Advances Vol. 4, No. 1 Hearing the Silence: Children’sVoices onViolence Kathryn S. Collins Abstract:Each yearmore than fivemillion children in the United States are exposed to traumatizing events in their communities. This paper presents a discussion of multiple areas in violence and victimization research that needs to be continued as well as provides suggestions on how to un-silence child survivors through bridging the gaps between research and practice. It reviews the overarching problem of vio- lence in the U.S. at the domestic and global levels and the effects of victimization. Suggestions on how to study possible mediators and moderators of victimization and individual and family adjustment, including: 1) The ecological perspective; 2) Court process and verdict; and 3) Utilization of victim services, are explored. Finally, a rationale and examples of combining qualitative and quantitative methods in future research that uses children’s attributions of violence as a mediator are pre- sented. Keywords: Children, victimization, community violence, court process, victim services Eachyearmore than fivemillion children and adolescents in theUnited States are exposed to traumatizing events in their communities and they represent one-quarter of American crime victims. Further, the Children’s Defense Fund (2001) indicates that in 1999more children and teens died from gunfire than from cancer, pneumonia, influenza, asthma, and HIV/AIDS combined. Violence endured in children’s homes, neighborhoods, and communities must continue to be considered one of the most alarming public health concerns in our society. This paper presents a discussion of multiple areas in the research that needs to be continued and provides suggestions on how to un-silence child survivors by bridging gaps between research and practice. It reviews the overarching problem of violence in the U.S. at the domestic and global levels and the effects of victim- ization. Suggestions on how to study possible mediators and moderators of vic- timization and individual and family adjustment including: 1) The ecological per- spective; 2) Court process and verdict; and 3) Utilization of victim services are explored. Finally, a rationale and examples of combining qualitative and quantita- tive methods in future research that uses children’s attributions of violence as a mediator are presented. 20 Kathryn S. Collins, Ph.D. is Assistant Professor, University of Pittsburgh, School of SocialWork, Pittsburgh, PA 15260. Copyright© 2003 Advances in SocialWorkVol. 4 No. 1 (Spring 2003) 20-33. Indiana University School of SocialWork. LITERATURE REVIEW Prevalence ofVictimization The U.S. is a culture with an interwoven thread of violence from its birth in revolu- tion to recent violent episodes at the World Trade Center, Pentagon, and Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Violence is the foundation of many revered ideals and institutions and a common and defining characteristic of American society (Cicchetti & Lynch, 1993;Van Soest & Bryant, 1995). However, even as the evidence of violent events appears to be decreasing in the U.S., its presence in the lives of children is still a signal for alarm.Violence figures significantly into the lives of chil- dren and families, and researchers and social scientists often underestimate its effects (Bell & Jenkins, 1993; Gibbs, 1988; Osofsky, 1995; Richters & Martinez, 1993a). An abundance of literature recognizes the impact of violence on children; however, there is little to direct researchers andpractitioners in developing effective victimization services to address the long-lasting effects of such violence. Furthermore, research on the mediators and moderators of the effects of violence is still in its infancy (NIMH, 2002). Children are exposed to violence through direct victimization or by witnessing violent episodes. They also hear about accounts of community and domestic vio- lence from parents, friends, relatives, neighbors, and themedia. Children who wit- ness violence experience co-victimization or secondary trauma.The line of demar- cation between direct victims and those who witness or hear about violence is obscure because of the similar reactions and effects produced by each (Figley & Klebeer, 1995; Shakoor & Chalmers, 1991). Jordan (2002) examined he complexities of the impact of domestic violence on the child survivor.Primary care physicians and mental health practitioners claim that children are the silent victims in their work with mothers who are survivors of domestic abuse (Zuckerman, Augustyn, Groves & Parker, 1995). Research indicates that children are present in 80% of the homes where there is violence against a woman (U.S.Department of Justice, 1999).The relationship between spousal abuse and the physical or sexual abuse of children in the home is now documented to reach 30% to 70% (Bowker, Arbitell &McFerron, 1988; Stark & Flitcraft, 1988; Suh & Abel, 1990). Several studies from metropolitan areas have addressed frequency and preva- lence and the extent and nature of adolescents’ exposure to violence (Bell & Jenkins, 1993; Fitzpatrick &Boldizar, 1993; Hill &Madhere, 1996; Osofsky,Wewers, Hann & Flick, 1993; Pynoos & Nader, 1990; Richters &Martinez, 1993b; Shakoor & Chalmers, 1991). The number of gun-related deaths and injuries to children are on a decline in theU.S.; however, nearly 12 children, approximately one every 100 minutes, die each day from gunfire in their homes, schools, and neighborhoods, which is the equivalent to a classroomof children dying every two days in theU.S. (Children’s Defense Fund, 2001). According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1997), the rate of firearms deaths among children under age 15 is almost 12 times higher in theU.S. than in 25 other industrialized countries combined. 21Collins/HEARING THE SILENCE: CHILDREN’S VOICES ONVIOLENCE 22 ADVANCES IN SOCIALWORK Trauma Symptomatology and Exposure A variety of trauma symptoms follow violence exposure. Childrenwho are victims andwitnesses to violence experience increased levels of fear, anxiety, and depres- sion as well as psychopathological disorders such as post-traumatic stress disor- der, physical injury, and sometimes death (Bell & Jenkins, 1993; Fitzpatrick & Boldizar, 1993; Garbarino, 1986; Pynoos, Frederick, Nader, Arroyo, Steinberg, Eth, Nunez & Fairbanks, 1987; Richters & Martinez, 1993b). Symptoms of post-trau- matic stress disorder include emotional and physiological hyper-arousal, intru- sive and frightening thoughts, feelings, and images of the trauma, and the numb- ing of emotional responses. Some children exposed to violence demonstrate a sense of futurelessness characterized by a belief that they will not reach adult- hood, along with a sense of anomie associated with feelings of hopelessness and low self-esteem (Freeman,Mokros & Poznanski, 1993; Terr, 1989). These reactions may be accompanied by feelings of vulnerability, self-blame, and retaliation (Finkelhor, 1980; Saunders, 1996). The clinical effects of children who witness parental violence are characteristic of trauma, with dissociation and defensive projections against recall and resolu- tion, which can be pathological (Silvern & Kaersvang, 1989). The child who endures family violence, such as parental homicide, has to cope with the trauma of the terrifying event; the grief associated with the loss of both parents (offender and victim) simultaneously; dislocation and insecurity regarding where and with whom they will live; and stigma, secrecy, and conflicts of loyalty (Black & Kaplan, 1988; Burman&Allen-Meares, 1994). Dyson (1990) states that the damage caused to African-American children from exposure to homicide perpetrated by a family member or an acquaintance reflects in post-traumatic stress disorder, behavior problems, and poor school performance. Furthermore, children who witness domestic violence are subject to cognitive and social developmental delays, a potential increase in violent and aggressive behavior, and a limited ability to establish trusting and empathic relationships (Coffee & Coffee, 1996). Nationally, children in preschool, elementary school, and high school who experience fre- quent verbal aggression and severe physical violence from parents exhibit the highest rates of aggression, delinquency, and interpersonal problems within the student population (Salzinger, Feldman, Hammer & Rosario, 1993; Vissing, Strauss, Gelles & Harrop, 1991;Wolfe & Jaffe, 1991). Some researchers have focused on exposure to violence as a cause of later per- petration of violence (Prouts, Shopler &Henley, 1982;Widom, 1989). Studies indi- cate that prolonged exposure to violence may constitute a form of early child- hood socialization toward violence. Perry, Perry and Boldizar (1990) suggest in a theoretical framework that environments of community violence: 1) provide aggressivemodels, 2) reinforce aggression, and 3) frustrate and victimize the child who is exposed. All of these factors may contribute to the development of aggres- sive tendencies in children. Some adolescents and children cope with their feel- ings of helplessness and being out of control by identifying with individuals who frighten them and deny their vulnerability (Safyer, 1994). Osofsky,Wewers, Hann and Flick (1993) found a direct correlation between exposure to violence and vio- lent behavior. For example, children and adolescents who have been exposed 23 exhibit higher incidences of fighting with peers compared to adolescents who have not been exposed. These individuals put themselves at risk for further harm by associating with gang members or aggressive individuals and by participating in activities such as assaults, robberies, rape, and murder (Bell & Jenkins, 1993; Herman, 1992; Shakoor & Chalmers, 1991). The degree of children’s victimization and exposure to violence correlates with distress symptoms. However, Richters andMartinez (1993a) caution against over- interpreting children’s psychological distress symptoms as indices of maladjust- ment. Just as fear, anxiety, and depression can cause long-term negative conse- quences, they may also serve as adaptive functions in dangerous environments. The distress may signal increased vigilance and normal, healthy reactions to loss and pain. Richters and Martinez (1993a) further assert “It remains an important task for researchers to develop strategies and criteria for discriminating between adaptive and maladaptive responses to violence exposure” (p. 6). Mediators andModerators of Effects Considerable variation exists in the amount, type, and severity of violence chil- dren experience. Because of distinct worldviews, coping strategies, self-concepts, and constructed ideas of violence, adolescents respond and endure exposure to violence differently. Very little is known about themediators between the stressor of victimization and the exposure and effects of symptomatology in children. Information developed through qualitative and quantitative research can be used to increase understanding of the mechanism and etiology of trauma symptoma- tology in child survivors of violent crime. Examining individual and aggregate fac- tors of the ecological perspective, attributions, court process and verdict, and service provision and utilization associated with individual and family adjust- ment will provide data for research and development of interventions to reduce trauma and stress. Ecological Perspective The ecological perspective enables one to simultaneously focus on person and environment and their reciprocal relationship. According to Germain and Glitterman (1995), “Instead of valuing prediction ofmaladaptive exchanges based on simplistic cause and effect, ecological thinking embraces indeterminacy in complex human phenomena” (p. 817). Therefore, it is necessary to examine adjustment of child survivors and their families from an ecological perspective. Specifically, researchers and practitionersmust take into consideration the child’s individual and family characteristics, such as race, gender, coping styles, socioe- conomic status, health and mental status, social support, history of violence exposure, and neighborhood and school supports, resources, and history of serv- ice utilization. Research literature recognizes application of the ecological perspective to the impact of violence. One such study by Richters andMartinez (1993b) argued that the mere accumulation of environmental adversities such as community vio- lence does not lead to adaptational failure of children living in violent environ- ments. Rather, the odds of their adaptational failure increase only when commu- nity violence contaminates or erodes stability or safety levels of the children’s Collins/HEARING THE SILENCE: CHILDREN’S VOICES ONVIOLENCE 24 ADVANCES IN SOCIALWORK homes. Their study concluded that the erosion of quality of the child’s microsys- tem and macrosystem is not an inevitable process (Richters & Martinez, 1993b). Elbedour, ten Bensel and Bastien (1993) and Walton, Nuttall and Nuttall (1997) proposed that the amount of failure and suffering of children exposed to different levels of war violence is ecologically conceptualized with their interaction among five factors: intensity and duration of exposure to violence, the individual, the family (microsystem), the community (exosystem), and the culture (macrosystem). The level of influence of the person-community ecosystem in which the person experiences trauma, copes, and makes meaning out of violent events depends on the child’s individual characteristics and her/his relationshipwith other individuals involved, the child’s perceptions of the events experienced, and her/his description of the larger environment (Harvey, 1996). Research also suggests that abuse ismore common in families where economic hardship and unemployment are issues (Meiselman, 1978; Straus, Gelles & Steinmetz, 1980; Jordan, 2002); in familieswhere thedecision-makingprocess is hierarchical, inwhich themale figurehas significant power and control, instead of amore cohesive and collaborative relationship struc- ture (Finkelhor, 1980; Gelles, 1974); and where there is little to no social support from the community, extended family, friends, and agency and institutional affilia- tions (Finkelhor, 1980; Garbino & Gillian, 1980; Gelles, 1974). Garbarino (1995) asserted that children are often capable of coping with one or two major risk factors in their lives, though the risk of developmental damage increases substantially when the experience of violence occurs in combination with other factors. Many children in such conditions are poor, live in father- absent homes, contend with parents who cope with depression or substance abuse problems, have parents with little education or employment prospects, and are exposed to domestic violence. Family adjustment and functioning relates to how familymembers of child sur- vivors perform necessary roles and tasks, adapt to problems, and communicate with one another in such a way that promotes family health and well being (Fobair & Zabora, 1995). The relationship between family adjustment and func- tioning and a child’s individual adjustment is a transactional process—the family system both affecting and being affected by the behavior of individual family members (Freisen & Koroloff, 1990). Furthermore, social support is an important factor in the ecological perspective which prevents child symptomatology. Individual family members’ social support is the experience of intimacy, accept- ance, companionship, and tenderness from peers and other family members. Research has shown that social support is a protective factor for children and families enduring stress (Wasserstein & La Greca, 1996). The school environment is a variable in the ecological perspective. “Nowhere has this nation’s educational system failed more dramatically than in inner-city schools serving predominantly poor African-American populations,” stated Gerdes and Benson in their 1995 needs assessment of inner city school children. (p. 139) In many Eastern urban schools, the drop-out rate for African-American youth living in areas of poverty and community violence is almost 40% (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1993). Schools fail to accommodate the variance of abili- ties, interests, learning styles, and individual needs such as poverty, parental illit- 25Collins/HEARING THE SILENCE: CHILDREN’S VOICES ONVIOLENCE eracy, poor health, and community violence of inner-city children and youth (Gerdes & Benson, 1995). Safyer (1994) indicated that many children and adolescents living in areas where violence is prevalent face considerable academic distress. She cited exam- ples of adolescents not sleeping soundly at night as a result of not feeling safe in their home environments. As a result, these students find it difficult to concen- trate in the classroom, causing some teachers to erroneously believe that these students are disinterested or lack academicmotivation and the ability to succeed (Safyer, 1994). Pynoos and colleagues (1987) found significant relationships between proxim- ity to violence and the type and number of post-traumatic stress disorder symp- toms in their study of 159 elementary school children sampled after a sniper attack on their school premises. Richters andMartinez (1993b) discovered in their study of children in the Washington, D.C. area that 22% of the victimization, according to the children’s reports, occurred in school, and another 30% stated victimization took place near their school. Court Process andVerdict Althoughnot all accounts of experienceswith violence are reportedor endup in the court process, onemust consider the difficult challenges that court processes pose for children and families who are survivors of violent crime. Designed with short- term, narrow interventions without adequate follow-up, they need to be consid- ered as part of the research, practitioner, and legal system agenda; the judicial sys- tem is a harsh environment that is not child-centric. Children often feel intimidat- ed by the criminal justice process and “re-live” the abuse and victimization, partic- ularly in the courtroom. This is predominantly true of younger children. This “re- living” of the abuse may intensify the victim’s trauma, thereby, causing the child to be apoorwitness andprovideweak testimony that poses additional barriers to suc- cessful investigation and prosecution (U.S. Department of Justice, Office for Victims of Crime, 1999). Children involved in court situations rely on professionals across several disciplines and viewpoints (e.g., law,mental health, policy, advocates, victim services, batterer programs, etc.) to help them through the lengthy process of navigating the justice system that can affect the child’s psychological develop- ment in significant and long-termways (Rossman, Hughs & Rosenberg, 2000). The U.S. Department of Justice, Office forVictims of Crime (1999) and Lipovsky and Stern (1997) report a number of court-related factors that have been identi- fied as stressful for child victims and witnesses: (1) Multiple interviews and not using developmentally appropriate language; (2) Delays and continuances; (3) Testifying more than once; (4) Lack of communication among professionals; (4) Fear of public exposure; (5) Lack of understanding of complex legal procedures; (6) Face-to-face contact with the defendant; (7) Practices that are insensitive to developmental needs; (8) Harsh cross-examination; (9) Lack of adequate support and victims services; (10) Sequestration of witnesses who may be supportive to the child; (11) Placement that exposes the child to intimidation, pressure, or con- tinued abuse; (12) Inadequate preparation for testifying; and (13) Lack of evi- dence other than the testimony of the child. However, there is paucity in the 26 ADVANCES IN SOCIALWORK research and practice literature regarding the impact of court related factors on long-term individual and family adjustment. The Office for Victims of Crime (1999) reports that some researchers and practi- tioners have found that testifying is not necessarily harmful to children, as long as they are adequately prepared (Goodman,Taub, Jones & England, 1992; Oates, Gray, Schweitzer, Kempe, et al., 1995). Having a trusted person, such as a victim-witness advocate, helps to reduce the anxiety and traumatic stress symptomatology of the child (Henry, 1997). Research further indicates that by reducing the number of interviews from lawyers, court officials, medical examiners, and police officers regarding the victimization can help to minimize psychological harm to child vic- tims (Tedesco & Schnell, 1987). Victimization Services Child survivors and their families do not choose to be victims. Therefore, it is nec- essary for survivors to choose and utilize a wide range of services that help them maneuver the criminal justice system and promote healing from victimization and trauma. For many children and families, violence is an unavoidable part of their lives (Noguera, 1995). Children need safe havens and people to help them over- come their experiences of vulnerability and ambivalence. Early interventions and services for child survivors and their families are essential for their health and well being (U.S. Department of Justice, Office forVictims of Crime, 1999). In the U.S. and other countries, there has been a phenomenal growth in victim service programs. Roberts (1990) reports that there were only 23 victim programs in 1975 but more than 600 such programs by 1986. Likewise, there were only seven emergency shelters for women survivors of domestic violence and four police-based crisis intervention programs in 1974. By 1987, however, there were more than 1,250 emergency shelters and crisis programs for women survivors of domestic violence and their children. During 1982 the President’s Task Force on Victims of Crime identified the American justice system as“appallingly out of bal- ance” and made 68 recommendations for how rights and services for crime vic- tims in this nation could be substantially improved. These accomplishments include theVictims of Crime Act in 1984, the landmark Crime Act of 1994, and the countless state statutes that strengthen victims’ rights and provide effective com- munity-based victim services. However, there is still a lack of comprehensive services for victims of crime in every community, resulting in part from inade- quate funding (U.S. Department of Justice, Office of CrimeVictims,1998; Lippert, 1999; National Victims Assistance Academy, 1999; Jordan, 2002). Research indicates that the participation of victim services, such as interven- tions provided by victim–witness advocates in child cases, appears to increase the percentage of guilty verdicts and promotes coping and adjustment for child sur- vivors (U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Victims of Crime, 1999). Dible and Teske (1993) found the conviction rate for child sexual abuse cases almost dou- bled (38% to 72%) after a district attorney in Collin County, Texas implemented child victim–witness advocacy programs. The proportion of offenders receiving prison sentences also almost doubled from 25% to 48%. Over the same period, prison sentences increased from 9.24 years to 16.48 years. 27 There is a need to create individualized interventions and services for children and families who are survivors of violent crime. Child advocates and researchers are becomingmore aware of the unique effects of a myriad of violence and abuse situations. Intervention efforts should be tailored to what is needed by families at a particular point in time, with careful analysis focusing on the context of the vio- lence, specific incidents, patterns, and psychological reactions (National Victim’s Assistance Academy, 1999). Access to a continuum of ecologically-based services for families and children rather than short-term, narrow interventions without adequate follow-up need to be considered part of the research, practitioner, and legal system agenda (U.S. Department of Justice, Office for Victims of Crime, 1999; Rossman, Hughes & Rosenburg, 2000; Jordan, 2002). BRIDGING FUTURE RESEARCH AND PRACTICE In our society, children represent a population whose voices are often ignored and silenced. As stated previously, psychology, social work, public health, sociol- ogy, andmedicine have begun to study the effects of children’s exposure to chron- ic community violence. However, little research has been done to both quantita- tively and qualitatively examine children’s perceptions of the violence they are experiencing. For example, a study that was initially designed to rely only on quantitative methods to gather frequency and perceived severity data of chil- dren’s exposure to violence as part of a larger study on perceptions of safety (Collins, 2001) turned into a more valuable and comprehensive study, because the researchers found that the children wanted to tell their stories of violence. Children’s Perceptions Hill and Madhere (1996) confirmed in their study that “the saliency of children’s perceptions of violence in their communities, the nature of their exposure to it, and whatmeaning they attach to it all become critical in understanding how they interpret the stressor of violence and how it affects them” (p. 26). Considerable variation exists in the amount, type, and severity of violence children experience. Because of distinct worldviews, coping strategies, self-concepts, and constructed ideas of violence, children respond and endure exposure to violence differently. Garbarino (1995) stated that the most crucial feature of child development is the child’s emerging capacity to form and maintain social maps. He suggested that social maps represent the world, reflect the simple cognitive competence of the child, and indicate the child’s moral and affective inclinations. Children’s social maps include experiences in the larger environment in counterpoint with the child’s inner life, both rational cognitive forces and the unconscious impetus (Garbarino, 1995). Through these social maps, childrenmay develop a framework within which to understand danger and safety. Simpson (1996) stated, “Perceptions of safety and danger are ‘intersubjective’ products of social con- struction, collective agreement, and socialization” (p. 549). She insisted that while objective danger and violence exist, perceptions do not derive directly from observation of the empirical world. Instead, the objective environment provides only discrepant and ambiguous information about danger and violence, provid- ing room for socially constructed beliefs. Collins/HEARING THE SILENCE: CHILDREN’S VOICES ONVIOLENCE 28 ADVANCES IN SOCIALWORK Children’sVoices Children are placed in a subordinate role and are not relied upon as resources for understanding concepts related to their well-being. As LeCompte (1993) described it, those in subordinate roles are those who are oppressed, silenced, and “have been deprived of voice without their consent” (p. 10). It must be the researcher’s goal to make the voices of the children heard. The role of the researcher in this type of comprehensive study is to be the mediator between those who are powerless, the children, and those in power who do not have the ability or do not choose to hear children’s voices. Being a mediator between the powerful and the powerless has been described as the traditional perspective of feminist researchers (Kerlin, 1997). For example, the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Justice (2001) suggest that their data indi- cate that children are safer at school and most harm and violence occurs within the home or en route to and from school. Yet, Collins (2001) has discovered through using a combined qualitative and quantitative research design that none of the children (high or low exposure) indicated that they felt safe at school. To many children violence is more than the number of incidents reported or the number of weapons children are “caught with” and safety is more than having structured rules, wire fences, or metal detectors. LeCompte (1993) described silence as occurring at two levels during the research process. The first level of silence occurs among the overall population of children. The second level of silence is within each individual child. Using the research role and providing a safe, warm environment of trust can be created between the children and the researcher so that children feel empowered to tell their stories and break the silence. Attributions An example of breaking the silence is qualitatively and quantitatively studying children’s attributions of violence. Attributions are the suspected or inferred causes of an event, situation, or behavior. The research on abuse-specific attribu- tion style is important to understanding the sequelae of childhood victimization (Brown & Kolko, 1999; Cohen & Mannariono, 1996; Spaccarelli, 1994; Wolfe, Gentile &Wolfe, 1989). Attributions are possible mediators of the response children undergo who have been sexually abused (Celano, 1992; Janoff-Bulman, 1979; Mannarino & Cohen, 1996; Wolfe, Gentile &Wolfe, 1989), physically abused (Brown & Kolko, 1999), or exposed to natural disasters (Joseph, Williams & Yule, 1993). Attributions have been demonstrated to be positively correlated with psychological and behavior problems. However, research has not examined the relationships among chil- dren’s attributions regarding the causes of violent crime, court process and ver- dict, and service utilization in children. Finkelhor and Browne (1985) suggest that specific attributions may be associated with specific trauma symptomatology. Children who perceived less blame and felt more empowered also reported a more positive adjustment and less trauma symptomatology. Another attribution, personal vulnerability, reflects adolescents’ beliefs that abuse happens often to adolescents, that it could happen again, and that adolescents are not able to pre- vent bad things from happening. Youth also may have a dangerous worldview— 29 children will be victimized in society and adults cannot be trusted for protection. The issues of self-blame/guilt, responsibility, and power/control have been found to mediate symptoms associated with child sexual abuse (Gold, 1986; Wyatt & Newcomb, 1990; Cohen &Mannarino, 1996). Children who are psychologically manipulated tend to blame themselves, take on responsibility for the abuse occurring, feel extreme amounts of guilt and shame, and have a sense of isolation from their peers and other family members. The perpetuation of abuse under these circumstances is common, therefore, increasing the likelihood of child survivors having low self-esteem, depression, suicidal tendencies, an inability to trust, and difficulty developing interpersonal relationships (Herman & Hirschman, 1977;Walker, 1979; Jordan, 2002). CONCLUSIONS A paradigm shift from traditional methods of violence research to more compre- hensive and revealing research that includes the voices of children would contin- ue to advance the knowledge and skills of child advocates in the areas of practice, policy, and research. Delineating the factors in the individual and her/his social environment, which could be addressed in interventions, may also provide sup- port for more effective victim services and treatment programs. Research on the impact the court process and verdict have on child survivors’ adjustment in relation to the victim services provided to children and families is an area of research that has been afforded little attention, yet has promising pol- icy implications. To effectively pursue and prosecute offenders in cases involving child survivors, the investigators, prosecutors, and judges must adjust their prac- tices to meet the needs of these children in an age-appropriate and responsive manner. Reducing trauma to the child increases the child’s participation, leading to an increased chance of a successful outcome to the investigation and prosecu- tion. This research also contributes to the children’s mental health and health services research literature. Few, if any, studies examine access and barriers to services for child survivors and their families. Victimization is an incident in one’s life that demands a response; however, few families are prepared to deal with this crisis. The child and family are forced to make decisions regarding reporting and services. The deci- sion to report or obtain additional services is based not only on the coping and functioning of the survivor and family, but also on the interaction of the survivor with institutional, community, and social support systems. It is critical to explore the decision-making process of survivors and their families in light of the envi- ronmental and system factors encountered in their healing process. Exploring these concepts will provide significant information on the obstacles to services that will be beneficial to service providers and policymakers. References Bell, C., & Jenkins, E.J. (1993). Community violence and children on Chicago’s south side. Special Issue: Children and violence. Psychiatry Interpersonal and Biological Process, 56(1), 46-54. Collins/HEARING THE SILENCE: CHILDREN’S VOICES ONVIOLENCE 30 ADVANCES IN SOCIALWORK Black, D., & Kaplan, T. (1988). Father kills mother: Issues and problems encountered by a child psychiatric team. British Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 624-630. Bowker, L.H., Arbitell, M., & McFerron, J.R. (1988). On the relationship between wife beating and child abuse. In K. Ylloe and M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 158-174). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Brown, E.J., & Kolko, D.J. (1999). Child victims’ attributions about being physically abused: An examina- tion of factors associated with symptom severity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 311-322. Burman, S., & Allen-Meares, P. (1994). Neglected victims of murder: Children’s witness to parental homi- cide. SocialWork, 39(1), 28-34. Celano, M.P. (1992). A developmental model of victims’ internal attributions of responsibility for sexual abuse. Journal of InterpersonalViolence, 7, 57-69. Cicchetti, D., & Lynch, M. (1993). Toward an ecological/transactional model of community violence and child maltreatment: Consequences for children’s development. Journal of Psychiatry, 56, 96-118. Children’s Defense Fund. (2001). In America: Facts on youth, violence, and crime. [On-line] http://www.chidrensdefensefund.org/ss_violence_youthdev_facts.html. Coffee, J., & Coffee, A.W. (1995). An intervention model for child witnesses of domestic violence. Hawaii Medical Journal, 55(9), 174-176. Cohen, J.A., & Mannarino, A.P. (1996). Factors that mediate treatment outcome of sexually abused pre- school children. Journal of the American Academy of Children and Adolescent Psychiatry, 56, 96-188. Collins, K.S. (2001). Children’s perceptions of safety and exposure to violence. International Journal of Adolescence andYouth, 10(1/2). Dible, D., & Teske, R.H., Jr. (1993). An analysis of the prosecutory effects of a child sexual abused victim- witness program. Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 79-85. Dyson, J.L. (1990). The effect of family violence on children’s academic performance and behavior. Journal of the National Medical Association, 82(1), 17-22. Elbedour, S., ten Bensel, R., & Bastien, D.T. (1993). Ecological integrated model of children and war: Individual and social psychology. Child Abuse and Neglect, 17, 805-819. Figley, C.R., & Klebeer, R.J. (1995) Beyond the victim: Secondary traumatic stress. In R.J.F. Kleber, D.R. Figley, & B.P. Gersons, (eds.), Beyond trauma: Cultural and societal dynamics.NewYork: Plenum Press. Finkelhor, D. (1980). Sex among siblings: A survey of prevalence, variety, and effects. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 9, 171-194. Finkelhor, D., & Browne, A. (1985). The traumatic impact of child sexual abuse: A conceptualization. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 55, 530-541. Fitzpatrick, K.M., & Boldizar, J.P. (1993). The prevalence and consequences of exposure to violence among African American youth. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32, 424- 430. Fobair, P.A., & Zabora, J.R. (1995). Family functioning as a resource variable in psychological cancer research: Issues and measure. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 13, 97-144. Freeman, L.N.,Mokros,H., & Poznanski, E.O. (1993).Violent events reported by normal urban school-aged children: Characteristics and depression correlates. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32(2), 419-423. Freisen, B.J., & Koroloff, N.M. (1990). Family-centered services: Implications for mental health adminis- tration and research. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 17, 13-25. Garbarino, J., & Gillian, G. (1980).Understanding abusive families. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Garbarino, J. (1986). The psychologically battered child. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Garbarino, J. (1995). The American war zone: What children can tell us about living with violence. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 16(6), 431-435. Garbino, J., & Gillian, G. (1980).Understanding abusive families. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Gelles, R.J. (1974). The other side of the family: Conjugal violence.Dissertation Abstracts International, 34, 6141-6142. 31 Gerdes, K.E., & Benson, R.A. (1995). Problems of inner city schoolchildren: Needs assessment by nominal group process. SocialWork in Education, 17(3), 139-147. Germain, C.B., & Glitterman, A. (1995). Ecological perspective. In R.L. Edwards, J.G. Hopps, L.D. Bernard, D.M. DiNitto, P.L. Ewalt, M. Frumkin, A. Garcia, J.J. Harris, M.N. Ozawa, R.C. Sarri, E.G. Schlesinger, F.W. Seidel, C.W.Williams, L. Beebe, & N.A. Winchester (Eds.). Encyclopedia of SocialWork, Vol. 1 (19th Ed.,) pp. 816-824.Washington, D.C.: National Association of SocialWorkers Press. Gibbs, J. (1988). Young, black, and male in America: An endangered species. Dover: Auburn House. Gold, E.R. (1986). Long-term effects of sexual victimization in childhood: An attributional approach. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 4013. Goodman, G.S., Taub, E.P., Jones, D.P., & England, P. (1992). Testifying in criminal court: Emotional effects on child sexual assault victims. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57(5) 1-142. Harvey, M. (1996). Ecological view of psychological trauma and trauma recovery. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9 3-23. Henry, J. (1997). System intervention trauma to child sexual abuse victims following disclosure. Journal of InterpersonalViolence, 12, 499-512. Herman, J. (1992). Trauma and recovery. NewYork: Basic Books. Herman, J., & Hirschman, L. (1977). Father-daughter incest. Signs, 2, 735-756. Hill, H., & Madhere, S. (1996). Exposure to community violence and African American children: A multi- dimensional model of risks and resources. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(1), 26-43. Janoff-Bulman, R. (1979). Characterological versus behavioral self-blame: Inquires into depression and rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1798-1809. Jordan, C. (2002) Governor’s office of child abuse and domestic violence services. [On-line] http://gocad- vs.ky.gov/ Joseph, S.,Williams, R., &Yule,W. (1993). Changes in outlook following disaster: The preliminary develop- ment of a measure to assess positive and negative responses. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 6, 271-279. Kerlin, R. (1997). Breaking the silence:Toward a theory ofwomen’s doctoral persistence.Unpublished doc- toral dissertation, University of Victoria, Canada. LeCompte,M.D. (1993). A framework for hearing silence.What does telling storiesmeanwhenwe are sup- posed to be doing science? InD.McLaughlin andW.Tierney, (Eds.),Naming silenced lives: Personal nar- ratives and the process of educational change, pp. 9-27. NewYork, NY: Routledge. Lipovsky, J.,&Stern,P. (1997). Preparingchildren for court:An interdisciplinaryview.Maltreatment,2, 150-163. Lippert J. (1999). Victim services: A quiet world of help. [On-line] http://www.geocities.com/joanlip- pert/victimservices.html Mannarino, A.P., &Cohen, J.A. (1996). Abuse related attributions andperceptions, general attributions and locus of control in sexually abused girls. Journal of InterpersonalViolence, 11, 162-180. Meiselman, K.C. (1978). Incest: A psychological study with cause and effects and treatment recommenda- tions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. National Institute of Mental Health. (2002). Mental health and mass violence: Evidence-based early psy- chological intervention for victims/survivors of mass violence. A workshop to reach concensus on best practices.NIH Publication No. 02-5138,Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. National Victim Assistance Academy. (1999). Academy text. [On-line] http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc/assist/nvaa99/ Noguera, P.A. (1995). Preventing and producing violence: A critical analysis of responses to school vio- lence.Harvard Educational Review, 65, 189-212. Oates, R.K., Gray, J., Schweitzer, L., Kempe, R.S., et al. (1995). A therapeutic preschool for abused children: The keepsafe project. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19(11), 1379-1386. Office for Victims of Crime (OVC) of the United States Department of Justice. (1998). New directions for the field: Victims’ rights and services for the 21st century. Author. Collins/HEARING THE SILENCE: CHILDREN’S VOICES ONVIOLENCE 32 Osofsky, J. (1995).Theeffectsof exposure toviolenceonyoungchildren.AmericanPsychologist,50(9), 782-788. Osofsky, J.,Wewers, S., Hann,D., & Flick, A. (1993). Chronic community violence:What is happening to our children? Psychiatry, 56, 36-45. Perry, D.G., Perry, L.C., & Boldizar, J.P. (1990). Learning of aggression. InM.Miller (Ed.),Handbook of devel- opmental psychopathology (pp. 135-146). NewYork: Plenum. Prouts, J., Shopler, J., & Henley, C. (1982). Forgotten victims of family violence. SocialWork, 27, 367-368. Pynoos, R.S., Frederick, C.J., Nader, K., Arroyo,W., Steinberg, A., Eth, S.,M.Nunez, F., & Fairbanks, L. (1987). Life threatandpost-traumatic stress inschool-agechildren.ArchivesofGeneralPsychiatry,44(12), 1057-1063. Pynoos, R., & Nader, K. (1990). Children’s exposure to violence and traumatic death. Psychiatric Annuals, 20, 334-344. Richters, J.E., &Martinez, P. (1993a). Community violence and children’s development: Toward a research agenda for the 1990’s. Psychiatry, 56, 3-6. Richters, J.E., & Martinez, P. (1993b). The NIMH community violence project I: Children as victims of and witnesses to violence. Psychiatry, 56, 7-21. Roberts, A.R. (1990). Helping crime victims: Research, policy, and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Rossman, B.R., Hughs, H.M., & Rosenberg, M.S. (2000). Children and interparental violence: The impact of exposure. Philadelphia, PA: Brunner/Mazel. Safyer, A.W. (1994). The impact of inner city life on adolescent development: Implications for social work. Smith College Studies in SocialWork, 64(2), 153-167. Salzinger, S., Feldman, R.S., Hammer, M., & Rosario, M. (1993). The effects of physical abuse on children’s social relationships. Child Development, 64(1), 169-187. Saunders, B.E. (1996). Book review of systemic treatment of families who abuse. Violence and Victims, 11(1), 93-94. Shakoor, B.H., & Chalmers, D. (1991). Co-victimization of African American children who are witness to violence: Effects on cognitive, emotional, and behavioral development. Journal of the National Medical Association, 83, 223-238. Silvern, L.,&Kaersvang, L. (1989).The traumatizedchildrenof violentmarriages.ChildWelfare,69(4), 421-436. Simpson, R. (1996). Neither clear nor present: The social construction of safety and danger. Sociological Forum, 11(3), 549-562. Spaccarelli, S. (1994). Stress, appraisal, and coping in child sexual abuse: A theoretical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2) 340-362. Stark, M.A., & Flitcraft, A. (1988). Women and children at risk: A feminist perspective on child abuse. International Journal of Health Services, 18, 97-188. Straus, M.A., Gelles, M.R., & Steinmetz, S.K. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press. Suh, E.K., & Abel, E.M. (1990). The impact of spousal violence on the children of the abused. Journal of Independent SocialWork, 4, 27-34. Tedesco, J.F., & Schnell, F.V. (1987). Children’s reactions to sex abuse investigation and litigation. Child Abuse and Neglect, 11, 267-272. Terr, L.C. (1989). Consultation advised soon after child’s psychic injury. Clinical Psychiatric Times, 17(5). U.S. Bureau of Census. (1993). Statistical abstract of the United States 1993. (113th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author. U.S. Department of Education, U.S. Department of Justice. (2001). Indicators of school crime and safety 2001. (October, 2001): 2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “Rates of homicide, suicide, and firearm-related death among children—26 industrialized countries.”Morbidity and MortalityWeekly Report 46, No. 5, (February 7, 1997): 101. ADVANCES IN SOCIALWORK U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office ofVictims of Crime. 1999, June).Breaking the cycle of violence: Recommendations to improve the criminal justice response to child victims and wit- nesses.Washington, D.C: Author. Van Soest, D., & Bryant, S. (1995). Violence reconceptualized for social work: The urban dilemma. Social Work, 40(4), 549-559. Vissing, Y.M., Strauss, M.A., Gelles, R.J., & Harrop, J.W. (1991). Verbal aggression by parents and psychoso- cial problems of children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 15(3), 223-238. Walker,W.D. (1979). Speak-up for children. Journal Medical Association State of Alabama, 48, 15. Walton, J.R., Nuttall, R.L., & Nuttall, E.V. (1997). The impact of war on the mental health of children: A Salvadoran study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 21(8) 737-749. Wasserstein, S.B., & La Greca, A.M. (1996). Can peer support buffer against behavioral consequences of parental discord? Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 25, 177-182. Widom, C.S. (1989). Does violence beget violence? A critical examination of the literature. Psychology Bulletin, 106, 3-28. Wolfe, D.A., & Jaffe, P. (1991). Child abuse and family violence as determinants of child psychopathology. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 23, 282-299. Wolfe, V.V., Gentile, C., &Wolfe, D.A. (1989). The impact of sexual abuse on children: A PSTD formulation. Behavioral Therapy, 20, 215-228. Wyatt, G.E., & Newcomb, M. (1990). Internal and external mediators of women’s sexual abuse in child- hood. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology, 58, 758-767. Zuckerman, B., Augustyn, M., Groves, B.M., & Parker, S. (1995). Silent victims revisited: The special case of domestic violence. Pediatrics, 96(3), 511-513. Author’s Note: The author expresses gratitude to the University of Pittsburgh’s Center for Minority Health, Graduate School of PublicHealth and theCenter formentalHealth Services Research, School of SocialWork for their support in preparing this manuscript. Address correspondence to: Kathryn S. Collins, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, University of Pittsburgh, School of SocialWork, 2117 Cathedral of Learning, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. E-mail: kscpitt@pitt.edu. 33Collins/HEARING THE SILENCE: CHILDREN’S VOICES ONVIOLENCE