.204 [107] J.E.N. Dolatabadi, H. Hamishehkar, M. Eskandani, H. Valizadeh. Formulation, characterization and cytotoxicity studies of alendronate sodium-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 117 (2014) 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.01.055 [108] S. Bhushan, V. Kakkar, H.C. Pal, D.M. Mondhe, I.P. Kaur. The augmented anticancer potential of AP9-cd loaded solid lipid nanoparticles in human leukemia Molt-4 cells and experimental tumor. Chemico-Biological Interactions 244 (2016) 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2015.11.022 [109] M. Eskandani, H. Nazemiyeh. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Self-reporter shikonin- Act-loaded solid lipid nanoparticle : Formulation , physicochemical characterization and geno / cytotoxicity evaluation. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 59 (2014) 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2014.04.009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.03.019 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-021-06538-2 https://doi.org/10.3109/10717544.2016.1141258 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112249 https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S198353 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.07.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2019.03.017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.03.050 https://doi.org/10.1166/jbn.2015.1965 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-012-0850-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.08.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.08.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2014.02.005. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.13.204 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.01.055 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2015.11.022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2014.04.009 ADMET & DMPK 12(3) (2024) 403-429 Addressing barriers in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma doi: https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 429 [110] S. Lakkadwala, S. Nguyen, J. Lawrence, S.M. Nauli, J. Nesamony. Physico-chemical characterisation, cytotoxic activity, and biocompatibility studies of tamoxifen-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles prepared via a temperature-modulated solidification method. Journal of Microencapsulation 31 (2014) 590-599. https://doi.org/10.3109/02652048.2014.898707 [111] F. Farjadian, A. Ghasemi, O. Gohari, A. Roointan, M. Karimi, M.R. Hamblin. Nanopharmaceuticals and nanomedicines currently on the market: Challenges and opportunities. Nanomedicine 14(1) (2019) 96-126. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2018-0120 [112] M. Zhao, H. Li, L. Fan, Y. Ma, H. Gong, W. Lai, Q. Fang, Z. Hu. Quantitative proteomic analysis to the first commercialized liposomal paclitaxel nano-platform Lipusu revealed the molecular mechanism of the enhanced anti-tumor effect. Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine and Biotechnology 46 (2018) 147- 155. https://doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2018.1489822 [113] Y. Barenholz. Doxil® - The first FDA-approved nano-drug: Lessons learned. Journal of Controlled Release 160 (2012) 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.03.020 [114] G.M. Jensen, D.F. Hodgson. Opportunities and challenges in commercial pharmaceutical liposome applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 154-155 (2020) 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2020.07.016 [115] A. Fassas, A. Anagnostopoulos. The use of liposomal daunorubicin (DaunoXome) in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia and Lymphoma 46 (2005) 795-802. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428190500052438 [116] L. Kager, Pötschger, Bielack. Review of mifamurtide in the treatment of patients with osteosarcoma. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 6 (2010) 279-286. https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s5688 [117] K. Tzogani, M. Straube, U. Hoppe, P. Kiely, G. O’Dea, H. Enzmann, P. Salmon, T. Salmonson, F. Pignatti. The European Medicines Agency approval of 5-aminolaevulinic acid (Ameluz) for the treatment of actinic keratosis of mild to moderate intensity on the face and scalp: Summary of the scientific assessment of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Us. Journal of Dermatological Treatment 25 (2014) 371-374. https://doi.org/10.3109/09546634.2013.789474 [118] S.S. Legha. Vincristine Neurotoxicity: Pathophysiology and Management. Medical Toxicology 1 (1986) 421-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03259853 [119] J.E. Frampton. Liposomal Irinotecan: A Review in Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Drugs 80 (2020) 1007-1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-020-01336-6 [120] Clinical studies. https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?cond=Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma Accessed on 20/10/2023. ©2024 by the authors; licensee IAPC, Zagreb, Croatia. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2214 https://doi.org/10.3109/02652048.2014.898707 https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2018-0120 https://doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2018.1489822 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.03.020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2020.07.016 https://doi.org/10.1080/10428190500052438 https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s5688 https://doi.org/10.3109/09546634.2013.789474 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03259853 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-020-01336-6 https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?cond=Diffuse%20Intrinsic%20Pontine%20Glioma http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/