A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Agricultural and Food Science (2023) 32: 69–79 69 https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.130323 Quality assessment of cold dried chicken slices during storage in different packages and temperatures Elif Aykın-Dinçer and Mustafa Erbaş Department of Food Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Akdeniz University, Antalya, 07058, Turkey e-mail: elifaykin@akdeniz.edu.tr In this study, dried chicken slices were packaged in MAP (modified atmosphere packaging) and AP (atmospheric packaging), and stored at 4 °C and 25 °C. The CO 2 content of MAP packaged samples decreased as the storage tem- perature and time increased. The slices exhibited lower a w values when they were packaged in AP at 25 °C. The pH increased from 6.1 to 6.2, 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) increased from 10.6 to 37.3 µmol MDA kg-1, and non-protein nitrogen (NPN) increased from 4.9 to 5.3 g 100 g-1 in MAP for 90 days of storage. The micro- biological quality of the samples was assessed by enumerating total aerobic mesophilic bacteria (TAMB), total psy- chrophilic bacteria (TPB), Micrococcus/ Staphylococcus, lactic acid bacteria (LAB), Enterobacteriaceae and yeast- mold, and was higher in the sample stored in MAP at 4 °C. Moreover, the sensory quality was determined by sensory evaluation with a 9-point hedonic scale. When the sensory and microbiological qualities were evaluated together, the shelf lives of the samples were determined to be 90 days at 4 °C and 75 days at 25 °C for MAP and 45 days at 4 °C and 30 days at 25 °C for AP. It could be concluded that the cold dried chicken slices can be stored in MAP for 90 days without much change in physicochemical, microbiological, and sensory quality. Key words: chicken, dried meat, low temperature-vacuum drying, MAP, storage Introduction Chicken meat is the type of meat most preferred by consumers in Turkey due to its relatively low-price, low-fat content, and high nutritional value (Anonymous 2022). However, poultry meat can microbiologically deteriorate rapidly due to its high water content, water activity value (a w ≈ 0.99), rich nutrient content, and high pH value, which limits its shelf life (Cantalejo et al. 2016). The multiple hurdle concept, which includes factors such as heat treatment, reduction of water activity, use of salt and various preservatives, selection of packaging methods that extend shelf life, and lowering of storage temperature, is one of the most reliable methods for controlling microbial growth (Rodríguez-Calleja et al. 2012). Combining these factors well improves microbial safety and sensory quality and extends the shelf life of the product (Cantalejo et al. 2016). However, in recent years, consumers prefer meat products that are nutritionally healthier, microbiologically safe, less processed, and free from chemical preservatives. Low temperature vacuum drying is a method based on the use of cold and dehumidified air in the drying process at pressures below atmospheric pressure. The sensory quality of meat products is adversely affected by dehydration to a moisture level < 10% (Modi et al. 2007). For this reason, the production of intermediate-moisture chicken meat (a w : 0.6–0.9 and moisture content: 10–50%, Huang and Nip 2001) by this system is becoming increasingly important. A higher drying rate at a low temperature and a drying environment containing less oxygen can be achieved, and biochemical reactions such as lipid oxidation and protein denaturation in meat products can be minimized through the application of vacuum (Wu et al. 2007, Aykın-Dinçer et al. 2020). In addition, the combi- nation of vacuum with other technologies allows the development of alternative methods to the traditional air drying method (Ran et al. 2019, Teng et al. 2020). Even if the activities of microorganisms are inhibited and their counts are reduced, deterioration in dried chicken meat can easily occur through chemical and physical reactions during storage. MAP is the process of converting the gas atmosphere in the package to the desired gas composition and is usually applied together with cold storage (Azlin-Hasim et al. 2018). It can enhance the shelf life and safety of meat products in a similar way to pasteurization and also provide additional benefits such as high product quality and reducing the use of preservatives (Pérez-Rodríguez et al. 2014). While postmortem muscle mitochondria continue to metabolize O 2 , active O 2 consumption and CO 2 formation decrease depending on the postmortem time (Faustman and Cassens 1990). Therefore, in the packaging of fresh meat, higher levels of O 2 are desired for the conversion of the myoglobin pigment to oxymyoglobin, while lower concentrations can be used in processed meat products. In particular, raw meat products are stored in modified atmosphere packages containing 70% O 2 and 30% CO 2 , and processed meat Received 26 May 2023 / Accepted 6 July 2023 The Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland ©This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.012 E. Aykın-Dinçer & M. Erbaş 70 products are stored in packages containing 70% N 2 and 30% CO 2 (Wani et al. 2015). In these packages, CO 2 gas (≥ 20%) is used to prolong the lag phase of aerobic bacterial growth and reduce the growth rate in the logarithmic phase. N 2 , an inert gas, is used to prevent oxidation, flavor alteration, and also precipitation caused by CO 2 (Cutter et al. 2012). The objective of this study was to investigate changes in quality properties of cold dried chicken slices at atmo- sphere condition or modified atmosphere condition at 4 °C and 25 °C. The different storage conditions as well as packaging type were determined by taking into account the dried meat products available in market. The shelf life of the slices was determined by assessing the physicochemical and microbiological quality characteristics together with the sensory evaluation. Material and methods Sliced chicken breast pieces (90 mm × 35 mm × 2 mm) were purchased from a well-known butcher (Veli Cengiz Et Ürünleri Ltd., Antalya, Turkey). The average weight of the slices after dry salting (0.75% salt) was determined to be 5.28 ± 0.55 g. Pasteurization and drying processes were applied to the chicken slices, which were hung in accordance with the low temperature vacuum drying system. For pasteurization, superheated steam was applied so that the core temperature of the slices was 72 °C. Then, the slices were dried in the same unit at a drying temperature of 10 °C and a pressure of 0.70 atm until they reached approximately 40% moisture content and 0.90 water activity. Packaging and storage of dried chicken slices Dried chicken slices were randomly grouped such that every group consisted of 5 pieces. Each of these groups was placed in polyvinyl chloride/ethylene vinyl alcohol/polyethylene (PVC/EVOH/PE) laminated plates (13.5 cm × 9 cm × 4 cm), and these plates were covered with a film consisting of layers of polyamide (15 µm) and polyeth- ylene (65 µm) (Aykın-Dinçer and Erbaş 2020) using a packaging device (Lipovak KV-600, Adapazarı, Turkey). In the MAP type packaging, the gas mixture (70% N 2 + 30% CO 2 ) (Habaş, Istanbul, Turkey) was given to the plates placed in the device after vacuum was applied. In the AP type packaging, the plates were closed with the film in the atmosphere. Packaged chicken slices were stored at two different storage temperatures (4 °C and 25 °C), and their quality characteristics were investigated at 15-day intervals for 90 days. Because the slices were analyzed on 7 different days (0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 days) during storage, they were divided into 7 groups and packed. For each storage temperature, 35 slices (7 packages × 5 slices) were used. For each packaging type, 70 slices (35 × 2 storage temperatures) and totaling in 140 slices (70 slices × 2 packaging types) were stored for each replication. Because the study was carried out in 2 replications, a total of 280 slices (140 × 2 replications) were analyzed. Determination of gas composition Before opening the package containing the dried chicken slices, the gas composition (%) in the headspace of the package was determined using a digital O 2 and CO 2 analyser (OXYBABY, Witt-Gasetechnik GmbH & Co. KG, Witton, Germany). Determination of physicochemical properties The a w values of the dried chicken slices were measured at 25 °C using an a w meter (Decagon Devices Inc., USA). The pH values were measured using a Hanna HI 2210 pH meter (Hanna Instruments, Woonsocket, RI, USA) (AOAC 2000). NPN (g 100 g-1 sample) was determined according to the method of Kaban (2009). TBARS (μmol malondialdehyde (MDA) kg-1 sample) was determined spectrophotometrically at a wavelength of 530 nm (Lemon 1975). Determination of microbiological quality The microbiological quality of the dried chicken slices was assessed by enumerating total aerobic mesophilic bacteria (TAMB), total psychrophilic bacteria (TPB), Micrococcus / Staphylococcus, lactic acid bacteria (LAB), Enterobacteriaceae, and yeast-mold. Agricultural and Food Science (2023) 32: 69–79 71 TAMB and TPB were determined on plate count agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) incubated at 30 °C for 48 h and at 7 °C for 10 days, respectively. Micrococcus/Staphylococcus were determined on mannitol salt phenol-red agar (Merck) incubated at 30 °C for 48 h. LAB and Enterobacteriaceae were determined on de Mann–Rogosa–Sharpe agar (Merck) and violet red bile dextrose agar (Merck), respectively, after incubation at 30 °C for 48 h in anaerobic conditions (Anaerocult A, Merck). Yeast-mold was determined on potato dextrose agar (Merck) incubated at 25 °C for 5 days (Aykın-Dinçer and Erbaş 2019). The criteria for shelf life was defined as the time when the TAMB count exceeded 7 log cfu g-1 in the microbiological analysis. Determination of sensorial quality In the sensory evaluation, eight panelists evaluated four samples in a single session for each storage time, and a total of seven sessions (0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 days) were conducted for one repetition. The appearance, color, odor, flavor, texture, and overall acceptability of the samples were determined according to a 9-point hedonic scale (1: did not like at all, 9: liked very much) (Huang et al. 2005). Panelists were Masters students in Department of Food Engineering in Akdeniz University. The samples were coded with three-digit numbers, and presented to the panelists in a random order. The responses were collected using paper in a laboratory. Panelists were asked to chew the samples in the mouth and clean their palate with water between samples, swallowing was optional. The criteria for shelf life was defined as the time when the overall acceptability score fell below 5 points out of 9 in the sensory evaluation. Only microbially acceptable samples were included in the sensory evaluation. Statistical analysis The packaging type (MAP and AP), storage temperature (4 °C and 25 °C), and storage times (0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 days) were taken as factors, and experiments were carried out in 2 replications according to a randomized complete block design. Variance analysis was performed using SAS version 7 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA), and the significant means were compared using Duncan’s multiple comparison test. The values were given as mean ± standard error. Results The O 2 % and CO 2 % values of the package under different storage conditions are given in Table 1. Temperature and storage time were found to have a significant effect on the O 2 % value (p < 0.01) in the AP type and on the CO 2 % value (p < 0.05, p < 0.01) in both packaging types (MAP and AP). Table 1. O 2 % and CO 2 % amount in the packaging under different storage conditions O 2 % CO 2 % MAP AP MAP AP Temperature (°C, n=14) 4 0.19 ± 0.05 15.24a ± 2.11 25.61a ± 1.25 4.19b ± 1.40 25 0.39 ± 0.08 10.99b ± 2.40 23.70b ± 1.61 7.46a ± 1.81 Significance NS ** * ** Time (day, n=4) 0 0.10 ± 0.06 20.85a ± 0.03 32.95a ± 0.47 0.05e ± 0.03 15 0.10 ± 0.06 20.48a ± 0.10 29.80b ± 0.53 0.28e ± 0.10 30 0.30 ± 0.11 19.63a ± 0.58 26.50c ± 0.67 1.33e ± 0.81 45 0.25 ± 0.09 15.60b ± 2.32 23.60cd ± 0.81 4.85d ± 1.63 60 0.43 ± 0.18 11.48c ± 3.67 21.48de ± 1.43 6.30c ± 2.04 75 0.40 ± 0.17 3.78d ± 2.26 19.83e ± 1.60 12.53b ± 1.45 90 0.45 ± 0.16 0.00e ± 0.00 18.45e ± 1.15 15.45a ± 1.19 Significance NS ** ** ** MAP = Modified atmosphere packaging; AP = Atmospheric packaging. a,b,c,d,eMeans with different letters within the column indicate differences. NS = Not Significant (p > 0.05); * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 E. Aykın-Dinçer & M. Erbaş 72 It was determined that as the storage temperature and time of the AP type packaged chicken slices increased, the O 2 % value decreased and the CO 2 % value increased. It was evaluated that this change in the gas composition of the AP type was caused by aerobic microorganisms. Microorganism growth was more active at 25 °C than at 4 °C, and as the storage time increased, they performed aerobic respiration, that is, they consumed O 2 and formed CO 2 gas. It was determined that the CO 2 % value of the MAP type packaged samples decreased as the storage temperature and time increased. During the storage period, the CO 2 value was reduced by about 15%. The a w and pH values of dried chicken slices under different storage conditions are given in Table 2. It was determined that the packaging type had a significant (p < 0.01) effect on the a w value of the dried chicken slices. In addition, the storage temperature had an effect (p < 0.01) on the a w value only in the AP type packaging, while the storage time had a significant (p < 0.01) effect on the a w value for both packaging types. It was determined that the packaging type had a significant (p < 0.01) effect on the pH value of the samples. Storage temperature and time had a significant (p < 0.01) effect only in the AP type packaging. The MAP type packaging caused lower pH values than the AP type. In addition, higher pH values were determined in the AP type at 25 °C and at the end of the storage period. TBARS and NPN values of dried chicken slices under different storage conditions are given in Table 3. The packaging type had a significant (p < 0.01) effect on the TBARS value of the dried chicken slices. In addition, the effect of storage temperature on the TBARS value was found to be significant only in the AP type, while the effect of storage time was significant at the p < 0.01 level in both packaging types. On the NPN value, the packaging type and storage temperature and time in both packaging types were found to be significant at the p < 0.01 level. The TBARS value of the AP type packaged samples was determined to be approximately 2 times that of the MAP type samples. In addition, the increase in the storage temperature from 4 °C to 25 °C in the AP type packaged samples caused the TBARS value to increase from 51.38 µmol MDA kg-1 to 62.90 µmol MDA kg-1. In addition, the TBARS value increased in both packaging types during the 90-day storage, and this was caused by O 2 in the AP type and carbonic acid formed from carbon dioxide dissolved in the sample water content in the MAP type. Table 2. a w and pH values of dried chicken slices under different storage conditions a w pH Packaging method (n=28) MAP 0.896a ± 0.003 6.13b ± 0.01 AP 0.836b ± 0.014 6.38a ± 0.05 Significance ** ** MAP AP MAP AP Temperature (°C, n=14) 4 0.897 ± 0.004 0.882a ± 0.006 6.10 ± 0.02 6.32b ± 0.07 25 0.894 ± 0.004 0.791b ± 0.021 6.15 ± 0.02 6.44a ± 0.08 Significance NS ** NS ** Time (day, n=4) 0 0.910a ± 0.001 0.903a ± 0.010 6.10 ± 0.04 6.09e ± 0.03 15 0.906a ± 0.002 0.893a ± 0.004 6.07 ± 0.04 6.09e ± 0.03 30 0.906a ± 0.004 0.850b ± 0.027 6.08 ± 0.02 6.18d ± 0.02 45 0.901ab ± 0.005 0.840b ± 0.023 6.11 ± 0.02 6.39c ± 0.09 60 0.894b ± 0.003 0.805c ± 0.041 6.17 ± 0.03 6.54b ± 0.08 75 0.883c ± 0.002 0.791cd ± 0.046 6.16 ± 0.04 6.70a ± 0.03 90 0.870d ± 0.002 0.773d ± 0.044 6.21 ± 0.04 6.69a ± 0.04 Significance ** ** NS ** MAP = Modified atmosphere packaging; AP = Atmospheric packaging. a,b,c,d,eMeans with different letters within the column indicate differences. NS = Not Significant (p > 0 .05); * p < 0.05; ** p < 0 .01 Agricultural and Food Science (2023) 32: 69–79 73 It was determined that the NPN value was higher in AP type packaged slices and increased with increasing storage temperature from 4 °C to 25 °C in both packaging types. More nitrogenous compounds might have been released due to the more active proteolytic enzymes and natural microflora in the samples under atmospheric storage conditions and at room temperature. In addition, it was determined that the NPN value reached the highest level on the 75th day of storage in MAP type samples and on the 45th day of storage in AP type samples and then decreased slightly. TAMB, TPB, Micrococcus/Staphylococcus, LAB, and yeast-mold counts of dried chicken meat slices at different storage conditions are given in Table 4. It was determined that the packaging type had a significant (p < 0.01) effect on TAMB, TPB, Micrococcus/Staphylococcus, LAB, and yeast-mold counts of dried chicken slices. The effect of storage temperature on all microorganism groups was found to be significant only in the AP type packaging, while the effect of storage time was significant in both packaging types (p < 0.05, p < 0.01). When all the microorganism counts were taken into account, it was determined that the microbial quality of the MAP type packaged samples was higher than that of the AP type packaged samples. Depending on the increase in storage temperature, an increase in the counts of all microorganisms in the AP type packaged samples was determined. This might be due to the higher oxygen levels in the product atmosphere and the absence of antimicrobial agents, resulting in a greater growth of microorganisms at room temperature. In addition, as the storage time increased, an increase in the counts of all microorganisms in both packaged types was determined. Meanwhile, the count of Enterobacteriaceae was below < 1 log cfu g-1 in dried chicken slices stored under different conditions. The reason for this might be that lactic acid bacteria suppressed the growth of Gram-negative bacteria by producing organic acids and various antibacterial metabolic products. The appearance, color, odor, flavor, texture, and overall acceptability scores of dried chicken slices under different storage conditions are given in Table 5. While the packaging type significantly affected the appearance score of the samples (p < 0.05), the storage temperature significantly (p < 0.01) affected the odor score in the MAP type packaging and the flavor score in the AP type packaging. It was also determined that the storage time significantly affected all sensory scores of the samples (p < 0.01) in both packaging types. Table 3. Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) and non-protein nitrogen (NPN) values of dried chicken slices under different storage conditions TBARS (µmol MDA kg-1) NPN (g 100 g-1) Packaging method (n=28) MAP 24.35b ± 1.88 5.19b ± 0.12 AP 57.14a ± 4.24 6.09a ± 0.20 Significance ** ** MAP AP MAP AP Temperature (°C, n=14) 4 23.64 ± 2.50 51.38b ± 5.43 4.82b ± 0.08 5.61b ± 0.22 25 25.06 ± 2.90 62.90a ± 6.34 5.55a ± 0.18 6.57a ± 0.30 Significance NS ** ** ** Time (day, n=4) 0 10.62e ± 0.40 10.69f ± 0.79 4.88c ± 0.14 5.03f ± 0.14 15 16.31d ± 0.64 48.68e ± 2.79 4.72c ± 0.09 5.22f ± 0.10 30 19.75c ± 1.34 57.38d ± 8.49 5.19b ± 0.49 5.48e ± 0.50 45 20.22c ± 0.68 65.75c ± 3.04 4.89c ± 0.07 7.48a ± 0.47 60 30.96b ± 1.59 69.82b ± 2.55 5.61a ± 0.49 5.71d ± 0.30 75 35.29a ± 2.79 70.74b ± 4.49 5.69a ± 0.32 6.70c ± 0.21 90 37.32a ± 1.49 76.93a ± 2.16 5.33b ± 0.08 7.00b ± 0.36 Significance ** ** ** ** MAP = Modified atmosphere packaging; AP = Atmospheric packaging. a,b,c,d,e,fMeans with different letters within the column indicate differences. NS = Not Significant (p > 0.05); * p < 0 .05; ** p < 0.01 E. Aykın-D inçer & M . Erbaş 74 Table 4. Microbial quality of dried chicken slices under different storage conditions TAMB TPB Micrococcus/ Staphylococcus LAB Yeast and mold Packaging method (n=28) MAP 5.07b ± 0.31 3.92b ± 0.24 4.05b ± 0.27 3.54b ± 0.36 4.30b ± 0.31 AP 6.53a ± 0.39 4.74a ± 0.32 5.98a ± 0.42 5.02a ± 0.49 5.54a ± 0.35 Significance ** ** ** ** ** MAP AP MAP AP MAP AP MAP AP MAP AP Temperature (°C, n=14) 4 4.80 ± 0.55 5.97b ±0.59 4.09 ± 0.41 4.15b ± 0.44 3.76 ± 0.37 5.29b ± 0.63 3.68 ± 0.59 4.09b ± 0.62 4.18 ± 0.50 5.19b ± 0.55 25 5.34 ± 0.27 7.08a ± 0.47 3.75 ± 0.27 5.32a ± 0.42 4.34 ± 0.39 6.67a ± 0.51 3.39 ± 0.44 5.95a ± 0.70 4.41 ± 0.39 5.90a ± 0.44 Significance NS ** NS ** NS ** NS ** NS * Time (day, n=4) 0 3.38d ± 0.61 2.90d ± 0.44 2.29d ± 0.11 2.17d ± 0.12 2.92c ± 0.55 1.96d ± 0.46 < 1d < 1c 1.69e ± 0.33 2.08d ± 0.39 15 4.10cd ± 0.76 5.58c ± 1.12 2.88cd ± 0.37 3.72c ± 0.89 3.18bc ± 0.86 4.60c ± 0.93 2.80c ± 0.67 4.78b ± 1.49 3.30d ± 0.52 4.21c ± 0.70 30 4.03cd ± 0.88 6.10bc ± 0.69 3.14bc ± 0.23 5.23ab ± 1.08 3.17bc ± 0.49 5.96b ± 0.63 3.35bc ± 0.60 5.18b ± 0.68 3.98cd ± 0.78 5.65b ± 0.55 45 5.12bc ± 0.39 7.03ab ± 0.57 3.69b ± 0.33 4.98b ± 0.38 3.51bc ± 0.57 6.78ab ± 0.56 4.20ab ± 0.20 5.71ab ± 0.99 4.45bcd ± 0.32 6.04b ± 0.27 60 5.48b ± 0.32 7.64a ± 0.19 4.82a ± 0.39 4.96b ± 0.41 4.52ab ± 0.20 7.14ab ± 0.43 4.47ab ± 0.37 5.92ab ± 0.76 4.88abc ± 0.34 6.78ab ± 0.22 75 6.21ab ± 0.40 8.29a ± 0.13 5.12a ± 0.36 6.26a ± 0.37 5.20a ± 0.32 8.02a ± 0.20 4.64ab ± 0.59 6.64a ± 0.07 5.62ab ± 0.38 7.29a ± 0.18 90 7.21a ± 0.36 8.14a ± 0.17 5.50a ± 0.30 5.84ab ± 0.37 5.85a ± 0.51 7.42a ± 0.54 5.31a ± 0.80 6.92a ± 0.44 6.16a ± 0.51 6.77ab ± 0.31 Significance ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** MAP = Modified atmosphere packaging; AP = Atmospheric packaging; TAMB = Total aerobic mesophilic bacteria; TPB = Total psychrophilic bacteria; LAB = Lactic acid bacteria. a,b,c,d,eMeans with different letters within the column indicate differences. NS = Not Significant (p > 0 .05); * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 A gricultural and Food Science (2023) 32: 69–79 75 Table 5. Sensory scores of dried chicken slices under different storage conditions Appearance Color Odor Flavor Texture Overall acceptability Packaging method MAP (n=26) 6.69b ± 0.21 5.78 ± 0.27 6.51 ± 0.22 6.15 ± 0.21 5.63 ± 0.22 5.91 ± 0.21 AP (n=14) 7.14a ± 0.22 6.39 ± 0.28 7.14 ± 0.18 6.59 ± 0.24 6.46 ± 0.24 6.52 ± 0.25 Significance * NS NS NS NS NS MAP AP MAP AP MAP AP MAP AP MAP AP MAP AP Temperature (°C) 4 6.80 ± 0.25 7.19 ± 0.25 5.96 ± 0.35 6.41 ± 0.38 6.68a ± 0.26 7.19 ± 0.23 6.20 ± 0.26 6.88a ± 0.32 5.75 ± 0.27 6.59 ± 0.34 5.91 ± 0.27 6.56 ± 0.35 25 6.56 ± 0.36 7.08 ± 0.41 5.56 ± 0.42 6.38 ± 0.46 6.31b ± 0.36 7.08 ± 0.30 6.10 ± 0.35 6.21b ± 0.31 5.48 ± 0.37 6.29 ± 0.35 5.92 ± 0.35 6.46 ± 0.36 Significance NS NS NS NS ** NS NS ** NS NS NS NS Time (day) 0 8.00a ± 0.20 8.06a ± 0.06 8.00a ± 0.23 7.44a ± 0.12 7.88a ± 0.26 7.81a ± 0.06 7.81a ± 0.31 7.50a ± 0.34 7.56a ± 0.26 7.50a ± 0.18 7.69a ± 0.26 7.56a ± 0.19 15 7.44ab ± 0.12 7.31b ± 0.12 6.38b ± 0.22 6.75a ± 0.25 7.38ab ± 0.22 7.38b ± 0.16 6.50b ± 0.10 6.19b ± 0.34 5.88b ± 0.22 6.38b ± 0.36 6.69b ± 0.12 6.50b ± 0.27 30 7.19b ± 0.16 6.50c ± 0.37 6.25bc ± 0.42 5.69b ± 0.34 7.13b ± 0.13 6.69c ± 0.26 6.44b ± 0.28 6.50b ± 0.40 5.75b ± 0.10 6.13b ± 0.26 6.19b ± 0.12 6.13b ± 0.33 45 6.56c ± 0.19 6.25c ± 0.25 5.50cd ± 0.18 5.00b ± 0.75 6.25c ± 0.31 6.25d ± 0.25 5.94b ± 0.12 5.75b ± 0.25 5.63b ± 0.16 5.25c ± 0.25 5.63c ± 0.07 5.25c ± 0.25 60 6.56c ± 0.21 5.19d ± 0.34 6.00c ± 0.18 6.13b ± 0.16 5.25b ± 0.27 5.25cd ± 0.18 75 5.19d ± 0.48 4.19e ± 0.37 5.19d ± 0.48 4.88c ± 0.46 4.25c ± 0.43 4.75de ± 0.31 90 5.13d ± 0.38 4.13e ± 0.13 5.00d ± 0.25 4.63c ± 0.13 4.50c ± 0.50 4.50e ± 0.25 Significance ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** MAP = Modified atmosphere packaging; AP = Atmospheric packaging. a,b,c,d,eMeans with different letters within the column indicate differences. NS = Not Significant (p > 0.05); * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 E. Aykın-Dinçer & M. Erbaş 76 Because the microbiological quality of the AP type packaged samples exceeded the acceptable level of 7 log cfu g-1, sensory analysis was not performed after the 45th day at 4 °C and the 30th day at 25 °C. In the MAP type, sensory analysis was not performed on the samples stored at 25 °C after the 75th day. The appearance score of the MAP type packaged samples was lower than that of the AP type packaged samples. As the storage temperature increased, the odor score of the MAP type samples and the taste score of the AP type samples decreased. The reason for the decrease in the odor score might be that more CO 2 dissolves in the chicken meat as the temperature increases (Table 1). The reason why AP type samples were perceived as less palatable as the storage temperature increased might be that the samples lost some water (Table 2, a w value) and the amount of lipid oxidation products and nitrogenous compounds increased (Table 3). Additionally, the overall acceptability scores of dried chicken slices decreased significantly as the storage time increased. Discussion CO 2 content within package was significantly (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05) affected (Table 1) by temperature, time and packaging type. Consistent with the results of the present study, it was determined that the sliced dry fermented sausage packs stored at 22 °C contained a higher percentage of CO 2 than the packs stored at 4 °C (Ščetar et al. 2013). Esturk and Ayhan (2009) also reported that the CO 2 content of the package increased significantly after 15 days of storage at 4 °C in salami slices packaged with 100% N 2 gas, and the reason for this was microbial deterioration. In another study on the storage of Iberian ham slices, it was reported that 5% O 2 in the packages was depleted within 18 days and the CO 2 % value increased as a result of the growth and metabolic activity of microorganisms (Andrés et al. 2006). The decrease of CO 2 might have resulted from the absorption of some of the CO 2 , a gas highly soluble in water and oil, by the samples. Similarly, in a study by Zouaghi and Cantalejo (2016) in which freeze-dried chicken meat was packaged in different CO 2 concentrations (20, 30, 40, and 50%) and stored at 21 °C for 28 days, the CO 2 % value decreased significantly at the end of storage, and the highest reduction was determined to be 5% for packages containing 50% CO 2 . Parra et al. (2010) also reported that as the storage time of MAP type packaged dry-cured Iberian ham slices increased, the amount of O 2 did not change, while the amount of CO 2 decreased significantly. The following conditions caused the slices to have lower a w values: i) AP type packaging compared to MAP type, ii) 25 °C storage temperature in the AP type compared to 4 °C, and iii) prolonged storage time in both packaging types. This might be due to the fact that the AP type packaged samples lose more water vapor during storage at room temperature. Lower pH value in MAP has been explained in many studies by the penetration of CO 2 gas in the packaging into the meat and its conversion to carbonic acid during storage (Cilla et al. 2006, Kim et al. 2014). The AP type packaging, 25 °C storage temperature, and long storage time might have supported microorganism activities, and accordingly, the protein in the meat structure might have been reduced to more nitrogenous compounds. Zouaghi and Cantalejo (2016) reported that the pH values of freeze-dried chicken meat stored at different gas atmospheres were higher in packages containing more oxygen after the 15th day. Rubio et al. (2007a) reported that the pH value of the vacuum packed cecina slices increased from 5.94 to 6.05 and the a w value decreased from 0.90 to 0.87 after 210 days of storage at 6 °C. Kim et al. (2014) found that the pH value increased from 5.54 to 5.61 and the a w value decreased from 0.88 to 0.82 in MAP type (25% CO 2 + 75% N 2 ) packaged pork samples after 90 days of storage at 10 °C. On the other hand, Parra et al. (2012) reported that the packaging type had no effect on the pH value in Iberian ham samples packaged with different atmospheric gases (vacuum, 70% N 2 + 30% CO 2 , and 70% Ar + 30% CO 2 ) and stored at 4 °C for 60 days. Lower TBARS value might be due to the delay of lipid oxidation by the MAP type packaging. Similarly, Aykın-Dinçer and Erbaş (2020) reported that the TBARS value (42.96 µmol MDA kg-1) of AP type packaged cold-dried beef slices was higher than that of the MAP type. In a study in which atmospheric packaged chicken charqui samples were stored at 25 °C for 120 days, it was reported that the TBARS value reached the highest value (1.6 mg MA kg-1) on the 90th day and then decreased at the end of storage (Silva et al. 2018). In a study by Modi et al. (2007) in which the atmospheric packaged dried chicken kebab mix was stored at 27 °C for 6 months, it was also reported that the TBARS value increased from 2.9 mg MA kg-1 to 5.3 mg MA kg-1. Aksu and Kaya (2005) reported that the TBARS values of pastırma slices in MAP type packaging and stored at 10 °C were higher than the samples stored at 4 °C. Uysal et al. (2022) noted that TBARS values for sausage chips with AP stored at 4 °C were lower compared to 25 °C. Agricultural and Food Science (2023) 32: 69–79 77 In another study comparing different packaging types (vacuum, AP, and MAP), the TBARS value was found to be the highest (2.80 mg MA kg-1) in AP type packaged pastırma slices after 120 days of storage at 4 °C (Gök et al. 2008). Consistent with the NPN results in the present study, Aykın-Dinçer and Erbaş (2020) found that the NPN value was higher (5.84 g 100 g-1) in AP type packaged dried beef slices and increased from 5.40 to 5.75 g 100 g-1 with the increase in storage temperature from 4 °C to 25 °C. Aksu and Kaya (2005) also reported that the NPN value in pastırma samples in MAP type packaging and stored at 2 different temperatures (4 °C and 10 °C) increased during storage, reached the highest value on the 120th day of storage, and was not affected by the storage temperature. CO 2 gas in the MAP type packaging might have suppressed the growth of microorganisms by creating an anaerobic environment and turning into carbonic acid, reducing the pH value (Table 4.9). Gök et al. (2008) found that MAP type samples had lower TAMB (6.07 log cfu g-1), yeast-mold (3.43 log cfu g-1), and LAB (4.00 log cfu g-1) counts compared to AP type packaged pastırma samples stored for 120 days. Rubio et al. (2007b) reported that the yeast-mold count of the MAP type (20% CO 2 + 80% N 2 ) packaged samples was lower than the vacuum-packed samples, and the packaging type did not have a significant effect on the counts of TAMB, TPB, LAB, and Micrococ- caceae. In another study, consistent with the results of the present study, the storage temperature (4 and 10 °C) did not have a significant effect on TAMB, Micrococcus/Staphylococcus, and LAB counts of MAP type packaged pastırma slices stored for 150 days (Aksu et al. 2005). AP and MAP type packaged samples exceeded the microbial acceptability limit (TAMB count 7 log cfu g-1) determined for poultry meat on the 45th day (7.03 log cfu g-1) and 90th day (7.21 log cfu g-1), respectively. Cantalejo et al. (2016) reported that the TAMB count of freeze-dried chicken meat was less than 5 log cfu g-1 during 8 months of storage. In a study in which dried chicken rings were aerobically packaged and stored at 30 °C for 45 days, it was reported that the TAMB count reached 5.18 log cfu g-1 and the yeast-mold count reached 2.04 log cfu g-1 at the end of storage (Mishra et al. 2015). It was determined that storage at room temperature negatively affected the sensory quality of the samples. Similarly, Aykın-Dinçer and Erbaş (2020) determined that the flavor score of cold-dried beef slices (5.51) stored at 25 °C was lower than the samples stored at 4 °C (6.20). As the storage time increased, a similar decrease was determined in all sensory scores of dried chicken slices. Mishra et al. (2015) associated the decrease in the flavor score during storage under aerobic conditions with an increase in the TBARS value in meat products. Modi et al. (2007) reported all sensory scores in the range of 7.7–8.1 in the chicken kebab mix at the beginning of storage, while the scores were determined to be in the range of 7.4–7.8 after 6 months storage at 27 °C in atmo- spheric conditions. Rubio et al. (2007b) reported that the packaging type did not have a significant effect on the color, odor, and flavor properties of dry fermented sausages, but the scores of these sensory properties decreased gradually as the storage time increased. In another study, all sensory scores of MAP-type packaged chicken meat were found to be above the acceptable limit of 4 points during the 28-day storage period (Zouaghi and Cantalejo 2016). The decrease of overall acceptability scores might be due to increased biochemical reactions such as lipid oxida- tion, pigment oxidation, and degradation of proteins and lipids in dried chicken slices during storage. Shelf life is defined as the time when the overall acceptability score falls below 5 points on a 9-point hedonic scale (Capita et al. 2018). According to this definition, the shelf life of the MAP type packaged samples was 90 days at 4 °C and 75 days at 25 °C. Because the overall acceptability score did not fall below 5, the shelf life of the AP type packaged samples was considered as the time when they were microbiologically safe and was determined to be 45 days at 4 °C and 30 days at 25 °C. In a study in which sugar-sweetened chicken jerky samples were stored under vacuum and aerobic (33% and 75% relative humidity) conditions, it was reported that samples stored aerobically had lower sensory scores and could not be consumed because their overall acceptability scores were below 5 on the 15–30th day of storage (Wongwiwat and Wattanachant 2015). The limitation of this study is that the panelists consisted of university students with similar education levels. Therefore, sensory evaluation results might not be a true reflection of general public consumers in terms of age, education level and employment status. Another limitation is that the quality of the products can be improved by the inclusion of another gas, not just nitrogen (N 2 ) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). E. Aykın-Dinçer & M. Erbaş 78 Conclusions In this study, cold dried chicken slices were packaged in two different types as MAP and AP and stored at 4 and 25°C for 90 days to determine the effect of different storage conditions. It was determined that as the storage temperature and time increased, the CO 2 % value decreased in the headspace of MAP type packaged samples, while the CO 2 % value increased and O 2 % value decreased in the headspace of AP type samples. The increase in the storage temperature in the AP type and the prolongation of the storage time in both packaging types caused lower a w values in the samples. On the other hand, the pH and TBARS values of dried chicken slices were higher in AP type packaging at 25 °C. The microbiological quality of MAP type packaged samples was higher, and this quality decreased due to the prolonged storage period in both packaging types. The shelf life of AP type samples was determined to be 45 days at 4 °C and 30 days at 25 °C, where they are microbiologically safe. As a result of the sensory evaluation, it was determined that the shelf life of the MAP type packaged samples was 90 days at 4 °C and 75 days at 25 °C. Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the infrastructure support from Akdeniz University Food Safety and Agricultural Research Center. It was supported by Akdeniz University Scientific Project Commission within the scope of the project numbered FBA-2019-4582. References Aksu, M.I. & Kaya, M. 2005. Effect of storage temperatures and time on shelf-life of sliced and modified atmosphere packaged Pastırma, a dried meat product, produced from beef. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 85: 1305–1312. https://doi. org/10.1002/jsfa.2118 Aksu, M.I., Kaya, M. & Ockerman, H.W. 2005. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging and temperature on the shelf life of sliced pastirma produced from frozen/thawed meat. Journal of Muscle Foods 16: 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745- 4573.2005.08404.x Andrés, A.I., Adamsen, C.E., Møller, J.K.S., Ruiz, J. & Skibsted, L.H. 2006. High-pressure treatment of dry-cured Iberian ham. Effect on colour and oxidative stability during chill storage packed in modified atmosphere. European Food Research and Technology 222: 486–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0176-x Anonymous 2022. Association of Poultry Meat Producers and Breeders, Poultry Meat Sector, Statistics, Ankara, Turkey. https:// besd-bir.org/tr/statistikler Access date: 09.03.2022 AOAC 2000. Official Methods of Analysis, 17th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC. Aykın-Dinçer, E. & Erbaş, M. 2019. Quality characteristics of cold-dried beef slices. Meat Science 155: 36–42. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.05.001 Aykın-Dinçer, E. & Erbaş, M. 2020. Effect of packaging method and storage temperature on quality properties of cold-dried beef slices. LWT-Food Science and Technology 124: 109171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109171 Aykın-Dinçer, E., Kılıç-Büyükkurt, Ö. & Erbaş, M. 2020. Influence of drying techniques and temperatures on drying kinetics and quality characteristics of beef slices. Heat and Mass Transfer 56: 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-019-02712-z Azlin-Hasim, S., Cruz-Romero, M.C., Morris, M.A., Cummins, E. & Kerry, J.P. 2018. Spray coating application for the development of nanocoated antimicrobial low-density polyethylene films to increase the shelf life of chicken breast fillets. Food Science and Technology International 24: 688–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013218789224 Cantalejo, M.J., Zouaghi, F. & Pérez-Arnedo, I. 2016. Combined effects of ozone and freeze-drying on the shelf-life of Broiler chick- en meat. LWT-Food Science and Technology 68: 400–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.12.058 Capita, R., Álvarez-González, T. & Alonso-Calleja, C. 2018. Effect of several packaging conditions on the microbiological, phys- icochemical and sensory properties of ostrich steaks during refrigerated storage. Food Microbiology 72: 146–156. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.fm.2017.10.007 Cilla, I., Martínez, L., Beltrán, J.A. & Roncalés, P. 2006. Dry-cured ham quality and acceptability as affected by the preservation system used for retail sale. Meat Science 73: 581–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.02.013 Cutter, C.N., Senevirathne, R.N., Chang, V.P., Cutaia, R.B., Fabrizio, K.A., Geiger, A.M., Valadez, A.M. & Yoder, S.F. 2012. Major mi- crobiological hazards associated with packaged fresh and processed meat and poultry. In: Kerry, J.P. (Ed.). Advances in meat, poul- try and seafood packaging. Oxford: Woodhead. p. 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857095718.1.1 Esturk, O. & Ayhan, Z. 2009. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging and storage time on physical and sensory properties of sliced salami. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 33: 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4549.2008.00317.x Faustman, C. & Cassens, R.G. 1990. The biochemical basis for discoloration in fresh meat: A review. Journal of Muscle Foods 1(3): 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4573.1990.tb00366.x Gök, V., Obuz, E. & Akkaya, L. 2008. Effects of packaging method and storage time on the chemical, microbiological, and sensory properties of Turkish pastirma-a dry cured beef product. Meat Science 80: 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.12.017 Agricultural and Food Science (2023) 32: 69–79 79 Huang, S.C., Shiau, C.Y., Liu, T.E., Chu, C.L. & Hwang, D.F. 2005. Effects of rice bran on sensory and physico-chemical properties of emulsified pork meatballs. Meat Science 70: 613–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.02.009 Huang, T.C. & Nip, W.K. 2001. Intermediate-moisture meat and dehydrated meat. In: Hui, Y.H., Nip, W.K., Rogers, R.W. & Young, O.A. (Eds.). Meat Science and Applications. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc. p. 403–442. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203908082.ch17 Kaban, G. 2009. Changes in the composition of volatile compounds and in microbiological and physicochemical parameters dur- ing pastırma processing. Meat Science 82: 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.11.017 Kim, I.S., Jin, S.K., Yang, M.R., Ahn, D.U., Park, J.H. & Kang, S.N. 2014. Effect of packaging method and storage time on physico- chemical characteristics of dry-cured pork neck products at 10 °C. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 27: 1623–1629. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13728 Lemon, D.W. 1975. An improved TBA test for rancidity. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Fisheries and Marine Service. Mishra, B.P., Chauhan, G., Mendiratta, S.K., Rath, P.K. & Nayar, R. 2015. Storage stability of aerobically packaged extended de- hydrated chicken meat rings at ambient temperature. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences 39: 493–500. https://doi. org/10.3906/vet-1406-93 Modi, V.K., Sachindra, N.M., Nagegowda, P., Mahendrakar, N.S. & Narasimha, R.D. 2007. Quality changes during the storage of dehydrated chicken kebab mix. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 42: 827–835. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1365-2621.2007.01291.x Parra, V., Viguera, J., Sánchez, J., Peinado, J., Espárrago, F., Gutierrez, J.I. & Andrés, A.I. 2012. Effect of exposure to light on phys- ico-chemical quality attributes of sliced dry-cured Iberian ham under different packaging systems. Meat Science 90: 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.07.007 Parra, V., Viguera, J., Sánchez, J., Peinado, J., Espárrago, F., Gutierrez, J.I. & Andrés, A.I. 2010. Modified atmosphere packaging and vacuum packaging for long period chilled storage of dry-cured Iberian ham. Meat Science 84: 760–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. meatsci.2009.11.013 Pérez-Rodríguez, F., Zamorano, A.R., Posada-Izquierdo, G.D. & García-Gimeno, R.M. 2014. Study of the effect of post-packag- ing pasteurization and argon modified atmosphere packaging on the sensory quality and growth of endogenous microflora of a sliced cooked meat product. Food Science and Technology International 20: 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013212469613 Ran, X.L., Zhang, M., Wang, Y. & Liu, Y. 2019. Vacuum radio frequency drying: a novel method to improve the main qualities of chicken powders. Journal of Food Science and Technology 56: 4482–4491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-03933-0 Rodríguez-Calleja, J.M., Cruz-Romero, M.C., O'Sullivan, M.G., García-López, M.L. & Kerry, J.P. 2012. High-pressure-based hurdle strat- egy to extend the shelf-life of fresh chicken breast fillets. Food Control 25: 516–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.11.014 Rubio, B., Martinez, B., Garcia-Cachan, M.D., Rovira, J. & Jaime, I. 2007a. Effect of high pressure preservation on the quality of dry cured beef "Cecina de Leon". Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 8: 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.if- set.2006.08.004 Rubio, B., Martínez, B., Sánchez, M.J., García-Cachán, M.D., Rovira, J. & Jaime, I. 2007b. Study of the shelf life of a dry fermented sausage "salchichon" made from raw material enriched in monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids and stored under modified atmospheres. Meat Science 76: 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.10.021 Ščetar, M., Kovačić, E., Kurek, M. & Galić, K. 2013. Shelf life of packaged sliced dry fermented sausage under different tempera- ture. Meat Science 93: 802–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.11.051 Silva, F.A., Estévez, M., Ferreira, V.C., Silva, S.A., Lemos, L.T., Ida, E.I., Shimokomaki, M. & Madruga, M.S. 2018. Protein and lipid oxidations in jerky chicken and consequences on sensory quality. LWT-Food Science and Technology 97: 341–348. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.07.022 Teng, X., Zhang, M., Bhandari, B., Xu, J. & Liu, Y. 2020. A comparative study on hygroscopic and physiochemical properties of chicken powders obtained by different drying methods. Drying Technology 38: 1929–1942. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937. 2019.1679831 Uysal, C., Enişte, İ., Çifçi, M., Şimşek, A. & Kılıç, B. 2022. Effects of different packaging methods and storage temperatures on physicochemical, microbiological, textural and sensorial properties of emulsion-type sausage chips. Journal of Stored Products Research 98: 102002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2022.102002 Wani, A.A., Singh, P., Pant, A. & Langowski, H.C. 2015. Packaging Methods for Minimally Processed Foods In: Siddiqui MW, Rah- man MS. (Eds.), Minimally Processed Foods. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. p. 35–55. ttps://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-10677-9_3 Wongwiwat, P. & Wattanachant, S. 2015. Quality changes of chicken meat jerky with different sweeteners during storage. Journal of Food Science and Technology 52: 8329–8335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1884-2 Wu, L., Orikasa, T., Ogawa, Y. & Tagawa, A. 2007. Vacuum drying characteristics of eggplants. Journal of Food Engineering 83: 422–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.03.030 Zouaghi, F. & Cantalejo, M.J. 2016. Study of modified atmosphere packaging on the quality of ozonated freeze-dried chicken meat. Meat Science 119: 123–-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.032 Quality assessment of cold dried chicken slices during storage indifferent packages and temperatures Introduction Material and methods Packaging and storage of dried chicken slices Determination of gas composition Determination of physicochemical properties Determination of microbiological quality Determination of sensorial quality Statistical analysis Results Discussion Conclusions Acknowledgements References