Agricultural and Food Science, Vol. 13 (2004): 18–28 18 © Agricultural and Food Science Manuscript received March 2003 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Vol. 13 (2004): 18–28. Impact dehulling oat grain to improve quality of on-farm produced feed 1. Hullability and associated changes in nutritive value and energy content Pirjo Peltonen-Sainio, Markku Kontturi, Ari Rajala MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Plant Production Research, FIN-31600 Jokioinen, Finland, e-mail: pirjo.peltonen-sainio@mtt.fi Anna-Maija Kirkkari Work Efficiency Institute, PO Box 13, FIN-05201 Rajamäki, Finland High hull content of oat (Avena sativa L.) limits its use as on-farm feed. Dehulling, used in the oat processing industry, can be performed on-farm, to increase nutritive value and energy content. A laboratory model of an impact oat dehuller, similar to a commercial device, was used to study the effects of rotation speed, grain characteristics and moisture content on hullability and groat energy content. Grain of oat cultivar Salo [from official variety trials, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Jokioinen (60˚49'N), 1996–2000] was assessed for quality prior to dehulling. Impact dehulling rota- tion speed ranged from 200 to 500 r min-1 at 50 r min-1 intervals, with moisture content of grains ranging from 10% up to 18%. Dehulling improved oat energy content markedly. Hullability was better at higher rotation speeds. 350 r min-1 was determined to be adequate to result in improved quality as no marked additional improvements were demonstrated by increasing rotation speed fur- ther. As the proportion of hulless groats increased with higher rotation speeds, nutritional and energy content of groat yield improved consistently. The higher the grain moisture, the higher the proportion of grains retaining hulls. Impact dehulling proved to be a potentially useful method to increase ener- gy content of oat grains on-farm. Key words: Avena sativa, fat, fibre, grain, groat, hulls, metabolizable energy, oats, proteins, rotational speed mailto:pirjo.peltonen-sainio@mtt.fi 19 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Vol. 13 (2004): 18–28. Introduction Nutritive value of oat (Avena sativa L.) grain is determined by two contrasting components: high quality groat encased by a hull, which resem- bles poor quality straw. The oat hull is mainly fibre; hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin. There are low levels of protein, fat, starch and water- soluble carbohydrates (Salo and Kotilainen 1970, Welch et al. 1983). As a result, digestibility of oat hull is low, ranging from 7 to 14% (Welch et al. 1983). For these reasons, high hull content of oat grain is the major determinant of decreas- ing nutritional quality, which is important if oat is used for feed. Reducing the proportion of hulls in grain yield evidently results in marked increases in me- tabolised energy content when it is used for an- imal feed (Welch et al. 1983). Such changes are achieved by breeding for low hull content (Ron- ald et al. 1999). The composition of the hull can also be modified by breeding, but Welch et al. (1983) found that even though significant genetic differences in hull composition existed, the range was modest. Contrary to groat, both lemma and palea – the components of hull – are primarily formed before grain filling (Bonnett 1961). Thus, conditions unfavourable for grain filling result in incompletely filled grains and tend to reduce the groat to hull ratio. Ronald et al. (1999) indi- cated that groat weight correlated only modest- ly with proportion of hull and reported high broad-sense heritability estimates for hull per- centage, which indicates the potential for select- ing for reduced hull content. Reduction in hull content is at the extreme in naked oat (A. sativa ssp. nuda L., Valentine 1987, Peltonen-Sainio 1997). The feed industry is not, however, necessarily receptive to receiving rel- atively small quantities of naked oat and is not willing to pay a bonus for it. Hence, naked oat is particularly attractive for on-farm use to substi- tute for other cereal grains with lower energy content (Valentine 1987, Peltonen-Sainio et al. 2004a). The latest naked oat cultivars are high yielding and, even though the unprotected groat is sensitive to damage (Peltonen-Sainio et al. 2001), no problems of storability were recorded when comparing naked and conventional oat (Welch 1977). Uncertainty in producing suffi- ciently viable seed does not, however, encour- age the seed merchants to invest in naked oat, which consequently limits farmers’ prospects to base their on-farm feed production on naked oat (Peltonen-Sainio et al. 2004a). As an alternative to naked oat, hulls can be separated from groats by dehulling grain prior to feeding to animals. This method, extensively used in the oat processing industry, is also per- formed on-farm. The farmer can either invest in an oat dehuller or have dehulling done as an ex- ternal service. These experiments were carried out to investigate the effects of adjustments, par- ticularly rotation speed, on an impact oat dehull- er as well as grain size and moisture content on hullability and the consequent nutritional con- tent and energy value of the resultant oat grain. Material and methods Grain of oat cultivar Salo was obtained from of- ficial variety trials carried out at MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Jokioinen (60˚49'N) in 1996– 2000. In each year, net plot size was 12.5 m2 and 500 viable seeds were sown per square meter. 100 kg of N ha-1, as NH4NO3, was applied at sow- ing. Weeds were chemically controlled and oth- er recommended management procedures were followed (for further details, see Kangas et al. 2001). Grain from each year was pre-purified by sorting with 1.5 mm sieves to remove immature grains, small particles, dust and weed seeds pri- or to all measurements and analyses. Rotation speed effects of impact oat dehuller (Experiment 1) Ten kilograms of pre-purified grains of oat cul- tivar Salo from 2000 were used as raw material 20 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Peltonen-Sainio, P. et al. Impact dehulling oat grain: hullability, nutritive value and energy content for the experiment. Three 250 g sub-samples were dehulled at rotation speeds of 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450 and 500 r min-1 with an im- pact oat dehuller (Rivakka, Nipere Ltd., Finland, http://www.nipere.fi). The impact dehuller used in these experiments is a scale model of the com- mercial device used to dehull oat prior to feed- ing for animals. The Rivakka oat dehuller re- moves the hulls from the grain by centrifugal force and impact against a rubber covered cham- ber wall minimising damage to the groat. After the impact dehulling, groats and hulls fall into the vertical ‘pipe’ where they are separated by aspiration created with a vacuum cleaner (Euro- vac). For better separation of groats and hulls the sample was further aspirated with a Saat- meister Kurt Pelz aspirator. Mean single grain weight (mg), hectolitre weight (kg) and grain moisture content (%) were measured from three replicate samples prior to dehulling. Hull content (%) was measured on three grain samples of 5 grams, dehulled by hand and weighing of the hulls and dividing their weight by the original weight of the non-dehulled grains. Dry matter (DM) content of non-dehulled grains and flour, and raw protein, fat, fibre and ash content (%) of non-dehulled grains were car- ried out according to standard methods at the Chemistry Laboratory of MTT Animal Science. Metabolised energy content (ME) for ruminants [1] and poultry [2] and net energy content (NE) for pigs [3] were calculated as follows: [1] ME (MJ kg-1 DM) = (15.2 × MRP + 34.2 × MRFa + 12.8 × MRFi + 15.9 × MNNE)/1000 [2] ME (MJ kg-1 DM) = (18.03 × MRP + 38.83 × M R Fa + 1 7 . 3 2 × MNNE)/1000 [3] NE (MJ kg-1 DM) = (10.8 × MRP + 36.1 × MRFa + 6.3 × MRFi + 12.7 × MNNE)/1000, in which MRP is metabolised raw protein (g kg-1 DM), MRFa is metabolised raw fat (g kg-1 DM), MRFi is metabolised raw fibre (g kg-1 DM) and MNNE is metabolised non-nitrogenous extracts (g kg-1 DM). MNNE [4] was calculated as: [4] MNNE (g kg-1 DM) = [1000 – (RP + RFa + RFi + ASH)] × 0.91, in which RP is raw protein content, RFa is raw fat content, RFi is raw fibre content and ASH is ash content all converted to g kg-1 DM. The cal- culations are based on Schiemann et al. (1972) and Kaustell et al. (1997). After dehulling, groat yield (g) and wastage (g) were weighed and their relative proportions (%) calculated. Groat yield consisted of groats that were liberated from hulls and either unbro- ken or broken and grains that retained their hulls. A 50 g sub-sample representing groat yield was analysed for hulls retaining grains (g) and their relative proportion on groat yield was calculat- ed. Hull content (%) of hulls retaining grains was measured after separating hull from groat by hand with a needle. Their relative proportions (%) were calculated. The remaining groat yields from each of dehulled sub-samples subjected to different rotation speeds were used for analys- ing chemical composition [raw protein, fat, ash, and fibre contents (%)] carried out according to standardised methods at Chemistry Laboratory of MTT Animal Science. Metabolised energy content for ruminants and poultry and NE con- tent for pigs were calculated. Effects of year on grain hullability and quality of groats (Experiment 2) Mean single grain weight (mg), hectolitre weight (kg) and grain moisture content (%) were ana- lysed prior to dehulling from three replicate sam- ples of pre-purified grain of oat cultivar Salo harvested in 1996–2000. Hull content (%) was measured as in Experiment 1. Three sub-sam- ples, each weighing 500 g, were dehulled with a Nipere dehuller using a rotation speed of 350 r min-1, which was fixed on the basis of the re- sults obtained from Experiment 1. Analyses of DM content of whole grains and whole grain flour, as well as of protein, fat, fibre and ash content (%) of grains and dehulled groats were carried out according to standardized methods 21 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Vol. 13 (2004): 18–28. at the Chemistry Laboratory of MTT Animal Science. Metabolised energy content for rumi- nants and poultry and NE content for pigs were calculated as in Experiment 1. Proportions of groat yield and wastage and hulls retaining grains in groat mass were measured as in Experiment 1. Effects of grain moisture on dehulling capacity (Experiment 3) After determining the moisture content of grain from 2000, three 180 g grain samples for each of the nine targeted grain moisture content class- es were placed in plastic bottles. The amount of water resulting in grain moisture contents rang- ing from about 10 to 18% were calculated and added to the bottles, which were sealed and shak- en overnight. The grain moisture content was measured and nine moisture content classes were determined: 10.3–10.5% (depending on treated sub-sample), 11.4–11.5%, 12.4–12.5%, 13.2– 13.5%, 14.1–14.4%, 15.4–15.5%, 16.3–16.4%, 17.3–17.4% and 18.5–18.7%. Three replicate samples per moisture content class, each weigh- ing 150 g, were dehulled at a rotation speed of 350 r min-1. Proportions of groat yield and wast- age were measured and dehulled groat yield was analysed for hulls retaining grains as in Experi- ment 1. An additional experiment was carried out to monitor the moisture distribution between hull and groat of artificially moisturised grain sam- ples. Prior to moisturising, grain moisture con- tent (%) was measured. Three 150 g subsamples were hulled using an impact dehuller (Rivakka, Nipere Ltd) with a rotation speed of 350 r min-1. The moisture contents of groats and hulls were measured as described above for whole grains. Three grain subsamples with moisture contents of 11.1%, 14.1–14.2% (depending on treated sub-sample) and 18.2–18.3% were produced as previously. Three replicate samples per moisture content class, each weighing 50 g, were dehulled by hand, and three replicate samples, each weigh- ing 130 g, were dehulled using a Rivakka oat dehuller with a rotation speed of 350 r min-1. The moisture contents of groats and hulls were meas- ured as described above for whole grains. Statistical analysis Significant differences among years, grain mois- ture contents and effects of different rotation speeds of the dehuller were established using PROC MIXED software (Littell et al. 1996). Data were considered to be completely ran- domised (three replicates). In the model, differ- ent grain moisture contents, rotation speeds and years were considered as fixed effects. Correla- tion analyses were conducted (PROC CORR of SAS) for data from the long-term oat trials to establish the relationship between groat and hull weight. Results Rotation speed effects on hullability and groat quality The higher the rotation speed of the impact oat dehuller, the lower the groat yield and the high- er the proportion of wastage (Fig. 1). The in- crease in proportion of wastage and concomi- tant decrease in groat yield were most marked, averaging 8 percentage units, when rotation speed increased from 200 to 250 r min-1. There- after the change was < 3 percentage units for each 50 r min-1 increase in rotation speed. At high rotation speeds, fewer hulls were left in the groat mass. At 200 r min-1 almost 60% of grains re- tained their hulls, while at rotation speed ≥ 400 r min-1 more than 97% were dehulled. Hull con- tent of grains with hulls tended to increase until 350–400 r min-1, but at higher rotation speeds dehulling was complete. As dehulling resulted in a marked decrease in fibre content of the groat yield, nutritive val- ue improved significantly (Fig. 2, Table 1). When compared with intact grains of cv. Salo, protein 22 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Peltonen-Sainio, P. et al. Impact dehulling oat grain: hullability, nutritive value and energy content and fat contents increased from 12.7 to 15.6% and 5.4 to 6.3%, respectively, and ash content decreased at most from 3.2 to 2.4% (data not shown) when impact dehulled. These changes in grain composition following dehulling marked- ly increased the calculated digestible energy con- tent of oat: from 13.3 to 14.2 MJ kg-1 DM, 10.7 to 11.7 MJ kg-1 DM and 14.3 to 15.7 MJ kg-1 DM when calculated for ruminants, pigs and poultry, respectively. Grain characteristic and moisture content effects on hullability and groat quality Growing conditions varied greatly between 1996 and 2000 and resulted in differences in duration of pre- and post-heading periods and quantity and quality of the grains produced by cv. Salo (Table 1). Quality of the grains subjected to de- hulling at a constant rotation speed of 350 r min-1 affected hullability and quality of the groat mass (Tables 2 and 3). The relative proportions of groat yield versus wastage differed among years, the difference being 8 percentage units at most (Table 3). Proportion of groats following dehulling was not associated with either single grain (R2 = 0.07) or single groat weight (R2 = 0.01) when results from only five years were compared. However, this evidently limited data tentatively indicated that groat yield was corre- lated with hectolitre weight (R2 = 0.98), grain yield (R2 = 0.90), hull content (R2 = 0.51) and length of grain filling period (R2 = 0.45). Use of Fig. 1. Effects of rotation speed of the impact oat dehuller on proportion of groat yield, wastage and hulls retaining grains and hull content of unhulled grains from 2000. Standard deviations are shown as values next to each legend. 23 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Vol. 13 (2004): 18–28. Fig. 2. Effects of rotation speed of the impact oat dehuller on protein, fat and fat content of groat yield and the calculated metabolised energy content for ruminants and poultry and net energy content for pigs (2000 trial). Standard deviations are shown as values next to each legend. an additional data set (509 cases, several oat cultivars grown in official variety trials carried out in Jokioinen, MTT between 1970 and 2001) showed that the association between single groat weight and single hull weight was rather weak (R2 = 0.15, Fig. 3). Proportion of unhulled grains differed by more than 20 percentage units de- pending on year (Table 3). Even though impact dehulling improved feed value markedly in each year, it neither narrowed nor extended the variation among years in nutri- tional quality of groat mass when compared with 24 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Peltonen-Sainio, P. et al. Impact dehulling oat grain: hullability, nutritive value and energy content that of the original grain yield (Table 3). For example, median protein content of oat grains was 13.7% ± 17% and fat content 5.3% ± 10%, while in groat mass it was 16.5% ± 18% and 6.4% ± 13%, respectively, at a constant impact dehuller rotation speed of 350 r min-1. Similar- ly, the median for calculated NE for pigs was 10.5 MJ kg-1 DM ± 2%, ME for poultry 14.0 MJ kg-1 DM ± 3% and ME for ruminants 13.0 MJ kg-1 DM ± 2% in oat grains and 11.4 MJ kg-1 DM ± 2%, 15.3 MJ kg-1 DM ± 2% and 13.9 MJ kg-1 DM ± 1% in groat mass, respectively. Table 1. Composition and the calculated digestible energy content for ruminants, pigs and poultry of intact oat grains and days to heading, length of grain-filling period and grain yield of oat cultivar Salo grown in official variety trials at Jokioinen in 1996–2000. Trait 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Mean Quality Grain moisture content (%) 9.4 8.7 9.9 7.9 9.1 9.0 Single grain weight (mg) 37.2 38.1 32.0 38.4 38.7 36.9 Hectolitre weight (kg) 47.9 47.9 45.2 42.5 47.7 46.2 Hull content (%) 24.9 23.5 24.6 26.2 22.5 24.3 Raw protein content (%) 11.4 13.4 11.3 16.0 12.7 13.0 Raw fat content (%) 5.3 4.7 5.8 4.7 5.4 5.2 Raw fibre content (%) 11.2 10.0 11.6 11.8 9.6 10.8 Ash content (%) 3.87 3.82 3.51 4.05 3.21 3.69 ME for ruminants (MJ kg-1 DM) 13.0 13.0 13.1 12.7 13.3 13.0 NE for pigs (MJ kg-1 DM) 10.5 10.5 10.6 10.2 10.7 10.5 ME for poultry (MJ kg-1 DM) 13.9 14.0 14.0 13.6 14.3 14.0 Growth1) Days to heading 59 48 58 52 58 55 Length of grain-filling period (d) 44 50 54 30 57 47 Grain yield (g m-2) 533 591 484 121 571 460 NE, net energy; ME, metabolised energy; DM, dry matter 1) Kangas et al. (2001) Table 2. Groat yield, proportion of wastage and hullability of impact dehulled oat grown in 1996–2000 using a fixed rotation speed of 350 r min-1. Year Proportion (%) Hulls retaining grains (%) Groat yield Wastage 1996 79.2 a 20.8 c 26.8 a 1997 79.5 a 20.5 c 16.9 b 1998 75.7 b 24.3 b 19.8 b 1999 71.6 c 28.4 a 17.6 b 2000 78.0 a 22.0 c 5.8 c Mean 76.8 23.2 17.4 Means within each column not followed by the same letter are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05. Fig. 3. Association between single groat weight and single hull weight according to official variety trials with several oat cultivars grown in Jokioinen in 1970–2001 (n = 509). 25 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Vol. 13 (2004): 18–28. Table 3. Protein, fat and fibre content and calculated energy content and improvement in energy content relative to unhulled grains (in parentheses) for ruminants, pigs and poultry of dehulled oat groat yield (1996–2000). Year Content (%) Metabolised energy (MJ kg-1 DM) Protein Fat Fibre Ruminants Pigs Poultry 1996 13.5 d 6.4 b 5.0 a 13.9 b (1.07) 11.4 b (1.09) 15.2 c (1.09) 1997 16.0 b 5.6 e 3.4 c 13.9 b (1.07) 11.3 c (1.08) 15.3 c (1.09) 1998 13.4 d 7.2 a 4.4 b 14.1 a (1.08) 11.6 a (1.09) 15.4 b (1.10) 1999 19.5 a 5.8 d 4.3 b 13.7 c (1.08) 11.1 d (1.09) 15.1 d (1.11) 2000 15.6 c 6.2 c 2.3 d 14.1 a (1.06) 11.6 a (1.08) 15.6 a (1.09) Mean 15.6 6.2 3.9 13.9 (1.07) 11.4 (1.09) 15.3 (1.09) A fixed rotation speed of 350 r min-1 was used for dehulling. Means within each column not followed by the same letter are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05. Table 4. Effects of grain moisture content prior to impact oat dehulling on groat yield, proportion of wastage and dehullability using a fixed rotation speed of 350 r min-1. Grain moisture Proportion (%) Hulls retaining content (%) grains (%) Groat yield Wastage 10.4 77.6 e 22.4 a 8.9 f 11.5 78.8 d 21.2 b 15.2 de 12.4 79.6 d 20.4 bc 16.4 d 13.3 80.6 c 19.4 d 19.6 bcd 14.2 80.6 c 19.4 d 23.3 bc 15.4 81.8 bc 18.2 e 25.4 abc 16.4 82.9 a 17.1 f 27.6 ab 17.4 83.4 a 16.6 f 30.5 a 18.6 82.8 a 17.2 f 24.9 abc Means within each column not followed by the same letter are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05. Table 5. Moisture distribution between groat and hull in dried and stored grains (control) compared to that in artificially moistened grains when dehulled with impact dehuller. Grain moisture content (%) Moisture content (%) Proportion (%) after artificial moistening Hull to Hull Groat groat ratio Groat yield Wastage Untreated control (10.9) 10.1 c 11.3 c 0.89 c 78.2 c 21.8 a Treatment control (11.1) 10.0 c 11.4 c 0.87 c 78.6 c 21.4 a 14.1–14.2 14.2 b 14.0 b 1.02 b 80.7 b 19.3 b 18.2–18.3 18.7 a 18.7 a 1.04 a 82.4 a 17.6 c Means within each column not followed by the same letter are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05. Artificially moisturising the grains to 10– 19% prior to dehulling indicated that the higher the moisture content of the grains, the more dif- ficult was dehulling (Table 4), while the propor- tion of broken groats was drastically decreased. The only exception to this trend was when in- creasing the moisture content from 17.4 to 18.6%, which seemed to be a turning point in this trend. The proportion of groat yield in- creased, while that of wastage decreased at high- er grain moisture content. An additional study indicated that the artificial moisturising method did not necessarily fully provide results compa- rable to those of dried and stored grains, as mois- ture content of hulls increased more relative to that of groats when artificially moistened (Ta- ble 5). 26 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Peltonen-Sainio, P. et al. Impact dehulling oat grain: hullability, nutritive value and energy content Discussion Feeding oat grains into the impact dehuller con- sistently improved nutritive value and energy content of oat (Fig. 2, Table 3). The increase in calculated metabolisable energy content was most prominent (9–10%) for monogastric poul- try and pigs, while at most some 7% increase was demonstrated for ruminants. Increase in en- ergy content resulted mainly from a marked re- duction in fibre content: from some 10% of in- tact grains to only about 2% in dehulled groats (Table 1, Fig. 2). Also the other important qual- ity components, protein and fat, were increased markedly when grains were liberated from en- capsulating hulls. According to the manufacturer, the dehull- ing properties of the laboratory oat dehuller used in this study were the same as those of the com- mercial device (Pekka Viirimäki, Nipere Oy, personal communication, 22 January 2003). Oat grains are a particularly attractive target for de- hulling as oat hulls drastically reduce the value of oat as a feed crop. Recorded changes in ener- gy content – following dehulling induced valua- ble improvements in grain composition – result- ing in an energy content comparable to that in naked oat and equal or better to that of wheat and barley (Valentine 1987, Doyle and Valentine 1988). Hence, these findings support the idea that the common problem of low energy content char- acteristic of on-farm cereal based feed, can be obviated through dehulling the oat grains. De- hulled groats are only different to naked oat in being richer in b-glucan (Givens et al. 2000). Thus, on-farm dehulling of conventional oat is an alternative to growing naked oat. An economic comparison incorporating energy value, average yield, dehulling costs and especially loss in de- hulling (at least 20%) is not, however, likely to show dehulled conventional oat to be a very com- petitive alternative for naked oat and barley. Our results indicated that use of higher rota- tion speeds resulted in fewer hulls in the groat mass (Fig. 1). Hullability, ease of removal of the hull from the groat (Browne et al. 2002), deter- mined the quality of the groat yield (Fig. 2). On this basis, rotation speed of impact oat dehuller that results in adequate degree of dehulling and improvement in groat quality can be demonstrat- ed, especially, as rotation speed was the major factor affecting groat to wastage ratio. Groat yield varied by up to 20 percentage units when the whole spectrum of rotation speeds was used (Fig. 1). Hullability mainly determined the amount of wastage. Almost full dehulling capac- ity was achieved using rotation speeds ≥ 400 r min-1, and only 5% of the grains retained hulls at 350 r min-1. Hull content of groats retaining hulls increased at higher rotation speeds indi- cating a tendency of grains with higher hull con- tent to have hulls particularly tightly bound to the groat. On the other hand, grains which did not dehull at low rotation speeds tended to have lower hull content than that of the intact grains. As the energy content of groat mass is closely associated with the amount of retaining hulls, the best rotation speed is primarily a compro- mise between degree of dehulling and groat breakage (Peltonen-Sainio et al. 2004b). This is particularly important if there is a risk of reduced storability resulting from increased groat dam- age. An impact oat dehuller rotation speed of 350 r min-1 was regarded as best for the tested culti- var Salo as it resulted in high groat yield char- acterised by low proportion of hulled grains in conjunction with high energy content. As culti- vars differed greatly and growing conditions had a large effect on hullability (Browne et al. 2002), the optimal rotation speed has to be determined separately for each cultivar. This is also support- ed by Doehlert et al. (1999), who found groat percentages of ten oat cultivars to differ by up to 6 percentage units when impact dehulled. Quality of raw material used for dehulling contributed to hullability and quantity and qual- ity of groat yield (Tables 2 and 3). Our experi- ment used grain of cultivar Salo from five years that differed in terms of growing conditions. There was an 8 percentage unit variation in groat yield and 21 percentage unit variation in propor- tion of unhulled grains at a fixed rotation speed of 350 r min-1. As these data were limited and 27 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Vol. 13 (2004): 18–28. did not allow broad conclusions to be drawn, we used long-term data to show that single groat weight was not strongly correlated with single hull weight (Fig. 3). This can be attributed to the time difference in their principal development phases of hulls (palea and lemma) versus groat (Bonnett 1961) in agreement with the finding of Ronald et al. (1999). This suggests that grain weight or hull content of oat provides only a rough estimate, if any, of groat mass to wastage ratio that can be realised with impact dehulling. This is further supported by the finding that over the five study years, in 1999 the lowest propor- tion of groat mass was associated with single grain weights far above the five-year average. However, groat yield correlated strongly with hectolitre weight. Doehlert et al. (1999) also did not find single grain weight to associate with groat yield from impact dehulling, but did find hectolitre weight and grain size uniformity to be correlated with groat percentage. Grain moisture content slightly affected the proportion of groat yield (Tables 4 and 5), but the effect was less significant than that of year. Therefore, the recorded year effect on groat yield and wastage ratio was probably not merely due to differences in grain moisture content prior to dehulling. We found that proportion of hulls re- taining grains increased with grain moisture con- tent until approximately 17% was reached, after which it tended to decrease with further increas- ing moisture. This is in agreement with the find- ings of Doehlert and McMullen (2001). The small grains tended to require higher rotation speeds to be released from hulls (Pelto- nen-Sainio et al. 2004b). Thus, for example, a large number of typically small sized tertiary grains (Palagyi 1983) in the grain mass might decrease hullability and require use of greater mechanical stress to yield groats with markedly improved metabolised energy content. Contrary to this, results of Browne et al. (2002) indicated that secondary grains were easier to dehull than primary grains, although this did not contribute to cultivar differences in hullability. Evidently, further studies are needed to establish the trait or combination of traits contributing to groat yield and wastage ratio and if associations are complex to construct a model for predicting quantity and quality of dehulled groat mass. In conclusion, our results indicated that qual- ity and energy content of oat grains improved markedly by impact dehulling. It is, however, of crucial importance that dehulled feed can be stored without problems such as rancidification of the groat mass. Acknowledgements. The technical assistance of Arto Timo- nen and Aino Lahti at MTT Agrifood Research Finland is gratefully acknowledged. References Bonnett, O.T. 1961. The oat plant: its histology and de- velopment. University of Illinois, Agricultural Experi- ment Station, Bulletin 672. 112 p. Browne, R.A., White, E.M. & Burke, J.I. 2002. Hullability of oat varieties and its determination using a labora- tory dehuller. Journal of Agricultural Science 138: 185–191. Doehlert, D.C. & McMullen, M.S. 2001. Optimizing condi- tions for experimental oat dehulling. Cereal Chemis- try 78: 675–679. Doehlert, D.C., McMullen, M.S. & Baumann, R.R. 1999. Factors affecting groat percentage in oat. Crop Sci- ence 39: 1858–1865. Doyle, J.C. & Valentine, J. 1988. Naked oats: an assess- ment of economic potential for livestock feed in the United Kingdom. Plant Varieties and Seeds 1: 99–108. Givens, D.I., Davies, T.W. & Laverick, R.M. 2000. Dietary fibre fractions in hulled and naked winter oat grain: effects of cultivar and various agronomic factors. Jour- nal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 80: 491– 496. Kangas, A., Laine, A., Niskanen, M., Salo, Y., Vuorinen, M., Jauhiainen, L. & Mäkelä, L. 2001. Results of offi- cial variety trials 1993–2000. MTT publications, Se- ries A 94. Jokioinen, Finland. 262 p. Kaustell, K., Tuori, M. & Huhtanen, P. 1997. Comparison of energy evaluation systems for dairy cow feeds. Livestock Production Science 51: 255–266. Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W. & Wolfinger, R.D. 1996. SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. 633 p. Palagyi, A. 1983. Tertiary seed proportions in the grain yield of several oat varieties. Cereal Research Com- munications 11: 269–274. Peltonen-Sainio, P. 1997. Groat yield and plant stand structure of naked and hulled oat under different ni- trogen fertilizer and seeding rates. Agronomy Jour- nal 89: 140–147. 28 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Peltonen-Sainio, P. et al. Impact dehulling oat grain: hullability, nutritive value and energy content Peltonen-Sainio, P., Kirkkari, A.-M. & Jauhiainen, L. 2004a. Characterising strengths, weaknesses, oppor- tunities and threats in producing naked oat as a nov- el crop for northern growing conditions. Agricultural and Food Science 13: 212–228. Peltonen-Sainio, P., Lehtinen, P., Kontturi, M., Rajala, A. & Kirkkari, A.-M. 2004b. Impact dehulling oat grain to improve quality of on-farm produced feed 2. Groat breakage and storability. Agricultural and Food Sci- ence 13: 29–38. Peltonen-Sainio, P., Muurinen, S., Vilppu, M., Rajala, A., Gates, F. & Kirkkari, A.-M. 2001. Germination and grain vigour of naked oat in response to grain mois- ture at harvest. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cam- bridge 137: 147–156. Ronald, P.S., Brown, P.D., Penner, G.A., Brûlé-Babel, A. & Kibite, S. 1999. Heritability of hull percentage in oat. Crop Science 39: 52–57. Salo, M.-L. & Kotilainen, K. 1970. On the carbohydrate composition and nutritive value of some cereals. Jour- nal of the Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 42: 21–29. Schiemann, R., Nehring, K., Hoffmann, L., Jentsch, W. & Chudy, A. 1972. Energetische Futterbewertung und Energienormen. VEB Deutscher Landwirtschafsver- lag Berlin. 344 p. Valentine, J. 1987. Breeding cereals of high nutritional quality with special reference to oats and naked oats. Aspects of Applied Biology 15: 541–548. Welch, R.W. 1977. The development of rancidity in husked and naked oats after storage under various condi- tions. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28: 269–274. Welch, R.W., Hayward, M.V. & Jones, D.I.H. 1983. The composition of oat husk and its variation due to ge- netic and other factors. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 34: 417–426. SELOSTUS Kotoisen kauran ravitsemuksellista arvoa ja energiapitoisuutta voidaan parantaa kuorinnalla Pirjo Peltonen-Sainio, Markku Kontturi, Ari Rajala ja Anna-Maija Kirkkari MTT (Maa- ja elintarviketalouden tutkimuskeskus) ja Työtehoseura ry Kauran kuori vastaa ravintoarvoltaan heikkolaatuis- ta olkea, mikä heikentää huomattavasti kauran ravin- toarvoa. Teollisuudesta tutulla kuorinnalla voidaan parantaa kotoisen kaurarehun laatua myös maatiloil- la, tai kuorinta voidaan teettää kaupallisella kuorijal- la. Tutkimuksessa selvitettiin, kuinka Rivakka-keski- pakokuorijan (Nipere Oy) säädöt ja kuorittavan kau- raraaka-aineen laatu vaikuttavat ydinsaantoon, hävik- kiin sekä jyvien ravitsemukselliseen laatuun ja ener- giapitoisuuteen. Kauran kuorintakokeet järjestettiin Maa- ja elin- tarviketalouden tutkimuskeskuksessa Jokioisilla. Vi- rallisissa lajikekokeissa vuonna 2000 kasvatettua Salo-kauran jyväsatoa kuorittiin Rivakka-keskipako- kuorijalla käyttäen useita kierrosnopeuksia (200–500 kierrosta minuutissa). Tutkimustulokset osoittivat, että kuoriutuvuus parani kierrosnopeuden lisääntyes- sä. Hyvä kuorintateho saavutettiin käyttämällä 350 kierrosta minuutissa, koska tällöin kuoriutumatta jää- viä jyviä oli niukasti (alle 10 %) ja saatavan ydinsa- don ravitsemuksellinen arvo sekä energiapitoisuus parantuivat huomattavasti kuorimattomaan kauraan verrattuna. Tutkimuksessa tarkasteltiin myös kuorittavan kauraraaka-aineen ominaisuuksien merkitystä kuorin- tatulokseen. Eri satovuosien (1996–2000) Salo-kau- raa kuorittiin vakionopeudella (350 kierrosta minuu- tissa). Lisäksi järjestettiin erillinen kostutuskoe, jos- sa tutkittiin kuinka jyvän kosteus vaikuttaa jyvien kuoriutuvuuteen. Kuorittavan raaka-aineen laatu vai- kutti huomattavasti kuorintatulokseen. Jyväkoko tai kuoripitoisuus eivät kuitenkaan yksinään selittäneet kuoriutuvuutta. Mitä korkeampi jyvän kosteuspitoi- suus oli, sitä heikommin jyvät kuoriutuivat. Normaa- liin varastokosteuteen kuivattu sato kuoriutui jo riit- tävästi hyvän ravitsemuksellisen arvon varmistaak- seen. Tutkimustulosten perusteella yhteenvetona voi- daan todeta, että kauran keskipakokuorinta olennai- sesti paransi kauran ravinto- ja energiapitoisuutta tar- joten varteenotettavan vaihtoehdon paljasjyväisen kauran viljelylle. Impact dehulling oat grain to improve quality of on-farm produced feed Introduction Material and methods Results Discussion References SELOSTUS