AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND, Vol.9,No.1, p.3 –16 Effect of feeding level and diet type on the performance of crossbred suckler cows and their calves AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Merja Manninen Ilmo Aronen Harri Huhta Photos: Merja Manninen International journal of agriculture and food science Vol. 9, No. 1, p. 3–16 ISSN 1457-3806 Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 3 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Vol. 9 (2000): 3–16. © Agricultural and Food Science in Finland Manuscript received May 1999 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Vol. 9 (2000): 3–16. Effect of feeding level and diet type on the performance of crossbred suckler cows and their calves Merja Manninen Agricultural Research Centre of Finland, Animal Production Research, FIN-31600 Jokioinen, Finland, e-mail: merja.manninen@mtt.fi Ilmo Aronen Agricultural Research Centre of Finland, Animal Production Research, FIN-31600 Jokioinen, Finland. Current address: Rehuraisio Ltd., PO Box 101, FIN-21201 Raisio, Finland Harri Huhta Agricultural Research Centre of Finland, Karelia Research Station, FIN-82600 Tohmajärvi, Finland. Current address: Agricultural Research Centre of Finland, Resource Management Research, Ecological Production, FIN-50100 Mikkeli, Finland A 2´2 factorial design experiment with 32 spring-calving Hereford-Ayrshire and 31 Lim- ousine-Ayrshire suckler cows was conducted to compare the effects of diets based on hay (H) or urea-treated straw (US) at two feeding levels (moderate; M and low; L) on the performance of cows and their calves. For feeding level L, the amount of feed was restrict- ed to 70% of that for feeding level M. Diet H was based on hay while for the US-diet, hay was replaced by urea-treated straw and barley (M:1.1 and L:0.8 kg dry matter, DM/day/ animal). Urea-solution was included in the H-diet to balance protein intake with respect to US-diets. Untreated straw was also offered on all diets. Feeding pre partum commenced by offering 1.0 kg/day of a barley-rapeseed meal mixture from day 60 to 30 and 1.5 kg/day from day 30 to 0 pre partum. Post partum cows received 3.0 kg/day of the same mixture. All cows were in calf to Charolais sires. During the mating period, cows were inseminated after oestrus synchronisation and subsequently exposed to a bull. Average daily intakes of the cows were on treatment MH 9.1 kg DM/day and 77.4 MJ metaboliz- able energy (ME), on treatment MUS 8.5 kg DM and 67.2 MJ ME, on treatment LH 6.9 kg DM and 58.9 MJ ME and on treatment LUS 6.7 kg DM and 53.7 MJ ME, respectively. Live weight gain (LWG) during the indoor feeding was lower (P<0.01) for cows on feeding level L than M. Cows fed US-based diets lost more (P<0.05) live weight (LW) during indoor feeding than those based on H-diets. Cows replenished LW losses at pasture and there were no differences in LW between treat- ments at the end of the grazing season. Imposed feeding treatments and the sex of the calf had no affect on the incidence of calving difficulty. There were no significant treatment effects on calf LWG or suckler cow milk production. During mating 69.3% of all experimental cows successfully conceived. The low level of feeding had no adverse affects on cow or calf health, but depressed mailto:merja.manninen@mtt.fi 4 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Manninen, M. et al. Effect of feeding level and diet type on performance of suckler cows reproductive performance. Cows replenished LW losses during the grazing period on suff icient good quality pasture. Urea-treated straw proved to be a suitable winter feed for spring calving suckler cows. Key words: beef cows, calves, conception rate, intake, plane of nutrition, milk production, straw, urea Introduction Feeding is the largest single cost in suckler cow production during the indoor feeding period. Due to geographical location the grazing period in southern Finland is at most only f ive months long. Therefore, the possibility to restrict the amount of winter feed without having detrimen- tal effects on cow or calf performance is essen- tial to reducing production costs and improving the prof itability of suckler beef production. The effect of a low plane of nutrition both pre and post partum has been widely reported and can potentially have a negative effect on the live weight of cows (Somerville et al. 1983), the incidence of calving diff iculty (Absher and Hobbs 1968), calf performance (Houghton et al. 1990), suckler cow milk production (Bartle et al. 1984) and conception rate (Holness et al. 1978, Somerville et al. 1979). The effect of feed restriction is usually dependent on the stage of pregnancy, age and breed of the cow, the extent and duration of feed restriction and, in cold or marginal circumstances, the climatic conditions during feed restriction. The major factor influ- encing the effect of feed restriction on the per- formance of suckler cows is however, their ini- tial condition score. Feeding of suckler cows during the indoor period is usually based on cheap, non-marketa- ble feeds such as timothy or cereal straws. Har- vesting straw in autumn is often diff icult due to inclement weather conditions. Thus, there is in- creased interest in preservation of straw using chemicals, the most popular of which is urea due to a low cost, convenience and safety (Ørskov et al. 1983, Williams et al. 1984, Block et al. 1989). Alaspää (1986) suggested that the pro- tection of high moisture straw against mould is the most important function of ammonia-based treatments including urea, whereas the effects of urea treatment on diet digestibility have been moderate (Alaspää 1986, Aronen 1990). The possibility to increase nitrogen content of straw with inexpensive urea treatment is also a poten- tial benef it. The purpose of the present experiment was to study the effects of replacing hay with urea- treated straw and barley at two different feeding levels from the middle of November until the start of grazing at the end of May on the per- formance of crossbred cows and their calves. Live weight changes of cows and calves, feed intake, milk production, calving diff iculty and conception rate are also discussed. Material and methods Animals and experimental design Thirty-two Hereford-Ayrshire (HfAy) -cows 31 months of age and initial live weight (LW) on 16 November of 498 kg and 31 Limousin-Ayr- shire (LiAy) -cows 30 months of age and initial LW of 487 kg were used in the current study. Experimental animals consisted of 54 second calving cows and 9 f irst calving cows, all of which were the same age. All cows were in calf to Charolais (Ch) sires. The experiment com- menced on 17 November. At calving, cows were on average 36 months old. Four experimental treatments were evaluated according to a 2∞2 factorial design and consisted of two feeding levels (low, L; moderate, M) and two diets (hay- 5 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Vol. 9 (2000): 3–16. based, H; urea-treated straw -based, US). Ani- mals were group-fed, once daily in the morning with eight animals per pen and two pens per treatment. All treatment groups contained an equal number of cows from each breed. The ex- periment consisted of two main parts, an indoor feeding period averaging 203 days and a graz- ing period averaging 106 days. The facilities in the barn have previously been described (Man- ninen et al. 1998). The grazing season commenced on 24 May. A meadow fescue-timothy (Festuca pratensis- Phleum pratense) pasture of approximately 40 hectares was continously grazed by cows and calves. Cows had free access to water and dur- ing grazing the only supplement was a mineral mixture rich in magnesium. The grazing season ended on 20 September and calves were weaned on 19 October. Calves were creep-fed milled barley from 14 August until weaning in order to facilitate adaptation to the post weaning diet. During the four week indoor period prior to weaning calves had free access to milled barley, hay and timothy straw. At this time cows had ad libitum access to hay and timothy straw. Feeds, feeding and feed sampling Meadow fescue-timothy hay was harvested at the end of June and at the beginning of July, dried in the swath and baled. Field-dried barley and oat straw was harvested during the two last weeks of August and the f irst week of Septem- ber and baled. Baling and treatment with the urea-solution was carried out simultaneously. The estimated dry matter (DM) content of straw was 600–750 g/kg when treated. The urea-solu- tion was prepared using 100 kg fertilizer grade urea dissolved in 150 litres of hot water. Urea was applied at an average rate of 60 kg per tonne freshweight of straw during baling. After baling the urea-treated small bales were packed tightly in empty silage silos in a cold barn and covered with plastic. Feed intake was recorded by group weigh- ing of offered and refused feeds on a daily ba- sis. On the MH-diet feed was offered to cows according to Finnish recommendations (Ojala 1987) that are based on those for dry dairy cows (Salo et al. 1982) documented as LW3/4/5003/4 ∞ 4.0 fattening feed units (FFU) for maintenance and 0.4 FFU/kg fat corrected milk for milk pro- duction. The average LW of cows at the start of the experiment and estimated energy and pro- tein values of experimental feeds were taken into consideration. For L-diets, the amount of feed was restricted to 70% on a DM basis of that of M-diets. On H-diets, feeding was based on hay, while for US-diets, hay was replaced by urea- treated straw and barley. The DM intake from hay and urea-treated straw was estimated to be equal for both diets at each feeding level. Bar- ley was included in US-diets (M:1.10 and L:0.80 kg DM/day/animal) to balance energy intake with respect to H-diets. A urea-solution (M:45.0 and L:31.5 g urea/day/animal) was given to cows on the H-diets to balance crude protein intake with respect to US-diets. In addition, untreated straw was offered for all diets (M:2.50 and L:1.97 kg DM/day/animal). The pre partum con- centrate feeding to all cows commenced by of- fering 1.0 kg/day of a barley-rapeseed meal (ÖPEX®-rapeseed meal, heat-moisture treated) mixture (70:30) from day 60 to 30 and 1.5 kg/ day from day 30 to 0 pre partum. After calving, cows received 3.0 kg/day of the same concen- trate mixture. During the indoor feeding period animals had free access to a mineral mixture rich in phosphorus (Fosfori-Hertta; Ca 145, P 115, NaCl 110, Na 55, Mg 35 g/kg), a salt lick and water. A vitamin mixture was given weekly at a rate of 50 g per cow. Two weeks before calving all cows were injected with an ADE-vitamin mixture and Selenium. Feed sampling and calculation of energy and protein values for feeds other than urea-treated straw was conducted according to Manninen et al. (1998). Chemical composition of urea-treat- ed straw was determined using standard proce- dures, while digestibility coeff icients used for urea-treated straw were based on the studies of 6 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Manninen, M. et al. Effect of feeding level and diet type on performance of suckler cows Aronen (1990). Digestibility coeff icients of urea-treated straw for protein, ether extract, crude f iber and nitrogen free extract used in the cur rent study were 0.401, 0.475, 0.519 and 0.489, respectively and the calculated D-value was 47.7%. The DM content of urea-treated straw was determined by oven drying at 105°C for 24 hours and corrected for volatile losses ac- cording to Huida et al. (1986). Fresh samples of urea- treated straw were analyzed for pH, volatile fatty acids, ammonia nitrogen (N), soluble and t o t a l N u s i n g t h e m e t h o d s d e s c r i b e d by M a n n i n e n e t a l . ( 1 9 9 8 ) . To avo i d a miscalculation of amino acids absorbed in the small intestine (AAT, g/kg DM) and protein balance in the rumen (PBV, g/kg DM) values assigned to urea-treated straw, the crude protein concentration of untreated straw offered at the same period of time during the experiment weeks was used to calculate degradable protein content o f u r e a - t r e a t e d s t r aw. D i g e s t i bl e c r u d e carbohydrate values for urea-treated straw were calculated by using crude f ibre content and digestibility of urea-treated straw and nitrogen free extract content and digestibility of untreated straw offered at the same period of time. Live-weight and calving difficulties Cows were weighed at the beginning of the ex- periment, 1–7 days pre partum, within 48 hours after parturition, at the beginning and end of the grazing season and at weaning. All information for one LiAy cow on the MUS-feeding was omit- ted from the f inal data due to an abortion two months after the start of the experiment. Calves were weighed immediately after birth, at 14 and 100 days of age, at the beginning and end of grazing and at weaning. One HfAy-cow gave birth to twins one of which was immediately given to a dam who lost her calf in an accident before turnout. All information concerning twin calves was excluded from the f inal data. One LiAy-cow abandoned her calf after birth and only the birth weight of this calf is included in the data. All the calvings were monitored and assistance was given if calving was prolonged. T h e i n c i d e n c e o f c a l v i n g d i ff i c u l t i e s wa s recorded using the following classif ication scale: easy calving with no assistance (1), calving with a slight assistance (2), diff icult calving (3) and ver y diff icult calving requiring veterinarian assistance or caesarean section (4). Milk production and rebreeding Milk production was assessed for six cows from each treatment group using the calf-suckling technique previously described by Manninen et al. (1998). Milk yield was measured on days 10, 50, 95 and 140 of lactation. At pasture an oe- strus synchronisation procedure was carried out using PRID® (Progesterone Releasing Intravag- inal Device, ABBOTT Laboratories) with 59 cows. Cows were subdivided into three groups according to calving date. Group 1 included 16 cows with PRID-coils being placed 24 May, re- moved 4 June and cows were inseminated using a double-f ixed-time artif icial insemination (AI) with Hereford-semen 6 and 7 June. Group 2 also included 16 cows, with the PRID-coils being placed 21 June, removed 3 July and cows were inseminated 5 and 6 July. Group 3 included 27 cows, the PRID-coils being placed 19, removed 31 July and cows were inseminated 2 and 3 Au- gust. A Hereford-bull ran with the cows after in- semination from 6 August to 6 September. Pregnancy diagnosis was conducted on 1 Octo- ber. Statistical analysis The GLM procedure of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS 1989) was used for analysis of variance. Animals were in pens with eight ani- mals per pen and two pens per treatment. Pen was used as an experimental unit (Gill 1989). Individual cow and calf data was used for test- ing cow and calf performance and milk produc- tion. Feed intake data was not statistically eval- uated due to f ixed experimental feeding regi- 7 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Vol. 9 (2000): 3–16. mens. Data for cows was analysed according to the following model y ijkl = µ + b i + d j + bd ij + p k (bd ij ) + ε ijkl where y ijkl is the response variable, µ is the general mean, b i is the feeding level, d j is the diet, bd ij is their interaction, p k is a random ef- fect due to the pen within treatment and ε ijkl is the random er ror ter m. In the analysis, the p k (bd ij ) term with four degrees of freedom has been used as an error term. Data for the calves was analysed using the same model with the exception that the effect of sex (s m ) and interactions between sex and feed- ing level, sex and diet, and sex, feeding level and diet were included. In this analysis, the p k (bds ijm ) term with eight degrees of freedom has been used as an error term. Calf birth date was used as a covariate in the analysis of variance when interpreting calf performance data. Standard error of estimate (SEE) was used to interpret calf data due to the variable number of observations per treatment. Results Chemical composition of feeds and feed intake Treatment of straw with the urea-solution suc- ceeded technically well and increased the crude protein content from 38 to 98 g/kg DM (Tab- le 1). Calculated energy and AAT values of urea- treated straw were little different than the corre- sponding values for untreated straw, except for the PBV value of urea-treated straw which was higher than that of the untreated straw (5 vs. – 56 g/kg DM). Hay, barley and rapeseed meal had a chemical composition typical for each feed in- credient. During the indoor feeding cows on the H- diet consumed numerically more DM/day than those on the US-diet (mean: H: 8.03 vs. US: 7.61 kg DM, Table 2). This was due to an overesti- mation of the DM content of urea-treated straw based on preliminary samples. In addition, on Table 1. Chemical composition and feeding value of experimental feeds. Hay Urea-treated Straw Barley Rapeseed Urea straw meal Number of samples 8 8 8 8 5 1 Chemical composition Dry matter (DM, g/kg) 867 654 875 862 881 1000 In the DM Ash 42 35 35 22 74 Crude protein 82 98 38 129 374 288 Ether extract 17 15 13 22 73 Crude fibre 360 459 474 50 133 Nitrogen free extract 499 393 440 777 346 Feed value (/kg DM) ME, MJ 9.0 6.7 6.3 13.6 11.8 AAT, g 75 56 55 107 152 PBV, g –46 5 –56 –46 141 2880 ME, metabolizable energy AAT, amino acids absorbed in the small intestine PBV, protein balance in the rumen In urea-treated straw: pH 8.46 In DM (g/kg); acetic acid 14 In total nitrogen (g/kg): ammonia N 372, soluble N 766, urea N 272 8 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Manninen, M. et al. Effect of feeding level and diet type on performance of suckler cows several cold days cows fed the US-diet did not consume all of the urea-treated straw offered since it was partially frozen. The proportion of hay accounted for 59.6% and the proportion of urea-treated straw 46.1% of the total DM intake for H- and US-diets, respectively. On the US- diet, the intake of DM and ME was 5.2% and 11.3% lower than that of the H-diet, respective- ly. The DM intake on the L feeding level was 77.4% of that on the M feeding level. The in- take of ME supplied by MUS, LH and LUS di- ets accounted for 86.9%, 76.1% and 69.4% of that supplied by the MH-diet. Live weight of cows and calving difficulties The live weight gain (LWG) from the start of the experiment to calving was higher (P<0.01) for cows fed the H-diet than for those fed the US-diet (Table 3). During this period cows on the M feeding level had higher (P<0.01) LWG than those on the L feeding level. Cows on the US-diet were 32 kg lighter (P<0.01) pre partum than those on the H-diet and cows on the L feed- ing level were 24 kg lighter (P<0.05) pre par- tum than those on the M level of feeding. Both post partum and at the beginning of grazing sea- son, cows fed either the H-diet or M feeding lev- els were heavier (P<0.05) than those fed US-di- ets or on the L feeding level. An interaction (P<0.05) in the LWG from calving to start of grazing between diet and feeding level was ob- served. On the LH-diet, cows lost more LW than those on the LUS-diet (–584 vs.–358 g/day) while the opposite occured on the M diets (295 vs. –239 g/day). At pasture, cows on the L feed- ing level had a daily LWG of 828 g, which was 295 g higher (P<0.05) than for those previously fed the M feeding level. Also the daily LWG of 770 g at pasture for cows previously offered the US-diet tended (P<0.10) to be higher than that of 590 g observed for cows previously fed the H-diet. Cow diet, feeding level or sex of the calf had no affect on the incidence of calving diff i- culty (Table 4). One calving was classif ied as diff icult and may have resulted from the small size of the dam, with a pre-calving LW of 366 kg. Nine calvings (14.5%) required slight assist- Table 2. Mean daily intake of dry matter (DM), energy (metabolizable energy, ME), amino acids absorbed in the small intestine (AAT) and protein balance in the rumen (PBV) of crossbred cows during indoor feeding. Feeding level Low Moderate Diet type Hay Urea-treated Hay Urea-treated straw straw Number of groups 2 2 2 2 DM intake, kg Hay 3.95 5.63 Straw 1.97 1.98 2.50 2.49 Urea-treated straw 3.01 4.02 Barley 0.58 1.34 0.58 1.62 Rapeseed meal 0.25 0.24 0.25 0.22 Urea 0.0315 0.045 Minerals 0.153 0.148 0.123 0.164 Total 6.94 6.72 9.13 8.51 ME 58.9 53.7 77.4 67.2 AAT 506 457 661 568 PBV –166 –91 –234 –138 9 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Vol. 9 (2000): 3–16. ance and the remainder of the calvings were clas- sif ied as easy. Live weight of calves No interactions in calf LW and LWG between feeding level, diet and sex were observed and therefore, only least squares means for the main effects are presented in Table 4. Feeding level and diet had no affect on the LW or LWG of calves. At 100 days of age and at the end of graz- ing season, male calves were heavier (P<0.05) than females. There were no signif icant differ- ences between diets and feeding levels in LWG from birth to weaning but male calves grew fast- er (P<0.05) than females (1368 vs. 1282 g/day). Intake of barley creep-feed by calves was on average 0.44 kg/day at pasture and 0.54 kg/day indoors prior to weaning. Milk production and conception rate Cow diet or feeding level had no affect on milk production which averaged 9.1 kg and 9.3 kg for L and M feeding levels and 9.6 kg and 8.8 kg for US- and H-diets, respectively (Table 5). On day 50 of lactation, cows on the US-diet tend- ed to produce more (P<0.10) milk than those on the H-diet. On day 140 of lactation there was an interaction (P<0.10) between feeding level and diet. Cows on the LH-diet produced more milk than those on the LUS-diet while the opposite was true for the M feeding level. During the mating period, 71% of cows on the L feeding level and 68% of those on the M feeding level successfully conceived. The corresponding val- ues for the H- and US-diets were 72% and 67%, respectively. Forty percent of experimental cows were in calf following double f ixed time AI, 29% after natural service and 31% remained non- pregnant. Table 3. Live weight (LW) and live weight gain (LWG) of cows during indoor feeding and grazing. Feeding level Low Moderate Statistical significance1 Diet type Hay Urea-treated Hay Urea-treated SEM2 Feeding Diet Inter- straw straw level type action Number of cows 16 16 16 15¤ LW, kg Initial 495 498 492 487 7.1 NS NS NS Pre-partum 539 508 563 531 6.3 * ** NS Post-partum 478 446 501 475 8.7 * * NS Beginning of grazing 467 440 505 472 7.7 * * NS End of grazing 546 536 551 537 16.4 NS NS NS Weaning 546 534 551 536 13.0 NS NS NS LWG, g/day Start ∅ Calving 246 46 409 239 33.9 ** ** NS Calving ∅ Grazing –584 –358 295 –239 118.4 * NS * Start ∅ Grazing –140 –296 64 –74 39.0 ** * NS On pasture 757 898 424 643 76.7 * o NS Start ∅ End of Grazing 167 123 192 162 39.7 NS NS NS 1 o P<0.10; * P<0.05; ** P<0.01; *** P<0.001; NS not significant. 2 Standard Error of the Mean. ¤ Mean was based on 15 (Moderate – Urea-treated straw) rather than 16 observations. SEM given should be multiplied by 1.0351 when making comparisions with other mean values. 10 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Manninen, M. et al. Effect of feeding level and diet type on performance of suckler cows Discussion Feeds and feed intake The health of cows and calves was good. The temperature during the indoor feeding period was lowest during the middle of January when indoor temperatures of –23°C were recorded. The effect of urea-treatment is based on the hy- drolysis of urea to ammonia which prevents the growth of fungi and undesirable bacteria such as Clostridia (Block et al. 1989). Earlier studies (Alaspää 1986, Aronen 1990) have shown that the treatment of straw with an urea-solution is an economical and practical method to preserve high moisture straw against mould. Treated straw and grass silage are usually not combined in dairy cow diets due to a surplus of nitrogen in silage and the low energy content of straw. Di- ets for beef cows typically contain only small amounts of grass silage and therefore, treated straw can be considered to be a suitable feed- stuff for beef production. Although the treatment and storage of straw was successful, the calculated feeding value of the urea-treated straw was not equal to hay. Alaspää (1986) reported an organic matter (OM) digestibility for urea-treated straw of 517 g/kg OM but the crude protein (CP) and DM content were higher relative to values observed in the current study. The moisture content of straw at the time of treatment, storage time and in the concentration of applied urea, influence the hy- drolysis of urea to ammonia that has a direct ef- fect on the eff icacy of urea treatment (Sundstol Table 4. Effect of diet type, feeding level and sex on calving difficulty and calf performance. Statistical significance Diet type Feeding level Sex of the main effects1 Hay Urea-treated Low Moderate Male Female SEE2 Diet Feeding Sex straw type level Number of calves3 31 31 31 31 28 24 Calving difficulty 1.11 1.19 1.21 1.09 1.16 1.15 0.312 NS NS NS Average calving date4 123 134 127 129 128 128 29.2 NS NS NS Live weight, kg Birth 42.3 41.3 41.6 42.1 43.1 40.6 4.30 NS NS o Day 14 59.9 57.7 58.2 59.4 60.5 57.2 5.27 NS NS o Day 100 172 177 174 175 180 170 10.4 NS NS * Day 161 252 257 253 257 263 247 13.9 NS NS ** Start of grazing 76.9 69.0 72.4 73.5 75.3 70.6 15.49 NS NS NS End of grazing 225 231 227 229 236 220 18.8 NS NS * Weaning 252 257 252 257 263 246 15.5 NS NS ** Weaning age, days 169 157 165 162 164 163 27.7 NS NS NS Live weight gain, g/day Birth ∅ grazing 1241 1156 1175 1222 1217 1181 214.0 NS NS NS On pasture 1411 1505 1459 1458 1510 1407 168.5 NS NS o Birth ∅ weaning 1305 1344 1311 1339 1368 1282 91.9 NS NS * 1 o P<0.10; * P<0.05; ** P<0.01; *** P<0.001; NS not significant. 2 Standard Error of the Estimate. 3 One female calf on low level-hay diet has only values for calving difficulty and birth weight. One female calf on high level-urea-treated straw diet has only values for calving difficulty, birth weight and 14-day weight. 4 Day 1 = 1 January. 11 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Vol. 9 (2000): 3–16. and Coxworth 1984). At baling, the estimated DM content of straw was between 600 and 750 g/kg which is in good agreement with practical recommendations (500–750 g/kg). In contrast to the study of Alaspää (1986), moulding was not a problem in the current study. During the f irst weeks of the experiment freezing of urea- treated straw was problematic but, however, was eliminated by incubating bales in warm techni- cal storage the day before feeding. Theoretical- ly, the CP content of the urea-treated straw should have exceeded 200 g/kg DM rather than the recorded value of 98 g/kg DM. This appar- ent discrepancy may be explained by evapora- tion of urea as gaseous ammonia during baling and storage which Sundstol and Cox wor th (1984) reported to be the greatest disadvantage of ammonia-based treatments. On the M feeding level for both diets, me- tabolizable energy (ME) and AAT intakes ex- ceeded the Finnish maintenance requirements of non-lactating dairy cows (Tuori et al. 1996). Crosses such as HfAy and LiAy in this experi- ment at second calving are still immature and h ave e n e rg y a n d p r o t e i n r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r growth. The AAT recommendation for mainte- nance is 3.25 g LW 0.75 for dairy cows which provides 344 g AAT/500 kg LW. The calculat- ed PBV for each treatment was considerably lower than zero which may reflect on imbal- ance between the availability of nitrogen and digestible carbohydrates for microbial protein synthesis in the rumen. On the other hand, the high AAT intake and low PBV may be due to an underestimation of protein degradability for the different feeds. On the US-diet the less neg- ative PBV value compared to the value of the H-diet (–114 vs. –200 g/day) was due to urea which is easily degraded in the rumen. In this experiment the negative PBV value, if truly rep- resentative, had no affect on animal perform- ance. Although barley was used as an energy supplement on the US-diet, the calculated en- ergy intake remained below the energy intake of cows fed the H-diet. The CP content of urea- treated straw was overestimated at the begin- ning of the experiment which resulted in a high- er CP intake for the H-diet as a result of addi- tional urea supplementation. Live weight of the cows Although the grazing period was only 106 days, cows successfully replenished the winter LW losses on good pasture. The importance of ad- equate good quality grass for grazing must be emphasized, particularly in Finnish circum- stances with a long indoor feeding period, pro- Table 5. Effect of feeding level and diet type on milk production (kg/day). Feeding level Low Moderate Statistical significance1 Diet type Hay Urea-treated Hay Urea-treated SEM2 Feeding Diet Inter- straw straw level type action Number of animals 6 6 6 6 Day of lactation 10 8.6 7.8 9.0 8.2 0.75 NS NS NS 50 9.9 12.6 9.2 11.1 0.96 NS o NS 95 9.7 9.8 10.7 10.0 0.94 NS NS NS 140 7.7 7.2 5.9 10.1 0.91 NS NS o Mean 9.0 9.3 8.7 9.8 0.68 NS NS NS 1 o P<0.10; * P<0.05; ** P<0.01; *** P<0.001; NS not significant. 2 Standard Error of the Mean. 12 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Manninen, M. et al. Effect of feeding level and diet type on performance of suckler cows ducing young, high-producing animals fed at a restricted feeding level during winter. This suggestion is suppor ted by Drennan (1991) who reported that severe winter feed restriction could not be tolerated when available pasture is limited during spring. With good quality and adequate supplies of grass, growing crossbred cows can rapidly increase their intake capasity leading to accretion of LW even during a short grazing period (Petit et al. 1995). Probably at the end of the indoor feeding period, cows on the LUS feeding had fewer body reserves to mobilize than those fed the LH-diet or receiv- ing the M feeding level. On the MH-diet, LWG during the entire experiment was 59 kg but only 36 kg for the LUS-diet. Such a difference in LW may affect subsequent reproductive per- formance, although this was not assessed in the current study. The plane of nutrition during the subsequent indoor feeding period may have to be increased for cows previously overwintered a lower plane of nutrition, such as diet LUS fed in the current study. Although the treatment of straw with urea is quite common, studies on the suitability of urea- treated straw for suckler cows are extremely lim- ited. In contrast to the results observed in this experiment, Turner et al. (1983) reported that LW losses during the indoor feeding were accepta- ble during pregnancy indicating that ammonia- treated barley or wheat straw with adequate min- eral supplementation may provide suff icient nu- trient intake to meet the requirements of preg- nant suckler cows. In the present experiment 1 kg of barley was given daily to cows as an en- ergy supplement on the US-diet from the begin- ning of the experiment but it was apparently in- suff icient to provide a total energy intake simi- lar to that cows fed the H-diet. The energy con- tent of urea-treated straw may have been lower than expected or the energy content of hay may have been underestimated. However, the use of urea-treated straw for immature, cross-bred suckler cows at a low feeding level may have longer term effects on cow performance and re- production eff iciency which were not measured in the current study. Calving difficulties and live weight of calves The treatments imposed had no affect on the in- cidence of calving diff iculty and no cow even on M feeding level was obese pre partum. The low liveweight gains of the cows during preg- nancy may explain the high number of easy calv- ings. It may be possible that the condition of the cows, although not measured, had an important effect on the easiness of the calvings in this ex- periment. Alternatively these f indings may be explained by the use of sires which result in a low incidence of diff icult calvings. High calf losses at or shortly after birth result in a major reduction in the subsequent calf crop. Most calf losses result from dystocia which is caused by disproportionate calf and dam sizes. Studies with different pre partum feeding levels (Corah et al. 1975, Drennan and Bath 1976a) have indicated that in many cases a high pre partum feeding level does not result in a higher incidence of calving diff iculties than a low pre par tum feeding level. Suckler cows fed ammonia- treated-straw (Turner et al. 1983) has been shown to calve normally which is consistent with the current data. Feeding level had no affect on the LW of calves in the current experiment, which is in agreement with the f indings of Absher and Hobbs (1968), Drennan and Bath (1976b), Nicol (1977) and Baker et al. (1982). However, in many studies (Hight 1968, Tudor 1972, Hodgson et al. 1980, Houghton et al. 1990) either a low pre or post partum feeding level of the dam has reduced the LWG of calves pre-weaning. Hight (1968) reported that calves from cows offered a low plane (small paddocks, previously grazed with sheep) of nutrition were 22% lighter at birth than those from cows fed at a higher plane of n u t r i t i o n ( a u t u m n - s av e d p a s t u r e , h ay t o appetite). Hodgson et al. (1980) observed that calves from cows receiving a low plane of nutrition (from calving until grazing hay for maintenance and concentrate suff icient for 2.25 kg milk) grew more slowly and were lighter at 13 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Vol. 9 (2000): 3–16. turn-out than those from cows with a higher nutrient intake (from calving until grazing hay for maintenance and concentrate suff icient for 9.00 kg milk) but the f inal calf LW was not signif icantly different. Tur ner et al. (1983) r e p o r t e d t h a t t r e a t e d s t r aw p l u s m i n e r a l s provided suff icient nutrient intake for mature suckler cows based on calf birth weights and subsequent calf performance. In the cur rent study, LW of calves at 161-days of age was similar for all heifers and bulls, and the small differences observed between treatments are of minor or no practical importance. Milk production and conception rate In accordance with the f indings of the current experiment are consistent with other reports (Baker and Barker 1976, Drennan and Bath 1 9 7 6 a , R u s s e l e t a l . 1 9 7 9 ) t h a t h ave demonstrated that a low plane of nutrition ei- ther pre or post partum has no effect on the milk yield of suckler cows. However, in other studies a low plane of nutrition has been associated with a decrease in suckler cow milk yield (Nicol 1977, Chestnutt 1980, Hodgson et al. 1980, Petit and Micol 1981, Baker et al. 1982, Bartle et al. 1984). Baker et al. (1982) reported that a low plane of nutrition during the f irst 8 weeks of lactation reduced milk energy secretion and milk protein concentration, but Lowman et al. (1979) did not f ind any effect of plane of nutrition during the f irst 150 days of lactation on milk composition. Information concerning the effect of treated straw on the milk production of suckler cows is limited. The observed signif icant i n t e r a c t i o n i n m i l k p r o d u c t i o n b e t we e n treatments on day 140 of lactation may due to t h e o b s e r v e d va l u e o f 2 kg/d of cow on the MH feeding. In an experi- ment with mature May-calving suckler cows, Turner et al. (1983) found that ammonia-treated barley or wheat straw plus small amount of con- centrete as winter feed for cows had no influ- ence on calf birth weight and calf performance. Somerville et al. (1983) suggested that energy- def icient beef cows will attempt to maintain milk production at the expence of body reserves. The situation may be more critical in the case of crossbred, high-producing, young suckler cows that are still growing. Rebreeding suckler cows within 90 days post partum is economically important. In the present experiment only 69.4% of the cows were preg- nant. The low conception rate may have result- ed from oestrus synchronisation followed by double f ixed-time AI and an attempt to insemi- nate the repeats due to practical diff iculties to adequately detect oestrus with nearly invisible signs. The type of diet offered or feeding level had no affect on conception rate. A further pos- sible explanation for poor reproductive eff icien- cy may be related to the LW of cows at the be- ginning of the experiment. Cows may have lost too much condition between calving and mating in an attempt to maintain a relatively high milk yield. Osoro and Wright (1992) and Richards et al. (1986) suggested that body condition at calv- ing is the most signif icant factor affecting re- productive performance. Hight (1968), Holness et al. (1978) and Somerville et al. (1979) report- ed reproductive failure in cows fed a low plane of nutrition which is in disagreement with the studies of Baker et al. (1982) and Drennan and Bath (1976a). According to Somerville et al. (1979) reproductive failure is most common in cows which have calved late during the calving period and were offered a low plane of nutri- tion. Conclusions Urea-treated straw proved to be suitable winter feed for suckler cows. The main observation in the present study was the ability of the cows to replenish LW losses during a relatively short grazing period, and that the restricted levels of feeding still permitted a gain in LW during the 12 month feeding period. With a low plane of nutrition during indoor housing it is essential to 14 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Manninen, M. et al. Effect of feeding level and diet type on performance of suckler cows have adequate amounts of pasture to facilitate a recovery of LW losses occured during winter housing. In the current study the low level of feeding had no negative effects on cow or calf health but reproductive eff iciency was poor. Condition scoring should used in further studies to provide a more accurate measure of suckler cow body reserves. Acknowledgements. The authors are grateful to Mr Helge Laamanen and his staff for their technical assistance during the experiment. The assistance of Lic Vet Med Juha Hurmalainen for cooperation with oestrus synchronisation of experimental animals is appreciated. Professor Pekka Huhtanen and Dr Seija Jaakkola are also acknowledged for their valuable comments and criticism of the current manuscript. References Absher, C.W. & Hobbs, C.S. 1968. Pre-calving level of energy in first calf heifers. Journal of Animal Sci- ence 27: 1130. Alaspää, M. 1986. Treatment of straw with ammonia, urea or a urea + ureaphosphate mixture: effect on dietary intake and growth of young ayrshire bulls raised for beef. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae 25: 91–97. Aronen, I. 1990. The effect of urea treatment and am- moniation on the nutritive value of oat straw. Annal- es Agriculturae Fenniae 29: 107–112. Baker, R.D. & Barker, J.M. 1976. Effect of plane of nutri- tion in early lactation on suckler cow and calf per- formance. Animal Production 22: 141. –, Le Du, Y.L.P. & Barker, J.M. 1982. The influence of winter nutrition, grazing system and stocking rate on the performance of spring-calving Hereford-Frie- sian cows and their calves. 1. Winter nutrition. Animal Production 34: 213–224. Bartle, S.J., Males, J.R. & Preston, R.L. 1984. Effect of energy intake on the postpar tum interval in beef cows and the adequacy of the cow’s milk production for calf growth. Journal of Animal Science 58: 1068– 1074. Block, H.-J., Weissbach, F. & Schmidt, L. 1989. Improv- ing the feeding value of straw by urea treatment. Symposium on developments in the use of new and non-conventional feeds in ruminant nutrition. Gene- va, 16–20 January 1989. Economic Commission for Europe. Chestnutt, D.M.B. 1980. Effect of weight gain at pasture on performance of autumn-calving single suckler cows. Animal Production 30: 450. Corah, L.R., Dunn, T.G. & Kaltenbach, C.C. 1975. Influ- ence of pre partum nutrition on the reproductive per- formance of beef females and the performance of their progeny. Journal of Animal Science 41: 819– 824. Drennan, M.J. 1991. Effect of cow breed type and winter feeding level on cow and calf performance. Proceed- ings of the suckler cow workers’ meeting. Liscombe EHF, UK. 6 p. – & Bath, I.H. 1976a. Single-suckled beef production. 3. Effect of plane of nutrition during late pregnancy on cow performance. Irish Journal of Agricultural Re- search 15: 157–168. – & Bath, I.H. 1976b. Single-suckled beef production. 4. Effect of plane of nutrition during late pregnancy on subsequent calf performance. Irish Journal of Ag- ricultural Research 15: 169–176. Gill, J.L. 1989. Statistical aspects of design and analy- sis of experiments with animals in pens. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 106: 321–334. Hight, G.K. 1968. Plane of nutrition effects in late preg- nancy and during lactation on beef cows and their calves to weaning. New Zealand Journal of Agricul- tural Research 11: 71–84. Hodgson, J., Peart, J.N., Russel, A.J.F., Whitelaw, A. & MacDonald, A.J. 1980. The influence of nutrition in early lactation on the performance of spring-calving suckler cows and their calves. Animal Production 30: 315–325. Holness, D.H., Hopley, J.D.H. & Hale, D.H. 1978. The effects of plane of nutrition, live weight, temporary weaning and breed on the occurrence of oestrus in beef cows during the post-partum period. Animal Production 26: 47–54. Houghton, P.L., Lemenager, R.P., Horstman, L.A., Hen- drix, K.S. & Moss, G.E. 1990. Effects of body com- position, pre- and post partum energy level and early weaning on reproductive performance of beef cows and preweaning calf gain. Journal of Animal Science 68: 1438–1446. Huida, L., Väätäinen, H. & Lampila, M. 1986. Compari- son of dry matter contents in grass silages as de- termined by oven drying and gas chromatographic water analysis. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae 25: 215–230. Lowman, B.G., Edwards, R.A., Somerville, S.H. & Jolly, G.M. 1979. The effect of plane of nutrition in early lactation on the performance of beef cows. Animal Production 29: 293–303. Manninen, M., Aronen, I., Puntila, M.-L., Heikkilä, R. & Jaakkola, S. 1998. Effect of type of forage offered and breed on performance of crossbred suckler heif- ers and their calves. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 7: 367–380. Nicol, A.M. 1977. The influence of plane of nutrition im- mediately post-calving on the performance of beef cows. Proceeding of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 37: 103–108. 15 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Vol. 9 (2000): 3–16. Ojala, M. 1987. Ravinnontarve ja ruokinta. In: Lihakar- jan kasvatus. 1st ed. Otava. p. 47–75. Ørskov, E.R., Reid, G.W. Holland, S.M., Tait, C.A.G. & Lee, N.H. 1983. The feeding value for ruminants of straw and whole-crop barley and oats treated with anhydrous or aqueous ammonia or urea. Animal Feed Science and Technology 8: 247–257. Osoro, K. & Wright, I.A. 1992. The effect of body condi- tion, live weight, breed, age, calf performance, and calving date on reproductive performance of spring- calving beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 70: 1661–1666. Petit, M. & Micol, D. 1981. Evaluation of energy require- ments of beef cows during early lactation. Livestock Production Science 8: 139–153. –, Garel, J.-P., D’Hour, P. & Agabriel, J. 1995. The use of forages by the beef cow herd. In: Journet, M. et al. (eds.). Recent developments in the nutrition of herbivores. Proceedings of the IVth International Symposium on the Nutrition of Herbivores. p. 473– 496. INRA Editions, Paris. Richards, M.W., Spitzer, J.C. & Warner, M.B. 1986. Ef- fect of varying levels of postpartum nutrition and b o d y c o n d i t i o n a t c a l v i n g o n s u b s e q u e n t reproductive performance in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 62: 300–306. Russel, A.J.F., Peart, J.N., Eadie, J., MacDonald, A.J. & White, I.R. 1979. The effect of energy intake during late pregnancy on the production from two geno- types of suckler cow. Animal Production 28: 309– 327. Salo, M.-L., Tuori, M. & Kiiskinen, T. 1982. Rehutaulukot ja ruokintanormit. Helsinki. 70 p. SAS 1989. SAS/STAT. User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C., USA. Somerville, S.H., Lowman, B.G. & Deas, D.W. 1979. The effect of plane of nutrition during lactation on the reproductive performance of beef cows. The Veteri- nary Record 104: 95–97. –, Lowman, B.G., Edwards, R.A. & Jolly, G. 1983. A study of the relationship between plane of nutrition during lactation and certain production characteris- tics in autumn-calving suckler cows. Animal Produc- tion 37: 353–363. Sundstol, F. & Coxworth, E. M. 1984. Ammonia treat- ment. Straw and other fibrious by-products as feed. Chapter 7. Sundstol, F. & Owen, E. (eds.). Elsevier, Netherlands. p. 196–247. Tudor, G.D. 1972. The effect of pre- and post-natal nutri- tion on the growth of beef cattle. 1. The effect of nu- trition and parity of the dam on calf birth weight. Aus- tralian Journal of Agricultural Research 23: 389–395. Tuori, M., Kaustell, K., Valaja, J., Aimonen, E., Saari- salo, E. & Huhtanen, P. 1996. Rehutaulukot ja ruokin- tasuositukset. Helsinki, Yliopistopaino. 99 p. Turner, P.J., Perks, D.A. & MacLeod, J. 1983. Feeding ammonia-treated straws to suckler cows. Animal Pro- duction 36: 540. Williams, P.E.V., Innes, G.M. & Brewer, A. 1984. Ammo- nia treatment of straw via the hydrolysis of urea. I. Effects of dry matter and urea concentrations on the rate of hydrolysis of urea. Animal Feed Science and Technology 11: 103–113. SELOSTUS Ureoidun oljen soveltuvuus risteytysemojen talviruokintaan kahdella eri ruokintatasolla Merja Manninen, Ilmo Aronen ja Harri Huhta Maatalouden tutkimuskeskus Tutkimuksessa selvitettiin heinään (H; heinää 59,6 % kokonaiskuiva-aineen (KA) syönnistä, keskimäärin 4,8 kg KA/d) ja ureoituun olkeen perustuvan (US; ureoitua olkea 46,1 % kokonais-KA:n syönnistä, kes- kimäärin 3,5 kg KA/d) ruokinnan soveltuvuutta emo- lehmien talviruokintaan. US-ruokinnalla eläimet sai- vat ohraa 1 kg/d kokeen alusta lähtien. Kaikki eläi- met saivat käsittelemätöntä olkea sisäruokintakauden ajan ja ohra-rypsirouhe -seosta ennen ja jälkeen poi- kimisen. H-ruokinnalla eläinten valkuaisen saanti ta- sapainoitettiin US-ruokintaa vastaavaksi urealisällä. Hereford-ayrshire ja limousine-ayrshire -risteytys- emoilla seurattiin näiden ruokintojen vaikutuksia kahdella eri ruokintatasolla (M; keskinkertainen, L; matala) elopainon kehitykseen, poikimiseen, maidon- tuotantoon, tiinehtymiseen ja niiden Charolais-son- neista syntyneiden vasikoiden kehitykseen syntymäs- tä vieroitukseen. Heinän energiapitoisuus (ME; muuntokelpoinen energia, MJ) oli keskimäärin 9,0, ureoidun oljen 6,7, oljen 6,3, ohran 13,6 ja rypsirouheen 11,8 MJ ME/ kg KA. Ohutsuolesta imeytyvää valkuaista (OIV) heinä sisälsi keskimäärin 75, ureoitu olki 56, olki 55, ohra 107 ja rypsirouhe 152 g/kg KA. MUS-ruokin- 16 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Manninen, M. et al. Effect of feeding level and diet type on performance of suckler cows nalla eläinten kuiva-aineen syönti oli sisäruokinta- kaudella päivittäin keskimäärin 8,5 kg, LUS-ruokin- nalla 6,7 kg, MH-ruokinnalla 9,1 kg ja LH-ruokin- nalla 6,9 kg. M-tason ruokinnoilla kotimaiseen lyp- sylehmien ruokintasuosituksiin perustuva suositus energian ja OIV:n minimitarpeeksi täyttyi. Ureoidun oljen jäätyminen aiheutti ajoittain ongelmia, jotka poistuivat, kun ureaolkipaalit otettiin ennalta lämpiä- mään hyvin tuuletettuun tekniseen tilaan. L- tai US-ruokinnalla olleet emot menettivät elo- painoaan ennen poikimista enemmän (P<0,01) kuin M- tai H-ruokinnalla olleet emot, mutta kuntoutui- vat hyvällä laitumella tehokkaasti. L-ruokintatasolla o l l e e t e m o t k u n t o u t u iva t l a i t u m e l l a p a r e m m i n (P<0,05) kuin M-tasolla olleet emot (828 vs. 533 g/ d). Myös US-ruokinnalla olleiden emojen kuntoutu- minen laitumella oli parempaa (P<0,10) kuin H-ruo- kinnalla olleiden emojen (590 vs. 770 g/d). Laidun- kauden päättyessä eri käsittelyillä olleiden emojen elopainoissa ei ollut eroja. Koetekijät eivät vaikutta- neet poikimisiin eivätkä vasikoiden kehitykseen. Sonnivasikat kasvoivat ennen vieroitusta paremmin (P<0,05) kuin lehmävasikat (1368 vs. 1282 g). Koe- tekijät eivät vaikuttaneet päivittäiseen maitotuotok- seen, joka oli keskimäärin 9,2 kg. Ainoastaan 69,3 % emoista tiinehtyi, 40,3 % synkronoinnin jälkeiselle keinosiemennykselle ja 29,0 % sonnille. Koetekijät eivät vaikuttaneet tiinehtyvyyteen. Tutkimuksen perusteella vielä kasvavat ristey- tysemot pystyvät korvaamaan sisäruokintakauden ai- kana tulleet huomattavatkin elopainon menetykset hyvällä laitumella. Alempi ruokintataso ei aiheutta- nut emoille ja vasikoille ongelmia, mutta tiinehtymis- tulos oli heikko. Ureoitu olki soveltui risteytysemo- jen talvikauden rehuksi. Photos: Merja Manninen AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Title Introduction Material and methods Results Discussion Conclusions References SELOSTUS