Maataloustieteellinen Aikakauskirja Vol. 56: 213—219, 1984 Distillers dried by-products from barley as protein source for ruminants MATTI NÄSI University of Helsinki, Department of Animal Husbandry, 00710 HELSINKI, Finland Abstract. The nutritive value of barley-derived distillers dried grains (BDDG) and distill- ers dried grains with solubles (BDDGS) was assessed in digestibility and in sacco rumen degra- dability experiments. The crude protein contents of BDDG and BDDGS were 26.4 % and 29.9 %, and the crude fibre contents 19.9 % and 17.4 % in DM, respectively. The ADF and NDF contents averaged 33 % and 67 % and the lignin 7.6 % of DM. The digestibilities of the nutrients were measured with four rams in both trials and the distillers by-products were given at two levels, 33 % ad 66 %, in hay-based rations. The digestibilities in BDDG and BDDGS were, respectively, 43.1 °/o and 47.7 % for organic matter, 64.5 °/o and 66.5 % for crude protein, and 86.7 % and 87.9 % for ether extract. Due to the low digestibilities, the energy values of the two products were low, 0.58 FU/kg DM and 8.0 MJ/kg for both, and DCP/FU 295 g for BDDG and 347 g for BDDGS. The rumen degradability of the crude pro- tein of BDDG and BDDGS was found to be low and significantly lower than the degradability of wheat distillery by-products (P < 0.05). Fine grinding gave more rapid degradability. Due to the low total digestibility and reduced lysine content, BDDG and BDDGS may have limited protein availability when given as supplements. Inlroduction The desire to increase the domestic protein supply to meet the demand for cattle feeding has stimulated interest in utilizing various agro-industrial by-products. Distillers feeds consist of fermentation residues from the distilling industry. During yeast fermenta- tion of grain nearly all starch is removed, so that the protein and other components be- come more cocentrated. Distillers dried grains (DDG) and brewers spent grains (BSG) are major by-products from commer- cial ethanol distilling and the brewing indus- try. At present little information is available concerning the characteristics and nutri- tional value of barley distillers by-products. However, barley is the main raw material in the integrated starch-ethanol production planned to start in 1987 in Finland, with an expected of 61700 tn DM feedstuff annual yield (Lehmussaari 1984). Distillers grains from barley contain the fibrous barley hulls, which makes barley-derived products very Index words: Barley distillers grain, barley distillers grains with solubles, protein supplement, ethanol fermentation by-products, ruminant nutrition. 213 JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE IN FINLAND https://www.c-info.fi/en/info/?token=5F2A4GYaRweGDhQa.aUh2sJWZE7Rn4noUDQZG-w.Gd0Hs_Ph7tYPZoGduKv1WB3bS6Kqu27j_8f3J2LDqwDCPQyECeBkvNgwwTvT2TFh2lNaWibZRod2xJ6POOqMYj90pYs3KQ04VIHfBEtEOBb--pGSYhe17gDLzBzGnv2S1mssbalcRzEbTcZRu5Za4QQ4X1N84q1kMiqV7x4 different from those from wheat or other grains and also increases the residue yield (Kaufmann and Emeis 1965, Newman and Gras 1983). The distillery by-products studied in the present experiments are quite different from the feedstuffs that will be obtained from the new process, but they should provide infor- mation on the nutritional value of ethanol fermentation residues from barley as protein supplements for ruminants. Materials and methods Barley-derived distillers dried grains (BDDG) and distillers dried grains with so- lubles (BDDGS) were obtained from OY Al- ko AB’s Koskenkorva factory. From the whole barley stillage, the residues from the distillation process, the coarse grains were separated and dried to produce BDDG and the solubles were condensed by evaporating to produce BDDGS together with dried dis- tillers grains. Drying was done in a drum dryer. Two digestibility and nitrogen balance trials were conducted, with four rams in each trial, to determine the nutritive value of bar- ley distillers by-products. Each trial con- sisted of two 21-day periods. During the first period BDDG or BDDGS composed 33 °7o of diet dry matter (DM) and hay 67 %; during the second period BDDG or BDDGS com- posed 67 *Vo of diet DM and hay 33 %. The ration was given at maintenance level, 50 g DM/kg W 0 75. Finn sheep rams weighing on average 83 kg received 1400 g of the BDDG diet daily, and Texel rams weighing on aver- age 44 kg received 875 g of the BDDGS diet daily. In addition mineral mixture was given daily and water was available ad libitum. Each of the two periods consisted of a 14-d adjustment period followed by a 7-d collection period, when faeces and urine were recorded daily and subsampled for analysis. Samples of the experimental feeds were taken for every period. The dry matter contents were determined by oven heating at 103 °C and samples for feed analysis were dried in a vacuum oven at 50 °C. The feed analyses were made on the dried samples by standard methods. Acid de- tergent fibre (ADF), neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and lignin (ADL) were determined ac- cording to Coering and Van Soest (1970). Crude lignin and water-soluble carbohydrates were determined as described by Salo (1965). Hay was analysed for in vitro digesti- bility according to Tilley and Terry (1963). In sacco rumen degradability of barley and wheat distillery by-products was determined in a nylon bag (porosity 40 /*m) as described by Setälä (1983). The digestibilities for the distillers by- products were calculated by the regression technique from diet digestibilities, as the ex- perimental rations composed different pro- portions of the individual feeds (Schneider and Flatt 1975). Effective protein degrada- bility was calculated using a 0.04 dilution rate from the rumen according to the equa- tion of Kristensen et al. (1982). Results and discussion The chemical composition of the experi- mental feeds used in the digestibility trials are shown in Table 1. The barley distillers by-products had quite a high percentage of crude protein, 26—30 °/o, but very high con- tents of crude fibre, 17—20 % of DM. The lignin content was high, too, 7 —B %. The starch has been removed by the fermentation process and the proportions of the other constituents of barley are two to three times as great as in the original material. Barley hulls make up about 10—12 % of the grain and its chemical composition is comparable to straw (Salo and Kotilainen 1970), so that this fibrous material reduces the feed value of barley distillers grains. The chemical compositions of BDDG and BDDGS were similar. Wheat distillers grains had a higher crude protein content but a much lower 214 Table 1. Chemical composition of barley dried distillers grain (BDDG), barley dried distillers grain with solubles (BDDGS) and hay used in digestibility experiments. BDDG BDDGS Hay, Hay, experiment I experiment II Dry matter 94.8 94.5 85.0 84.1 Ash 4.1 4.4 6.1 5.6 Crude protein 26.4 29.9 7.8 5.9 True protein 21.6 27.6 5.8 4.3 Ether extract 7.7 6.4 1.9 1.4 Crude fibre 19.9 17.4 38.3 36.9 Nitrogen-free extract 41.9 41.9 45.9 50.2 Acid detergent fibre 33.0 33.8 Neutral detergent fibre 61.9 69.4 Acid detergent lignin 9.9 13.5 Lignin 7.4 7.9 Water-soluble 2.0 5.3 carbohydrates In vitro digestibility Dry matter 64.9 66.6 Organic matter 63.5 64.6 crude fibre content (Table 4). Moss and Ke- zar (1982) reported 23 % crude protein and 21 % crude fibre for wet distillers grains from barley ethanol. The ADF and NDF of the present BDDG were a little higher than those found by Newman and Gras (1983). Water-soluble carbohydrates were low, which indicates that the fermentation was efficient. Table 2 presents the digestibility values of the diets containing distillery by-products at two levels of the ration 33 and 67 %. The digestibilities for BDDG and BDDGS were calculated by the regression technique from the quantities of each feed consumed in each digestion trial and the digestion coefficients of the rations. This method eliminates the as- sociative effects on digestibility of different feeds given together (Schneider and Flatt 1975). The digestibilities of both BDDG and BDDGS were found to be low: for organic matter 43 % and 48 °/o, respectively, and for Table 2. Digestibility coefficients of the diets including dried barley distillers grain (BDDG) or dried barley distil- lers grain with solubles (BDDGS) at two levels, 33 and 67 % diet of dry matter. 33 % BDDG 67 % BDDG 33 % BDDGS 67 % BDDGS 67 % hay 33 % hay 67 % hay 33 % hay x s.d. x s.d. x s.d. x s.d. Digestibilities Dry matter 57.9 1.7 50.0 2.5 58.1 1.0 52.1 1.9 Organic matter 58.8 1.6 50.9 2.4 59.7 1.2 53.9 1.9 Ash 43.7 3.3 34.3 5.1 27.9 13.1 16.4 7.1 Crude protein 67.9 0.8 65.3 3.1 58.2 1.1 63.8 1.9 Ether extract 79.9 1.6 83.8 2.4 83.5 1.6 86.2 1.9 Crude fibre 46.0 1.3 26.0 3.9 57.7 1.5 42.4 2.6 N.F.E. 63.1 3.0 55.6 1.9 59.9 1.0 51.6 1.9 Nitrogen balance, g/d 1.8 1.0 —6.1 3.4 2.9 0.4 4.8 1.1 Biological value 44.6 3.9 13.0 11.3 60.8 7.5 48.0 3.9 215 Table 3. Digestibility coefficients of barley distillers grain (BDDG) and barley distillers grain with solubles (BDDGS) calculated by regression and their feed values. BDDG BDDGS Digestibilities Dry matter 42.5 47.5 Organic matter 43.1 47.7 Crude protein 64.5 66.6 Ether extract 86.7 87.9 Crude fibre —12.2 10.6 N.F.E. 47.8 41.5 Feed values FU/kg DM 0.576 0.578 kg/FU 1.74 1.73 DCPVoofDM 17.0 20.0 DCPg/FU 295 347 van Es system GE, MJ/kg DM 20.47 20.33 ME, MJ/kg DM 8.16 8.15 q = ME/GE 0.40 0.40 NEW, MJ/kg DM 3.98 3.99 NEL, MJ/kg DM 4.45 4.45 km, f 0.49 0.49 k, 0.56 0.56 ME, MJ/kg MAFF 8.01 8.02 ME, MJ/kg DM Axelsson 8.63 8.69 crude protein 65 °/o and 67 %. The values in this experiment were a little lower than the Canadian results for barley distillers by- products, whose DM digestibility was 54.5 °7o and whose crude protein value was 78.3 % (Moss and Kezar 1982). The values for wheat DDGS were 70 —72 % for organic matter and 78 —80 % for crude protein (Sa- lo et ai. 1982). The low digestibilities of BDDG and BDDGS may be attributed to their fibrous hull contents and to the rapid rate of passage of small particles through the forestomachs (Poutiainen 1968). Due to the low digestibilities, the energy values were low. The calculated net energy values were the same fot both products, 0.58 FU/kg DM. In the net energy evaluation the value number 0.80 was used, which is given for distillery by-products in feed tables (Sa- lo et ai. 1982). The value is evidently overes- timated for barley by-products, because the equation of Van Es (1978) yielded only 0.53 for the metabolization of gross energy com- pared with 0.95 for barley. Ettala and Näsi (1983) performed feeding experiments with growing cattle to evaluate some agro-indus- trial by-products as feed and found that BDDGS had a low nutritive value when used as supplement in a high straw diet. When cattle given BDDGS 1.5kg plus 1.5 kg barley were compared with cattle receiving 3.0 kg barley supplemented with NPN, the daily gains averaged 786 g and 904 g, respectively. The dressing percentages were low for both treatments, 42.4 and 44.3 °7o. Thomas (1982), however, found that the perform- ances with BDDG were similar to those with soybean as protein supplement for cattle. The nitrogen balances were positive in the rams on rations containing BDDGS and in- creased with greater inclusion. The Texel rams gained 1.8 kg on average during the ex- periment. The rams on rations containing BDDG had a slightly positive balance at the Table 4. Chemical composition of different barley and wheat distillers products used in in sacco rumen degrada- bility measurements. Barley Wheat DDG DDGS DDGS DDG DDGS DDGS fine fine Dry matter 95.5 93.5 96.1 94.9 93.9 94.6 Ash 3.9 4.4 7.2 7.8 4.9 6.9 Crude protein 28.6 31.1 35.4 40.6 45.8 42.8 Ether extract 5.0 5.0 5.3 5.4 5.1 5.1 Crude fibre 17.4 16.1 11.2 9.9 10.8 10.1 N.F.E. 45.1 43.3 40.8 36.4 33.4 35.0 216 lower level but a negative balance at the higher level. The biological values were rather low for all the rations (Table 2). The protein values were fairly suitable, 295 g DCP/FU for BDDG and 347 g DCP/FU for BDDGS. Wheat DDGS has a FU value of 0.72/kg DM and 336 g DCP/FU (Salo et ai. 1982). The barley distillers grains had low in sac- co rumen degradability (Table 5). The high temperatures during boiling and drying re- duce the degradation of crude protein. Grain protein generally has rapid and high degra- dation in the rumen (Salo et ai. 1982). Low degradability is suitable for ruminant protein supplement. BDDG and BDDGS had redu- ced contents of lysine, 3.2 and 1.7 g/16 g N and, the availability of lysine was very low (Näsi 1984). The protein in barley distillers by-products, although resistant to microbial degradation in the rumen, has limited value as a protein supplement because of its low digestibility and availability. WDDGS also had low degradability. This may result from the treatments during processing, especially condensing of solubles during drying. Fine grinding (average particle size 0.5 mm) was also compared with normal grinding (aver- age particle size 1.0 mm). Fine grinding gave products with a lower fibre content but higher protein content, indicating that par- tial fractionation had occurred (Table 4). Fine grinding led to rapid and almost full degradation. This is partly due to the very small particle size. The solubility of the DM of these products in water was 64.6 % for fine WDDGS and 42.7 % for fine BDDGS. The corresponding values for WDDG and WDDGS were 34.8 % and 30.0 %, and for BDDG 21.7 °/o and BDDGS 22.7 %, respec- tively. In the feed tables of Salo et ai. (1982) the degradability of the crude protein of DDGS is given as 60 % in two hours and the total degradability as 65 °7o. Waller et al. (1980) have shown that, due to its low rumen degradability, corn DDGS fed toge- ther with urea is comparable to soybean meal as a protein supplement for steers. Corn ■-> -c ._ ■-, 00 m vt m *s fi r- «ff R r^ T*: <-**■ "**"! "O 22 V£s V£) -i Ö _ C"i rl vo ITI rn oo "8 Q ._, —, J 2 ._ j* ooC "O T 3 £ CJ H «..£3 (n r- >n oo o \0 O »n Ov vo vom en vo tt rs oo "u £" T) oo »rt O On O (S OO Q OO \D v" fN m vo Tt M oo .-, —, x ._ —, ooj 2 -o -a xi u x> «--.or-; vo v> «n JS Tf O VO I-" -" Tf" ■# r- vo Tt o\ -S jr, -g -n xi '3 15 S* "O rt . ■ x: t; m x h oo »n «s "y ■e S r-" rn «n a* —voj£ G r-i <*-> »n v-iTfr- ro g .a - ■— c c w ! _*: J- —i oo öoöo .c oo >n o r-*sr- .X <" O vo mr- «n oö t|- 'th urt l) >» vo o 00 00 r-;"S invor- wi b m n vo i_ •° S oo»no ti— iZ oOTtr- -1 n x w«w ■s Ero . T3C1 "^ 2Q J= vq vo ov r- # rn«n xi W vo Ov vo Qvo«n •§ Jl - cm -nr-" m o"«nw-i _ -, n n «n inr*->r- fr, U 0> "-J * ■3 w