Agricultural and Food Science, Vol. 13 (2004): 198–211


198

© Agricultural and Food Science
Manuscript received June 2003

A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E

Vol. 13 (2004): 198–211.

Dehulling capacity and storability of naked oat
Anna-Maija Kirkkari

Work Efficiency Institute, Department of Agriculture, PO Box 13, FIN-05201 Rajamäki, Finland,
 e-mail: anna-maija.kirkkari@tts.fi

Pirjo Peltonen-Sainio
MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Plant Production Research, FIN-31600 Jokioinen, Finland

Pekka Lehtinen
Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Biochemistry and Microbiology, PO Box 6100,

FIN-02015 TKK, Finland

Harvested naked oat is not completely hulless. Hull content of various cultivars ranged between
one and six percent. Genotype and environment control expression of nakedness. Using different
threshing settings at different grain moisture contents, it was investigated whether grain moisture
at threshing and combine harvester settings affected hull content and its relationship to germina-
tion capacity. Naked groats were stored at room temperature and analysed for protein content and
fatty acid composition to determine storability. Grain moisture content at threshing had contrary
effects on hull content and degree of hull retention in different years. Small grains tended to retain
hulls more tightly during threshing. Grain filling capacity appears to be the dominant factor deter-
mining degree of nakedness rather than stage of maturity. The postulated protective nature of hulls
was confirmed only for cultivar Lisbeth. Highly viable samples of grain of cv. Lisbeth, threshed at
normal settings, contained a higher percentage of hulls than those with low germination capacity,
while for cv. Bullion, a protective effect of the hulls was not evident. Grain moisture content at
threshing did not affect protein content of naked cultivars, but some differences in fatty acid com-
position were recorded. Changes in lipid composition and volatile oxidation products during stor-
age of groats were relatively moderate, indicating no major problems related to storage when na-
ked oat was dried well.

Key words: Avena sativa L. nuda, germination, grain, grain moisture, groat, combine harvesters, hulls,
naked oat, storage, threshing

mailto:anna-maija.kirkkari@tts.fi


199

A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E

Vol. 13 (2004): 198–211.

Introduction

Oat (Avena sativa L.) florets are protected by two
bracts or scales, the lemma on the outside and
the palea on the inside (Bonnett 1961). Unlike
conventional oat, the lemma of naked oat is thin
and papery, containing only a little lignin, and
from which the naked grain threshes free simi-
larly to wheat and rye (Valentine 1995, Ougham
et al. 1996). However, dehulling of naked oat is
not complete. Experiments carried out with na-
ked oat in Finland showed that the hull content
of different cultivars generally ranged between
one and six percent, although some cultivars had
hull contents as high as 13 percent (Kangas et
al. 2001). Variation in hull retention was report-
ed to be substantial (Lawes 1971, Machan 1998).
It is possible to increase the expression of na-
kedness through plant breeding. Modern culti-
vars can have less than one percent of hulled
grains. Kangas et al. (2001) reported that the lat-
est breeding lines of naked oat had a lower pro-
portion of hulls in grains. This study aimed to
compare dehulling capacity of different cultivars
under Finnish growing conditions.

The single gene N-1 controls the attachment
of the hull to the groat. Three additional alleles
(N-2, N-3 and N-4) interact with N-1, and their
combined effect contributes to the degree of na-
kedness of naked oat (Kibite 2002). There are
four principal phenotypes of naked oat: com-
pletely naked, partially naked, partially hulled
and completely hulled. Lawes and Boland (1974)
reported that ten of 89 diverse naked genotypes
grown in a field produced completely naked
grains. The mosaic phenotype is a mixture of
naked and covered kernels, in various propor-
tions, depending on the alleles at the N-2 and N-
3 loci (Kibite 2002).

The attachment of the hull is associated with
factors including lignin content of the lemma,
the multiflorous character and the length of the
rachilla. In cultivars with mosaic expression of
nakedness, the lignin content of the lemma var-
ies greatly. Some groats retain the lemma while
others thresh free from them (Valentine 1995).

The spikelet of naked oat is multiflorous, often
bearing three or more florets per spikelet. Con-
ventional oat usually has two fertile florets. The
earlier the floret is set in the panicle, the more
physiologically mature it is at threshing and the
more probably it is also dehulled.  Grains retain-
ing hulls are often from the least mature spike-
lets.

In addition to genotype, environmental con-
ditions markedly control the expression of na-
kedness (Boland and Lawes 1973). Lawes and
Boland (1974) found that naked oat grown in the
greenhouse regularly produced more naked
groats than that grown in the field. They surmised
that temperature has a major effect: at 25˚C, the
expression of nakedness was complete in all cul-
tivars studied, while at 20˚C some cultivars de-
hulled incompletely and at 15˚C only one culti-
var expressed complete nakedness. Jenkins
(1973) also reported that cool conditions prior
to heading resulted in more hulled groats when
compared with warm conditions. According to
Lawes and Boland (1974), the degree of naked-
ness of early-sown naked oat was higher than
that of late sown. One possible reason for this
was that the late sown oat developed under con-
ditions more prone to higher temperature. More-
over, the longer the light period, the higher the
degree of nakedness. Furthermore, there are
some indications that dry growing conditions
increase hull retention (Cuddeford 1995). Thus,
the aim of this study was to evaluate whether
grain moisture at threshing and combine harvest-
er settings affect hull content. As hulls are evi-
dently important for successful germination and
seedling establishment through protecting the
groat from mechanical damage (Fulcher 1986,
Peltonen-Sainio et al. 2001), the connection be-
tween the hull content and germination capacity
was also investigated.

When the groat is damaged, lipase becomes
active and breaks down fatty acids to produce a
rancid flavour. Because naked oat is far more
susceptible to mechanical damage than conven-
tional oat (Valentine 1995, Thorton 1986, Kirk-
kari et al. 2001, Peltonen-Sainio et al. 2001), it
has been assumed to be also more susceptible to



200

A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E

Kirkkari, A.-M. et al. Dehulling capacity and storability of naked oat

Table 1. Threshing settings and moisture content at harvest.

Year Threshing settings

Cylinder speed, rpm Concave clearance, mm Moisture content, %

1998 1200 18/7 20–44
1999 900 18/7 15–37

1200 18/7 15–36
2000 1200 18/7 17–28

1200 15/5 17–26

developing a distinctive rancid flavour associat-
ed with hydrolysis and oxidation of oat lipids.
Our additional aim was to gauge the storability
of naked oat.

Material and methods

Experiment 1
The Finnish naked oat cultivar Lisbeth and the
British cultivar Bullion were grown in an exper-
iment carried out at the research farm of the Work
Efficiency Institute in Rajamäki, southern Fin-
land, in 1998–2000. The experiment was sown
at three different dates using standard farm ma-
chinery in spring to obtain grain samples from
plants grown under different growing conditions
and at different threshing moisture contents. The
naked oat cultivars tested differed in their groat
properties. A hectolitre of the seed were used
each year in test weighed of cv. Bullion 68.6 kg
and cv. Lisbeth 62.7 kg. Correspondingly, one
thousand groats of cv. Bullion weighed 29.5 g
and of cv. Lisbeth 27.8 g.

The naked oat cultivars were sown in 250 m2

field plots, samples from which were threshed
in three to seven different rounds at different
grain moisture contents. The autumn weather
conditions determined the number of threshing
rounds each autumn to get as many samples as
possible with different threshing moisture con-

tents. The threshing was carried out using stand-
ard farm machinery at three different threshing
settings. The normal setting was used in 1998
with the cylinder (diameter 450 mm) speed at
1200 rpm (28 m s-1) (recommended in the user
manual for threshing conventional oat) and with
the front concave clearance set at 18 mm and
the rear concave clearance at 7 mm. In 1999, two
cylinder speeds were used, 1200 rpm (28 m s-1)
and 900 rpm (21 m s-1) and normal concave clear-
ance set. In 2000, the concave clearance was re-
duced, with the front concave clearance setting
at 15 mm and the rear at 5 mm and only one
cylinder speed, 1200 rpm (28 m s-1), was used.
(Table 1).

After each threshing round, a sample of ap-
proximately 3 kg of grain was taken from the
hopper of the combine harvester. To analyse the
grain moisture, 10 g of whole grain was dried at
130˚C for 19 hours and weighed. After harvest-
ing, the samples were dried with cold air and
the germination analyses were carried out ap-
proximately four months after harvesting. Ger-
mination analyses (4 × 100 seeds on blotting
paper) were made at the Plant Production Inspec-
tion Centre. Germination was classified from
four replicates as being normal, abnormal or non-
viable. Only normally germinating grains with
undamaged radicles and hypocotyls were includ-
ed in calculation of the germination percentage.

The samples from 1998–2000 were analysed
for the proportion of hulls remaining attached
to the groats as a percentage of the weight of
three sub-samples of approximately 5 grams



201

A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E

Vol. 13 (2004): 198–211.

each. The hulled groats were separated from the
sample, dehulled by hand and the proportion of
the hulls of the total sample was weighed (termed
hull content %). In addition, the number of hulled
groats per one hundred groats was assessed for
samples from 1999 and 2000 (termed degree of
hull retention %). The impact of degree of na-
kedness on groat damage (germination damage),
hull content and threshing moisture content was
tested across threshing settings and cultivars.

Experiment 2
An additional set of experiments was arranged
to study the association between grain size and
hull content. The contribution of threshing mois-
ture content induced variation in groat breakage
and hull content to storability, in terms of ef-
fects on fatty acid composition and synthesis of
volatile lipid oxidation products, was also inves-
tigated. Two replicate samples of grain (each ca.
250 grams) of five naked oat cultivars, Bullion,
Lisbeth, Neon, Rhiannon and SW95926 were
manually sorted into naked and hulled samples.
The cultivars were grown at Viikki Experimen-
tal Farm of the University of Helsinki in 1999
and were harvested at grain moisture content of
ca. 20%. The naked grains from each cultivar
were weighed and sorted using sieve sizes of 1.7
and 2.0 mm. The grains > 2.0 mm, >1.7 mm and
<1.7 mm were weighed and the grain size distri-
bution (%) among these three size groups was
determined. Grains retaining hulls of each culti-
var were first dehulled by hand and the resulting
naked yield was sorted into three size groups and
the proportion of each size group was determined
as described above. Expression of nakedness of
cultivars SW95926 and Rhiannon was, howev-
er, complete in 1999 and hence, grain size dis-
tribution of unhulled grains was not possible.

Grain yield from the naked cultivars Bullion
and Lisbeth grown in 1998 and 1999 at Viikki
Experimental Farm and from a conventional ref-
erence cultivar Salo, were harvested at three or
four moisture contents. Cultivar Bullion was
harvested at grain moisture contents of 10.5,

23.0, 27.4 and 45.0% in 1998 and, 13.7, 19.9,
23.6 and 42.5% in 1999. Cultivar Lisbeth was
harvested at 10.1, 20.2, 26.1 and 41.6% in 1998
and, 12.1, 19.1 and 30.9% in 1999. The conven-
tional reference cultivar Salo was harvested at
10.1, 18.7, 26.7 and 37.6% in 1998 and, 12.4,
20.7, 24.9 and 35.2% in 1999. In 1999 addition-
al control samples at grain moisture content of
19.9% for cv. Bullion, 19.1% for cv. Lisbeth and
16.5% for cv. Salo were manually threshed to
avoid any mechanical stress induced grain dam-
age caused by combine harvesting. Hull content
(%) was measured by dehulling the grains re-
taining hulls by hand, weighing the hulls and
groats and calculating the proportion of hulls
from the total sample. Degree of hull retention
(%) was measured as the number of grains re-
taining hulls in a sample of 100 grains. Hull con-
tent and degree of hull retention were analysed
from three replicate samples. About 50 g of each
sample (a total of 26), including only naked
groats, was analysed for protein content (through
Kjeltec Auto 1030 Analyzer) and fatty acid com-
position (through gas chromatography) after stor-
age at room temperature (20˚C) until September
2000 (i.e., yield 1998 for two years and 1999
for one year). Grain composition was analysed
at MTT Chemistry Laboratory using accredited,
standardised methods.

Naked groat samples of cv. Bullion and cv.
Lisbeth, representing different moisture con-
tents at harvest, and those of conventional ref-
erence cultivar Salo were analysed for volatile
lipid oxidation products. Volatile lipid oxida-
tion products were determined essentially as
described in Heiniö et al. (2002). Briefly, head-
space composition of the sample was deter-
mined by static headspace measurement. Prior
to the measurement, the sealed vials were equil-
ibrated at 100˚C for 25 minutes. The headspace
sample was then fed into a gas chromatograph
equipped with a mass selective detector. The
detector signals were calibrated using an exter-
nal standard and all data were normalized so
that for each compound, the maximum response
was set to unity.



202

A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E

Kirkkari, A.-M. et al. Dehulling capacity and storability of naked oat

Results

Variation in hull content and degree of
hull retention

In Experiment 1, the hull content (mass) for cul-
tivar Lisbeth varied between 1.2 and 7.1%, with
a mean of 3.9% depending on year. The hull con-
tent of cultivar Bullion was significantly lower,
varying from 0.4 to 5.2%, the average being
1.6%. In 1999, when only 63 mm of precipita-
tion accumulated from drilling to harvest, the
hull percentage of naked oat was high, whereas
under the favourable growing conditions of 2000,
the hull content was lower.

Contrary to the recorded cultivar differences
in hull content, the degree of hull retention was
clearly higher in cultivar Lisbeth than in cv. Bul-
lion. In cv. Lisbeth it ranged from 29.59% to
21.53%, whereas in cv. Bullion it was 12.11%
to 9.84% (Table 2). Degree of hull retention of
cv. Lisbeth was also higher under the dry condi-
tions of 1999, while cultivar Bullion had slight-
ly more hull retaining grains in 2000 than 1999.

Experiment 2 comprised five naked oat cul-
tivars and results indicated that in both years
cultivars Lisbeth and Bullion had low hull con-

tent ranging from less than 1 to 5% (Fig. 1).
Cultivar Neon also had very low hull content,
less than 3% at maximum. Cultivar Rhiannon and
particularly cultivar SW95926 exhibited high
hull contents, approaching 15%. Degree of hull
retention changed in parallel with that of hull
content (Figs. 2 and 3). In general, ten percent-
age units increase in degree of hull retention re-
sulted in three percentage units increase in hull
content.

Threshing moisture content and
the hull content

High moisture contents at threshing increased
hull content in cv. Bullion, but not in cv. Lisbeth
when standard threshing settings were used.
However, in 2000 the degree of hull retention
decreased as grain moisture increased. Also in
Experiment 2, contrary responses to grain mois-
ture occurred. Namely, in 1998 hull content and
degree of hull retention increased with increased
grain moisture, while in 1999 they decreased.
Cultivar Neon was the only exception to this ten-
dency as its hull content and degree of hull re-
tention always increased at increasing threshing
moisture contents.

Table 2. Variation in the proportion of hull content (mass) and degree of hull retention (number) in cv. Lisbeth and cv.
Bullion. Standard error of the mean (± SE) is given in parentheses.

Cultivar Year Hull content % Degree of hull retention (%)

Threshing Normal Low cylinder Narrow concave Normal Low cylinder Narrow concave
settings threshing speed clearance threshing speed  clearance

Lisbeth 1998 2.85 (1.81)
1999 4.60 (1.52) 4.33 (0.96) 27.79 (4.91) 29.59 (5.01)
2000 4.44 (1.36) 4.67 (1.26) 21.53 (8.12) 23.96 (5.52)

Bullion 1998 1.51 (0.79)
1999 1.56 (1.39) 1.58 (0.97) 10.11 (6.21) 12.11 (7.70)
2000 2.27 (0.95) 1.90 (0.82) 10.12 (3.96) 9.84 (3.63)



203

A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E

Vol. 13 (2004): 198–211.

15

12

9

6

3

0

1998

1999

Bullion Lisbeth Neon Rhiannon   SW95926

23 27 33 14 20 24 36 42 17 24 26 42 12 19 32 20 23 36 11 20 34 42 18 23 29 34 16 18 21 29 42 2125 27 15 18 24 27 38

Grain moisture at harvest (%) on each cultivar

Hull content (%)

Fig. 1. Hull content of five naked
oat cultivars at different threshing
moisture content in 1998 and
1999. Error bars indicate standard
error of mean.

50

40

30

20

10

0

1998

1999

Bullion Lisbeth  Neon Rhiannon SW95926

23 27 33 14 20 24 36 42 17 24 26 42 12 19 32 20 23 36 11 20 34 42 18 23 29 34 16 18 21 29 42 2125 27 15 18 24 27 38

Grain moisture at harvest (%) on each cultivar

Degree of hull retention (%)

Fig. 2. Degree of hull retention of
five naked oat cultivars at differ-
ent threshing moisture contents in
1998 and 1999. Error bars indicate
standard error of mean.

Threshing settings and the expression
of nakedness

Low cylinder speeds, resulting in more gentle
threshing and less mechanical stress, were asso-

ciated with increased hull content in both culti-
vars with increasing threshing moisture contents.
Reduced concave clearance increased hull con-
tent in cultivar Lisbeth and decreased in cv. Bul-
lion as the threshing moisture content increased
(Fig. 4).



204

A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E

Kirkkari, A.-M. et al. Dehulling capacity and storability of naked oat

to 61% of naked groats were between 1.7 and
2.0 mm and only some 11–22% and 35% in size
group <1.7 mm, in other naked cultivars and cv.
Lisbeth respectively. When grains retaining hulls
were manually dehulled and sorted, groat size
distribution was contrary to that in groats liber-
ated from hulls during threshing. Only 4–14%
of dehulled grains were > 2.0 mm, while groat
size groups 1.7–2.0 mm and <1.7 mm dominat-
ed.

Storage quality
When studying the effects of grain moisture con-
tent on grain composition after one (harvested
in 1999) and two years (harvested in 1998) stor-
age at room temperature, our results indicated
that no threshing moisture content induced vari-
ation was associated with protein content of na-
ked cultivars, Bullion and Lisbeth, or conven-
tional cv. Salo (data not shown). However, some
differences in fatty acid composition were re-
corded. Manually threshed control samples in
particular had a higher proportion of polyunsat-
urated fatty acids in all cultivars independent of
grain moisture content. The proportions of fatty
acids were dependent on the year of harvest such
that 1998 samples had lower linoleic acid con-
centrations compared with samples harvested in
1999 (Fig. 6). No systematic threshing moisture
content effects on any of the measured fatty acid
concentrations were recorded.

Major differences in production of volatile
compounds were found between years, while
there were far fewer among cultivars. Compared
with groat samples stored for one year, the sam-
ples stored for two years clearly produced more
volatile compounds known to result from oxida-
tion of unsaturated fatty acids (Table 4). The
presence of these volatile oxidation products was
not systematically affected by the moisture con-
tent during threshing, but appears to reflect the
fatty acid composition of the sample. The low
content of polyunsaturated fatty acids in sam-
ples stored for two years was associated with a
high level of volatile oxidation products. Thus,

20

16

12

8

4

0

0        10   20    30  40 50         60   70

Degree of hull retention (%)

Y=0.0021X2+0.19X1.171
R2=0.92
n=117

Hull content (%)

Fig. 3. Association between degree of hull retention and
hull content of five naked oat cultivars in 1998–1999.

Effect of degree of hull retention on
germination damage

In these experiments, the seed batches of cv. Lis-
beth that germinated well after normal thresh-
ing contained more hulls than the poorly germi-
nating ones, but not in cv. Bullion. After thresh-
ing at a low cylinder speed, samples of cv. Bul-
lion that germinated well contained fewer hulls
than for those that germinated poorly. In cv. Lis-
beth, at low cylinder speed, hull content was not
associated with germination capacity (Fig. 5).
For both cultivars, the samples that germinated
well after threshing at a reduced concave clear-
ance contained fewer hulls than those that ger-
minated poorly.

Grain size distribution and hull content
Results from the experiment with five naked oat
cultivars indicated that sorting groats liberated
from hulls during threshing into three size groups
resulted in 33 to 48% of groats > 2.0 mm de-
pending on cultivar (Table 3). The small-grained
cv. Lisbeth was, however, an exception, as only
some 3% of its groats were > 2.0 mm. About 40



205

A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E

Vol. 13 (2004): 198–211.

$*0&(1) "2++*.-

)
8+
3
-
+
6
-
&8
0
6
.
7
0
13
/

*
.
+
6
"
%
%
$

'
4
:
&,
;
21
3
-
.
6
&7
5
.
.
-

)
8+
3
-
+
6
-
&,
4
3
,
+
9
.
&

,
2.
+
6
+
3
,
.

*
.
+
6
"
%
%
%

(
+
6
6
4
:
&,
4
3
,
+
9
.
&,
2.
+
6
+
3
,
.

)
8+
3
-
+
6
-
&,
;
21
3
-
.
6
&7
5
.
.
-

*
.
+
6
#
!
!
!

%.*012/(!'.-1(-1!,

y = 0.0037x + 3.6824

R2 = 0.0003

y = 0.0524x + 0.4874

R2 = 0.1198
0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

10 20 30 40 50

#2++!'.-1(-1 ,

y = 0.1949x + 0.9118

R2 = 0.1016

y = -0.0182x + 2.2773

R2 = 0.0066

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

10 20 30 40 50

y = 0.1233x - 0.8126

R2 = 0.8215

y = 0.0729x + 2.9301

R2 = 0.1168

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

10 20 30 40 50

Fig. 4. Hull content and grain
moisture at harvest in oat cultivars
Lisbeth and Bullion in 1998–2000.

the variation of fatty acid content may be partly
explained by the specific loss of unsaturated fatty
acids due to oxidation.

Threshing moisture content affected the con-
centrations of another groups of volatile com-
pounds that probably indicate degradation of
amino acids or microbe and/or enzyme activity

(Table 5). In this case differences between years
were modest. The higher the grain moisture at
harvest, the higher the concentration of isobu-
tanal in cv. Bullion in 1998 and cv. Salo in 1999,
isopentanal and 3-pentanon in cv. Salo in 1999,
and fenylacetaldehyde in cultivars Bullion and
Salo in 1999.



206

A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E

Kirkkari, A.-M. et al. Dehulling capacity and storability of naked oat

$).%'/( "0**)-,

)
8+
3
-
+
6
-
&8
0
6
.
7
0
13
/

*
.
+
6
"
%
%
$

'
4
:
&,
;
21
3
-
.
6
&7
5
.
.
-

)
8+
3
-
+
6
-
&,
4
3
,
+
9
.
&

,
2.
+
6
+
3
,
.

*
.
+
6
"
%
%
%

(
+
6
6
4
:
&,
4
3
,
+
9
.
&,
2.
+
6
+
3
,
.

)
8+
3
-
+
6
-
&,
;
21
3
-
.
6
&7
5
.
.
-

*
.
+
6
#
!
!
!

y = 0.0261x + 1.8721

R2 = 0.0692

y = -0.0058x + 2.1764

R2 = 0.0097
0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

#0**!&-,/',/ +

y = -0.0045x + 4.7046

R2 = 0.0013

y = -0.062x + 6.9169

R2 = 0.5682

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

y = -0.0472x + 8.5833

R2 = 0.018

y = -0.1315x + 12.455
R2 = 0.2052

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Fig. 5. Hull content and germina-
tion capacity in oat cultivars Lis-
beth and Bullion in 1998–2000.

Discussion

Expression of nakedness
Grain moisture content at threshing had contra-
ry effects on hull content and degree of hull re-
tention in different years. The hull content was

at its highest in 2000 at the same time as the pro-
portion of hull-retaining grains was as its lowest
in Experiment 1. Growing conditions in 2000
probably favoured full and relatively slow rip-
ening better than in 1999 when severe drought
occurred, improving dehulling capacity. This
indicates that the hulls remaining attached to the
grains must have been heavy, which could also



207

A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E

Vol. 13 (2004): 198–211.

late. The opposite response was registered in
1999 under constant drought (Fig. 2), although
in both cases the aim was to harvest grains only
when they were physiologically fully mature.
Only the cultivar Neon expressed similar trends
in both years: the lower the moisture content,
the fewer grains retaining their hulls. Strong
correlation (R2 = 0.92) between degree of hull
retention and hull content in Experiment 2
(Fig. 3) suggested that there was no marked
growing-condition dependent difference in hull
weight and no mixing of hulled and naked oat.
As there were contrasting results for grain mois-
ture effects on dehulling capacity, there was no
recommended range established for threshing
moistures favouring dehulling. Peltonen-Sainio
et al. (2004) concluded that when an impact de-
huller was used, the lower moisture contents re-
sulted in higher dehulling capacity. Threshing
settings had only limited effects on hull content
and degree of hull retention, contrary to our pos-
tulation that gentle threshing increases the hull
percentage.

The function of hulls is to protect the groat
(Welch 1995). In an experiment by Thorton
(1986), naked oat that retained hulls was not
damaged to a similar extent as dehulled oat dur-
ing threshing. The embryo of naked oat protrudes
from the groat, which has been presumed to be a
reason for sensitivity to damage, in addition to
the softness of the groat (Valentine 1995). How-
ever, the experiments of Thorton (1986) and Pel-
tonen-Sainio et al. (2001) showed no constant

Table 3. Proportion of different groat size groups (%) dehulled during threshing and grains retaining hulls after manual
dehulling. Standard error of mean (± SE) is given in parentheses.

Cultivar Groats dehulled during threshing1) Grains retaining hulls after dehulling2)

> 2.0 mm 1.7–2.0 mm < 1.7 mm > 2.0 mm 1.7–2.0 mm < 1.7 mm

Bullion 47.2 (1.5) 39.7 (1.2) 13.2 (0.3) 11.5 (0.8) 42.8 (2.4) 45.8 (3.1)
Lisbeth 3.4 (0.1) 61.5 (0.1) 35.2 (0.1) 3.8 (0.2) 44.2 (1.2) 52.1 (1.0)
Neon 33.2 (0.4) 45.0 (0.4) 21.9 (0.8) 14.1 (1.3) 43.9 (1.8) 42.1 (0.6)
Rhiannon 46.8 (0.2) 41.7 (0.4) 11.5 (0.5) – – –
SW95926 47.7 (0.4) 41.1 (0.8) 11.3 (0.4) – – –

1) Results shown earlier in Peltonen-Sainio et al. (2001).
2) Due to almost complete expression of nakedness when threshed, no data available for cultivars Rhiannon and SW95926

45

40

35

30

45

40

35

30

45

40

35

30

25

S
a

tu
ra

t e
d

 (
%

)
M

o
n

o
u
n

sa
tu

ra
te

d
(%

) 
 P

o
ly

u
n

s a
tu

ra
te

d
 (

%
)

Bullion                                 Lisbeth                 Salo

1998               1999                1998             1999    1998              1999

1
0

.5
%

2
3

.0
 %

2
7

.4
%

4
5

.0
 %

1
3

.7
%

1
9

.9
%

2
3

.6
%

4
2

.5
%

1
9

.9
%

1
0

.1
%

2
0

.2
%

2
6

.1
%

4
1

.6
%

1
2

.1
%

1
9

.1
%

3
0

.9
%

1
9

.1
%

1
0

.2
%

1
8

.7
%

2
6

.7
%

3
7

.6
%

1
2

.4
%

2
0

.7
%

2
4

.9
%

3
5

.2
%

1
6

.5
%

Combine harvested
Hand threshed

Fig. 6. Effect of harvest moisture on contents of saturated,
monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids in naked
oat cultivars Bullion and Lisbeth and conventional Salo in
1998 and 1999.

result from contamination of naked oat by con-
ventional oat. For Experiment 2, high grain mois-
ture at harvest resulted in decreased hull con-
tent and degree of hull retention in 1998 when
the growing season was rainy and oat matured



208

A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E

Kirkkari, A.-M. et al. Dehulling capacity and storability of naked oat

Table 4. Normalised concentrations of volatile compounds associated with oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids. Standard
error of mean (± SE) is given in parentheses (± SE of 0.01 indicates that ± SE is < 0.01).

Moisture content (%) Pentanal 1-Pentanol Hexanal 1-Hexanol Pentylfuran Nonanal

cv. Bullion 1998
10.5 0.57 (0.03) 1.00 (0.08) 0.93 (0.04) 0.88 (0.01) 1.00 (0.03) 0.73 (0.10)
23.0 0.38 (0.05) 0.47 (0.05) 0.43 (0.02) 0.65 (0.05) 0.35 (0.01) 0.31 (0.03)
27.4 0.32 (0.02) 0.51 (0.03) 0.48 (0.02) 0.65 (0.05) 0.37 (0.01) 0.28 (0.01)
45.0 0.47 (0.01) 0.43 (0.03) 0.60 (0.02) 0.43 (0.06) 0.45 (0.02) 0.34 (0.01)

cv. Bullion 1999
13.7 0.22 (0.01) 0.28 (0.03) 0.32 (0.02) 0.39 (0.04) 0.48 (0.02) 0.48 (0.18)
19.9 0.15 (0.01) 0.28 (0.02) 0.16 (0.01) 0.29 (0.12) 0.19 (0.00) 0.19 (0.03)
23.6 0.27 (0.02) 0.29 (0.03) 0.29 (0.01) 0.35 (0.03) 0.42 (0.01) 0.32 (0.04)
42.5 0.35 (0.02) 0.26 (0.03) 0.37 (0.01) 0.19 (0.09) 0.40 (0.01) 0.25 (0.05)
Control (19.9) 0.13 (0.02) 0.19 (0.01) 0.14 (0.01) 0.39 (0.04) 0.14 (0.01) 0.15 (0.02)

cv. Lisbeth 1998
10.1 0.55 (0.05) 0.66 (0.05) 0.83 (0.06) 0.71 (0.01) 0.74 (0.03) 1.00 (0.07)
20.2 0.27 (0.01) 0.32 (0.03) 0.36 (0.03) 0.45 (0.03) 0.34 (0.01) 0.26 (0.03)
26.1 0.28 (0.01) 0.38 (0.04) 0.37 (0.04) 0.54 (0.06) 0.32 (0.02) 0.36 (0.08)
41.6 0.42 (0.02) 0.29 (0.02) 0.51 (0.02) 0.26 (0.06) 0.46 (0.01) 0.39 (0.05)

cv. Lisbeth 1999
12.1 0.32 (0.02) 0.37 (0.03) 0.41 (0.01) 0.30 (0.03) 0.53 (0.01) 0.45 (0.05)
19.1 0.16 (0.01) 0.20 (0.02) 0.18 (0.01) 0.38 (0.02) 0.17 (0.01) 0.20 (0.01)
30.9 0.24 (0.01) 0.20 (0.02) 0.24 (0.01) 0.20 (0.01) 0.34 (0.01) 0.47 (0.01)
Control (19.1) 0.16 (0.01) 0.10 (0.01) 0.12 (0.01) 0.33 (0.02) 0.15 (0.01) 0.15 (0.02)

cv. Salo 1998
10.1 1.00 (0.07) 0.8  (0.05) 1.00 (0.03) 1.00 (0.02) 0.82 (0.04) 0.89 (0.06)
18.7 0.99 (0.05) 0.69 (0.02) 0.92 (0.03) 0.75 (0.06) 0.78 (0.02) 0.79 (0.03)
26.7 0.90 (0.02) 0.67 (0.04) 0.91 (0.01) 0.80 (0.04) 0.88 (0.01) 0.95 (0.03)
37.6 0.85 (0.01) 0.54 (0.04) 0.74 (0.02) 0.40 (0.03) 0.64 (0.01) 0.64 (0.02)

cv. Salo 1999
12.4 0.41 (0.01) 0.24 (0.01) 0.23 (0.01) 0.37 (0.03) 0.23 (0.01) 0.31 (0.07)
20.7 0.42 (0.03) 0.24 (0.01) 0.24 (0.01) 0.42 (0.05) 0.21 (0.01) 0.32 (0.06)
24.9 0.51 (0.03) 0.28 (0.01) 0.34 (0.01) 0.36 (0.03) 0.38 (0.01) 0.32 (0.11)
35.2 0.71 (0.01) 0.35 (0.02) 0.45 (0.01) 0.41 (0.01) 0.51 (0.01) 0.42 (0.15)
Control (16.5) 0.44 (0.02) 0.28 (0.02) 0.35 (0.01) 0.39 (0.05) 0.50 (0.01) 0.78 (0.31)

association between protrusion of embryo and
sensitivity to groat damage. Groat damage was
not associated with groat weight, length, round-
ness or diameter (Peltonen-Sainio et al. 2001).
The postulated protective nature of hulls was
confirmed only for cultivar Lisbeth. Highly via-
ble samples of cv. Lisbeth, threshed at normal
settings, had a higher hull percentage than those
with low germination ability, while for cv. Bul-
lion, there was no evident protective effect of
the hulls. As reduced concave clearance did not

decrease hull content, it likewise did not affect
germination capacity.

The hull content and degree of hull retention
varied among cultivars. On the basis of the re-
sults for Lisbeth, one could assume that it is a
mosaic cultivar, in which the lignin content of
hulls varies greatly and, thus, makes its hull con-
tent non-responsive to even rough handling. An
alternative is that hull retention of cultivar Lis-
beth is associated with its exceptional grain size
distribution compared with other tested cultivars.



209

A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E

Vol. 13 (2004): 198–211.

Table 5. Normalised concentrations of volatile compounds possibly associated with degradation of amino acids that could
indicate microbe or enzyme activity.

Moisture content (%) Isobutanal Isopentanal* 3-Pentanon* Fenylacetaldehyde

cv. Bullion 19981
0.5 0.061 (0.003) – – 0.145 (0.008)
23.0 0.072 (0.003) – – 0.107 (0.002)
27.4 0.076 (0.003) – – 0.152 (0.014)
45.0 0.228 (0.012) 0.304 (0.019) 0.285 (0.015) 0.430 (0.028)

cv. Bullion 1999
13.7 0.129 (0.005) 0.125 (0.001) 0.118 (0.013) 0.128 (0.010)
19.9 0.103 (0.003) 0.254 (0.002) 0.222 (0.003) 0.135 (0.033)
23.6 0.162 (0.006) 0.171 (0.007) 0.199 (0.006) 0.230 (0.035)
42.5 0.390 (0.075) 0.350 (0.006) 0.350 (0.006) 0.320 (0.058)
Control (19.9) 0.113 (0.004) 0.088 (0.001) – 0.109 (0.021)

cv. Lisbeth 1998
10.1 0.069 (0.002) – – 0.148 (0.008)
20.2 0.127 (0.046) – – 0.138 (0.015)
26.1 0.092 (0.005) – – 0.169 (0.006)
41.6 0.370 (0.069) 0.450 (0.011) 0.360 (0.006) 0.660 (0.012)

cv. Lisbeth 1999
12.1 0.127 (0.008) 0.116 (0.001) – 0.117 (0.020)
19.1 0.106 (0.005) 0.109 (0.002) – 0.100 (0.001)
30.9 0.192 (0.007) 0.180 (0.043) 0.211 (0.027) 0.200 (0.015)
Control (19.1) 0.080 (0.007) – – 0.126 (0.020)

cv. Salo 1998
10.1 0.208 (0.006) 0.226 (0.015) 0.253 (0.016) 0.340 (0.012)
18.7 0.163 (0.005) 0.191 (0.006) 0.225 (0.016) 0.340 (0.041)
26.7 0.156 (0.004) 0.184 (0.014) 0.230 (0.007) 0.287 (0.009)
37.6 1.000 (0.127) 1.000 (0.017) 1.000 (0.023) 1.000 (0.017)

cv. Salo 1999
12.4 0.169 (0.001) 0.180 (0.009) 0.194 (0.017) 0.218 (0.027)
20.7 0.212 (0.012) 0.190 (0.012) 0.212 (0.027) 0.265 (0.082)
24.9 0.390 (0.035) 0.298 (0.019) 0.285 (0.019) 0.370 (0.064)
35.2 0.520 (0.011) 0.35  (0.006) 0.430 (0.006) 0.490 (0.052)
Control (16.5) 0.340 (0.064) 0.247 (0.006) 0.245 (0.002) 0.380 (0.081)

–, not detectable

In general, as in convention oat, sorting and pre-
cleaning aim at even size distribution for better
dehulling properties in industry (Deane and
Commers 1986). In this study, we noted that cv.
Lisbeth had very small grains, but it had also
very high hull content. Hence, in cultivars other
than Lisbeth and Bullion, small grains tended to
retain hulls more tightly during threshing (Ta-

ble 3). This may indicate that the most advanced
grains were more completely filled and mature
and therefore, also better able to dehull. This,
together with our finding of growing condition
effects on dehulling capacity, may emphasise that
grain filling capacity is the dominant factor in
determination of degree of nakedness rather than
stage of ripening.



210

A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E

Kirkkari, A.-M. et al. Dehulling capacity and storability of naked oat

Storability
The changes in lipid composition and in the vol-
atile oxidation products during storage of oat
groats were relatively moderate. The most obvi-
ous change was the slight oxidation of linoleic
acid during storage over 1–2 years. This was
probably due to groat breakage in the combine
harvester as oxidation was minimal in the man-
ually threshed groats. The moisture content dur-
ing harvesting was however not critical in deter-
mining the stability of unsaturated fatty acids.
Compared with conventional oat, all the naked
oat cultivars studied were of similar storage sta-
bility.

The presence of degradation products of ami-
no acids in the oats harvested at high moisture
content, especially in conventional cultivar Salo,
may be explained by the germination prior to
harvesting. As these compounds are associated
with positive flavour parameters, the moisture
content prior to harvesting probably has a large
effect on groat properties (Heiniö et al. 2002).

chemistry and technology. American Association of
Cereal Chemists, St Paul, MN. p. 47–71.

Heiniö, R.-L., Lehtinen, P., Oksman-Caldentey, K.-M. &
Poutanen, K. 2002. Differences between sensory pro-
files and development of rancidity during long-term
storage of native and processed oat. Cereal Chem-
istry 79: 367–375.

Jenkins, G. 1973. The effect of sowing date and photope-
riod on panicle morphology in naked oats. Annals of
Applied Biology 73: 85–94.

Kangas, A., Salo, Y. & Vuorinen, M. 2001. Paljasjyväisten
kauralajikkeiden satoisuus. (The yield of naked oat).
In: Kaurasta elinvoimaa. EKT-sarja 1221. Helsinki,
Finland. p. 77–83. (In Finnish).

Kibite, S. 2002. An isozyme marker linked to the N-1 gene
coverning nakedness in oat. Oat Newsletter v. 48.
Updated 2 Oct 2002. Cited 1 Apr 2003. Available on
the Inter net: http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/ggpages/
newsletter/v48/Isozyme.htm

Kirkkari, A.-M., Peltonen-Sainio, P. & Rita, H. 2001. Re-
ducing grain damage in naked oat through gentle
harvesting. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland
10: 223–229.

Lawes, D.A. 1971. Oat improvement – recent research
and developments. Field Crop Abstracts 24: 203–215.

Lawes, D.A. & Boland, P. 1974. Effect of temperature on
the expression of the naked grain character in oats.
Euphytica 23: 101–104.

Machan, F. 1998. Performance and quality of naked oat
cultivars of the world collection, Czech Republik,
1995–1997. Updated 2 Aug 1998. Cited 3 Oct 1999.
Available on the Internet: http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/
ggpages/oatnewsletter/oatnews_main.html

Ougham, H.J., Lapitova, G. & Valentine, J. 1996. Mor-
phological and biochemical characterization of spike-
let development in naked oats (Avena sativa). New
Phytologist 134: 5–12.

Peltonen-Sainio, P., Kontturi, M., Rajala, A. & Kirkkari,
A.-M. 2004. Impact dehulling oat grain to improve
quality of on-farm produced feed. I Hullability and
associated changes in nutritive value and energy
content. Agricultural and Food Science 13: 18–28.

Peltonen-Sainio, P., Muurinen, S., Vilppu, M., Rajala, A.,
Gates, F. & Kirkkari, A.-M. 2001. Germination and
grain vigour of naked oat in response to grain mois-
ture at harvest. Journal of Agriculture Science, Cam-
bridge 137: 147–156.

Thorton, M.S. 1986. Investigations into the problems as-
sociated with the development of naked oats as a
crop. PhD. Thesis: University of Wales, Aberystwyth.

Valentine, J. 1995. Naked oats. In: Welch, R.W. (ed.). The
oat crop, production and utilization. Chapman & Hall,
London, UK. p. 504–527.

Welch, R.W. 1995. Naked oats. In: Welch, R.W. (ed.). The
oat crop, production and utilization. Chapman & Hall,
London, UK. p. 279–320.

References
Boland, P. & Lawes, D.A. 1973. The inheritance of naked

grain character in oats studied in a cross between
the naked variety Caesar and the husked variety BO
1/11. Euphytica 22: 582–591.

Bonnett, O.T. 1961. The oat plant: Its histology and de-
velopment. Bulletin 672. University of Illinois, Agri-
cultural Experiment Station. 112 p.

Cuddeford, D. 1995. Oats for animal feed. In: Welch, R.W.
(ed.). The oat crop, production and utilization. Chap-
man & Hall, London, UK. p. 321–368.

Deane, D. & Commers, E. 1986. Oat cleaning and
processing. In: Webster, F.H. (ed.). Oats: chemistry
and technology. American Association of Cereal
Chemists, St Paul, MN. p. 371–412.

Fulcher, R.G. 1986. Morphological and chemical organi-
zation of the oat kernel. In: Webster, F.H. (ed.). Oats:



211

A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E

Vol. 13 (2004): 198–211.

SELOSTUS
Paljasjyväisen kauran kuoriutuvuus ja säilyvyys

Anna-Maija Kirkkari, Pirjo Peltonen-Sainio ja Pekka Lehtinen
Työtehoseura ry., MTT (Maa- ja elintarviketalouden tutkimuskeskus) ja Teknillinen Korkeakoulu

Paljasjyväisen kauran kuoriutuminen puinnissa ei ole
täydellistä, vaan kuorta jää jyviin 1–6 % lajikkeesta
ja ympäristöoloista johtuen. Vaikka paljasjyväisen
kauran kuoriksi sanotut helpeet ovat paperiset ja hau-
raat ja kuoripitoisuus on pieni, toisin kuin tavanomai-
sella kauralla, vähäisetkin määrät kuoria alentavat
paljasjyväisen kauran käyttömahdollisuuksia. Siksi
loppukäyttäjän tavoitteena onkin mahdollisimman
hyvin kuoriutunut paljasjyväinen kaura. Tässä tutki-
muksessa selvitettiin paljasjyväisten kauralajikkeiden
kuoriutumista erilaisissa puintikosteuksissa ja erilai-
silla puintisäädöillä. Lisäksi tutkittiin paljasjyväisen
kauran jyvän kokojakauman, itävyyden ja säilyvyy-
den yhteyttä kuoriutuvuuteen. Kokeet tehtiin Työte-
hoseuran, Helsingin yliopiston Viikin ja MTT:n Jo-
kioisten koetiloilla sekä säilyvyysanalyysit Teknilli-
sessä korkeakoulussa.

Puintikosteus vaikutti eri tavalla kuoripitoisuu-
teen ja kuorellisten jyvien määrään eri vuosina. Kas-
vuoloiltaan suotuisana vuonna 2000 kuorellisten jy-
vien määrä oli alhaisimmillaan, vaikka kuoriprosentti

olikin korkeampi kuin kuivana vuonna 1999. Satei-
sena vuonna 1998 korkea puintikosteus vähensi kuo-
ripitoisuutta ja kuorellisten jyvien määrää, kun vai-
kutus oli päinvastainen kuivana vuonna 1999. Puin-
tisäädöillä oli vain vähäinen vaikutus paljasjyväisen
kauran kuoriutuvuuteen. Kuoripitoisuudessa ja kuo-
rellisten jyvien määrässä oli eroja lajikkeiden välil-
lä. Myös jyvän koolla oli vaikutusta kuoriutuvuuteen,
sillä pienet jyvät kuoriutuivat huonoimmin. Tästä voi-
si päätellä, että suurempien jyvien jyvän täyttyminen
on ollut täydellisempää, mikä näin edistäisi kuoriu-
tuvuutta. Tulosten mukaan jyvän täyttymisolosuhteet
vaikuttavat kuoriutumiseen enemmän kuin jyvän val-
mistumisaste.

Kuorien suojaava vaikutus tuli esille vain Lisbeth-
lajikkeella, sillä sen hyvin itävissä jyvänäytteissä oli
enemmän kuorta kuin huonosti itävissä. Sen sijaan
Bullion-lajikkeella tätä vaikutusta ei havaittu. Puin-
tikosteus ei olennaisesti vaikuttanut kauran säilyvyy-
teen.


	Dehulling capacity and storability of naked oat
	Introduction
	Material and methods
	Results
	Discussion
	References
	SELOSTUS