Impaginato 41 Adv. Hort. Sci., 2018 32(1): 41-47 DOI: 10.13128/ahs-21894 Tomato plant growth, leaf nutrient concentrations and fruit quality under nitrogen foliar applications M.K. Souri*, S. Dehnavard Department of Horticultural Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. Key words: ammonium sulfate, calcium nitrate, foliar feeding, plant nutrition, urea, yield. Abstract: Tomato is a typical plant that has distinct response to different nitro- gen forms in hydroponic culture. In addition, it is a well known susceptible plant to ammonium nutrition in hydroponic culture. However, its response to foliar application of nitrogen sources and N-forms has not been well investigat- ed. In the present study, the growth, productivity and fruit quality of tomato was investigated under foliar application of nitrogen from different sources. Ammonium sulfate, urea and calcium nitrate with constant concentration of 100 mM N were weekly sprayed during four months under hydroponic culture system. A water spray treatment was considered as control. The results showed that vegetative growth parameters were significantly affected by N sources in different patterns. The factors such as plant height, leaf area, num- ber of lateral shoots and shoot fresh and dry weight, as well as leaf nitrate reductase activity was significantly reduced by foliar application of ammonium sulfate and to less extent by urea, while there was improvement of these traits by foliar application of calcium nitrate compared to control. However, ammoni- um sulfate treated plants had the highest leaf SPAD value and leaf N concentra- tions. Plant fruiting pattern was also influenced by treatments, as ammonium sulfate spray reduced the fruit yield, and fruit vitamin C content, while it increased fruit TSS and titratable acidity. The highest value of yield and vitamin C was recorded in calcium nitrate sprayed plants. 1. Introduction Application of different fertilizers play important role in agricultural pro- duction of food commodities. Supply of adequate essential nutrients can significantly improve plant growth, quality and their nutritional values (Marschner, 2011). Different sources of each nutrient element can be applied as fertilizer to meet plant’s need of that special element. Generally for most nutrients, there is little difference among effects of various sources; however, regarding nitrogen there is significant different effect of N form and sources on many vegetative and reproductive traits of plants (Souri and Roemheld, 2009). (*) Corresponding author: mk.souri@modares.ac.ir Citation: SOURI M.K., DEHNAVARD S., 2018 - Tomato plant growth, leaf nutrient concentrations and fruit quality under nitrogen foliar applications. - Adv. Hort. Sci., 32(1): 41-47 Copyright: © 2018 Souri M.K., Dehnavard S. This is an open access, peer reviewed article published by Firenze University Press (http://www.fupress.net/index.php/ahs/) and distribuited under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Received for publication 18 October 2017 Accepted for publication 22 November 2017 AHS Advances in Horticultural Science Adv. Hort. Sci., 2018 32(1): 41-47 42 Nitrogen fertilizers have important role in improv- ing crop productivity; however low use efficiency rate of N fertilizers threatens sustainable plant production (Souri, 2010). On market, various nitrogen sources exist for application under field and hydroponic cul- ture. Urea, ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate are the main nitrogen fertilizers for soil appli- cation, while calcium nitrate and potassium nitrate are the major nitrogen sources commonly are used in hydroponic systems (Marschner, 2011). Nitrogen forms (ammonium vs. nitrate) can have significant effect on morphology and physiology of plants partic- u l a r l y u n d e r h y d r o p o n i c c u l t u r e ( S o u r i a n d Roemheld, 2009). In addition, ammonium instead of n i t r a t e ( S m o l e ń a n d S a d y , 2 0 0 9 ; S o u r i 2 0 1 0 ; Mars ch n er, 2011) an d f o l i ar co mp l emen tati o n (Kolota and Osinska, 1999; Dehnavard et al., 2017) supply of nitrogen can significantly improve N fertiliz- ing efficiency in cropping systems. There may be several potential benefits of provid- ing nitrogen to greenhouse crops via the foliage. These include: reduced nitrogen losses through deni- trification and leaching, the ability to supply nitrogen when root activity is impaired e.g. in soil or water saline conditions, and luxury supply of plants with nitrogen. In cereals and some agronomic crops, late foliar application of urea generally results in higher grain protein and N content (Fageria et al., 2009). The best quality parameters of plant growth and pro- ductivity of cabbage was reported when foliar versus soil application of fertilizers was applied (Atanasova et al., 2007). Tomato is one of the major vegetable crops that is cultivated in many parts of the world and consumed in many dishes. The application rate of N fertilizers in t o m a t o c u l t u r e i s g e n e r a l l y h i g h ( S o u r i a n d Roemheld, 2009), with N efficiency of about 30-50% (Zotarelli et al., 2009; Souri, 2010). In many green- houses due to continuous cultivation and fertiliza- tion, soil salinity level is generally much higher than the threshold. If some levels of required N could be applied on plants as foliar spray, it can improve N use efficiency with less soil salinity buildup and less envi- ronmental side effects. In literature the tomato responses to continuous foliar spray of nitrogen sources have not well been established. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate response of tomato plants to foliar application of various nitrogen forms and sources under greenhouse and hydroponic culture. 2. Materials and Methods Experimental set up This study was conducted during 2012 under green- house conditions at Faculty of Agriculture, Trabiat Modares Uni., Tehran-Iran. The experiment was done in hydroponic system with four treatments and four replications arranged in completely randomized design. Tomato seeds (Lycopersicon esculentum var. Money Maker) were germinated in quartz sands and after germination (in four-leaf stage) two homoge- neous seedlings were transferred to pots containing a mixture of cocopeat and perlite in ratio of 3:1 (v/v). One week later one of them was removed and one week later foliar treatments were applied on plants. The nutrient solution composition was prepared fol- lowing Hoagland formula (Dehnavard et al., 2017). Black plastic pots as replication, with a volume of nearly 12 liter were used for plants cultivation. For first two weeks after seedling transplanting, plants were supplied with one daily application of 100-200 ml of nutrient solution. Thereafter, pots were sup- plied two times per day with nutrient solution of a final quantity of 250-1500 mL until end of experi- ment. The amount of applied solution increased with plant size and reached the amount of 1.5 liter per day at full plant size. Treatments were foliar spray of three nitrogen sources of ammonium sulfate (AS), urea, calcium nitrate (CN) and a no spray control. All three N sources were applied in constant concentration of 100 mM N (equals to 1400 mg L-1 N). Sprays were done on weekly basis during 4 months of active growth period from 25 March (first foliar spray) until the end of July 2012. Distilled water was sprayed in control plants. Spraying treatments were done in the early morning, one hour after sun rise. Measurements During plant growth period for four months, various vegetative traits as well as fruit harvesting records were collected. The final harvest of plants was done at the end of July. Chlorophyll index was measured two times by SPAD meter (model 502 Plus, Illinois, USA), each time with 30 readings on 3 different areas for 10 randomly selected leaves per pot that the average was presented as leaf SPAD value. SPAD readings were done at the middle of experiment and before final harvest, at 10 o’clock in the morning. P l a n t h e i g h t , n u m b e r o f l a t e r a l s h o o t s , Souri et al. - Tomato plant growth, leaf nutrient concentrations and fruit quality under N-foliar applications 43 shoots fresh and dry weight were measured at final harvest. Cumulative harvest of fruits was recorded as final yield. Plant leaf area was measured by leaf area meter and calculated as average area of a single leaf. Fruits after harvesting were transferred to labora- tory for further quality assessment. Fruit firmness was measured by penetrometer (Model Wagner) after removing fruit skin using a blade. Fruit total sol- uble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA) and pH were determined in fruit juice squeezed by a squeezer. Fruit TSS percentage was measured by a portable refractometer (Atago, Tokyo, Japan). Fruit pH was determined using a portable pH meter, and titratable acidity was determined with titration of 5 mL of fruit juice with NaOH 0.1 N until end pH of 8.1. For determination of vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid), 50 g of fresh fruit tissue was crushed in a porcelain mor- tar in vicinity of 20 mL metaphosphoric acid 6%, and then the juice transferred into a 50 ml tube, then centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min. Five mL of the supernatant transferred into an Erlenmeyer flask, and received 20 mL of metaphosphoric acid 3%. Then titration of the extract was done by di-chloro phenol indophenols until appearance of a rosa color, which the amount of vitamin C (mg 100-1 g FW) was calcu- lated accordingly and based on a standard curve of L- ascorbic acid concentrations. From each treatment and replicates 3 fruits were kept in room temperature (25±2°C) for one week, thereafter their weight loss percentage was calculat- ed. Total nitrogen of leaves was determined using kejeldahl method and the activity of leaf nitrate reductase enzyme (NR) was determined after grind- ing and homogenizing of leaf materials in a mortar containing liquid nitrogen. Nitrate reductase was extracted in a buffer consisting of 100 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 1 mM EDTA, 7mM cystein, 3% polyvinyl polypy- rolidone (PVPP), 10 Μm leupeptin, and 1 mM phenyl methyl sulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). After preparation of extracts sulfanilamide (0.5%) and N-(1-naphthyl)-eth- ylenediamine dihydrochloride (0.01%) in 1.5 M hydrochloric acid (HCl) were used for color develop- ment and the amount of NO2- was determined spec- trophotometrically at 540 nm and then nitrate reduc- tase activity was calculated accordingly. Statistical analysis Excel software was used for calculating means and standard deviations and data were analyzed by SPSS software. Comparison of means was performed at 5% by Duncan’s multiple range test. 3. Results The results of present study showed that plant veg- etative growth parameters were significantly affect- ed by nitrogen sources. Plant height was significantly higher in calcium nitrate treated plants compared to ammonium sulfate and urea treated plants (Table 1). The significant largest area of a single leaf and the highest number of lateral shoots were recorded in those plants which were treated with calcium nitrate, while the significant lowest records were in ammoni- um sulfate treated plants (Table 1). SPAD value as a chlorophyll concentration index of plants were high- est in ammonium sulfate treated plants (Table 1), and there was no significant effects among other treatments. Plant shoot fresh and dry weights were significantly affected by foliar spray of nitrogen sources. The sig- nificant highest shoot fresh and dry weight was obtained from plants treated with calcium nitrate and control plants. The significant lowest shoot fresh Foliar spray treatment Plant height (m) Leaf area (cm2) Lateral shoots (no.) SPAD value Control (d-water) 1.98±0.16 ab 74.95±6.2 b 59.25±3.5 b 37.025±1.6 b Ammonium sulfate 1.365±0.22 c 66.60±6.0 c 43.25±5.6 c 46.925±3.8 a Urea 1.753±0.17 b 71.25±5.6 bc 51.00±9.7 bc 39.825±1.8 b Calcium nitrate 2.225±0.22 a 80.60±2.7 a 70.50±5.2 a 39.275±1.8 b Table 1 - Mean values of plant height, leaf area, number of lateral shoots and leaf SPAD of tomato plants. Plants were grown in Hoagland nutrient solution for 17 weeks All three N sources were applied in constant concentration of 100 mM N. SPAD readings were done two times at the middle of experiment and before final harvest, and the average was presented. Data are average of 4 replications ± SD. In each column means with a common letter have no significant difference at 5% of Duncan test. Adv. Hort. Sci., 2018 32(1): 41-47 44 and dry weight was in plants treated with ammonium sulfate and urea (Table 2). Determination of leaf nitrogen concentration (Table 2) revealed that plants treated with ammonium sulfate and urea had signifi- cantly higher amounts compared to control and calci- um nitrate treated plants. Foliar spray of nitrogen sources showed significant effect on leaf nitrate reductase enzyme activity (Table 2). Nitrate reduc- tase is the key enzyme in nitrate assimilation that its activity depends on several factors including nitrogen and nitrate status of plant tissues. The significant highest activity of this enzyme was in leaf of plants treated with calcium nitrate followed by control plants and those treated with urea. The significant lowest nitrate reductase activity was in ammonium sulfate treated plants. Fruiting pattern of plants was also influenced by sprays of nitrogen sources and forms (Table 3 and 4). Number of fruits per plant was highest in calcium nitrate treated plants; however, they had no signifi- cant difference with control and urea treated plants. Those plants which were treated with ammonium sulfate produced significant lowest number of fruits (Table 3). The amounts of fruit yield per plant was significantly higher in calcium nitrate treated plants (Table 3), followed by control, urea and ammonium sulfate treated plants. Fruit firmness was not affect- ed by foliar spray of nitrogen sources; however the percentage of fruit weight loss was significantly influ- enced by N foliar treatments. The highest weight loss, during one week keeping fruits at room temper- ature, was in fruits of those plants which were treat- Table 2 - Mean values of shoot fresh and dry weight, leaf N concentration and nitrate reductase activity of tomato plants Plants were grown in Hoagland nutrient solution for 17 weeks. All three N sources were applied in constant concentration of 100 mM N. Data are average of 4 replications ± SD. In each column means with a common letter have no significant difference at 5% of Duncan test. Foliar spray treatment Shoot FW (g) Shoot DW (g) Leaf N concentration (%) Leaf nitrate reductase activity (µ mol NO 2 g FW h) Control (d-water) 1581±122 ab 13.7±1.6 a 2.3±0.17 b 0.71±0.1 b Ammonium sulfate 1213±59 c 11.5±0.8 b 3.2±0.30 a 0.17±0.01 d Urea 1469.5±79 b 11.4±1.14 b 2.9±0.32 a 0.30±0.09 c Calcium nitrate 1758.3±186 a 14.2±1.7 a 2.5±0.13 b 0.90±0.06 a Table 3 - Mean values of fruit number, fruit yield, fruit firmness and fruit postharvest weight loss in tomato Plants were grown in Hoagland nutrient solution for 17 weeks. All three N sources were applied in constant concentration of 100 mM N. Fruit weight loss was measured after one week in room temperature of 25±°C Data are average of 4 replications ± SD. In each column means with a common letter have no significant diff erence at 5% of Duncan test. Foliar spray treatment Number of fruits plant-1 Fruit yield (g plant-1) Fruit firmness (kg cm2) Fruit weight loss (%) Control (d-water) 19.7±2.7 a 2210.7±253 b 1.24±0.16 a 5.15±0.83 b Ammonium sulfate 17.2±2.6 b 1824.5±218 c 1.32±0.10 a 12.25±2.04 a Urea 19.0±2.2 a 1896.0±230 c 1.23±0.21 a 6.35±0.79 b Calcium nitrate 20.2±2.2 a 2994.5±306 a 1.38±0.11 a 5.40±1.01 b Table 4 - Mean values of fruit TSS, fruit TA, fruit pH, and fruit L-ascorbic acid content in tomato under different fertilization Plants were grown in Hoagland nutrient solution for 17 weeks. All three N sources were applied in constant concentration of 100 mM N. Data are average of 4 replications ± SD. In each column means with a common letter have no significant difference at 5% of Duncan test. Foliar spray treatment Fruit TSS (%) Fruit TA (%) Fruit pH Fruit L-ascorbic acid (mg 100 g FW-1) Control (d-water) 5.50±0.16 ab 3.75±0.13 b 3.68±0.1 a 36.8±4.1 a Ammonium sulfate 5.98±0.27 a 4.57±0.22 a 3.95±0.3 a 31.0±2.1 b Urea 5.48±0.17 ab 3.85±0.21 b 3.90±0.2 a 33.5±2.9 ab Calcium nitrate 5.35±0.18 b 3.60±0.18 b 3.78±0.2 a 37.1±3.4 a Souri et al. - Tomato plant growth, leaf nutrient concentrations and fruit quality under N-foliar applications 45 ed with foliar spray of ammonium sulfate (Table 3). Fruit TSS was also highest in ammonium sulfate treated plants and the significant lowest fruit TSS was in calcium nitrate treated plants (Table 4). Similarly, fruit titrateable acidity values (TA) unchanged in urea and calcium nitrate treated plants compared to con- trol, however sprays of ammonium sulfate resulted in significant higher amounts of fruit TA (Table 4). Fruit juice pH was not affected by foliar sprays of nitrogen sources (Table 4). The significant highest L-ascorbic acid concentration was in calcium nitrate treated plants and control plants, while the significant lowest L-ascorbic acid was in ammonium sulfate treated plants (Table 4). 4. Discussion and Conclusions The results showed that many growth and produc- tivity traits of tomato plants were significantly affect- ed by spray of N sources. Plant biomass production and its different parameters including plant height, leaf area, number of lateral shoots, fresh and dry weight were significantly reduced by both ammoni- um sulfate and to less extent by urea treatments, while calcium nitrate sprays resulted in improvement of all these growth parameters compared to AS and urea treatments. Reduction in growth parameters of tomato due to foliar application of various concentration of ammo- nium sulfate have been reported by Dehnavard et al. (2017). On the other hand, tomato is a distinct sensi- tive plant to ammonium nutrition particularly under hydroponic culture (Loqué and von Wirén, 2004; Souri and Roemheld, 2009). In present study, despite plants were fed by nitrate in nutrient solution; how- ever foliar application of ammonium forms of nitro- g e n ( a m m o n i u m s u l f a t e a n d u r e a ) r e s u l t e d i n reduced growth of plants. Foliar absorption of nitro- gen cannot be restricted by root medium N status, as there is always plant affinity to absorb nitrogen (Marschner, 2011; Dehnavard et al., 2017). Foliar spray of ammonium sulfate in concentration of 100 and 200 mM with weekly application was resulted in significant growth restriction and less biomass pro- duction of tomato plants (Dehnavard et al., 2017), while sprays of 50 mM improved tomato plant growth parameters, probably due to the fact that applied ammonium concentration and corresponding absorption was not in stressful level, but rather favored better photosynthesis and plant growth. Daily foliar application of urea as the sole N source for tomato seedlings improved seedlings growth (Nicouloud and Bloom, 1996). Despite the tomato tis- sue concentrations of ammonium increases signifi- cantly in 12-24 hour after foliar urea application (Nicouloud and Bloom, 1996), however from various studies it seems that plants can tolerate urea sprays better than ammonium sulfate (Souri and Roemheld, 2009). Metabolism of malate and excretion of pro- tons play important role in maintaining pH during ammonium assimilation in the shoot following ammonium sprays (Peuke et al., 1998). Urea in fre- quent applications and higher levels may have toxici- ty to plants (Bowman and Paul, 1992). However, although foliar spray of urea is common in some crops, but its physiological effects varies with season, cultivar and concentration (Bowman and Paul, 1992; Fageria et al., 2009). In addition, it has been reported that foliar spray of urea compared to ammonium and nitrate may has less damage to leaves (Bowman and Paul, 1992). The absorption rate of urea is generally higher than calcium nitrate and ammonium sulfate in foliar spray (Bowman and Paul, 1992; Fageria et al., 2009). However, within the tissues urea breakdowns to ammonium ions that similar to ammonium uptake can result in some toxicities (but with lesser extent) and restricted plant growth traits. SPAD values and leaf N concentration in ammonium sulfate treated plants were significantly higher com- pared to control and calcium nitrate sprayed plants. There are few studies reporting the effects of foliar application of nitrogen sources on vegetable crops. Urea has been mainly used in one or limited applica- tions with no negative side effect on plant growth (Fageria et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2009). Higher leaf SPAD value by ammonium sprays could be mainly due to higher chlorophyll concentration induced by restricted leaf expansion and higher N concentrations (Souri and Roemheld, 2009; Dehnavard et al., 2017). The effect of foliar applications of ammonium sulfate and urea on chlorophyll readings in this study is in agreement with the results of foliar ammonium application on tomato (Dehnavard et al., 2017), and urea spray on broccoli (Yildirim et al., 2007) and onion (Charbaji et al., 2008). Ammonium spray prob- ably by restriction of leaf area expansion has resulted in higher leaf N concentrations. In addition, ammoni- um absorption can take place by many nutrient spe- cific and unspecific transporters, which results in less plant cell control over ammonium uptake and trans- port within the tissues (Souri and Roemheld, 2009). It seems that chlorophyll biosynthesis is less sensi- tive to ammonium rather than other leaf parameters Adv. Hort. Sci., 2018 32(1): 41-47 46 such as leaf cell expansion and cell division, root and shoots growth and protein biosynthesis. It has been shown that foliar application of urea or soil applica- tion of a stabilized ammonium fertilizer (ENTEC) can significantly increase N concentrations of leaves and root in carrot (Smoleń and Sady, 2009) and tomato (Souri and Roemheld, 2009) with less nitrate content. Three foliar sprays of urea with 3 days interval on onion plants showed that bulb fresh and dry weight were increased by urea levels to 5000 mg L-1 without any damage to leaves (Charbaji, et al., 2008). The best quality parameters of dry weight, total soluble sugars, vitamin C and low nitrate content in the cab- bage leaves were achieved by foliar versus soil appli- cation of fertilizers (Atanasova et al., 2007). Foliar application of ammonium and then urea sig- nificantly reduced nitrate reductase activity of toma- to leaves (Table 2). This can be a negative factor when nitrate is actively taken up by plant roots and due to low activity of this enzyme most of nitrate accumulate in vacuoles resulting in higher nitrate accumulation in leaves and probably in fruits. Tomato plant yield was significantly reduced by ammonium sprays, while it was increased by calcium nitrate treatment. This ammonium effect could be d u e t o r e s t r i c t e d v e g e t a t i v e g r o w t h , r e d u c e d hydraulic conductance, phloem translocation and less fruit set, while calcium nitrate had no effect on fruit number but it increased the average fruit weight resulted in higher yield compared to control. Foliar nitrogen application generally increase plant yield. The maximum increase in marketable yield in cab- bage, onion, and cucumber using supplementary foliar N fertilization was 20.3%, 10.8% and 7.3%, respectively (Kolata and Osinska, 1999). Foliar fertil- ization significantly decreased the level of cucumber leaf infestation by downy mildew disease (Kolata and Osinska, 1999). C h a n g e s i n f r u i t q u a l i t y t r a i t s a r e g e n e r a l l y observed due to foliar N applications. In this study increase in fruit TSS by ammonium spray can be due to higher chlorophyll content of leaves and higher photosynthetic rates. It is probably feasible that foliar sprays of ammonium induced stress signals leading plant to have more fruit sugars and TSS con- tent. Guvenc et al. (1995) reported that foliar urea application improved some quality (Vitamin C and Titratable acidity) and growth properties of tomato. In onion plants foliar spray of urea increased N, P, K and Ca concentration of leaves that resulted in high- er photosynthesis and sugar production; however, other nutrients were not affected (Charbaji et al., 2008). Similar results in carrot were found by foliar application of nitrogen sources (Smoleń and Sady, 2009). In present study, ammonium spray reduced vitamin C content of fruits. This can be due to stress condi- tions induced by foliar ammonium spray and less hydraulic conductance of plant tissues (Souri and Roemheld, 2009). Changes in quality parameters of tomato by foliar nitrogen sprays are in agreement w i t h s i m i l a r s t u d i e s o n o t h e r v e g e t a b l e c r o p s (Guvenc et al., 1995; Chaurasia et al., 2005; Yildirim et al., 2007; Dehnavard et al., 2014), which showed that increasing nitrogen application reduced the vita- min C content. In addition, foliar application of nitro- gen compounds can significantly improve plants tol- erate to heat stress (Zhao et al., 2008). Foliar N appli- cation can improve plant growth parameters of dry weight, relative water content and nitrate reductase activity under moderate water stress particularly with drought sensitive varieties (Zhang et al., 2009). In this experiment, foliar application of ammonium sulfate and to less extent urea reduced normal plant growth and some quality traits, while calcium nitrate generally improved tomato growth and some quality factors. However, calcium nitrate can increase nitrate content of fruits that is not suitable, and therefore is not recommended in repeated applications. Spray of ammonium sulfate increased fruit TSS and titrateable acidity while it decreased vitamin C and fruit posthar- vest freshness. So, restricted growth through lower height and less lateral shoots in ammonium foliar sprayed plants may suggest benefits regarding labor requirement for plant pruning-training and manage- ment under greenhouse production of tomatoes. In a d d i t i o n , b y f o l i a r N a p p l i c a t i o n ( p a r t i c u l a r l y Ammonium sulfate and urea) less soil salinity and less nitrate accumulation occur. Nevertheless, it is revealed that tomato still show sensitivity to ammo- nium nutrition through the foliage similar to root ammonium nutrition via nutrient solution. References ATANASOVA E., MITOVA I., DIMITROV I., STANCHEVA I., 2007 - Effect of different fertilizer sources on the quali- ty of head cabbage. - J. Appl. Hort., 9(1): 74-76. BOWMAN D.C., PAUL J.L., 1992 - Foliar absorption of urea, ammonium, and nitrate by perennial ryegrass turf. - J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 117: 75-79. CHARBAJI T., ARABI M.I.E., JAWHAR M., 2008 - Urea foliar fertilization affects onion weight and nutrient content. - Inter. J. Vegetable Sci., 14(3): 198-204. Souri et al. - Tomato plant growth, leaf nutrient concentrations and fruit quality under N-foliar applications 47 CHAURASIA S.N.S., SINGH K.P., RSI M., 2005 - Effect of foliar application of water soluble fertilizers on growth, yield, and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). - Sri Lankan J. Agric. Sci., 42: 66-70. D E H N A V A R D S . , S O U R I M . K . , M A R D A N L U S . , 2 0 1 4 - Qualitative parameters of tomato fruits affected by foliar application of nitrogen in hydroponic culture. - Iranian J. Plant and Seed, 30(2): 237-240. D E H N A V A R D S . , S O U R I M . K . , M A R D A N L U S . , 2 0 1 7 - Tomato growth responses to foliar application of ammonium sulfate in hydroponic culture. - J. Plant Nutr., 40(3): 315-323. FAGERIA N.K., BARBOSAFILHO M.P., MOREIRA A., GUIMAR C.M., 2009 - Foliar fertilization of crop plant. - J. Plant Nutr., 32: 1044-1064. GUVENC I., PADEM H., ALAN R., 1995 - Effect of foliar application of different levels of urea on yield and yield component of tomatoes. - II. Turkey Nat. Hort. Symp., Adana, Turkey. KOLOTA E., OSINSKA M., 1999 - Efficiency of foliar nutrition of field vegetables grown at different nitrogen rates. - I n t e r . C o n f . E n v i r o n . P r o b l e m s A s s o c i a t e d w i t h Nitrogen Fertilization of Field Grown Vegetable Crops, 563: 87-91. LOQUÉ D., VON WIRÉN N., 2004 - Regulatory levels for the transport of ammonium in plant roots. - J. Exp. Bot., 55: 1293-1305. MARSCHNER H., 2011 - Mineral nutrition of higher plants. 3rd Edition - Academic Press, London, UK, pp. 676. NICOULOUD B.A.L., BLOOM A.J., 1996 - Absorption and assimilation of foliarly applied urea in tomato. - J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 121(6): 1117-1121. PEUKE A.D., JESCHKE W.D., DIETZ K.J., SCHREIBER L., HAR- TUNG W., 1998 - Foliar application of nitrate or ammo- nium as sole nitrogen supply in Ricinus communis L. Carbon and nitrogen uptake and inflows. - New Phytol., 138(4): 675-687. SMOLEŃ S., SADY W., 2009 - The effect of various nitrogen fertilization and foliar nutrition regimes on the concen- trations of nitrates, ammonium ions, dry matter and N- total in carrot (Daucus carota L.) roots. - Scientia Hortic., 119(3): 219-231. SOURI M.K., 2010 - Effectiveness of chloride compared to 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate on nitrification inhibi- tion in soil. - Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 41(14): 1769-1778. SOURI M.K., ROEMHELD V., 2009 - Split daily application of ammonium cannot ameliorate ammonium toxicity in tomato plants. - Hort. Environ. Biotechnol., 50: 384- 391. YILDIRIM E., GUVENC I., TURAN M., KARATAS A., 2007 - Effect of foliar urea application on quality, growth, min- eral uptake and yield of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L., var. italica). - Plant Soil and Environ., 53(3): 120-128. ZHANG L., LI S., LIANG Z., LI S., 2009 - Effect of foliar nitro- gen application on nitrogen metabolism, water status, and plant growth in two maize cultivars under short- term moderate stress. - J. Plant Nutr., 32(11): 1861- 1881. ZHAO W.Y., XU S., LI J.L., CUI L.J., CHEN Y.N., WANG J.Z., 2008 - Effects of foliar application of nitrogen on the photosynthetic performance and growth of two fescue cultivars under heat stress. - Biol. Plant., 52(1): 113- 116. ZOTARELLI L., SCHOLBERG J.M., DUKES M.D., MUÑOZ- CARPENA R., ICERMAN J., 2009 - Tomato yield, biomass accumulation, root distribution and irrigation water use efficiency on a sandy soil, as affected by nitrogen rate and irrigation scheduling. - Agr. Water Manag., 96(1): 23-34.