Voi 611997): S4I-345. Effect of soil-spraying time on root-colonization ability of antagonistic Streptomyces Hanna Kortemaa Department ofPlant Biology, Plant Pathology, PO Box 28, FIN-00014 University ofHelsinki, Finland. Current address: KTTK, Seed Testing Department, PO Box 111. FIN-32201 Loimaa, Finland, e-mail: hanna.kortemaa@mmm.fi Kielo Haahtela Department of Biosciences, Division ofGeneral Microbiology, PO Box 56, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland Aino Smolander Vantaa Research Centre. Finnish Forest Research Institute, PO Box 18, FIN-01301 Vantaa, Finland The root-colonization ability ofStreptomyces griseoviridis Anderson et al. was tested on turnip rape (Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera DC.) and carrot (Daucus carota L.) by the sand-tube method. Non- sterile sand was sprayed with a microbial suspension immediately or 7 days after the seed had been sown. Results expressed as population frequencies and densities indicated that S. griseoviridis effec- tively colonizes the rhizosphere when the microbe is applied immediately after sowing but less effec- tively when it is applied 7 days later. Detection values of S. griseoviridis were higher for turnip rape than for carrot. In sterile sand, S. griseoviridis invaribly colonized the rhizosphere of turnip rape after each of the two applications. These findings indicate that S. griseoviridis can compete with indige- nous soil microbes in the rhizosphere if it is sufficiently abundant in the soil before the seed emerges. If applied later, however, it competes rather poorly. In root-free nonsterile sand, S. griseoviridis dis- persed and survived well. r Key words: actinomycetes, biological control, Brassica rapa ssp. oleifera, Daucus carota, plant growth- promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), rhizosphere ntroduction S. griseoviridis, a biocontrol agent used against some seed-borneand soil-borne plant pathogens (Tahvonen 1988), produces the auxin indole-3- acetic acid (IAA). The concentration of lAA pro- duced on solid media by S. griseoviridis is of the same magnitude as that reported to have a growth-promoting effect (Tuomi et al. 1994). Mycostop (Kemira Oy, Finland) is a biofungi- cide produced by fermentation of the spores and © Agricultural and Food Science in Finland Manuscript received March 1997 341 AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND https://www.c-info.fi/en/info/?token=Q6YysS3UEt5I3smc.BenP0HVQRwJEEzm367g6Cw.R_XS3bay7DNwMGAvRjMKdd8k6khg1vMzPIyxFO-l8D8Vjb6Mc1tE_krIGej-a4Arke8hx90AwZoCY4fVzGJPsUu4pkmlDWBGp1paZw7NM5KyvTfmVXX-E2u5ZIhCAkceqd7fKeiU1CV3Qc5vrgvq9kR8rsxdaQdH9d8G8qAqkkaabwnXUBP72pq4-23-PHLv9tso4Q17CqbxSbginGZ9b4ea8-4TIB36goO9kUg7AzfdlR4JWDaswFCQIFhzerocnPGQqf3jBqgkCdYQAi_YsOp2gVNKnrrgqKqFMhhHSYbuFONonw Kortemaa, H. et al. Effect ofsoil-spraying time on Streptomyces griseoviridis mycelium of a S. griseoviridis strain isolated from peat by Tahvonen (1982). Several isolates ofStreptomyces spp., includ- ing the S. griseoviridis isolated from peat, pro- duce polyene antibiotics. In contrast to nonsup- pressive isolates most of the suppressive isolates produce a candicidin-type antibiotic (Raatikai- nen et al. 1993). Scanning electron microscopy studies show that S. griseoviridis is a hyperpar- asite ofvarious plant pathogenic fungi (Tapio and Pohto-Lahdenperä 1991). Besides antibiosis and parasitism, competition is often mentioned as a mechanism ofbiocontrol. According to Sivan and Chet (1989), the inhibition of germination of chlamydospores might be due to competition between Trichoderma harzianum Rifai and Fusarium oxysporum Schlecht.: Fr. Rothrock and Gottlieb (1984), on the other hand, showed that the antagonism of S. hygroscopicus var. gelda- nus was due to the antibiotic production, not to competition for nutrients. Microbes that colonize roots are ideal for use as biocontrol agents against soil-borne diseases (Weller 1988). Because soil spraying, like seed dressing is, an application method that has re- sulted in good biocontrol, our objective was to study how roots of turnip rape and carrot are colonized after soil-spraying treatment and to test whether application time has any effect on root colonization. We tested the root-coloniza- tion ability in both nonsterile and sterile sand to establish the effect of microbial competition in therhizosphere on the colonization potential. As well as the growth ofS. griseoviridis in the rhizo- sphere, we examined the dispersal of this antag- onist in root-free sand. Material and methods Root colonization in nonsterile sand The dispersal of S. griseoviridis in the rhizo- sphere was tested by the sand-tube method as described by Ahmad and Baker (1987) and Kor- temaa et al. (1994). Seeds of turnip rape, Brassi- ca rapa subsp. oleifera cv. Kulta, and carrot, Daucus carota cv. Nantes Fancy, were surface- sterilized with ethanol and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) as described by Kortemaa et al. (1994). PVC-plastic tubes 20 cm long and 3.2 cm in di- ameter were longitudinally sliced and fastened together with rubber bands. The tubes were blocked at the bottom with cotton wool and filled with nonsterile, sieved (0.5-1.2 mm) sand (pH 6.2). The sand, water and water-soluble fertiliz- er were mixed as described earlier, resulting in a water potential of - 1 kPa (Kortemaa et al. 1994). One surface-sterilized seed was sown in each tube, and the tubes were placed vertically, five per each plastic pot containing the same sand mixture. A microbial suspension was prepared of Mycostop biofungicide as a 0.01% suspen- sion in water. The average colony-forming unit (cfu) value of S. griseoviridis of the suspension detected on semi-selective water agar with glyc- erol (Kortemaa et al. 1994)was 8 x 104 ml 1 ; sml of this microbial suspension was spread evenly with a pipette on the sand surface in each tube immediately after sowing (day 0) or was applied 7 days after sowing. The pots were covered with plastic bags, and no water was added after sow- ing. The pots were incubated for 4 weeks in a growth chamber (16 h light period, light inten- sity 150 mMols'm 2at 20°C and 8 h dark period at 18°C). After 4 weeks, the tubes were opened, and the roots were cut into 2 cm segments. The sand adhering to the root segments was considered as rhizosphere soil. For population-density counts, the cfu values were determined by a dilution- plating method on water-agar plates, although this method did not permit population densities lower than 102 cfu g ] soil to be detected. Sand- free root segments and above-ground portions of seedlings, i.e. stems and leaves, were placed on water-agar plates to isolate S. griseoviridis. Root-colonization frequencies were counted for root segments and the rhizosphere, and the population density was counted as cfu g' 1 rhizo- sphere soil. Each experiment comprised 10plants of turnip rape and carrot and the two application 342 AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Vol. 6 (1997): 341-348. times for the suspension. Five control plants were not treated. The experiment was conducted three times. Root colonization in sterile sand For this experiment, turnip rape was grown in sterile sand in a large glass pot containing four longitudinally sliced tubes. The sand was steri- lized for I h and other material for 20 min at 121°C in an autoclave. A water suspension of S. griseoviridis, which had grown for 7 days on glucose-yeast-malt agar (GYM) (Kortemaa et al, 1994), was prepared for the spraying treatment instead of Mycostop suspension. The average population density of the suspension, which mainly consisted of spores of 5. griseoviridis, was 6.5 x 106 cfu ml 1 . For these experiments, the sterile seed was sown, the sand-tubes were incubated, and S. griseoviridis was applied and isolated as described above. The only exception was that for population density counts the mi- crobe was isolated in the same manner for one tube in each pot on water-agar and GYM-agar plates to ensure that the sand was not contami- nated with other microbes. Each experiment con- tained one untreated control pot and three pots with the two application times of the S. griseo- viridis suspension. The experiment was conduct- ed twice. Dispersal in nonsterile sand without plants For this experiment a large plastic box (40 cm x 60 cm) and 32 plastic tubes were filled with the nonsterile sand-water-fertilizer mixture de- scribed above. The tubes were placed randomly in the box in a vertical position. Five millilitres of 0.01% Mycostop suspension was pipetted evenly onto the surface of each sand-tube; after this treatment, the tubes were not watered. The average population density of the suspension was 3 x I04 cfu ml 1. The box with the sand tubes, which was covered to avoid loss ofmoisture, was incubated in a growth chamber under the condi- tions described above for 4 weeks. Each week (7, 14, 21 and 28 days after treatment), eight tubes were randomly taken as a sample for meas- urements of population frequencies and densi- ties at different depths of sand. The soil for these counts was sampled at every 2 cm between 0 and 12 cm from the top of the tube. The population density was counted by the dilution-plate meth- od on water-agar plates. The experiment was conducted twice. Statistical analysis Cfu values were logarithmically transformed before analyses of variance [PROC GLM (SAS Institute Inc. 1988)].Tukey’s Studentized Range (HSD) Test was used to compare significantly different means. Results Root colonization in nonsterile and sterile sand When Mycostop suspension was sprayed imme- diately (day 0) after sowing, the root-coloniza- tion frequencies on the roots and rhizosphere of turnip rape and carrot were higher than when the suspension was applied 7 days after sowing (Ta- ble 1). The frequency values were higher for tur- nip rape than carrot. The stems and leaves of turnip rape seedlings were colonized 100% af- ter 0 and 73% after 7 days of treatment. For car- rots, the corresponding values were 77% and 54%. The differences in population density values between the two applications were significant (P=0.05) at all root depths in therhizosphere soil (Table 2). At a distance of0-2 cm from the seed, the differences were significant between both treatments and plant species. 343 AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Kortemaa, H. et al. Effect ofsoil-spraying time on Streptomyces griseoviridis Table 1.Root-colonization frequency ofStreptomyces griseoviridis on root segments and in rhizosphere of turnip rape (Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera) and carrot (Daucus carota) after two different spraying times of Mycostop suspension in nonsterile sand. Root-colonization frequency (%) Root a Rhizosphereb day ODepth (cm) day O day 7d day 7 Brassica 0-2 100 (30)' 100(30) 47 (30) 10(27) 18(19) 0(15) 100(30) 100(29) 100(24) 83 (19) 85 (14) 100(30) 2-4 100(29) 47 (30) 4-6 100(24) 10(27) 6-8 83(19) 23(19) 8-10 85 (14) 0(15) Daucus 0-2 97 (29) 51(28) 4(25) 0(24) 0(11) 0 (8) 97 (29) 83 (29) 82 (25) 64(17) 22(10) 61 (28) 2-4 83 (29) 7(25) 4-6 82 (25) 0(24) 6-8 65 (17) 0(11) 8-1 23(10) o (8) a S. griseoviridis isolated from root segments. b S. griseoviridis isolated from root segments and/or from rhizosphere soil. c Suspension sprayed on day 0 after sowing. d Suspension sprayed on day 7 after sowing. • Number of samples studied (n). The rhizosphere ofturnip rape was effectively colonized by S. griseoviridis in sterile sand. The results for the dilution series on GYM agar showed that the sand remained uncontaminated during the experiments. The root-colonization frequencies were 100%. Population densities were high, and there were no significant differ- ences between treatments (Table 3). The stems and leaves of turnip rape seedlings were colo- nized 66% and 75% after the 0 day and the 7- day treatments. Table 2. Population densities (cfu values) of Streptomyces griseoviridis in rhizosphere ofturnip rape (Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera) and carrot (Daucus carota) after two different spraying times of Mycostop suspen- sion in nonsterile sand. Population density (cfu) 102 g 1 of soil Depth (cm) 0-2 2-4 4-6 6-8Treatment 8-10 Brassica day 0 day 7 11 000* 3 100b 2 800* 5 300“ 1 100h I OOO1 3 b 350 nd5l0b Daucus day 0 day 7 530 < 1 < 1 270* nd <1 < 1 nd nd2201 Means within a column followed by the same letter were not significantly different according to Tukey’s Studentized Range (HSD) Test (P=0.05). nd: not detected 344 AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Vol. 6 (1997): 341-348. Table 3. Population densities (cfu values) ofStreptomyces griseoviridis in rhizosphere of turnip rape (Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera) after two spraying times of spore suspension on sterile sand. Population density (cfu) 102 g 1 of soil Depth (cm) Treatment 0-2 2-4 4-6 6-8 8-10 day 0 39 000 23 000 5 600 7 700 920 day 7 79 000 42 000 13 000 4 000 1900 Means were not significantly different according to Tukey’s Studentized Range (HSD) Test (P=0.05). Dispersal in nonsterile sand without plants S. griseoviridis dispersed well in root-free sand when 5 ml of Mycostop suspension was sprayed on the surface of the sand. The isolation frequen- cies of S. griseoviridis had already reached al- most 100% at a depth of 0-6 cm from the top 7 days after inoculation (Fig. 1), and continued to accumulate over the next 2 weeks (14 and 21 days after treatment). The population densities of S. griseoviridis isolated from different depths in the sand tube were highest at the top and decreased with depth (Fig. 2). The population of S. griseoviridis was stable during the experiment; differences in pop- ulation densities between sampling days were not significant (P=0.05) for any depth category. Discussion Root colonization was more effective when S. griseoviridis was applied to nonsterile sand im- mediately after sowing than when it was applied 7 days later, probably because during those days the rhizosphere was colonized by other soil mi- crobes with which S. griseoviridis was unable to compete. The results of sterile-sand experi- ments, in which the rhizosphere was 100% col- Fig. I. Accumulation of isolation frequencies of Slreptomyces gri- seoviridis at different soil depths during 28 days after spraying of Mycostop suspension on root-free sand. 345 Kortemaa, H. et al. Effect ofsoil-spraying time on Streptomyces griseoviridis onized by S. griseoviridis after both treatment times, support this contention.The higher popu- lation densities in sterile than in nonsterile sand are probably due to the higher inoculation den- sities and lack of competition with other mi- crobes in sterile sand. The number of micro-or- ganisms in nonsterile sand was probably rather low, and the absence of many of the microbes, both plant-growth-promoting and deleterious strains, to be found in soil with abundant organ- ic material most likely affected competition. Scher et al. (1984) noted that microbial compe- tition negatively affects the root-colonization capacity of fluorescent pseudomonads in non- sterile soil. Isolation frequencies and population densi- ties were greater for turnip rape than for carrot because the root exudates of turnip rape were probably more abundant or more available than those of carrot. The same results were obtained in our previous study (Kortemaa at el. 1994) us- ing the plate test. Sterile plants of turnip rape and carrot inoculated with S. griseoviridis were grown on water-agar plates. The difference in root colonization between the two plant species was clear. Without the effect of other microbes, the difference between plant species was sug- gested to be of plant origin, i.e. due to root exu- dates or morphological differences. In both plant species the upper part of the root was more frequently colonized by S. griseo- viridis than the lower parts. The population densities in the rhizosphere of turnip rape were higher than in the root-free sand experiment but population densities were lowest in the carrot rhizosphere. The results are similar to those of our previous studies, which were done using oth- er application methods (Kortemaa et al. 1994, 1997). All these differences were probably due to root exudates (Curl and Truelove 1986) The soil-spraying treatment method used here resulted in better dispersal in sand than did seed Fig. 2. Population densities (cfu values) of Streplomyces griseoviridis at different soil depths during 28 days after spraying of Mycostop suspension on root-free sand. Differences in population densities between sampling days were not significant (P=0.05) for any depth category. 346 AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Vol. 6 (1997): 341-348. treatment (Kortemaa et al. 1994). Root-coloni- zation was best when the S. griseoviridis sus- pension was mixed into the sand before sowing (Kortemaa et al. 1997). After seed treatment, the antagonist must actively colonize the rhizosphere with the aid of the root and seed exudates. After the soil-spraying treatment the antagonist dis- persed well as shown by the experiment without plants, the antagonist being available all around the root. Seven days after seed sowing, therhizo- sphere was mainly colonized by other soil mi- crobes and S. griseoviridis was not able to colo- nize the rhizosphere effectively. Our results suggest that S. griseoviridis can compete with indigenous soil microbes in the rhizosphere if it is well established in the sand before the seed emerges. If applied to the rhizo- sphere later, however, it competes rather poorly with other microbes. According to Lacey (1973), Streptomyces spp. colonize new substrates more slowly than do other bacteria and fungi. Our find- ings suggest that competition is probably not the main mode of action of antagonistic S. griseo- viridis. S. griseoviridis was isolated in great num- bers in root-free sand with very little organic material. The antagonist survived well in root- free sand after the suspension had been mixed into the sand (Kortemaa et al. 1997). Hatzinger and Alexander (1994) showed that the bacteria which survived well in nonsterile soil were present in the highest population densities in the rhizosphere. Bahme and Schroth (1987) noted that the bacteria which survived in nonrhizo- sphere soil have good potential as biocontrol agents because the bacteria can await the emerg- ing seed in the soil. According to Wellington et al. (1990), populations of S. lividans and S. vio- laceolatus remain constant or decline in natural soil, and after a short mycelial growth phase, sporulation occurs and inoculants survive in the soil as spores. Mohammadi and Lahdenperä (1994) found that seed dressing controls Rhizoctonia solani Kiihn on cauliflower more effectively than does soil spraying or the mixing of Mycostop suspen- sion into the growth substrate. On the other hand, soil-spraying treatment resulted in better cucum- ber seed emergence and a better gerbera flower yield than did other methods. According to El- Abyad et al. (1993) seed-coating treatment with antagonistic Streptomyces spp. was a more ef- fective way of controlling various tomato path- ogens than was soil inoculation. These results together with those of the present study support the idea that both timing and application meth- od must be right if effective biocontrol is to be achieved with S. griseoviridis. The dispersal of S. griseoviridis after soil- spraying treatment was effective in both the rhizosphere and root-free sand. The root-colo- nization ability of the antagonist depended on the application time. S. griseoviridis could not compete effectively with indigenous soil mi- crobes, and the rhizosphere was effectively col- onized only if the sand was treated immediately after sowing. Acknowledgements. We thank Tuula Laine and Lahja Pe- sonen for their technical assistance. References Ahmad, J.S, & Baker, R. 1987. Rhizosphere competence of Trichoderma harzianum. Phytopathology77: 182- 189. Bahme, J.B. & Schroth, M.N, 1987. Spatial-temporal col- onization patterns of a rhizobacterium on under- ground organs of potato. Phytopathology77: 1093- 1100. Curl, E.A. &Truelove, B. 1986. The rhizosphere. Spring- *e?-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. 288 p. El-Abyad, M.S., El-Sayed, M.A., El-Shanshoury, A.R. & El-Sabbagh, S.M. 1993, Towards the biological con- trol of fungal and bacterial diseases of tomato using antagonistic Streptomyces spp. Plant and Soil 149: 185-195. Hatzinger, P.B. & Alexander, M. 1994. Relationship be- tween the number of bacteria added to soil or seeds and their abundance and distribution in the rhizo- sphere of alfalfa. Plant and Soil 158: 211-222. 347 AGRICULTURAL AND POOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Kortemaa, H. et al. Effect ofsoil-spraying time on Streptomyces griseoviridis Kortemaa, H,, Pennanen, T, Smolander, A. & Haahtela, K. 1997. Distribution of antagonistic Streptomyces griseoviridis in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere sand. Journalof Phytopathology 145: 137-143. -, Rita, H., Haahtela, K. & Smolander, A. 1994. Root- colonization ability of antagonistic Streptomyces gri- seoviridis. Plant and Soil 163: 77-83. Lacey, J. 1973. Actinomycetes in soils, composts and fodders. In: Sykes, G. & Skinner, F.A. (eds.). Actino- mycetales: Characteristics andpractical importance. Academic Press, London, p. 231-251. Mohammadi, O. & Lahdenperä, M.L. 1994. Impact of application method on efficacy of Mycostop biofun- gicide. In: Ryder, M.H. et al. (eds.). Improving plant productivity with rhizosphere bacteria. Proceedings of theThird International Workshop on Plant Growth- Promoting Rhizobacteria. CSIRO, Australia, p. 279- 281. Raatikainen, 0., Tuomisto, J., Tahvonen, R. & Rosenqvist, H. 1993. Polyene production of antagonistic Strepto- myces species isolated from Sphagnumpeat. Agri- cultural Science of Finland 2: 551-561. Rothrock, C.S. & Gottlieb, D. 1984. Role of antibiosis of Streptomyces hygroscopicusvar. geldanus to Rhizoc- lonia solani in soil. Canadian Journal of Microbiol- ogy 30: 1440-1447. SAS Institute Inc. 1988. SAS/STAT user’s guide. Release 6.03. Cary, USA. 1028 p. Scher, F.M., Ziegle, J.S. & Kloepper, J.W. 1984. A meth- od for assessing the root-colonizing capacity ot bac- teria on maize. Canadian Journal ofMicrobiology 30: 151-157. Sivan, A. & Chet, I. 1989. The possible role of competi- tion between Trichoderma harzianum and Fusarium oxysporum on rhizosphere colonization. Phytopathol- ogy 79: 198-203. Tahvonen, R. 1982. The suppressiveness of Finnish light coloured Sphagnum peat. Journal of the Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 54: 345-356. - 1988. Microbial control of plant diseases with Strep- tomyces spp. EPPO Bulletin 18: 55-59. Tapio, E. & Pohto-Lahdenperä, A. 1991. Scanning elec- tron microscopy of hyphal interaction between Strep- tomyces griseoviridisand some plant pathogenic fun- gi, Journal of the Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 63: 435-441. Tuomi, T., Laakso, S. & Rosenqvist, H. 1994. lndole-3- acetic acid (lAA) production by a biofungicide Strep- tomyces griseoviridisstrain. Annales Botani Fennici 31: 59-63. Weller, D.M. 1988. Biological control of soilborne plant pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. Annual Review of Phytopalholology26: 379-407, Wellington, E.M.H., Cresswell, N. & Saunders, V.A. 1990. Growth and survival ot streptomycete inoculants and extentof plasmid transfer in sterile and nonsterile soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 56: 1413- 1419. SELOSTUS Kasvualustan käsittelyhän vaikutus Streptomyces griseoviridis -antagonistin juurten asutuskykyyn Hanna Kortemaa, Kielo Haahtela ja Aino Smolander Helsingin yliopisto ja Metsäntutkimuslaitos Mikrobit, jotka asuttavat tehokkaasti juuria, ovat lu- paavia biotorjuntaeliöitä käytettäväksi maalevintäis- ten kasvitautien torjuntaan. Antagonistisen Strepto- myces griseoviridis -sädebakteerin kykyä asuttaa ryp- sin ja porkkanan juuria testattiin hiekkaputkimenetel- mällä. Käsittelemätön hiekka kasteltiin mikrobiliuok- sella joko välittömästi tai seitsemän vuorokauden kuluttua siemenen kylvöstä. Tulokset osoittivat, että S. griseoviridis asutti juurivyöhykkeen tehokkaasti, jos mikrobikäsittely tehtiin välittömästi kylvön jäl- keen, mutta selvästi heikommin, kun käsittely tehtiin viikon kuluttua kylvöstä. Mikrobitiheydet olivat ryp- sin juuressa suuremmat kuin porkkanan juuressa. Antagonisti eristettiin juuren yläosasta useammin kuin alemmista osista. Steriilissä hiekassa S. griseo- viridis asutti rypsin juuret tehokkaasti molempien käsittelyaikojen jälkeen. Nämä tulokset osoittavat, että S. griseoviridis pystyy kilpailemaan maassa luon- taisesti esiintyvien mikrobien kanssa, jos antagonis- tia on kasvualustassa runsaasti ennen siemenen itä- mistä. Jos antagonisti lisätään maahan myöhemmin, se pystyy suhteellisen huonosti kilpailemaan muiden mikrobien kanssa. Hyvän biotorjuntatuloksen saavut- taminen käytännön kasvintuotannossa edellyttää oi- kean käsittelymenetelmän ja -ajan tuntemista. S. gri- seoviridis levisi ja säilyi elävänä hyvin steriloimat- tomassa hiekassa, jossa ei kasvanut kasveja. 348 AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND