Impaginato 3 Adv. Hort. Sci., 2021 35(1): 3­9 DOI: 10.36253/ahsc­8468 Foliar application of potassium on antioxidant enzyme activities of tomato plants under drought stress A. Farzane 1, H. Nemati 1 (*), M. Shoor 1, H. Ansari 2 1 Department of Gardening, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. 2 Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. Key words: Catalase, evapotranspiration, KCl, polyphenol oxidase, superoxide dismutase. Abstract: Water stress negatively affects productivity in crops, while the foliar application of potassium­containing compounds may be helpful in reducing the drought effects. This study evaluated the efficacy of foliar applied potassium chloride (control ­ distilled water spray ­, 3 and 6 mM­1) on tomato plants under drought stress. Three irrigation levels were maintained at 100, 75 and 50% according to evapotranspiration designated as well watered, moderate and severe drought stressed. Increasing drought stress significantly reduced plant growth and yield. The foliar applied KCl produced maximum leaf area, stem diameter and length, plant yield under each drought stress conditions compa­ red to control. The minimum of growth factors were obtained by control under severe stress. Highest yield per plant was also recorded for foliar applied KCl under moderate condition than other treatments. Foliar applied KCl alone decreased the SOD, CAT and PPO in well­watered condition but KCl application on tomato plants under drought stress induced the antioxidant enzyme activi­ ties more than control well­watered treatment. 1. Introduction The major limitation for plant growth and crop production in arid and semi­arid regions is soil water availability. Plants that are continuously exposed to drought stress can form ROS (Reactive oxygen species), which leads to leaf damage (Foyer et al., 2002; Oerke and Dehne, 2004; Cakmak, 2005) and, ultimately, decreases crop yield. The decrease in soil water potential causes alteration in minerals uptake by plant roots and reduc­ tion in leaf expansion under drought stress conditions (Kaminek et al., 1997; Pospisilova et al., 2000). Drought is becoming a serious threat to crop production worldwide resulting in 67 and 82% reduction in K uptake under mild and severe water stress conditions (Baque et al., 2006). During drought stress, root growth and the rates of K+ diffusion in the soil towards the roots were (*) Corresponding author: nemati@um.ac.ir Citation: FARZANE A., NEMATI H., SHOOR M., ANSARI H., 2021 ­ Foliar application of potassium on antioxi‐ dant enzyme activities of tomato plants under drought stress. ­ Adv. Hort. Sci., 35(1): 3­9 Copyright: © 2021 Farzane A., Nemati H., Shoor M., Ansari H. This is an open access, peer reviewed article published by Firenze University Press (http://www.fupress.net/index.php/ahs/) and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Received for publication 16 April 2020 Accepted for publication 24 Dcember 2020 AHS Advances in Horticultural Science https://doi.org/10.36253/ahsc-8468 http://www.fupress.net/index.php/ahs/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Adv. Hort. Sci., 2021 35(1): 3­9 4 both restricted, thus limiting K acquisition. The result ing lower K concentrations can further depress the plant resistance to drought stress, as well as K absorption, which ultimately leads to reduction in the fruit size, plant yield, lack in red color of tomato and fruit quality (Bidari and Hebsur, 2011; Afzal et al., 2015), and deteriorated photo­ synthesis, enzyme activation in plants (Marschner, 1995; Garg et al. , 2004; Afzal et al. , 2015). Maintaining adequate plant K is, therefore, critical for plant drought resistance. When plants were supplied with different K+ con­ centrations and then subjected to drought stress, their stomatal conductance was more markedly reduced in normal K plants than in low K plants (Wang et al., 2013). During drought stress, the sto­ mata cannot function properly in K+­deficient plants, resulting in greater water loss. Drought stress did not decrease water use efficiency (WUE), whereas it did increase WUE by rapid stomata clo­ sing during water deficit (Egil la et al. , 2005). Adequate levels of K nutrition enhanced plant drou­ ght resistance, water relations, WUE and plant growth under drought conditions (Wang et al., 2013). Besides various adaptive mechanisms; potas­ sium (K) sprayed under drought condition can improve the tolerance of crop plants to various types of abiotic stresses, and it also improved sub­ sequent growth and yield. Mengel and Kirkby (2001) reported that K improves physiological processes by the regulation of turgor pressure and photosynthe­ sis; translocation of cations and enzymes activation, while, Cakmak (2005) also observed that plant suf­ fering from drought stress required more internal K. Yield limiting effect of water deficit could be over­ come by increasing K supply (Damon and Rengel, 2007). In legumes, devastating effects of drought can be alleviated by rich K supply (Sangakkara et al., 2000). A close relationship between K nutritional status and plant drought resistance has been demonstrated. The bottom lines of the reviewed results in this section indicate that under drought stress conditions, yield losses can be minimized by the sufficient supply of K. However, its application effect at tomato growth stages is not well understood yet. The objec­ tive of present work was to study the possible role of K applied on tomato plant under drought, in mitiga­ tion of stress in terms of physiological components and antioxidant enzyme values. 2. Materials and Methods This experiment was designed to observe the effect of KCl on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seedlings under drought stress. Seeds of tomato were sown in plastic trays and maintained in a greenhouse up to 4 real leafy stages, at Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. The experimental design was a split plot design with three water stress plot as main plot and 3 KCl treatments (0, 3 and 6 mM­1) as subsidiary plot with 3 replications. The subsidiary plot area was 1 m2 (1×1 m) and consisted of four plants per plot. After 70 days from sowing, seedlings with uniform growth were transplanted to an experi­ mental field with a 50 cm inter­seedling spacing. According to evapotranspiration (ETc = crop evapo­ transipration), the water stress was conducted on tomato plants at three levels well­watered (100% ETc), moderate and severe drought stress (75 and 50% ETc, respectively). According to Penman­ Monteith equation, the crop evapotranspiration, ETc (Formula 1), is calculated by multiplying the referen­ ce crop evapotranspiration, ETo, by a crop coeffi­ cient, Kc and ETo (Formula 2) is calculated by Ep and Kp factors. ETc = Kc ETo [1] Where ETc= crop evapotranspiration [mm d­1], Kc= crop coefficient [1.15 for tomato], ETo= crop evapo­ transpiration [mm d­1]. ETo= Ep. Kp [2] Where Kp= Pan coefficient (0.77), Ep0 pan evapora­ tion. The foliar spray was applied five times (during two month) to tomato plants during growth and fruit set with KCl at 0, 3 and 6 mM­1 dose. Growth and plant analysis Plant height and stem diameter were measured at the end of the harvesting season and presented as cm and mm respectively. The total yield of tomato fruits were measured by gram scales (g) in different harvesting times per plant. The leaf area (LA) measu­ red by Windias (Delta­T Co, England) and presented as (mm2). The integrated water­use efficiency (formula 3) is typically defined as the ratio of biomass produced (D, kg h­1) to the rate of total water irrigation (Wi, m 3ha­1) and rainfall (Wp, mm) during the drought stress treat­ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penman%E2%80%93Monteith_equation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penman%E2%80%93Monteith_equation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biomass Farzani et al. ‐ Tomato antioxidant enzyme activities 5 ment. WUE= D/(Wp + Wi) [3] Assays of enzymatic and non‐enzymatic antioxidants Fruits were randomly selected from each treat­ ment, at the end of the experiment. Total soluble proteins were quantified by following the protocol devised by Bradford (1976). For determination of enzymatic antioxidants, fruit samples were extracted in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.8). The extract was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm 4°C and the supernatant was used for further assay of catalase (CAT) Chance and Maehly, 1955 and poly phenol oxidase (PPO) (Siriphanich and Kader, 1985) and super oxide dismu­ tase (SOD) activities (Giannopolitis and Ries, 1977). Tomato juice was squeezed from the fresh tomatoes onto a digital refractometer (PR­100, Atago Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) to measure total soluble solids (TSS) and the results were expressed in Brix according to AOAC method 932.12 (2005). For measured the proli­ ne content, leaves were randomly selected and expe­ rimented according to Bates et al. (1973) method. Statistical analysis Effects of water stress treatments; KCl and corre­ sponding interactions were determined by analysis of variance according to the general linear model proce­ dure of SAS (version 8.2; SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.). Means were compared using Least Significant Difference (LSD, p≤0.05) according to method descri­ bed by Tukey HSD. Analysis showed a significant inte­ raction between KCl and watering treatment for the some measured parameters. The graphs draw by using excels 2010 software. 3. Results Increasing drought stress (DS) levels significantly reduced plant growth and yield, but foliar applica­ tions of KCl improved the harmful effects of drought stress. Comparison of means indicate that leaf area (LA) was gradually decreased with increasing drought stress (Table 1). The minimum leaf area was obtained under extreme drought conditions (50% ETc). Water stress decreased LA but exogenous application of KCl ameliorated the negative effects of water stress significantly than water spray only (Fig. 1a). However, highest LA in each treatment was recorded for foliar applied KCl than control under well­watered, mode­ rate and severe drought stress. A minimum LA was recorded under severe drought stress, especially con­ trol × 50% ETc treatment (Fig. 1a). The increasing water stress decreased stem length (Fig. 1b). A maximum stem length was observed under well­watered conditions by exogenous applica­ tion of 6 mM­1KCl while in moderate and severe drought, foliar applied KCl had no significant effects. Minimum stem length was noted under extreme water stress without foliar KCl application. Stem dia­ meter decrease in response to DS (Table 1). Foliar KCl application helps to plant tolerance with increasing stem diameter under DS condition. Data showed (Fig. 1c) the increasing in KCl doses (0 up to 6 mM­1) lead to increasing in stem diameter in all of treatments. The tomato yield displayed a significant reduction in response to the increasing levels of water deficit treatments. For example, under effect of 50% ETc condition, the yield decreased by 21% (Table 1) com­ pared to control. In the other hand, plants had more vegetative growth and less yield in well­watered con­ dition (100% ETc) than moderate DS (75% ETc). In non­DS condition, foliar spray of KCl showed similar fruit yield under well­watered, moderate and severe drought conditions. But foliar KCl application had effective enhancement on plant yield under drought stress (Fig. 1d). Tomatoes irrigated with 50% ETc without KCl foliar application also produced fruits with significantly higher juice brix value than other Table 1 ­ Effects of different drought stress levels on tomato plants Means in each column followed by similar letters are not significantly different at 0.05 probability level, using LSD (Least Significant Difference) test. Drought LA (mm2) St. Length (cm) St. Diameter (mm) WUE Yield plant ­1 Brix 0 Proline (µg/g.fw) Protein (mg g­1 fw) SOD (IU mg­1 min­1 protein) CAT (IU mg­1 min­1 protein) PPO (IU mg­1 min­1 protein) Control 7555.156 a 52.66 a 14.69 a 4.360 b 1225.861 a 7.00 b 6734.877 c 1.405 a 967.28 a 178.35 c 80.777 b 75% ETc 5464.41 b 47.44 b 14.41 a 6.187 a 1404.72 a 7.11 b 9468.355 a 1.540 a 1240.31 a 196.63 b 142.66 b 50% ETc 3294.32 c 42.66 c 11.82 b 2.462 c 963.62 b 7.722 a 8161.222 b 1.382 a 1133.79 a 207.83 ab 258.11 a Adv. Hort. Sci., 2021 35(1): 3­9 6 treatments (Fig. 1e). The results in figure 1 (f) revealed that DS on tomato had higher significantly record in water use efficiency than those normally irrigated. Because of fewer yield in control treatment than 75% ETc, the results affirmed that the treatment 75% ETc and then control showed the highest water use efficiency than 50% ETc treatments. Foliar application of KCl had no significant effects of WUE under non­DS condition. Finally, the foliar application of KCl × 75% ETc showed the highest significant record in WUE in plants subjected to DS, respectively. Meanwhile, the treat­ ment 6 mM­1 KCl × 75% ETc recorded the highest significant WUE compared to other studied treat­ ments under well­watered and sever DS. Leaf proline concentration responded differently to drought and K supply. Drought stress (Table 1) increased proline concentration in leaves but exoge­ nous KCl decreased the proline content under none DS conditions (Table 2). The tomato leaves were sprayed with KCl had more proline content under drought stress than control conditions (Fig. 2 a). At 0 mM­1KCl level with no DS, the proline content in lea­ ves was 1168.4 µM/g F.wt. which increased to 13368.5 and 12111.5 µM/g F.wt. with increasing DS stress in 50% ETc with 3 and 6 mM­1 KCl foliar applica­ tion, respectively. Increase in KCl doses enhanced the total soluble proteins in tomato fruits (Table 2). Maximum fruit protein content was evident at moderate stress with 3 mM­1KCl followed by 0 mM­1KCl with minimum value under well­watered conditions (Fig. 2b). Foliar spray with KCl had impressive effects on protein con­ tents under well­watered and drought stress. However, the exogenous application of KCl perfor­ med better than control for fruit total soluble pro­ tein. A rise in drought stress also amplified the antioxi­ dants status of tomato fruits (Fig. 2c, d, e). Results showed that the enzymatic antioxidant contents in tomato fruits were sprayed by KCl, were decreased. So, the maximum SOD with no significant differences were recorded for foliar applied 0 and 3 mM­1KCl under severe drought and 0 mM­1KCl under modera­ te conditions (Fig. 2c). Increased CAT activities with no significant differences were found under medium and severe drought stress (Fig. 2d). Decreasing water level increased PPO contents for all treatments (Fig. 2e) and the highest value of PPO was obtained under sever DS but increasing in foliar application of KCl doses from 0 to 6 (mµ­1) caused to decrease the PPO fruit content (Fig. 2e). Fig. 1 ­ Effect of exogenous application of different KCL level on leaf area (a), stem length (b), stem diameter (c), yield (d), Brix (e), and WUE (f) of tomato under drought condi­ tions. (LSD, p≤0.05). Table 2 ­ Foliar application effects of different KCl levels on tomato plants Means in each column followed by similar letters are not significantly different at 0.05 probability level, using LSD (Least Significant Difference) test. KCl LA (mm2) St. Length (cm) St. Diameter (mm) WUE Yield plant ­1 Brix 0 Proline (µg/g fw) Protein (mg g­1 fw) SOD (IU mg­1 min­1 protein) CAT (IU mg­1 min­1 protein) PPO (IU mg­1 min­1 protein) Control 4836.40 b 43.11 b 12.23 c 4.014 a 1168.46 a 7.777 a 8953.16 a 1.286 b 1539.26 a 230.56 a 167.44 ab 3 5197.64 b 46.55 b 13.88 b 4.426 a 1211.41 a 6.777 ab 7590.68 c 1.562 a 761.61 b 196.29 ab 204.66 a 6 6279.84 a 53.11 a 14.81 a 4.014 a 1214.32 a 7.277 b 7820.60 b 1.479 ab 1040.52 ab 155.96 b 109.44 b Farzani et al. ‐ Tomato antioxidant enzyme activities 7 4. Discussion and Conclusions Increasing water stress has direct impact on crop growth and yield reduction and similar observations for reduction in growth and fruit yield of tomato were found in present study. Reduction in tomato yield under restricted water availability might have been due to reduction in photosynthetic area such as leaf area and leaf number (Chaves et al., 2011; Khan et al., 2015). In the present study, yield, leaf area and stem length were drastically reduced due to drought effect, whilst KCl foliar application improved these characters in tomato plants. It has been reported that the foliar application of KCl improved the growth factors in agronomy crops (Ahmad and Jabeen, 2005; Yasmeen et al., 2013). Besides adaptation role, positive effect of KCl on pro­ tein contents was also pronounced under drought stress. Proline is a well­known amino acid that gene­ rally accumulates when plants are exposed to envi­ ronmental stresses (Kavi­Kishor et al. , 2005). Enhanced proline synthesis is a common response of tomato plants to drought and may determine the stress tolerance (Doan and Maurel, 2005; Khan et al., 2015). Proline is believed to acts as a signaling mole­ cule that initiates adaptation to the stress (Maggio et al., 2002), acts as osmolyte for osmotic adjustment (Hayat et al. , 2012), helps in stabilizing membranes/proteins and scavenges free radicals (Ashraf and Foolad, 2007). Thus, it decreases the adverse effects of cytoplasmic acidosis and maintains proper NADP+ /NADPH ratios (Liang et al., 2013). In plants grown under drought conditions, proline indu­ ces the expression of drought stress responsive genes and, thus, decreases the damage due to exces­ sive Na+ ions accumulation (Chinnusamy et al., 2005). Proline act as a compatible solute in the plants (Mansour, 2000) and, generally, increases with increase in both the salinity stress and drought stress duration (Kishor and Sreenivasulu, 2014). Thus, it is likely to observe enhanced proline synthesis with increasing drought stress duration. Antioxidant enzy­ mes activities were considered as indicators of sca­ venging ROS and reducing oxidative stress (Dionisio­ Sese and Tobita, 1998; Lin and Kao, 2002). For exam­ ple, SOD may convert superoxide radicals into H2O2 and H2O2 was further decomposed by CAT and POD (Redman et al., 2011). In this study, drought stress significantly increased the antioxidant enzymes acti­ vities. The results of many researchers’ studies pro­ ved that adequate external K supply significantly decreased antioxidant enzymes activities and proline in drought stressed plants might be caused by enhan­ cing plant physiological metabolism and reducing ROS production and MDA content (Wei et al., 2013; Yasmeen et al., 2013; Bahrami­Rad and Hajiboland, 2017). In the other hand, the combination of drought stress and exogenous KCl application improved the antioxidant activities and proline content than well­ watered conditions. So, rise in drought stress with exogenous application of KCl induce tolerance in crops (Yasmeen et al., 2013). A similar trend was fol­ lowed by all the treatments in case of antioxidant enzyme activities under each water stress treatment. The results of this study clearly demonstrated that water deficit at any critical crop growth stage seve­ rely affected the physiological and antioxidant and non­antioxidant parameters of tomato. Foliar appli­ cation of K on a drought stressed plants at all growth stages improved the physiological performance and plant tolerance but reduced antioxidant enzyme acti­ vities. All these findings lead us to recommend that for tomato crop under drought farmers should spray the crop with 6 (mµ­1) KCl to minimize the negative effect of drought. This can have a dual benefit: Fig. 2 ­ Effect of exogenous application of different KCl levels on enzymatic and non­enzymatic antioxidants; proline (a), total soluble protein (b), superoxide dismutase (c), cata­ lase (d) and polyphenol oxidase (e) of tomato fruits under drought conditions. (LSD, p ≤ 0.05). 8 Adv. Hort. Sci., 2021 35(1): 3­9 improving the physiological performance of tomato and supplying K nutrient to plants. For the foliar spray on a small scale, a common hand­boom sprayer can easily be used, whereas on large scale use of a mechanical boom­sprayer is advised. Acknowledgements The authors are highly thankful to Faculty of agri­ culture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran for pro­ viding funds to complete this study which was a part of a research project entitled “Study on effective treat­ ments to improve water use efficiency at different levels of drought stress on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.)”. References AFZAL I., HUSSAIN B., BASRA S.M.A., HABIB ULLAH S., SHAKEE Q., KAMRAN M., 2015 ­ Foliar application of potassium improves fruit quality and yield of tomato plants. ­ Acta. Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus., 14(1): 3­13. AHMAD R., JABEEN R., 2005 ­ Foliar spray of mineral ele‐ ments antagonistic to sodium‐a technique to induce salt tolerance in plants growing under saline condi‐ tions. ­ Pak. J. Bot., 37: 913­920. ASHRAF M., FOOLAD M.R., 2007 ­ Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress tolerance. ­ Environ. Expt. Bot., 59: 206­216. BAHRAMI­RAD S., HAJIBOLAND R., 2017 ­ Effect of potas‐ sium application in drought‐stressed tobacco (Nicotiana rustica L.) plants: Comparison of root with foliar application. ­ Ann. Agric. Sci., 62: 121­130. BAQUE M.A., KARIM M.A., HAMID A., TETSUSHI H., 2006 ­ Effect of fertilizer potassium on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under water stress conditions. ‐ South Pacific Stud., 27: 25­36. BATES L.S., WALDREN R.P., TEARE I.D., 1973 ­ Rapid deter‐ mination of free proline for water stress studies. ­ Plant Soil., 39: 205­207. BIDARI B.I., HEBSUR N.S., 2011 ­ Potassium in relation to yield and quality of selected vegetable crops. ‐ Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 24(1): 55­59. BRADFORD M.M., 1976 ­ A rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utili‐ zing the principle of protein‐dye binding. ­ Anal. Biochem., 72: 248­254. CAKMAK I., 2005 ­ The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants. ­ J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 168: 521­530. CHAVES M., COSTA J.M., SAIBO N.J.M., 2011 ­ Recent advances in photosynthesis under drought and salinity. ‐ Adv. Bot. Res., 57: 49­104. CHINNUSAMY V., JAGENDORF A., ZHU J.K., 2005 ­ Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants. ‐ Crop Sci., 45: 437­448. DAMON P.M., RENGEL Z., 2007 ­ Wheat genotypes differ in potassium efficiency under glasshouse and field condi‐ tions. ­ Aust. J. Agric. Res., 58: 816­823. DIONISIO­SESE M.L., TOBITA S., 1998 ­ Antioxidant respon‐ ses of rice seedlings to salinity stress. ­ Plant Sci., 135: 1­9. DOAN T.L., MAUREL C., 2005 ­ Aquaporin In a challenging environment: molecular gears for adjusting plant water status. ­ Plant Cell Environ., 28: 85­96. EGILLA J.N., DAVIES F.T., BOUTTON T.W., 2005 ­ Drought stress influences leaf water content, photosynthesis, and water‐use efficiency of hibiscus rosa‐sinensis at three potassium concentrations. ­ Photosynthetica, 43: 135­140. FOYER C.H., VANACKER H., GOMEZ L.D., HARBINSON J., 2002 ­ Regulation of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in maize leaves at optimal and chilling temperatures: Review. ­ Plant Physiol. Biochem., 40: 659­668. GARG B.K., BURMAN U., KATHJU S., 2004 ­ The influence of phosphorous nutrition on the physiological responose of moth bean genotypes to drought. ­ J. Plant Nut. Soil Sci., 167: 503­508. GIANNOPOLITIS C.N., RIES S.K., 1977 ­ Superoxide dismuta‐ se. I. Occurrence in higher plants. ­ Plant Physiol., 59: 309­314. HAYAT S., HAYAT Q., ALYEMENI M.N., WANI A.S., PICHTEL J., AHMAD A., 2012 ­ Role of proline under changing environments: A review. ‐ Plant Signal Behav., 7(11): 1456­1466. KAMINEK M., MOTYKA V., VANKOVA R., 1997 ­ Regulation of cytokinin content in plant cells. ­ Physiol. Plant., 101: 689­700. KAVI­KISHOR P.B., SANGAM S., AMRUTHA R.N., SRI­LAXMI P., NAIDU K.R., RAO K.R.S.S., RAO S., REDDY K.J., THE­ RIAPPAN P., SREENIVASULU N., 2005 ­ Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation, uptake and transport in higher plants: Its implications in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance. ­ Curr. Sci., 88(3): 424­438. KHAN S.H., KHAN A., LITAF U., SHAH A.S., KHAN M.A., BILAL M., Ali M.U., 2015 ­ Effect of drought stress on tomato cv. Bombino. ­ J. Food Process. Technol., 6(7): 465. KISHOR P.B.K., SREENIVASULU N., 2014 ­ Is proline accu‐ mulation per se correlated with stress tolerance or is proline homeostasis a more critical issue? ­ Plant Cell Environ., 37(2): 300­311. LIANG X., ZHANG L., NATARAJAN S.K., BECKER D.F., 2013 ­ Proline mechanisms of stress survival ‐ Antioxid. Redox Sign., 19(9): 998­1011. LIN C.C., KAO C.H., 2002 ­ Osmotic stress‐induced changes in cell wall peroxidase activity and hydrogen peroxide Farzani et al. ‐ Tomato antioxidant enzyme activities 9 level in roots of rice seedlings. ‐ J. Plant Growth Regul., 37: 177­183. MAGGIO A., MIYAZAKI S., VERONESE P., FUJITA T., IBEAS J.I., DAMSZ B, NARASIMHAN M.L., HASEGAWA P.M., JOLY R.J., BRESSAN R.A., 2002 ­ Does proline accumula‐ tion play an active role in stress‐induced growth reduc‐ tion. ­ Plant J., 31: 699­712. MANSOUR M.M.F., 2000 ­ Nitrogen containing compounds and adaptation of plants to salinity stress ­ Biol. Plant, 43(4): 491­500. MARSCHNER H., 1995 ­ Functions of mineral nutrients: macronutrients, pp. 299­312. ­ In: MARSCHNER H. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Second edition, Academic Press, NY, USA, pp. 651. MENGEL K., KIRKBY E.A., 2001 ­ Principles of plant nutri‐ tion. Fifth edition. ­ Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 864. OERKE E.C., DEHNE H.W., 2004 ­ Safeguarding production‐ losses in major crops and the role of crop protection ­ Crop Prot., 23: 275­285. POSPISILOVA J., SYNKOVA H., RULCOVA J., 2000 ­ Cytokinin and water stress. ­ Biol. Plant., 43: 321­328. REDMAN R.S., YO K., WOODWARD C.J.D.A., GREER C., ESPI­ NO L., 2011 ­ Increased fitness of rice plants to abiotic stress via habitat adapted symbiosis: A strategy for mitigating impacts of climate change. ‐ PLoS ONE, 6(7): e14823. SANGAKKARA U.R., FREHNER M., NOSBERGER J., 2000 ­ Effect of soil moisture and potassium fertilizer on shoot water potential, photosynthesis and partitioning of car‐ bon in mung bean and cowpea .­ J. Agron. Crop Sci., 185: 201­207. SIRIPHANICH J., KADER A.A., 1985 ­ Effects of CO2 on total phenolics, phenylalanine ammonia lyase, and polyphe‐ nol oxidase in lettuce tissue. ‐ J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 110(2): 249­253. WANG M., ZHENG Q., SHEN Q., GUA S., 2013 ­ The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. ­ Int. J. Mol. Sci., 14: 7370­7390. WEI J., LI C., LI Y., JIANG G., CHENG G., ZHENG Y., 2013 ­ Effects of external potassium (K) supply on drought tolerances of two contrasting winter wheat cultivars. ­ PLoS ONE, 8(7): e69737. YASMEEN A., SHAHZAD M.A., ABDUL­WAHID B., FAROOQ M., HAFEEZ­UR­REHMAN N., HUSSAIN N., 2013 ­ Improving drought resistance in wheat (Triticum aesti­ vum) by exogenous application of growth enhancers. ‐ Int. J. Agric. Biol., 15: 1307­1312.