A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E M. F. Seleiman et al. (2017) 26: 47–55 47 Manuscript received December 2016 Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of whole- crop maize fertilized with synthetic fertilizer or digestate and harvested at two maturity stages in Boreal growing conditions Mahmoud F. Seleiman1,3, Shaimaa Selim2,4, Seija Jaakkola2 and Pirjo S.A. Mäkelä1 1Department of Agricultural Sciences, Crop Science, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 27, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland 2Department of Agricultural Sciences, Animal Nutrition, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 28, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland 3Permanent address: Department of Crop Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Menoufia University, 32514 Shibin El-kom, Egypt 4Permanent address: Department of Nutrition and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Menoufia University, 32514 Shibin El-kom, Egypt e-mail: mahmoud.seleiman@agr.menofia.edu.eg Maize cultivation for silage could be a sustainable option in Boreal conditions, especially when combined with nutrient recycling. Effects of digestate (sludge from biogas of domestic origin) application in comparison with synthetic fertilizer and two maturity stages on chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of whole-crop maize were investigated. Starch, neutral detergent fiber, water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and digestible organic matter (DOM) contents of maize did not differ in response to the two fertilizer treatments. However, starch, DOM and metabo- lizable energy of maize increased, while ash, crude protein and WSC contents decreased with increasing maize maturity. Heavy metals in maize fertilized with digestate remained low. The results indicate that whole-crop maize fertilized with digestate and harvested at 150 days after sowing is a promising feed and has good nutritive value, even in Boreal conditions. Key words: digestate, heavy metals, in vitro digestibility, nutritive value, Zea mays L. Introduction Whole-crop maize (Zea mays L.) is an important and widely investigated forage for ruminants (Bal et al. 1997, Jensen et al. 2005, Cone et al. 2008, Khan et al. 2015), and is also used as an energy crop (Ericsson and Nilsson 2006, Seleiman et al. 2013). It has been used to produce silage because of its high nutritive value and potential for high yield in a single harvest (e.g. Phipps et al. 2000, Kirkland et al. 2005, Njoka et al. 2005). The growth of maize typically benefits from high temperatures and short days which has limited its use as feed in Boreal condi- tions. Although early maturing varieties have become available that are better adapted to the climate of northern Europe (Jensen et al. 2005, Mussadiq et al. 2012) the implementation of maize as feed requires more knowledge on factors affecting the development pattern and nutritional characteristics of maize grown in long day conditions. Maturity is an important preharvest factor that affects nutrient content, digestibility and ensilability of forages (Mussadiq et al. 2012, Lynch et al. 2013). Advancing maturity is known to increase dry matter (DM) and starch contents and decrease neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and crude protein (CP) contents of maize, and the DM content in particular has been used as an indicator of optimum harvest time associated with ensiling and feeding quality (Johnson et al. 2002). Dry matter content of ensiled crop higher than 250 g kg-1 is desirable to avoid effluent and nutrient losses and to improve crop ensilability characteristics (McDonald et al. 1991). The positive responses of replacing high-quality grass silage with moderate quality (DM 257 g kg-1, starch 219 g kg-1 DM) maize silage (O’Mara et al. 1998) support growing maize even in zones where maize does not get its thermal requirement, and consequently does not mature optimally or reach optimal DM content. In addition, maize can be grown with organic fertilizers to reduce the demand of synthetic fertilizers and to recycle nutrients from the organic sources (Pain et al. 1989, Jarvis 1993). Anaerobic digestion has become an alternative option for recycling nutrients available in organic residues from e.g. domestic, agricultural and industrial sources (Odlare et al. 2008, Massé et al. 2011, Alburquerque et al. 2012, Insam et al. 2015, Gómez-Brandón et al. 2016). The major advantages of anaerobic digestion are renewable energy production (biogas), conservation of natural resources through using the end-product (i.e. digestate) as fertilizer and soil amendment (Stinner et al. 2008, Möller and Stinner 2009). Digestate contains high level of phosphorus (P) A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E M. F. Seleiman et al. (2017) 26: 47–55 48 and nitrogen (N) (Seleiman et al. 2012). N applied into soil through the application of digestate is rapidly available for plant growth during short-term (Alburquerque et al. 2012). However, a slow rate of microbial activities owing to the low temperature in the soil might reduce the capacity of digestate as fertilizer (Alburquerque et al. 2012). Digestate application improves chemical and microbiological properties of the soil (Odlare et al. 2008, Alburquerque et al. 2012), plant growth and quality (Alburquerque et al. 2012, Kouřimská et al. 2012, Seleiman et al. 2012). The objective of the current study was to investigate the chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of whole- crop maize fertilized with synthetic fertilizer or digestate and harvested at two maturity stages. Materials and methods Plant material and experimental design The plant material originates from a previously published investigation on suitability of forage maize for bioenergy in Boreal conditions (Seleiman et al. 2013). Three field experiments were conducted at the Viikki Experimental Farm (60° 13’ N, 25° 10’ E, 3 m a.s.l., average length of growing season 175 days), University of Helsinki, Finland. Maize (cv. Ronaldinio, intermediate maturity class FAO 240, KWS SAAT, Einbeck, Germany) was developed for the majority of mainstream sites (270–310 g kg-1 DM) and is categorized as a fodder cultivar. Soil samples were collected annually prior to sowing from topsoil (0–20 cm depth), and were analyzed at Viljavuus- palvelu Oy, Mikkeli (2009–2010) and Suomen Ympäristöpalvelu Oy, Oulu (2011), Finland (Table 1). According to the WRB system (IUSS Working Group) the fields are typically Luvic Gleysols or Luvic Stagnosols (Michéli el al. 2006). In 2009 and 2010, the plots were sown on organic medium clay, while in 2011 they were sown on organic sandy clay. Fertilization treatments, synthetic fertilizer and digestate (sludge from biogas of domestic origin), were estimated on the basis of total N needed for maize (i.e. 120 kg N ha-1) taking into account the soil fertility. The 100% digestate (3.87 t digestate ha-1) contained 11.60 kg ammonium (NH 4 +), 0.02 kg nitrate (NO 3 ) and 108.38 kg organic N. The 100% synthetic fertilizer (120 kg N ha-1, N-P-K:28-3-5, Cemagro Oy, Lohja, Finland) contained 58.50 kg NO 3 and 61.50 kg NH 4 +). The amount of digestate was calculated based on the total N content (Table 1). Both fertilizers were applied prior to seeding. The digestate was tilled to a depth of 7 cm. Sowing dates were 13 May in 2009, 16 May in 2010 and 15 May in 2011. The sowing density of maize was about 95200 plants ha-1, and distance between rows was 70 cm and plant spacing was 15 cm. Weeds were controlled using 2.3 kg ha-1 Lentagran WP (pyridate 450 g kg-1, Belchim Crop Protection) at 25 days after sowing (DAS) (BBCH stage 13, Meier 2001). There was no supplementary irrigation during the growing seasons. The precipitation level during the growing seasons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 was 343, 288 and 393 mm; while the average temperature during those growing seasons was 14.5, 15.7 and 15.8 °C, respectively (Table 2). The field experiment was performed in a randomized complete block design with four replicates. Plot size was 20 m2 (8 x 2.5 m). Table 1. Chemical properties of soil and digestate used during the three years (2009–2011) Parameter Soil properties Digestate 2009 2010 2011 pH (1:5) 6.40 6.30 6.20 7.20 N 20.4b 14.1b 14.6b 31.0c P 17b 19b 1650a 26c K 300b 300b 8050a 2c Mn 9b 4b 270a 220a Cd 0.3a 0.6a 0.5a 0.4a Cr 35a 48a 72a 30a Cu 53a 77a 91a 270a Pb 30a 74a 97a 20a Zn 96a 180a 90a 470a As 7.1a 7.8a 9.6a 5.0a a = mg kg-1; b = mg l-1; c = g kg-1 N, P, K and Mn for soil are presented in soluble form, whereas all elements for digestate are presented in total concentration. A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E M. F. Seleiman et al. (2017) 26: 47–55 49 Measurements and analyses The whole-crop maize samples of 1.0 m2 from each plot during the three growing seasons were manually harvested twice during ripening at 120 DAS (BBCH stage 83, early dough stage: kernel content soft; Meier 2001) and 150 DAS (BBCH stage 85, dough stage: kernels yellowish to yellow) on 15th of September and 15th of October, respectively. The plants were cut at ground level and weighed. Then plant samples were cut into small pieces and dried at +105 °C for 72 h and weighed (dry weight) to obtain dry matter content. Dried samples were ground (ZM 200, Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany) into a fine powder (0.5 mm mesh size) and stored at room temperature for further analysis. The ash content of whole-crop maize was analyzed from 1 g subsamples by complete combustion in a muffle furnace (LV 15/11/P320, Nabertherm GmbH, Bremen, Germany) as described by Seleiman et al. (2012). The total N content of whole-crop maize was analyzed (Seleiman et al. 2013) from 200 mg subsamples using the Dumas combustion method (VarioMAX CN, Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany). N content was multiplied by 6.25 to obtain the crude protein content for each sample (Horwitz 1980). Starch content of a 100 mg ground sample (0.5 mm) was measured with an assay kit (K-TSTA-50A/K-TSTA-100A, Megazyme, Wicklow, Ireland) and protocol supplied by the manufacturer using the UV-spectrophotometer (Model UV-1800 240V IVDD, Shimadzu Inc., Kyoto, Japan). Water-soluble carbohydrates were analyzed at 630 nm in a spectrophotometer (Model UV-1800 240V IVDD, Shimadzu Inc., Kyoto, Japan) using a method based on anthrone assay (Yem and Willis 1954) with modifications related to sample size, which was decreased to 30 mg. Neutral detergent fiber (aNDFom) was analyzed using a Tecator Fibertec system (1020 Hot extractor and 1021 Cold extractor, FOSS, Hillerød, Denmark) according to Van Soest et al. (1991) with sodium-sulfite and α-amylase and was expressed exclusive of residual ash. Digestible organic matter content in DM (DOMD) was analyzed using a method based on pepsin-cellulase solubility (Friedel 1990) with the modifications of Nousiainen et al. (2003). The results were calculated using a correction equation to convert pepsin-cellulase solubility to in vivo OM digestibility (Huhtanen et al. 2006). Metabolizable energy content (ME) was calculated according to Luke (2015) as ME (MJ) = 0.0155 × DOMD. For determination of heavy metals and metalloids (i.e. As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn), subsamples of 300 mg were digested in nitric acid with microwave heating, filtered and analyzed in an Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometer (iCAP 6200, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Cambridge, United Kingdom) as described by Seleiman et al. (2012), with every 20th sample a standard. All glassware was acid-washed to avoid chromium contamination. Statistical analysis The effects of harvest dates, fertilizer treatments, years and their interactions as fixed effects on dry matter content, chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of whole-crop maize were tested with split split-plot analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Predictive Analytics Software (PASW) statistics 20.0 (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, United States of America). The standard errors of the means (SEM) were determined using PASW. Statistical significance was established at p ≤ 0.05 for all analyses. Table 2. Long-term (1971–2000; FMI 2011) and monthly means for temperature and precipitation during three growing seasons at Kaisaniemi, located near Viikki, Finland Temperature (°C) Precipitation (mm) Month 2009 2010 2011 1971–2000 2009 2010 2011 1971–2000 April 4.5 4.7 6.0 3.3 8 42 29 36 May 11.0 11.9 10.8 10.0 45 59 27 32 June 14.1 15.1 17.4 14.6 77 33 49 49 July 17.5 22.4 20.9 16.9 131 49 56 62 August 17.0 17.7 16.9 15.3 50 97 173 78 September 13.1 11.5 12.9 10.1 40 50 88 66 October 4.3 5.1 7.6 5.2 90 29 69 73 A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E M. F. Seleiman et al. (2017) 26: 47–55 50 Results No statistically significant interactions for fertilizer x harvest date x year were recorded (data not shown) while the significant two-factor interactions are presented in Table 3 (fertilizer x harvest date) and Figs. 1 and 2 (year x harvest date). There were no effects of fertilizer treatments (synthetic fertilizer and digestate application), harvest dates (120 and 150 DAS) or their interactions on the whole-crop maize DM content. However, in 2010 DM content of whole-crop maize was lower at 150 DAS compared to 120 DAS while in 2009 and 2011 it was higher or the same (interaction year x harvest date p < 0.001) (Fig. 1). Delaying harvest from 120 DAS to 150 DAS decreased (p < 0.001) ash content (Table 3). However, the ash content was lower with digestate than with synthetic fertilizer at 120 DAS while it was higher with digestate at 150 (inter- action p < 0.01). Digestate application resulted in lower (p < 0.01) CP content in whole-crop maize compared with fertilizing maize with synthetic fertilizer. Also, CP content obtained from whole-crop maize harvested at 150 DAS was lower (p < 0.01) than that harvested at 120 DAS (Table 3). Digestate application resulted in similar starch contents in whole-crop maize as for synthetic fertilizer at 120 or at 150 DAS (Table 3). However, whole-crop maize harvested at 150 DAS had higher (p < 0.001) starch content than that harvested at 120 DAS. Overall, starch content in whole-crop maize was increased by 113 g kg-1 DM with synthetic fertilizer and by 93 g kg-1 DM with digestate when the harvest of maize was delayed until 150 DAS. However, at 150 DAS the lowest starch content (146 g kg-1 DM) of whole-crop maize was recorded in 2010, while much higher starch contents (242 and 252 g kg-1 DM) were recorded in 2009 and 2011, indicating interaction between harvest date and year factors (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2). Table 3. Chemical composition, in vitro digestibility, DOMD and ME content at 120 and 150 DAS for whole-crop maize fertilized with synthetic fertilizer or digestate averaged over three years Harvest dates Fertilizer Ash CP Starch WSC aNDFom DOMD OMD ME (g kg-1 DM) (MJ kg-1 DM) 120 DAS Synthetic fertilizer 61.3 88.9 107 126 573 654 686 10.1 Digestate 58.6 82.1 114 121 563 654 687 10.1 150 DAS Synthetic fertilizer 45.3 82.4 220 67 565 681 714 10.6 Digestate 47.2 73.6 207 60 554 700 732 10.8 SEM 0.83 2.18 11.3 4.9 14.0 3.4 3.4 0.05 Significance (p) Harvest dates (H) <0.001 <0.01 <0.001 <0.001 0.520 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 Fertilizer (F) 0.629 <0.01 0.821 0.209 0.459 0.336 0.330 0.211 H × F <0.01 0.633 0.340 0.913 0.981 0.326 0.321 0.200 DAS = Days after sowing; WSC = Water soluble carbohydrate; CP = Crude protein; DMOD = Digestible organic matter content in dry matter; OMD = Organic matter digestibility; ME = metabolizable energy; aNDFom = Neutral detergent fiber; SEM = Standard error of mean Fig. 1. The interaction between harvest date and year for dry matter content of whole-crop maize. Data shown are means ± standard errors of means. 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 2009 2010 2011 D ry m at te r co nt en t ( g kg -1 ) Years 120 DAS 150 DAS A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E M. F. Seleiman et al. (2017) 26: 47–55 51 There were no differences between the fertilizer treatments on the WSC content of maize. The WSC content of whole-crop maize harvested at 120 DAS was higher (p < 0.001) than for that harvested at 150 DAS, while the differences for WSC of whole-crop maize between harvest dates was higher in 2009 than in 2010 and 2011 (interaction p < 0.05) (Fig. 2). The content of aNDFom in whole-crop maize was not affected by the fertilizer treat- ment (Table 3). In 2010, aNDFom content was clearly lower at 150 DAS than at 120 DAS, while in 2009 and 2011 the content was higher at 150 DAS than 120 DAS (interaction p < 0.05) (Fig. 2). The highest aNDFom content (616 g kg-1 DM) in whole-crop maize was recorded at 150 DAS during 2011. Organic matter digestibility, DOMD and ME content in whole-crop maize were not affected by the fertilizer treat- ments. However, they were higher (p < 0.001) in maize harvested at 150 DAS than when harvested at 120 DAS (Table 3). Markedly higher values of DOMD and ME for whole-crop maize were recorded when harvested at 150 DAS during 2010 in comparison with maize harvested during 2009 or 2011 (interaction p < 0.05) (Fig. 2). Digestate application resulted in a slightly higher content of heavy metals and metalloids in whole-crop maize com- pared with that fertilized with synthetic fertilizer, but the increase was not significant (p > 0.05) (Fig. 3). Whole- crop maize fertilized with digestate contained As 0.71, Cd 0.10, Cr 7.33, Zn 62.00 mg kg-1 DM, while maize fertilized with synthetic fertilizer contained As 0.56, Cd 0.09, Cr 6.42, Zn 58.00 mg kg-1 DM. 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 W SC (g k g- 1 D M ) 120 DAS 150 DAS 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 St ar ch ( g kg -1 D M ) 400 450 500 550 600 650 2009 2010 2011 aN D Fo m ( g kg -1 D M ) Years 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 O M S (g k g- 1 D M ) 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 O M D (g k g- 1 D M ) 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 2009 2010 2011 D O M D (g k g- 1 D M ) Years Fig. 2. The interaction between harvest date and year on the chemical composition, organic matter solubility (OMS) and digestibility (OMD) and digestible organic matter in dry matter (DOMD) of whole-crop maize. Data shown are means ± standard errors of means. A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E M. F. Seleiman et al. (2017) 26: 47–55 52 Discussion The dry matter content did not differ when maize was fertilized with synthetic fertilizer or digestate. Neither was there an effect of harvest date on the average DM content. This was a result of the lower DM content at 150 DAS than at 120 DAS in 2010. The minor increase in DM content between the harvest dates in 2009 and 2011 was comparable with the results of Lynch et al. (2013) who reported pre-ensilage chemical composition of different maize hybrids harvested in September and October in Ireland. However, in the present experiment the advancing maturity between 120 DAS and 150 DAS was evidenced by doubled starch content. Thus, the DM content of whole plant is not necessarily an accurate indicator of the maturity stage. The importance of interactions between environmental and genetic factors on the development of forage maize was shown in the investigation of Mussadiq et al. (2012). In their two year study at northern latitudes (56o N–59o N) the DM content of three forage maize hybrids varied between 160–370 g kg-1 at approximately 150 DAS. Khan et al. (2015) concluded that the DM intake, milk yield and milk protein content increased with advancing maturity, reaching an optimum level for maize ensiled at DM contents of 300–350 g kg-1, and then declined slightly at further maturity beyond 350 g kg-1. It should be noted that in the present experiment samples were taken at harvest, and that the effect of DM content on the success of ensiling process may modify the feeding value of maize silage. Crude protein content in whole crop maize decreased at 150 DAS (78.0 g kg-1 on average) in comparison with harvest at 120 DAS (85.5 g kg-1 on average). The results are consistent with findings of other studies showing CP content decrease from 84.7 to 82.2 g kg-1 (Johnson et al. 2002), and from 99.1 to 90.5 g kg-1 (Lynch et al. 2012) with increasing maturity. The average CP content of maize was higher with synthetic fertilizer (85.7 g kg-1 DM) than with digestate treatment (77.9 g kg-1 DM). This might be due to the slightly higher DM yield of maize fertilized with digestate in comparison with maize fertilized with synthetic fertilizer (Seleiman et al. 2013). The increase in starch content of whole-crop maize and the parallel reduction in the content of water-soluble carbohydrate, with the later harvest, were in accord with Hunt et al. (1989), Filya (2004) and Lynch et al. (2012). This can be related to the increased contribution of cob to the whole-crop DM yield and accumulation of starch in Fig. 3. Micro-element (mg kg-1 DM) content at 150 DAS in whole maize plants fertilized with synthetic fertilizer and digestate. Data shown are means averaged over three years ± standard error of means. 0 20 40 60 Zn (m g kg -1 D M ) 0 2 4 6 8 10 Cu (m g kg -1 D M ) 0 2 4 6 8 10 Synthetic fertilizer Digestate Cr (m g kg -1 D M ) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 A s (m g kg -1 D M ) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Pb (m g kg -1 D M ) 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 Synthetic fertilizer Digestate Cd (m g kg -1 D M ) Synthetic Digestate fertilizer Synthetic Digestate fertilizer A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E M. F. Seleiman et al. (2017) 26: 47–55 53 the grains during the maturation period (Cone et al. 2008, Lynch et al. 2012). The starch content of maize reached at 150 DAS in 2009 and 2011 (250 g kg-1 DM) was comparable with starch contents in early maturing hybrids in Ireland with later harvest dates of 174 DAS in 2008 and 168 DAS in 2009 (Lynch et al. 2012, 2013). Silage made from whole-crop maize necessitates high starch content and consequently a high fraction of well-matured cob because sufficient digestibility of stover components will only sustain levels of animal performance that can be attained by using average quality of grass silage (O’Kiely and Moloney 1995). The reduction of starch in whole-crop maize at 150 DAS during 2010 was due to the reduction of the DM yield (Seleiman et al. 2013), which resulted from bird damage to the developing ears. Cutting at high stubble height (45.7 cm) resulted in lower aNDFom and N content and higher starch content of whole-crop maize compared with cutting at 12.7 cm (Neylon and Kung 2003). Thus cutting at ground level in the current experiment probably slightly overestimated the aNDFom content and underestimated DOMD value of the maize samples compared with potential values at a higher cutting height. The study of Kruse et al. (2008) showed that most of the variation in aNDFom content was explained by harvest maturity followed by maturity type and environmental conditions. The DOMD value and consequently ME value of the whole-crop maize increased with delaying harvest from 120 DAS to 150 DAS. This agrees with the in vitro results of Lynch et al. (2012) between 126 DAS and 153 DAS while the further delay of harvest to 174 DAS decreased digestibility. Many investigations have revealed the negative effects of increasing maize maturity on digestibility, mainly when maize is harvested with high DM content (≤ 350 g DM kg-1; Khan et al. 2015). This indicates changes in the cob/stover ratio and changes in the digestibility of the nutrient components while the profile of digestibility changes differ among hybrids (Lynch et al. 2012, 2013, Khan et al. 2015). However, no reduction in OM digestibility was recorded when four maize silages containing between 220 and 380 g DM kg-1 were fed in dairy cow diets comprising 420 g maize silage kg-1 total DM intake (Sutton et al. 2000). The increase in DOMD of the whole-crop maize with the delay in harvest was consistent with lessening NDF and increasing starch content. The considerable rise in starch content of grains reduced the content of NDF in the whole crop maize due to the simultaneous increase in the ratio of grains to the whole-crop maize DM (Bal et al. 2000). The reduction of CP and water-soluble carbohydrate, and the stability of NDF by delaying harvest, might be due to the dilution that occurred with the increasing starch content (Deaville and Givens 2001). With respect to heavy metal and metalloid content in whole-crop maize, digestate application resulted in a higher content of As and Cd, by 0.15 mg kg-1 and 0.014 mg kg-1, respectively, than application of synthetic fertilizer. However, digestate did not result in critical contents of all studied heavy metals and metalloids in whole-crop maize according to the indices of animal health, and they were below the maximum tolerable levels for cattle feed (As 30 mg kg-1, Pb 100 mg kg-1, Cr 100 mg kg-1, Cu 40 mg kg-1, Zn 500 mg kg-1, Cd 10 mg kg-1 [NRC 2005]). This indi- cates that whole-crop maize fertilized with digestate, based on the total N needed by maize, can be used safely as ruminant feedstuff. Conclusion Chemical composition and in vitro OM digestibility of whole-crop maize did not differ between fertilizer and digestate treatments. The DM (231–318 g kg-1) and starch (146–252 g kg-1 DM) contents that were reached 150 days after sowing, at the beginning of October, suggest that it is possible to harvest at least moderate quality maize forage even in Boreal conditions. Further, the contents of heavy metals in whole-crop maize fertilized with digestate were comparable to those with synthetic fertilizer, thus digestate can be recycled safely as fertilizer for silage maize production. Acknowledgements The Department of Agricultural Sciences of the University of Helsinki, the Finnish Cultural Foundation and Niemi- Säätiö are gratefully acknowledged for their financial support. Helsingin Seudun Ympäristöpalvelut–kuntayhtymä HSY, Jätevedenpuhdistusosasto is acknowledged for providing the digestate. Markku Tykkyläinen is acknowledged for his assistance in the field, and Marjo Kilpinen and Leena Luukkainen, Anne Vepsäläinen, Karoliina Heinonen and Anne Hannikainen are acknowledged for their invaluable technical assistance with the laboratory analyses. A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E M. F. Seleiman et al. (2017) 26: 47–55 54 References Alburquerque, J.A., de la Fuente, C., Ferrer-Costa, A., Carrasco, L., Cegarra, J., Abad, M. & Bernal, M.P. 2012. Assessment of the fertiliser potential of digestates from farm and agro industrial residues. Biomass & Bioenergy 40: 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.02.018 Bal, M.A., Coors, J.G. & Shaver, R.D. 1997. Impact of the maturity of corn for use as silage in the diets of dairy cows on intake, digestion and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 2497–2503. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76202-7 Bal, M.A., Shaver, R.D., Jirovec, A.G., Shinners, K.J. & Coors J.G. 2000. Crop processing and chop length of corn silage: Effects on intake, digestion, and milk production by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 1264–1273. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74993-9 Cone, J.W., Van Gelder, A.H., Van Schooten, H.A. & Groten, J.A.M. 2008. Effects of forage maize type and maturity stage on in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 55: 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-5214(08)80033-4 Deaville, E.R. & Givens, D.1. 2001. Use of the automated gas production technique to determine the fermentation kinetics of carbohy- drate fractions in maize silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology 93: 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00289-9 Ericsson, K. & Nilsson, L.J. 2006. Assessment of the potential biomass supply in Europe using a resource-focused approach. Bio- mass & Bioenergy 30: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.09.001 Filya, I. 2004. Nutritive value and aerobic stability of whole crop maize silage harvested at four stages of maturity. Animal Feed Science and Technology 116: 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.06.003 Finnish Meteorological Institute 2011. www.FMI.fi. Friedel, K. 1990. Die Schätzung des energetischen Futterwertes von Grobfutter mit Hilfe einer Cellulasemethode. Wissenschaftli- che Zeitschrift der Universität Rostock, N-Reihe 39: 78–86. (in German). Gómez-Brandón M., Juárez M., Zangerle M., Insam H. 2016. Effects of digestate on soil chemical and microbiological proper- ties: Acomparative study with compost and vermicompost. Journal of Hazardous Materials 302: 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.09.067 Horwitz, W. 1980. Official methods of analysis. The association of official analytical chemists. Washington, USA: Benjamin Frank- lin Station. 1018 p. Huhtanen, P., Nousiainen, J. & Rinne, M. 2006. Recent developments in forage evaluation with special reference to practical applications. Agricultural and Food Science 15: 293–323. Hunt, C.W., Kezar, W. & Vinande, R. 1989. Yield, chemical composition and ruminal fermentability of corn whole plant, ear, and stover as affected by maturity. Journal of Production Agriculture 2: 357–361. https://doi.org/10.2134/jpa1989.0357 Insam, H., Gómez-Brandón, M. & Ascher, J. 2015. Biogas fermentation residues-friend or foe of soil life and fertility. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 84: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.006 Jarvis, S.C. 1993. Nitrogen cycling and losses from dairy farms. Soil Use and Management 9: 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.1993.tb00937.x Jensen, C., Weisbjerg, M.R., Nørgaard, P. & Hvelplund, T. 2005. Effect of maize silage maturity on site of starch and NDF digestion in lactating dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 118: 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.10.011 Johnson, L.M., Harrison, J.H., Davidson, D., Mahanna, W.C., Shinners, K. & Linder, D. 2002. Corn silage management: Effects of maturity, inoculation and mechanical processing on pack density and aerobic stability. Journal of Dairy Science 85: 434–444. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74092-7 Khan, N.A., Yu, P., Ali, M., Cone, J.W. & Hendriks, W.H. 2015. Nutritive value of maize silage in relation to dairy cow performance and milk quality. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 95: 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6703 Kirkland, R.M., Steen, R.W.J., Gordon, F.J. & Keady, T.W.J. 2005. The influence of grass and maize silage quality on apparent diet digestibility, metabolizable energy concentration and intake of finishing beef cattle. Grass and Forage Science 60: 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2005.00472.x Kouřimská, L., Poustková, I. & Babička L. 2012. The use of digestate as a replacement of mineral fertilizers for vegetables growing. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica 43: 121–126. https://doi.org/10.7160/sab.2012.430401 Kruse, S., Herrmann, A., Kornher, A. & Taube, F. 2008. Evaluation of genotype and environmental variation in fibre content of silage maize using a model-assisted approach. European Journal of Agronomy 28: 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2007.07.007 Luke 2015. Feed tables and nutrient requirements. Jokioinen: Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke). http://www.mtt.fi/feed- tables. Accessed 09 September 2015. Lynch, J.P., O’Kiely, P. & Doyle, E.M. 2012. Yield, quality, and ensilage characteristics of whole-crop maize and of the cob and stover components: harvest date and hybrid effects. Grass and Forage Science 67: 472–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00868.x Lynch, J.P., O’Kiely, P. & Doyle, E.M. 2013. Yield, nutritive value and ensilage characteristics of whole-crop maize, and of the sep- arated cob and stover components – nitrogen, harvest date and cultivar effects. Journal of Agricultural Science 151: 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859612000342 Massé, D.I., Talbot, G. & Gilbert, Y. 2011. On farm biogas production: a method to reduce GHG emissions and develop more sustain- able livestock operations. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167: 436–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.075 McDonald, P, Henderson, A. R. & Heron, S. J. E. 1991. The Biochemistry of Silage. 2nd ed. Marlow, United Kingdom: Chalcombe Publications. 340 p. A G R I C U LT U R A L A N D F O O D S C I E N C E M. F. Seleiman et al. (2017) 26: 47–55 55 Meier, U. 2001. Growth Stages of Mono-and Dicotyledonous Plants: BBCH-Monograph. 2nd ed. Berlin, Germany: The work was performed under the Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry. 158 p. Michéli, E., Schad, P. & Spaargaren, O. 2006. World reference base for soil resources 2006: A framework for international classi- fication, correlation and communication. Rome, Italy: Report No. 103 – The work was performed under the IUSS, ISRIC and FAO. Mussadiq, Z., Hetta, M., Swensson, C. & Gustavsson, A. 2012. Plant development, agronomic performance and nutritive value of forage maize depending on hybrid and marginal site conditions at high latitudes. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil and Plant Science 62: 420–430. Möller, K. & Stinner, W. 2009. Effects of different manuring systems with and without biogas digestion on soil miner- al nitrogen content and on gaseous nitrogen losses (ammonia, nitrous oxides). European Journal of Agronomy 30: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2008.06.003 Neylon, J.M. & Kung, L. JR. 2003. Effects of cutting height and maturity on the nutritive value of corn silage for lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86: 2163–2169. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73806-5 Njoka. E.M., Muraya, M.M. & Okumu, M. 2005. Plant density and thinning regime effect on maize (Zea mays) grain and fodder yield. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44: 1215–1219. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA03015 Nousiainen, J., Rinne, M., Hellämäki, M. & Huhtanen, P. 2003. Prediction of the digestibility of the primary growth of grass silag- es harvested at different stages of maturity from chemical composition and pepsin-cellulase solubility. Animal Feed Science and Technology 103: 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00283-3 NRC (National Research Council of the National Academies) 2005. Mineral tolerance of animals. 2nd ed. Washington, USA: The National Academies Press. 510 p. O’Kiely, P. & Moloney, A.P. 1995. Performance of beef cattle offered different ratios of grass and maize silage. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 34: 76 (abstract). O’Mara, F.P., Fitzgerald, S., Murphy, J.J. & Rath, M. 1998. The effect on milk production of replacing grass silage with maize silage in the diet of dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 55: 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(98)00115-8 Odlare, M., Pell, M. & Svensson, K. 2008. Changes in soil chemical and microbiological properties during 4 years of application of various organic residues. Waste Management 28: 1246–1253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.06.005 Pain, B.F., Phillips, V.R., Clarkson, C.R. & Klarenbech, J.V. 1989. Losses of nitrogen through ammonia volatilisation during and following the application of pig or cattle slurry to grassland. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 47: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740470102 Phipps, R.H., Sutton, J.D., Beever, D.E. & Jones, A.K. 2000. The effect of crop maturity on the nutritional value of maize silage for lactating dairy cows 3. Food intake and milk production. Animal Science Journal 71: 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800055259 Seleiman, M.F., Santanen, A., Kleemola, J., Stoddard, F.L. & Mäkelä, P. 2013. Improved sustainability of feedstock production with sludge and interacting mycorrhiza. Chemosphere 91: 1236–1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.02.004 Seleiman, M.F., Santanen, A., Stoddard, F.L. & Mäkelä, P. 2012. Feedstock quality and growth of bioenergy crops fertilized with sewage sludge. Chemosphere 89: 1211–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.07.031 Stinner, W., Möller, K. & Leithold, G. 2008. Effects of biogas digestion of clover/grassleys, cover crops and crop residues on ni- trogen cycle and crop yield in organic stockless farming systems. European Journal of Agronomy 29: 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2008.04.006 Sutton, J.D., Cammell, S.B., Phipps, R.H., Beever, D.E. & Humphries, D.J. 2000. The effect of crop maturity on the nutrition- al value of maize silage for lactating cows. 2. Ruminal and post-ruminal digestion. Animal Sciences Journal 71: 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800055247 Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. & Lewis, B. A. 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and non starch polysaccha- rides in relation to animal production. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 Yem, E.W. & Willis, A.J. 1954. The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochemistry Journal 57: 769–773. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0570508