Impaginato 207 Adv. Hort. Sci., 2021 35(2): 207­213 DOI: 10.36253/ahsc­9981 Impact of Moroccan Crocus sativus L. tepals, corms, and stigmas extract on growth and photosynthetic pigments in tomato seedling A. Khoulati (*), E. Saalaoui Laboratory of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed First University, Oujda, Morocco. Key words: Biostimulant, chlorophyll, Saffron by­product, Solanum lycoper‐ sicum L. Abstract: An experiment was carried out in a greenhouse to study the effect of aqueous extracts of Crocus sativus L. by­products on tomato plants. Three con­ centrations of tepals and corms were used by fertigation: 1 g/L, 2 g/L, and 3 g/L. The aqueous extract of the stigmas was used as a foliar application at 0.6 g/L. The experiment was carried out in a completely randomized block with three repetitions for each concentration. The concentration of tepal extract at 3 g/L significantly (p≤0.05) increased the plants’ height, the chlorophyll a, b con­ tent in the leaf. The same results were observed for the foliar treatment with stigmas; however, there was no effect of tepal extract on the carotenoid con­ tent. On the other hand, the concentration 2 g/L of the corms extract had a positive impact (p≤0.05) in the chlorophyll b content while the concentration of 3 g/L increased the plant’s height, the chlorophyll a (p≤0.05). Current results indicate that Crocus sativus by­products could improve certain physiological aspects of the recipient plants and be new and natural biostimulants. 1. Introduction Saffron (Crocus Sativus L.) is a stemless, bulbous perennial plant that belongs to the Iridaceae family (Taylor et al., 2008). Moroccan surfaces grown from saffron are about 1000 ha, mainly in the mountains of the AntiAtlas. This production area takes more and more importance in other regions (Lage and Cantrell, 2009). In the production of saffron, for each kilogram of spices produced, about 53 kg of tepals are made (Maggi et al., 2012), and 90% of the total fresh weight corresponds to the by­products composed of tepals, which are generally discarded as waste (Menghini et al., 2018). Hundreds of corms too small for flowering to be replanted are dumped to obtain only 1 kg of dry stigmas (Smolskaite et al., 2011). However, this biomass is a potentially significant source of bioactive com­ pounds. Many researchers have focused their attention on valuing saffron by­products to increase crop profitability, such as floral bio­residues and (*) Corresponding author: aminekhoulati89@gmail.com Citation: KHOULATI A., SAALAOUI E., 2021 ­ Impact of Moroccan Crocus sativus L. tepals, corms, and stigmas extract on growth and photosynthetic pigments in tomato seedling. ­ Adv. Hort. Sci., 35(2): 207­213. Copyright: © 2021 Khoulati A., Saalaoui E. This is an open access, peer reviewed article published by Firenze University Press (http://www.fupress.net/index.php/ahs/) and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Received for publication 31 October 2020 Accepted for publication 9 April 2021 AHS Advances in Horticultural Science Short note https://doi.org/10.36253/ahsc-9981 http://phypha.ir/ppj/search.php?sid=1&slc_lang=en&auth=Ennouamane http://www.fupress.net/index.php/ahs/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Adv. Hort. Sci., 2021 35(2): 207­213 208 corms (Lahmass et al., 2018). The enhancement of these properties of saffron floral bio­residues was evaluated on the antioxidant activity (Sanchez­ Vioque et al., 2012), the anti­inflammatory activity (Amin and Hosseinzadeh, 2015), the antifungal and cytotoxic activity (Zheng et al., 2011), and antibacter­ ial activity (Shadmehri et al., 2019). On the other hand, the tepals are used in many industries, as active ingredients in various food (Tuberoso et al. 2016), in cosmetic formulations (Natalia et al., 2019), and as a potential resource of natural color thanks to the high content of anthocyanins for food applica­ tions, and biomedical (Shadmehri et al., 2019). Bioactive components of corms include proteogly­ cans and saponins, which have shown antifungal and antioxidant activity (Rubio­Moraga et al., 2011). In a preliminary study, saffron stigmas showed a biostim­ ulant and antifungal effect on the tomato plant (Khoulati et al., 2019). The applied treatments signifi­ cantly improved plant height and positively affected the tomato fruit quality after enhancing the sec­ ondary metabolites’ content. These bioactive molecules of tepals and corms are supposed to have an effect biostimulant on recipi­ ents’ plants. Therefore, the current study was planned to confirm the use of tepals and corms extract as a biostimulant on the morphological pho­ tosynthetic pigment parameters of tomato seedlings. The study will promote Crocus sativus L. by­product and produce new and natural biostimulants of plant growth. 2. Materials and Methods Plant material Tomato cultivar was sown in plastic trays until germination, at a temperature of 27°C ±2, 70% rela­ tive humidity, photoperiod of 16 h/8 h light/dark. At four leaves emergence, the seedlings were trans­ ferred to plastic pots (33x18 cm) containing 60% sand, 35% peat (Floragard 50/50, v/v), and 5% gravel and maintained at the optimum temperature (28/ 20°C, day/ night) and natural daylight under green­ house in the northeast of Morocco (34°50’33” N, 2°10’18” W). The containers are placed on 100 cm apart rows and 60 cm within rows. There was no fer­ tilizer application, and all the plants received the same volume of irrigation water. One week later, the first treatment is applied. Tepals and corms extracts at three different concen­ trations (1 g/L, 2 g/L, and 3 g/L) were used both as fertigation with a 200 mL volume by one plant and 0.6 g/L used foliar application by the saffron stigmas. Distilled water was taken as a control treatment. Each replicate set contained three seedlings, and the experiment had three replications in a completely randomized trial. After one week from the first appli­ cation, the treatments were repeated, keeping the same concentration and method as the first applica­ tion. One week after the second application, and when the biostimulant effect was visually observed, samples were collected to determine the morpholog­ ical and photosynthetic pigment indices. Aqueous extract preparation Saffron stigmas originating from Taliouine (Morocco) were purchased, milled, and conserved at ­20°C until each use. The dried tepals were harvested during the 2019 production in the Tinissane region in the northeast of Morocco (34°50’33” N, 2°10’18” W). The tepals were milled and stored at ­ 20°C until each use. The corms were obtained from Taliouine and kept at ­20°C after drying. Before each application, the concentration of tepals and corms powder used for the study left 24 h in 1 L of distilled water for extraction in the dark for each concentration: 1 g/L, 2 g/L, and 3 g/L. For stigmas foliar application, 0.6 g extracted in 1 L of the distilled water 24 h in the dark. Quantification of the main components of extracts ­ The anthocyanin contents of tepals were mea­ sured according to the protocol explained by Ganjewala et al. (2008). The absorbance (Abs) of the samples was measured at 530 nm, and the results were expressed in milligram equivalent cyanidin 3­ glucoside by 100 grams of dry matter (mg CGE/100g DM). Flavonol’s contents were determined by mea­ suring the absorbance at 360 nm, and the results were expressed in milligram equivalent quercetin 3­ glucoside by 100 grams of dry matter (mg QGE/100g DM). ­ The total polyphenol of tepals was determined using the Folin­Ciocalteu method (Velioglu et al., 1998). The total polyphenols concentrations were expressed in milligrams of gallic acid equivalent to 100 grams of dry matter (mg GAE/100 g DM). ­ The content of crocin, picrocrocin, and safranal of saffron stigmas was determined following ISO 3632 (ISO, 2003). Morphological indices of tomato seedling Plant height was recorded using a measuring tape in cm. Shoot fresh weight was measured immediately Khoulati and Saalaoui ‐ Saffron tepals, corms, and stigmas as biostimulants 209 after rooting up the plants using an electronic bal­ ance. To determine the dry weight, samples were oven­dried for 24 h at 80 °C, and the value of the samples recorded in grams. Photosynthetic pigments The chlorophyll content and carotenoid were determined by crushing 0.2 g fresh leaf sample in 20 mL of 80% acetone and placed at room temperature for 48 h in the dark. A spectrophotometer was used to observe the absorbance at 663, 645, and 652 nm of the samples (Lichtenthaler, 1987). Chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll calculated using the following formula: Chlorophyll a (Chl a) = (12.7 x Abs663) ­ (2.69 x Abs645) Chlorophyll b (Chl b) = (22.99 x Abs645) ­ (4.68 x Abs663) Total chlorophyll = Chl a + Chl b Total carotenoid content = (1000 Abs470 ­ 1.82 Chla­85.02 Chlb) 198 Statistical analysis All figures and statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics 17.0 software. The data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of triplicate independent experiments and analyzed using a one­way analysis of variance (ANOVA). p≤0.05 was treated to be statistically significant. The Student­Newman­Keuls (SNK) test was used to classi­ fy averages using different letters for significant dif­ ferences. 3. Results The main components of extracts The anthocyanins, flavonols, and polyphenols con­ tents of tepals were 43.66 ± 0.79 mg CGE/100 g DM, 0.19 ± 0.21 mg QGE/100 g DM, and 672.73 ± 1.02 mg GAE/100 g DM, respectively. Total crocin, safranal and picrocrocin contents in the saffron sample are 184.56 ± 2.19 mg/g, 4.89 ± 0.18 mg/g, and 62.43 ± 0.37 mg/g, respectively. Morphological indices Variations in the morphological data revealed the significant effect of tepals, corms, and stigma extracts on tomato seedling growth in terms of concentra­ tions used (Figs. 1, 2). For the application of tepal extracts by fertigation, the highest plant height was recorded for plants fertigated with 3 g/L followed by 2 g/L. In contrast, the lowest values were observed in Fig. 2 ­ Tepal, corm, stigma extracts application to influence the tomato plant's plant height. The pictures were taken one week after the last treatment. 0 represents control treatment. A) treatment with petal extract by fertigation (2 g/L, 3 g/L). B) treatment with corm extract by fertigation (1 g/L, 2 g/L, 3 g/L). C) foliar application by saffron stigma extract at 0.6 g/L. Fig. 1 ­ Saffron stigmas, tepals, and corms extracts affect the hei­ ght of the tomato seedling. Measurements were made one week after the last treatment. Data were recorded for a total of three plants by treatment replicated three times. The concentration of saffron was represented as 0.6 g/L. The concentrations of tepals and corms are defi­ ned as 1 g/L, 2 g/L, and 3 g/L. 0: control. Bars represent averages and error lines one standard deviation. The dif­ ference in the letters indicates significant differences at p≤0.05 based on the SNK test. ***: the significative diffe­ rence at p≤0.001. Adv. Hort. Sci., 2021 35(2): 207­213 210 control seedlings. Concerning the treatment of corms highest plant was recorded for plants fertigates with 3 g/L followed by 2 g/L and 1 g/L compared to the control. However, the treatment by stigmas foliar application showed a significant difference at p≤0.001 compared to the control (Figs. 1, 2). Table 1 represents fresh shoot weight, dry shoot weight, fresh root weight, and dry root weight. As compared to control, the fresh and dry weight of seedlings were increased with tepal application and reached a signif­ icant level at 2 g/L followed by seedlings applied with 3 g/L. However, the same concentrations of applied tepal increased the weight of root fresh and root dry at 2 g/L, followed by 3 g/L. However, no effect of the application of the different concentrations of corm extract observed. Photosynthetic pigments The effect of tepals and corms on the chlorophyll contents of tomato leaves is depicted in figure 3. As it can be observed, the various applications influ­ enced significantly enhanced the chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll content. Concerning the use by tepal fertigation, the high value was recorded for the concentration of 3 g/L with an increase of 45.96 % for Chla and 28.71 % for Chlb, compared to the control. The application by corm fertigation at 3 g/L has increased Chla and Chlb concentrations of 37.12 % and 15.22 %, respectively (Fig. 3), compared to the control. On the other hand, the three corm extract concentrations significantly increased the carotenoid content (Table 1). However, no effect was observed on the carotenoid content after fertigation by the three different tepals (Table 1). For foliar application by saffron stigmas, the Chla, Chlb, and carotenoid content significantly increased 11.59 % for Chla, 56,84 % for Chlb, and 55,69% for Table 1 ­ Influence of tepal and corm application on the root and shoot weight of tomato plants and carotenoid leaves The difference in the letters indicates significant differences at p≤0.05 based on the SNK test. * = significative difference at p≤0.05. FW= fresh weight. Fig. 3 ­ Effect of tepal and corm extract on pigment system of tomato leaves. Data are the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates. The column followed by different let­ ters shows a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 significance level between treatments according to the SNK test. FW= fresh weight. Chla= chlorophyll a; Chlb= chlorophyll b; Totalchl=: total chlorophyll. 0= control.letters are not significantly different, as determined by Tukey's test (P<0.05). Application Concentration (g/L) Root fresh weight (g) Root dry weight (g) Shoot fresh weight (g) Shoot dry weight (g) Carotenoid (mg/g FW) Control 0 0.185±0.289 a 0.0192±0.004 1.72±0.135 a 0.132±0.017 2.431±0.108 a Tepal 1 0.195±0.009 a 0.021±0.001 * 1.68±0.355 a 0.118±0.036 2.507±0.209 2 0.261±0.341 b 0.0323±0.005 * 2.641±0.564 b 0.218±0.046 * 2.703±0.335 3 0.212±0.013 a 0.0283±0.008 * 2.332± 0.156 ab 0.218±0.046 * 2.985±0.337 Corm 1 0.138±0.427 0.017±0.003 1.436±0.613 0.119±0.060 2.98±0.652 b 2 0.141±0.018 0.019±0.003 1.516±0.548 0.107±0.045 2.889±0.147 b 3 0.142±0.519 0.016±0.004 1.495±0.591 0.01±0.044 2.708±0.15 b Khoulati and Saalaoui ‐ Saffron tepals, corms, and stigmas as biostimulants 211 2 g/L, and 3 g/L) are chosen to assess their effect by fertigation in some morphological and biochemical parameters of tomato seedling under greenhouse conditions in a completely randomized block. The application of tepal, corm, and stigmas extracts has influenced the growth of the plant. Tepal has been reported as a protein source, fiber, fats, and essential minerals (K, Ca, and P) necessary for plants’ growth (Fahim et al., 2012; Khazaei et al., 2016). Tepals are also rich sources of phenolic and biologically active compounds such as flavonoids (kaempferol, rutin, quercetin, luteolin, hesperidin, and bioflavonoids), tannins, and anthocyanins (Kanakis et al., 2006; Srivastava et al., 2010). The increased growth of tomato plants suggests that tepal extract may act as a promoter of plant growth with a 3 g/L concentration, which contains 1.308 mg CGE/L of anthocyanin and 20.181 mg GAE/L of polyphenol. Corms also are a rich source of phenolic, flavonoid, and especially saponin (Rubio­Moraga et al., 2013), likely to participate in increased growth characteristics of the treated plants in the results of current research. Saffron stigmas contain nitroge­ nous substances, anthocyanins, glycosides, monoter­ penes, aldehydes, flavonoids, vitamins, volatile oils, proteins, carbohydrates (Amin and Hosseinzadeh, 2015). Also, some studies indicated the presence of micro­nutrients in saffron such as Zn, Mn, and certain amino acids (Priscila del Campo et al . , 2009; D’Archivio et al., 2014), which favored the develop­ ment of the plant height and that the current results strongly corroborated with our previous study (Khoulati et al., 2019) with a concentration of 0.6 g/L, which contains 110.73 mg/L of crocin, 2.93 mg/L of safranal, and 37.45 mg/L of picrocrocin in the extract used in this study. Photosynthesis is one of the primary processes of plant metabolism impacted by external conditions (Kalaji et al., 2017). Chlorophyll is a critical compo­ nent of photosynthesis which absorbs sunlight (Hörtensteiner and Kräutler, 2011). It occurs in chloroplasts as green pigments in all photosynthetic plant tissues (Mazumder and Paul, 2014). Chla, the primary photosynthetic pigment of photosystems I and II, converts the energy of light. Chlb is an acces­ sory pigment that absorbs light’s energy (Petit et al., 2012). On the other hand, carotenoids are also essential for plants because they protect the photosynthetic apparatus from light­mediated stress. Carotenoids participate in a wide range of physiological process­ carotenoid (Fig. 4, Table 1). However, no significant difference was reported from the different tepal extract concentrations on the carotenoid content (Table 1). The different concentrations of the corm extract participated in the increase of the Chla and Chlb content but not in the same way as the tepal extracts; the highest value in Chla in plants treated with 3 g/L of the extract corms is 12.73 mg/10 g FW and while the highest value in Chla in plants treated with 3 g/L of the tepal extract is 13.55 mg/ 10 g FW. However, a significant difference is observed in the carotenoid content of plants treated with extracts of corms, while this difference in carotenoid is absent in plants treated with tepal extracts. Chlorophyll con­ tent, especially Chlb of plants treated with the appli­ cation of stigmas extract at 0.6 g/L, increased. The carotenoid content also increased after treatment with the stigma extract. 4. Discussion and Conclusions The present study’s objective was to valorize the tepals, corms, and stigmas of Crocus sativus L. and take advantage of its bioactive components to use them as a biostimulant alternative to chemicals prod­ ucts. Therefore, three tepals and corm extract (1 g/L, Fig. 4 ­ Effect of saffron stigmas on pigment system of tomato leaves by foliar application. Data are the mean ± stan­ dard errors of three replicates. ***= the significative dif­ ference at p≤0.001. *0 the significative difference at p≤0.05. FW= fresh weight. Chla= chlorophyll a; Chlb= chlorophyll b; Totalchl= total chlorophyll. 0= control. quality performance and does not present risks for the user and the consumer. Besides, these results present an advantage for the farmer practicing the culture of Crocus sativus by recovering the waste which they throw before like tepals. However, future research needed to explore the influence on the treated plants’ primary and sec­ ondary metabolites provides a platform to elaborate and study the biological activity of the extracts inside the treated plants to identify and later confirm the molecular patterns involved in the bioactive mecha­ nism of these extracts. Acknowledgements Authors express their thanks to Rayan Agricole, the ANPAM and the CNRST to participate in this study’s realization. References AMIN B., HOSSEINZADEH H., 2015 ­ Analgesic and anti‐ inflammatory effects of Crocus sativus L. (Saffron), pp. 319–324. ­ In: RONALD R.W., and R.P. VICTOR (eds.) Bioactive nutraceuticals and dietary supplements in neurological and brain disease. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 528. D’ARCHIVIO A.A., GIANNITTO A., INCANI A., NISI S., 2014 ­ Analysis of the mineral composition of Italian saffron by ICP‐MS and classification of geographical origin. ­ Food Chem., 157: 485­489. FAHIM N.K., JANATI S.S.F., FEIZY J., 2012 ­ Chemical com‐ position of agriproduct saffron (Crocus sativus L.) petals and its considerations as animal feed. ‐ GIDA, 37: 197­ 201. GANJEWALA D., BOBA S., RAGHAVENDRA A.S., 2008 ‐ Sodium nitroprusside affects the level of anthocyanin and flavonol glycosides in pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Arkel) leaves. ‐ Acta Biologica Szegediensis, 52: 301­ 305. HÖRTENSTEINER S., KRÄUTLER B., 2011 ­ Chlorophyll breakdown in higher plants. ‐ Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg., 1807: 977­988. ISO, 2003 ­ TS 3632‐1/2. Technical specification. Crocus sativus L. Saffron. ­ International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland. KALAJI H.M., BABA W., GEDIGA K., GOLTSEV V., SAMBORS­ KA I.A., CENTER M.D., DIMITROVA S., PISZCZ U., BIELEC­ KI K., KARMOWSKA K., DANKOV K., KOMPALA A., 2017 ­ Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool for nutrient status identification in rapeseed plants. ‐ Photosynth. Res., 136: 329­343. 212 Adv. Hort. Sci., 2021 35(2): 207­213 es, including growth, development, and plant responses to environmental stimuli, and protect plants against photo­oxidative damage (Racchi, 2013). The application of tepal and corm extract by ferti­ gation, and saffron extract by foliar application, sig­ nificantly improved the chlorophyll content. The tepal extract increased the Chla content in a linear manner (R² = 0.947); the increase in the Chla content correlated with the rise of the concentration of the tepal extract (r = 0.973) (Fig. 5). This increase in chlorophyll content may result from reduced chloro­ phyll degradation, which may be related mainly to polyphenol in the extract and many other molecules that can increase the pigment content. They can also activate enzymes responsible for the regulation and photosynthetic reduction of carbon and the chloro­ plast protection against oxidative damage. Also, they can include compounds that play a photoprotective role by scavenging reactive oxygen species. The exogenous application of biostimulant has been shown to activate specific genes involved in the tran­ scription of proteins for photosynthetic processes (Trevisan et al., 2011) . However, higher chlorophyll content may involve growth stimulation and primary metabolic responses of treated plants compared to control plants (Shalaby and El­Ramady, 2014). In this study, we concluded that the aqueous extract of tepals and corms at 3 g/L had a bio­stimu­ latory effect on tomato plants. The use of these extracts in specialized horticulture practices such as organic farming may be a better solution to ensure Fig. 5 ­ Linear regression curve between chlorophyll a, and the concentrations of tepal extracts. Chla= chlorophyll a. **= correlation is significant at the 0.01 level. R²= R­squared. Khoulati and Saalaoui ‐ Saffron tepals, corms, and stigmas as biostimulants 213 KANAKIS C.D., TARANTILIS P.A., POLISSIOU M.G., DIAMAN­ TOGLOU S., TAJMIR­RIAHI H.A., 2006 ­ Antioxidant flavonoids bind human serum albumin. ­ J. Mol. Struct., 798: 69­74. KHAZAEI K.M., JAFARI S.M., GHORBANI M., KAKHKI A.H., SARFARAZI M., 2016 ­ Optimization of anthocyanin extraction from saffron petals with response surface methodology. ­ Food Anal. Methods, 9(7): 1993–2001. KHOULATI A., OUAHHOUD S., MAMRI S., ALAOUI K., LAH­ MASS I., CHOUKRI M., KHRAMACH EZ., ASEHRAOU A., SAALAOUI E., 2019 ­ Saffron extract stimulates growth , improves the antioxidant components of Solanum lycopersicum L ., and has an antifungal effect. ‐ Ann. Agric. Sci., 64: 138­150. LAGE M., CANTRELL C.L., 2009 ­ Quantification of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) metabolites crocins , picrocrocin and safranal for quality determination of the spice grown under different environmental Moroccan conditions. ­ Sci. Hortic, 121: 366­373. LAHMASS I., SABIR O., MOHAMMED E., ASSIA S., MOHAMMED E., REDOUANE B., MOHAMMED C., ENNOUAMANE S., 2018 ­ Determination of antioxidant properties of six by‐products of crocus sativus determi‐ nation of antioxidant properties of six by‐products of Crocus sativus L. (Saffron) plant products. ­ Waste Biomass Valorization, 9: 1349­1357. LICHTENTHALER H.K., 1987 ­ Chlorophyll and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes, pp. 350­ 382. ­ In: PACKER L., and R. DOUCE (eds.) Methods in Enzymology. Academic Press, San Diego, USA, pp. 609. MAGGI L., MAGDALENA M., LUIS G., ANTONIA M.M., GON­ ZALO L.A., JÉSSICA S.D., ANA M.S., 2012 ­ Increasing the applications of Crocus sativus flowers as natural antiox‐ idants. ­ J. Food Sci., 77 (11). MAZUMDER P.B., PAUL S.B, 2014 ­ Effect of copper on growth and chlorophyll content in tea plants (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze). ­ Int. J. Res. Appl., Natural Social Sci. IJRANSS, 2(5): 223­230. MENGHINI L., LEPORINI L., VECCHIOTTI G., LOCALTELLI M., CARRADORI S., FERRANTE C., ZENGIN G., RECINELLA L., CHIAVAROLI A., LEONE S., BRUNETTI L., ORLANDO G., 2018 ­ Crocus sativus L . stigmas and by‐products: Qualitative fingerprint, antioxidant potentials and enzyme inhibitory activities. ­ Food Res. Int., 109: 91­ 98. NATALIA M., MARÍA J.B., CÁNDIDA L., MARTÍNEZ­NAVAR­ RO M.E., ROSARIO S.M., GONZALO L.A., 2019 ­ Bioactivity and bioavailability of the significant bioac‐ tivity and bioavailability of the major metabolites of Crocus sativus L. flower. ­ Molecules, pp. 1­24. PETIT A.N., FONTAINE F., VATSA P., CLEMENT C., VAILLANT­GAVEAU N., 2012 ­ Fungicide impacts on photosynthesis in crop plants. ‐ Photosynth. Res., 111: 315­326. PRISCILA DEL CAMPO C., GARDE­CERDÁN T., SÁNCHEZ A.M., MAGGI L., CARMONA M., ALONSO G.L., 2009 ­ Determination of free amino acids and ammonium ion in saffron (Crocus sativus L.) from different geographi‐ cal origins. ­ Food Chem., 114: 1542­1548. RACCHI M.L., 2013 ­ Antioxidant defenses in plants with attention to Prunus and Citrus spp. ­ Antioxidants, pp. 340­369. RUBIO­MORAGA Á., GERWIG G.J., CASTRO­DIAZ N., LUISA M., ESCRIBANO J., FERNANDEZ J., KAMERLING J.P., 2011 ­ Triterpenoid saponins from corms of Crocus sativus: Localization , extraction and characterization. ­ Ind. Crop. Prod., 34: 1401­1409. RUBIO­MORAGA Á., GÓMEZ­GÓMEZ L., TRAPERO A., 2013 ­ Saffron corm as a natural source of fungicides: The role of saponins in the underground. ‐ Ind. Crop. Prod., 49: 915­921. SANCHEZ­VIOQUE R., RODRIGUES­CONDE M.F., REINA­ URENA J.V., ESCOLANO­TERCERO M.A., HERRAIZ­ PENALVER D., SANTANA­MERIDAS O., 2012 ­ In vitro antioxidant and metal chelating properties of corm, petal and leaf from saffron (Crocus sativus L.). ­ Ind. Crop. Prod., 39: 149­153. SHADMEHRI A.A., FARIDEH N., HAMIDREZA M., PARICHEHRE Y., MAHBOOBEH N., 2019 ­ Cytotoxicity, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Crocus sativus petal extract. ‐ Int. J. Res. Med. Sci., 5(1): 69­76. SHALABY T.A., EL­RAMADY H., 2014 ­ Effect of foliar appli‐ cation of bio‐stimulants on growth, yield, components, and storability of garlic (Allium sativum L .). ‐ Aust. J. Crop Sci., 8: 271­275. SMOLSKAITE L., TALOU T., FABRE N., VENSKUTONIS P.R., 2011 ­ Volarization of saffron industry by‐products: bioactive compounds from leaves. ­ FOODBALT, pp. 67­ 72. SRIVASTAVA R., AHMED H., DIXIT R.L, SARAF S.A., 2010 ­ Crocus sativus L.: A comprehensive review. ‐ Pharmacogn. Rev., 4(8): 200­208. TAYLOR P., KUMAR R., SINGH V., DEVI K., SHARMA M., SINGH M.K., AHUJA, P.S., 2008 ­ State of art of saffron (Crocus sativus L .) agronomy: A comprehensive review. ‐ Food Rev. Int., 25(1). TREVISAN S., BOTTON A., VACCARO S., VEZZARO A., QUAGGIOTTI S., NARDI S., 2011 ­ Humic substances affect arabidopsis physiology by altering the expression of genes involved in primary metabolism, growth and development. ­ Environ. Exp. Bot., 74: 45–55. TUBEROSO C.I.G., ANTONELLA R., PAOLA M., MAURIZIO A., COSIMO P., 2016 ­ Antioxidant activity, cytotoxic activi‐ ty and metabolic profiling of juices obtained from saf‐ fron (Crocus sativus L .) floral by‐products. ‐ Food Chem., 199: 18­27. VELIOGLU Y.S., MAZZA G., GAO L., OOMAH B.D., 1998 ­ Antioxidant activity and total phenolics in selected fruits, vegetables, and grain products. ‐ J. Agric. Food Chem., 46(10): 4113­4117. ZHENG C., LIN L., WEN­HUI M., TING H., LU­PING Q., 2011 ­ Chemical constituents and bioactivities of the liposolu‐ ble fraction from different medicinal parts of Crocus sativus. ­ Pharm. Biol., 49: 756­763.