Agricultural and Food Science, vol. 19 (2010): 327-340 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Vol. 19(2010): 327–340. 327 © Agricultural and Food Science Manuscript received July 2009 Introduction While many small dairy farms have shut down milk production, the livestock density and number of livestock farms have increased in certain regions in western and central Finland during recent dec- ades. At present, most dairy farms prefer almost continuous grass cultivation to crop rotation with cereals and grasses. Consequently, slurry is spread onto fields of silage grass instead of using earlier methods where slurry was applied to cereal fields before autumn ploughing or before spring tillage. Due to the soil wetness and risk of soil compac- Nitrogen losses from grass ley after slurry application – surface broadcasting vs. injection Jaana Uusi-Kämppä and Pasi K. Mattila MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Plant Production Research, FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland, e-mail: jaana.uusi-kamppa@mtt.fi As the livestock numbers on Finnish dairy farms have increased and most fields on dairy farms are under grass, it has become common to spread cattle slurry over grasslands. To estimate environmental effects of recurrent slurry applications, a 5-year field study was performed to compare nitrogen (N) losses to water and ammonia losses to air by volatilization, when cattle slurry was either surface broadcast or injected into clay soil after grass cuttings. Slurry was spread on the grass in summer (1996–1997) or both in summer and autumn (1998–2000). Biomass N uptake before grass harvesting and amount of soil mineral N in spring and autumn were measured and field N balances were calculated. Despite cool weather, up to one third of the ammonium N of broadcast slurries was lost through ammonia volatilization after application in autumn, but injection effectively prevented losses. The mean surface runoff losses of total N were negligible (0.3–4.6 kg ha-1 yr-1) with the highest loss of 13 kg ha-1 yr-1 measured after slurry broadcasting to wet soil in autumn and followed with heavy rains. A substantial part (24–55%) of the applied mineral N was not recovered by the foregoing measurements. Key-words: Slurry application, grassland, surface runoff, nitrogen, nitrogen uptake, NH3 volatilization, nitrogen balance, surface broadcasting, injection A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Uusi-Kämppä, J. et al. Nitrogen losses from broadcast or injected slurry 328 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Vol. 19(2010): 327–340. 329 tion in spring, however, only mineral fertilizer is often surface applied to grass in the beginning of the growing season whereas cattle slurry is applied after the first cut. If the growing season is extremely rainy, it may not be possible to spread slurry with heavy machinery on wet soils in summer. Then the slurry tanks are emptied in the autumn to provide storage capacity for the winter months. In Finland, slurry is applied to grassland sur- face either by conventional broadcasting or by more recently adopted band spreading and trailing shoe techniques, whereas injection is used to apply slurry below the soil surface. Surface application is an easy and cheap process but it leaves the ma- nure prone to NH3 volatilization (Braschkat et al. 1997, Mattila and Joki-Tokola 2003) and surface runoff (Turtola and Kemppainen 1998). Injection of slurry might be better environmentally but it is more expensive and more difficult than broadcast application. Top-dress fertilization of grass fields with mineral fertilizers is also a typical comple- mentary method. The purpose of this study was to compare two different slurry application methods – surface broadcasting and injection – on grass fields. The former method is a cheap and commonly used prac- tice on most dairy farms whereas the latter is con- sidered as a difficult method to use, particularly on stony soils. In this study, we investigated whether slurry injection could be recommended in given environmental conditions in boreal climates. Loss- es of total nitrogen (TN), ammonium N (NH4 +-N, hereafter NH4-N) and nitrate N (NO3 –-N, hereafter NO3-N) to surface runoff water from the surface- applied slurry were compared to losses from inject- ed slurry or mineral fertilization on a grass field. Knowledge of ammonia (NH3) losses to air due to the methods in cool autumn weather was also lack- ing. Nitrogen uptake by grass was measured for N balances. The amounts of soil mineral N (SMN; NH4-N plus NO3-N) at different depths were also measured and N balances were calculated to allow an estimation of the risk for NO3 leaching. Material and methods The experimental field The study was performed on an eight-plot ex- perimental field (0.34 ha; Uusi-Kämppä and Heinonen-Tanski 2008) located in Jokioinen, south west Finland (60°49’N 23°30’E). The area had a long-term (1971–2000) mean annual precipitation of 607 mm and mean annual temperature of 4.3 °C, with the mean temperatures of the coldest (Febru- ary) and the warmest (July) months being -6.5 and 16.1 oC, respectively (Drebs et al. 2002). The soil was classified as Typic Cryaquept (Soil Survey Staff 1996) containing 61% clay in the plough layer. The concentrations of Ca, K, Mg and P in the plough layer were at a satisfactory or good level. The experimental plots with slopes of 0.9–1.7% were isolated from each other by plastic film to a depth of 0.6 m and by soil banks. Uncultivated 10-m wide buffer zones were established at the lower edge of the plots since buffers (mostly 3-m or 15-m wide) are typical on Finnish fields. Ten- metre wide buffer area in the upper edges of the plots of total length of 70 m, and 0.5-m (1998– 2000) or 1.5-m (1996–1997) wide borders on both sides of the plots were also untreated, with neither soil nor plant sampling, nor slurry application, due to difficulties to drive and work with tractors and spreaders on those areas on the narrow plots. The grass ley on the experimental field consisted for the most part of timothy (Phleum pratense) and meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis) sown in June 1995. The grass ley was cut twice a year, with the first cut always in June and the second cut in late August (1996), September (1997, 1998) or early October (2000). Treatments and applications The experimental treatments were as follows: 1. Surface broadcasting (SB) of cattle slurry onto the grass ley (three replicates); A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Uusi-Kämppä, J. et al. Nitrogen losses from broadcast or injected slurry 328 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Vol. 19(2010): 327–340. 329 2. Injection (IN) of cattle slurry into the grass ley (depth of 0.05–0.1 m; three replicates); and 3. Mineral fertilization (MF) – top-dress fertiliza- tion onto the grass ley (two replicates). Slurry was applied annually to grass ley after the first cut in 1996–1997 (Phase I) and biannually after the first and the second cuts in 1998–2000 (Phase II). In Phase I, the application rates of min- eral N (160 kg ha-1 yr-1 including NH4-N of slurry and NH4-N and NO3-N of mineral fertilizer) and total P (36 kg ha-1 yr-1) represented the nutrient amounts allowed by Finnish ‘good agricultural practice’ and the average used on most Finnish farms. In Phase II, the corresponding amounts were 230 and 66 kg ha-1 yr-1 for mineral N and total P, respectively. In autumn, slurry amounts of 33–42 t ha-1 were applied, although the maximum allowed autumn slurry amount at that time was 30 t ha-1 (Finlex 1998). In fact, 120–160 kg ha-1 more TN in slurry was applied than allowed in the nitrate directive (170 kg TN ha-1 yr-1) to detect possible environmental risks due to over-dosing of manure. More details about P applications in slurry and fer- tilizers, slurry properties, and storage tanks have been presented by Uusi-Kämppä and Heinonen- Tanski (2008). In Phase I (annual slurry application in June, 1996–1997), cattle slurry (34–61 t ha-1, Table 1) was applied to an area of 3 m × 50 m by a “Vogel- sang” spreader on slurry plots after the first grass cut in June. Slurry was either applied to the soil surface with a band spreading unit equipped with a small splash plate under each hose, or injected with an injector that had 10 tines with 0.3 m spac- ing, each equipped with a disc coulter and a press wheel (Kapuinen 1998). Table 1. Application dates, amended plot area, amount of slurry, and total nitrogen (TN) applications in slurry (s) and mineral fertilizer (mf) in plots where slurry was surface broadcast (SB) or injected (IN) into soil and in mineral ferti- lized (MF) plots. Values in parenthesis indicate the application rate of mineral N in slurry and mineral fertilizer. Dates Area, Slurry rate, t ha-1 TN (mineral N) kg ha-1 m2 (wet weight) SB IN MF Annual slurry application (Study phase I) 14 May 1996 350 112 (112) mf 112 (112) mf 112 (112) mf 17–19 June 1996 150 34–37 134 (78) s 146 (85) s 81 (81) mf 12 May 1997 350 49 (49) mf 49 (49) mf 49 (49) mf 26–27 June 1997 150 61 148 (78) s 148 (78) s 80 (80) mf Total 1996–1997 443 (317) 455 (324) 322 (322) mf Mean 1996–1997 48 222 (159) 228 (162) 161 (161) mf Biannual slurry application (Study phase II) 11 May 1998 350 48 (48) mf 48 (48) mf 48 (48) mf 29 June 1998 250 50–52 187 (94) s 194 (97) s 92 (92) mf 16 October 1998 250 38–42 140 (73) s 155 (80) s 11 May 1999 250 61 (61) mf 61 (61) mf 100 (100) mf 30 June 1999 250 59–62 209 (112) s 219 (118) s 100 (100) mf 27 October 1999 250 33–38 105 (58) s 120 (67) s 8 May 2000 250 69 (69) mf 69 (69) mf 100 (100) mf 21–22 June 2000 250 47–52 170 (94) s 188 (105) s 100 (100) mf 23 October 2000 250 33–36 119 (59) s 130 (64) s Total 1998–2000 1108 (668) 1184 (709) 540 (540) mf Mean 1998–2000 90 369 (223) 395 (236) 180 (180) mf A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Uusi-Kämppä, J. et al. Nitrogen losses from broadcast or injected slurry 330 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Vol. 19(2010): 327–340. 331 During Phase II (biannual slurry application in June and October, 1998–2000) slurry was ap- plied by a “Teho-Lotina” spreader that had an in- jector with 0.47 m tine spacing and disc coulters but no press wheels. Broadcast spreading was carried out by holding the injector up while each tine was equipped with a small splash plate. The slurry amounts were slightly higher in the IN than SB plots due to a lower driving speed during injec- tion. In autumn 2000, the field was ploughed three days after the slurry application, when the ammonia volatilization measurements had been finished. Mineral fertilizer was spread by a “Juko” ferti- lizer drill to all plots in spring and to MF plots after the first cut in June. In spring 1996, NK fertilizer (20% N and 15% K; Table 1) was surface applied to all plots. Since then ammonium nitrate fertilizer (26% N) was spread in spring, except in spring 1999 and spring 2000 when NPK fertilizer (20% N, 4% P and 7% K) was spread on the MF plots only. Due to half of the NH4-N in slurry spread in autumn was assumed to be available for plants in the following spring (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 1998), 39 and 31 kg ha-1 less fertilizer N was applied to slurry plots than to MF plots in spring 1999 and in spring 2000, respectively. On the MF plots, NPK fertilizer (20% N, 4% P and 7% K) was surface applied every summer, except in the first summer, when NPK fertilizer (18% N, 5% P, 10% K) was spread. Measurement of ammonia volatilization Volatilization of NH3 was measured after the autumn applications of slurry (SB and IN) in 1999 and 2000 by the equilibrium concentration technique, also called the “JTI method” (Svensson 1994). The method uses passive diffusional NH3 samplers that are placed on treated areas both in ambient air and under ventilated chambers. The ammonia volatiliza- tion rate in ambient air is calculated from the amounts of NH3 absorbed by the samplers. Air temperature is used to calculate the diffusion coefficient of NH3. The concentration of NH3 inside the chambers was used as a measure of NH3 volatilization potential without the effect of varying wind conditions in ambient air. Ammonia volatilization was measured in the daytime starting at 5–15 min after the application of slurry and lasting for 2.75–4 h divided into two consecutive periods. On the following two days, NH3 measurement began about 24 h and about 48 h after the slurry application and lasted for 3.5–5 h on each of the days. The measurement was carried out in the three replicate plots of both SB and IN. Two chambers and two ambient air sampler holders were placed on each plot. Air temperature was measured with a thermohygrograph at about 0.2 m height and wind speed was measured with a cup anemometer at 2 m height. The volatilization of NH3 between measurement periods was interpolated by calculat- ing the average emission values before and after an interval and correcting it based on the temperature and wind speed that prevailed during the interval. The procedure is described in detail by Malgeryd (1996). Water sampling and analyses Surface and near-surface runoff (referred to hereafter as surface runoff) to a depth of 0.3 m was collected in a modified collector trench planned by Puustinen (1994) at the lower end of each plot and fed by pipes into 8 plastic tanks (2.0 m3) buried in the soil. Water volume was measured by flow meters (Oy Tekno- Monta Ab, JOT-company, 1992) and representative subsamples were taken through samplers (Fig. 1) for laboratory analyses when the tanks were emptied. Water was sampled 16–27 times per year, with most samplings in spring and autumn. The time interval between water samplings in peak runoff periods varied from a day to two weeks, depending on rains and snowmelts. The volume of runoff water was calculated from the whole plot area, whereas the N losses were cal- culated from the slurry applied source area. On the border areas, the mean TN losses through surface runoff were estimated to be negligible (ca 0.5 kg ha-1 yr-1) according to the TN concentrations of surface runoff water measured earlier on nearby plots under A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Uusi-Kämppä, J. et al. Nitrogen losses from broadcast or injected slurry 330 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Vol. 19(2010): 327–340. 331 unfertilized grass (Turtola and Paajanen 1995). In spring 1997, the surface runoff results from one SB plot and one MF plot were omitted, due to freezing of the outlet pipes. Precipitation was measured at Jokioinen Observatory, Finnish Meterological In- stitute, situated 0.5 km from the field. Water samples were stored in polyethylene bot- tles for periods from a few days to a few weeks in the dark (4°C) before determining the nutrient concentrations. The storage time probably did not have a large impact on the concentrations of TN and NO3-N, but the concentrations of NH4-N may have decreased during the prolonged storage (Tur- tola 1989). For the determinations of NH4-N and NO3-N, the samples were filtered through a mem- brane filter (0.2 µm) and analysed with a Skalar autoanalyser according to Finnish standard methods (SFS 3030, SFS 3032). The concentration of TN was determined from unfiltered water samples by oxidation of N compounds to NO3 in alkaline solu- tion (SFS 3031). Soil sampling and analyses Because the drainage water was not measured, both the amounts of NH4-N and NO3-N as well as their sum (SMN) in the 0–60 cm soil layers were used to indicate the risk of N leaching from the grass ley. Soil samples were taken separately from each plot in spring and autumn before the application of mineral fertilizer or slurry (Uusi-Kämppä and Heinonen- Tanski 2008). The samples taken in spring 1997 were omitted because the field had been fertilized a few days earlier. Soil samples were frozen immediately after the sampling. For NH4-N and NO3-N analyses, soils were thawed overnight (4°C), and 40 ml of moist soil was subsequently extracted with 100 ml of 2 M KCl for 16 hours (Sippola and Yläranta 1985). After filtration, concentrations of NH4-N and NO3- N were measured with a Skalar autoanalyser. The concentrations of TN and carbon (C) were deter- mined using the C-N-autoanalyser (LecoCN-2000, Leco Corporation, St.Joseph, MI, USA). Other samplings and calculations of nitro- gen balances Slurry samples were taken during spreading and analysed for concentrations of TN (Kjeldahl) and NH4-N as described by Mattila and Joki-Tokola (2003). Above-ground biomass was sampled before har- vesting the grass. Samples (0.64 m2) were collected from each plot so that the grass was cut leaving a stubble of 1 cm. Plant samples were dried at 60°C overnight for TN analysis with a LECO analyser and at 105°C for dry matter (DM) determination. Field N balance was estimated as the differ- ence between N inputs and outputs (Equation 1). The N uptake of grass, ammonia volatilization and TN in surface runoff were considered as outputs in the calculations. Ammonia volatilization from summer-applied slurry was estimated to be 40% of the applied NH4-N for surface application and 0.4% for injection, based on the results of Mattila and Joki-Tokola (2003). Volatilization from autumn- applied slurry was taken from the results of the NH3 measurements carried out in this study. Ammonia volatilization from mineral fertilizer, in turn, was estimated to be 1.6% of the applied N (Grönroos et al. 2009). Equation 1: N balance = N (input) – N (output) = (Nfertilizer + Nslurry) – (Ncrop + Nvolatilized NH3 + TNrunoff) 3 2 1 Fig. 1. Sampling of surface runoff: 1, water from the collector tank flows through the flow meter; 2, the wa- ter sample drips into a pail; 3, the rest of the water flows through an outlet. A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Uusi-Kämppä, J. et al. Nitrogen losses from broadcast or injected slurry 332 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Vol. 19(2010): 327–340. 333 Statistical analyses Amounts of grass yield and biomass N in grass as well as the amounts of NO3-N, NH4-N and SMN in the soil (0–0.6 m) were analysed statistically using a mixed model, where treatment, sampling date and their interactions were used as fixed effects while block, block x treatment and block x sampling date were used as random effects. The soil data were log-transformed before analysis because of skewed distributions. For statistical analyses of the surface runoff results, log-transformation was used for the TN and NH4-N values. The data from the two study phases were analysed together using a mixed mod- el whereby study, treatment, and their interactions were used as fixed effects, whereas block, block × treatment, and block × study were used as random effects. Each block included two or three adjacent plots with different treatments. Soil, plant and run- off analyses were performed using an SAS/MIXED procedure. The effect of application technique on NH3 concentration in chambers was studied for each measurement period with analysis of variance ac- cording to a randomized complete block arrange- ment (Steel and Torrie 1981) with three replica- tions. The effect was considered significant with p values <0.05. The analysis was carried out with the GLM procedure of SAS statistical software ver- sion 6.12. Results and discussion Dry Matter and Nitrogen Uptake of Grass In Phase I, the mean DM grass yields (8.0–9.3 t ha-1 yr-1) and N uptakes (160–200 kg ha-1 yr-1) were higher in the MF plots than in the slurry treated plots (Table 2). There were no significant differences in the DM yields or N uptakes between treatments in the first cuts, probably since all the treatments received the same amount of fertilizer N in spring. In contrast, in the second cuts, the DM yields and N uptakes were statistically (p < 0.05) lower in the slurry treated plots than in the MF plots, although the same amount of mineral N (ca 80 kg ha-1) was spread in all treatments. In Phase II (biannual slurry application), the mean DM yields (5.5–7.0 t ha-1 yr-1) and N uptakes (90–125 kg ha-1 yr-1) were lower than in Phase I, although the mean applications of mineral N were 44, 53 and 20 kg ha-1 yr-1 higher on the SB, IN and MF plots, respectively, than in Phase I. This time, however, three-fourths of the applied mineral N originated from cattle slurry on the SB and IN plots, whereas in Phase I, half of the mineral N was from slurry and half from mineral fertilizer. As in Phase I, there were no statistical differences in uptake between the treatments in the first cuts, but in the second cuts, the N uptake was statistically higher (p < 0.05) in the MF and IN plots than in the SB plots in 1998–1999. Ammonia volatilization The NH3 volatilization from SB was considerable, which is indicated both by NH3 volatilization rates in the ambient air and by NH3 concentrations in the chambers (Table 3). Over IN, chamber concentra- tions of NH3 were low and the volatilization rates in ambient air were close to zero and often slightly negative, which may indicate deposition of NH3 that drifted from SB. Despite this disturbance, it can be concluded that the volatilization of NH3 from injected slurry was small compared with broadcast slurry. To obtain undisturbed results, slurry injection and the subsequent NH3 measurement should have been carried out before broadcasting. However, different timing of the applications would have compromised the comparison of SB and IN by making a difference in the weather conditions at application and during a few days thereafter. There are also earlier studies showing that in- jection of slurry into soil effectively prevents NH3 volatilization (e.g. Frost 1994, Dosch and Gutser 1996). Most of the previous work has been done A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Uusi-Kämppä, J. et al. Nitrogen losses from broadcast or injected slurry 332 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Vol. 19(2010): 327–340. 333 with mass balance or wind tunnel techniques, but the JTI method used in this study has proven to give results comparable with other methods (Mis- selbrook et al. 2005b). Mattila and Joki-Tokola (2003) used the same JTI equipment as in this study, and measured negligible NH3 volatilization from cattle slurry injected to ley in summer, and a 40% loss, on average, of NH4-N from broadcast slurry. The results reported here indicate that sur- face application in autumn may cause high losses despite the lower temperature. In cooler weather, the volatilization rate is lower, but total losses may still be considerable, as also observed by Sommer et al. (1991). The effect of temperature on NH3 volatilization is interconnected with many other factors such as solar radiation, air humidity, soil moisture content and drying of manure after appli- cation. Temperature as such has not always proven an important factor in determining NH3 volatili- zation from applied manure (e.g. Braschkat et al. 1997, Sommer and Olesen 2000, Misselbrook et al. 2005a). On the SB plots, ammonia volatilization was the largest measured single N flow into the envi- ronment (15% of TN application and 24% of the mineral N). The NH3 volatilization was highest on the application day and decreased rapidly during the following two days (Table 3). The decrease is assumed to result from a rainfall and a reduc- tion in the concentration of NH4-N in the slurry although not measured after the application. Am- monia volatilization was higher in 2000 than in Table 2. Over-ground grass dry matter yields and biomass N. Percentage of biomass N from the previous mineral N ap- plication is given in parenthesis. Date of harvest Yield, kg ha-1 p Biomass N, kg ha-1 p SB IN MF SB IN MF Annual slurry application (Study phase I) 13 June 1996 4600 4600 5100 0.65 150 (134) 150 (134) 150 (134) 0.81 20 August 1996 3800a 3400a 4500b 0.04 54a (69) 49a (58) 80b (99) 0.02 Total 1996 8400 8000 9600 0.12 204 (107) 199 (101) 230 (119) 0.16 23 June 1997 5000 4700 4500 0.36 85 (173) 86 (176) 96 (196) 0.81 24 September 1997 3300a 3200a 4500b 0.03 37a (47) 37a (47) 71b (89) 0.02 Total 1997 8300 7900 9000 0.40 122 (96) 123 (97) 167 (129) 0.18 Mean 96–97 8400 8000 9300 163 (102) 161 (99) 199 (124) Biannual slurry application (Study phase II) 19 June 1998 2700 3000 2500 0.11 59 (123) 63 (131) 52 (108) 0.11 4 September 1998 2300a 2700b 3600c <0.01 34a (36) 47b (48) 57b (62) 0.01 Total 1998 5000a 5700b 6100b 0.03 93(65) 110 (76) 109 (78) 0.08 24 June 1999 4200 4000 4800 0.35 81 (60) 71 (50) 100 (100) 0.12 12 October 1999† 700 1100 1100 0.11 14a (13) 30b (25) 36b (36) 0.03 Total 1999 4900 5100 5900 0.32 95 (39) 101 (39) 136 (68) 0.09 21 June 2000 3100 3000 3600 0.31 42 (33) 47 (35) 56 (56) 0.18 4 October 2000 3400 4100 5300 0.20 44 (47) 60 (57) 73 (73) 0.13 Total 2000 6500 7100 8900 0.22 86 (39) 107 (44) 129 (65) 0.13 Mean 98–00 5500 6000 7000 91 (48) 106 (53) 125 (70) †The grass was not harvested. Different letters in the same row indicate a significant difference between treatments (p < 0.05). SB = surface broadcasting of slurry, IN = slurry injection, MF = mineral fertilization A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Uusi-Kämppä, J. et al. Nitrogen losses from broadcast or injected slurry 334 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Vol. 19(2010): 327–340. 335 1999, which may have resulted at least partly from higher ambient temperatures (Table 3) and a higher DM content of the slurry: 6.9 and 8.3% in 1999 and 2000, respectively (Uusi-Kämppä and Heinonen- Tanski 2008). Amount of surface runoff The mean annual precipitation during the experiment was 626 mm (586–673 mm) which is near the long- term (1971–2000) average of 607 mm. On our field, the surface runoff was 10–20% of the precipitation (Table 4). The mean annual surface runoff (110 mm) in the Phase II was comparable to the surface runoff (110 mm) on a nearby clay soil under timothy and red clover in September 1992–August 1993 (Uusitalo et al. 2007). In Phase I, surface runoff (64 mm) was only half of that was measured in Phase II. On a coarse-textured pasture soil, Saarijärvi et al. (2007) measured surface runoff of 66–107 mm which was around 40% of the total runoff and 15% of the average precipitation in Eastern Finland. The measured volumes of surface runoff on our field agreed quite well with these findings, indicating that there has been deep percolation (drainflow) as well. However, if the drainage system does not function well or there is no drainage system, the surface runoff can be multifold compared to volumes of drainflow from well-drained grass fields (Turtola and Paajanen 1995, Bilotta et al. 2008). Nitrogen losses in surface runoff Owing to the relatively small amounts of fertilizer and slurry N in Phase I and lack of heavy rainfall after the slurry applications in summer, losses of TN, NH4-N and NO3-N in surface runoff were negligible from all treatments over the 18-month monitoring period (Table 4). In fact, the volumes of surface Table 3. Concentration of NH3 in chambers on surface broadcasting (SB) and injection (IN) plots, NH3 volatilization in ambient air and weather conditions during the measurement periods. Date Period NH3 concentration µg m-3 p NH3 volatilization from SB SB IN Volatilization rate NH3-N, g ha -1 h-1 N loss, % of NH4-N Temperature, °C Wind, m s-1 Precipitation, mm 1999 27 Oct 1 7896a 76b 0.014 1230 20 6.0 2.8 1 (0.5) 27 Oct 2 4216a 128b 0.025 791 4.0 1.6 0 28 Oct 3 1400a 40b 0.002 220 2.5 1.3 0 (4) 29 Oct 4 593a 29b 0.000 201 10.0 2.9 0 2000 23 Oct 1 9657a 103b 0.032 1492 33 11.0 1.4 0 23 Oct 2 7476a 105b 0.019 920 8.0 1.3 0 (5) 24 Oct 3 730a 55b 0.016 154 9.0 3.8 <0.5 (5.5) 25 Oct 4 198a 32b 0.013 20 9.0 3.3 0 Superscripts denote statistically significant differences. Volatilization from injected slurry is excluded, because it was close to zero and may have been affected by NH3 drifting from broadcast slurry. Nitrogen loss values include measured emissions from all the four peri- ods and estimated emissions during their intervals. Precipitation between the end of a measurement period and the start of the next peri- od is in parenthesis. SB = surface broadcasting of slurry, IN = slurry injection, MF = mineral fertilization. A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Uusi-Kämppä, J. et al. Nitrogen losses from broadcast or injected slurry 334 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Vol. 19(2010): 327–340. 335 runoff and N losses were higher before slurry ap- plications during the snow melting in spring 1996. In Phase II, over the 36-month monitoring period the cumulative losses of NH4-N and TN, 5.2 kg ha-1 and 20 kg ha-1, respectively, were still relatively small in surface runoff from the plots with slurry broadcasting (Table 4). The TN losses were small, although the slurry TN rates exceeded the currently allowed maximum amount of 170 kg ha-1 yr-1. Injection further reduced the originally small surface runoff losses of NH4-N and TN by 83% (p < 0.001) and 34% (p < 0.01), respectively, com- pared with surface broadcasting, although a little more slurry TN (20–30 kg ha-1 yr-1) was spread on the IN plots. On a fine sandy soil, Turtola and Kemppainen (1998) measured great annual N loss- es in surface runoff from grass with autumn broad- cast slurry, 16–36 kg ha-1 yr-1 and 7.7–22 kg ha-1 yr-1 for TN and NH4-N, respectively. In their study, however, the amount of TN applied in autumn was one-third higher and the volumes of surface run- off were three times greater than in Phase II of our study. In Norway, Uhlen (1978) reported that surface runoff losses of TN and NH4-N were 8 and 4 kg ha-1, respectively, during the next 14 months after autumn application of 60 t ha-1 semi-liquid cow manure (228 kg TN ha-1) to grass. On boreal pastures, too, the annual losses of TN in surface runoff were small (below 5 kg ha-1) in the study of Saarijärvi (2008), although the pastures often receive more N than silage grasses. However, after slurry application (140–155 kg TN ha-1) to wet soil on October 16, 1998, followed with heavy rainfall (60 mm) and surface runoff (10 mm) during the next two weeks, the mean losses of TN and NH4-N in surface runoff from the SB plots were 9.3 and 3.5 kg ha-1over 2.5 months, respec- tively (Fig. 2), being 47% of TN and 67% of NH4- N losses over the whole 3-year study phase. During three days after slurry application, incidental TN losses were highest, at 6.8, 0.5 and 0.1 kg ha-1 from the SB, IN and MF plots, respectively. Soon after slurry application, the mean TN concentration in surface runoff water was 92 mg l-1 for SB, but less for IN (7.6 mg l-1) and MF (1.2 mg l-1; Fig. 3). Since concentrations of NO3-N and NH4-N from SB plots were < 0.1 mg l-1 and < 51.1 mg l-1, respectively, a large part of TN was in organic form. In June 1998, surface runoff (4 mm) from the grass stubble was also high with high rainfall (99 mm) but N losses Table 4. Precipitation and means of surface runoff and losses of total nitrogen, ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen to surface runoff water. Study period Precipitation, mm n† Surface runoff, mm Total nitrogen kg ha-1 Ammonium nitrogen Nitrate nitrogen SB IN MF SB IN MF SB IN MF SB IN MF Annual slurry application (Study phase I) 1 Jan 1996–18 June 1996 204 11 67 71 63 4.6 3.9 4.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 2.1 1.2 1.5 19 June 1996–31 Dec 1997 1065 21 56 66 63 2.1 2.2 1.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.2 Total 1269 32 123 137 126 6.7 6.1 6.0 0.8 0.9 1.0 2.4 1.7 1.7 Biannual slurry application (Study phase II) 1 Jan 1998–16 Oct 1998 507 21 102 104 82 3.4 3.5 2.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 17 Oct 1998–31 Dec 1998 120 8 36 36 30 9.3 1.2 0.5 3.5 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 1 Jan 1999–30 June 1999 221 16 110 116 99 3.6 3.0 1.6 1.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 1 July 1999–20 Oct 2000 845 17 63 63 40 1.6 2.5 1.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.2 21 Oct 2000–31 Dec 2000 172 9 29 33 17 1.7 2.7 0.8 0.1 0 0 0.2 0.9 0.2 Total 1865 71 340 352 268 19.6 12.9 6.9 5.2 0.9 0.7 1.1 2.2 0.8 † n = number of samplings SB = surface broadcasting of slurry, IN = slurry injection, MF = mineral fertilization A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Uusi-Kämppä, J. et al. Nitrogen losses from broadcast or injected slurry 336 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Vol. 19(2010): 327–340. 337 were negligible because slurry had not yet been applied (Fig. 2). While the N losses were small on our experi- mental field with a slope of 0.9–1.7%, losses may be higher on steep slopes with heavy rainfalls soon after slurry application. The surface application of manure is no longer allowed on fields with an aver- age slope of over 10% (Finlex 2000). Heathwaite et al. (1998) have also shown that the 10-m un- treated buffer zone below the source area applied with cattle slurry reduced the TN load by 75% in surface runoff. Thus in our study, the 10-m buffer zone probably decreased nitrogen losses from all treatments. At present, nitrogen losses from slurry applied fields are mitigated, since the application of N fertilizers (including slurry N) is not allowed Fig. 2. Cumulative losses of to- tal nitrogen in surface runoff and periodic precipitation from summer 1996 to autumn 2000. Slurry applications are marked by arrows. (Au, autumn; Sp, spring; Su, summer) Fig. 3. The average concentra- tions of total nitrogen in sur- face runoff during 1996–2000. Slurry applications are marked by arrows. The concentration was off scale twice in broad- cast plots. 0 100 200 300 400 S u 96 A u 96 S p 97 S u 97 A u 97 S p 98 S u 98 A u 98 S p 99 S u 99 A u 99 S p 00 S u 00 A u 00 Precipitation (mm) 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Total nitrogen (kg ha-1) in surface runoff Precipitation Broadcasting Injection Mineral fertilization 0 2 4 6 8 10 Total nitrogen (mg l -1 ) in surface runoff Broadcasting Injection Mineral fertilization 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 92 20 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Uusi-Kämppä, J. et al. Nitrogen losses from broadcast or injected slurry 336 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Vol. 19(2010): 327–340. 337 on areas closer than 5 metres to a watercourse. And along the width of the next five metres, surface application of N fertilizers is prohibited if the field slope exceeds two per cent (Finlex 2000). Even wider unmanured areas would be needed on field edges with steep slopes along lakes and rivers to decrease direct N losses in surface runoff from source fields to water. The cumulative load of NO3-N in surface run- off was small in all treatments (0.8–2.2 kg ha-1), being highest in the IN plots over the 3-year study phase. The small NO3-N losses in surface runoff from grass are consistent with results from studies of Uhlen (1978), Turtola and Kemppainen (1998), Ridley et al. (2001), Smith et al (2001), and Saari- järvi (2008). Ploughing of grass soil in October 2000 increased slightly losses of NO3-N and TN in surface runoff but decreased NH4-N losses (Table 4). Soil mineral nitrogen and nitrogen leaching Although in Phase II slurry was spread to the grass ley in autumn, the SMN amounts measured in the following spring were only slightly higher (0–30 kg ha-1) or even lower (4–6 kg ha-1) than the amounts measured in autumn before the slurry applications. This demonstrates that the slurry N added in the autumn (105–155 kg TN; 60–80 kg NH4-N) might have volatilized, become converted to organic form in the soil or leached. In the IN plots, however, the SMN amounts in spring were significantly higher (p = 0.03) than in the SB plots, probably due to lower NH3 volatilization and slightly higher N input. Also the NO3-N amounts were 6–7 kg ha -1 higher in the IN plots compared to SB plots in May 1999 and in October 1999 (p < 0.001). Cameron et al. (1996) observed that NO3-N leaching was consistently higher after subsurface injection of dairy pond sludge compared to surface application. According these results slurry injection may thus increase N leaching from grass fields. The summer season 1999 was fairly warm and dry and therefore only one grass yield could be harvested (Table 2). Hooda et al. (1998) and Sc- holefield et al. (1993) have reported that NO3-N leaching is higher after a dry and warm summer than after a wet and cool summer season, since in dry conditions nitrification may be high whereas denitrification and plant uptake of N can be lower than during cool and wet years. In October 1999 and April 2000, the NO3-N amounts in soil were 3–7 kg ha-1 higher than measured at other times in this study (Fig. 4) and, thus, there was a slightly higher risk for NO3-N leaching from the grassland. 0 20 40 60 80 7. 10 .9 6 8. 11 .9 7 7. 05 .9 8 15 .0 9. 98 4. 05 .9 9 20 .1 0. 99 26 .0 4. 00 16 .1 0. 00 27 .1 0. 00 7. 10 .9 6 8. 11 .9 7 7. 05 .9 8 15 .0 9. 98 4. 05 .9 9 20 .1 0. 99 26 .0 4. 00 16 .1 0. 00 27 .1 0. 00 7. 10 .9 6 8. 11 .9 7 7. 05 .9 8 15 .0 9. 98 4. 05 .9 9 20 .1 0. 99 26 .0 4. 00 16 .1 0. 00 27 .1 0. 00 Broadcasting Injection Mineral fertilization Soil mineral nitrogen (kg ha-1 ) NO -N NH -N4 3 16 19 4 5 28 1611 26 16 0. 5 16 1 9 45 11 2 8 16 26 1 6 0. 5 16 19 45 11 43 16 43 16 18 Fig. 4. Amounts of soil mineral nitrogen (±S.D.) at 0–60 cm dur- ing 1996–2000. The number of weeks passed between previous slurry application and soil sam- pling is shown inside of the bars. A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Uusi-Kämppä, J. et al. Nitrogen losses from broadcast or injected slurry 338 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Vol. 19(2010): 327–340. 339 Immediately after ploughing in October 2000, the amount of SMN was greater in the plots where slurry had been previously injected (p < 0.01) than in those in which slurry had been broadcast (Fig. 4). In the SB plots, part of the slurry N was volatil- ized as NH3 and therefore also the NH4-N amounts in soil were smaller than in IN plots (p < 0.01). The experiment continued for 5 years and before that the field had not received manure for years, which increased the capacity of the soil to retain excess slurry N. In this respect, the situation is often different on animal farms, where the same grass fields have been manured for decades. More- over clay soil has a higher capacity for retaining NH4-N than coarse textured soils. Since most Finn- ish cattle farms are situated on areas with coarse textured soils, the risk for higher N leaching losses to water is more likely than in our study. Nitrogen balance and fate of nitrogen During the five study years, the cumulative field TN surpluses were 687, 971 and 65 kg ha-1 in the SB, IN and MF plots, respectively (Fig. 5). In Phase I, TN balances were negative on the MF plots. In Phase II, the amount of non-recovered N was ex- tremely high, up to 58% (ca 210 kg ha-1 yr-1) and 72% (ca 280 kg ha-1 yr-1) of the TN input on the SB and IN plots, respectively (Fig. 5). According to Macdonald and Jones (2003), 20–70% of the N inputs to agricultural systems may be unaccounted for. Although denitrification was not measured it is obvious that large part of organic N applied in slurry was not mineralized and thus it was not recognized as SMN. In Canada, Bittman et al. (2007) estimated that ca 30% of applied manure-N was stored in soil organic matter. A significant amount of NH4-N in slurry might also have been microbially immobi- lized soon after application due to decomposition of fatty acids in slurry (Kirchmann and Lundvall 1993, Sørensen and Amato 2002). According to the results of Huss-Danell and Chaia (2007), over 30 kg N ha-1 can be incorporated into grass roots in the northern part of Sweden. Pierzynski and Gehl (2005) showed that some of the N saved from NH3 emissions may have been lost as N2O from slurry injected fields. In a Finnish study, however, only ca 0.7% of cattle slurry N incorporated with a disc was lost as N2O fluxes (Syväsalo et al. 2006, Perälä et al. 2006). Ammonium can also be fixed into clay minerals or nitrate can be leached into subsurface drains or ground water. 0 100 200 300 400 In pu t O ut pu t In pu t O ut pu t In pu t O ut pu t In pu t O ut pu t In pu t O ut pu t In pu t O ut pu t Broadcasting Injection Mineral fertilization Broadcasting Injection Mineral fertilization N input/output (kg ha-1 ) Surface runoff Plant uptake Non-mineral N Mineral N Phase I Phase II NH volatilization3 Fig. 5. Input of mineral N and non-mineral N and output of N (plant uptake, NH3 volatilization and TN in surface runoff) during study Phases I and II. A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Uusi-Kämppä, J. et al. Nitrogen losses from broadcast or injected slurry 338 A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Vol. 19(2010): 327–340. 339 Conclusions Despite cool autumn weather, a considerable portion (20–33%) of the surface-applied slurry NH4-N was lost through ammonia volatilization within a few days after application, but the injection of slurry into the soil effectively prevented this. Nitrogen losses in surface runoff from grass field applied with slurry were small during the five study years, except when heavy rainfall occurred after slurry application in autumn. Although high slurry N amounts were added to grass, nitrogen leaching risk was surpris- ingly small from clay soil. If over-dosing of manure would continue longer, however, the situation could be different. When moderate slurry amounts (as in Phase I) are applied in summer and by a technique with low NH3 emissions most of the N is kept within the nutrient cycle of the farm. These study results can be directly applied to clay soils, whereas on coarse textured soils, the leaching losses may be higher than in this study. Acknowledgements. We are grateful to Mr. Risto Tanni, Mr. Ari Seppänen, Mr. Aaro Närvänen, Mr. Pekka Kivistö and Mr. Petri Kapuinen, Lic.Sc. (Agr. Eng.) for their technical assistance during the experi- ment. We thank biometrician Lauri Jauhiainen for his statistical expertise. Critical comments and sug- gestions by Prof. Eila Turtola, Adjunct Prof. Helvi Heinonen-Tanski and the anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged. Financial support for this study was provided by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. References Bilotta, G.S., Brazier, R.E., Haygarth, P.M., Macleod, C.J.A., Butler, P., Granger, S., Krueger, T., Freer, J. & Quinton J. 2008. Rethinking the contribution of drai- ned and undrained grasslands to sediment-related wa- ter quality problems. Journal of Environmental Quality 37: 906–914. Bittman, S., Kowalenko, C.G., Forge, T., Hunt, D.E., Bou- naix, F. & Patni, N. 2007. Agronomic effects of multi-year surface-banding of dairy slurry on grass. Bioresource Technology 98: 3249–3258. Braschkat, J., Mannheim, T. & Marschner, H. 1997. Estima- tion of ammonia losses after application of liquid cattle manure on grassland. Zeitschrift fűr Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde 160: 117–123. Cameron, K.C., Rate, A.W., Noonan, M.J., Moore, S., Smith, N.P. & Kerr L.E. 1996. Lysimeter study of the fate of nutrients following subsurface injection and surface application of dairy pond sludge to pasture. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 58: 187–197. Dosch, P. & Gutser, R. 1996. Reducing N losses (NH3, N2O, N2) and immobilization from slurry through optimized ap- plication techniques. Fertilizer Research 43: 165–171. Drebs, A., Nordlund, A., Karlsson, P., Helminen, J. & Ris- sanen P. 2002. Climatological statistics of Finland 1971– 2000. Helsinki: Finnish Meteorological Institute. Finlex. 1998. Decision of the Council of State on the re- striction of discharge of nitrates from agriculture into waters (219/1998). Issued in Helsinki, 19 March 1998. Helsinki: Finlex. Cited 16 April 2009. Available on the Internet: http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/1998/19980219 (in Finnish) Finlex. 2000. Government Decree on the restriction of discharge of nitrates from agriculture into waters (931/2000). Issued in Helsinki, 9 November 2000. Hel- sinki: Finlex. Cited 13 March 2009. Available on the Internet: http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/2000/ en20000931.pdf Frost, J.P. 1994. Effect of spreading method, application rate and dilution on ammonia volatilization from cattle slurry. Grass and Forage Science 49: 391–400. Grönroos, J., Mattila, P., Perälä, P., Nousiainen, J., Regi- na, K., Saarinen K. & Mikkola-Pusa, J. 2009. Develop- ment of ammonia emission inventory in Finland. Revised model for agriculture. Finnish Environment 8/2009. Hel- sinki: Finnish Environment Institute. 60 p. Heathwaite, A.L., Griffiths, P. & Parkinson, R.J. 1998. Ni- trogen and phosphorus in runoff from grassland with buf- fer strips following application of fertilizers and manures. Soil Use and Management 14: 142–148. Hooda, P.S., Moynagh, M., Svoboda, I.F. & Anderson, H.A. 1998. A comparative study of nitrate leaching from in- tensively managed monoculture grass and grass-clo- ver pastures. The Journal of Agricultural Science 131: 267–275. Huss-Danell, K. & Chaia, E. 2007. N2 fixation and nitro- gen allocation to above and below ground plant parts in red clower-grasslands. Plant and Soil 299: 215–226. Kapuinen, P. 1998. A light liquid manure injector for grass- lands in polar farming. In: Chastain, J.P. (Ed.) 4th Interna- tional Dairy Housing Conference, Conference Proceed- ings. American Society of Agricultural Engineers publi- cation 01-98. St.Joseph, MI, USA: p. 346–354 Kirchmann, H. & Lundvall, A. 1993. Relationship between N immobilization and volatile fatty acids in soil after ap- plication of pig and cattle slurry. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 15: 161–164. Macdonald, A.J. & Jones, D.L. 2003. Missing N: is the so- lution in dissolved N? In: Hatch, D.J. Controlling Nitro- gen Flows and Losses. Wageningen: Wageningen Ac- ademic Publishers. p. 600–605. Malgeryd, J. 1996. Åtgärder för att minska ammoniake- A G R I C U L T U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E Uusi-Kämppä, J. et al. Nitrogen losses from broadcast or injected slurry 340 missionerna vid spridning av stallgödsel (Measures to reduce ammonia emissions following application of an- imal manure). JTI-rapport, Lantbruk & Industri nr 229. Uppsala: Swedish Institute of Agricultural Engineering. (In Swedish with English summary). 126 p. Mattila, P.K. & Joki-Tokola. E. 2003. Effect of treatment and application technique of cattle slurry on its utiliza- tion by ley: I. Slurry properties and ammonia volatiliza- tion. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 65: 221–230. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. 1998. Perustuki maati- loille. 1998 Maatalouden ympäristötuki. Helsinki: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. 32 p. (In Finnish). Misselbrook, T.H., Nicholson, F.A. & Chambers, B.J. 2005a. Predicting ammonia losses following the appli- cation of livestock manure to land. Bioresource Tech- nology 96: 159–168. Misselbrook, T.H., Nicholson, F.A., Chambers, B.J. & John- son, R.A. 2005b. Measuring ammonia emissions from land applied manure: an intercomparison of commonly used samplers and techniques. Environmental Polluti- on 135: 389–397. Perälä, P., Kapuinen, P., Esala, M., Tyynelä, S. & Regina, K. 2006. Influence of slurry and mineral fertiliser appli- cation techniques on N2O and CH4 fluxes from a barley field in southern Finland. Agriculture, Ecosystems & En- vironment 117: 71–78. Pierzynski, G.M. & Gehl, K.A. 2005. Plant nutrient issues for sustainable land application. Journal of Environmen- tal Quality 34: 18–28. Puustinen, M. 1994. Effect of soil tillage on soil erosion and nutrient transport in plough layer runoff. Publica- tions of the Water and Environment Research Institute 17: 71–90. Helsinki, National Board of Waters and the Environment, Finland. Ridley, A.M., White, R.E., Helyar, K.R., Morrison, G.R., Heng, L.K. & Fisher, R. 2001. Nitrate leaching loss un- der annual and perennial pastures with and without lime on a duplex (texture contrast) soil in humid southeastern Australia. European Journal of Soil Science 52: 237–252. Saarijärvi, K. 2008. Nitrogen cycling on intensively man- aged boreal dairy pastures. Doctoral Dissertation. Ag- rifood Research Reports 134. Jokioinen: MTT Agrifood Research Finland. 71 p. Cited 15 April 2010. Available on the Internet: http://www.mtt.fi/met/pdf/met134.pdf Saarijärvi, K., Virkajärvi, P. & Heinonen-Tanski, H. 2007. Nitrogen leaching and herbage production on intensive- ly managed grass-clover pastures on sandy soil in Fin- land. European Journal of Soil Science 58: 1382–1392. Scholefield, D., Tyson, K.C., Garwood, E.A., Armstrong, A.C., Hawkins, J. & Stone, A.C. 1993. Nitrate leaching from grazed grassland lysimeters: effects of fertilizer in- put, field drainage, age of sward and patterns of weath- er. Journal of Soil Science 44: 601–613. Sippola, J. & Yläranta, T. 1985. Mineral nitrogen reserves in soil and nitrogen fertilization of barley. Annales Agri- culturae Fenniae 24: 117–124. Smith, K.A., Jackson, D.R. & Pepper, T.J. 2001. Nutrient losses by surface run-off following the application of or- ganic manures to arable land. 1. Nitrogen. Environmen- tal Pollution 112: 41–51. Soil Survey Staff, 1996. Keys to soil taxonomy. 7th ed. Washington, DC: USDA, Natural Resources Conser- vation Service. Sommer, S.G. & Olesen, J.E. 2000. Modelling ammonia volatilization from animal slurry applied with trail hoses to cereals. Atmospheric Environment 34: 2361–2372. Sommer, S.G., Olesen, J.E. & Christensen, B.T. 1991. Ef- fects of temperature, wind speed and air humidity on am- monia volatilization from surface applied cattle slurry. The Journal of Agricultural Science 117: 91–100. Sørensen, P. & Amato, M. 2002. Remineralisation and re- sidual effects of N after application of pig slurry to soil. European Journal of Agronomy 16: 81–95. Steel, R.G.D. & Torrie, J.H. 1981. Principles and procedures of statistics, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, Singapore. Svensson, L., 1994. A new dynamic chamber technique for measuring ammonia emissions from land-spread manure and fertilizers. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B, Soil Plant Science 44: 35–46. Syväsalo, E., Regina, K., Turtola, E., Lemola, R. & Esala M. 2006. Fluxes of nitrous oxide and methane, and ni- trogen leaching from organically and conventionally cul- tivated sandy soil in western Finland. Agriculture, Eco- systems & Environment 113: 342–348. Turtola, E. 1989. Effect of storage and sulphuric acid addi- tion on analytical results of nitrogen and phosphorus in water samples containing eroded material. Aqua Fen- nica 19(2): 109–112. Turtola, E. & Kemppainen, E. 1998. Nitrogen and phospho- rus losses in surface runoff and drainage water after ap- plication of slurry and mineral fertilizer to perennial grass ley. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 7: 569–581. Turtola, E. & Paajanen, A. 1995. Influence of improved subsurface drainage on phosphorus losses and nitro- gen leaching from a heavy clay soil. Agricultural Water Management 28: 295–310. Uhlen, G. 1978. Nutrient leaching and surface runoff in field lysimeters on a cultivated soil. II. Effects of farm yard manure spread on a frozen ground and mixed in the soil on a water pollution. Scientific Reports of the Agricultur- al University of Norway. 57(28): 1–23. Uusi-Kämppä, J. & Heinonen-Tanski, H. 2008. Evaluating slurry broadcasting and injection to ley for phosphorus losses and fecal microorganisms in surface runoff. Jour- nal of Environmental Quality 37: 2339–2350. Uusitalo, R., Turtola, E. & Lemola, R. 2007. Phosphorus losses from a subdrained clayey soil as affected by cul- tivation practices. Agricultural and Food Science 16: 352–365. Nitrogen losses from grass ley after slurry application– surface broadcasting vs. injection Introduction Material and methods The experimental field Treatments and applications Measurement of ammonia volatilization Water sampling and analyses Soil sampling and analyses Other samplings and calculations of nitrogen balances Statistical analyses Results and discussion Dry Matter and Nitrogen Uptake of Grass Ammonia volatilization Amount of surface runoff Nitrogen losses in surface runoff Soil mineral nitrogen and nitrogen leaching Nitrogen balance and fate of nitrogen Conclusions References