AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Genetic parameters for growth traits in pigs estimated using third degree polynomial functions Marja-Liisa Sevön-Aimonen Department ofAnimal Science, P.O. Box 28, FIN-00014 University ofHelsinki, Finland. Current address: Agricultural Research Centre ofFinland, Institute ofAnimal Production, FIN-31600 Jokioinen, Finland. e-mail: marja-liisa.sevon-aimonen@mtt.fi Kristina Sternberg Department ofAnimal Science, P.O. Box 28, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland. Current address: Finnish AnimalBreeding Association, P.O. Box 40, FIN-01301 Vantaa, Finland. Matti Ojala Department ofAnimal Science, P.O. Box 28, FIN-00014 University ofHelsinki, Finland A total of 8745 purebred Yorkshire and Landrace pigs extracted from Finnish progeny test station data was analysed. The pigs were weighed weekly during the test. A third degree polynomial func- tion, age = f(weight), was fitted separately for each pig and was used to describe the growth patterns of individual pigs. Their live weight at the inflection point (LW. p ) was 72 kg, age at the inflection point (AGE |p) 126 d, and maximum daily gain (DGmax) 1111 g/d, on average. The average daily gain from 30 to 90 kg was 957 g/d and in the smaller weight ranges (30 to 50, 50 to 70 and 70 to 90 kg) the average daily gains were 829, 1042 and 1046 g/d, respectively. Genetic parameters for growth and carcass traits were estimated using REML with an animal mod- el. The heritability estimates (h2 ) for LWjp , AGEjp and ADG3(MjO were 0.08, 0.33 and 0.23, respective- ly, and for smaller weight ranges from 0.14 to 0.21. Fast growing and lean animals had higher LW jp than others and the r between LW and ADG,„ DG and M% was 0.58, 0.73 and 0.57, respective-g ip 30-90’ max ’ ’ * ly. The rg between ADG30 90 and M% was close to zero. Key words: growth curve, growth patterns, daily gain, carcass composition, heritability, genetic cor- relations ntroduction profitability of pig production. It is therefore important to understand the growth process as fully as possible. Growth is usually considered as the rate of growth during a defined growing period. This rate gives information about the Growth performance of slaughter pigs is among the most fundamental factors determining the © Agricultural and Food Science in Finland Manuscript received May 1996 Vol.6 (1997): l-10. https://www.c-info.fi/en/info/?token=ycGo0toj3Ox_EJ9-.RtsQ1iSYaSTnmC0FtigpdA.361O8S8W879_QC5D6F05k-4wgsaw_ChPNO8UqV0LBo_Fcju3Txvq71zqHe3cn9esmb3M3I2CSXZD0mE9Ds-od7JNdz_VlLagAtFg3s9CXfIyUwcH9Eb3GarCLqGoSu04_z9bnlyjlouEZri_Kp-iuFTfi6PXP8sflxJGr1snl2q7OOONPiiFS8PmkqtL0VLXVbCEzpK_zWI-_HwEJ4aElYMvDo2y4dSMvNbsprYwvZ1fRvQ7lRJPuTrfGtXEiBneZCAVxAG3HdO0G-1ujIK0FyufgLUGmIxAlg6mZ51_bFnDBLl313vqpv4pw1BlCEqNkZpO5Yc1 AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND 2 average level of growth performance but not about changes in in rate during the growing pe- riod. To be able to examine these changes, we need growth curves for individual pigs. The mathematical functions most often used to describe and predict growth are the Richards function (Richards 1959) and its special cases (e.g. logistic, Gompertz(Laird 1966)) and poly- nomial functions. The main reason for the pop- ularity of the Richards function and its special cases is the good biological interpretability of parameters. Flowever, with these functions, ob- servations are needed on a wideage and weight range of growth, otherwise the risk of false re- sults is increased. In pigs, the weighing data are usually only from a short period, from about 25 kg to 100 kg live weight. Such short periods of growth can be described accurately with pol- ynomial functions (Kanis 1988). The degree of the polynomial function determines how many inflection points can exist in the curve. With a polynomial of the third degree, there can be one inflection point in the curve, and the maximum daily gain can be estimated. A polynomial of the fifth degree or higher would permit the detec- tion of multiphasic growth curves, as suggested by Koops and Grossmann (1991). However, when weighing records are available for only a short period or the number of observations is insufficient, polynomials of a high degree might just picture random environmental fluctuations in growth. Live weight growth is that it is traditionally viewed as a continuous process that results in a single, smooth, S-shaped growth curve with an inflection point at about 30% of the mature weight (Brody 1945). Environment obviously causes some alteration in growth patterns. Whit- temore (1986, 1987), for example, argued that the shape of the growth curve depends on ani- mal management and feeding practices more than on any biological age or weight-related rule. Studies of Vangen (1977), Cöp and Buiting (1977) and Krieter (1986) have, however, indi- cated that there is also genetic variation in changes in growth traits during the growing period. The growth curve is usually presented as a func- tion, y=f(x), where x is time and y is size (Wal- stra 1980). In some cases, weight has been cho- sen to be x-variable (e.g. Kanis 1988, Schmidt 1991). Functionally growth processes seem to be associated with body weight more than with age (Kanis 1988, Timon and Eisen 1970). The purpose of our study was to describe the shape of the growth curve and the factors affect- ing the growth pattern inFinnish test station pigs. We also sought to estimate heritabilities for and correlations among traits describing the growth pattern, growth rate and carcass composition. Material and Methods Data and test procedure The data were obtained from the Finnish Ani- mal Breeding Association and included weigh- ing records and carcass measurements of all Yorkshire and Landrace pigs that arrived at test stations between August 1990 and July 1992. There was a total of 8745 animals with complete records in the data set. The proportions of the two breeds and sexes (castrated males and gilts) were about equal. The pigs were raised in groups of four fullsibs and were weighed weekly. They were hand-fed twice a day, according to a scale based on the mean weight of the fullsib group (Table 1). The feed mixture contained 1.0 FU/kg (FU = feed unit, 0.7 kg starch equivalent; Salo et al. 1990), 15% digestible crude protein and 0.96% lysine. The average growing period was from 23 to 97 kg live weight, and the age of the pigs was 71 days at arrival and 152 days at slaughter. Fitting and classification of polynomial functions A polynomial of the third degree was chosen because it enabled us to obtain the position of the inflection point of the curve and estimate the Sevön-Aimonen, M.-L. et al. Geneticparameters for growth traits in pigs Table I. Feeding scale according to live weight used in the pig test stations. The fitted curves were classified according to the combinations of the signs of the coeffi- cients from the polynomial regression (func- tion 1).Mean weight of a fullsib group Kg feed per pig per day 17.0- 18.9 19.0- 19.9 20.0 - 22.4 22.5 - 24.9 25.0 - 27.4 27.5 - 29.9 30.0 - 32.4 32.5 - 34.9 35.0 - 37.4 37.5 - 39.9 40.0 - 42.4 42.5 - 44.9 45.0 - 47.4 47.5 - 49.9 50.0 - 54.9 55.0- 60.0 - 64.9 65.0 - 69.9 70.0 - 74.9 75.0 - 79.9 80.0 - 84.9 85.0- >95.0 1.000 1.100 Traits1.200 1.300 The eight traits studied were: live weight at the point of inflection (LW. , kg), age at the point of inflection (AGE. , d), daily gain at the point of inflection(DG , g/d), average daily gains from 30 to 50, 50 toTo, 70 to 90 and 30 to 90 kg live weight (ADG weigh|l weighi2 , g/d) and percentage of lean meat with bone in high value cuts (back, shoulder, loin and ham) in carcass with head (M%, %). The LW ] of individual pigs was obtained by equating the second derivativeof the fitted func- tion 1 to zero. AGE was obtained by placing LW into function 1. DG was estimated by ip max J placing LW. into the first derivate of function 1, which results in d(age)/d(weight) at the given weight; the corresponding estimate ofdaily gain was obtained by taking the inverse of it. The average daily gains in the given weight range were estimated by calculating age at the lower and upper weight limits using function 1 and dividing the weight difference by the age differ- ence. For the figures, daily gain values at given weights (Figs 1,2) were obtained as DGmax 1.400 1.500 1.600 1.750 1.850 1.950 2.050 2.150 2.250 2.350 2.450 2.600 2.700 2.800 2.900 2.950 3.050 3.100 3.200 maximum daily gain. Age was chosen as the y- variable and weight as the x-variable because the growth of pigs is normally considered within a weight rather than an age range. The function, y=f(x), was fitted individually to each animal’s longitudinal age-weight data: When daily gains and inflection point param- eters were examined, only those animals having an inflection point within their real weighing period were included in the data. A total of 7419 animals fulfilled this condition. y = b„ + b,x + b,x. 2 + b ,x ' + e.,Jij iO il ij i 2 ij i 3 ij ij where y.. is the observation of age of the i ,h pig at the j,h weighing time, (j=1,...,k, k = 12 on an average for a pig), x.. is the weight of the i th pig at the j,h weighing time, bio, b M , b i 2 and bi 3 are polynomial regression coefficients for the weight of the i lh pig and e.. is a residual term. Fitting resulted in a polynomial function Statistical methods The data were analysed by the restricted maxi- mum likelihood (REML) method (Patterson and Thompson 1971). The statistical analyses were made using PEST software package (Groeneveld 1990), which includes a variance component estimation program (Groeneveld 1993), based on the derivate-free procedure. Heritabilities were yr b io + b,i xi + b ,2 x, 2+ b ,3x , 3 (function 1) for every pig, which was the least squares approximation of the observed data. 3 Vol. 6 (1997): I-10. AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Sevön-Aimonen, M.-L. et al. Geneticparameters for growth traits in pigs Fig. 1.Average trend of daily gain curves ofpigs in curve types 1-6 presented in Table 2. Daily gains at given weights were estimated using first derivative of third de- gree polynomials fitted to age- weight data of each pig (for de- tails see section Material and methods). Fig. 2. Daily gain curves in cas- trates and gilts. Daily gainsat giv- en weights were estimated using first derivative of third degree poly- nomials fitted to age-weight data of each pig (for more details see section Material and methods). 4 AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND estimated using a univariate model; genetic and phenotypic correlations using a bivariate mod- el. The model assumed was: y.... = u + br + sb + s. + sr,+ fg + a + e...,J ijklmno ~ i j k I °m n ijklmno where y... =an observationJ IlkllllllO (i = population average br. = fixed effect of the i' h breed (Yorkshire, Lan- drace) sb = fixed effect of the j'h test station-batch sub- class (j = 1 114) sxk = fixed effect of the k' h sex (castrates, gilts) sr ( = fixed effect of the l' h ratio of sexes in the group (1 = 1.....5) fg m = random effect of the mth litter/fullsib group with expected value zero and variance of 2 a = additive genetic effect of the n'h animal with expected value zero and variance O a 2 e = random residual effect with expected val- ue zero and variance a 2 e When the heritability of M% was estimated, slaughter weight was added to the model as a covariate. Breeds were analysed together to en- sure there where were enough animals in each test station-batch subclass. Because of comput- ing limitations the pedigree information was lim- ited to three generations, the tested animals in- cluded. (1.5% of all animals); 8618 animals then re- mained in the growth curve type data. Growth curve types Six different combinations ofpolynomial regres- sion coefficients of function 1 appeared with the frequencies given in Table 2. The shapes of the corresponding curves for daily gain are present- ed in Figure 1. Curve types 1 and 2 resemble the traditional view of growth, according to which daily gain first increases and then, after reach- ing the inflection point, slowly decreases. The majority of animals, 93.2%, had type I or 2 curves (Table 2, Figure 1). For 5.0% of the ani- mals (curve types 3, 4 and 5) the growth rate slowed in the middle of the test period and then increased again towards the end. In curve type 5, daily gain increased and in type 6 decreased throughout the test period. The proportion of typical growth curves was higher here than in the studies of Kanis (1988) and Schmidt et al. (1991). Curve types seemed to differ slightly between sexes. Castrates had a greater number of typical curves than gilts (95.8 vs 90.8%). The sex ef- fect, along with the feeding regime, may explain some of the differences in the proportion of typ- ical growth curves observed between our study and studies of Kanis (1988) and Schmidt et al. (1991). In the study of Kanis (1988) there were Table 2. Distributionof pigsby different growth curve types defined by coefficient signs from the polynomial of the third degree. Results and discussion Accuracy of the function Growth Combination curve type of coefficients n % The coefficient of determination (R 2 ) was 0.998 on average, so the third degree polynomial func- tion fitted in the individual age-weight data very well. Before classification of curves, animals with R 2 more than three standard deviations be- low the average were excluded from the data 1 7736 89.8+H—h ++++ 2 291 3.4 3 401 4.7 4 26 0.3 5 157 1.8 6 7 0.1 5 Vol. 6(1997): I-10. AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Sevön-Aimonen, M.-L. et al. Geneticparameters for growth traits in pigs Table 3. Means, standard deviations (sd), coefficient of variation (v%), minimum and maximum for traits studied. Trait 1’ mean sd v% min max LW ip , kg 71.98.6 12.027.1 103.4 AGE p , d 126 11.79.3 71 176 DG '".g/pv 1111 121.110.9 712 1675max’ ° r ADG,aS0 ,g/d 829 81.49.8 493 1188 ADGW7O , g/d 1042 101.09.7 691 1479 ADG7(HW,g/d 1046 135.813.0 401 1522 ADG3(p90, g/d 956 84.68.9 591 1267 M% 56.52.1 3.747.1 64.4 n=7419 ” LWjp = live weight at point of inflection in fitted polynomial AGE |p = age at point of inflection in fitted polynomial DGmax = maximum daily gain ADG weighll wdgho = average daily gain within period of giv- en live weights M% = percentage of lean meat with bone of high value cuts (back, shoulder, loin and ham) in carcass with head three different data sets: barrows with ad libi- tum access to feed, gilts with ad libitum access to feed and barrows with restricted feeding. Growth curve types were classified according to a non-linear function (daily gain = f(weight)) fitted directly to daily gains measured weekly. The percentages of typical growth curves were 83.1, 60.6 and 90.6, respectively. In the study of Schmidt et al. (1991), all animals were gilts with ad libitum access to feed. Growth curve types were classified as in the present study using signs of the polynomial regression coefficient offunc- tion age=f(weight); 69% of pigs had a typical growth curve. Means and variances Maximum gain (1111 g/d, on average) was reached when animals weighed 72 kg and were 126 days old, on average (Table 3, Figure 2). In the literature, estimates ofweight at the point of inflection vary from about 60 kg to over 100 kg (Schneider 1974, Walstra 1980, Kanis 1988, Schmidt et al. 1991) depending on breed, sex, feeding scale etc. The average daily gain increased from 829 g/d between 30 and 50 kg live weight to 1046 g/d between 70 and 90 kg live weight. The average daily gains within the last two weight ranges examined were almost equal. Depending on the properties of the function chosen, the curve for daily gain is a parabola and thus symmetrical around a vertical line through its maximum, which, as mentioned before, was very close to 70 kg live weight, on average. However, due to the high coefficient of determination the curve probably reflects real growth patterns of pigs during the test period. Some factors affecting the traits examined The effect of sex on DG , AGE , all averagemax’ ip’ ° daily gains within different weight ranges and M% was statistically highly significant. There was, however, no difference between sexes in LW jp . Castrates were three days younger than gilts at the time of DG . The average of DG° max ° max was 112 g higher in castrates than in gilts (Fig- ure 2) and ADG 30 90 was 79 g better in castrates. The sex difference in daily gain increased to- wards the end of the test period, being 48 g/g from 30 to 50 kg, 96 g/d from 50 to 70 kg and 107 g/d from 70 to 90 kg. The difference in growth rate was largest around the inflection point, at about 72 kg live weight. In M% the sex difference was 1.9 percentage units, in favour of gilts. The results of sex effects on LW, p reported elsewhere are contradictory. In studies of Wal- stra (1980) and Kanis (1988), maximum gain was reached at a lower body weight in castrates than in gilts. In the study of Schneider (1974), the inflection point was at a lower body weight in gilts than in castrates. The higher growth rate and lower leanness of castrates at feeding levels roughly the sama as those used here has been widely documented (e.g. Richmond and Berg 6 AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND 1971, Cöp and Buiting 1977, Johansson et al. 1987b). The sex ratio in the test group of fullsibs had no effect on either LW or AGE . The effect of 'p 'p sex ratio on DGmax and on average daily gains in all weight ranges examined was, however, sta- tistically highly significant. The smaller the number of castrates in the test group, the better was the average daily gain of both castrates and gilts. In ADG 1(| 90 the difference between the ex- treme groups (four castrates vs four gilts) was 50 g/d. In castrates the effect was most marked before 70 kg live weight and in gilts after 70 kg live weight. In the test group the sex ratio had no effect on M%. These results are consistent with those of Ollivier (1977), who suggested that sex ratio within a pen may have an important effect on growth. It has been reported that cas- trates tend to dominate gilts in restricted feed- ing systems (Cöp and Buiting 1977, Johansson et al. 1987b). Heritabilities The weight at which the pig reaches its maxi- mum daily gain (LW. ) was determinated only slightly by additive genetic components (Table 4). Heritability for AGE was moderate, but this was probably due to the marked effect of the herd on age at arrival at the test station and thus also on age at the point of inflection. In the study of Schmidt et al. (1991), heritability estimates for weight and age at the point of inflection were 0.22 and 0.38, respectively. Estimates of heritability for the average dai- ly gain at different weight ranges varied from 0.14 to 0.23. The estimate ofheritability for short weight ranges was lowest for ADG W 50 and high- est for ADG7O-90, possibly because of the di- minishing relative magnitude of maternal and herd effects. The estimate of heritability for ADG,O_, () was higher than observed in any of the short weight ranges. Thus, a wider weight range enables an animal to compensate for short term environmental fluctuations in growth. Table 4. Estimates of heritability (h2) and permanent envi- ronmental effects (c2 ). Trait" h 2 c 2 LW p 0.08 0.08 AGE, 0.33 0.17 DGma' 0.19 0.05 ADg",,.,,, 0.14 0.08 ADGW7O 0.17 0.05 ADG™ 0.21 0.05 0.23 0.03 M% 0.60 0.05 " LW.p = live weight at point of inflection in fitted polynomial AGE.p = age at point of inflection in fitted polynomial DG milx = maximum daily gain ADG WC igh.i-wcight2 = average daily gain within period of giv- en live weights M% = percentage of lean meat with bone of high value cuts (back, shoulder, loin and ham) in carcass with head The heritability estimates for daily gain ob- tained in this study were somewhat lower than the majority ofestimates presented by other au- thors (e.g. McKay and Garnett 1986, Geri et al. 1990, Schmidt et al. 1991), although estimates at a similar level to those found here have also been reported (e.g. Johansson et al. 1987a, Stern et al. 1990, Bryner et al. 1992). The heritability of M% (0.60) in our study was in good agreement with the average level of heritabilities ofcarcass traits reported elsewhere (e.g. Lundeheim et al. 1980, Johansson et al. 1987a, Bereskin and Steele 1988, Stern et al. 1990, Schmidt et al. 1991). Phenotypic and genetic correlations The phenotypic and genetic correlations between LW, p and ADG J 0 90 were positive (Table 5), im- plying that fast growing animals reach their point of inflection at a later stage than animals grow- ing at a slower rate. This result is the opposite of that obtainedby Schmidt et al. (1991), In their study, the genetic correlation between weight at the point of inflection and growth rate (between 7 Vol. 6 (1997): 1-10. AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Sevön-Aimonen, M.-L. et al. Geneticparameters for growth traits in pigs Table 5. Genetic (above diagonal) and phenotypic correlations among traits studied. Trait” LW AGE DG ADG ADG ADG AD0,... M% ig ig max 30-50 50-70 70-90 30-90 LW ip +0.42 +0.73 -0.02 +0.54 +0.87 +0.58 +0.57 AGE, +0.78 +0.20 -0.37 -0.02 +0.23 -0.04 +0.46 DG 'P +0.25 -0.01 +0.54 +0.97 +0.98 +0.94 +0.19 max ADG, OSO -0.18 -0.45 +0.17 +0.78 +0.45 +O.BO -0.15 ADGS(WO -0.09 -0.30 +O.BB +0.44 +0.91 +0.99 -0.03 ADG7(mo +0.57 +0.25 +O.Bl +0.16 +0.63 +0.93 +0.27 ADG J(WW +0.20 -0.16 +0.76 +0.71 +0.84 +0.79 +0.09 M% +O.ll +0.22 -0.12 -0.30 -0.24 -0.09 -0.16 11 LW ip = live weight at point of inflection in fitted polynomial AGE, p =age at point of inflection in fitted polynomial DG mal = maximum daily gain ADG weightl uraghi2 = average daily gain within period of given live weights M% =percentage of lean meat with bone ofhigh value cuts (back, shoulder, loin and ham) in carcass with head 30 and 100kg) was negative (-0.30). In growth curve studies on laboratory animals (Timon and Eisen 1970,Aumann and Butler-Wemken 1992), however, the results have been in agreement with those obtained here. The correlation between LW and M% was 'p phenotypically slightly and genetically clearly positive (Table 5). Thus, animals increasing their growth rate up to a high live weight were also lean. In the study of Schmidt et al. (1991) the corresponding genetic correlation was negative (-0.28). The genetic correlations among average dai- ly gains in different weight ranges were fairly high, indicating that mainly the same genetic factors regulate growth throughout the growing period. However, the correlations were not close to unity, and thus some genetic differences in growth patterns may exist. The correlation be- tween ADGJ(WO and ADG J0_70 was lower than the correlationbetween ADG J0 and ADG ?0 90 . One explanation for this might be that growth rate is affected by other genetic factors besides those directly regulating growth, especially in the first weight range. For example, animals with stress susceptibility might, as a consequence of changes in their environment, feed etc., grow slowly at the beginning of the test, even if they have good genetic potential for growth. On the other hand, as mentionedbefore, the symmetry of the daily gain curve hampers interpretation of the results somewhat. Many researchers have con- cluded that in general, growth is mainly regu- lated by the same genetic factors at all stages (Fredeen and Mikami 1986, Johansson et al. 1987a, Rydhmeretal. 1989). The phenotypic correlations between average daily gain and M% were negative (Table 5), i.e. fast growing animals had a higher percentage of fat than slow growing animals. The negative correlation was largest between ADG3(K50 and M%. The genetic correlation between average daily gain in the first weight range and M% was also clearly negative. The genetic correlation between ADG 50 70 and M% was close to zero and between ADG70 90 and M% clearly positive. The results are somewhatcontradictory, since growth in at the beginning of the growing period has usually been attributed to growth of muscles and at the end of the growing period increasingly to growth of fat tissue. The phenomenon we ob- served may be associated with the protein con- tent of the feed and the feeding scale used. The amount of lysine in feed was obviously a restric- tive factor in lean growth for the best animals at the beginning of test period. In general, the re- sults indicated that there is no significant antag- onistic relationship between M% and the aver- 8 AGRICULTURAL AND POOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND age daily gain during the whole growing period. In the literature, the results of correlations be- tween growth and leanness vary. With ad libi- tum feeding, correlations tend to be unfavoura- ble (e.g. Kennedy et al. 1985, Schmidt et al. 1991) With restricted feeding, however, the cor- relations can be close to zero (e.g. Bryner et al. 1992) or even positive (e.g. Johansson et al. 1987b). Conclusions Most animals had a typical growth curve with an inflection point at about 72 kg live weight. Growth rate seemed to be clearly affected by the ratio of sexes in the test group. More research wouldbe needed to clarify the importance of the effect of the sex ratio on testing results. The feeding system may have been the main reason for the limited genetic variation in the growth pattern. The relatively high genetic cor- relations between average daily gain at differ- ent weight ranges indicated that growth at all stages is regulated mainly, but not entirely, by the same genetic effects. However, the measures of daily gains at different weight ranges were obtained from the same fitted polynomial, and hence were not independent measures. No ma- jorantagonistic relationship between growth rate and leanness was observed. References Aumann, J. & Butler-Wemken, I. von. 1992. Einfluss an- tagonistischer Körpergewichtsselection und Kreu- zung aut den Wachstumsverlauf einer Mäusepopu- lation. Archiv fur Tierzucht 35: 201- 210. Bereskin, B. & Steele, N.C. 1988. Estimates of genetic parameters for carcass measures of body composi- tion and growth in swine. Journal ofAnimat Science 66: 2498-2507. Brody, S. 1945. Bioenergetics and growth. New York, Reinhold Publication corporation. 1023 p. (ref. Wal- stra 1980). Bryner, S.M., Mabry, J.W., Bertrand, J.K., Benyshek, L.L., Cöp, W.A.G. & Suiting, G.A.J. 1977. Feed intake in six lines of pigs and its influence on growth and car- cass traits. Animal Production 25: 291-304. Fitzhugh, H.A. Jr. 1976. Analysis of growth curves and strategies for altering their shape. Journalof Animal Science 42: 1036-1051. Fredeen, H.T. & Mikami, H. 1986. Mass selection in a pig population: correlated responses in preweaning growth. Journal of Animal Science 62:1533-1545, Geri, G., Franci, 0., Zappa, A., Campodoni, G. & Poli, B.M. 1990. Relationships between adipose tissue characteristics of newborn pigs and subsequentper- formance: I. Characteristics at 8 days of age and growth rate until slaughter. Journal ofAnimal Science 68: 1922-1928. Groeneveld, E. 1990. PEST user's manual. Institute of Animal husbandry and Animal Behaviour, Federal Agricultural Research Centre, Germany. 73 p. - 1993. A multivariate multimodelßEML package. Pre- liminary user's guide. Institute of Animal Husbandry and Animal Behaviour, Federal AgriculturalResearch Centre, Germany. 9 p. Johansson, K., Andersson, K. & Lundeheim, N. 1987a. Evaluation of station testing of pigs. I. Genetic pa- rameters for feed measurements and selection ef- fects on voluntary feed intake. Acta Agriculturea Scandinavica 37: 93-107. - , Andersson, K. & Sigvardsson, J. 1987b. Evaluation of station testing of pigs. 111.The genetic parameters for carcass measurements of partially dissected pigs. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 37:120-129. Kanis, E. 1988. Food intake capacity in relation to breed- ing and feeding of growing pigs. Wageningen Agri- cultural University, The Netherlands. 129 p. Doctoral thesis. Kennedy, 8.W., Johansson, K. & Fludson, G.F.S. 1985. Heritabilities and genetic correlation for backfat and age at 90 kg in performance-tested pigs. Journal of Animal Science 61: 78-82. Koops, W.J. & Grossmann, M. 1991. Applications of a multiphasic growth function to body composition of pigs. Journal of Animat Science 69: 3265-3273. Laird, A.K. 1966. Postnatal growth of birds and mammals. Growth 30: 349. (Ref. Fitzhugh 1976). Lundeheim, N., Johansson, K. & Andersson, K. 1980. Estimated phenotypic and genetic parameters based on data from the Swedish pig progeny testing sta- tions. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 30:183-188. McKay, R.M. & Garnett, I. 1986. Prenatal and postnatal influences on growth and fat measurements in swine. Journal ofAnimal Science 63: 1095-1100. Ollivier, L. 1977. Note: Effet défavorable du mélage des 9 Vol. 6 (1997): 1-10. AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Sevön-Aimonen, M.-L. et al. Geneticparameters for growth traits in pigs sexes dans I'engraissement des pores en groupe. Annates de Zootechnique26: 615-619. Patterson, H.D. & Thompson, R. 1971. Recovery of in- terblock information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 427-436. Richards, J.F. 1959. A flexible growth function for empir- ical use. Journal of Experimental Botanic 10: 290. (Ref. Fitzhugh 1976). Richmond, R.J.& Berg, R.T. 1971.Tissue developement in swine as influenced by liveweight, breed, sex and ration. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 51: 31- 39. Rydhmer, L, Eliasson, L, Stern, K., Andersson, K. & Ei- narsson, S. 1989. Effects of piglet weight and frater- nity size on performance, puberty and farrowing re- sults. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 39; 397-406. Salo, M.-L, Tuori, M. & Kiiskinen, T. 1990. Rehutaulukot Ja ruokintanormit. 70 p. Yliopistopaino,Helsinki. (In Finnish: Feed tables and feeding allowances). Schmidt, E. von., Krieter, J. & Kalm, E. 1991. Wachstum beim Schwein: Vergleich von Funktionen sowie Ver- lauf von Tageszunahme und Futteraufnahme und deren Beziehung zum Schlachtköperwert. Zuchtung- skunde 63: 306-316. Schneider, A. 1974. Die Zuhterichen Möglichkeiten un- ter ad libitum Futterung beim Schwein. Eidgenös- sichen Technischen Hochschule. Zurich. 93 p. Doc- toral thesis. Stern, S., Rydhmer, L, Johansson, K. & Andersson, K. 1990. Selection for lean tissue growth rate in Swed- ish Yorkshire pigs on low or high protein diets. Pro- ceedings of the 4th World Congress on Genetics applied to Livestock Production. Edingburgh, UK, XV: 450-453. Timon, V.M. & Eisen, E.J. 1970.Comparisons of restrict- ed feeding of mice selected and unselected for post- weaning gain. 1. Growth, feed consumption and feed efficiency. Genetics 64:41. Vangen, O. 1977. Studies on a two trait selection exper- iment in pigs. I. Growth, feed consumption and feed conversion ratio after 10 years of selection for growth rate and backfat thickness. Acta Agriculturae Scan- dinavica 27: 331-340. Walstra, P. 1980. Growth andcarcass composition from birth to maturity in relation to feeding level and sex in Dutch Landrace pigs. MededelingenLandbouwho- gesscool Wageningen.The Netherlands. 206 p. Doc- toral Thesis. Whittemore, C.T. 1986. An approach to pig growth mod- elling. Journal of Animal Science 63: 615-621. - 1987. Elements of pig science. Harlow, Essex Long- man Scientific & Technical. 181 p. SELOSTUS Sian kasvuominaisuuksien perinnölliset tunnusluvut arvioituna kolmannen asteen polynomifunktion avulla Marja-Liisa Sevön-Aimonen, Kristina Sternberg ja Matti Ojala Helsingin yliopisto Tutkimuksessa selvitettiin joidenkin sian kasvua ku- vaavien muuttujien periytyvyyttä. Suomen kotieläin- jalostusosuuskunnan kantakoeaineistosta poimittiin yhteensä 8745 yorkshire-ja maatiaisrotuisen sian tie- dot. Kokeen aikana eläimet oli punnittu viikoittain. Jokaisen sian punnitustietoihin sovitettiin kolmannen asteen polynomifuntio ikä=f(paino), jota käytettiin kuvaamaan yksittäisen sian kasvurytmiä ja kasvuno- peutta. Kasvuominaisuuksien ja ruhon laadun periy- tymisasteet ja ominaisuuksien väliset korrelaatiot es- timoitiin käyttäen REMLiä ja eläinmallia. Sovitetun polynomifunktion selitysaste (R2) oli 98,5%:11a sioista yli 0,99. Sikojen paino funktion käännepisteessä eli maksimikasvun kohdalla oli kes- kimäärin 72 kg, ikä 126 vrk ja päiväkasvu 1111 g/vrk. Keskimääräinen päiväkasvu painovälillä 30-90 kg oli 957 g/vrk. Lyhyillä painoväleillä 30-50 kg, 50- 70 kg ja 70-90 kg keskimääräiset päiväkasvut olivat vastaavasti 829 g/vrk, 1042 g/vrk ja 1046 g/vrk. Käännepisteen elopainon periytymisastearvio oli 0,08 ja kasvuominaisuuksien periytymisastearviot vaihte- livat alkukasvun o,l4:stä koko jakson o,23:een. Geneettiset korrelaatiot eri painovälien keskimää- räisten kasvujen välillä olivat 0,45-0,95. Nopeakas- vuisten ja lihakkaiden eläinten kasvu hidastui suu- remmassa elopainossa kuin hidaskasvuisten eläinten. Ruhon laadun ja kasvunopeuden välillä ei ollut epä- suotuista geneettistä yhteyttä. Vähäinen perinnöllinen vaihtelu funktion käännepisteen sijainnissa saattaa johtua noudatetusta rajoitetusta ruokintanormista. 10 AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND