Impaginato 135 Adv. Hort. Sci., 2022 36(2): 135­144 DOI: 10.36253/ahsc­12341 Maintaining physicochemical and sen­ sory properties of guava var. Getas Merah using alginate and Cyclea barba‐ ta leaves powder as edible coating N.A. Utama 1 (*), I.A. Pranata 1, P.C. Pramesi 2 1 Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Jalan Brawijaya, Bantul, 55183 Yogyakarta, Indonesia. 2 Center for Food and Nutrition Studies Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jl. Teknika Utara, Barek, 55281 Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Key words: Postharvest treatment, preservation, Psidium guajava, shelf­life. Abstract: Indonesia is one of the major countries which contributes the world’s guava production. Guava var. Getas Merah is commonly found in Indonesia. Guava has a short shelf­life as it rapidly goes under postharvest ripening. This leads to a faster deterioration of physicochemical and sensorial properties of guava. A generally used method to extends shelf­life is by edible coating. In this study, a combination of alginate and Cyclea barbata leaves powder (CBLP) was investigated as a potential edible coating. The analysis of firmness, total soluble solids, total reducing sugar, total titratable acidity and organoleptic tests were conducted to evaluate the quality of guava fruits stored for 20 d at 14°C. A split plot design study was used and four different treatments with different CBLP concentrations were applied. The samples treated with 2% alginate and 0.8% CBLP showed the lowest total dissolved solids, total reducing sugar, and total titratable acidity. Moreover, the samples were reported with the highest score on color, taste, and texture parameters. The firmness test showed that samples treated with 2% alginate and 0.2% CBLP had the lowest firmness loss and high­ est score for aroma. In summary longer quality retention of guava fruits was found after the addition of CBLP in alginate­based edible coating. 1. Introduction As a tropical country, Indonesia is rich in horticultural products, espe­ cially fruits. Guava (Psidium guajava L.) var. Getas Merah is one of many fruits that are highly produced and consumed in Indonesia. Although it has high content of vitamin C, dietary fiber, antioxidants, and minerals, guava is a perishable food product and has a relatively short shelf life (Kumar et al., 2001; Naaseer et al., 2018). During its ripening stage, guava undergoes physicochemical changes such as total soluble solid, pectin content, total titratable acidity, total sugar content, and total anthocyanin content (Dube and Singh, 2015). Total soluble solids of guava cv. Apple (*) Corresponding author: nafi@umy.ac.id Citation: UTAMA N.A., PRANATA I.A., PRAMESI P.C., 2022 ­ Maintaining physicochemical and sensory proper‐ ties of guava var. Getas Merah using alginate and Cyclea barbata leaves powder as edible coating. ­ Adv. Hort. Sci., 36(2): 135­144. Copyright: © 2022 Utama N.A., Pranata I.A., Pramesi P.C. This is an open access, peer reviewed article published by Firenze University Press (http://www.fupress.net/index.php/ahs/) and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Received for publication 24 November 2021 Accepted for publication 9 March 2022 AHS Advances in Horticultural Science https://doi.org/10.36253/ahsc-12341 http://www.fupress.net/index.php/ahs/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Adv. Hort. Sci., 2022 36(2): 135­144 136 Colour were found to be increasing rapidly between 75 to 150 days. Whereas its maximum acidity of 0.41% was reached after 105 days. Following the increase of total titratable acidity during immature and intermediate stage of maturation, the value will be decreased during maturity stage. On the contrary, total reducing sugar increased during late maturity. These changes happen very fast; therefore, fully ripe guava can easily bruise and considered as highly per­ ishable (Fabi et al., 2010). By reducing the rate of this physicochemical and sensory properties to sustain the quality of guava, shelf­life extension can be achieved. The storage of guava with chemicals such as boric acid and naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) at ambient temperature is commercially available and feasible (Singh et al., 2017). Although this technique has been proven to effectively maintain the quality of guava, the use of chemicals may affect those potential con­ sumers that have a negative perception of chemical preservatives. The use of plastic packaging for indi­ vidual packaging with clink and shrink film was reported (Rana et al., 2015). By individually wrapping guava fruits, changes of total soluble solids slowed down and extending the shelf life for 10 days. However, the use of plastic is not a sustainable choice. The preservation technique by edible coating can be an option for a more sustainable choice. It is applied by adding a thin layer to the fruit to prevent gas release. The edible coating must be able to form a layer that acts as a respiration and transpiration inhibitor by reducing moisture and solute migration and gas exchange. Another requirement for edible coating material is that it is safe to consume and has the ability to enhance shelf­life (Vaishali et al., 2019). Compared to the synthetic coatings, edible films can act as both gas and moisture barrier which results in a modified atmosphere to enhance the shelf life of fruits (Kocira et al., 2021). Polysaccharides such as alginate, chitosan, and pectin, are the most frequent polymer used for edible coatings. Alginate is derived from brown sea algae and is an example of hydrocol­ loids, film­forming biopolymers (Parreidt et al., 2018). The application of alginate­based edible coat­ ings has been conducted with the addition of various ingredients to extend the shelf life of guava. The application of alginate and betel­essential oil on rose apple resulted in quality retention until nine days (Setiawan et al., 2019). The effect of both chitosan and alginate edible coating with the addition of pomegranate peel extract were reported (Nair et al., 2018). The study reported significant retention of quality deterioration in guava after the edible coat­ ing’s application and storage at 10°C. Another study by showed that the addition of ZnO nanoparticles in chitosan and alginate effectively inhibits rot in guavas, indicating their antimicrobial action (Arroyo et al., 2020). In this study, Cyclea barbata leaves, which also has potential as an edible coating, is economically feasible, and is more available in Indonesia, was included to the alginate coating. Cyclea barbata is a well­known plant that is widely used by Indonesian people as food and medicine. It is rich in carbohy­ drates, polyphenols, saponin, calcium, phosphor, and vitamins A2 and B (Acamovic and Brooker, 2005). The main component of Cyclea barbata leaves extract that forms a gel is pectin polysaccharide with low methoxy content belongs to the gel­forming hydro­ colloid group. The gel formed by pectin will be highly adhesive fand transparent and consequently has potential as an edible coating material (Rachmawati et al., 2010). Thus, this study investigated the addi­ tion effect of Cyclea barbata leaves powder (CBLP) in alginate­based coating as edible coating to maintain physicochemical parameters and sensory quality of guava. 2. Materials and Methods Study design This study was conducted using a split plot design study. This study was carried out in 2018 and used four treatments with a variation of CBLP concentra­ tions. A total of 135 whole guava fruits were used during this study. Each treatments used 27 guava that were grouped for each three guavas to be stored in a polystyrene board with plastic wrap after coating as one set. These three pieces of guava acted as trip­ licates of biological replicates. During the 20 days of storage, physicochemical and sensory analyses were done every four days. During this days, one set of fruits were randomly taken to be analyzed further for its physicochemical properties. Then, one fruit were selected randomly for sensory analyses. Plant materials This study used guava from an orchard in Sleman Regency, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The guava used in this study was harvested 109­114 days after the fruit Utama et al. ‐ Preservation of guava by edible coating 137 bloomed. According to a previous study, guava can be harvested after optimum maturity by observation of color attained or between 105­135 days after the fruit sets (Dube and Singh, 2015). This range of day is suitable for distant transportation to refrain from har­ vest losses. However, the length of the distance from this study was not mentioned. Therefore, this study used a more restricted range of harvesting days. The fruits were selected by visual observation to remove the defected fruits and choose the fruits with the same size. Then, fruits with a weight of 170 g were selected. From the orchard, selected fruits were transported to Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The fruits were stored in the refrigerator at 14°C for one day; then they were washed by submerging in 0.05% sodi­ um benzoate solution for 10 min and dried to pre­ vent the growth of bacteria and molds during storage (Masamba Mndalira, 2016). Preparation of CBLP and alginate edible coating The coating used in this study was produced according to a previous study (Olivas et al., 2007), with some modifications. The CBLP was made by cleaning fresh Cyclea barbata leaves with water fol­ lowed by drying (oven­dried) at 50°C for 18 h. The dried leaves were ground and sieved using a sifter (0.5 mm mesh) to produce a powder. Alginate was made by dissolving 10 g alginate in 500 mL water (to make 2% alginate solution) and heating with a water bath at 80°C for 30 min while stirring until the solu­ tion became transparent. A total of 2.5% glycerol as a plasticizer was added to the edible coating solution. The treatments with different formulation used was as below: ­ No coating applied (control) ­ 2% alginate + 0.2% CBLP ­ 2% alginate + 0.4% CBLP ­ 2% alginate + 0.6% CBLP ­ 2% alginate + 0.8% CBLP Application of edible coating solution Selected fruits that had been washed were soaked in the edible coating solution for 3 min, followed by dipping into a 2% CaCl2 solution for 15 min until it formed a layer. The samples were dried at room tem­ perature. Each three samples were stored in a poly­ styrene board wrapped with plastic. The storage temperature was kept at 14°C and 95% RH. Analyses of physicochemical parameter To investigate the ability of shelf­life extension by adding CBLP to alginate coating, the samples were measured for their physical (firmness), chemical (total soluble solids, total reducing sugar, and titrat­ able acidity), and organoleptic qualities. The parame­ ters were measured every four days within 20 d of storage time. Firmness. The analysis of firmness was conducted by measuring the samples chosen for the weight loss measurements using a penetrometer. The samples with the skin still intact were stabbed with the device in three different locations using 250 g of pressure on the scale of 1/10 mm for 10 s. The results obtained were averaged and expressed in kg/cm2. Total soluble solids. The samples for the analysis of total soluble solids were selected by choosing one random guava in a box of nine fruits. The chosen sample was extracted by mashing the fruit and press­ ing to obtain the juice. About two to three droplets of the juice were inserted into a handheld digital refractometer (ATAGO, Tokyo, Japan). The samples were measured three times for replication and then the average value was taken. The results were expressed in % Brix unit. Total reducing sugar. The reducing sugar analysis was carried out according to Somogyi (1937) as modi­ fied by Nelson (1944). One milliliter of the juice extracted for the total soluble solid analysis was added to a test tube that contained 25 mL Nelson A, 1 mL Nelson B, and 1 mL cupric reagent solution. The test tubes were heated in a water bath (Memmert, Schwabach, Germany) for 20 min and cooled. Afterward, 2 mL arsenic­molybdic reagent was added to the tube and mixed until homogeneous before adding 7 mL of distilled water. The samples’ absorbance was read using a spectrophotometer (λ = 540 mm) (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Massachusetts, America). The results were reported as the percent­ age of reducing sugars (%). Total titratable acid. The total titratable acid analysis was conducted according to Ranganna (1986). From a box of nine guava fruits, one was selected randomly to be measured. The chosen sam­ ple was mashed, and 10 g were taken to be added into a 100 mL volumetric flask. After that, distilled water was added until it reached the 100 mL mark. The solution was then mixed until homogeneous and filtered using filter paper. Then, 10 mL of the filtrate was transferred to an Erlenmeyer. Two to three drops of the indicator of 1% phenolphthalein were Adv. Hort. Sci., 2022 36(2): 135­144 138 added. Titration was conducted using NaOH 0.1 N until the solution turned a pinkish color. The volume of NaOH 0.1 N used for the titration was recorded to be calculated and converted to the total titratable acidity value. The total titratable acidity (%TA) was calculated with the equation %TA = (V x N x MW x df x 100%)/(m x 1000 x v) where V = volume of NaOH 0.1 N used (mL), N = nor­ mality of NaOH used, MW = molecular weight of dominating acid (molecular weight of citric acid = 192), df = dilution factor, m = mass of sample (g), and v = valence of dominant acid (valence of citric acid = 3). The results were reported as percentages (%) Organoleptic tests. In this study, the organoleptic test used a hedonic test where the perception of the sample’s color, aroma, taste, texture, and overall acceptability was measured. The measurement used a ranking test with a 9­point scale (Meilgaard et al., 2006) where a score of 1 is the lowest score (dislike extremely) and 9 is the highest (like extremely). The hedonic test was done with 50 panelists (ratio male: female is 1:1) from academic staff and students of Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. The pan­ elists were aged between 18 and 60 years old. Statistical analysis The results of firmness, total soluble solids, total reduced, sugar and total titratable acid were ana­ lyzed with one­way ANOVA. Means were separated and analyzed using the Duncan multiple range test (DMRT, α = 5%) using Statistic Analytical Software (SAS) version 9.4. 3. Results and Discussions Firmness The firmness analysis of guava treated with algi­ nate­based edible coating and different concentra­ tions of CBLP is exhibited in Table 1. All samples show declining trends during the 20 days of observation. A sudden drop can be seen in samples coated with algi­ nate but no addition of CBLP after four days of stor­ age and the firmness continues to decrease. Compared to these samples, the samples treated with the addition of CBLP in alginate shows slower decrease of firmness. The different values between control and treated samples indicated that the edible coating could prevent firmness loss during storage. In this study, samples coated with the addition of the lowest CBLP concentration shows the highest firmness after 20 days of storage. Similar result was also seen in the application of aloe vera and sage essential oil in tomatoes (Tzortzakis et al., 2019). After 7 days of storage, tomato with aloe vera and 0.1% sage essential oil had lower softening compared to the addition of 0.5% sage essential in aloe vera. Another study reported that apples coated with high­ er concentration of lemongrass oil and oregano oil showed sudden firmness drop (Rojas­Graü et al., 2007). A possible explanation of this result is the low pH of coating solution due to the higher concentra­ tion of essential oil was added. This result occurred because the sample coated with alginate and CBLP had a more effective gas dif­ fusion barrier than the control sample, therefore, enzymes that were involved in respiration and tissue softening will be less active. Firmness and juiciness of fruit is an important parameter that also relates to the marketability. The firmness of fruit is correlated to the pectin content on the cell walls. Due to pectin solubilization, the texture of fruits will be softer and resulted in firmness loss. This pectin solubilizations can be caused by several reasons, such as the depoly­ merization of pectin by pectinase enzymes (i.e., poly­ galacturonase, cellulase and pectin methyl esterase) Table 1 ­ Result of firmness in kg/cm2 of guava treated with alginate­based edible coating enriched with different concentration of Cyclea barbata leaves powder (CBLP) Results followed by the same letter(s) imply that there is no significant difference between results according to the Duncan multiple range test (p>0.05). Treatments Observation days 0 4 8 12 16 20 Control 3.58 ± 0.13 a 0.60 ± 0.09 c 0.58 ± 0.02 d 0.28 ± 0.01 c 0.12 ± 0.01 c 0.08 ± 0.02 d 2% alginate + 0.2% CBLP 3.56 ± 0.07 a 2.81 ± 0.18 a 2.58 ± 0.13 ab 2.35 ± 0.23 a 1.99 ± 0.14 a 1.76 ± 0.05 a 2% alginate + 0.4% CBLP 3.05 ± 0.05 c 2.43 ± 0.05 b 2.34 ± 0.13 bc 2.29 ± 0.13 a 1.99 ± 0.17 a 1.58 ± 0.10 b 2% alginate + 0.6% CBLP 3.03 ± 0.22 b 2.83 ± 0.06 a 2.23 ± 0.15 c 1.97 ± 0.15 c 1.65 ± 0.14 b 1.39 ± 0.09 c 2% alginate + 0.8% CBLP 3.34 ± 0.27 ab 2.87 ± 0.11 a 2.72 ± 0.17 a 2.22 ± 0.08 b 1.95 ± 0.07 a 1.55 ± 0.03 b Utama et al. ‐ Preservation of guava by edible coating 139 and the loss of neutral chains (arabinan and galactan) which binds pectin to the cell wall via glycans or cel­ lulose matrix (Paniagua et al., 2014). By adding edible coating, the pectinase enzymes activity is lower and firmness loss is hindered (Zhou et al., 2010). Another factor of the firmness is the transpiration of fruit. The balance between water loss and water uptake highly affected mechanical properties of the skin by controlling cell turgor. When turgor is removed by membrane matrix disassemble (i.e., solu­ bilization of pectin during ripening), water can move freely which results in cell walls relaxation (Brüggenwirth and Knoche, 2016). Fruit transpiration is highly correlated with the water vapor pressure of airspace inside of the fruit and the air directly outside as the driving force (Montanaro et al., 2012). Even after harvesting, detached fruit has sufficient water content to support an additional of 10 hours transpi­ ration without moisture supply from xylem/phloem supply. The application of edible coating can gener­ ate a layer to delay transpiration (Kocira et al., 2021). Thus, a possible mechanism of alginate and CBLP as edible coating is by generating a water vapor barrier to lower water content loss of fruit. Total soluble solids Table 2 exhibits the results of total soluble solids with different CBLP concentrations. The result of total soluble solids indicates the total sugars in the sample. All samples had an increase at the beginning of stor­ age time followed by a decline until the last observa­ tion day. This increase of total soluble solids during the ripening stage in guava was previously reported (Patel et al., 2014). It was also explained that the increase can be from depolymerization of polysaccha­ rides and conversion of fruit starch to sugars. However, all samples showed a decline in total dissolved solids after 20 days due to the senescence phase. A similar trend of total soluble solids was also reported in the application naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) and potassium nitrate as pre­harvest treat­ ments on the storage quality of winter guava (Mandal et al., 2012). At the beginning of storage, hydrolysis of insoluble polysaccharides to simple sug­ ars resulted in the increase of total soluble solids (Brothakar et al., 2002). Within time, all the insoluble polysaccharides will be completely hydrolyzed while soluble solids and organic acids will be used for respi­ ration. This leads to the decrease of total soluble solid. The fall of total soluble solids content in mature fruit towards senescence has also been reported in mango fruits. The same study investigated the effect of different concentrations of Bavistin DF solution to extend shelf­life as a postharvest treatment on mango fruits. The trend of total soluble solids observed in the control samples indicated that they underwent a faster maturation stage and headed towards senescence (Islam et al., 2013). On day 20, samples coated with 2% alginate and 0.8% CBLP had the lowest level of total dissolved solids. The higher the amount of CBLP, the lower the total dissolved solids were. The mechanism of edible coating in inhibiting starch degradation which leads to the increase of total soluble solids during fruit ripening is by the decrease of respiration rate. The degradation of cell walls and starch to soluble sugars and organic acids act as a supply of carbons during climacteric respira­ tion of fruit (Colombié et al., 2016). Guava is consid­ ered climacteric fruit, indicated by the inclined ethyl­ ene production at the peak of ripening (Ishartani et al., 2018). The edible coating of alginate and CBLP in guava created an additionally layer that can hinder the respiration rate; thus, lowering the conversion rate of starch to total soluble solids. Table 2 ­ Result of total soluble solids in % Brix unit of guava treated with alginate­based edible coating enriched with different concen­ tration of Cyclea barbata leaves powder (CBLP) Results followed by the same letter(s) imply that there is no significant difference between results according to the Duncan multiple range test (p>0.05). Treatments Observation days 0 4 8 12 16 20 Control 7.27 ± 0.06 a 7.30 ± 0.10 a 7.47 ± 0.15 a 7.88 ± 0.07 a 8.19 ± 0.03 a 7.03 ± 0.06 a 2% alginate + 0.2% CBLP 6.53 ± 0.07 b 6.90 ± 0.10 b 7.03 ± 0.06 b 7.13 ± 0.04 b 7.15 ± 0.05 c 6.73 ± 0.12 b 2% alginate + 0.4% CBLP 5.36 ± 0.14 c 6.20 ± 0.20 d 6.82 ± 0.04 c 7.10 ± 0.00 b 7.23 ± 0.00 b 6.71 ± 0.10 b 2% alginate + 0.6% CBLP 5.27 ± 0.06 c 7.00 ± 0.10 b 7.03 ± 0.00 b 7.15 ± 0.05 b 7.23 ± 0.06 b 6.39 ± 0.13 c 2% alginate + 0.8% CBLP 5.42 ± 0.25 c 6.62 ± 0.08 c 6.85 ± 0.12 c 7.07 ± 0.06 b 7.05 ± 0.02 d 6.17 ± 0.06 d 140 Adv. Hort. Sci., 2022 36(2): 135­144 Total reducing sugar The results of total reducing sugar analysis with different edible coating concentrations on guava fruits are shown in Table 3. All samples show an increase in sugar reduction throughout the observation time. These results are similar to those of a previous study, where different varieties of guava were investigated for their total reducing sugars after 5 months of storage time at ambient temperature (Choudhary et al., 2008). The reducing sugars may be increased in the senescence phase of climacteric fruits due to starch hydrolysis to glucose, fructose, and sucrose (Patel et al., 2013). A high level of reducing sugars indicates rapid starch hydrolysis in fruit. The reducing sugar content in guava is varied within different varieties (Choudhary et al., 2008). The highest level of reducing sugar is fructose, fol­ lowed by glucose (Mowlah and Itoo, 1982). After the ripening stage, reducing sugar content of guava were found to be decreasing in overripe fruits (Bashir and Abu­Goukh, 2003). However, a clear explanation about this decrease has not been fully understood due to the complex process of starch breakdown, sugar synthesis and sugar metabolism in fruits are very complex which involves not only by ethylene but also an abundant of hormones and enzymes (Cordenunsi­Lysenko et al., 2019). In addition to this complexity, different fruits may possess different metabolic pathway of sugar. Previously, a study was conducted to investigate the sugar metabolism of peach during fruit development (Desnoues et al., 2014). The proposed pathway mentioned a conver­ sion of fructose and glucose to fructose 1,6­bisphos­ phate (F16BP) which involved in the glycolysis and respiration flux. On the last observation day, samples with 2% algi­ nate and 0.8% CBLP showed the lowest reducing sugar level. This implies that the addition of 0.8% CBLP mixed with alginate could suppress starch hydrolysis into glucose, sucrose, and fructose. The edible coating with polysaccharide base and CBLP acted as a selectively permeable membrane towards CO2 and O2 gases’ diffusion. This characteristic may extend shelf­life, as fruit’s respiration rate became slower (Kocira et al., 2021). CBLP has an alcohol con­ tent that could inhibit fruit senescence when added in alginate (Viña et al., 2000). Total titratable acid The analysis of total titratable acid in guava fruits treated with different concentrations of the edible coating was conducted. The results are exhibited in Table 4. Table 4 ­ Result of total titratable acid in percentage (%) of guava treated with alginate­based edible coating enriched with different concentration of Cyclea barbata leaves powder (CBLP) Results followed by the same letter(s) imply that there is no significant difference between results according to the Duncan multiple range test (p>0.05). Table 3 ­ Result of total reducing sugar in percentage (%) of guava treated with alginate­based edible coating enriched with different concentration of Cyclea barbata leaves powder (CBLP) Treatments Observation days 0 4 8 12 16 20 Control 9.33 ± 0.06 b 9.94 ± 0.02 b 12.16 ± 0.05 a 12.34 ± 0.00 b 13.59 ± 0.00 a 15.29± 0.02 a 2% alginate + 0.2% CBLP 9.76 ± 0.05 a 10.13 ± 0.02 a 10.14 ± 0.03 e 11.50 ± 0.06 c 12.21 ± 0.13 a 13.37 ± 0.00 d 2% alginate + 0.4% CBLP 8.98 ± 0.13 c 9.46 ± 0.03 d 10.30 ± 0.06 d 13.00 ± 0.04 a 13.45 ± 0.21 a 13.57 ± 0.02 b 2% alginate + 0.6% CBLP 8.69 ± 0.03 d 9.76 ± 0.07 c 11.38 ± 0.04 b 12.97 ± 0.05 a 13.03 ± 0.38 a 13.30 ± 0.03 e 2% alginate + 0.8% CBLP 8.24 ± 0.06 e 9.70 ± 0.07 c 10.55 ± 0.11 e 10.98 ± 0.06 d 12.03 ± 0.08 c 13.42 ± 0.04 c Treatments Observation days 0 4 8 12 16 20 Control 0.67 ± 0 b 0.67 ± 0 b 0.67 ± 0 b 1.11 ± 0.003 a 1.78 ± 0.003 a 2.01 ± 0 a 2% alginate + 0.2% CBLP 0.67 ± 0 b 0.67 ± 0 b 0.67 ± 0 b 0.81 ± 0.001 ab 1.13 ± 0.003 ab 1.56 ± 0 b 2% alginate + 0.4% CBLP 0.67 ± 0 b 0.67 ± 0 b 0.67 ± 0 b 0.67 ± 0 b 1.13 ± 0.003 ab 1.34 ± 0 c 2% alginate + 0.6% CBLP 0.67 ± 0 b 0.67 ± 0 b 0.67 ± 0 b 0.67 ± 0 b 1.13 ± 0.003 ab 1.34 ± 0c 2% alginate + 0.8% CBLP 0.67 ± 0 b 0.67 ± 0 b 0.67 ± 0 b 0.67 ± 0 b 0.67± 0 b 0.67 ± 0 b Results followed by the same letter(s) imply that there is no significant difference between results according to the Duncan multiple range test (p>0.05). Utama et al. ‐ Preservation of guava by edible coating 141 As a climacteric fruit, guava will have a sudden increase in respiration along with or before the senescence stage due to increases in CO2 and ethyl­ ene after the climacteric phase (Tripathi et al., 2016). Therefore, the level of total titratable acid has fre­ quently been used to indicate the shelf­life of fruit. According to the results, most of the samples had an increase in total titratable acid starting from day 12, except the samples coated with 2% alginate + 0.8% CBLP. This result is different from a previous study of guava (cv. Sardar), in which titratable acidity decreased after 40 days of storage (Mandal et al., 2012). This reduction of total titratable acid level dur­ ing storage was due to guava, as climacteric fruit, during the peak of ripening resulted in the rise of malic enzyme activity and pyruvate decarboxylation. Therefore, respiration rate and metabolic activity such as degradation of organic acids. However, similar to the results in this study an increase of total titratable acidity level in guava fruits was also observed (Dube et al., 2015). In their study, the total titratable acidity increased until 120 days of storage, after which it declined. The increase of total titratable acidity is correlated to the undissociated organic acids level in the maturation of fruit which is stored in the vacuole of cell plants. When ripening stage begin, organic acids will be depleted as sub­ strates in respiration. Therefore, this indicate that the samples were not fully ripen during harvesting. Total titratable acid in guava coated with alginate and CBLP tended to have a lower rate of increase. This indicates that the edible coating with alginate and CBLP could decrease the respiration rate and suppress the use of organic acid, followed by main­ taining the amount of total acid in guava throughout the storage time. According to Paul and Pandey (2014), fruit’s deterioration rate is affected by O2 and CO2 gases’ diffusion through the lenticel on the fruit’s surface (Paul and Pandey, 2014). The O2 gas entering the sample will increase the respiration rate, causing further deterioration. The sturdy edible coating of 2% alginate + 0.8% CBLP on the fruit’s surface prevented gas diffusion, which resulted in no significant increase of total titratable acidity. Organoleptic tests The visual appearance of samples before and after 20 days of storage can be seen in figure 1. From the appearance after 20 days, samples with no edible coating applied showed yellowish color and went into deterioration stage. In contrast, samples with edible coating were visibly similar in appearance with light green color. For organoleptic testing, a hedonic test was con­ ducted to evaluate the sensory qualities of guava fruits treated with different edible coating concentra­ tions. The results of the analysis are shown in figure 2. Based on the organoleptic test, samples coated with 2% alginate + 0.8% CBLP had the best score in the color, taste, and texture parameters. This is because a higher CBLP concentration in the edible coating would further inhibit the respiration and transpiration rates. The best score for the aroma parameter was obtained by an edible coating with 0.2% CBLP. This is because the alcohol level due to fermentation in CBLP gave an unpleasant odor; thus, the lowest concentration gave the best score of Fig. 1 ­ Visual appearance of guava fruit on day 0 (a) and after 20 days of storage with: no edible coating (b); 0.2% alginate + 0.2% Cyclea barabata leaves powder (CBLP) (c); 0.2% alginate + 0.4% CBLP (d); 0.2% alginate + 0.6% CBLP (e); 0.2% alginate + 0.8% CBLP (f). Adv. Hort. Sci., 2022 36(2): 135­144 142 aroma quality. The highest overall score was obtained by two different concentrations of CBLP: 0.2% and 0.4%. Moreover, edible coating with 0.4% CBLP had the highest score of taste. In general, samples coated with alginate and CBLP had a higher score for sensory analysis compared to control samples. Similar results were obtained from fresh­cut mango coated with polysaccharide­based edible coatings: samples coated with alginate had the highest consumer acceptance due to their ability to prevent firmness loss (Salinas­Roca et al., 2018). The maintenance of sensory quality by alginate­ based edible coating on fruits were also found on strawberry, water apples and apple fresh­cut (Guerreiro et al. , 2015; Utama et al . , 2020; Marghmaleki et al., 2020). 4. Conclusions Different concentrations of CBLP in an alginate­ based edible coating to extend the shelf­life of guava fruit were evaluated. The samples treated with 2% alginate and 0.8% CBLP had the significantly lowest level of total dissolved solids, total reducing sugar, and total titratable acidity and the highest scores on color, taste, and texture parameters in the organoleptic tests. From the analysis of firmness and organoleptic tests, the lowest firmness loss and high­ est score for aroma parameters were observed in samples treated with 2% alginate and 0.2% CBLP. Therefore, these results imply that the application of an edible coating based on alginate with the addition of CBLP can maintain the physicochemical and senso­ ry properties of guava fruits. References ACAMOVIC T., BROOKER J.D., 2005 ­ Biochemistry of plant secondary metabolites and their effects in animals. ­ Proc. Nutr. Soc., 64(3): 403­412. ARROYO B.J., BEZERRA A.C., OLIVEIRA L.L., ARROYO S.J., MELO E.A., DE SANTOS A.M.P., 2020 ­ Antimicrobial active edible coating of alginate and chitosan add ZnO nanoparticles applied in guavas (Psidium guajava L.). ­ Food Chem., 309: 125566. BASHIR H.A., ABU­GOUKH A.B.A., 2003 ­ Compositional changes during guava fruit ripening. ­ Food Chem., 80(2003): 557­563. BROTHAKAR P.K., KUMAR R., KUMAR R., 2002 ­ Effect of plant extracts on size and rind thickness of Baromasi lemon fruits (Citrus lemon) during storage. ­ J. Agric. Sci., 15: 98­103. BRÜGGENWIRTH M., KNOCHE M., 2016 ‐ Factors affecting mechanical properties of the skin of sweet cherry fruit. ­ J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 141(1): 45­53. CHOUDHARY M., DIKSHIT S., SHUKLA N., SAXENA R., 2008 ‐ Evaluation of guava (Psidium guajava L.) varieties and standardization of recipe for nectar preparation. ­ J. Hortic., 3(2): 161­163. COLOMBIÉ S., BEAUVOIT B., NAZARET C., BÉRNARD C., VERCAMBREM G., GALL S.L., BIAIS B., CABASSON C., MAUCOURD M., BERNILLON S.T., MOING A., DIEAUIDE­ NOUBHANI M., MAZAT J.P., GIBON Y., 2016 ‐ Respiration climacteric in tomato fruits elucidated by constrain‐based modelling. ­ New Phytol., 213: 1726­ 1739. CORDENUNSI­LYSENKO B.R., NASCIMENTO J.R.O., CASTRO­ ALVES V.C., PURGATTO E., FABI J.P., PERONI­OKYTA F.H.G., 2019 ­ The starch is (not) just another brick in the wall: The primary metabolism of sugars during banana ripening ‐ Front. Plant Sci., 10(391): 1­10. DESNOUES E., GIBON Y., BALDAZZI V., SIGNORET V., GÉNARD M., QUILOT­TURION B., 2014 ­ Profiling sugar metabolism during fruit development in a peach proge‐ ny with different fructose‐to‐glucose ratios. ­ BMC Plant Biol., 14(336): 1­13. DUBE A., SHUKKLA R., SINGH P., 2015 ­ Compositional and antioxidant changes in guava (Psidium guajava L.) vari‐ eties during development and ripening. ­ J. Ecol. Environ., 33(1): 33­36. DUBE A., SINGH P., 2015 ­ Changes in antioxidant and bio‐ chemical constituents in guava (Psidium guajava L.) fruit cv. apple colour during development and ripening. Fig. 2 ­ Result of organoleptic tests of guava treated with algina­ te­based edible coating enriched with different concen­ tration of Cyclea barabata leaves powder (CBLP). Utama et al. ‐ Preservation of guava by edible coating 143 ­ Int. J. Agric. Environ. Biotechol., 8(4): 855­859. FABI P., PERONI F.H.G., GOMEZ M.L.P.A., 2010 ­ Papaya, mango and guava fruit metabolism during ripening: postharvest changes affecting tropical fruit nutritional content and quality. ‐ Fresh Prod. J., 4(Special Issue 1): 56­66. GUERREIRO A.C., GAGO C.M.L., FALEIRO M.L., MIGUEL M.G.C., ANTUNES M.D.C., 2015 ­ The use of polysac‐ charide‐based edible coatings enriched with essential oils to improve shelf‐life of strawberries. ­ Postharvest Biol. Technol., 110: 51­60 ISHARTANI D., RAHMAN F.L.F., HARTANTO R., UTAMI R., KHASANAH L.U., 2018 ­ Physical, chemical and sensory characteristics of red guava (Psidium guajava) velva at different fruit ripening time. ­ IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. for 2018, 102: 1­8 ISLAM M.K., KHAN M.Z.H., SARKAR M.A.R., ABSAR N., SARKAR S.K., 2013 ­ Changes in acidity, TSS, and sugar content at different storage periods of the postharvest mango (Mangifera indica L.) influenced by Bavistin DF. ­ Int. J. Food Sci., 2013: 1­8. KOCIRA A., KOZLOWICZ K., PANASIEWICZ K., STANIAK M., SZPUNAR­KROK E., HORTYŃSKA P., 2021 ­ Polysaccharides as edible films and coatings: Characteristics and influence on fruit and vegetable quality‐ A Review. ­ Agronomy, 11: 813. KUMAR M., TOMAR M., AMAROWICZ R., SAURABH W., NAIR M.S., MAHESHWARI C., SASI M., PRAJAPATI U., HASAN M., SINGH S., CHANGAN S., PRAJAPAT R.K., BERWAL M.K., SATANKAR V., 2021 ‐ Guava (Psidium guajava L.) leaves: Nutritional composition, phytochem‐ ical profile, and health‐promoting bioactivities. ­ Foods, 10(4): 752. MANDAL G., DHALIWAL H.S., MAHAJAN, B.V.C., 2012 ­ Effect of pre‐harvest application of NAA and potassium nitrate on storage quality of winter guava (Psidium guajava). ­ Indian J. Agric. Sci., 82(11): 985­989. MARGHMALEKI S.N., MORTAZAVI S.M.H., SAEI H., MOSTAAN A., 2020 ­ The effect of alginate‐based edible coating enriched with citric acid and ascorbic acid on texture, appearance and eating quality of apple fresh‐ cut. ­ Int. J. Fruit Sci., 21(1): 40­51. MASAMBA K.G., MNDALIRA K., 2016 ­ Vitamin C stability in pineapple, guava and baobab juices under different storage conditions using different levels of sodium ben‐ zoate and metabisulphite. ­ Afr. J. Biotechnol., 12(2): 186­191. MEILGAARD M.C., CARR B.T., CIVILLE G.V., 2006 ­ Sensory evaluation techniques. ­ Vol I. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp. 464. MONTANARO G., DICHIO B., XILOYANNIS C., 2012 ‐ Fruit transpiration: Mechanisms and significance for fruit nutrition and growth, pp. 233­250. ­ In: MONTANARO G. Advances in selected plant physiology aspects. Intech Open, London, UK, pp. 400. MOWLAH G., ITOO S., 1982 ­ Guava (Psidium guajava L.) sugar components and related enzymes at stages of fruit development and ripening. ­ Nippon Shokuhin Kogyo Gakkaishi, 29(8): 472­476. NAIR M.S., SAXENA A., KAUR C., 2018 ­ Effect of chitosan and alginate‐based coatings enriched with pomegran‐ ate peel extract to extend the postharvest quality of guava (Psidium guajava L.). ­ Food Chem., 240: 245­ 252. NASEER S., HUSSAIN S., NAEEM N., PERVAIZ M., RAHMAN M., 2018 ­ The phytochemistry and medicinal value of Psidium guajava (guava). ­ Clin. Phytosci., 32(4): 1­8. NELSON N., 1944 ­ A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for the determination of glucose. ­ J. Biol. Chem., 3(2): 375­380. OLIVAS G.I., MATTINSON D.S., BARBOSA­CÁNOVAS G.V., 2007 ­ Alginate coatings for preservation of minimally processed ‘Gala’ apples. ‐ Postharvest Biol. Technol., 45(1): 89­96. PANIAGUA C., POSÉ S., MORRIS V.J., KIRBY A.R., QUESADA M.A., MERCADO J.A., 2014 ­ Fruit softening and pectin disassembly: an overview of nanostructural pectin modifications assessed by atomic force microscopy. ­ Ann Bot., 114(6): 1375­1383. PARREIDT T.S., MÜLLER K., SCHMID M., 2018 ­ Alginate‐ based edible films and coatings for food packaging applications. ­ Foods, 7(10): 170. PATEL R.K., MAITI C., DEKA B.C., DESHMUKH N.A., VERMA V., NATH A., 2014 ­ Physical and biochemical changes in guava (Psidium guajava L.) during various stages of fruit growth and development. ­ Int. J. Agric. Environ. Biotechnol., 8(1): 75. PATEL R.K., MAITI C.S., DEKA B.C., DESHMUKH N.A., NATH A., 2013 ­ Changes in sugars, pectin, and antioxidants of guava (Psidium guajava) fruits during fruit growth and maturity. ­ Indian J. Agric. Sci., 83(10): 1017­1021. PAUL V., PANDEY R., 2014 ­ Role of internal atmosphere on fruit ripening and storability ‐ A review. ­ J. Food Sci. Technol., 51(7): 1223­1250. RACHMAWATI A.K., ANANDITO R.B.K., MANUHARA G.J., 2010 ­ Extraction and characterization of pectin on green cincau (Premna oblongifolia) in edible film pro‐ duction. ­ Biofarmasi J. Nat. Prod. Biochem., 8(1): 1­10. RANA S., SIDDIQUI S., GOYAL A., 2015 ­ Extension of the shelf life of guava by individual packaging with cling and shrink films. ­ J Food Sci Technol., 52(12): 8148­ 8155. RANGANNA S., 1986 ­ Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruit and vegetable products. ­ Tata Mac Graw Hill, Uttar Pradesh, Noida, pp. 1112. ROJAS­GRAÜ M.A., RAYBAUDI­MASSILIA R.M., SOLIVA­ FORTUNY R.C., AVENA­BUSTILLOS R.J., MCHUGH T.H., MARTÍN­BELLOSO O., 2007 ­ Apple puree‐alginate edi‐ ble coating as carrier of antimicrobial agents to prolong shelf‐life of fresh‐cut apples. ­ Postharvest Biol. Technol., 45(2007): 254­264. SALINAS­ROCA B., GUERREIRO A., WELTI­CHANES J., Adv. Hort. Sci., 2022 36(2): 135­144 144 ANTUNES M.D.C., MARTÍN­BELLOSO O., 2018 ­ Improving quality of fresh‐cut mango using polysaccha‐ ride‐based edible coatings. ­ Int. J. Foods Sci., 53(4): 938­945. SETIAWAN C.K., UTAMA N.A., PRADANA B.A., 2019 ­ Combination of alginate based edible coating‐betel essential oil in extending the shelf life of rose apple cv. Dalhari (Syzygium samarangense). ­ Adv. Hort. Sci., 33(1): 33­38. SINGH J., PRASAD N., SINGH S.K., 2017 ­ Postharvest treat‐ ment of guava (Psidium guajava L.) fruits with boric acid and NAA for quality regulation during ambient storage. ­ Int. J. Bio­Resour. Stress Manag., 8(2): 201­ 206. SOMOGYI M., 1937 ­ A new reagent for the determination of sugars. ­ J. Biol. Chem., 160: 61­68. TRIPATHI K., PANDEY S., MALIK M., KAUL T., 2016 ­ Fruit ripening of climacteric and non‐climacteric fruit. ‐ J. Eviron. Appl. Bioresearch., 4(1): 27­34. TZORTZAKIS N., XYLIA P., CHRYSARGYRIS A., 2019 ‐ Sage essential oil improves the effectiveness of Aloe vera gel on postharvest quality of tomato fruit. ­ Agronomy, 9: 635. UTAMA N.U., YULIANTI, PRAMESI P.C., 2020 ­ The effects of alginate‐based edible coating enriched with green grass jelly and vanilla essential oils for controlling bac‐ terial growth and shelf life of water apples. ­ AIMS Agric. Food, 5(4): 756­768. VAISHALI, SHARMA H.P., SAMSHER, CHAUDHARY V., SUNIL, KUMAR M., 2019 ­ Importance of edible coating on fruits and vegetables: A review. ­ J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem., 8(3): 4104­4110. VIÑA J., GOMEZ­CARBERRA M.C., LLORET A., MARQUEZ R., MIÑANA J.B., PALLARDÓ F.V., SASTRE J., 2000 ­ Free radicals in exhaustive physical exercise: Mechanism of production, and protection by antioxidants. ­ Life, 50(4­ 5): 271­277. ZHOU R., LI Y., YANG L., XIE J., 2010 ­ Effect of edible coat‐ ings on enzymes, cell‐membrane integrity, and cell‐wall constituents in relation to brittleness and firmness of Huanghua pears (Pyruspyrifolia Nakai, cv. Huanghua) during storage. ­ Food Chem., 124(2011): 569­575.