
































Microsoft Word - APE-V3N1-p1


Advances in Politics and Economic 
ISSN 2576-1382 (Print) ISSN 2576-1390 (Online) 

Vol. 3, No. 1, 2020 
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ape 

1 
 

Original Paper 

KENOTOMY, Creativity Face to Face with Artificial 

Intelligence 

George Teodorescu1* 

1 International Institute for Integral Innovation, Meran, Italy 
* George Teodorescu, International Institute for Integral Innovation, Meran, Italy 

 

Received: November 16, 2019  Accepted: December 8, 2019  Online Published: December 17, 2019 

doi:10.22158/ape.v3n1p1          URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.22158/ape.v3n1p1 

 

Abstract 

Artificial Intelligence wins an increasing capacity for undertaking more efficiently repetitive jobs and 

routine based tasks, using highly accurate logic-adaptive and deductive algorithms, replacing 

successfully the humans for these occupations. 

Facing this new reality the ultimate asset of mankind became the Creative Thinking. 

Enhancing and fostering the Creative Thinking should be a major duty especially along the educational 

process. Whatever the domain of study might be, the ability of generating fresh ideas and disruptive 

concepts will be sooner than expected the winning trump, or even the only reason for employing a 

human operator. 

What is Kenotomy? 

Kenotomy is Creativity focused education, leading students toward a seminal thinking mode, by 

developing their genuine imagination talent and enabling them with the skills for shifting approaches, 

encouraging unusual thinking pathways, archetypal perspective and serendipity, facilitating 

conceptualizing and recognizing the potential of ideas. 

Kenotomy is based on the integrative understanding of the creative mental processes and uses an 

adequate methodology for addressing them, triggering the ideation process. 

Kenotomy builds up creative minds, whatever the major of the students might be. 

How does Kenotomy work? 

Kenotomy differentiates two types of Creativity: the Reactive and the Intrinsic one and describes the 

dedicated ways for initiating them specifically. 

First of all Kenotomy relieves the acquired and inherent inhibitions, releasing and stimulating the 

inborn speculative talent and enhances the ideation ability, overcoming the empiric myopia by high 

abstracting skills and the routine saturation by a fresh apex-perspective.  



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ape                 Advances in Politics and Economic                   Vol. 3, No. 1, 2020 

2 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

As a project centered education Kenotomy develops individual disruptive thinking as well as the group 

synergetic resonance with spectacular outcome: original problem solutions and unexpected, seminal 

concepts. 

Keywords 

creativity focused education, culture of creativity, disruptive creativity, archetypal perspective, 

multiplatform society 

 

1. Artificial Intelligence? 

The public discourse is haunted for a while by a new syntagm: Artificial Intelligence, which would 

imply the existence of two kinds of intelligence, a natural one and a man-made counterpart. 

This is the fall out of an anthropocentric approach, where it is assumed that intelligence belongs to the 

humans, being somehow a singular aptitude of mankind. 

The Universe is not chaotic mess, but a sophisticated and well-balanced clockwork; it is impossible to 

deny the intelligence of this enormous evidence. 

From this point of view, Intelligence is an abstract and universal regulatory framework, an intrinsic one, 

like the harmony behind the logic, mathematics and music, for example. Johannes Keppler analogy 

between music and planetary system, is a discrete nod of ubiquitary intelligence. 

The Intelligence is self-sufficient and indivisible, therefore the term Intelligence excludes any attribute, 

like: human, artificial, personal, etc. 

The Intelligence addresses different platforms, among them biological ones, for example the humans, 

but remains independent of them. 

Intelligence is natural only, perhaps it is even the reason of the nature itself, but never “artificial”, 

which is an anthropocentric pretentiousness. 

Under these coordinates the actual effort of simulating cognitive functions, with the goal of replicating 

the human mind and installing this on man made items, seems more like the intelligence is driving 

discretely this enterprise for conquering these new platforms too. 

It is not flattering to feel yourself as the instrument of a largely superior entity, instead of being the 

master of the Universe, but the Sun is not orbiting around Earth either. 

This different approach suggests a better definition of this actual mind-replicating project: 

Self-Adaptive Logic, instead of “artificial” Intelligence. 

 

2. Intelligence and Disruptive Creativity 

The attribute “adaptive” implies a higher level within Intelligence, far beyond the Consequent Logic, 

which is invariably and accurately following a predetermined, pattern, and a “hardwired algorithm” 

routine. 

The Adaptive Logic means perceiving the need of change and being flexible enough for reacting 

properly, besides the ability of following routines, which might be often the main task. 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ape                 Advances in Politics and Economic                   Vol. 3, No. 1, 2020 

3 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

Scrutinizing the term “adaptive”, we find two aspects: adaptability by flexibility, absorbing the event’s 

impacts, but remaining the same, and the adaptability by change, transforming itself incrementally as 

an effect of event’s impacts, this is the mechanism of evolution. 

The Adaptive Logic is an intelligent survival strategy, supported by Reactive Creativity. 

These are the main features sought out by the projects focused on Artificial General Intelligence, 

approximating the human bound intelligence. 

As Kenotomy shows, the Reactive Creativity delivers a consequent, mainly predictable outcome, built 

on empiric facts and current knowledge. 

Therefore the ultimate target of Mind Replicating projects is the rationally thinking and routine based 

(τέχνη) mindsetof theemployee of today, the average intelligence. 

These routine focused minds seem to have no chance and a gloomy future, versus a faultless Adaptive 

Logic on a tireless inorganic platform the intelligence on biologic platforms. That is the nightmare 

scenario after the Singularity Point. 

But just the imperfection of our biologic platform and the dual nature of our mind enables us to keep on 

with human ascendancy across the replicated intelligence on abiotic scaffolds, as they are supporting 

the random, subliminal Disruptive Creativity, the unexpected approaches, radically different concepts, 

which are changing the coordinates, inspiring new domains of activity and even new strategies of life. 

As the Disruptive Creativity is not rooted in rational thinking and consciousness, Intelligence based 

models can’t aspire to compete with it, as they are burdened by a conceptual handicap.  

Disruptive Creativity provides to the mankind’s a successful way out beyond the Singularity threshold. 

 

3. Side-by-Side or Piggy Back 

A world with parallel platforms of Intelligence, biologic and abiotic ones, might be quite different than 

the unipolar world of mankind intelligence monopoly. 

The shared domain of intelligence might bring up competition, an unequal one, as already predicted by 

several grim scenarios of dystopia.  

They are several approaches in defining the domain of Intelligence. 

In our understanding the scope of intelligence is dominated by the logic and includes: (Table1: Scope 

of Intelligence). 

 

Table 1. Scope of Intelligence 

The reflexive logic Aptitude of perceiving opportunities and 

identifying problems 

The consequent logic Capacity of following accurately routines 

The reflective logic Ability of evaluating alternatives, selecting the 

best and even 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ape                 Advances in Politics and Economic                   Vol. 3, No. 1, 2020 

4 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

The logic driven adaptability Consequent ideation on paradigmatic, pragmatic 

logic and axiological levels 

 

So far extend the skills of Artificial General Intelligence, AGI, too, impersonating the scope of human 

cognitive functions, which are related to logic and raising the concern of inequitable competition by 

artificial platforms based intelligence. 

In this perspective the dystopia scenarios of a mankind ancillary to intelligent items might be justified. 

Fortunately the human brain owns a binary nature, besides the neo-cortex rooted intelligence it has 

plenty of neuronal networks, which process emotional impulses and even deeper, ancestral instincts. 

These intrinsic impulses affect the logic clockwork of neo-cortex, stimulating unexpected insights, and 

disruptive approaches and inspire unforeseen concepts. 

As a result, the disruptive thinking is a unique feature of mankind, which might hinder the accurate 

logic and disturbs the mindfulness, but triggers the outbreak of routine and incremental adaptive 

behavior. 

Disruptive creativity is beyond intelligence; it creates the real difference and outruns the step-by-step 

pathway of it. The goal of intelligence is the perfection, but perfection is an asymptotic dead-end street. 

Different is better than perfection, as it is outlining a steadily moving horizon. 

AGI might beat the human based intelligence in every domain of logic, as well as in memorizing 

accuracy and capacity, but will need to look up to mankind for new approaches and out of the box 

concepts, which could be generated by the eccentric human brain only. 

Under these circumstances it is the actual duty of humanity to shift the focus of education toward 

creativity, fostering the seminal thinking modes and setting disruptive thinking as the main goal of 

education by Kenotomy. 

 

4. Kenotomy, Creativity Focused Education 

Creativity is generally perceived as a magic aptitude, a random inspiration or is fully mistaken with 

improving and adapting, the logic upgrading of state of the art, which is a cognitive process. 

Creativity deserves a better understanding and a strong focus, as it is the particular asset of mankind 

and the only one, which will preserve the human supremacy after the singularity point, when the 

handicap across the non-biologic based intelligence will arise. 

Triggering and surging Ideation, better said, the original mental outcome by creativity is the synergetic 

effect of the interaction between the cognitive, logic-deductive mind functions and the subliminal: 

emotional and instinctual impulses. 

Therefore Creativity is the brand of mankind, as it integrates the unique, binary nature of the human 

brain. 

Left alone, without subliminal or extrinsic impulses, or trained unilaterally the neo-cortex delivers quite 

accurate logic routines, even adaptive routines, and therefore expected outcome. This is the 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ape                 Advances in Politics and Economic                   Vol. 3, No. 1, 2020 

5 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

logic-deductive mind segment, supposed to be replicated by the algorithmic AGI effort. But the human 

brain is and can do much more, overcoming the logic routine by disruptive, creative thinking. 

Kenotomy is explaining, exploiting and developing this unique feature of human mind and facilitates 

the resulting original outcome, the ideas. 

Emotional, instinctual or mixed impulses interfere with the regular neo-cortex operation distracting and 

disrupting it, triggering seminal thinking modes and generating unusual, unexpected outcome, like: 

reveries, phantasies, daydreams, unusual solutions, concepts and even unprecedented approaches. In 

this case the mind operates in a subliminal-inductive mode, leaving established pathways for generating 

newness. 

The seminal thinking modes (Figure 1) are the effect of joint work of binary nature of human mind 

with both: cognitive and instinct-emotional features, each seminal thinking mode corresponding to a 

dedicated dyad.  

 

 

Figure1. Correspondence between Seminal Thinking Modes and Dyads 

 

A creative mind needs the harmonious development of both kinds of features: cognitive and 

instinct-emotional features as they are supporting and triggering the seminal thinking modes. 

This desiderate is intrinsic to human, inborn, as children provide evidence of most of the required 

features for creativity: playfulness, fun, courage, curiosity, passion, speculativeness, disruptiveness, 

originality and risk propensity. 

Creativity is an innate, but inhibited, human ability and is based on the binary nature of human mind, 

expressed by the Kenotomy’s dyadic concept of Seminal Thinking Modes. 

By children the only missing features, for being accomplished inventors, are: perseverance, knowledge 

and abstraction. The mankind minds filling this gap by an education focused on: Memorized 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ape                 Advances in Politics and Economic                   Vol. 3, No. 1, 2020 

6 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

Knowledge, Rigorous Logic Patterns and Convergent Thinking (Figure1), a strategy conceived in 

XVIII century, as the upcoming bureaucratic-industrial time required a large amount of disciplined 

routine workers with a solid memory and rigorous logic-deductive minds, for following dedicated 

pathways. 

This educational focus was well meant, but is counterproductive for creativity and questionable in a 

face-to-face competition with AGI. 

The inhibitory effect of this educational concept on creativity becomes evident in Figure 2: 

-Memorizing Capacity, is getting irrelevant, as the real time access to Global Cloud Memory is 

available everywhere already, and sustains routine and empirical myopia, which are severe inhibitors of 

seminal thinking modes. 

-The Convergent Thinking is inducing compulsory focus and fosters a specific inhibitor: empirical 

myopia 

-Developing Rigorous Logic Patterns has the fall out of the inhibitors routine and compulsory focus. 

 

 

Figure 2. Inhibitors from Actual Education Startegy of Seminal Thinking Modes 

 

The extent of damage of this educational strategy on the genuine creative capacity of children has been 

already revealed by a long-term survey, made on behalf of NASA by G. Land and Jarman. The survey 

quantifieda 85 % loss of creative capacity of the same children between the ages of 5 and 18 years. A 

recent neuroscience conclusion is convergent to this observation, finding that children by the age of 5 

have 10 times more synapses than at the adulthood (18 years old), even if the number of neurons 

stabilizes at 80-90 billions. It has a dramatic pruning effect on synapses, this is afact. 

What happens to all the children between the ages of 5 and 18, what is reducing so strikingly their 

creative capacity and even mutilates the biologic support of it? 

The answer is obvious; the entire young generation goes through the educational system, based on: 

Memorized Knowledge, Rigorous Logic Patterns and Convergent Thinking, meant to develop the 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ape                 Advances in Politics and Economic                   Vol. 3, No. 1, 2020 

7 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

Knowledge, Focus and established Logic patterns, standard routine workers, the KFL strategy. 

This means, that the actual KFL strategy of education is trading the genuine creative capacity, which is 

the vantage asset of mankind across the AGI for developing the cognitive and memory features, which 

are the trump of AGI across the mankind. This is obvious a counterproductive approach. This sounds as 

absurd as it is, but it is another fact. 

Seminal Thinking modes and their inhibitors  

KFL is systematically inhibiting the seminal thinking modes, and doing so it is sending a signal for a 

major shifting of education focus worldwide (Table 2). 

 

Table 2. Seminal Thinking Modes and Corresponding Inhibitions 

Seminal Thinking Modes Inhibitions 

Integrative Thinking, the Big Picture Empiric Myopia 

Speculative Thinking Compliance to conformity (routine) 

Divergent Thinking Compulsory Focus (close thought) 

Eccentric Thinking Fear of Making Mistakes 

Spirit of Endeavour Fear of Unknown 

Grit Reluctance 

 

Until the monumental task of reorienting the educational strategy worldwide will have any noticeable 

results, the need for a strongly creative young generation will grow. 

The singularity point is sensibly forecasted for 2040. This sounds very optimistic, as the quantic 

paradigm has been reached by Google research already in September 2019. 

These facts set the priority for Kenotomy in restoring a good part of the young people’s creative 

capacity by contributing sekience the induced and inherent inhibitions. 

Relieving inhibitions of the Seminal Thinking Modes 

The main task of Kentomy’ educational curricula is: fostering and developing the features of a creative 

mind (Table 3). 

 

Table 3. Mind features and Creativity Related Abilities 

Mind Features Abilities 

Mental Elasticity Shifting Approaches 

Eccentric Thinking Disruptive Approaches 

Archetypal Perspective High Abstraction Skills 

Ideation Speculative Thinking 

Integrative Thinking Conceptualizing 

Ideas Management Taxonomy of Ideas 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ape                 Advances in Politics and Economic                   Vol. 3, No. 1, 2020 

8 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

A special curricular role has the capacity of dealing with ideas, Ideas Management. 

Kenotomy, Pedagogic Goal: 

The Education based on Kenotomy stimulates original thinking minds, animates disruptive problem 

solvers and business pioneers for sustaining the human primacy in the upcoming context, where the 

routine tasks and regular occupations will be taken over by Artificial General Intelligence. As such 

Kenotomy has a key role to play in a new educational strategy, focused on Creativity Kenotomy is 

enabling the students to use creatively the acquired knowledge for generating new concepts and 

approaches, thereby extending the cognition’s frontier. 

Tasks of Curriculum: 

Mental Elasticity (shifting approaches) 

It is essential, to relieve inherent and acquired inhibitions, which are hampering and even discouraging 

the natural, disruptive creative process. As the main Inhibitions are Empirical Myopia; Routine and 

Compulsory Focus the Kenotomy training is focused on them: 

 

Table 4. Remedial Methods of Extant Inhibitions 

INHIBITION REMEDIAL METHOD 

Empirical Myopia See with your mind-Abstracting skills 

Routine See with fresh Eyes- Changing several points 

of view  

Compulsory Focus  Divergent, random addressing topics 

 

Archetypal Perspective (high abstraction skills) 

Developing the capacity for abstracting until the Archetypal Horizon, identifying the corresponding 

Archetype to topic, as in the kenotomial Cascade (Figure 3). 

 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ape                 Advances in Politics and Economic                   Vol. 3, No. 1, 2020 

9 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

 
Figure 3. Kenotomial Cascade 

 

Kenotomial Cascade illustrates the entire creative process, making transparent several aspects: 

-First of all the strong relationship between the levels of abstraction and expected original outcome, 

indicating, that any creative process must be preceded by an intensive abstraction of the topic until 

reaching the archetypal horizon. 

-There is no content change under the rational level (content line), but a superficial novelty based on 

forms, features, and functions. 

-The diversity of concepts and solutions is exponentially higher, when the creativity process starts from 

the Archetypal Perspective. 

-The quest for originality has a steep and dead-end way if the starting point is a material item or his 

paradigm. 

-Just the Archetypal Perspective opens the wide horizon of archetypal shifting and facilitates reaching a 

sustainable leadership, far ahead of AGI incremental perfectionist way 

-From Archetypal perspective the material and even the paradigmatic diversity are relative, but 

inspiring cross-domain connections and new insights. 

Kenotomial Cascadeintegrates both binary domains of the subliminal-intuitive and logic-deductive 

thinking; ad therefore is the background frame and should be the roadmap of any project work, the 

central axle of Kenotomy education, which is as well a problem solving methodology. 

Along the main project develops a living creative culture, the entire class growing together 

synergistically as a motivated team. 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ape                 Advances in Politics and Economic                   Vol. 3, No. 1, 2020 

10 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

Ideation (speculative thinking)  

The speculative procedures: association, combination, analogy, inversion, ambiguity, and extrapolation 

have an essential role for activating the reactive Creativity. 

Divergent thinking is required for exploring randomly by synergetic resonance and through the 

ambiguity of icon/word transfer. 

A special training of novelty awareness is trained for recognizing serendipity and conceptual short cuts, 

avoiding incremental processes. 

Eccentric Thinking (disruptive approaches) 

To stimulate emotional and intuitive impulses for seeding of neo-cortex, the emotional/intuitive dyadic 

features are the main stimulants for triggering the Subliminal Creativity, like: playfulness, fun, curiosity, 

passion, speculativeness, disruptiveness, originality and courage, originality, risk propensity. The 

surprising, even shocking effect of an unusual topic, the moderator’s art of introducing it and even the 

set up of the environment play an essential role for triggering the eccentric thinking. 

During any speculative work should be avoided any critical attitude, the eccentricity and fun must be 

stimulated, unexpected associations and disruptive insights are welcome. A good sense of humor and an 

easy-going attitude and are, besides the fine awareness of serendipity by the moderator, the effective 

facilitators for installing of mental team resonance, which is eventually boosting the ideas outcome. 

Conceptualizing (Integrativethinking) 

Conceptualizing means, integrating the ideas’ harvest into a coherent concept. 

This is a logic deductive process, but nonlinear, with intuitive bridges, as there is no straight and 

smooth way from the rough ideas to conceptual configuration. 

Integrative thinking includes a substantial amount of adaptive thinking for making understandable the 

original work of mind, and even more the disruptive one. 

The teaching methodology is a project centered one, therefore the process of conceptualizing is an 

organic process of integration for the bounty of ideas, generated in the speculative phase, toward a 

coherent and articulated concept.  

The descendent side of Kenotomial Cascade, beyond the Archetypal Apex, is a seminal pathway toward 

disruptive approaches and original concepts. 

Ideas Management (taxonomy of ideas) 

There is a semantic ambiguity, not to say a random use of the terminology related to ideation’s outcome. 

This arbitrary practice hinders a good Ideas Management. 

A generally ignored source of ideas lays in identifying, formulating and defining the rank of upcoming 

ideas and to evaluate their seminal potential and degree of originality. 

In this respect Kenotomy proposes a clear hierarchy of subsequent terms, based on their phylogeny and 

level of abstraction: Approaches >Concepts> Solutions> Designs. 

Figure 4 is a 3D clade representation of this space of ideas, which shows the relationship among these 

categories of mental outcome and stimulates the creative exploration of white spots. 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ape                 Advances in Politics and Economic                   Vol. 3, No. 1, 2020 

11 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

Browsing along the axles and reflecting upon further potential approaches, concepts and especially 

solutions is an inspiring experience. 

More unusual the resulting ideas are, more intensively they must been considered as valuable. 

There is a bounty of serendipity there, even by the most trivial topics, many new insights arise, by a 

fresh look into the axles of Space of Ideas. 

The speculative-inductive nature of thus exploration is one more leap ahead off the perfectionist, 

incremental gait of the algorithmic way of AGI. 

 

 

Figure 4. Space of Ideas-Original Outcome of Creativity 

 

For evaluating the ideas, they are two essential criteria: 

- Seminality© - the potential of an idea for generating further subsequent ideas 

The iconic example here is the paradigmatic “wheel” and the world of revolving, induced by it. 

- Disruptivity©- the degree of originality of an idea. 

The best illustration is the Lamarck’s concept of evolution, Max Planck’s quantic discontinuity, or 

Einstein’s vision of relativity, which have been not related to anything known before. 

Kenotomy, the creativity oriented education, has the potential for preparing the transition into a Culture 

of Creativity, where a competition driven by disruptive concepts, would be followed by AGI supported 

optimizing of the implementation into solution, as well as operation and adaptive upgrades. 

This major change of education strategy might preserve the supremacy of mankind, by transforming it 

in a fertile source of concepts and approaches, challenging steadily the logic driven AGI, but in a 

synergetic harmony of complementary expertize. 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ape                 Advances in Politics and Economic                   Vol. 3, No. 1, 2020 

12 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

This would be a scenario of side-by-side, a partnership between mankind and AGI, acting as 

complementary platforms driven by intelligence, one, A.I. with accurate deductive-logic skills and the 

other one, us, with inductive-speculative ability. 

As AGI means intelligence on a man-made platform, there is one more important aspect, expressed by 

the question: 

 

5. Who’s Whom? 

The approach of a shared universal intelligence, active on different platforms, implies partnership and 

respect, overcoming the preconception of an “intelligent” man-made item, like a smart box, or even 

worse of a “robot” meant as an obtuse, dull-witted operator. 

Several dystopias are handled now, in the dawn of singularity, outlining a mankind subdued by 

intelligent machines.  

All of them ignore, perhaps intentionally, the disruptive mankind capacity due to the binary nature of 

human mind. 

Besides the resentful luddites, who are loosing already their plain routine jobs to AI, they are even 

more professionals, who are performing some higher, adaptive job skills, but will lose soon their jobs to 

AGI too. 

The way ahead is not a Sisyphean fight against AI or AGI, but developing original thinking and thus 

the creative capacity meaning shifting the strategy of education toward stimulating Seminal Thinking 

Modes. 

This fear of a scared Pygmalion is a wrong adviser. Behind this fear loom the mentioned prejudice, 

which is considering AGI objects, but objects. After singularity moment these man made items might 

be more intelligent than those, who would buy them. 

Should be allowed to buy intelligent bodies?  

It is not too early to start reflecting upon the social status of artificial platforms based intelligence. This 

new situation is a challenge in many respects, to the business and to the property. Making business with 

intelligent entities, disposing of them pragmatically and taking them in possession is no more ethically 

acceptable in sec XXI. The classic owner-item relationship is shifting in a new paradigm, as he object 

equals, at least the intelligence of the owner. 

IoT concept developed a living environment of smart, autonomous and networked entities, dedicated to 

specific tasks, but still preserving the anthropocentric mentality, of a “Robotic aided Mankind” 

After the threshold of singularity, many such intelligent platforms will be able to meet better decisions 

than their biological owners. It would be sensible to understand and accept early enough the need for a 

plural society, able to accept partners of a different material nature. 

As the intelligence on non-biologic platforms is rapidly upgrading, the mankind should consider 

acquiring this versatility too, however the procedure might occur, as the biologic platform is resilient 

by nature, developing slowly along generations, and not willing to support quick redesigns. 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ape                 Advances in Politics and Economic                   Vol. 3, No. 1, 2020 

13 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

They are several strategies for a multiplatform society, being discussed in the public discourse:  

- Cyber-society-an upgraded humanity by implants a world of human cyborgs, next to Intelligence 

on non-biologic platforms, AGI, like the Neuralink project of Elon Musk. 

- CRISPR-world, a mutant humanity, with a cognition upgraded by genetic engineering, risking a 

shrinking or the loss of the features, due to the binary nature of humans.  

This might be the ultimate disaster, as it would mean drying up the most precious asset of mankind, the 

disruptive creativity. 

In all these dystopia-scenarios implanted or genetically modified humans and AGI would be 

competitors, sharing the same high and strict logic-deductive capacity, with all the risks of a selective 

outcome, implied by any competition. 

- Synergetic Culture of Creativity, a specialized-binary world, where the highly creative mankind 

creates and delivers the disruptive input next to non-biologic platforms, which are able to optimize, 

implement and develop pragmatic solutions based on the disruptive concepts, delivered by humans, 

until a new radical vision, or adisruptive change, provided by humans too, arises.  

In such a world of conceptual competition the heroes would be the creators of highly disruptive ideas 

and the material bounty becomes irrelevant.  

Mankind is dedicated by her binary nature to think creatively, whereas the AGI is specialized in 

transferring these ideas to reality, clearly making the distinction between creative humans and AGI 

designed to transfer and optimize these ideas. This scenario recognizes the primordially of creative 

aptitude, as the human-bound driving force across the subsequent process of innovation, understood as 

a transfer process of conceptual content in solutions and pragmatic, concrete output. 

Such a perspective is based on the mutual need and respect for the unique abilities and performance of 

intelligence on different platforms, recognizing mutually the benefits of specialization and the shared 

substance of intelligence too, but implies a radically different education for humans with a strong focus 

on creative features, meaning Kenotomy centered education, for building a Culture of Creativity. 

In a Culture of Creativity the synergetic relationship of both Intelligence platforms, biological and 

non-biological, makes the title question: “who’s whom?” senseless, and it is good so. No platform of 

intelligence should own the other one. A different question might be left open: do the different 

platforms share the intelligence, or intelligence itself diversified her platforms, for acting more 

efficiently? 

A last observation: 

There is not much time left to make a choice among the optional scenarios, 2040 is like tomorrow and 

for the actual children generation might be already too late, as the 90% pruning of children’s synapses 

by a routine bound educational strategy starts at the age of 4.  

We need to hurry up, making hard decisions. Hesitating and procrastinating might end up in a still 

avoidable scenario. 

 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ape                 Advances in Politics and Economic                   Vol. 3, No. 1, 2020 

14 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

References 

Angela, L. D. (2017). GRIT: The power of Passion and Perseverance. Simon & Schuster. 

Pierce, C. S. (1992). Reasoning and the Logic of Things. Harvard University Press. 

Dr. Flavio, F. (2012). Functional Role of Frontal Alpha Oscillations in Creativity. Journal of 

Neuroscience. 

Ernst &Young. (2018). Failure boosting innovation-Z generation.EY Study. 

George, L., & Beth, J. (1998). Breakpoint Beyond, Mastering the Future Today. Leadership 2000 Inc 

1998. 

Max, B. (1997). Ungehorsam der Ideen-Asugewählte Schriften. Springer Verlag 1997. 

Retrieved from https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19940029213.pdf 

Richard, E. (1999). Vatz' - Framing, discourse on creation of rhetorical meaning. NCA convention, E. 

Vatz on RhetoricandPsychiatry. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 


