




































AGORA International Journal of Economical Sciences, http://univagora.ro/jour/index.php/aijes 

ISSN 2067-3310, E-ISSN 2067-7669 

Vol. 18, No. 1 (2024), pp. 44-54 

 

44 

 

FISCAL POLICY FRAMEWORK IN A DECARBONIZED FUTURE 

FOR RESOURCE-RICH COUNTRIES 

 

E. EYVAZ-ZADA 

  

Elmir Eyvaz-Zada  

Economic Scientific Research Institute, Azerbaijan 

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8245-7546, E-mail: eyvazzadeelmir@gmail.com    

 

Abstract: In a world transitioning towards decarbonization, resource-rich countries 

(RRCs) face unique challenges in shaping their fiscal policy frameworks, necessitating 

significant adjustments. This paper analyzes the effects of decarbonization on the fiscal policies 

of RRCs, focusing on the intersection of fiscal sustainability and sustainable development 

goals. The key findings reveal that effective fiscal discipline is crucial for maintaining fiscal 

sustainability amid fluctuating resource revenues. Implementing medium-term budget 

frameworks helps RRCs manage economic volatility and plan for long-term fiscal health. The 

adoption of green fiscal policies can support RRCs in navigating the challenges of 

decarbonization, contributing to both fiscal sustainability and sustainable development goals. 

Additionally, decarbonization affects various economic aspects, including budget revenues, 

expenditures, and the overall fiscal sustainability landscape, necessitating tailored fiscal 

policies. This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into designing and 

implementing fiscal policies suited to the needs of resource-rich countries during the global 

energy transition. The study highlights how green fiscal policies can assist RRCs in managing 

decarbonization challenges while achieving sustainable development goals. 

Keywords: decarbonization, fiscal policy, resource-rich countries, public finance, 

green fiscal policies. 

 

INTRODUCTION 

Achieving the target of keeping global temperature increases below 2°C, ideally stay 

within a 1.5°C limit, requires a profound transformation across various sectors, including 

energy, industry, transportation, and agriculture. This urgent need for action was emphasized 

with the adoption of the Paris Agreement in December 2015, indicating a collective global 

effort to address climate change. However, international efforts to combat climate change 

remain mainly insufficient, and pose fiscal risks on public finances. The global temperature 

levels are expected to increase by more than 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels over the next 

five years, according to the latest data from the World Meteorological Organization (WMO, 

2023). According to the "Global Risks-2024" report of the Davos Economic Forum published 

in January of 2024, "Extreme weather events", "Loss of biodiversity and destruction of the 

ecosystem" and "Lack of natural resources" are among the main risks in the long term (World 

Economic Forum, 2024). These risks emphasize the  critical necessity for coordinated global 

efforts to tackle climate change and its related impacts. 

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8245-7546
mailto:eyvazzadeelmir@gmail.com


Elmir EYVAZ-ZADA 

45 

 

Furthermore, fossil fuels, including crude oil, natural gas, and coal are the primary 

source of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, and continue to dominate global energy 

supply. The resource-rich countries are the major contributors to global emissions on a per 

capita basis due to extraction, processing, and exports, and sometimes inefficient energy 

systems used by industry and housing. These countries as a whole represent almost 30.0 percent 

of the global population, 15.0 percent of world’s gross domestic product, and 20.0 percent of 

global greenhouse gas emissions. Even a 50 percent probability of limiting warming to 1.5°C, 

nearly 60 percent of proven reserves for oil and natural gas and 90 percent for coal must remain 

unextracted (Welsby, et al., 2021). Considering the decarbonization is important, resource-rich 

countries face unique challenges on designing their fiscal policy frameworks, requiring 

significant adjustments. During the 2017-22 period, the net export of fossil fuels on average 

represented a significant portion of GDP in various countries: 40.3 percent in Libya, 39.2 

percent in Equatorial Guinea, 37.3 percent in Qatar, 36.0 percent in Kuwait, and 35.5 percent 

in Azerbaijan (Figure 1). 

 

Figure 1. 

Net export of fossil fuels (percent of GDP) by fossil fuel producer (Average 2017-2022) 

Rank Country All Fuels Crude Oil Natural Gas Coal 

1 Libya  40,3 35,2 5,2 -0,01 

2 Equatorial Guinea 39,2 28,1 11,1 0,00 

3 Qatar  37,3 13,0 24,3 -0,01 

4 Kuwait  36,0 33,5 2,5 -0,03 

5 Azerbaijan  35,5 28,7 6,7 0,00 

6 Angola  34,9 32,2 2,7 -0,01 

7 Iraq 33,2 33,7 -0,4 -0,01 

8 Brunei Darussalam 32,9 10,6 22,7 -0,49 

9 United Arab Emirates 32,6 29,1 3,5 -0,04 

10 South Sudan 31,1 31,1 0,0 0,00 

11 Republic of Congo 30,6 30,5 0,2 -0,09 

12 Oman 23,1 16,6 6,6 -0,03 

13 Saudi Arabia 22,1 21,4 0,7 -0,01 

14 Gabon 20,7 20,5 0,2 -0,02 

15 Algeria  20,3 10,2 10,1 -0,06 

16 Kazakhstan  19,1 17,9 1,1 0,11 

17 Norway 18,1 7,9 10,1 -0,06 

18 Mongolia  14,8 -5,8 -0,2 22,5 

19 Turkmenistan  14,3 1,6 12,4 0,20 

20 Chad 14,1 14,1 0,0 0,00 

21 Venezuela  13,2 13,2 -0,1 0,03 

22 Trinidad and Tobago 13,0 3,2 10,0 -0,08 

23 Russian Federation 12,3 10,5 0,6 1,12 

24 Papua New Guinea 12,1 2,1 10,0 0,00 

25 Iran 11,9 10,3 1,5 0,02 

26 Bahrain 9,5 8,9 N/A 0,00 

27 Nigeria  8,7 7,1 1,6 0,00 

28 Ghana   5,8 5,8 0,0 -0,04 

29 Colombia  5,6 3,4 -0,1 2,30 

30 Canada  4,1 3,2 0,5 0,30 

Sources: IMF, World Economic Outlook database; UNCTAD; IMF staff calculations. 



FISCAL POLICY FRAMEWORK IN A DECARBONIZED FUTURE FOR RESOURCE-RICH 

COUNTRIES 

46 

 

In Angola, the net export of fossil fuels represented 34.9 percent of GDP in 2017-2022. 

Moving forward, countries like Iraq, Brunei, the United Arab Emirates, South Sudan, and 

Congo was estimated to have more than 30 percent of GDP from fossil fuel exports during the 

same period. In addition, the World Bank analyzes countries' preparedness levels for a low-

carbon transition using a composite indicator. (Figure 2). The Gulf countries and Russia are on 

the borderline, frequently facing similar levels of exposure but enjoying greater resilience due 

to the complexity of their economies. This indicator highlights the more vulnerable RRCs that 

have not yet diversified their economy towards low-carbon growth. These RRCs are small oil-

gas producers in Middle East, the North Africa, sub-Saharan Africa, and Latin America 

(Peszko, and Grzegorz, 2020). In addition, poverty and ongoing conflicts are among the most 

significant challenges making countries more vulnerable to climate change. 

 

Figure 2. 

Countries’ Preparedness for a Low-Carbon Transition      

 

Source: Diversification and Cooperation in a Decarbonizing World (World Bank, 2020, p.57) 

The least prepared countries, such as Iraq and Libya, are particularly vulnerable to 

external shocks from the decarbonization process, due to long-term conflicts have destroyed 

all non-oil tradable industries and already weak institutions. Due to their poor governance, 

Equatoral Guinea, Nigeria, and the Venezuela are the least resilient and most exposed 

countries. Azerbaijan, Botswana, and Kazakhstan share high exposure and relatively weak 

resilience. On the other hand, Norway is well-equipped for decarbonization due to its 

resilience, particularly its diversity, economic flexibility, and high quality of human capital and 



Elmir EYVAZ-ZADA 

47 

 

institutions. In contrast, some less prepared countries, like Angola, are less exposed than 

Norway. 

Another significant determinant of the resilience for resource-rich countries to 

decarbonization is their complexity and economic performance. Countries with high levels of 

economic complexity, high-income growth are better prepared to new capacities in anticipation 

of decline in demands for fossil fuels and carbon-intensive products and services. 

The Economic Complexity Index (ECI) measures the diversity and prevalence of a 

country's exports. ECI scores show that Mongolia, Venezuela, Nigeria, and Congo perform 

particularly poorly and may struggle to create new capabilities in their economies compared to 

other RRCs. Russia and Kuwait, ranking 53rd and 55th respectively, are good performers in 

the ECI index among the RRCs out of 133 countries listed in the Harvard Atlas of Economic 

Complexity. Interestingly, Saudi Arabia, ranked 38th, holds a better position than Norway, 

which remains at 44th place. The low-ranking countries show potential challenges in 

diversification and innovation, indicating lower resilience to decarbonization compared to 

other RRCs. Gabon, the Republic of Congo, Mongolia, and Azerbaijan have low ECI scores. 

This low ranking suggests that these RRCs may face challenges in adapting to the 

decarbonization process due to their fossil fuel-focused economies. 

Figure 3. 

Economic Complexity Index ranking, 1995-2021 

               
Source: The growth Lab at Harvard University 2021  

Uncertainties related policy actions in the rest of the world, consumption choices in 

developing countries, and technological advancements complicate decision-making for the 

resource-rich countries when establishing a comprehensive strategy. Robust transition risk 

management strategies towards sustainable growth calls for RRCs to implement two main 

strategies.   



FISCAL POLICY FRAMEWORK IN A DECARBONIZED FUTURE FOR RESOURCE-RICH 

COUNTRIES 

48 

 

Historically, diversification efforts in resource-rich countries have traditionally focused 

on shifting down the value chain towards energy-intensive and polluting industries. This 

involves diversifying outputs and exports through energy or carbon-intensive industrialization 

related to fossil fuels. This approach has generated short-term export revenues and helped in 

managing volatility in energy prices. However, this approach has also heightened their 

dependency on carbon-intensive economic activities, thereby increasing their vulnerability to 

the global low-carbon transition. 

Another pathway for diversification is to promote a more extensive diversification of 

wealth (assets), which can lead to the development of productive and competitive economies 

that are also adaptable and resilient in a decarbonizing world. This relies on knowledge and 

efficiency, which enhance productivity over time and diversify the portfolio of national assets 

(inputs), including natural capital and intangible assets such as knowledge, innovation, and 

institutions. Fossil fuel depended countries should diversify their portfolio to include a broader 

range of produced, human, and natural capital. This can be achieved by increasing investments 

in education and innovation, ecosystem services, and enhancing their social capital and 

institutional capacity. 

This involves prioritizing investing in education sector and innovation to foster a 

proficient workforce able to stimulate diversified economic growth. Additionally, improving 

ecosystem services through restoration efforts can mitigate environmental decline while 

promoting sustainable development. Moreover, strengthening social capital and institutional 

capacity is crucial for fostering inclusive governance systems that enable efficient resource 

management and fair distribution of advantages. By collectively focusing on these aspects, 

fossil fuel-dependent countries can navigate the transition towards a more varied and 

sustainable future. 

Additionally, diversification can occur through climate cooperation. Diversification 

alone is unlikely to trigger a low-carbon transition. Moreover, climate initiatives in net fuel-

importing nations might result in what is known as "dirty" diversification, where emission-

intensive industries relocate to resource-rich countries. In order to transition the global 

economy to a low-carbon model, resource-rich countries must implement domestic climate 

policies. These policies would aid in diversifying assets and promoting economic 

diversification, while also shielding RRCs from potential consequences such as border taxes 

or broader trade sanctions imposed by other nations due to insufficient climate policies. 

Nonetheless, these policies come with immediate risks, posing challenges for policymakers in 

terms of justification and implementation. 

Possible remedies for this issue encompass innovative collaborative mechanisms, such 

as wellhead taxes and preferential trade agreements, or broader conditional financial and 

technology transfers. These strategies have the potential to encourage and streamline climate 

cooperation among resource-rich countries, facilitating a more comprehensive structural 

transition compared to a piecemeal, project-focused approach to climate finance. 

For both of these strategies, RRCs will need to develop and implement plans that 

account for a just transition for affected communities particularly in the coal-dependent regions 

who will be the first affected by a low carbon transition, including through re-training, re-

tooling and targeted social protection (International Labour Organization, 2015).   

https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_ent/documents/publication/wcms_432859.pdf


Elmir EYVAZ-ZADA 

49 

 

Fiscal Impact of Decarbonization and Climate Change 

Managing the impact of decarbonization on fiscal sustainability will be one of the most 

serious concerns facing resource-rich countries in the future decades. Currently, the growing 

production of energy from renewable sources and the global expansion of electrification in 

both public and private transportation are anticipated to reduce the demand for commodities. 

As alternative technologies become more affordable and actions to address climate change 

intensify in accordance with the Paris Agreement, the demand for hydrocarbons is expected to 

decrease significantly. Renewable energy sources are expected to play a greater role in 

electricity production, and the transition to electromobility and increased reliance on electricity 

in various sectors will significantly reduce the demand for hydrocarbons. The International 

Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) and the International Energy Agency (IEA) report that 

renewable energy has become more affordable than fossil fuels, and three-quarters of all new 

electricity production capacity is renewable globally (IRENA, 2024). Many countries are 

increasing the sale of electric vehicles while proposing a ban on the sale of diesel and gasoline 

vehicles in the relatively near future. 

From a public finance perspective, uncertainty regarding future oil-gas demand poses 

major fiscal risks, as many countries rely on production and export of hydrocarbon resources. 

The fiscal consequences of decarbonization have a significant impact on countries' budget 

balances, resulting in decreasing fiscal income and increased public spending (Ossowski, 

Rolando & Havard Halland, 2016). To improve fiscal risk management in the face of such 

challenges, the RRCs must strengthen its fiscal strategy and tools. 

The impact of decarbonization on hydrocarbon export revenues often translate into 

fluctuations in budget revenues derived from state-owned enterprises and private companies, 

both domestic and international. These revenues encompass dividends, royalties, production 

sharing, and tax payments, where applicable. The potential effects of decarbonization on public 

finance can occur in various ways. 

Broad Tax Base and Spending Composition. Decarbonization effects on hydrocarbon 

revenues can lead to broader implications for the tax base and government expenditure. Apart 

from directly affecting the budget revenues, the changes can impact various aspects of taxation 

and public expenditure. For example, a decrease in hydrocarbon revenues might push 

governments to consider their spending priorities, potentially redistributing spendings. This 

reallocation could affect crucial sectors like infrastructure development, social welfare 

programs, or educational initiatives. 

Moreover, the interaction between hydrocarbon revenues and government spending can 

impact economic stability and long-term viability. Governments may face challenges if 

excessively dependent on volatile hydrocarbon revenues to public finance essential services 

and infrastructure projects. A sudden decline in revenues could result in budget deficits, 

increased debt, all of which can hinder economic growth and social cohesion. In RRCs, a 

decrease in hydrocarbon revenues could precipitate economic downturns, unemployment, and 

social unrest, underscoring the link between hydrocarbon exports and broader macroeconomic 

stability. 

Increasing Spending. The decarbonization might necessitate increased spending on 

certain areas. The process may lead to job losses and economic dislocation for workers in 



FISCAL POLICY FRAMEWORK IN A DECARBONIZED FUTURE FOR RESOURCE-RICH 

COUNTRIES 

50 

 

affected industries. To mitigate the social impacts of these changes, governments may need to 

expand spending on social safety nets and support programs. This could include unemployment 

benefits, job training programs, healthcare coverage, and assistance for displaced workers to 

transition to new employment opportunities. 

As countries navigate the decarbonization, state-owned enterprises focuses on fossil 

fuel-related activities may face important challenges. In order to address these challenges, 

financial support may be required for SOEs in several key areas. This assistance focues a lot 

of initiatives, such as investments in research to explore alternative energy sources, expansion 

into renewable energy initatives, and the implementation of more sustainable business 

practices. Furthemore, allocating spending for infrastructure aimed at meeting environmental 

standards and helping the decarbonization to cleaner energy sources is important. Morever, the 

appling of workforce transition projects and retraining initiatives is significant to aim 

employees impacted by the evolving landscape of the industry. In such case, targeted financial 

support serves as a cornerstone in empowering SOEs to navigate shifting market dynamics and 

contribute meaningfully to the achievning decarbonization goals.  

Government Guarantees and Debt: When state-owned enterprises face financial 

challanges during the decarbonization process, governments might provide guarantees on their 

debt, either implicitly or explicitly. While the guarantes can give strugling SOEs stability, they 

also pose serious risks to public finances. 

If the SOEs default or experience financial trouble, the responsibility of the guarantes 

falls on the public finance. This could lead to high levels of public debt. In addition, implicit 

guarantees, even if not officially stated, can create market distortions among state-owned 

enterprises. 

In order to mitigate these risks, governments need to evaluate the financial health of the 

SOEs receiving guarantees and set clear standards for providing such support. Transparency 

and accountability in managing public finances are crucial. To help minimizing the impact on 

government finances while facilitating a smooth transition to a sustainable economy is 

important. 

 

Decarbonization and the Role of Fiscal Policy Framework 

Maintaining fiscal discipline to ensure macroeconomic stability may become even more 

challenging in a decarbonized future. The global decarbonization could affect various aspects 

of resource-rich countries' economies, including hydrocarbon export incomes and investments, 

which directly affect budget revenues, as well as the hydrocarbon industry, with its spillover 

effects on other sectors of the economy. Additionally, decarbonization may have implications 

for inflation rates and the stability of the financial sector.  

Consequently, it is important to prioritize fiscal discipline measures in upcoming 

period. Experience during previous oil price drops have shown that policy responses are 

typically procyclical by necessity, with reductions in public expenditure that can hinder long-

term growth (IMF, 2015). 

The procyclical fiscal policy may drive inflation and weaken competitiveness during 

periods of high revenues, while conversely leading to economic downturns when budget 

revenues decrease and decreasing spending are important to uphold fiscal sustainability. Many 



Elmir EYVAZ-ZADA 

51 

 

commodity exporters revise or recalibrate their fiscal rules during the collapse in commodity 

prices. Looking ahead, the prospect of permanently reduced of fossil fuel revenues may raise 

concerns regarding the government's capacity to sustain specific levels of public infrastructure, 

wage expenditures, social welfare programs, and more broadly, debt sustainability, and balance 

sheet vulnerabilities. The fiscal policy should be tailored to particular circumstances of each 

country. Implementing a medium-term fiscal framework supported by fiscal rules is crucial in 

this regard. 

Decarbonization affects the fiscal policies of RRCs, particularly regarding the 

alignment of fiscal sustainability with sustainable development goals. An assessment of the 

importance of fiscal discipline, medium-term budget frameworks, and green fiscal policies in 

guiding RRCs toward a decarbonized path. 

Furthermore, potential impacts of decarbonization on different sectors of the economy, 

including budget revenues, expenditures, and overall fiscal sustainability are important for 

implementing fiscal policies tailored to the needs of resource-rich nations amidst the global 

energy transition. Additionally, adoption of green fiscal policies can help these countries 

address the challenges of decarbonization while advancing their sustainable development 

goals. 

By exploring the connection between fiscal resilience and decarbonization, strong and 

credible fiscal frameworks are crucial for resource-rich countries as they navigate the transition 

towards a greener and more sustainable future. 

Stabilising public finance by establishing realistic fiscal targets will accelerate green 

growth. Without fiscal sustainability, achieving the sustainable development goals during 

future decarbonization is not achievable. Next-generation fiscal rules should be designed and 

aimed to strike a better balance between sustainability and flexibility, as well as 

decarbonization goals. The immediate action should focus on achieving sustainable fiscal 

targets, such as the non-resource fiscal balance as a share of non-resource GDP, and identifying 

the sources of financing to smooth the transition process, where possible. 

The fiscal rule targets should consider not only short-term constraints, such as the size 

of the financing gap, but also longer-term objectives. Resource-rich countries are different, 

encompassing both high and low-income countries, as well as a range of fiscal positions. The 

determination of the fiscal rule targets will depend on country-specific elements, including the 

volatility on hydrocarbon revenues, the adequacy of reserves and fiscal space accordance with 

fiscal sustainability. To ensure the credibility of fiscal policy, the fiscal rule should integrate 

well-designed escape clauses for deviations in extraordinary circumstances.  

The RRCs can achieve climate goals by maintaining fiscal discipline and implementing 

green fiscal policy. "Green fiscal policy" encompasses expenditure, revenue, and borrowing 

policies to promote the government's sustainable development objectives, utilizing fiscal policy 

tools to achieve environmental and climate-related targets. The climate change initiatives can 

be directly associated with fiscal policy, mainly through government spending or taxation, and 

they also have an indirect effect on macroeconomic and fiscal outcomes. On the expenditure 

side, green public investment, subsidies and transfers focused on climate-related initiatives play 

a key role at facilitating the decarbonization by promotion of clean energy, encouraging 

innovation in green technologies, and improving energy efficiency. 



FISCAL POLICY FRAMEWORK IN A DECARBONIZED FUTURE FOR RESOURCE-RICH 

COUNTRIES 

52 

 

By employing fiscal instruments for environmental objectives, it becomes possible to 

positively impact price signals and market incentives, thereby directing consumers, producers, 

and investors towards more sustainable decisions. In terms of revenue generation, significant 

climate policies, such as the emissions trading system (ETS), carbon taxes, and other 

environmental taxes (for example, excise taxes on fossil fuels), directly or indirectly establish 

a price for carbon emissions. Economic theory emphasizes that carbon pricing should be main 

aspect of effective climate change policy (Raúl Delgado & Huáscar Eguino ). 

The resource-rich countries should work to align their economies with the goals of the 

Paris Agreement. To meet the targets, identifying and sharing best practices and common 

approaches, building expertise, and benefiting RRCs is important. Under this approach, 

identifying, assessing, and reducing government fiscal risks arising from climate change and 

decarbonization, and using macroeconomic analysis to integrate climate considerations into 

fiscal policy, is crucial (OECD, 2020). Additionally, reducing fiscal risks arising from 

decarbonization and integrating climate into macro-fiscal policy and management for a 

sustainable and green recovery is essential (Mr. Luc Eyraud, et al, 2023). 

Efforts to mitigate and adapt to climate change will have major economic consequences 

and will affect the fiscal sustainability of government budgets in the medium and long terms. 

Supporting the development of methods for identifying and managing fiscal risks from 

decarbonization impacts and the effects of efforts to mitigate them by reducing greenhouse gas 

emissions is imperative. Using green budgeting, green procurement, and climate-informed 

public investment management to integrate climate considerations into policymaking and 

budgeting and drive effective and equitable climate action that can deliver climate policy goals 

(Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action , 2022). 

Around the world, reforms are being carried out in accordance with the demands of the 

decarbonization, particularly in the field of tax legislation. Important steps are being taken in 

the direction of attracting green investments and supporting "green financing" initiatives. 

Implementing green fiscal policies, such as reducing subsidies and using tools like carbon 

taxes, will be critical to advance any country's decarbonization program. 

"Carbon tax" is a payment levied on the volume of carbon emissions in order to ensure 

the reduction of relevant carbon-based emissions in the atmosphere. Oil products, natural gas, 

and coal are charged according to their carbon content. The implementation of the carbon tax 

aims to attract additional funds to revive the economy and bring it to a higher ecological level, 

while reducing the volume of GHG emissions (Asian Development Bank, 2023). The main 

goal here is to encourage enterprises to decrease GHG emissions and invest in the application 

of modern technologies along with paying for environmental damage. This, in turn, is called 

the "polluter pays" principle. In this case, the damage that may be caused to nature as a result 

of production activity is compensated. 

Environmental tax reforms (such as those carbon taxes) have multiple benefits beyond 

climate. Carbon taxes can support multiple Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in various 

ways. Firstly, carbon taxes absolutely increase the price of fossil fuels, thereby reducing fossil 

fuel consumption and aiding in achieving climate goals. Secondly, as a source of tax revenue, 

carbon taxes can increase budgetary revenues, which can then be utilized for development 

purposes, such as enhancing spending on health, education, and welfare (UN, 2023). 



Elmir EYVAZ-ZADA 

53 

 

Carbon taxes can serve as economic incentives for innovation by stimulating the 

development of green technologies and sustainable practices. Additionally, they encourage 

businesses to invest in research and development for low-carbon solutions. 

Furthermore, carbon taxes can generate revenue for sustainability, such as providing 

funds for environmental initiatives and renewable energy projects, thereby addressing the dual 

goals of emission reduction and funding sustainable programs. 

Beyond all the advantages mentioned above, there are also disadvantages of carbon 

taxation. One such disadvantage is its regressive impact on lower-income individuals. There is 

a risk that carbon taxes may disproportionately affect lower-income individuals, as they often 

spend a higher percentage of their income on carbon-intensive goods and services. 

Additionally, competitiveness concerns for industries are a significant issue. Industries subject 

to carbon taxes may face higher production costs, potentially leading to concerns about 

competitiveness and the possibility of carbon leakage, where industries relocate to regions with 

less stringent regulations. Furthermore, considering the complexity of implementation, carbon 

taxation can be challenging. Designing and implementing an effective carbon tax system 

requires careful consideration and monitoring to determine the appropriate tax rate and address 

potential loopholes. Additionally, incomplete coverage and sectoral exemptions can also be 

disadvantages. The effectiveness of carbon taxes may be compromised if they do not cover all 

sectors or if certain industries are granted exemptions, potentially limiting their overall impact 

on emissions reduction. 

 

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSSION 

As countries transition towards decarbonization, policymakers will need to carefully 

balance environmental goals with economic considerations. Assisting in mobilizing the 

financial resources to implement national climate action plans in RRCs, climate budgeting 

applications, as well as addressing climate risks and vulnerabilities is important to ensure 

climate resilience. The RRCs can achieve climate goals by maintaining fiscal discipline and 

implementing green fiscal policy. 

The transition to sustainable development requires funding beyond governments' 

financial capacity. Public finances are important in spurring private investment consistent with 

climate goals. Stabilising public finance by establishing realistic fiscal targets will accelerate 

green growth. Without fiscal sustainability, achieving the sustainable development goals 

during future decarbonization is not achievable. Implementing carbon pricing mechanism and 

investing in renewable energy can help mitigate the economic impacts of decarbonization. 

Investing in climate initiatives not only brings about climate benefits such as helping achieve 

Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and mitigating climate-related risks, migration, 

and disease but also environmental benefits, including cleaner air and water quality, and safer 

and less congested roads.  

Governments can promote the use of green bonds by leveraging the growing interest of 

capital markets in sustainable projects. In addition, ministries of finance can support the 

development of fiscal policy framework  with their implemenation of carbon taxes. Moreover, 

fostering global cooperation and partnerships will be essential to address worldwide challenges 

related climate change. Governments might also necessitate to provide targeted support and 



FISCAL POLICY FRAMEWORK IN A DECARBONIZED FUTURE FOR RESOURCE-RICH 

COUNTRIES 

54 

 

incentives for industries and communities heavily reliant on fossil fuels to facilitate a just 

transition. In addition, to facilitate the process, it is important to ensure macroeconomic 

stability and improve governance and the business climate. This involves planning public 

investments, and structural reforms to facilitate private investment. Overall, specific and 

coordinated efforts will be important to ensure sustainable and a smooth transition to a 

decarbonized future. 

While this study provides a comprehensive analysis, one of its strengths is its detailed 

exploration of fiscal policies tailored to RRCs. However, a potential weakness is the variability 

of regional contexts, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, further 

research is needed to explore alternative explanations and practical implications of fiscal 

policies in different economic and political environments. 

 

REFERENCES  

1. Asian Development Bank (2023). Fiscal Policy Instruments.  

2. Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action (2022). Driving Climate Action through 

Economic and Fiscal.  

3. IMF (2015). The Commodities Roller Coaster: A Fiscal Framework for Uncertain Times. 

Fiscal Monitor. 

4. International Labour Organization (2015). In Guidelines for a just transition towards 

environmentally sustainable economies and societies for all 

5. International Renewable Energy Agency– IRENA (2024).  

6. Mr. Luc Eyraud, William Gbohoui, and Mr. Paulo A Medas (2023). A New Fiscal 

Framework for Resource-Rich Countries.  

7. OECD (2020). Best Practices for Managing Fiscal Risks.  

8. Ossowski, Rolando, and Håvard Halland (2016). Fiscal Management in Resource-Rich 

Countries.  

9. Peszko, Grzegorz (2020). Diversification and Cooperation in a Decarbonizing World.  

10. Raúl Delgado & Huáscar Eguino . Fiscal Policy and Climate Change.  

11. The growth Lab at Harvard University (2021). The growth Lab at Harvard University.  

12. UN (2023). https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. 

13. Welsby, Dan, James Price, Steve Pye, and Paul Ekins (2021). “Unextractable Fossil Fuels 

in a 1.5 °C World”.  

14. World Meteorological Organization - WMO (2023).  

15. World Bank blog. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/climatechange/diversification-and-

cooperation-decarbonizing-world-climate-strategies-fossil-fuel 

16. World Economic Forum (2024). Global Risks Report 


