Impaginato 217 Adv. Hort. Sci., 2021 35(3): 217­231 DOI: 10.36253/ahsc­10706 Punica granatum L. extract contributes to phytopathogens control and enhances Eruca vesicaria (L.) Cav. germination in vitro and in vivo S. de Sousa Silva 1, P.C.S. Alves 2, D.F. Coutinho 3, T.R.S.A. Luz 3, G.M.G. Fontoura 4, A.A. Berretta 5, M.C. Gonçalves Maciel 6 (*) 1 Departamento de Ciências Naturais, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Estrada Pinheiro/Pacas, Km 10, s/n, Enseada, 65200‐000 Pinheiro, Maranhão, Brazil. 2 Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Programa de Pós‐Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Cidade Universitária do Bacanga, Avenida dos Portugueses, 1966, 65080‐805 São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil. 3 Departamento de Farmácia, Laboratório de Farmacognosia II, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Cidade Universitária do Bacanga, Avenida dos Portugueses, 1966, 65080‐805 São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil. 4 Laboratório de Imunofisiologia, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Cidade Universitária do Bacanga, Avenida dos Portugueses, 1966, 65080‐805 São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil. 5 Laboratory of Research, Development and Innovation, Apis Flora Indl. Coml. Ltda., Rua Triunfo, 945, Santa Cruz, 14020‐670 Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil. 6 Departamento de Biologia Celular, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Brasília, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Bloco E s/n 1° andar ‐ Asa Norte, 70910‐900, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil. Key words: antimicrobial, botanical pesticides, food security, plant diseases, pomegranate peel, punicalagin. Abstract: The study aimed to investigate antimicrobial activity of the hydroal­ coholic crude extract from the fruit peel of Punica granatum (Pp) and punicala­ gin compound (Pg) on phytopathogenic bacterial isolates and its potential use as a sustainable alternative in treatment of vegetable seeds. The antimicrobial activity in vitro was tested by agar well diffusion assay and through viability tests in liquid medium. In vivo treatment with Pp was tested on Eruca vesicaria seeds infected with Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. Pp induced the formation of large inhibition zones to the growth of the tested pathogens (35.33 mm ­ 6.66 mm), with dose­dependent effect. Viability tests confirmed the antimicrobial activity of the Pp on X. campestris pv. campestris and P. caro‐ tovorum subsp. carotovorum with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 125 μg/mL. Punicalagin compound presented MIC of the 31.25 μg/mL. The seed treatment with Pp indicated control of pathogen­induced symptoms in seedlings of the E. vesicaria and positive effect in seed germination, emergence and in stomatal functionality. The results indicate strong potential of the extract from the fruit peel of P. granatum and Punicalagin for formulating botanical pesticides for plant disease control. (*) Corresponding author: macielmcg@gmail.com Citation: DE SOUSA SILVA S., ALVES P.C.S., COUTINHO D.F., LUZ T.R.S.A., FONTOURA G.M.G., BERRETTA A.A., GONÇALVES MACIEL M.C., 2021 ­ Punica grana‐ tum L. extract contributes to phytopathogens control and enhances Eruca vesicaria (L.) Cav. germination in vitro and in vivo. ­ Adv. Hort. Sci., 35(3): 217­231. Copyright: © 2021 De Sousa Silva S., Alves P.C.S., Coutinho D.F., Luz T.R.S.A., Fontoura G.M.G., Berretta A.A., Gonçalves Maciel M.C. This is an open access, peer reviewed article published by Firenze University Press (http://www.fupress.net/index.php/ahs/) and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Received for publication 20 March 2021 Accepted for publication 26 May 2021 AHS Advances in Horticultural Science https://doi.org/10.36253/ahsc-10706 http://www.fupress.net/index.php/ahs/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Adv. Hort. Sci., 2021 35(3): 217­231 218 1. Introduction According to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations estimates, by 2050 the world population should exceed 9.5 billion inhabitants, rais­ ing the demand for food by up to 60% (FAO, 2016). Plants account for 80% of food ingested in the human diet, providing affordable, safe and nutritious resources for a healthy life. However, pests and dis­ eases pose a threat to food security, due to damage caused to crops that compromises access to food and rises product prices (FAO, 2017). Phytopathogenic bacteria causes a large number of different plant diseases, some of which are devas­ tating to agricultural crops (Van Der Wolf and De Boer, 2015). Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith) (Yabuuchi et al., 1995) stands out as one of most destructive pathogens due to the rapid development of wilting symptoms and death of host plants (Yuliar et al., 2015). The pathogen affects a large range of host plants, comprising almost 450 species from 54 different botanical families (Allen et al., 2005). Direct losses in important crops are estimated in 0 to 91% (tomatoes) and in 33 to 90% in potatoes (Elphinstone, 2005). The bacterium Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Pammel) Dowson is a vas­ cular (Ryan et al., 2011) and seed­born (Griesbach et al., 2003) pathogen which is distributed worldwide. Infested seeds may emerge in young seedlings infect­ ed by the pores on the margin of the cotyledons. This pathogen causes black rot disease, which seriously affects Brassicaceae (Cruciferous) crops (Vicente and Holub, 2013), important food items grown worldwide (Gupta et al., 2013). Finally, Pectobacterium is widely studied soft­rot bacterial pathogen causing infections in potato crops and stored tubers, reducing the pro­ duction and quality of tubers (Adeolu et al., 2016). Ralstonia solanacearum, X. campestris and P. caro‐ tovorum have been included among the 10 most important bacterial pathogens of the plants accord­ ing to their economic and scientific impact (Mansfield et al., 2012). Control of bacterial diseases in conventional agri­ culture often uses fast­acting synthetic pesticides and antimicrobials (Kotan et al., 2014). According to national phytosanitary pesticide database (AGROFIT, 2016), substances unsafe to the environment like kasugamycin, cuprous oxide, copper hydroxide and ‘extremely toxics’ like benzalkonium chloride were registered for control of soft rot P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum in potatoes. Pesticides indicated for control of bacterial wilt caused by R. solanacearum like Bismerthiazol and Thiodiazole cop­ per have shown low efficacy, high phytotoxicity, harmful environmental effects and bacterial resis­ tance development (Yang and Bao, 2017). Cultural practices like the use of pathogen­free seeds is recommended to prevent black rot disease in crops (Chitarra et al., 2002). If pathogen­free seed is not available, seed should be treated to eliminate the bacteria. However, seed treatments do not always eliminate 100% of bacteria on or in the seed, and may adversely affect seed germination and vigor (Celetti and Callow, 2002). The need to reduce chemical pesticide use in crops, associated with demands for healthy food and development of sustainable agriculture, has driven research for natural compounds with low impact on the environment and on people health (Jiménez­ Reyes et al., 2019). The secondary metabolism of the plants produces many bioactive compounds that pro­ vide protection against pests and pathogens (Borges et al., 2018). Unlike synthetic pesticides, natural com­ pounds exhibit rapid biodegradation after use in the field (Soberón et al., 2014), little or no phytotoxicity, abundant sources and low costs, since they come from a renewable source (Zheng et al., 2016). Thus, medicinal plant uses with antimicrobial activity can be considered an effective component in the inte­ grated management against phytopathogens (Khan et al., 2020). Punica granatum L. (Pomegranate) is a plant of the Lythraceae family, native from central Asia (northern India to Iran), nowadays cultivated in sever­ al parts of the world, including Africa and America (Viuda­Martos et al., 2010; Erkan and Dogan, 2018). The fruit of Pomegranate (called balausta) is a pulp berry formed by a thick and leathery skin with vari­ able color depending on the variety. The seeds are a reproductive structure that present a fleshy outer testa called sarcotesta where the juice is extracted (Melgarejo et al., 2020). The production, marketing and consumption of pomegranate fruit have increased rapidly throughout the world in recent years, mainly due to greater awareness of their health­promoting attributes (Selcuk and Erkan, 2015). The peel of P. granatum represents 30 to 40% of the fruit, being usually discarded as waste during industrial processing for the production of pome­ granate juice (Gullon et al., 2016). However, this part of the fruit is rich in phenolic acids, tannins (such as punicalin and punicalagin) and flavonoids with vari­ De Sousa Silva et al. ‐ Punica granatum L. extract acts in phytopathogen control and Eruca vesicaria (L.) Cav. germination 219 ous biological functions, including activity against pathogenic microorganisms (Dey et al., 2012; Türkyılmaz et al., 2013). Punicalagin compound is an important bioactive agent found in pomegranate fruit peel, with antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiviral and immunosuppressive activity. The compound belongs to the ellagitannin family which includes other tannins such as punicalin and gallic acid, char­ acterized by good water solubility (Akhtar et al., 2015). In the last years several studies have evidenced the antimicrobial activity of the pomegranate extract against many species of the plant pathogenic fungi suggesting high potential source of natural antifungal agents (Mohamad and Khalil, 2015; Balah and Nowra, 2016; Elsherbiny et al., 2016; Li Destri Nicosia et al., 2016; Rongai et al., 2017; Karm, 2019; El Khetabi et al., 2020). However, few studies have investigated the antimicrobial activity of the pome­ granate extract against phytopathogenic bacteria (Quattrucci et al., 2013; Farag et al., 2015; Khaleel et al., 2016). Khaleel et al. (2016) have indicated in vitro antimicrobial activity of the ethyl acetate pomegran­ ate peel extract against R. solanacearum, P. caro‐ tovorum subsp. carotovorum and X. gardineri and Farag et al. (2015) highlighted notable in vitro antimi­ crobial activities from the methanol pomegranate peel extract against variety of temperate climate (race 3, biovar 2) of the R. solanacearum. Despite this, the knowledge about the antimicrobial activity of the hidroalcoholic extract of P. granantum and iso­ late compounds against these pathogens is scarce. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the in vitro antimicrobial activity of hydroalcoholic crude extract from the fruit peel of the P. granatum and Punicalagin compound on isolates of phytopathogen­ ic bacteria. The potential of the extract for natural control of X. campestris pv. campestris as an sustain­ able alternative for treatment of vegetable seeds was assayed. 2. Materials and Methods Bacterial Isolates The bacterial isolates were provided by the collec­ tion of the São Paulo Biological Institute ­ São Paulo, Brazil (X. campestris pv. campestris, Isolate No. Xcc2149) and Rosa Mariano Culture Collection of the Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Brazil (R. solanacearum, Isolate No. CCRMRs187, race 3, biovar 1; and P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, Isolate No. CCRMPcc36). Agar medium of 523 Kado & Hesket was used as a culture medium for maintenance of the microbial cultures before antimicrobial tests. Hydroalcoholic crude extract from the fruit peel of the P. granatum and pure compound The hydroalcoholic crude extract from the fruit peel of the P. granatum (Pp) was supplied by Apis Flora®. The hydroalcoholic crude extract was concen­ trated under low pressure, dried and the remainder was later lyophilized. For the experiments, the lyophilized dry residue was diluted in an isotonic phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The Pp was concen­ trated under reduced pressure. Pure Punicalagin (Pg) compound was purchased from Sigma­Aldrich Brazil Ltda (P0023, 1 mg, Batch: WXBC5016V), ≥98% (HPLC), of pomegranate, C48H28O30, molecular weight of 1084.72. Chemical characterization of the hydroalcoholic crude extract from the fruit peel of the P. granatum Total phenolic compounds. For determination of total phenolics an analytical curve of tannic acid (Sigma­Aldrich) was carried out. Pomegranate extract was prepared in 50 mL volumetric flask using water as solvent. The samples were homogenized and, the flasks were brought to the ultrasonic bath for 30 min­ utes. A 0.5 mL aliquot was transferred to another 50 mL flask where 2.5 mL of Folin­Denis reagent and 5.0 mL of 29% sodium carbonate were added. The sam­ ples were protected from the light and the readings were performed after 30 minutes in a UV­Vis spec­ trophotometer at 760 nm (Fernandes et al., 2018). All samples were analyzed in triplicate. Ellagic acid. Ellagic acid (EA) was acquired from Fluka (95.0%, Batch BCBN4398V). The High­ Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) grade methanol was supplied by J.T. Baker (Mexico City, Mexico), and purified water was obtained using a Milli­Q Direct Q­5 filter system (Millipore, Bedford, USA). The analytical grade acetic acid was purchased from Synth (Labsynth, Diadema, Brazil). To determine the ellagic acid content (EAC), the extracts previously diluted in methanol were proper­ ly homogenate using a vortex and then remained for 30 minutes in ultrasound bath. The solution was fil­ tered and subjected to HPLC analysis (Shimadzu apparatus equipped with a CBM controller, LC­20AT quaternary pump, a SPD­M 20A diode­array detector and auto sampler, Shimadzu LC solution software, Adv. Hort. Sci., 2021 35(3): 217­231 220 version 1.21 SP1) using a 100 mm x 2.6 mm Shim pack ODS C18 column. The mobile phase used for ellagic acid was methanol and acetic acid aqueous solution 2% using a elution gradient (0­7 min, 20­72.5% v/v methanol, 7­7.5 min, 72.5­95% v/v methanol, 7.5­8.5 min. 95% v/v methanol, 8.5­9 min 95­20% v/v methanol, 9­10 min 20% v/v methanol) with a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1, and oven temperature of 25°C. The eluted samples were detected by UV detector at 254 nm. Calibration curve was constructed by plotting the peak area (y) against concentration in μg mL−1 of standard solutions (x). The standard equation obtained from the curve was used for quantification of ellagic acid as mg/g extract of sample. All assays were carried out in triplicates and the ellagic acid quantification was reported. Determination of antimicrobial activity The Pp was assayed for antibacterial activity at different concentrations using a standard agar­well diffusion assay (CLSI, 2012). Suspensions of bacteria strains (1.5 x 108 CFU/mL) were spread using swabs over the 523 Kado & Hesket agar media in sterilized Petri dishes. Then, wells with a diameter of 6 mm were punched aseptically and 25 μL of Pp at different concentrations were introduced into each well (100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25 and 3.125 mg/mL, solubilized in an isotonic phosphate buffered saline (PBS). All plates were incubated at 28°C for 48 hours. Measures of the zones around the wells (mm) were recorded as inhibition zone for Pp. Streptomycin sulfate (500 µg/ml, P. carotovorum subsp . carotovorum) (Pachupate and Kininge, 2013) and oxytetracyclin hydrochloride (Terramicin®) (30 μg/mL, X. campestris pv. campestris and R. solanacearum) (Santos et al., 2008) were used as positive control. The isotonic phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was used as negative control. All tests were performed in six replicates. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were performed in 96­well micro­plates (Eloff, 1998) using serial dilutions of Pp (500; 250; 125; 62.5; 31.25 μg/mL) and Pg (250; 125; 62.5; 31.25 μg/mL). Hundred microliters of Pp or Pg diluted in liquid cul­ ture medium and the tested microorganism suspen­ sions (1.5 x 105 colony­forms unity CFU/well). After incubation (28°C for 24 h), the content of each well was sown in Petri dishes with agar culture medium. The Petri dishes were incubated for 48 hours at 28°C to account for the colony­forms unity (CFU). To indi­ cate viable bacteria cells in the microplate, 10 μL of thiazolyl blue (tetrazolium salt 3­(4.5­dimethylthia­ zol­2­yl)­2.5­diphenyltetrazolium bromide) reagent were added to the microplate wells and incubated at 28°C for 1­3 h (Mosmann, 1983). The color change produced in reaction was measured in a spectropho­ tometer (540 nm) and the values were correlated to the viable bacteria cells in the microplate. MIC was measured as the lowest concentration necessary to inhibit growth of the tested pathogen. Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) was considered as the minimum concentration in which no growth was visually observed in Petri dishes with solid medium, with 99.99% of eradication of the initial inoculum (De Nova et al., 2019). The concentration of the Pp and Pg that inhibited the growth of half of the inoculum was estimated as the inhibitory concentration 50 (IC50) (Soothill et al., 1992), represented as Log (inhibitor) versus normalized absorbance (%) (dose­ response inhibition model). Streptomycin sulfate (500 μg/mL) and oxytetracycline hydrochloride (30 μg/mL) were used as positive control and isotonic phosphate buffered saline (PBS). All tests were per­ formed in four replicates. Effect of Hydroalcoholic crude extract from the fruit peel of the P. granatum on X. campestris pv . campestris control in seeds Seeds of the Eruca vesicaria (L.) Cav. (Feltrin®, cultivated arugula variety, germination from 7 to 10 days) were purchased from a local market. Seeds were disinfected and coated with pathogenic bacte­ ria according standard protocol (Kotan et al., 2014). Seeds coated with pathogen were directly soaked in treatments consisting in: 1 ­ Pp suspension (500 µg/mL or 250 µg/mL) or 2 ­ association between Pp (500 µg/mL or 250 µg/mL) and antibiotic (strepto­ mycin sulfate, 500 µg/ml) for 3 hours. The seeds were left to dry on sterile Whatman filter paper sheets overnight in laminar flow hood. The seeds were sown in plastic pots containing garden soil and sand (1:1) totaling thirty seeds per treatment (ten seeds/pot). Other part of the seeds was transferred to Petri dishes with Whatman paper filter placed on the bottom (moistened with 10 mL of sd. H2O) total­ ing thirty seeds per treatment (ten seeds/plate). The percentage of germination and seedling emergence was determined 10­12 days after sowing. E. vesicaria seedlings were assessed 18 days after emergence to determine the appearance of symptoms of disease (Vicente and Holub, 2013) and survival rate. After this, the seedlings were removed from the substrate for assessment of the effect of the extract in growth promotion. Antibiotic (streptomycin sulfate at 500 De Sousa Silva et al. ‐ Punica granatum L. extract acts in phytopathogen control and Eruca vesicaria (L.) Cav. germination 221 µg/ml), disinfected seeds infected with pathogen, and sterilized seeds not infected with pathogen (healthy) were used as controls. All tests were per­ formed in triplicates. Anatomical analysis Eruca vesicaria (L.) Cav. seedling samples leaves were preserved in fixative solution FAA (Formaldehyde, Glacial Acetic Acid, 95% EtOH) (Johansen, 1940). To prepare the samples, leaves were sectioned in transverse and paradermic sections using disposable razors. Leaf diaphanization was per­ formed according to the standardized technique (Kraus and Arduin, 1997) and stained with safranin and Astra blue solutions, both at 0.5%. Semi­perma­ nent slides were analyzed with optical microscope to visualize the adaxial epidermis, abaxial epidermis, pal­ isade parenchyma, spongy parenchyma, stomatal density and stomatal morphology. Stomatal density (D) was calculated as D= number of stomata/(40x objective ocular area) (mm2) (Abdulrahaman et al., 2009). Public domain software ImageJ 1.43a version 64 (Schneider et al., 2012) was used to obtain stom­ atal measures of the polar diameter (PD) (µm), equa­ torial diameter (QD) (µm) and stomatal area (A) (µm2) to each treatment. Stomatal functionality (FUN) was calculated as FUN=polar diameter (µm)/equatorial diameter (µm) of the stomata (De Castro et al., 2009). Statistical analysis Results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviations. To determine difference between sam­ ples, one­way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test and Student’s t test were performed at p<0.05. Inhibitory concentration 50 (IC50) was performed by Nonlinear Regression analysis (dose­response inhibi­ tion model) with 95% profile likelihood. All analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism® v. 8.0 software. 3. Results Chemical characterization of the hydroalcoholic crude extract from the fruit peel of the P. granatum The results demonstrated that Pp possessed 6.34 mg/g of ellagic acid and 0.83 g/g of total phenolic as tannic acid. HPLC chromatogram was performed focused on ellagic acid, and the fingerprint is present­ ed in figure 1. In vitro antimicrobial activity of the hydroalcoholic crude extract from the fruit peel of the P. granatum Hydroalcoholic crude extract from the fruit peel of the P. granatum (Pp) was tested for its antimicrobial properties against phytopathogenic bacteria. Pp pro­ duced bacterial growth inhibition zones for all three investigated isolates (Table 1 and Fig. 2). The highest mean values of inhibition zones were verified for R. solanacearum , followed by X. campestris pv . campestris and P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum. There was an increase of the inhibition zone pro­ duced as the increase of the P. granatum extract con­ Table 1 ­ In vitro inhibition zone produced by treatment with Punica granatum L. hydroalcoholic extract (Pp) against isolates of the phytopathogenic bacteria Data were represented as mean ± standard deviation for six repli­ cations. ND= No detected of inhibition zone. # Control with anti­ biotics streptomycin sulfate for P. carotovorum subsp. Carotovorum and oxytetracyclin hydrochloride (Terramicin®) for X. campestris pv. Campestris and R. solanacearum. The values followed by different letters (a­m) along each column are significantly different according to ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test (p<0.05). Fig. 1 ­ HPLC chromatogram of ellagic acid in Punica granatum extract (Pp). The extract was characterized considering the content of ellagic acid and the total phenolic as tan­ nic acid by HPLC chromatography performed focused on ellagic acid. The mobile phase used for ellagic acid was methanol and acetic acid aqueous solution [2% ­ and elu­ tion gradient (0­7min, 20­72.5% v/v methanol, 7­7.5 min, 72.5­95% v/v methanol, 7.5­8.5 min. 95% v/v methanol, 8.5­9 min 95­20% v/v methanol, 9­10 min 20% v/v methanol)], flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1, and oven tempe­ rature of 25°C ­100 mm x 2.6 mm Shim pack ODS C18 column. The eluted samples were detected by UV detec­ tor at 254 nm. Concentrations (mg mL­1) Inhibition zones (mm)* R. solanacearum X. campestris pv. campestris P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum Control# 42.83±1.4 a 45.03±0.6 f 35.17±0.75 j 100 35.33±1.2 b 28.83±0.7 g 22.67±0.51 k 50 31.17±2.1 b 26.33±0.8 g 20.00±0.89 k 25 25.67±1.8 c 23.0±1.0 g 16.67±1.03 l 12.5 22.17±2.6 c 19.5±0.5 g 10.17±5.11 m 6.25 16.0±2 d 15.67±1.3 h ND 3.12 6.66±5.2 e 9.66±4.9 i ND 222 Adv. Hort. Sci., 2021 35(3): 217­231 centration (dose­dependent effect) (Table 1). In vitro antimicrobial activity through the microdilu‐ tion test Microdilution assays indicated susceptibility of the bacterial isolates P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum and X. campestris pv. campestris to several concen­ trations of the Pp (Fig. 3 A­E and 4 A­E) and Pg (Fig. 3 B­E and 4 B­E). Were made tests with different con­ centrations of the Pp (500 to 31.25 μg/mL) to verify cell viability of the bacteria in comparision with nega­ tive control and antibiotic. Bacteria in the negative control remained with high celular viability. In the groups treated with Pp in the highest concentrations (500 and 125 μg/mL) there was a reduction of the cell viability of the both bacteria in relation to the negative control (Fig. 3 A­C and 4 A­C). The antimicro­ bial effect of the Pp in concentrations of 500 and 250 μg/mL for X. campestris pv. campestris was similar to antibiotic and different of the negative control (Fig. 4 A­B). Concerning to P. carotovorum subsp. carotovo‐ rum, the antimicrobial effect of the Pp in concentra­ tion of 500 μg/mL was similar to antibiotic and diffe­ rent of the negative control (Fig. 3 A).The smallest concentrations of the Pp (62.5 and 31.25 μg/mL) did not produce any antimicrobial effect in cell viability Fig. 2 ­ In vitro antimicrobial activity of Punica granatum L. hydroalcoholic extract (Pp) against isolates of phyto­ pathogenic bacteria. Bacterial growth in Petri dishes with solid medium in agar­well diffusion assay. A) R. solana‐ cearum; B) X. campestris pv. campestris; C) P. carotovo‐ rum subsp. carotovorum. CTRL= negative control with PBS; ATB= positive control with antibiotic. Fig. 3 ­ In vitro inhibition rates of the P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum cell viability (%) for treatments with Punica granatum L. hydroalcoholic extract (Pp) and Punicalagin compound (Pg). Each graph was accompanied of bacterial growth in Petri dishes with agar solid medium. (*) significant difference between treatments (Pp or Pg) and antibiotic (Atb); (#) significant difference between treatments (Pp or Pg) and negative control (Control) (p<0.05, ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test). Each bar repre­ sents mean ± SD. De Sousa Silva et al. ‐ Punica granatum L. extract acts in phytopathogen control and Eruca vesicaria (L.) Cav. germination 223 for these both pathogens (Fig. 3 D­E and 4 D­E). Antimicrobial activity of the Pg against the investi­ gated pathogens was higher than action of the Pp. The lowest concentration of the Pg that inhibits bac­ terial growth (MIC) to both P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum and X. campestris pv. campestris was 31.25 μg/mL (Fig. 3E and 4E). Punicalagin compound at the highest tested concentration (250 μg/mL) showed antibiotic­like antimicrobial activity, in terms of the cellular viability of the both pathogens (Fig. 3B and 4B). The observation of bacterial growth in cul­ ture plates with agar medium indicated that Pg in this concentration (250 μg/mL) may present bacterio­ static action for P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum (Fig. 3B) or bactericidal action to X. campestris pv. campestris (Fig. 4B). Regarding to the concentration that inhibits 50% of bacterial inoculum (IC50) Pp presented a concentra­ tion of 212 μg/mL to P. carotovorum subsp. carotovo‐ rum (Fig. 5A) and 154.6 μg/mL to X. campestris pv. campestris (Fig. 5B). The concentration of the Pg compound that inhibits 50% of bacterial inoculum (IC50) was 58.96 μg/mL to P. carotovorum subsp. Fig. 4 ­ In vitro inhibition rates of X. campestris pv. campestris cell viability (%) for treatments with Punica granatum L. hydroalcoholic extract (Pp) and Punicalagin compound (Pg). Each graph was accompanied of bacterial growth in Petri dishes with agar solid medium. (*) significant difference between treatments (Pp or Pg) and antibiotic (Atb); (#) significant difference between treat­ ments (Pp or Pg) and negative control (Control) (p<0.05, ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test). Each bar represents mean ± SD. Fig. 5 ­ Inhibitory concentration 50 (IC50) of the treatments with Punica granatum L. hydroalcoholic extract (Pp) and Punicalagin compound (Pg) against isolates of the phyto­ pathogenic bacteria. A) and B) represent inhibitory effect of the treatment with Pp on P. carotovorum subsp. caro‐ tovorum and X. campestris pv. campestris. C) and D) represent inhibitory effect of the treatment with Pg on P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum and X. campestris pv. campestris by the Nonlinear Regression (dose­response inhibition model) with 95% profile likelihood. Adv. Hort. Sci., 2021 35(3): 217­231 224 carotovorum (Fig. 5C) and 21.15 μg/mL to X. campestris pv. campestris (Fig. 5D). In vivo antimicrobial and biostimulant activity of the hydroalcoholic crude extract from the fruit peel of the P. granatum in E. vesicaria seeds infected by X. campestris pv. campestris The most effective concentrations of the Pp in microdilution assays (500 μg/mL and 250 μg/mL) were tested for the control of the X. campestris pv. campestris in E. vesicaria seeds. Infected and untreated seeds (negative control) presented a lower emergence percentage compared to healthy seeds. On the other hand, treatment of infected seeds with Pp (500 μg/mL) promoted an increase of the 15% in the percentage of emergence in relation to the nega­ tive control (Table 2). In addition, E. vesicaria seedlings treated with Pp did not develop main symptom of black rot disease caused by X. campestris pv. campestris (the “V” chlorotic lesion in the margin of the leaflet). This symptom was verified in seedlings of infected and untreated seeds. There was no phytotoxic effect of the Pp in seedlings development. Seedlings of the E. vesicaria treated with highest concentration of the Pp (500 μg/mL) showed a biggest growth length of radicle (Fig. 6). Treatment with streptomycin sulfate crude or associated with Pp resulted in seedlings with chlorosis symptom (yellowish leaves) (Fig. 7). The results of this study showed different seedling survival rates of the E. vesicaria according to each treatment (Fig. 8A­D). Infected and untreated seedlings (negative control) showed an abrupt drop in the percentage of survival at the 7th day after emergence. Seedlings treated with Pp at the highest concentration (500 μg/mL) showed slowly decrease Fig. 7 ­ Appearance of Eruca vesicaria L. (Cav.) seedlings germi­ nated in Petri dishes and in pots with different treat­ ments. Healthy seeds – uninfected seeds; Seeds with antibiotic: seeds infected with X. campestris pv. campe‐ stris and treated with streptomycin sulfate; Seeds with pomegranate extract: seeds infected and treated with Punica granatum L. hydroalcoholic extract (Pp) (500 µg/mL). Fig. 6 ­ Growth length of radicle of the Eruca vesicaria L. (Cav.) seedlings treated with Punica granatum L. hydroalcoholic extract (Pp). (A) seedlings of healthy seeds; (B) seedlings of infected with X. campestris pv. campestris and untrea­ ted seeds; (C) seedlings of seeds infected and treated with streptomycin sulfate; (D) seedlings of seeds infected and treated with Pp (500 µg/mL); (E) seedlings of seeds infected and treated with Pp (250 µg/mL); (F) seedlings of seeds infected and treated with association between Pp (500 µg/mL) and streptomycin sulfate. Table 2 ­ In vivo activity of the Punica granatum L. hydroalco­ holic extract (Pp) in germination and emergency of the Eruca vesicaria L. (Cav.) seeds infected with X. campestris pv. Campestris # Health= seeds uninfected with pathogen;*Ctrl­ = negative con­ trol (seeds infected and untreated); Ctrl+ = positive control (seeds infected treated with streptomycin sulfate); Pp= seeds infected treated with Punica granatum L. hydroalcoholic extract (Pp) at concentrations of 500 μg/mL and 250 μg/mL; Pp + Atb= association between Pp (500 μg/mL or 250 μg/mL) and antibiotic streptomycin sulfate (500 µg/mL). In each column, values follow­ ed by different letters (a­d) are significantly different according to ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test (p<0.05). Treatment* Concentration (μg/mL) Germination (%) Emergency (%) Health# ­ 93.3±5.1 a 80±0.0 b Ctrl­ ­ 93.3±5.1 a 45±5.7 c Ctrl+ 500 93.3±10.33 a 65±5.7 d Pp 500 100±0.0 a 60±11.55 d 250 93.3±5.1 a 45±5.7 d Pp + Atb 500 + 500 93.3±5.1 a 60±11.55 d 250 + 500 86.6±10.3 a 60±11.55 d De Sousa Silva et al. ‐ Punica granatum L. extract acts in phytopathogen control and Eruca vesicaria (L.) Cav. germination 225 in the percentage of survival in the same period (Fig. 8A). On the 13th day after emergence, the survival rates of the seedlings treated with Pp (500 μg/mL and 250 μg/mL) were 50% and 42%, respectively, versus 20% of the negative control (Fig. 8B). Association between Pp (500 μg/mL and 250 μg/mL) and antibiotic also promoted higher survival rates in relation to negative control in the same period (61% and 61.9%, respectively) (Fig. 8B). After 16 days of seedling emergence there were similar rates for treatment with Pp (500 μg/mL and 250 μg/mL) and treatment with association between Pp and antibiot­ ic. These percentages remained high (36%­38%) in relation to negative control (15%) (Fig. 8D). Anatomical analyses of E. vesicaria seedling leaves indicated differentiation of mesophilic structures, especially in relation to the palisade parenchyma (Fig. 9A­F). Uninfected (healthy) seedlings presented well­ preserved anatomical structures (Fig. 9A). Seedlings of the infected and untreated seeds group (negative control) showed some alterations in mesophilic tis­ sue, especially in relation to incomplete differentia­ tion of palisade parenchyma, when compared to healthy plants (Fig. 9B). Seedlings in the group previ­ ously treated with streptomycin sulfate presented altered palisade parenchyma cells in a more rounded shape (Fig. 9C). Seedlings treated with Pp at a con­ centration of 500 μg/mL showed clear differentiation of mesophilic structures, with well­structured pal­ isade parenchyma (Fig. 9D). Seedlings treated with Pp at a concentration of 250 μg/mL did not present clear differentiation of mesophilic elements (Fig. 9E). Appearance of stomata of seedlings in different treatments with Pp was represented in figure 10 (A­ F). From these images, the mean values of the fol­ Fig. 8 ­ In vivo effect of the treatment with Punica granatum L. hydroalcoholic extract (Pp) in survival rates of Eruca vesi‐ caria L. (Cav.) seedlings germinated in pots. Clean (health)= seeds uninfected with X. campestris pv. campe‐ stris; Ctrl­ = infected and untrated seeds; Ctrl+= seeds infected and treated with streptomycin sulfate; Pp 500 µg/mL and Pp 250 µg/mL= Seeds infected and treated with Punica granatum L. hydroalcoholic extract (Pp); Pp 500 µg/mL + Atb or Pp 250 µg/mL + Atb= seeds infected and treated with association between Punica granatum L. hydroalcoholic extract (Pp) and streptomycin sulfate. A) total survival rates; B) survival rates in thirteenth day; C) survival rates in fourteenth day; D) survival rates in sixteenth day. Means with (*) are different from the negative control by the Student’s t test at p<0.05. Fig. 9 ­ Cross sections of the mesophyl of Eruca vesicaria L. (Cav.) seedlings infected with the X. campestris pv. cam‐ pestris submitted to different treatments. A) Uninfected seedlings; B) seedlings infected with X. campestris pv. campestris and untrated; C) seedlings infected and trea­ ted with streptomycin sulfate; D) Seedlings infected and treated with Punica granatum L. hydroalcoholic extract (Pp) (500 µg/mL); E) Seedlings infected and treated with P. granatum L. hydroalcoholic extract (Pp) (250 µg/mL); F) Seedlings infected and treated with association between P. granatum L. hydroalcoholic extract (Pp) (500 µg/mL) and streptomycin sulfate. Epad= adaxial epidermis; Abed= abaxial epidermis; Lp= lacunous parenchyma; Pp= palisade parenchyma; Vb= vascular bundle. Adv. Hort. Sci., 2021 35(3): 217­231 226 lowing parameters were taken: polar diameter (PD), equatorial diameter (QD), stomatal functionality (FUN), area (A) and stomatal density (SD) (Table 3). Seedlings of the group treated with Pp (500 μg/mL) showed highest values of PD, FUN and A (μm2) in comparison to negative and positive control (Table 3). Stomatal functionality of the group treated with Pp (500 μg/mL) was similar to that of healthy seedlings. The highest mean of SD was verified for the group treated with Pp at a concentration of 250 μg/mL, being statistically similar to the clean group. Seedlings of the infected and untreated group showed smallest values of PD, FUN and SD. Small val­ ues of PD and FUN were observed too in seedlings treated with antibiotic (Table 3). 4. Discussion and Conclusions In the present study, the effective antimicrobial action of the P. granatum fruit peel extract and its isolated punicalagin compound on phytopathogenic bacteria (R. solanacearum, P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum and X. campestris pv. campestris), listed among the ten most important species in scientific and economic aspects worldwide (Mansfield et al., 2012), was shown . The wide zones of inhibition of bacterial growth in agar­diffusion tests and marked reduction in the percentage of the cell viability in broth microdilution assays indicate high potential of pomegranate extract in the control of these phy­ topathogens. Pomegranate peel has substantial amounts of phenolic compounds, such as hydrolysable tannins (punicalin, punicalagin, ellagic acid, and gallic acid), flavonoids (anthocyanins and catechins), and nutri­ Fig. 10 ­ Paradermic sections of the leaf blade of Eruca vesicaria L. (Cav.) seedlings submitted to different treatments. A) Uninfected seeds; B) seeds infected with X. campe‐ stris pv. campestris and untrated; C) seeds infected and treated with streptomycin sulfate; D) seeds infec­ ted and treated with Punica granatum L. hydroalcoho­ lic extract (Pp) at concentration of 500 µg/mL; E) seeds infected and treated with P. granatum L. hydroalcoho­ lic extract (Pp) at concentration of 250 µg/mL; F) seeds infected and treated with association between P. gra‐ natum L. hydroalcoholic extract (Pp) (500 µg/mL) and streptomycin sulfate. St= stomata; Ep= epidermis. Treatments Stomatal measures * PD QD FUN A (μm2 ) SD (mm2) Health 25.2±4.5 14.9±1.07 bcdef 1.71±0.3 c 302.5±21.3 def 77.7±9.8 bcdf Ctrl­ 22.9±2.3 d 18±1.2 a 1.28±0.1 ad 348.5±36.8 df 29.3±13.7 acdef Ctrl+ 21.5±2.9 df 18.2±0.8 a 1.18±0.1 ade 270±19.6 d 46.9±5.4 abed Pp 500 μg/ml 29.6±4 bcef 17.6±1.9 a 1.69±0.2 bcef 483±41.1 abce 49.1±7.6 ab Pp 250 μg/ml 22.9±1.4 d 16.7±1 a 1.37±0.01 cd 335±19.7 ad 87.2±15.8 bcd Pp 500 μg/ml +Atb 26±2.3 c 19.4±3.6 a 1.36±0.1 cd 449.8±49.2 ab 51.3±5.7 ab Table 3 ­ Stomatal measures in paradermic sections of leaves of the Eruca vesicaria L. (Cav.) submitted to different treatments Health= uninfected seedlings; Ctrl­ = infected and untreated seedlings (negative control); Ctrl+ = seedlings infected and treated with streptomycin sulfate (positive control); Pp 500 μg/mL and Pp 250 μg/mL= seedlings infected and treated with P. granatum L. hydroalco­ holic extract (Pp) at concentration of 500 μg/mL or 250 μg/mL; Pp 500 μg/mL + Atb= seedlings infected treated with P. granatum L. hydroalcoholic extract (Pp) at concentration of 500 μg/mL in association with antibiotic streptomycin sulfate (500 µg/mL). * Data were represented as mean ± standard deviation for three replications. PD= polar diameter (μm); QD= equatorial diameter (μm); FUN=­ stomatal functionality; A= stomatal area; SD= stomatal density (mm2). In each column, values followed by different letters (a­f) are significantly different according to Student’s t test (p<0.05) where: a­ comparison with health; b­comparison with Ctrl­; c­comparison with Ctrl+; d­comparison with Pp 500 μg/ml; e­comparison with Pp 250 μg/ml; f­comparison with Pp 500 μg/ml +ATB. De Sousa Silva et al. ‐ Punica granatum L. extract acts in phytopathogen control and Eruca vesicaria (L.) Cav. germination 227 ents, which are responsible for its biological activity (Magangana et al., 2020). The fruit peel has high antioxidant and antimicrobial activities and may be used as an excellent natural additive for food preser­ vation and for quality enhancement. The health­pro­ moting benefits of pomegranate peel have prompted the food industry to focus on pomegranate­peel­con­ taining food preparations, which include nutraceuti­ cals, phenolic­enriched diets, and food supplements (Opara et al., 2009; Fawole et al., 2012). The Pp showed both bacteriostatic (P. carotovo‐ rum subsp. carotovorum,) and bactericidal effect (X. campestris pv. campestris). Bactericidal effect is desirable in order to inhibit the emergence of resis­ tant bacterial strains and toxicity (Soberón et al., 2014). The study results support literature data on the antimicrobial action of the ethanolic P. granatum fruit peel extract against phytopathogenic bacteria Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, the cause of bac­ terial spot disease in tomatoes, with bacterial growth inhibition zones of 5­26 mm and dose­dependent effect (Quattrucci et al., 2013). Additionally, the results agreement with studies that reported antibac­ terial action of the methanolic pomegranate peel extract against R. solanacearum, with growth inhibi­ tion zone of the 13.9 mm (50 mg/mL), and ethyl acetate extract against R. solanacearum, P. carotovo‐ rum subsp. carotovorum and X. gardneri with inhibi­ tion zone of 8.5­22.75 mm (concentrations of 25­200 mg/mL) (Farag et al., 2015; Khaleel et al., 2016). Studies with extracts from other parts of the plant (leaf and seed) have shown more discrete antimicro­ bial activity on R. solanacearum and X. campestris (Hassan et al., 2009; Uma et al., 2012). Antimicrobial activity of the P. granatum fruit peel extract against Gram­negative and Gram­positive bacteria has been correlated with the presence of polyphenolic compounds in it, mainly punicalagin (Gullon et al., 2016). A relatively high amount of polyphenols (867 mg/g) was detected in a pomegran­ ate peel extract preparation, especially the ellagitan­ nin punicalagin (296 mg/g), with antimicrobial action of the extract on isolates of S. aureus, Escherichia coli, Aspergillus niger and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Ibrahium, 2010). The antimicrobial mechanism of action of polyphenols seems to be related to the direct action of these compounds on the bacterial cell wall by formation of complexes with wall pro­ teins, causing lysis (Akhtar et al., 2015). The interac­ tion of these compounds with sulfhydryl groups of extracellular microbial proteins results in inhibition of protein activity (Dey et al., 2012). The impressive antimicrobial action of punicalagin on P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum and X. campestris pv. campestris verified in the present study suggests that this molecule may be an essential component in the biological activity of P. granatum fruit peel extract against phytopathogenic bacteria. Several studies prove antimicrobial activity of the punicalagin compound against isolates of clinical importance such as Staphylococcus aureus (MIC 250 μg/mL ) and methicillin­resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (Xu et al., 2017; Mun et al., 2018). According to Xu et al. (2017) punicalagin compound has direct action on cell membrane disruption, increased K+ ion flow and inhibition of biofilm forma­ tion in S. aureus. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the antibacterial activities of the isolated compound punicalagin against plant patho­ genic bacteria. Further investigations may elucidate the mechanism of action of this compound on phy­ topathogenic bacteria. Data from the in vivo assays of this study indicat­ ed that Pp is effective in control of X. campestris pv. campestris in E. sativa seeds. Black rot infection caus­ es tissue necrosis, premature leaf fall, atrophied growth and death of young plants (Vicente and Holub, 2013). In the present study, treatment with Pp in the highest concentration reduced incidence of disease symptoms and promoted a high survival rates of seedlings in comparison to infected and untreated group. Additionally, the association between Pp and antibiotic resulted in percentages of seedling survival above that observed in treatment with antibiotic alone (16th day of observation), indi­ cating probable synergistic interaction between treatments. P. granatum extract produced no harm­ ful effect on germination, emergence or seedling development of the E. sativa. This is in agreement with a study that proved the effective action of treat­ ment with natural plant extract (Origanum onites) in the control of Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. michiga‐ nensis, Xamthomonas axonopodies pv. vesicatoria and Xanthomonas campestris pv. vitians in seeds of tomato and lettuce, without affecting seedling germi­ nation and growth (Kotan et al., 2014). Treatment of the seeds with hot water (50°C for 20­30 min) has been the most effective treatment for seedborn blackrot control. However, treatments do not always eliminate 100% of the bacteria and may adversely affect seed germination and vigor (Celetti and Callow, 2002). Natural plant extracts, like pomegranate fruit Adv. Hort. Sci., 2021 35(3): 217­231 228 peel extract, may represent a good alternative to control of seed born phythopatogens ensuring seed viability after treatment. Treatment of E. vesicaria seeds with streptomycin sulfate, despite being effective in controlling X. campestris pv. campestris, demonstrated toxic effect for seedlings, evidenced by the yellowish aspect of the leaves (chlorosis). This result corroborates the findings of Napoles et al. (1991) for treatment of Brassica oleracea seeds with the same antibiotic (500 ppm for 1 h). The streptomycin is associated with several phytotoxic effects like blocking chlorophyll synthesis, especially in younger leaves, inhibition of methionine and phosphate absorption, production of photosynthetic process changes and enzymatic inhi­ bition (Falkiner, 1990). In addition, treatment of seeds with streptomycin resulted in severe reduction in the ratio between the polar and equatorial diame­ ters (stomatal functionality). However, treatment with Pp (500 μg/ml) keep values of stomatal func­ tionality (FUN) similar to the healthy seedlings. The highest ratio of FUN indicates stomata with more elliptic morphology, a mechanism of the drought tol­ erant plants to keep the water present in its interior at a maximum as a response to its hydric state (Melo et al., 2014). Treatments with Pp indicated antagonistic values of stomatal density (SD) and stomatal area (A). The parameters SD and A can directly affect mechanisms such as photosynthesis, transpiration and efficient water use in plants (Lawson and Blatt, 2014). The increase in SD coupled with reduction in A may result in the optimization of gas exchange (Franks et al., 2009). This pattern was observed in seedlings treated with Pp at a concentration of 250 μg/ml and similarly in the health group. On the other hand, the reduction in SD may represent a more conservative water use (Bertolino et al., 2019). This pattern was verified in seedlings treated with Pp at a concentration of 500 μg/ml. Since there is no damage to CO2 fixation or plant cooling, this reduction in water loss can be advantageous in environments with low water avail­ ability (Bertolino et al., 2019). Thus, the Pp can influ­ ence both pathogen control in seeds and the physio­ logical characteristics of the plant through changes in stomatal patterns. In conclusion, hydroalcoholic crude extract from the fruit peel of the P. granatum (Pp) demonstrated high potential for control of the phytopathogenic bacteria R. solanacearum , X. campestris pv . campestris and P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum. Punicalagin compound potentiated antimicrobial activity on these pathogens, corroborating studies that relate the abundance of the phenolic com­ pounds (flavonoids and tannins) with the antibacteri­ al activity of pomegranate fruit peel. Pp extract was effective to control seedborn pathogen X. campestris pv. campestris in seeds of the E. vesicaria and pro­ moted several beneficial effects to seedlings with no phytotoxic effect. Moreover, association between Pp and antibiotic indicated probable synergistic interac­ tion between treatments (16th day of observation) potencializing the seedling survival over the observed in relation of the antibiotic utilizing in isolated way. The investigation of antimicrobial activity of the Pp and isolate compounds like Punicalagin repre­ sents a promising path regarding the biotechnologi­ cal development of botanical pesticides that ensure quality and safe of the food crop production. Acknowledgements The Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) primarily funded this work ­ [Finance code 001]. This work was supported by the Foundation for Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Maranhão (FAPEMA) ­ Brazil. References ABDULRAHAMAN A.A., EGBEDO F.O., OLADELE F.A., 2009 ­ Stomatal complex types, stomatal density, and the sto‐ matal index in some species of dioscorea. ­ Arch. Biol. Sci., 61: 847­851. ADEOLU M., ALNAJAR S., NAUSHAD S.S., GUPTA R., 2016 ­ Genome‐based phylogeny and taxonomy of the ‘Enterobacteriales’: proposal for Enterobacterales ord. nov. divided into the families Enterobacteriaceae, Erwiniaceae fam. nov., Pectobacteriaceae fam. nov., Yersiniaceae fam. nov., Hafniaceae fam. nov., Morgane. ­ Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 66: 5575­5599. AGROFIT, 2016 ­ Sistema de Agrotóxicos Fitossanitários. ­ Ministério da Agric. Pecuária e Abast, http://agrofit.agricultura.gov.br/agrofit_cons/princi­ pal_agrofit_cons. AKHTAR S., ISMAIL T., FRATERNALE D., SESTILI P., 2015 ­ Pomegranate peel and peel extracts: Chemistry and food features. ­ Food Chem., 174: 417­425. ALLEN C., PRIOR P., HAYWARD A.C., 2005 ­ Bacterial wilt disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum species com‐ De Sousa Silva et al. ‐ Punica granatum L. extract acts in phytopathogen control and Eruca vesicaria (L.) Cav. germination 229 plex. ­ American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul Minnesota, USA, pp. 528. BALAH M.A., NOWRA A.A., 2016 ­ Efficacy of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) and Henna (Lawsonia inermis L.) natural extracts to control some plant pathogens and weeds. ­ Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control, 26: 487­496. BERTOLINO L.T., CAINE R.S., GRAY J.E., 2019 ­ Impact of stomatal density and morphology on water‐use effi‐ ciency in a changing world. ­ Front. Plant Sci., 10: 1737­ 1748. BORGES D.F., LOPES E.A., FIALHO MORAES A.R., SOARES M.S., VISÔTTO L.E., OLIVEIRA C.R., MOREIRA VALENTE V.M., 2018 ­ Formulation of botanicals for the control of plant‐pathogens: A review. ­ Crop Prot., 110: 135­ 140. CELETTI M., CALLOW K., 2002 ­ Black rot of Crucifer crops. ­ Food Rural Aff. Factsheet. http://www.omafra.gov.on. ca/english/crops/facts/02­025.htm#seed. CHITARRA L.G., LANGERAK C.J., BERGERVOET J.H.W., VAN DEN BULK R.W., 2002 ­ Detection of the plant pathoge‐ nic bacterium Xanthomonas campestris pv. Campestris in seed extracts of Brassica sp. Applying fluorescent antibodies and flow cytometry. ­ Cytometry, 47: 118­ 126. CLSI, 2012 ­ Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests , 7th edition . ­ Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 92. DE CASTRO E.M., PEREIRA F.J., PAIVA R., 2009 ­ Histologia vegetal: estrutura e função de órgãos vegetativos. ­ UFLA Lavras, Brazil, pp. 234. DE NOVA P.J.G., CARVAJAL A., PRIETO M., RUBIO P., 2019 ­ In vitro susceptibility and evaluation of techniques for understanding the mode of action of a promising non‐ antibiotic citrus fruit extract against several pathogens. ­ Front. Microbiol., 10: 884. DEY D., DEBNATH S., HAZRA S., GHOSH S., RAY R., HAZRA B., 2012 ­ Pomegranate pericarp extract enhances the antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin against extended‐ spectrum β‐lactamase (ESBL) and metallo‐β‐lactamase (MBL) producing Gram‐negative bacilli. ­ Food Chem. Toxicol., 50: 4302­4309. EL KHETABI A., LAHLALI R., ASKARNE L., EZRARI S., EL GHADAROUI L., TAHIRI A., HRUSTIĆ J., AMIRI S., 2020 ­ Efficacy assessment of pomegranate peel aqueous extract for brown rot (Monilinia spp.) disease control. ­ Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol., 110: 101482. ELOFF J.N., 1998 ­ A sensitive and quick microplate method to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration of plant extracts for bacteria. ­ Planta Med., 64: 711­713. ELPHINSTONE J.G., 2005 ­ The current bacterial wilt situa‐ tion: a global overview, pp. 9­28. ­ in: Allen C., Piror P. and Hayward A.C. (eds.) Bacterial wilt disease and the Ralstonia Solanacearum species complex. APS Press, St. Paul Minnesota, USA, pp. 520. ELSHERBINY E.A., AMIN B.H., BAKA Z.A., 2016 ­ Efficiency of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peels extract as a high potential natural tool towards Fusarium dry rot on potato tubers. ­ Postharvest Biol. Technol., 111: 256­ 263. ERKAN M., DOGAN A., 2018 ­ Pomegranate/Roma‐Punica granatum, pp. 355­361. In: RODRIGUES S., E. DE OLIVEI­ RA SILVA, and E.S. DE BRITO (eds.) Exotic fruits. Reference guide. Academic Press, London, UK, pp. 466. FALKINER F.R., 1990 ­ The criteria for choosing an antibio‐ tic for control of bacteria in plant tissue culture. ­ Newsl. IAPTC, 60: 13­23. FAO, 2016 ­ Se o atual ritmo de consume continuar, em 2050 o mundo precisará de 60% mais alimentos e 40% mais água. ­ FAO, https://nacoesunidas.org/fao. FAO, 2017 ­ Plant health and food security. International Plant Protection Convention, Rome, Italy, p. 2. FARAG M.A., AL­MAHDY D.A., SALAH EL DINE R., FAHMY S., YASSIN A., PORZEL A., BRANDT W., 2015 ­ Structure activity relationships of antimicrobial gallic acid deriva‐ tives from pomegranate and acacia fruit extracts against potato bacterial wilt pathogen. ­ Chem. Biodivers., 12: 955­962. FAWOLE O.A., MAKUNGA N.P., OPARA U.L., 2012 ­ Antibacterial, antioxidant and tyrosinase‐inhibition activities of pomegranate fruit peel methanolic extract. ­ BMC Complement. Altern. Med., 12: 1178. FERNANDES R., BERRETTA A., TORRES E., BUSZINSKI A., FERNANDES G., MENDES­GOUVÊA C., DE SOUZA­NETO F., GORUP L., DE CAMARGO E., BARBOSA D., 2018 ­ Antimicrobial potential and cytotoxicity of silver nano‐ particles phytosynthesized by pomegranate peel extract. ­ Antibiotics, 7: 51. FRANKS P.J., DRAKE P.L., BEERLIG D.J., 2009 ­ Plasticity in maximum stomatal conductance constrained by negati‐ ve correlation between stomatal size and density: an analysis using Eucalyptus globulus. ­ Plant. Cell Environ., 32: 1737­1748. GRIESBACH E., LÖPTIEN H., MIERSCH U., 2003 ­ Resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Pammel) Dowson in cabbage Brassica oleracea L. ­ J. Plant Dis. Prot., 110: 461­475. GULLON B., PINTADO M.E., PÉREZ­ÁLVAREZ J.A., VIUDA­ MARTOS M., 2016 ­ Assessment of polyphenolic profile and antibacterial activity of pomegranate peel (Punica granatum) flour obtained from co‐product of juice extraction. ­ Food Control, 59: 94­98. GUPTA M., VIKRAM A., BHARAT N., 2013 ­ Black rot‐A devastating disease of crucifers: A review. ­ Agric. Rev., 34: 269. HASSAN M.A.E., BEREIKA M.F.F., ABO­ELNAGA H.I.G., SAL­ LAM M.A.A., 2009 ­ Direct antimicrobial activity and induction of systemic resistance in potato plants against bacterial wilt disease by plant extracts. ­ Plant Pathol. J., 25: 352­360. IBRAHIUM M.I., 2010 ­ Efficiency of pomegranate peel extract as antimicrobial, antioxidant and protective Adv. Hort. Sci., 2021 35(3): 217­231 230 agents. ­ World J. Agric. Sci., 6: 338­344. JIMÉNEZ­REYES M.F., CARRASCO H., OLEA A.F., SILVA­ MORENO E., 2019 ­ Natural compounds: A sustainable alternative to phytopathogens control. ­ J. Chil. Chem. Soc., 64: 4459­4465. JOHANSEN D.A., 1940 ­ Plant microtechnique, 1st edition. ­ McGraw­Hill Book Company, Inc., London, UK, pp. 521. KARM I.F.A., 2019 ­ The role of Pomegranate (Punica gra­ natum) husks and citrus (Citrus aurantium) husks extracts in reducing the growth of some pathogenic fungi of the plant. ­ Plant Arch., 19: 241­244. KHALEEL A.I., SIJAM K., RASHID T.S., BIN AHMAD K., 2016 ­ Phytochemical determination and antibacterial activity of Punica granatum peel extracts against plant patho‐ genic bacteria. ­ Am. J. Plant Sci., 7: 159­166. KHAN R.A.A., AHMAD M., NAZ I., NAJEEB S., YANLIN L., ALAM S.S., 2020 ­ Sustainable management of bacterial wilt of tomato using dried powder of Xanthium struma­ rium L. ­ J. Plant Pathol., 102: 421­431. KOTAN R., CAKIR A., OZER H., KORDALI S., CAKMAKCI R., DADASOGLU F., DIKBAS N., AYDIN T., KAZAZ C., 2014 ­ Antibacterial effects of Origanum onites against phyto‐ pathogenic bacteria: Possible use of the extracts from protection of disease caused by some phytopathogenic bacteria. ­ Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam), 172: 210­220. KRAUS J.E., ARDUIN M., 1997 ­ Manual básico de métodos em morfologia vegetal. ­ Edur, Seropédica, Brasil, pp. 198. LAWSON T., BLATT M.R., 2014 ­ Stomatal size, speed, and responsiveness impact on photosynthesis and water use efficiency. ­ Plant Physiol., 164: 1556­1570. LI DESTRI NICOSIA M.G., PANGALLO S., RAPHAEL G., ROMEO F.V, STRANO M.C., RAPISARDA P., DROBY S., SCHENA L., 2016 ­ Control of postharvest fungal rots on citrus fruit and sweet cherries using a pomegranate peel extract. ­ Postharvest Biol. Technol., 114: 54­61. MAGANGANA T.P., MAKUNGA N.P., FAWOLE O.A., OPARA U.L., 2020 ­ Processing factors affecting the phytoche‐ mical and nutritional properties of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel waste. ­ A review. Molecules, 25: 4690. MANSFIELD J., GENIN S., MAGORI S., CITOVCKY V., SRIA­ RIYANUM M., RONALD P., DOW M., VERDIER V., BEER S. V., MACHADO M.A., TOTH I., SALMOND G., FOSTER G.D., 2012 ­ Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in mole‐ cular plant pathology. ­ Mol. Plant Pathol., 13: 614­629. MELGAREJO P., NUNEZ­GOMEZ D., LEGUA P., MARTÍNEZ­ NICOLÁS J.J., ALMANSA M.S., 2020 ­ Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) a dry pericarp fruit with fleshy seeds. ­ Trends Food Sci. Technol., 102: 232­236. MELO E.F., FERNANDES­BRUM C.N., PEREIRA F.J., DE CAS­ TRO E.M., CHALFUN­JÚNIOR A., 2014 ­ Anatomic and physiological modifications in seedlings of Coffea arabi­ ca cultivar Siriema under drought conditions. ­ Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 38: 25­33. MOHAMAD T., KHALIL A., 2015 ­ Effect of agriculture waste: pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) fruits peel on some important phytopathogenic fungi and control of tomato damping‐off. ­ J. Appl. Life Sci. Int., 3: 103­ 113. MOSMANN T., 1983 ­ Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. ­ J. Immunol. Methods, 65: 55­63. MUN S.­H., KANG O.­H., KONG R., ZHOU T., KIM S.­A., SHIN D.­W., KWON D.­Y., 2018 ­ Punicalagin suppresses met‐ hicillin resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to oxacillin. ­ J. Pharmacol. Sci., 137: 317­323. NAPOLES P., AMAT Z., RAMIREZ P., 1991 ­ The use of diffe‐ rent treatments to control Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in cabbage seeds. ­ Prot. Plantas, 1: 33­41. OPARA L.U., AL­ANI M.R., AL­SHUAIBI Y.S., 2009 ­ Physico‐ chemical properties, vitamin C content, and antimicro‐ bial properties of pomegranate fruit (Punica granatum L.). ­ Food Bioprocess Technol., 2: 315­321. PACHUPATE V.J., KININGE P.T., 2013 ­ Effect of copper sulphate and streptomycin on isolated strains of Pectobacterium spp. from banana plants. ­ Int. J. Adv. Biotechnol. Res., 3: 703­710. QUATTRUCCI A., OVIDI E., TIEZZI A., VINCIGUERRA V., BALESTRA G.M., 2013 ­ Biological control of tomato bacterial speck using Punica granatum fruit peel extract. ­ Crop Prot., 46: 18­22. RONGAI D., PULCINI P., PESCE B., MILANO F., 2017 ­ Antifungal activity of pomegranate peel extract against fusarium wilt of tomato. ­ Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 147: 229­238. RYAN R.P., VORHÖLTER F.­J., POTNIS N., JONES J.B., VAN SLUYS M.­A., BOGDANOVE A.J., DOW J.M., 2011 ­ Pathogenomics of Xanthomonas: understanding bacte‐ rium‐plant interactions. ­ Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 9: 344­ 355. SANTOS L.A., BANDEIRA D.A., DA SILVA J.P., DA SILVEIRA E.B., GOMES A.M.A., DE MARIANO R.L., 2008 ­ Caracterização de isolados de Xanthomonas campestris pv campestris de sistemas de produção orgânico e rea‐ ção de brássicas à podridão‐negra. ­ Hortic. Bras., 26: 486­491. SCHNEIDER C.A., RASBAND W.S., ELICEIRI K.W., 2012 ­ NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. ­ Nat. Methods, 9: 671­675. SELCUK N., ERKAN M., 2015 ­ Changes in phenolic com‐ pounds and antioxidant activity of sour–sweet pome‐ granates cv. ‘Hicaznar’ during long‐term storage under modified atmosphere packaging. ­ Postharvest Biol. Technol., 109: 30­39. SOBERÓN J.R., SGARIGLIA M.A., DIP MADERUELO M.R., ANDINA M.L., SAMPIETRO D.A., VATTUONE M.A., 2014 ­ Antibacterial activities of Ligaria cuneifolia and Jodina rhombifolia leaf extracts against phytopathogenic and clinical bacteria. ­ J. Biosci. Bioeng., 118: 599­605. SOOTHILL J.S., WARD R., GIRLING A.J., 1992 ­ The IC50: an exactly defined measure of antibiotic sensitivity. ­ J. De Sousa Silva et al. ‐ Punica granatum L. extract acts in phytopathogen control and Eruca vesicaria (L.) Cav. germination 231 Antimicrob. Chemother., 29: 137­139. TÜRKYILMAZ M., TAĞI Ş., DERELI U., ÖZKAN M., 2013 ­ Effects of various pressing programs and yields on the antioxidant activity, antimicrobial activity, phenolic content and colour of pomegranate juices. ­ Food Chem., 138: 1810­1818. UMA T., MANNAM S., LAHOTI J., DEVI K., KALE R.D., BAGYARAJ D.J., 2012 ­ Biocidal activity of seed extracts of fruits against soil borne bacterial and fungal plant pathogens. ­ J. Biopestic., 5: 103­105. VAN DER WOLF J., DE BOER S.H., 2015 ­ Phytopathogenic bacteria, pp. 65­77. ­ In: LUGTENBERG B. (ed.) Principles of plant‐microbe interactions. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 448. VICENTE J.G., HOLUB E.B., 2013 ­ Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (cause of black rot of crucifers) in the genomic era is still a worldwide threat to brassica crops. ­ Mol. Plant Pathol., 14: 2­18. VIUDA­MARTOS M., FERNÁNDEZ­LÓPEZ J., PÉREZ­ÁLVAREZ J.A., 2010 ­ Pomegranate and its many functional com‐ ponents as related to human health: a review. ­ Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf., 9: 635­654. XU Y., SHI C., WU Q., ZHENG Z., LIU P., LI G., PENG X., XIA X., 2017 ­ Antimicrobial activity of punicalagin against Staphylococcus aureus and its effect on biofilm forma‐ tion. ­ Foodborne Pathog. Dis., 14: 282­287. YABUUCHI E., KOSAKO Y., YANO I., HOTTA H., NISHIUCHI Y., 1995 ­ Transfer of two Burkholderia and an Alcaligenes species to Ralstonia gen. nov.: proposal of Ralstonia pickettii (Ralston, Palleroni and Doudoroff 1973) comb. nov., Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith 1896) comb. nov. and Ralstonia eutropha (Davis 1969) comb. nov. ­ Microbiol. Immunol., 39: 897­904. YANG L., BAO X.­P., 2017 ­ Synthesis of novel 1,2,4‐triazole derivatives containing the quinazolinylpiperidinyl moie‐ ty and N‐(substituted phenyl)acetamide group as effi‐ cient bactericides against the phytopathogenic bacte­ rium Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. ­ RSC Adv., 7: 34005­34011. YULIAR, NION Y.A., TOYOTA K., 2015 ­ Recent trends in control methods for bacterial wilt Diseases Caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. ­ Microbes Environ., 30: 1­11. ZHENG S., ZHOU X., XU S., ZHU R., BAI H., ZHANG J., 2016 ­ Synthesis and antimicrobial characterization of half‐ Calycanthaceous alkaloid derivatives. ­ Molecules, 21: 1207.