Maataloustieteellinen Aikakauskirja Vol. 59: 153—159, 1987 Bacterial and fungal diseases of potatoes in Finland ESKO SEPPÄNEN Department of Plant Pathology, Agricultural Research Centre, SF-31600 Jokioinen, Finland Abstract. Six bacterial and 18 fungal diseases are reviewed. Six and 28, respectively, of their causal organisms are presented. The occurrence and economic effects of these diseases are estimated. Index words: potato, bacterial diseases, fungal diseases Introduction Potato is cultivated in Finland in a climati- cally extreme area where yield variation is high. Potatoes are usually grown in sandy soils thus often exposed to drought. The growing period is hardly 100 days (from May to Sep- tember), while in Lapland it is far shorter often being limited by night frosts. The brief harvesting period lasting from two to three weeks is frequently quite cold with average temperatures of not more than 10°C. The basic problem confronting modern, highly mechanized production is the harvesting of unripened tubers in extremely cold weather, when many tubers are scuffed and wounded. The storage period is long, even ten to eleven months. Disease control has been mostly based on varietal resistance, and the knowledge re- quired often obtained by variety trials. Chem- ical control was not common prior to the 19705, when greater specialization in potato production by farmers took place. Bacterial diseases Blackleg and soft rot (Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica and E. caroto- vora subsp. carotovora). The extent of E. carotovora contamination in 71 commercial seedpotato stocks was investigated in 1981 1983. E. carotovora was detected in 82 % of the stocks, and theaverage levels of contami- nation in the three years were 73, 28, and 10 %, respectively (Harju 1985). Recontami- nation by E. carotovora was found after the second year of yield cultivation when pathogen- free seed potato stocks were investigated during four years’ multiplication. E. caroto- 153 JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE IN FINLAND https://www.c-info.fi/en/info/?token=XNrqeSxynN8rjcaN.ExeCz6XARphjCkLg7WmasQ.2IUXEJ9gBoCT4TnyRCMweTsDqBhb5X2rtZwA8n8rMAmRh5WYX8AWmO2JODr6nQfLCTNPdoUoJ0lCmlfIF8gsAKT6DLunobN_rAfr1xrV0LrJW4IQi2ZdVzYqKyqUDylrQBwEAjzyPWSqlVdg45M_C2LN8WMGAh0m9PxKt3cEiLQ vora subsp. atroseptica was the predominant soft rot organism isolated from tubers, and it was always associated with blackleg stems. Serotyping of Eca isolates indicated that in ad- dition to serogroup I, three other serogroups exist (Harju and Kankila 1987). Bacterial ring rot (Corynebac- terium sepedonicum) was first found at the end of the 19605. Seppänen and Heinämies (1972) identified the pathogen and mapped the incidence of disease based on 542 tuber samples, 321 tubers on average, from seed stocks col- lected from different parts of the country. The disease occurred quite commonly in Oestro- bothnia but only sporadically in other parts of the country. The degree of infection was low, on average one to two per cent. In sub- sequent official inspections the situation has not improved with regard to the exportation of potatoes (Rautapää and Virtanen 1985). Pink eye (Pseudomonas fluorescens) occurs in abundance on tubers grown in light soils in wet conditions. External symptoms may be confused with those of tuber blight (Seppänen 1981 a, 1982 d). Common scab (Streptomyces sca- bies) and russet scab (Streptomyces sp.) also occur to a certain extent every year, the latter mainly affects Bintje. Their oc- currence is the consequence of warm and dry weather during the first half of July, and yearly variation is wide. The use of varietal resistance to common scab has been the only means of controlling it, and results of screenings have been reported by Roivainen (1938), Ylimäki (1951 b, 1960 a), Jamalainen and Seppänen (1965), Varis (1965, 1970, 1975), Joy (1980), Häkkinen (1981), and Mustonen (1985). Attention has been paid to scab resistance in potato breeding, which has resulted in the fairly resistant cultivar Pito and Hankkijan Tuomas. Trials to control com- mon scab with PCNB-preparate were carried out by Ylimäki and Hänninen (1957), Ylimä- ki (1958), but the treatment was too expen- sive for general use. Heinämies and Seppänen (1971) attempted to study the morphological, physiological, and pathogenic properties of the potato scab organism. Fungal diseases during the season Late blight and tuber blight (Phytophthora infestans). Late blight was the most important fungal disease of potato until the 19705. Its great annual fluctuation was as- certained long ago (Grotenfelt 1910), and the question of the efficacy of chemical con- trol as a complement to varietal resistance is still a problem. Rainio (1937) attempted to estimate the oc- currence and economic impact of these dis- eases by employing information collected from different parts of the country over a number of years. His results confirmed that in some years the diseases are quite common causing great losses, while in other years there is hardly any blight in the whole country. Cor- responding results have been reported by Si- mojoki (1963), Yllö (1963), and Seppänen (1971) based on blight observations in variety trials carried out over many years. Seppänen (1971) analyzed material based on observa- tions made from variety trials over more than 30 years in different parts of the country. He concluded that in southern Finland leaf blight occurred nearly every year, in four years out of five on average, but the incidence of a se- vere blight epidemic was only one year out of three and less northwards. The lowering of tuber yield due to premature defoliation was estimated to be less than 10 % on average, even in southern Finland, and that of tuber blight lesser still. The only study dealing with the fungus itself has been conducted by Mä- kelä (1966) on the overwintering of the fungus and other factors influencing the rise of epidemics. After the severe late blight epi- demic in 1953,Pohjakallio (1954) compared the pathogenicity of some isolates from dif- ferent parts of the country. The control of late and tuber blights has mainly been based on varietal resistance, which has been considered a fairly important property for the use of a cultivar (Koskinen 154 1932, Sauli et ai. 1935, Meurman 1936, Val- le et ai. 1938, Roivainen 1939, Huttunen et ai. 1946, Brummer 1950, Linja-Aho 1955, Varis 1960, 1965, 1970, 1975, Yllö 1963, Seppänen 1967, 1971, Joy 1980, Häkkinen 1981, Mustonen 1985). Seppänen (1967, 1971) introduced the term ’relative resistance to late blight’, i.e. the resistance of a given cul- tivar to late blight compared with its earliness. In Finnish potato breeding consideration has also been given to resistance to late blight, and such cultivars as Jaakko, Veto, and Hankki- jan Tuomas, are notably resistant in relation to their earliness. Interest in chemical con- trol had been slight though the results of screenings using different preparates were pro- mising (Jamalainen 1933, Ylimäki 1951, 1953, 1954, 1956, 1960, 1961). The use of chemical control to complement varietal re- sistance was not common until the 19705, when the mean area under potato cultivation of a single farm increased (Seppänen 1977). Nowadays chemical control ranging from one to three treatments is a common procedure most often employing the systemic metalaxyl + mancozeb preparate, usually complemented with mangan preparates (Seppänen 1987). Vine killing is often used to control the tuber blight. Potato wart (Synchytrium endo- bioticum). Potato wart was first found in 1924,probably as a result of the importation of potatoes in 1921 —1924 (Tiro 1927, Rainio 1928). Since then, it has been encountered in numerous localities mainly in southern Fin- land. In field plots there has hardly been a single finding, but the disease has been found in home gardens (Hilu 1932, Lehtola 1944, Ollila 1949, Ylimäki 1950, 1955, Aura 1962, 1971). Hilu (1932) conducted a larger study on the distribution of the disease in Fin- land and abroad. In potato breeding wart resistance is re- quired of all new cultivars, therefore resistant cultivars are generally recommended to growers. This disease was widely known prior to this first finding. Trials to obtain good, wart- resistant cultivars were started and resistant cultivars were strongly recommended to growers. As early as 1925, a law was enacted prohibiting the growing of susceptible culti- vars in localities where potato wart had been identified. Together all the above precautions have been effective in the prevention of this disease. Stem canker (Rhizoctonia solani) is quite common but seldom causes significant losses. Seppänen (1985) studied its incidence in five fields cultivated with potatoes as a monoculture for 15—25 years. Seed tubers of three susceptible cultivars treated with thia- bendazole (ULV) were planted as usual. Plant samples were collected about one month later and analyzed. As the presence of stem canker was either negligible or absent, it was con- cluded that monoculture is not associated with the disease. White collar caused by the same fungus is common but considered insignificant in the potato. Black scurf and Rhizoctonia scab (Rhizoctonia solani) are rather com- mon but seldom the cause of poor quality in table potatoes (Seppänen 1972). However, they may have a significant role as carriers of the fungus into the next season. According to tests screening fungicides for seed dressing, varying yield increases have been obtained, and the treatment is therefore recommended (Seppänen 1974, Pietilä 1987). Powdery scab (Spongospora sub- terranea) occurs nearly every year in slight amounts but is not significant (Seppänen 1972). Early blight (Alternaria solani) is rather common in certain cultivars during warm seasons but without importance. Verticillium wilt (Verticillium albo-atrum) is rare and has been found only in a few farms in southern Finland (Seppänen 1983 e). Stalk break (Sclerotinia sclerotio- rum) is considered uncommon. However, in 1986, as a consequence of a wet and cold late season, it occurred generally in some locali- 155 ties, even causing economic losses (Seppänen 1986). Storage diseases Dry rots (Fusarium sp.) and Gan- grene (Phoma exigua var. exigua and P. e. var. foveata) are the most common storage diseases. Jamalainen (1943 a, 1943 b, 1944) isolated eight Fusarium species from potato tubers, but at that time dry rots were insig- nificant compared with tuber blight (Ollila 1947). As late as the beginning of 19705, Sep- pänen (1972) determined tuber blight to be the most common cause of decay in tubers in packaged table potatoes. In some samples of Bintje grown from stocks originating from re- cently imported seed stocks, the causal agents of gangrene were isolated and identified. In 1975,about nine thousand tons of seed pota- toes were imported, and at the same time storage diseases, dry rots and gangrene, also appeared. This created considerable problems under Finnish growing conditions, where the scuffing and wounding of tubers had been un- til then the main problems. The causal orga- nisms were later isolated and identified (14 Fusarium and 2 Phoma species), some char- acteristics of the fungi were clarified and the importance of the diseases as well as the resistance of our cultivars to them were esti- mated (Seppänen 1980 a, 1980 b, 1981 b, 1981 c, 1981 d, 1982 a, 1982 b, 1982 c, 1983 a, 1983 b, 1983 c, 1983 d). In the 1980 s there were fewer problems due to dry rots and gan- grene. One reason for this is the activities of the Seed Potato Center founded in 1976 (Pie- tarinen and Seppänen 1981). Silver scurf (Helminthosporium solani) and skin spot (Polyscutalum pustulans) are quite common storage diseases (Seppänen 1972), especially after wet late seasons and harvesting conditions, but hardly ever cause significant economic losses. The only method of control recommended is that of drying the tubers as soon as possible after harvest. Pink rot (Phytophthora erythrosep- tica) is rare, the first findings were made by Seppänen (1971). There have been numerous findings from all over the country since then, but only a couple are of importance. Leak or watery wound rot (Pythium ultimum) occurs sporadically and may be harmful in some table potato stocks wounded at harvest. Black dot (Colletotrichum atramen- tarium) is insignificant (Seppänen 1972). Summary Six bacterial and 18 fungal diseases and their causal organisms 6 and 29, respectively, were presented. Their occurrence and econom- ic importance were roughly estimated. Potato late blight and tuber blight were the diseases of greatest importance and most dif- ficult to control until the 19705. Nowadays most farmers use chemical control to assure the quantity and quality of the yield. Since the mid-19705, Fusarium dry rots and gangrene have become the most serious problem. With the aid of developments in seed potato pro- duction, and due to the increased knowledge and skill of growers the situation is under control. The bacterial diseases presented here occur every year but seldom cause great crop losses. Black leg and soft rot, as well as com- mon scab must be coped with because the pos- sibilities to control them are limited. The eradication of ring rot appears to be slow and laborious. As to other diseases, more atten- tion ought to be paid to stem canker and black scurf as well as to skin spot. Other diseases are only sporadically harmful. 156 References Aura, K. 1962. Perunasyöpä. Koetoim. ja Käyt. 19: 6—7, 1971. Perunasyöpä. Koetoim. ja Käyt. 28: 29, 32. Brummer, V. 1950. Peruna. Summary: Potatoes. Sie- menjulkaisu 1950: 58—70. Grotenfelt, G. 1910. Perunarutto ja sen esiintyminen Suomessa. Maahenki II: 484—492. Harju, P. 1985. Siemenperunan tyvi-ja märkämätätar- tunta. Koetoim. ja Käyt. 42: 26. & Kankila, J. 1987. Contamination of seed potato stocks by Erwinia carolovora in Finland. Abstr. of Conf. Papers and Posters of the 10th Trienn. Conf. of the EAPR.: 430. Heinämies, H. & Seppänen, E. 1971. Morphological, physiological and pathogenic properties of potato scab organism in Finland. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 10; 174—180. Hilli, A. 1932. Perunasyövän (Synchytrium endobioti- cum [Schilb.] Perc.) leviämisen syistä Suomessa ja ul- komailla. Abstract: The reasons of the spread of po- tato wart (Synchytrium endobioticum [Schilb.] Perc.) in Finland and abroad. Valt. Maatal. koetoim. Julk. 46: 1—249. Huttunen, E., Brummer, V., Heikinheimo, A. & Pohjan- heimo, O. 1946. Tuloksia vertailevista lajikekokeista Tammistossa 1938—45. Summary: Results of compa- rative variety trials at Tammisto 1938—45. Siemenjul- kaisu 1946; 21 108. Häkkinen, S. 1981. Perunan lajikekokeet Etelä-Savon koeasemalla v. 1975—1980. Etelä-Savon koeaseman tie- dote 3: 1—26. Jamalainen, E. A. 1933. Perunaruton esiintymisestä ja torjuntatoimenpiteistä. Suomen Kasvinsuojeluseuran Julk, 2: 6—lo. 1943 a. Über die Fusarien Finnlands I. Staatl. Landw. Versuchstät. Veröff. 122: 1—26. 1943 b. Über die Fusarien Finnlands. 11. Staatl. Landw. Versuchstät. Veröff. 123: 1—24. 1944. Über die Fusarien Finnlands. 111. Staatl. Landw. Versuchstät. Veröff. 124: 1—23. & Seppänen, 1965. Perunalajikkeiden ruvenkestävyys. Summary: Trials on resistance of potato varieties to scab. Maatal. ja Koetoim. 19: 165 —171. Joy, P. 1980. Peruna. Summary: Potatoes. Siemenjul- kaisu 1980: 101 110. Koskinen, Y. K. 1932. Perunan laatukokeiden tuloksia vuosilta 1920—1930. Valt. Maatal. koetoim. Julk. 44: I—l2l. Lehtola, V. B. 1944. Perunasyövästä ja sen torjunnas- ta Suomessa. Maatalous 9: 168—172. Linja-Aho, M. 1955. Peruna. Summary: Potatoes. Sie- menjulkaisu 1955: 52—68. Liro, J. 1927, Perunasyöpä. Valt. Maatal.koetoim. Tied.ant. 6: I—4. Meurman, O. 1936. Perunan laatukokeiden tuloksia Maatalouskoelaitoksen puutarhaosastolla vuosina 1928 —1935. Valt. Maatal.koetoim. Tied.ant. Ill: I—lB. Mustonen, L, 1985. Perunalajikkeet eri käyttötarkoituk- siin. Koetoim. ja Käyt. 42: 10. Mäkelä, K. 1966. Factors influencing the epidemics of Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary in Finland. Acta Agr. Fenn. 104, 2: I—loo.1 —100. Ollila, L. 1947. Tuhosienien merkityksestä perunava- rastojen turmelijoina Suomessa. Summary: On the sig- nificance of fungous diseases in stored potatoes in Fin- land. Maatal. tiet. Aikak. 19: 89—98. 1949. Perunasyöpä. Valt. Maatal.koetoim. Tied.ant. 218: I—B. Pietarinen, E. & Seppänen, E. 1981. Start of seed potato production in Finland. A review. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 20: 184—187. Pietilä, L. 1987. Seitti perunan vaivana. Käytännön Maamies 36, 4: 87. Rainio, A. J. 1928. Perunasyöpä tehdasalueilla Suomes- sa. Suomen SahanomistajainMaanviljelysyhdistyksen Vuosikertomus: I—B.1 —8. 1937. Perunaruton aiheuttamat tuhot Suomessa ja sen esiintymiseen vaikuttavista tekijöistä. Referat: Die durch den Kartoffelschimmel verursachten Schäden in Finnland und über die auf sein Auftreten einwirken- der Faktoren. Staatl. Landwirtschaftl. Ver.tät. Veröff. 95: 1—47. Rautapää, J. & Virtanen, R. 1985. Perunan rengasmä- tä levinnyt uhkaavasti. Maatal.hali. Aikak. 15, 2: 21—25. Roivainen, H. 1938. Perunarupi ja sen torjuminen. Valt. Maatal.koetoim. Tied.ant. 142: I—7. 1939. Perunarutto ja sen torjuminen. Valt. Maatal.koe- toim. Tied.ant. 155: I—9. Sauli, J. 0., Valle, 0., Huttunen, E. & Rancken, G. 1935. Tuloksia vertailevista laatukokeista Tammistossa 1930—34. Referat: Ergebnisse vergleichender Sorten- versucheauf Tammisto 1930—34. Siemenjulkaisu 1935: 20—92. Seppänen, E. 1967. Perunalajikkeidemme rutonkestä- vyys. Summary: Resistance of potato varieties to late blight. Maatal. ja Koetoim. 21: 116—120. 1971. Influence of weather conditions and late blight on the yields of potatoes in Finland, 1931—62. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 10: 65—109. 1972. On the external quality of table potatoes in Fin- land and factors influencing it. Acta Agric. Fenn. 11: 119—134. 1974. Siemenperunan peittaus. Käytännön Maamies 23, 4: 13—14. 1977. Kehittyvä perunanviljelymme. Käytännön Maa- mies 26, 2: 43—44. 1980 a. Studies on potato gangrene in Finland. Acta Agric. Fenn, 19: 173—179. 1980 b. On the growth of some Fusarium ssp. in cv. 157 Bintje under different environmental conditions. Potato Res. 23: 478. 1981 a. Peruna tukehtui märkyyteen. Koetoim. ja Käyt. 38: 44. 1981 b. Fusariums of the potato in Finland I. On the Fusarium species causing dry rot in potatoes. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 20; 156—160. 1981 c. Fusariums of the potato in Finland 11.On the growth optima of Fusarium species in tubers of cv. Bintje. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 20: 161—176. 1981 d. Fusariums of the potato in Finland 111. Va- rietal resistance of potato tubers to someFusarium spe- cies. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 20: 177—183. 1982 a. Fusariums of the potato in Finland IV. Varia- tion of tuber resistance to storage diseases before and after harvesting. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 21: 123—130. 1982 b. Fusariums of the potato in Finland V. Fur- ther investigations on the growth optima of Fusarium species in potato tubers. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 21: 162 168. 1982 c. Further studies on varietal differences in re- sistance to potato gangrene. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 21: 155—161. 1982 d. Erfarenheter av bladmögelsommaren in Fin- land. Växtskyddsrapporter. Jordbruk 20: 57—59. 1983 a. Fusariums of the potato in Finland VI. Varietal tuber resistance to Fusarium species. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 22: B—l7.8 —17. 1983 b. Fusariums on the potato in Finland VII. Yield decrease caused by pathogens of dry rots and gangrene. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 22: 110—114. 1983 c. Fusariums of the potato in Finland Vili. Oc- currence of the pathogens causing potato dry rot and gangrene. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 22: 115—119. 1983 d. Different tolerances of 14 Fusarium spp. to thiophanateraethyl. Res. note. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 22: 120—121. 1983 e. Perunarupi vuoden 1982 vitsaus. Koetoim. ja Käyt. 40, 1: 4. 1985. Maalevintäiset taudit yksipuolisessa perunan- viljelyssä. Käytännön Maamies 34: 20. 1986. Peruna kasvukautena 1986 Varsikuolio vioitti kasvustoja. Koetoim. ja Käyt. 43: 49. 1987. Tarkennusta rutontorjuntaan. Käytännön Maa- mies 36, 6; 32—33. & Heinämies, H. 1972. Occurrence of potato ring rot caused by Corynebacterium sepedonicum (Speck. & Kotth.) in Finland. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 11: 315—319. Simojoki, P. 1963. Kasvitaudeista Pohjois-Pohjanmaalla. Summary: On plant diseases in North Ostrobothnia; Maatal. ja Koetoim. 17; 218 —222. Valle, 0., Huttunen, E. & Rancken, G. 1938. Tulok- sia vertailevista laatukokeista Tammistossa 1935—37. Referat; Ergebnisse vergleichender Sortenversuche auf Tammisto 1935—37. Siemenjulkaisu 1938: 53—106. Varis, E. 1960. Peruna. Summary: Potatoes. Siemenjul- kaisu 1960: 67—85. 1965. Peruna. Summary: Potatoes. Siemenjulkaisu 1965: 58—71. 1970. Peruna. Summary: Potatoes. Siemenjulkaisu 1970: 66—77. 1975. Peruna. Summary: Potatoes. Siemenjulkaisu 1975: 73—78. 1975. Hankkijan Tuomas. (Engl, sum.) Siemenjulkai- su 1975; 166—169. Ylimäki, A. 1950. Perunasyövän levinneisyydestä ja tor- juntamahdollisuuksista maassamme. Koetoim. jaKäyt. 7,4: 3. 1951 a. Perunaruttoa torjumaan. Maamies 36: 279. 1951 b. Miksi perunat ovat rupisia. Maamies 36: 312, 318. 1953. Perunaruttoruiskutus kannattaa meilläkin. Koe- toim. ja Käyt. 10, 6; 3—4. 1954. Perunarutto pitkä kanto perunaviljelyssäm- me. Maatalous 47: 251—254. 1955. Perunasyövän levinneisyys jatorjunta Suomes- sa. Zusammenf: Verbreitung und Bekämpfung von Kartoffelkrebs in Finnland. J. Sei. Agric. Soc. Finl. 27: 199—220. 1956. Uusia kokemuksia perunaruton torjunnasta, Koetoim. ja Käyt. 13, 6: 22. 1958. The control of potato scab with PCNB prepa- rations. J. Sei. Agric. Soc. Finl. 30: 210. 1960 a. Perunarupi. Käytännön Maamies 1960 (4): 170. 1960 b. Perunaruton kemiallinen torjunta. Maatal. ja Koetoim. 14: 234—242. 1961. Perunarutto ja sen torjuminen. Koetoim. ja Käyt. 18: 1,4, 8. & Hänninen, P. 1957. Perunarupeakin voidaan tor- jua. Koetoim. ja Käyt. 14, 5: 19. Yllö, L. 1963. Perunan lajikekokeiden tuloksia Kasvin- viljelylaitoksella Tikkurilassa v. 1931—48. Summary: Results of variety trials on potato at the Department of Plant Husbandry in Tikkurila, 1931—58. Acta Agric. Fenn. 2: 109—133. 158 SELOSTUS Perunan bakteeri- ja sienitaudit Suomessa Esko Seppänen Kasvitautiosasto, Maatalouden tutkimuskeskus, 31600 Jokioinen Katsauksessa on esitetty Suomessa todetut 6 bakteeri- ja 18perunan sienitautia sekä niiden aiheuttajat (6 bak- teeria ja 28 sienilajia). Tautien esiintymisrunsaus ja ta- loudellinen merkitys on arvioitu. Perunan lehtirutto ja mukularutto (aiheuttaja Phytophlhora infeslans) ovat ol- leet merkitykseltään suurimmat aina 1970-luvulle asti. Tuolloin ruton kemiallinen torjunta yleistyi ammattivil- jelijöiden keskuudessa janykyisin rutto ei ole aiheutta- nut torjuntavaikeuksia. 1970-luvun puolivälissä tuotiin maahamme noin 9000 tonnia siemenperunaa, jonka mukana seurasi runsaasti kuivamädän ja Phomamädän aiheuttajia. Nämä meillä aikaisemmin vain niukasti esiintyneet taudit ovat siitä läh- tien olleet taloudellisesti merkittävimmät. Niiden aiheut- tajat 14 Fusarium-lajia, joistaF. solani var. coeruleum ja F. avenaceum ovat yleisimmät, sekä 2 Phoma-lajia, on kartoitettu ja niiden tärkeimmät ominaisuudet selvi- tetty. Siementuotannon kehittämisen ja viljelijäin tiedon ja taidon parantamisen avulla on nämäkin taudit saatu hallintaan. Bakteeritaudit ovat jokavuotisena kiusana, joskin ne harvoin aiheuttavat suuria menetyksiä. Tyvimädän ja märkämädän (Erwinia carolovora) samoin kuin tavalli- sen perunaruvenkin (Slreplomyces scabies) kanssa on tul- tava toimeen, sillä keinot niiden torjumiseksi ovat rajal- liset. Rengasmädän (Corynebaclerium sepedonicum) hä- vittäminen näyttää kestävän odotettua kauemmin. Muista taudeista versolaikku ja seittirupi (Rhizoclonia solani) se- kä känsärupi (Polyscutalum pustulans) vaativat nykyis- tä enemmän huomiota. Bakteeritaudit punasilmä (Pseu- domonas fluorescens) ja verkkorupi (Slreplomyces sp.) sekä sienitaudit perunasyöpä (Synchytrium endobioli- cum), perunaseitti jakuoriroso (Rhizoclonia solani), kuo- rirokko (Spongospora subterranea), perunapolte (Aller- naria sotani), näivetystauti (Verlicillium albo-atrum), var- sikuolio (Sclerolinia sclerotiorum), harmaa hilse(Helmin- thosporiumsotani), punamätä (Phytophlhora erylhrosep- tica) jasydänmätä(Pythium ullimum) ovat vain harvoin taloudellisesti merkittäviä. 159