
































Microsoft Word - 163-Final.docx


Aboye et al.  Advancements in Agricultural Development 
  Volume 3, Issue 1, 2022 
  agdevresearch.org 

1. Almaz Balta Aboye, Assistant Professor of Rural Development, Wolaita Sodo University, PO Box 138, Wolaita Sodo 

Ethiopia, Ethiopia.almaza.boye@ucdconnect.ie,  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3038-6501  

2. Jim Kinsella, Professor of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, University College Dublin, Belfield Dublin 4 

Ireland, jim.kinsella@ucd.ie,  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6556-3555 
3. Tekle Leza, Associate Professor of Rural Development, Wolaita Sodo University, PO Box 138, Woliata Sodo Ethiopia., 

Tekle.leza@yahoo.com,  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4065-0281 
87 

 

Major Climatic Changes Experienced by Farm Households: 
Evidence from the Lowlands of Southern Ethiopia 

 
A. Aboye1, J. Kinsella2, T. Leza3 

 
 

  

Abstract 

Ethiopia is one of the world’s most vulnerable countries experiencing drought and floods as a result 
of climate variability and change. This study examined the major climatic changes experienced by 
farm households in the lowlands of Southern Ethiopia. It utilized a mixed methods sequential 
explanatory design approach to triangulate quantitative data with qualitative data. Using a multi-
stage sampling procedure, 400 farm household heads participated. Moreover, meteorological data 
were acquired from the National Meteorology Agency for the period from 2000 to 2019. Descriptive 
statistics, rainfall anomalies, and coefficient variation were used for data analysis. The findings show 
that over the last 20 years, the frequency and intensity of extreme weather had increased, and there 
was an overall change in the seasonality of rainfall. Drought assessment results showed that 2004, 
2009, 2012, 2015, and 2017 were all drought years in the study districts. The results revealed that 
reduced crop production, flooding, crop losses, drought, malaria, and animal disease were the major 
climate change impacts that farm households experienced in the lowlands of Southern Ethiopia. The 
study suggests that drought-resistant crops and water harvesting schemes should be promoted to 
minimize the effects of climate change. 
 

Keywords 

Climate variability, farmers’ observations, vulnerable hot-spots, adaptive capacity 



Aboye et al.  Advancements in Agricultural Development 
 

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v3i1.163   88 
 

Introduction and Problem Statement  
 
Climate change is a critical development challenge (Kolawole et al., 2016). It is considered one 
of the biggest challenges of the 21st century, globally impacting people’s lives (Abidoy & 
Odusola, 2015). Its’ severity is high in Africa, whose main economic activities largely depend on 
climate-sensitive sectors (Kolawole et al., 2016). Climate change impacts all economic sectors, 
with agriculture being one of the most sensitive and intrinsically vulnerable (Paul et al., 2016). 
In Ethiopia, the impact of climate change on the socio-economic fabric of society is tremendous 
(Auci et al., 2018). The southern parts of Ethiopia are most vulnerable, with significant rainfall 
variability and change resulting in prolonged drought and flood occurrences (Belay et al., 2021).  
 
Wolaita Zone in Southern Ethiopia has a high population density and is largely dependent on 
small-scale, labour-intensive agriculture. Itis one of the most climate-vulnerable hotspots in 
Africa underpinned with a very weak adaptive capacity (Bedeke et al., 2018). The amount, 
duration, and intensity of rainfall in the zone varies considerably, generally decreasing from 
highland to lowlands (Wolaita Zone Finance and Economic Development Department 
[WZFEDD], 2017). Studies (Bedeke et al., 2018; Bekele et al., 2020; Mihiretu et al., 2020; 
Tessema & Simane, 2020) have been undertaken in different agroecological zones throughout 
Ethiopia to assess farm households’ perceptions of climate variability. Understanding the 
historical and projected implications of climate change on agriculture and farm household 
livelihoods is critical for a country's development of climate-resilient systems (Georgis, 2015). 
This study examined the major climatic changes experienced by farm households in the 
lowlands of Wolaita, Southern Ethiopia, and aimed to inform stakeholders on actions that can 
be taken to address these vulnerabilities. 
 

Theoretical and Conceptual Framework  
 
The livelihoods of the majority of people in the study area are dependent on agriculture, which 
in turn is highly impacted by climate change. Therefore, the theoretical framework that is 
adapted for this study takes into consideration this reality and is based on the sustainable 
livelihood framework designed by Department for International Development London (DIFD,1999).  
The paper does not address all the elements of the framework and focuses on the vulnerability 
context in terms of the impact of climate change while accepting other important factors 
combine with climate change to create the vulnerability context of the time. 

 
Climate-induced hazards such as droughts, floods, and rising temperatures pose a major threat 
to the livelihoods of the poor in Ethiopia (Bekele et al., 2020). The impact of climate change is 
expected to heighten the vulnerability of both humans and animals (Intergovernmental Panel 
on Climate Change [IPCC], 2018). The Ethiopia Climate Action Report (Irish Aid, 2017) noted 
that climate change and its associated variability in Ethiopia influence crop planting times, 
length of growing seasons, shifts in crop types or cultivars, pest and weed prevalence, as well as 
the frequency of crop failures.  



Aboye et al.  Advancements in Agricultural Development 
 

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v3i1.163   89 
 

Climate change is the result of greenhouse gas emissions, much of which is caused by human 
activities and natural cycles (National Research Council [NRC],. NRC (2020) noted certain 
endothermic gases (such as carbon dioxide) are warming the earth and increasingly, humans 
are influencing the climate and temperature of the earth by burning fossil fuels, cutting down 
forests, and farming livestock. This adds a large amount of greenhouse gases to the ones 
naturally produced in the atmosphere, which intensifies the greenhouse effect and global 
warming (IPCC, 2018; Kaddo, 2016; Trenberth, 2018). However, the biggest contribution of 
greenhouse gas emissions (71%) comes from agriculture and land-use and/or land-use change 
activities (Crippa, et al 2021). 
 
Figure 1 presents the conceptual framework for this study and suggests the causes and effects 
of climate change on farm household livelihoods. The temperature change and rainfall 
variability as a consequence of climate change gives rise to droughts, floods, consequential 
changes in agricultural production, and the prevalence of human and animal diseases. These 
changes adversely affect the livelihoods of farm households including those who live in the 
lowlands of Ethiopia. 
 
Figure 1 
 
The Climatic and Farming Factors Affecting Farm Households’ Livelihoods in Ethiopia (Study 
Conceptual Framework) 

 
 

 
 



Aboye et al.  Advancements in Agricultural Development 
 

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v3i1.163   90 
 

Purpose  
 

The purpose of the study was to examine the major climatic changes that agricultural 
households in the lowlands of Southern Ethiopia have been experiencing. The objectives were: 
• To determine how farmers perceived long-term climate changes. 
• To examine climate change variability in the study area using twenty years of climate data 

(from 2000 through to 2019). 
• To assess how farm households experienced climate change impacts in their livelihoods. 
 

Methods  
 
This study applied a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design to triangulate the data 
collected. Multi-stage sampling procedures were applied to choose the sample of respondents 
for the household survey. Wolaita Zone was purposively selected at the principal stage as it is 
one of the most climate-vulnerable zones in the Southern Region of the country. Out of the 16 
districts in the Zone, four of them, namely Duguna Fango, Damot Woyede, Abala Abaya, and 
Kindo Koyisha, were purposively selected because of their relatively large areas of lowland.  
Two villages from each district were then randomly selected. The Cochran’s (1977) formula 
	𝑛ₒ=𝑍!𝑝𝑞/𝑒! was used to determine the sample size of the study population. Where	𝑛ₒ is the 
sample size, e is the desired level of precision with a 95% confidence level, p is the estimated 
proportion of an attribute that is present in the population, and q is 1-p. Finally, 400 
respondents were selected from the eight chosen villages by employing systematic random 
sampling based on the probability proportional to size. 
 
A structured questionnaire was used to collect household data. For this, four data collectors 
were recruited and trained. The questionnaire was pre-tested and contained both open and 
closed questions. Based on testing results the questionnaire was revised and refined. The 
finalized survey was conducted between September 2020 and November 2020. Focus group 
discussions (FGD) were held in each of the selected villages. The FGD participants were 
purposefully selected by considering farming experiences (men and women). In each FGD 
group, eight men and women farmers from the local area participated. Semi-structured 
interviews were employed to collect qualitative data and researcher field notes and records 
were kept. The study obtained ethical clearance from University College Dublin, Ireland, and 
Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia. The meteorological data was gathered from the National 
Meteorology Agency of Ethiopia including detailed local temperature and rainfall data from 
four weather stations in the study area.   
 
The collected data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Version 
26). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quantitative data, while qualitative data 
were coded and thematically analyzed. Coefficient variations (CV) were used to determine the 
level of rainfall variability in the study districts. When the CV was less than 20% it was 
considered as ‘less variable’; ‘moderately’ variable when it was between 20 and 30%; ‘highly’ 
variable when it was greater than 30%; ‘severely’ variable when it was greater than 40%, and a 



Aboye et al.  Advancements in Agricultural Development 
 

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v3i1.163   91 
 

CV greater than 70% indicated an ‘extremely’ high rainfall variability (Mazor et al., 2009). The 
data also examined Rainfall Anomaly (X) which is deviations of annual rainfall from long-run 
averages. This was used to evaluate the variability pattern and drought level in the study 
district (Ayal & Leal Filho, 2017).  
 

Findings  
 
This section presents the demographic characteristics of respondents-, the long-term impacts 
of climate change on farmers’ livelihoods as observed by farmers, climate variability in the 
study districts, and climatic changes experienced by farm households. 
 
Demographic Characteristics 
Of the household heads surveyed for this study, 79.8% were male and 20.2% were female. 
Female household headship for the study area was slightly lower than the national average 
which was 22.1% for rural areas (Central Statistical Agency [CSA], 2016). Nearly 39% of survey 
respondents had not attended formal school and the education level of respondents was higher 
than the national average, in which 69.8% of the population had no education or had not 
attended primary school (CSA, 2016). Average age of respondents were 44.2 years with a 
minimum and maximum age of 35 and 76 years respectively. Mean household size of 
respondents were 6.3 persons/household compared to the national average of 4.9 
persons/household in rural areas (CSA, 2016).  Average landholding size for study respondents 
was 1.12ha per household, which is larger than that in the Wolaita Zone, where the average 
landholding size per household was 0.25ha (WZFEDD, 2017). The larger farm-holdings held by 
those surveyed can be explained by the fact that lowland farms tend to be much bigger than 
highland and midland farms in the zone. The survey found that around 48% of household heads 
possessed mobile phones, which is similar to the national average of 47.2% for rural households 
in Ethiopia (CSA, 2016) (see Table 1).  
 
  



Aboye et al.  Advancements in Agricultural Development 
 

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v3i1.163   92 
 

Table1 
 
Percentage Distribution of Farmers by District and Selected Demographic and Socio-economic 
Characteristics (N = 400) 

 
Household characteristics 

% of Respondents 

Total 
(N= 400) 

Duguna 
Fango 
(n=139) 

Damot 
Woyide 
(n=116) 

Abala 
Abaya 
(n=106) 

Kindo 
Koyisha 
(n=39) 

Male household head 79.8 78.4 76.7 84.9 79.5 
Female household head 20.3 21.6 23.3 15.1 20.5 
Mean age of household heads (years) 44.2 45.7 43.0 43.5 44.7 
Mean household size 6.3 6.2 6.5 6.3 6.0 
Educational Status of household head      

Did not attend primary school 39 46.8 37.9 27.4 46.1 
Attended primary school and above  61 53.3 62 72.7 53.9 

Household head farming experience      
20-30 years 85.5 84.9 86.2 86.8 82.1 
31+ years 14.5 15.1 13.8 13.2 17.9 

Average land size of household 
(hectares)   

1.1 1.0 0.8 1.5 1.5 

Household heads that had a mobile 
phone 

47.8 37.4 37.9 67.0 61.5 

 
Farmers’ experience of farming was predicted to be a significant factor in determining their 
perceptions and awareness of their surroundings (Araro et al., 2020). The survey results 
presented in Table 1 show that all farmers had more than 20 years farming experience. 
 
Farmer Perceptions of long-term Climate Change 
Respondents have observed temperature and rainfall changes over the past 20 years (Table 2). 
Results show that almost all farmers (99.5%) observed an increase in the frequency of extreme 
droughts over this time period, while the vast majority (97.5%) of farmers observed that 
temperatures had increased. More than 77% of surveyed farmers observed that the frequency 
of rainfall variability had increased, and three quarters (75.3%) of farmers had observed that 
the overall amount of rainfall had decreased with 17.3% suggesting it was ‘more erratic’. 
 
  



Aboye et al.  Advancements in Agricultural Development 
 

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v3i1.163   93 
 

Table 2 
 
Percentage Distribution of Farmers by their Opinions on Climate Variability/ Change over the 
Previous 20 Years (2000–2019) (N = 400) 

Climate variability 
% of respondents 

Increase Decrease Moderate/constant 
Frequency of extreme droughts 99.5 0.5 - 
Frequency of rainfall variability 77.3 22.8 - 
Daily temperature change 97.5 2.5 - 
Amount of the rainfall in each year 7.5 75.3 17.3 (‘more erratic’) 

 
Over 85% of respondents felt that the intensity of extreme drought over the previous 20 years 
had been ‘severe’ (stayed for a long period), and 7% believed it had been ‘extremely severe’ 
(i.e., stayed for a very long period).  
 
Furthermore, farmers in the FGDs were asked what climate changes occurred in their area in 
the last 20 years and what is causing it. One FGD participant, a man from Kindo Koyisha Village, 
stated that one of the reasons may be that: 

 God might have been punishing us for doing awful work, simultaneously noting that the 
land is drier with very small production harvested each year and, I plant different types 
of trees to shade, however, they didn’t withstand the hot weather. Several other 
participants didn’t agree, describing the reason being due to the illegal cutting of trees. 
 

Temperature Change and Rainfall Variability 
This section presents temperature and rainfall variability in the study districts based on 20 years 
of climate data between the period2000 to 2019. 
  
The National Meteorology Agency temperature data (Figure 2) shows that average maximum 
high daytime temperatures (excess of 30 ᵒC) were observed in seven out of the recorded twenty 
years, while the minimum high daytime temperature was observed in five of the twenty years 
(temperature over 17 ᵒC). This suggests that there has been high temperature variability over 
the past 20 years in the study district. 
 
  



Aboye et al.  Advancements in Agricultural Development 
 

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v3i1.163   94 
 

Figure 2 
 
Average Annual Minimum and Maximum Temperatures in the Study Area (2000–2019) 

 
Source: National Meteorology Agency of Ethiopia (Hawassa branch) 
Note. The data in Figure 2 was extracted by Agency staff specifically for this study from the local 
branch of the National Meteorology Agency of Ethiopia. 
 
Rainfall data for the study area is presented in Figure 3 and suggests that the annual rainfall 
variability among four stations of the study district was highest in Bele. The data for the study 
area shows that the minimum average annual rainfall was 703.1 mm while the maximum 
average was 1362.35 mm (Figure 3) indicating a high rainfall variability in the study district.  
 
Figure 3  
 
Average Annual Rainfall for Lowlands of Wolaita Zone 

 
Source: National Meteorology Agency of Ethiopia (Hawassa branch) 
Note. The data in Figure 3 was extracted by Agency staff specifically for this study from the local 
branch of the National Meteorology Agency of Ethiopia. 
 
As indicated in Table 3, seasonal rainfall variability was observed in the study districts. Though 
high rainfall variability was experiential in all seasons, extremely high rainfall variability was 
observed in the Bega season with a CV greater than 70%. The variability was severe in the 
Meher and Belg seasons with the CV greater than 40%.  
 
 



Aboye et al.  Advancements in Agricultural Development 
 

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v3i1.163   95 
 

Table 3   
 
Seasonal Average Rainfall (mm), for Four Meteorology Stations in the Study Area (2000−2019)  
 
Stations 
  

Seasons 
Bega (Winter) 
(Dec., Jan., Feb.) 

Tseday (Spring) 
 (Mar., Apr., May.) 

Meher (Summer) 
 (Jun., July, Aug.) 

Belg (Autumn)  
(Sep., Oct, Nov.) 

SD M CV SD M CV SD M CV SD M CV 
Bedessa 56.5 82.8 68.2 107.2 389.9 27.5 119.4 392.8 30.4 90.3 268.4 33.7 
Bele 68.6 73.2 93.8 122.5 340.6 35.9 256.2 479.8 53.4 87.5 263.1 33.3 
Billate 49.5 67.1 73.7 103.6 286.9 36.1 75.8 245.3 30.9 70.1 217.2 32.3 
Humbo 91.5 79.1 115.7 126.7 353.4 35.9 153.8 445.9 34.5 146.6 267.2 54.9 

Source: National Meteorology Agency of Ethiopia (Hawassa branch) 
Note. The data in Table 3 was extracted by Agency staff specifically for this study from the local 
branch of the National Meteorology Agency of Ethiopia. 
 
The rainfall anomaly (Figure 4) shows the presence of annual rainfall variability over the 
previous 20 years in the study area. The negative and positive values in Figure 4 indicate the 
availability of dry and wet years in the study district. Based on rainfall anomaly value (X), Agnew 
and Chappell (1999) classified drought into four categories. When the X value is less than -1.65, 
it is classified as ‘extreme’ drought. ‘severe’ drought occurs when -1.28 > X > -1.65, ‘moderate’ 
drought is found when - 0.84 > X > -1.28, and when the X value is greater than -0.84,it indicates 
‘no drought’. The rainfall anomaly values for the study area found the range between the 
highest values of 1.69 in the year 2007 to the lowest value of -1.82 in the year 2015. The results 
show that 2015 was found to be in extreme drought while 2009 was in severe drought. The 
years 2004, 2012, and 2017 are classified as being in moderate drought whilst 2007, 2008, 
2010, 2013, and 2019 were found to be rainy (wet) years. 
 
Figure 4 
 
Rainfall Anomaly of the Study Area 

 
Source: National Meteorology Agency of Ethiopia (Hawassa branch) 
Note. The data in Figure 4 was extracted by Agency staff specifically for this study from the local 
branch of the National Meteorology Agency of Ethiopia. 
 



Aboye et al.  Advancements in Agricultural Development 
 

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v3i1.163   96 
 

Climate Changes Experienced by Farm Households 
This section relates to the third objective of the study. It presents the farmer-reported changes 
associated with crop production, crop losses, and climate-related diseases. 
 
Changes in Crop Production 
The impact of climate variability and changes in crop production in the past 20 years (2000-
2019) is presented in Table 4. The finding revealed that over 93% of farmers reported a decline 
in crop yields and overall incomes from agriculture. A large proportion of respondents (97%) 
have observed increased partial or total crop failure, while more than 95% of respondents have 
reported an increasingly shortened growing season. Both rainfall and temperature variability 
have affected the overall conditions of farmers' livelihood through its impact on crop yields, 
crop failures, shifting cropping calendars, increasingly delayed planting dates, changes in crop 
varieties, soil erosion, and pest and disease prevalence. The impact of climate change had 
contributed to a decline in land use and land cover change. 
 
Table 4   
 
The Distribution of Farmers by the Response to the Impact of Climate Variability and Changes in 
Crop Production in the Previous 20 Years (2000-2019) (N = 400) 
Change on crop production % of respondents 

Increased Declined Same 
Crop yield 4.3 93.3 2.5 
Partial or total crop failure 97.0 1.0 2.0 
Shortened length of the growing season 95.3 3.5 1.3 
Shift in cropping calendar (delayed planting date) 98.5 1.3 0.3 
Change in crop varieties 98.3 1.5 0.3 
Pest and disease prevalence 99.8 0.3 - 
Soil erosion 72.5 27.3 0.3 
Land use/land cover change 8.8 90.0 1.3 
Income from agriculture 0.5 99.0 0.5 

 
Regarding this, focus group members were asked about how climate changes impact their crop 
production. An FGD participant, a man from Abala Sipa Village, stated that:  

During the main rainy season, the rain comes late and then as nonstop heavy rains 
continuously rain for several weeks; or else, the rain comes sooner and then stops for 
several weeks.  

This situation forced him to change the crop planting date. Several other participants agreed, 
describing as “a result, we couldn’t able to feed our family members throughout the years.” 
 
Crop Loss  
All surveyed farmers reported that over the previous 20 years, flood affects their farms on five 
or more occasions, and some farmers (6.8%) reported it was more than five times. In the study 
area, farmers plant different types of crops namely, maize, haricot bean, sorghum, barley, teff, 



Aboye et al.  Advancements in Agricultural Development 
 

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v3i1.163   97 
 

onion, pepper, yam, and coffee on their farms. Pigeon pea and haricot bean are typically used 
in intercropping with maize however, the dominant crop in the study area is maize. Some 73% 
of farmers reported that they had experienced crop losses in the previous production season 
(2019) with the rest (27%) reporting that they had not been affected. The study findings 
indicated that more than two out of every three farmers (66%) had lost about 0.32 ha of maize 
crops in the reported production season (see Table 5). 
 
Table 5 
 
The Distribution of Farmers by Losses of Crops Experienced in the Last Production Season (N = 
400) 

Types of crop loss Frequency % 

Average crop loss in 
hectares/ 
household  

Maize 264 66.0 0.32 
Haricot beans 11 2.8 0.25 
Barley 1 0.3 0.30 
Teff 7 1.8 0.26 
Paper 3 0.8 0.26 
Onion 3 0.8 0.26 
Yam 3 0.8 0.26 
No 108 27.0 - 
Total 400 100  

 
Regarding this, focus group members were asked questions related to climate changes’ impact 
on their crop production. A participant in the focus group, a woman from Tora Sadebo Village, 
stated that “Flood comes in each heavy rainy season and it totally or partially damaged the 
planted crops, eroded cultivated and communal land.” All other participants agreed, describing 
“heavy rain eroded our land and damages the community residences.” They explain that 
“increment in temperature causes the ‘Maize Virus’ which mainly affects the maize crops.”  
 
Climate-related Diseases 
Malaria is a vector-borne disease that is linked to climate change (Simane, 2016; Wu et al., 
2016). The study findings show that 82% of the respondents had experienced malaria, and just 
over half (51.5%) reported that the health status of animals was ‘bad’. Farmers were 
interviewed on how climate changes impact human and animal health. A man from Abala 
Maraka village took part in the focus group and discussed his experiences and associated 
feelings as: 

 The temperature increases, the prevalence of the malaria epidemic and Tsetse flies 
increases within the community. Our animals are mostly affected by Tsetse flies 
(Tryponsomises). It is sad to share you this … but our livestock were died in respective 
years due to climate variability.  



Aboye et al.  Advancements in Agricultural Development 
 

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v3i1.163   98 
 

Subsequently he noted that “the remaining animal is not healthy because of the shortage of 
feed.” Other participants share his views by noting “more lands were out from cropping 
because of the unavailability of oxen for plowing.” 
 

Conclusions, Discussion, and Recommendations  
 
The farmers in the study area reported an increase in long-term temperature as well as 
declining rainfall which are in line with local weather records. Farmers' observations of 
increasing temperatures are congruent with Bongaarts (2019) and the Ethiopian Panel of 
Climate Change's (Ethiopian Panel on Climate Change [EPCC], 2015) findings that the country's 
average temperature has risen over the past five decades (at a rate of 0.2 degrees C per 
decade).  Excerpts from the focus groups also confirmed an increase in daytime temperatures 
and a decline in annual rainfall in the study area.   
 
Crop yields and productivity in the study area are influenced by rainfall patterns in both the 
Belg and Meher seasons. The Meher season production is tremendously important as it 
accounts for 92% of the total area cultivated and more than 96% of total crop production 
(Tafesse et al., 2011). Results revealed that in the main production season, the rainfall pattern 
was extremely unpredictable and erratic in the study area. The computed coefficient variation 
for annual and seasonal rainfall variability in the study district suggests a lot of inter-annual and 
intra-annual rainfall variability. According to findings from the focus groups, the study district 
does not receive adequate rainfall during the main cropping period (Meher). These variations 
highly impact on agricultural production as well as farmers' lives in general. These findings are 
consistent with those of Bedeke et al. (2018), Habtemariam et al. (2016), and Mihiretu et al. 
(2020). By way of response, drought-resistant crops and water harvesting schemes could be 
developed to reduce the affects of climate change. 
 
The temperature distribution in the study district is characterized by a general increase and a 
few inter-annual changes. Both yearly maximum and minimum temperatures recorded at the 
study area meteorology stations have increased. Rainfall anomaly results revealed that there 
were five drought years and five wet (rainy) years between 2000 and 2019. The results 
indicated that within three or four year intervals, major climatic variability was observed in the 
study district. The climate data findings were also comparable with farmers' observations and 
indicated that their crops had been flooded at least five times in the previous 20 years. This 
finding also aligns with the study conducted by Araro, et al. (2020) in the Konso District of 
Southern Ethiopia and with the World Bank's Assessment Study (World Bank, 2010). The report 
from the World Bank showed that droughts and floods were common occurrences in the 
country, happening every three to five years. 
 
The farmers in the study area reported that crop losses were due to rainfall variability, high 
temperatures, floods, and crop diseases (mainly ‘Maize Virus’). The findings suggest that 
climate variables and the livelihood of farmers are connected. Climate-related diseases such as 
malaria and tsetse flies highly impact both human and animal well-being (Parham et al. 2015; 



Aboye et al.  Advancements in Agricultural Development 
 

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v3i1.163   99 
 

Pagabeleguem et al., 2016). As farmers noted in the FGD, the increment of temperature was 
conducive to the prevalence of the malaria epidemic in the study area. Diseases (Tsetse flies) 
due to the variability of weather conditions and shortage of feed were seen as major causes of 
poor animal health. Matewos (2019) reported malaria, cholera, and animal diseases were the 
most common epidemics attributed to climate change and variability. 
 
The scientific explanations of climate changes have mostly concentrated on anthropogenic 
greenhouse gas emissions, caused by human activities (NRC, 2020). According to FGD, some 
farmers in the study area consider adverse weather conditions connected with spiritual causes 
as punishments from God, while the others recognized the contribution of human activities 
such as deforestation, overgrazing, and demographic pressures. Filling the knowledge gap 
through training of all stakeholders is crucial to their understanding of the causes of climate 
change variability at the local level.  
 

Acknowledgements  
 
This study was funded by European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme 
under the Marie Sktodowska-Curie grant agreement No 778196. However, the contents of the 
paper reflect only the author’s view and that the Agency is not responsible for any use that may 
be made of the information it contains.  
 

References  
 
Abidoye, B. O., & Odusola, A. F. (2015). Climate change and economic growth in Africa: An 

econometric analysis. Journal of African Economies, 24(2), 277–301.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/eju033   

 
Agnew, C. T., & Chappell, A. (1999). Drought in the Sahel. Geojournal, 48(4), 299–311.  

https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007059403077  
 
Araro, K., Legesse, S. A., & Meshesha, D. T. (2020). Climate change and variability impacts on 

rural livelihoods and adaptation strategies in Southern Ethiopia. Earth Systems and 
Environment, 4(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-019-00134-9 

 
Auci, S., Castellucci, L., & Coromaldi, M. (2018). The impact of climate change on the 

distribution of rural income in Ethiopia. International Journal of Environmental 
Studies, 75(6), 913–931. 
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00207233.2018.1475914 

 
Ayal, D. Y., & Leal Filho, W. (2017). Farmers' perceptions of climate variability and its adverse 

impacts on crop and livestock production in Ethiopia. Journal of Arid Environments, 140, 
20-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.01.007  

 



Aboye et al.  Advancements in Agricultural Development 
 

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v3i1.163   100 
 

Bedeke, S. B., Vanhove, W., Wordofa, M. G., Natarajan, K., & Van Damme, P. (2018). Perception 
of and response to climate change by maize-dependent smallholders. Climate 
Research, 75(3), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01524 

 
Bekele, M., Bezabih, M., Elias, H., Fisker, P., Gebrehiwot, T., Kuma, T., Mekasha, T., Mekonnen, 

A., Tarp, F., & Teklewold, H. (2020). Building resilience to climate change in Ethiopia 
what do we know so far? Development Economics Research Group. 
https://www.econ.ku.dk/derg/wps/01-2020.pdf 

 
Belay, A., Demissie, T., Recha, J. W., Oludhe, C., Osano, P. M., Olaka, L. A., Solomon, D., & 

Berhane, Z. (2021). Analysis of climate variability and trends in southern 
Ethiopia. Climate (Basel), 9(6), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9060096 

 
Bongaarts, J. (2019). Intergovernmental panel on climate change special report on global 

warming of 1.5°C Switzerland: IPCC, 2018. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12234    
 
Central Statistical Agency. (2016). Ethiopia demographic and health survey. 

https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR328/FR328.pdf 
 
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques. Wiley.  
 
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F. N., & Leip, A. (2021). 

Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nature 
Food, 2(3), 198-209. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9  

 
Department for International Development, Londen. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods guidance 

sheets. Emergency Nutrition Network. 
https://www.ennonline.net/attachments/872/section2.pdf 

 
Ethiopian Panel on Climate Change. (2015). First assessment report, working group II agriculture 

and food security. Ethiopian Academy of Sciences. 
 
Georgis, K. (2015). Planning national adaptation responses to climate change. A Repository of 

Agricultural Research Outputs.  https://hdl.handle.net/10568/65079 
 
Habtemariam, L. T., Gandorfer, M., Kassa, G. A., & Heissenhuber, A. (2016). Factors influencing 

smallholder farmers’ climate change perceptions: A study from farmers in 
Ethiopia. Environmental Management ,58(2), 343–
358.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0708-0  

 
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C. 

https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/download/ 
 



Aboye et al.  Advancements in Agricultural Development 
 

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v3i1.163   101 
 

Irish Aid. (2017). Ethiopia climate action report for 2016: Resilience and economic inclusion 
team. 
https://www.irishaid.ie/media/irishaid/allwebsitemedia/30whatwedo/climatechange/E
thiopia-Country-Climate-Action-Reports-2016.pdf 

 
Kaddo, Jameel R. (2016). Climate change: Causes, effects, and solutions [A honors project]. 

Parkland College. http://spark.parkland.edu/ah/164 
 
Kolawole, O. D., Motsholapheko, M. R., Ngwenya, B. N., Thakadu, O., Mmopelwa, G., & Kgathi, 

D. L. (2016). Climate variability and rural livelihoods: How households perceive and 
adapt to climatic shocks in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Weather, Climate, and 
Society, 8(2), 131-145. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-15-0019.1 

 
Matewos, T. (2019). Climate change-induced impacts on smallholder farmers in selected 

districts of Sidama, southern 
Ethiopia. Climate, 7(5),70. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli7050070  

 
Mazor, R. D., Purcell, A. H., & Resh, V. H. (2009). Long-term variability in bioassessments: A 

twenty-year study from two northern California streams. Environmental 
Management, 43(6), 1269–1286. 
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00267-009-9294-8.pdf 

 
Mihiretu, A., Okoyo, E. N., & Lemma, T. (2020). Small holder farmers’ perception and response 

mechanisms to climate change: Lesson from Tekeze lowland goat and sorghum 
livelihood zone, Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 6(1). 
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2020.1763647 

 
Moroda, G. T., Tolossa, D., & Semie, N. (2018). Perception and adaptation strategies of rural 

people against the adverse effects of climate variability: A case study of Boset District, 
East Shewa, Ethiopia. Environmental Development, 27, 2– 13. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2018.07.005 

 
National Meteorology Agency of Ethiopia. (2020). Local branch of the National Meteorology 

Agency Awassa, Ethiopia. 
 
National Research Council. (2020). Climate Change: Evidence and Causes: Update 2020. The 

National Academies Press. http://nap.edu/25733 
 
Pagabeleguem, S., Ravel, S., Dicko, A. H., Vreysen, M. J. B., Parker, A., Takac, P., Huber, K., 

Sidibé, I., Gimonneau, G., & Bouyer, J. (2016). Influence of temperature and relative 
humidity on survival and fecundity of three tsetse strains. Parasites & Vectors, 9(1), 
Article 520. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1805-x 

 



Aboye et al.  Advancements in Agricultural Development 
 

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v3i1.163   102 
 

Parham, P. E., Waldock, J., Christophides, G. K., & Michael, E. (2015). Climate change and 
vector-borne diseases of humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: 
Biological Sciences, 370(1665), Article 20140377. 
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0377 

 
Simane, B., Beyene, H., Deressa, W., Kumie, A., Berhane, K., & Samet, J. (2016). Review of 

climate change and health in Ethiopia: Status and gap analysis. Ethiopian Journal of 
Health Development, 30(1), 28–41. 
https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ejhd/article/view/147317  

  
Taffesse, A. S., Dorosh, P., & Gemessa, S. A. (2011). Crop production in Ethiopia: Regional 

patterns and trends [Working document]. International Food Policy Research Institute 
 https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/essprn11.pdf 

 
Tessema, I., & Simane, B. (2020). Smallholder farmers’ perception and adaptation to climate 

variability and change in Fincha sub-basin of the Upper Blue Nile River Basin of 
Ethiopia. GeoJournal, 86, 1767–1783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10159-7 

 
Trenberth, K. E. (2018). Climate change caused by human activities is happening and it already 

has major consequences. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 36(4), 463–481. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2018.1450895 

 
Wolaita Zone Finance and Economic Development Department. (2017). Annual statistical 

abstract of Wolaita Zone. Finance and Economic Development Department Wolaita 
Sodo, Ethiopia.  

 
World Bank Group. (2010). Economics of adaptation to climate change: Ethiopia. 

https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/12504/686500ESW0P1
130UBLIC00EACC0Ethiopia.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y  

 
Wu, X., Lu, Y., Zhou, S., Chen, L., & Xu, B. (2016). Impact of climate change on human infectious 

diseases: Empirical evidence and human adaptation. Environment International, 86, 14–
23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.09.007  

 
 
© 2022 by authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of 
the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). 
 


