______________ Rebecca Rouland Polmanteer is a Doctoral Candidate, School of Social Work, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14260; Robert H. Keefe is Associate Professor, School of Social Work, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14260; and Carol Brownstein-Evans is Professor, Department of Social Work, Nazareth College, Rochester, NY 14618. Copyright © 2016 Authors Vol. 17 No. 2 (Fall 2016), 273-284, DOI:10.18060/21008 Social Workers’ Screening Practices for Postpartum Depression Rebecca Rouland Polmanteer Robert H. Keefe Carol Brownstein-Evans Abstract: The Affordable Care Act specifies mothers living with postpartum depression (PPD) are a group in need of services. Although mothers with PPD prefer to receive services from social workers than from professionals from other disciplines, limited research has addressed where social workers learn how to screen for PPD, the instruments they use, in what contexts they screen, and at what point during the perinatal period they screen mothers. The authors used an online survey to study a national sample of perinatal social workers (n=261) on their screening practices of mothers with PPD. More than half (n=149, 57.1%) of the respondents indicated they neither learned how to screen nor how to diagnose PPD during their undergraduate or graduate school education. Despite the availability of easy-to-use PPD screening instruments, only 25% (n=66) of the respondents indicated they have used any screening instruments. Of added concern is that many of the respondents indicated they do not consult the professional literature on PPD from social work and other disciplines to guide them in their practice. We recommend social workers integrate relevant findings from evidence-based research about PPD into their practice as appropriate, and that BSW and MSW curricula incorporate relevant information on PPD into their programs. Keywords: Social work practice; postpartum depression; maternal and child health; assessment and evaluation Postpartum depression (PPD) affects up to 25.0% of all new mothers (Gaynes et al., 2005) and an even greater proportion of new mothers from racial and ethnic minority backgrounds (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2008). Because mothers living with PPD are more likely to seek services from social workers than from professionals from other disciplines (Zittel-Palamara, Rockmaker, Schwabel, Weinstein, & Thompson, 2008), social workers are in an excellent position to screen new mothers for PPD (Abrams & Curran, 2007). To date, however, there has been limited research that has investigated whether or not social workers screen new mothers at risk for PPD. Despite the fact that social workers have a long-standing history of providing services to mothers and children, there has been little research published in social work journals to guide them in their work with mothers with PPD (Keefe, Brownstein-Evans, Lane, Carter, & Rouland Polmanteer, 2015). Although relevant to the population of mothers living with PPD, research from other professional fields such as nursing and psychiatry is more likely to address individual/biomedical factors such as hormonal fluctuations than to consider issues known to affect maternal and child well-being such as neighborhood safety and domestic violence (Lane et al., 2008). The authors of this study conducted a nationwide Polmanteer et al./SOCIAL WORK SCREENING PRACTICES 274 online survey to learn what screening instruments social workers use, in what contexts they screen, and at what point during the perinatal period they screen new mothers for PPD. Literature Review Understanding Postpartum Depression (PPD) PPD has come into the public’s consciousness over the past 30 years, when highly publicized accounts of new mothers harming their newborn infants catalyzed legislators to begin addressing the problem (Rhodes & Segre, 2013). One result is Section 2952 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Support, Education, and Research for Postpartum Depression (2010), which mandates research on the course of PPD, consideration of the differences in treatment needs among mothers from various racial and ethnic groups, and the development of culturally competent, evidence-based treatment approaches (Rhodes & Segre, 2013). The American Psychiatric Association (APA, 2013) classifies PPD as a major depressive disorder. The primary symptoms include sadness, hopelessness, worthlessness, thoughts of self-harm or of harming the infant, and behavioral changes such as slowed body movements (APA, 2013). Although other forms of major depression manifest within one month of the causative stressor, PPD often does not emerge until one year after childbirth (O’Hara & McCabe, 2013; O’Hara & Wisner, 2014). PPD can be a debilitating disorder (APA, 2013) that has severe consequences for new mothers and their infants (Letourneau et al., 2012). Mothers with PPD report experiencing disrupted sleep (Glavin, 2012; Lucero, Beckstrand, Callister, & Sanchez Birkhead, 2012), poor concentration and appetite (Glavin, 2012), decreased self-esteem, feelings of failure, (Glavin, 2012), anxiety (Glavin, 2012; Lucero et al., 2012), social withdrawal, guilt (Lucero et al., 2012), sexual dissatisfaction (Morof, Barrett, Peacock, Victor, & Manyonda, 2003), obsessive thoughts (Lucero et al., 2012), hopelessness (Sealy, Fraser, Simpson, Evans, & Hartford, 2009), and ongoing fears of harming their baby (Sealy et al., 2009) and of committing suicide (Lucero et al., 2012). Despite these negative feelings, an estimated 50% of mothers with PPD do not seek treatment (CDC, 2008) or do not consider their symptoms problematic (Keefe & Brownstein-Evans, 2013). Many other mothers who experience their symptoms as negative choose either to go without treatment (Sampson, Zayas, & Seifert, 2012) or not to disclose their symptoms to service providers (Lucero et al., 2012) whom they fear will judge them negatively or consider them unfit. Relevance of PPD to Social Work Among the mothers most at risk for PPD are mothers from racial and ethnic minority groups (Liu & Tronick, 2013), lower socioeconomic status (Liu & Tronick, 2013; O’Hara & McCabe, 2013), and rural communities (Villegas, McKay, Dennis, & Ross, 2011). These same mothers are often less able to afford ongoing health care, and therefore are often forced to access lower-cost or non-fee-for-service agencies, which often bring them to the ADVANCES IN SOCIAL WORK, Fall 2016, 17(2) 275 attention of a practicing social worker. Social workers working in maternal and child health settings are thus well placed to address this problem. Screening New Mothers for PPD The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) strongly encourage prenatal screening for depression in pregnant women (ACOG, 2015; USPSTF, 2016). Although various easy-to- use screening instruments normed on mothers from differing backgrounds exist, social workers who are qualified to administer the instruments, have been reluctant to regularly screen mothers for PPD (Gaynes et al., 2005; Keefe, Brownstein-Evans, & Rouland Polmanteer, 2016). Interestingly, the majority of mothers in one study indicated they were willing to be screened (Gemmill, Leigh, Ericksen, & Milgrom, 2006). Of the healthcare providers who screen, many do not use the results to advise mothers on providing follow- up care (Gjerdingen & Yawn, 2007). Consequently, the majority of mothers with PPD do not receive adequate screening, depression diagnoses, or appropriate follow-up care (USPSTF, 2016). Given the mandates from Section 2952 of the ACA, social workers working with new mothers must become competent in screening for PPD and providing evidence-based services. To learn about current screening practices, the authors surveyed perinatal social workers nationwide with the goal of being able to offer guidance to social workers working with new mothers. Methods The purpose of this study was to learn more about how social workers working with new mothers and young children screen new mothers for PPD, where they learned how to screen new mothers, when they screen, and what screening instruments they use. Methodology and Measurement The authors obtained institutional review board approval to conduct a survey of perinatal social workers nationwide. The authors then obtained approval to adapt the scale developed by Seehusen, Baldwin, Runkle, and Clark (2005) on family practitioners’ screening behaviors for PPD. The Seehusen et al. scale consists of 24 close-ended questions and one open-ended question: five questions on the frequency that family practitioners screen mothers for PPD, the scales they use, and the contexts in which the practitioners screen; 12 questions on the practitioners’ ideas about the importance of screening and the impact of screening on various family members; one question on where the practitioner learned to screen for PPD; five questions on practitioner demographics; and one open- ended question for the respondent to add additional information. The survey was adapted by adding seven questions specific to social work practice, including one question on where practitioners refer new mothers with PPD, four questions on the respondent’s practice setting, and two additional demographic questions (race and year of birth). The 32-item instrument was then pilot-tested with five social workers from the National Association of Perinatal Social Workers at their annual meeting in Baltimore Polmanteer et al./SOCIAL WORK SCREENING PRACTICES 276 and on 10 social workers from perinatal networks around New York State whose feedback was incorporated into the survey. The adapted survey was administered in the winter of 2014 using SurveyMonkey (2013). Sampling Frame Study criteria included being age 18 or older and currently working with new mothers. An e-mail describing the purpose of the survey, the informed consent form, and the link to the survey was sent to contact persons at the National Association of Perinatal Social Workers and state perinatal associations who were asked to submit the email with the accompanying documentation and survey link to their listserv members. Additionally, the program directors of all Bachelors (BSW) and Masters of Social Work (MSW) programs accredited by the Council on Social Work Education were asked to submit the email with the accompanying documentation and survey link to their alumni listserv members. Results Respondent Characteristics The final sample resulted in 261 respondents. Because we do not know the total population of social workers practicing in maternal and child health settings or which contact people at the perinatal organizations and BSW and MSW programs sent the email with accompanying survey to their listserv members, we are unable to assess if our respondents are representative of the total population of maternal and child health social workers nationwide. Of the 261 respondents, 158 (60.5%) provided complete demographic information (see Table 1). Most of the respondents identified their role as a social work practitioner (n = 120, 76.0%) working full-time (n = 123, 77.9%) and having a Master’s degree in social work (n = 130, 82.3%). The respondents are employed in a variety of settings including hospitals (n = 95, 60.1%), health centers (n = 32, 20.3%), child and family programs (n = 16, 10.1%), and private practice (n = 9, 5.7%). The responding social workers were overwhelmingly female (n = 153, 96.8%), and worked in urban areas (n = 102, 64.6%), were between 20 to 70 years of age (�̅� = 44.100, 𝜎 = 11.874) and self-identified predominantly as white, non-Hispanic/Caucasian (n = 125, 79.1%). Source of Learning About PPD Of the 261 respondents, 112 (43%) reported learning about PPD while enrolled as undergraduate or graduate students (see Table 2). While eight (3.1%) respondents reported having learned about PPD in their BA or BS programs, 27 (10.3%) reported learning about PPD in their BSW programs, and 77 (29.5%) reported having learned about PPD in their MSW programs. ADVANCES IN SOCIAL WORK, Fall 2016, 17(2) 277 Table 1. Characteristics of the Respondents who Screen New Mothers for PPD Variable n (%) Social work role Practitioner 120 (76%) Supervisor 18 (11.4%) Degree Master’s degree in social work 130 (82.3%) Bachelor’s degree 21 (13.3%) Doctoral degree 7 (4.4%) Employment status Full-time 123 (77.9%) Part-time 35 (22.2%) Geographic location Urban 102 (64.6%) Suburban 43 (27.2%) Rural 10 (6.3%) Employment setting Hospital 95 (60.1%) Health Center 32 (20.3%) Child or Family Program 16 (10.1%) Private Practice 9 (5.7%) Gender Female 153 (96.8%) Male 4 (2.5%) Prefer not to disclose 1 (0.6%) Race/Ethnicity White, Non-Hispanic/Caucasian 125 (79.1%) Black/African American 14 (8.7%) Hispanic 10 (6.3%) Multiracial 3 (1.9%) Asian 2 (1.3%) American Indian 2 (1.3%) White, Hispanic 2 (1.3%) Note. Percentage totals for each variable may not add to 100% due to missing data or rounding error. Learning How to Screen New Mothers for PPD The respondents reported receiving information about PPD screening (see Table 2) through on-the-job training (n = 119, 45.6%) followed by continuing education programs (n = 96, 36.8%), professional conferences (n = 69, 26.4%), and field/internship experiences (n = 53, 20.3%). The respondents also reported obtaining information from medical (n = 82, 31.4%) and social work journals (n = 98, 37.5%). Polmanteer et al./SOCIAL WORK SCREENING PRACTICES 278 Table 2. Characteristics of Screening Practices Variable n (%) Where do social workers learn about PPD? Master of Social Work 77 (29.5%) Bachelor of Social Work 27 (10.3%) Bachelor of Science/Arts 8 (3.1%) Where do social workers learn about screening for PPD? On the Job Education 119 (45.6%) Social Work Literature 98 (37.5%) Continuing Education Credits 96 (36.8%) Medical Literature 82 (31.4%) Conferences 69 (26.4%) Field Education 53 (20.3%) When do social workers screen for PPD? Delivery to one year postpartum 92 (35.2%) When symptoms are present 72 (27.6%) Prenatally 46 (17.6%) At well child visits 15 (5.7%) Delivery to two years postpartum 7 (2.7%) What screening instruments do social workers use? Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) 66 (25.3%) Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) 17 (6.5%) Postpartum Depression Checklist (PDC) 10 (3.8%) Postpartum Depression Screening Scale (PDSS) 9 (3.4%) Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) 9 (3.4%) General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) 7 (2.7%) Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM (SCID) 5 (1.9%) Centers for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) 3 (1.1%) Note. Due to the potential for multiple responses to the corresponding survey item, percentages provided in parentheses are calculated using the total sample size (n=261). Timing of PPD Screening The respondents identified screening for PPD most frequently between delivery and one year postpartum (see Table 2). Of the 261 participants, 46 screened prenatally (17.6%), 92 screened from delivery to one year postpartum (35.2%), seven screened from delivery to two years postpartum (2.7%), and 15 screened during well-child visits (5.7%). Additionally, 72 social workers (27.6%) reported screening only when symptoms were present. Screening Instruments Used Of the respondents who reported screening for PPD (see Table 2; n = 135), 83 (61.5%) indicated they used a validated tool with the most common being the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (Cox, Holden, & Sagovsky, 1987) (EPDS; n = 66, 48.8%). Additional instruments included the Patient Health Questionnaire (Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams et al., 1999) (PHQ-9; n = 17, 12.6%), Postpartum Depression Checklist (Beck, 1998) (PDC; n = 10, 7.4%), Postpartum Depression Screening Scale (Beck & Gable, 2002) (PDSS; n = 9, 6.6%), the Beck Depression Inventory (Beck, Steer, & Garbin, 1988) (BDI; n = 9, 6.6%), ADVANCES IN SOCIAL WORK, Fall 2016, 17(2) 279 the General Health Questionnaire (Goldberg & Williams, 1988) (GHQ; n = 7, 5.2%), the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM (Gormanet al., 2004) (SCID; n = 5, 3.7%), and the Centers for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (Radloff, 1991) (CES-D; n = 3, 2.2%). Implications and Discussion The results from this study highlight that 43% of the responding social workers learned about PPD and how to screen for it during their educational training. This finding is similar to the findings from Gaynes et al. (2005) who found more than half of practitioners did not learn about PPD while in their professional training. Most of the respondents in this study learned how to screen for PPD while on the job, through continuing education programs, or at professional conferences. Some of the respondents also reported learning about PPD through empirical literature, including social work journals. We were somewhat stymied by this outcome given the dearth of research reported in social work journals on PPD (Keefe et al., 2015). Although we were pleased to find that some of the responding social workers screen mothers from birth to one year, results from other studies conclude that PPD may not manifest until after one-year post-childbirth (O’Hara & McCabe, 2013; O’Hara & Wisner, 2014). Likewise, the recommendations set forth by ACOG (2015) and USPSTF (2016) encourage maternal health service providers to screen all pregnant women and new mothers for PPD throughout pregnancy and the first postpartum year. As in the Gaynes et al. (2005) report, many of our respondents reported learning about PPD while employed and not while enrolled in their academic programs. This finding is particularly troublesome given the sample in this study was comprised only of social workers working with pregnant and new mothers and children. Research has begun to address the problem of too few knowledgeable social workers screening new mothers for PPD. For example, recently published research concludes that BSW and MSW programs can incorporate content on PPD seamlessly into their curricula (Keefe, et al., 2015), and specific recommendations have been made for developing social work continuing education workshops to train social workers on how to work with mothers who have PPD (Keefe, Rouland Polmanteer, & Brownstein-Evans, in press). Social Work Education Instructors of social work research courses can help students develop and test interventions with individuals, families, groups, and communities at various service sites used by postpartum mothers. In human behavior and the social environment courses, instructors can include course content on PPD risk and protective factors. Social work practice courses can include various case scenarios that emphasize engagement, contracting for services, and intervention practices, as well as forming coalitions with service providers working with new mothers. In social policy courses, instructors can require students to trace the development of the ACA while also considering other landmark maternal and child health legislation including the Sheppard-Towner (Moehling, & Thomasson, 2012) and Melanie Blocker-Stokes Acts (Rhodes & Segre, 2013). Finally, field educators can assign students in maternal and child health placements to work with new mothers at risk for PPD and the mothers’ families. Students should be instructed on Polmanteer et al./SOCIAL WORK SCREENING PRACTICES 280 the use of standardized screening instruments, which would help prepare them to work with new mothers who may develop PPD after childbirth (O’Hara & McCabe, 2013; O’Hara & Wisner, 2014). Social Work Practice Only about one-third of the responding practitioners reported consulting evidence- based practice literature, including the social work (37.5%) and medical literature (31.4%). Using existing evidence-based practices is crucial to effective social work practice (NASW, 2008). However, given the limited best practices research on PPD published in social work journals, we were not surprised by this finding. We recommend that social workers integrate relevant findings from evidence-based practice research about PPD into their own practice as appropriate. Social Work Research In accordance with the ACA, it is recommended that social work researchers systematically investigate the risk factors, screening and assessment approaches, and interventions for all new mothers with a particular focus on mothers from diverse or vulnerable groups. Finally, researchers should publish their findings in social work journals not only as a way to reach other social work professionals but also to ensure that a social work perspective is infused in the developing research. Summary and Conclusion The interpretation of these findings should be made in light of the study’s limitations. To begin, data were collected electronically. Although electronic data collection provided the opportunity to reach social workers nationwide, social workers who are uncomfortable with technology or who are without access to the Internet were likely excluded. Additionally, the data collection was limited by missing data. Although there were 261 respondents, only 158 provided full demographic information. In addition, the sample was not randomly selected, so the results cannot be considered generalizable. Despite these limitations, this study is the first to examine how social workers screen mothers for PPD, which thus adds to the very limited body of knowledge on PPD in social work journals. Most of the responding social workers did not learn about PPD during their formal education or field placements. These findings, along with federal mandates put forward through the ACA, should encourage maternal and child health social workers to focus more thoroughly on the needs of new mothers at risk for and who may have PPD. References Abrams, L. S., & Curran, L. (2007). Not just a middle-class affliction: Crafting a social work research agenda on postpartum depression. Health & Social Work, 32(4), 289- 296. doi:https://doi. org/10. 1093/hsw/32. 4. 289 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2015). Committee opinion number 630: Screening for perinatal depression. Retrieved from https://www. acog. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/32.4.289 https://www.acog.org/-/media/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Obstetric-Practice/co630.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20160201T1823533744 ADVANCES IN SOCIAL WORK, Fall 2016, 17(2) 281 org/-/media/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Obstetric-Practice/co630. pdf?dmc=1&ts=20160201T1823533744 American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Beck, A. T., Steer, R., & Garbin, M. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77-100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5 Beck, C. T. (1998). A checklist to identify women at risk for developing postpartum depression. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 27(1), 39- 46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02589.x Beck, C. T., & Gable, R. K. (2002). Postpartum depression screening scale manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2008). Prevalence of self-reported postpartum depressive symptoms - 17 states, 2004-2005. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 57(14), 361-366. doi:https://doi. org/10. 1176/appi. books. 9780890425596 Cox, J. L, Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression: Development of the 10-iten Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 782-786. doi:https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.150.6.782 Gaynes, B. N., Gavin, N., Meltzer-Brody, S., Lohr, K. N., Swinson, T., Gartlehner, G., Brody, S., & Miller, W. C. (2005). Perinatal depression: Prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 119. AHRQ Publication No. 05-E006-2. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Gemmill, A. W., Leigh, B., Ericksen, J., & Milgrom, J. A. (2006). A survey of the clinical acceptability of screening for postnatal depression in depressed and non- depressed women. BMC Public Health, 6, 211-219. doi:https://doi. org/10. 1186/1471-2458-6-211 Gjerdingen, D. W. & Yawn, B. (2007). Postpartum depression screening: Importance, methods, barriers, and recommendations for practice. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 20(3), 280-288. doi:https://doi. org/10. 3122/jabfm. 2007. 03. 060171 Glavin, K. (2012). Screening and prevention of postnatal depression. In M. G. R. Castillo (Ed.), Perinatal depression (pp. 1-19). Retrieved from http://cdn. intechopen. com/pdfs-wm/26569. pdf doi:https://doi. org/10. 5772/31664 Goldberg, D. P., & Williams, P. (1988). The user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research- Nelson. Gorman, L.L., O’Hara, M.W., Figueiredo, B., Hayes, S., Jacquemain, F., Kammerer, M.H., Klier, C.M., Rosi, S., Seneviratne, G., & Sutter-Dallay A-L. (2004). https://www.acog.org/-/media/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Obstetric-Practice/co630.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20160201T1823533744 https://www.acog.org/-/media/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Obstetric-Practice/co630.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20160201T1823533744 https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02589.x https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.150.6.782 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-211 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-211 https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2007.03.060171 https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2007.03.060171 http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/26569.pdf http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/26569.pdf https://doi.org/10.5772/31664 Polmanteer et al./SOCIAL WORK SCREENING PRACTICES 282 Adaptation of the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV disorders for assessing depression in women during pregnancy and post-partum across countries and culture. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 184(46), S17-S23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.184.46.s17 Keefe, R. H., & Brownstein-Evans, C. (2013, November). Assessing postpartum depression among low-income mothers: Culture, race, and ethnicity. Paper presented at the 141st annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, Boston, MA. Keefe, R. H., Brownstein-Evans, C., Lane, S. D., Carter, D. B. & Rouland Polmanteer, R. S. (2015). Postpartum depression and the Affordable Care Act: Recommendations for social work educators. Advances in Social Work, (16)2, 202-213. doi:https://doi. org/10. 18060/18502 Keefe, R. H., Brownstein-Evans, C., & Rouland Polmanteer, R. S. (2016). Addressing access barriers to services for mothers at risk for perinatal mood disorders: A social work perspective. Social Work in Health Care, 48(1), 1-11. doi:https://doi. org/10. 1080/00981389. 2015. 1101045 Keefe, R. H., Rouland Polmanteer, R. S., & Brownstein-Evans, C. B. (in press). Postpartum depression: A critical area for continuing social work education. Professional Development: The International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education Lane, S. D., Webster, N., Levandowski, B. A., Rubinstein, R. A., Keefe. R. H., Wojtowycz, M. A., Cibula, D. A., Kingson, J., & Aubry, R. (2008). Environmental injustice: Childhood lead poisoning, teen pregnancy, and tobacco. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42(1), 43-49. doi:https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. jadohealth. 2007. 06. 017 Letourneau, N. L., Tryphonopoulos, P. D., Duffett-Leger, L., Stewart, M., Benzies, K., Dennis, C-L., & Joschko, J. (2012). Support intervention needs and preferences of fathers affected by postpartum depression. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing, 26(1), 69-80. doi:https://doi. org/10. 1097/JPN. 0b013e318241da87 Liu, C. H., & Tronick, E. (2013). Rates and predictors of postpartum depression by race and ethnicity: Results from the 2004 to 2007 New York City PRAMS survey (Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System). Maternal and Child Health Journal, 17, 1599-1610. doi:https://doi. org/10. 1007/s10995-012-1171-z Lucero, N. B., Beckstrand, R. L., Callister, L. C., & Sanchez Birkhead, A. C. (2012). Prevalence of postpartum depression among Hispanic immigrants. Journal of the Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 24(12), 726-734. doi:https://doi. org/10. 1111/j. 1745-7599. 2012. 00744. x Moehling, C. M., & Thomasson, M. A. (2012). The political economy of saving mothers and babies: The politics of state participation in the Sheppard-Towner Program. The Journal of Economic History, 72(1), 75-103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050711002440 https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.184.46.s17 https://doi.org/10.18060/18502 https://doi.org/10.18060/18502 https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2015.1101045 https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2015.1101045 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.06.017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.06.017 https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0b013e318241da87 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1171-z https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00744.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00744.x https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050711002440 ADVANCES IN SOCIAL WORK, Fall 2016, 17(2) 283 Morof, D., Barrett, G., Peacock, J., Victor, C. R., & Manyonda, I. (2003). Postnatal depression and sexual health after birth. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 102(6), 1318- 1325. National Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Retrieved from https://www. socialworkers. org/pubs/code/code. asp O’Hara, M. W., & McCabe, J. E. (2013). Postpartum depression: Current status and future directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 379-407. doi:https://doi. org/10. 1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185612 O’Hara, M. W., & Wisner, K. L. (2014). Perinatal mental illness: Definition, description, and aetiology. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 28, 3- 12. doi:https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. bpobgyn. 2013. 09. 002 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 42 U. S. C. § 18001 (2010). Radloff, L. (1991). The use of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale in adolescents and young adults. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 20, 149- 165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537606 Rhodes, A. M., & Segre, L. S. (2013). Perinatal depression: A review of US legislation and law. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 16(4), 259-270. doi:https://doi. org/10. 1007/s00737-013-0359-6 Sampson, M., Zayas, L. H., & Seifert, S. B. (2012). Treatment engagement using motivational interviewing for low-income, ethnically diverse mothers with postpartum depression. Clinical Social Work Journal, 41(4), 387-394. doi:https://doi. org/10. 1007/s10615-012-0422-1 Sealy, P. A., Fraser, J., Simpson, J. P., Evans, M., & Hartford, A. (2009). Community awareness of postpartum depression. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 38, 121-133. doi:https://doi. org/10. 1111/j. 1552-6909. 2009. 01001. x Seehusen, D. A., Baldwin, L, Runkle, G. P., & Clark, G. (2005). Are family physicians appropriately screening for postpartum depression? Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 18(2), 104-112. doi:https://doi. org/10. 3122/jabfm. 18. 2. 104 Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & The Patient Health Questionnaire Primary Care Study Group. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ primary care study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1737-1744. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.18.1737 SurveyMonkey. (2013). SurveyMonkey: How it works. Retrieved from https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/take-a-tour/?ut_source=header U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2016, January). Final recommendation statement: Depression in adults: Screening. Retrieved from http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStat ementFinal/depression-in-adults-screening1 https://www.socialworkers.org/pubs/code/code.asp https://www.socialworkers.org/pubs/code/code.asp https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185612 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185612 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.09.002 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537606 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-013-0359-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-013-0359-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-012-0422-1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-012-0422-1 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2009.01001.x https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.18.2.104 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.18.1737 https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/take-a-tour/?ut_source=header http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementFinal/depression-in-adults-screening1 http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementFinal/depression-in-adults-screening1 Polmanteer et al./SOCIAL WORK SCREENING PRACTICES 284 Villegas, L., McKay, K., Dennis, C-L., & Ross, L. (2011). Postpartum depression among rural women from developed and developing countries: A systematic review. The Journal of Rural Health, 27(3), 278-288. doi:https://doi. org/10. 1111/j. 1748-0361. 2010. 00339. x Zittel-Palamara, K., Rockmaker, J. R., Schwabel, K. M., Weinstein, W. L., & Thompson, S. J. (2008). Desired assistance versus care received for postpartum depression: Access to care differences by race. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 11, 81-92. doi:https://doi. org/10. 1007/s00737-008-0001-1 Author note: Address correspondence to: Robert H. Keefe, School of Social Work, University at Buffalo, SUNY Buffalo, NY 14260, 716-645-1230, rhkeefe@buffalo.edu https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-0361.2010.00339.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-0361.2010.00339.x https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-008-0001-1 mailto:rhkeefe@buffalo.edu