introduction the age of human rightsthe age of human rightsthe age of human rightsthe age of human rights journal introduction it is a great pleasure to present the first issue of the the age of human rights journal, and to do so just on the international day of human rights. this new journal is aimed at the dissemination of all types of studies, essays and comments concerning human rights from different approaches and fields of knowledge, such as jurisprudence, philosophy of law, constitutional law, political philosophy and other legal or philosophical disciplines. we intend that, from the very first issue, the journal will set an international benchmark in the field of human rights, and will become a meeting place for the discussion of the major challenges rights are facing today. in order to meet such an aim, we have the support and advice of a distinguished scientific board, consisting of scholars as relevant as robert alexy, joana abrisketa, kai ambos, reiner arnold, fareda banda, martha n. bello albarracin, emmanuel decaux, elias diaz, sakiko fukuda-parr, todd landman, massimo la torre, mario losano, javier de lucas, susan millns, felipe morente, ramon paniagua, antonio e. luño perez, philip pettit, michel rosenfeld, and richard wilson. this journal is edited in the framework of the research program “the age of rights”, composed of about one hundred researchers belonging to some of the most important human rights research groups, who aim to analyse integrally the reality of human rights in contemporary societies by identifying the main challenges and problems they face today, or may face in the future, and to propose possible solutions leading to the establishment of an international rule of law. our aim, in short, is to contribute, through scientific reflection, to make the 21st century, eventually, the age of rights. finally, we would like to make this journal a tribute to one of the leading researchers and proponents of human rights in spain, internationally recognized, and founder of the research program, dr. gregorio peces-barba. dr. ramón ruiz ruiz editor the legal recognition of the human rights situation of women with disabilities in the state of qatar1 maría laura serra2 maría del carmen barranco avilés3 patricia cuenca gómez4 rafael de asís roig5 pablo rodríguez del pozo6 abstract: from the continental law, this paper analyses the situation regarding the rights and fundamental freedoms of women with disabilities in qatar. the analysis uses as the main reference, article 6 of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (crpd) and the general comment that the crpd committee has made to this article. in this aspect, it tries to outline the difficulties that qatar, as a state party, has in order to be able and take the very first steps towards a real inclusion for women with disabilities. keywords: women with disabilities, qatar, article 6 crpd, equality and non-discirmination. summary: i. introduction; ii. the concept of disability and the right to equality in qatar: relationships between the domestic and the international human rights system; ii.1 disability; ii.2 equality and non-discrimination; iii. the omission of women with disabilities in qatar; iv. article 6 and its relationship with qatar’s domestic legal system; v. how can qatar implement these measures on the basis of its domestic and international legal system? i. introduction the guarantee of protection and the promotion of human rights is applied in a less comprehensive way with regards to women and girls with disabilities than for other social groups, even those in vulnerable situations. their status as women combined with the concept of their disability gives rise to certain prejudices and stereotypes that, in a 1 this publication was made possible by the nprp award nprp-7-380-5-051 from the qatar national research fund (a member of the qatar foundation). the statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors. 2 universidad carlos iii de madrid, spain (marialaura.serra@nuigalway.ie). 3 universidad carlos iii de madrid, spain (mcarmen.barranco@uc3m.es). 4 universidad carlos iii de madrid, spain (patricia.cuenca@uc3m.es). 5 universidad carlos iii de madrid, spain (rafael.asis@uc3m.es). 6 weill cornell medical college in qatar, qatar (prd2002@qatar-med.cornell.edu). the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 105-115 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.5 105 m. laura serra, m. c. barranco avilés, p. cuenca gómez, r. de asís roig, p. rodríguez del pozo discriminatory context, can result in a lack of protection of their human rights and fundamental freedoms, that is to say inequality of opportunities in both the public and private spaces. the ministerial declaration of july 2010 of the economic and social council (ecosoc) recognizes disability as a cross-cutting issue essential for the attainment of the mdgs, emphasizing the need to ensure that women and girls with disabilities are not subject to multiple or aggravated forms of discrimination, or excluded from participation in the implementation of the mdgs. also, the 2030 agenda for sustainable development provides the global community with an opportunity to work towards achieving the sustainable development goals (sdgs) for all women and girls, and address the rights and demands of women with disabilities as a matter of priority. the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (crpd) uses a twintrack approach with regards to the protection of human rights for certain social groups in vulnerable situations, such as children (article 7) and women (article 6), but it also refers to all persons with disabilities facing situations of risk, including armed conflict, humanitarian emergencies, and natural disasters (article 11). this twin-track approach aims at guaranteeing human rights for all persons, thereby giving visibility to their situation as in the case of women with disabilities. article 6 of the crpd recognizes that women with disabilities are subject to multiple forms of discrimination. hence, the crpd is the first and only human rights treaty with an explicit reference to multiple discrimination against women and girls with disabilities. in this regard, article 6 states that states parties to the crpd –including qatar– shall “take all appropriate measures to ensure the full development, advancement and empowerment of women, for the purpose of guaranteeing them the exercise and enjoyment of the human rights and fundamental freedoms set out in the present convention”. article 6 is based on certain principles established in the crpd (article 3), which provide guidelines for the interpretation and implementation of the convention, including article 6 thereof. likewise, the rights and freedoms of persons with disabilities included in the crpd, as well as the obligations of the states parties, arise from these principles. article 6’ text represents the basis of a mandate imposed to the states parties concerning the adoption of measures to ensure all human rights and fundamental freedoms for women and girls with disabilities, but such mandate stems from the acknowledgement that women and girls with disabilities face multiple forms of discrimination. the inclusion of an article on women with disabilities in the crpd was deemed necessary to provide visibility: the fact that women and girls with disabilities face discrimination becomes only visible when addressed in a specific provision. however, article 6 also works in a mainstream manner, aligning with gender-sensitive considerations in some other articles of the convention, particularly in fields such as health, violence, family rights, and participation in public life, among others (arnade the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 105-115 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.5 106 the legal recognition of the human rights situation of women with disabilities in the state of qatar and häfner, 2005). the general comment no. 3 of the crpd committee states that this provision is a response to the lack of recognition of the rights of women and girls with disabilities. through an assessment of qatar’s legal framework, this paper addresses the legal situation of women with disabilities by using article 6 of the crpd as a reference. the analysis has a general scope, including a review of domestic legislation on the promotion and protection of rights of women with disabilities. regardless of the geopolitical context, addressing the issue of women with disabilities entails research into equality and non-discrimination, understood not just as a principle but also as a right. the analysis is on civil and political rights as also economic, social, and cultural rights. at the regional level, qatar has ratified the arab charter on human rights which enshrines the right to equality and non-discrimination before the law (article 11), the right to recognition as a person before the law (article 22); and equality before the courts and tribunals (article 12), among other rights. qatar is an arab country, in which a traditionally muslim society coexists with groups of expatriates from different regions, mostly from india and the philippines, who adhere to different religions. qatar has a dual legal system. hence, since its independence (in 1971) from the british empire, a large part of its jurisdiction has been governed by continental law (the adlia court)7 and the sharia law applies to several areas in which women, when viewed as subjects of rights, are considered to be below men. although, the new constitution of 2005 is slightly hints a more liberal society within the context of the arab region, “sharia law is recognized in the constitution as the principal source of legislation (article 1)”8. in this regard, amnesty international (2016, p.300) on its annual report on the state of the world’s human rights stated that “women in qatar face discrimination in law and in practice, and are inadequately protected against violence within the family”. this paper is built on a theoretical basis, but it cannot be denied that it has been written from a western perspective. in any case, its purpose is to describe and identify the legal situation of women with disabilities in qatar according to the continental law of qatar and the human rights treaties that it has ratified. hence, the work is divided into two parts: the first addresses how disability is tackled in qatar, as well as the right to equality and non-discrimination. the second analyzes both paragraphs of article 6 of the crpd in more detail with relation to qatar’s legislative framework, in order to identify both legal gaps in qatar’s continental law in relation to the crpd and potential improvements. the right to equality is a fundamental principle designed to protect human rights and it is essential for the exercise of other human rights. in addition to the crpd, the 7 for further information on qatar’s legal dualism, see, for instance, hamzeh (1994). 8 a/hrc/29/26/add.1, para. 9. the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 105-115 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.5 107 m. laura serra, m. c. barranco avilés, p. cuenca gómez, r. de asís roig, p. rodríguez del pozo universal declaration of human rights, the international covenant on civil and political rights, the international covenant on economic, social and cultural rights, the convention on the rights of the child (crc), the international convention on the elimination of all forms of racial discrimination (cerd) and the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women (cedaw) specify and guarantee the right to equality, thus shaping part of the applicable legal framework – within the international human rights system– with regard to equality and nondiscrimination for women with disabilities. of the aforementioned treaties, qatar has only ratified the cedaw (without having signed nor ratified its protocol) and the crpd (having signed but not ratified its protocol). it has also ratified the cerd, the crc (and two of its protocols), and the convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (the united nations convention against torture). it is important to emphasize that discrimination is often enshrined in law, as well as in practice. however, qatar’s legal reality makes it slightly more complicated to talk about equality and non-discrimination in practice for women with disabilities in qatar, since the economic and social council (ecosoc) committee –not ratified by qatar– has conceptualized equality and non-discrimination in practice mainly through general considerations. this is all the more relevant regarding women and girls with disabilities, who have a long history of facing discrimination and oppression9. the fact that the cedaw protocol has not been ratified further hinders the protection and promotion of the rights of women (with and without disabilities), since the optional protocol to the cedaw establishes, among other things, cedaw’s own complaints and investigation procedures through its committee. also, according to facio and obando (2004, pp.1516) ratifying the protocol “would promote a more effective implementation of the cedaw through a wider interpretation and actual application of the convention […], it could also raise public awareness on the international guarantees regarding women’s human rights, as well as drawing attention to the cedaw […]”. it is worth noting that qatar is not the only state –others include western countries– that have not ratified certain human rights treaties and/or their optional protocols. however, the problem in qatar is more acute due to the combination of this lack of ratification and the country’s domestic legislation, which lacks an integrated gender approach to disability, and where disability is conceived from a perspective somewhat removed from that endorsed by human rights. 9 in this regard, general comment no. 20 of the un committee on economic, social and cultural rights (2009) highlights the fact that merely addressing formal discrimination will not ensure substantive equality. this committee emphasizes that eliminating discrimination in practice requires paying sufficient attention to groups of individuals that suffer historical or persistent prejudice. the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 105-115 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.5 108 the legal recognition of the human rights situation of women with disabilities in the state of qatar ii. the concept of disability and the right to equality in qatar: relationships between the domestic and the international human rights system ii.1 disability the crpd does not define disability as such, but according to its first article, persons with disabilities include those who have long-term physical, mental, intellectual, or sensory impairments, which in interaction with various barriers may hinder their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others. in that same provision, the crpd states its purpose, which is to promote, protect, and ensure the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disabilities, and to promote respect for their inherent dignity. one of the major problems with qatar’s continental law concerning persons with disabilities is structural, as reflected in its conceptual basis. on the one hand, and in spite of the efforts and money invested by the state for persons with disabilities (including the national health and development strategy, the shafallah center, and the development of high-technology educational institutions for persons with sensory impairments, generally leaning towards the promotion of services rather than rights), the underlying rationale is (albeit not completely) based on a medical/rehabilitative model instead of the social model of disability. in general terms, the medical model refers to disability as a condition of the person. this model assumes that the person with disabilities must adapt to the environment rather than the other way around. the social model of disability, in contrast, considers disability to be a social construct. under this model, disability is defined as a person’s situation because of their environment and not a condition of the individual. the social model of disability is clearly reflected in article 1 of the crpd and the rest of its provisions, and has inspired the negotiation and subsequent signing of the convention, which, as a human rights treaty, has shaped a model of human rights that accord with this social model. among the legal instruments illustrating that qatar predominantly follows the medical/rehabilitative model are the qatari civil code and the constitution. whether it is guided by a protective purpose, or simply because it advocates substituted decisionmaking and thereby restricts the legal capacity of persons with disabilities (in breach of article 12 of the crpd), the qatari civil code denies access to justice for persons with disabilities (as referred to in article 13 of the crpd). for instance, articles 71, 81, 87, 157, 161, 372, or 458, among others, as well as the national constitution, equate disability with inability (articles 15 and 101). moreover, law no. 25 of 2001 – mandatory education 25/2001–, clearly addresses disability only from a medical perspective (article 8). the same can be said of law no. 23 of 2004 –regarding promulgation of the code of criminal procedure 23/2004– where a substitutive model prevails, thus denying access to justice for persons with disabilities, particularly those with mental disabilities, according to the law (article 5), referring to the protection of the person instead of their recognition as legal subjects (article 20). section 7 of this the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 105-115 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.5 109 m. laura serra, m. c. barranco avilés, p. cuenca gómez, r. de asís roig, p. rodríguez del pozo law, on judicial rulings, is based on the medical model, identifying disability as a feature of the person. it also provides for a disability test. notwithstanding this legal framework, qatar is only amongst the average of the rest of states when measuring the extent to which it follows the medical/rehabilitative model in its domestic legislation. in many societies (including those that have ratified the crpd and have carried out reforms along the lines it advocates) this model often overlaps with the social model. sometimes, even certain features of a segregate model remain. this does not justify the fact that qatar, as a state party, has not updated its legislation in the light of the crpd, but illustrates a legal-political mental framework that hampers and slows down the process, showing that continental law progresses at an even slower pace for women and girls with disabilities in an arab country. ii.2 equality and non-discrimination any intended or unintended action or omission by a person or a group of persons that has the purpose or effect of impairing the dignity of another person or group of persons may be considered discrimination. equality does not lie in the description of a person, since we all have unique characteristics that distinguish us from one another; equality refers to a legal concept. we are all equal before the law. equality can be understood both as a normative and a tangible concept. thus, there is a formal equality –an equality that is expressed before the law– and a substantive equality, according to which the state should promote certain conditions in order to achieve a real equality that materializes in the daily life of every person. substantive equality requires a greater effort than simply amending the law. eliminating formal discrimination requires ensuring that a state’s constitution, laws, and policy documents do not discriminate on prohibited grounds. addressing formal discrimination alone will not ensure substantive equality. eliminating discrimination in practice requires paying sufficient attention to those groups of individuals that suffer historical or persistent prejudice, instead of merely comparing the formal treatment of individuals in similar situations. states parties must therefore immediately adopt the necessary measures to prevent, diminish, and eliminate the conditions and attitudes that cause or perpetuate substantive or de facto discrimination10. putting an end to the violation of the rights of women and girls with disabilities is not only necessary to achieve a formal equality but is important and crucial to achieve substantive equality. iii. women with disabilities in qatar in the concluding observations from the crpd committee on the initial report presented by the state of qatar, the committee shows “concerned about the multiple forms of discrimination that women and girls with disabilities experience. it is 10 see the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women (cedaw). the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 105-115 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.5 110 the legal recognition of the human rights situation of women with disabilities in the state of qatar concerned about the overall lack of information on the social, economic and political situation of women and girls with disabilities, and on the limited participation of women with disabilities in making decisions affecting them in general. it is also concerned that measures to mainstream the rights and needs of women and girls with disabilities in strategies have not been implemented”. women in qatar are disregarded in their legal situation and equality of opportunities. this disregard is based on certain stereotypes, as explained by cook and cusack (2010, p.9), a general understandig or preconception of women’s features, or the assumption of certain roles that should be adopted by the members of a group, in this case women and girls with disabilities. it is a situation of disregard because qatar’s domestic legal system is built upon a stereotype of persons with disabilities as being a homogeneous group without sex and/or gender differences. qatar’s legislation evinces this by ignoring women with disabilities, despite the above-mentioned concept of disability. for instance, law no. 2/2004, in respect of persons with special needs, enshrines the principles of equality and non-discrimination –article 2 establishes that “special needs persons shall enjoy the […] rights in addition to any applicable rights under any other relevant legislation”– but it does not provide any cross-cutting strategy to take into account the rights and needs of women and girls with disabilities (particularly with regard to special education). furthermore, it is easy to identify that the qatari legal system disregards women with disabilities when one examines law regarding sexual offences; in this case, the stereotype only affects women with disabilities, who are perceived as non-sexual women. for example, article 280 of the criminal code, on adultery and crimes of honour, establishes that “whoever copulates with a female without compulsion, duress or ruse knowing that she is of diminished capacity or under sixteen years of age shall be punished with life imprisonment.” this provision clearly reflects a general perception of women with disabilities as being asexual persons, since sexual intercourse with them is considered a crime even in the absence of coercion. these protective stereotypes are in line with the understanding of disability as being a condition of the person, enshrined in qatar’s legal system and following a medical/rehabilitative model of disability that is charitable in nature. such stereotypes, by appealing to paternalistic interests, prevent consideration of the needs of those who are being stereotyped, as well as their capacities and wishes. this can also result in barriers to information for women and girls with disabilities, since they are not only discriminated against, but are also subject to a lack of control over their own bodies and sexual desires and acknowledgement of their sexual and reproductive needs. this leads us to look at article 6 of the crpd to try to see how qatar could address equal opportunities for women with disabilities from a human rights perspective. the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 105-115 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.5 111 m. laura serra, m. c. barranco avilés, p. cuenca gómez, r. de asís roig, p. rodríguez del pozo iv. article 6 and its relationship with qatar’s domestic legal system article 6 is based on the recognition that women with disabilities are subject to discrimination in states parties that have endorsed the crpd. what should be understood by “discrimination” and what types of discrimination are referred to by this provision? as noted above, discrimination is any action or omission that has the purpose or effect of impairing the inherent dignity of another person/legal subject. qatar has ratified the cerd and the cedaw. both human rights treaties define discrimination as any distinction, exclusion, restriction, or preference that has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment, or exercise of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural, or any other field of public life. the qatari constitution acknowledges that persons are equal before the law, and prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, race, language, or religion (article 35). under this perspective, the national constitution of qatar does not provide a definition of discrimination, and it fails to include disability or gender as potential grounds for discrimination. it is true that both the cedaw and the crpd were ratified after the qatari constitutional reform, but the constituent powers did not anticipate this by leaving an open clause that could have allowed for a different interpretation. it is, on the contrary, a closed clause. however, the legal situation of women with disabilities, with regards to equality and non-discrimination, could be safeguarded if the crpd is taken into consideration. on the one hand, the definition of discrimination is incomplete in the framework of the international legal system in which qatar participates (since it is the human rights committee, as the competent body designated by the international covenant on civil and political rights, that is in charge of analyzing this concept in depth11, and qatar has neither signed nor ratified this covenant); but on the other hand, in addition to the definition established in the cedaw and the cerd, qatar, as state party to the crpd can also refer to the definition provided in article 2 of the crpd on discrimination on the basis of disability. this definition is wider than just being based upon the condition of the person. the definition of discrimination established in the crpd raises the issue of the social construction of disability. disability is not defined as the being the result of any “impairments” (the word used by the crpd to refer to the individual condition of a person regardless of his/her social context), but it could potentially affect persons without “impairments” who are discriminated against for their relationship with a person with disabilities12 or because they themselves appear to have a disability. this broader sense of the grounds for discrimination is relevant, differing from the other conventions mentioned above. both the cerd and the cedaw define discrimination 11 see, for instance the general comment no. 18 of the human rights committee. 12 see quinn (2009, p.102). the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 105-115 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.5 112 the legal recognition of the human rights situation of women with disabilities in the state of qatar on the basis of a specific ground. the crpd goes a step further by adding “discrimination on the basis of disability”. the starting-point of article 6 is therefore the fact that women with disabilities face discrimination. considering the concept of discrimination defined in both the cedaw and the crpd (in the latter case, discrimination on the basis of disability), it must be highlighted that article 6(1) refers to multiple discrimination. general comment no. 3 of the committee on the rights of persons with disabilities defines multiple discrimination as a situation in which a person experiences discrimination on two or more grounds, leading to discrimination that is compounded or aggravated. it then provides a non-comprehensive list of grounds for discrimination: age, disability, ethnic, indigenous, national or social origin, gender identity, political or other opinion, race, refugee, migrant or asylum seeker status, religion, sex and sexual orientation. hence, multiple discrimination can be described as a situation where a person is discriminated against on two or more grounds, which then accumulate and overlap. through this statement, the crpd requires states parties to take measures against discrimination not only with regard to disability, but also with regard to gender and other identities such as age (article 7). the second paragraph of article 6 refers to the measures to be taken by the states parties to ensure the full development, advancement, and empowerment of women with disabilities, for the purpose of guaranteeing them the exercise and enjoyment of the human rights and fundamental freedoms set out in the convention. it is difficult to determine the nature of these measures if such development, advancement, and empowerment are to be not only economic, but also human and social, as can be deduced from a holistic reading of the crpd. that is the understanding of the committee in its general comment no. 3, when it states that although development relates to economic growth and the eradication of poverty, it is not limited to those areas. it also provides that while gender and disability-sensitive development measures in the areas of education, employment, income-generation, and combating violence may be appropriate to ensure the full economic empowerment of women with disabilities, additional measures are necessary with regards to health and participation in politics, culture and sports. v. how can qatar implement these measures on the basis of its domestic and international legal system? the crpd recognizes that women and girls with disability face different forms of discrimination, which means that qatar is not the only state that should devise a direct and indirect action plan to ensure equality of human rights and fundamental freedoms for women with disabilities. the special rapporteur on the rights of persons with disabilities makes it clear that discrimination against women (and girls) with disabilities is enshrined in law and in the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 105-115 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.5 113 m. laura serra, m. c. barranco avilés, p. cuenca gómez, r. de asís roig, p. rodríguez del pozo practice13. in her report to the general assembly14, she establishes that women and girls with disabilities face many difficulties in accessing adequate housing, health care, education, vocational training, and employment, and are more likely to be institutionalized and experience poverty. also, she says that women with disabilities are often excluded from the labour market. consequently, the development, advancement, and empowerment measures to be undertaken by qatar as a state party to the crpd on the basis of article 6(2) must take into account both formal and substantive equality, and the latter should not remain as an abstract concept. in this regard, equality can be assessed through measures designed to encourage the development, advancement, and empowerment of women with disabilities in qatar. in its general comment no. 3, the crpd committee establishes that in order to advance and empower women with disabilities, measures must go beyond development and also aim to improve the situation of women with disabilities throughout their lifespan. it is not enough to take women with disabilities into account when designing development measures; rather, women with disabilities must also [have the tools that allow them to] be able to participate in and contribute to society. at the same time, the human rights-based approach of the general comment no. 3 of the crpd committee provides that ensuring the empowerment of women with disabilities means promoting their participation in public decision-making. ultimately, the second paragraph of article 6 of the crpd is a guarantee for women with disabilities to enjoy substantive equality of rights. the aim of this provision is for states parties to take appropriate measures to ensure the full development, advancement, and empowerment of women, for the purpose of guaranteeing them the exercise and enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms set out in the crpd, and that is what qatar should seek. it would be important for qatar, as a state party to the crpd, to set up one or several independent mechanisms within its domestic legal system to promote, protect, and monitor the implementation of equal rights and opportunities for women with disabilities. however, an important first step is to gather the relevant information, particularly from the civil movement where women are in a significant hierarchical position. also, it is important to gather statistical data (consistent and comparable statistics, disaggregated by gender) and specific information in order to eliminate all types of discrimination now faced by women and girls with disabilities in all areas. 13 see un doc. a/hrc/28/58. 14 see un doc. a/70/297. the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 105-115 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.5 114 the legal recognition of the human rights situation of women with disabilities in the state of qatar references amnesty international (2016). amnesty international report 2015/16: the state of the world’s human rights. london: amnesty international. arnade, s. and häfner, s. (2005). draft. towards visibility of women with disabilities in the un convention. a discussion paper on the integration of women’s issues in the “comprehensive and integral international convention on the protection of the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities”. berlin: disabled peoples’ international. cook, r. j. and cusack, s. (2010). gender stereotyping: transitional legal perspectives. pennsylvania: university of pennsylvania press. facio, a. and obando, a. e. (2004). ‘introducción sobre el proceso de elaboración del protocolo facultativo de la convención sobre la eliminación de todas las formas de discriminación contra la mujer’ in torres, i. (ed.) convención cedaw y protocolo facultativo. convención sobre la eliminación de todas las formas de discriminación contra la mujer, 2nd ed. san josé: instituto interamericano de derechos humanos, pp. 15–33. hamzeh, a. (1994). qatar: the duality of the legal system. middle eastern studies, 30(1), pp.79–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263209408700984 quinn, g. (2009). ‘a short guide to the united nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities’ in quinn, g. and waddington, l. (eds.) european yearbook of disability law. anwerp: intersentia, pp. 89–114. the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 105-115 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.5 115 https://doi.org/10.1080/00263209408700984 the legal recognition of the human rights situation of women with disabilities in the state of qatar0f i. introduction ii. the concept of disability and the right to equality in qatar: relationships between the domestic and the international human rights system ii.1 disability ii.2 equality and non-discrimination iii. women with disabilities in qatar iv. article 6 and its relationship with qatar’s domestic legal system and do not just sit by goodwill, humanity or justice, but by necessity, the need to meet the immensity of his desires the age of human rights journal, 4 (june 2015) pp. 81-90 issn: 2340-9592 81 bentham was right. was he? josé j. jiménez sánchez 1 abstract: the importance that the majority principle occupies in bentham’s theory reveals how it was in tune with what others thought about this principle. i will discuss only the role that this principle holds in kelsen. for him, the majority principle is central to his articulation of the legal-political order and will have an essential place within the state in shaping the rules of the normative will of the state. the same will not occur with the act of foundation, in which the majority will be relegated by the requirement for unanimity. the difficulty of the problem does not lie in the recognition of the importance of the role that the majority principle occupies but in the way that it is justified. the major differences appear in terms of its legitimacy. this will eventually lead us to ask whether bentham was right or not in his approach to the majority principle. keywords: general will; civil society; democracy and rule of majority. summary: i. introduction; ii. bentham was right; iii. kelsen after bentham; iv. conclusion: was bentham right? i. introduction “[the] great earl of warwick dined at his table in his different manors in the country about 30.000 persons every day in the year, of his dependants” 2 . and he did it not just for goodwill, humanity or justice, but by necessity, the need to satisfy the immensity of his desires. thus it was his luxury and whim which enabled his dependents to get what is necessary for life. this allows us to describe the earl of warwick’s behavior as both selfish and wilful, while at the same time the result of his conduct could be considered as reasonable, to the extent that his selfishness implies that those who not only have to satisfy their whims, but to go on being able to do so, will have access to the necessary means to ensure their survival. so the fruit of the property of the lord cannot be solely in his hands, but must be shared among all and moreover, according to adam smith, on a relatively equal basis, for those who have more cannot consume much more than those who have nothing. adam smith expressed it most clearly when asserting: “the produce of the soil maintains at all times nearly that number of inhabitants which it is capable of maintaining. the rich only select from 1 department of philosophy of law, university of granada, spain (jimenezs@ugr.es). 2 a. smith, lectures on jurisprudence, 1762-3, pos. 982. bentham was right. was he? the age of human rights journal, 4 (june 2015) pp. 81-90 issn: 2340-9592 82 the heap what is most precious and agreeable. they consume little more than the poor, and in spite of their natural selfishness and rapacity, though they mean only their own conveniency, though the sole end which they propose from the labours of all the thousands whom they employ, be the gratification of their own vain and insatiable desires, they divide with the poor the produce of all their improvements. they are led by an invisible hand to make nearly the same distribution of the necessaries of life, which would have been made, had the earth been divided into equal portions among all its inhabitants, and thus without intending it, without knowing it, advance the interest of the society, and afford means to the multiplication of the species. when providence divided the earth among a few lordly masters, it neither forgot nor abandoned those who seemed to have been left out in the partition” 3 . therefore we have to qualify as rational what at first sight would have to be characterized as irrational, greed, desire and whim, on finding that they produce a reasonable effect. thus, the satisfaction of luxury and caprice, that is, the very convenience of the rich, is rational, in so far as it satisfies their desires, and yet, at the same time it creates a benevolent effectthe reasonablefor those who satisfy those desires. this is what explains the distribution of the necessities of life among all the inhabitants of the earth and consequently, the promotion of the general interest, the interest of society. according to smith there is an invisible hand-providence-that ensures social order. that invisible hand is so because in the need to satisfy the whim, at the same time public interest is ensured. it seems clear that adam smith's attempt to explain the social order has something to do with other attempts contemporary to his own work, although the matrix of the former is just the opposite of the preeminence of the individual against the universal, the particular will, capricious and selfish, compared to the general will, as the central and essential element by which human action has to be understood and legitimized. i refer especially to rousseau’s proposal that has a different character, mainly because he cannot admit smith’s play between the rational and reasonable insofar as he holds that rationality can only be found under the direction of the general will, by which the particular will has to be ordered. desire and whim respond only to a selfish will, and as such irrational will. from here it is well understood that the path laid out by rousseau is radically different from smith’s. rousseau establishes, in principle, the general will on a unanimous agreement, although later and given the problems that the appeal to such unanimity causes, he deemed the agreement of many to be sufficient. with this he would have no other remedy but to admit the will of all as the addition and subtraction of individual wills, that is, he had to rely on the particular will to institutionalize the foundational will of the social order. this does not mean that the individual will was not also in unanimity, although its emergence was seen even more clearly when considering the will of the many. however, problems arising from the infiltration of contingency implicit in the individual will, in the grounding of the general will, are corrected to the extent that its 3 a. smith, the theory of moral sentiments, digireads.com book, 2010 (1759, 1790), pp. 127-128. josé j. jiménez sánchez the age of human rights journal, 4 (june 2015) pp. 81-90 issn: 2340-9592 83 institutionalization demands “for all the votes to be counted. any formal exclusion is a breach of generality” 4 . at the same time, production of the general will is settled on three conditions, which are those which, in turn, give legitimacy and justify the act of “total alienation [aliénation] of each associate together with all of his rights to the entire community” 5 . these conditions are what the social order has to achieve, first, the protection of life and possessions of all associates; second, that in this association each of its members shall obey nobody but himself, and finally all will remain as free as they were in the previous situation, ie, when they had their natural freedom. this is what we should properly understand as the meaning of that alienation of which the act of association consists, since “it is so false that there is, in the social contract, any genuine renunciation on the part of private individuals that their situation, as a result of this contract, is really preferable to what it was beforehand; and, instead of an alienation, they have merely made an advantageous exchange of an uncertain and precarious mode of existence for another that is better and surer. natural independence is exchanged for liberty; the power to harm others is exchanged for their own security; and their force, which others could overcome, for a right that the social union renders invincible” 6 . thus, rousseau thought of the social order as a social contract articulated around the general will, in which the individual will has its own space assured in the law. therefore, it cannot depend on the individuality, but has to do it from that same general will, which is typical of a people’s assembly in order to give itself the law: “when a law is proposed in the people’s assembly, what is asked of them is not, to be precise, whether they approve or reject the proposition, but whether or not it conforms to the general will that is theirs. each man, in 4 j. j. rousseau, on the social contract, in id., basic political writings, second edition, trans. and ed. by d. a. cress, int. and new annotation by d. wootton, hackett pub. comp., indianapolis, cambridge, 2011 (1762), p. 171, fn. 36. 5 rousseau, on the social…, op. cit., p. 164. moreover, that alienation had to be implemented “without reservation, the union is as perfect as possible, and no associate has anything further to demand. for if some rights remained with private individuals, in the absence of any common superior who could decide between them and the public, each person would eventually claim to be his own judge in all things, since he is on some particular point his own judge. the state of nature would subsist and the association would necessarily become tyrannical or hollow”, p. 164. 6 rousseau, on the social…, op. cit., p. 176. in the same sense we can see what rousseau says about transformation of possession into proprietary ownership: “what is remarkable about this alienation is that, in accepting the goods of private individuals, the community is far from despoiling them; rather, in so doing, it merely assures them of legitimate possession, changing usurpation into a true right, and enjoyment into proprietary ownership. so, since owners are considered trustees of the public good, and since their rights are respected by all members of the state and maintained with all its force against foreigners, through a surrender that is advantageous to the public and still more so to themselves, they have, so to speak, acquired all they have given. this paradox is easily explained by the distinction between the rights the sovereign and the proprietor have to the same land”, rousseau, on the social…,op. cit., p. 169. bentham was right. was he? the age of human rights journal, 4 (june 2015) pp. 81-90 issn: 2340-9592 84 giving his vote, states his opinion on this matter, and the declaration of the general will is drawn from the counting of votes” 7 . the people in assembly has to decide, necessarily, according to the majority rule, which would raise the paradox of how it is possible to establish by majority in what the general will consists. however, rousseau believes that it is feasible to establish the general will through majority rule. the reason would be found, in his opinion, in that when one votes one is not expressing agreement or disagreement with the proposition, but whether it is in conformity with the general will which is one’s own will. thus the declaration of the general will could be obtained from the calculation of votes. his argument rests on the assumption that it is possible to identify the will of each one with the general will, but only when the people are gathered in assembly to give themselves the law. once the law is created, rousseau admits in it the play of the particular will, which we can see when he speaks of the election of the government, in which the people as government choose those who have to be responsible for the implementation of the law. ii. bentham was right however, neither smith’s nor rousseau’s explanations seem sufficient. clearly the claims of rousseau, or his conceptualization of what the act of alienation consists of or the ability of the individual will to determine whether something is or is not in conformity with the general will when the people are met in assembly are not indisputable. but it is also evident that the distribution of wealth is irrational, so it seems clear that the social order cannot be legitimized purely on the self-interest of those who govern in a society-the sinister interest-an interest that bentham considered opposed to the general interest, which he defines as the sum of individual interests. in this sense, bentham continues rousseau's understanding of the will of all, and thinks the general interest as that which is expressed by that will, the will of all, which, according to rousseau, is simply the “sum of private wills” 8 . this is the climate and the problems that face bentham when justifying human actions, whether of individual or of government. to do that he argues that such actions should be justified from the principle of utility, which meant “that principle which approves or disapproves of every action whatsoever, according to the tendency which it appears to have to augment or diminish the happiness of the party whose interest is in question: or, what is the same thing in other words, to promote or to oppose that happiness. i say of every action whatsoever; and therefore not only of every action of a private individual, but of every measure of government” 9 . the principle of utility rules the possibility of the judgment of any action and is seen as an increase or decrease in the 7 rousseau, on the social…, op. cit., p. 227. 8 rousseau, on the social…, op. cit., p. 172 9 j. bentham, an introduction to the principles of morals and legislation, ed. by j. h. burns and h. l. a. hart, the athlone press, london, 1970, pp. 11-12. josé j. jiménez sánchez the age of human rights journal, 4 (june 2015) pp. 81-90 issn: 2340-9592 85 happiness of the party whose interests are at stake, ie, an increase or decrease of his pleasure over pain. thus, individual action would be justified provided that it promotes individual interest, which always happens when it increases “the sum total of his pleasures” 10 , for which there is no better judge than oneself when judging what actions lead to the increase of one’s own happiness 11 . regarding the latter, the actions of government, they can only be described as useful if they increase the happiness of the subjects whose interests are affected by them. bentham defines “the business of government” as the promotion of “the happiness of the society, by punishing and rewarding” 12 . the difficulty lies in the definition of what we understand by happiness of society. bentham argues that the interest of the community is “the sum of the interests of the several members who compose it” 13 . that is, he poses the question of the happiness of society as the “general interest” or “universal interest”, which he resolves, as we have said, according to rousseau’s the will of all, but confronts rousseau’s conception thereof on the general will, in the sum of individual interests or “aggregation of the self-interests of all the individual members of the community” 14 . bentham’s problem was in determining how the sum of the different interests should be made, that is, how the question of the will of all is solved. bentham did it in the additions he made in july 1822 to an introduction to the principles of morals and legislation, in which he made his position clear. he defined the principle of utility as "the greatest happiness or greatest felicity principle" 15 as a way of lightening the phrase “the greatest happiness of all those whose interest is in question, as being the right and proper, and only right and proper and universally desirable, end of human action” 16 . the problem is centered on “those whose interest is in question”, that is the “number, of the interests affected” 17 and the number is to be understood as its “largest proportion” 18 . later, in another addition, also of july 1822, in footnote d, bentham again insisted that against “those features of the english government, by which the greatest happiness of the ruling one with or without that of a favoured few, are now so plainly seen to be the only ends to which the course of it has at any time been directed” 19 , the principle of utility may “be designated by the name of the greatest happiness principle” 20 , that is, “a principle, which lays down, as the only right and justifiable end of government, the greatest happiness of the greatest number” 21 . 10 bentham, an introduction…op.cit, p. 12 11 “[t]here is no man who is so sure of being inclined, on all occasions, to who upon the whole can have had so good opportunities as you must have had of knowing what is most conducive to that purpose. for who should know so well as you do what it is that gives you pain or pleasure?”, in bentham, an introduction…, op. cit., p. 244. 12 bentham, an introduction…, op. cit., p. 74. 13 bentham, an introduction…, op. cit., p. 12 14 p. schofield, “bentham on the identification of interests”, utilitas, vol. 8, nº 2, july 1996, p. 233. 15 bentham, an introduction…, op. cit., p. 11a. 16 bentham, an introduction…, op. cit., p. 11a. 17 bentham, an introduction…, op. cit., p. 11a. 18 bentham, an introduction…, op. cit., p. 11a. 19 bentham, an introduction…, op. cit., p. 14d. 20 bentham, an introduction…, op. cit., p. 14d. 21 bentham, an introduction…, op. cit., p. 14d. bentham was right. was he? the age of human rights journal, 4 (june 2015) pp. 81-90 issn: 2340-9592 86 the principle of utility as a legitimating principle of government action is resolved, in bentham, by the greatest happiness of the greatest number, i.e. majority rule. thus the principle of utility ends by transforming itself into the recognition of the unlimited power of the sovereign, the majority, to which the action of the government has to be submitted and from which finally any law has to be justified or not. this is the impossibility of justifying the originating power, because bentham actually adhered to demand justification for government action, but not the action of the real power, the sovereign power, which is the power of the majority. therefore, the limit, the principle of utility, which is nothing but the recognition against the power of government operative power-, of the authentic sovereign -the constitutive power-, which is identified with the power of those who make up through the sum of their individual interests the universal interest, understood by this as the greatest happiness of the greatest number. regardless of the systems of aptitude and securities, as well as the fact that “[a]lthough the other three authorities [legislative, judicial, and administrative] are subordinate to the constitutive authority, by their very existence in the state they effectively limit the constitutive power of the authority” 22 , bentham devised a mechanism to counteract all power, by which i mean the institutionalization of the public opinion tribunal, which is the recognition of freedom of conscience and expression as central to the construction of the social order 23 . bentham's argument relating to the creation of this tribunal implies the attempt to create a genuine limit to the sovereign, as we have already seen that the principle of utility was nothing but the recognition in the limitation of government action the true sovereign, but posed no limitation on this. now, however, the limit of what the tribunal is, ie, the limit which involves the recognition of freedom of conscience and expression, poses two problems. first, if in reality it is actually such a limit and not a self-limitation and, secondly, whether the creation of that limit would not be inconsistent with bentham’s approach. if the law and therefore the institutionalization of this tribunal must follow the indications of the principle of utility, i.e., the greatest happiness of the greatest number, and this involves the recognition of the power of the majority as sovereign, then it seems clear that the creation of such a tribunal and the political freedoms on which it rests cannot be a real limit of the sovereign, but only and exclusively a self-limitation, for those freedoms of conscience and expression will be recognized to the extent that the sovereign has decided to do so, and they will also be suppressed if that is his desire. fundamentally, bentham's model responds to the conception of a majoritarian democracy in which the limit is designed from the principle of legality or rule of law, which starts its operation from that established by the majority rule. on the rule of law a series of measures have been established that serve to ensure the construction of a controlled democracy, although it does not possess any mechanism necessarily to submit the majority, it is only possible to understand the resignation of the majority to the arbitrary imposition of its will as a self-limitation. regarding the question of whether the creation of that limit, the freedoms of conscience and expression, would be a contradiction to bentham’s system, while those freedoms would have to be outside the 22 f. rosen, “jeremy bentham and democratic theory”, in g. j. postema (ed.), bentham: moral, political and legal philosophy i, ashgate-darmouth, 2002 (1979), p. 48. 23 see in this respect, f. rosen, “jeremy bentham and democratic theory”, art. cit., pp. 52 and ff. josé j. jiménez sánchez the age of human rights journal, 4 (june 2015) pp. 81-90 issn: 2340-9592 87 scope of the decisions of the majority, we would have to say that there is no contradiction, because in bentham the recognition of public rights and liberties can only ultimately depend on the sovereign, while law is created by the will of the legislator in terms of his mandate, so that rights other than those provided by the legislator are not acceptable. the conclusion we might draw from these pages is that bentham was right, he could see the shortcomings of models of smith and rousseau, the first settled on the invisibility of providence and the second on the abstract spirituality of the general will, both far in excess of the actual real will of the members of a particular society. the best proof of his correctness can be found in kelsen’s model of democracy which hinged on the majority rule. this model assumes the reaffirmation of bentham’s project from the moment in which not only the primacy of the majority will is posed, but also the need to establish, in bentham’s wake, certain corrections on the functioning of that rule of the majority to avoid it degenerating into the empire of the majority. iii. kelsen after bentham following bentham, who believed he had resolved the problem put by rousseau by dissolving the general will in the will of all, that is, by identifying the general interest with the sum of the interests of all, with the interest of the majority, kelsen persisted in this approach, and highlighted what in his opinion is rousseau’s error, the “metaphysical -or, better, metapoliticalillusion” 24 , as he thinks it cannot be defended, as rousseau does, the general will as the objective foundation of the state order. on the contrary, the “theory of a social contract [...] is a function of the subjective volonté of the tous” 25 . in this way, kelsen, like bentham, departs from the essentialist grounding, abstract or providential, to approach a foundation of the state attached to actual reality and therefore contingent. this implies that for kelsen we have to approach three questions: 1º the rule of the majority; 2º the need to conceive the common will as transaction and 3º the recognition that the common will and its instrument, majority rule, may end up by committing excesses. in line with what bentham had argued to uphold the principle of the greatest happiness of the greatest number, kelsen asserts that of freedom for the greatest number. he will maintain that majority rule cannot be justified “by saying that more votes carry a greater total weight than fewer votes”, since the “purely negative assumption that the will of one person should not count more than the will of another does not entail the positive claim that the will of the majority should rule” 26 .the reason which justifies majority rule is that if in a given social order it is not possible for all men to be free, the use of such a rule would at least ensure they were “the greatest possible number”, so “that the number of individual wills that are in conflict with the general 24 h. kelsen, the essence and value of democracy, ed. by n. urbinati and c. invernizzi accetti, trans. by b. graf, rowman and littlefield publishers, lanham, maryland, 2013 (1929), pos. 789. 25 kelsen, the essence…, op. cit., pos. 691, fn. 10. 26 kelsen, the essence…, op. cit., pos. 610. bentham was right. was he? the age of human rights journal, 4 (june 2015) pp. 81-90 issn: 2340-9592 88 will of the social order should be minimized” 27 . therefore, majority rule is a presupposition of any agreement, to the extent that the "compromise [between the different interests, between the majority and the minority] constitutes a real approximation to the unanimity that the idea of freedom demands in the development of the social order by its subjects” 28 . regarding the second question, the formation of a common will, kelsen says this is what enables a democratic system to be built based on transaction, so that it would be surrendered to ‘a “higher” absolute truth or an absolute value standing above group interests” 29 , since it would only try to reach an agreement or compromise between these different interests. if “the will of society is not to be the expression of the interests of one group alone, that will must be the result of a compromise between opposing interests” 30 , so that the common will is constructed “in a moderate direction” 31 , as an agreement between the majority and the minority, between the various interests of the majority and the minority. to justify this reasoning kelsen constructs a syllogism in which the major premise says that the concept of the majority “already presupposes the existence of a minority”, 32 the minor premise establishes “the right of the minority to exist” 33 and he draws the conclusion that “[t]hough this does not entail the necessity, it at least raises the possibility of a protection of the minority […which] is the essential function of socalled freedoms and fundamental rights or human and civil rights” 34 . if we read it backwards we see there are two inconsistencies. first, the conclusion dilutes what is already stated in the second premise, because it gets less than the minor premise implies, and second, this premise, the minor, is a change of terrain, because the field in which the major is formulated, the terrain of pure logic, is abandoned, to move to the field of law. this second incongruity has less relevance to the fact that his conception of majoritarian democracy cannot avoid slipping into “majority domination” 35 . in relation to the above the first inconsistency has more substance, because if in the second premise he situates the reflection in the terrain of law and i admit that the right of one, the majority, implies the right of another, the minority, i cannot get less at the conclusion of what was already in the premise, and this is what kelsen does when speaking of possibility rather than necessity. if the right of one implies that of the other, then it is not a matter of possibility, but of necessity. to admit this would have led kelsen to have abandon axiological relativism and consistent with this, his conception of the transaction and the compromise between different positions that defend opposing values and interests, and none of them can be considered better than the others as they are all relative. obviously he could not do it. 27 kelsen, the essence…, op. cit., pos. 620. 28 kelsen, the essence…, op. cit., pos. 1473. 29 kelsen, the essence…, op. cit., pos. 1365. 30 kelsen, the essence…, op. cit., pos. 796. 31 kelsen, the essence…, op. cit., pos. 796. 32 kelsen, the essence..., op. cit., pos. 1305. 33 kelsen, the essence..., op. cit., pos. 1305. 34 kelsen, the essence..., op. cit., pos. 1305-1316. 35 kelsen, the essence..., op. cit., pos. 1446. josé j. jiménez sánchez the age of human rights journal, 4 (june 2015) pp. 81-90 issn: 2340-9592 89 this is the reason why, finally and just like as bentham, he conceived the limit of the majority will as self-restraint and therefore designed it as the “principle of legality” 36 . from here he establishes a series of constitutional measures that serve to ensure a controlled, limited democracy. in order to avoid a “dictatorship of the majority over the minority” 37 and since we have no mechanism that necessarily subjects the majority, it is only possible to understand the majority's resignation to “the implementation of its will in the face of a qualified minority” as a “self-restraint” 38 , which constitutionally must be reflected in the recognition not only of the absolute majority -the legislative authority-, but also of the “principle of the qualified majority" the constituent authority-, which has to function in relation to the “[m]easures, which infringe upon certain national, religious, economic, or broadly intellectual spheres of interest, are possible only with the assent, and not against the will, of a qualified minority; that is, they require agreement between the majority and the minority” 39 , which ensures a higher level of protection than mere legality, on dealing with issues requiring greater degrees of consensus, which is similar to the majority required to amend the basic rules of a system, ie, rules of constitutional reform. secondly, he introduces the constitutional court, which is what has to ensure that the majority does not slide into its empire, by protecting those legislative procedures that require qualified majorities, since “the enforcement of the constitution in the legislative process is in the eminent interest of the minority” 40 , that is, the protection of their rights. iv. conclusion: was bentham right? in short, the above measures would not prevent, as kelsen himself acknowledges, “the limitless expansion of state power and, consequently, the complete loss of individual ‘freedom’ […] as long as this state power is constituted by its subjects” 41 . it is true that this statement could result in the play between majority and minority saying that the majority could subjugate the minority, in that the latter had consented to participate to it, which seems opposite to all reasonableness, as the limits of the political will have be so constructed that they cannot be widened or constricted depending on the contingency of that same will. in my opinion, i think this is the reason why kelsen ends by stating: “he who views absolute truth and absolute values as inaccessible to the human understanding cognition must deem not only his own, but also the opinion of others at least as feasible. the idea of democracy thus presupposes relativism as its worldview. democracy values everyone’s political will equally, just as it gives equal regard to each political belief and opinion, for which the political will, after all, is merely the 36 kelsen, the essence..., op. cit., pos. 1605. 37 kelsen, the essence..., op. cit., pos. 1349 38 kelsen, the essence..., op. cit., pos. 1322 39 kelsen, the essence…, op. cit., pos. 1322-1332. 40 kelsen, the essence..., op. cit., pos. 1600. 41 kelsen, the essence..., op. cit., pos. 629. bentham was right. was he? the age of human rights journal, 4 (june 2015) pp. 81-90 issn: 2340-9592 90 expression. hence, democracy offers every political conviction the opportunity to express itself and to compete openly for the affections of the populace” 42 . with this, kelsen, without knowing it, goes beyond his conception of limit as self-restraint, ie on the declaration and protection of a number of freedoms and fundamental rights, which finally depended on that same majority will, which meant being locked into the same presuppositions as bentham’s conception, for whom the institutionalization of the public opinion tribunal, built on the recognition of freedom of conscience and expression, is eventually supported by majority decisions. however, if we read carefully what kelsen says, we can appreciate that his discourse is contradictory, in so far as, on the one hand, he asserts the relativism on which democracy rests, arguing that it appreciates alike all political will and opinion, while at the same time it has to ensure, on the other, the possibility of manifestation, that is, to express one’s opinion to all men, which cannot be left to what a majority may decide at any given time. so when i say that everything is relative, i cannot maintain at the same time there is something that is not, freedom of expression, which cannot be questioned, as one cannot both defend one thing and its opposite. only if we delve into the principles on which kelsen stands can we avoid this contradiction. to put it another way, would it be possible to settle a social order on the recognition of freedom of expression while we rely on such recognition of the contingency of a decision adopted by the majority? or, on the contrary, would it not be a better remedy to recognize that right as a necessity, as that which the concept of democracy demands, beyond the accidental support of the majority at a given time? this would allow us to abandon the contingency and, therefore, find the foundation of social order not in the particular will of the majority sum of individual wills, but in the general will. if this were so, then bentham would be wrong, although going more deeply into this question would require much more space than i have already taken. 42 kelsen, the essence..., op. cit., pos. 1906-1017. the age of human rights journal, 2 (june 2014) pp. 68-85 issn: 2340-9592 68 legal aspects of the financing of religious groups in spain óscar celador angón 1 abstract: the purpose of this paper is to analyze the spanish public polices in the financing of churches and religious organizations. according to this approach, and taking in account that the spanish legal frame lack of a common regulation for all religious groups, this paper aims to provide analysis of the following issues: the constitutional principles of the spanish political system relevant to the religious freedom, the cooperation agreements between the state and the religious groups, and the economic and fiscal regime of the catholic church and the religious minorities. keywords: financing of religious groups, fiscal neutrality, religious minorities, cooperation agreements between the state and the religious groups. summary: i. introduction; ii. constitutional model of church-state relations; iii. fiscal neutrality, religious freedom and religious pluralism; iv. development of the constitutional principles: cooperation agreements between the state and the religious groups; v.economic and fiscal regime of the religious groups; iv. conclusions. i. introduction the 1978 spanish constitution created a new model of relationships between the state and the religious organizations, breaking the model of catholic confessional state characteristic of the spanish constitutional history. the main ingredients of the 1978 constitutional frame were the protection of ideological and religious freedom guaranteed in the article 16.1 of the spanish constitution, the equality of individuals ordained in the article 14 of the spanish constitution, and the ideological and religious neutrality established in the article 16.3 of the spanish constitution. the spanish constitution also protects the individual against the discrimination for religious reasons in his article 14. however, as we will see, reality shows that in the context of public funding the catholic church, the religious groups that signed agreements of cooperation with the state in 1992 (evangelicals, muslims and jews), and the remaining religious groups have a different status. 1 professor of public law on freedom of thought, conscience and religión, universidad carlos iii de madrid, spain (ocelador@der-pu.uc3m.es). legal aspects of the financing of religious groups in spain the age of human rights journal, 2 (june 2014) pp. 68-85 issn: 2340-9592 69 as an introductory remark, it may be useful to note that the criterion used in this paper for classifying religious groups as majority or minority, depend if the relation between the religious groups and the state are organized by means of especial agreements. according to this approach, and taking in account that the spanish regulation lack of a common regulation for all religious groups, this paper aims to provide analysis of the following issues: the constitutional principles of the spanish political system relevant to the religious freedom, the cooperation agreements between the state and the religious groups, and the economic and fiscal regime of the catholic church and the religious minorities. ii. constitutional model of church-state relations on december 28, 1978, after many years of dictatorial government, spain adopted a democratic government and approved a legal frame that guides the current pattern of relationships between the state and the religious groups (pelayo olmedo 2007). the spanish constitution of 1978, in providing for a democratic and pluralistic state, entailed a profound change in the state’s traditional attitude towards religious matters. the 1978 constitution recognizes and protects the rights to equality and freedom of religion; and the practice of these rights is guaranteed under the broadest possible terms, subject only to the limitations of public order and the respect of the constitution and the public liberties and fundamental rights. since the disestablishment of the catholic church in 1978, in theory all religious organizations stand on the same legal footing. however, the tradition of the catholic church as the only establish church has had consequences in the formulation of the current model of relations between the state and religious groups. the keywords of the model of church and state relations are formulated in the articles 14 and 16 of the spanish constitution: article 14: equalityspaniards are equal before the law and may not in any way be discriminated against on account of birth, race, sex, religion, opinion or any other personal or social condition or circumstance. article 16: no faith shall be the official state religion1. freedom of ideology, religion and worship of individuals and communities is guaranteed, with no other restriction on their expression than may be necessary to maintain public order as protected by law. 2. no one may be compelled to make statements regarding his or her ideology, religion or beliefs. 3. no religion shall have a state character. the public authorities shall take into account the religious beliefs of spanish society and shall consequently maintain appropriate cooperation relations with the catholic church and other religious organizations. óscar celador angón the age of human rights journal, 2 (june 2014) pp. 68-85 issn: 2340-9592 70 the reference to the catholic church in the spanish constitution should not be interpreted as a way of favoring this religious group on the others, but as the way to break up with the historical precedent of the military dictatorship. during the franco years, roman catholicism was the only religion with legal status, other worship services could not be advertised, and the catholic church was the only religious group that could own property and exercise rights. this close cooperation was formalized through a concordat with the vatican in 1953 that granted an extraordinary set of privileges to the catholic church: mandatory canonical marriages for all catholics; exemption from government taxation and the establishment of a budget for the church (for example for the payment of priests salaries); subsidies for new building construction and the reconstruction of church buildings damaged by the war; censorship of materials the church deemed offensive; the right to establish universities, to operate radio stations, and to publish newspapers and magazines; protection from police intrusion into church properties; mandatory catholic religious instruction, even in public schools; and exemption of clergy from military service. franco secured in return the right to name roman catholic bishops in spain, as well as veto power over appointments of clergy down to the parish priest level 2 . the 1978 constitution recognized the historical role of the catholic church, and opened the doors for a relationship of independence and cooperation between the state and the religious groups. according with the spanish conception of religious freedom, all the religious groups are able to practice their religion freely, and nothing impedes to the individuals live and develops their personality according to their faith (souto paz 1995: pp. 17-20, 35-39). freedom of religion implies that the state should not intervene (neither by acting nor by failing to act) in the process of forming religious convictions or in manifesting them. the religious freedom protected in the article 16 of the spanish constitution is defined as an individual private and personal affair, which must be exercised without fear of persecution or discrimination. religious freedom has been developed through the general law 7/1980 on religious freedom, and defined as the right to: a) profess whatever religious beliefs they freely choose or profess none at all; change or relinquish their faith; freely express their own religious beliefs or lack thereof or refrain from making any statement in such regard. b) take part in the liturgy and receive spiritual support in their own faith; celebrate their festivities; hold their marriage ceremonies; receive decent burial, with no discrimination for reasons of religion; be free from any obligation to receive spiritual support or participate in religious services that are contrary to their personal convictions. 2 http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/secretariat_state/archivio/documents/rc_seg-st_19530827_concordatospagna_sp.html. legal aspects of the financing of religious groups in spain the age of human rights journal, 2 (june 2014) pp. 68-85 issn: 2340-9592 71 c) receive and deliver religious teaching and information of any kind, orally, in writing or any other means; choose religious and moral education in keeping with their own convictions for themselves and any non-emancipated minors or legally incompetent persons, in and outside the academic domain. d) meet or assemble publicly for religious purposes and form associations to undertake their religious activities in community in accordance with ordinary legislation and the provisions of this general act. e) the right of churches, faiths and religious communities to establish places of worship or assembly for religious purposes, appoint and train their ministers, promulgate and propagate their own beliefs and maintain relations with their own organisations or other religious faiths, within the national boundaries or abroad. iii. fiscal neutrality, religious freedom and religious pluralism the full exercise of religious freedom demands a complete separation between church and state, because all the citizens have the same right to the religious freedom. the state must play the role of a neutral actor and should not promote one religion over the other, or promote a religion over another ideology (rodriguez garcia 2009; castro jover 2005). the state can promote religious freedom as a fundamental right, but not a concrete ideology or religion, because all religions are equal for the state. the limit to the religious freedom is to infringe the rules protecting fundamental values, so that a person that violates these rules can’t invoke the obedience to a religious obligation as a cause of impunity (torres del moral 1998: pp. 50-51). the coexistence of a plurality of religious groups and cultures in states that recognizes in their constitution the legal principle of church and state separation doesn't outline problems, when these religious groups can practice their religion freely. however, the problems appear when a state (theoretically neutral) favors a group on the others (tarodo soria 2007: pp. 227-278). religious pluralism can be defined as a plurality of religious groups and cultures coexisting within common society. the responsibility of a democratic government is to promote religious diversity, because more religious groups mean more possibility of choice and in consequence more individual freedom. this conception of state appears in the spanish constitution, as one of the fundamental values of the democracy 3 . the state support of religious freedom and the targets of a democratic state are connected, because both policies are founded in the achievement of peaceful coexistence, and promote the full inclusion in the society of those having different beliefs as members of the civil society (torres gutiérrez 1999: pp. 24-33). 3 article 1.1 establishes that “spain constitutes itself into a social and democratic state of law which advocates liberty, justice, equality, and political pluralism as the superior values of its legal order”. óscar celador angón the age of human rights journal, 2 (june 2014) pp. 68-85 issn: 2340-9592 72 religious groups can act and organize their activities, they are free to acquire and to sell property, to accept dispositions of individuals under the civil law, and the contributions and other income that religious groups registered in the ministry of justice receive are exempt from taxation. in addition, individuals making contribution to religious groups may deduct part of the amount of their contribution from the gross income on which they must pay income taxes (torres gutiérrez 2000a: pp. 303-331). however, from a constitutional perspective it is not clear whether the direct or indirect public financing of religious groups is consistent with the constitutional model. the debate about the public policies in the financing of religious organizations is a very complex one, and there is not a common agreement in the doctrine about this topic. one sector of the authors argues that the state ideological and religious neutrality forbids government to provide any form of economic assistance to religious groups, independently of their number of members or age (torres gutiérrez 1996: pp. 75-88). it doesn't matter what form aid takes, whether the economic assistance is direct or indirect, or when the economic assistance is directed to all the religious groups and all are benefit equally. the central idea is that any class of economic assistance from the public sector designated to the religious groups tends to establish a religion and is therefore unconstitutional 4 . the defenders of the separation between church and state prefer that the state doesn't finance any religious or ideological group at all, in order to avoid discriminating against their citizens because they have a concrete religious belief, or because they do not have religious beliefs (rodríguez garcía 2005: p. 112). other sector of the authors argues that the government has an obligation, supported in the exercise of the religious freedom, to accommodate the desires of the population to exercise their religious beliefs. according with this point of view, the government may provide economic assistance to the religious groups, because with this policy public powers are promoting religious freedom (motilla de la calle 1989: p. 197). iv. development of the constitutional principles: cooperation agreements between the state and the religious groups statistical evidence indicates that the number of minority religions in spain is growing. this actual growth is taking place within a general framework of legal freedom which possesses both a domestic and a european side. from a european point of view, it is necessary take in account that the article 10.2 of the spanish constitution establishes that: “the principles relating to the fundamental rights and liberties recognized by the constitution shall be interpreted in conformity with the universal declaration of human rights and the international treaties and agreements thereon ratified by spain”. the european convention on human rights (echr) is one of the treaties ratified for spain in this field, and his article 9 says that: “everyone has the right 4 about this topic, see torres gutiérrez (2000b); torres gutiérrez (2001b); martín sánchez (1990); panizo y romo de arce (1991-1992). legal aspects of the financing of religious groups in spain the age of human rights journal, 2 (june 2014) pp. 68-85 issn: 2340-9592 73 to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance. freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others”. according with the constitutional frame and the echr, all the religious organizations don’t matter their size or number of members, enjoy full religious freedom and equality under the law (tarodo soria 2005: pp. 353-388). however, as we will see, reality shows that a clear distinction exists between the catholic church, religious minorities (jews, evangelists and muslims) and the rest of the registered religious groups. all of them have the right to free exercise of religion, but the status of each religious group depends of the existence of an agreement of cooperation with the state. the article 16 of the constitution establishes that “the public powers will keep in mind the religious beliefs of the spanish society and maintain cooperation relationships with the catholic church and the other religious groups”. this means that public authorities must be neutral in its relationships with the religious groups, and cooperate with the religious groups but not because the state values their religious beliefs positively, but because the state values positively the exercise of the fundamental right of religious freedom (albiñana garcía 1997; amerigo cuervo 2004: pp. 11-36). this form of understanding the relationships between the state and the religious groups has been developed through the article 7 of the spanish organic law of religious freedom, which establishes that: “1. the state, taking account of the religious beliefs existing in spanish society, shall establish, as appropriate, co-operation agreements or conventions with the churches, faiths or religious communities enrolled in the registry where warranted by their notorious influence in spanish society, due to their domain or number of followers. such agreements shall, in any case, be subject to approval by an act of parliament. 2. subject to the principle of equality, such agreements or conventions may confer upon churches, faiths or religious communities the tax benefits applied by ordinary legislation to non-profit entities and other charitable organizations”. spain has a long tradition using special agreements between the state and the religious groups, and until 1992 the beneficiary of such agreements has been exclusively the catholic church (amérigo cuervo 2001: pp. 433-442). these special agreements use to work in three areas: first area is education, and usually the special agreements permits to religious groups get money to finance its private religious schools, or to teach their religion in the public school. the second area is the accommodation of canon law to the civil law, in areas as family law and marriage law. óscar celador angón the age of human rights journal, 2 (june 2014) pp. 68-85 issn: 2340-9592 74 the third typical example is the using of special agreements to finance the salary of the clergy or the maintenance of the religious buildings 5 . the application of the principle of cooperation implied that the state is obliged by the constitution to maintain co-operative relations with the religious groups, to the extent that religious beliefs prevailing in spanish society demand (motilla de la calle 1989: p. 197). according with this legal frame is possible to differentiate three levels of church and state relations: first, the catholic church legal status is established in 4 international agreements between spain and the holy see of 1979. those agreements, together with the one signed in 1976, replaced the spanish concordat of 1953. the 1979 agreements are: 1) agreement on legal affairs; 2) agreement on education and cultural affairs; 3) agreement on economic affairs; and 4) agreement on religious assistance in the armed forces and military service for clergy and religious persons. these agreements provides certain benefits to the catholic church that have not been yet made available to other religious entities, or for not religious groups, in areas as, for example, economic assistance, religious education in public school, or religious assistance in the public institutions, as the army forces, hospitals or penitentiary institutions (satorras fioretti 2000: p. 21). second, in 1992, as a result of the negotiations between the religious minorities (muslims, jews and protestants) and the government, it was approved three cooperation agreements, one for each religious minority. the religious organizations were the federation of evangelical entities of spain (ferede), the federation of israelite communities of spain (fcie), and the islamic commission of spain (cie). jews, muslims, and protestants have their own official status through these bilateral agreements, but enjoy fewer privileges than the catholic church. the three agreements are identical in their content, and provide benefits in matters of great importance to citizens professing these faiths, as for example: the status of their religious leaders in areas of such importance as social security and ways of complying with their military duties, legal protection for their religious places, civil validity of marriage ceremonies held pursuant to their religious rites, religious services in public centres or establishments, religious education in schools, tax benefits applicable to religious properties, or the commemoration of religious holidays. and third, the other religious groups recognized by the state and registered in the ministry of justice, but without agreements of cooperation with the state, enjoy fewer privileges than the jews, muslims, and protestants. in conclusion, the spanish constitution and the legal regulation provide for freedom of religion, and in theory there is no any official religion and religious 5 see: torres gutiérrez (2003) pp. 197-223; torres gutiérrez (2001a) p. 97-109; torres gutiérrez (2002) pp. 877-892. legal aspects of the financing of religious groups in spain the age of human rights journal, 2 (june 2014) pp. 68-85 issn: 2340-9592 75 discrimination is illegal. however, in the practice the catholic church enjoys some privileges unavailable to other religious groups; and muslims, jews and protestants enjoy some privileges unavailable to other religious groups (torres gutiérrez 2003a: pp. 243-268). v. economic and fiscal regime of the religious groups the financing of religious groups in spain is operated through direct economic assistance exclusively in the case of the catholic church. there is no state direct financial support either for the religious minorities or the religious groups registered in the ministry of justice, which must find their own funds for their religious functions, as for example, the salary or stipends of the clergy and other church officers, or the building and maintenance of places for the practice of the religious worship. in common with the charities, the religious organizations do receive certain tax advantages, and their contributors get tax deductions for their contributions. religious organizations are exempt from the payment of major taxes, when such taxes affect their religious activities. the religious organizations are collective manifestations of the right of religious freedom; therefore, from the constitutional perspective, the state is forced to value positively the exercise of the fundamental rights, and should exempt these entities from the payment of taxes. v. 1. economic and fiscal regime of the catholic church v. 1. 1. economic regime in 1979 it was approved an agreement concerning economic affairs between the spain and the holy see of special importance, since it substituted the concordat of 1953. the preamble of the agreement is very clear, and says that, on the one hand, the state cannot indefinitely ignore or prolong legal obligations undertaken in the past; and on the other hand, given the spirit shaping the relations between the catholic church and the state, it is necessary to give a new meaning to both the sections concerning economic contributions as well as to the common system according to which said contributions shall be made 6 . the agreement of 1979 tried to adapt the confessional system of financing of the catholic church, established in the concordat of 1953, to the constitutional model of 1978. the agreement designs a transitional system of public financing of the catholic church, expiring with the self-financing of the church and its financial independence. 6 vid. preamble of the instrument of ratification, dated 4 december 1979, of the agreement of 3 january 1979 concerning economic affairs (boe nº 300, 15 december). fernández coronado (1991) pp. 541-77, óscar celador angón the age of human rights journal, 2 (june 2014) pp. 68-85 issn: 2340-9592 76 respect to the duration of the state direct funding, the terms of the agreement were the following ones: “three complete fiscal years after this agreement is signed, the state may assign to the catholic church a percentage from income taxes or net patrimony or other taxes of a personal nature following the most suitable technical method. to do this, each taxpayer must, on the respective tax form, expressly declare his decision concerning the use he wishes to make of the money concerned. in the absence of such a declaration, the corresponding amount shall be assigned to other purposes. as long as the new system is not applied, the state, in the general budget, shall consign a suitable bequest to the catholic church, in the form of one lump sum, which shall be updated yearly. during the substitution process, which shall take place over a period of three years, the budgetary bequest shall be decreased in proportion to the tax assignation received by the catholic church. therefore, the state guaranteed every year to the catholic church the same economic revenues, with independence of the number of taxpayers that indicates in the declaration of irpf its desire to finance to the catholic church” 7 . until 2007, the income tax form included a box that allows taxpayers to assign a percent of their taxes to the catholic church. public financial assistance to the catholic church it has been a difficult and contentious issue. the church argued that, in return for the public subsidy, the state had received the social, health, and educational services of tens of thousands of priests and nuns who fulfilled vital functions that the state itself could not have performed. but the affirmation of the catholic church it is not complete true, because that money is dedicated to pay the salary of the catholic priest, and the state financial assistance for catholic education, charities or social services, are provided with other state budget. additionally, the catholic church may freely obtain payment or donations from the private sector, organize public collections and receive offerings 8 . the amounts donated to the catholic church have the same fiscal regime for donors than the donations to organizations classified or declared as charitable or of public utility (rodríguez garcía 2005: p. 113). v. 1. 2. fiscal regime the fiscal status of the religious activities developed by the catholic church is regulated in the 1979 agreement concerning economic affairs 9 , which established that: a) the following income shall not be subject to income tax or value-added tax: 1. the publication of instructions, statutes, pastoral letters, diocesan bulletins and any other document written by the competent church authorities. 2. teaching activities in 7 instrument of ratification, dated 4 december 1979, of the agreement of 3 january 1979 concerning economic affairs (boe nº 300, 15 december), art. 2. 8 instrument of ratification, dated 4 december 1979, of the agreement of 3 january 1979 concerning economic affairs (boe nº 300, 15 december), art. 1. 9 instrument of ratification, dated 4 december 1979, of the agreement of 3 january 1979 concerning economic affairs (boe nº 300, 15 december), arts. 4 and 5. legal aspects of the financing of religious groups in spain the age of human rights journal, 2 (june 2014) pp. 68-85 issn: 2340-9592 77 diocesan and religious seminaries, as well as ecclesiastical disciplines at church universities. 3. the purchase of objects dedicated to the worship. b) the holy see, the episcopal conference, the diocese, parishes and other territorial districts, religious orders and congregations and religious institutions and their provincials and their convents and monasteries are entitled to the following exemption: 1. total and permanent exemption from property taxes on the following real estate: churches and chapels designated as places of worship, and their branches and annexed local buildings designated for pastoral purposes; residences of bishops and parish priests; premises designated as offices for the diocesan curia and parish offices; seminaries designated for training diocesan and religious clergy, and church universities, as long as they impart teaching related to church disciplines; and the buildings designated fundamentally as houses or convents of the orders, congregations and religious institutions. 2. total and permanent exemption from excise duties, income tax and capital gains taxes. this exemption does not include those products obtained through financial operations, or those derived from its patrimony, when it has been transferred, nor to capital gains, nor to earnings subject of withholding at the source on income tax. 3. total exemption from taxes on succession, donations and transfer taxes, as long as the acquired goods or rights are used exclusively for worship, maintenance of the clergy, the sacred apostolate or charitable purposes. the catholic religious associations dedicated to religious, charitable, teaching, medical, hospitable or social care shall enjoy the fiscal benefits provided for non-profit organizations, or those granted to private charitable organizations 10 . v. 1. 3. the negotiations between the government and the catholic church of 2006 the negotiations between the government and the catholic church of 2006 in the area of public funding were carried out by the technique of the exchange of notes between the nuncio of their sanctity in spain and the ministry of external affairs. the negotiations concluded with the emission of a combined note in december 2006. the result of the negotiations can be summarized in three points: first, the catholic church will receive from the state exclusively the 0, 7% (before this agreement it was the 0,52%) of the personal income taxes of those taxpayers that, on their tax form, expressly declare their decision concerning the use he wishes to make of the money concerned. in absence of such a declaration, the corresponding amount shall be assigned to other social purposes. it is important to indicate that the contributors that indicate their desire to finance to the catholic church do not pay any more taxes that those who choose not to do it, because they can destine one part of the taxes that are forced to pay to the state to the catholic church. 10 instrument of ratification, dated 4 december 1979, of the agreement of 3 january 1979 concerning economic affairs (boe nº 300, 15 december), art. 5. óscar celador angón the age of human rights journal, 2 (june 2014) pp. 68-85 issn: 2340-9592 78 the negotiation was satisfactory for both parts. the government got that the catholic church accepts to pass to the penultimate phase designed in the 1979 agreement concerning economic affairs (the last one is self-financing); while the church has gotten a new financing system but the church didn't refuse anything what did not have to refuse, and made it 16 years after the conventional date, and in exchange it has gotten a financing model that, contrary to the previous financing system, doesn't have date of expiration. second, the catholic church commits to present an economic annual memory, explaining the destination of the revenues received through the system of tributary assignment. and third, the catholic church accepted to pay the value-added tax (iva). the catholic church refused to be exempted to the iva after a long process. the european commission remitted a report to spain in december of 2005, requesting that the catholic church were charged with the iva. the spanish government responded to the commission that the agreement concerning economic affairs between spain and the holy see of 1979 is an international treaty that was signed before the entrance of spain in the european union, and by virtue of this international agreement spain cannot charge with the iva the religious activities of the catholic church, unless the religious group accepts its subjection voluntarily to the tax. the answer of the european commission was that the european regulation forces spain to appeal to all the appropriate means to eliminate the incompatibilities between the european legislation and the national one 11 . v. 2. financing of religious minorities v. 2. 1. economic regime the religious minorities may request services and donations of their followers, organize public donation campaigns and receive offerings and other contributions, as establishes the organic law of religious freedom of 1980. the amounts donated to the religious groups will have the same fiscal regimen for the donor in their income tax as those amounts given to organizations classified or declared as charitable or of public utility. the religious minorities do not receive direct economic subsidies as happen with the catholic church, for this reason religious minorities have requested repeatedly to receive public funding. protestant and muslim leaders would like their communities to receive government support, through an income tax allocation as the catholic church. in answer to these petitions, the government created in 2005 the foundation pluralism and coexistence, dependent of the ministry of justice, in order to promote the integration of the muslim, jewish and protestant minorities. 11 the commission recommended to the spanish government to the amount that the catholic church was saved, and that spain, without charging the tax directly to the church, fulfils the community legislation and paid the iva. see félix ballesta and martínez félix (2007) p. 66; llamazares fernández (1991) p. 909. legal aspects of the financing of religious groups in spain the age of human rights journal, 2 (june 2014) pp. 68-85 issn: 2340-9592 79 the foundation was constituted by the ministry of justice with a double purpose. on the one hand, it seeks to contribute to the execution of programs of cultural, educational and social interest of the non-catholics religious groups with cooperation agreement with the spanish state, or with notorious character due to their number of followers. and on the other hand, to improve the knowledge that the society has of the religious minorities, avoiding negative stereotypes and favouring its integration in the spanish society. the beneficiaries of the foundation are exclusively the religious groups that signed agreements with the state in 1992 (evangelicals, jewish and muslims), and the religious groups that the ministry of justice has recognized as notorious (at the moment: mormons, jehovah witness and buddhists). the political character of the foundation is appreciated in the composition of the foundation's board, which includes representatives of most government ministries as well as members of concerned religious groups. the foundation funds are used for cultural, educational, and social integration programs (not religious activities). the foundation's bylaw establishes the foundation's objectives: "to contribute to the implementation of programs and projects of a cultural, educational, and social-integration nature" (article 7). the foundation supports activities that pursue these goals as, for example, cultural, social integration and educational activities that reinforce values like democracy, social justice, and respect for human rights, especially among young persons 12 . the foundation does not finance worship services; rather it seeks to benefit religious groups as they carry out activities relating to education, cultural development, and community service. the measure adopted by the government in 2005 doesn't have precedents in the spanish constitutional history, and it supposes that the state finances the cultural activities of the non-catholic religious groups, using a specific institution for the pursuit and attainment of this result. in the words of the first director of the foundation, “because it receives public funding, the foundation represents an entirely new modus operandi in this field and consequently involves the incurrence of some uncertainties. nevertheless, the foundation's mission may prove to be of interest and may ultimately improve how spain's constitutional system treats religion. specifically, the foundation seeks to achieve equality by supporting measures designed to fully integrate religious minorities into spanish society. this goal will be met as the foundation's resources are used to help minority religions conduct social-welfare and charity programs, to provide 12 to realize these objectives, the following actions may be proposed by the foundation: “1.creating teaching materials (manuals, textbooks, audiovisual aids, etc.) that reflect the cultural diversity of spanish and european society as well as the exchange of experiences in this field; 2.creating integration initiativesespecially specific programs for areas where the rate of social exclusion is highest-principally targeting students who, due to their social situation, may act under racist and xenophobic influences; 3.supporting educational content that can help to better comprehend the characteristics of a multicultural society, especially in areas or subjects like history, human sciences, or languages; and 4.promoting the formation of associations, for young persons in particular, with the purpose of encouraging activities meant to slow the growth of racist and xenophobic attitudes”. see contreras mazario (2007) pp. 575ff. óscar celador angón the age of human rights journal, 2 (june 2014) pp. 68-85 issn: 2340-9592 80 education and diffusion of information about minority cultures, and to train and educate members of minority cultures” 13 . another argument that would justify the state funding of the cultural activities of the religious minorities would be the absence of social or cultural integration of these communities, but it ignores that other religious or not religious groups (as for example the gypsy minority) are excluded of this type of measures. v. 2. 2. fiscal regime of the religious minorities the fiscal regime of the religious minority groups is regulated in the article 11 of the cooperation agreement between the spanish state and the islamic, jewish and protestant minorities 14 . the following operations realized for the religious minorities shall be subject to no taxation whatsoever: the income proceeding from the distribution of religious publications and internal religious bulletins directly to the religious communities; and religious teaching in centres belonging to the religious minorities, or devoted to training religious leaders. the religious minorities as a legal person are exempt: a) from real estate tax in the case of: places of worship and outbuildings or ancillary premises devoted to religious services or spiritual; premises used for the religious minorities as community offices; and institutions devoted solely to training of religious leaders. b) from the corporation tax when the income, property and rights so acquired, are devoted to worship or social services. 13 according to contreras, “greater difficulties arise with the exclusion of religious entities that qualify and register in the register of religious entities yet are nonetheless excluded because they do not have a conspicuous and well established presence in spain. this exclusion gives us pause, for it represents a limit in the range of possible beneficiaries and eliminates minority religious groups who are equally capable of carrying out many of the foundation's aims. nevertheless, the limitation can be justified by the need for proportionality and the need to identify the most representative groups. both of these restrictions are necessary because the foundation distributes economic assistance from a pool of scarce resources. therefore, there is ample justification for limiting economic resources to groups that, while minorities, enjoy special legal recognition such as notorious character, despite the uncertainty this concept may have. while this exclusion could arguably be seen as breaking the principle of equality guaranteed in article 14 of the constitution, such differential treatment for religious groups has not been criticized as unconstitutional. even so, the application of notorious character to certain religious groups should be understood as transitory; in the future, all religious groups registered in the register of religious entities will enjoy notorious character” (contreras mazario 2007: p. 610). 14 in 1992 agreements on cooperation with the state were signed by three organizations on behalf of protestants, jews, and muslims. the organizations were the federation of evangelical entities of spain (ferede), the federation of israelite communities of spain (fcie), and the islamic commission of spain (cie). laws 26, 27, 28, november 10, 1992, (boe nº1 272, of 12 november 1992). legal aspects of the financing of religious groups in spain the age of human rights journal, 2 (june 2014) pp. 68-85 issn: 2340-9592 81 c) from the transfer tax when the respective property or rights acquired are devoted to religious services or spiritual support. the associations and entities created and managed by the religious minorities for charitable-educational, medical and hospital or social service activities, also enjoy the tax benefits that spanish state ordinary legislation on taxes applies to non-profit organizations, and those granted to private charitable organizations. v. 3. other religious groups the organizations inscribed in the ministry of justice and recognized by the state as religious do not enjoy the benefits of the “foundation pluralism and coexistence” for the development of their cultural, educational and social integration activities, except if the ministry of justice has recognized them notorious character (at the moment: mormons, jehovah witness and buddhists), or they have signed cooperation agreements with the state. this category of religious groups have the same source of resources than the private ideological organizations to finance their activities, and can improve their tax and fiscal situation by becoming non-profit entities, but not for their religious character but for lacking of profit interest. in the case that the religious groups acquire the status of non-profit entities, they are exempt from certain taxes, which would normally be considered taxable corporate income and which would apply to income received from collections, offerings, and fixed contributions. the same status applies to distribution of text for religious and theological instruction in religious education centers. but, in any case their fiscal status will be worse than the status of the religious group with agreements of cooperation. this situation is incongruous with the constitutional model of equality and not discrimination ordered in the article 14 of the spanish constitution, because the fiscal equality in the exercise of the religious freedom cannot be made depend on the signature of an agreement of cooperation with the state, that which, in turn, depends on elements as the notorious character of the groups, that are subjective and depend excessively on the political interest of the government. vi. conclusions the political and social transformation of the spanish society operated by the constitution of 1978 should in theory have had a profound impact on the model of relations between the state and the religious organizations. the constitutional change was radical, as was the passing from a catholic confessional state to a model of full religious freedom. to avoid a traumatic change in this context, the state has carried out cooperation agreements with the religious organizations. these agreements have promoted the integration of religious groups in civil society, but have legitimized a óscar celador angón the age of human rights journal, 2 (june 2014) pp. 68-85 issn: 2340-9592 82 discriminatory system in which some religious organizations enjoy economic benefits and privileges not available for ideological (non-religious) and other religious groups. al the moment, religious groups enjoys different methods of financing. the catholic church is funded by private donations, and public money coming from the personal income taxes of those taxpayers that, on their tax form, expressly declare their decision concerning the use he wishes to make of the money concerned. religious minorities with agreement of cooperation, and the religious groups that the ministry of justice has recognized as relevant, are funded by private donations and public money coming from the public foundation pluralism and coexistence. religious groups recognized by the ministry of justice -but not recognized as relevantare financed exclusively by private donations. and religious organizations that have not been recognized as such by the ministry of justice are financed by the same mechanisms than ideological associations. the direct public financing of the catholic church supposes that the state discriminates among its citizens for reason of its beliefs, and this discrimination doesn't disappear because the state finances other religious groups (for example, by the public foundation pluralism and coexistence). the system used in spain to finance the catholic church it is not the church tax in the way of the german system, were citizens freely decide to finance their religious organizations using the state structures but without cost for the state. in germany church members pay an extra tax plus their income tax, and the extra amount is the money designated to finance their religious organization. the spanish system is a direct economic assistance to the catholic church that, in consequence, is financed by all the contributors. the fiscal regime of religious organizations also raises serious questions about its constitutionality. cooperation agreements between the state and religious organizations have established a discriminatory system in which the catholic church enjoys a privileged status. however, unlike what happens with direct public funding, in this context there is a slow process of equalization between religious groups, and between religious groups, charities and nonprofit organizations. the best example of this situation is the acceptance of the catholic church to pay the value-added tax since 2006. there is also a slow process of fiscal equalization between the non-profit organizations and the religious groups that signed agreements of cooperation with the state in 1992, characterized by the access of non-profit entities to the tax status enjoyed by religious minorities. from a constitutional perspective, is the exemption of religious groups from taxation a matter of legislative grace or a consequence of the religious freedom? there is a constitutional basis for tax exemptions when the income is used for the promotion of religious freedom. as long as taxes have had any potential negative impact on the religious activities of the religious organizations, they have been expressly exempted from such taxes. the amount of the exemptions is not an impermissible sponsorship of religion, since the government does not transfer part of its revenue to the religious organizations, but simply abstains from demanding that the religious organizations legal aspects of the financing of religious groups in spain the age of human rights journal, 2 (june 2014) pp. 68-85 issn: 2340-9592 83 support to the state. the exemption of religious organizations from taxes may be rooted in the article 16 of the spanish constitution (freedom of religion and state ideological and religious neutrality), because the taxation of religious organization would prevent the exercise of the fundamental right of religious freedom. as we have seen, religious organizations enjoy different models of public financing depending on the agreements of cooperation that they have negotiated with the state. this situation supposes a religious discrimination prohibited by the constitution, which can only be justified on the need to address a slow transition in this context, due to the deep confessional past of the spanish society, but it's been 35 years since the adoption of the constitution. for all these reasons, it seems necessary to change the financing model of religious groups in spain according with three principles. first, direct public funding of religious organizations must disappear in the case of the catholic church and the religious minorities, as a way to prevent that public money will be used to finance private beliefs and to avoid discrimination among religious groups. second, the state can encourage through tax deductions private donations to religious institutions. this model should be the same for all religious and ideological groups, and tax benefits should be identical for all citizens, regardless of what religious group they want to fund. and third, it is necessary to equate the tax status of religious organizations, charities and non-profit organizations that perform activities of public interest. references albiñana garcía c. (1997) “la financiación de las iglesias”. in: revista española de derecho financiero, vol. 14. amérigo cuervo f. (2001) “a propósito de la sentencia del tribunal constitucional de 15 de febrero de 2001”. in: laicidad y libertades. escritos jurídicos, nº. 1. amerigo cuervo f. (2004) “la financiación de las confesiones religiosas en los países de la unión europea”. in: laicidad y libertades. escritos jurídicos, nº. 4. castro jover, a. (2005) la utilización de los signos de identidad religiosa en las relaciones de trabajo en el derecho de estados unidos. madrid: servicio de publicaciones de la universidad complutense. contreras mazario, j. m. (2007) “direct financing of religious minorities in spain”. in: the brigham young university law review, nº 3. félix ballesta, m.a. and martínez félix c. (2007) “¿es contraria al derecho comunitario la exención del impuesto sobre construcciones, instalaciones y obras (icio), de que goza la iglesia católica en españa?”. in: cuadernos de integración europea, nº. 7. fernández coronado a. (1991) “ los acuerdos del estado español con la federación de entidades religiosas evangélicas de españa (ferede) y la federación de comunidades israelitas, (fci). consideraciones sobre los textos óscar celador angón the age of human rights journal, 2 (june 2014) pp. 68-85 issn: 2340-9592 84 definitivos”. in: anuario de derecho eclesiástico del estado, vol. vii. llamazares fernández d. (1991) derecho eclesiástico del estado. derecho de la libertad de conciencia. madrid: servicio de publicaciones de la universidad complutense. martín sánchez i. (1990) “la financiación de las confesiones religiosas en el derecho español”. in: anuario de derecho eclesiástico del estado, vol. vi. motilla de la calle a. (1989) “notas sobre problemas fundamentales de derecho eclesiástico contemporáneo”. in: anuario de derecho eclesiástico del estado, vol. v. panizo y romo de arce, a. (1991-1992) “soluciones conceptuales al actual sistema económico de la iglesia católica”. in: revista de la facultad de derecho de la universidad complutense de madrid. nº 79. pelayo olmedo, j.d. (2007) las comunidades ideológicas y religiosas, la personalidad jurídica y la actividad registral. madrid: ministerio de justicia. rodríguez garcía, j.a. (2005) “la protección jurídica de las minorías culturales en el derecho comunitario”. in: revista europea de derechos fundamentales, nº 5. rodriguez garcia, j. a. (2009) laicità, interculturalità e il meticciato costituzionale democratico in spagna. in: stato, chiese e pluralismo confessionale. satorras fioretti, r.m. (2000) lecciones de derecho eclesiástico del estado. barcelona: bosch. souto paz, j.a. (1995) derecho eclesiástico del estado. el derecho de la libertad de ideas y creencias, 3rd ed. madrid: marcial pons tarodo soria, s. (2005) “los recientes convenios de colaboración entre la generalitat de catalunya y confesiones minoritarias”. in: laicidad y libertades. estudios jurídicos, nº 5. tarodo soria, s. (2007) “federalismo fiscale, principio di sussidiarietà e neutralità dei servizi sociali erogati”. in esperienze a confronto, a cura di antonello de oto e federica botti, bolonia: bolonia university press. torres del moral, a. (1998) principios de derecho constitucional español. madrid: servicio de publicaciones de la universidad complutense. torres gutiérrez, a. (1996) “consideraciones generales sobre el régimen fiscal de las confesiones religiosas en españa”. in: revista de contabilidad y tributación, nº 165. torres gutiérrez, a. (1999) “la asignación tributaria en españa. una quiebra del principio de laicidad del estado”. in: boletín de la sociedad española de ciencias de las religiones. torres gutiérrez, a. (2000a) “el art. 7 de la ley orgánica de libertad religiosa y la discriminación de las confesiones religiosas en españa en la tributación por iva”. in: laicidad y libertades. escritos jurídicos. nº 0. torres gutiérrez, a. (2000b) iglesia y fisco en la historia de españa. madrid: servicio de publicaciones de la facultad de derecho de la universidad complutense. torres gutiérrez, a. (2001a) “los beneficios fiscales de las viviendas de los ministros de culto católico en españa y el principio de laicidad del estado. la sentencia del tribunal supremo de 19 de marzo de 2001”. in: boletín de la legal aspects of the financing of religious groups in spain the age of human rights journal, 2 (june 2014) pp. 68-85 issn: 2340-9592 85 sociedad española de ciencias de las religiones, nº 15. torres gutiérrez, a. (2001b) régimen fiscal de las confesiones religiosas en españa. madrid: colex. torres gutiérrez, a. (2002) “la financiación de la iglesia católica en españa”. in: revista española de derecho canónico, vol. 59. torres gutiérrez, a. (2003a) “el desarrollo postconstitucional del derecho fundamental de libertad religiosa en españa”. in: revista de estudios políticos, vol. 120. torres gutiérrez, a. (2003b) “la asignación tributaria en españa. un estudio crítico”. in: revista jurídica de navarra, nº 34. on the need to study the impact of the international implementing the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities in qatar: from charity to human rights1 pablo rodríguez del pozo2 maría del carmen barranco avilés3 khalid al ali4 rafael de asís roig5 abstract: a historically marginalized and overlooked segment of the general population worldwide, persons with disabilities have long struggled with discrimination, inequality and even maltreatment. they have often been treated as societal outcasts and their disabilities treated as medical conditions that need to be “fixed” in order for the individual to join the rest of society. throughout the last three decades, this approach has been steadily changing towards an inclusive model whereas persons with disabilities are recognized as a protected group of citizens who are due the same complete human rights as the general population. this change has become particularly evident with the united nation’s approval of the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (crpd) in 2006. however, the strides made by the approval of the crpd are merely philosophical unless the rights recognized by the convention can be defended by a court of law. this is where the importance of the ratification of the crpd by member and observer states comes into focus. by ratifying the treaty in 2008, qatar committed itself to a number of social and legal obligations. however, implementation of the crpd in qatar is dependent on a number of factors including political willingness, the abilities of the crpd’s united nations follow-up committee, and the capacity to raise awareness among the public in qatar. this paper looks into the traditional approaches taken towards persons with disabilities, the impact of the crpd and the challenges faced by qatar as it looks to implement the crpd. keywords: disabilities, qatar, united nations, human rights, non-discrimination the history of human rights in the 20th century might best be described as an evolving process moving toward equality, non-discrimination (peces-barba 2014), and the elimination of geographic and non-geographic borders (ansuátegui 2014). this has 1 this publication was made possible by the nprp award nprp-7-380-5-051 from the qatar national research fund (a member of the qatar foundation). the statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors. 2 weill cornell medical college in qatar (prd2002@qatar-med.cornell.edu). 3 universidad carlos iii de madrid, spain (mcarmen.barranco@uc3m.es). 4 qatar university (kalali@qu.edu.qa). 5 universidad carlos iii de madrid, spain (rafael.asis@uc3m.es). the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 1-17 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.1 1 p. rodríguez del pozo, m. c. barranco avilés, khalid al ali, r. de asís roig continued to the present day and in all likelihood will endure throughout the 21st century. independently of other factors, two main processes have led to the path toward equality and non-discrimination, and continue to have an overarching influence: the process of generalization and the process of specification of human rights (peces-barba 2015: 154). generalization seeks to extend the benefits of human rights to persons or groups who were not recognized as bearers of those rights or who were in practice denied the benefits of those rights. specification attributes some particular rights to certain persons in order to allow them to fully enjoy the complete set of human rights enjoyed by the general population. these two processes have manifested as two main dimensions: equality as non-discrimination and equality as a demand for differential treatment (sometimes called positive discrimination). in the process of specification, the notion of formal equality (equality before the law) is combined with the idea of material equality, which consists of the factual enjoyment of rights (barranco 2011: 22). material equality often requires a differential treatment for certain persons or groups affected by difficulties that impede or condition the effective exercise of their equal rights. the process of specification, thus, gets reflected as demands for positive differentiation in order to protect the rights of individuals who face special difficulties in exercising their basic rights. in line with the process of specification, the united nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (crpd) introduced a new paradigm for the rights of persons with disabilities. in addition, it introduced for the first time a relationship between diversity, equality, and the foundation of human rights in an international legal text. the challenges of implementing the crpd and making the domestic legislation of signatory countries consistent with its mandates are enormous, and the state of qatar is one of many countries that are exploring revisions to its existing legislation. in this article, we will analyze the basic contents of the crpd together with a historic account of the notions that inform it. we will analyze the contextual factors that might contribute to qatar’s success in implementing the convention but which might also present certain challenges. further, we will suggest a roadmap to better understand if and how the text of domestic legislation and regulations is consistent with the crpd’s mandates. we will finish by suggesting strategies that might help speed up the process of implementation, by pointing out some of the challenges ‒ and opportunities ‒ that lie ahead. the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities the international crpd, approved by the united nations general assembly on december 13, 2006, was the culmination of a long process and the fruition of the contributions of many actors ranging from the united nations member states to the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 1-17 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.1 2 implementing the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities in qatar: from charity to human rights observer states, un agencies, national organizations concerned with human rights (palacios 2008; cabra, palacios, bariffi 2009), and organizations for people with disabilities, as well as individuals with disabilities, all of whom played a noteworthy role throughout the crafting of the crpd6. historically, the un considered disability as a matter of social development, and thus kept it outside the scope of the system of international protection of human rights (quinn and degener 2002; lawson 2007, mègret 2008). however, its approach underwent a steady change over the last three decades. an example of this development is the framing of standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities, which was adopted by the un general assembly, in 19937. thanks to this document, people with disabilities have come to be understood as a group in need of protection. the un has also emphasized the particular nature of the rights of persons with disabilities in certain situations and has insisted that member states must adopt special measures to guarantee the enjoyment of human rights by those individuals with disabilities. however, the standard rules remains a non-enforceable document; it is useful as a guide or soft law, but it does not strengthen the rights of these vulnerable groups. this was a long-time concern among the experts who maintained that it was necessary to have an international treaty specifically to protect the rights of persons with disabilities (quinn and degener 2002: 293–294). it was not until may 2001 that such an instrument began to be prepared, culminating in what became the first human rights treaty of the 21st century, the crpd. the convention was a major leap forward, because it came to universally crystallize the most up-to-date notions of disability, based on its social causation and its understanding as an element of diversity, leaving behind the outdated concept of disability as a medical problem. in the following pages, we will take a historical look at the categorization of disability and will summarize the main traits of the concept of disability as introduced by the crpd. from undesired evil to social enrichment: models of disability and human rights there are various ways of thinking about disability. a leading disability scholar, agustina palacios, from the universidad nacional de mar del plata, in argentina, has identified three major historical models through which the concept of disability has been conceived, which, in turn, determined how disabled persons should be treated (palacios 2008: 103). isolation and exclusion the isolation and exclusion notion of disability is the most primitive one. in this model, magic or the intervention of supernatural powers were considered to be the cause 6 these organizations, which totaled about 70 at the end of the process, worked together in the international disability caucus.7 7 resolution 48/96, adopted by the general assembly 48/96 (a/res/48/96). the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 1-17 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.1 3 p. rodríguez del pozo, m. c. barranco avilés, khalid al ali, r. de asís roig of disability. people with disability were considered unnecessary, or even dangerous, bearers of evil messages or living signs of the god’s ire. as a consequence, societies isolated these people by marginalizing them or, at best, by treating them as objects of charity ‒ to alleviate their lives that were not worth living. needless to say, there was a clash between these ideas and any notion of human rights. the medical model this concept, sometimes called rehabilitative approach, sees the origin of disability as a product of a physical, mental, or sensory limitation, and dictates that those with disabilities should be studied and managed by medical science. people with disabilities are no longer considered useless, as in the previous model, as long as they can be rehabilitated. this model seeks to normalize people with disabilities in order to integrate them into society (oliver 1996: 31). disability is seen as a problem of the individual caused by accident, illness, or a physical condition, requiring medical assistance. the goal of such assistance is either a cure or to better adapt the individual to his or her situation (oliver, barnes and mercer, 2003). disability is, in this model, dealt within the framework of the social security system, and is protected by civil law through regulating the declaration of incapacity and the establishment of rules for guardianship. since this model deals with the treatment of disability from a welfare point of view, persons with disabilities are not seen as subject to discrimination (lawson 2007: 563‒619. stein 2007. cuenca 2012). rather, they are seen as having a limiting physical or mental anomaly: accordingly, public policies should be aimed at resolving such anomalies to the greatest degree possible in order to integrate the rehabilitated person into mainstream society. the social model and its diversity model variant in this case, disability is seen as a set of limitations, the roots of which have to be found in the failure of society to accommodate the differing degrees of ability of its members and to provide appropriate services for those who need them (morris 1991. hanh 1993. hughes 2002). in this view, it is not the organic or mental condition per se, but rather the social context that determines the individual’s disability. disability is viewed not only as a result of functional limitations but also as a consequence of social influences (quinn and degener 2002: 14). problems that at first seem to belong to an individual, in fact, assume a social nature – a consequence of social dynamics. in this model, the rights of people with disabilities are limited by the social context. it is thus necessary that public policies overcome discrimination and realize the universal enjoyment of rights, paying special attention to the social determinants of discrimination. of late, a variant of the social model is gaining traction, however. this variant is called the diversity model of disability (romañach and palacios 206: 28), and it is based on the postulates of the independent life movements. this notion considers disabled the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 1-17 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.1 4 implementing the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities in qatar: from charity to human rights people (or differently abled persons, to use the term favored by the proponents of this vision) as intrinsically valuable on their own merits on the basis of their diversity, which exists to enrich human societies and make them more creative, interesting, and even prosperous. the diversity model shares with the social model’s view that disability is a socially determined condition, but it adds something of its own: it does not perceive disability as being necessarily bad, or an intrinsic limitation. the person with a disability is, in this perspective, simply a person different from others, and his or her presence in society contributes to its richness. public policy with regard to disability should, thus, become nearly invisible, or at least non-obvious. to this end, the diversity model demands the specification of a set of rights. the social and diversity models share a number of postulates, three of which will be mentioned here. first, they question the focus of the traditional model of human dignity based on people’s capacities and social role (a greater contribution to society equals greater dignity and honors) (de asís 2007. cuenca 2015). almost as a corollary, they do not accept the notion of percentages of handicap8, but rather focus on the specific situation in which each person with disabilities finds himself or herself. finally, they both pursue equality as their final goal. this is why they support the main strategic tool to enable equality, this is, positive discrimination, or the idea that there are circumstances and situations that make persons different and these are relevant enough to justify unequal treatment in order to achieve material equality. the social and diversity models both correspond to two major points of focus present in the contemporary study and treatment of disability: the focus on the individual situation and the focus on the group (de asís 2013: 70). the focus on the individual situation, typical of the social model, analyzes the disability not by concentrating on the features that identify the person with a disability, but rather by focusing on the surrounding social circumstances in which the person is immersed. the legal response to these situations is aimed at enacting the rights that are denied or that the disabled person is effectively unable to exercise. the focus on the group, a development from the diversity model, analyzes the question of diversity from the perspective of the characteristics that serve to identify a person, and sees the appropriate legal response as reaffirming the value of the group, by highlighting what makes the group recognizable and promoting diversity as the guiding value and goal. 8 as does, for example, spanish legislation that makes reference to a handicap equal to or greater than 33%. the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 1-17 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.1 5 p. rodríguez del pozo, m. c. barranco avilés, khalid al ali, r. de asís roig there is a subtle difference between these two approaches. while they are both aimed at universalizing rights, that is, to extend the enjoyment of human rights to people with disabilities and to correct discriminatory situations, the focus on the individual situation resorts to positive discrimination to achieve equality, while the focus on the group uses positive discrimination not to strengthen the rights of scattered individuals, but rather to combine all individual recognitions of rights in order to obtain a positive valuation of the group’s identity (de asís 2010: 163). in the group view, the group’s identity is the path to achieving equality. the crpd contains elements that reflect both these models and focus9. crpd: the human rights-based approach to disability the model of diversity that was analyzed earlier and the focus on the group are embodied in the preamble to the crpd, which affirms that signatory states recognize "…the valued existing and potential contributions made by persons with disabilities to the overall well-being and diversity of their communities, and that the promotion of the full enjoyment by persons with disabilities of their human rights and fundamental freedoms and of full participation by persons with disabilities will result in their enhanced sense of belonging and in significant advances in the human, social and economic development of society and the eradication of poverty." also paragraph ‘d’ of article 3 sets out as one of the general principles of the convention, "respect for difference and acceptance of persons with disabilities as part of human diversity and humanity." these principles have influenced the convention the most. article 1 proclaims that the basic objective is “to promote, protect and ensure the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disabilities, and to promote respect for their inherent dignity.” as is made patent throughout the text, the final goal of the convention is not the recognition of new rights exclusive to persons with disabilities; rather it is the identification of the rights that all human beings possess, paired with a set of additional assurances that need to be provided to people with disabilities so that they can enjoy the benefits of their basic human rights on the same basis as everyone else, most particularly within environments in which the protection of those rights needs to be reinforced due to the extent to which they have historically been unprotected or directly violated. the crpd marks a turning point in the treatment of disability. its most noteworthy feature is that it completes a process where disability is brought within the purview of the parameters of human rights (palacios and bariffi 2007. mackay 2007). in addition, the crpd fosters visibility and raises awareness about the rights of persons with disabilities, and provides a legal instrument to demand the effective exercise of those rights (cuenca 2012). 9 from the material published to date on the pursuit of rights for the hearing impaired, this community could be placed in the individual model. however, hearing impaired communities are not pursuing a disability human rights strategy, but rather a strategy of cultural and linguistic rights.23 the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 1-17 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.1 6 implementing the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities in qatar: from charity to human rights the human rights approach is based on legitimate and inalienable demands and interests, independent of any political wrangling and beyond changing economic and other policies. the uniqueness of the human rights-based approach implies, at least (de asís 2013: 33). 1) the consideration of those rights as the inspiration for, and the factor that determines the validity of, public policies; 2) the legal enforceability of the identification of any individual with disabilities as being in full possession of their human rights; 3) the identification of those who have the legal mandate to respect those rights; 4) legal accountability for the non-observance of those rights; 5) the accountability of the states in relation to the enactment of rights; and finally, 6) the requirement of the treatment of the disability as a matter of universal interest, not limited to a single group. this has significant implications for the demands and aspirations of persons with disabilities. the reference to the human rights framework brings these demands and aspirations within the ambit of legal rights that can be defended before a court of law, because such rights now create, in turn, true obligations held by public authorities and individuals. beyond that, the rights recognized by the convention can be defended by resorting to the tools provided by international law on human rights. the human rights approach implies abandoning the discourse of welfarism or, in the least, relegating it to a secondary order (barranco 2015: 29). nevertheless, it must be cautioned that the human rights framework does not turn the demands and claims of persons with disabilities into absolute ones. general human rights theory has stated that it is not possible to refer to absolute human rights. the right to universal accessibility may be restricted to what is considered necessary, possible, and reasonable (de asís 2013: 82). in any event, the rights framework, which assumes the non-existence of absolute rights, requires that any limitation of rights is strictly undertaken within its ethical framework, related to the notion of human dignity and in line with the main objective of that right. the right to accessibility, for instance, is designed to address the barriers and obstacles that prevent the execution of certain goals, such as being educated or having access to justice, which are considered to be indispensable. implementing the crpd in qatar qatar ratified the crpd on may 13, 2008, and signed its optional protocol, pending ratification. by ratifying this treaty, the state of qatar commits to a number of obligations that have social and legal repercussions. the depth and legal strength of those developments will depend on three main contextual factors and critically on the textual factor, this is, the current legislative and regulatory framework. the contextual factors are concerned with the local and international political climate, and with the social dynamics in qatar. the first contextual factor is represented the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 1-17 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.1 7 p. rodríguez del pozo, m. c. barranco avilés, khalid al ali, r. de asís roig by the political willingness of the qatari legislators and their sensitivity toward the satisfaction of the rights of persons with disabilities. the second factor is the role of the crpd's united nations follow-up committee in identifying missing goals or deviations and requesting corrective measures in a proper and timely manner. the third contextual factor is the dynamism and efficacy of movements and groups dedicated to the rights of persons with disabilities in qatar, and their ability to raise awareness among the public about those rights and become a receptive and respected voice before the government. it is critical for the implementation of the crpd that these contextual factors are aligned and operate synergistically. the precondition to achieve such synergy is that all parties involved have a shared philosophy about disability and, thus, speak the same language. the foundation of the crpd was dictated by what we describe as the social model of disability, mentioned above, where disability is understood to be the consequence of the social environment. nevertheless, the crpd also contains elements that belong to the abovementioned diversity model, where the differently-abled person is seen as a valuable member of society, based on his or her contribution to the benefits of diversity. all the actors in the process of implementing the crpd should embrace its model of understanding and methods of dealing with disability. the legislator should be sensitive to the social conditions that make disability apparent. social movements and groups promoting the rights of persons with disabilities should ensure that their demands focus on the social context and include the value of persons with disabilities as individuals as well as a group. these movements should educate the public in the philosophy that inspires the crpd. however, even having achieved an alignment of contextual factors, and even if all the contextual factors were aligned and operated synergistically, the implementation of the crpd could still be derailed if the work of the relevant bodies is technically weak or incoherent. enter the textual factor, which is technical in nature and consists of having a solid understanding of the current textual legal framework in qatar and of the necessary changes and adjustments required to make it compliant with the crpd. the quality of the textual factor will, in the end, determine, despite the political willingness of the legislator, the work of the united nations follow-up committee and the strategies of the stakeholders: the actual realization of the rights of persons with disabilities in qatar, as has happened in other ratifying countries. this requires an understanding and a study of qatari legislation. it is, thus, critical to conduct a study that aims to define the impact of the crpd on the rights of persons with disabilities in qatar and to identify areas where adjustments are needed in the qatari legislation to ensure its full compliance with the crpd. it is also important to suggest ways in which the internal qatari law might be incorporated into the requirements of the crpd, employing a legislative technique that is consistent with the qatari legal system and its inspiring values and traditions. the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 1-17 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.1 8 implementing the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities in qatar: from charity to human rights in the following section, we will try to outline some of the challenges related to contextual factors and the legal and regulatory factors to be addressed for an in-depth implementation of the crpd in qatar, as well as a work plan that takes into account both the technical complexity of the task and the methodological requirements of a convention based on international rather than local considerations. understanding the context the state of qatar has introduced a number of important legislative reforms, many of which are aimed at promoting the rights established by the 2003 constitution approved by a referendum, indicating a breakthrough for the region and a testament to qatar’s leadership. continuing on this path, qatar has ratified the international conventions on human rights and has created governmental agencies for the promotion and protection of those rights, such as the human rights office and the directorate of human rights, at the ministry of foreign affairs and at the ministry of interior, respectively. to the same end, qatar has also created non-governmental agencies such as the national human rights committee. some of these agencies provide direct aid and services to persons with disabilities, such as the ministry of labor and social affairs directorate for the protection of rights of children, women, the elderly and persons with disabilities, the shafallah center for children with special needs, and the al noor institute for the blind, among others. these are impressive developments in qatar’s infrastructure to address disability in a country where, according to the national census of 201010, there are a total of 7,743 persons with disabilities, representing 0.45% of the total population11. political commitment to the cause of people with disabilities has been robust in qatar. in 1995, the country passed law no. 38, which modified the provisions of the social security system, providing governmental assistance to social groups including organizations of persons with disabilities. in 1998, the government created the supreme council for family affairs (scfa, decree no. 53/1998), a high-level national body that, among other things, has the mandate to deal with the implementation of international conventions, ratified by qatar, which relate to the rights of children, women, and persons with disabilities. following the scfa’s recommendations, qatar passed, in 2004, law no. 2/2004, for the protection of people with special needs, aimed at ensuring the rights of persons with disabilities in all the fields12. the mandates of the law are remarkably ambitious. 10 see http://www.qsa.gov.qa/qatarcensus/census_results.aspx 11 these numbers appear to be remarkably low by international standards, where people with disabilities account for approximately 10% of the total population. under-registration is a likely explanation for the apparent distortion. culture may explain part of this phenomenon, but some legal definitions of disability might be at the root of this problem. 12 these laws can be found at http://www.almeezan.qa/default.aspx?language=en the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 1-17 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.1 9 http://www.qsa.gov.qa/qatarcensus/census_results.aspx http://www.almeezan.qa/default.aspx?language=en p. rodríguez del pozo, m. c. barranco avilés, khalid al ali, r. de asís roig under this law, persons with special needs enjoy particular protection in the state of qatar, by means of: 1) special education, health treatment, disease prevention, and vocational training; 2) receiving all the tools and means to facilitate their learning and mobility processes; 3) receiving special qualifications and training certificates upon completion of certain training programs and subsequently being appointed to roles that accommodate their relevant skills and training; 4) dedicating around 2% of the jobs in the private sector to people with special needs without any discrimination based on disability. undoubtedly there is administrative, economic, and legislative support for persons with disabilities in qatar. however, there is a risk that despite all these efforts, resources, and political will, the outcome might be a patchwork of somewhat noncohesive endeavors when taking steps toward enabling persons with disabilities and implementing the crpd. the reason behind this fear is that in qatar, the concept of disability seems to be more slanted toward the medical or rehabilitative model. in these models, disability is seen to be a state caused by accident or illness or any other physical condition that needs medical care and the assistance of social welfare to overcome physical or mental limits, and that efforts must be made to integrate the newly rehabilitated person productively into society. this has historically led to a huge advancement in the treatment of persons with disabilities, but the crpd encourages countries and societies to go beyond the medical model to embrace the social and diversity models, which speak the language of antidiscrimination and human rights when approaching the problems of persons with disabilities. perhaps the medical concept of disability is at the root of why qatar is assessed as a country expending considerable effort on behalf of persons with disabilities; however, the implementation of these efforts is still perceived as a work in progress. a united nations special rapporteur on disability remarked, after a brief mission to qatar in 2010, that there is "a clear commitment from qatari society to the needs of persons with disabilities"; these are tangible at the shafallah centre for children with special needs and at the al noor institute for the blind. the rapporteur stressed that "… it appears that there is a clear commitment from the state and the private sector toward the issues confronting persons with disabilities in qatar. anecdotal evidence suggests that the private sector is a big contributor to institutions [for people with disabilities]." nevertheless, the rapporteur warned that "… it also became clear that much of the caring and development remain almost exclusively disability-specific as opposed to the mainstreaming of the development needs of persons with disabilities.”13 clearly, mainstreaming the needs of those with disabilities will be a step in the right direction. in 2010, the international disability alliance, a global network that aims to promote the effective and full implementation of the crpd, recommended that "qatar 13 these observations may be found at http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=183 the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 1-17 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.1 10 http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=183 implementing the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities in qatar: from charity to human rights adopt a proactive and comprehensive strategy to eliminate de jure and de facto discrimination on any grounds and against all children, paying particular attention to girls, [and] children with disabilities.14" some of the challenges that have to be addressed at this level have to do with the currently weak independent organization of people with disabilities. one prerequisite that the crpd stipulates as essential for the social model is that decisions affecting people with disabilities should be taken with their participation. in the case of public decisions, this requires the existence of independent organizations able to act as counterparts to governmental agencies. some of the existing conditions in qatar give us hope that qatar will be able to produce a seamless implementation of the crpd: the political will, evident in a number of administrative, organizational, and economic efforts, is palpable. there exists a healthy social environment that is sensitive toward disability, and interest groups are organized around solid institutions that are respected and heard in the social scene. however, there is the risk of not moving at the right pace, not due to lack of effort or will, but rather founded in the prevalent philosophy regarding disability that considers persons with disability as incapable of making their own decisions and which, due to concerns about their care, prevents their equal participation and inclusion. embracing the social and diversity model of disability is an additional effort that needs to be made to hasten the crpd's implementation in qatar, to benefit persons with disabilities. however, all these efforts do not necessarily guarantee success. the crpd is a written, enforceable law, and accordingly those interpreting the domestic legislative framework have the task of embedding it into the qatari legal and regulatory system in a coherent, technically solid manner. this is the textual factor, which will be analyzed in the next section. understanding the texts (the legal and regulatory framework) the “textual” implies studying the current textual legal and regulatory framework in qatar in order to better understand how to translate into mandatory texts the principles and the provisions of the crpd. this study might need to fill gaps where the laws are mute, and to introduce changes where they are needed. the qatari constitution, article 6, states that "the state shall respect international charters and conventions and shall strive to implement all international agreements, charters and conventions to which it is party." however, in incorporating such international charters and conventions, substantial revisions are often required. the formal incorporation of the crpd into internal law will have a significant impact on the various branches of the legal system and might imply the adoption or modifications of various laws in order to give practical effect to the rights set out in it. 14 see http://www.internationaldisabilityalliance.org/sites/disalliance.epresentaciones.net/files/public/files/upr-7th-session-recommendations-from-ida.doc (last accessed december 7, 2015). the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 1-17 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.1 11 http://www.internationaldisabilityalliance.org/sites/disalliance.e-presentaciones.net/files/public/files/upr-7th-session-recommendations-from-ida.doc http://www.internationaldisabilityalliance.org/sites/disalliance.e-presentaciones.net/files/public/files/upr-7th-session-recommendations-from-ida.doc p. rodríguez del pozo, m. c. barranco avilés, khalid al ali, r. de asís roig it might be tempting for the legislator to draw up and pass a general law establishing that legal and regulatory changes should be made, allowing the different departments and agencies to make ‒ or propose ‒ such particular changes independently. however, a single law may not necessarily succeed, first, because some of the needed reforms will probably require a period of time before they reach maturity and become embedded in common practice, and it will also be necessary that social awareness develop simultaneously. second, because along with some general normative changes, much more scattered, specific areas would need to be addressed, which might require specific mention in the legislation. third, because some reviews are neither technically nor theoretically complicated, while many others are complex and more controversial ‒ for example making mandatory the construction of ramps, or that signage includes braille subtitles, cannot be likened to changing the entire system of representation and guardianship ad litem. a single law may not cover all the necessary elements required to address these variations. particularly complex issues are concerned with the development of technical standards to prevent discrimination on the grounds of disability along with the consideration of cases of multiple or intersectional discrimination. it will also be necessary to articulate a definition of disability under the convention and, of course, to proceed with the implementation of legal remedies and the harmonization of measures taken within the existing laws to ensure widespread acceptance and practical application. naturally, the objectives of the convention and each of its articles may be subject to different interpretations; and there are sometimes not so clear understandings of internal laws and regulations. an additional challenge to any review of internal qatari law is, thus, that any proposed change derived from the crpd must be thoroughly debated on the basis of a range of interpretive arguments and potentially colliding legal hermeneutics. the next section sketches a work plan aimed at better understanding the impact of the crpd on the qatari legal and regulatory system. as in any realistic plan, our proposal is flexible and will need to adapt to, and learn from, what it discovers as it progresses. the impact of the crpd on qatar's legal system: taking the fast track although it is true that each state has the freedom to set up its own internal procedures to transform international law into domestic law, after ratifying an international treaty, state parties have to start a process by which their domestic legislation is reviewed and reformed in order to avoid contravening their international obligations. it is necessary, and timely, to carry out a thorough study of the qatari norms that are impacted by the crpd. this extends to all domestic legislation in qatar, including ‒ the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 1-17 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.1 12 implementing the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities in qatar: from charity to human rights but not limited to ‒ the norms that affect the rights of persons with disabilities, as every single portion of the legal system might be affected by the convention. some efforts have already been made, most particularly in the law no. 2/2004 on the rights of persons with disabilities. however, an in-depth study must encompass the entire legal system in an attempt to highlight the likely reviews and modifications that the texts would need to become fully crpd-compliant, without abandoning qatar’s heritage, most particularly those elements that refer to deeply rooted muslim traditions at the center of national identity. the study should be divided into: 1) analysis of the principles today that shape the legal framework for the treatment of persons with disabilities, and a review as to what extent they harmonize with the principles that animate the crpd; 2) analysis of the impact of the crpd on the broader areas of qatari legislation (civil, commercial, criminal, labor, tax, and procedural law); 3) analysis of the impact of the crpd on specific areas of qatari legislation (e.g., health, healthcare, and biomedical research, freedom and security, employment, social services, accessibility to audiovisual means, travel and transportation); and 4) proposals for ways to reconcile internal law with the mandate of the crpd. this study will rely, by design, on three of the classically described methods of law research: doctrinal, problemand policy-oriented, and reform-oriented. doctrinal research probes what the law is in a particular area and tries to determine the exact mandates of that law. in our case, since the intersections between the law and the rights of people with disabilities as defined by the crpd are scattered throughout the qatari legal system, the doctrinal method would require us to divide and subdivide the legal system by areas, in order to collect and analyze every relevant piece of legislation. doctrinal research also requires the analysis of secondary sources, such as specialized journal articles that contain commentaries on the law, and ‒ when necessary ‒ the jurisprudence of the courts, in order to identify the way the judicial reasoning applies the law to reality. problem and policy research consists of assessing the problems affecting the law, and the policy issues underpinning the law, in its current configuration. researchers should identify the policies underpinning the existing law, and should be able to note how some policies may have to be revised and or others that might have become obsolete in light of the crpd. this would help explain why particular pieces of legislation were enacted in the first place, and would cast a light on the possible legislative reforms required to adapt to the crpd. this kind of research requires input from agencies, institutions, and organizations that deal with protecting, promoting the welfare and education of, and representing the disabled in qatar. reform-oriented research consists of organizing the findings obtained from other methods, and trying to reach a conclusion on whether the law needs to be reformed. in our case, the project should reach tentative conclusions as to whether the current qatari the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 1-17 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.1 13 p. rodríguez del pozo, m. c. barranco avilés, khalid al ali, r. de asís roig legal system requires amendments, repeals, or the enactment of new laws and regulations in order to become fully compliant with the crpd and how these changes might be achieved. as with policy research, input from agencies, institutions, and organizations that deal with protecting, promoting the welfare and education of, and representing the disabled in qatar is very relevant. the study should be organized in four stages: 1) inquiry into disability and the law in qatar; 2) determination of the extent to which the principles and criteria of the current legal system in qatar conform to the legal framework of the rights of people with disabilities as laid out by the crpd; 3) study of the general impact of the crpd on the qatari legal system to determine the areas that need to be modified or reformed; and finally, 4) the design of proposals for the development of the crpd's mandates and/or the possible amendments required to qatari legislation for it to become fully compliant with the crpd. the dissemination of the results will be made stage by stage, in accordance with the objectives of the study and as required by the research design itself. this study will help qatar adopt a proactive and comprehensive legal strategy to eliminate discrimination on any grounds, and against any group. it will also help qatar fulfill its commitment as required by the crpd. beyond this, the study will help remove barriers that prevent full integration of the disabled into mainstream society and which might hinder their personal and professional development. the project will help people with disabilities to become visible in qatar. the study will propose high-impact legal measures to further the protection that qatar provides to people with disabilities. it will have a critical significance to people with disabilities in qatar, and to their families. the project will consolidate qatar’s leadership in the region in matters of compliance with international conventions, human rights, and human development. conclusions human rights have moved, since the 20th century, toward equality, making successful efforts to eliminate all barriers to this end. the process has gained further momentum in the present century, trying, on the one hand, to further generalize the enjoyment of human rights among persons or groups who were not recognized as the bearers of, or who in practice were denied the benefits of, those rights and, on the other hand, trying to grant a specific set of special rights to certain persons so that they might fully enjoy the full spectrum of human rights. the un crpd of 2008 breaks new ground in the promotion of the rights of persons with disabilities, while also transcending that goal by crystallizing the most advanced model regarding the very concept of disability in the context of human rights. such a concept is the social model of disability, where disability is seen as the social failure to accommodate the different degrees of ability of its members. to some extent, the convention adopts the diversity model, which views persons with disabilities as net contributors to the enrichment of human societies. the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 1-17 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.1 14 implementing the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities in qatar: from charity to human rights qatar ratified the crpd in 2008. qatar should be confident that several factors place the country on a solid footing to face the challenges of fully implementing the crpd. qatar's leadership has shown the moral sensitivity and political willingness to further the rights of persons with disabilities in accordance with the convention. this commitment is evidenced by the reforms already implemented to enhance liberties and human rights in general, epitomized by the human rights offices in the ministries of interior and foreign affairs, together with the national human rights committee, created in 2002. more specifically, the ministry of labor and social affairs has a directorate dedicated to the elderly and persons with disabilities, to protect the rights of these vulnerable groups. these are impressive structural efforts, which create an auspicious context for the implementation of the crpd. qatar has also passed some key legislative texts, such as law no. 2/2004 for the protection of people with special needs, which contains ambitious mandates aimed at furthering the rights of persons with disabilities. all these administrative and legislative efforts have been accompanied by generous funding. however, there is room for improvement in these initiatives. these very valuable initiatives still look unsystematic. this has also captured the attention of the international disability alliance in its report on the country in 201015. we believe that all qatari institutions, as well as the private sector, need a clear legal mandate to put the country on the fast track toward the full implementation of the crpd. we find that such a clear mandate should start with a simple yet transformative approach to the very notion of disability. in qatar, today’s concept of disability seems to be centered on the medical or rehabilitative model. given its commitment, qatar will, no doubt, expand its social model of understanding disability and, ideally, introduce in its framework the principle that persons with disability contribute to social diversity, which enriches and creates a more prosperous society at large. in addition, a thorough understanding of the current legal and regulatory domestic framework, or the textual factor, as we have termed it, is necessary. to that end, we first need to study the main bodies of legislation in order to identify, in depth, the impact of the crpd on the main qatari legislation (civil, commercial, criminal, labor, tax, and procedural law). second, a similar analysis should be made of specific areas of qatari legislation that are critical for the persons with disabilities (e.g. health, health care and biomedical research, employment, social services, accessibility to audiovisual means, travel, and transportation). such a study should be shared with, and receive the input of, the main actors in each sector along with the government agencies involved in guaranteeing and furthering the rights of persons with disabilities. in addition, for the results to be operational, it should have the participation of disabled people themselves. 15 see http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/specialrapporteur/qatar_2010.doc (last accessed december 10, 2015). the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 1-17 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.1 15 http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/specialrapporteur/qatar_2010.doc p. rodríguez del pozo, m. c. barranco avilés, khalid al ali, r. de asís roig on this basis, a number of realistic, constructive proposals should be devised exploring ways to reconcile internal law and the mandate of the crpd, without deviating from qatar’s heritage and religious traditions. the value of this study and its ensuing proposals will patently be to enable the evolution of national legislation to meet qatar’s international commitments and further the protection of people with disabilities. it will also become a valuable tool to reaffirm qatar's leadership in the region in matters of human rights and human development. the qatari population at large would benefit from this kind of work since it ultimately could help integrate a group of people ‒ people with disabilities ‒ whose contribution to the country's human capital can be of high value, in a context of an increasingly complex, diverse global society that aspires to become a knowledge-based economy in the posthydrocarbon era. references ansuátegui roig, fj. (2014). “ciudadanía y fronteras de los derechos”. papeles el tiempo de los derechos, 24. bariffi, f. (2014). el regimen jurídico internacional de los derechos humanos de las personas con discapacidad. madrid: cinca. available at http://www.cermi.es/eses/coleccionescermi/convenciononu/lists/coleccion/attachments/12/colecci on%20onu%20no11_onu.pdf. last accessed september 7, 2015. barranco, m.c. (2015). “human rights and vulnerability. the examples of sexism and ageism”, en the age of human rights journal; 5. barranco, mc. (2011). diversidad de situaciones y universalidad de los derechos. madrid: dykinson. cabra, ma, bariffi, f. and palacios, a. (2009). derechos humanos de las personas con discapacidad: la convención internacional de las naciones unidas. madrid: ramón areces. cuenca gómez, p. (2012). los derechos fundamentals de las personas con discapacidad. un análisis a la luz de la convención de la onu. madrid: cuadernos de la cátedra democracia y derechos humanos, universidad de alcalá-defensor del pueblo cuenca gómez, p. (2015). “disability and human rights: a theoretical analysis”, en the age of human rights journal, 4. cuenca, p. (2012). estudios sobre los derechos de las personas sordas. madrid: dykinson. de asís, r. (2007). “derechos humanos y discapacidad. algunas reflexiones derivadas del análisis de la discapacidad desde la teoría de los derechos”. en campoy cervera, i, palacios, a (eds), igualdad, no discriminación y discapacidad. una visión integradora de las realidades española y argentina. madrid: dykinson. the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 1-17 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.1 16 http://www.cermi.es/es-es/coleccionescermi/convenciononu/lists/coleccion/attachments/12/coleccion%20onu%20no11_onu.pdf http://www.cermi.es/es-es/coleccionescermi/convenciononu/lists/coleccion/attachments/12/coleccion%20onu%20no11_onu.pdf http://www.cermi.es/es-es/coleccionescermi/convenciononu/lists/coleccion/attachments/12/coleccion%20onu%20no11_onu.pdf implementing the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities in qatar: from charity to human rights de asís, r. (2010). “las situaciones de dependencia desde un enfoque de derechos humanos”, en ramiro, m.a. y cuenca, p (eds) los derechos humanos. la utopía de los excluidos. madrid: dykinson. de asís, r. (2013). sobre discapacidad y derechos. madrid: dykinson. hanh, h. (1993). the political implications of disability definitions and data. disabil policy stud.;4(2). hughes, b. (2002). disability and the body. barnes c, barton l, oliver m (eds), disability studies today. oxford: polity press. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590220148531 lawson, a. (2007). “the united nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: new era or false dawn?”, en syracuse j int law commerce; 34. mackay, d. (2007). “the united nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities”, en syracuse journal international law commerce; 34. mégret, f. (2008). the disabilities convention: human rights of persons with disabilities or disability rights? hu rights quaterly; 30. morris, j. (1991). pride against prejudice. a personal politics of disability. london: women’s press ltd. oliver, m. (1996), understanding disability: from theory to practice. new york: palgrave macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24269-6 oliver, m., barnes, c. and mercer, g. (2003). disability. cambridge: polity press. palacios, a (2008). el modelo social de discapacidad. madrid: colección cermi. palacios, a. y bariffi, f. (2007). la discapacidad como una cuestión de derechos humanos. una aproximación a la convención internacional sobre los derechos de las personas con discapacidad. madrid: cinca, colección telefónica accessible. peces-barba, g. (2014). historia de los derechos fundamentales. siglo xx. madrid: dykinson. peces-barba, g. (2015). curso de derechos fundamentales. madrid: boe‒universidad carlos iii. quinn, g. and degener, t. (2002), eds. human rights and disability: the current use and future potential of united nations human rights instruments in the context of disability. geneva: office of the united nations commission for human rights, united nations. romañach, j. and palacios, a. (2006). el modelo de la diversidad. madrid: diversitas‒ aies. stein, ma. (2007). disability human rights. calif law rev., 95. the age of human rights journal, 9 (december 2017) pp. 1-17 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n9.1 17 https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590220148531 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24269-6 pablo rodríguez del pozo1f maría del carmen barranco avilés2f khalid al ali3f rafael de asís roig4f from undesired evil to social enrichment: models of disability and human rights isolation and exclusion the medical model the social model and its diversity model variant crpd: the human rights-based approach to disability implementing the crpd in qatar understanding the context understanding the texts (the legal and regulatory framework) the impact of the crpd on qatar's legal system: taking the fast track conclusions references the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 98 feminism and women with disabilities maría laura serra 1 abstract: women with disabilities are doubly discriminated against and socially excluded: through gender and disability. in order to perform an in-depth analysis of their actual situation, it is necessary to understand which models have been able to provide legal and political answers to this issue. hence, the feminist model can be identified, on the basis of which we might elaborate upon its possible ties with the social model of disability. this study shows the correctness of feminist conclusions when dealing with inequality between men and women, but it also proves the inaccurateness of feminism in its approach on women with disabilities. keywords: women with disabilities; feminist movement; disabilities; social model of disability; discrimination. i. preface this scholarly work is aimed at showing the absence of an analysis on women with disabilities within the feminist discourse along with the consequences stemming therefrom. as it is well known, the feminist movement is of a vast, diverse, and multilayered nature. that is why i will refer to two schools of thought, which i consider shall be deemed representative of the movement as a whole as well as closely tied to the human rights discourse: egalitarian feminism and difference-based feminism or simply difference feminism. for that purpose, i will put forward what i consider to be flaws in these feminist strands, and i will attempt to specify the reasons for these shortcomings. i will also try to explain how their outcomes result in discriminatory acts against women with disabilities and in a hindered enjoyment of rights with respect to non-disabled women. accordingly, and through a close examination of how the arguments originated in the feminist grassroots (as well as of the demands which triggered these grassroots' mobilization) giving rise to the feminist theory, both their relevance and their correctness on gender inequality is examined herein. notwithstanding, this is an incomplete analysis to the extent that these arguments do not include women with 1 universidad carlos iii de madrid, spain (lauriserra@gmail.com). this paper was originally published in spanish in derechos y libertades, n º31, june 2014, pp. 251-272. maría laura serra the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 99 disabilities within the group, or better said, insofar as they do not regard them as women. therefore, these arguments shall be subject to a critical study. throughout this paper i will try to elaborate upon this omission, which could be due to a lack of knowledge or a deliberate scheme. along these lines, the said feminist strands analyze the relevant issues both from a human rights outlook and a women's rights and rights of persons with disabilities perspective. they perform a thorough study of discrimination situations suffered by women with disabilities in the legal and social domains from a joint perspective. i.1. feminist thought. claimed rights despite the existence of various schools of thought within the feminist movement, they all share certain elements and objectives. in this connection, and regarding women's rights in the contemporary world -both socially and legally speaking-, these schools of thought coincide to a great extent when censuring male domination. similarly, they agree on the meaning of the term patriarchy or that of the sex-gender system, 2 set forth in the 1970s feminist theory: "patriarchy is not an essence; it is a social organization or a set of consistent practices which create a distinct material and cultural setting to foster its continuity" (puleo, 2000). in this connection, it shall be understood that the aim of the feminist movement is to eradicate this patriarchy and to pursue equality between men and women. however, at different points in time the feminist movement has had different projections, and its claims have stemmed from different political theories and from certain elements which shaped a given group at a given moment in time. in this vein, we 2 as it happens with many other terms, there is no agreement on the use of the notion of patriarchy within the feminist movement. in fact, it is a term which has been severely criticized since it was used by radical feminists such as millet or firestone. in this vein, i assume jónasdóttir's definition, who states that "patriarchy has an adequate abstraction degree as for general theory, [and thus] this term shall not be expected to provide specific details as for how a patriarchal society works (…). however, it provides an adequate prior framework in order to know how to inquire about the given social reality in each case." some feminist theories prefer the `sex-gender system,´ this meaning any sort of gender organization, not necessarily an oppressive or a hierarchical one. a good example is provided by celia amorós, who considers patriarchy to be a synonym of sex-gender system (amorós, 1992, pp. 41-58). in order to further elaborate on this, see puleo (2000). feminism and women with disabilities the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 100 can talk about pre-modern feminism (which comprises the first claims from "controversial feminists"); modern feminism (starting with poulain de la barre's work along with french revolution women's and feminist movements which gave rise to the great social movements of the 19th century), and finally contemporary feminism, by means of which the 60s and 70s neo-feminism along with the most recent trends is examined. 3 the analysis performed in this paper will be based on contemporary feminism, on the basis of egalitarian feminism, both in its liberal and radical strands -which originated in the united states-, and on the basis of difference feminism, which flourished in europe, particularly in france and italy. the reason for this choice is that these two strands are the ones that best encompass the relevant ties between feminism and human rights. it must be clarified that not every theoretical contribution from these strands' scholars is examined herein. in fact, this paper highlights the most significant insights by means of a general assessment of these thoughts, which provides a good background for this work's theses statements. according to beltrán pedreira (2001), the traditional distinction between the public and private spheres is challenged by means of a general feminist outlook. this is because the notion of a private sphere operating outside government's intervention as well as the alleged government's neutrality "simply accounts for a fictional construct which is very far from the traditionally set forth regulation and legal overview of family and reproduction. the said traditional regulatory framework has simply strengthened the patriarchy which was already in place." in this vein, liberal feminism focuses on removing all legal barriers (sánchez muñoz et al. 2001). this school of thought aims at putting in place "gender-blind regulation" 4 (beltrán pedreira, 2001) and as a result, they called for a greater 3 classification performed by de miguel (2000). 4 this term is used by beltrán pedreira. this idea was first put forward in the united states circa 1982, to the end of the passing of a constitutional amendment declaring sexual equality ("equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the united states or by any state on account of sex."). they maría laura serra the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 101 female representation in the legislative and executive bodies. this claim gave rise to another main goal of liberal feminism: the incorporation of women to public life, companies, trade, education or politics. in accordance with this strand, gender inequality is due to an unfair rights and opportunities allocation. liberal feminism is characterized by its definition of an inequality situation and by its advocacy of relevant reforms up until equality between men and women is accomplished (de miguel, 2000). however, the authors do not want this feminist approach to be in connection with a classic and traditional liberalism, 5 since it goes "far beyond many liberal constructions in its approach and objectives" (sánchez muñoz et al. 2001). radical feminism does not even examine the public-private distinction; it asserts that inequality is present in both spheres. this school of thought took care of women subordination situations, comprising oppression in marriage along with sexual oppression by means of prostitution, pornography, pro-life regulation, lack of property rights and sexual violence. every group of women stemming therefrom sought social awareness, and to that end they protested and started a struggle for a change in sexual domination structures (beltrán pedreira, 2001). generally speaking, radical feminism stressed the importance of the psychological dimension of oppression 6 (young, 2000): "it asserts that formal equality schemes are not enough in order to put an end to patriarchal domination, the origins of which can be traced back to the sexgender system. on the basis of this strand, it can also be asserted that equality shall only be achieved by dismantling the foundations of this sex-gender system" (barranco avilés, 2013). in this connection, silvina álvarez states that "from this perspective, feminist analysis becomes driven by the notion of patriarchy, understood as the male sought neutrality in the legislation, without taking into account gender, as well as attaining a greater female presence within the executive and legislative bodies (beltrán pedreira, 2001, p. 94). 5 barranco explains that the abstract right holder construct performed by liberalism "in the collective imagination matches a middle-class, heterosexual, white, economically, physically and socially independent white man." see barranco avilés (2011). 6 young, when explaining the concept of oppression, breaks it into five categories: exploitation; marginalization; powerlessness; cultural imperialism and violence. at the same time she highlights that oppression is a group condition, and in that regard she points out that oppression entails great injustices suffered by certain groups due to certain unaware people's reactions, who despite their good intentions, act driven by cultural stereotypes. in order to further elaborate on this subject, see: young (2000, p.71). feminism and women with disabilities the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 102 domination system which unavoidably entails women subordination" (álvarez, 2001). as opposed to egalitarian feminism approaches, difference feminism is a selfproclaimed advocate of sexual differences. this strand defines itself as a group of women which "highlight typically feminine features, roles and attitudes" (de las heras, 2009). hence, "it establishes a women liberation agenda towards a true female identity, leaving aside any reference to males" (cavana, 2000). gilligan 7 showed through a comparative study of men and womenthat from a very young age, males and females give different responses when faced with the same problems. in this connection, this authoress explains that there are two different ethics on the part of women and men: a female behavior, where responsibility and interdependence are strongly expressed, with a tendency towards more relational behaviors and a lack of jealousy. she also pointed out that the male moral conduct is grounded on the notion of rights, the entitlement of which shall be construed in relation to "a hypothetical impartial justice, which is also distributive and equitable." along these lines, the authoress outlines a feminine ethic of care, rooted in the absence of violence and in the willingness to help others 8 (álvarez, 2001). in a nutshell, these feminist strands' aims can be differentiated from each other by the role they assign women within society. on the one hand, there are some schools of thought fostering the "masculinization" of women in order to integrate women in socio-political structures created by males in accordance with their features and specific needs (egalitarian feminism). on the other hand, difference feminism advocates for a philosophical construct rooted in a cultural or group identity. 7 carol gilligan is an american feminist, philosopher and psychologist, whose studies took place after nancy chodrow´s (feminist, sociologist and psychoanalyst). gilligan reinterpreted freud's oedipus process, and explains that males and females reach their gender identity in distinct manners, and that the way in which men and women relate to their mothers is clearly different. similarly, chodrow asserts that there is a different identity development between men and women, which leads to large differences when entering into personal relations. "women's self-perception tends to be as people tied to others by some sort of continuity linkage, by sympathy, closeness and affection. contrarily, males tend to be distant, aggressive and selfish in their personal relations." 8 in this connection, gilligan elaborates on what she calls an "ethic of care regarding affection, sensitivity and altruism, as opposed to men's ethics based on aggressiveness, competition and selfishness." maría laura serra the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 103 the feminist movement, in order to find a place for women within society, takes as a starting point the existence of a true male domination enforced through a patriarchal system. however, it does so within a given cultural context, which results in the impossibility of including women with disabilities within those theoretical grounds. as barranco avilés (2013) declares, "feminist movements have homogenized women's image and have focused on a certain kind of woman, preferably western women." along these lines, palacios explains that "in broad terms, feminism has adopted a dominant woman pattern, which leaves women with disabilities aside. thus, women with disability have been included in sub-groups designed for excluded women." 9 ii. women with disabilities within feminism from this paper's standpoint, it is relevant to understand why women with disabilities were excluded from the feminist movement. in this section i will try to show how feminist thinking, which has been critical with the social structure in place, takes for granted the irrelevance and invisibility of women with disabilities in this social structure, aiming for the acknowledgment of a series of rights using a methodology (a scheme) thought for and adapted to the said rights. ii.1. invisibility invisibility can be considered as one of the main causes giving rise to the lack of analysis on women with disabilities. from this outlook, it is highlighted that "gender and disability have been regarded as independent and isolated elements by the current women and disability movements, both of which have been very far away from each other" (alvarez ramirez, 2012). i only intend to comprise feminist thought with 9 this idea was taken from a. palacios, in conferencia internacional 2008-2013: cinco años de vigencia de la convención internacional sobre los derechos de las personas con discapacidad. comité español de representantes de personas con discapacidad (cermi) and instituto de derechos humanos bartolomé de las casas, universidad carlos iii de madrid, madrid, may 2013. feminism and women with disabilities the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 104 respect to women with disability, leaving aside the thorough and in-depth analysis performed by the social model 10 on disability and its connection with women. the fact that women with disabilities are invisible to feminism and its strands is due to different social and cultural factors, which historically have awarded women with disability a vulnerable role within society. this perception of women with disabilities as dispensable and dependent on others is conducive to an imprisonment, a reductionism concerning their position as legal subjects which at the same time leads to oblivion and invisibility. the existing relationship between vulnerability and invisibility further increases the impact of stereotypes and assigned roles. within our societies, there is at least a double discrimination and social exclusion for women, on account of their gender and due to their disability, and this places them under one or more (as the case may be) particularly vulnerable social groups. in the words of barranco "the vulnerable nature of human beings is not dependent, or at least not totally, on their personal features. it is society's development what can make people become vulnerable" (barranco avilés, 2011). in this vein, sheldon illuminates much of our subject matter when she asserts that women with disability are portrayed within society as needy, dependent and passive, all of them typically feminine features, whilst they are construed as incapable of assuming feminine roles (sheldon, 2004). at the same time, barranco points out that when this dependence becomes "official," 11 it leaves room for arbitrary domination, and that is when rights become vulnerable. 10 "there are two main premises as for the social model. in the first place, it is alleged that the causes leading to disabilities are neither religious nor scientific, but at least predominantly social. pursuant to this model's advocates, disabilities are not due to individual constraints, but the actual limitations of society when it comes to providing adequate services and duly ensuring that disabled people's needs are taken into account as for social organization. regarding the second premise -which refers to the utility for the communitypersons with disabilities are construed as people who have a lot to contribute to society, or at least that their contribution would be as useful as that from the non-disabled. moreover, assuming as a starting point that every human life is equal in terms of dignity, from the social model it is claimed that the contributions to society by persons with disabilities are closely tied to inclusion and difference acceptance" (a. palacios, 2008). in order to further elaborate on this, see this authoress' work. 11 this means that for certain subjects (for instance, the case under examination here: a disabled woman) legislation limits the person with disabilities' legal capacity and thus his or her autonomy as for decisionmaking. see barranco avilés (2001). maría laura serra the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 105 sheldon (2004) accounts for a postulate the basis of which is that women with disability have not been caught by feminist expectations and objectives. in her view, non-disabled feminists are wrong when they are oblivious to the fact that women with disabilities can greatly contribute to feminist thinking, and goes as far as to consider that this movement supports points of view which are prejudicial for women with disability. according to sheldon, the feminist movement frequently declares that solely examining personal experiences shall suffice, experiences such as being "privileged" women, white, non-disabled, and heterosexual, while "marginalized women are overlooked" (barranco avilés, 2001). ii.2. claimed rights in connection with what was stated in the previous section's last paragraph, there is a second cause leading to the absence of women with disability in the various feminist strands, and it has to do with the objectives (claimed rights) sought by each of these schools of thought. as it is well known, the main objective pursued by the feminist movement is the empowerment of women and gender equality. to that end, feminism seeks to break with the existing inequality between men and women carefully crafted and implemented for generations by the patriarchal society itself. for the purpose of removing these barriers, each and every feminist strand focused on several goals stemming from their respective ideologies. according to these schools of thought, these goals were meant to putting an end to that sexist fragmentation. a careful examination of the particular demands and qualms of the contemporary feminist movement points to a twofold conclusion. on the one hand, the obstacles encountered by non-disabled women are, to a greater extent, similar to those faced by women with disabilities. however, a close study of the said objectives shows an absolute lack of focus on disability, and women with disability are thus forgotten by this discourse. considering this premise, palacios' words become increasingly relevant when she asserts that "the largest obstacles faced by women with disability when trying feminism and women with disabilities the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 106 to exercise their legal capacity 12 are related to communication barriers (non-accessibility within the communication process when trying to shape their wishes, needs, and preferences) and, above all, attitudinal barriers, which in some cases include legal barriers driven by preconceptions and stereotypes about women with disabilities; court rulings resulting from legal interpretations based upon biases; absence of trained staff, and lack of support as well as of a gender approach when it comes to the exercise of legal capacity, among many others" (palacios, 2009). a crucial aspect within feminist movement objectives, as well as within disabled women's aims, is related to the exercise of certain individual rights, namely the right to sexuality, reproductive and abortion rights, along with maternity rights. below is a brief analysis of these rights, which fall within a set of issues the focal point of which is domination over women. as kathleen barry has pointed out, "domination over women is politically addressed to specifically feminine features, namely sexuality and reproduction, which are socially and politically constructed as inferior. as women are politically, legally and economically discriminated against, this condition stems from a previous exploitation condition, which takes place in sexuality and reproduction by means of women's bodies" (barry, 2005, 1998). ii.2.a) sexuality sexuality, both as an objective and a right claimed by women, was ignored by liberal feminism. meanwhile, radical and difference feminism dealt with it, yet not in the same manner. the first refers to women sexualization as a form of oppression deeply rooted in the patriarchal system. this strand of feminism asserts that prostitution and pornography account for forms of oppression, caused by patriarchal domination. barry refers to a "colonized territory" when she describes a woman's body and the 12 asís explains that legal capacity "shall be understood as a result of [legal] personality and leads to acknowledging the possibility of being entitled to rights and subject to obligations. de asís roig, 2012. in addition, bariffi points out that "the essence of the concept and the rationale behind human rights entails considering that every person shall be awarded certain rights with no constraints nor discrimination of any kind." in this connection, see the work by f. bariffi, 2009. maría laura serra the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 107 oppression to which it is subjected. this same authoress explains that men, since they are in need of sexual experiences, look for women and frequently violently use them as a mere item. barry compares men and women and concludes that men can sometimes be used for sex, but "in the light of sexualization, male bodies are not sexualized bodies." by means of this last statement, the authoress addresses the social construct made about sex. this construct defines sex as something inherently feminine and limited to a female body, which is reified. she clarifies that "prostitution is the essence of women's sexualization, because in its context, sexualized bodies in societies -every woman's body is indeed sexualized-, only need to be present and available to act on them to the end of having sex: particularly, the client's sexual pleasure or fantasy." barry develops this idea and clearly differentiates between male and female sexuality. she asserts that men's sexuality has been construed "as a must, as a necessity," whilst women's has been traditionally regarded as a sort of "social identity," thus turning women into something or someone totally sexualized. women's image becomes completely blurred and women are subsequently assigned a role after their reification has been performed. in barry's (2005) words, this power exercised over women is "institutionalized" in the form of prostitution, pornography and marriage. within difference feminism, only a few cultural feminists tackled this subject. susan brownmiller, germaine greer, andrea dworkin, and mary daly, believe that male sexuality is aggressive and potentially lethal, as opposed to female's, which focuses on personal relations. they also think that women are morally superior to men, that feminine oppression stems from the removal of women's essence, and for that reason it is crucial to highlight the existing differences between both sexes as well as to become lesbian, insofar as "heterosexuality shall be censured due to its closeness to the masculine world" (osborne, 2005). these two social movements, which aimed -and still aimat representing women's interests, have placed women with disabilities and their relation to sexuality on an outer layer, while these women have been socially disadvantaged with respect to any other woman. the truth is that women with disability are considered, exclusively feminism and women with disabilities the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 108 because of their disabilities, as (something or someone) asexual. this statement, deeply rooted in the collective imagination, derives from an existing stereotype, the arguments of which are clearly discriminatory, since they are grounded on the actual disability. certain consequences are derived as for the situation of women with disability from this reflection and the outcomes of the said bias. at the same time, this reflection leads to the lack of theoretical support of the feminist movement itself. according to palacios (2012), "disability conditions are often negatively considered, in order to justify the impossibility of exercising [certain] rights. nowadays, women with disability are discriminated against on the basis of disability, as their sexuality is underrated, as well as their right to exercise it and thus also their very personality is underrated. again, the authoress points out that "barriers encountered by women with disabilities when they attempt to exercise their rights result from the design of a society exclusively thought of for a standard person (usually a non-disabled man)" (palacios, 2012). the aim here is, from human rights, disability and social model's perspective, designing society for all: for every man and woman. 13 notwithstanding, this deeply rooted understanding of society is due to stereotypes and leads to diverse ways of abusing women. simply acknowledging them as dependent persons or the family itself 14 creates an overprotection mechanism that brings along the "infantilization" of women with disability, who are dressed, undressed, and taken care of as if they were children. since women become used to this practice and since they do not know the implications of making decisions about their own bodies (we shall recall that their autonomy is removed), it gets to the point of being unable to tell the difference between a situation in which a given woman is being touched as a result of a medical examination or a situation of abuse (villaverde, 2010). this 13 for an in-depth analysis of universal accessibility and reasonable accommodation, see the work by de asis & palacios (2007). 14 it shall be clarified that when i refer to family or relatives i also refer to (or maybe i just refer to) people with no blood ties, but who are part of a mutual assistance scheme, aimed at providing care. this may comprise friends, neighbors or teachers who could have developed some emotional and support bonds with the person in question over time. maría laura serra the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 109 inability to tell the difference results from the creation of a social environment. it is the answer to what society resolves about them: we are talking about people who cannot or must not decide over their own bodies and sexual desires and who are actually treated as asexual people or just as items which can be used for sexual purposes. 2.2.b) control over their bodies 15 sterilization is a medical procedure by which any person is deprived of the power of reproducing. a forced sterilization takes place when this procedure is performed on a person without his or her consent. forced sterilizations are performed on people without their consent, and they are normally driven by eugenic, punitive or forced contraception purposes. concerning women with disability, sterilizations are performed to the end of preventing them from getting pregnant (forced contraception), since they are considered to be legally and socially incapable of parenting. this practice may be set forth by a state's law, 16 i.e., it may be imposed on women with disabilities unknowingly, or it may be requested before a court by the woman's representative, to the extent that the latter shall give its consent replacing the woman's freedom and autonomy with regards to the decision of her own body. in this connection, palacios (2012) puts forward that "women with disability are constrained by legal barriers in those countries in which it is legal to replace the woman's decision-making abilities involving her right to form a family." hence, barranco points out that "regulations are sometimes aimed at safeguarding the rights of people who are considered to be vulnerable. many policies grounded on the rights to be granted in line with the specification processes have been drafted accordingly. notwithstanding, a safeguarding policy which does not take into account the freedom of action of the persons addressed 15 the decision over the own body comprises both reproduction and abortion. in this chapter only reproduction will be dealt with, excluding abortion from this study, since the issues to be examined herein are previous to it. 16 in this regard, the international committee on the rights of persons with disabilities has played a role since in september 2011 urged spain to eliminate this practice because it was contrary to the crpd. see committee on the rights of persons with disabilities, on the sixth session, 19 september 2011, crpd/c/esp/co/1, review of the reports turned in by the states parties in virtue of article 35 of the convention, final remarks of the international committee on the rights of persons with disabilities, par. 37 and 38. text available in: http://www.convenciondiscapacidad.es/noticias_new.html. see also villaverde (2012). http://www.convenciondiscapacidad.es/noticias_new.html feminism and women with disabilities the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 110 thereby shall not be considered respectful or far less grounded on human rights" (barranco avilés, 2001). it is mostly women with intellectual and mental disabilities who are subject to this practice, and it is often their family members -who act as their representatives and thus replace their legal will 17 -, who request judicial authorization to perform this practice. in this vein, palacios (2012) asserts that "there is a common axis which allows for the constant violation of disabled women's rights, arising from the consideration of women with disabilities as weak, asexual and childish -subject to protection-, which at the same time leads to the replacement of their will, or even in previous measures, which prevent women themselves from finding out about their actual will (since exercising one's will is a learning process to which many women with disability have no access).” the problem here is that the family does not get involved in the woman's willingness to have sexual relations or in the right time for her to have them. contrarily, what is thoroughly assessed, and thus curtailed, is the right to be a mother. from this perspective, villaverde states that there are "mainstream preconceptions about sexuality of girls and women with intellectual disability, on the basis of which forced sterilizations and abortions are grounded. these practices are enshrined in healthcare protocols regarding sexuality and reproduction, which were drafted with a total disregard for the applicable human rights law. 18 furthermore, the drafters of these protocols were completely unaware of these women's problems and they did not listen 17 quinn sets forth that "there is nothing inherently wrong in making decisions by replacement, inasmuch as this substituting decision-making process reflects my own will as well as my preferences (…). instead of reproducing the person's will and preferences, there is always a conscious ignorance of his or her will and preferences, even when those are totally despicable" (quinn g., 2012 p. 42). bariffi explains that "the support system is featured by placing the final decision in the disabled person, regardless of the necessity of a third party's intervention to validate the decision in question. this third party has to give advice, contention to help for the person with disabilities." in order to further elaborate on this subject, see: bariffi f. (2009). 18 forced sterilization is considered as a crime against humanity as well as a serious criminal offense. in this connection, one of its main features is that there is no need to ground the decision on a medical treatment, since regarding women with disabilities as the dominant approach is the medical model, it is often said that it is for the woman's best interest, thus allowing to perform the medical treatment without having it framed within a criminal offense. for an in-depth analysis, see: palacios, (2008). maría laura serra the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 111 to women with intellectual disability who are subject to the said violations. all of this takes place at the guardian or parent's request, who is ‘duly representing his children’ and allegedly acts ‘with the best of intentions.’ these are simply paternalistic expressions which put social awareness at rest whilst violating human rights awarded to the most vulnerable people in society (articles 1, 3, 12, 13, 23, and 25 of the un convention on the rights of persons with disabilities)" (villaverde, 2012). the foregoing is framed within gender inequality in the context of a patriarchal system. in other words, it is the man who decides whether women are able to conceive children (men with disability are not subject to vasectomy procedures) and who, by means of a standardization scheme, drafts a legal mechanism to the end of curtailing this right. this hypothesis is the framework for every feminist objective; it is the focal point for every claim arising from this movement. however, this situation cannot be found in its discourse. i am working with the simplifying proposal on which the absence of women with disability in the discourse is grounded, because the feminist movement is not identified by this proposal. moreover, i consider sheldon (2004) to be right when she asserts that it may be inevitable for non-disabled feminists to share all of society's negative attitudes towards people with disability as long as we live in a disabled society. the feminist movement's keystone is no other than reproductive freedom. in this connection, davis (2004) highlights that in the early 20th century feminism's main demands revolved around birth control; these claims were issued by white, nondisabled, middle-class women. as for disadvantaged women, the movement adopted a eugenic approach towards the attainment of demographic control, whilst it disregarded the individual right to birth control. hence, throughout this century, forced sterilization of women with disability became mainstream, and these abuses still take place today (hubbard, 1990). therefore, it must be concluded that reproductive freedom shall not be considered solely as the right to not being a mother, but also as the right to maternity. feminism and women with disabilities the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 112 some situations of discrimination faced by women with disability can be inferred from this holistic outlook performed on the objectives pursued by mainstream feminism. as young (2000) rightly points out, feminist general values also include social conditions which define injustice: oppression, the institutional barriers curtailing an unhindered development of personality, and the domination which prevents selfdetermination from taking place. ii.3. methodology as we saw before, the absence of women with disability in the feminist movement discourse can be due to three different reasons. in the first place, it could be due to the "invisibility" of women with disabilities. secondly, it may stem from a total unawareness of the fact that both feminism and disability movements have in common almost every objective. in the third place, the said absence may be willful, and could be triggered by a methodological reason put in place to achieve the aims pursued. in fact, we are confronted by schemes, which are based on a series of carefully planned actions over time by the movement itself. in the previous section we concluded that women with disabilities were not part of the objectives foreseen by the various feminist movement strands. through this paragraph we try to find out the reasons why we reached the abovementioned conclusion. to this end, we analyze in detail this work's hypothesis, which can be summarized in a homogenization of the feminist movement, which leads to the absence of women with disability in the feminist discourse. "gender-based discrimination has very distinct features. in addition to the fact that women are not a minority (they actually account for more than half of the population), it is frequent to see how discrimination against women takes on a protection connotation (this sort of discrimination allegedly has a benign nature)” (barrère unzueta, 2003). notwithstanding, in the legal domain, discrimination can only be defined as a difference in treatment, yet not in status, since defining the maría laura serra the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 113 latter necessarily entails talking about subordination or, in the words of añón roig, "systemic discrimination." in other words, it is strange to the legal notion of discrimination, and "accounts for a sort of inequality stemming from the impact of social values, which at the same time have arisen from the false universalism embodied in the drafting processes of the recognition of rights." reference is made to those situations of social inequality, subordination or domination, in which it is impossible to individualize a given conduct nor a discriminatory treatment (in legal terms), can be identified (añón roig, 2010). in light of all the foregoing, the discursive analysis of each of the strands becomes relevant. along these lines, asís roig (2013) talks about a supporting discourse which puts forward two kinds of arguments, the so-called "situation argument" and the "identity argument." from this perspective, asís asserts that pursuant to difference feminism, the claimed rights are grounded on "distinct feminine features which identify women, and not necessarily on the discrimination situation suffered by them." contrarily, in accordance with egalitarian feminism (in its two schools of thought: liberal and radical egalitarian feminism), "the justification of rights comes from the discrimination situation faced by women, and not from the possible existence of distinct feminine features" (de asis roig, 2013). barrere unzueta (2003) points out that the applicable law shall be subject to an in-depth examination. in addition, she demands a "shift in the legal notion of discrimination (based on differences in treatment) towards the concept of subordination (based on differences in status)." furthermore, feminism censures specific antidiscrimination legislation, on the basis of its severe deficiencies regarding the very understanding of discrimination while pointing out the existing structural and social inequalities (añón roig, 2010). discrimination against people with disability results from a social construct and a power relation, just as gender-based discrimination. "persons with disabilities see how their autonomy is curtailed, leaving them as mere passive right holders instead of legal feminism and women with disabilities the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 114 subjects" (cuenca gómez, 2012). "disability is an evolving concept, (…) as well as a cultural notion, which experiences changes between cultures and societies" (palacios, 2008). therefore, its interaction with the environment is essential (serra, 2013), i.e., disability only arises when social factors account for a true obstacle for people. the language used by the reports of the committee on the elimination of discrimination against women can also be discriminatory 19 when dealing with genderbased discrimination from a protective outlook. on the basis of this parameter, the committee confers women with disability the same status as that awarded to "elderly women," and it uses a stereotyped language to address the first: the committee declares that women "suffer" disabilities and are in need of "special attention." language is an ideological instrument of power and in a context in which women with disabilities are discriminated against on account of their gender and because of their disabilities, such leniency in the language use shall not be permitted, since language "does not operate in the vacuum, but it is used in a given context" (halliday, 1982). therefore it is dangerous to continue using a stereotyped language, the content of which is driven towards subordination in the surrounding reality. vulnerable groups put in place, by means of their movements and grass roots, certain schemes and tools aimed at putting an end to the existing structural discrimination 20 in order to be able to develop their personality on an equal footing with every other member of society. regardless if we are within a legal culture (the analysis performed herein is meant to be purely scientific), when we find ourselves in the equality and non-discrimination arena we notice several differences between feminism and the disability movement concerning the tools to be used. 19 report from the committee on the elimination of discrimination against women 37th session (01/15 to 02/02 2007) 38th session (05/14 to 07/01 2007) 39th session (07/23 to 08/10 2007) general assembly 62nd official document supplement no. 38 (a/62/38). 20 añón roig, following vandenhole, explains that structural discrimination shall be understood as a "sort of inequality stemming from the influence of dominant social values stemming from the able, heterosexual male model, while it shows a prevalent race, religion and language status" (añón roig, 2010, pp. 127-162). maría laura serra the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 115 i consider these differences to be due to both movements' starting points. the perspective adopted in order to put an end to the said barriers differs from one discourse to the other. the feminist movement, understood as a group discriminated against in its various strands, is based on homogenizing a given standard. egalitarian feminism's demands revolve around the aim of total equality between men and women, in the literal sense of the term, on the basis of an assimilation ideal, 21 as well as "making sexual equality dependent on the removal of every gender-based barrier" (mosquera andrade, 2006). it might seem that being on an equal footing with respect to the enjoyment and awarding of rights means being equal in the remaining human and social features, but the difference is a merely descriptive term, and as ferrajoli points out, that difference is part of equality. pursuant to young (2000), difference feminism "has regarded self-organization and the assertion of a cultural and group identity as a better strategy in order to be empowered and participate in the dominant institutions." in this connection, this strand of feminism defines women unlike egalitarian feminism. its standard is no longer a white western male, but the "perfect" woman, characterized by certain features. the philosopher michael sandel (2007), when referring to genetic engineering, puts forward a set of ideas which i consider to perfectly fit this work. he points that "it is somewhat tempting to think that designing (…) ourselves in order to succeed in a competitive society accounts for our freedom. however, changing our nature to fit in the world -and not the other way aroundis the greatest loss of freedom possible. it keeps us from critically reflecting on the world and appeases our impulse towards social and political improvement." this is exactly the subject of the new paradigm brought by the social model of disability, when it establishes that "the causes of disability are not 21 this ideal of justice is analyzed by i.m. young (2000). feminism and women with disabilities the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 116 individual but social, and particularly due to the way society is shaped" (palacios, 2008). in this connection, the disability movement does not want to equal the disabled to the non-disabled concerning physical, mental, psychic, mental or sensory abilities. the aim is making differences part of human reality (which is the same thing many feminist movements do, yet not addressing disability). the goal is not to assess people's value on the basis of their social utility (palacios, 2008). their struggle is performed under a perspective which clearly differs from that of egalitarian feminism: they do not want to be equal (literally speaking) to non-disabled people. they claim to be different, highlighting that because of this they shall not be deprived from tools to develop their autonomy nor this should lead to discriminatory actions. iii. closing remarks women with disabilities have not yet solved their human rights generalization process (de asís roig, 2010). young points out that "an understanding of the legal system which challenges institutionalized domination and oppression shall provide a vision of a heterogeneous public sphere acknowledging and asserting group differences." similarly, young states that "cultural imperialism consists in making a group invisible while labeling and stereotyping it. (…) thus, those who subject to cultural imperialism become invisible subjects, they lose their condition of people with own perspectives and experiences, with specific group interests. however, at the same time, they are labeled and petrified in a negative mirror existence, deviated from the dominant standard. dominant groups do not need any self-awareness; they play an unlabeled, neutral and apparently universal role" (young, 2000). the situation faced by women with disability is due to a series of factors. this work accounts for my attempt to show how a good part of feminist thinking has greatly contributed to this situation. notwithstanding, this same way of thinking has led to the recognition of women's rights by using arguments and perspectives which are also maría laura serra the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 117 applicable to women with disability. that is why it is necessary for these discourses to get intermingled as well as to insert the disability social model's approach in the feminist movement. references alvarez ramirez g., (2012), igualdad y no discriminación. in pelaez a. and villarino p. (coord.), manual la transversalidad de género en las políticas públicas de discapacidad, madrid, cinca. álvarez s. (2001), feminismo liberal, radical y socialista (section 3). in e. beltrán and v. maquieira (eds.), feminismos. debates teóricos contemporáneos, madrid, alianza editorial. amorós c. (1992), notas para una teoría nominalista del patriarcado. in asparkía, universitat jaume i, castellón, p. 41-58. añón roig m.j. (2010), autonomía de las mujeres: una utopía paradójica. in ramiro m.a. and cuenca p. (eds.), los derechos humanos: la utopía de los excluidos, madrid, dykinson. bariffi f. (2009), capacidad jurídica y capacidad de obrar de las personas con discapacidad a la luz de la convención de la onu. in cayo perez bueno l. and sastre a. (eds.), hacia un derecho de la discapacidad. estudios en homenaje al profesor rafael de lorenzo, pamplona, aranzadi. barranco avilés m.c. (2011), diversidad de situaciones y universalidad de derechos, madrid, dykinson. barranco avilés m.c. (2013), feminismos en el siglo xx. in peces-barba martinez g., fernandez garcia e., de asís roig r., ansuátegui roig f.j., fernandez liesa c.r., historia de los derechos fundamentales. siglo xx, volume ii, madrid, dykinson. barrère unzueta m. (2003), problemas del derecho antidiscriminatorio: subordinación versus discriminación y acción positiva versus igualdad de oportunidades, cuadernos electrónicos de filosofía del derecho [online] issn-e 1138-9877, [accessed: march, 2014] barry k. (2005), teoría del feminismo radical: política de la explotación sexual, translation by r. castillo. in amorós c. and de miguel a. (eds.), teoría feminista: de la ilustración a la globalización. del feminismo liberal a la posmodernidad. vol. 2., madrid, minerva ediciones. beltrán pedreira e., (2001) feminismo liberal, radical y socialista (section 2). in e. beltrán and v. maquieira (eds.), feminismos. debates teóricos contemporáneos, madrid, alianza editorial. cavana m.l. (2000), diferencia. . in amorós c. (dir.), diez palabras clave sobre la mujer, navarra, editorial verbo divino. feminism and women with disabilities the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 118 cuenca gómez p. (2012), los derechos fundamentales de las personas con discapacidad. un análisis a la luz de la convención de la onu, cuadernos de la cátedra de democracia y derechos humanos no.7, madrid, universidad de alcalá, defensor del pueblo. davis a.y. (2004), mujeres, raza y clase, translated by a.v. matos, madrid, akal ediciones. de asís roig r. (2010), las situaciones de dependencia desde un enfoque de derechos humanos. in ramiro m.a. and cuenca p. (eds.), los derechos humanos: la utopía de los excluidos, madrid, dykinson. de asís roig r. (2012), sobre la capacidad. in palacios a. and bariffi f. (coords.), capacidad jurídica, discapacidad y derechos humanos. una revisión desde la convención internacional sobre los derechos de las personas con discapacidad, buenos aires, ediar. de asís roig r. (2013), sobre discapacidad y derechos, madrid, dykinson. de asis roig r. and palacios a. (2007), derechos humanos y situaciones de dependencia, madrid, dykinson. de las heras s. (2009), una aproximación a las teorías feministas, revista universitas [online] p. 45-82, available from: http://e-revistas.uc3m.es/index.php/univ/index [accessed: march, 2014] de miguel a. (2000), feminismos. in amorós c. (dir.), diez palabras clave sobre la mujer, navarra, editorial verbo divino. halliday m.a.k. (1982), el lenguaje como semiótica social: la interpretación social del lenguaje y del significado, estados unidos de norteamérica, fondo de cultura económica. hubbard r. (1990), the politics of women’s biology, new brunswick, rutgers university press. mosquera andrade v. (2006), mujeres congresistas. estereotipos sexistas e identidades estratégicas, ecuador 2003-2005, flacso, ecuador. osborne r. (2005), debates en torno al feminismo cultural. in amorós c. and de miguel a. (eds.), teoría feminista: de la ilustración a la globalización. del feminismo liberal a la postmodernidad. vol. 2, madrid, minerva ediciones. palacios a. (2012), género, discapacidad y acceso a la justicia. in rosales p.o (dir.), discapacidad, justicia y estado. acceso a la justicia de personas con discapacidad, buenos aires, ministerio de justicia y derechos humanos de la nación. palacios, a (2008), el modelo social de la discapacidad: orígenes, caracterización y plasmación en la convención internacional sobre los derechos de las personas con discapacidad, madrid, cinca. puleo a.h (2000), patriarcado. in amorós c. (dir.), diez palabras clave sobre la mujer, navarra, editorial verbo divino. quinn g. (2012), personalidad y capacidad jurídica: perspectivas sobre el cambio de paradigma del artículo 12 de la cdpd, translated by m.l. serra. in palacios a. and bariffi f. (coords.), capacidad jurídica, discapacidad y derechos humanos. una revisión desde la convención internacional sobre los derechos de las personas con discapacidad, buenos aires, ediar. http://e-revistas.uc3m.es/index.php/univ/index maría laura serra the age of human rights journal, 5 (december 2015) pp. 98-119 issn: 2340-9592 119 sánchez muñoz c., beltrán pedreira e., álvarez s. (2001), feminismo liberal, radical y socialista. in e. beltrán and v. maquieira (eds.), feminismos. debates teóricos contemporáneos, madrid, alianza editorial. sandel m.j. (2007) contra la perfección. la ética en la era de la ingeniería genética, translated by r. vilà vernis, barcelona, marbot ediciones. serra m.l. (2013), mujer y discapacidad. in bariffi f. (coord.), práctica clínica y litigación estratégica en discapacidad y derechos humanos. algunas experiencias con la realidad, madrid, dykinson. sheldon a. (2004), women and disability. in swan j., french s., barnes c and thomas c. (eds.), disabling barriers-enabling environments, london, sage publications. villaverde m.s. (2010), “capitulo capacidad jurídica” in ciclo documental audiovisual diversidades, [online] http://ciclodiversidades.blogspot.com.ar/p/videos.html [accessed: february, 2014] young, i.m. (2000) la justicia y la política de la diferencia, translation to spanish by s. álvarez, madrid: ediciones cátedra. http://ciclodiversidades.blogspot.com.ar/p/videos.html social rights in the face of the crisis. reflections on the spanish case fernando puzzo1 abstract: spain and many european countries are going through a critical stage that endangers the achievements of civilization and protection of social rights which are the standard of the constitutionalism of the social-democratic systems after the second world war. the emergence of the economic and financial crisis and its impact on member states, especially in regard to the realization of the rights and, in particular, the social ones, impose a critical reflection since on the european scene there is not a shared concept. in the spanish social and democratic rule of law, many of the social rights are placed in chapter iii of title i as guiding principles of social and economic policy. the analysis of this regulatory body of the constitution is problematic insofar as it raises the problem of redirecting the content of such rules to legal structures in order to ensure guarantee levels which approximate them to fundamental rights within the framework of a european model of social democracy. the problem of the welfare state (in spain and other european countries) affects the quality of representative democracy. keywords: social rights; welfare state; financial crisis; crisis of contemporary constitutionalism; democracy. summary: i. introduction; ii. the welfare state as the basis of the guiding principles of social and economic policy; iii. social rights as fundamental rights; iv. the content and the legal effectiveness of the rights included in chapter iii of title i of the constitution; v. concluding reflections. i. introduction with the affirmation of the democratic principle, the european constitutional doctrine of the second post-war era, accepting the full legislative nature of constitutions, has highlighted a new state model –social and democratic rule of lawbased on universal suffrage and on the participation of citizens in the formation of the will of the state and, moreover, on the constitutional guarantee of the effectiveness of fundamental rights. beside the original principle of formal equality, the social principle of substantial equality, the consolidation of the tasks of the state and the constitutional provision of new and more extensive catalogs of rights (political, civil, economic, and social) are stated. 1 professor of constitutional law, university of calabria, italy (fernando.puzzo@unical.it). the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 108-126 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2932 108 fernando puzzo although with different formulas for intensity and latitude for the recognition and for the protection of specific legal situations, it can be said that in the european constitutionalism of the second postwar era a close relationship between advanced conception of democracy, form of state and fundamental rights has been positivized. very differently from how it was sanctioned in the original liberal constitutionalism, such a relationship is done through the expansion of constitutionally protected legal situations and a new interpretation of the concept of freedom, now tightly integrated with that of equality: a concept of equality which considers as unacceptable the differences based on economic and social relationship, i.e. those based on income capacity. finally, in such a view the social rights, along with the classical ones of freedom, are conceived as constitutive conditions of the constitutional principle of equality and, at the same time, of the value of the person and their dignity. however, in the european countries it is not always possible to perceive a positivization of the fundamental social rights as legal situations constitutionally recognized and protected in ways comparable with the so-called negative liberties2. indeed, while civil and political rights are recognized as a common basis of modern democratic states in all european constitutions, only from the constitutionalism after the second post-war era on, with the evolution of contemporary form of state, new fundamental rights, based on the close integration between the notion of freedom and of equality, are stated and as a consequence the social rights appeared. from that perspective, the principles of social justice that inspire contemporary constitutions, by incorporating the "freedom from want"3, implement the right to demand the services aimed at ensuring the individual and the citizen a minimum of security and social justice . referring to their protection, in the constitutional state of the second world postwar, the rights exist by the constitution, which expresses, as known, something more and different from the law of the liberal state, because in the fullness of its provisions it represents "an essential transformation"4 in respect of the previous liberaldemocratic constitutions. in this perspective, where the ius is no longer lex and the rights are no longer a rule set by the legislature, the constitutions establish subjective claims binding the state in the concrete exercise of its power. the contemporary constitutionalism makes a metamorphosis of the sovereignty of the law into the sovereignty of the constitution, thus transforming the fundamental rights into inviolable rights5. 2 cfr. a. saccomanno, “eguaglianza sostanziale e diritti sociali nel rapporto fra ordinamento interno ed ordinamento comunitario” in s. gambino (coord.), costituzione e diritto comunitario. principi e tradizioni costituzionali comuni. la formazione giurisprudenziale del diritto costituzionale europeo, milano, 2002. 3 cfr. n. bobbio, “sui diritti sociali”, in g. neppi modona (a cura di), cinquant’anni di repubblica italiana, torino, 1996. 4 cfr. f. balaguer callejón, (coord.), manual de derecho constitucional, 2008. 5 cfr. g. zagrebelsky, il diritto mite, torino, 1992. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 108-126 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2932 109 social rights in the face of the crisis. reflections on the spanish case on this basis the "welfare state" is born, which by sanctioning the primacy of politics over economics in the framework of a model of emancipatory substantial democracy, maneuvers the levers of the economic system and becomes promoter of development, pull factor for production and employment according to the standards of a keynesian economic interventionism that allows bridle the capitalism in the network of the democracy. however, it is still possible to perceive the absence of a shared concept on the effectiveness of the rights -particularly the social ones, since many constitutional provisions are different either because of their legal qualification or because of the legal scope of such rights. indeed, some european systems, for example, discipline this matter through general clauses (art. 20 basic law for the federal republic of germany) or through "guiding principles of social and economic policy" (chap. iii ec ), while others -as the italian constitutionprotect the social rights either through fundamental principles or with specific constitutional provisions. although the spanish constitutional catalog of social rights is extended and has the nature of constitutional rights, the doctrine stresses that the jurisdictional forms of their protection are not always the appropriate for subjective rights, as they are closer to those of the "legitimate interests", since between their prevision and their a legislative and administrative “facere” is needed. it can be seen that the degree of effectiveness contrasts with their structure of rights, whose degree of effectiveness appears openly insufficient. although different arguments have been stated (from economic to political constraints, from the capacity of the judiciary to that of the political system), the leitmotiv that perhaps summarizes all of them is that social rights "cost" and the state has serious problems of taxation, whence the complex problems of financial sustainability of rights in general, and the social rights in particular, derives. the question of the cost of social rights refers therefore to the issue of the structure of such rights as well as to the maintenance of the constitutional state. nevertheless, as pointed out by accredited doctrine -but also by the very constitutional jurisprudencethe cost of social rights should not impact on the structure of constitutionally guaranteed rights, so the question of the cost of rights is a false problem since it is intrinsic to all constitutional rights and therefore also to the classic ones of freedom6. moreover, in relation to the question of the legal effectiveness of the so-called programmatic constitutional provisions it seems particularly appropriate to mention the argumentative iter followed by the italian constitutional court7 which can be an example for all those systems which have constitutional guarantee clauses of the rights 6 cfr. g. lombardi, “diritti di libertà e diritti sociali”, in politica e diritto n. 1/1999. 7 specially, sentences 1/1956 and 4/1981. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 108-126 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2932 110 fernando puzzo or constitutional provisions on substantive equality and dignity of the person. ii. the welfare state as the basis of the guiding principles of social and economic policy the welfare state in spain is fully affirmed in the 1978 constitution8, which proclaims it in the art. 1 by means of the formula of "social and democratic state of law"9. the interventionist role of public authorities that defines the welfare state is found firstly in the art. 9.2 of the constitution, from which the so-called "substantial social principle" (taken from the italian constitutional charter) according to which 'it is for the public authorities to promote conditions so that freedom and equality of individuals and groups to which they belong are real and effective; to remove the obstacles that prevent or hinder their fulfillment and to facilitate the participation of all citizens in political, economic, cultural and social life”. from the letter of the rule that defines the structure of art. 9.2 can be followed, synthetically, that the interventionist dimension of public authorities, strictly speaking, affects three planes of reference: (i) promoting that the conditions for freedom and equality of the individual and the group are real and effective; (ii) the elimination of obstacles that stand to their full enjoyment and (iii) promoting the participation of citizens in the various areas of public life10. the configuration of the social state consists of different regulatory layers, located in different parts of the spanish constitution to which specific functions correspond. it is therefore a complex structure that can be synthesized in an essential way through a series of elements: in primis, as a set of values configured as authentic axiological foundation of the state, together with a number of purposes set in programmatic rules which define the main guidelines that should inform the activity of public authorities; another element is the block of social rights and guiding principles of interventionist policies, included in title i of the constitution, together with a set of instruments and public powers which, in addition to composing the organic part and the autonomic corpus of title viii of the spanish constitution, design the economic standards of title vii; and finally, there are some mechanisms of guarantee and control designed to ensure both the effectiveness of the rights recognized and the effective compliance of the programmatic goals. 8 among others, cfr. r.l. blanco valdés, introduzione alla costituzione spagnola del 1978, torino, 1999 (ult. ed. 2009); m. aragón reyes, constitución y democracia, madrid, 1989 and g. de vergottini, una costituzione democratica per la spagna, milano, 1978. 9 m.a. aparicio pérez, “el estado social en la jurisprudencia del tribunal constitucional”, in g. cámara villar and j. cano bueso (ed. and coord.), estudios sobre el estado social (el estado social y la comunidad autónoma de andalucía), madrid, 1993. 10 f. balaguer callejón, “el estado social y democrático de derecho. significado, alcance y vinculación de la cláusula del estado social”, inn j.l. monereo (coord.), comentario a la constitución socioeconómica de españa, granada, 2002. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 108-126 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2932 111 social rights in the face of the crisis. reflections on the spanish case from this perspective, social rights are a key element of the constitutional architecture of the welfare state11, in that, since all rights are linked to the previous value of human dignity, there are some social rights that are projected as real life support; thus, only from these rights condition of citizenship can be fully exercised. hence, certain rights such as, education, health and housing, must be assumed as essential elements for access to full status as citizens, so that the different degree of "subjective" enforceability of certain social rights should not involve a their subordinate position, regardless of the economic situation, whether favorable or unfavorable. from the constitutional point of view, in other words, the normative dimension of social rights can be perceived, although their level of guarantee and protection may have a different degree of coverage, depending on their different location in the constitutional text12. from this perspective, assuming that the constitutional text itself includes most of social rights under title i, formally calling them as "rights" both in chapter ii in sections 1 and 2 and in chapter iii -although titled as "guiding principles of social and economic policy", also incorporating certain rights expressly named as suchit can be concluded that from the time the constituent assembly positivizes the rights, they are considered as genuine rights, whose guarantee level generally depends on the provisions of art. 53 sc, which implies that their legal nature cannot be denied13. in short, the fundamental option chosen by the spanish constituent assembly when defining the state ex art. 1.1 sc, is to include the formal and material social clause in combination with the democratic principle and the rule of law. this formulation, overcoming the liberal model, assumes a finalist social function, designed to ensure and safeguard decent living conditions and, therefore, to have the means to meet the needs of disadvantaged subjects. in other words, it reveals a conception of state which leads teleologically the direction through principles of political nature14. the spanish constitution contains provisions legitimizing and guiding the action of the state, so that, in addition to other economic provisions, it determines explicitly rules setting welfare rights as such, others that are projected as directives or mandates to the legislature and others taking the form of statements: in short, a series of rules which, taken together, are fully connected to the principle of substantive equality and therefore to the real and effective equality. 11 j.l. cascajo castro, m. terol becerra, a. domínguez vila, v. navarro marchante (coords.), derechos sociales y principios rectores, actas del ix congreso de la asociación de constitucionalistas de españa, valencia, 2012. 12 j.l. cascajo, la tutela constitucional de los derechos sociales, madrid, 1988. 13 g. pisarello, los derechos sociales y sus garantías. elementos para una reconstrucción, madrid, 2007. 14 l. ferrajoli, “derechos y garantías. la ley del más débil”, madrid, 2004. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 108-126 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2932 112 fernando puzzo in the very preamble –in which the objectives aimed at ensuring harmonious coexistence with a fair economic and social order, the progress of culture and the economy, ensuring everybody a dignified life– there are several provisions defining the social state. indeed this is also evident in the principle of equality, or rather in its indivisible and material aspects (arts. 14 and 9.2), in the welfare dimension of the rights and, in particular, in the recognition of social rights (for example, the right to education, art 27;. the right to protection of health, art. 43); and also in the benefits of the social security system of art. 41, in addition to the consecration of principles on the action of public authorities in economic and social affairs ex arts. 40, 49, 50, 51, and other provisions. that being so, it should be noted, however, that the core of the contents related to social state are largely in chapter iii of title i, signed with the phrase "of the guiding principles of social and economic policy". the analysis of this regulatory body of the constitution is problematic because it clearly expresses the social dimension of the state. in other words, the problem of redirecting the content of these norms to legal structures in order to ensure guarantee levels similar to those already configured on the principles and contents of the rule of law and democratic state arises. moreover, it should be noted that in fact the exercise and guarantee of all constitutional rights depend on public intervention, in the sense that it applies not only to social or welfare rights, but to a greater or lesser extent, to all civil rights recognized in the constitutions. these, indeed, do not escape the need for positive action by the state, measurable in economic or budget terms, by which to ensure their effective protection, so that ultimately we can say that the rights depend on taxes and therefore their protection always involves a cost for public authorities, also with respect to those rights that enjoy a legal cover at the highest level15, by virtue of the introduction of the so-called principle of budgetary stability -a consequence of austerity policies applied in times of economic and financial crisisin the framework of the supreme constitutional principles that inspire and bind the state action. accordingly, at the constitutional level it is not possible to appreciate immediately a relatively crystallized model of social state, in the sense that the latter rather than expressing a structural reality of the constitutional order, is projected as a teleological imperative and as such, it is expressive of the tension between social, political and economic forces, and this entails different possibilities of development, but at the same time, many contradictions. indeed, the guiding principles, although they are firmly grounded from the point of view of value system and enjoy a significant symbolic power of evocation in relation to the articulation of new bases of the political and social organization, however they do not have the normative density of other constitutional provisions, while their nature is that of guiding principles or directive norms, despite that sometimes they are called rights, whose direct and immediate addressee is not the citizen but the public authorities. 15 s. holmes and c.r. sunstein, il costo dei diritti. perché la libertà dipende dalle tasse, bologna, 2000. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 108-126 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2932 113 social rights in the face of the crisis. reflections on the spanish case iii. social rights as fundamental rights in the framework of the second postwar constitutionalism, to state that rights such as education, equality, health and housing are essential to the democratic and contemporary concept of human dignity16 is an assertion that can be shared peacefully; an assertion supported by the spanish constitutional court, which in its case law indicates that in the spanish constitution "human dignity is the foundation of political order and social peace”. its legal form is raised to milestone of the constitutional order, needed to build the political order and the social peace. the constitutional concept of human dignity expresses the legal recognition of equality and freedom of all human beings by virtue of being, embodied in those values of the legal order sanctioned in art. 1.1 of the constitution and which are included in the fundamental rights of title i. in addition, human dignity -and related rights of art. 10.1 scis also identified in the field of health, which as underlined by the constitutional court (cc), represents "a value of undoubted constitutional significance"17 of "singular importance"18 as recently confirmed by the jurisprudence of the german constitutional court, whereby the legal obligation would come from the fundamental right to dignified existence, deductible from the human dignity of art. 1 and the principle of the social state ex art. 20.1 of the german constitution (judgment of the german constitutional court of february 9, 2012). as known, therefore these are not "classic rights of freedom," whose negative dimension is manifested in creating a protective barrier against possible illegal interference of the state but rights whose nature is to provide social benefits, that is, rights which obligate the state to guarantee a certain service or a particular good for citizens19. however, at the constitutional level, as already noticed, all rights are not covered by the same legal status, so the problem arises of which are the consequence of this differentiation. in this regard, we should remember that the cc has stated that "the protection of family, health maintenance and adequate and dignified housing, values which together with sufficient social benefits in situations of necessity that must be guaranteed a public social security, are constitutionally enshrined in the arts. 39, 41, 43 and 47 of the constitution, and force public authorities, not only to the deployment of the corresponding administrative action."20 in other words, it can be drawn that for their protection, although these are legal rights, it is not decisive that they may be enforceable before the ordinary judge in the more or less extensive forms established by the legislature, as this argument would lead to give the law the role of to recognize a right which instead preexists it, since it has been foreshadowed in the constitution establishing its existence, letting the law to determine its extent. 16 stc 86/1985, fj 8. 17 atc 96/2011 18 atc 239/2012 19 abramovich and courtis, los derechos sociales como derechos exigibles (prologue by l. ferrajoli), madrid, 2002. 20 stc 113/1989. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 108-126 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2932 114 fernando puzzo moreover, it should be clear that, regardless of their form, the recognition of these rights in the sc shows the concern of the constituent assembly to put the person and their rights in the center of the legal and political construction of the state. therefore a state that cannot be passive, but on the contrary, considers as a foundation of political order the personal dignity, so that it cannot be indifferent to the social, economic and cultural conditions in which the lives of the citizens operate. in short, a constituted state which is obliged to "promote the conditions so that the freedom and equality of individuals and groups are real and effective." in this regard, the constituent assembly has designed two guidelines because, on the one hand, has imposed on public authorities a specific role which has, given its binding nature, an effectivity of all mandatory and enforceable rights and, on the other, it has foreshadowed the purposes to which public authorities should aim, which retain respect to the latter a wider leeway, and therefore adscribing to the category of the guiding principles. from this point of view, the normative density concerning the compulsory promotion of the liberty and the equality is variable, depending on whether it is a fundamental right rather than a guiding principle. but if we look at the rights mentioned at the beginning, it is evident that the first two, i.e., education and equality, are fundamental rights included in chapter ii of title i sc, while the other two, health and housing, fall within the scope of the guiding principles of chapter iii of the same title, so that the differential legal status for rights and principles refers to the problem of their direct legal effectiveness and, ultimately, to the issue of their virtuality for citizens21. it should be remembered that the constitution is also a legal document22, consisting of several parts, which are binding both for public authorities and for citizens. on this basis, therefore, it is possible to note that the guiding principles of social and economic policy materialize their effectiveness in the democratic state, from their very legal nature, ie from their role of informing principles of the action of the public authorities, whose effectiveness can be controlled both legally and politically. in addition, leaving aside the legal force of the guiding principles which we will discuss below, it should reflect on the direct impact of fundamental rights in the social state23. from this point of view, we can say generally, that fundamental rights and therefore also those with social content, are effective with respect to all public authorities; therefore their normative virtuality depends on the will of the constituent assembly, in the sense that ensuring their protection and effectiveness does not require the action of the legislature, while those with social content (such as the right to 21 l. prieto sanchís, “derechos sociales y el principio de igualdad sustancial”, in revista del centro de estudios constitucionales n. 22/1995. 22 e. garcía de enterría, la constitución como norma y el tribunal constitucional, madrid, 1985, (iii ed.). 23 j.j. solozábal, “una revisión de la teoría de los derechos fundamentales”, in revista vasca de administración pública n. 58/2000. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 108-126 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2932 115 social rights in the face of the crisis. reflections on the spanish case education or the right to health, which have a different legal status) require the interpositio legislatoris and the administrative facere in order to develop their content. from this perspective, the original question about welfare social rights as fundamental rights embodied in the various constitutions arises, together with the classic fundamental rights, so, due to their different foundations, fundamental social rights are connected with the realization of the principle of real and effective equality, while the classic fundamental rights are linked to the achievement of the principle of freedom. this doctrinal debate, today, refers to the issue of justiciability of social rights and that of the constitutional protection of their essential content which, from the spanish perspective, is linked to the legal status of fundamental rights as justiciable rights not only against the administration, but also against the legislature, so that their protection includes also the guarantee of a minimum content restricted, plus an equal recognition. from the subjective perspective, fundamental social rights are protected by the ordinary courts, through a preferential and summary process and, where appropriate, by the constitutional court. in summary, therefore, we can say that they are subjective rights endowed with a particular resistance against the legislature, as the binding nature of fundamental rights makes them spaces of freedom and welfare resistant to any possible type of impairment. hence the legal nature of fundamental rights is extensible to fundamental social rights, so the welfare content of these rights become mandatory and therefore are enforceable, regardless of social, economic and political circumstances. regarding social rights within the scope of the principles, their content assumes the function of informing the positive legislation and judicial practice, and so they can qualify as rights strictu sensu, they require legislative implementation and therefore are enforceable before the judicial authority. in conclusion, taking into account the different legal status, it can be stated that through the fundamental rights the constituent assembly configures a part of the social state and through the principles prefigures it, forwarding to the legislature its final configuration. iv. the content and the legal effectiveness of the rights included in chapter iii of title i of the constitution as already stated, it is necessary to underline that the norms contained in chapter iii of title i of the constitution are quite heterogeneous since it is possible to distinguish norms that identify rights expressly called as such24, in addition to duties25. other provisions are mandated to the legislature, both in terms of punitive provisions of 24 as, for example, the right to the protection of health ex art. 43.1, or the right to culture in art. 44.1, or the right to decent housing in art. 47, and also the right to enjoy an adequate environment in art. 45.1. 25 as, for example, the duty of parents to attend their children (art. 39) or the duty to protect the health (art. 43.2) and the duty to protect the enviroment (art. 45.1). the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 108-126 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2932 116 fernando puzzo administrative and criminal relevance26, and as specific mandates27. finally, there are norms that set principles designed to guide the actions of public authorities in order to achieving general purposes, which by stating their programmatic nature are fully consistent with the meaning of the heading 'guiding principles' and which however can be differentiate by their vagueness and incompleteness regarding means, conditions and requirements, as can be seen emblematically in the content of art. 40.1, which states that "public authorities shall promote favorable conditions for social and economic progress and for a more equitable distribution of regional and personal income within the framework of a policy of economic stability." however, in order to systematize their content, guiding principles can be grouped taking into account the objectives pursued and which are subject to protection. firstly, we can distinguish guiding norms establishing objectives or general purpose of state action; for example, it is significant the formulation linking the public authorities to the promotion of "the favorable conditions for social and economic progress and for a more equitable distribution of the regional and personal income within the framework of a policy of economic stability" with the intention of achieving full employment oriented politics in art. 40.1, which, as noted by the constitutional jurisprudence, in the collective dimension is combined with the right to work ex art. 35.1 sc28. another example of guiding norm of general purpose is in art. 44.2 sc, according to which "the public authorities shall promote science and scientific and technical research in the general interest", developed by the legislature by law 13/1986 of promotion and general coordination of scientific and technical research. along with this type of regulations, there are guiding norms on the protection of certain goods of general interest, among which the content of art. 45.2 sc, which states that "the public authorities shall ensure the rational use of all natural resources, in order to protect and improve the quality of life and to preserve and restore the environment, relying on the indispensable collective solidarity". with this norm the constituent assembly states a mandate to the public authorities intended to protect the environment, combining harmonically the rational economic use of natural resources with environmental protection. these constitutional purposes aimed at protecting the environment, on the one hand refer to the necessary systematic interpretation in relation to other principles and rights such as the right to property, free enterprise and the principle of the free movement of goods and29, and on the other hand, being a matter of transversal nature, the environment can determine the exercise of other material powers, as the management of the territory, fishing, etc.30. 26 as in relation to environment (art. 45.3) or in relation to the protection of the cultural, artistic and historical heritage (art. 46). 27 as, for example, in relation to foreign trade (art. 51.3) and the professional associations (art. 52), or also as previsions of institutional guarantee, in relation to the establishment of a public regime of social security (art. 41) or in relation to the family (art. 39). 28 stc 22/1981, fj 8. 29 sstc 227/1988, fj 7, and 243/1993, fj 5. 30 stc 36/1994, fj 3. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 108-126 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2932 117 social rights in the face of the crisis. reflections on the spanish case the norm in art. 46 sc can be included in this type of guiding norms. according to it "public authorities shall guarantee the preservation and shall promote the enrichment of the historical, cultural and artistic heritage of the peoples of spain and of the goods comprised in it, whatever their legal status and their ownership" from where the possibility of introducing limits and authorizations for the sale and transfer of goods of "cultural interest" is inferred31. in addition, chapter iii includes norms aimed at the protection of persons, by ensuring a vital existential minimum, especially with regard to the protection of workers; indeed based on art. 41 sc "public authorities shall maintain a public social security system for all citizens guaranteeing adequate social assistance and benefits in situations of need, especially in case of unemployment". it is therefore clear that this provision expresses a central profile of the welfare state, as it prefigures the existence of a system of public social protection as a necessary institutional guarantee32, by which the mentioned constitutional principles designed to protect citizens in case of necessity and unemployment are concretized. in short, as noted by the constitutional court, social security should be seen as a "necessary function of the social and democratic rule of law"33 in the sense that situations of need are assigned to the minimum care constitutionally guaranteed, to which other contributory benefits can be attached: it is therefore unavailable for the legislature, because, although these rights have a legal configuration and therefore are susceptible to be modulated by this34, the legislature is obliged to maintain a public social security system in recognoscible terms for the image the social conscience in every time and place has of it. in addition, obviously, it assumes particular importance the provision contained in chapter iii, by which the right to health protection is recognized in the art. 43.1 sc, with respect to which the jurisprudence itself uses an integrating interpretation, given their intrinsic nature of essential human need35. under this norm, paragraph 2 states that "it is the responsibility of the public authorities to organize and safeguard public health through preventive measures and the necessary benefits and services. the law shall establish the rights and duties of all in this respect”36, hence, as stated in the 31 stc 17/1991. 32 stc 37/1994, fj 3d. 33 stc 65/1987, fj 17. 34 stc 37/1994, fj 3. 35 about the right to health cfr. j.j. ruiz ruiz, “el derecho a la salud en la actual crisis económica: los límites constitucionales a los recortes de prestaciones sanitarias y las exigencias de sostenibilidad del gasto social”, in s. gambino (coord.), diritti sociali e crisi economica. problemi e prospettive, torino, 2015. 36 about the universalization of the health benefits, cfr. specially the art. 3.2 of ley general de sanidad de 1986 and, more recently, after the economic recession and the y, más recientemente, tras la recesión económica y the emergence of the fiscal and budgetary crisis, the abundant emergency legislation and, in particular, the real decreto-ley 16/2012. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 108-126 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2932 118 fernando puzzo constitutional jurisprudence, it follows the necessary existence of a national health regulatory system (national heal system) 37. other norms contained in chapter iii are intended for the protection of persons as belonging to certain social groups, such as children (art. 39.4) or youth (art. 48), elderly (art. 50) or disabled persons (art. 49). finally, there are norms connected with the requirement of protection of human dignity, aimed at people who demand tangible and intangible goods necessary for the free development of the individual, such as the aforementioned right to health and access to culture (art 44.1), or the right to decent and adequate housing (article 47) others aimed at the specific protection of the rights of workers (article 40.2); and finally other norms aimed at the social, economic and legal protection of the family (art. 39.1), understood, as noted by the constitutional court, in a broad sense, so that the protection is not limited to that which is born from the marriage of art. 3238. that having been said, we must now examine both the value and the legal effectiveness of the rights and principles that guide the action of the public authorities in chapter iii. first of all, it should be noted that, in the case of constitutional norms, there is no doubt that, under art. 9.1 sc, they have legal force, regardless of the specific scope of the constitutional regulatory structure. it seems clear that, in the case of guiding norms aimed to pursue the objectives of the political organization established in the constitution, they comprise regulated values and criteria and, therefore, represent data of the system intended to their achievement and interpretation. it follows that the socalled "guiding principles"39 cannot be understood as mere programmatic proclamations or be treated as if they were pure "constitutional rhetoric." such a position has been held from the point of view of constitutional interpreter, for which "from that perspective, it should be recalled that the guiding principles of social and economic policy, among which is the aforementioned provision, are not mere norms without content (stc 19/1982, fj 6) but, as far as the courts are concerned, their decisions must be informed by their recognition, respect and protection, as provided for in art. 53.3 sc40. beyond the obvious connections with the social, democratic and lawful character of the spanish state, the legal effectiveness of these principles can be found, in primis, in the content of art. 53.3 sc, which states that "recognition, respect and protection of the principles recognized in the third chapter shall guide legislation, judicial practice and actions of public authorities. they may only be invoked before the ordinary courts in accordance with the provisions of the laws that implement them” from which a mandate to the legislature which does not deprive of normative effectiveness the content 37 stc 211/2014 fj 4. 38 sstc 222/1992, ffjj 4 y 5, 47/1993, fj 2, 116/1999, fj 13. 39 j. tajadura tejada (dir.), los principios rectores de la política social y económica, madrid, 2004. 40 stc 95/2000. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 108-126 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2932 119 social rights in the face of the crisis. reflections on the spanish case of the right in question, since it imposes to legislate favorably to the guaranteed content, which can ultimately lead to an appeal of unconstitutionality ex art. 161.1 sc, although considering social rights as norms does not amount to assert their justiciability. at the constitutional level, it can be firstly seen see that the norms expressly qualified as rights per se do not constitute subjective rights directly justiciable, but only legal situations enforceable before the courts, based on the scope of the laws that develop them in the legal level, anchoring them in the aforementioned constitutional foundation. in short, their effectiveness is not immediate or direct, but deferred and mediate as set out by the legislature, respecting the design prefigured by the constituent assembly, so it follows that they do not have the normative structure of the rights, but they are guiding principles susceptible of development by the legislature, configured so as rights that potentially have a plural configuration41. from this point of view, although it is not possible to recognize a full legal and constitutional protection, as in the case of the right to health covered by the guiding principles of chapter iii, it can be said that it is not possible to deny forcibly their nature and this implies, on the one hand, that a certain degree of enforceability can be protected jurisdictionally and, secondly, that the nature of constitutionally recognized right implies the existence of a content and that determining such content corresponds to the legislature. regarding the effectiveness of such rights regarding the legislature this can be seen as a consequence of the mandate that requires their development, recognition, respect and protection, that the legislature is primarily called to give concreteness to such guiding principles and therefore also the other powers are obliged to respect the law under the provision of the democratic principle and the system of sources. this dimension is particularly reinforced at the constitutional level as it is accompanied by a specific institutional guarantee, as for example, in the articles 39 (protection of the family) and 41 (public social security system), which foreshadows a unavailable core for the legislature itself. however, regardless of such a significant and important feature, not being provided regarding the legislature the limit of respect for the essential content, it seems clear that the margin of discretion with respect to its configuration, is quite broad according the general concepts and terms used by the constituent assembly. as for the extent of the possible configuration, important issues arise: firstly, the issue concerning the possible remedy in case of abstention or inactivity of the legislature and, secondly, the question concerning the so-called principle of irreversibility, i.e., the possibility of understanding the contents of the guiding principles previously recognized assuming them as irreversible level of guarantee and, therefore, as binding the legislature. in accordance to the first point, ie the complex problem of "unconstitutionality by omission", it is sufficient to note that the constitutional court has not got 41 stc 206/1997. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 108-126 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2932 120 fernando puzzo instruments to force the legislature to act in the case of an "absolute omission”, that is, if there is not supplement or development legislation. however, in the exercise of judicial review of legislative acts, in line of principle it might be accepted the possibility of control by the constitutional court as a result of an " relative omission" in the event that the relevant legislative regulation is incomplete. however, given that the legislature is not subject to respect the "essential content", as noted by constitutional jurisprudence42, this hypothesis refers to the problem of identifying what may be the control parameter regarding the alleged incompleteness, in addition to the intrinsic "vagueness and uncertainty" that define the guiding principles themselves. all this, however, does not close the possibility that such control can be exercised in the event that the principle of equality or the right to effective judicial protection come into play or even that can be exercised under other objective guarantees offered by the constitutional order, but in that case, these latter rights and guarantees in the context of a systematic interpretation would be those which would be placed as a parameter of judicial review, and the reference would not be only to the guiding principles. as for the so-called theory of the "irreversibility" of the content of social rights, which involves crystallizing the content of the rights already recognized by the legislative regulation, it has been adopted as a constitutional guarantee43, it could contravene the democratic and the political pluralism principles, since it would limit the free exercise of discretionary policy options in economic and social realms. however, the respect for the principles that define the social state admit the need to guarantee the essential minimum content established through legislative development. in this sense, the constitutional court, invoking the right to equality -in line with the prohibition of discrimination based on sexhas stated that "given the social and democratic character of the rule of law that our constitution stands and the obligation imposed to the state by the arts. 9.2 and 35 of the constitution to promote that the conditions for equality of individuals and groups are real and effective and the promotion through the work, but in no case can there be discrimination on grounds of sex, it can be understood that the worker cannot be deprived of the already achieved social conquests without enough reason to do so”44. furthermore, the application of the principle of irreversibility -or of no regression social benefitscan be seen as a control of reasonability of a reform in peius of social benefits contrary to the principle of proportionality and equity or no unenforceable due to supervening circumstances45. from another point of view, another limit and interpretive instrument can be inferred from the constitutional dictate of art. 31.2, according to which "the public expenditure shall make an equitable allocation of public resources, and its programming and execution shall comply with the criteria of 42 about the nature of such principles, cfr. stc 45/1989, fj 4, where it is stated that «it is unlikely that any legal norm can be considered unconstitutional by omission, that is, for not fulfilling, isolately considered, the mandate of the public authorities and, specially, that of the legislature, where each one of these principles is generally concreted». 43 sstc 134/1987, fj 5, and 184/1990, fj 5. 44 stc 81/1982, fj 3. 45 sstc 136/2012, fj 5, 71/2014, fj 7b and 85/2014, fj 3c. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 108-126 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2932 121 social rights in the face of the crisis. reflections on the spanish case efficiency and economy" which seems to impose in a finalist way the sense of the redistributive effect of public expenditure. finally, regarding the legal effectiveness, since the spanish constitution generally refers to the recognition, respect and protection of the guiding principles that should inform the action of public authorities, it appears that government and administration are bound by those norms, both in the exercise of the management function and in the exercise of normative authority itself. the same is true with respect to judicial organs, as also constitutionally judicial practice must be informed by these principles, so that both the interpretation of the norms and their application, cannot be outside the guiding principles. regarding the latter, a fortiori, suffice it to recall that this constitutional requirement is also reinforced by art. 5.1 of the organic law of the judiciary, which states that judges and courts interpret and apply the laws and regulations "according to the precepts and constitutional principles", according to their interpretation by the constitutional courts, so that from this view, there arises the possibility that the courts use these principles as a constitutional parameter to raise any questions of unconstitutionality. v. concluding reflections in the spanish constitutional order most of welfare social rights are presented as formal rights and materially conditioned by the concrete development made by public authorities and therefore their immediate enforceability before the ordinary judge is limited by the constitutional provision of art. 53.3. such an arrangement, according to the jurisprudence of the constitutional court implies, on one side, a derogation of the obligatoriness of the constitution, since it affirms that "the constitutional principles and fundamental rights and freedoms are binding on all public authorities (arts. 9.1 and 53.1 sc) and are immediate source of rights and obligations and not mere programmatic principles. the very fact that our basic norm in art. 53.2 provides a special system of protection before the constitutional court, which extends to conscientious objection, is but a confirmation of the principle of immediate applicability. the only exceptions of this general principle are the cases where so impose the constitution itself (i.e. the guiding principles of chapter iii) or when the very nature of the norm prevents considering it immediately applicable46. it follows that the constitutional court may control a violation of the constitution by omission of legislatively developing a constitutional norm, thus ensuring the protection of those subjective legal situations, at least in terms of their essential minimum. although welfare rights can be invoked before the ordinary courts in accordance with the terms laid down in the laws that develop them, it seems possible to find a 46 stc 15/1982. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 108-126 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2932 122 fernando puzzo constitutionally consistent interpretation by the ordinary judge, which could pose a appeal of unconstitutionality on the limits of the law of development approved by the public authorities, based on a parameter that systematically combines several constitutional provisions (preamble, art. 1.1 of the preliminary title, guiding principles of chap. iii tit. i, art. 9.2 and art. 14 ec). such systematic and evolutionary interpretation, as already noted, already used by other european constitutional courts, could rely on the arguments by the supreme interpreter when, in discussing the nature of the guiding principles of social and economic policy, states that "it is unlikely that any law can be considered unconstitutional by omission, that is, for not respecting, in isolation, the mandate of the public authorities and, in particular, the legislature, in which each of these principles is usually concreted"47. however, from this interpretive perspective, according to an attentive doctrine, "not prevent, obviously, the possibilities of control that might result from the coming into play the principle of equality, the right to effective judicial protection or any objective guarantee provided by the constitutional order, but in these cases these rights or guarantees would be the constitutional control parameter within a systematic interpretation and not, by themselves, the guiding principles"48. in that sense, for example, the right to vital minimum49 could be configured from the right to life (art. 15), from the principle of the social state (art. 1.1.) 50, in relation to the dignity of the person (art. 10.1) and also from some guiding principle such as the right to the protection of health (art. 43), to adequate housing (art. 47). even more, referring to social rights the spanish constitutional jurisprudence, as the italian, does not accept the thesis of the programmatic nature of constitutional norms, stressing that "the constitution is just that, our supreme law and not a programmatic or main statement; this is something affirmed unequivocally and generally in the art. 9.1 which states that "citizens and public authorities are subject to the constitution" as well as that "repeated decisions of this court as supreme interpreter of the constitution (art. 1 lotc) have declared that indubitable value of the constitution as a norm"51. regardless the immediate obligatoriness of some constitutional provisions, included in chapter ii, "rights and freedom" (articles 14-38), which do not need mediation of the ordinary legislature and are directly effective without legislative development, paraphrasing the constitutional court: "if it is true that such value needs to be modulated with regard to the arts. 39-52 in the terms of art. 53.3 of the spanish constitution, there can be no doubt about the immediate binding nature 47 stc 45/1989. 48 cfr. f. balaguer callejón, (coord.), manual de derecho constitucional, 2008, (iii ed.). 49 cfr. p. tenorio, “el tribunal constitucional, la cláusula del estado social, los derechos sociales y el derecho a un mínimo vital digno”, in aavv (actas ix congreso de la ace), derechos sociales y principios rectores, valencia, 2012. 50 in relation to the legal fundamental values and principles in which the spanish democratic and social rule of law is founded, in particular: sstc nn. 4/1981, 15/1982, 16/1982, 77/1982, 80/1982, 7/1983, 8/1983, 15/1983. 51 stc n. 80/1982. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 108-126 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2932 123 social rights in the face of the crisis. reflections on the spanish case (i.e., without mediation by the ordinary legislature) of the arts. 14-38, components of the second chapter of the first title, as the first paragraph of art. 53 states that the rights and freedoms set forth in this chapter are binding on all public authorities. that the exercise of such rights has to be regulated only by law and the need for it to respect their essential content, mean that these rights already exist, and are binding on all public authorities including obviously the judges and magistrates members of the judiciary (art. 117 ec), from the very moment of the entry into force of the constitution. one of such rights is equality before the law of all spaniards, there may be no discrimination between them on grounds of birth (art. 14 ec)"52. furthermore, as a part of the doctrine supports, other constitutional provisions, those concerning the "guiding principles of social and economic policy" (arts. 39-52) need a legislative modulation in accordance with the provisions of art. 53.3 sc in response to their "different legal effectiveness"53. however, in consideration of their nature of general constitutional provisions, such rights and principles as a whole are directive to the action of the legislature as well as hermeneutical criterion and parameter for the judges in the exercise of the judicial function. it is, in short, a set of fundamental principles and values that the constituent assembly of 1978 believed suitable to recognize constitutionally while assuring the courts and judges a deep elasticity, which was necessary in view of the concrete conformation in spain to the deep historical, economic and social changes already experienced over decades in other european countries. however, from the beginning of the new millennium54 the complex architecture of contemporary constitutionalism, to which largely the achievements in terms of civilization and social justice are due, seems today to crack because of many forces and trends of varied nature that make waver forms and ways of being of the democratic, social, legal and constitutional state, and that until yesterday were assumed to be firm and definitive as inherent to the idea of democracy conceived as heritage of everyone55. in this context, it is evidently that the most acute problems of the crisis concern especially to the welfare state model. in spain the development and crisis of the welfare state model have elements of continuity with other european systems, and especially, the countries of the 52 ibidem. 53 among others, cfr. e. garcía de enterría, la constitución como norma y el tribunal constitucional, madrid, 1985, (iii ed.) y jiménez campo, “estado social y democrático de derecho”, in diccionario del sistema político español, madrid, 1984. 54 cfr. m. luciani, “integrazione europea, sovranità statale e sovranità popolare. norme e idee”, inn istituto enciclopedia italiana, xxi secolo. norme e idee, roma, 2009, vol. i. 55 cfr. m. luciani, “integrazione europea, sovranità statale e sovranità popolare. norme e idee”, in istituto enciclopedia italiana, xxi secolo. norme e idee, roma, 2009, vol. i., ove secondo l’autore “l’idea che la crisi della sovranità sia un problema solo per gli stati non è accettabile … essa è un problema innanzitutto per le persone perché senza sovranità i loro diritti politici (e non solo) non sono garantiti e le politiche redistributive non si possono attuare”, p. 164. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 108-126 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2932 124 fernando puzzo mediterranean area, exacerbated by the economic and financial crisis and the relative political and constitutional answers both on the national and on that european realm56. on the basis of the crisis in the social, democratic and legal constitutionalism, a central relief is occupied by the consequences of the economic crisis linked to the limits on public expenditure and, therefore, to the availability of public resources needed for ensuring the exercise of the functions of the welfare state57, on the loss of centrality of parliamentary decision respect to the demands, now constitutionalized, of levelling the balance of the state and, ultimately, on the effectiveness of human rights58. in such a scenario, the welfare state, born to guarantee freedoms and rights in the constitutional perspective of realizing the goals of social justice, due to degradation / evanescence of social rights eventually makes fragile the democracy itself, ignoring the normative value the constitutional text. but do not forget that, although in different ways, the european constitutions of the last post-war, beyond procedural rules, are substantive rules regarding the very content of the laws. in other words, it is in the normative conception of the constitution, as norm and limit of the legislative acts, where its superiority is located59. show, by assigning direct binding nature to the fundamental principles and norms, it is the most innovative and original aspect of the contemporary constitutionalism and, at the same time, reflects the historical requirement of not leaving the system of freedoms and rights to the mere realization of principle of legality but of making it an instrument of guarantee and direction in addition of protection and promotion. finally, the problem of the welfare state (in spain and other european countries) basically concerns not only the general taxation, but also the very representative quality of the democracy and, therefore, in order to the adequacy of the protection of the represented interests represented, in short, it depends on the effectiveness of the democratic principle. the reduction of available resources also endangers the very justiciability of fundamental rights, not only the social ones. such a risk, however, seems even more 56 cfr. f. puzzo, “il costituzionalismo dei diritti sociali e la sovranità finanziaria statale, ovvero dalla novella costituzionale sul c.d. ‘federalismo fiscale’ al trattato europeo sul c.d. ‘fiscal compact’, passando per la legge cost. n. 1/2012 sul principio del pareggio di bilancio”, in s. gambino (coord.), diritti sociali e crisi economica. problemi e prospettive, torino, 2015. 57 cfr. s. gambino (coord.), diritti sociali e crisi economica. problemi e prospettive, torino, 2015, and in particular s. gambino, “crisi economica e diritti sociali (con particolare riguardo al diritto alla salute, all’assistenza sociale e all’istruzione)”, g. ruiz-rico ruiz, “el valor de los derechos constitucionales en tiempos de crisis”, j. lozano miralles, “universidad y crisis económica: el caso español”. 58 cfr. m. luciani, “l’equilibrio di bilancio e i principi fondamentali: la prospettiva del controllo di costituzionalità”, in www.cortecostituzionale.it, 22/xi/2013, a. spadaro, “i diritti sociali di fronte alla crisi (necessità di un nuovo «modello sociale europeo»: più sobrio, solidale e sostenibile” en rivista aic n. 4/2011 (www.rivistaaic.it); c. salazar, “crisi economica e diritti fondamentali”, in rivista aic n. 4/2013; a. ruggeri, “crisi economica e crisi della costituzione”, in aa.vv., scritti in onore di antonio d’atena, milano, 2015. 59 cfr. e. garcía de enterría, la constitución como norma y el tribunal constitucional, madrid, 1985, (iii ed.) and v. crisafulli, “la costituzione e le sue disposizioni di principio”, milano, 1952. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 108-126 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2932 125 http://www.rivistaaic.it/ social rights in the face of the crisis. reflections on the spanish case pervasive because of the provisions introduced in the new art. 135 of the spanish constitution (and similarly on the reform of article 81 of the italian constitution) which makes the enforceability of fundamental rights in monetarily conditioned rights, which leads to discharge on judges of final recourse -constitutional court, court of justice of the european union and the european court of human rightsthe decision on the balance between financial sustainability and effectiveness of social law. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 108-126 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2932 126 two-lane blacktop: refugees & torture jesús garcía cívico1 abstract: the right not to be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and the right of asylum have, individually considered, an extensive field of application", but it is possible to point out some traits in common. firsty, in both rights undelie the moral spirit of the universal declaration of human rights. at the same time, according to the recent reports of the main human rights organisations, both rights are in deep political crisis. furthermore, is possible to see that sometimes they cross each other: there is a triple «zone of intersection between the right of asylum and the right not to suffer torture, inhuman or degrading treatment: one of the reasons for escaping from a country is to avoid suffering torture ("refuge after torture") secondly, sometimes inhuman and degrading treatment occur precisely in the process of seeking asylum ("inhuman treatment in the refuge"), finally, there are countries with strong deficiencies in their immigration policies and this can produce a perverse effect: the transfer of potential asylum seekers to countries where they are at risk of torture or inhuman treatment again ("torture or inhuman and degrading treatment after asylum"). keywords: torture; refugees; human rights; international law; human rights effectiveness summary: i. introduction; ii. right of asylum and right not to suffer torture: same nature and common destiny; ii.1. a pretty similar starting point;. ii.2. a common destin; iii. from torture to asylum seeking; iv. torture (inhuman and degrading treatment) in the seek for asylum; v. torture or inhuman treatment after seeking asylum; vi. synthesis and recapitulation. i. introduction both the right not to suffer torture or the right to asylum have, individually considered, case-by-case, broad fields of application. torture is, unfortunately, a very widespread reality and, at the same time, the reasons of the refugees to escape from their countries are very varied. however, there are at least two common notes between them that allow us to understand and approach them together. firstly, we can agree that both are at the center of the big concerns that allowed historically the main human rights declarations since 1948. neither asylum nor the interdiction of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment are just two more human rights among others, but rather they synthesize very well the core of the essential worries of the issue of the universal declaration of human rights and the subsequent covenants: the imposition of a better world committed with the legal 1 universitat jaume i, castellón, spain. center of research of the effectiveness of rights (civico@dpu.uji.es). the age of human rights journal, 8 (june 2017) pp. 49-66 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n8.3 49 two-lane blacktop: refugees & torture and political demands derived from the fundamental budget of the whole catalog of human rights: the human dignity. the second common note is the existence of a zone of intersection between the right of asylum and the right not to suffer torture, inhuman or degrading treatment. this intersection belongs to the normative configurations of both rights as well to the real, empirical field of their effectiveness (the physical space where rights violations are committed). this can be understood in a triple way: firstly, the crossroads of both rights is due to the fact that one of the reasons for escaping from a country is precisely to avoid suffering torture in it ("refuge after torture" as we could call that encounter); secondly, –and this is already a real feature of our present time–: inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment, occur precisely in the process of seeking asylum ("inhuman treatment in the refuge"); a last area of intersection results from the fact that there are countries with strong deficiencies in their immigration policies and this can produce a perverse effect: the transfer of potential asylum seekers to countries where they are at risk of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ("torture or inhuman and degrading treatment after asylum"). but let us begin with their common nature and similar destinies. ii: right of asylum and right not to suffer torture: same nature and common destiny ii.1. a pretty similar starting point the right to asylum and the right to be free from torture have a common feature: both were part of the deepest believes and raison d'être of the world declaration of human rights (1948). the prohibition of torture is, in a political philosopher ronald dworkin's fine expression, «a fixed point in the moral universe», but in addition, and as professor javier de lucas recalled a few years ago with regard to the extension of torture into democracy, the experience of that destructive capacity which can reach the policy of instrumental torture, was so serious that the malheur de conscience of the twentieth century, which the very birth of the un has as one of its priority objectives, for the purpose of eradicating it. in the twentieth century there were so many cases of systematic cruelty, including experimentation with human beings, that this explains percetly the need, not only for the right not to be tortured, but also for the emphasis on its absolute character. the right not to be tortured is reflected in article 5 of the 1948 declaration of human rights and article 7 of the covenant on civil and political rights: "no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”. both torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment are prohibited practices at all times and in all places, even in times of war. on an ethical perspective, the moral conviction that a human being can not be tortured by other human beings was, at a moment of our intellectual history (a zig.zag the age of human rights journal, 8 (june 2017) pp. 49-66 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n8.3 50 jesús garcía cívico civilizatory process), so powerful, that it spread in the most important juridical texts and endowed, for that reason, of the most serious of the binding legal forces. the prohibition of torture is still (these are times when it must be remembered) a rule of ius cogens integrated at the bottom of the big principles that reflect superior values that bind the whole humanity. the moral and legal imperative –do not torture, any time, anywhere, in any circumstances– is mandated by the un convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. “no exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency,” says the convention, can “be invoked as a justification of torture.” all the declarations of rights stand out their absolute character: there are no exceptions. that same compromise affects the meaning of the principle of non-refoulement as regards the right of asylum: no person should be sent back to a country where he or she may be subjected to torture. such a prohibition against repatriation is set out in article 33.1 of the 1951 geneva convention. it is an essential guarantee of the right of asylum: no contracting state may, by expulsion or refoulement, place a refugee in any borders of territories where their life or freedom is endangered because of their race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or their political opinions. although there are exceptions on security and final conviction for serious crimes, the fact is that the principle of non-refoulement has evolved into an absolute standard, there are no exception or derogation2 with regard to the real effectiveness of the right of asylum, the united nations high commissioner for refugees (unhcr) has developed a large number of documents in recent decades to adapt protection mechanisms to new dynamics of persecution. it has also done so on theoretical currents for the recognition of refugee status in situations of danger to life or physical and mental integrity not contemplated at the time of its promulgation. in all these cases, the principle of non-refoulement is a fundamental component of the customary prohibition of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.3 in fact, the convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment prohibits (article 3.1.) states parties to expel, return or extradite a person to another state "where there are reasonable grounds to believe that they would be in danger of being subjected to torture". in this sense, the european court 2 indeed, the non-refoulement rule contained in human rights treaties covers a broader range of situations than that set out in 1951 and, in addition to not allowing exceptions or exceptions, does not require that the danger be linked to civil status or politician of the individual, but can derive from any cause, and covers, in addition to the return and expulsion, also extradition. among others: unhcr, handbook of procedures and criteria for determining refugee status under the 1951 convention and the 1967 protocol relating to the status of refugees, ginebra, 1988; goodwin-gill, g., the refugee in international law, clarendon press, oxford, 1996, stenberg, g., non-expulsion and nonrefoulement. the prohibition against removal of refugees with special reference to articles 32 and 33 of the 1951 convention relating to the status of refugees, iustus förlag, uppsala, 1989. 3 acnur «opinion 97: sir lauterpacht, e. y bethlehem, d., refugee protection in intrenational law, cambridge, 2001. the age of human rights journal, 8 (june 2017) pp. 49-66 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n8.3 51 two-lane blacktop: refugees & torture of human rights (echr) has ruled (soering case) that the prohibition of art. 3 of the european convention against ill-treatment “is also absolute with regard to expulsión”. according to the human rights committee, "it would be unreasonable to interpret the responsibility of states under the terms of article 2 of the covenant (referring to the covenant on civil and political rights, which refers to the commitment to respect and guarantee it) in such a way as to enable them to perpetrate violations of the pact in the territory of another state which they could not perpetrate in their own territory". that is to say, the european court of human rights has interpreted the european convention for the prevention of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment as prohibiting states which have ratified the convention not only from inflicting torture or inhuman or degrading treatment, but also to send asylum seekers to countries where there is a real risk of such treatment or of being sent back to others where that danger is predictable. in short, if both rights summed up well the wide ethical convictions of the second half of the twentieth century (at least in its first decades) was by a serie of strong believes probably based on the recent memory of a nameless atrocities and te consequent need to protect not only life or phisical integrity of the human being, but also his dignity. and there is no greater affront to this dignity than the impossibility of finding refuge in the world or that humna being´s "reification" that we call “torture”. we can go even further, after analyzing the recent arguments that claim the lawfulness of torture, professor la torre has developed the thesis that there is a conceptual connection between torture and illegality, a phenomenological contradiction between law and torture4. at the same time, all the organizations committed to the defense of human rights insist today in a fact: the legal status of refugees is obligatory for all states that form the international system of law, established in the geneva convention and in the protocol of new york. ii.2. a commom destiny i think it is possible to agree that there are two human rights that are in global crisis today: the right to asylum and the right not to suffer torture. the importance of each of them is such that this crisis climate can also be understood as a crisis of political institutions, that is, as a political crisis. regarding the first, and as javier de lucas has been insisting for more than a decade, asylum and refuge rights are not one of the catalog of rights, but are at the core of any political project that respects human rights. that is why the current 'refugee crisis' can be understood as the eu crisis as a political project: a common area of freedom, security and justice, chaired by the theorical notion of human rights5. the international organization for migration estimates that more than 3,770 refugees and 4 la torre., m., «a dangerous liaison. tortura and law», derechos y libertades: revista del instituto bartolomé de las casas, nº 28, 2013, pp. 25-38. 5 de lucas, j., «sobre el proceso de vaciamiento del derecho de asilo por parte de los estados de la ue», ars iuris salmanticensis, vol. 4, junio 2016, pp. 21-27; id., mediterráneo, el naufragio de europa, tirant lo blanch, valencia, 2016. the age of human rights journal, 8 (june 2017) pp. 49-66 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n8.3 52 jesús garcía cívico migrants died last year trying to cross the mediterranean sea to europe 6, at the same time, we are witnessing an strong retreat in the “defense” of tradiitonal national borders with sospicious xenophobic arguments as far as torture is concerned, scandals such the so-called "cia flights" 7 together with the impunity in the well known abu ghraib8 and guantanamo cases9, the success of the populist «ticking bomb» argument10, or the very existence of secret detention centers in europe give an idea of the scope of the serious implications to which we referred earlier. so, definitively, one of the issues that brings the destiny of the prohibition of torture closer to the norms on asylum is a common basic crisis (a type of political crisis) concretized in the lack of seriousness with which they are assumed the legal and political obligations arising from the legal nature of both rights. furthermore, the future seems even worse11: it is not posible to measure exactly the consequences12 of this "emptying", again in the words of de lucas, 13 in which national policies overlap political ideals, but also supranational commitments (those of the united states vis-a-vis the un, those of the member states vis-a-vis eu). 6 international organization for migrations, fatal journeys volume 2: identification and tracing of dead and missing migrants, geneva, 2016. 7 kaleck w., «justice and accountability in europe: discussing strategies», cia – “extraordinary rendition” flights, torture and accountability – a european approach, european center for constitutional and human rights, second edition, 2008, p. 15. 8 bennet, w. l., lawrence, r. g., livingston, s., «none dare call it torture: indexing and the limits of press independence in the abu ghraib scandal», journal of communication, 56, 2006, pp. 467-485. sands, ph., the torture team. rumsfeld’s memo and the betrayal of american values, palgrave-macmillan, new york 2008. 9 vid., la torre, m., «la teoría del derecho de la tortura» derechos y libertades: revista del instituto bartolomé de las casas, nº 17, 2007, pp. 71-87. 10 the ticking-bomb argument, where a terrorist is tortured in order to extract information of a primed bomb located in a civilian area, is often invoked as one of those extreme circumstances where torture becomes justified. as the war on terrorism intensifies, the ticking-bomb argument has become the dominant line of reasoning used by both academics and policy advisers to justify a legalized, statesponsored program of torture. buffani and arrigo have argued for the unconditional refutation of any attempt to justify torture, without exceptions beacuse the empirical evidence suggests that the institutionalization of torture practices creates serious problems. «torture interrogation fails to fulfil its initial purpose as a low-cost life saver, while its long-term potential is the devastation of democratic institutions». bufacchi, v. and arrigo, j. m., “torture, terrorism and the state: a refutation of the ticking-bomb argument”, journal of applied philosophy, 23, 2006, pp. 355-373. on the inefficacy argument: carver, r., handley. l., (eds.); does torture prevention work?, liverpool university press, 2016. 11 human rights watch; “trump’s national security choice won’t rule out torture” https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/11/18/us-trumps-national-security-choice-wont-rule-out-torture 15/11/2016. 12 harbury, tj. k., truth, torture and the american way. the historical consequences of u. s. involvement in torture, beacon press, boston, 2005. 13 de lucas, j., «sobre el proceso de vaciamiento del derecho de asilo por parte de los estados de la ue», cit., p. 21. the age of human rights journal, 8 (june 2017) pp. 49-66 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n8.3 53 two-lane blacktop: refugees & torture both the attacks of 11 september and the eu “refugee crisis” of recent years seem to have allowed, in a context of urgency and exceptionality, the idea that it is possible for the goverments to avoid taking on the basic demands of these two human rights developed in a historical phase of extraordinary consensus. accordingly, both the right not to suffer torture or inhuman and degrading treatment, as well as the requirements of the right of asylum, could be redesigned by the existence of contexts of exceptionality (defined as such by the political actors themselves) which will allow them to no longer ignore the regulative ideal or "ethical encouragement" of them, but rather the basic political and juridical implications derived from their binding force. so, the actuality of both rights is quite similar: both are in a critical situation. the years after the september 11 attacks allows establishing a genuine global network that, in the shelter of the fight against terror, includes a complex structure of dark detention centers where human rights violations are fragrant and impunity including inhuman treatment and torture14. moreover, even before the ankara agreement, it seems to be a kind of «rights local markets» whose message to the population is that there is no longer any space safeguarded by the human rights system that is not susceptible to give in to short time political and economic interests of the rulers of national states, the populist parties´s pression15 and, apparently, also the worst demandings of their voters. our time should be characterized as being an historical phase of human rights way in which the protagonism would rest on the empirical work and the statistics16. the essence of this phase should be the development of the priority of the measurament17, material means, tools and guarantees for the effectiveness (or real effectiveness) of human rights. 18 however, we are facing a setback that seems to be far behind the starting point. in the first case (the right not to suffer torture or inhuman or degrading treatment), rather than a stagnation of the traditional format of its prevention (another form of real effectiveness), the main feature seems to be the revision of the foundations of non-exceptionality. one of the key questions is whether states can use methods of “coercive interrogation” that do not qualify as torture. on the issue of regulation, there are those –alan dershowitz, for example– who believe that banning torture and coercion outright is unrealistic. instead, dershowitz said, the practice should be regulated by court warrants.19 in our opinión, all these positions are part of an immoral 14 human rights watch, «no more excuses: a roadmap to justice for cia torture», 2015. https://www.hrw.org/report/2015/12/01/no-more-excuses/roadmap-justice-cia-torture. 7/09/2016 15 gale, p., «the refugee crisis and fear. populist politics and media discourse», journal of sociology, 40(4), 2004, pp. 321-340. 16 claude, r., jabine, th.; “exploring human rights issues with statistics, in, human rights and statistics, getting the record straight, university of pennsylvania press, 1992, p. 23. 17 landman, t., «measuring human rights: principle, practice and policy», human rights quarterly, 26, 2006, pp. 906931. 18 garcía cívico, j. «¿qué es un indicador de derechos humanos y cómo se utiliza?», derechos y libertades: revista del instituto bartolomé de las casas, año nº 15, nº 24, 2011, p. 179. 19 memorandum for alberto r. gonzales, counsel to the white house, from jay s. bybee, assistant attorney general and john c. yoo, deputy assistant attorney general, standards of conduct for interrogation under 18 u.s.c, section 2340-2340a, 2002; memorandum for john a. rizzo, acting general counsel, cia, from jay s. bybee, assistant attorney general, interrogation of al qaeda the age of human rights journal, 8 (june 2017) pp. 49-66 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n8.3 54 https://www.hrw.org/report/2015/12/01/no-more-excuses/roadmap-justice-cia-torture jesús garcía cívico debate20 (quite truculent, to be honest), including the wrong and dangerous expression "war on terror". as michael ignatieff wrote the judicialisation of torture, and of coercive interrogation techniques involving stress and duress, physical abuse, sleep deprivation and so on, could lead to torture and coercion becoming routine rather than an exception21. that is, a position in favour of outright prohibition of both torture and coercive interrogation has gained strength from the abuses at abu ghraib, and from the memos of the office of legal counsel and the white house parsing the torture convention into permission for coercive interrogation. it seems clear from the dire experience of abu ghraib that outright prohibition of both torture and coercive interrogation is the only way to proceed. that is to say, the traditional main problem concerning the effectiveness of the right not to be tortured had been the continued existence of torture in the world, but nowadays, we can add new justifications in a worrying path of exceptionality (excepcionalities), trivialization and/or strange normalization (including legalization) of torture practices. according to amnesty international's most recent report, during the past five years torture has been reported in 141 countries. in addition, 2015 has been the first year in which torture has spread as much as in world war ii. immediately linked to the extent of the crime of torture, we find the question of its impunity. the diagnosis is worrying in itself, but it also translates into population movements, exodus that have as main motive truly terrifying situations: threats of murder, torture, imprisonment without guarantees, enforced disappearances, etc. finally, if we want to highlight the novelties in the area of conjunction of both rights (and the assets that are protected with them), another feature that points to a common destination is the fact that both torture and asylum are affected by another legal novelty: the rise of private actors in human rights violations22. the convention against torture definition contains a requirement that the actor be a public official or other person acting in an official capacity but there are facts that allow a new trend in the jurisprudence of the committee against torture, the european court of human rights and the un human rights committee to admit a wider reading of ‘the actor’ in international human rights law 23 . we refer to the open cases against international corporations for human rights violations that point in particular to the crime of torture as operative, 2002. dershowitz, a. d., «is there a torture road to freedom?», los angeles times, 8 de noviembre de 2001.yoo, j., the powers of war and peace, university of chicago press, chicago, 2005. 20 the immoral character of the debate itself, has been pointed out in many places, among others, by massimo la torre, la torre, m., «la teoría del derecho de la tortura» derechos y libertades: revista del instituto bartolomé de las casas, nº 17, 2007, pp. 71-87. as slavoj žižek wrote, those who are not openly pro-torture, make it a legitimate subject of debate, are even more dangerous than explicit support. žižek, s., «sobre terrorismo y tortura», in pasajes: revista de pensamiento contemporáneo, nº. 17, 2005, pp. 21-27 p. 23. 21 ignatieff, m., torture: does it make us safer? is it ever ok?, kenneth roth and minky worden, (eds.), the new press / human rights watch, 2006. 22 rosemann, n.; «the privatization of human rights violations – business’ impunity or corporate responsibility? the case of human rights abuses and torture in iraq», non-state actors and international law, 5, 2005, pp. 77-100. 23 sivakumaran, s., «torture in international human rights and international humanitarian law: the actor and the ad hoc tribunals», leiden journal of international law, 2005, pp. 541-556. the age of human rights journal, 8 (june 2017) pp. 49-66 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n8.3 55 two-lane blacktop: refugees & torture well as forced displacement (basically in the case of land grabbing24). these facts are not isolated but integrated in a more general trend25 and if we had to indentify some specific cases, among them would be the hiring of mercenaries and private forces in the conflicts that the us maintains in iraq and other countries in the zone («blackwater case» and others26), while on the otthe side (dealing with refugees) we could talk about the increasing business of illegal people trafficking. that is, there is a final convergence that has to do with what the dutch sociologist saskia sassen studies as “power issues arising from the globalization process”: there are more and more populations displaced or imprisoned, more destruction of the land, etc. and this explains why at the origin there is a complex knot of private institutions and systems that we do not know still well, even when this causes the blurring between refugee and economic immigrant as well as their gradual loss of semantic relevance.27 iii. from torture to asylum seeking daily, millions of refugees and migrants fleeing war and persecution in countries like syria, south sudan, myanmar and iraq suffer intolerable misery and human rights violations28. refugees are people who have had to flee their country because of armed conflict, serious human rights abuses or persecution and the threat of inhuman treatment or torture is one of the traditional motives for fleeing a country. in recent years the number of people forced to seek refuge in a third state due to this scourge (torture) growing especially in unstable territories and areas of conflict, has increased. according to unhcr, more than 60 million people have left their countries or become displaced; although the reasons why people migrate remain diverse and often complex, the truth is that there are thousands of people running away from abuses and crimes such as torture. syria, afghanistan, somalia, sudan, south sudan, the democratic republic of the congo, the central african republic, myanmar, iraq and eritrea are countries with extraordinary human rights deficits, in particular, as regards torture and inhuman or degrading treatment. 24 zamora cabot, f., «acaparamiento de tierras (land grabbing) y empresas multinacionales: el caso mubende-neumann», in papeles el tiempo de los derechos, 2013, (5). 25 aymerich, i., «orígenes ideológicos de la distribución de responsabilidades públicas y privadas en la garantía de los derechos humanos», in zamora, f. j., garcía cívico, j., sales pallarés, s., (eds.), la responsabilidad de las multinacionales por violaciones de derechos humanos, cuadernos democracia y derechos humanos, universidad de alcalá, madrid, 2013, pp. 21-40. 26 as the journalist james scahill has denounced as dirty wars, drawn from the ranks of the navy seals, delta force, former blackwater and other private security contractors, the cia’s special activities division, and the joint special operations command (jsoc), these elite soldiers are operating worldwide, with thousands of secret commandos working in more than one hundred countries, including torture and othe abuses. scahill, j. guerras sucias. el mundo como campo de batalla, barcelona, paidós, 2013. 27 sassen, s., expulsions, brutality and complexity in the global economy, harvard university press, 2014. 28 unhcr, global trends, forced displacement in 2015, p.8: http://www.unhcr.org/uk/statistics/unhcrstats/576408cd7/unhcr-global-trends-2015.html the age of human rights journal, 8 (june 2017) pp. 49-66 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n8.3 56 jesús garcía cívico in syria, according to recent reports by the united nations, amnesty international, human rights watch and the syrian observatory for human rights, government forces and non-state armed groups committed countless war crimes and enforced disappearances with impunity. between 2011 and 2015, thousands of deaths were in custody due to torture. the islamic state armed group imposed sieges and attacks with chemical weapons in civilian areas. there are already 400,000 more dead, 7.6 million internally displaced persons and 4.6 million refugees in other countries. in general terms, the refugees who are arriving to europe at the moment, come from territories with a high level of conflict and violence. in addition to the syrian refugees, there are a significant number of afghans and iraqis who also try to reach europe across the mediterranean. the hell of torture is particularly aberrant and scandalous in another country where refugees come from, eritrea, where, in addition, young people are forced into military service similar to slavery. in eritrea, since the dictatorship was hardened in 2008, some 50,000 people have fled the country to europe or israel. according to the un, some 3,000 people are trying to flee every month. by the end of 2014, the organization had registered 48,400 eritrean asylum applications in 44 industrialized countries. in the last decade, about 305,000 eritreans (5% of the population) have fled. the eritreans form the second group, behind the syrians, who cross from north africa to europe by boat, and in recent months hundreds of them have died in the attempt. but that already leads us to the second intersection: when suffering, due to serious human rights violations, occurs in the search for refuge or in the arrival to the country on which asylum depends. iv. torture (inhuman and degrading treatment) in the seek for asylum a second area of very wide intersection is characterized by inhuman and degrading treatment in the search for asylum and refugee reception. amnesty international has described many human rights violations (including torture and abuses) in transit; recentely many refugees and migrants in italy in 2016 have described thir journeys, facing abuse at every stage from their arrival in libya until they reached the mediterranean coast. the abuses included abductions, extortion, sexual violence, killings, torture and religious persecution by people smugglers, traffickers, organized criminal gangs and armed groups. women whom amnesty international interviewed said rape was so commonplace along the smuggling routes that they took contraceptive pills before travelling. 116 refugees and migrants have reported that people-smugglers hold them captive to extort a ransom from their families. they are kept in deplorable and often squalid conditions, deprived of food and water and repeatedly beaten, harassed and insulted. testimonies also reveal shocking abuses by the libyan coastguard and at immigration detention centres in libya. refugees and migrants have described the age of human rights journal, 8 (june 2017) pp. 49-66 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n8.3 57 two-lane blacktop: refugees & torture shootings and beatings while being picked up by the coastguard as well as further torture and other ill-treatment at detention centres.29 many refugees are living in grinding poverty without access to basic services and without hope for the future, many are desperate to move elsewhere and some are willing to risk dangerous journeys to try and find a better life. on the first situation, we have already pointed out the thousands of drowning deaths in mediterranean sea; this phenomenon is not even exclusive (although it is especially lacerating, given the wealth of europe compared to the countries of the world which host the largest number of refugees30), the migration routes in southeast asia are, as amnesty international points out, equally dangerous; on the balkan route, refugees and migrants face arbitrary detention, ill-treatment by security forces, abuse, exploitation by smugglers, summary returns, including death. in central america, thousands of people attempting to cross mexico are kidnapped, raped or killed on one of the world's most dangerous journeys. during the journey they are exposed to abuse by officials of the migration services, police officers, military personnel, human traffickers and criminal gangs.31 although the weakening of asylum policies and social convictions around them must have been gradual, it has been in the last two years, as a result of the arrival of refugees from conflicts in the countries of north africa and the middle east, but above all the terrible war in syria, which is already remarkably visible the phenomenon we are paying attention to. among the facts that demonstrate the hostility of the eu is the rise of far-right and racist/xenophobic parties; the pressure on the african border (ceuta and melilla) where a group of emigrants was shot by the spanish guardia civil; the replacement of the mare nostrum rescue operation by military border control devices (“operation sofía”), eu outsourcing policies which have led the african union countries to restrict the arrival of refugees or bilateral treaties (spain with mauritania, nigeria, senegal or morocco, france with mali, or italy with gaddafi's libyan regime). in the case of the eritrean dictatorship, for example, about 50,000 young people have fled from the country to europe or israel, but to refer to a case already mentioned in the previous section (the torture that gives rise to the search for refuge). about 10,000 have disappeared along the way: a brutal network of people trafficking abducts refugees 29 amnesty international, tackling the global refugee crisis: from shirking to sharing responsibility, report p. 24. 30 when we break the global refugee crisis down by the numbers, the inequality in the response of states is stark. this is because the problem is not the number of refugees but that the vast majority (86% according to figures from unhcr, the un refugee agency) are hosted in lowand middle-income countries. meanwhile, many of the world’s wealthiest nations host the fewest and do the least. for example, the uk has accepted approximately 8,000 syrians since 2011, while jordan – with a population almost 10 times smaller than the uk and just 1.2% of its gdp – hosts over 656,000 syrian refugees. the total refugee and asylumseeker population in australia is 58,000 compared to 740,000 in ethiopia. such unequal sharing of responsibility is at the root of the global refugee crisis and the many problems faced by refugees. amnesty international, tackling the global refugee crisis: from shirking to sharing responsibility, report; www.amnestyinternational.org. 16/09/2016. id., «refugio e inmigración»: https://www.es.amnesty.org/en-que-estamos/temas/refugio-e-inmigracion/ 17/09/2016. 31 amnesty international, tackling the global refugee crisis: from shirking to sharing responsibility, cit., p. 24-48. the age of human rights journal, 8 (june 2017) pp. 49-66 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n8.3 58 https://www.es.amnesty.org/en-que-estamos/temas/refugio-e-inmigracion/ jesús garcía cívico in the sinai peninsula, where they are locked up and savagely tortured while bedouin groups demand astronomical rescue of families. another crossroad between inhuman treatment and asylum seeking takes place around the lifting of fences32. the words of a kurdish syrian from kobani after the double wire fence in hungary ("this is like guantanamo", he said) graphically supports the label of this epigraph. indeed, the deplorable images of hundreds of mostly refugee migrants crowded into the hungarian countryside of roszke, near the serbian border, many of them with children, crying over the ground are a difficult argument. human rights watch was one of the first organizations to denounce inhuman treatment before half a world could see the distribution of food thrown into bags through a fence similar to the way that human feeds the most dangerous animals in the zoo. in addition, according to unicef data, in 2015 a quarter of all refugees who arrived in europe, more than 100,000, were minors and about 10,000 crossed the border of their country alone. one year later, in 2016 and already according to europol figures, about 10,000 children would have disappeared within the eu. these "disappearances" are not only another evidence of the failures in the community asylum system but also a disturbing fact in the confluence of the juridical goods that protect the two rights about we are writting now. the examples are very numerous, but we wanted to add a concrete one that illustrates the possibility of this section (inhuman and degrading treatment in response to attempts to apply for asylum on arrival). it is an example that has to do with a prophylactic conception of the political management of the refuge. on the one hand, the path followed by australia that culminated in the so-called "pacific solution"; on the other hand, the answer of the eu, that is the pact with turkey. in both cases it seems that “we” want to avoid direct contact with the refugees. we will leave the second scenario (the eu agreement with turkey) for the third possibility of which we wrote in this work: torture after the search for refuge. in the first case, australia began by maintaining policies conforming to the standards of instruments relating to asylum and refugee rights. in 1976, for example, this country welcomed more than 124,000 refugees from the vietnam war and a decade later did the same with more than 147,500 lebanese when the civil war razed their country33. but the flow of refugees provoked a social rejection against the newcomers. a rejection that the political parties tried to take advantage of. in 1992, the government had already decided to detain any person who arrived in australia without a valid visa, including asylum seekers. a decade later, they launched the “pacific solution”. this plan consisted of the diversion of ships with immigrants and refugees. the ships were forcibly taken to internment centers on the manu and nauru islands in papua new guinea. as amnesty international denounced, australia’s “operation sovereign borders” is the country’s military-led border control operation. it began in late 2013 and 32 amnesty international, fear and fences europe’s approach to keeping refugees at bay, http://www.amnesty.eu/content/assets/doc2015/2015_documents/report_-_fear_and_fences.pdf 33 like the united states and canada, australia was a young, large, relatively sparsely populated country seeking to increase its population and economic growth through immigration. «la solución de australia, la pesadilla de los refugiados», el país, 12/08/2015. the age of human rights journal, 8 (june 2017) pp. 49-66 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n8.3 59 two-lane blacktop: refugees & torture involves a number of agencies which include the australian federal police, australian defence force, australian border force and department of immigration and border protection. the mandate of operation sovereign borders is to stop anyone –including asylum-seekers and refugees– from reaching australia irregularly by boat. in operations that are called “pushbacks” or “turnbacks.”34 never before has a country signatory to the un convention on refugees (both countries ratified it) completely closed the door to potential refugees35. although this is a fact with clear analogies with the intentions of not a few governments around us, starting with ours, as an example of new paradigm36, australia is the only country in the world that encloses irregular immigrants and refugees in detention centers outside its borders 37 . since then there have been cases of suicide and many other cases of worsening of the physical and mental health of thousands of immigrants, including children and sick people. according to amnesty international, by forcibly transferring refugees and people seeking asylum to nauru, detaining them for prolonged periods in inhumane conditions, denying them appropriate medical care, and in other ways structuring its operations so that many experience a serious degradation of their mental health, the australian government has violated the rights to be free from torture and other ill-treatment and from arbitrary detention, as well as other fundamental protections. in recent years, australian vessels have towed to people fleeing conflict zones or countries such as iran, afghanistan or pakistan. in many of these cases, when nongovernmental bodies agreed to the testimony of some of them, they found that they were fleeing precisely for having suffered torture, inhuman treatment or threats of torture. 34 amnesty international, australia: appalling abuse, neglect of refugees on nauru, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2016/08/australia-abuse-neglect-of-refugees-on-nauru/ 02/10/2016 also see the guardian, “the nauru files”: https://www.theguardian.com/news/series/naurufiles 133 amnesty international, annual report 2015/2016, australia country page: https://www.amnesty.org/en/countries/asia-and-the-pacific/australia/reportaustralia/ 35 mcmaster, d., «asylum-seekers and the insecurity of a nation», australian journal of international affairs, 56:2, 2002, pp. 279-290. 36 crisp, j., a new asylum paradigm? globalization, migration and the uncertain future of the international refugee regime (working paper no. 100). geneva, united nations high commissioner for refugees, 2003. creamer, c., simmons, b.; “ratification, reporting, and rights: quality of participation in the convention against torture”, human rights quarterly, vol. 37, num. 3, 2015, pp. 579-608. 37 the united nations' top official on refugees has slammed australia before an international audience, saying he is "dismayed" by the country's treatment of asylum seekers in detention in the context of the accelerating migration crisis in south-east asia and europe. the un high commissioner for human rights, zeid raâad al hussein, told the human rights council overnight in geneva that he was "alarmed" by the current migration crises, calling on countries to put human rights first and to approach the issue "far more" comprehensively. http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/un-highcommissioner-for-human-rights-dismayed-at-australias-treatment-of-asylum-seekers-20150527ghaij7.html the age of human rights journal, 8 (june 2017) pp. 49-66 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n8.3 60 jesús garcía cívico there is no enough space here for an exhaustive development of the rest of the analogous cases neither. we will just mention something that affects our country: in its report of 2015, the committee against torture of the united nations implicitly referred to what we call «devoluciones en caliente», and in general to the expulsion and extradition of persons "without prior assessment of the risk of return and impede access to procedures for determining refugee status". the un urged spain to review immigration legislation "with a view to unconditionally respecting the right of non-refoulement" as reflected in the concluding observations on the sixth periodic report38. the case of mistreatment and death caused by «concertinas» fits the possibility of inhuman or degrading treatment occurring in the context of the search for refuge (or arriving there); amnesty international report 2002 "spain: identity crisis: torture and racist abuse by state agents" collected more than 300 different cases of immigrants who had undergone these practices at border posts, reception centers, police stations or in the streets. 39 . the temporary immigrant shelter centers (ceti) of ceuta and melilla, public administration establishments, are still very illustrative examples of the dangerous path of something theorically conceived as first-time reception devices intended to provide basic social services and benefits to immigrants and asylum seekers identification and medical check-ups are carried out. 40): the 2015 report expressed concern about the high levels of overcrowding and the deplorable material conditions of its facilities. these were described as a threat to the health and the physical and psychological integrity of the people there. v. torture or inhuman treatment after seeking asylum there is also a third case: the possibility (an actual perversion of the asylum system) that an asylum seeker ends up in a country where he is at risk of being tortured or suffer cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment… again. this risk has great relevance due to the number of people (including children) wandering unprotected along europe (or in countries in transit and international waters). we will concentrate in some of the consequences of the agreement between the eu and turkey that entered into force on 38 it was also criticized the "excessive use of force" by the police and civil guard in border controls and demonstrations. attitudes that, according to this un agency, remain unpunished for lack of prevention measures and mechanisms to be supervised. the report recalls that some agents who have made disproportionate use of their force even became pardoned. the un considered in that report that the crime of torture, as contained in the criminal code, is poorly developed and the penalties "are still not adequate considering their seriousness." spain is requested to amend the articles in order to bring it into line with that of the international convention against torture.http://www.europapress.es/sociedad/noticiaonu-insta-espana-revisar-legislacion-inmigracion-asilo-20150515180958.html 18th september 2016 39 zúñiga lópez, l., «instrumentos jurídicos para prevenir la tortura y los tratos inhumanos y degradantes» in ararteko, la prevención y erradicación de la tortura y los malos tratos en los sistemas democráticos, colección «jornadas sobre derechos humanos» nº 7, 2004, p. 137. 40 on the legal regulation of these centers: articles 264-266 reglamento de la ley orgánica 4/2000, aprobado por real decreto 557/2011, 20th april. the age of human rights journal, 8 (june 2017) pp. 49-66 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n8.3 61 http://www.europapress.es/sociedad/noticia-onu-insta-espana-revisar-legislacion-inmigracion-asilo-20150515180958.html http://www.europapress.es/sociedad/noticia-onu-insta-espana-revisar-legislacion-inmigracion-asilo-20150515180958.html two-lane blacktop: refugees & torture 20th march 2016 and which authorized the return of asylum seekers to turkey under the assumption that it is a safe country for refugees. according to human rights watch, the first round of deportations authorized by the eu from the greek island of chios to turkey in april 2016 was hasty and chaotic and violated the rights of the deportees. moreover, the turkish authorities have not allowed visits by human rights groups or un agencies once there. the eu and greece, in this kind of “race” to find a populist solution outside the legal mechanisms already foreseen for the cases of asylum and refuge (those we underlined in the first section) ignored the basic rights of all people, including those who wanted to apply for asylum. these are evictions that highlight the fundamental problems of large-scale eu-wide accelerated returns to an unsafe country. the authorities did not inform them that they would be deported, nor where they would be taken, and some people were not allowed to take personal belongings. in addition, and according to unhcr, thirteen of the deportees of chios had expressed their desire to apply for asylum in greece. the greek authorities precipitated the forced returns from chios and lesbos, in order to meet a deadline announced for the commencement of the deportations. according to europe´s gatekeeper41, a quite recent amnesty international report, the eu is in danger of becoming complicit in another serious violation of human rights against refugees and asylum seekers due to turkish pressure on applicants to return to iraq or syria as well as police arrests and collective deportations forced into war zones. finally, human rights watch has denounced another side effect of the euturkey agreement: after its entry into force, cases of syrian refugees returned from the turkish borders to syria have been documented after being brutally beaten, some of them to death.42 vi. synthesis and recapitulation firstly, we linked the raison d'être of human rights of asylum and the right of not suffering torture, inhuman and degrading treatment with its common nature but also with its current global crisis situation, both are not two simple rights but, installed in the same nucleus of human rights declarations and covenants, they exemplified very well the spirit that accompanied the first phase of the history of human rights. the beginning of the second half of the twentieth century was an era characterized by the widest reflection and consensus. however, today, in the first decades of the 21st century, it is possible to see that, precisely because of a context of the opposite nature, a pattern of exception, urgency and fear –terrorist attacks and massive refugee flows– is quite irresponsible and full of nuances, the fate of both rights is again, unfortunately, similar. 41 amnesty international, europe's gatekeeper: unlawful detention and deportation of refugees from turkey: https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur44/3022/2015/en/ 14/09/2016. 42 human rights watch, world report, 2016. the age of human rights journal, 8 (june 2017) pp. 49-66 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n8.3 62 https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur44/3022/2015/en/ jesús garcía cívico both rights limit the powers that governments can justly exercise over the human beings under their power (torture) or in their territories (asylum), and these limits include an absolute ban on subjecting individuals to forms of pain that strip them of their dignity, identity and even sanity. however, the end of the seriousness conception with which the obligations and implications of the legally binding force of both rights were assumed paralleled a worrying retreat in the socio-political perception of the demands stemming from the "hard core" of human rights catalogs. we argued here for the unconditional refutation of any attempt to justify torture, without exceptions. the extension of instrumental torture as a fundamental part of the "war on terror" is becoming, in the words of massimo la torre, a veritable "legal nightmare." similarly, the “refugee crisis” is –and here we come to the expression of javier de lucas– a “political emptiness” of the eu. it is not the only case, the "pacific solution" in australia, as well as some background of the referendum on the exit of the eu (so called “brexit”) by the uk, the fences against the immigrants of the hungarian president viktor orbán and the sinister referendum to reject the quotas refugees imposed by the eu, or the rise of extreme right-wing parties to the fears of european citizens (from austria to finland) for the arrival of refugees, make clear the new paradigm: the abandonment of the basic legal obligations of the right of asylum. secondly, we wanted to draw a picture of the (very current) state of a triple zone of intersection between the right not to suffer torture or inhuman or degrading treatment and the rights of asylum and refuge: a) torture as the cause of the search of refuge; b) torture and/or inhuman and degrading treatment in the search for shelter; c) torture and/or inhuman or degrading treatment after the search for shelter. with regard to the first question, the seriousness of the crimes against the syrian population, the extent of torture in eritrea, iraq, afghanistan, pakistan, sudan, south sudan, the democratic republic of the congo, the central african republic and other refugee origins continues to explain the arrival of potential asylum seekers to the eu (and many other countries). at the same time, if the real danger of torture or escape from it is today one of the most worrying causes of the ungrateful, dangerous and obstacle-free refugees seeking asylum in europe, another scandal dereives from the most basic abuses and violations of human rights in this quest for refuge, from torture itself: from the terrible case of eritrean refugees on their journey through africa to the thousands of dead people in the mediterranean sea. finally, the agreement between the eu and turkey which entered into force in march 2016 authorizing the return of asylum-seekers to turkey under the assumption that it is a safe country illustrates the possibility that violations of rights at the end of the refugee journey. we mentioned in the title ot his work the image of a paved road in two directions, a nod to the famous film of monte hellman, but regarding with cinametophrapic images, we would particularly like to finish with the recent film by anton corbijn based on john le carre's novel the most wanted man (2014) as it perfectly illustrates the devilish two-way road in this article´s tittle: at the beginning of this film, a young chechen with aspect of having been brutally tortured leaves naked of a dark sewer of hamburg. his past is a past of torture in russian prisons, his present is the age of human rights journal, 8 (june 2017) pp. 49-66 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n8.3 63 two-lane blacktop: refugees & torture the deseperate seek for refuge and peace through strong pacifist convictions expressed in his muslim faith, his future will be become him just in an object coveted by his "informative value" by the new intelligence agencies that are permanently removed from the principles and values (if any) of the old spies of that distant time full of contradictions, but a time as well, when it was possible to achieve that normative code of universal validity that we called human rights covenants. references aymerich, i., «orígenes ideológicos de la distribución de responsabilidades públicas y privadas en la garantía de los derechos humanos», in zamora, f. j., garcía cívico, j., sales pallarés, s., (eds.), la responsabilidad de las multinacionales por violaciones de derechos humanos, cuadernos democracia y derechos humanos, universidad de alcalá, madrid, 2013, pp. 21-40. bennet, w. l., lawrence, r. g., livingston, s., «none dare call it torture: indexing and the limits of press independence in the abu ghraib scandal», journal of communication, 56, 2006, pp. 467–485. bufacchi, v. and arrigo, j. m., torture, terrorism and the state: a refutation of the ticking-bomb argument. journal of applied philosophy, 23, 2006, pp. 355–373. carver, r., handley. l., (eds.); does torture prevention work?, liverpool university press, 2016. claude, r., jabine, th.; “exploring human rights issues with statistics, in human rights and statistics, getting the record straight, university of pennsylvania press, 1992. creamer, c., simmons, b.; “ratification, reporting, and rights: quality of participation in the convention against torture”, human rights quarterly, vol. 37, num. 3, 2015, pp. 579-608. crisp, j., a new asylum paradigm? globalization, migration and the uncertain future of the international refugee regime (working paper no. 100). geneva, united nations high commissioner for refugees, 2003. de lucas, j., «sobre el proceso de vaciamiento del derecho de asilo por parte de los estados de la ue», ars iuris salmanticensis, vol. 4, junio 2016. de lucas, j., mediterráneo, el naufragio de europa, tirant lo blanch, valencia, 2016. dershowitz, a. d., «is there a torture road to freedom?», los angeles times, 8 de noviembre de 2001. gale, p., «the refugee crisis and fear. populist politics and media discourse», journal of sociology, 40(4), 2004, pp. 321-340. the age of human rights journal, 8 (june 2017) pp. 49-66 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n8.3 64 jesús garcía cívico garcía amado, j. a., paredes castañón, j. m., (coords.) torturas en el cine, tiran lo blanch, valencia, 2005, p. 39. garcía cívico, j. «¿qué es un indicador de derechos humanos y cómo se utiliza?», derechos y libertades: revista del instituto bartolomé de las casas, año nº 15, nº 24, 2011. goodwin-gill, g., the refugee in international law, clarendon press, oxford, 1996. harbury, tj. k., truth, torture and the american way. the historical consequences of u. s. involvement in torture, beacon press, boston, 2005. human rights watch, «no more excuses: a roadmap to justice for cia torture», 2015. https://www.hrw.org/report/2015/12/01/no-moreexcuses/roadmap-justice-cia-torture. human rights watch, world report, 2016. human rights watch; “trump’s national security choice won’t rule out torture” https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/11/18/us-trumps-national-securitychoice-wont-rule-out-torture 15/11/2016. ignatieff, m., torture: does it make us safer? is it ever ok?, kenneth roth and minky worden, (eds.), the new press / human rights watch, 2006 amnesty international, tackling the global refugee crisis: from shirking to sharing responsibility, report; www.amnestyinternational.org. 16/09/2016. id., «refugio e inmigración»: https://www.es.amnesty.org/en-queestamos/temas/refugio-e-inmigracion/ 17/09/2016. amnesty international, fear and fences europe’s approach to keeping refugees at bay, http://www.amnesty.eu/content/assets/doc2015/2015_documents/report_fear_ and_fences.pdf amnesty international, europe's gatekeeper: unlawful detention and deportation of refugees from turkey: https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur44/3022/2015/en/ 14/09/2016. amnesty international, australia: appalling abuse, neglect of refugees on nauru, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2016/08/australia-abuseneglect-of-refugees-on-nauru/ amnesty international, annual report 2015/2016 international organization for migrations, fatal journeys volume 2: identification and tracing of dead and missing migrants, geneva, 2016. kaleck w., «justice and accountability in europe: discussing strategies», cia – “extraordinary rendition” flights, torture and accountability – a european approach, european center for constitutional and human rights, second edition, 2008, p. 15. the age of human rights journal, 8 (june 2017) pp. 49-66 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n8.3 65 two-lane blacktop: refugees & torture landman, t., «measuring human rights: principle, practice and policy», human rights quarterly, 26, 2006, pp. 906-931. la torre, m., «la teoría del derecho de la tortura» derechos y libertades: revista del instituto bartolomé de las casas, nº 17, 2007, pp. 71-87. la torre., m., «a dangerous liaison. tortura and law», derechos y libertades, número 28, época ii, enero 2013, pp. 25-38. lauterpacht, e. y bethlehem, d., refugee protection in intrenational law, cambridge, 2001. mcmaster, d., «asylum-seekers and the insecurity of a nation», australian journal of international affairs, 56:2, 2002, pp. 279-290. rosemann, n.; «the privatization of human rights violations – business’ impunity or corporate responsibility? the case of human rights abuses and torture in iraq», non-state actors and international law, 5, 2005, pp. 77-100. scahill, j. guerras sucias. el mundo como campo de batalla, barcelona, paidós, 2013. sands, ph., the torture team. rumsfeld’s memo and the betrayal of american values, palgrave-macmillan, new york 2008. sassen, s., expulsions, brutality and complexity in the global economy, harvard university press, 2014. sivakumaran, s., «torture in international human rights and international humanitarian law: the actor and the ad hoc tribunals», leiden journal of international law, 2005, pp. 541-556. stenberg, g., non-expulsion and non-refoulement. the prohibition against removal of refugees with special reference to articles 32 and 33 of the 1951 convention relating to the status of refugees, iustus förlag, uppsala, 1989. unhcr, handbook of procedures and criteria for determining refugee status under the 1951 convention and the 1967 protocol relating to the status of refugees, ginebra, 1988. unhcr, global trends, forced displacement in 2015. yoo, j., the powers of war and peace, university of chicago press, chicago, 2005. zamora cabot, f., «acaparamiento de tierras (land grabbing) y empresas multinacionales: el caso mubende-neumann», in papeles el tiempo de los derechos, 2013, (5). žižek, s., «sobre terrorismo y tortura», in pasajes: revista de pensamiento contemporáneo, , nº. 17, 2005, pp. 21-27 p. 23. zúñiga lópez, l., «instrumentos jurídicos para prevenir la tortura y los tratos inhumanos y degradantes» in ararteko, la prevención y erradicación de la tortura y los malos tratos en los sistemas democráticos, colección «jornadas sobre derechos humanos» nº 7, 2004, p. 137. the age of human rights journal, 8 (june 2017) pp. 49-66 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n8.3 66 reasonableness in the concept of reasonable accommodation1 rafael de asís roig2 abstract: reasonable accommodation is one of the pillars upon which the recognition of the rights of people with disabilities rests. it acquires its full meaning when understood in connection with the concept of universal design, since both concepts fall within the framework of universal accessibility. an accurate understanding of reasonable accommodation requires, on the one hand, clarifying its connection with universal design and accessibility, and on the other, unraveling what “reasonable” means. the reasonableness in accommodation takes to three kinds of reflections. on the one hand the one concerning non-discrimination, which requires to assess, when examining whether the adjustment is justified or not, if it entails a violation of the principle of equality (since it differentiates or it does not, in an unjustified manner, thus harming a human right such as accessibility). in this justifying test there is an essential methodological tool at hand, which shall be regarded as the second great reflection on reasonableness in accommodation: the principle of proportionality. in virtue of this principle, the reasonableness test requires facing the adjustment’s adequacy and necessity and, in addition to that, the advantages or sacrifices that produces on rights. and since both of these reflections do not ensure a single answer, reasonableness requires a last reflection on the basis of acceptability. the adjustment’s justification, or the lack of it, shall be subject to the community’s acceptance or rejection. keywords: accessibility, reasonable accommodation, disability, universal design. summary: i. universal accessibility and reasonable accommodation; ii. the meaning of reasonableness; ii.1. three dimensions in reasonableness; ii.2. reasonableness in accommodation; iii. reasonableness in disability; iii.1. reasonableness and unreasonable costs; iii.2. a comprehensive vision. reasonable accommodation is one of the pillars upon which the recognition of the rights of people with disabilities rests. it acquires its full meaning when understood in connection with the concept of universal design, since both concepts fall within the framework of universal accessibility (which, in general, but particularly so in the field of disability, is part of the right to have rights).3 1 i would like to thank f. javier ansuátegui, m. c. barranco, p. cuenca, a. palacios and m. l. serra, for their comments and suggestions for this paper’s rough draft. there is a spanish version of this paper in salmon, e. and bregaglio, r. (2014). 2 instituto de derechos humanos bartolomé de las casas, international, ecclesiastical and philosophy of law department, universidad carlos iii de madrid, spain (rafael.asis@uc3m.es). 3 i would like to point out, just as a reminder, that the rights of the disabled unfold within generalization and specification. on the rights of people with disabilities see, for a general scope, cuenca, p. (2012). generalization expresses the need for people with disabilities to be entitled to the same rights as any other person; specification conveys the necessity of recognizing people with disabilities specific rights. well then, taking into account the preceding statement and contrary to what i favored in de asís, r. (2013), the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 42-59 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2929 42 rafael de asís roig an accurate understanding of reasonable accommodation requires, on the one hand, clarifying its connection with universal design and accessibility, and on the other, unraveling what “reasonable” means. admittedly, achieving a fully comprehensive notion of this idea seems almost impossible. in spite of that, in the forthcoming pages i will attempt to offer some reference points in order to provide the term with a meaningful content. i. universal accessibility and reasonable accommodation as has just been said, universal accessibility is one of the major principles (rights) when dealing with the issue of disability. it therefore comes as no surprise that it appears in the preamble of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (crpd) being its importance highlighted “in enabling persons with disabilities to fully enjoy all human rights and fundamental freedoms.”4 as to this international enactment, accessibility is also comprised in the general principles provided by article 3 and there is even a provision as a whole (article 9) devoted to this particular principle. hence, article 9 crpd is worded as follows: “to enable persons with disabilities to live independently and participate fully in all aspects of life, states parties shall take appropriate measures to ensure for persons with disabilities access, on an equal basis with others, to the physical environment, to transportation, to information and communications, including information and communications technologies and systems, and to other facilities and services open or provided to the public, both in urban and in rural areas”. in most legal texts accessibility is enshrined as a principle. however, accessibility may be brought forward as: a) a requirement for action by the public authorities as well as a validity standard for any legal performance (legal principle of universal accessibility); b) a relevant claim tied to the defence of any fundamental right (universal accessibility falls within every fundamental right’s core content); c) a need for non-discrimination (the right to accessibility on an equal basis); d) a right itself, the right of access to goods, products and services not related to human rights, understood as a performance right (of a statutory or a fundamental nature) which correlatively brings along the “design for all” obligation ((de asís, aiello, bariffi, campoy, and palacios 2007: p. 104 ff). furthermore, universal accessibility is integrated and grounded in the crpd by reference to three other major rights: the right to an independent living, to a full participation in society and equal opportunity. both universal design and reasonable accommodation are part of generalization as long as they aim at extending the enjoyment of human rights to persons with disabilities. 4 in order to attain an accurate understanding of the convention palacios, a. (2008) is a must-read. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 42-59 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2929 43 reasonableness in the concept of reasonable accommodation independent living shall mean “the situation in which disabled people retain their full ability to make decisions about their very existence and actively take part in their community, in accordance with the right to the free development of personality”5. article 19 of the convention addresses the right to an independent living as follows: “states parties to the present convention recognize the equal right of all persons with disabilities to live in the community, with choices equal to others, and shall take effective and appropriate measures to facilitate full enjoyment by persons with disabilities of this right and their full inclusion and participation in the community, especially by ensuring that: a) persons with disabilities have the opportunity to choose their place of residence and where and with whom they live on an equal basis with others and are not obliged to live in a particular living arrangement”. full participation in society is a right covered by the definition of disability which lays the foundations for many of the rights set forth in the crpd6. accordingly, article 1 reads: “persons with disabilities include those who have long-term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairments which in interaction with various barriers may hinder their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others.” there is no doubt, however, that equal opportunity rights provide the basis for accessibility thereby integrating the two previous rights. the referred equal opportunity rights, as n. bobbio pointed out, “are aimed at placing every member of a given community on equal starting points with regards to participation conditions in the competition of life or in the conquest of the most significant milestones in a lifetime” (bobbio 1993: 78). it brings along “measures focused on removing those obstacles that prevent individuals from competing on equal terms” (barranco 2011: 36). nevertheless, as m.c. barranco has stated, it may turn to be insufficient to ensure the recognition and enjoyment of rights on an equal basis. actually, “it is easy to imagine situations in which two individuals have equal opportunities to compete but due to the given circumstances, individuals that belong to a certain group would win every single time” (barranco 2011: 38). this happens because in many cases the reflection on equality is not only projected onto specific practices or situations but embedded in social structures. this is why it is important to use a broad concept of “opportunity” when speaking about equal opportunities. this concept must be so overarching as to comprise structural situations. along these lines, the demand for accessibility does not take place in the abstract or in relation to domains with an individual or a personal scope, but it is rather applied to goods, products and services linked to social life which some people (the majority) enjoy. 5 as defined by article 2 of the spanish general law on the rights of persons with disabilities of 2013. 6 article 22 of the spanish general law on the rights of persons with disabilities of 2013 begins by pointing out that “persons with disabilities are entitled to live independently and to a full and effective participation in every aspect of life.” the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 42-59 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2929 44 rafael de asís roig the bottom line is that although accessibility can be accomplished through different means, two of them are usually highlighted: universal design and reasonable accommodation. pursuant to article 2 of the spanish general law on the rights of persons with disabilities of 2013, universal design means “the activity aimed at planning and conceiving from the very beginning, where possible, environments, processes, goods, products, services, objects, instruments, programs, devices or tools to be usable by all people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design.” it is an obligation stemming from the right to universal accessibility in each of its dimensions, to be complied with, not only by public authorities, but rather by every individual who participates in the making of these goods and products, in the provision of a service, or in the enforcement of a given right. therefore it shall be construed as an obligation that accounts for the importance of taking the validity of rights among subjects of private law in a serious manner when it comes to enforcing the rights of the disabled. from a conceptual standpoint, what is troublesome about universal design lies on determining the meaning of the term ‘possible’, which, as it may have been appreciated, sets an internal boundary for the content of this principle. from a general point of view, a first sense of ‘possible,’ the most basic one, closely relates to the state of knowledge and research. therefore, the design for all might be constrained by progress made in science and technology as well as by human diversity and our chances to learn about it. it is a boundary which, legally speaking, is amply illustrated by the old aphorism “ad impossibilia nemo tenetur.” in addition, the design for all might find other bounds that have to do with the consequences tied to its enforcement and which complement the mentioned primary meaning of possible. as it has been previously stated, the design for all is aimed at accomplishing universal accessibility. nonetheless, there may be occasions when measures brought along by universal design might lead to harmful outcomes which could be prejudicial for other rights at stake, thus weakening its legal foundation. let’s imagine, for instance, that in order to meet universal design standards it is necessary to cause environmental damage or that a blatantly unreasonable cost which causes the nonenforcement of other rights at stake is required. in these situations, design for all shall be deemed unreasonable, thus turning the need for what is possible into the need for reasonableness. universal accessibility, as it happens with every right, is not an absolute right. this obviously implies that the universal design obligation is not an absolute right either. therefore, when focusing on the consequences, the impact of universal design on rights and their cost must be taken into account. however, as it will be noted below, these are issues that shall not be addressed separately, being the latter determined by the first. founding the boundaries of design on reasonableness only makes sense when such the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 42-59 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2929 45 reasonableness in the concept of reasonable accommodation design entails undermining the enjoyment of a given right in an unacceptable manner. on this point, reasonableness is normally assessed in terms of proportionality. i will take care of the matter later. reasonable accommodation measures (also referred to as reasonable adjustments) intend to shape the environment, goods and services to meet the particular needs of a given person. in accordance with the crpd, reasonable accommodation means “necessary and appropriate modification and adjustments not imposing a disproportionate or undue burden, where needed in a particular case, to ensure to persons with disabilities the enjoyment or exercise on an equal basis with others of all human rights and fundamental freedoms.”7 it is a right meant to fulfill the legal interest protected by the right to accessibility, so it can also be considered as an expression of this principle or right. hence, reasonable accommodation acquires its fullest dimensions when the underlying legal interest in accessibility cannot be fulfilled universally, thus becoming an actual right aimed at solving a given situation (palacios 2004). the right to reasonable accommodation encompasses neither a preferential nor a privileged treatment. moreover, it does not bear a time dimension and it shall not be understood as a mere measure either. nevertheless, the adjustments are not aimed at replacing the duty to provide accessibility or let alone to limit it. admittedly, the lack of accessibility, i.e., the breach of the accessibility obligation, may or may not be justified, and that will depend on whether a design for all has been accomplished (either originally or by means of accessibility measures). if it has actually been accomplished, either because there is in fact universal accessibility or because its existence was either impossible or unreasonable, we cannot talk about a violation of the duty to provide accessibility. if it has not been accomplished, because there is no universal accessibility and its existence was possible or reasonable, we can in fact talk about non-compliance with the duty to provide accessibility. in this latter case we are dealing with a discrimination scenario that must be settled by remedying the unsatisfactory situation and accomplishing accessibility. as i have stated elsewhere, universal design might sometimes encounter constraints related to the progress made in technology and knowledge, which could entail the lack of accessibility with regards to certain goods, products and services. in these cases, the lack of accessibility does not amount to discrimination against anybody (because it is justified, i.e., “universal design was either impossible or unreasonable”) and can be remedied by means of reasonable 7 as the un committee on the rights of persons with disabilities has pointed out, “the duty to provide reasonable accommodation is an ex nunc duty, which means that it is enforceable from the moment an individual with an impairment needs it in a given situation (workplace, school, etc.) in order to enjoy her or his rights on an equal basis in a particular context. here, accessibility standards can be an indicator, but may not be taken as prescriptive. reasonable accommodation can be used as a means of ensuring accessibility for an individual with a disability in a particular situation. reasonable accommodation seeks to achieve individual justice in the sense that non-discrimination or equality is assured, taking the dignity, autonomy and choices of the individual into account. thus, a person with a rare impairment might ask for accommodation that falls outside the scope of any accessibility standard”. section 26 of the general comment on article 9 of 11 april 2014 (general comment no. 2). the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 42-59 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2929 46 rafael de asís roig accommodation (since the mentioned goods, products and services are linked to participation in society). however, if the breach of the duty to provide universal design and consequently the lack of accessibility are not justified (i.e., “if universal design was possible or reasonable”), these non-compliances would in fact amount to discrimination thus preventing reasonableness and reasonable accommodation from coming into play. hence the importance of correctly interpreting the requirement that has been put forward, so it does not become an outlet for the duty to provide accessibility or universal design (de asís 2013: 80). a comprehensive understanding of accessibility embodies: (i) universal design, which operates as a general principle from which specific obligations or duties stem; (ii) accessibility measures, which play a role when universal design is not achieved; (iii) reasonable accommodation, which arises when there is grounds for the non-universal nature of accessibility. in other words, the requirement for universal accessibility is fulfilled through universal design. however, there may be situations in which universal design does not allow to comply with the accessibility obligation. these situations could be the result of: (i) universal design was either not possible (boundaries set forth by science, technology, knowledge or human diversity) or unreasonable (it is prejudicial for rights at stake or involves a disproportionate cost); (ii) universal design was indeed possible but actually not performed. in the first case, the lack of accessibility is justified and accommodation comes into play. in the second, there is no grounds for the lack of accessibility, amounting to a discrimination scenario that is not to be remedied by means of reasonable accommodation. in these situations, the lack of accessibility can only be solved by making the given good, service, or right universally accessible,8 and not by carrying out reasonable adjustments. in short, the content of universal accessibility is constrained by three types of circumstances that could be considered as the bounds for what is necessary, possible and reasonable. the bounds of what is necessary refer to the kind of goods, products or services onto which accessibility is projected (and that must be tied to participation in society). the bounds of what is possible relate to the status of scientific knowledge and human diversity (there are indeed limitations in knowledge, and the greatness of human diversity makes it impossible to fully accomplish accessibility standards). the bounds of reasonableness address the absence of grounds for accessibility because rights at stake and goods are affected or because it brings along unreasonable costs (on which i will focus later). 8 in these cases, accessibility is accomplished by carrying out special general measures. this brings along a strengthened claim for universal design as opposed to these accessibility measures, since it is a principle more aligned with a less stigmatizing approach to disability, pointing out that these measures fall within a distinct approach which does not favor the inclusion of people with disabilities. it is actually stated that many of the policies aimed at fostering accessibility entail special measures for certain groups or individuals that perpetuate a picture of “abnormality” certainly incompatible with the disabilities social model’s philosophy. for instance, it shall be upheld that it is better to have just a ramp rather than having a staircase and a ramp. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 42-59 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2929 47 reasonableness in the concept of reasonable accommodation in other words, discrimination on the grounds of the lack of accessibility takes place when providing a design for all is possible as well as reasonable yet it is not carried out. however, there might be another way of breaching the duty to provide accessibility and another form of discrimination stemming from a bad use of adjustments. the very conception of accessibility incorporates a dimension regarding accommodation and related to reasonableness at the same time. as it has been stated, the need for reasonableness in the adjustments is enshrined in the definition of reasonable accommodation. thereupon, there might be a lack of accessibility, because it has not been possible to achieve a design for all, which cannot be remedied due to the unreasonableness of the possible adjustment to be made. in these cases there is no room to talk about a breach of the duty to provide accessibility. nevertheless, if the adjustment shall be deemed reasonable, its non-performance amounts, once again, to discrimination. hence, reasonableness comes up again as a boundary for accessibility, although now in its projection onto accommodation. ii. the meaning of reasonableness as we have just examined, the terms possible and reasonable are central when studying accessibility. we have related the first to the state of knowledge (both scientific/technical and about human diversity) whereas the latter has been tied to legal reasoning and clashes with rights or other fundamental legal interests. in this section i am keen on analyzing the meaning of reasonableness within the context of accommodation. for this purpose, i will start by unraveling the general meaning of this term and secondly i will outline its role in accommodation. first of all i will clarify the power of the right to accommodation and the context where it shall be placed. as it has been stated before, we are dealing with an essential right within the framework of the rights of the persons with disabilities. accommodation, as any other right, can have boundaries. nevertheless, since it is a result of a restriction on accessibility, the legal grounds for these boundaries requires a greater argumentative effort. the adjustment´s nature becomes really important at this point. indeed, the requirement for reasonableness allows relating the adjustment in question to other parameters such as interests, principles, rights... consequently, if the adjustment has a constitutional character, the parameters must be constitutional as well, whereas if it has a statutory nature the parameters must have this same essence; if accommodation shall be considered a human right, the parameters must be those of that legal context. hence, as it happened when dealing with accessibility (maybe with greater justification in this case), the right to reasonable adjustments can (must) be construed as a human right. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 42-59 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2929 48 rafael de asís roig ii.1. three dimensions in reasonableness i will begin by underscoring that rational does not mean reasonable. reasonableness refers to goals and values9; rationality basically brings forward logic and practical arguments, along with a domain in which there seem to be clear referents. along these lines we might think that there is some sort of basic rationality affecting every domain of knowledge (a common compliance with deductive reasoning and the principles of practical rationality, such as consistency, efficiency, coherence, generalization...), and alongside there is another kind of rationality that connects to the first, which shall be understood within a particular domain and that is to be called sectoral. for instance, we could refer to a legal rationality based on rules. in this dimension, a rational behavior in law is the one that can be labeled as lawful.10 nonetheless we must recall that there are different rationality criteria, thus legal rationality could be found irrational from an economic outlook. something similar applies to reasonableness, since it can have a general dimension but it can also project itself onto a particular domain made up of a series of principles and values. according to the foregoing, there is no reason for rationality and reasonableness to coincide. therefore, there can be unreasonable rational measures, while we can also think of reasonable decisions which are also irrational. however, this last point calls for certain clarification. as noted above, when dealing with rationality a difference must be made between basic rationality and sectoral rationality, and the same applies to reasonableness. reasonable but irrational measures are implemented when combining different domains of knowledge. this is why something could be reasonable from an ethical standpoint yet irrational from a legal perspective. the context of reasonableness is opposed to that of truth and certainty. therefore, what is reasonable in the legal domain has nothing to do with the use of rules, despite the fact that these rules could be assessed in terms of reasonableness. reasonableness relates to practical wisdom,11 to arguments and principles. we shall not consider that applying reasonableness leads us to the only right answer there is. contrarily, it is indeed useful in order to define a framework for admissible decisions, thus allowing us to identify the wrong ones. 9 according to l. recaséns, reasonableness has to do with experience (recaséns siches 1971: 49). 10 in the view of m. atienza, a legal decision shall be deemed strictly rational if and only if: 1) follows the rules of deductive reasoning; 2) follows practical rationality principles, i.e., consistency, efficiency, coherency, generalization and honesty; 3) is made without avoiding at least one or more binding sources of law 4) it is not adopted on the basis of ethical or political criteria which are not specifically provided by the legal system (atienza 1987: 193-194). 11 see the interesting book by schwartz, b. y sharpe, k., practical wisdom, riverhead books, new york 2010. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 42-59 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2929 49 reasonableness in the concept of reasonable accommodation on the other hand, it must be highlighted that reasonableness has gained such salience in the legal domain as to be also used as a validity parameter (along with rationality). reasonableness is central in the constitutional arena (mercader uguina 2008: 127 ff.) since this is where law’s evaluative dimension becomes more evident.12 in this domain, reasonableness is mainly used for assessing the constitutional grounds for regulatory decisions. in common law, the notion of “principle of reasonableness” is normally used for referring to the substantive due process of law, a doctrine that obtained its utmost splendor in the early 20th century, and which was meant to assess the constitutionality of a rule on the basis of the reasonable relation between means and ends. reasonableness has been used when analyzing the safeguards of the right to an effective legal protection, putting together four control canons: a) congruence; b) line of reasoning; c) the absence of errors; and, d) the reasonableness of the court’s judgment (rocas trías and ahumada ruiz 2013). finally, the principle of reasonableness has projected itself onto equality protection, being used in this domain to distinguish between differentiation and discrimination (nino 2005: 419; martinez tapia 2000: 99). in all of these applications of the idea of reasonableness in law, the latter has borne different referents, often tied to common sense and practical wisdom. but there are two referents that play an important role in this use of reasonableness. although i briefly outline their respective meanings below, for now it is important to remark that whereas the first sets forth a series of steps and dimensions aimed at setting boundaries for what is reasonable, the latter focuses on assessing the outcomes of a given decision. in brief, reasonableness in law takes concrete form in the shape of nondiscrimination, proportionality and acceptability. ii.2. reasonableness in accommodation as we have seen, the requirement for reasonableness in accessibility and accommodation has two dimensions. the first entails some sort of justification for the adjustment in question within the universal accessibility approach. accommodation is justified on the grounds of the need for universal accessibility and its reasonableness stems from the latter. in these cases, the lack of accessibility has occurred because providing a universal design has been impossible or was deemed unreasonable. nevertheless, the implementation of a particular measure such as accommodation can indeed be reasonable. in these situations universal design is not within reasonableness, 12 in the view of the spanish constitutional court, "reasonableness is not strictly synonymous with hermeneutic correction, but in addition to that, it is a requirement for compliance with the values enshrined in the constitution”. constitutional court judgment 261/89 of 16 october, legal grounds 4. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 42-59 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2929 50 rafael de asís roig but accommodation is certainly reasonable (in principle because the rights or interests are affected in a lesser degree). the second dimension relates to the actual adjustment and its impact. this dimension calls for a reasonable adjustment so it can work as a boundary for the accessibility approach. reasonableness, for this matter, involves leaving out certain measures that, although shall be deemed necessary to achieve accessibility, cease to be justified once another set of parameters starts to be taken into consideration (cayo bueno 2012: 159 ff.). in these cases, the accommodation in question has an excessive impact on some rights and legal interests, allowing the principle of proportionality to step in, through which it is assessed whether the adjustment entails an undue or unreasonable burden. in a way, reasonableness works as a double test on accessibility. the first has to do with the grounds of a universal measure allowing for general access to a good or a service; the second relates to the single measure enabling a particular access to a good or service. in all events, reasonableness shall not be an outlet for the universal design requirement nor shall become a strategy that enables to disguise actual cases of discrimination as for the enjoyment of rights or on the basis of disability. what i want to underscore with this is that the adjustment applies when the lack of accessibility is justified, but denying the adjustment might vary that justification and turn the mentioned absence into a case of discrimination. as it has been stated, reasonableness in accommodation entails, on the one hand, the justification for the lack of universal accessibility, and on the other, the adjustment’s justification. this call for reasonableness is expressed mainly in terms of proportionality. notwithstanding, as it was pointed out above, the requirement for reasonableness has two other dimensions, which are non-discrimination and acceptability. it is common to relate non-discrimination to the prohibition of prejudicial unjustified unequal treatment. however, non-discrimination also encompasses the prohibition of equal treatment without justification (i.e. the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of undifferentiation). this is because discrimination involves a violation of equal treatment, and equality plays a key role both when the unequal treatment is justified and also when there is justification for providing an equal treatment.13 hence, when examining non-discrimination, we shall focus on how we assess a given treatment and its weight. 13 as a matter of fact, in the legal context we normally connect discrimination with unjustified unequal treatment from a “counterfactual” standpoint according to which all human beings are equal. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 42-59 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2929 51 reasonableness in the concept of reasonable accommodation it is along these justification attempts where reasonableness turns into the requirement for proportionality.14 as it has been remarked, the principle of proportionality is the product of three major “sub-principles”: adequacy, necessity and proportionality (bernal pulido 1997: 100 ff.). the adequacy principle expresses the demand for any right’s restriction to adequately match a legitimate constitutional purpose. hence, when understood within the reasonable accommodation domain, the principle of adequacy states that a limitation in the adjustment could only be performed taking a constitutional aim as the reference and assuming that setting boundaries for the adjustment is an adequate means to achieve the mentioned constitutional ends. under this principle, the adjustment could only be denied when it hindered the attainment of another constitutional interest and denying the accommodation was deemed as an adequate means to preserve this interest. nevertheless, one might also argue that the adjustment’s weight or importance is such that its performance is justified inasmuch as other measures enabling the satisfaction of the other interest can still be carried out. ultimately, the adequacy principle calls for a specification on whether the legal interest opposing the adjustment can be met through other means. the principle of necessity declares that any adequate limitation on a right must be as benign as possible for the said right as compared to the remaining adequate limitations. with regards to accommodation, it sets forth that the limiting measure must be as harmless as possible (within the adequate measures), thus requiring clarifying whether or not there are better measures. strictly speaking, the principle of proportionality (also called weighing), provides that any adequate and necessary limitation on a given right must pass the advantages and sacrifices test. this test means that the limitation’s advantages shall overcome the sacrifices to be made (both for the right holders and citizens at large) within constitutional values. in short, it requires assessing and weighing the interests at stake. therefore, proportionality involves: (i) examining whether the interests ruled out as a result of the adjustment can be fulfilled with other measures or just denying the adjustment, (ii) assessing whether there are better measures (adjustments); (iii) comparing the advantages and sacrifices attached to one and the other. applying proportionality standards poses a series of issues and it can hardly be stated that its use ensures that the right decision will be made. determining ends, advantages, sacrifices, adequacy, etc…, is subject to different possible judgments. 14 as many others have stated, we are living the era of proportionality. see, in this regard, barak (2012: 457). the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 42-59 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2929 52 rafael de asís roig proportionality, as a criterion which legitimizes a possible limitation on a given right, involves a broad subjective margin of appraisal, and accordingly, what is relevant in its application are the underlying reasons. at this point, and within an argumentation grounded on rights, it is important to warn that not every reason is to be taken into consideration or weighed on an equal basis.15 the last dimension of reasonableness is acceptability (aarnio 1991: 71 ff.).16 the importance of the latter increases as we are confronted with the impossibility of reaching the right answer, as it has been pointed out several times, just through proportionality. the requirement for acceptability calls for decisions allegedly acceptable to the community. it is thus related to the need for the community’s reasonable expectations to be met. a reasonable decision shall be made within the expectations of the decision’s addressees, and within this framework it shall be the one allegedly featuring the widest acceptance. certainly, the most complex cases, those that can only be solved on a one-byone basis, are the ones in which the accommodation clashes with actual human rights. this is why it is essential to consider reasonable accommodation as a human right itself. iii. reasonableness in disability as has been shown, the meaning of reasonableness has a central importance in the context of the persons with disabilities. in this section i will attempt to frame this idea within the mentioned context. notwithstanding, prior to that we will examine an argument relating to the costs of the design or the adjustment which has been put aside until this very moment. 3.1. reasonableness and unreasonable costs as we have already seen, one of the limits set on universal accessibility, which can apply both to universal design and reasonable accommodation, relates to unreasonable costs. indeed, when dealing with universal accessibility we saw how what is possible was integrated in its definition, thus allowing for an assessment of its economic costs in terms of reasonableness. we have also faced this assessment when tackling reasonable accommodation, since the latter can be limited, from a conceptual 15 in spain, article 66 (2) of the general law on the rights of persons with disabilities of 2013 states the following: “as for ascertaining if a given adjustment is reasonable… the costs, the discriminatory effects that could entail for the disabled not to adopt it, the structure and characteristics of the person, entity or organization that must implement it, and the possibility of obtaining official financing or any other sort of aid shall be taken into account.” 16 i have addressed this principle in de asís, r. (2005). the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 42-59 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2929 53 reasonableness in the concept of reasonable accommodation standpoint, by the unreasonable costs of its performance.17 therefore it seems appropriate to carefully examine this limit’s scope with respect to accessibility, thus providing the full meaning of reasonableness in this domain. let me begin by recalling, as i have consistently done throughout this paper, that we are in the human rights domain, which undoubtedly restricts the referents that can be used as well as their scope. that said, it shall be noted that rights, as could not be otherwise, have always been limited by their economic feasibility, either by means of reflecting on scarcity or the so called “reservation of the possible”. indeed, the focus on economy and on the costs of measures is by no means foreign to the context of rights. the traditional view has talked about material boundaries of rights when referring to constraints that preclude the satisfaction of the underlying interests and needs. and among the examples of these boundaries we can find references made to scarcity. nevertheless, the understanding of scarcity as a material boundary of rights shall aim for neutrality in its formulation, i.e., it must be an expression of natural scarcity.18 for instance, the claim that every individual in the world shall own a true goya painting could not be considered as a fundamental right. something similar, though not identical, applies to an alleged right to never getting sick. the material boundaries thus entail a limitation to certain demands which are unable to be met in a generalized manner due to natural scarcity. however, facing this natural scarcity a built one can be found, i.e., the one stemming from human decisions, in judgment calls that award a higher value to some other interest deemed as more relevant (ansuátegui 1991-92: 147 ff.).19 in these 17 however, the un committee on the rights of persons with disabilities, in its comment on article 9 of 11 april 2014 (general comment no. 2) has noted that the economic costs shall not be put forward as a justification for not attaining accessibility (accomplishing universal design) but that it is indeed a valid argument as for grounding a non-performance of the adjustment. “state parties, in accordance with the convention, are not allowed to use the austerity measures as an excuse to avoid ensuring gradual accessibility for persons with disabilities. obligation to implement accessibility is unconditional, i.e. the obliged entity may not excuse the omission referring to the burdens of provision the access for persons with disabilities. contrarily, the duty of reasonable accommodation only exists, if implementation constitutes no undue burden on the side of the entity” (section 25). on universal design, see section 15 of the comment. 18 it is important to distinguish between natural and real scarcity, i.e., between the one that naturally exists and the one we create. as ferenc fehér points out: "the most important indicator to support this claim is the malthusian fiasco. many times we exceed the malthusian production level with respect to the population growth, and despite this we produce a number of edibles which is more than enough for the survival of humankind. if there is hunger in our world it is because it has been artificially provoked, and not caused by ‘natural scarcity’" (feher (1993: 64). 19 in other occasions i have used this example to illustrate the argument. let’s imagine a planet in which 60% of the population were women and the remaining 40% were men. an alleged right to get married (providing that it was ethically justified) would not be troublesome and could even become widespread. however, it could indeed be troublesome to have this kind of right inasmuch as divorce, a second marriage and same sex marriage were to be banned. in view of this we can hardly claim that this difficulty is caused by scarcity or at least only by it. in better words, with what we are confronted here is a situation of scarce the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 42-59 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2929 54 rafael de asís roig situations, a right’s boundary is set not because it is actually impossible to fulfill it, but because this right is ranked below some other interest. hence, a weighing process is needed. the focus on the economic costs as a limit for rights has taken place alongside with the so-called “reservation of the possible.” this expression has its origins in germany in the early 70s.20 it was meant for underscoring the dependency of economic, social, and cultural rights on the state’s economic capacity, and at the same time for disregarding any justification, on the grounds of unreasonableness, for the satisfaction of these rights when fulfilling them would entail unreasonable costs (ansuategui roig 2014: 24 ff.). beyond the distinct ideological nature of this reservation, since it is only projected onto economic, social and cultural rights (when all rights involve costs for the state), the reservation of the possible is useful when it comes to highlighting the connection between rights and the economy.21 both the reservation of the possible and the scarcity arguments take us again to the principle of proportionality, which as we have seen, involves studying the relation between rights and interests. limiting a right on the basis of its excessive costs is an argument for which there is no room in the context of rights, unless it is proven that the mentioned cost is unbearably harmful for other rights. at this point what is really relevant is not the cost itself, but the impact on the right. economy is a tool which, as such, shall be at the service of rights and not the other way around. the economic model seeks its justification on the basis of liberty, dignity, equality… and these values are obviously the ones that provide a justification for the state itself.22 hence, as i have pointed out somewhere else, the use of “an argument based on an unreasonable cost of the accommodation shall be examined with great care and it shall be even deemed as lacking proper justification when this cost does not entail a real and blatant non-fulfillment of the human rights of others. in other words, there is no room for an argument that takes into account the cost with no regard to the context of rights. its use, as an admissible argument when it comes to rights, requires to be tied to these (in terms of expressing a limitation set on the rights of others). in addition, it shall assess the cost attached to the non-fulfillment of the interest in terms of segregation or lack of integration” (de asis 2013: 124). resources caused by, among other factors, a series of principles that determine the alleged right. actually, natural scarcity would exist in relation to an alleged right of women to get married to men who have never been married. 20 in particular, the 1972 judgment is normally pointed out as the first one in which this clause is included and acknowledged as numerus clausus. the reservation of the possible argument has been in conflict with the existential minimum argument since then (gomes canotilho 1998: 439). 21 recently, in spain, as for rights of the persons with disabilities, the judgment 1834/2012 from the administrative chamber of the castilla león superior court of justice, upheld by the constitutional court by means of the 10/2014 of 27 january judgment can be examined, where the right to an inclusive education is constrained on the basis of the unreasonable nature of the adjustment, on similar grounds as the ones provided by the reservation of the possible. 22 as ferrajoli has recalled, the state “is not a profit-seeking corporation” (ferrajoli 2007: 68). the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 42-59 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2929 55 reasonableness in the concept of reasonable accommodation the claim for rights, which takes for granted the absence of absolute rights, requires that the rights’ limitation is performed within the ethical framework to which the rights belong, and therefore using reasons and arguments grounded on rights and interests which are awarded the same value. when it comes to boundaries, it is important to preserve sensitivity for accomplishing a dignified human life and for the consideration that the rights’ main purpose shall be, precisely, fighting against barriers and obstacles preventing highly valued interests from being fulfilled. as i have remarked in some other places, the reflection on reasonableness in the context of rights shall be governed by: (i) the respect for freedom of choice (autonomy and physical and moral integrity) and the satisfaction of basic needs; (ii) the need for regarding and, where appropriate, equally empowering every individual in order to determine what can be deemed as correct; (iii) awarding a particular justifying weight to the decisions accepted by the majority of involved parties (de asis 2000:149 ff.). these three referents projected onto the costs of rights domain, require full transparency and a great deal of knowledge about the allocation of resources and, in short, about public spending. the claim for the rights of persons with disabilities individually considers the reasonableness test within the actual human rights context. hence, for instance, when applying the principle of proportionality we must keep in mind that we are not dealing with welfare measures (which is partly true), but instead with instruments aimed at accomplishing a dignified human life, which intend to meet basic needs or demands, and which, accordingly shall prevail over others.23 furthermore, with regards to universal design and reasonable accommodation, it is important to be aware that a limitation set on the first (a justified one) leaves the way open for accommodation, whereas limiting the latter leaves the right lacking a definite fulfillment. 3.2. a comprehensive vision as we have seen, reasonableness in accommodation takes us to three kinds of reflections. on the one hand the one concerning non-discrimination, which requires to assess, when examining whether the adjustment is justified or not, if it entails a violation of the principle of equality (since it differentiates or it does not, in an unjustified manner, thus harming a human right such as accessibility). in this justifying test there is an essential methodological tool at hand, which shall be regarded as the second great reflection on reasonableness in accommodation: the principle of proportionality. in virtue of this principle, the reasonableness test requires facing the adjustment’s adequacy and necessity and, in addition to that, the advantages or sacrifices that produces on rights. and since both of these reflections do not ensure a single answer, reasonableness requires a last reflection on the basis of acceptability. the 23 see section 16 of the above mentioned comment on article 9 by the un committee on the rights of persons with disabilities. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 42-59 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2929 56 rafael de asís roig adjustment’s justification, or the lack of it, shall be subject to the community’s acceptance or rejection. obviously, these dimensions must act jointly in order to conclude that the requirement for reasonableness has been complied with. in any event, as we have seen, the call for reasonableness is not projected only onto the adjustment but also onto universal design and, generally speaking, onto accessibility. hence, if we take as a reference the idea of accessibility, we can agree that it can be fulfilled through general measures (universal design) and through particular measures (reasonable accommodation). in both cases, these measures must be necessary (justified because they favor full participation in society), possible (matching scientific and technical knowledge along with a proper understanding of human diversity) and reasonable (non-discriminatory, proportional and acceptable).24 therefore, in accordance with the foregoing, it is possible to have a comprehensive vision about reasonableness in the disability domain. this demand makes it necessary to deem a measure as reasonable in the context of disabilities when: a) it is justified because it adequately provides for full participation in society. b) it shall be deemed as possible, taking into account the state of scientific, technical and human diversity knowledge. c) it shall be deemed as a non-discriminatory differentiation or undifferentiation which is not harmful for physical and moral integrity and at the same time does not prevent from meeting basic needs nor avoids participation in society on an equal basis. d) it shall be deemed as proportional and, therefore, entails more advantages than sacrifices within the context of human rights. e) it shall be deemed as acceptable by the community to which it is addressed. 24 certainly, when it comes to adjustments, what is possible falls within a scientific and technical knowledge framework, being human diversity one of the reasons for its existence. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 42-59 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2929 57 reasonableness in the concept of reasonable accommodation references: aarnio, a. (1991) lo racional como razonable. madrid: centro de estudios constitucionales. alexy, r. (1997) teoría de los derechos fundamentales. madrid: centro de estudios constitucionales. ansuategui roig, f.j. (2014) rivendicando i diritti social. napoli: edizioni scientifiche italiane. ansuátegui, f.j., (1991-1992) "algunas reflexiones sobre la visión integral de los derechos", estado & direito, n. 7-0. atienza, m. (1987) “para una razonable definición de lo razonable”, doxa, n. 4. barak, a. (2007) proportionality. constitutional rights and their limitations. new york: cambridge university press. barranco, m.c. (2011) diversidad de situaciones y universalidad de los derechos. madrid: dykinson. bernal pulido, c. (2007) el principio de proporcionalidad y los derechos fundamentales. madrid: centro de estudios políticos y constitucionales. bobbio, n. (1993) igualdad y libertad. barcelona: paidós. cayo bueno, l. (2012) “la configuración jurídica de los ajustes razonables”, in aa.vv., 2003-2012: 10 años de legislación sobre no discriminación de personas con discapacidad en españa. madrid: cinca. cuenca, p. (2012) los derechos fundamentales de las personas con discapacidad. un análisis a la luz de la convención de la onu. alcalá: universidad de alcalá. de asis, r. (2000) “la igualdad en el discurso de los derechos”, in j. a. lópez garcía and j. alberto del real, los derechos: entre la ética, el poder y el derecho, madrid: dykinson. de asís, r. (2005) el juez y la motivación en el derecho. madrid: dykinson. de asís, r. (2013) sobre discapacidad y derechos. madrid: dykinson. de asís, r., aiello, a.l., bariffi, f., campoy, i., and palacios, a. (2007) sobre la accesibilidad universal en el derecho. madrid: dykinson. feher, f. (1993) "el socialismo de la escasez", revista del centro de estudios constitucionales, n. 15. ferrajoli, l. (2007) principia iuris. teoria del diritto e della democracia, 2. teoria della democracia. bari: laterza. gomes canotilho, j.j. (1998) direito constitucional e teoria das constituiçao, coimbra: almedina. http://www.tribunalconstitucional.es/es/actividades/documents/xv%20trilateral/pon encia.pdf. looked up on march 10th 2014. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 42-59 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2929 58 rafael de asís roig martinez tapia, r. (2000) la igualdad y razonabilidad en la justicia constitucional española. almería: universidad de almería, servicio de publicaciones. mercader uguina, j.r. (2008) “tutela judicial efectiva, control de razonabilidad de las decisiones judiciales y «canon reforzado» de motivación en la doctrina del tribunal constitucional”, revista del ministerio de trabajo y asuntos sociales, 73. nino, c.s. (2005) fundamentos de derecho constitucional. buenos aires: astrea. palacios, a. (2004) “el derecho a la igualdad de las personas con discapacidad y la obligación de realizar ajustes razonables”, in campoy cervera, i. (coord.), los derechos de las personas con discapacidad: perspectivas sociales, jurídicas y filosóficas. madrid: dykinson. palacios, a. (2008) el modelo social de la discapacidad. madrid: cermi. recaséns siches, l. (1971) experiencia jurídica, naturaleza de la cosa y lógica «razonable». méxico: fondo de cultura económica. rocas trías, e. and ahumada ruiz, m. (2013) “los principios de razonabilidad y proporcionalidad en la jurisprudencia constitucional española” salmon, e. and bregaglio, r. (eds.) (2014) diez conceptos claves para entender la convención sobre los derechos de las personas con discapacidad. lima: idehpucp. schwartz, b. and sharpe, k. (2010) practical wisdom. new york: riverhead books. the age of human rights journal, 6 (june 2016) pp. 42-59 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.v0i6.2929 59 the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 84 extra-taxation and property right in the european union law carlos maría lópez espadafor1 abstract: indirect taxes are the essence -and the main priorityof tax harmonization in the european union. the vast majority of eu tax harmonization directives refer to this type of taxation. at the same time, indirect taxes constitute the field in which the principles of tax justice are less defined, either regarding eu member states, or the institutions of the european union. this is an issue about which no explicit reference has been found within the eu original or primary law; we don’t find it in the treaty of the european union or in the treaty on the functioning of the european union. the materialization of the fundamental rights in the area of community taxation will be of crucial importance for the concretion of these principles, especially in relation to the property right. thus, within the fiscal harmonization of indirect taxation, the extra-fiscal perspective and, particularly within it, the environmental issues, are of especial relevance. we should bear in mind that excise duties represent an essential field within tax harmonization and within them, taxation of energy and energy products is paramount. these products, due to their highly pollutant nature, have an environmental transcendence that needs to be taken into consideration. keywords: extra-taxation, enrironmental taxation, human rights, fundamental rights, property right, european union. contents: i.extra-taxation and european union law; ii.environmental taxation and high public revenues; iii.tax justice and right of ownership; iv. european union tax law and ban of confiscation as regards tax matters; v.non confiscation in tax matters and fundamental right to private property; vi.private property in the eu charter of fundamental rights and the material principles on tax justice; vii.rational solutions; viii.excise duties; ix.realization of the parameters of the current non-taxation purposes; x.the ethical component of environmental tax regulation; x.1.ethics and environmental tax from a globalized perspective; x.2.states, governments, law-makers and taxpayers; xi. degree of realization of the material principles of tax law. i. extra-taxation and european union law the argument of the extra-taxation of hydrocarbons has been used to increase the fiscal pressure over the gasoline until a point where its legitimacy should be discussed, not only from the constitutional point of view, but also from the european union treaties. hydrocarbons represent one of the fields in which multi-taxation affects the most. it is necessary to delimit that problem in this context, by determining its own limits, at both internal and international levels, thus providing an answer to its current perspectives, particularly in the european context. in spite of the fact that almost all the european union member states have similar principles of tax justice, there is not an express specification about them in the primary law of the european union. the institutions of 1 full professor of financial and tax law, university of jaén, spain (cmlopez@ujaen.es). extra-taxation and property right in the european union law the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 85 the european union have some tax competences given by their member states, specially highlighting fiscal harmonization of certain state taxes. the tax harmonization directives, despite this lack of express specification, cannot forget these principles of tax justice. although some taxes are described by the legislator as environmental taxes, with the purpose of reducing co2 (carbon dioxide) emissions, the observance of their structures reveals that their principal purpose is to obtain public revenues. with the excuse of environmental taxation, there are some taxes with the single objective to obtain high public incomes. the blame for this situation lies with member states and european institutions, because energy taxes are harmonized by directives at european level. so we have to check if this kind of taxation is against tax justice principles. the problem is that in the european union a definition of these principles does not exist. nevertheless, in european union law the property right exists as a fundamental and human right. we have to analyse if this kind of taxes represents (or not) an infringement of the property right as the origin of some tax justice principles. ii. environmental taxation and high public revenues sometimes, on the pretext of “additional taxation”, certain taxes are used only to achieve high public revenues. certain taxes are presented by the tax legislator as environmental taxation, aimed at reducing emissions of co2 (carbon dioxide), although their structure seems to indicate that at the end their main purpose is not this, but to get more public revenues. for example, think about the excise duty on hydrocarbons, with regard to the taxation of petrol and diesel fuels. the consumer is to pay indirectly an amount greater than the value of the product through taxation. therefore, the consumer when buying gasoline, pays out a price that is the sum of the value of the product and the levy, which represents most of the final amount, including the excise duty indirectly charged, and the value added tax. individual states are not the only ones responsible for this situation but also eu institutions are, since the tax on mineral oils has been harmonized by eu directives. however, after all, the union with this type of tax rather than thinking about environmental protection has mainly thought to protect free competition in the european petrol and diesel market, with the aim of ensuring that the final price of this product would not be too different from one member state to another. the eu sets a rate or minimum tax load, which may be increased by the member states. pollution control should be achieved mainly through tax breaks for biofuels, and not so much, as specified above, with exorbitant tax levies on still needed fuels. such high taxation on petrol and diesel will eventually cause a damaging effect on the people living in areas where there are not many opportunities for public carlos maría lópez espadafor the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 86 transportation, compared to the inhabitants of big cities. hence the residents of rural areas are going to pay for this taxation. it has not been proven at all that a higher tax levy corresponds to lower fuel consumption. we are talking about products which cannot be set aside in the current way of life. only the economic crisis, with a decrease in economic, commercial and industrial activities, has succeeded in decreasing the consumption of these products. not even the rise in the oil price can considerably reduce fuel consumption; neither could an increase in taxes could actually reduce it. then we should wonder whether a tax which is so high is contrary to the material principles on tax justice. the problem is that in european union law there is not a definition of the so-called principles involved. however, in this law, there is a consecration of the right to property as a fundamental and human right2. therefore, we should analyze if these cases of high tax levy represent or not a violation of the right to property, a right from which in some states the principles of tax justice are deduced. iii. tax justice and right of ownership the search for tax justice is a pending issue in the process of european integration. however, this lacuna may make it difficult for such integration to be built on sufficiently firm legal and economic bases. therefore, the principles of tax justice in european union law are still a not fully explored subject of investigation. the institutions of the european union hold a series of taxation jurisdictions granted by member states, among them there is particular harmonization of certain state taxes. the constant tension between direct and indirect taxes affects socio-economic policy, so that it is appropriate to identify the constitutional and legislative principles that could in some way limit the role of the latter in comparison to the former, and find their basis in eu law. even though in most eu member states the material principles of tax justice correspond in their essential content, to the original eu law, an explicit statement of those principles does not exit. in spain, the study of tax law has focused on the primacy of the principles contained in paragraph 1 of article 31 of the constitution: the tax justice of material principles. article 131 of the spanish constitution, at the end of paragraph 1, in relation to income and wealth, proclaims “its fairer distribution”. this final declaration sanctions spain as a “social and democratic constitutional state”, in paragraph 1 of article 1 of the constitution. this suggests that the nature of the tax and social justice of our state, often 2 regarding the human rights discipline on a tax law standpoint, see soler roch, m.t. (2011) deber de contribuir y derecho de propiedad en el ámbito de los derechos humanos, lección inaugural, curso académico 2011-2012, universidad de alicante: 5. extra-taxation and property right in the european union law the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 87 poorly analyzed, instead was the object of the first precepts of the constitution. reading in conjunction articles 1.1, 31.1 and 131.1 of the constitution, it is inferred that in a social and democratic constitutional state redistribution of wealth can be implemented through public revenue and expenditure. for this reason, before exorbitant fiscal pressures on goods and products, for which the price/value of the asset becomes lower than the taxes, there is the need to find a constitutional provision that would prevent such excesses. all this forces us to say that in tax matters we must respect the right to private property, questioning the maximum tax levy on property, also in relation to the acquisition costs of goods and products. it is obvious that in order to consume a good it is necessary to acquire it: the problem arises when the taxation on a good or product obstructs the possibility of acquisition disproportionately and unlawfully. one more clarification, when it comes to property, the mind turns to the traditional patterns of property of real estate; instead, it is necessary to think that property is a concept applicable to any type of product, since, in principle, in order to consume, you must first purchase the property. therefore, we cannot limit ourselves to state legislation, but must take into account the impact on eu law, as most of the indirect taxes are harmonized by the community. the concept of non-confiscation does not explicitly appear in the european community discipline, although it should be a fundamental right sanctioned not only in the constitution, but also by the european community discipline of fundamental rights. the crisis experienced by the european and world economy has highlighted the need for closer economic integration between the member states of the european union. there are two essential tools to achieve a real economic integration: monetary policy and tax policy. in monetary policy matters, greater integration in the euro zone and a major limitation of the public deficit has been reached. in fiscal policy, the rule of unanimity in tax harmonization matters is still applied. thus, only with the unanimity of the representatives of the member state governments is it possible to adopt the directives on tax harmonization. this lack of democratic legitimization in the field of tax harmonization, which does not depend on the will of the parliament elected by european citizens, renders even more real the prediction by the material principles of tax justice as a limit and guarantee in the tax harmonization for eu member state taxpayers, by virtue of the primacy of its law with respect to the law of the member states. pursuing the contemplation of the material principles of tax justice in tax harmonization seems a necessary step for the extension of the powers of the european union in relation to the tax harmonization mentioned. then, it must be emphasized that, within the member states, the development of the material principles of tax justice occurred mainly with regard to direct taxes. by contrast, the powers of eu institutions in the field of tax harmonization essentially concern indirect taxes. thus, the prediction of the material principles of tax justice with carlos maría lópez espadafor the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 88 respect to tax harmonization would result in the implementation of these principles with regard to indirect taxes. there is no express provision for such material principles of tax justice in the original law of the european union, though, as bosello said, with regard to eu member states “the constitutional principles that inspire the tax legislation in individual states are substantially the same”3. however, some of these principles might be inferred, as mentioned, from the consecration of the right to property as a fundamental right in the original law. in a way, it would be a parallel process to that achieved by the member states, which have derived some of these principles from the provision of property rights in their relative national constitutions4. this approach would allow observance of the principles of economic capacity and especially the principle of non-confiscation. iv. european union tax law and ban of confiscation on in tax matters as a first approximation, we could define the principle of non-confiscation as the duty of the tax legislator not to apply taxes that cause the cancellation of the economic capacity of the taxpayer, leading to unreasonable taxation. for this reason, nonconfiscation could be seen as a manifestation of the right to private property in the tax field. article 31 of the constitution, paragraph 1, provides that the tax system cannot result in the confiscation of property. at the same time, the tax system should be set according to the parameters of equality and progressiveness, the “guiding” principles of it. on the other hand, article 33 guarantees the right to private property and shows at the same time its social function. this social function can be observed from many points of view, one of which, without a doubt, is the duty to contribute. the doctrine, though with varied forms, has recognized the link between the ban on confiscation and the right to private property5. 3 bosello, f. (1959) costituzioni e tributi negli stati della comunità economica europea, rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile 2: 1513. 4 an important benchmark about comparative law of tax justice principles could be the german law. in this respect, regarding the german constitutional case law see herrera molina, p.m. (1996) “una decisión audaz del tribunal constitucional alemán: el conjunto de la carga tributaria del contribuyente no puede superar el 50% de sus ingresos. análisis de la sentencia del bverfg de 22 de junio de 1995 y de su relevancia para el ordenamiento español”, impuestos, ii: 1033. 5 palao taboada, c. (1979) la protección constitucional de la propiedad privada como límite al poder tributario, in hacienda y constitución, madrid, instituto de estudios fiscales: 319-320; núñez pérez, g. (1991) la prohibición constitucional de tributos confiscatorios: dos supuestos, impuestos 22: 8; sánchez serano, l. (1996) principios de justicia tributaria, capítulo iv del manual general de derecho financiero, tomo segundo, derecho tributario. parte general. granada, comares: 91-92; naveira de casanova, g. j. (1997) el principio de no confiscatoriedad. estudio en españa y argentina. madrid, mcgraw-hill: 448; cazorla prieto, l. m. (2000) derecho financiero y tributario (parte general), navarra, aranzadi: 112; garcía dorado, f. (2002) prohibición constitucional de confiscatoriedad y deber de tributación, madrid, dykinson: 90; poggioli, m. (2012) indicatori di forza economica e prelievo confiscatorio, padova, cedam: 105. extra-taxation and property right in the european union law the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 89 both concepts are defined in two different precepts of our constitution. the question should be whether this means that they have different or distant meanings, when we consider tax matters. in our opinion, the answer to this question must be negative, and a link between the two concepts or ideas has to be recognized. from a purely technical legal point of view, in a more rigorous and systematic way, it would not be possible to think that two provisions can say the same thing, because one of the two would be unnecessary and normally the legislator, or in this case the constituent, does nothing useless. thus, one might say that two different rules have to identify two different concepts. the concept of private property is actually a general concept that is applicable in all branches of law, and thus in tax matters. if so, you might think that the general consecration of the right to private property would be sufficient to prevent taxes taking on a confiscatory character. so, what advantage would there be to have an express provision of non-confiscation? would it have a different meaning? the jurisdiction of european union institutions on taxation essentially concerns indirect taxes, although there are certain community provisions relating to direct taxes. the law under the legislation enactment of the eu institutions has to respect the postulates sanctioned by the regulations of the original law of the union. actually, we do not find, in the cited original law, an express manifestation of the essential principles in the field of tax justice. however, nothing prevents the principle of non-confiscation being inferred from some provisions of the original law of the european union, and in particular from the right to private property. basically, as concerns tax matters, it is possible to identify a dual line of protection against violations of these principles, deriving both from state regulations and from community regulations. consequently, in the presence of violations of these principles, alongside the possibility to bring the action before the constitutional court of each state, within the community, the court of justice of the european union would have competence on the matter of tax harmonization or proper union resources. a first analysis could lead us to define the principle of non-confiscation in tax matters as the duty of the tax legislator not to set taxes that lead to a levy which can wipe out the economic possibilities of the taxpayer, and that would result, therefore, in unreasonable taxation. when we speak of a tax that wipes out the economic possibility of the taxpayer we do not intend to refer to a tax which allows the taxpayer to have only the minimum subsistence. as a matter of fact, we believe that in order for the levy to be legitimate, what is left in the hands of the taxpayer after the levy should be as close as possible to the economic result of his or her productive capacity (meant as a capacity to produce revenue) and never less than the amount of the tax collected in respect of the participation in the carlos maría lópez espadafor the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 90 maintenance of public expenditure. in this regard sometimes the doctrine, in our opinion, has been extremely restrictive in identifying the economic resources that should be legitimately left over for the taxpayer as a result of the tax levy. as we will see later, the consecration of the right to private property sanctioned in the charter of fundamental rights of the european union goes in this direction. v. non-confiscation in tax matters and the fundamental right to private property in our opinion, in virtue of what was claimed above, non-confiscation on taxation matters presents itself as a manifestation of the right to private property6 in the tax matter. the constitutions of european states expressly consecrate the fundamental right to private property in the tax law. we believe that the ban on confiscation should be linked to the right to private property. yet, we must wonder whether the right to private property, which is a general right valid for the different branches of the legal system, may also be relevant in the field of taxation. if so, it might be thought that the general consecration of the right to private property would be sufficient to prevent taxes from producing effects of confiscation. non-confiscation can be understood as a limitation to taxation which presupposes respect for private property in the tax law. private property plays a social function, and tax law must implement a redistributive function of the wealth of a social and democratic state of law. therefore, although the tax levy necessarily implies a limitation of private property, that levy, in order to be legitimate, cannot completely empty of content the right to property. the levy may limit private property, but it should not completely destroy its contents. in other words, the tax levy may limit the property only up to a certain limit. what is this limit? the one determined by a threshold of maximum taxation which, if exceeded, would affect the very nature of property debasing the private-law content. to put it differently, state constitutions give property an essentially private-law qualification. this is to say that the property and its use must be valid to a greater extent for the taxpayer than for the state. if not, the provisions of the right to private property in the constitutions would have no sense. private property of the taxpayer cannot have too public a projection; the goods and rights of the taxpayer should never be at the service of the tax authorities to a greater extent than at the service of the taxpayer. this rule would be violated by a tax system that imposes a confiscatory levy type. 6 the right to property is born in the civil field, it is consecrated in the constitutional field and it is used in the taxation field. on the relations between civil law and tax law, see fregni, m.c. (1998) obbligazione tributaria e codice civile, torino, giappichelli: 6-9. extra-taxation and property right in the european union law the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 91 we could just say that if the state7 took over 50 percent of the income, we would be in the presence of confiscatory taxation, as in the pockets of the taxpayers there would remain a quantum inferior to the revenue of the state. the same thing would occur, in consumption taxes, if in purchasing a good, the taxpayer ended up sustaining tax of more than half of the final price of the goods (tax included); for example, if the product cost 100 € and more than 50 of these corresponded to value added tax and excise duties, we would be dealing with a confiscatory situation, in principle. vi. private property in the charter of fundamental rights of the european union and the material principles on tax justice the prohibition on confiscation in the european tax system could be derived from the protection of private property in the european union. within union law, there is a consecration of the right to private property although not even in this field is protection of the principle of non-confiscation in the tax system expressed. consecration of the right to private property as part of european union law, can be identified from jurisprudence of the eu court of justice, which has claimed that the general principles and fundamental rights in the constitutions of the member states are an integral part (also) of european union law. in addition, there is the consecration of the right to private property contained in the european charter of fundamental rights. in this charter, the right to property is covered aseptically, without being classified as private. yet, the context, in which it appears, leaves no doubt that the meaning of the eu provision refers to private property as the essential core of the right to property. the draft treaty by which the intention was expressed to subscribe to a constitution for europe, later replaced by the lisbon treaty (from which the content of this charted has been deleted), sanctioned in paragraph 1, article ii-17, stated that: everyone has the right to own, use, dispose of and bequeath his or her lawfully acquired possessions. no one may be deprived of his or her possessions, except in the public interest and in the cases and under the conditions provided for by law, subject to fair compensation being paid in good time for their loss. the use of property may be regulated by law in so far as it is necessary for the general interest. in any case, it is possible to find a similar text in paragraph 1 of article 17 of the charter of fundamental rights of the european union, both in the 2000/c 364/01 version, and in the 2007/ 303/01 version, solemnly proclaimed on 12th december 2007, the day before the signing of the treaty of lisbon. thus, the content of the mentioned charter has attempted to incorporate the text of the draft of european constitution, which never came to light. however, although this has not been well understood, the treaty of lisbon, as we shall see below, provided an express reference to the provisions of the mentioned charter. on the other hand, in the fifth paragraph of the preamble of the charter it is stated that: this charter reaffirms, with due regard for the powers and tasks of the community and the union and the principle of subsidiarity, the rights as they result, in particular, from the constitutional traditions and international obligations common to the member states, the treaty on the european union, the community treaties, the european convention for the protection 7 and, of course, other public bodies. carlos maría lópez espadafor the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 92 of human rights and fundamental freedoms, the social charters adopted by the community and by the council of europe and the case-law of the court of justice of the european communities and of the european court of human rights. together with this, and well beyond community legislation, it must be noted that additional protocol 1 of the european convention on human rights8 establishes in the first paragraph of article 19, that “every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions” stating later that “no one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law”. the second paragraph of the same article provides that “the preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair the right of a state to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest or to secure the payment of taxes or other contributions or penalties”. this article is entitled with the inscription “protection of property”. the fact that, this article, has to do at the same time with private property and taxes, does not mean that taxes are able to render property meaningless, as this would be, obviously, against the recognition of the protection of private property sanctioned in the very convention.10 at the same time, it must be noted that the treaty on the european union already established in the first paragraph of article 6, that “the union is founded on the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law, principles which are common to the member states”. it is then stated in the second paragraph of the same article that “the union shall respect fundamental rights, as guaranteed by the european convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms signed in rome on 4 november 1950 and as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the member states, as general principles of community law”. paragraph 8 of article 1 of the treaty of lisbon (signed in lisbon on december 13 of 2007), which amended the treaty on the european union along with the founding treaty of the european community, rewrote article 6 of the treaty on the european union. following this change, in the first line of paragraph 1 of article 6 of the treaty on the european union it was stated that “the union recognizes the rights, freedoms and principles enshrined in the charter of fundamental rights of the european union on 7 december 2000, as adapted on 12 december 2007 in strasbourg, which has the same legal value as the treaties”. in paragraph 2 of the new version of article 6 it is also stated that “the union shall accede to the european convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. such accession shall not affect the union’s competences as defined in the treaties”. finally, paragraph 3 of the amended article 6 of 8 a treaty provided for also in the treaty of lisbon, as we will see. 9 in this regard, see, inter alia, sermet, l. (1999) “the european convention on human rights and property rights”, human rights files, nº 11 rev.: 25; ergec, r. (2011) “taxation and property rights under the european convention on human rights”, intertax, vol. 39, nº 1: 2; quintas seara, a. (2014) “the protectionof taxyers’ property rights in light of the recent ecthr jurisprudence: anything new on the horizon, or just more of the same?”, intertax, vol. 42, nº 4: 218. 10 among the explanations on the charter of fundamental rights (2007 / c 303 / 02), in the penultimate paragraph of the explanation on the “right to property” it is stated that this law has the same extension and meaning as the one guaranteed by the echr. extra-taxation and property right in the european union law the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 93 the treaty states that “fundamental rights, as guaranteed by the european convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms and as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the member states, shall constitute general principles of the union’s law”. focusing, specifically, on the issue of fundamental rights with regard to the right to private property, it is useful to start from the judgment of the court of justice of the european union of 13 december 1979 (case 44/79), and the more recent judgment of the same court of 10 july 2003 (joined cases c-20/00 and c-64/00). in these judgments it was declared that “fundamental rights form an integral part of the general principles of law which the court ensures compliance and that, for that purpose, the court draws inspiration from the constitutional traditions common to the member states and from the guidelines supplied by international treaties for the protection of human rights on which the member states have signed or cooperated in,” adding further that “echr has, in this regard, special significance”. it is necessary to highlight, along with the other fundamental rights thus protected, the importance of the right to property, and also, according to the quoted judgments, that in the exercise of fundamental rights some restrictions would be allowed only if “they do not constitute, with regard to the aim pursued, a disproportionate and intolerable interference, impairing the very substance of those rights.” although in european union law the principle of non-confiscation in tax law is not expressly sanctioned, the right to private property is definitely recognized. prohibition for community rules to imply confiscatory situations in tax law therefore arises from the will to enforce the respect of the right to private property, which is also enacted, as we have stated, by the community legal discipline. moreover, contemplation of a fundamental right like this must be considered part of the original law of the european union, to which its derived legislation must necessarily be subordinated. it follows that the tax laws enacted by the community institutions, whether they are intended to regulate the european union’s own resources or to regulate eu tax harmonization, will never produce a content that produces confiscation effects in tax matters; if that were the case, it would violate a fundamental right of the european union. as long as in the original law of the european union, there is not an express provision of the material principles of tax justice that could protect european taxpayers and curb the excesses of tax harmonization, protection of taxpayers will not rest on solid foundations. to ensure the protection of the taxpayer and to build solid fiscal harmonization it is necessary to establish the principles of the original law of the union. to do this a reform of the eu treaties is needed. currently, within the original law of the european union the main treaties are the treaty on european union and the treaty on the functioning of the european union. in view of its content, it could be said that the latter treaty is the most likely to provide the express statement of the material principles of tax justice in european union law. carlos maría lópez espadafor the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 94 vii. rational solutions under the legitimacy of some goal framed in the constitution, although unrelated to the need for tax revenues, occasionally legislature reaches levels of indirect taxation apparently too high. thus, it is necessary to determine what quantitative limit can be derived, even in such cases, from the material principles of tax justice. defining limits in this regard may help to curb indirect versus direct taxation, making our tax system more progressive and thus fairer, in light of the constitutional principles of tax justice. article 31 of the spanish constitution, a predicate of the tax system, expresses the principle of non-confiscation, which would play its role in relation to this system as a whole, beyond all taxation. however, at the same time we have seen the bond that exists between the ideas of non-confiscation in tax matter and of private property. their interpretation will always have to be realized from the perspective of justice, since this, beginning from the title of “just” which appears explicitly in the aforementioned precept of the constitution, becomes a value in itself on tax matters, solving possible doubts in the articulation of the other principles. however, no matter how uncertain in itself the idea of justice may be, there are some elements which obviously could not be disregarded as a whole, such as the ideas of logic and rationality. the “just” will be increasingly likely to appear as illogical or irrational. as we said, in relation to the tax system, we talk about “system” and “just” in our constitution. those requirements, contained in the first paragraph of art. 31 of the quoted text of the constitution, can be satisfied only by the rationality of the organization of the different tax laws. in the analysis of the idea of rationality in relation to the tax system it is necessary to start from the considerations by sainz de bujanda, which necessarily must be considered here. this scholar distinguishes between an “internal rationality” and an “external rationality.” he indicates that “a tax system is rational only if, giving internal rationality to each individual tax; it aims to associate it with external rationality, that is, its ability to combine harmoniously with the remaining charging procedures that integrate together.” this author stresses that “the external rationality of a tax is its capacity to integrate into the system, without breaking the rationality of the latter, which happens if any of the taxes which compose it, added to the others, destroys the basic objectives of the system, and so violates the general principles of tax justice.” he adds that “the technique to achieve this external rationality is that the legislator, when he determines any tax or substantially changes an existing one, verifies with rigor if it may be integrated in the whole without problems.” all this leads to the affirmation that “rationality can-not in any way be separated from the value of “justice” nor from other requirements associated with this, such as security and certainty.” in this way, this author notes that “a tax system, in fact, is rational only if it is right and it can be right only if it conforms to extra-taxation and property right in the european union law the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 95 the basic and main regulations of the positive order, contained in the constitution, and to the general principles of law, principles of natural law tradition”11. these words contain considerations that have necessarily to be taken into account. compared to the two perspectives of rationality mentioned, internal and external, the latter is the one most directly connected with the idea of the system, even though neither of them can be recognized of course in the realization of tax system. if we really want the tax system to be precisely this, it cannot only consist of an accumulation of taxes, but also of harmonious interweaving of them. to the extent that it is not a mere sum of taxes, but also a harmonious set of these, rationality will be much greater and, in its working, as we have seen, the justice which must prevail in the tax system will be even greater. analysis of whether a tax system as a whole is confiscatory or damages the overall ability of the taxpayer can be difficult. it must start from compliance with the constitutional principles of tax justice of each tax in particular. later, it has to move on to analysis of conformity with the constitution regarding the confluences of taxes on the same manifestation of economic capacity and, thus, of cases of multiple taxation on the same taxpayer. from the analysis of a single tax we would move on to the taxes added to it. this allows us a more precise and rigorous review and observation of the justice on tax system justice as a whole. as a result of this analysis specific cases of unconstitutionality could be highlighted or we could understand that there are none. however, what would be proven would be possible situations that, even keeping within the precise limits of the constitution, would come close to the limit of the rationality, the systematic nature, of the good technique and of the order of the tax system as a whole. therefore, we consider that a useful technique for the analysis of the rationality and constitutionality of the tax system is to begin from the rationality and constitutionality of each taxation and subsequently to move on to investigation of the implications of the technical appropriateness and constitutionality of cases of multiple taxation, as a confluence of certain taxes, thus contributing to the understanding and consideration of a more rational tax system as a whole. it may happen that each aspect of the tax system individually taken, apparently responds to the principle of economic capacity. however, against unreasonable accumulation of taxes, the tax system as a whole could levy on the taxpayer a higher contribution to public expenditure than the one they would pay on the basis of their global economic capacity, reaching confiscatory limits. 11 sainz de bujanda, f. (1987) la contribución territorial urbana. trayectoria histórica y problemas actuales. valencia, consejo general de cámaras de la propiedad urbana de la comunidad valenciana: 515. carlos maría lópez espadafor the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 96 on the other hand, moschetti explains that elements of rationality are coherence between the objectives that the legislator has set and the means used to achieve these aims, consistency between individual provisions and the system in which the rules are set, proportionality between the means and the purposes, and proportionality between loss of a legal value and satisfaction of other legal values12. thus, when the legislator pursues an apparent extrafiscal end, very often it leads to an illogical situation, when the means used do not help to reach that objective, as we have already had occasion to point out. so ideas of rationality and justice should preside over interpretation of the ideas of non-confiscation and private property in tax law. in this way, the application of these ideas, which do not prove rational, are unlikely to be considered right. it is very difficult to determine whether the tax system as a whole is or is not confiscatory. in relation to what was said above, all taxes (not only direct ones) above 50% of the total income of the taxpayer would begin in principle to clash with the patterns that today social consciousness would recognize as rational. however, as we said, applying this limit of 50% to the tax system as a whole can be very difficult in relation to the variety of situations that may be occur in real life, and especially compared to combined direct and indirect taxation. a taxpayer may pay tax that is more than 50% of his or her income and in his on her life, not perform actions of consumption that submit him or her to sustain for these a greater tax burden than the value of what he or she buy for consumption. moreover, we could find other taxpayers whose overall contribution for all direct and indirect taxes does not exceed 50% of their income and for whom it is usual to perform actions of consumption where the tax burden incurred for these is higher than the value of what they buy for consumption. hence, in the search for demarcation of the principle of non-confiscation, seeking that rationality we talked about and implementing a fair tax system, we have to start through the analysis of every tax and the set of taxes on the same wealth. then, regarding neither this rationality; nor the tax system as a whole nor any tax considered individually or situations of accumulation of taxes on the same manifestation of economic capacity will prove to be confiscatory or to damage private property rights in tax matters. consequently, the resolution of situations of conflict regarding non-confiscation in tax matters, complying with the idea of private property in the most rational possible form, should start by examining each tax, determining whether it is confiscatory or not, and then, if not individually found to be confiscatory, we should evaluate the accumulation of tax on a single manifestation of wealth. later, once its confiscatory nature was determined, its unconstitutionality would be clear, although the tax system as 12 moschetti, f. (2003) la razionalità del prelievo ed il concorso alle spese pubbliche, le ragioni del diritto tributario in europa (giornate di studi per furio bosello), università di bologna, www.berliri.giuri.unibo.it.: 4. extra-taxation and property right in the european union law the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 97 a whole did not reach the limit described above. and, before that, if the tax system as a whole, with a large majority of taxpayers, exceeded the aforementioned limit, the system would largely suffer from being confiscable and thus, unconstitutional, although its taxes or partial accumulations did not give this appearance examining them individually. specifying all the stated ideas and the limits of what the tax system as a whole can expect, the tax on some consumptions may already be confiscatory. therefore, in relation to the consumption of each type of good, in particular, we must proceed by determining whether each tax individually considered can be confiscatory and then evaluate the accumulation of taxes, that is, the circumstances of double or multiple taxation on each consumption and in particular whether they can be confiscatory. to this end, neither each tax individually considered nor the set of taxes on consumption of any type of goods can be a greater tax burden than the value of what enters the assets of the taxpayer, which is what can be consumed. a violation of this limit implies rupture of the idea of private property. in order to consume it more than twice what enters would outflow. public finance would take away more than what we have acquired is worth, and property would become more public than private. this would be something irrational and, as such, clearly unfair. according to what has been said, we mean that there should be a limit on nonconfiscatory taxation on consumption, and thus respect for the right of private property in this area of taxation, examining it not only in reference to consumption in general in its totality, but also in relation to the consumption of each type of good whose taxation in itself could be identified as confiscatory. excise duties were born with an intended extra fiscal purpose, looking for a higher tax burden for certain consumptions which the governments were trying to limit, thus making up for their high social cost or environmental impact. what happens is that this tax burden, higher because of certain specific consumption through excise duties, should be added to the tax burden by consumption itself, as any product or service in general, through value-added tax. what really happens is that in the latter tax you must pay not only for the price of the consumed product itself, but also for the tax burden which has represented the corresponding excise duty, with the exception of the excise duty on certain means of transport. viii. excise duties in the perspective of the eu legal system, the debate concerning the current issues of the excise duties is normally focused on two points. on the one hand, the question is if these indirect taxes are compatible or not with their non-tax rationale of the protection of the environment. on the other, we find the consideration that the lack of a tighter fiscal harmonization of these taxes in the eu could imply an issue for the free competition in the member states, considering that some differences on the taxation of the energy or of the energetic products between the single states cold distort the competition, pushing the companies that have to consume a lot of energy to establish themselves in other countries, where the taxation on the energy is lower. carlos maría lópez espadafor the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 98 in other cases, however, the creation of new indirect taxes on specific consumptions by the european countries, out of the category of the harmonized excise duties, rises the discussion over this new indirect taxes, concerning their compatibility with the valueadded tax, regulated also by the article 401 of the directive 2006/112/ce of the council, of the 28th november 2006, related to the common system of the valueadded tax. this directive replaced the former sixth vat directive; specifically, the article 401 of the directive 2006/112/ce replaced the well-known article 33 of the former sixth vat directive in a similar way. the eu commission through different proposal for directives, tried to harmonize the indirect taxes on the circulation of the vehicles in the union, with the purpose of adapting further these indirect taxes to the protection of the environment, taking into consideration the co2 emissions of the vehicles. pursuing the same perspective, the commission made as well an effort to abolish the registration taxes, but even after a transitionary period, still hasn´t reached its goal. at the same time, the eu commission also tried to raise the minimum harmonized tax rates of the fuels on the tax on hydrocarbons in the member states, but also this go as has not been achieved, yet. facing some indirect taxes like the excise duties where the tax rate is remarkably high, the lack of a consolidated european doctrine on the subjects of the principles of tax justice and, more specifically, of tax harmonization is even more noticeable. excise duties were born with an intended extra fiscal purpose, looking for a higher tax burden for certain consumptions which the governments were trying to limit, thus making up for their high social cost or environmental impact. what happens is that this tax burden, higher because of certain specific consumption through excise duties, should be added to the tax burden by consumption itself, as any product or service in general, through value-added tax. what really happens is that in the latter tax you must pay not only for the price of the consumed product itself, but also for the tax burden which has represented the corresponding excise duty, with the exception of the excise duty on certain means of transport. we would be dealing with a problem in relation with excise duties on fabrication and the excise duty on coal. ix. realization of the parameters of the current non-taxation purposes it may be difficult to find an indirect tax that has a purely non-taxation purpose, i.e. a tax through which the tax legislator tries to limit, or even remove, the activities harmful for the environment, the health or any other value constitutionally guaranteed. indeed, the indirect taxes tailored as taxes that have a purely non-taxation purpose, normally, or even primarily, have a clear tax collection function. among these, many of them apply to products connected to the old tax monopolies existing before the accession extra-taxation and property right in the european union law the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 99 of a member state to the european communities. in particular, these are products that generate plentiful tax revenues which the tax legislator does not want to lose. in relation to these taxes, therefore, non-taxation models pertaining to the indirect taxes that purely has non-taxation purpose are not in line with the political / social purposes that such taxes should put in place, due to the great role of the taxation and of its collecting tax function mentioned above. in addition, the european union, when it comes to harmonize the indirect taxes to which the referred products are subjected to, mainly try to avoid problems of tax free competition between member states instead of finding a really nontaxation purpose. these can only lead to a non-taxation policy without coherency in its development which does not cease to be a mere excuse to keep an excessive taxation. the principles of tax justice should apply also to a tax that has a non-fiscal purpose though this does not always happened. moreover, the fact that these taxes are usually indirect taxes and that –in these cases– the principles of tax justice do not apply adequately (and even less in the european law), eliminate useful parameters that could be used for the implementation of these taxes. also for these reasons, the implementation of a system of taxes that have a purely non-fiscal purpose may be difficult to set up. the non-tax purposes do not have to respect only the constitutional discipline, but also the european one. in most countries, when the tax system becomes confiscatory has not been specified. the few attempts to specify when the prohibition of confiscation is violated have focused primarily on direct taxes, which are those that can be more adjusted to progressivity. the greater weight of direct taxes –mainly of progressive direct taxes– than the indirect ones –essentially proportional– is what can help ensure the tax system as a whole to act progressively. this requires moving towards a specification of the principle of non-confiscatory in relation to indirect taxation, as a limit to this and, thus, as an impulse to greater progressivity of the tax system. in some way it could be said that the legal certainty of the european union taxpayer does not conform to the schemes of modern constitutional states. the tributary systems of the different states necessarily are shaped from the basis of the principles contained in their constitutions, essentially their material principles of tax justice. these should be dealt with both in their specific configuration, where appropriate in the corresponding constitutional text, and in the deduction of them made by constitutional jurisprudence, sometimes starting from the constitutional recognition of fundamental rights. if european union law aspires to further development and legitimacy, it should necessarily start from the articulation of principles of tax justice in the discipline of the union. in the absence of a european constitution, the deduction of such principles is only possible from the fundamental rights included in the law of the union. moreover, even the failed draft european constitution did not expressly address this need. later, in the norms derived from treaty of lisbon neither the treaty of the european union nor the treaty on the functioning of the european union addressed expressly this need. only by laying solid foundations in this respect, a harmonized european tax system will be legitimately achieved to be developed on such foundations. carlos maría lópez espadafor the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 100 the fiscal harmonization in the european union is principally centered in the indirect taxation. at the same time, the principles of tax justice are found less developed -in the doctrine and in the constitutional jurisprudence of the stateson the themes of the indirect taxes, also considering what happens with the subject of the direct taxes. to this we have to add that neither in the treaty on the european union neither in the treaty on the functioning of the european union, we find an express consecration of these principles. to all of this we need to think also to the equilibrium that has to exist, for some of the indirect taxes that are subject to fiscal harmonization, to respect both the principles of tax justice and the non-tax purposes of the environmental protection that the institutions are trying to pursue. against this background, there are not some clear parameters that could be used as limits in the activities of the european union in this area and the solution could be found in the interpretation of the discipline of the fundamental rights from the taxation perspective. facing some indirect taxes like the excise duties where the tax rate is so high, is even more evident the lack of a consolidate doctrine in the european union on the subjects of the principles of tax justice. x. the ethical component of environmental tax regulation x.1. ethics and environmental tax law from a globalized perspective discussing ethics in terms of environmental tax law brings about a much broader thematic scope, such as the connection between ethics and rights, moral norms and legal norms, which already is a difficult topic to deal with. we would obviously be looking for social ethics (or a social morality) beyond personal ethics (or a personal morality), but it is not easy to find social ethics of wide dissemination. there could be as many social ethics as different societies or (as many) as social groups within a society. all this situation becomes more complicated when we look at the international society, since apart from it being difficult to find shared ethical aspects in the various societies within the various member states of the international community, it is also hard to find unequivocal ethical aspects at the (lower) level of geographic areas which group the various member states. it sometimes seems almost impossible to find common ground in the combination of ethics and rights when we add the problems of separating ethics and religion and the fact that there are far more widespread religions in the western world and other religions in the eastern or south-eastern world. whenever some religion does not value the right to life enough, without which the rest of the rights could lose their meaning, it seems hard to think of finding a basic international morality. thus, it would obviously be more difficult to find an international law morality and far more difficult to find an international environmental law morality. the relationship between the person and the environment is something that can, to a large extent, arise from individual sensitivity, which goes much further than the morals of the international community’s different geographical areas. as a result, a extra-taxation and property right in the european union law the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 101 specific social group within a particular geographical area can develop environmental sensitivities. furthermore, the different economic options or economic ideologies and, ultimately, the great options or alternatives to socio-economic policy can indubitably influence the different options for environmental policy. although globalization is often seen as an economic issue, it could also be seen differently. thus, it could be considered to be not only economic but also cultural or social. an example for this could be the obviously positive effects of using rightly understood globalization to improve women’s rights in some geographical areas at international level. often, some of the very influential states manage to impose, at a global level, globalized behavioral economics, yet they fail to take into account the importance of environmental sensitivities. obviously, environmental protection involves significant costs and an apparent income loss, in appropriate legal and economic terms. but this financial cost is merely apparent and short-term, since climate change impacts can be unpredictable or at least known to be negative, even negative from an economic perspective. evidently, one of the best future investments will be an environmental investment. x.2. states, governments, law-makers and taxpayers the only way to find a meeting place legitimately shared by all within the international community could eventually lead us towards the field of fundamental rights or, at least, as part of these, of those we may rightly call human rights. the tax-paying citizen cannot renounce their fundamental rights. the state has to respect their fundamental rights. constitutional tradition of fundamental rights fused with the legal corpus of the european union. the law-maker can only charge the full weight of environmental tax treatment on the tax-payer to the extent that it respects their fundamental rights. within these rights we find the right to property. it is the government’s duty to find ways to protect the environment through environmental tax regulation which do not damage the fundamental rights of the taxpayer. furthermore, excessive taxes normally prove to be ineffective in terms of environmental protection. this is why raising our voices against the current environmental tax regulation should not be considered unethical or immoral, especially since fiscal excesses may involve a violation of the tax-payer fundamental rights. besides, this in turn frequently involves an infringement of the material principles of tax justice. what may well be carlos maría lópez espadafor the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 102 unethical or immoral is the attempt to camouflage behind alleged environmental goals what only intends to generate tax revenue. in order to do this, certain services and goods, which the tax-payer finds almost impossible to do without, are heavily taxed, leaving them with no real alternatives. the environmental policies of governments should move beyond environmental tax regulation, or at least should not have the latter as the main actor in the process, since this has not proved effective in fighting climate change. the powers that be cannot charge tax-payers with an imaginary ethical component based on false environmental extra-taxation. what has been unethical is law-makers’ attitude, which under cover of an alleged environmental aim have been simply trying to obtain easy revenue. the best environmental tax is the one which does not yield any revenue, because this would mean that no polluting taxable event or activity has taken place. if the revenue obtained from taxing a given behavior or activity detrimental to the environment is small, we can consider it a success because it would involve that the activity in question, which would have damaged the environment, has been rare. however, this is not the idea guiding the law maker when they qualify as extra-fiscal taxes the purpose of which is not really to protect the environment but to collect revenue. consequently, governments should explore ways to protect the environment and to fight climate change which go way beyond tax-collection, reducing the presence and importance of current environmental tax-regulation, which has proved to be, so far, useless. is it ethical to charge the citizens with taxes of an apparently environmental nature, when they have no other option but to employ fossil fuel vehicles? let us think, for instance, in those citizens living in rural areas, away in the mountains, far from major urban centers. would it be ethical to treat them in the same way than those inhabiting big cities? from a purely technical fiscal perspective, the treatment in both cases should be the same, but the former would be greatly harmed since we would be dealing with an indirect taxation on a specific consumption that they cannot escape or avoid. couldn’t we consider positive, from an environmental perspective, to avoid measures damaging those inhabiting rural areas which should not be abandoned? not only from a fiscal perspective but from a moral or ethical one, both in an individual and a collective sense, it is necessary to deeply revise the standard parameters employed in environmental tax regulation, or in that tax regulation which is only apparently environmental. xi. degree of realization of the material principles of tax law at times, a greater level of realization within a constitution of a specific principle does not necessarily imply a greater respect by the legislator. this is precisely what happens with regard to the principle of non-confiscatory taxes on revenue. if we had to focus on one of the constitutions where the taxation principles are described in a more extra-taxation and property right in the european union law the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 103 detailed way, we could choose the constitution of venezuela 13; however, it is well known this is one of the states with fewer tax law guarantees on account of its problematic political system. young or recent constitutions have better chances of using other earlier ones from other states as benchmarks. the main problem lies in the fact that the maturity of a political-constitutional system is more relevant to the effectiveness of a specific principle of tax law than the greater or lesser specificity expressed in the constitution. thus, in this sense, we should necessarily focus on the example provided by the german political system. the constitution of germany does not specifically gather in its document the principle of non-confiscatory taxation in tax matters, but the constitutional court of germany has inferred from the right to private property –enshrined by the constitutionthe prohibition to confiscate by the tax system, even providing precise percentages as a boundary to the legislator, although this has been essentially done in terms of indirect taxes14 . we can use the example provided by germany to stress that the explicit degree of realization of a principle in the constitution is not as important as the specific interpretation of the latter by constitutional jurisprudence. we could also claim that constitutional texts seem to brag about what they lack, as in the spanish aphorism a constitutional document may not specifically emphasize the principle of non-confiscatory taxation but be found within a system where the jurisprudence of its constitutional court fully explores the possibilities of the constitution. this, as previously stated, is what takes place in the system of germany. on the contrary, in spain15 we find a very detailed declaration of the principles of taxation in its constitution (art. 31.1), as compared to the majority of the constitutions of neighboring states. however, the constitutional court of spain, when given the chance, has not made the most of this opportunity to specify, in a precise manner, which percentages of the taxes could be considered confiscatory. it is true, though, that the legitimacy of a tax system is shown on the level of public services, but taxpayers have certain rights regarding this –and regarding their condition as citizens and as governed citizenswhich the legislator cannot empty of significance. let us consider, especially, the right to property, as a constitutionalized, fundamental right and even as a right enshrined in international documents. at the same time, the constitution of spain recognizes the principle of progressivity as an inspiration for the spanish tax system. the advancement of 13 bear in mind article 317 of the constitution. 14 see herrera molina, p.m. (1996) “una decisión audaz del tribunal constitucional alemán…”, cit.: 1033 et ff. 15 with respect to the spanish legal reality, see martínez muñoz, y., gil garcía, e., martín jiménez, j., alonso murillo, f., (2018) national report of spain, observatory for the protection of taxpayers’ rights, ibfd: 1. carlos maría lópez espadafor the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 84-104 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.5 104 progressive indirect taxes as opposed to proportional indirect taxes is what could bestow greater progressivity on a tax system. obviously, granted that, within indirect taxes, progressivity is well structured. progressivity within indirect taxes, even though it may exist, is minimal compared to that within direct taxes. furthermore, the doctrinal development of the principles of taxation has been a lot greater in comparison with direct taxes than with indirect taxes. the main core of indirect taxes is harmonized according to eu directives, which set a harmonized minimum level of taxation in every member state. therefore, tax harmonization represents a clear reinforcement of indirect taxes --and an excessive increase of the harmonized minimum levels of taxation could clearly restrain the progressivity of the tax system, strengthening indirect taxes. thus, by defining the principle of non-confiscatory taxation in revenue, regarding indirect taxes, the principle would not only materialize, but it would also ensure the effectiveness of the principle of progressive taxation as it determines a limit on indirect taxes, in such a way it will never be able to be illegitimately excessive as opposed to direct taxes. according to this, the european union is responsible for the failure of the principle of progressive taxation in fiscal issues, a principle attached to the constitutions of the member states. the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 1 escaping the ivory tower: legal research on human rights from a critical perspective1 dolores morondo taramundi2 abstract: this article aims to address some of the criticisms that have been made of human rights research, especially of human rights research conducted by legal scholars. it argues that a conscious and critical approach to the limitations of the 'ivory tower' of legal scholarship on rights is becoming increasingly necessary in a research context marked by the convergence of multiple disciplines, the ever-growing contestation of human rights, and the complexity of the international regime for the protection of human rights. this article outlines three strategies that could be useful for legal scholars to escape from the ivory tower and make a significant contribution to multidisciplinary human rights studies. keywords: legal method, legal research, interdisciplinarity, intersectoriality, activism, critical theory, human rights theory contents: i.the 'ivory tower': criticism of the limits of legal scholarship on human rights; i.1.criticism of the lack of methodological rigour in a technical sense; i.2.criticism of the lack of methodological rigour in a subjective sense; i.3.separating the wheat from the chaff in the criticism of (the methodology used by) human rights legal research; ii.the new work context for human rights legal scholarship ; ii.1.the contestation of human rights; ii.2.the complexity of human rights law; iii.the escape routes from the ivory tower: some cues; iii.1.disclosure; iii.2.critique; iii.3.cowork/network; iv.conclusions i. the 'ivory tower': criticism of the limits of legal scholarship on human rights a wave of concern about the existing methodological problems in human rights research began in europe about a decade ago (coomans et al., 2009 y 2010; mcconnell and smith, 2018). the methodological issue is not a new problem in human rights research. in fact, it could be said that it is a recurring problem rather than a new one, even though this has not been explicitly stated (taekema and van klink, 2011, p. 1). this is also true of other areas of legal research (or, more precisely, those originating from that field3). in general, the debate on methodology in the legal field is closely linked to the debate on the very nature of legal research and to the ultimate question as to whether it 1 the research leading to this publication has received funding through the project “la desigualdad compleja en las sociedades plurales. indicadores para las políticas públicas” (der2016-77711-p) of the national i+d+i plan of the spanish ministry of economy. 2 human rights institute, university of deusto, spain (dolores.morondo@deusto.es). 3 in fact, as in other areas of legal scholarship, the discussion on human rights research methodology in legal academia does not revolve around the label of ‘method’ or ‘methodology’, but around the more general question of whether it is possible to obtain legal knowledge of a given topic, usually by discussing its normative meaning, definition, sources, etc. in this sense, the lively debate held in the journal doxa (doxa.ua.es) in the 1980s and 1990s, and the discussion about luigi ferrajoli's theses on fundamental rights (ferrajoli 2001) are examples of the discussion on human rights methodology. dolores morondo taramundi the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 2 can be descriptive, or whether it is necessarily normative in nature, as are the materials it investigates (smits, 2009, p.45). from the mid-1990s onwards, human rights research has been a multidisciplinary field. it had previously been the exclusive remit of public international law, and therefore there had been no need to raise methodological issues or even consider the epistemological position to be adopted. the historical circumstances that had accompanied the birth of the universal declaration of human rights, the precarious balance of the political consensus,4 and the period of intense production of international treaties that began in the 1960s had led legal scholars to deal with the mechanisms for guaranteeing rights, ignoring theoretical and philosophical issues, as advocated by bobbio in 1964 (bobbio 1990, p. 16). however, the increasingly multidisciplinary nature of this area of study has reopened a series of questions, starting with the methodological one. important methodological shortcomings have been identified, particularly in connection with legal research on human rights, which is frequently considered to inhabit an ivory tower. the remainder of this section reviews the criticisms of human rights legal scholarship. in order to plan the escape from the ivory tower, firstly a discussion is provided of the new characteristics of the research context in which this methodological challenge is to be faced (section 2). secondly, an escape route from the ivory tower is outlined that can serve as a basis for a much-needed methodological reflection (section 3). i.1. criticism of the lack of methodological rigour in a technical sense compared to research related to other social phenomena or produced by other scientific communities, the research conducted by human rights scholars has been often described as 'sloppy', which has the double meaning of careless and bungling, but also sentimental and emotional. in other words, human rights research, especially that carried out by legal scholars, has been accused of lacking methodological rigour from the technical and the subjective points of view. from a technical point of view, it has been found that there has frequently been no reference to the method used in human rights research, and much less a discussion about the adequacy or the impact of a particular method in relation to other possible methods of analysis, or its appropriateness to the research question (coomans et al., 2010, p. 181). in the case of legal research, in particular, the method or methods that are not explicitly referred to are not even noticeable from the perspective of other social sciences. the legal method in general (not only in human rights research) is invisible to those outside legal academia, thus giving rise to the idea that legal research lacks a method. methodology is also a non-reflective area or form of knowledge within legal research, 4 this is summed up in a well-known sentence by jacques maritain: ‘we agree on these rights, providing we are not asked why’ (maritain, 1983, p. 94). escaping the ivory tower: legal research on human rights from a critical perspective the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 3 both in academic research and in legal practice, so legal scholars rarely know how to answer questions about their methods or their methodological training. in a short questionnaire conducted by eva brems about this issue, half of the people interviewed replied that they had never received methodological training but, above all, the same percentage responded that they did not feel the need to receive that type of training or discuss methods, unless they had to work in multidisciplinary groups or apply for research grants (which usually include a methodology section) (brems, 2009, pp. 84-85). in other words, legal scholars who engage in legal research in human rights not only do not receive training on (legal?) research methods, but they do not feel the need for such training or to discuss the research method while they are among legal scholars. in fact, it is generally the interaction outside their scientific community that leads them to consider the methodological issue. not only do legal scholars seem baffled at the questions about their method, but they also do not seem concerned about the criticisms made of their work because of a lack of methodology. this may be partly due to the fact that social science tends to judge legal research according to whether or not it uses social research methods, and whether or not legal research pursues research objectives and questions that can be understood from within empirical social science research (feldman, 1989, pp. 2-5). legal scholarship has been frequently accused of not being concerned about the effectiveness of human rights (coomans et al., 2010, p. 181), for example; or about whether legal provisions for human rights really defend human dignity or not (kennedy, 2004, p.24); or about what could have been the 'true' reasons for a state to sign a certain human rights treaty. from outside the legal community, it is usually considered that only the part of legal research that is closest to the social sciences (socio-legal research or research by the various ‘law & something’) is actual research. but most of legal research is doctrinal or dogmatic,5 and legal scholars who conduct it rarely feel challenged by that kind of criticism: their job is not to study the effectiveness of the norms, nor their political or economic appropriateness, but the effectiveness and validity of the norms within the legal system, which is a normative dimension of the rights rarely visible to the social sciences. finally, legal scholars' lack of reflectivity on the legal method and its invisibility from outside the legal community make it difficult to comprehensively convey a criticism of the methodology: what is missing, what is not done, and the standards to be used to assess the validity and the scientific nature of the method. there is a good example for this in the above-mentioned study conducted by eva brems. after examining a range of legal research papers on human rights published in some prestigious international journals, brems concluded that explaining the method used was not the norm in these publications. she also explained what had counted as a “methodological description” in her review; she admitted that a single phrase along the lines of 'the research question will be addressed through the analysis of the jurisprudence of the european court of human rights' was sufficient (brems, 2009, pp. 87-88). thus brems’ review shows not only how 5 the discussion below will use the expressions 'legal doctrine', 'legal dogmatics' and 'doctrinal research' as synonyms. i am aware that there are differences between them. however, these would not be very relevant to the issues at stake here, and elaborating on these distinctions in an article of general scope would create an additional difficulty. dolores morondo taramundi the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 4 often this legal research in human rights is conducted without any methodological indication, but also the lack of guidelines on what it is and should be considered as method, methodology and methodological discussion in legal research. i.2. criticism of the lack of methodological rigour in a subjective sense in addition to this lack of technical rigour in the selection and application of the method, human rights research is also considered to have methodological shortcomings from a subjective point of view. some authors have attributed the lack of attention to research methodology to the fact that individuals who conduct research into human rights are often activists or were former activists (føllesdal, 2009, p. 233; coomans et al., 2010, p. 179). in these cases, methodology may be dispensed with because, if they ignore the demands and constraints involved in applying a rigorous methodological approach, scholars/activists can ‘point’ research towards the conclusions they previously established, a trap that leads to ‘wishful thinking’ (coomans et al., 2010, p. 179); in other criticisms that used harsher language, human rights research has been considered to be ‘ideological’ in nature, as opposed to scientific. andreas føllesdal, for example, considers this research to be ‘normative’:6 as these researchers are activists, there is a tendency to ‘dull an appropriately sceptical attitude’ towards human rights institutions. human rights research has an ‘agenda’ that seeks to promote human rights (or, in føllesdal's words, the ‘legal human rights’ that national and international norms are, as opposed to the philosophical conceptions of human rights or philosophical rights, which relate to human dignity and/or social justice). this agenda causes the pronounced absence of internal criticism of human rights by human rights scholars. according to coomans et al. (2010, p. 182), it is the 'passionate' belief held by these legal scholars/activists in the goodness and usefulness of human rights norms and institutions that leads them to direct their work towards improving and respecting human rights norms, ignoring that these are merely instruments in the defence of human dignity and that they may not even be good instruments. in this sense, human rights research and again, in particular, investigation conducted by legal scholars is accused of being lenient or deferential towards human rights institutions; and of putting itself at the service of the establishment by being reluctant to make any unnecessary (or even necessary) criticism of the activities and output of international human rights organisations. the research carried out by these legal scholars/activists is therefore unable to promote transformation, and it cannot even properly defend human rights institutions or the implementation of human rights. 6 føllesdal makes a distinction between the ‘normative’ of human rights research and the ‘normative’ in political philosophy (his own disciplinary field). legal research in human rights is 'normative' in a pejorative sense, since this 'normative' attitude is identified with the absence of the 'appropriate sceptical attitude' that should characterise scientific research, which borders on an also pejorative use of 'ideology'. the normative nature of philosophical research in human rights, however, seeks to examine the justifiability of norms and values (føllesdal, 2009, p. 233). escaping the ivory tower: legal research on human rights from a critical perspective the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 5 in summary, it has been argued that the human rights scientific community, especially legal scholars, live in and maintain an ivory tower of abstract human rights research. their research has been portrayed as being far removed from real experiences and from the actual effectiveness of human rights to protect the dignity of millions of people who are abused, and as being unable to create the conditions for ensuring that their knowledge output is appropriate. i.3. separating the wheat from the chaff in the criticism of (the methodology used by) human rights legal research the criticism of a lack of methodological rigour in human rights legal research related to both technical and subjective aspects is not unproblematic. however, i believe that both aspects are worthy of being taken into account to appreciate, and ultimately correct, the methodological limitations of human rights research. in order to better focus on those aspects of legal research methodology that should be strengthened, it would be useful to separate the wheat from the chaff in terms of criticism. this highlights a number of issues. first of all, it is striking that both the origin of these criticisms and the discomfort of legal scholars themselves when talking about methodology emerge in the context of the increasingly multidisciplinary nature of the field of human rights research. at least since the late 1990s, human rights have no longer been an object of study only for public international law. the interest that human rights have aroused in other disciplines enriches our knowledge about them, but radically changes the context of study. human rights are a multidimensional phenomenon, so any monodisciplinary approaches (not only legal research) are insufficient to understand their complexity. in order to create new knowledge about human rights, we have to accept this new multidisciplinary landscape and provide the necessary interdisciplinary research conditions for fruitful collaborations to take place between different partial forms of knowledge. while the methodological issue is not the only aspect involved, it is one of the fundamental factors in establishing such collaboration. secondly, a consideration can be made on the trail of the criticism regarding the weight of legal doctrine and legal dogmatics in human rights legal research. many of the critical views on the work of human rights legal scholars do not seem to have a clear understanding of what constitutes legal dogmatics and what its purpose is.7 hence it is necessary to give some thought to the relationship between doctrinal and non-doctrinal 7 some of the criticisms really seem to be begging the question. for example, it is surprising that human rights legal scholars are considered ‘deferential’ towards human rights courts and the monitoring bodies of human rights institutions because they regard their pronouncements as authoritative. the function of legal doctrine is precisely examining the norms within a legal system, and within that legal system, legislative texts and decisions by courts are authoritative, they set the boundaries of the legal order that legal doctrine assesses. of course, one may be interested in other things (for example, in finding what the social impact of certain decisions of human rights courts is), but legal doctrine cannot be deemed to be doing a bad job because it fails to answer a question that is outside its remit. if you cannot hammer a screw, the fault does not lie in the hammer. dolores morondo taramundi the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 6 legal scholarship (as it happens in other areas of legal studies8). also, it should be investigated how legal doctrine can be productive to the other sciences; how its research results can be ‘translated’ for those outside legal scholarship; and ultimately, how to find methodologically appropriate ways to validate dogmatics against different external parameters. a third point of reflection closely linked to the idea of the ivory tower is that related to the limits legal doctrine has in doing 'criticism.' what can the role of criticism be in legal doctrine? how can critical concepts that go beyond identifying contradictions and gaps, interpretations or misconceptions be introduced, in order to propose mechanisms for resolution? can a critical concept be introduced and rendered operational to apprehend complexity and design appropriate responses? can legal doctrine accept a form of 'external criticism' that does not ignore the systemic nature of rules, the authoritative sources of interpretation, etc.? one which does not fall into 'wishful thinking', confusing the wishes, the claims, and the individual experience of injustice with rights? can the concept of criticism of critical theories be introduced to examine power relations? a final consideration worth making at this stage, forced by criticism, is that a relationship between scientific reflection and legal practice is necessary in and almost constitutive of legal research. in the field of human rights research, this relationship is not only established between legal scholars and legal practitioners (human rights lawyers, judges, experts sitting in human rights monitoring bodies), but also with human rights activists who may not be lawyers (in fact, very often they are not). can methodological reflection help us do human rights legal research that is not reduced to being a mere ‘crutch’for practitioners' work? is there such thing as basic legal research and applied legal research, as in the hard sciences? what is the difference between theoretical legal knowledge about human rights, and legal knowledge of human rights that is derived from both legal and non-legal practice, and from activism? ii. the new work context for human rights legal scholarship none of the above-mentioned arguments and criticism of legal methodology are new, nor have they changed substantially within legal science.9 however, as mentioned before, in human rights studies (and certainly in other fields of study related to social justice) questions are being raised that oblige legal scholars to explicitly rethink the methodological problem and to address it in a new way. before concentrating on the two issues that i believe have radically altered the landscape of human rights studies since the 1990s, i want to emphasise the role that disciplinary multiplicity plays as a catalyst in the new context for the work of human rights legal scholars. 8 for example, in international law and european law (van gestel and micklitz, 2011; van gestel et al. 2012), in the history of law (jensen, 2016), or in comparative law (legrand, 2017). 9 suffice it to recall the work of j. von kirchmann the worthlessness of jurisprudence as a body of knowledge (english translation) (die wertlosigkeit der jurisprudenz als wissenschaft, darmstadt, 1848). escaping the ivory tower: legal research on human rights from a critical perspective the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 7 if one accepts the fact that there is disciplinary plurality in the field of human rights studies, the issue of interdisciplinarity and the methodological challenge that it entails also needs to be taken seriously. if what we can and want to know about human rights is no longer limited to the knowledge and understanding of the international norms that establish them, the analysis of the texts in which they are contained and the operation of the international organisations that are responsible for monitoring their compliance by states, it follows that we will need to have some mechanisms to answer the various questions we may want to ask. this is a key aspect in the new reflexion on research methodology on human rights (mcconnell and smith, 2018; andreasen et al., 2017; coomans et al., 2009) but one that is usually resolved by using juxtapositions. in interdisciplinary research, or even in research conducted by multidisciplinary teams, it is very important to establish forms of ‘translating’ between the different disciplines and epistemological and theoretical approaches in the research design stage. this will minimise the danger of ‘incommensurability’ between languages and research findings depending on the different methods used. in interdisciplinary research, it is necessary to move forward with methodological approaches and methods that can act as 'chameleons' or as 'amphibians', adapting to different environments and their requirements. this task is clearly not to be performed by legal scholars by themselves. the construction of an interdisciplinary approach that goes beyond the juxtaposition or the substitution of some types of knowledge by other (equally partial) types, which is not dissolved in dilettantism or in a 'know-it-all' approach, and seeks to find a shared solution to new, more complex, multidimensional knowledge gaps, is a task to be undertaken by the scientific community as a whole. this process would ultimately transform that knowledge and turn it into a social production. this interdisciplinary transformation obviously cannot be addressed here.10 but it is important to realise that this is a fundamental challenge in the methodological scenario of current human rights research. if legal scholars (and all other scholars) wish to participate in that scenario, they have to act convergently, stepping outside of their ivory towers. ii.1. the contestation of human rights this section deals with two aspects that change significantly the contexts in which the methodological issue needs to be considered. these two aspects (the contestation of human rights and the complexity of the human rights law system) make it necessary to deal with the methodological issue not only explicitly, but also in a way that is different from previous waves of concern about methodology. 10 see the contribution by cristina de la cruz in this same issue. dolores morondo taramundi the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 8 the first aspect is that the concept of human rights has become increasingly and more frequently contested. the 40 years that separated the universal declaration from the end of the cold war saw the affirmation of human rights as a powerful mechanism of political legitimation and as a vehicle for claims from radically diverse groups. the context and conditions in which human rights doctrine became extended and established during what came to be called the 'age of rights' (bobbio, 1990) cannot be discussed here. however, paradoxically, at the time when bobbio coined this term, a process of contestation of human rights matured and raised new and old issues on several fronts. the old issues, that had not been resolved at the time of the universal declaration, delayed the drafting of the international covenants and their entry into force, and meandered throughout the cold war period. they included the opposition between political civil rights and economic, social and cultural rights, the nature of rights as a ‘natural’ limit to the state, and their international protection as a limit to the sovereignty of the state. some new issues also resulted from the global geo-political conditions that arose in the late 1960s, the decolonisation process, the emergence of regional human rights protection systems, the fall of communist regimes in europe, and the development of international civil society organisations. since the beginning of the new century, a theoretical reflection has also emerged on the ‘human rights crisis’ (klabbers, 2002; hoover, 2012; morondotaramundi 2014) and the urgent need to re-found their doctrine. the human rights crisis does not really involve a new set of claims that are sometimes divergent or even in opposition to human rights as they were reflected in international human rights law. this process of contestation is not in itself a negative development, nor does it in itself discredit the age of rights, although it denounces some of its critical points. if we understand human rights as a corpus of rules, the processes of change and transformation of the law are inherent to the very idea of social regulation. the human rights crisis that has been theorised since the beginning of the century has other components. in his analysis of the crisis, a. langlois opposes this critical literature (which he qualifies as an ‘anathema to the promotional propaganda of human rights that we are accustomed to hearing’ (langlois, 2012, p. 559) to the naive rhetoric of the human rights movement that includes universalism, indivisibility, inalienability and a long list of new rights, treaties and mechanisms. it is important to note that what is described as naive rhetoric and promotional propaganda of human rights are not marginal details, but their main theoretical elements (universality, indivisibility and inalienability) and operational components (positivisation, internationalisation and provision of control and guarantee mechanisms). in addition, the theoretical contestation of human rights in recent years has not so much questioned the specific political consensus on which the expansion of human rights was based,11 but the idea of a political consensus detached 11 indeed, many aspects of the political consensus around the universal declaration of 1948 may be (and have started to be) criticised (jensen, 2016). escaping the ivory tower: legal research on human rights from a critical perspective the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 9 from the objective (or, at least strong and compelling) foundations of human rights (klabbers 2002; morondotaramundi 2014). this is also, therefore, a crisis about the meaning of human rights, which has become undermined as they have been instrumentalised into playing a role in legitimising power. this crisis is also a struggle –not for rights– but for the meaning attributed to the expression ‘human rights’, including its rhetorical use in a symbolic function, the emotional pseudo-definitions, and the continuous prescriptive re-definitions. i think that the main vector of ‘rhetoric’ in human rights is this crisis and not, as coomans, gründfel and kamminga (2010, pp. 182-183) argue, the mere fact that there are activists doing research or that human rights scholars –generally– want to improve the implementation and enjoyment of human rights. this is the context in which human rights legal scholars have to work today: a human rights legal system where political consensus has become eroded and a struggle around the definition of human rights that includes some of its fundamental elements (foundations, portfolio, guarantees and subjects). i believe that human rights today –and probably since the 1990s– have the characteristics of ‘essentially contested concepts’ (gallie, 1956). essentially contested concepts are those notions ‘the proper use of which inevitably involves endless disputes about their proper uses on the part of their users’ (gallie, 1956: 169). these concepts involve a disagreement about the reasons for attributing a certain meaning to a particular linguistic expression.12 gallie warned that the indeterminate nature of these types of concepts cannot be resolved by appealing to logic or linguistics. the plurality of meanings of the expression ‘human rights’ and the mechanisms for determining the dominant meanings are not related to either coherence or semantic or pragmatic correction (as in the case of ambiguous expressions or vague concepts), but to more complex theoretical debates about their role in society and their fundamental properties. ii.2. the complexity of human rights law a key aspect in the consideration that human rights legal scholars live in an ivory tower disconnected from reality is probably the way in which legal scholarship deals with the peculiarities of the international system for the protection of human rights. from outside the legal community it is difficult to understand that legal scholars discuss whether a certain right exists without taking into account that in reality it is constantly violated by the authorities of a country or by private groups tolerated by the authorities of a given country; and that their victims have no protection from the law, and they are even often stigmatised and persecuted by law enforcement agencies and the judicial system. likewise, it can be shocking that the existence of a certain human right that is claimed as such by millions of people can be denied, and that certain injustices 12 it is my understanding that the category of an 'essentially contested concept' is also preferable to the concept/conception distinction made by r. dworkin (1977, pp. 134-136), because it compels us to consider the problem from an argumentative/justifying point of view that is, in my opinion, more fruitful than the analytical-conceptual framework of dworkin's distinction. dolores morondo taramundi the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 10 cannot be categorised as human rights violations (christiansen and jensen, 2019; alston, 2015). it might seem that the human rights of legal scholars exist in a separate world, parallel to real life on the planet. and yet, the boundaries of that separate world are precisely the second aspect that changes the work context in which human rights legal scholars have to face their new methodological challenges. burdened with the theoretical requirements of the doctrine of the universality, indivisibility and inalienability of human rights, human rights legal scholars have to enter a ‘legal system’ of a sui generis nature. indeed, international human rights law has two sets of characteristics that alter the usual environments of legal theorisation (i.e. national legal systems) and that, by comparison, make it look like a ‘crowded house’ (cruz villalón, 2012). cruz villalón, advocate general at the court of justice of the european union, uses this analogy of the 'crowded house' to refer to the current state of fundamental rights in europe13 in reference to both the rights that are considered fundamental, and to the people who deal with the complex task of declaring and applying them. while the intervention of cruz villalón highlighted how the judges of constitutional courts and courts of human rights in europe find it awkward to cohabitate in a crowded house, following this metaphor, i would like to discuss the difficulties that living in a crowded house entails for anyone who has to tidy up, find the belongings of each person in the house, and plan the shifts to watch tv there (i.e. legal scholars). that is, one dimension of the complexity of the human rights protection system to which the legal scholarship has paid increasing attention (brems, 2014; o’cinneide, 2009; brems and ouald chaib, 2018; bribosia and rorive, 2018) is its multi-level and multi-layered nature. in general terms, it cannot be said what a certain human right consists of (what it protects, what cases it covers, what its limits are, and who its right holders and duty bearers are). in different places, human rights are defined by the interaction of up to four levels of protection14 that could be aligned with, contradict, or complement each other. even where the founding provisions contain similar or identical formulations, there is a plethora of implementers of those standards that may differ in their interpretations or find themselves in so-called ‘zones of friction’. many of these zones of friction are jurisdiction problems or issues involving the application of legal concepts that the legal scholarship is called to examine and possibly solve. the other dimension of the complexity of human rights law is the multitude of rights; not so much because there are too many human rights15 but, as cruz villalón pointed out, because their sources are broad and heterogeneous (national constitutions, 13 although cruz villalón applied the analogy in a more restricted way to the european protection system, i believe that, mutatis mutandis, it is even more valid when applied at a global level. 14 international/global, supranational/regional, national and sub-state/local. see, for example (marx et al., 2015). 15 the first decade of this century has produced vast literature around the ‘inflation’ of human rights, and the need to limit the rhetoric of their language and 'streamline' protection only for those rights that are most necessary in the defence of human dignity. i have examined some critical points of these doctrines in morondo taramundi (2014). escaping the ivory tower: legal research on human rights from a critical perspective the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 11 supranational declarations, charters of rights, international treaties). there are major differences between human rights sources according to their origin, age, acquired authority, symbolic function, legal force and guarantees (cruz villalón 2012, p. 3). for all these reasons, the legal dimension of human rights cannot be fully understood by applying a view of the legal norms that is indebted to national legal systems.16 not only does the corpus of human rights law have a significant proportion of international law; it also receives a different impact according to the various sources across a broad spectrum of graded rules. these sources are not interchangeable, although the formulation of the right they contain may be; but they are not incompatible either. therefore, it is for legal scholarship to elucidate the issues concerning to what extent human rights (which are configured in the interaction of multiple heterogeneous sources and in the practices of creation, interpretation and application of various subjects called upon for their protection) are legal in nature. these two dimensions, the multilayered character and the heterogeneity of the sources (including those that do not have full legal nature or are 'quasi-legal', 'soft law', etc.), have to be taken into account when thinking of human rights legal research as being necessarily different from the legal scholarship (doctrinal and non-doctrinal) that can be produced within national legal systems. iii. the escape routes from the ivory tower: some cues let us assume, then, that we take seriously (albeit critically) the criticism of the methodological limitations that can be seen in human rights legal research today; and that, at the same time, we take into account this new multidisciplinary human rights research context, which has been shaken by the contestation of human rights and is extremely complex from a legal and regulatory point of view. this section outlines three issues; three escape routes from the ivory tower that could provide the basis for a methodological reflection on legal research in the new context. this endeavour commands a critical perspective that can contribute to the shared tasks involved in human rights studies and, at the same time, influence the real (although not immediate) protection of human rights and their values. the proposals provided below are not fully developed strategies; they are not an instruction manual and they are not accompanied by a series of methods (with lowercase ‘m’). nor are they alternative strategies to choose from. they are different elements for reflection on methodology (with a capital ‘m’). specifically, on the questions that need to be asked and answered when designing the research study, to be used as guidance in selecting specific methods; in recognising the limits of our research; in identifying complementarities in other scientific disciplines and with other sources of knowledge based on practice; and in assessing the possible social impact and the potential of knowledge for social transformation. 16 neither kelsen's inverted pyramid, nor even hart's rule of recognition seem adequate ways of thinking about these complex systems any longer (smits, 2009, p. 55). dolores morondo taramundi the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 12 iii.1. disclosure the first escape route from the ivory tower involves engaging in methodological reflection and disclosing it. a conscious reflection on methodology that is not merely the choice of a method to collect or to analyse data; it compels us (legal scholars) to position ourselves in the theoretical and epistemological panorama of scientific research and human rights studies. this is undoubtedly easier in the field of non-doctrinal legal research, in the various sub-disciplines of law & something and in law-in-context studies. in these areas, legal research can avail itself of the theoretical and methodological reflections of the disciplines that law is related to. but the fact that there is a well-trodden path does not mean that there are no further steps to take. the methodological reflection of multidisciplinary approaches in legal research should always adopt a self-analytical attitude to avoid a gradual movement away from the practice of law that may render it irrelevant to the understanding and transformation of law. in a review of the us debate on legal scholarship and methodology, van gestel and micklitz (2011) showed a fracture between two sides: ‘multidisciplinarians’ and ‘doctrinalists.’ although multidisciplinarians take the credit and the intellectual reputation in elite universities, legal doctrine is still the foundation of legal education. in addition, their analysis showed that there are signs of a trend reversal in terms of considering ‘black letter law’ scholarship to be dead. this and other studies warn of the danger that the increasing instrumentalisation of law may reduce legal research to a mere policy instrument (van gestel et al., 2012, p. 20). this explicit reflection on the theoretical and methodological positions is even a greater challenge in the investigation of legal doctrine or legal dogmatics. in fact, many authors who have addressed the problem have opted to abandon legal doctrine in favour of multidisciplinary approaches in the study of law. this is not the position endorsed here. there is no reason to believe that if legal scholars engaged in discussions about objects other than rules, such as human dignity or democracy (as some do), their work would be of a higher methodological standard than their production as legal scholars. much to the contrary. nor is there any reason to believe that legal scholarship would be of better quality if it adopted methods from other disciplines, such as empirical research methods.17 therefore, let legal scholars do their job. the escape route from the ivory tower does not require that legal doctrine or dogmatics disappear. the need for engaging in and disclosing methodological reflection does not mean that doctrine has no role in the new context of human rights research, or that legal scholars have to improvise or become recycled into something else (sociologists of law, or experts in legal anthropology or legal-social psychology). taking criticism and the new context seriously implies that legal doctrine can improve. a legal dogmatics of human rights can surely go beyond merely commentating 17 empirical legal research has grown significantly (van dijck et al., 2018). however, critical voices have also emerged about its limits in terms of its production of knowledge about law (leeuw, 2015). escaping the ivory tower: legal research on human rights from a critical perspective the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 13 on and glossing judgments and new rules; it can contribute more than by simply uncritically systematising normative data and the techniques used to resolve contradictions or indeterminacies in the system. the methodological turn in the legal doctrine would also oblige legal scholars to learn to ‘translate’ and share our knowledge with other disciplines; to learn to incorporate the knowledge produced by other disciplines; and to understand the ways of ‘leveraging’ legal research outputs into wider and more complex environments than the relatively homogeneous communities of their legal scholar colleagues. improving legal doctrine does not mean making it more similar to ‘multi-disciplines’ (the various ‘law & something’ or law-in-context disciplines), but to refine its own nature. iii.2. critique a second escape route from the ivory tower is to make legal research more aware of the relationship between the human rights rules that are analysed and the power they contain and represent. according to the traditional understanding of doctrine, legal scholars criticise the ‘failures’ of the legal system (contradictions, gaps, the indeterminacy of law) and propose solutions for the self-integration of the system. in other words, criticism means detecting errors and proposing solutions, but within the legal system,18 in order to improve the functioning of law. in my opinion, criticism can have two additional meanings, both of which can have a place in human rights legal research, including the legal doctrine of human rights. on the one hand, criticism can refer not simply to the detection of ‘errors’, but to the analysis of complexity. a critical study of legal doctrine, in this sense, would not only be devoted to identifying contradictions and proposing solutions de lege ferenda for the (better) protection or legal guarantee of a right, but would examine the ‘errors’ (contradictions, gaps or indeterminacies) found in relation to differentiated factors, both internal and external to the human rights law system. in this area, the law can be deemed to be a ‘discipline in transition’, to use the expression of the dutch evaluation agency (in van gestel et al., 2011, p. 2). it is a discipline that is facing a move towards more internationalised and globalised studies, towards reducing the predominance of legal practice within its purpose, towards multidisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity, and towards abandoning implicit traditions in favour of methodological approaches. indeed, the approaches that have tried to deal with the idea of criticism as an understanding of complexity are numerous: for example, studies of the multi-layered nature of human rights protection mentioned earlier, work on distinction between substantive and procedural violations of human rights (gerards and brems, 2017), and the growing attention given to dissenting opinions (white and boussiakou, 2009). 18 obviously, this idea of a closed, comprehensive system, capable of self-integration (which is a requirement for the guiding value of modern legal science, that is, the certainty of the law) has been criticised as a 'myth' since the end of the nineteenth century by all anti-formalist currents of law (calvo, 1994; van gestel and micklitz, 2011). dolores morondo taramundi the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 14 there is a further meaning of ‘criticism’, which is in my opinion the one that most lends itself as a route of escape from the ivory tower. i refer to the use of ‘critical’ in the expression 'critical theory', that is to say, those theories that enquire about essential nodes of social power relations (based on class, gender, race, disability, migrant status and other fundamental axes of subordination of groups of individuals in our societies). in the study of human rights, critical theories are the perspective that would make it possible to understand human rights, according to the bobbian adage of human rights as a result of new struggles against old powers.19 the question of power is, therefore, a fundamental issue in human rights research. the investigation of power is always complicated, both because of the heterogeneous ways in which it manifests itself and because of its ability to become invisible, in particular, in contact with the law (which shows its institutionalised or ‘naturalised’forms). it is important to reflect on how to deal with the issue of power in legal research and, in particular, in the legal doctrine of human rights. this is an even more urgent question if we take into account the current context of contestation of human rights. so far the issue of power has been almost exclusively approached by those who review human rights law from critical perspectives, namely, those who carry out an examination of the law from outside the law.20 the approach to the issue of power from within is hindered today by the hegemonic theory of human rights law: the so-called theory of generations of human rights. the theory of the generations of human rights is a narrative about rights that was imposed during the cold war and became both the historiography and the dominant theory of human rights. proposed by karel vasak in 1979, the theory classifies human rights into three separate groups: firstgeneration human rights, which includes civil and political rights; second-generation human rights, which comprises economic, social and cultural rights, and third-generation human rights, made up of collective or solidarity rights. each of the groups is explained on the basis of a different historical origin (the liberal revolutions, the democratisation processes and the proletarian movement of the nineteenth century, and the development processes linked to the post-colonial period, respectively). it is not just a historiography, since generations also function as analytical categories that explain the legal characteristics of each type of right: its legal nature, its right-holders and duty-bearers, and the type of associated guarantees. i agree with other authors (jensen, 2017) that this is a fundamentally flawed theory (which actually concealed and sustained the ideological partition of the world in the cold war).21 the theory of generations is an erroneous historiography of human rights (jensen, 2017) and has no explanatory capacity from a legal point of view (ferrajoli, 2011; macklem, 2015). as a theoretical configuration, it 19“human rights however fundamental are historical rights and therefore arise from specific conditions characterized by the embattled defence of new freedoms against old powers” (bobbio, 1990, pp. xiii). 20the literature is too broad to be cited: feminist, anti-racist, post-colonialist and de-colonialist perspectives, critical legal studies and post-marxist perspectives, to mention only the best known. 21 jensen noted how vasak's initial work in 1977 was intended to promote the agenda of a third generation of rights to development, peace and a healthy environment (although its implementation was of little benefit to the effective development of these rights, since the duty-bearers were not even defined for the thirdgeneration rights). escaping the ivory tower: legal research on human rights from a critical perspective the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 15 also locks the definition of human rights to a series of historical ‘roots’ in a kind of genealogical determinism and establishes a strong hierarchy between them. it is essential to question it in order to appreciate the contestation of the definition of human rights by what is really a political phenomenon. by contesting the theory of generations, a discussion can be initiated about power in human rights rules. it must be borne in mind, however, that both the genesis of the declaration and the prominence of the theory of generations have effectively hindered the development of theoretical knowledge of human rights, and that we are at a very early stage in this regard. if one asks people (not students, but scholars) or reviews scientific works and manifestos of international organisations about what human rights are, the outcome is discouraging. colleagues and reference works do what children do when they are learning to speak: finger-pointing. definitions of human rights are in most cases denotative definitions (provided by enumeration or by giving examples) and even ostensive definitions (by directly pointing the finger at the declaration or some other treaty). any attempt beyond that falls into the circular definition: ‘human rights are rights that are inherent to human beings.’ while the questioning of the so-called theory of generations and a renewed historiography of human rights (jensen, 2016) suggested using new approaches to their definition and analysis, critical theories can and should play an important role in this development in order to preserve the ability to analyse human rights as an expression of power relations. following the insights of other legal disciplines, when developing our theoretical and methodological assumptions about studying human rights law we must take into account that legal positivism (and the legal doctrine that is developed within that framework) prioritises the certainty of the law at the expense of excluding the challenges involved. pierre legrand warned that in the positive doctrines ‘certain knowledge is banished from the sphere of significance, and some issues are made never to arise, therefore allowing for (…) an ultimately immaculate development of internal heuristic processes generating ultimately immaculate legal results’ (legrand, 2017, pp. 6-7). to avoid the epistemic self-referential and self-contained ivory tower, human rights legal scholars, as comparative law scholars, need to free themselves from the obsession with the certainty of law in legal positivism and recognise ‘the essential unruliness of legal texts and legal cultures’ (legrand, 2017, p.44) also or particularly so in the human rights law systems. iii.3. co-work/network the third escape route from the ivory tower is related to the 'crowded house' discussed in the previous section. the production of knowledge about human rights is a collective task in the hands of a heterogeneous plurality of subjects, who provide partial and sometimes fragmentary forms of knowledge. this leads us, again, to the need to consider the methodological characteristics of this multidisciplinary and multisectoral type of research; one partaken of by subjects whose interest in research is not the production of knowledge in itself, nor its dolores morondo taramundi the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 16 transmission, as in the case of scientific research, but its showcasing for practical purposes of social transformation or the defence of individual or collective interests. i disagree with the argument posed by coomans et al. (2009 and 2010) that the root of the problem regarding the quality of human rights research is the confluence between academia and activism (whether in terms of individuals or work teams), or that activism has an agenda and practitioners have a function. this would be like holding that, for medical research to be good, it has to be indifferent to the ability of the results to effectively cure diseases. as feldman argued, scientific knowledge for all fields ‘involves curiosity about the world, which may be stimulated either by the need to achieve a goal or by desire to understand something for its own sake’ (1989, pp. 502-503). but coomans and his colleagues were right in proposing the use of methodology, or rather, of methodological rigour and the critical function, as instruments to curb ‘hagiography’ and rhetorical uses in the field of human rights (which are frequent in some areas more than others, although not only found among activists). a reflection on methodology can draw the areas of collaboration and the boundaries between human rights legal scholars and other actors who do research, but not scholarship, in the field of human rights. these lines would have the function of preserving the scientific aspirations of human rights legal scholarship, preventing its role from being reduced to being merely an ancillary instrument in the work of legal practitioners, human rights ngos and policy-makers. legal scholarship, in this way, can aspire not only to create more knowledge about the legal dimension of human rights, but also better knowledge, enhanced methods to approach that dimension, more accomplished theories to explain it, and better paradigms to integrate such knowledge with that of other disciplines. the confluence of academia and activists also has zones of friction, even when working on a common theoretical approach. one of the greatest difficulties we face in our doctoral programme, for example, is that we receive applications for admission from people who have been working in the field for years (with national and international organisations in humanitarian intervention, in human rights policy implementation programmes, etc.). it is challenging to explain the difference (as an intellectual activity and as a result) between the doctoral thesis and a report (however detailed and innovative). it is difficult both for those who need to explain it and for those who seek to understand the explanation. at a time when scholars are required to produce research at an increasingly fast pace, to direct it more towards measurable impacts, to bring it closer to the interests (or the needs) of public administrations, and ultimately increasingly closer to transfer than to basic research, it is problematic to define what it means to ‘push the boundaries of knowledge’, and what the degree of ambition should be in a doctoral project. escaping the ivory tower: legal research on human rights from a critical perspective the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 17 iv. conclusions this paper has reviewed some of the most common criticisms of the research conducted by human rights legal scholars in relation to some of its methodological deficits. according to critics, these deficits are based on poor, self-referential research results that are detached from the reality of human rights in people's lives, and lacking in terms of critical capacity. in order to escape from the ivory tower of human rights legal research, however, some new characteristics of the context must be taken into account. the field of human rights studies nowadays has a plurality of scientific disciplines; human rights are a contested concept (unlike what happened until the end of the twentieth century); and human rights law, which has developed spectacularly, has extremely complex characteristics related to the sources of law, degrees of regulation, interpretation mechanisms and guarantee systems. taking into account both the criticism and the new context, three ‘escape routes from the ivory tower’ have been outlined that suggest some elements to initiate a methodological reflection in human rights legal research. first, the need to disclose the actual methodological reflection, to ensure that it enters the very process of exposure to criticism and can eventually improve, as typically found in scientific work; and also to be able to ‘translate’ legal research for the other disciplines with which we have to collaborate in the ‘crowded house’ of human rights. second, the need to incorporate criticism, not only as a review of the system's malfunctions –as traditionally has been done in legal doctrine– but with a view to studying the complexity of the power relations reflected in the norms. if human rights are born in the ‘struggles in defence of new freedoms against old powers’, power relations need to be accounted for. and third, the need for academics, practitioners and activists to collaborate and use methodological reflection accurately, so as to delimit the forms and confines of that collaboration, preserving the function of each group and the scientific ambition of legal scholarship. references alston, ph. (2015) report of the special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights a/hrc/29/31, human rights council, 29th session, 27 may 2015. available at http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=a/hrc/29/31 andreassen, b., sano, h.-o., mcinerney-lankford, s. (2017) research methods in human rights. a handbook. cheltenham: edward elgar publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785367793 bobbio, n. (1990) l’età dei diritti. torino: einaudi. brems, e. (2014) ‘should pluriform human rights become one? exploring the benefits of human rights integration’, european journal of human rights, 4, pp. 447470. http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=a/hrc/29/31 https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785367793 dolores morondo taramundi the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 18 brems, e. (2009) ‘methods in legal human rights research’in coomans, f., grünfeld, f. and kamminga m.t. (eds.) methods of human rights research. antwerp: intersentia, pp. 77-90. brems, e. and ouald chaib, s. (2018) fragmentation and integrationin human rights law: users’ perspectives. cheltenham: edward elgar publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788113922 bribosia, e. and rorive, i. (2018) human rights tectonics. global dynamics of integration and fragmentation. cambridge: intersentia https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780688060 calvo garcía, m. (1994) los fundamentos del método jurídico: una revisión crítica. madrid: tecnos christiansen, c. o. and jensen, s. l. b. (eds.) (2019) histories of global inequality. basingstoke: palgrave macmillan. coomans, f., grünfeld, f. and kamminga m.t. (2010) ‘methods of human rights research: a primer’, human rights quarterly, 32, pp. 180-187 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19163-4_1 coomans, f., grünfeld, f. and kamminga m.t. (eds.) (2009) methods of human rights research. antwerp: intersentia cruz villalón, p. (2012) rights in europe – the crowded house, king’s college london working paper in european law 01/2012. available at https://www.kcl.ac.uk/law/research/centres/european/research/celwpel01201 2final.pdf dworkin, r. (1977) taking rights seriously. cambridge (mass.): harvard university press feldman, d. (1989) ‘the nature of legal scholarship’, modern lawreview, 52(4), pp. 498-517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1989.tb02611.x ferrajoli, l. (2001) diritti fondamentali. un dibattito teorico. roma-bari: laterza follesdal, a. (2009) ‘methods of philosophical research on human rights’ in coomans, f., grünfeld, f. and kamminga m.t. (eds.) methods of human rights research. antwerp: intersentia, pp. 233-246 gallie, w. b. (1956) ‘essentially contested concepts’, proceedings of the aristotelian society, 56 (1955 1956), pp. 167-198 https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.167 https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788113922 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780688060 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19163-4_1 https://www.kcl.ac.uk/law/research/centres/european/research/celwpel012012final.pdf https://www.kcl.ac.uk/law/research/centres/european/research/celwpel012012final.pdf https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1989.tb02611.x https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.167 escaping the ivory tower: legal research on human rights from a critical perspective the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 19 gerards, j. and brems, e. (2017) procedural review in european fundamental rights cases. cambridge: cambridge university press hoover, j. (2012) ‘human rights contested’, journal of intervention and statebuilding, 6(2), pp.233-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2012.672692 jensen, s. l. b. (2017) ‘putting to rest the three generations theory of human rights’ open global rights, 15 november. available at: https://www.openglobalrights.org/putting-to-rest-the-three-generations-theoryof-human-rights/ jensen, s. l. b. (2016) the making of international human rights: the 1960s, decolonization and thereconstruction of global values. cambridge: cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316282571 kennedy, d. (2005) the dark side of virtue: reassessing international humanitarianism. princeton: princetonuniversity press https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400840731 klabbers, j. (2002) ‘glorified esperanto? rethinking human rights’, finnish yearbook of international law, 13, pp. 63-77 langlois, a. (2012) ‘human rights in crisis? a critical polemic against polemical critics’, journal of human rights, 11(4), pp. 558-570 https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2012.702473 leeuw, f. l. (2015) ‘empirical legal research: the gap between facts and values and legal academic training’, utrecht law review, 11(2), pp. 18-33 https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.315 legrand, p. (2017) ‘jameses at play: a tractation on the comparison of laws’, the american journal of comparative law, 65(suppl. 1), pp. 1-136 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avx018 macklem, p. (2015) the sovereignty of human rights. oxford new york: oxford university press maritain, j. (1983) el hombre y el estado. madrid: encuentro marx, a., hachez, n., meuwissen, k., schmitt, p., raube, k., jaraczewski, j., roszak, j., lewis, t., starl, k., morondotaramundi, d., tuovinen, a.-k., and weatherburn, a. (2015) ‘localizing fundamental rights in the european union: what is the role of local and regional authorities, and how to strengthen it?’journal of human rights practice, 7(2), pp. 246–271 https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huv004 https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2012.672692 https://www.openglobalrights.org/putting-to-rest-the-three-generations-theory-of-human-rights/ https://www.openglobalrights.org/putting-to-rest-the-three-generations-theory-of-human-rights/ https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316282571 https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400840731 https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2012.702473 https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.315 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avx018 https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huv004 dolores morondo taramundi the age of human rights journal, 13 (december 2019) pp. 1-20 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n13.1 20 mcconnell, l. and smith, r. (2018) research methods in human rights. london and new york: routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315672632 morondo taramundi, d. (2014) ‘anti-retórica y minimalismo de los derechos humanos’ in fernández garcía, e. and martínez garcía, j. i. (dirs.), los derechos en el contexto ético, político y jurídico. valencia: tirant lo blanch, pp. 121-147 o’cinneide, c. (2009) human rights and within multi-layered systems of constitutional governance: rights cosmopolitanism and domestic particularism in tension. university college dublin law research paper 12/2009. available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=1370264 smits, j. (2009) ‘redefining normative legal science: towards an argumentative discipline’ in coomans, f., grünfeld, f. and kammingam.t. (eds.) methods of human rights research. antwerp: intersentia, pp. 45-57 taekema, s. and van klink, b. (2011) ‘editorial. legal methods under discussion’. recht en methode, 1(1), pp. 11-12 https://doi.org/10.5553/rem/221225082011001001002 van dijck, g., sverdlov, s. and buck, g. (2018) ‘empirical legal research in europe: prevalence, obstacles, and interventions’, erasmus lawreview 2 [online]. available at http://www.erasmuslawreview.nl/tijdschrift/elr/2018/2/elr-d17-00020.pdf (accessed: 15 july 2019) van gestel, r., micklitz, h.-w. (2011) revitalizing doctrinal legal research in europe: what about methodology? eui working papers law no. 2011/05. available at https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/16825 van gestel, r., micklitz, h.-w., maduro, m. p. (2012) methodology in the new legal world. eui working papers law no. 2012/13. available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2069872 white, r.c.a., and boussiakou, i. (2009) ‘separate opinions in the european court of human rights’, human rights law review, 9(1), pp. 37–60 https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngn033 received: august 19th 2019 accepted: september 25nd 2019 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315672632 https://ssrn.com/abstract=1370264 https://doi.org/10.5553/rem/221225082011001001002 http://www.erasmuslawreview.nl/tijdschrift/elr/2018/2/elr-d-17-00020.pdf http://www.erasmuslawreview.nl/tijdschrift/elr/2018/2/elr-d-17-00020.pdf https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/16825 https://ssrn.com/abstract=2069872 https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngn033 chapter three – media trial the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 102 privacy as a human right and media trial in india gifty oommen 1 abstract: even before india became independent, it had already become party to the united nations declaration on human rights 1948 (udhr). press had played a very important and productive role in the independence movement, through its strong support for the popular movement of satyagraha and abdication of foreign goods and other similar forms of freedom struggle. such was the impact of the print media that it frightened the british, as it gave a picture of a strong india, though the reality was a disintegrated india ruled by princely kings and people in deep poverty. the framers of our constitution knew the immense power vested in the print media, therefore they imbibed the freedom of speech and expression in article 19(1) (a) of the indian constitution from article 19 of the udhr, and also reflected similarly in article 19 of the international covenant on civil and political rights 1966 (iccpr). udhr 1948 in article 12 and iccpr 1966 in article 17 give protection to the concept of privacy. though freedom of speech and expression given in article 19 of the udhr 1948 and iccpr 1966 was enshrined in article 19(1)(a) of the indian constitution. we do not find such constitutional recognition given to privacy in india. here, privacy is not given any separate constitutional status. right to life, liberty and security of person is enshrined in article 3 of the udhr 1948. this is recognized in article 21 of the indian constitution. privacy was not included in this article. in nihal chand v.bhagwan dei during the colonial period, as early as in 1935, the high court recognized the independent existence of privacy from the customs and traditions of india. but privacy got recognition in free india for the first time in kharak singh case. in kharak singh v. state of u.p., the supreme court struck down domiciliary visits by the police as it violates article 21. but it was in the minority view given in this case by justice subha rao, that privacy got recognition as a right included in article 21 of the constitution. in this case the apex court recognized privacy as part of right to life and personal liberty. privacy was recognized as a separate right in udhr 1948. this has failed to materialize in the same spirit as a fundamental right in the indian constitution, like the right to speech and expression and right to life. article 3 of the udhr 1948, protects life and personal liberty, not privacy. in india privacy is described as part of right to life and personal liberty in article 21 of the constitution as there is no separate provision for privacy in the constitution. privacy has been defined by supreme court in sharada v. dharampal as ‘the state of being free from intrusion or disturbance in one’s private life or affairs’. this is different and distinct from the life and liberty in article 21 of the constitution. india being signatory and party to the udhr1948 is bound to protect privacy as a fundamental right in the constitution and also to give a higher status to it in reference to press. keywords: privacy, article 21, press, indian constitution, liberty, law commission of india 1 asst. professor, government law college, ernakulam, india (giftyoommen@gmail.com). gifty oommen the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 103 introduction even before india became independent, it had already become party to the united nations declaration on human rights 1948, (udhr). this was indicative of its future plans and visions for a free and democratic government. in furtherance of this, when it finally got independence the first strategy was to have its own constitution. in 1950 india declared itself to be a fully democratic country, having adopted most of the basic principles of the udhr. indian government understood the importance of press and its impact on the people of india. press had played a very important and productive role in the independence movement, through its strong support for the popular movement of satyagraha and abdication of foreign goods and other similar forms of freedom struggle. such was the impact of the print media that it frightened the british, as it gave a picture of a strong india, though the reality was a disintegrated india ruled by princely kings and people in deep poverty. the framers of our constitution knew the immense power vested in the print media, therefore they imbibed the freedom of speech and expression in article 19(1)(a) of the indian constitution from article 19 of the udhr, and also reflected similarly in article 19 of the international covenant on civil and political rights 1966 (iccpr). 2 but somewhere in their thought process it never came to light, about the consequences of an unbridled horse set free in a vast pasture called india. british india was not a free country like free india. there, the print media had to work under constraints, which forced them to be within rules. originally enacted article 19(2), provided that ‘nothing in sub clause (a) of clause (1) shall affect the operation of any existing law relating to libel, slander, defamation, contempt of court or any matter which offends against decency or morality or which undermines the security of or tends to overthrow, the state’. although article 19(1)(a) does not mention freedom of press. the supreme court in romesh thapper v. state of madras 3 stated that freedom of speech and expression includes freedom of press. it stated ‘turning now to the merits there can be no doubt that freedom of speech and expression includes propagation of ideas, and that freedom is enshrined by the freedom of circulation’. 4 here the supreme court further increased the ambit of the freedom of the press. after this came the first amendment of the constitution in 1951, amending article 19(2). the new article provided ‘nothing in sub clause (a) of clause (1) shall affect the operation of any existing law or prevent the state from making any law, in so far as such 2 u.d.h.r.1948 & i.c.c.p.r. 1966-article 19-everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference. everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression ,this right shall include seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontier in writing or in print , in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice. this exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it duties and responsibilities. it may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but be such as are provided by law and are necessary: (a) for respect of the rights or reputations of others; (b)for the protection of national security or of public order, or of morals. indian constitution –article 19(1)(a)every citizen shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression. article 19(2) provides the reasonable restrictions .the constitution provisions are in consensus with the above conventions. 3 romesh thapper v. state of madras 1950 s.c.r. 594. 4 romesh thapper v. state of madras 1950 s.c.r. 594 at p. 597. privacy as a human right and media trial in india the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 104 law imposes reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub clause in the interests of the security of the state, friendly relations with foreign states, public order, decency or morality or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.’ this amendment further increases the ambit of freedom of press under the constitution. definition of freedom of speech & expression freedom of speech and expression in the context of public interest is the press –the print media and the broadcast media. it has taken the responsibility to inform the public about the functioning of the elected government. this includes all other matters in which public have a right to know. right to discussion and criticize forms an active part of this right. in romesh thappar v. state of madras 5 , the supreme court has included press in the definition of freedom of speech or expression. in l.i.c.v. manubhai shah 6 , the supreme court reiterated as in indian express newspapers v. union of india 7 stated that freedom to circulate ones views can be by word of mouth or in writing or through audiovisual media. this right to circulate also includes the right to determine the volume of circulation 8 . the press enjoys the privilege of sitting in the courts on behalf of the general public to keep them informed on matters of public importance. the journalist therefore has the right to attend proceedings in court and publish fair reports. this right is available in respect of judicial and quasi-judicial tribunals 9 however this is not an absolute right. there are also other important considerations, for instance the reporting of names of rape victims, children, juvenile, woman should be prohibited. this restriction is placed because of their weak position in the society that makes them vulnerable to exploitation. therefore in the interests of justice, the court may restrict the publicity of court proceedings 10 . under section 151 of the civil procedure code, 1908, the court has the inherent power to order a trial to be held in camera. the right to report legislative proceedings is also a part of the press freedom. in a democratic society it is necessary that the society shall be a part of the discussions on policy matters. they need to know the details of debates, as transparency in governance is a must for the proper functioning of a democratic society. this right of the press to true 5 romesh thappar v. state of madras 1950 s.c.r. 594 at page 597. 6 l.i.c. v. manubhai shah (1992) 3 s.c.c. 637. 7 indian express newspapers v. union of india (1985) 1 s.c.c. 641. 8 sakal papers v. union of india, a.i.r. 1962 s.c. 305. 9 saroj iyer v. maharashtra medical (council) of indian medicine, a.i.r. 2002 bom .95. 10 naresh shridhar mirajkar v. state of maharashtra, a.i.r. 1967 s.c. 1. gifty oommen the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 105 reporting of parliamentary proceedings is protected by the constitution 11 . it also gives protection to true reporting of the proceedings of state assemblies. 12 a similar protection is provided in the parliamentary proceedings (protection of publication) act, 1977. in tata press ltd v. mahanagar telephone nigam ltd 13 , the supreme court also included into freedom of speech and expression the right to advertise or the right of commercial speech. before this decision, advertisements were not considered as part of the definition of free speech. this decision reflects the dilution in the already wide freedom of speech and expression. it was in variance to the earlier limitation on this freedom, which was enunciated in hamdard dwakhana v. union of india 14 , in which the apex court observed that commercial advertisement does not fall within the protection of speech and expression as there is an element of trade and commerce in them. but in tata case, supreme court stated that advertising pays a large portion of the costs of supplying the public with newspaper. so for a democratic press the advertising subsidy is crucial. the court further observed that without advertising, the resources available for expenditure on reporting the ‘news’ would decline, which may lead to an erosion of its quality and quantity. in hindustan times v. state of u.p. 15 , the supreme court again reiterated the importance of advertising and its connection with the circulation of paper. the right to privacy – international obligations udhr 1948 in article 12 and iccpr 1966 in article 17 give protection to the concept of privacy. though freedom of speech and expression given in article 19 of the udhr 1948 and iccpr 1966 was enshrined in article 19(1)(a) of the indian constitution. we do not find such constitutional recognition given to privacy in india. here, privacy is not given any separate constitutional status. right to life, liberty and security of person is enshrined in article 3 of the udhr 1948. this is recognized in article 21 of the indian constitution. privacy was not included in this article. in nihal chand v. bhagwan dei 16 during the colonial period, as early as in 1935, the high court recognized the independent existence of privacy from the customs 11 article 361-a of the constitution of india (1) no person shall be liable to any proceedings, civil or criminal, in any court in respect of the publication in a newspaper of a substantially true report of any proceedings of either house of parliament or the legislative assembly or as the case maybe, either house of the legislature of a state, unless the publication is proved to have been made with malice (2) clause (1) shall apply in relation to reports or matters broadcast by means of wireless telegraphy as part of any programme or service provided by means of a broadcasting station as it applies in relation to reports or matters published in a newspaper. explanation: in this article newspaper includes a news agency report containing material for publication in a newspaper. 12 ibid. 13 tata press ltd v. mahanagar telephone nigam ltd (1995) 5 s.c.c. 139. 14 hamdard dawakhana v. union of india, a.i.r. 1965 s.c. 1167. 15 hindustan times v. state of u.p. (2003) 1 s.c.c. 591. 16 nihal chand v. bhagwan dei a.i.r. 1935 all.1002. privacy as a human right and media trial in india the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 106 and traditions of india. but privacy got recognition in free india for the first time in kharak singh case. 17 in kharak singh v. state of u.p., the supreme court struck down domiciliary visits by the police as it violates article 21. but it was in the minority view given in this case by justice subha rao , that privacy got a recognition as a right included in article 21 of the constitution. in this case the apex court recognized privacy as part of right to life and personal liberty. privacy was recognized as a separate right in udhr 1948. this has failed to materialize in the same spirit as a fundamental right in the indian constitution, like the right to speech and expression and right to life. 18 article 3 of the udhr 1948, protects life and personal liberty, not privacy. in india privacy is described as part of right to life and personal liberty in article 21 of the constitution as there is no separate provision for privacy in the constitution. privacy has been defined by supreme court in sharada v. dharampal 19 as ‘the state of being free from intrusion or disturbance in one’s private life or affairs’. this is different and distinct from the life and liberty in article 21 of the constitution. indian view india is member of the united nations organizations, so it is bound by article 12 of the universal declaration of human rights, 1948 to bring in statutory enactments to keep itself in tune with the international commitment. further, india has also ratified the international covenant on civil and political rights, 1966 20 . india does not give privacy a fundamental right status, while freedom of speech and expression is given protection under article 19(1)(a). privacy is not even enumerated among the reasonable restrictions to the right to freedom of speech and expression enlisted under article 19(2). nevertheless the courts have protected this right to privacy to some extent not just under tort law but also under article 21 and under the reasonable restrictions enumerated in article 19(2) of the constitution. under the tort law, a personal action for damages would be possible for unlawful invasion of privacy. in these cases, the publisher and printer of journal, magazine or book or the broadcaster and producer of a broadcast would be liable in damages. these would arise basically in relation to matters concerning the private life of the individual, which includes the family, marriage, parenthood, children and his sexual life. let us have a look at some of them. 17 kharak singh v. state of u.p. and others 1964 s.c.r. (1) 332. 18 u.d.h.r. 1948article 3everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. 19 sharada v. dharampal, (2003) 4 s.c.c. 493, at p.521. 20 article 17 of the international covenant on civil and political rights ,1966: 1. no one shall be subject to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, human or correspondence, nor to lawful attacks on his honor and reputation. 2. every one has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks. gifty oommen the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 107 (i) morality and decency one of the restrictions imposed on right to free speech and expression is in the interest of ‘morality’ and ‘decency’. there are several legislative provisions governing these two elements 21 . apart from these provisions there are some judicial decisions also. these two terms have no specific meanings. these change according to the value system of a given society. it changes from one generation to another; and also from one judge’s perspective to another. in chandra kant kalayandas kakodkar v. state of maharashtra 22 the supreme court observed that such notions vary from country to country depending on their moral standard. but even within the same country, like india as you cross a few hundred kilometers, morality changes at varying lengths. this makes it very difficult to straight jacket these concepts. (ii) obscenity the definition of obscenity has been given by the supreme court as the quality of being obscene which means offensive to modesty or decency; lewd, filthy and repulsive 23 . 21 the indian penal code, 1860, section 292 – 294 makes the sale, letting to hire, distribution, public exhibition, circulation, import, export and advertisement of obscene material an offence punishable with imprisonment and fine. the dramatic performances act, 1876, preamble section 3 (c): section 6 gives the government the power to prohibit public dramatic performances on the ground of obscenity and in case of violation imprisonment and fine follows. the post office act 1898, section 20: prohibits the transmission by post any material on the ground of decency or obscenity. the cinematograph act,1952 –section 5 b prohibits the certification of a film by the censor board for public exhibition of the film or any part of it is against the interest of morality and decency. the young persons (harmful publications), act 1956 section 2 (a) 3-7, prohibits publications which could corrupt a child or young person and invite him to commit crimes of violence or cruelty, etc. a contravention is punishable with imprisonment and fine. the customs act 1962, section 11 (b) empowers the government to prohibit or improve conditions on the import or export of goods in the interest of decency and morality. the indecent representation of women (prohibition), act 1986 section 3-6 prohibits the indecent representation of women through advertisements or other publications, writings, paintings, figures etc and makes the contravention punishable with imprisonment and fine. the cable television networks (regulation), act 1995 – section 5, 6, 16, 17, 19, 20 read with the cable television network rules, 1994 prohibits the telecast of programmes on cable television, which offend decency and morality and on contravention amounts to imprisonment and fine. the information technology act, 2000 section 67 makes the publication and transmission in electronic form of ‘material’ which is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest or if its effect is such as to tend to deprave and corrupt persons who are likely, having regard to all relevant circumstances, to read, see or hear the matter contained or embodied in it – punishable with imprisonment and fine. 22 chandrakant kalayandas kakodkar v. state of maharashtra (1969) 2 s.c.c. 687. 23 ranjit d. udeshi v. state of maharashtra ( lady chatterley’s lover) a.i.r. 1965 s.c .881. at7. p. 885. privacy as a human right and media trial in india the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 108 distinction between obscenity and indecency is that while everything obscene is indecent, everything indecent is not obscene. obscenity is quiet repulsive and provocative. vulgarity is another aspect of it. in samaresh bose v. amal mitra 24 the supreme court held that a vulgar writing is not necessarily obscene. vulgarity arouses a feeling of disgust, revulsion and also boredom but does not have the effect of corrupting the morals of any reader, whereas obscenity has the tendency to corrupt those whose minds are open to such influences. in lady chatterley’s lover 25 , the supreme court stated that ‘sex and nudity in art and literature cannot be regarded as evidence of obscenity without something more. if the rigid test of treating with sex as the minimum ingredient were accepted, then hardly any writer of fiction today would escape the fate lawrence had in his days. similarly in bobby art international v. ompal singh hoon 26 , where a member of the gujjar community filed a petition seeking to restrain the exhibition of the film ‘bandit queen’ on the ground that it was a slur on the womanhood in india and that the rape scene in the film was suggestive of the moral depravity of the gujjar community. here the supreme court drew distinction between nudity amounting to obscenity and nudity which does not amount to obscenity. the court stated that frontal nudity which the petitioner contended amounted to indecency within article 19(2) and section 5-b of the cinematograph act was not to arouse prurient feelings but revulsion for the perpetrators. thus the court rejected the petitioner’s contention. all sex or sex connected matters are therefore not obscenity amounting to indecency. in k.a. abbas v. union of india 27 , the supreme court observed that it was wrong to classify sex as essentially obscene or even indecent or immoral. the court criticized the failure of parliament and the central government to separate the artistic and socially valuable from the obscene and indecent. it said that the law showed more concern for the depraved rather than the ordinary moral man. in r. v. hecklin 28 , it was laid down that the effect of a publication on the most vulnerable members of the society is the determining factor and whether they were likely to read it or not is immaterial. even if literary merit was there, the defense was not available. although, the hecklin ‘s test was overruled in england by the enactment of the obscene publications act 1959, 29 in india the supreme court of india adopted the 24 samaresh bose v. amal mitra (1985) 4 s.c.c. 289. p. 318. 25 ranjit d. udishi v. state of maharashtra (lady chatterley’s lover) a.i.r. 1965 s.c. 881 pp. 887-88. 26 bobby art international v om pal singh hoon (1996) 4 s.c.c. 1. 27 k.a. abbas v. union of india (1970) 2 s.c.c. 780 pp. 802, 803. 28 r. v. hecklin (1868) l.r. 3 q.b. 360. gifty oommen the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 109 hecklin’s test in ranjit d. udeshi v. state of maharashtra 30 . this case was concerning the conviction of a bookseller and his partners for being in possession of a book containing ‘obscene’ material. lawrence’s’ lady chatterley’s lover was the book in question. the court relied on hecklin’s test and interpreted the word ‘obscene’ to mean that which is ‘offensive to modesty or decency; lewd, filthy and repulsive’ and held that regard should be had to our community mores and standards. hecklin’s test was later replaced by the likely readers test recognized under section 292 (1) of the indian penal code 1860 31 . here the question was whether it was possible that those who are likely to read it may get access to it. the test was based on the ‘target audience’. thus in chandrakant kalyandas kakodkar v. state of maharashtra 32 , the supreme court laid this new test. it stated that ‘it is duty of the court to consider the article, story or book by taking an overall view of the entire work and to determine whether the obscene passages are so likely to deprave and corrupt those whose minds are open to such influences and in whose hands the book is likely to fall; and in doing so the influences of the book on the social morality of our contemporary society cannot be overlooked’. 33 similarly, in samaresh bose 34 the supreme court held that while judging whether there is obscenity the judge should place himself in the position of a reader of every group in whose hands the book is likely to fall and should try to appreciate what kind of possible influence the book is likely to have in the minds of the readers. privacy under article 21 article 21 of the indian constitution clearly gives protection to life and personal liberty. in this perspective, though in different factual base, the supreme court for the first time recognized the ‘right to privacy’. it was in kharak singh v. state of u.p. 35 , that majority of the bench struck down domiciliary visits as being unconstitutional. though they were yet unreceptive to the idea of privacy, the minority view by justice subha rao held that article 21’s concept of liberty included privacy. 36 he stated: 29 the obscene publications act 1959, section 1states if the entire article ‘is if taken as a whole , such as to tend to deprave and corrupt persons who are likely , having regard to all relevant circumstances, to read, see or hear the matter contained or embodied in it .’ 30 ranjit d. udeshi v. state of maharashtra a.i.r. 1956 s.c. 881. 31 section 292(1) of indian penal code, 1860-for the purposes of subsection (2) a book , pamphlet ,paper , writing , drawing , painting , representation, figure or any other object shall be deemed to be obscene if it is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest or if its effect, or ( where it comprises two or more distinct terms) persons who are likely , having regard to all relevant circumstances to read, see or hear the matter contained or embodied in it. 32 chandrakant kalyandas kakodkar v. state of maharashtra (1969) 2 s.c.c. 687. 33 ibid. 34 samaresh bose v. amal mitra (1985) 4 s.c.c. 289. 35 kharak singh v. state of u. p. and others 1964 s.c.r. (1) 332. 36 id at p. 359. privacy as a human right and media trial in india the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 110 ‘it is true that our constitution does not expressly declare a right to privacy as a fundamental right, but the said right is an essential ingredient of personal liberty. every democratic country sanctifies domestic life; it is expected to give him rest, physical happiness, peace of mind and security. in the last resort, a person’s house, where he lives with his family, is his ‘castle’. it is his rampant against encroachment on his personal liberty.’ 37 later the supreme court continued to elaborate on this issue of privacy. in a series of cases concerning journalist’s seeking permission from the court to interview and photograph prisoners, the court held that the press had no absolute right to interview or photograph a prisoner unless he consented to it. though right to privacy was not the question, the court impliedly acknowledged the right to privacy. in r. rajagopal v. state of t.n. 38 , which is the watershed in the field of privacy, the supreme court discussed the right to privacy in the reference to media. it was concerning the right of the publisher of a magazine to publish the autobiography of ‘autoshanker’ who was a condemned prisoner. the state contended that it exposed same sensational links between the police authorities and the criminal, so it was likely to amount to defamation and therefore should be restrained. it was in this context that privacy came up. the supreme court held that the press had every right to publish the autobiography of autoshanker to the extent, as it appeared from the public records, without any permission. in case the publication went beyond the public record and published his life story, then it would amount to an invasion of his right to privacy. here the court regarded privacy in two aspects – firstly as a tortuous liability, which gives an action for damages for invasion of privacy. secondly – ‘a right to be left alone’ implicitly read into the right to life and liberty in article 21. in another similar case regarding khushwant singh’s book ‘truth, love and a little malice’, the 39 then union minister for animal welfare, ms. maneka gandhi, gave a petition in the high court stating that certain contents of his book, even if true, violated her right to privacy. the high court held that ‘well established principles’ weigh in favor of the right of publication and there was no question of any irreparable loss or injury since respondent herself has also claimed damages which will be the remedy in case she is able to establish defamation and the appellant is unable to defend the same as per law. in an earlier case though in london 40 , ms maneka gandhi had won a libel suit against british writer katharine frank and her publishers, who had written indira gandhi’s biography. she won an apology and damages along with deletion from the book of the 37 ibid. 38 r. rajagopal v. state of t.n. (1994) 6 s.c.c. 632. 39 the times of india, nov 10, 2001, p. 7. khushwant singh and anr .v. maneka gandhi a.i.r.2002 delhi58. 40 the times of india, november 10, 2001 p. 7. gifty oommen the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 111 offending passage referring to sanjay and maneka gandhi’s alleged involvement in the cover-up of a murder in 1976. in india this case failed as india had no law to protect the privacy and family of a person. in kaleidoscope (india) p ltd. v. phoolan devi 41 , where phoolan devi, one of india’s most dreaded dacoit at one time, sought an injunction to restrain the exhibition of the controversial biographical film “bandit queen” in india and abroad. the court stated that the film infringed her right to privacy. though she was a public figure, whose private life was exposed to the press and though she had assigned her copyright in her writings to the film producers, still private matters relating to rape or the alleged murders committed by her could not be commercially exploited as news items or as matters of public interest. but in bobby art international v. om pal singh hoon 42 when the supreme court was confronted with the contention that bandit queen was a slur on the womanhood of india, the court rejected the petitioner‘s contention that the frontal nudity was indecent within article 19(2) and section 5-b of the cinematograph act 1952. the object of the scene, the court said was to bring revulsion for the perpetrators, so there is no indecency in the scene. here the result of the decision was that even rape scenes can be shown, as public interest outweighs privacy in india. right to privacy was read into section 5(2) of the telegraph act, 1885, by the supreme court in people’s union for civil liberties v. union of india 43 which allowed interception of messages in cases of public emergency or in the interest of public safety. the court held that the right to privacy included the right to hold a telephone conversation in the privacy of ones’ home or office and that telephone tapping infringed this right to privacy. the government had failed to establish proper procedure under section 7(2)(b) of the act to ensure procedural safeguards. tort – protection of privacy following the common law system of adjudication india has adopted the principle of precedent system of adjudication. in this context, the courts in india have recognized the tort law as a tool for preserving the individual’s honor and esteem. the main offence prohibited by common law is defamation. every person has the right to be respected. reputation is an integral aspect of the dignity of an individual. as stated in state of bihar v. lal krishna advani 44 , right to reputation is a facet of the right to life. where any authority, in discharge of its duties traverses into the realm of personal reputation, it must provide a chance to the person concerned to have a say in the matter. 41 kaleidoscope (india) (p) ltd v. phoolan devi a.i.r. 1995 del . 316. 42 bobby art international v. om pal singh hoon (1996) 4 s.c.c.1. 43 people’s union for civil liberties v. union of india (1997) 1 s.c.c. 301. 44 state of bihar v lal krishna advani (2003) 8 s.c.c. 361 privacy as a human right and media trial in india the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 112 indian courts have come to give protection to reputation but at the same time they have defended the press also. where the publisher, when he published the news item did not know of the existence of the plaintiff and later had published a correction in his paper, the court held he was not liable for defamation. 45 this would not have been the course of action in uk. such a case would come under the defamation act 1996 46 and now it would come under the human rights act 1998 47 in uk. in uk, for a similar error would cost the press heavily in terms of money despite giving apology in the next issue. that would have a deterrent effect. 48 reference to the plaintiff defamation requires that the plaintiff should be identified by name or description or position or photograph or by anything which would enable the reader or viewer to know or recognize him, which would consequently cause defamation. even if the libel statements are not made directly against a person but he is aggrieved by them, then he has the right to maintain a complaint 49 . in john thomas v dr. k. jagdeesan 50 , it was held that the words ‘by some person aggrieved’ indicates that the complainant need not be the defamed person himself. here therefore it was held that the director of an organization against which defamatory statements are made could be the aggrieved person. in g. narasimhan v. t.v. chokkappa 51 it was held that if a defined group is defamed, then each member of that group can file a complaint, even if it does not specifically mention his name. 45 t.v ramasabha v. a.m. ahmad mohideen a.i.r. 1972 mad. 398. 46 the defamation act 1996, section 2(4) an offer to make amends under the section is an offer(a) to make a suitable correction of the statement complained of and a sufficient apology to the aggrieved party.(b)to publish the correction and apology in a manner that is reasonable and practicable in the circumstances and (c)to pay to the aggrieved party such compensation (if any) and such costs , as may be agreed or determined to be payable. 47 human rights act 1998object –‘an act to give further effect to rights and freedoms guaranteed under the european convention on human rights.’ 48 hulton v. jones. [1910]a.c.20artemus jones described as a church warden, accused of living with a mistress in france. it was a fictional figure, but court awarded the person of that name damages. cassidy v. daily mirror newspapers ltd. [1929]2 k .b.331-paper published photographs of the plaintiff ‘s husband with an unnamed lady, announcing their engagement , which was not so. the paper had to give damages. 49 criminal procedure code (1973), section 199no court shall take cognizance of an offence under chapter xxi of the indian penal code except on a complaint made by some person aggrieved by the offence. chapter xxi of the indian penal code 1860 deals with defamation, having sections 499502. 50 john thomas v. dr. k. jagadeesan (2001) 6 s.c.c. 30. 51 g. narasimhan v. t.v. chokkappa (1972) 2 s.c.c. 680. gifty oommen the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 113 published or broadcasted by the defendant the law of defamation comes into operation only when the statement is published to another person or persons other than the persons defamed. where copies of such statement are sent to others it amounts to defamation. it is enough if it is told to just one person. in mahendar ram v. harnandan prasad 52 , the defendant had sent a registered notice to the plaintiff containing defamatory allegations against him. it was written in urdu with which the plaintiff was not conversant. so he got another person to read it in the presence of some other persons. in this case, the court does not take it as publication because there was no evidence to show that the defendant knew that the plaintiff did not know the urdu script. in in re. s.k. sundaram 53 , where an advocate sent a telegram to the then chief justice of india, containing contemptuous and defamatory statements against the then chief justice, it was held that sending a telegram amounts to publication since both before and after transmission the message is read by the telegraphic staff. if it was sent in a letter form then it will not amount to defamation. truth as defense in all cases of defamation truth cannot be taken as a defense. it is a defense in case of civil action for libel or slander. in case of criminal prosecutions under indian penal code, this defense of truth has not been recognized. 54 it has to be proved that the publication was made in public faith and for the public good 55 .in sewakram sobhani v. r.k.karanjia, 56 a magazine had published a report that a female detainee in the bhopal central jail had become pregnant through the appellant, a politician. this news report had been made from a government enquiry report. the court held public good as a defense under the ninth exception to section 499 of the indian penal code, 1860. the justification was that the prison being a public institution should be disciplined properly. and this news was based on reliable sources in good faith for public good. 52 mahendar ram v. harnandan prasad a.i.r .1958 pat. 445. 53 in re. s.k. sundaram (2001) .2 s.c.c .171. 54 chapter xxi: defamationsection 499: whoever , by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, make or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except in the cases hereinafter expected, to defame that person […] ninth exception – imputation made in good faith by person for protection of his or other’s interests-it is not defamation to make an imputation on the character of another provided that the imputation be made in good faith for the protection of the interests of the person making it, of any other person or for the public good. 55 sewakram sobhani v. r.k.karanjia (1981) 3 s.c.c.208. the supreme court held that the ninth exception of section 499 of indian penal code 1860 needs that the imputation must be shown to have been made in (i) in good faith and (2) for the protection of the person making it or of any other person or for the public good. 56 ibid. privacy as a human right and media trial in india the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 114 a defamatory statement should be genuine so as to come under the defense of justification by truth. mere belief that it was thought to be genuine is not enough. it must be proved to be true and genuine. in case of truth as defense, the defendant has to establish it. all defamatory statements are presumed to be false and it is for the defendant to rebut this presumption 57 . fair comment just like justification by truth, the defense of fair comment is also a complete defense against an action for defamation. these defenses are needed for media; otherwise its working can be affected, which is to bring forth opinion, fair comment and criticism. to get protection under the ninth exception to section 499 of the indian penal code 1860, both public good and good faith have to be established 58 . even the contempt of court proceedings after the contempt of court (amendment) act, 2006, truth is maintained as a defense to contempt action 59 . sub judice reporting when a case is being conducted in the court, it is presumed that court will do fair justice in the matter. nothing should interfere in that especially the media. media should not conduct a parallel trial of sub judice matters. a judge shall decide the matter on the merits of the case and objectively. this is not possible when there is so much discussion in the matter through the media, as it creates a clouded atmosphere disturbing the serenity. in saibal kumar v. b.k. sen 60 the supreme court held that it is improper for a newspaper to conduct parallel investigation into a crime and publish its results. trial by newspapers must be prevented when trial is in progress in a tribunal of the country. the reason being, that this interferes with the cause of justice. reporting is different from investigation of the same matter. reporting is the function of the media to give the public, knowledge concerning the administration of justice that is taking place. formation and expression of opinion is needed to safeguard against judicial error. beyond reporting of cases, moving into conducting the investigation alongside the governmental system is overstepping by the media. various opinions expressed in the media reports can bring in prejudice to the mind of the judges. 57 mitha rustomji v. nusservanji nowroji, a.i.r. 1941 born. 278. 58 harbajan singh v. state of punjab a.i.r. 1966 s.c. 97. 59 the contempt of courts (amendment) act, 2006, section 2, substitutes section 13 of the contempt of courts act, 1971. 60 saibal kumar v. b.k. sen a.i.r. 1961 s .c 633. gifty oommen the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 115 in saroj iyer v. maharashtra medical (council) of indian medicine 61 , the court held that as a part of the open justice system, the journalists have a fundamental right to attend proceedings in court under article 19(1)(a) of the constitution. they have a right to publish a faithful report of the proceedings in the court. so this fundamental right of the press is along with the duty to publish or broadcast things witnessed by them in the courts and not to be couple and mix it with their investigation report. vulnerable matters an ordinary citizen needs to know subjects and events of public interest. this right does not however go to the extent of knowing the name of the rape victim or family problem of a public figure. these informations do not fall within the category of newsworthiness of the news. it was stated in state of punjab v. gurmit singh 62 , that the identity of rape victims should be protected not only to save them from public humiliation but also to get the best available evidence which the victim may not be in a position to provide if she is in public. in people’s union for civil liberties v. union of india 63 , the supreme court further upheld the validity of section 30 of the prevention of terrorism act, 2002, regarding holding of in-camera proceedings for the protection of a witness whose life is in danger. in these cases, the identity and address of the witness is kept secret. there are so many enactments providing in-camera procedures and protection of the identity and other details of persons associated with the case 64 . so it is implicit in the indian law that private and confidential matters in certain cases should be given utmost protection. but this is not enough, it has to put in practice by the courts by strict gagging orders, as is done in uk where in baby p abuse case, 65 the high court released the names of the couple who 61 saroj iyer v. maharashtra medical (council) of indian medicine a.i.r. 2002 bom. 97. 62 state of punjab v. gurmit singh, (1976) 2 s .c .c. 384, pp. 404-05. 63 people’s union for civil liberties v. union of india (2004) 9 s .c .c. 580. 64 the indian penal code, section 228-aprohibits publication of the name of a victim of a sexual offence. fair comment is allowed. indian divorce act 1869, section 53 – proceedings under the act may be heard behind closed doors in certain circumstances. the special marriages act 1954, section 33 – in-camera proceedingsif either party desires or court decides the hindu marriage act 1955, section 22 – in-camera proceedings allowed if either party so desires or court decides the official secrets act 1923, section 14 – empowers the court to exclude the public from proceedings if prejudicial to the safety of the state, subject to section 7. the contempt of courts act 1971, section 4prohibits publication of proceedings in-camera in certain cases. the prevention of terrorism act 2002, section 30 (repealed from 21 st sept 04) – permitted the holding of proceedings in-camera where the life of the witness was in danger. the children act 1960 , section 36–prohibition of names or photograph or address or school or any identity of children in any case be published, unless the authority feels it is in the interest of the child. the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act 2000, section 21prohibition of publication of name or photograph or address or school or any identity of a juvenile in conflict in any case in media or visual media unless the authority feels it is in the interest of the child. 65 ‘couple named in baby p abuse case’ agence france –presse, london, retrieved 20/08/2009. privacy as a human right and media trial in india the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 116 abused the toddler and in the process killed the baby, only after the case was decided and parties put in safe places. indian courts have to use their powers and not wait for the victim to ask for these protections. contempt of court contempt of court happens not just when judges are criticized but also when matters which are sub judice are discussed and criticized in the press. this results in lowering the role of the judiciary in the administration of justice. when the issue is before the court, it is considered the duty of the media to allow the course of law to take place. they can report the matter in court in a fair manner and not critically. they should wait for the final outcome of the case. this is the object behind the reasoning given by the court in rajendra sail v. m.p. high court bar association 66 . the supreme court warned the media against sensationalizing of the issues and stressed that the press needed a strong internal system of self regulation. it said that the reach of the media is very large and large numbers of people believe it’s reporting to be true. 67 this freedom of the press should be exercised in the interest of the public good. court also stated that the press should have an efficient mechanism to scrutinize the news reports pertaining to such institutions such as judiciary, which because of the nature of their office cannot reply to publications. 68 thus the freedom of the press should be used by them cautiously. normally, truth and good faith have been recognized as defenses to charges of contempt. now with the amendment of contempt of courts act 1971 69 , truth has been made a legal defense to a charge of contempt. a trial by press, electronic media or public agitation is an antithesis to the rule of law. it can only lead to miscarriage of justice 70 . therefore, it may be contempt to publish an interview with the accused or a potential witness 71 because there is always a likelihood that the trial is prejudiced by these publications or broadcasting. if the media in the process of reporting adds anything in excess to the actual proceedings in the court, it no doubt amounts to interference with justice. in uk, where courts are convinced of the fact that media has influenced the jury, then the case is taken away from that court and posted to a court far away from that area. in india, it is very difficult to prove that the judge has been influenced by the media talk. but there is no doubt that no person even if it is the judge can 66 rajendra sail v. m.p. high court bar association (2005) 6 s.c.c. 109. para 31 at p. 125. 67 ibid. 68 ibid. 69 the contempt of courts (amendment) act 2006 section 2 substituting section 13 of the contempt of courts act, 1971. 70 state of maharashtra v. rajendra jawanmal gandhi, (1997) s.c.c. 386. 71 r.v. savundranayagan (1968) 3 all er 439n. gifty oommen the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 117 stop himself from keeping track of the news of the day. there is every possibility of not only the judges but also the witnesses getting influenced. the intention of the reporter to interfere with the administration of justice or not is immaterial in determining whether it constitutes contempt of court 72 . the possibility of influence has to be considered and not the intention of the journalist. the law commission reports the forty second law commission examined the various aspects of right to privacy under chapter 23 of its 42 nd report and recommended for insertion of a new chapter to be called “offences against privacy” to substitute the existing chapter xix making unauthorized photography and use of artificial listening or recording apparatus and publishing such information listened or recorded as offences 73 . the law commission in its one hundredth and fifty sixth report stated that right to privacy is a vast subject and its scope has been widened considerably under article 21 of the constitution by the supreme court under its various decisions 74 . the law commission admitted that on studying the matter of privacy as extended under article 21 of the constitution and also in the various reports of foreign law commissions, it would recommend that these offences cannot appropriately be incorporated in the ipc. therefore it stated that the recommendation of its 42 nd report to include ‘offence against privacy’ is deleted and that a separate legislation should be there to comprehensively deal with such offences against privacy. 75 in the law commission’s 200 th report 76 justice m. jagannadha rao stated that at present under section 3(2) 77 of the contempt of courts act, 1971 read with the explanation 72 s.k. sundaram: inre, (2001) 2 s.c.c: a.i.r. 2001 s.c. 2374. 73 law commission of india forty second report on the indian penal code ,1971, chapter 23, pp.336-340. 74 law commission of india one hundred and fifty sixth report on the indian penal code vol.1 august, 1997, p.340. 75 id at p. 341. 76 200 th report on trial by media; free speech and fair trial under criminal procedure code, 1973, august 31 st 2006 – justice m. jagannadha rao http://law commission of india.nic.in/reports/rep200.pdf. p. 223. , retrieved on 4.6.09. 77 the contempt of courts act 1971section 3innocent publication and distribution of matter not contempt. (1) a person shall not be guilty of contempt of court on the ground that he has published (whether by words spoken or written or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise) any matter which interferes or tends to interfere with, or obstructs or tends to obstruct, the course of justice in connection with any civil or criminal proceeding pending at the time of publication, if at that time he had no reasonable grounds for believing that the proceeding was pending. (2)notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this act or any other law for the time being in force, the publication of any such matter as is mentioned in sub-section (1) in connection with any civil or criminal proceeding which is not pending at the time of publication shall not be deemed to constitute contempt of court. (3)a person shall not be guilty of contempt of court on the ground that he has distributed a publication containing any such matter as is mentioned in sub-section (1), if at the http://law/ privacy as a human right and media trial in india the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 118 there under, gives full immunity to publications even if they prejudicially interfere with the course of justice in a criminal case, if by the date of publication, a charge sheet, or challan is not filed or if summons or warrant are not issued. 78 such publications would be contempt only if a criminal proceeding is pending. 79 the dispute regarding when the case is said to be ‘pending’ had caused a lot of controversy. the report stated that indian supreme court holds publication, prejudicial after ‘arrest’ as criminal contempt. it was settled in a.k. gopalan 80 wherein the supreme court stated that it is from the point of arrest that contempt arises. this report also agrees with this decision. india is signatory to the madrid principles on the relationship between the media and judicial independence1994 81 , wherein the basic principle stated was that though it is the function and right of the media to gather and convey information to the public and to comment on the administration of justice, including cases before, during and after trial, it should be done without violating the principle of presumption of innocence. therefore the yardstick is whether media reporting has violated the basic principle that an accused is presumed to be innocent till pronounced guilty by the court. recent trends of trial by media recently the press, especially the electronic media has been very enthusiastic to grab and report it even before the police or other channels get to know about it. this investigative journalism is good but at the same time it is going out of hand. there is no way to regulate it or stop it. though we have the press council of india, which was established around twenty two years before, the electronic media will not come under its regime. the pci entertains more than 10,000 complaints a year, has no teeth and the purpose is defeated as it evokes no fear or sanction. simply an apology is demanded from the press, if found guilty. these types of liberal approaches are not going to remedy the harm caused by press reporting. more stringent measures are to be adopted to curb the malady though self-regulation can operate as a useful and viable tool. time of distribution he had no reasonable grounds for believing that it contained or was likely to contain any such matter as aforesaid […] explanation: for the purposes of this section , a judicial proceeding is said to be pending –[…] (b) in the case of a criminal proceeding under the code of criminal procedure or any other law(i) where it relates to the commission of an offence, when the charge sheet or challan is filled, or when the court issues summons or warrant, as the case maybe, against the accused and (ii) in any other case, when the court takes cognizance of the matter to which the proceeding relates […] 78 supra n. 71. 79 ibid. 80 a.k. gopalan v. noodeen 1969 (2 )s. c. c.734. 81 madrid principles on the relationship between the media and judicial independence – convened by the international commission of jurists in madrid from 18-20jan.1994. gifty oommen the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 119 new government policy the government in its zeal to bring liberalization in media has allowed foreign direct investment into it. the policy brought in 2003, permits unto 26% in print media, while in broadcasting, it is allowed unto 100% 82 . this is in a situation, where there is no law to control the tyranny of electronic media. with the doors open for the foreign media to invade india with their ideas and experiment with the indian youth, the government is taking no urgent steps to bring in a regulation to control the widespread electronic media. conclusion a study of the development of privacy traces back to nihal chand v. bhagwan dei 83 in 1935, where the high court recognized the independent existence of privacy from the customs and traditions of india. india even before independence became a member of un and was signatory to the udhr 1948. the udhr was almost fully incorporated into the indian constitution. one of the exceptions to it was the giving no recognition to the concept of privacy. udhr gave privacy a foremost position in article 12, while freedom of speech and expression found place only in article 19. article 19 was subject to conditions such as reputation, national security, and public order and of morals. in the indian constitution, the restrictions imposed on freedom of speech and expression in article 19(2) was on the lines of libel, slander, defamation, contempt of court or any matter which offends against decency or morality or which undermines the security of or tends to overthrow the state. this clause was later amended by the 1st amendment act of 1951, and a new clause was inserted instead of the above clause. the new clause brought reasonable restrictions on the lines of security of state, public order, decency or morality or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence. this took away further, the grounds of restrictions in the earlier unamended clause i.e. libel and slander. freedom of press was included in this right to speech and expression by the apex court in romesh thapper v. state of madras. 84 here the court held that this freedom includes right to propagate ideas including the right to circulate. all the above factors further gave impetus to press but at the same time the right of an individual to plead right to privacy against undue interference by press was completely denied as this right to privacy was not given an independent status as a fundamental right on the same footing as of freedom of press in the constitution . the framers of the constitution failed to imbibe the full spirit of udhr 1948 by neglecting to recognize the right to privacy as a fundamental right. 82 www. dailymail.co.uk. a government appointed panel advises indian government to increase fdi in print media from 26% to 49% retrieved on 07/02/13. 83 nihal chand v. bhagwan dei a.i.r. 1935 all.1002. 84 romesh thappar v. state of madras 1950 s.c.r. 594. privacy as a human right and media trial in india the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 120 it was in kharak singh, 85 that the apex court had the opportunity to discuss privacy for the first time, wherein it struck down domiciliary visits on an accused under article 21 of the constitution. but it was only through the minority view of justice subha rao, that privacy found a place in article 21 of the constitution. this was due to lack of an article on privacy. article 21 of the indian constitution protects life and personal liberty which is on the lines of article 3 of the udhr. therefore article 21 is not the solution to the problem faced in the matter of privacy protection. article 21 is only an interim relief till legislative weapons are put in action to bring in a parallel article on the lines with article 12 of the udhr in the indian constitution to protect privacy. due to lack of constitutional and legislative measures to protect privacy, the victims of press abuse had to the take the help of tort law. tort law did not refer to privacy but only other offences such as libel, slander, defamation, morality and decency. these different offences form part of the term ‘privacy’ but individually these offences could never fulfill the need of protection of privacy faced by individuals. even indian penal code allowed punishment or penalty for the above offences but not for privacy. privacy as a term never came into the minds of legislators. the courts also gave decisions on the lines of the various offences mentioned above. the other grounds left for the victims were only article 19(2) and article 21 of the constitution. there was no legislative effort to codify and protect privacy till date neither in the constitution nor in any legislation. the victims had to always depend on the court’s discretion and interpretation of privacy, when the question of infringement of privacy was considered. this has been a loophole since the time of independence. it is therefore recommended that the constitution should be amended to include this right to privacy as the first step. once the grundnorm is amended, the position of privacy will be legally at par with international standards. then is the need to enact a privacy act. thirdly the need to amend the contempt of court act 1971, to give the courts, specific powers apart from the general powers to issue gagging orders and other orders to protect an accused from media intrusion which has the effect of tampering with evidences and witnesses and causing interference in administration of justice. also as stated in rajendra sail’s case 86 , we need a strong press council in india. it should be a strong regulatory authority with representatives of legal, social, common man and press. presently the press council is dominated by the different newspapers. in parshuram babaram sawant v. times global broadcasting co. ltd. 87 , retd. justice p.b. sawant‘s photograph was flashed as justice p.k. samantha, retd. justice of calcutta high court, who was alleged to be involved in the famous provident fund scam of 2008. it gave a false impression among viewers that the plaintiff was involved in the scam. though the said channel stopped publishing the photograph, when the mistake was brought 85 kharak singh v. state of u.p. and others 1964 s.c.r.(i) 332. 86 rajendra sail v. m.p. high court bar association (2005) 6 s.c.c. 109. p.125. 87 special civil suit no. 1984/2008 in pune trial court. gifty oommen the age of human rights journal, 3 (december 2014) pp. 102-121 issn: 2340-9592 121 to their notice, no corrective or remedial steps to undo the damage were taken by the channel on their own. the plaintiff by his letter dated 15/9/2008 called the defendant to apologize publicly with damages of rs 50 crores. by its reply the defendant apologized but no mention of damages was there. it was a belated action hence plaintiff demanded rs 100 crores. the court held that the defendant was entitled to pay rs 100 crores to the plaintiff. the bombay high court ordered the times to deposit 20 crores in cash and 80 crores in bank guarantee, before taking up its appeal against the pune trial court in the defamation case. 88 this was upheld by the supreme court. 89 this was very good move by the court. to conclude with, the former chief information commissioner of india, wajahat habibullah 90 had also demanded a law on privacy complimentary to the law on right to information. he had stated that while all information regarding the government should have public accountability, there should be a law to respect privacy also to run parallel to it 91 . therefore the need for the right of privacy is inevitable. 88 ‘s.c. asks times now to deposit rs 100 crores before h.c.takes up its appeal in defamation case’, times of india.indiatimes .com/india dated november 15, 2011. retrieved on 27/02/2013. 89 ibid. 90 kp saikiran ‘clc for law on privacy’ january 31, 2009, the new indian express p.11. 91 ibid. the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 13-34 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.2 13 medical malpractice as a tort in the u.s., as a crime in italy: factors, causes, paths and outcomes andrea di landro1 abstract: the aim of the paper is, firstly, to try to understand the reasons for the different approaches to medical malpractice in two legal systems taken as models: the u.s., where professional negligence is almost exclusively subject of tort law; italy, where criminal law instruments are instead widely used. the different extent of criminal responsibility for negligence and omission seems connectable to different political and cultural models: individualistic liberalism, on the one hand, solidarist statism and communitarianism, on the other hand; in juridical terms, to the ideal contrast between the reactive state and the active state; to the different approach to the relationship between subject and body, dominical-individual versus collectivistsocial; with a tendential "privatization" of the health-good, in the us model, and a "socialization" of the good-health itself, in the italian model. secondly, the paper tries, in a comparative perspective, to evaluate these different approaches, in terms of access to justice, paths and outcomes of the two models. the article attempts to highlight the strengths and the weaknesses of the contingent-fee system in the u.s. tort arena, and of the criminal justice system as "free legal aid" in italy: a balanced solution should also allow victims hindered by the costs and the length of civil actions the possibility of using these latter form of protection, avoiding that criminal justice is exploited for compensatory purposes. indeed, tort law more easily can meet compensatory claims, due to the lower probative standard required, the preponderance of evidence, rather than the beyond any reasonable doubt standard, required in criminal law. also in terms of outcomes, the main problems arising in the two systems need to be tackled: the problem of few persons compensated, allowing a greater number of injured parties to access to justice and obtain fair compensation; the problem of symbolic criminal convictions (observed in the italian experience), avoiding the automatic use of suspended penalties and monetary penalties as substitute of penalties weighing on professional practice and freedom, since these automatic mechanisms limit the preventive effectiveness of the criminal sanction and run the risk of creating discrimination on a census basis. keywords: medical malpractice, negligence, omission, access to justice, standard of proof. summary: i. introduction. medical malpractice in u.s. law. no criminal responsibility for personal injury negligence or involuntary manslaughter due to minor (not gross) negligence. from practical problems to political-criminal problems… ii. (continued)…the distribution of omissive and negligent crimes, between individualistic liberalism, solidaristic statism and communitarianism; between the reactive state and the active state; between the individual model of property and the collective/communitarian model of inalienability; between “privatized” and “socialised” healthcare. iii. “access to justice”, paths and outcomes: contingent fee in tort area and criminal justice as “free legal aid”; “preponderance of evidence” and “beyond reasonable doubt”; compensation for a few people and symbolic criminal convictions. 1 associate professor of criminal law, university of central sicily “kore”, italy (andreadilandro@gmail.com). andrea di landro the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 13-34 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.2 14 i. introduction. medical malpractice in u.s. law. no criminal responsibility for personal injury negligence or involuntary manslaughter due to minor (not gross) negligence. from practical problems to political-criminal problems… in anglo-american law, medical conducts with inauspicious outcomes are subject matter mainly in the arena of civil law (malpractice tort law). in the arena of negligent liability, an important comparative difference is that in north-american criminal law, battery is generally punished only if commited with intent (so-called specific intent), and only exceptionally, in some jurisdictions, if due to negligence2. on the contrary, in italian criminal law we find the crime of personal injury negligence (punishable with imprisonment of up to three months, or with a fine up to 309 euro: articles 590 590 sexies of the italian criminal code), in addition to the crime of negligent homicide (punishable ex officio, as is standard in the italian procedural system, with imprisonment from six months to five years: art. 589 590 sexies of the italian criminal code). in common law, negligence has historically been approached autonomously with respect to different areas of the legal system. in criminal proceedings only gross negligence is relevant; in civil proceedings minor negligence is evaluated, in other words, unintentional fault. in fact, normally, negligence (also called carelessness) by health professionals and the related causal problems, especially about the omissive actus reus, are subject matter of civil law3. therefore, in the u.s., criminal responsibility of the doctor is traditionally more limited than civil responsibility. in the context of criminal law, the first function of mental states (mens rea), with particular reference to negligence, is indeed to distinguish criminal and non-criminal conduct4. in u.s. law, unlike english law, great efforts have been undertaken to define gross negligence (criminal negligence), especially in the model penal code (m.p.c.), sec. § 2.02, lett. d): «a person acts negligently with respect to the material element of a crime when he/she should be aware of the substantial and unjustified risk related to his / her behavior. the risk must be of such a nature and entity that its failure to perceive by the agent subject, given the nature and purpose of his conduct, as well as the circumstances 2 v. saunders v. state, 208 tennessee 347, 345 s.w. 2d 899 (tenn.1961), in loewy, criminal law, eagan, minnesota, 2003, 67. 3 on the relationship between criminal and civil negligence, in uk law, see herring & palser, the duty of care in gross negligence manslaughter, in crim. l. rev., 2007, p. 24. 4 bloch-mcmunigal, criminal law: a contemporary approach. cases, statutes, and problems, new york, 2005, p. 210. medical malpractice as a tort in the u.s., as a crime in italy: factors, causes, paths and outcomes the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 13-34 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.2 15 known to him, involves a serious deviation from the standards of diligence that a reasonable person would observe in the same circumstances». it must be said that this autonomous, complex definition of criminal negligence, principally based on two elements "substantial and unjustified risk of which the subject should be aware" and the "lack of perception that implies a serious deviation from the standards of diligence" ("failure to perceive” that “involves a serious deviation from the standard of care"), does not receive unanimous approval by the commentators 5 . in criminal proceedings, the fact that mental state is essentially a question of degree usually causes problems, from both a theoretical and a practical point of view6. in various u.s. jurisdictions, in order to put into effect and apply the model penal code in case law, several epithets are used to describe the amount of negligence necessary to integrate negligent homicide. the most typical are: «criminal negligence», «gross negligence» and «culpable negligence». "about the only certainty of meaning one can ascribe to these epiteths to quote a current u.s. manual7 is that they require more than ordinary negligence, i. e., more than would be required in a civil case. undesirable as this lack of certainty may be, it is probably unavoidable. nobody has yet devised a formula which more precisely describes the degree of negligence necessary for involuntary manslaughter". to explain the “something extra” necessary for criminal negligence and to avoid a reprehensible vicious circle of evaluation tests, focus is usually placed on the «moral defect» that «can properly be imputed to instances where the defendant acts out of insensitivity to the interests of other people, and not merely out of an intellectual failure to grasp them»8. a notion of criminal negligence impregnated, therefore, by subjectivity, that contains a basis of morality9. it could also be defined as an intuitive conception of the mental state, that must be "felt" (by the jury), rather than analyzed. to the italian doctrine, which has a long tradition of commitment to the mythvalue of legality, this idea might seem contrary to the defense of civil rights: yet in the u.s. this is considered the best indication upon which to trace the boundary of criminal relevance, of negligence and other notions. 5 in a critical sense, see fletcher, dogmas of the model penal code, in 2 buffalo criminal law review, 3 (1998); id, basic concepts of criminal law, oxford, 1997, chap. 8; simons, dimensions of negligence in criminal and tort law, 3 theoretical inq. l., 305 (2002); edgar, mens rea, in encyclopedia of crime and justice, 1037 (1983): "the terms that positively indicate the mens rea, basic, are fictions. the law deals with probative problems related to the mental states through the use of presumptions". 6bloch-mcmunigal, paper cited, p. 211. 7 loewy, criminal law, mn, 2003, 39. 8 comment to model penal code, § 2.02, negligence. 9 husak & singer, of innocence and innocents: the supreme court and mens rea since herbert packer, 2 buffalo criminal law review, 860 (1999). andrea di landro the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 13-34 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.2 16 in a sense it is the “price” that the anglo-saxon system pays for a concept of negligence exclusive to the criminal system. a concept lacking in certain analytical parameters for establishing the notion, and above all the civil/penal shift, the “something extra” of criminal negligence appears to be resolved intuitively, "self-evident" to the criminal system itself. a system that definitively entrusts laymen to evaluate the criminal relevance of negligence. what is the approach of u.s. law regarding civil negligence? in the second reformulation of us civil law (restatement of torts, second), the basic structure of civil negligence includes minor negligence. civil negligence is defined in plainer terms than criminal negligence: "negligence is conduct that falls below the standard established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm. it does not include reckless conduct that disregards the interests of others". it is interesting to note how the most recurring question in u.s. law manuals is, in inverted terms, speculation on a question that is increasingly widespread among italian criminal law scholars. italian scholars focus on the question of legitimacy and/or opportunity to adjust restrictive terms regarding the concept of criminal negligence, to eventually cover cases of gross negligence (whether conscious or not). american criminal law scholars, on the contrary, start from the limit of grossness (the already existent de iure), consider whether it is desirable that in different areas of substantive law the concept of mental states becomes uniform, thus arriving to align criminal and civil negligence10. ii. (continued) ... the distribution of omissive and negligent crimes, between individualistic liberalism, solidaristic statism and communitarianism; between the reactive state and the active state; between the individual model of property and the collective/communitarian model of inalienability; between "privatized" and "socialised" healthcare. the role of criminal law in italy cannot be assessed outside of the overall legal, political and cultural context. to quote the spanish scholar silva sanchez «the pretension to harmonize a maximum state and a minimum criminal law constitutes a contradiction in terms. for a single reason: insecurity about the perception of the services [...] directly or indirectly coming from the state leads to the exploitation of criminal law to guarantee (at least so it is claimed) them»11. from a political and cultural point of view, the "maximum state" (to resume the expression of silva sanchez) seems connected, in italy (and perhaps in continental europe in general), to the greater trust traditionally placed in regulatory interventions of the state. the idea is that "institutional public regulation is superior in allocating optimal well-being 10 cfr. bloch-mcmunigal, paper cit., 318. 11 silva sanchez, la expansión del derecho penal aspectos de la política criminal en las sociedades postindustriales, madrid, 2011, in particular chap. 4. medical malpractice as a tort in the u.s., as a crime in italy: factors, causes, paths and outcomes the age of human rights journal, 12 (june 2019) pp. 13-34 issn: 2340-9592 doi: 10.17561/tahrj.n12.2 17 when compared to the "market". in other words, the developement of political-normative regulations produces superior desirable results on well-being than the commitment of the same well-being to uncontrolled forces within civil society"12. given these premises, in states (like italy) where criminal law traditionally carries out such a role, an invitation to prudence seems due. as when it is suggested to decisivly "trim" many branches off a criminal law system that is perceived, almost presumptively, as suffocating and primitive. the objective is to "transplant" concepts, models, ideas and systematic constructions applied by another legal system actualised in a different country13. in other words, a cure worse than the disease, if the much lauded elimination/reduction of some parts of the criminal "penal apparatus", despite its flaws, are not compensated by the introduction of adequate forms of substitutive control. the principle of criminal law as a last resort (extrema ratio), which certainly expresses a noble request, can simultaneously represent a "magic bullet" that easily lends itself to indistinct and uncontrolled use. a principle whose insignia seems obvious to recognise, but that still includes too many unknown "variables". primarily "the difficulty or the impossibility of precisely defining the need for criminal sanctions and the sufficiency of non-criminal alternatives, with respective degrees of effectiveness, given the infeasibility of previous tests, shortcomings, discords and the doubtful value of unestimatable empirical findings"14. beyond the hypercritical attempts to "demolish without reconstructing" and the preconceived defense of existing laws, it must be acknowledged – with f. mantovani that the main challenge of current criminal law seems to be its "crisis of solitude". in the face of various social problems, criminal law is often left not as the last (extrema) resort, but as the sole resort (ratio) in an attempt to "keep the peace"15. this also seems to be the case of medical responsibility. in the abscence of valid and alternative systems of control and socio-cultural counterforces, is it really feasible or desirable that criminal law recedes from a "hard line" defense of life, well-being and personal safety?16 12 sgubbi, il reato come rischio sociale, bologna, 1990, 17. 13 to use an engineering metaphor, a "cogwheel" that spins in a given apparatus of rules could turne out to be not as functional in another one. 14 mantovani, la "perenne crisi" e la "perenne vitalità" della pena. e la "crisi di solitudine" del diritto penale, in studi in onore di giorgio marinucci, milan, 2006, 1181. the author speaks also of "crisis of the crisis", in the sense that "the crisis of the criminal law is accompanied by the crisis of the proposed alternative models to the criminal law itself". 15 id, paper cit., 1202. 16 as mantovani teaches (paper cit.), the modern history of the criminal law consists precisely in a (never outdated) dialectic between legitimization, de-legitimization and re-legitimation: attempt to remove such dialectic contrapositions, from this point of view, represents only a sterile "intellectualism", a "reductionism" that smacks of an idealized "illuminism out of time and space". even fiandaca-musco agree that <