A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E M. Vestberg et al. (2014) 23: 236–245 236 Reproducibility of suppression of Pythium wilt of cucumber by compost Mauritz Vestberg1, Sanna Kukkonen1, Päivi Parikka2, Dan Yu3 and Martin Romantschuk 3 1 MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Plant Production Research, Antinniementie 1, FI-41330 Vihtavuori, Finland 2 MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Plant Production Research, FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland 3 Department of Ecological and Environmental Science, University of Helsinki, Niemenkatu 73, FI-15140, Lahti, Finland e-mail: Mauritz.vestberg@mtt.fi There is increasing global interest in using compost to suppress soil-borne fungal and bacterial diseases and nema- todes. We studied the reproducibility of compost suppressive capacity (SC) against Pythium wilt of cucumber using nine composts produced by the same composting plant in 2008 and 2009. A bioassay was set up in a greenhouse using cucumber inoculated with two strains of Pythium. The composts were used as 20% mixtures (v:v) of a basic steam-sterilized light Sphagnum peat and sand (3:1, v:v). Shoot height was measured weekly during the 5-week ex- periment. At harvest, the SC was calculated as the % difference in shoot dry weight (DW) between non-inoculated and inoculated cucumbers. The SC was not affected by year of production (2008 or 2009), indicating reproducibility of SC when the raw materials and the composting method are not changed. Differences in shoot height were not as pronounced as those for shoot DW. The results were encouraging, but further studies are still needed for pro- ducing compost with guaranteed suppressiveness properties. Key words: Commercial composts, suppressive capacity, Pythium wilt, bioassay Introduction When used in agriculture, horticulture or landscaping compost contributes to soil fertility, structure, porosity, or- ganic matter, water holding capacity and disease suppression (Itävaara et al. 1997). The subject of disease suppres- sion by composts represents a recently established alternative use of compost. The interest in this has increased due to concern over pesticide use, increasing incidences of pesticide resistance and paucity of chemical control compounds and disease resistant plant varieties. Hoitink et al. (1975) first suggested inclusion of compost in grow- ing media to suppress soil-borne plant pathogens. Subsequently, the phenomenon of disease suppressiveness of composts has been addressed extensively in several reviews, for example by Hoitink and Fahy (1986), Hoitink and Boehm (1999), Noble and Coventry (2005) and Raviv (2008, 2009). The capacity of composts to suppress plant diseases is clearly linked with their degree of maturity (Kuter et al. 1988, Hadar and Gorecki 1991), although ex- cessively stabilized composts may lose this ability (Hoitink and Grebus 1997). Use of compost has suppressed globally important soil-borne pathogens such as Pythium Pringsh. spp. (Erhart et al. 1999), Phytophthora de Bary spp. (Hoitink and Boehm 1999), Fusarium Link spp. (Suárez-Estrella et al. 2007) and Rhizoctonia DC spp. (Nakasaki et al. 1998). There are examples also of inhibition of disease-causing bacteria (Schönfeld et al. 2003) and nematodes (Oka and Yermiyahu 2004) by using composts. Different mechanisms have been suggested to explain the disease suppression phenomenon (reviewed by Hadar and Papadopoulou 2012). These include physical and chemical mechanisms, like competition for nutrients and effects of humic and fulvic acids, or biological mechanisms, such as parasitism, antibiosis and systemic induced resistance caused by a con- sortium of compost microorganisms. Species of Pythium cause damping-off and wilting in a broad range of plant species. Promising control of Pythi- um diseases using composts or compost water extracts has been reported in several studies. Pascual et al. (2002) noticed that the addition to soil of whole composts and their humic fractions reduced the effect of the pathogen on pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants. The greatest pathogen suppression was achieved with the chemical pesticides, but this also caused a significant decrease in the number of non-target bacteria and fungi and on beneficial soil microorganisms such as Trichoderma Persoon and Pseudomonas Migula. Nine out of seventeen composts from organic household waste were mildly suppressive to Pythium ultimum Trow in a study of Erhart et al. (1999). A bark compost also studied by them was even strongly suppressive. Hunter et al. (2006) found that sequences of Basidiomycete yeast genera and sequences highly similar to those of Cryptococcus Vuill. increased in their rela- tive abundance in suppressive samples studied in a cress bioassay. The bacteria isolated, Bacillus subtilis (Ehrenb.) Manuscript received April 2014 A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E M. Vestberg et al. (2014) 23: 236–245 237 Cohn and B. thuringiensis Berliner, acted antagonistically on the mycelial growth of P. aphanidermatum (Edson) Fitzp. in a study performed on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) (Ben Jenana et al. 2009). Chen et al. (1988) stud- ied suppressiveness of bark composts against damping-off caused by Pythium ultimum. They concluded that co- existence of large populations of mesophilic microorganisms, substantial microbial activity, low concentrations of available nutrients, and a high degree of microbiostasis characterized container media suppressive to Pythium damping-off. McKellar and Nelson (2003) achieved results indicating that communities of compost-inhabiting mi- croorganisms colonizing cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seeds within the first few hours after sowing in a Pythi- um-suppressive compost play a major role in the suppression of P. ultimum sporangium germination, seed colo- nization and damping-off. Results further indicate that fatty acid metabolism by these seed-colonizing bacterial consortia can explain the Pythium suppression observed. Suppressiveness of composts against soil-borne disease has been the subject of many studies for more than two decades, but the practical applications of the phenomenon in the growing media industry and in the field are still few. This is mainly because the suppressiveness abilities of composts are difficult to predict from one year to an- other despite using similar raw materials and composting facilities (Raviv 2008). As a part of an Indo-Finnish joint project, twenty one commercially produced composts in Finland were screened for their ability to suppress plant disease caused by Phytophthora cactorum (Lebert & Cohn) J. Schröt. and Pythi- um spp. About one third of the composts demonstrated suppressiveness against either disease in a plant bioas- say (Vestberg et al. 2011). The aim of this work was to study the reproducibility of suppressiveness against Pythi- um wilt on cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) when using composts produced by the same composting plant in two successive years. Material and methods Composts The study included nine commercial composts produced in 2008 and 2009. The choice of the nine composts was based on the results of two larger screening experiments including 21 composts that were carried out against Py- thium wilt in cucumber and Phytophthora cactorum crown rot in strawberry (Fragria x ananassa Duchesne) (Vest- berg et al. 2011). Five composts were suppressive, three neutral while one suppressed Pythium wilt in the previous study. Six composts were produced in closed systems like tunnels or drums followed by maturation in windrows while three composts were produced in windrows from the outset (Table 1). The raw materials varied considera- bly. There was one poultry manure (PM) compost, four biowaste composts (BW1, BW2, BW3 and BW4), one sew- age sludge (SS) compost and one compost of each of the following mixtures: horse manure + paper mill sludge (HM + PMS), cattle manure + garden waste (CM+GW) and sewage sludge + biowaste (SS+BW) (Table 1). The first compost samples from 6–9 month old windrows were collected in April–May 2008, and were thereafter stored in the dark at +4 °C until use in the experiment established in August, 2009. During the storage time nitrification oc- curred in all composts (results not shown). The second sampling was carried out in the same production plants in April–May 2009, and thereafter stored at +4 °C. From the compost windrows, five compost samples were dug from 10–50 cm depth and thereafter pooled to give one composite sample. Details about the composting process itself such as duration, temperature curves and number of turnings at the various production sites were not available. Chemical analyses Chemical properties of composts were given by the compost producers, including pH, electrical conductivity (EC), total amounts of nitrogen (N tot ) carbon (C) phosphorus (P tot ) and potassium (K). In addition, water-soluble con- centrations of nitrate (NO 3 ) and ammonium (NH 4 ) were measured (EN 13652). Ammonium-acetate-extractable amounts of P and K in composts were measured according to Finnish standard tests (Vuorinen and Mäkitie 1955). At harvest of the experiment, samples from the various treatments were analysed for their pH, EC and amounts of available P, K, magnesium (Mg) and Calcium (Ca). Compost maturity was estimated in two ways. Composts with a NO 3 -N/NH 4 -N ratio exceeding the value 1 were regarded as mature (Itävaara et al. 2006). Compost maturity was also measured by the Rottegrad test, which is a test of self-heating for composts developed by the The German Federal Compost Quality Assurance Organization. The test is performed in an open Dewar vessel (1.5l). Temperature is measured in the lower third of the vessel, for at least 5 days, and the maximum temperature is recorded. The rotting degrees are assigned I (Tmax 60–70°C) to V (Tmax 20–30°C). Compost with rotting degrees II or III is designated as fresh compost, and a rotting degree of IV or V indicates mature compost. A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E M. Vestberg et al. (2014) 23: 236–245 238 Table 1. Types, raw materials used and maturity of composts produced in 2008 and 2009. Ratio NO 3 -N/NH 4 -N Rottegrad Compost Type of composting 2008 2009 2008 2009 PM = Poultry manure Windrow - 0.3 V V BW1 = Biowaste 1 Windrow 0.5 2.1 V III HM+PMS = Horse manure + paper mill sludge Drum 1.0 0.0 V II CM+GV = Cattle manure + garden waste Windrow >4.3 280 V V BW2 = Biowaste 2 Drum + tunnel >1.2 120 V V BW3 = Biowaste 3 Tunnel 0.5 182 V V SS=Sewage sludge Tunnel >1.8 3.2 V V SS+BW = Sewage sludge + biowaste Tunnel >2.8 463 V V BW4 = Biowaste 4 Tunnel 6.5 9.1 V V Experimental set-up The experiment was a strip-strip-plot design with year as main strip, Pythium inoculation as sub-strip and com- post as strip-strip-plot. It was arranged on greenhouse tables in 5 blocks. Cucumber seedlings were grown for ten days prior to establishment of the experiment. Two Pythium strains, a Finnish Pythium sp. originating from Zant- edeschia sp. and a P. ultimum (CBS 101588, origin tomato) strain, were used together as inoculants. The fungi were cultivated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates for one week at room temperature prior to inoculation. To inoculate the plants, the agar medium, including the fungal mycelium, was ground and mixed. The inoculum was added to the pots at planting depth (about 5 cm), 5 g of inoculum strain-1. Ground PDA medium alone was added to the control pots as 10 g pot-1. The plants were grown between 27 August and 30 September 2009 in a green- house at MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Jokioinen, Finalnd, at temperatures of 24°C (day) and 18°C (night) with a 16 hour day length. Prior to the establishment of the experiment, both Pythium strains were tested and found capable of causing growth decrease and wilting symptoms in cucumber. The composts were used as 20% mixtures (v:v) with a steam sterilized (on three successive days) light natural Sphagnum peat and sand (3:1, v:v). Depending on the pH in the compost, the basic peat substrate was limed at a rate of 0–7 g Dolomite lime l-1 peat to reach a pH of 6–6.5. The amounts of soluble nutrients in the compost mixes were targeted to about 250 mg N, 100 mg P and 350 mg K l-1 compost mix by adding compound fertilizers of vari- ous nutrient composition. Two controls without compost were established. These had the same basic substrate as the compost containing mixtures; one of the controls was steam sterilized while the other one was not. The compost was replaced by dark peat in the controls. Based on the bulk densities of composts (0. 5–0.7 g cm-1),light (0.06 g cm-1 ) and dark (0.11 g cm-1 ) Sphagnum peat and sand (1.4 g cm-1 ), the bulk densities of the final mixtures were roughly estimated to 0.42–0.47 g cm-3 and 0.34 g cm-3, for mixtures containing composts or being without composts, respectively. During the experiment, the plants were fertigated weekly with a 2 mS cm-1 compound fer- tilizer solution (14,7N– 5P–21K, Yara Ltd.). Plant growth and disease assessment Plant height was measured weekly starting one week after planting. At harvest, plant dry weight (DW) was also measured. Suppressive capacity (SC) was calculated separately for each compost as the difference (%) in DW be- tween Pythium inoculated and non-inoculated plants. At harvest disease severity was assessed as median differences in plant vigour, (on a scale 0–5, 0 = dead, 5 = very good), leaf colour (on a scale 1–3, 1 = highly discoloured, 3=dark green) and discoloration of the root system (on a scale of 1–3, 1 = poor, 3 = good). Statistical analyses The analysis of variance was based on the common mixed model for a strip-strip plot. Fixed factors were compost origin, sampling year and disease inoculation, whereas replication was as a random (blocking) factor. In the case of SC values, the model was reduced to a strip plot since the difference between inoculated and un-inoculated treatments was calculated and the effect of disease inoculation could not be tested separately. A suitable covari- ance structure was chosen by comparing compound symmetry and heterogeneous compound symmetry struc- ture against unstructured covariance using a likelihood-ratio test. A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E M. Vestberg et al. (2014) 23: 236–245 239 Pairwise comparisons were performed using two-sided t-type tests. Model assumptions were checked graphically. Equality of variances was visually judged by plotting residuals against fitted values and normality of the variables by inspecting model residuals in a normal probability plot. Statistical analyses were performed using the SAS sys- tem, Enterprise Guide version 4.2 (SAS Institute Inc. 2008). The examination of the model residuals revealed two influential outliers for the SC variable. Pythium inoculation increased shoot DW by 101% and 51% in these two cases, respectively. The influence of the outlying values on the results was examined by comparing results of the analysis of the reduced and complete data. On checking the data, no logical reason for the exceptional values was determined. It was possibly an issue of human error. We decided to use the reduced data in the statistical analysis of SC. Results Compost properties Most of the composts were mature according to the NO 3 /NH 4 ration and the Rottegrad test (Table 1). The NO 3 / NH 4 ration however indicated immaturity of two composts produced in 2008 and 2009. According to the Rottegrad test, no composts produced in 2008 were immature while two composts produced in 2009 were so. The total amounts of nutrients in composts from 2008 and 2009 did not differ much from each other (Table 2). The carbon content was, however, considerably lower in one compost (HM+PMS) produced in 2009 compared with the compost produced in 2008. Compared with 2008 samples, the total amounts of P were higher in 2009 samples in two composts (HM+PMS and SS composts) and those of K in three composts (HM+PMS, BW1 and BW3 composts). The pH of composts varied considerably from about 5 to more than 8. The pH was several units higher in the HM+PMS compost in 2009 than in 2008 (Table 3). The EC was clearly higher in 2009 in four out of nine composts. On the other hand, the PM compost had lower EC in 2009 than in 2008 (Table 3). The amounts of available N, P and K varied more between production year than did the levels of total nutrients (Table 2 and 3). Table 2. The amounts of total nitrogen, carbon, phosphorus and potassium in nine compost lots produced in 2008 and 2009 at commercial compost producing plants in Finland. PM=poultry manure, BW=biowaste, HM=horse manure, PMS=paper mill sludge, CM=cattle manure, GW=garden waste, SS=sewage sludge, DW=dry weight. A number after BW indicates different producers. Total nutrients, % Total nutrients, g kg-1 compost DW Type of compost Nitrogen Carbon Phosphorus Potassium 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 PM 3.2 3.5 41.1 41.2 17.9 17.1 33.3 32.6 BW1 3.7 3.5 44.8 43.4 3 4.0 2.7 7.3 HM+PMS 1.7 1.8 47.5 33.1 3.2 8.7 3.6 17.4 CM+GW 1.4 1.3 24.0 23.3 2.7 3.6 4.8 6.3 BW2 1.8 1.6 32.8 28.0 3.2 3.5 9.5 8.5 BW3 2.8 3.2 33.7 29.5 7.1 8.1 6.9 15.5 SS 1.9 2.3 28.1 25.9 21.6 25.2 1.8 1.9 SS+BW 2.7 2.8 29.3 27.3 29.2 30.8 5.7 5.2 BW4 2.1 2.5 23.5 25.6 4.7 6 13.6 14.4 The attempt to adjust pH and levels of available nutrients in compost mixtures close to each other by using com- pound fertilizers was partly successful. At the end of the cucumber bioassay, the pH levels of substrate mixtures of composts collected in 2008 varied within 1 unit and those of composts collected in 2009 within 1.6 units (Ta- ble 4). Corresponding values for the original composts were 3.1 and 3.2 units, respectively (Table 3). The amount of available Ca, K, Mg and P also varied considerably. The greatest variation was found in P, where values ranged between 27 and 487 and between 30 and 360 in mixtures of composts produced in 2008 and 2009, respectively. A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E M. Vestberg et al. (2014) 23: 236–245 240 Table 3. pH, electrical conductivity and the amounts of available ammonium, nitrate, phosphorus and potassium in nine compost lots produced in 2008 and 2009 at commercial compost producing plants in Finland. PM=poultry manure, BW=biowaste, HM=horse manure, PMS=paper mill sludge, CM=cattle manure, GW=garden waste, SS=sewage sludge, EC=electrical conductivity, N=nitrogen. A number after BW indicates different producers. EC mS cm-2 Available nutrients, mg l-1 compost Compost pH Ammonium-N Nitrate-N Phosphorus Potassium Nr 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 PM 7.8 8.3 3.7 1.2 - 378 - 124 1048 1325 4837 5250 BW1 6.0 5.5 0.2 1.5 81 89 37 183 90.5 184.4 218 1284 HM+PMS 5.3 8.4 0.5 2.5 81 643 85 0 28.7 239.5 346 3010 CM+GW 7 8.1 0.8 0.5 <78 0 339 28 68 58.7 603 484 BW2 8.2 8.0 1.4 0.9 <78 2 96 239 3.9 2.04 1318 760 BW3 7.5 7.5 0.5 2.3 159 2 73 364 154.7 57.1 652 3266 SS 5.1 5.4 1.3 2.3 <78 350 142 1111 1.9 1.39 102 137 SS+BW 5.4 5.2 1.2 0.9 <78 1 222 463 3.4 4.38 520 313 BW4 7.8 8.2 4.0 2.9 81 39 524 356 5.9 8.33 3215 2759 Table 4. pH, and the amounts of available calcium (Ca), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg) and phosphorus (P) in nine compost mixtures and in sterilized and natural peat controls at harvest of a cucumber bioassay in the greenhouse with Finnish commercial composts produced in 2008 and 2009. PM=poultry manure, BW=biowaste, HM=horse manure, PMS=paper mill sludge, CM=cattle manure, GW=garden waste, SS=sewage sludge, EC=electrical conductivity, N=nitrogen. A number after BW indicates different producers. pH Ca, mg l-1 substrate K, mg l-1 substrate Mg, mg l-1 substrate P, mg l-1 substrate Treatment 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 PM 5.73 5.74 1872 1685 538 620 608 655 487.0 359.7 BW1 6.03 6.3 1981 1891 347 304 769 722 42.6 44.0 HM+PMS 6.09 5.94 1112 2364 291 391 497 287 29.4 151.3 CM+GW 5.96 5.44 1579 1253 243 274 517 381 41.4 61.9 BW2 6.28 6.94 2548 3472 489 577 349 396 47.2 69.2 BW3 6.25 6.22 2568 2603 362 412 581 556 206.4 199.6 SS 5.94 5.64 1582 1843 246 203 476 435 26.8 29.7 SS+BW 5.68 5.72 1393 1510 299 252 478 565 28.6 26.7 BW4 6.7 6.97 4726 4963 648 742 382 399 185.3 230.6 Sterilized control 6.03 1646 409 562 48.1 Natural control 5.65 1942 309 525 39.8 Suppressiveness against Pythium wilt By the end of the experiment, Pythium inoculation had decreased cucumber plant height by 10.4% in control sub- strate mixtures without addition of compost (Figure not shown). Weekly measurement of plant height indicated different curves for suppressive composts than for non-suppressive ones (Fig 1). In the former case (for example in composts BW1, HM+PMS and CM+GW), Pythium inoculated and non-inoculated curves remained very close to each other, indicating that the pathogen did not cause growth decrease when assessed as plant height. Also in BW2, suppressiveness seemed to occur similarly in both samples despite different growth of cucumber during the two years. Compost PM, on the other hand, encouraged similar growth in both years, but the effect of com- post was conducive rather than suppressive. A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E M. Vestberg et al. (2014) 23: 236–245 241 Fig. 1. Impact of inoculation with Pyhtium vs control on plant height, measured weekly, of cucumber in growing media containing 20% compost produced in 2008 or 2009. PM=poultry manure, BW=biowaste, HM=horse manure, PMS=paper mill sludge, CM=cattle manure, GW=garden waste, SS=sewage sludge, DW=dry weight. A number after BW indicates different producers. Analysis of variance showed that Pythium inoculation significantly decreased cucumber DW. For this parameter, the main effects of Compost and Year, as well as the interactions Compost x Pythium, Compost x Year and Year x Pythium were statistically significant (Table 5). Because the varying nutrient levels in different compost mixtures caused differences in growth, the parameter “difference in shoot DW between Pythium inoculated and non-inoc- ulated” (the suppressiveness capacity, SC), is better suited for the comparison of composts. The Year of produc- tion did not significantly affect this variable. Table 5. Analysis of variance results for the Pythium wilt experiment. Measured variables were dry weight of cucumber plants at the end of the experiment and the percentage difference in shoot DW between non-inoculated and Pythium inoculated. Shoot dry weight (DW) Shoot DW difference, non-inoculated – Pythium inoculated Effect Num DF Den DF F value Pr>F Num DF Den DF F value Pr>F Pythium 1 4 23.03 0.0087 Compost 10 77.9 9.27 <0.0001 10 72 5.73 <0.0001 Year 1 50.2 27.27 <0.0001 1 4.5 0.1434 0.1434 Pythium x compost 10 72.4 4.45 <0.0001 Pythium x year 1 41.9 4.18 0.0473 Compost x year 10 50.2 24.02 <0.0001 8 72 0.5023 0.5023 Pythium x compost x year 10 41.9 1.57 0.1491 A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E M. Vestberg et al. (2014) 23: 236–245 242 The SC of individual composts is shown in Figure 2. In steam-sterilised peat without compost, shoot DW decreased by 32.7% following Pythium inoculation. Growth decrease in the majority of composts was significantly lower than this. An exception was the poultry manure (PM) compost, which caused a slight increase in Pythium wilt. Similarly to the majority of composts, the natural peat substrate also significantly decreased Pythium disease. The impact of Pythium inoculation on the visually estimated cucumber variables of plant vigour, leaf colour and root discoloration measured at harvest was negligible, so those results are not presented here. Discussion Suppression of soil-borne disease by using composts has been reported in numerous studies (recently reviewed by Noble 2011), but the practical applications of the phenomenon remain limited. The main reason for this is the lack of reliable prediction and quality control tools for evaluation of the level and specificity of the suppression effect (Hadar and Papadopoulou 2012). We must also bear in mind that composts are living substrates that will probably never completely reach the stability found in manufactured products like inorganic fertilizers. The varia- tions in compost properties are due to the choice of raw materials, their proportions in the compost mix, and the temperature regime and moisture control during composting (Raviv 2013). The difficulties in producing compost of stable quality during two or more successive years is maybe the biggest bottleneck preventing the large scale use of composts in high-input agriculture and horticulture. We compared the chemical and biological quality of nine composts produced during two successive years (2008 and 2009). Compost raw materials and composting systems were the same during both years. Despite this, nutri- tional and maturity differences did occur between composts produced in 2008 and 2009. Compost maturity has been shown to be a prerequisite for the development of suppressiveness (Hoitink & Fahy 1986, Kuter et al. 1988, Hadar and Gorecki 1991) in most studies. The impact of compost maturity was verified also in our study. The two immature composts from 2009 were not suppressive while the corresponding mature composts from 2008 were (Table 1, Fig. 2). These results are in line with the findings of Chef et al. (1983), who showed that green compost- ed hardwood bark was conducive to Fusarium wilt while the mature composted hardwood bark was suppressive. Fig. 2. Impact of composts produced in two successive years (2008 and 2009) on Pythium induced reduction (Pythium inoculated – non-inoculated, %) in shoot dry weight of cucumber measured at harvest of a pot experiment conducted in greenhouse conditions of 5 weeks duration. Lines on bars indicate standard deviation of means (N=5). PW=poultry manure, BW1 – BW4 = biowaste 1 – biowaste 4, respectively, HM=horse manure, PMS=paper mill sludge, SS=sewage sludge. A number after BW indicates different composting plants using this raw material. Bars indicated with * and ** differ from the sterilized peat control at p<0.05 and 0.01, respectively. Bars indicated with NS do not differ from the sterilized peat control. A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E M. Vestberg et al. (2014) 23: 236–245 243 Although some nutritional and maturity differences were evident between composts produced in 2008 and 2009, the overall SC (suppressive, neutral or conducive) expressed as the percentage difference in cucumber shoot DW between non-inoculated and Pythium inoculated plants was not affected by year of production (Table 5, Fig 2). This result is encouraging, indicating that the suppressiveness can be reproduced in commercial composting plants if the raw materials and the composting method are exactly the same. In other studies, reproducibility has been achieved in experiments when the same composts were used in different experiments (Serra-Wittling et al. 1996, Widmer et al. 1998, Borrero et al. 2004). Reports on comparisons of composts produced during two or more suc- cessive years seem not to be available. Six month longer storage of the 2008 composts at 4 °C did not lower their SC, as judged from the fact that the SC was largely similar to that for the previous (Vestberg et al. 2011) cucumber wilt experiment. In other studies, stor- age of composts has not affected suppressiveness or has led to loss of suppressiveness. Saadi et al. (2010) demon- strated that compost suppressiveness against Fusarium wilt of melon can be maintained for at least one year un- der a wide range of storage conditions, without any loss of suppressive capacity. Van Rijn et al. (2007) found that the effect of storage on suppression of Fusarium wilt on flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) was compost dependent. In most cases, three months of storage did not affect suppression, but for one compost all three storage methods studied (at +4 °C, at –20 °C or as dry) eliminated the 24% disease suppression recorded for the fresh compost. In some other composts, storage has even caused a significant increase in disease suppression (van Rijn et al. 2007). In a study of Widmer et al. (1998), addition of fresh municipal waste compost reduced Phytophthora nicotianae infection in citrus seedlings, but this effect was lost after storage. Suppressiveness of a leaf compost against Py- thium damping-off of cotton was not affected by 10 years of storage in a study of McKellar and Nelson (2003). As compared with a steam sterilized control, also the natural light Sphagnum peat control significantly decreased Pythium disease in our study. This result is in agreement with the results of Tahvonen (1982) and Wolffhechel (1988), who found that some lots of light Sphagnum peat had suppressed Pythium spp. This phenomenon was further verified by Boehm and Hoitink (1992), who found suppression of P. ultimum when using light coloured peat of the quality H2 on the von Post decomposition scale. The impact of peat changed to conduciveness when more decomposed peat was used (H4 on the von Post scale). In contrast to this result is the finding of Hunter et al. (2006), who established no correlation between the level of peat decomposition (H2–H5) and disease sup- pression of P. sylvaticum in cress. Wolffhechel (1988) concluded that there is a microbiological reason behind the suppressivness of peat because the effect could be destroyed by heat treatment and by addition of benomyl. Ac- cording to Tahvonen (1982), strongly pathogen antagonistic strains of Streptomyces and Trichoderma viride can be isolated from suppressive peat. The choice of parameters for showing suppressiveness is important, in particular when working with pathogen inoculation in a bioassay. In our case, few cucumbers wilted and died as a result of Pythium inoculation, so it was not possible to compare the composts by creating a disease index. Leaf colour and general shoot vigour were not good indicators of the disease either. However, Pythium caused a clear reduction of shoot growth that was best recognised in the dry matter accumulation (33% lower) and to some extent also in plant height (10% lower). Re- searchers often meet problems when trying to adjust suitable levels of disease outbreak in bioassays. The result from pathogen inoculation is easily sudden death of all test plants. From this point of view, we consider the clear decrease in dry matter of cucumber as a good indicator of the functioning of the pathogen. We used compost at the rate of 20% v/v of the growing medium. According to Raviv (2008), compost amend- ment at the rate of 10–25% of the growing medium has been enough to induce suppressiveness in the major- ity of studies. Tuitert et al. (1998) pointed out that the dosage of composts applied in potting mixes with peat is limited to 20% at maximum also due to their high salt content. In our case, it would not have been possible to increase the rates of composts because of very high levels of available P in some composts. However, Veeken et al. (2005) showed that the disease suppressiveness of potting mixes strongly increased from 31 to 94% when the compost amendment rate was increased from 20 to 60%. They used biowaste compost that was wet sieved prior to composting. In this way, they achieved a high quality compost that was high in organic matter, but low in EC and heavy metals. Such quality composts may well be used in potting mixes at concentrations considerably higher than 20% (Veeken et al. 2005). It can be concluded that the reproducibility of the SC was good in this scientific study, but in practice variations in compost quality often lead to variations in SC. Because of this growers are still reluctant to rely on compost to control soil-borne disease (Pugliese et al. 2011). Two approaches can be taken to increase the level of SC of com- posts. First, reproducible composting techniques that produce composts with predictable chemical, physical and A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E M. Vestberg et al. (2014) 23: 236–245 244 biological quality and high suppressive capacity, should be adopted. Second, the suppressive capacity can be en- sured and further increased by inoculation of the composts with biological control agents (BCAs). The latter pos- sibility has been investigated in a number of studies, of which there has been a significant increase in the suppres- sive effect of compost by the addition of BCAs (Noble et al. 2006). In the majority of studies, Trichoderma BCAs have been used for increasing the suppressive effect (Hoitink 1990, Trillas et al. 2006, Pugliese et al. 2011, Bernal- Vicente et al. 2012), but positive effects from non-pathogenic Fusarium (Postma et al. 2003) and Bacillus (Nakasaki et al. 1998) have also been observed. Scheuerell et al. (2005) concluded that currently available composts could potentially provide commercially acceptable control of Pythium spp., but it is necessary to fortify composts with BCAs for the control of Rhizoctonia solani. Conclusions Production year of nine commercial Finnish composts did not affect their suppressive capacity (whether suppres- sive, intermediate or conducive) to Pythium wilt of cucumber studied in a bioassay. Natural light Sphagnum peat also suppressed the disease. Slight differences in nutrient levels and pH between composts from 2008 and 2009 did not affect the SC, but the SC was decreased in two immature composts of 2009. Six months of storage of the 2008 composts at +4 °C did not affect the SC of the composts compared with results from a previous experiment. Acknowledgements We wish to thank the composting plants for giving us composts. The study was supported by grant no. 121574 from the Academy of Finland. References Ben Jenana, R.K., Haouala, R., Triki, M.A., Godon, J.-J., Hibar, K., Ben Khedher, M. & Henchi, B. 2009. Composts, compost extracts and bacterial suppressive action on Pythium aphanidermatum in tomato. Pakistan Journal of Botany 41: 315–327. Bernal-Vicente, A., Ros, M. & Pascual, J.A. 2012. Inoculation of Trichoderma harzianum during maturation of vineyard waste com- post to control muskmelon Fusarium wilt. BioResources 7: 1948–1960. Boehm, M.J. & Hoitink, H.A.J. 1992. Sustenance of microbial activity in potting mixes and its impact on severity of Pythium root rot of poinsettia. Phytopathology 82: 259–264. Borrero, C., Trillas, M.I., Ordovás, J., Tello, J.C. & Avilés, M. 2004. Predictive factors for the suppression of Fusarium wilt of tomato in plant growth media. Phytopathology 94: 1094–1101. Chen, W., Hoitink, H.A.J., Schmitthenner, A.F. & Tuovinen, O.H. 1988. The role of microbial activity in suppression of damping off caused by Pythium ultimum. Phytopathology 78: 314–322. Chef, D.G., Hoitink, H.A.J. & Madden, L.V. 1983. Effects of organic components in container media on suppression of Fusarium wilt of Chrysanthemum and Flax. Phytopathology 73: 279–281. Erhart, E., Burian, K., Hartl, W. & Stich, K. 1999. Suppression of Pythium ultimum by biowaste composts in relation to compost microbial biomass, activity and content of phenolic compounds. Journal of Phytopathology 147: 299–305. Hadar, Y. & Gorecki, B. 1991. Suppression of germination of sclerotia of Sclerotium rolfsii in compost. Soil Biology and Biochem- emistry 23: 303–306. Hadar, Y. & Papadopoulou, K.P. 2012. Suppressive composts: Microbial ecology links between abiotic environments and healthy plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology 50: 133–153. Hoitink, H.A. 1990. Production of disease suppressive compost and container media, and microorganism culture for use therein. US Patent 4,900,348. 37 p. Hoitink, H.A.J. & Boehm, M.J. 1999. Biocontrol within the context of soil microbial communities: a substrate-dependent phenom- enon. Annual Review of Phytopathology 37: 427–446. Hoitink, H.A.J. & Fahy, P.C. 1986. Basis for the control of soilborne plant-pathogens with composts. Annual Review of Phytopa- thology 24: 93–114. Hoitink, H.A.J., Grebus, M.E., 1997. Composts and the control of plant disease. In: Hayes, M.H.B. and Wilson, W.S. (eds.). Humic Substances in Soil, Peats and Waters: Health and Environmental Aspects. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK. p. 359-366. Hoitink, H.A.J., Schmitthenner, A.F. & Herr, L.J. 1975. Composted bark for control of root rot in ornamentals. Ohio Report on Re- search and Development. 60: 25–26. Hunter, P.J., Petch, G.M., Calvo-Bado, L.A., Pettitt, T.R., Parsons, N.R., Morgan, J.A.W. & Whipps, J.M. 2006. Differences in microbi- al activity and microbial populations of peat associated with suppression of damping-off disease caused by Pythium sylvaticum. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72: 6452–6460. A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E M. Vestberg et al. (2014) 23: 236–245 245 Itävaara, M., Vikman, M., Kapanen, A., Venelampi, O. & Vuorinen, A. 2006. Compost Maturity. Method book. VTT Tiedotteita – Research Notes 2351. 38 p. (in Finnish with English summary) Itävaara, M., Vikman, M. & Venelampi, O. 1997. Windrow composting of biodegradable packing materials. Compost Science & Utilization 5: 84–92. Kuter, G.A., Hoitink, H.A.J. & Chen, W. 1988. Effects of municipal sludge compost curing time on suppression of Pythium and Rhizoctonia diseases of ornamental plants. Plant Disease 72: 751–756. McKellar, E. & Nelson, E.B. 2003. Compost-induced suppression of Pythium damping-off is mediated by fatty-acid-metabolizing seed-colonizing microbial communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69: 452–460. Nakasaki, K., Hiraoka, S. & Nagata, H. 1998. A new operation for producing disease-suppressive compost from grass clippings. Ap- plied and Environmental Microbiology 64: 4015–4020. Noble, R. 2011. Risks and benefits of soil amendment with composts in relation to plant pathogens. Australasian Plant Pathol- ogy 40: 157–167. Noble, R. & Coventry, E. 2005. Suppression of soil-borne plant diseases with composts. A review. Biocontrol Science and Tech- nology 15: 3–20. Noble, R., Pereira, N., Coventry, E. & Whipps, J. 2006. Scoping study of research conducted on the disease suppression capabil- ity of composted materials in horticulture, agriculture and turf grass applications. The Waste and Resources Action Programme. R& D Report: Organics. Warwick HRI, University of Warwick, UK. ISBN: 1-94405-252-4. http://www2.wrap.org.uk/farming_grow- ing_and_landscaping/reports_and_guidance/scoping_study.html. Accessed 15.04.14 Oka, Y. & Yermiyahu, U. 2004. Suppressive effects of composts against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica on tomato. Nematology 4: 891–898. Pascual, J.A., Garcia, C., Hernandez, T., Lerma, S. & Lynch, J.M. 2002. Effectiveness of municipal waste compost and its humic frac- tion in suppressing Pythium ultimum. Microbial Ecology 44: 59–68. Postma, J., Montanari, M. & van den Boogert, P.H.J.F. 2003. Microbial enrichment to enhance disease suppressive activity of com- post. European Journal of Soil Biology 39: 157–163. Pugliese, M., Liu, B., Gullino, M.L. & Garibaldi, A. 2011. Microbial enrichment of compost with biological control agents to enhance suppressiveness to four soil-borne diseases in greenhouse. Journal of Plant Disesases and Protection 118: 45–50. Raviv, M. 2008. The use of compost in growing media as suppressive agent against soil-borne diseases. Acta Horticulturae 779: 39–49. Raviv, M. 2009. Recent advances in soil-borne disease control using suppressive media. Acta Horticulturae 819: 125–134. Raviv, M. 2013. Composts in growing media: What’s new and what’s next? Acta Horticulturae 982: 39–52. Saadi, I., Laor, Y., Medina S., Krassnovsky, A. & Raviv, M. 2010. Compost suppressiveness against Fusarium oxysporum was not reduced after one-year storage under various moisture and temperature conditions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 42: 626–634. Scheuerell, S.J., Sullivan, D.M. & Mahaffee, W.F. 2005. Suppression of seedling damping-off caused by Pythium ultimum. P. ir- regulare and Rhizoctonia solani in container media amended with a diverse range of Pacific Northwest compost sources. Phyto- pathology 95: 306–315. Schönfeld, J., Gelsomino, A., van Overbeek, L.S., Gorissen, A., Smalla, K. & van Elsas, J.D. 2003. Effects of compost addition and simulated solarisation on the fate of Ralstonia solanacearum biovar 2 and indigenous bacteria in soil. FEMS Microbiology Ecol- ogy 43: 63–74. Serra-Wittling, C., Houot, S. & Alabouvette, C. 1996. Increased soil suppressiveness to Fusarium wilt of flax after addition of mu- nicipal solid waste compost. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 28: 1207–1214. Suárez-Estrella, F., Vargas-García, C., López, M.J., Capel, C. & Moreno, J. 2007. Antagonistic activity of bacteria and fungi from horticultural compost against Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. melonis. Crop Protection 26: 46–53. Tahvonen, R. 1982. The suppressivness of Finnish light-coloured Sphagnum peat. Journal of the Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 54: 345–356. Trillas, M.I., Casanova, E., Cotxerrera, L., Ordovás, J., Borrero, C. & Avilés, M. 2006. Composts from agricultural waste and the Trichoderma asperellum strain T-34 suppress Rhizoctonia solani in cucumber seedlings. Biological Control 39: 32–38. Tuitert, G., Szczech, M. & Bollen, G.J. 1998. Suppression of Rhizoctonia solani in potting mixtures amended with compost made from organic household waste. Phytopathology 88: 764–773. Van Rijn, E., Termorshuizen, A.J. & van Bruggen, A.H.C. 2007. Storage method affects disease suppression of flax wilt induced by composts. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 39: 2743–2749. Veeken, A.H.M., Blok, W.J., Curci, F., Coenen, G.C.M., Termorshuizen, A.J. & Hamelers, H.V.M. 2005. Improving quality of com- posted biowaste to enhance disease suppressiveness of compost-amended, peat-based potting mixes. Soil Biology and Biochem- istry 37: 2131–2140. Vestberg, M., Kukkonen, S., Rantala, S., Prochazka, P., Tuohimetsä, S., Setälä, H., Romantschuk, M., Kurola, J. & Yu, D. 2011. Sup- pressiveness of Finnish commercial compost against soil borne disease. Acta Horticulturae 891: 59–65. Vuorinen, J. & Mäkitie, O. 1955. The method of soil testing in use in Finland. Agrogeological Publications. 63:1–44. Widmer, T.L., Graham, J.H. & Mitchell, D.J. 1998. Composted municipal waste reduces infection of citrus seedlings by Phytoph- thora nicotianae. Plant Disease 82: 683–688. Wolffhechel, H. 1988. The suppressiveness of Sphagnum peat to Pythium spp. Acta Horticulturae. 221: 217–222. Reproducibility of suppression of Pythium wilt of cucumberby compost Introduction Material and methods Composts Chemical analyses Experimental set-up Plant growth and disease assessment Statistical analyses Results Compost properties Suppressiveness against Pythium wilt Discussion Conclusions Acknowledgements References