Agricultural and Food Science, Vol. 14 (2005): 346–353


346

A G R I C U L T U R A L  A N D  F O O D  S C I E N C E

Vol. 14 (2005): 346–353.

© Agricultural and Food Science
Manuscript received June 2005

Introduction of automatic milking system in Finland: 
effect on milk quality

Heidi Salovuo, Pilvi Ronkainen, Antti Heino
Department of Food Technology, PO Box 66, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland

Antti Suokannas
MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Agricultural Engineering Research, Vakolantie 55, FI-03400 Vihti, Finland

Eeva-Liisa Ryhänen
MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Food Research, FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland, e-mail: eeva-liisa.ryhanen@mtt.fi

When an automatic milking system (AMS) is introduced on a farm the milking of cows and related work is 
changed in many ways compared to farms with traditional milking systems. The objective of this paper was 
to study the effect of the introduction of robotic milking in Finland on the composition and hygienic qual-
ity of milk. The study was carried out on three farms which were the first in Finland to introduce the auto-
matic milking system (Volontary Milking System™). Main chemical composition, somatic cell count, total 
bacteria count, freezing point, free fatty acids, as well as Bacillus cereus, Clostridium spores, psychro-
trophic bacteria and coliforms were determined. After the introduction of the automatic milking system an 
increase in somatic cell count and total bacteria count, psychrotrophic bacteria and coliforms was observed; 
however, the differences were not statistically significant. The counts for Clostridium spores were at the 
same level in the automatic and the conventional milking system. Bacillus cereus counts were very low in 
both milking systems studied. Milk fat content and free fatty acids were elevated when AMS was intro-
duced. The introduction of AMS resulted in a significant increase (P < 0.01) in the freezing point during the 
first three months. Though there was a trend that the overall quality of milk was impaired after the introduc-
tion of AMS, the quality of milk remained at premium class.

Key words: automatic milking, milk quality, somatic cell count, total bacteria count

Introduction

The first automatic milking system (AMS) was in-
troduced in the Netherlands in the beginning of the 
1990s. Since then the AMS has been installed at a 
number of farms in Europe, USA and Japan. In 

Finland the system was introduced in 2000 and the 
number of farms with AMS has steadily increased 
since then.

The milking of cows changes in many ways 
when traditional milking systems are replaced by 
an AMS. The system includes voluntary visits for 
milking and milking may occur more than twice 



347

A G R I C U L T U R A L  A N D  F O O D  S C I E N C E

Vol. 14 (2005): 346–353.

daily. In AMS human presence is not required dur-
ing milking. The machine prepares the cow for 
milking independently according to settings that 
are pre-programmed. The AMS includes the clean-
ing of teats in order to minimise the transmission 
of mastitis or other harmful bacteria. The machine 
is also programmed to indicate cows with abnor-
mal milk or milk with high somatic cell count 
(SCC), by use of different sensors. The cleaning 
process of milking equipment is automatic and is 
carried out two to three times a day (24 h). After an 
idle period the milking equipment is automatically 
flushed. A flush is also given when a cow with ab-
normal milk, for example with a high SCC, has 
visited the milking unit. (Schuling et al. 2001)

The effects of AMS on udder health and milk 
quality have been evaluated in a number of experi-
ments. According to several studies the total bacte-
ria counts (TBC) and SCC and the free fatty acid 
(FFA) level elevate after the introduction of AMS 
(van der Vorst and Hogeveen 2000, Everitt et al. 
2002, Rasmussen et al. 2002). However, no effects 
(Klungel et al. 2000) or even an improvement 
(Berglund et al. 2002) in SCC have also been re-
ported. The health, stage of lactation, (living) envi-
ronment and feeding of the animal affects the qual-
ity and chemical composition of milk (Akam et al. 
1989). Elevated SCC are usually a sign of mastitis. 
The TBC of milk is an indicator of the milking hy-
giene and the cooling of milk but can also imply 
hazards in animal health (Hayes et al. 2000). It has 
been suggested that factors related to AMS, such 
as increased milking frequency, may also have an 
impact on milk quality (Escobar and Bradley 1990, 
Hamann and Gyodi 2000, Klungel et al. 2000, Ho-
geveen et al. 2001). Klungel et al. (2000) suggest-
ed that increased levels of free fatty acids may be 
partly explained by shorter intervals. According to 
Hogeveen et al. (2001) the variation in the milking 
interval could be part of the explanation for an ap-
parent increase in SCC with automatic milking. 
However, more research on the relationships be-
tween milking intervals and milk quality is re-
quired.

The present study was carried out as part of a 
larger Finnish project investigating the impact of 
AMS on udder health, animal welfare and milk 

quality on three Finnish farms. The objective of 
this work was to study the effect of the introduc-
tion of robotic milking on the composition and hy-
gienic quality of milk.

Material and methods

Dairy cows and milking
Three farms participated in this study; two private 
farms (PF1 and PF2) and the Helsinki University’s 
research farm. The farms are located in south-
western Finland. The research farm had an average 
26 cows and private farms from 33 to 55 cows. 
The cows were mainly of the Holstein Friesian 
breed.

The cows were milked with the Voluntary 
Milking System™ (VMS; DeLaval Group, Tumba, 
Sweden). The mean milking frequency was 2–3 
times per day. The AMS included the cleaning of 
the teats with a special teat cup. After milking the 
teat cups were automatically detached.

Collection and analysis of milk samples
Bulk tank milk samples were collected once a 
week for three months on the research farm and 
farm PF2 before the new milking equipment was 
adopted. From farm PF1 samples were taken once 
a week for one month before installation. After in-
stallation of the new equipment bulk tank milk 
samples were collected twice a week during the 
first three months and later on once a week from 
all farms. The samples were taken for the first year 
of using AMS during years 2000 and 2001. Before 
drawing samples from farm tank, milk was stirred 
for five minutes. Samples were stored in refrigera-
tor at +4°C and transported to the laboratory by 
milk-lorry within 24 hours.

The results were compared to a reference group 
which included the conventional milking parlour 
of the research farm and 26 farms on a milk col-
lecting route located in south-western Finland.



348

A G R I C U L T U R A L  A N D  F O O D  S C I E N C E

Salovuo, H. et al. Introduction of automatic milking

The fat, protein and lactose content (g l-1), SCC 
(cells ml-1) and freezing point (°C) were deter-
mined using CombiFoss 6000, (Foss A/S, Hillerod, 
Denmark), which is a combination of MilcoScan 
FT 600 and Fossomatic 5000. The TBC (cfu ml-1) 
was determined by automated fluorescence micro-
scopy (BactoScan 8000, Foss A/S, Hillerod, Den-
mark). The samples were analysed by Valio Ltd 
Kouvola until 1 April 2001 and after that by Valio 
Ltd Seinäjoki.

Milk samples to analyse of FFA were collected 
once a week for seven months (research farm and 
PF1) or for four months (PF2) after installation of 
AMS. The FFA (mEq 100 g-1 fat) were determined 
according to the method of FIL-IDF (1989) with 
slight modification.

Bacillus cereus count in raw milk was deter-
mined using the ISO method 7932 (ISO 7932). In 
total 19 samples were taken from the three AMS 
equipments during a period from November 2001 
to February 2002. Control samples (n = 20) were 
taken from conventional milking parlours. 
Clostridium spores were determined according to 
Bergere and Sivelä (1990) from samples collected 
once a week for seven months from April to Octo-
ber 2001 (n = 60). Samples from conventional 
milking parlours (n = 84) were taken in April, May 
and October 2001.

Psychrotrophic bacteria and coliforms were 
also determined from bulk milk samples. Samples 
were collected once a week for seven months after 
the introduction of AMS. The determination of 
coliforms was performed using a standard method 
(FIL-IDF 1985). Psychrotrophic bacteria were de-
termined according to the IDF Standard (FIL-IDF 
1991). All determinations were performed in du-
plicate.

Statistical analysis
The study was divided into five periods: the first 
period was before AMS was adopted. The follow-
ing periods are 1–3, 4–6, 7–9 and 10–12 months 
after installation. Mean values for the parameters 
were calculated separately for each farm. From 
these results an overall mean and standard devia-
tion were calculated.

Geometric means and standard deviation (SD) 
were calculated for the SCC and TBC. Arithmetic 
means and SD were calculated for fat, protein and 
lactose content as well as for the freezing point.

The data were statistically analysed by analysis 
of variance using SPSS 9.0 statistical software. 
Statistical analyses were only performed to nor-
mally distributed parameters within the test group. 
Within the group differences were tested with 
Tukey’s test.

Results

Somatic cell count and total 
bacteria count

TBC and SCC are presented in Table 1. The SCC 
elevated from 142 000 (log 5.15) to 208 000 (log 
5.31) cells ml-1 during the first nine months com-
pared to the situation before installation of AMS. 
There was a slight improvement in SCC during the 
last period, which can be seen as a decrease of cell 
count by 32 000 (log 0.07) cells ml-1. The TBC was 
elevated about three fold during the AMS period 
from 3 800 (log 3.54) to 12 400 (log 4.07) cfu ml-1. 
However, the increases in SCC and TBC were not 
statistically significant (P > 0.05).

Coliforms and psychrotrophic bacteria
The count of coliforms bacteria in AMS was ele-
vated compared to traditional system. The colifor-
mic counts (geometric mean) were 57 cfu ml-1 and 
18 cfu ml-1 for AMS-milk and conventional milk, 
respectively. The variation in bacterial counts was 
substantial; in the AMS-milk the highest counts 
were 28 000 cfu ml-1 and in the reference group 9 
900 cfu ml-1. As can be seen in Table 2, counts over 
100 cfu ml-1 are more frequent in AMS milk than 
in conventional milk. The count of psychrotrophic 
bacteria in AMS-milk was 1 281 cfu ml-1 and was 
10 fold higher than in the reference group (119 cfu 
ml-1).



349

A G R I C U L T U R A L  A N D  F O O D  S C I E N C E

Vol. 14 (2005): 346–353.

Table 1. The somatic cell count and total bacteria count in milk before and after the introduction of the 
automatic milking system in three months periods. 

Somatic cell count 
(Log cells ml-1)

Total bacteria count 
(Log cfu ml-1)

Geometric mean Standard deviation Geometric mean Standard deviation

Before introduction 5.15 0.16 3.54 0.54

After introduction, months
1–3  5.22 0.11 3.92 0.21
4–6 5.29 0.09 3.96 0.37
7–9 5.31 0.10 4.05 0.18
10–12 5.24 0.12 4.07 0.40

Table 2. Coliforms in milk produced using automatic 
milking system (n = 56) or by conventional parlour 
milking (n = 72).

cfu ml-1 Automatic  
milking system

Conventional

n % n %

< 100 35 63.5 55 76.4
100–1000 15 26.8 15 20.8
> 1000 6 10.7 2 2.8

n = number of observations

Table 3. Clostridium spores in milk produced using 
automatic milking system (n = 60) or by conventional 
parlour milking (n = 84).

Most propable 
number l-1

Automatic  
milking system

Conventional

n % n %

< 300 50 83.3 69 82.1
300–1000 8 13.3 10 11.9
> 1000 2 3.3 5 6.0

n = number of observations

Bacillus cereus and Clostridium spores
In the present study the content of Bacillus cereus 
in raw milk was very low (1 cfu ml-1) and bacteria 
were detected in only two of the 39 raw milk sam-
ples studied (one positive sample in each groups). 
The level of Clostridium spores is presented in Ta-
ble 3 showing that the majority of the raw milk 
samples contained Clostridium spores under 300 
l-1; 80 and 83%, in conventional and AMS, respec-
tively. Most of the samples had less than 1 spore 
ml-1.

Main chemical composition, freezing point 
and free fatty acids

The fat content of milk was elevated from 3.85 up 
to 4.20% when AMS was introduced. However, 
the increase was not statistically significant. Only 
minor changes in protein and lactose content were 
detected after introduction of AMS (Table 4).

The freezing point (FP) elevated significantly 
(P < 0.01) from –0.531 to –0.518°C during the first 
three months after the introduction of AMS. After 
that the FP returned to the same level as before 
AMS (Table 4).

The introduction of AMS elevated the level of 
FFA. The mean values (±SD) were 0.52 ± 0.09 and 
0.82 ± 0.16 mEq 100 g-1 fat for conventional milk-
ing (n = 40) and AMS (n = 88), respectively.

Discussion
Even though in the present study the TBC and 
SCC had a tendency to increase, the quality of 
milk still remained good. The upper limits for high 
quality milk in Finland (E-class, extra) are for the 
SCC 250 000 cells ml-1 (log 5.40) (3 months geo-
metric mean) and for the TBC 50 000 cfu ml-1 (log 
4.70) (2 months geometric mean). In present study 
the levels measured did not exceed these limits. 



350

A G R I C U L T U R A L  A N D  F O O D  S C I E N C E

Salovuo, H. et al. Introduction of automatic milking

Table 4. The chemical composition and freezing point of milk before and after the introduction of the automatic milking 
system in three months periods. Values are arithmetic means.

Fat 
(g l-1)

Protein 
(g l-1)

Lactose 
(g l-1)

Freezing point (°C)

Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD

Before introduction 38.5 3.3 33.5 1.6 49.1 0.6 –0.531a 0.003

After introduction, months
1–3 39.7 1.4 32.1 1.0 48.1 0.4 –0.518b 0.002
4–6 42.0 2.0 33.1 0.5 48.4 0.2 –0.524ab 0.002
7–9 40.3 0.8 33.6 0.9 48.5 0.5 –0.528ab 0.005
10–12 40.4 1.1 33.6 0.2 48.6 0.5 –0.530a 0.002
a,b values within same column marked with different letters are statistically different (P < 0.01)
SD = standard deviation

Since 1998 over 90% of Finnish milk has been in 
the E-class (Finnish Association for Milk hygiene 
2004). It can be suggested that although some ad-
verse effects on milk quality were observed, the 
overall hygienic quality of milk was not markedly 
changed by the introduction of AMS. However the 
amount of data was quite small, the variation in 
counts was high and there was only three farms 
participating in the study. Also the farms differed 
from each other among other things in feeding, liv-
ing environment and hygienic status. Moreover, it 
should be noted that one farm was a research 
farm.

Others have also reported increases in TBC 
and SCC due to the introduction of AMS. In the 
Netherlands, according to Klungel et al. (2000), 
the TBC increased from 8 000 to 19 000 cfu ml-1, 
although the SCC did not rise after the introduc-
tion of AMS. Van der Vorst and Hogeveen (2000) 
discovered that both TBC (from 8 000 to 12 000 
cfu ml-1) and SCC (181 000 to 192 000 cells ml-1) 
increased during the first year of automatic milk-
ing. In Denmark the TBC increased from 7 400 to 
14 000 cfu ml-1 and the SCC increased from 
246 000 to 302 000 cells ml-1 (Rasmussen et al. 
2002). Increase in TBC may be caused by failures 
in the cleaning system (Hayes et al. 2000). The 
main reason for high SCC seems to be that farms 
with AMS have been reported to have more new 
infections during the first year of AMS (Rasmus-
sen et al. 2001). The same phenomenon was also 
found in our larger project studying the impact of 

AMS on udder health and animal welfare. Accord-
ing to this larger study significantly more infec-
tions were reported on all farms. Unreliable detec-
tion of subclinical infections was suggested to be 
the most important reason for increase of infec-
tions (Suokannas et al. 2005).

Coliforms are an indicator of milking and cow-
house hygiene, especially environmental contami-
nation. According to Schuling et al. (2001), the 
amount of coliforms in raw milk should be below 
100 cfu ml-1. High counts of coliforms can be at-
tributed to coliform mastitis or environmental con-
tamination (Hayes et al. 2000). In this study the 
high counts of coliforms might originate from en-
vironmental contamination which could have been 
caused by temporary problems in the cleaning 
process.

The count of psychrotrophic bacteria in AMS-
milk was 10 fold higher than in the reference 
group. Sources of contamination of psychrotrophs 
include soil, dust, air, water, vegetation and faeces 
as well as milking equipment (Shah 1994). Higher 
psychrotrophic counts in this study may be an in-
dication of failures in the AMS cleaning system. 
Psychrotrophic bacteria can cause problems in the 
manufacture of milk products, such as cheese mak-
ing, due to enzymatic activity when counts in-
crease to 104–107 cfu ml-1 (Cromie 1992). The 
counts of psychrotrophic bacteria in this study re-
mained below 104 cfu ml-1 and represented a share 
under 10% of total bacteria indicating good milk-
ing hygiene.



351

A G R I C U L T U R A L  A N D  F O O D  S C I E N C E

Vol. 14 (2005): 346–353.

In our study the content of Bacillus cereus in 
raw milk was very low. Bacillus cereus is a well 
known organism of food poisoning and a common 
contaminant in raw milk (te Giffel et al. 1995). The 
spore content in milk is strongly associated with 
the degree of contamination of the teats with soil 
Christiansson et al. (1999). According to Chris-
tiansson et al. (1999) the milking equipment, the 
air in the barn and animal feeding do not signifi-
cantly affect the spore content. Slaghuis et al. 
(1997) reported that restricted pasturing during 
summer reduced the contamination level of milk 
and suggested that automatic milking will lower 
the level of Bacillus spores in milk. To our knowl-
edge, so far no reports on the incidence of Bacillus 
cereus in milk produced by an AMS have been 
published. Our study suggests that AMS poses no 
risk for contamination of aerobic spores.

Clostridium spores represent a minority of 
bacteria found in raw milk, contamination levels 
being around 10–102 spores ml-1. If lactating cows 
are fed with heavily contaminated silage, levels 
can increase to over 103 spores ml-1 (Aureli and 
Franciosa 2002). Spores in milk originate from the 
udder, and go from the teats and teat cups to the 
milk. Dirty cows, spores in the air and milking 
equipment also affect the butyric acid bacteria 
content of milk (Stadhouders and Jørgensen 1990). 
In contrast to our study, Rasmussen et al. (2002) 
reported a significant increase in spores of anaer-
obes going from conventional to automatic milk-
ing, and this phenomenon was observed through-
out the first year. Most of the clostridial species 
relevant in dairy products are nonpathogenic for 
humans but can cause defects in final products 
(Aureli and Franciosa 2002) such as late blowing 
in hard cheese caused by Clostridium tyrobutyri-
cum (Klijn et al. 1995).

The fat content of milk tended to increase when 
AMS was introduced. However, the differences 
were not significant. This phenomenon may partly 
be caused by shorter intervals in milking, which 
was also seen in the traditional milking system 
with increased milking frequency. Bruckmaier et 
al. (2001) found that the fat content increases when 
the milking interval is shorter. However, our re-
sults are in disagreement with the studies of Klun-

gel et al. (2000) and Everitt et al. (2002). Klungel 
et al. (2000) found that fat and protein content was 
significantly decreased after the introduction of 
AMS (from 4.41 and 3.49 to 4.37 and 3.42, respec-
tively). In a Swedish study carried out by Everitt et 
al. (2002) the fat (from 4.18 to 4.09%) and protein 
(from 3.31 to 3.26 %) contents dropped after in-
stallation of AMS.

Elevated FFA levels indicate increased lipoly-
sis of milk. Escobar and Bradley (1990) suggest 
that lipolysis is mainly caused by milk pipelines, 
but it can also be caused by bacteria, such as psy-
chrotrophic bacteria (Shah 1994). The effect of 
mechanical treatment on milk causing lipolysis 
continues during storage (Needs et al. 1986). How-
ever, rapid cooling of milk has been reported to 
delay the lipolysis (Escobar and Bradley 1990). A 
recent report from Klungel et al. (2000) supports 
our findings. They also found a significant increase 
in FFA after introduction of AMS.

The FP of milk is measured to find out possible 
water addition in milk. In Finnish dairies the limit 
for rejection is adjusted to –0.512°C. A similar el-
evation of FP observed in our study, has also been 
observed by others (Klungel et al. 2000, Rasmus-
sen et al. 2002). In our study the FP decreased after 
the introduction period. This phenomenon has also 
been reported by Everitt et al. (2002). Cleaning 
procedures can leave residues of water in pipe 
lines and thus changes in the FP can be a mark of 
water in the pipelines. Further, air intake and more 
frequent milking with the AMS can cause changes 
in the FP of milk (Klungel et al. 2000).

Conclusion
The present work was conducted on the first Finn-
ish farms equipped with an AMS. The study 
showed that the bulk milk was not seriously al-
tered by the implementation of AMS. The intro-
duction of AMS tended to increase SCC, TBC, 
psychrotrophic and coliformic counts and the level 
of FFA and fat content of milk in Finland. How-
ever, the changes were not statistically significant. 



352

A G R I C U L T U R A L  A N D  F O O D  S C I E N C E

Salovuo, H. et al. Introduction of automatic milking

There were no major differences in counts of 
Clostridium spores and Bacillus cereus between 
the conventional system and AMS. The freezing 
point of milk was significantly increased after the 
installation of AMS and returned to the original 
level after an introduction period. Though the 
overall quality of milk tended to be impaired after 
the introduction of AMS, the quality of milk re-
mained at premium class.

Acknowledgements. The authors gratefully thank the farm-
ers and technical staff on the research farm for participat-
ing in this study. We also thank Valio Ltd for analysing 
samples, and the Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and For-
estry and Valio Ltd for funding this research.

References
Akam, D.N., Dodd, F.H. & Quick, A.J. 1989. Milking, milk 

production hygiene and udder health. FAO Animal Pro-
duction and Health Paper 78. 119 p.

Aureli, P. & Franciosa, G. 2002. Clostridium spp. In: Rogin-
ski, H. et al. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences. 
London, UK: Academic Press. p. 456–463.

Bergere, J.L. & Sivelä, S. 1990. Detection and enumeration 
of clostridial spores related to cheese quality – classi-
cal and new methods. IDF Bulletin 251: 18–23.

Berglund, I., Petterson, K. & Svannersten-Sjaunja, K. 2002. 
Automatic milking: effects on somatic cell count and 
teat end-quality. Livestock Production Science 78: 
115–124.

Bruckmaier, R.M., Macuhova, J. & Meyer, H.H.D. 2001. 
Specific aspects of milk ejection in robotic milking: a 
review. Livestock Production Science 72: 169–176.

Christiansson, A., Bertilsson, J. & Svensson, B. 1999. Bacil-
lus cereus spores in raw milk: factors affecting the con-
tamination of milk during the grazing period. Journal of 
Dairy Science 82: 305–314.

Cromie, S. 1992. Psychrotrophs and their enzyme residues 
in cheese milk. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 
47: 96–100.

Escobar, G.J. & Bradley, R.L., Jr. 1990. Effect of mechanical 
treatment on the free fatty acid content of raw milk. 
Journal of Dairy Science 73: 2054–2060.

Everitt, B., Ekman, T. & Gyllenswärd, M. 2002. Monitoring 
milk quality and udder health in Swedish AMS herds. 
In: The First North American Conference on Robotic 
Milking, Toronto, Canada. V-72–V-75.

FIL-IDF 1985. Milk and milk products. Enumeration of colif-
orms – Colony count technique and most probable 
number technique at 30°C. FIL-IDF Standard 73A:1985. 
8 p.

FIL-IDF 1989. Milkfat products and butter. Determination of 
fat acidity. FIL-IDF Standard 6B: 1989 (Provisional). 3 p.

FIL-IDF 1991. Milk. Enumeration of psychrotrophic micro-
organisms. Colony count technique at 6.5°C. FIL-IDF 
Standard 101A:1991. 3 p.

Finnish Association for Milk Hygiene 2004. E-luokan osuus 
maidosta 1998–2004. http://www.maitohygienialiitto.fi/
laatu_E-luokan_os_03.html. Cited 14 September 
2004.

Hamann, J. & Gyodi, P. 2000. Somatic cell counts and elec-
trical conductivity in relation to milking frequency. Milch-
wissenschaft 55: 303–307.

Hayes, M.C., Ralyea, R.D., Murphy, S.C., Carey, N.R., 
Scarlett, J.M. & Boor, K.J. 2000. Identification and char-
acterization of elevated microbial counts in bulk tank 
raw milk. Journal of Dairy Science 84: 292–298.

Hogeveen, H., Ouweltjes, W., de Koning, C.J.A.M. & Stel-
wagen, K. 2001. Milking interval, milk production and 
flow-rate in an automatic milking system. Livestock 
Production Science 72: 157–167.

ISO 7932. Microbiology – General guidance for the enu-
meration of Bacillus cereus – Colony count technique 
at 30°C. 2nd edition. International Organization of 
Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland. 1993.

Klijn, N., Nieuwnhof, F.F.J., Hoolwerf, J.D., van der Waals, 
C.B. & Weerkamp, A.H. 1995. Identification of Clostrid-
ium tyrobutyricum as the causative agent of late blow-
ing in cheese by species-specific PCR amplification. 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61: 2919–
2924.

Klungel, G.H., Slaghuis, B.A. & Hogeveen, H. 2000. The 
effect of the introduction of automatic milking systems 
on milk quality. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 1998–
2003.

Needs, E.C., Anderson, M. & Morant, S.V. 1986. Interaction 
of factors which influence the extent of lipolysis during 
milking and storage of raw milk. Journal of Dairy Re-
search 53: 203–210.

Rasmussen, M.D., Bolm, J.Y., Nielsen, L.A.H. & Justesen, 
P. 2001. Udder health of cows milked automatically. 
Livestock Production Science 72: 147–156.

Rasmussen, M.D., Bjerring, M., Justesen, P. & Jepsen, L. 
2002. Milk quality on Danish farms with automatic 
milking systems. Journal of Dairy Science 85: 2869–
2878.

Schuling, H.J., Verstappen-Boerekamp, J.A.M., Knapp-
stein, K. & Benfalk, C. 2001. Optimal cleaning of equip-
ment for automatic milking. Deliverable D16. Available 
on the Internet: http://www.automaticmilking.nl. Cited 
18 March 2003.

Shah, N.P. 1994. Psychrotrophs in milk: a review. Milchwis-
senschaft 49: 432–437.

Slaghuis, B., te Giffel, M.C., Beumer, R.R. & Andre, G. 
1997. Effect of pasturing on the incidence of Bacillus 
cereus spores in raw milk. International Dairy Journal 7: 
201–205.

Stadhouders, J. & Jørgensen, K. 1990. Prevention of the 
contamination of raw milk by a hygienic milk produc-
tion. IDF Bulletin 251: 32–36.

Suokannas, A., Salovuo, H., Ronkainen, P., Heino, A., Ho-
vinen, M., Kasanen, I., Raussi, S., Kaihilahti, J., Aisla, 
A.-M., Saastamoinen, S., Alasuutari, S. & Manninen, E. 
2004. Maidon laatu, eläinten utareterveys, käyttäytymi-
nen ja hyvinvointi automaattilypsyssä. Abstract: Effects 



353

A G R I C U L T U R A L  A N D  F O O D  S C I E N C E

Vol. 14 (2005): 346–353.

of automatic milking on the milk quality, udder health, 
behaviour and welfare of cows. Maa- ja elintarviketa-
lous 62. 97 p.

te Giffel, M.C., Beumer, R.R., Slaghuis, B.A. & Rombouts, 
F.M. 1995. Occurrence and characterization of (psy-
chrotrophic) Bacillus cereus on farms in the Nether-

lands. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 49: 125–
138.

Van der Vorst, Y. & Hogeveen, H. 2000. Automatic milking 
system in the Netherlands. In: Robotic milking proceed-
ings of the international symposium. Lelystad, Nether-
lands. p. 73–82.

SELOSTUS
Automaattisen lypsylaitteiston käyttöönoton vaikutus maidon laatuun
Heidi Salovuo, Pilvi Ronkainen, Antti Heino, Antti Suokannas ja Eeva-Liisa Ryhänen

Helsingin yliopisto ja MTT (Maa- ja elintarviketalouden tutkimuskeskus)

Lypsy ja siihen liittyvät työt muuttuvat tilalla, kun auto-
maattinen lypsyjärjestelmä otetaan käyttöön. Tämän tut-
kimuksen tarkoituksena oli tutkia automaattisen lypsy-
järjestelmän käyttöönoton vaikutusta maidon koostu-
mukseen ja laatuun Suomessa. Tutkimus toteutettiin 
kolmella tilalla, jotka olivat ensimmäisiä automaattilyp-
sytiloja Suomessa. Maidon kemiallinen koostumus, so-
maattiset solut, kokonaisbakteerit, jäätymispiste, vapaat 
rasvahapot, Bacillus cereus, klostridi-itiöt, psykrotrofit 
bakteerit, ja koliformiset bakteerit määritettiin. Auto-
maattilypsyn käyttöönoton jälkeen somaattisten solujen, 
kokonaisbakteerien, psykrotrofisten ja koliformisten 

bakteerien määrät olivat korkeampia kuin perinteisesti 
lypsettäessä, mutta erot eivät olleet tilastollisesti merkit-
seviä. Klostridi-itiöiden määrä oli samalla tasolla auto-
maattilypsymaidossa ja perinteisesti lypsetyssä maidos-
sa. Bacillus cereuksen määrä oli hyvin alhainen molem-
milla lypsytavoilla. Maidon rasvapitoisuus ja vapaiden 
rasvahappojen määrä kohosivat automaattisen lypsyn 
käyttöönoton jälkeen. Jäätymispiste kohosi ensimmäis-
ten kolmen kuukauden kuluessa laitteiston käyttöön-
otosta. Vaikka maidon laatu heikkeni, se oli edelleen E-
luokan maitoa.


	Introduction of automatic milking system in Finland:effect on milk quality
	Introduction
	Material and methods
	Results
	Discussion
	Conclusion
	References
	SELOSTUS