id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
ahs-7407	Raei, Yaghoub; Sayyadi Ahmadabad, Mehdi ; Ghassemi-Golezani, Kazem ; Ghassemi, Saeid 	Pinto bean and black mustard responses to bio-fertilizers under intercropping system	2020	8	.pdf	application/pdf	5125	280	56	Source df Mean Square Pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Black mustard (Brassica nigra L.) 100 grains weight Biological yield Grain yield Harvest index 100 grains weight Biological yield Grain yield Harvest index Replication 2 72.94 3680597 1131685 2.03 0.01 1786035 157796 2.60 Cropping pattern 2 79.10 ** 40310058 ** 9924157 ** 0.70 NS 0.01 NS 122550980 ** 1961700 ** 5.77 NS Fertilizer (F) 3 140.98 ** 37336605 ** 9970014 ** 17.55 NS 0.14 * 24340924 ** 832223 ** 2.44 NS C × F 6 4.78 NS 989636 NS 236278 NS 6.49 NS 0.17 ** 8957965 NS 11308 NS 6.06 NS Error 22 2.75 559597 133108 10.29 0.04 5045637 21412 3.77 Cv % ­ 5.23 16.85 16.27 6.40 4.46 17.12 8.53 14.59 Raei et al. ‐ Pinto bean and black mustard intercropping and bio‐fertilizersn 179 cantly increased the field performance of these plants (Table 3, Fig. 1), followed by bio­fertilizers + 50% chemical fertilizer. Application of bio­fertilizers and chemical fertilizer increased most of the agronomic traits in pinto bean and black mustard plants.	cache/ahs-7407.pdf	txt/ahs-7407.txt