




































AGORA International Journal of Economical Sciences, http://univagora.ro/jour/index.php/aijes 

ISSN 2067-3310, E-ISSN 2067-7669 

Vol. 19, No. 1 (2025), pp. 77-86 

 

77 
 

THE IMPACT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS ON THE 

EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY FRAMEWORKS 

IN THE EU 

 

A.-M. COATU, F.-A. POPESCU, L. PETRILA 

 

Ana-Maria Coatu¹, Felix-Angel Popescu², Laurențiu Petrila³   

¹ ² Faculty of Economic Sciences, Agora University of Oradea, Romania 

¹ E-mail: anamaria.coatu@gmail.com  

² https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3020-2098, E-mail: felixangelpopescu@gmail.com  

 ³ Faculty of Juridical and Administrative Sciences, Agora University of Oradea & Faculty of 

History, International Relations, Political Sciences & Communication Sciences, University of 

Oradea, Romania. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8415-3327, E-mail: lauren.petrila@gmail.com   

 

Abstract:  This study explores how socio-economic factors affect the effectiveness of 

public accountability frameworks in EU member states, with Romania as a case study. Using 

data from the World Bank, Eurobarometer, and cross-country comparisons, it identifies five 

key determinants: income inequality, education, healthcare access, political participation, and 

economic stability. Grounded in institutional theory, the research shows that inclusive 

institutions and lower disparities lead to stronger accountability, while weaker frameworks 

often reinforce inequality and corruption. For Romania, the study recommends boosting 

transparency, enforcing anti-corruption measures, improving rural-urban equity, and 

enhancing civic education to strengthen the link between citizens and institutions. 

Keywords: public accountability, socio-economic factors, European Union, 

governance, institutional theory, Romania, income inequality, transparency 

 

INTRODUCTION 

Democratic governance relies fundamentally on effective public accountability—

mechanisms that ensure governments remain transparent, responsive, and answerable to their 

citizens. Within the European Union’s complex, multi-level governance structure, the 

relationship between socio-economic development and the functionality of accountability 

frameworks has become increasingly important for understanding variations in governance 

quality among member states. 

Despite the EU’s formal commitment to transparency, good governance, and 

democratic accountability, significant disparities persist in how effectively these principles are 

implemented across member countries. While states such as those in the Nordic region 

consistently demonstrate high levels of institutional trust and citizen engagement, several 

Eastern European countries, including Romania, continue to face structural challenges such as 

corruption, weak institutional capacity, and low public confidence in governance. 

These differences suggest that institutional design alone does not account for variations 

in accountability effectiveness. Rather, underlying socio-economic factors—such as income 

inequality, education levels, economic stability, and social cohesion—play a critical role in 

shaping how accountability mechanisms are perceived, accessed, and enforced. In contexts 

mailto:anamaria.coatu@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3020-2098
mailto:felixangelpopescu@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8415-3327
mailto:lauren.petrila@gmail.com


THE IMPACT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC 

ACCOUNTABILITY FRAMEWORKS IN THE EU 

78 
 

marked by high inequality or weak public services, even well-designed frameworks may fail 

to function effectively. 

This study investigates how socio-economic conditions influence the effectiveness of 

public accountability mechanisms across EU member states, with a particular focus on 

Romania as a post-transition case. Grounded in institutional theory, the research explores how 

socio-economic contexts affect the legitimacy and performance of governance structures. 

The study addresses the following research questions: 

 What socio-economic factors explain cross-national variations in accountability 

effectiveness within the EU? 

 How do income inequality, education, economic conditions, and social cohesion 

interact to shape governance outcomes? 

By combining comparative analysis with a focused case study, this research contributes 

to the broader understanding of democratic accountability in the EU. It aims to inform both 

scholarly debates on governance and practical efforts to strengthen institutional performance, 

especially in countries where socio-economic disparities undermine accountability. Romania’s 

experience offers valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities of building more 

effective accountability frameworks in post-transition settings. 

Governance structures are deeply influenced by historical choices, with institutions 

playing a pivotal role in shaping outcomes. Countries with inclusive institutions tend to channel 

socio-economic development into equitable and sustainable governance, promoting 

transparency and fairness. In contrast, nations with emerging institutions often reinforce cycles 

of inequality and corruption, undermining public trust and hindering long-term progress. 

Recognizing the importance of institutional inclusivity is critical for understanding governance 

challenges and opportunities in diverse socio-economic contexts. 

The effectiveness of governance frameworks hinges on the strength and adaptability of 

institutions. Robust checks and balances, such as independent judicial systems, transparent 

public financial management, and active civil society organizations, are essential for translating 

socio-economic resources into effective governance practices. Institutions that fail to evolve in 

response to socio-economic changes, such as globalization, technological advancements, or 

demographic shifts, risk becoming rigid and unresponsive, fuelling public discontent. 

Institutional adaptability is therefore not only a mechanism for resilience, but also a 

prerequisite for legitimacy and public trust. 

Addressing socio-economic inequalities is equally vital for fostering better governance. 

Programs that reduce income disparities and improve access to education create an 

environment where governance frameworks can thrive. By empowering marginalized groups 

and enhancing public awareness, these efforts contribute to more equitable and inclusive 

systems of governance. Moreover, empowering civil society strengthens accountability, 

ensuring that governance reflects the diverse needs and expectations of the population. 

Building institutions that are transparent, inclusive, and adaptive remains fundamental 

to effective governance. Transparency mitigates corruption, inclusivity fosters equitable 

representation, and adaptability ensures institutions remain relevant amid changing socio-

economic dynamics. By incorporating these principles into policy, the European Union and its 

member states can address the complex interplay between socio-economic development and 

governance, fostering more effective and equitable public accountability frameworks. 



Ana-Maria COATU, Felix-Angel POPESCU, Laurențiu PETRILA 

79 
 

Exploring the Link between Socio-Economic Development and Governance 

Socio-economic development and governance are intricately connected, with the 

effectiveness of governance frameworks often shaped by the socio-economic environment in 

which they operate. Understanding this relationship requires a deep dive into theoretical 

foundations, particularly institutional theory, which provide valuable insights into how socio-

economic factors influence governance. Institutional theory places institutions—understood as 

shared beliefs, norms, rules, and symbols—at the core of organizational analysis. It examines 

how organizations adopt practices and designs to gain legitimacy, align with societal norms, 

and ensure survival in their environments. This theory emphasizes that organizations are not 

isolated entities but are deeply influenced by external cultural, legal, and normative forces. 

Institutional theory focuses on how institutions mediate the relationship between socio-

economic factors and governance.  

Institutional theory has significantly contributed to understanding why organizations 

adopt specific practices. However, one may consider it obsolete for its perceived determinism 

and oversimplification of human agency. Despite these challenges, the theory remains a 

powerful framework for analysing organizational behaviour, particularly in contexts where 

legitimacy and cultural alignment are critical for survival. Public accountability is a cornerstone 

of effective governance, ensuring that governments and public institutions remain answerable 

to their citizens. Within the European Union (EU), the complexity of multi-level governance 

structures presents unique challenges and opportunities for fostering accountability. A 

significant body of research has explored the socio-economic determinants that influence 

public accountability in the EU, offering valuable insights into how these factors shape 

governance outcomes. 

Numerous studies have identified key socio-economic factors that play a critical role in 

shaping public accountability frameworks within the EU. These factors include economic 

development, income inequality, education levels, and cultural diversity. Below, we review 

some of the most relevant findings. Research consistently highlights a positive correlation 

between economic development and public accountability. Economically prosperous member 

states tend to have stronger institutional frameworks, greater transparency, and higher levels of 

civic participation. For instance, a study by Charron et al. (2017) found that wealthier EU 

countries exhibit lower levels of corruption and higher public trust in institutions.  Studies such 

as those by Rothstein and Uslaner (2005) argue that high levels of income inequality erode 

social trust and weaken public accountability. In the EU, countries with lower income 

inequality, such as Sweden and Denmark, tend to score higher on accountability metrics 

compared to more unequal states like Romania and Bulgaria. 

Education is a critical driver of civic engagement and public accountability. According 

to a study by Deakin and Reed (2019), higher education levels are associated with greater 

demand for transparency and better oversight of public resources. This trend is particularly 

evident in Northern European countries, where investments in education have fostered a culture 

of accountability. Cultural and social norms significantly influence public accountability. 

Research by Hofstede et al. (2010) suggests that individualistic cultures, prevalent in Western 

Europe, are more likely to prioritize accountability compared to collectivist cultures. 

Additionally, cultural attitudes toward corruption and nepotism vary across the EU, affecting 

the effectiveness of accountability mechanisms. 



THE IMPACT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC 

ACCOUNTABILITY FRAMEWORKS IN THE EU 

80 
 

The EU's diverse socio-economic landscape creates significant regional variations in 

public accountability. Studies have categorized member states into distinct clusters based on 

their accountability performance: 

Countries such as Sweden, Germany, and the Netherlands consistently rank high in 

public accountability indices. These nations benefit from strong institutions, robust legal 

frameworks, and high levels of socio-economic development. 

Southern European countries, including Italy, Greece, and Spain, face challenges 

related to corruption and bureaucratic inefficiency. However, recent reforms aimed at 

enhancing transparency and reducing inequality have shown promising results. 

Eastern European states, including Romania, Bulgaria, and Hungary, often struggle 

with weak institutions and low public trust. Research by Mungiu-Pippidi (2015) highlights the 

role of historical legacies and socio-economic disparities in shaping these outcomes. 

 

The Role of Transparency, Integrity, and Accountability in Governance 

Transparency, integrity, and accountability are foundational to effective governance in 

the European Union (EU). These principles are enshrined in EU treaties, emphasizing open 

decision-making processes, citizen participation, and the accessibility of information. Such 

frameworks are critical for building trust in public institutions and ensuring that socio-

economic policies serve the common good. For example, mechanisms like the EU's 

Transparency Register and parliamentary oversight help scrutinize interactions between 

policymakers and lobbyists, ensuring that policies align with citizens' interests rather than 

private agendas. 

There is an uneven implementation of transparency and accountability measures across 

EU institutions and member states, shaped by socio-economic disparities. In wealthier 

countries with robust economies, these frameworks function more effectively, supported by 

stronger institutions and greater public trust. Conversely, in countries with weaker economies 

or higher levels of corruption, such as Romania or Bulgaria, public accountability mechanisms 

often face greater challenges. Socio-economic inequality exacerbates these issues, making it 

harder to ensure fair representation and equitable policy implementation. 

Despite significant progress, the EU faces challenges in ensuring consistent application 

of accountability frameworks. Institutions such as the European Parliament and Commission 

have adopted codes of conduct, mandatory transparency requirements, and measures to 

regulate lobbying. However, gaps remain in areas like enforcement, particularly for the Council 

of the EU, which lags in transparency compared to other institutions. Recent reforms aim to 

address these gaps, including the introduction of stricter codes of conduct for European 

Commissioners and measures to mitigate conflicts of interest. 

A recurring theme in the report is the role of citizen engagement in strengthening public 

accountability. EU treaties mandate that institutions act “as closely as possible to the citizen,” 

reflecting the need for participatory governance. This principle aligns with the broader socio-

economic goal of reducing disparities by involving marginalized communities in the decision-

making process. Such participation fosters trust and ensures that governance frameworks 

address diverse needs effectively. 

In the European Union (EU), policymaking has shifted away from traditional, 

hierarchical structures toward more complex, decentralized processes. These include networks 



Ana-Maria COATU, Felix-Angel POPESCU, Laurențiu PETRILA 

81 
 

of political, public, and private actors, forming informal and formal groups that collaborate on 

policy formulation and implementation. These interactions take place across multiple levels of 

governance, and often involve a diverse range of actors, from bureaucracies to interest groups 

and private companies. However, this networked form of governance raises critical concerns 

about accountability. 

One of the central issues in multi-level governance is the accountability of the various 

actors involved. These actors, such as bureaucrats, interest groups, non-governmental 

organizations (NGOs), and experts, may not have a democratic mandate, which complicates 

the accountability process. While they are accountable to different entities, these relationships 

are often weak or ambiguous. For instance, bureaucrats, though subject to political oversight, 

may not face sufficient scrutiny due to the complex layers of governance. Similarly, interest 

groups often only answer to their members or donors, and NGOs may struggle with internal 

accountability and external representation of their constituencies. 

Experts, who are seen as independent, are usually held accountable by their peers but 

do not face political accountability. The lack of direct political oversight in these networks 

leads to what some describe as "accountability gaps," where decision-making processes are 

obscure and hard to scrutinize by the public. This lack of visibility is particularly evident in 

formal networks, like European regulatory agencies, which deal with technical matters that 

don’t attract media attention. As a result, public scrutiny is limited, and accountability can 

become fragmented. 

The complexity of multi-level networks also creates competing accountability 

demands. Actors within the network must navigate multiple forums, each with different 

expectations, which can lead to conflicting priorities and a lack of clarity about who is 

responsible for what. As accountability procedures become more intricate, they risk becoming 

ineffective or misunderstood. These networks, though a response to the complexity of modern 

governance, face challenges in ensuring that all actors are properly held to account, creating a 

paradox of "excess accountability" without adequate political oversight. 

While EU governance networks offer flexibility and inclusivity, they also present 

significant challenges for political accountability. The lack of transparency and the 

fragmentation of responsibility can make it difficult for citizens and other stakeholders to hold 

decision-makers accountable, undermining trust in the EU’s policymaking processes. 

 

The Impact of Socio-Economic Factors on the Effectiveness of Public Accountability 

Frameworks in the EU: A Focus on Romania 

The effectiveness of public accountability frameworks across European Union (EU) 

member states varies significantly, with socio-economic factors playing a critical role in 

shaping institutional performance. Disparities in income distribution, education, healthcare 

access, political participation, and economic stability directly influence public trust, civic 

engagement, and the ability of governance systems to ensure transparency and responsiveness. 

This section explores these dynamics, with a particular focus on Romania as a representative 

post-transition state. 

 

Income Inequality 



THE IMPACT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC 

ACCOUNTABILITY FRAMEWORKS IN THE EU 

82 
 

Income inequality is a major barrier to effective accountability. Societies with 

pronounced economic disparities often exhibit lower levels of trust in public institutions and 

reduced civic engagement. In the EU, Nordic countries such as Sweden and Denmark—

characterized by lower Gini coefficients and strong welfare systems—demonstrate high 

accountability standards and robust citizen involvement. Conversely, Romania, with a Gini 

coefficient of 31 (above the EU average of 29.6), experiences weakened public trust, limited 

political participation, and persistent perceptions of corruption. These dynamics illustrate how 

inequality not only restricts access to power but also erodes the social cohesion necessary for 

holding institutions accountable. 

 

Education and Literacy 

Educational attainment is closely linked to civic awareness and the capacity to demand 

accountability. Countries with high literacy rates and well-developed education systems, such 

as Finland and Denmark, tend to have more informed populations that actively engage in public 

affairs. Romania, while improving in educational access, still faces marked disparities between 

urban and rural areas. These gaps hinder the development of a well-informed citizenry, 

particularly in marginalized communities, and limit the effectiveness of accountability 

mechanisms. 

 

Access to Healthcare 

Equitable access to healthcare contributes to social trust and institutional legitimacy. In 

countries like Germany and France, well-funded healthcare systems support positive citizen-

state relations, reinforcing accountability structures. In contrast, Romania struggles with 

systemic healthcare challenges, including underfunding and regional disparities. Limited 

access to quality medical services in rural areas exacerbates public dissatisfaction and 

reinforces perceptions of governmental neglect, thereby reducing citizen engagement in 

oversight processes. 

 

Political and Civic Participation 

Citizen participation in political life is essential for the functioning of accountability 

frameworks. In high-participation countries such as Sweden and Denmark, strong civic cultures 

underpin institutional transparency and responsiveness. Romania, by contrast, records lower-

than-average voter turnout and civic engagement. This disengagement is often driven by public 

disillusionment with political elites and widespread perceptions of corruption. When citizens 

feel alienated from decision-making processes, the legitimacy and effectiveness of 

accountability mechanisms are undermined. 

 

Economic Stability 

A stable and inclusive economy provides the material foundation for strong 

governance. States with diversified and resilient economies—such as Germany and the 

Netherlands—tend to have the institutional capacity to deliver high-quality public services, 

which in turn reinforces public trust and accountability. Romania, despite experiencing 

consistent economic growth, continues to face high levels of poverty and regional economic 



Ana-Maria COATU, Felix-Angel POPESCU, Laurențiu PETRILA 

83 
 

disparities. These challenges limit institutional performance and hinder citizen participation, 

particularly in economically disadvantaged areas. 

Together, these socio-economic factors create distinct accountability landscapes across 

the EU. Romania’s experience underscores how formal institutional reforms may fall short 

when underlying socio-economic inequalities persist. A deeper understanding of these 

structural factors is essential for designing effective, context-sensitive accountability 

frameworks in both newer and older EU member states. The effectiveness of public 

accountability frameworks across EU member states is deeply influenced by socio-economic 

factors, including income inequality, education, access to healthcare, political participation, 

and economic stability. Romania, with its high levels of income inequality, disparities in 

education, and challenges in healthcare access, faces significant hurdles in fostering public trust 

and ensuring effective accountability. In contrast, EU member states with lower socio-

economic disparities, such as the Nordic countries, tend to have more effective accountability 

mechanisms due to greater public trust, higher political participation, and stronger social safety 

nets. 

For Romania to enhance the effectiveness of its public accountability systems, it must 

focus on addressing socio-economic inequalities, improving education outcomes, and ensuring 

broader access to public services, particularly healthcare. By doing so, Romania can foster 

greater citizen engagement, improve trust in government institutions, and strengthen the overall 

accountability framework. 

In our research on public accountability in the EU we have used quantitative analyses, 

based on data from indices such as the World Bank’s Worldwide Governance Indicators 

(WGI), and Eurobarometer surveys to measure accountability levels and their socio-economic 

determinants and statistics on GDP per capita, economic growth rates, and education levels 

affect public accountability frameworks. 

The Eurobarometer 101 survey sheds light on public perceptions across the European 

Union (EU), offering valuable insights into governance and socio-economic trends. In 

Romania, the findings highlight citizens' attitudes toward EU governance, trust in institutions, 

and socio-economic challenges that influence governance effectiveness. 

Romanian respondents demonstrated moderate trust in EU institutions, reflecting 

alignment with broader EU trends. However, trust in national institutions remains relatively 

low, indicating ongoing governance challenges. Corruption, perceived inefficiencies in public 

administration, and a lack of transparency are among the key concerns influencing public 

opinion. These findings emphasize the need for stronger accountability mechanisms and more 

transparent governance practices at the national level. 

The survey revealed a growing interest among Romanian citizens in participating in EU 

decision-making processes. With over 70% of respondents expressing interest in the upcoming 

European elections, this highlights a positive shift toward civic engagement and political 

participation. However, barriers such as limited awareness of EU policies and their local impact 

remain challenges to further engagement. 

Economic disparities and income inequality significantly affect governance in 

Romania. The survey highlights that citizens from economically disadvantaged regions express 

higher dissatisfaction with governance compared to those in urbanized and wealthier areas. 



THE IMPACT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC 

ACCOUNTABILITY FRAMEWORKS IN THE EU 

84 
 

This underscores the importance of targeted socio-economic policies to reduce disparities and 

improve trust in public institutions. 

To address these challenges, Romania could focus on enhancing transparency, reducing 

corruption, and fostering greater civic participation. Promoting educational initiatives about 

EU governance and creating platforms for citizen feedback could further bridge the gap 

between citizens and institutions. 

By addressing these concerns, Romania has the opportunity to strengthen both national 

and EU-level governance, ensuring that public trust is rebuilt and democratic engagement 

continues to grow. 

The World Bank's Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) offer a comprehensive 

framework to evaluate governance across six key dimensions: Voice and Accountability, 

Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism, Government Effectiveness, Regulatory 

Quality, Rule of Law, and Control of Corruption. These indicators provide insight into the 

governance performance of countries worldwide, including Romania, by combining data from 

diverse sources such as surveys, reports, and expert assessments. 

Romania's performance on the World Bank's Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) 

from 2013-2023 reveals a nuanced picture of governance progress. Romania demonstrates 

strongest performance in Voice and Accountability (71st percentile in 2023) and Regulatory 

Quality (73rd percentile), reflecting successful democratic institutions and EU regulatory 

alignment. However, significant challenges persist in Political Stability (53rd percentile) and 

Control of Corruption (54th percentile), indicating ongoing governance weaknesses that affect 

public trust. 

Government Effectiveness remains a critical area where Romania struggles. The 

inefficiency of public administration, bureaucratic hurdles, and inconsistent policy 

implementation have hindered progress. These issues are particularly evident in areas like 

healthcare, education, and infrastructure development. In Regulatory Quality, Romania’s 

efforts to align with EU standards have been significant, but challenges in enforcement and 

administrative delays remain obstacles. 

The Rule of Law in Romania presents a mixed picture. While the judiciary has made 

significant strides in recent years, including tackling high-profile corruption cases, public trust 

in judicial impartiality remains fragile. This ties directly to the Control of Corruption, a key 

governance metric where Romania has faced persistent challenges. Despite notable anti-

corruption campaigns and increased scrutiny of public officials, corruption continues to erode 

public confidence in governance, affecting both domestic and foreign investment. 

To improve its WGI scores and overall governance, Romania must focus on 

strengthening public institutions, improving transparency, and enhancing the efficiency of 

public services. Addressing corruption requires not only robust enforcement of anti-corruption 

laws but also fostering a culture of integrity within public administration. Furthermore, 

investing in civic education and fostering public participation in governance can help bridge 

the gap between citizens and institutions. 

By addressing these governance challenges, Romania has the potential to not only 

improve its WGI rankings but also build a stronger, more resilient society that can better align 

with EU norms and foster sustainable development. 

 



Ana-Maria COATU, Felix-Angel POPESCU, Laurențiu PETRILA 

85 
 

CONCLUSIONS 

This study has demonstrated that the effectiveness of public accountability frameworks 

across European Union member states is deeply intertwined with broader socio-economic 

conditions. While formal institutional design and legal frameworks remain essential, they are 

insufficient on their own to ensure accountability in contexts marked by persistent inequality, 

low civic participation, and uneven access to public services.  

By applying institutional theory and drawing on comparative data from EU countries, 

with a specific focus on Romania, this research has identified five key socio-economic 

determinants—income inequality, education, healthcare access, political participation, and 

economic stability—as central to shaping governance outcomes. 

The Romanian case illustrates how post-transition countries continue to struggle with 

entrenched governance challenges despite formal alignment with EU standards. Socio-

economic disparities, especially between rural and urban regions, weaken public trust and 

hinder citizen engagement, thereby reducing the legitimacy and efficacy of accountability 

mechanisms. While Romania has made progress in areas such as regulatory alignment and 

democratic participation, gaps remain in corruption control, public service delivery, and 

government effectiveness. 

The findings underscore the importance of adopting an integrated approach to 

governance reform—one that combines institutional strengthening with targeted socio-

economic interventions. Improving access to education and healthcare, reducing income 

inequality, and fostering civic engagement are not only social imperatives but also prerequisites 

for building accountable and transparent governance systems. 

For Romania and other EU member states facing similar challenges, future progress 

depends on policies that prioritize institutional inclusivity, citizen empowerment, and adaptive 

governance. In doing so, the EU as a whole can better ensure that its public accountability 

frameworks are both equitable and resilient, supporting democratic legitimacy and policy 

coherence across its diverse socio-political landscape. 

 

Acknowledgement: This research has been conducted with the support of the Erasmus+ 

programme of the European Union, within the Project 101127024, Jean Monnet Module 

EnMoDemo - Enhancing and Monitoring Democracy in Romania as a EU Member State, co-

financed by European Commission in the framework of Jean Monnet Action 

 

REFERENCES 

1. Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2017). Measuring Quality of Government in 

EU Regions. Regional Studies, 51(4), 833-847. 

2. Deakin, M., & Reed, G. (2019). Education and Public Accountability in the EU. 

European Journal of Education, 54(2), 221-234. 

3. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: 

Software of the Mind. (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. 

4. Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2015). The Quest for Good Governance: How Societies Develop 

Control of Corruption. Cambridge University Press. 

5. Papadopoulos, Y. (2021). Political accountability in EU multi-level governance: the 

glass half-full. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, 2021:4. 



THE IMPACT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC 

ACCOUNTABILITY FRAMEWORKS IN THE EU 

86 
 

6. Reuters. (2025, January 21). EU approves Romania’s seven-year deficit reduction 

plan at https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/eu-approves-romanias-seven-year-

deficit-reduction-plan-2025-01-21/ 

7. Reuters. (2025, January 24). Romania eyeing bond sales, fights to avoid ‘fallen angel’ 

junk rating at https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/romania-eyeing-bond-sales-

fights-avoid-fallen-angel-junk-rating-2025-01-24/ 

8. Reuters. (2024, October 25). Romanian firms wary of post-election ‘shock therapy’ to 

cut budget deficit at https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/romanian-firms-wary-

post-election-shock-therapy-cut-budget-deficit-2024-10-25/ 

9. Rothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. M. (2005). All for All: Equality, Corruption, and Social 

Trust. World Politics, 58(1), 41-72. 

10. European Parliament Voter Turnout Statistics: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/at-

your-service/en/20190201PVL00001 

11. OECD Education at a Glance: https://www.oecd.org/education/  

12. Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index: 

https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi  

13. World Bank: https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-

indicators 

 

https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/eu-approves-romanias-seven-year-deficit-reduction-plan-2025-01-21/
https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/eu-approves-romanias-seven-year-deficit-reduction-plan-2025-01-21/
https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/romania-eyeing-bond-sales-fights-avoid-fallen-angel-junk-rating-2025-01-24/
https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/romania-eyeing-bond-sales-fights-avoid-fallen-angel-junk-rating-2025-01-24/
https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/romanian-firms-wary-post-election-shock-therapy-cut-budget-deficit-2024-10-25/
https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/romanian-firms-wary-post-election-shock-therapy-cut-budget-deficit-2024-10-25/
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/at-your-service/en/20190201PVL00001
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/at-your-service/en/20190201PVL00001
https://www.oecd.org/education/
https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi
https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators
https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators

