JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE IN FINLAND Maataloustieteellinen A ikakauskirja Vol. 56: 131—135 Ruminal degradation and in vivo digestibility of processed rapeseed meal LIISA SYRJÄLÄ-QVIST, EEVA PEKKARINEN and JOUKO SETÄLÄ Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Helsinki SF-00710 HELSINKI 71, Finland Abstract. The digestibility and nutritive value of rapeseed meal processed in different ways were studied with adult rams fed on alkali-treated straw. The rumen degradability was determined by the nylon bag technique. The rapeseed meal feeds were: 1) untreated rapeseed meal, 2) heat-treated rapeseed meal (2—5 sec. at over 100°C), 3) heat- treated rapeseed meal + 5 % urea phosphate and 4) heat-treated rapeseed meal + 10 % rapeseed hulls. The heat treatment reduced the rumen degradation and in vivo digestibility of the rapeseed meal, althoughnot significantly (P > 0.05). Addition of urea phosphate to the heat- treated rapeseed meal increased the ruminal degradability of the crude protein and improved the digestibility of all the constituents of the rapeseed meal, especially that of crude fibre (P > 0.05). The rapeseed hulls had no noticeable effect on digestibility. Introduction Rumen microbes need a certain amount of rumen-degradable crude protein for maxi- mal protein synthesis and fermentation ac- tivity. When the feed contains insufficient rumen-degradable protein for the microbes, digestion and protein synthesis are reduced, but presence of this protein in excess of the need for microbial synthesis can decrease the utilization of protein. Reduction of rumen-degradable protein has been shown to have a beneficial effect with high-production animals, whoseprotein requirement is great (Anon. 1978, Kauf- mann, 1979, Anon. 1980). For instance, milk production and protein utilization were im- proved in dairy cows, when part of the silage protein was replaced with rapeseed meal pro- tein of lower rumen-degradability (Syrjälä- Qvist and Setälä 1982). When untreated and formaldehyde-treated rapeseed meal was fed to high-production dairy cows, the treat- ment was found to reduce the ruminal NH 3-N concentration, but did not reduce the digestibilities of dry matter, nitrogen or fibre (Ingalls et al. 1983). Nor had it any effect on milk production. The aim of the present experiment was to study the digestibility and nutritive value of Index words: rapeseed meal, heat treatment, urea phosphate, digestibility rumen degradability 131 https://www.c-info.fi/en/info/?token=kdbOkyoxsgYWX0ko.q5XENEooOevGL5zrx6WiUQ.nUTOYhBghyWAHObLc9l4aA2G-AvoYQHXrj-hAktDSJiy-oKPMUETR6JK90z9b9HEVy290ivZk_Y-hUKiPs-Gxx1iyIojABU-pAhX6VbHANBIUI8PfbIdAk0TY3yuwrO5TFXjzrJW2kEHnwtg_COHvV8W-opRHFiJRCfmBpbxEUrcd7WwGoacp9jBFyhT26prqi5R0Y8g4S6CXJ4ZjIUhDsOT8fqTmzhg0AbLBUu2zrVPbRwyAKnn rapeseed meal when it is untreated and when its ruminal degradability has been modified by heat treatment. The effect of adding urea phosphate or rapeseed hulls to the heat- treated rapeseed meal was also examined. Experimental procedures The digestibility and nitrogen balance ex- periment was performed with four adult sheep according to a 4 x 4 Latin square. Each experimental period lasted two weeks, the second week being the total collection period. The rapeseed feeds used in experi- ment were as follows: 1) Untreated rapeseed meal 2) Heat-treated rapeseed meal (2—5 sec. at over 100°C) 3) Heat-treated rapeseed meal +5 % urea phosphate 4) Heat-treated rapeseed meal +lO °7o rapeseed hulls The basic feed was alkali-treated straw, whose digestibility was known (Table 1). Each diet consisted of 400 g rapeseed feed and 550 g straw per animal and day plus mineral and vitamin mixtures and water. The feeding procedures, feed sampling, analyses and calculations were as described by Syrjä- lä et ai. (1978). The ruminal degradability of the rapeseed meal feeds was determined by the nylon bag Table 1. The mean chemical composition, digestibility and nutritive value of the different feeds. Feeds Untreated Heat-treated Heat-treated Heat-treated rapeseed rapeseed rapeseed meal rapeseed mea NaOH- treated straw rapeseed rapeseed meal rapeseed meal meal meal + urea + hulls phosphate Dry matter, % % of dry matter: 88.3 90.7 91.1 89.6 76.3 Ash 7.7 7.5 9.2 7.4 10.6 Crude protein Crude fat 36.4 36.1 39.9 34.6 2.8 3.8 4.2 4.0 5.6 0.8 Crude fibre N-free extract 14.6 14.7 14.1 15.4 46.5 37.5 37.4 32.7 37.0 39.3 Digestibility, 9o Dry matter 75.1 71.9 74.8 73.5 57.4 76.5 73.5 76.8 74.3Organic matter Crude protein Crude fat 58.5 79.7 78.4 81.3 77.7 —30.0 82.8 86.6 84.3 89.8 80.0 Crude fibre N-free extract 50.3 45.6 53.6 49.7 71.6 80.2 76.4 78.3 76.7 50.6 N balance, g/day N secretion in urine, % of N supply 2.1 1.6 1.9 1.7 61,9 62.3 65.1 60.5 N secretion in feaces, % of N supply 29.0 30.7 27.2 31.7 kg/f.u. 1 1.21 1.21 1.18 1.18 1.08 1.05DM kg/f.u. 2 DCP g/f.u.3 1.07 MO 311» 310- 350" 283» DCP % in DM 29.0» 28.3» 32.4b 26.9» 1 f.u. = feed unit = 0.7 starch equivalent 2 DM = dry matter 3 DCP = digestible, crude protein Statistical analysis applied only to digestibilities and feeding values. Different index letters in a vertical column show that there are significant differences between the averages at the 99.9 % levels of confidence. 132 3 tehnique (Mehrez and orskov 1977), as described by Setälä (1983). The incubation periods were 2, 5 and 9 hours and the sheep used in the experiment received 1.5 kg hay per day. Results and discussion The heat-treatment decrease the in vivo digestibility of all the components of the rapeseed meal except that of crude fat (Table 1). The differences were, however, not sig- nificant (P > 0.05). Addition of urea phos- phate to the heat-treated rapeseed meal im- proved the apparent digestibility, especially that of crude fibre, but not significantly. Ad- dition of rapeseed hulls to the heat-treated rapeseed meal had also no significant effect. The nitrogen balance of the sheep in dif- ferent diets and the results describing the energy value of the different rapeseed feeds were about the same (Table 1). In the untreated rapeseed meal the ruminal degradability of crude protein, organic mat- ter and dry matter remained at the same level, about 40 % during the incubation periods of 2 and 5 hours, but after 9 hours it had increased to 56—58 *7o (Fig. 1). These values are about the same as those obtained for crude protein in other studies, (Anon. 1982, Setälä and Syrjälä-Qvist 1982), or lower (Mathers et al. 1977, Anon. 1980). The method used in removing oil from seeds has been shown to affect the ruminal protein degradation (Joseffson 1972) and this can be one reason for the variation in the results of different experiments. Heat treatment of the feeds has also been shown to decrease the degradation of feed protein in the rumen (Mehrez and orskov 1977). In this experi- ment the degradation of crude protein with heat-treated rapeseed meal without urea phosphate was lower than with untreated meal during the incubation periods of 2 and 9 hours, but not during the incubation peri- od of 5 hours. With heat-treated rapeseed meal the degradation of crude protein after 2, 5 and 9 hours incubation was 22, 43 and 46 °7o, respectively, and with untreated rapeseed meal it was 39, 41 and 55 %. Hence heat treatment slightly affected the rate of protein degradation in the rumen. When the heat-treated rapeseed meal con- tained urea phosphate, the degradation of crude protein in the 2, 5 and 9 hour incuba- tion periods was 12, 7 and 13 % units higher than with heat-treated rapeseed meal. The values were higher than those of untreated rapeseed meal in the incubation periods of 5 and 9 hours. The reason is the high solubility of urea in the rumen, though the rate of urea degradation is slown down when urea is given as urea phosphate (e.g. Mcqueen et al. 1980). Addition of rapeseed hulls did not have any marked effect on theruminal degradabi- lity of the dry matter, organic matter or Fig. I. Ruminal degradability of the rapeseed feeds in different incubation periods. 133 crude protein of the heat-treated rapeseed meal. The results showed that in this case, when the level of feeding was set at about main- tenance, heat treatment did not improve the utilization of rapeseed meal. The heat treat- ment reduced the ruminal degradability of the crude protein, which was already rather low in the untreated rapeseed meal, and also tended to decrease the in vivo digestibility. As the heat-treated rapeseed meal was the only protein source, the rumen microbes probably did not have enough rumen-degra- dableprotein for maximal activity, which led to reduced rumen fermentation activity. This conclusion is supported by the positive effect of urea on the digestibility of crude fibre. References Anon. 1978. Alimentation des Ruminants. INRA publi- cations, Route de Saint-Gyr. Institut National de la Recheche Agronomique. 597 p. Anon. 1980. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux. 351 p. Anon. 1982. Rehutaulukot jaruokintanormit. Helsinki. 70 p. Ingalls, J. R., Rae, R. C. & Chase, L. E. 1983. Canola meal and formaldehyde treated canola meal in rations for lactating cows. International Rapeseed Conferen- ce 1983: 1558—1562. Paris. Josefsson,E. 1972. Nutrition value and use of rapeseed meal. Rapeseed cultivation, composition, processing and utilization ed. Appelquis, L-A. & Ohlsson R. p. 354—375. Elsvier, Amsterdam and London. Kaufmann, W. 1979. Zur Eiweissverdauung bei Wieder- käuern im Hinblick auf die faklorielle Berechnung des Eiweissbedarfes. Z. Tierphys.Tierernähr. u..Fut- termittelk. 42: 326—333. Mathers, J. C., Horton, C. M. & Miller.E. L. 1977. Rate and extent of protein degradation in the rumen. Proc.Nutr.Soc. 1977: 37A. Mcqueen R. E., Seoane J. R., Nicholson J. W. G. & Mcrae K. B. 1980. Effect of urea phosphate, urea- form or urea on rumen and blood ammonia. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 60: 572. Mehrez, A. Z. & ORSKOV, E. R. 1977. A study of the artificial fibrebag techique for determining the diges- tibility of feeds in rumen. J.Agric.Sci., Camb. 88: 645—650. Setälä, J. 1983. The nylon bag technique in the deter- mination of ruminal feed protein degradation. J.Scient.Agr.Soc.Finl. 55: I—7B.1 —78. Setälä, J. & Syrjälä-Qvist, L. 1982. Ruminal degrada- tion of protein of processed rapeseed. EAAP Con- gress. Leningrad. 5 p. Syrjälä-Qvist, L. & Setälä, J. 1982. Comparison of grass silage, soybean and rapeseed as protein sources in dairy cow feeding. EAAP Congress. Leningrad. 5 p. Syrjälä, L., Syväoja, E.-L. & Boman, M. 1978. Utiliza- tion of untreated and formaldehyde treated skimmilk powder and skimmilk powder-barley pellets by ruminants. J.Scient.Agric.Soc.Finl. 50: 166—176. Ms received April 12, 1984 134 SELOSTUS Prosessoidun rypsirouheen pötsihajoavuus ja in vivo sulavuus Liisa Syrjälä-Qvist, Eeva Pekkarinen ja Jouko Setälä Helsingin yliopisto, kolieläinlieleen laitos, 00710 HELSINKI 71 Lipeäolkea perusrehuna saaneilla täysikasvuisilla päs- seillä määritettiin erilaisten rypsirehujen sulavuus ja ruokinta-arvo sekä heinäruokinnalla olleella pässillä sa- mojen rypsirehujen pötsihajoavuus. Kokeissa käytetyt rypsirehut olivat seuraavat: 1) tavallinen rypsirouhe, 2) lämpökäsitelty rypsirouhe (2 —5 sek. yli 100°C:ssa), 3) lämpökäsitelty rypsirouhe +5 % ureafosfaattia, 4) läm- pökäsitelty rypsirouhe + 10 % rypsinsiementen kuoria. Lämpökäsittely vähensi rypsirouheen pötsihajoavuut- ta sekä alensi in vivo sulavuutta. Pötsimikrobistolle tuli tällöin todennäköisesti puutetta typellisistä aineista, mi- kä tässä kokeessa käytetyillä ruokinnoilla johti mikrobi- aktiviteetin heikkenemiseen ja edelleen sulavuuden ale- nemiseen. Tätä osoitti myös se, että lisättäessä ureafos- faattia lämpökäsiteltyyn rouheeseen, pötsissä hajoavan valkuaisen osuus lisääntyi ja samalla myös sulavuus, varsinkin kuidun sulavuus parani. Siemenkuorilla sen sijaan ei ollut sanottavaa vaikutusta sulavuuteen. 135