Maataloustieteellinen A ikakauskirja Vol. 63: 115—130, 1991 Seasonal dynamics and primary production of the flora in a winter rye field in Finland PÄIVI HALINEN and MIKKO RAATIKAINEN Department of Biology, University of Jyväskylä, Yliopistonkatu 9, 40100 Jyväskylä, Finland Abstract. The total weed seed storage in the plough layer of 20 cm was 93 965 seeds/m 2 , of which 36 taxa were defined. The proportion of seeds of annual and winter annual species in soil was 89.6 %. The number of rye seeds emerging in autumn was 614 per m 2 and weeds 224 per m 2. The total number of weeds was 381/m2 when the calculation was based on the time of maximal appearance. 0.3 % of the total amount of weeds emerged. Rye and Elymus repens were the dominant species in the above-ground vegetation, whereas the biomass of the other weeds remained poorly developed because of marked shading from these two. The maximum biomass of the living above-ground vegetation, 614 g/m2 , was achieved in the middle ofAugust (12. VIII). Net above-groundprimary production, measured by the har- vesting method, was 664 g/m2 ■ year and underground production 190 g/m 2 • year, giving a total production of vegetation and detritus of 854 g/m2 -year. The net efficiency of the pri- mary producers was 0.7 "In. Index words: weed primary production, winter rye, seasonal dynamics 1. Introduction A weed study on winter cereals in Finland was started in 1969 by the Agricultural Re- search Centre, and was carried out at the Department of Biology, University of Jyväs- kylä, and the Institute of Plant Husbandry of the Agricultural Research Centre in Jokioi- nen. So far a report on weed species and den- sities (Raatikainen et ai. 1979 a), a report on weed biomass (Raatikainen et ai. 1985) and two papers on the ecology of weeds over the whole country have been published (Raati- kainen & Raatikainen 1979 b, 1983). This part of the work is concerned with seasonal dynamics and primary production. Earlier work on this topic includes that of Salonen (1949) in Finland on the location of roots of rye and Bray (1963) in Canada on the production of the roots of rye. In Poland, 115 JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE IN FINLAND https://www.c-info.fi/en/info/?token=JGP8HS0hc3Pao2CE.-JahxZkhK0RZasYng3BCVA.Py0oepqlz7HomcOSaVPRmW85rRvriLxZDIp_KM7JrlqOMVD8PTskm18AsKA0WZ97yeZ0HrC2f76BMlRoSexxEbzzkZWLBNEyfvSbz0Lvq2RO32LILjvCz226V82LKwSkOtIY8j2jgisqkgXbSu6k2t4pWo176IekEntlyigeIg-OngrUYoVdeldxVGkwXgF7iJLhtTHd Herbich (1969), Kukielska (1973) and Woj- cik (1973) have studied primary production in a winter rye field and Pasternak (1974) that in a winter wheat field. 2. The rye field The rye field studied, of area 1.4 ha, was under normal cultivation and was located within a field area of 20 ha in the rural com- mune of Jyväskylä (62° 16 'N, 25°33'E). A 30 x 100m rectangule was studied in the centre of the rye field. The field has been cultivated for over a hundred years. Oats was grown in it in 1970—72, barley in 1973—74 and it was left fallow in 1975. Rye (cv. Pekka) was sown late that autumn, on 13.1 X 1975, at a density of 200 kg/ha. The soil is sandy till, the results of fertility tests performed in 1975 being: pH 5.9, calcium 1275 mg/1, potassium 150 mg/1, phosphorus 8.4 mg/1, magnesium 60 mg/1, boron (water- soluble) 0.2 mg/I, copper (acid-soluble) 4.0 mg/1 and manganese 4.0 mg/1. The amounts of calcium, potassium and phosphorus are given as elements. Observations made at Jyväskylä airport, 17 km NNE of the site, were used to summarize weather conditions (Kuukausikatsaus Suomen sääoloihin 1975 and 1976). Mean temperature in September 1975 and May 1976 differed from the long-term means for 1931—1960 by about + 2°C and those on June and July 1976 by about -2°C. Rainfall in September 1975 and June 1976 was about 30 mm higher than the means for the corresponding months in 1931—60 and that in October —November 1975 and in May 1976 about 30 mm lower. 3. Methods 3.1. Seed storage in the 20 cm surface layer The cultivated layer of 20 cm in ten ran- domly selected plots was sampled with a soil auger (5 cm2) on 7.V 1976, taking eight sam- ples from each plot. Each set of eight sam- ples were mixed to form one specimen, of which 0.6 1 was analysed. The material was washed through a series of sieves, the smallest mesh size being 0.21 mm. The mesh size was larger than that used by Brenchley and Warington (1930), but smaller than those of Kropac (1966) and Paatela and Erviö (1971), whose seed separation method was adopted for use here with some modifications. The material remaining on the sieves was dried at 40° C. The seeds and the organic material were then separated out by immersing them in a solution of 0.17 NaCl/cm3 water. 3.2. Above-ground vegetation Ten permanent sampling sites of size 86.5 x 28.9 cm (0.25 m 2) were selected in the rye field for assessment of the number of plant species, number of sprouts of perennial plants and percentage cover. The number of weeds was counted at each site. Percentage cover was estimated by species on 18. X 1975, 1 I.V 1976, 5.V1 1976, 29.V1 1976, 23.V11 1976, 12.V111 1976 and I.IX 1976. The biomasses were studied on 6.V 1977. Ten 0.25 m 2 randomly selected plots were chosen on each counting date, the above- ground plant material was clipped and the non-living parts of plants lying loose on the ground and easily parted from the plants were collected into a detritus sample. Plant individuals that had overwintered were marked in spring and their growth was monitored until 5.V1 1976. A 0.25 m 2 size of sampling plot has been used earlier by other authors including Mukula et ai. (1969) when studying spring cereals and Herbich (1969), Wojcik (1973) and Raatikainen et ai. (1979 a, 1985) studying winter cereals. The plants were dried at +3s° and weighed. Mean moisture content was 6.3 % in the dicotyledons, 6.1 % in the monocotyledons and 4.7 % in the detritus. All other results are expressed here in terms of dry weight. The grain yield was determined only in the sam- ples taken on I.IX 1976. The energy content of the plants was cal- culated using the values stated by Herbich 116 (1969), 17.5 kJ/g dry plant material for rye and 17.3 kJ/g for the weeds. 3.3. Underground parts of the vegetation The roots in the same clip plots were sam- pled with a soil auger, two samples of area 150 cm 2 and depth 20 cm being taken from each plot. Thus 20 root samples were taken on each sampling date. The roots were sepa- rated from the soil by the washing method used by Törmälä and Raatikainen (1976), for example. The depths of the roots were examined on 12.VIII 1976, when samples were taken from o—2o and 21—40 cm. 5.1 % of the under- ground biomass existed of the latter depth. The biomass of the underground parts of plants was corrected by reference to this fig- ure. The biomasses of the underground parts of the plants are again quoted in terms of dry weight. Energy content was calculated using the figure of 16.3 kJ/g dry plant material stated by Herbich (1969). 4. Results 4.1. Seed storage in the soil The seed storage of the cultivated layer was 93 965 seeds/m2 at the beginning of the growing season (Table 1). 36 taxa were deter- mined to species or genus. The six most abun- dant taxa, Chenopodium album, Galeopsis spp., Lapsana communis, Spergula arvensis, Stellaria mediaand Viola arvensis, accounted for 86 % of the total amount of seeds. The proportion of seeds of winter annuals was 46.5 %, that of annuals 43.1 %, that of peren- nials 9.5 %, that of spring cereals 0.6 % and that of unidentified specied 0.3 %. Rye seed was sown in the autumn to a den- sity of 800 per m 2. Germinating percentage was 77 and sprouting percentage 75. 4.2. Emergence and wintering Of the eight taxa shooting in the autumn, all the individuals of Elymus repens and Poa spp. survived through the winter. 98 % of the individuals of rye wintered successfully, 83 % of those of Viola arvensis, 35 % of those of Lapsana communis and 2 % of those of Stel- laria media. All the individuals of Chenopo- dium album and Galeopsis spp. died during the winter. Emergence of all the winter annual species continued in spring, but it was considerably less significant than in the autumn. The emer- gence of annuals was the most rapid in June and that of perennials until August (Fig. 1). Of the winter annual species, rye and Stellaria media were greatest in number in the autumn and the other species only in mid or late sum- mer. Of the annual species, the numbers of Chenopodium album were greatest in the autumn and those of the other annuals gener- ally in June—July. The density of perennials was greatest in the late summer (Table 1). Thus the number of species at the sampling sites increased until August (Fig. 2). The total number of taxa was 30. The plant taxa were divided into three groups according to theiremergence rhythm: 1) One, more or less clear, emergence pe- riod. These species were mainly annuals. Galeopsis spp. and Erophila verna had a very short emergence period with the peak at the Fig. I. Seasonal dynamics of the number ( ) and the green biomass ( ) of winterannuals (■), annuals (•) and perennials ( a ) (without Elymusrepens). Months in figures or text: O or X = October. M or V =May etc. 117 Table 1. Numbers of seeds in the soil, maximum numbers of individuals of given plant taxa and their timing, and maximum biomass of each taxon and its timing. w =winter annual or biennial, a =annual, p =perennial. Seeds Max. number Max biomass ind./m: ind./m ! date g/m 2 date 628.0 18. X 75 1.2 I.IX 501.77 23.V11 .11 23.V11 Rye Achillea millefolium Agrostis tenuis P P a 67 33 A vena saliva 67 Barbarea vulgaris Betula spp. w 433 P 2 233 Capsella bursa-pastoris w 167 1.9 I.IX .08 29.V1, 23.V11 Carex canescens C. echinata P P P P 1 667 33 C. nigra 33 Ceraslium fontanum 667 .4 12.V111, .08 12.V111 I.IX Chenopodium album Elymus repens a P P 6 400 100 22.9 18.X.75 137.6 12.V111 .04 29.V1 137.39 12.V111 Equisetum arvense Ercphila verna .15 23.V11 .01 5.V1 .02 29.V1 w 2.4 5.V1 6.8 23.V11 .3 12.V111 Erysimum cheiranthoides Fumaria officinalis a a P a a a 67 Galium spp. Galeopsis spp. 67 4 200 9.6 5.V1 1.2 12.V111 .28 23.V11 .20 23.V11Gnaphalium uliginosum Hordeum vulgare 533 Lapsana communis Myosotis arvensis Phleum pratense Poa spp. w w 11 833 40.1 12.V111 6.0 23.V11 1.7 23.V11 5.6 12.V111 3.11 23.V11 .49 23.V11 .09 23.V11 .04 11. V .05 12.V111 .08 23.V11 .04 12.V111 900 P P a a P 500 167 Polygonum convolvulus P. lapahtifolium 267 1 033 1 033 2.8 23.V111 .4 29.V1,Potentilla erecta 23.V11, 12.V111 Ranunculus acris R. repens P P a P P 267 133 7.6 23.V11 1.2 29.V11 .09 5.V1 .16 29.V1Raphanus raphanistrum Rumex acetosa 800 33 R. acelosella 1 600 2.8 2.V111, .04 23.V11 I.IX Spergula arvensis Stellaria media Taraxacum spp. Thlaspi arvense Trifolium repens a 27 667 24 833 6.7 23.V11 93.6 18. X 95 .03 29.V1 .23 29.V1vv P a P P P w 133 .8 29.V1 2.4 I.IX 6.8 12.V111 .02 29.V1 .46 23.V11 .19 23.V11 .34 23.V11 .53 23.V11 33 Veronica serpyllifolia Vicia cracca 33 100 Viola arvensis Unknown seeds Total seeds 5 567 18.4 23.V11 233 93 965 Total weeds Rye + weeds 381.2 144.47 646.24 886.81 1 009.2 Underground parts Total biomass (above ground and underground) 1 533.05 118 beginning of June. Spergula arvensis and Erysimum cheiranthoides emerged relatively late, from the end of June until the end of July. 2) A few emergence periods. The species belonging to this group were usually winter annuals. Lapsana communis and Viola arven- sis had a three-peaked emergence period, the first peak being in the autumn, the second early in May and the third at the end of June. Among the annual species, this rhythm was most clearly followed by Chenopodium al- bum, the emergence peaks for which were in the autumn, at the end ofMay and beginning of June and weak emergence at the beginning of August. Stellaria media had a two-peaked rhythm, the first in the autumn and the sec- ond at the end of June. The emergence peaks in autumn and from the end of June to the beginning of August were caused especially by the heavy rain (Fig. 3). 3) Emerging throughtout the growing sea- son. Perennial species were typical represen- tatives of this group, and Myosotis arvensis also emerged fairly evenly from May until the encj 0f ju iy ancj thgj, on to tne encj 0f August after a short break. In the case of certain perennial species, e.g. Elymus repens, an in- crease in numbers took place almost through- out the growing season due to vegetative growth. The total number of individuals, shoots and sprouts of weeds was 381 No./m2 when the calculation was based on the time of maximal appearance of the plants (Table 1). The num- ber of plants to germinate and emerge cor- responded to 0.41 °7o of the total seed storage in tr, e soil, with the mainly vegetatively in- creasin 8 Perennials Elymus repens and Ranun- cuius repens excluded. The percentage of 119 Fig. 2. Number of plant taxa found during sampling in- tervals. Fig. 3. Seasonal dynamics of total radiation energy (■), green biomass (•) and precipitations ( ■). Fig. 4. Seasonal dynamics of the biomass of the main components of vegetations. Rye (•), Undergroundparts of vegetation (■), Weeds (a) and Detritus (x). weeds within the total number of plants and number of perennial shoots was 37.8 %, and that of sprouts of rye 60.7 %. 4.3. Trends in biomass and numbers of winter rye and weeds The biomass of rye and weeds increased up to August (Fig. 4), while the amount of detri- tus began to increase rapidly after the wither- ing of the plants had accelerated in that month. Detritus reached its maximum in Sep- tember, 17.5 g/m2 . The number of rye remained relatively even during the whole growing season apart from a decrease of 7 °/o in June (Fig. 5). The winter annual species had already reached their maximum number in autumn, and all of them had their growing season max- imum at the end of July. Rye dominated the above-ground biomass, with 75 °7o its maxi- mum biomass for the whole vegetative period being 84 °7o at the end of July. Of the perennial species, Elymus repens was Fig. 5. Seasonal dynamics of the number ( ) and the green biomass ( ) of rye. Fig. 7. Seasonal dynamics of the number ( ) and the green biomass ( ) of Lapsana communis (■) and Viola arvensis (•), (overwintered...). Fig. 6. Seasonal dynamics of the number ( ) and the green biomass ( ) of Elymus repens. Fig. 8. Seasonal dynamics of the number ( ) and the green biomass ( )of Slellaria media (■) and Chenopodium album (•). Fig. 9. Seasonal dynamics of the number ( ) and the green biomass ( )of Galeopsis spp. (+) and Myo- sotis arvensis (•). 120 dominant (Table 1), with a growth pattern that resembled that of rye. The maximal bio- mass increment rate was maintained from the end July until the beginning of August, when the peak biomass was reached (Fig. 6). Typi- cal of the growth of couch grass was the con- siderable number of vegetative shoots. To facilitate comparison between the winter an- nuals, annuals and perennials, trends in their numbers and biomasses are presented without rye and E. repens in Fig. 1. Weeds other than E. repens served only to fill the space left by the strong competitors, rye and E. repens, and their individuals were in general smallbecause of the pronounced shading, and with some, notably mainly Galeopsis bifida and Poa pratensis, occurring mainly in sterile form. Trends in numbers and biomass by taxa during the vegetative period are given in Figures 7—13. d „ _ , , , ,4.4. Proportional development ofplant taxa Rye and Elymus repens made up over 83 % of the number of individuals and over 97 °?o of the biomass of the above-ground vegeta- tion in the rye field during the growing sea- son. Rye and couch grass faced equally well in mutual competition. E. repens continued to emerge and increased its proportion of the biomass after the rye had ripened in August (Figs. 14 and 15). Practically only E. repens among all the weeds succeeded in restricting the growth of rye. Its proportion of the above-ground weed biomass ranged from 86 % to almost 99 °7o. Fig. 10. Seasonal dynamics of the number ( ) and the green biomass ( )ofRanunculus repens (+) and Achillea millefolium (•). Fig. 11. Seasonal dynamics of the number ( ) and the green biomass ( ) of Erysimum cheiranthoides (+) and Raphanus raphanistrum (•). Fig. 12. Seasonal dynamics of the number ( ) and the green biomass ( )of Spergula arvensis (+) and Capselta bursa-pastoris (•). Fig. 13. Seasonal dynamics of the number ( ) and the green biomass ( ) of Thlaspi arvense (+ ) and Gnaphalium uliginosum (•). 121 The proportion of the biomass composed of winter annuals, annuals and perennials (ex- cluding E. repens) decreased as the rye grew, e.g. the biomass of winter annuals from 3 % in May to 0.2 % in August (Fig. 16). The proportions in terms of numbers of in- dividuals, on the other hand, showed growth within all these groups. The winter annual weeds reached their maximum proportions in autumn, but increased in number during the vegetative period up to the end of July, thus maintaining their position as the biggest group (Fig. 16). Trends in the proportions of annuals and perennials were very similar until July, when that of annuals began to decrease. Three types of trend in the numbers of the different plant taxa could be distinguished in relation to rye: 1) Species that sprouted in the autumn or early in the spring and generally reached their peak either in the autumn or at thebeginning of the summer. Among the winter annuals, Viola arvensis belonged to this group, sprout- ing in the autumn, but not reaching its maxi- mum, 3.2 °Io, until July. Stellaria media and Chenopodium album emerged best in the autumn, the proportion of S. media being 15.3 % and that of Chenopodium album 3.7 °7o (Fig. 17). Of the annual species. Galeopsis spp. emerged early and had already reached its maximum of 1.6 °/o by June (Fig. 17). Fig. 14. Seasonal changes in the dominance of the total number ( ) and the green biomass ( ) of rye (■), Elymus repens (a) and other weeds (•). Fig. 15. Seasonal changes in the dominance of the num- ber of rye ( ) and the biomass of rye ( ) of all weeds (■) and of weeds without Elymus repens (•). Fig. 16. Proportionof winterannuals (■), annuals (•) and of perennials (without E. repens (a) of the number ( ) and biomass ( )of rye. Fig. 17. Proportion of Lapsana communis (■), Viola ar- vensis (•), Stellaria media (a ), Galeopsis spp. (x ) and Chenopodium album ( + ) of the number of rye. 122 4 2) Species whoseproportion was greatest in midsummer. The sprouts of these could not compete with rye, and soon withered. These were the annuals Erysimum cheiranthoides, maximal 1.2 %, Spergula arvensis, 1.2 % and Thlaspi arvense 0.15 °7o, and the perennial Ranunculus repens, 1.3 °?o (Figs. 18 and 19). 3) Species, which increased in proportion among the total number of individuals dur- ing the whole vegetative period and which reached their maximum numbers in August— September. These included the winter annuals Lapsana communis (Fig. 17) and Myosotis ar- vensis (Fig. 18), the perennial Achillea mille- folium (Fig. 19), and the annuals Raphanus raphanistrum, Capsella bursa-pastoris and Gnaphalium uliginosum (Fig. 19). 4.5 Primary production One method for assessing primary produc- tion is to measure the maximal biomass value of the species. The maximum biomass of rye, 502 g/m2 , was attained at the end of July. The calculated energy value of this biomass was 8 785 kJ/m2 . The stock of rye grain on the first of September was 170 g/m2 , or 37 °lo of the concurrent air-dry (humidity 6.1 %) above-ground biomass of rye. The energy value of these grains was 2 975 kJ/m 2 . The weight ratio between the rye grains and straw was 1 : 17. The biomass of the stubble after harvest- ing was 202 g/m2 , 3 535 kJ/m2 , and this con- tinued to account for a high proportion of the total above-ground biomass, 34 %, in the samples taken the next spring (6. V 1977)even though some decomposition had taken place. The maximum biomass of weeds, 142 g/ m 2, 2 457 kJ/m2 , occurred at the beginning of August. The proportion of the above- ground parts of Elymus repens among total weeds was 97 °7o. Summing of the maximum biomasses of the plant taxa gives an above- ground net primary production of 144.5 g/ m 2, 2 500 kJ/m 2 (Table 1). The living above-ground biomass reached its peak at the beginning of August (12.VIII), when it was 614 g/m 2 , 10534.7 kJ/m2 . The net primary production, obtainedby summing the maximum biomasses, was 646.5 g/m2 , 11 285 kJ/m2 (Table 1). The proportion of rye was 78 %, that of E. repens 21 % and that of the other weeds 1 %. By adding the maxi- mum value for detritus to the summed value for living above-ground biomass, we obtain a total net above-ground primary production of 664 g/m2 , 11554 kJ/m 2 . Fig. 18. Proportion of Myosotis arvensis (■), Ranuncu- lus repens (•), Erysimum cheiranthoides ( a ) and Sper- gula arvensis (x) of the number of rye. Fig. 19. Proportion of Achillea millefolium (■), Capsel- la bursa-pastoris (•), Gnaphaliumuliginosum (x), Rapha- nus raphanistrum ( a ) and Thlaspi arvense ( + ) of the number of rye. 123 The production of the below-ground vege- tation 190.2 g/m2 , 3 119 kJ/m 2 , was ob- tained by taking the difference between the maximum and minimum biomass values for the growing season. Thus net primary produc- tion was 3.2—3.4 times greater than the below-ground biomass itself. The ratio of the green biomass to the below-ground biomass was only 0.7 even at its maximum (12. VIII) and the above-ground biomass never exceeded 41 % of the sum of the below-ground and green biomass during the whole growing sea- son (Fig. 20). Growth of the above-ground biomass was most rapid up to the end of July, after which it continued at a slower rate, until the biomass started to diminish in the middle of August. The net changes in the living above-ground biomass between the sampling dates were (g/m2): 11.V—5.V1 (+142.14), 6.—29.V1 (+134.87), 30.V1-23.V11 23. VII ( + 294.03), 24.V11—12.V111 (+ 17.92) and 13.V111— 1.1X (-25.66) (Fig. 21). Part of the below-ground biomass decomposed in the early summer, while growth was rapid at the same time and continued until August (Fig. 21). The sum of the production of the above- ground vegetation, below-ground vegetation and detritus during the period 11.V—1 .IX was 853.9 g/m2 , 14858 kJ/m2 , taking the value acquired by summing the peak biomasses to obtain a value for above-ground production. Since the total amount of the radiation ener- gy received during the period studied (II.V—I.IX) amounted to 2209733 kJ/m 2 , the net efficiency of the primary producers was 0.67 %. 5. Discussion 5.7. Number of seeds in the soil Research into the amounts of weed seeds in arable soils has mainly employed germination and washing flotation methods, and the differences between the methods used make comparison difficult. The germinations meth- od reveals about 20—25 °7o of total seed stor- age in the soil (Kropac 1966). Since the length of dormance and the circumstances of germination differa lot between different spe- cies (Kolk 1962), there are also considerable possibilities for error in the results. Seed storage in the top 20 cm of the field studied was 93 965 seeds/m2 , compared with an average of 43 850 seeds/m2 in the plough layer of 20 cm reported by Paatela & Erviö (1971) in spring cereal fields in Finland. Regional variation was from 30 890 seeds/ m 2 to 56 790 seeds/m2 and variation due to soil type from 37 890 to 53 160 seeds/m2 . Kropac (1966) found 19 922 and 70 321 seeds/m2 in 25 cm layers in two separate Io- Fig. 20. Relation of the aboveground and underground biomass (■) and the proportion of the aboveground bio- mass of the combined biomass of the underground and aboveground parts (•). Fig. 21. Daily net changes (g/m 2 in green biomass (• • • •). underground biomass ( ) and in their sum ( ) during sampling interval. 124 calities. All the above figures were obtained using the washing-flotation method. Korsmo (1930) in Norway reported 10 500 —33 574 seeds/m2 in a 25 cm layer and Brenchley and Warington (1930, 1933) in England 39 092 and 29 330 seeds/m2 in a 15 cm layer, both using the germination method. The weed flora found here consisted main- ly of seeds of annual species, which accounted for 89.6 % of total weed storage in the field studied. The proportion of annual weed seeds in arable soils in Switzerland is 81 % (Buch- li 1936), that in Canada 98.8 % (Budd et al. 1954) and that in Czechoslovakia 92.9 % (Kropac 1966). Moreover, it is usually only a few species that form the majority of the weed seed storage. In this case Spergula ar- vensis and Stellaria media together contrib- uted 55.9 % of the total number of seeds. 5.2. Viability and emergence of seeds Little research has been carried out into the viability and emergence of seeds in soil. Brenchley & Warington (1936) in England studied the permanence of seeds in arable soils, and found this to be species specific and to vary mainly from four to nine years and only exceptionally to exceed ten years. In ad- dition to species specificity, many environ- mental factors such as soil type, climate and cultivation measures influence the retention of viability in seeds. Although there are great regional and lo- cal variations in weed seed storage, certain similarities have also been mentioned. In Czechoslovakia Kropac (1966) reports the number of viable seeds to range from 1 000 to 20 000 per m 2 and in Finland Aniszewski & Simojoki (1984) and Paldanius & Simojoki (1984) from 1 823 to 64 800 seeds/m2. Investigations into the germination of seeds are made more difficult by the fact that there are different ages of seeds of the same spe- cies in the soil simultaneously. Moreover seeds of some species are known to show variations in their germination process. Van der Vegte (1978) in Netherlands, for example, identifies two population of Stellaria media in fields within dune areas which differ in their length of dormance, rhythm of germination and the length of life. Wehsarg (1912), Brenchley & Warington (1930), Buchli (1936) & Erviö (1981) have observed considerable periodici- ty in the germination of seeds. Moreover it has been discovered that this periodicity can change or weaken along with the age of the seeds (Brenchley & Warington 1936). The literature concerning the relation be- tween the potential weed flora (viable seeds) and the number of individuals germinating is mainly based on germination experiments car- ried out under laboratory conditions, and little work has done on this relation under in vivo conditions. Aniszewski & Simojoki (1984) and Paldanius & Simojoki (1984) re- port germination of viable seeds to be 10.5— 41.9