Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 187 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Vol. 9 (2000): 187–200. © Agricultural and Food Science in Finland Manuscript received June 2000 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Vol. 9 (2000): 187–200. Feeding levels during the growing phase affect the production of primiparous Finnish Landrace ewes Riitta Sormunen-Cristian Agricultural Research Centre of Finland, Animal Production Research, FIN-31600 Jokioinen, Finland, e-mail: riitta.sormunen-cristian@mtt.fi Lauri Jauhiainen Agricultural Research Centre of Finland, Data and Information Services, FIN-31600 Jokioinen, Finland The effect of different feeding levels on the performance of primiparous ewes was studied in 31 Finnish Landrace ewes bred to lamb at the age of one year. Ewe lambs, initially weighing on average 19.2 kg (SEM 0.63), were placed on a low (L), standard (S) or high (H) level of feeding from 2 months of age to the end of mating and from 2 months pre-partum to the end of 8-week lactation. Changes in live weight were affected by the diet. During rearing, the ewe lambs on L diet gained significantly less (18.0 vs. 24.1 kg/lamb, P<0.0001) and they were also significantly lighter at mating than those on H diet (47.8 vs. 54.1 kg/lamb, P<0.01). Excluding ewe lambs on L diet, mating was successful. The highest litter size (4 lambs/ewe) occurred on H diet. Intensive feeding did not have a negative effect on milk yield. Ewes on S diet tended to produce the most milk, but the differences between diets were not significant. A high feeding level decreased the fat content, but its influence on the protein content of milk was small. It was suggested that replacement ewe lambs can be reared together with market lambs. The official Finnish feeding recommendations for sheep seemed to be unnecessarily high. Key words: ewe lamb, growth rate, milk composition, milk yield, nutrition, sheep Introduction Prepubertal female lambs have a period of ac- celerated mammary parenchymal growth ending at about 4 months of age (Anderson 1975). Dur- ing that critical period, high level of nutrition may inhibit the mammary parenchymal growth and reduce milk yield of ruminants at maturity (Gould and Whiteman 1975, Johnsson and Hart 1985, Foldager and Sejrsen 1991). Also too low level of nutrition before mating has had a nega- tive effect on the productivity of ewes (Kassem et al. 1989). In several studies, ewe lambs reared on a low level showed delayed onset of oestrus or totally failed to exhibit oestrus in the first year mailto:riitta.sormunen-cristian@mtt.fi 188 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Sormunen-Cristian, R. & Jauhiainen, L. Feeding levels during the growing phase of Finnish landrace ewes (Younis et al. 1978, Kassem et al. 1989). The delay has been associated with diets deficient in energy, protein or both. Typically, 18% of the spring-born ewe lambs in Finland are kept for replacement and 100% of these are bred to lamb as yearlings. In practice, all female and male lambs are reared together and fed intensively since no particular nutrient rec- ommendations are available for breeding lambs in Finland (Salo et al. 1990, Tuori et al. 1996). Thus, the productive performance of primiparous Finnish Landrace ewes is suspected to be low due to the negative effects of intensive feeding. As long as reproductive performance is not reduced, ewe lambs could remain with market lambs, which would reduce labour and space requirements, and also permit selection of replacement females when the animals are older and larger. The relationship between early ewe lamb nu- trition and subsequent productivity for primipa- rous and multiparous Finnish Landrace ewes lambing at the age of one year has not been re- ported earlier. Furthermore, there is little infor- mation on the milk yield and quality of ewes suckling in their first lactation. The present study was designed to evaluate the productive perform- ance of Finnish Landrace ewe lambs fed differ- ent dietary energy and protein levels from wean- ing through breeding and during late gestation and 8-week lactation. Material and methods Animals, their feeding and management Thirty-one pure-bred Finnish Landrace ewe lambs born between 8 and 20 March, and weaned at the age of 56 days were used in the experi- ment. The lambs were penned individually in- doors and they commenced the experiment after weaning in May. The basic management of un- weaned lambs and their dams has been described in detail by Sormunen-Cristian et al. (1997). The study was carried out at the Sheep Research Sta- tion of the Agricultural Research Centre of Fin- land in Jokioinen (60°54’N, 23°30’E, 107 m above sea level). From weaning to the age of 23 weeks ewe lambs were given a mixture of concentrates (bar- ley grain 77 –> 86% and soya bean meal 23 –> 14%) as follows: feeding group L (low level) 54 g dry matter (DM)/kg metabolic live weight (W0.75), feeding group S (standard level) 63 g DM/kgW0.75 and feeding group H (high level) 72 g DM/kgW0.75. Group L received 14% less and group H 14% more energy and protein in the concentrates than group S. Chopped hay made from timothy (Phleum pratense L.) – meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.) grass was giv- en ad libitum. Mineral mixture (Ca:P = 2:1), cal- cium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) and salt (NaCl) were added in the concentrates 20 g, 15 g and 10 g/ lamb/day, respectively. The ewe lambs complet- ed their growing test at the age of 23 weeks when the appropriate slaughter weight was reached. During the 10-week mating (16 Sep – 24 Nov), all ewe lambs received concentrates 70% (54 g DM/kgW0.75) of the total DM intake for combined maintenance and flushing (Salo et al. 1990). From concentrates, group L received 14% less and group H 14% more crude protein (CP) than group S. The amount of CP for groups L, S and H was 106, 123 and 140 g/fattening feed unit (FFU = 0.7 kg starch equivalent), respectively. During early gestation, all ewe lambs were fed similarly. Concentrate supplement (106 g CP in FFU) was offered at 500 grams/lamb/day. Dur- ing the last 2 months of pregnancy, ewe lambs on the L, S and H diets received concentrates (185 g CP/FFU) at levels of 500, 550 and 600 g/lamb/ day, respectively, and during lactation at levels of 360, 420 and 480 g/suckling lamb/day, respec- tively. The concentrate rations were kept un- changed throughout the lactation period. Experimental procedures and analytical methods The ewe lambs were exposed to rams when they were 225 days (SD 3.7) old. A vasectomized 189 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Vol. 9 (2000): 187–200. adult ram equipped with a crayon harness was used for the detection of behavioural oestrus (5 Oct –18 Nov). The ewe lambs found in oestrus were hand-mated with a fertile Finnish Landrace ram and returned to their respective feeding groups. The live weights of the ewe lambs were re- corded at the beginning of the study and subse- quently at 2-week intervals. In addition, they were weighed 7, 2 and one day before lambing and 24 and 48 hours after parturition and at weekly intervals during lactation. Their lambs were weighed at parturition, at the age of 3 days and on the same days with their dams during the lactation. The ewe lambs were culled only when phys- ical conditions deteriorated seriously. Individual feed intake was recorded daily. The lambs and ewes were given hay once and concentrates twice a day during the rearing and lactation periods. Feed samples were taken at every feeding and pooled over a 2-week period. The samples were analyzed according to stand- ard procedures (AOAC 1984). In vivo digesti- bility of hay and concentrates was determined by the total collection method with three wethers. Feed values were calculated on the basis of chemical composition and digestibility of feeds. Net energy (NE) of feeds was calculated as FFU according to Salo et al. (1990) and metaboliza- ble energy (ME) according to MAFF (1975). The feed unit (FU) was obtained by dividing the ME value by 11.7 (Tuori et al. 1996). Protein intake was calculated in terms of amino acids absorbed in the small intestine (AAT) and protein balance in the rumen (PBV) (Tuori et al. 1996). In the AAT-PBV calculations, the degrability of crude protein was taken from the feed tables (Tuori et al. 1996). The chemical compositions and feed- ing values of the feeds are given in Table 1. The milk yield was estimated by measuring the secretion rate over a 4-h period by intramus- cular oxytocin injection (5 IU/ml) as outlined by McCance (1959). The ewes were milked by hand 6 times a week for 8 lactation weeks. Represent- ative milk samples from two days’ milking were Table 1. Chemical composition and feed values of the experimental feeds offered during rearing (1), 8 weeks pre-partum (2) and lactation (3). Timothy-fescue hay Concentrate Period 1 2 3 1 2 3 Number of samples 7 4 3 7 3 3 Dry matter (DM), g/kg 839 808 862 881 889 880 In DM, g/kg Organic matter 929 926 923 966 965 964 Crude protein 104 104 109 197 210 199 Ether extract 21 24 24 22 19 19 Crude fibre 327 322 351 55 58 64 Digestible organic matter 604 606 604 617 783 781 Feed values/kg DM Net energy, FFU 0.58 0.58 0.55 0.85 1.08 1.07 ME, FU 0.78 0.79 0.78 0.84 1.07 1.07 ME, MJ 9.16 9.19 9.17 9.83 12.5 12.49 AAT, g 64 65 65 100 121 117 PBV, g -30 -31 -27 37 15 12 FFU=fattening feed unit (0.7 kg starch equivalent); ME=metabolizable energy; FU=feed unit (ME MJ/11.7); AAT= amino acids absorbed from the small intestine; PBV=protein balance in the rumen. 190 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Sormunen-Cristian, R. & Jauhiainen, L. Feeding levels during the growing phase of Finnish landrace ewes taken, pooled and analysed weekly for fat and protein by the same methods as described by Sormunen-Cristian et al. (1997). Statistical methods Measurements of live weight of ewe lambs, milk yield, as well as fat and protein content of milk were repeated several times for each animal. The repeated measurements of each response varia- ble were correlated and the correlation was tak- en into account in the statistical models. Covar- iance structure for the repeated measurements was chosen, comparing all biologically sensible structures using Akaike’s and Schwarz’s Baye- sian information criteria (Wolfinger 1996). Un- structured, Toeplitz, compound symmetry and heterogeneous Toeplitz proved useful for live weight of ewe lambs, milk yield and fat and pro- tein content of milk, respectively. Thirty-six dams of ewe lambs were random- ly allotted to three feeding groups as described earlier (Sormunen-Cristian et al. 1997). Due to the randomization method the mean of twin ewe lambs of each dam was used as the experimen- tal unit instead of individual values. There were only four pairs of twins at the end of the study. Hence, the response variable (Y) was analysed according to the following statistical model: Y ijk = µ + dam j + diet i + time k + (diet × time) ik + ε ijk where µ is the intercept and dam j represents the normally distributed random effect associat- ed with the jth dam. Diet i , time k and (diet × time) ik represent the fixed effect associated with the jth feeding group, kth time and their interac- tion, respectively. ε ijk are correlated residual er- rors with covariance structure defined above. ε ijk and dam j are mutually independent. Litter weight was measured only at birth. Thus the statistical model included µ, diet i , dam j and ε ij and the residual errors are independent and normally distributed with zero means and the same unknown variance σ2. Assumptions of the models were checked by using graphical methods: box-plot for normali- ty of errors and plots of residuals for constancy of error variance (Neter et al. 1996). Pairwise comparisons were made between the three lev- els of feeding. The milk yield and milk compo- sition, comparisons between diet means were made also by orthogonal trend contrasts. The parameters of the models were estimated by the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estima- tion method using the SAS system for Windows, release 6.12, and MIXED procedure. Results and discussion Feed intake The average daily nutrient intakes during rear- ing and mating are summarised in Table 2. From weaning to 23 weeks of age ewe lambs on H diet consumed 14% more energy (ME MJ) and 16% more protein (AAT g) on average than those on S diet. The differences between L and S diets were lower, only 4 and 8%, respectively. The smaller differences resulted from the different substitution rates. Increasing concentrate supple- mentation from 54 to 63 and from 63 to 72 g DM/kgW0.75 reduced hay intake at a substitution rate of 0.67 and 0.19, respectively. During rear- ing, ewe lambs on L, S and H diets consumed concentrates 0.65 (SD 0.062), 0.77 (SD 0.102.) and 0.93 (SD 0.117) kg DM/lamb/day, respec- tively, on average. The concentrate intake was 43% higher on H diet than on L diet. This de- c r e a s e d t h e h a y i n t a k e s o t h a t t h e concentrate:forage ratio was 80:20 on H diet, whereas on L diet it was 65:35. According to Owen (1976), the roughage:concentrate ratio on H diet was ideal to ensure maximum DM intake. Expressed on a metabolic body weight basis, total DM intake on L, S and H diets averaged 82, 82 and 88 g/kgW0.75, respectively. In Finland there are no feeding standards for 191 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Vol. 9 (2000): 187–200. replacement ewe lambs, only official recommen- dations for fattening lambs (Salo et al. 1990, Tuori et al. 1996). For a growth rate of 0.2–0.3 kg/day a 30 kg fattening lamb is considered to require 0.76–0.96 FFU (Salo et al. 1990), 0.98– 1.25 FU and 86–112 g AAT a day (Tuori et al. 1996). When calculated according to the old feed evaluation system (Salo et al. 1990), the energy intake in this study was sufficient for a growth rate of 0.2 kg/day on all diets, but on a new sys- tem basis (Tuori et al. 1996) the energy intakes from L and S diets were below predicted recom- mendations (NRC 1985, Tuori et al. 1996). Ac- cording to Tuori et al. (1996), all ewe lambs did satisfy their protein (AAT) needs for a growth rate of 0.2 kg/day whereas, according to NRC (1985), the ewe lambs on L and S diets experi- enced a crude protein deficiency of 12.4 and 4.9%, respectively. During mating total DM intakes were 74, 70 and 67 g/kgW0.75 on L, S and H diets, respective- ly. Energy intake averaged 15.2 ME MJ/lamb/ day and was almost equal on all diets. Due to the experimental policy there were differences in protein intakes between diets. According to NRC (1985), a 50 kg ewe requires daily 150 g CP for mating. In this study, the ewe lambs sat- isfied their protein need on all diets. In Finland, however, there are no standards for combined maintenance and flushing of growing ewe lambs. The calculated total AAT intakes during mating exceeded the feeding recommendationds for a 45 kg lamb with a daily growth rate of 200 g (Tuori et al. 1996) by 43% on average, but the Table 2. Daily nutrient intake of primiparous ewe lambs during rearing and mating. In each figure pair, the upper figure is the mean and the lower is the standard deviation. Rearing from 8 to 23 weeks Mating from 26 to 36 weeks Diet L S H L S H Number of ewes 11 10 10 10 10 9 Forage, kg DM 0.34 0.26 0.23 0.36 0.28 0.25 0.106 0.053 0.044 0.129 0.060 0.059 Total DM, kg 1.00 1.03 1.17 1.27 1.27 1.29 0.155 0.131 0.143 0.154 0.125 0.144 Organic matter (OM), kg 0.95 0.98 1.12 1.19 1.18 1.20 0.146 0.125 0.138 0.144 0.112 0.127 Digestible OM, kg 0.61 0.63 0.72 0.95 0.96 0.97 0.095 0.081 0.089 0.105 0.087 0.100 Net energy, FFU 0.75 0.80 0.93 1.21 1.25 1.28 0.105 0.102 0.114 0.125 0.110 0.126 ME, FU 0.82 0.85 0.97 1.28 1.30 1.32 0.126 0.108 0.120 0.14 0.12 0.13 ME, MJ 9.58 9.96 11.33 14.97 15.21 15.46 1.473 1.268 1.399 1.641 1.378 1.572 Crude protein, g 162 176 205 156 181 197 20.7 21.3 25.1 17.9 16.4 19.7 AAT, g 87 94 109 117 126 131 12.0 11.7 13.3 12.5 11.2 13.0 PBV, g 12 19 26 -47 -32 -22 2.7 3.3 3.5 5.1 3.1 2.8 L=low; S=standard; H=high; DM=dry matter; FFU=fattening feed unit (0.7 kg starch equivalent); ME= metabolizable energy; FU=feed unit (ME MJ/11.7); AAT= amino acids absorbed from the small intestine; PBV= protein balance in the rumen. 192 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Sormunen-Cristian, R. & Jauhiainen, L. Feeding levels during the growing phase of Finnish landrace ewes energy intake (ME MJ) was 4% below recom- mendations. During the last 2 months of pregnancy, ewe lambs on L diet tended to eat more than those on S and H diets in proportion to live weight (53, 50 and 47 g DM/kgW0.75, respectively). The high- est individual DM intake occurred in one L ewe 2 weeks before parturition (1.59 kg DM/ewe/ day). The result agreed with McNeill et al. (1998) who found that lean ewes had a higher volun- tary feed intake than fatter ewes in late pregnan- cy. The calculated protein balance in the rumen (PBV) was negative on all diets (Table 3). During lactation, the differences in energy and protein intakes between ewes on S and H diets were smaller than those on S and L diets. The negative protein balance value (PBV) in the rumen on all diets suggested that the microbial protein synthesis was constrained by dietary ni- trogen supply. The recommended PBV intake falls between 0 and -20 g for twin-suckled ewes (Havrevoll et al. 1992). In Norway it is recom- mended to give 70 g AAT for producing a kilo- gram of milk, which is equivalent to 200 g of daily gain in lambs (Lind et al. 1998). To meet the nutrient recommendations for lactation, twin- suckled ewes weighing 50–60 kg should be fed daily levels providing on average 26.1 ME MJ, 224 g AAT and 372 g CP (Tuori et al. 1996). Ewes on all diets experienced an energy and pro- tein deficiency with energy and protein intakes of 27–35% and 29–37% below recommended levels, respectively. Table 3. Daily nutrient intake of primiparous ewes during 8 weeks pre-partum and lactation. In each figure pair, the upper figure is the mean and the lower is the standard deviation. 8 weeks pre-partum 8-week lactation Diet L S H L S H Number of ewes 8 9 6 8 9 6 Forage, kg DM 0.71 0.65 0.60 1.05 1.05 1.03 0.167 0.120 0.184 0.226 0.131 0.068 Total DM, kg 1.15 1.13 1.13 1.66 1.76 1.81 0.168 0.123 0.187 0.256 0.147 0.151 Organic matter (OM), kg 1.08 1.07 1.07 1.54 1.64 1.69 0.155 0.114 0.174 0.243 0.136 0.153 Digestible OM, kg 0.77 0.77 0.78 1.10 1.18 1.22 0.102 0.075 0.114 0.168 0.100 0.124 Net energy, FFU 0.89 0.90 0.92 1.21 1.32 1.38 0.099 0.074 0.110 0.180 0.125 0.172 ME, FU 1.03 1.03 1.04 1.45 1.56 1.63 0.133 0.080 0.148 0.222 0.134 0.169 ME, MJ 12.03 12.00 12.22 17.02 18.28 19.01 1.551 1.143 1.732 2.593 1.572 1.980 Crude protein, g 165 167 173 232 253 266 17.3 13.4 19.7 34.4 23.9 32.1 AAT, g 99 100 104 139 151 158 10.9 8.3 12.4 20.6 14.1 19.1 PBV, g -16 -14 -11 -24 -23 -26 5.4 3.7 5.9 6.2 3.8 2.9 L=low; S=standard; H=high; DM=dry matter; FFU=fattening feed unit (0.7 kg starch equivalent); ME= metabolizable energy; FU=feed unit (ME MJ/ 11.7); AAT= amino acids absorbed from the small intestine; PBV=protein balance in the rumen. 193 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Vol. 9 (2000): 187–200. Live weights of ewe lambs Live weights and changes in live weights dur- ing the entire experiment were affected by diet (Table 4). Initial live weights at weaning were similar among the feeding groups and averaged 19.2 kg (SEM 0.63). From weaning to 23 weeks of age, ewe lambs on L, S and H diets gained on average 170, 195 and 230 g/lamb/day, respec- tively. The growth rates were in agreement with NRC (1985) which recommends a growth rate of 182–227 g/lamb/day for breeding lambs with a live weight of 30–40 kg. Differences in live weight changes during rearing were statistically significant (P<0.001). In contrast to our results, Christenson et al. (1976) found that weight gains during the growing period were greater for ewe lambs fed the 11% CP diet than for those fed 13 to 15% as a result of higher ad libitum intake of the low protein diet than of the higher protein diets. According to recommendations (Tuori et al. 1996), ewe lambs on L and S diets did not satisfy their energy requirements (ME MJ) dur- ing rearing but, except for ewes on L diets, were able to increase their live weight by about 200 g/lamb/day. Thus, in view of reasonable weight gain, the Finnish recommendations for fatten- ing lambs were considered to be unnecessarily high for replacement ewe lambs. At the beginning of the mating period, the live weights on L, S and H diets averaged 47.8 (SEM 1.72), 51.3 (SEM 1.61) and 54.1 (SEM 1.62) kg, respectively. The importance of live weight as a factor affecting the attainment of puberty has been reported widely. Among others, Keane (1976) has postulated the existence of a threshold live weight below which puberty will not occur. According to Christenson et al. (1976) and NRC (1985), Finnish cross-bred ewe lambs should be fed levels that will result in lambs weighing a minimum of 40–43 kg at breeding. In the present study, the live weights at mating averaged 51.1 kg (95% confidence interval from 49.1 to 53.1 kg), i.e. 72% of adult body weight (Savolainen 1998). The commonly used recom- mendation is that ewe lambs should have attained Table 4. Live weights of ewe lambs (LS means) at selected points of rearing, mating, pregnancy and lactation. Significance Diet L S H SEM L vs. S L vs. H S vs. H Live weight of ewes, kg At birth 3.0 3.1 3.1 0.18 0.56 0.69 0.85 At weaning (8 weeks) 19.0 19.1 19.4 1.13 0.93 0.81 0.87 At 23 weeks 37.0 39.7 43.5 1.60 0.22 <0.01 0.09 At mating 47.8 51.3 54.1 1.72 0.16 0.01 0.22 56 days pre-partum 57.1 60.5 65.9 1.90 0.20 <0.005 0.05 28 days pre-partum 58.5 61.9 67.7 2.13 0.28 <0.01 0.06 1 day pre-partum 63.0 66.8 73.4 2.32 0.25 <0.005 0.05 2 days post-partum 53.3 57.7 57.3 1.76 0.09 0.13 0.86 28 days post-partum 50.5 56.7 59.2 2.17 0.05 <0.01 0.42 56 days post-partum 50.2 54.9 59.7 2.22 0.14 <0.01 0.13 Live weight change, kg Weaning to 23 weeks 18.0 20.6 24.1 0.71 0.01 <0.0001 <0.005 Mating to 1 day pre-partum 15.2 15.5 19.2 0.97 0.83 <0.01 0.01 At lambing -9.7 -9.1 -16.1 1.10 0.67 <0.0005 <0.0001 Lambing to 56 days post-partum -3.1 -2.8 2.4 1.13 0.83 <0.005 <0.005 L=low; S=standard; H=high; SEM=max. standard error of diet means. 194 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Sormunen-Cristian, R. & Jauhiainen, L. Feeding levels during the growing phase of Finnish landrace ewes two-thirds of their mature weight before expo- sure for breeding. It is generally assumed that adult ewes in good physical condition at mating can lose some weight in the second and third months of pregnancy (Wilkinson and Chestnutt 1988). In the present study, live weight gains during the first three months of pregnancy varied from 9.2 (17.9% of body weight) to 11.8 kg (21.8%) for S and H di- ets, respectively. According to NRC (1985), suf- ficient additional feed for replacement lambs should be provided to meet weight gains of 0.12 to 0.16 kg/day during the entire pregnancy. In agreement with NRC (1985), ewe lambs on L, S and H diets gained on average 0.11, 0.11 and 0.13 g/lamb/day, respectively. The similarity of mean live weight gains between groups of ewe lambs in late pregnancy indicated similar nourishment. When fed high levels throughout, ewes lost weight most at lambing due to a higher prolificacy. Al- though ewes did not satisfy their energy and pro- tein needs during lactation, they were able to maintain their body weight. Therefore, the Finn- ish recommendations (Tuori et al. 1996) were concluded be unnecessarily high for ewes lactat- ing for the first time. Mating and lambing performance After the start of mating, ewe lambs on L, S and H diets conceived in 14, 9 and 6.5 days on aver- age, respectively. This was in accord with Dick- erson and Laster (1975) who reported that live weight gain in the first 5 months of life was of great importance to the occurrence of puberty. Athough energy intakes during rearing and mating on L and S diets were below recommen- dations (Tuori et al. 1996), they appeared to be sufficient for ewe lambs on the S diet, since the conception rate was good. One ewe lamb on the L diet totally failed to exhibit oestrus and two others returned to service. In addition, one ewe on L diet was later found to be barren. Dietary factors have had contradictory effects on repro- ductive performance (Christenson et al. 1976, Stoerger et al. 1976, Quirke 1979). The tendency within a mature ewe flock for heavier ewes to have higher ovulation rates which result in more lambs per ewe was found to be true among ewe lambs on the H diet. One- year old Finnish Landrace ewes produce 1.7 lambs/ewe on average (Savolainen 1998), where- as prolificacy was higher in this study, averag- ing 2.4 lambs/ewe (Table 5). Lambing difficulty was not a problem in the ewes since the lambs born were small in size. According to Chris- tenson et al. (1976), Finnish Landrace ewes lambing at 1 year of age require close manage- ment during and after lambing, or lamb losses may be excessive. The length of gestation aver- aged 143.7 (SD 1.68) days, being shorter than reported by Shrestha and Heaney (1990) in twin- bearing Finnish Landrace ewes (144.3 days). Milk yield Analyses of milk yield included only the ewes suckling twins. Thus three ewes, one from each diet, were omitted. There were only slight dif- ferences between diets in the shape of lactation curves (diet x week interaction, P=0.04), with more prominent peaks on the curves of ewes on the H diet. In accordance with Gibb and Treach- er (1982), milk production peaked in the third and fourth lactation week (Table 6). Consistent with earlier results (Sormunen-Cristian et al. 1997), twin-suckled ewes on the S or L diet tend- ed to produce more milk (11.6 and 4.1%) than those on the H diet, but the differences between diets were not statistically significant. Umberg- er et al. (1985) found that intensive feeding dur- ing rearing had a negative effect on the milk pro- duction of ewe lambs at maturity. In the study of Umberger (cited by Johnsson and Hart 1985), female lambs fed to grow about 200 g/day from early weaning to first mating at 9 months of age had a lower and less persistent milk yield in their first lactation than contemporaries reared to grow about 100 g/day. However, NRC (1985) recom- mends feeding levels for ewe lambs that will result in a higher daily growth rate. Johnsson and Hart (1985) suggested that the significant reduc- 195 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Vol. 9 (2000): 187–200. tion in milk yield reported as a result of a high level of feeding can be explained in terms of impairment of prepubertal mammogenesis. Large differences in the level of nutrition after 9 months of age, when the ewes were pregnant, had no effect on the subsequent milk yield in the study of Umberger (cited by Johnsson and Hart 1985). During the 8-week lactation ewes on L, S and H diets nursing twins produced on average 2.06, 2.20 and 1.98 kg of milk per day, respectively. Compared with adult Finnish Landarce ewes (Sormunen-Cristian et al. 1997), the milk yield of primiparous ewes was 39% lower. According to Treacher (1978), the milk yield of a ewe lamb- ing for the first time at 1 year of age is substan- tially low. Milk yields increase from the first to second lactation by 25–45% (Treacher 1978). Maximum milk yield occurs in the third lacta- tion (Boyazoglu 1963, Cappio-Borlino et al. 1997). In this study, milk yield was measured by the oxytocin method which might overesti- mate the production as reported by Bencini et al. (1992). Table 5. Mean diet effects on lambing performance. Diet Low Standard High Number of ewe lambs exposed 10 10 9 Number of lambing ewes1 8 9 6 Number of ewes: Single births 1 1 0 Twin births 4 7 1 Triplet- quadruplet births 3 1 5 Prolificacy (lambs/ewe lambed) 2.3 2.0 3.0 Birth mortality (dead/born) 0/18 0/18 2/18 Artificial rearing (transferred/alive) 3/18 1/18 5/16 Rearing type (lambs reared/ewe) 1.9 1.9 1.8 1Ewes eliminated or dead during pregnancy were excluded. Table 6. Eight-hour milk yield (g) of twin-suckled primiparous ewes fed low (L), standard (S) and high (H) levels. Diet Significance Week L S H SEM L vs. S L vs. H S vs. H 1 624 635 505 73.9 0.90 0.21 0.18 2 731 750 587 73.9 0.83 0.14 0.09 3 763 790 759 73.9 0.76 0.96 0.75 4 766 795 732 73.9 0.73 0.72 0.51 5 740 754 748 73.9 0.86 0.93 0.95 6 651 735 715 73.9 0.33 0.50 0.84 7 629 722 651 73.9 0.28 0.82 0.45 8 592 660 581 73.9 0.42 0.91 0.41 Mean 687 730 660 65.9 0.58 0.75 0.42 Number of ewes per L, S and H diet = 7, 8 and 5, respectively; SEM=max. standard error of means. 196 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Sormunen-Cristian, R. & Jauhiainen, L. Feeding levels during the growing phase of Finnish landrace ewes Throughout lactation, ewes on the L and S diets lost weight, indicating that milk produc- tion was partially supported at the expense of stored body tissue. In some instances, a slight restriction of nutrient intake in lactating ewes may not greatly reduce milk production, but it may result in the loss of body weight and body reserves (Peart 1982). Milk composition The level of feeding had a marked effect on the fat content of milk. Milk fat was highest on the L and lowest on the H diet (Table 7). Differences between the S and H diets were not significant. Compared to the milk produced by adult Finnish Landrace ewes (Sormunen-Cristian et al. 1997), the average fat content was 1.3–2.4 percentage points higher in this study. On the contrary, Gonzalo et al. (1993) found that the fat percent- age increased with increasing parity. In the study of Cappio-Borlino et al. (1997), fat percentages were equal in the first and second parity, but sig- nificantly higher in the third parity. The differences in protein content between diets varied from week to week (P=0.04). In agreement with Cappio-Borlino et al. (1997), the lowest point of the protein curve, when detecta- ble, occurred at approximately the same time as peak milk yield. The protein content was high- est on the S diet and varied less than that on the other diets. On the L diet the protein content declined in early lactation to a minimum level (42.9 g/kg milk) in weeks 3 to 5 and thereafter increased steadily, regaining the initial level at the end of lactation (48.1 g/kg milk). Variations in protein content between ewes were small. In agreement with Cappio-Borlino et al. (1997), the average protein percentage was less than that of adult ewes (Sormunen-Cristian et al. 1997). The lower protein percentage of milk for ewes dur- ing the first lactation was probably related to the reduced rumen functionality and synthesis effi- ciency of the mammary gland and to preferen- tial utilization of amino acids by growing tis- sues (Cappio-Borlino et al. 1997). Lamb performance The birth weight and postnatal growth of twin lambs to the age of 8 weeks were not affected by diet (Table 8). Inconsistently, Wilkinson and Chestnutt (1988) reported that the higher level of nutrition in late pregnancy resulted in higher ewe live weights as well as higher lamb birth weights. The total lamb birth weights were high- Table 7. Milk fat and protein content (g/kg milk) in twin-suckled ewes fed low (L), standard (S) and high (H) levels. Milk fat Milk protein Diet Significance Diet Significance Week L S H SEM P1 P2 P3 L S H SEM P1 P2 P3 1 89 86 82 4.4 0.68 0.10 0.43 48.2 48.5 49.0 2.83 0.93 0.84 0.90 2 87 78 71 4.4 0.09 <0.01 0.22 44.4 46.4 43.1 1.52 0.24 0.52 0.10 3 85 79 71 4.4 0.20 <0.01 0.10 42.8 46.7 43.7 1.52 0.03 0.67 0.13 4 83 74 74 4.4 0.09 0.11 0.94 42.9 46.9 45.0 1.39 0.01 0.24 0.27 5 84 74 72 4.4 0.06 0.04 0.67 42.9 47.0 45.4 1.30 <0.01 0.13 0.36 6 82 72 70 4.4 0.04 0.04 0.84 44.9 46.7 45.7 1.34 0.24 0.63 0.57 7 84 71 72 4.4 0.01 0.03 0.91 45.5 47.8 47.1 1.13 0.13 0.33 0.68 8 86 77 77 4.4 0.10 0.15 0.96 48.1 48.0 46.8 1.48 0.99 0.92 0.93 Number of ewes per L, S and H diet = 7, 8 and 5, respectively; SEM=max. standard error of means; P1= L vs. S, P2=L vs. H, P3=S vs. H. 197 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Vol. 9 (2000): 187–200. er for ad libitum fed ewes than for ewes restrict- ed to 87.5 and 75% ad libitum feeding (Ch- ristenson et al. 1976). In contrast, a negative re- lationship between nutrition level in mid-preg- nancy and lamb birth weight was reported by Robinson (1977). The lambs in the present study weighed at weaning 5.3 kg less on average than their dams at the same age. The difference in live weight was explained by a better milk yield of the adult ewes which reared the dams. However, the mean value for the conversion efficiency of milk to live weight gain (0.178 kg live weight gain for each kg fresh milk intake) was consist- ent with the observations of Boyazoglu (1963). Health of experimental ewes The ewe lambs on S diet were healthier than those on the other diets. Only one ewe aborted; this occurred on the S diet about 30 days before lambing and the ewe was eliminated from the study. In total, four ewe lambs on the H diet were culled due to vaginal prolapses (three cases) and leg injury. The first cervical prolapse occurred before mating and the subsequent ones 70 and 120 days after mating, respectively. This find- ing agreed with Wilkinson and Chestnutt (1988), indicating that prolapses might be more likely to occur where more concentrate is offered and the ewe has excess fat. Because the cervical pro- lapse is due primarily to lack of space within the ewe, especially in multiparous ewes, it has also been suggested that hay should be restrict- ed or withheld during the last month of preg- nancy. In addition, one ewe lamb on the H diet suffered from laminitis, but she recovered. On the L diet, one ewe lamb failed to exhibit oe- strus, another was found to be barren and the third one was eliminated due to leg injury. Just before lambing ewes on the H diet were more than 10 kg heavier than those on the L diet. Oddy and Holst (1991) suggested that fat ewes were susceptible to reductions in feed intake in late pregnancy, making them more prone to hypogly- caemia. However, in the present study, no health problems occurred at lambing. Mastitis was not observed. Conclusions A study was carried out to test whether replace- ment ewe lambs of the Finnish Landarce breed reared as intensively as fattening lambs tended to have lower productive performance as primi- parous ewes. Feeding prepubertal ewe lambs according to the energy and protein standards of fattening lambs had no detrimental impact on their milk yield, the protein content of their milk Table 8. Mean diet effects on weight and growth rate of twin lambs. Diet Significance Diet L S H SEM L vs. S L vs. H S vs. H Litter weight, kg 5.8 5.4 7.2 0.60 0.58 0.09 0.03 Live weight of twins, kg - at birth 2.7 2.6 2.9 0.17 0.78 0.45 0.31 - at 2 weeks 4.8 4.7 4.6 0.27 0.68 0.46 0.70 - at 4 weeks 6.8 6.9 6.6 0.36 0.82 0.70 0.55 - at 6 weeks 9.4 9.8 9.7 0.52 0.57 0.70 0.91 - at 8 weeks 12.9 13.5 13.5 0.80 0.57 0.62 0.99 Weight gain of twins, g/day 179 189 185 15.4 0.48 0.70 0.80 L= low; S= standard; H=high; SEM=max. standard error of means. 198 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Sormunen-Cristian, R. & Jauhiainen, L. Feeding levels during the growing phase of Finnish landrace ewes or on the growth rate of their lambs. It is sug- gested that since productive performance was not reduced, replacement ewe lambs can be reared together with market lambs. Furthermore, the current data indicates that the official Finnish feeding recommendations for sheep are unnec- essarily high and therefore need to be revised. However, additional studies are needed to vali- date these findings. Acknowledgements. The authors are grateful to Ms Helvi Kananen and her staff for technical assistance during the experiment. Dr Seija Jaakkola is also acknowledged for her valuable comments and criticism of the current manuscript. References Anderson, R.R. 1975. Mammary gland growth in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 41: 118–123. AOAC 1984. Official methods of analysis. 14th ed. Asso- ciation of Official Chemists, Inc., Arlington, Virginia. 1141 p. Bencini, R., Martin, G.B., Purvis, I.W. & Hartman, P.E. 1992. Use of oxytocin to measure milk output in Me- rino ewes and its effect on fat content. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 32: 601–603. Boyazoglu, J.G. 1963. Quantitative aspects of milk pro- duction in sheep. 1. Bibliographical review. Annales de Zootechia 12: 237–296. Cappio-Borlino, A., Portolano, B., Todaro, M., Macciotta, N.P.P., Giaccone, P. & Pulina, G. 1997. Lactation curves of Valle del Belice dairy ewes for yields of milk, fat, and protein estimated with test day models. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 3023–3029. Christenson, R.K., Laster, D.B. & Glimp, H.A. 1976. In- fluence of dietary energy and protein on reproduc- tive performance of Finn-cross ewe lambs. Journal of Animal Science 42: 448–454. Dickerson, G.E. & Laster, D.E. 1975. Breed, heterosis and environmental influences on growth and puber- ty in ewe lambs. Journal of Animal Science 41: 1–9. Dýrmundsson, Ó.R. 1973. Puberty and early reproduc- tive performance in sheep. I. Ewe lambs. Animal Breeding Abstract 41: 273–289. Foldager, J. & Sejrsen, K. 1991. Rearing intensity in heif- ers and the effect on subsequent milk production. Report no 693 from the National Institute of Animal Science. Denmark. 131 p. Gibb, M.J. & Treacher, T.T. 1982. The effect of body con- dition and nutrition during late pregnancy in the per- formance of grazing ewes during lactation. Animal Production 34: 123–129. Gonzalo, C., Carriedo, J.A., Baro, J.A. & Primitivo, F.S. 1993. Factors influencing variation of test day milk yield, somatic cell count, fat, and protein in dairy sheep. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 1537–1542. Gould, M.B. & Whiteman, J.V. 1975. Relationship be- tween preweaning growth rate of female lambs and the growth of their offspring. Journal of Animal Sci- ence 40: 585–589. Havrevoll, Ø., Nedkvitne, J.J., Matre, T., Volden, H., Eik, L.O. & Berg, J. 1992. Proteinnormer for ungdyr og sau. Husdjurforsøksmøtet, 1992. 671 p. Johnsson, I.D. & Hart, I.C. 1985. Pre-pubertal mammo- genesis in the sheep. 1. The effects of level of nutri- tion on growth and mammary development in female lambs. Animal Production 41: 323–332. Kassem, R., Owen, J.B. & Fadel, I. 1989. The effect of pre-mating nutrition and exposure to the presence of rams on the onset of puberty in Awassi ewe lambs under semi-arid conditions. Animal Production 48: 393–397. Keane, M.G. 1976. Breeding from ewe lambs. Farm and Feed Research 7: 10–12. Lind, V., Nordang, L. & Todnem, J. 1998. Kraftfor til sau som har lammet. Sau og Geit 51: 54–55. Maff, 1975. Energy Allowances and Feeding Systems for Ruminants. Technical Bulletin 33. Her Majesty’s Sta- tionary Office, London. 79 p. McCance, I. 1959. The determination of milk yield in the Merino ewe. Australian Journal of Agricultural Re- search 10: 839–859. McNeill, D.M., Kelly, R.W. & Williams, I.H. 1998. Parti- tion of nutrients in moderately fat ewes compared with lean ewes given ad libitum access to feed in late pregnancy. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49: 575–580. Neter, J., Kutner, M., Nachtsheim, C. & Wasserman, W. 1996. Applied Linear Statistical Models. Fourth Edi- tion. Irwin, Chicago. 1310 p. NRC 1985. Nutrient Requirements of Sheep. 6 th revised ed. Washington, D.C. 99 p. Oddy, V.H. & Holst, P.J. 1991. Maternal-foetal adaptions to mid pregnancy feed restriction in single-bearing ewes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42: 969–978. Owen, J.B. 1976. Sheep Production. Bailliere Tindall, London. 436 p. Peart, J.N. 1982. Lactation of suckling ewes and does. In: Coop, I.E. (ed.). Sheep and Goat Production. El- sevier Scientific Publ. Co., New York. p. 119–134. Quirke, J.F. 1979. Effect of body weight on the attain- ment of puberty and reproductive performance of Galway and Fingalway female lambs. Animal Produc- tion 28: 297–307. 199 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Vol. 9 (2000): 187–200. Robinson, J.J. 1977. The influence of maternal nutrition on ovine foetal growth. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 36: 9–16. Salo, M.-L., Tuori, M. & Kiiskinen, T. 1990. Rehutaulukot ja ruokintanormit. Yliopistopaino, Helsinki. 70 p. Savolainen, U. 1998. Lammastarkkailutulokset 1997. Lammas ja vuohi 2: 10–16. Shrestha, J.N.B. & Heaney, D.P. 1990. Genetic basis of variation in reproductive performance. 2. Genetic correlation between gestation length and prolificacy in sheep. Animal Reproduction Science 23: 305–317. Sormunen-Cristian, R., Ketoja, E. & Hepola, H. 1997. Sufficiency of the energy and protein standards for lactation of adult multiparous Finnish Landrace ewes. Small Ruminant Research 26: 223–237. Stoerger, M.F., Hinds, F.C., Lewis, J.M. & Wallace, M. 1976. Influence of dietary roughage level on repro- ductive rate in ewe lambs. Journal of Animal Science 43: 952–958. Treacher, T.T. 1978. The effects on milk production of the number of lambs suckled and age, parity and size of ewe. European Association for Animal Production, Publication 23: 31–35. Tuori, M., Kaustell, K., Valaja, J., Aimonen, E., Saarisalo, E. & Huhtanen, P. 1996. Rehutaulukot ja ruokinta- suositukset. Yliopistopaino, Helsinki. 99 p. Umberger, S.H., Goode, L., Carualo, E.V., Harvey, R.W., Britt, J.H. & Linnerud, A.C. 1985. Effects of acceler- ated growth during rearing on reproduction and lac- tation in ewes lambing at 13 to 15 months of age. Theriogenology 23: 555–564. Wilkinson, S.C. & Chestnutt, D.M.B. 1988. Effect of level of food intake in mid and late pregnancy on the per- formance of breeding ewes. Animal Production 47: 411–419. Wolfinger, R. 1996. Heterogeneous variance-covariance structures for repeated measures. Journal of Agri- cultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 1: 205–230. Younis, A.A., Al-Kamali, A.A. & El-Tawil, E.A. 1978. Ef- fect of flushing on fertility of Awassi and Hamdani ewes. World Review of Animal Production 14: 41– 48. 200 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E I N F I N L A N D Sormunen-Cristian, R. & Jauhiainen, L. Feeding levels during the growing phase of Finnish landrace ewes SELOSTUS Ruokinnan voimakkuuden vaikutus siitosuuhikaritsan tuotantoon Riitta Sormunen-Cristian ja Lauri Jauhiainen Maatalouden tutkimuskeskus Maassamme käytössä olevissa lampaiden ruokinta- suosituksissa ei erotella siitos- ja lihakaritsoiden ra- vinnontarvetta. Keväällä syntyneet, siitokseen jätetyt suomenlammasrotuiset uuhikaritsat kasvatetaankin normaalisti yhdessä lihakaritsoiden kanssa ja ruoki- taan myös yhtä voimakkaasti. Siitoskaritsoiden liian voimakas ruokinta ennen puberteettiä ja ensimmäi- sen tiineyden ja maidontuotantokauden aikana voi kuitenkin heikentää jopa pysyvästi utareen kehitystä ja alentaa eläimen maidontuotantokykyä. Vastaavas- ti liian niukka ruokinta pidentää kasvatuskautta, li- sää ruokintakustannuksia ja aiheuttaa muun muassa tiinehtyvyyshäiriöitä. Sopivana siitoskaritsan kasvu- nopeutena vieroituksesta astutukseen pidetään noin 200 g päivässä. Ensi kertaa poikivien suomenlammasrotuisten uuhikaritsoiden ravinnontarvetta ja maidontuotantoa ei aikaisemmin ole tutkittu. Tutkimuksen tarkoituk- sena oli selvittää ruokinnan voimaperäisyyden vaiku- tusta siitosuuhikaritsoiden kasvuun, tiinehtyvyyteen, terveyteen, karitsatuotokseen ja maidontuotantoon. Tutkimuksessa oli mukana 31 suomenlammasuuhika- ritsaa kolmessa ruokintaryhmässä kahdeksan viikon iästä kahdeksannen maidontuotantoviikon loppuun. Heinän saanti oli vapaa kaikissa tuotosvaiheissa. Kasvatuskaudella, vieroituksesta 23 viikon ikään ohra-soijaväkirehuseosta annettiin elopainoon suh- teutettuna alitusryhmälle 54 g kuiva-aineena (ka)/me- tabolinen elopaino-kg (kgW0.75), vertailuryhmälle 63 ja ylitysryhmälle 72 g ka/kgW0.75. Alitusryhmä sai 14 % vähemmän ja ylitysryhmä 14 % enemmän valku- aista ja energiaa kuin vertailuryhmä. Astutuskaudel- la kaikki karitsat saivat väkirehua 70 % (54 g ka/ kgW0.75) kokonaiskuiva-aineen syönnistä. Tiineyden aikana väkirehumäärä oli 500–600 g/uuhi/päivä ja maidontuotantokaudella 360–480 g/imevä karitsa/päi- vä. Kasvatuskaudella alitus-, vertailu- ja ylitysryhmän uuhikaritsat saivat rehuannoksestaan energiaa keski- määrin 0,82, 0,85 ja 0,97 rehuyksikköä, raakavalku- aista 162, 176 ja 205 g sekä ohutsuolessa imeytyviä aminohappoja 87, 94 ja 109 g päivässä. Vastaavana aikana karitsat kasvoivat keskimäärin 170, 195 ja 230 g/karitsa/päivä. Ruokintasuositusten mukaan alitus- ja vertailuryhmän karitsat kärsivät energian vajauksesta kasvatus- ja astutuskaudella. Maidontuotantokaudella kaikkien karitsauuhien energian ja valkuaisen saanti jäi noin 27–37 % alle suositusten. Tuotosten perusteella ravinnonsaanti oli kuitenkin riittävä. Ylitysryhmän ruokinta nopeutti siitokseen jätet- tyjen uuhikaritsoiden kiimaantuloa ja tiinehtymistä. Eniten energiaa ja valkuaista saaneilla uuhilla oli myös suurin sikiävyys (4,0 karitsaa/uuhi). Voimak- kaan ruokinnan ongelmat olivat luomiset ja jalkasai- raudet. Parhaiten maitoa tuottivat vertailuryhmän uu- het. Erot maidontuotannossa eri ruokintaryhmien vä- lillä olivat kuitenkin pienet. Runsas väkirehuruokin- ta vähensi maidon rasvapitoisuutta, mutta sen vaiku- tus maidon valkuaispitoisuuteen oli vähäinen. Tutkimuksen perusteella siitokseen jätetyt suo- menlammasuuhikaritsat voidaan kasvattaa yhtä voi- makkaalla ruokinnalla (väkirehua 62 g ka/kgW0.75) kuin lihakaritsat tuotoksen siitä kärsimättä. Käytös- sä olevat ruokintasuositukset vaativat tarkentamista. Title Introduction Material and methods Results and discussion Conclusions References SELOSTUS