Supply of nutrients and productive responses in dairy cows given diets based on restrictively fermented silage Pekka Huhtanen Agricultural Research Centre ofFinland, Animal Production Research, FIN-31600 Jokioinen, Finland, e -mail: pelcka.huhtanen@mtt.fi The objective of this paper is to review research which has evaluated the feeding of dairy cows with diets containing large proportions of grass silage. In Finland, milk production systems evolved are based on the use of restrictively fermented silages. Higher potential yields, smaller production risks than with cereal grains, short grazing period and high digestibility of grasses grown in northern lati- tudes have facilitated this development. Factors affecting nutrient supply from these diets are dis- cussed. Digestibility is determined mainly by the stage of maturity at harvesting and it is not marked- ly affected by the level of energy and protein supplementation. Intake of grass silage is influenced both by digestibility and fermentation characteristics. Efficiency of microbial synthesis is high in animals given diets based on restrictively fermented silage but rumen fermentation pattern is charac- terised by low molar proportions of propionate. Production responses to additional concentrate are relatively small, especially when the amount of concentrate exceeds 10kg day 1. High substitution of silage dry matter (DM), negative associative effects on digestion and partitioning of energy towards body tissues account for small production responses. Protein supplementation has consistently in- creased milk protein yield but responses do not appear to be related to the level of milk production, silage crude protein content, amount of concentrate or stage of lactation. The new protein evaluation system provides an accurate prediction of protein yield with the typical Finnish dairy cow diets. The high slopes (ca. 0.5) between protein supply and milk protein yield within experiments suggest that protein supply is suboptimal and protein supplements are used with a high efficiency. Key words: energy, milk production, nutrient supply, protein, response to nutrients, silage ntroduction Domesticatedruminants are well adapted to dif- ferent environmental conditions and diets. Milk production systems adopted in different climat- ic zones employ contrasting input levels. High concentrate diets are used in manyWestern coun- tries, whereas dairy cow rations fed in New Zea- land are mainly comprised (90%) of grazed pas- ture. In Finland grazed pasture cannot contrib- ute more than 25-30% of annual energy intake © Agricultural and Food Science inFinland Manuscript received February 1998 219 Voi 7(1998): 219-250 AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND owing to a short (100-120 days) grazing period. Long indoor feeding period and a large year- around demand of milk products have increased the importance ofconserved forages in dairy cow diets. High concentrate costs and a shortage of domestic protein supplements have favoured the development of forage-based feeding systems. Invention of silage additives by professor A.I. Virtanen established a firm background for si- lage-based feeding systems. Although he was granted a Nobel prize in 1945 for these inven- tions, silage production did not increase in Fin- land until the 1960 s when flail-type forage har- vesters became widely available. This generated an extensive research programme into grassland production, ensiling, and feeding and supple- mentation of grass silage. This research pro- gramme led to the development of a silage-based ‘GreenLine’ feeding system, which is now wide- ly adopted in Finland. There are several reasons why grass silage- based feeding system has been adopted in Fin- land. Higher yield potential with smaller produc- tion risks of grasses compared with cereal grains has favoured grass production. In field experi- ments dry matter (DM) yields of timothy (Phleum pratense) and meadow fescue (Festuca prat- ensis) in North Ostrobothnia (64°40' N) and North Savo (63°10' N) are generally from 9000 to 10 000 kg/ha for 1-3-year old swards (Nis- sinen and Hakkola 1995,Rinne, K. et ai. unpub- lished). At the same research stations DM yields of barley are ca. 5000kg/ha. Despite lower con- tents of metabolisable energy (ME) and higher storage losses of grass silage than with grain, feed energy yield per hectare is considerably higher from grass than from grain production, especially in the middle and northern parts of Finland. Higher crude protein content of grass was also considered as an advantage when pro- tein supplements were not widely available. Winter feeding systems based on grass silage provide several advantages compared with hay- based systems. Silage making is much less de- pendent on weather conditions than hay making and harvesting losses are generally smaller for silage than hay (Pitt 1991). When conserved as silage, the swards can be harvested at an earlier stage of growth and therefore the nutritional val- ue of silage is higher. Owing to the long winter feeding period and high building costs milk production must be in- tensive to be profitable. However, because of high cereal grain and other concentrate prices, intensive milk production in Finland has been based on production and feeding ofhigh-quality forages rather than increasing the proportion of concentrates in the diet. This strategy has been successful since annual milk yield in controlled herds increased from 5859 kg in 1987 to 7186 kg in 1997 without marked increase in the pro- portion of concentrates in the diet [ca. 350 g (kg DM 1) ]. In addition to the high nutrient content of silage, a good hygienic quality has even al- lowed production of Emmenthal cheese in Finn- ish dairies from milk produced by silage-fed cows. Milk quota, adopted in Finland in 1985, should encourage farmers to reduce unit costs ofproduction and concentrate inputs. In contrast, subsidy policies of the European Union (EU) have considerably reduced the relative price of concentrates in Finland. Biased price ratios of concentrates to forages in relation to their natu- ral production costs could jeopardise the sustain- able milk production system in Finland. The impacts of concentrate-based systems on animal welfare and environmental issues would be del- eterious. Furthermore, the image ofmilk current- ly held by consumers as being natural and healthy would also be threatened, if high con- centrate diets are fed to dairy cows. Research interests during the last two dec- ades have focused on optimisation of forage con- servation, determinationof nutrient supply, sup- plementation of grass silage-based diets, opti- misation of diet composition to improve nutri- ent utilisation and milk composition and to re- duce environmental pollution. Factors affecting nutritive value and supplementation of grass si- lage have been discussed in several reviews (Tho- mas and Thomas 1985, Thomas and Rae 1988, Lampila et al. 1988, Chamberlain et al. 1989, Harrison et al. 1994, van Vuuren et al. 1995). This paper will focus more specifically on nu- 220 Seminar in honour of the 100th anniversary ofMTT AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND trient supply and response to nutrients with di- ets based on restrictively fermented silages wide- ly used in Finland. Nutrient supply from grass silage-based diets The amount of nutrients absorbed from the di- gestive tract depends on the content of digesti- ble nutrients in the feed and DM intake. Most of the variation in net energy content of a feed is associated with digestibility, while methane and urinary losses and differences in the utilisation of ME account for relatively little variation. Digestibility Fermentation Chemical composition and digestibility ofgrass silage are affected by maturity at harvest more than by other management factors such as parti- cle size, DM at harvest and harvesting system. The effect of ensiling on digestibility is often small provided that silage is not badly ferment- ed and effluent production is minimised. Well- preserved silages can be classified as high-lac- tate or restrictively fermented silages. The former can be produced by natural fermentation with- out the use of additives or as a result of using bacterial inoculants, enzymes or low rates of formic or other acid acids. Restrictively ferment- ed silages are generally produced by high appli- cation rates of formic acid (FA) during ensiling. Digestibility of high-lactate silages has been re- ported to be similar to that of restrictively fer- mented formic FA-treated silages (Jaakkola 1992. Harrison et al. 1994). Huhtanen et al. (1997a) and Heikkilä et al. (1998a) reported that organic matter (OM) digestibility in dairy cows fed inoculant-treated silage was higher than that treated with FA. A lower digestibility of neutral detergent fibre (NDF) of FA-treated silage ap- peared to account for this difference. Enzymes have been used as silage additives in an attempt to supply more fermentable substrates for lactic acid bacteria. Earlier it was also assumed that enzymes would improve silage digestibility, thereby permitting later harvesting and higher DM yields without reduced digestibility. How- ever, studies reviewed by Jaakkola(1992) show- ed that cell wall degrading enzymes did not improve OM digestibility and in fact decreased cell wall digestibility. As a result of preferential in silo degradation of the highly digestible cell wall material by enzymes, less digestible resi- due is left for ruminal digestion. Harrison et al. (1994) reported that enzyme treatment improved silage DM digestibility in one-third of the com- parisons. Maturity The decline in digestibility of grass with pro- ceeding stage of growth is faster at northern lat- itudes (Deinum et al. 1981). For example, in the UK the decline in OM digestibility is typically 3 g kg 1 per day whereas in Finland it is approx- imately 5 g kg 1 per day. The faster decline in digestibility at northern latitudes is related to a more rapid stem development and to smaller pro- portion of leaf DM (Deinum et al. 1981). How- ever, at the same morphological stage the digest- ibility of the whole grass crop is higher at north- ern latitudes. Lower temperature, long day and high solar radiation would promote DM accu- mulation, without much effect on ageing and digestibility (Van Soest et al. 1978). At 50% and 70% content of leaf sheaths and stems in vitro digestibility of timothy was 80 and 170 g kg’ 1 higher in Tromsö (69°N) than in Wageningen (52°N) (Deinum et al. 1981). Lignification in the cell wall fraction increases with plant maturity, which reduces its digestibil- ity and, consequently, energy value of grasses. The lower temperature reduces lignification, and therefore the digestibility of plant material is maintained at a high level (700-750 g kg’ 1) even when the NDF content is ca. 600 g (kg DM)' 1 . The mean decline ofdigestibility in four studies conducted at 60-61 °N with first-cut silages 221 Vol. 7 (1998): 219-250. AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND was 5.4 g kg" 1 per day (Fig. 1). The rate of de- cline is not always linear being generally slower at the beginning of the growing season when the rate of DM accumulation is slow. The fastest daily declines in OM digestibility of 8 to 10 g kg" 1 per day often occurred during the recommen- ded harvesting time. OM digestibility (OMD) was positively correlated with silage crude pro- tein (CP) content and negatively with NDF in four studies using 18 silages: OMD (g kg 1 ) = 532 + 1.393 xCP (g kg 1 ) (R 2 = 0.696; SE est. 32.8) (1) OMD (g kg" 1) = 1115 - 0.669 x NDF (g kg ') (R 2 = 0.744; SE est. 30.1) (2) Although within studies the relationship be- tween digestibility and NDF or CP content was relatively strong, prediction of silage D-value [g digestible OM (kg DM)'] from chemical com- position during harvesting time will lead to sub- stantial errors. Prediction errors of 32.8 and 30.1 g kg ' are unacceptable for ration formula- tion. In practice, prediction errors are likely to be much greater since N fertilisation and other man- agement factors are standardisedbetter in research conditions. Improved methods for predicting silage D-value than that currently adopted based on grass CP and crude fibre content are urgently required. It is essential that silage D-value can be accurately predicted from a standing crop in or- der to reach an optimal balance between silage quality and DM yield. This is especially impor- tant at northern latitudes where the rates of changes in both DM yield and digestibility are very fast for first-cut swards. Surprisingly, the present data indicated that silage OMD could be more accurately predicted by number of days elapsed from May 1 (R 2 = 0.845) than by chem- ical composition. Total diet OM digestibility of grass silage- based diets can exceed 800 g kg' 1 in growing cattle fed at the level between 70 to 80 g DM per kg live weight(LW)075 (Table 1). The proportion of grass silage was 700 g (kg DM)' 1 and that of barley-rapeseed mixture (800:200) 300 g (kg DM) 1 . Digestibility of cell wall carbohydrates was also very high indicating a high potential NDF digestibility. When determined by 12 day ruminal in situ incubation, potential NDF digest- ibility of grass cut at the recommended stage of maturity for silage can exceed 900 g kg ' (Rinne et al. 1997, Huhtanen and Vanhatalo 1997). The decline in potential digestibility of NDF is slow at the beginning of the growing season but ac- celerates later (Huhtanen and Jaakkola 1994, Huhtanen and Vanhatalo 1997). In contrast, the rate of digestion declines faster at early stages of the growing season. Supplementation Owing to the high potential digestibility of grass silage and negative associative effects on diges- tion (refer to Mould 1988), OM digestibility of the total diet is not affected by the amount of concentrate supplements in dairy cows (Table 2). Only at a low level of supplementation did OM digestibility increase as expected, but at higher levels of supplementation OM and especially NDF digestibility slightly decreased when the amount of concentrate was increased. Reduced cell wall digestibility is partly due to adverse effects of low rumen pH on cellulolysis and part- ly to the intrinsic characteristic of silage and concentrate NDF the former generally being more digestible. As a result of negative associa- tive effects on digestion, the increase in ME in- take calculated from digestible OM (DOM) in- take was markedly lower than that estimated from feed table values (Tuori et al. 1996). The ME content of incremental increases in DM in- take was 10.6 MJ kg" 1 , i.e. only 73.5% of the predicted increase [14.5 MJ (kg DM)' I ]. Exclud- ing the study using 3 and 6 kg of concentrate from the data, the ME content of incremental DM intake was only 9.8 MJ (kg DM) ' or 68.4% of predicted increases. Protein supplementation has often increased total diet digestibility, although dietary CP con- tent has exceeded the level considered to be op- timal for ruminal cell wall digestion (Oldham 1984). Supplementation with soya bean meal (SBM) increased total diet DM digestibility by 0.25 g kg' 1 per 1 g increase in concentrate CP 222 Seminar in honour of the 100th anniversary ofMIT AGRICULTURAL AND POOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND content (Gordon et al. 1981), which corresponds to 0.60 g kg ' per 1 g increase in dietary CP con- tent. In contrast, supplementation of diets based on grass silage and cereal grains with rapeseed meal (RSM), which is the most common dairy cow protein supplement in Finland, had no ef- fect on total OM (0.723 vs. 0.725) or NDF di- gestibility (0.635 vs. 0.643) in 13 comparisons. Since digestibility of RSM is lower than that of SBM, smaller responses to RSM than to SBM supplementation may merely reflect differences in protein supplement digestibility. Improved Table 1.Digestibility of grass silage-based (700 g silage DM kg 1 total DM) diets in cattle. Ref. Composition (g kg ‘) CP NDF Digestibility (g kg 1) OM NDF Cellulose Khalili and Huhtanen 1991 Jaakkola and Huhtanen 1992 Rinne et al. 1997 183 501 813 774 846 179 484 187 409 837 824 869 409 821 757 818 Rinne et al. 1997 167 497 816 765 821 DM - dry matter CP = crude protein NDF = neutral detergent fibre OM = organic matter Fig. 1. Relationship between silage organic matter (OM) digestibility in sheep with days after May I, crude protein and neutral detergent fibre (NDF)content. [Data from stud- ies Rinne et al, 1995 (�), 1997 (■), unpublished (�) and Tuon et al. 1992(□)]. 223 Vol. 7(1998): 219-250. AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Table 2, Effects of the amount of concentrate on diet digestibility and marginal increases in ME intake. Ref. 1 Concentrate (kg day ') OM dig (g kg ') NDF dig (g kg ') AME/ %of Low High Low High Change4 Low High Change4 ADM12 expected5 (1) 3 6 684 699 5.0 658 635 -7.7 14.06 93.7 (2) 7 10 763 760 -1.0 715 693 -7.3 10.16 75.4 (3) 7 10 715 712 -1.0 665 629 -12.0 9.78 76.5 (4) 9 15 735 725 -1.7 650 593 -9.5 10.67 68.3 (5) 6 12 746 725 -3.5 670 589 -13.5 8.42 53.5 Mean5 729 724 -0.43 672 628 -10.00 10.62 73.5 Mean6 740 731 -1.79 675 626 -10.58 9.76 68.4 1 References: Saarisalo et al. 1997(1), Rinne et ai. 1995 (2), Shingfield etai. unpublished(3), Heikkilä 1994(3) ? Heikkilä et ai. 1998 b (5) Change in ME intake (MJ) per kg increase in total DM intake 3 Change in ME intake (MJ) perkg increase in total DM intake as %of expected increase calculated from feed table values or digestibility measurement determined in sheep 4 Change per kg increase in concentrateDM intake 5 Mean of all five studies 6 Mean of studies exluding study (1) in which a smaller amount ofconcentrate was used OM = organic matter NDF = neutral detergent fibre ME = metabolisable energy DMI = dry matter intake OM digestibility with increasing level of fish meal inclusion (Heikkilä et al. 1998a) is in line with this suggestion. Feed intake Feeding levels ofhigh producing dairy cows are 3-4 times higher than required for maintenance, i.e. much higher than that ofother domesticated animals used for food production. Animal per- formance is determined mainly by intake of di- gestible energy (DE) and nutrients. A large pro- portion of the variation (60-90%) in DE intake between animals and feeds can be accounted for by differences in feed intake. Only 10% to 40% of this variability is related to differences in di- gestibility (see Mertens 1994). Feed intake is regulated by physical and physiological mecha- nisms. Physiological regulation, often called metabolic regulation, operates when animals are fed highly digestible, palatable and low-fill diets and intake is limited by energy demand of animals. Physical factors regulate intake when the intake is limited by the physical capacity of the digestive tract (Mertens 1994). Digestibility Physical limitationof reticulo-rumen has gener- ally been accepted to be the major factor limit- ing intake of forage diets. Thomas and Cham- berlain (1982) suggested that physical factors regulate the intake of well-preserved highly di- gestible grass silages. The decrease in silage DM intake when water-filled bladders were inserted into the rumen (Parhan and Thomas 1978) sup- ports this hypothesis. However, more recent data from rumen evacuation studies (Gasa et al. 1991, Bosch et al. 1992,Rinne et al. 1996)suggest that factors other than rumen fill limit the intake of early-cut highly digestible silages. Rumen fill in terms of total digesta, DM or NDF was smaller for cows fed early-cut than for those fed late-cut silage. Using digestion and passage kinetic pa- rameters and rumen pool size of NDF derived from the study of Rinne et al. (1996) in a mech- anistic rumen model (Huhtanen, unpublished) predicted that the intake potential of high digest- 224 Seminar in honour of the IOOth anniversary ofMTT AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND ibility silages (D-values 730 and 737 g DOM (kg DM) 1 were 3.2 and 3.6 kg day 1 higher than measured values in lactating dairy cows. Simu- lations were based on the assumption that intake of late-cut silage (D-value 637) was limited by rumen NDF fill. Analysis of data from produc- tion trials carried out at the University of Hel- sinki from 1985 to 1993 also suggests that ener- gy demand was more likely to be limiting total DM intake than rumen fill. In all studies (47 di- ets), grass silage was fed ad libitum and concen- trates comprised approximately 400 g kg ' of the total DM. Regression equations indicate that in- creased DM intake provided almost all the extra energy required for higher milk production. DM intake (kg) = -9.68 + 0.0307 x LW (kg) + 0.407 x milk (kg) (R 2 = 0.901) DM intake (kg) = -10.10 + 0.0300 xLW (kg) + 0.421 x ECM (kg) (R 2 = 0.929) In addition large increases in silage and total DM intake in feeding experiments during the past 20 years clearly suggest that the intake of grass silage-based diets has not been limited by ru- men fill. For example, data of Heikkilä et al. (1998b) indicated that the highest mean silage DM intake of 16.0 kg day 1 with 6 kg day 1 of concentrate was higher than the total DM intake (13.9 kg day 1 ) in studies carried out in 1970- 1975 (Ettala et al. 1978). Data from milk record- ing from practical farms also indicate that mean milk yields exceeding 9000 to 10 000 kg year 1 from diets containing 35% of total DM intake as concentrates (Kaustell, K., unpublished). Intake potential ofgrass silage is determined by intrinsic characteristics of the grass ensiled. Silage DM intake is positively related to digest- ibility, although this relationship is not always so clear as with dried forages. The mean increase in silage DM intake was 0.16 kg (SE 0.018) per 10g kg 1 increase in D-value (Harrison et al. un- published). Although the regression equation of Rook et al. (1991) suggested that the relation- ship between silage D-value and DM intake is curvilinear, other published studies (e.g. Rinne et al. 1995) indicate that this relationship is lin- ear up to 740 g kg 1 . The large variation in the effects of silage D-value on intake can often be associated with differences in silage fermenta- tion characteristics. Early-cut grasses are often more difficult to ensile due to a higher buffering capacity, and therefore the higher intake poten- tial of an early-cut silage is not always realised due to poor fermentation quality. Improved di- gestibility and enhanced intake lead to an in- crease in total ME intake by ca. 0.3 MJ per 1 g kg' 1 increase in D-value. In addition to increased ME intake, utilisation of ME for milk produc- tion and energy retention have been reported to be higher with early-cut than late-cut silage (Gor- don et al. 1995). Silage fermentation quality In addition to physical and physiological factors, psychogenic modifiers such as taste, smell, tex- ture and visual appeal can influence feed intake (Mertens 1994). Modifications of carbohydrate and nitrogen fractions during ensiling produce fermentation end-products which decrease silage DM intake compared with fresh forages. Depres- sions in intake have been highly variable (1- 64%) in sheep (Demarquilly 1973). However, providing that the quality of fermentation is good, the effects of ensiling on intake are gener- ally very small in cattle. In two recent studies (Keady and Murphy 1993) and Cushanan and Mayne (1995) the intake ofFA-treated silage was not significantly lower than the intake of fresh forage. A review ofFinnish and Swedish studies comparing barn-dried hay and FA-treated silage made from the same sward indicated no differ- ence in forage DM intake (Huhtanen 1993b). Variable effects of ensiling on forage DM intake are most likely to be related to extent and type of in silo fermentation. Earlier studies based on correlations calculated from individual ob- servations (Wilkins et al. 1971, Ettala and Lampila 1978) clearly demonstrate the adverse effects of fermentation end-products on intake. Analyses of the Agricultural Research Centre of Finland (MTT) data by Huhtanen (1993b) using 49 treatment means from 14 dairy cow studies indicated that within an experiment the total acid 225 Vol. 7(1998): 219-250. AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND content was the best predictor of silage DM in- take. The effects of lactic acid, volatile fatty ac- ids (VFA) and ammonia on silage DM intake were curvilinear. At low concentrations, lactate had a positive effect on silage intake. This is probably related to the secondary fermentation of some low lactate silages as indicated by high concentrations of ammonia and VFA. At higher concentrations, lactic acid had a negative effect on silage DM intake but there is little evidence that lactic acid per se limits intake since con- centrations of ammonia and VFA are often in- creased in extensively fermented silages. Recent studies with wilted silage (Jaakkola et al. 1995, Heikkilä et al. 1998a) suggest that the effects of lactic acid are small provided that secondary fer- mentation and proteolysis are prevented. The effects of ammonia and VFA on silage DM in- take appear to be curvilinear with greater depres- sions occurring at low concentrations (Huhtanen 1993b). Using a larger data set of 250 treatment means, Khalili et al. (unpublished) derived sim- ilar relationships between silage fermentation end-products and intake. Use of this larger data- set indicated that the linear effects of total acids and ammonia caused depressions in intake of 13.7 g DM per 1 g (kg DM) 1 and 14.3 gDM per 1 g (kg N) 1. These values are lower than respect- ive values of 24.7 g per g (kg DM) 1 and 18.5 g DM per 1 g (kg N)' 1 derived exclusively from Finnish data. The adverse effect of lactate on silage DM intake was smaller than that of VFA when both independent variables were used in the same model (11.9 and 21.4 g). The mechanism of silage DM intake depres- sion with increasing concentrations of fermen- tation acids is not well understood. Reduced in- take may simply be due to psychogenic factors, i.e. fermentation products, which impair silage ‘palatability’. Silage fermentation products are also potential feed-back controllers of physio- logical intake regulation. Badly fermented si- lages decrease rumen motility (Clancy et al. 1977), which will induce a greater rumen fill at the same level of intake. Greaterrumen NDF fill with one of the enzyme-treated silages than with FA-treated silage (Jaakkola et al. 1991) supports this suggestion. Higher intake ofrestrictively fer- mented than of extensively and/or badly ferment- ed silage may also be associated with improved post-ruminal balance of amino acids to energy as a result of more efficient of rumen microbial N synthesis in the rumen. Positive effects of RSM supplementation and a greater effect of postru- minal than ruminal casein infusion (Khalili et al. 1995a) tend to support this suggestion. How- ever, the adverse effects of lactic acid on silage intake have not been overcome by postruminal casein infusion (Choung and Chamberlain 1993a) or by fish meal supplementation (Heik- kilä et al. 1998a). Supplementation Grass silage is in most cases fed with energy and protein supplements. Energy supplements de- crease silage DM intake but generally increase total DM intake. Ettala and Lampila (1978) re- ported a decrease of0.64 kg in silage DM intake per kg increase in concentrate DM intake with a mean barley DM intake of 2.1 kg. In a literature review (Ryhänen et al. 1996) involving 121 es- timates of DM substitution rates (SR; decrease in silage DM intake per increase in concentrate DM intake) the mean SR was 0.39 with a high standard deviation (SD; 0.30). In recent studies at MTT mean SR in 16 comparisons was 0.53 (SD 0.12) when the amount of concentrate var- ied between 3 and 15 kg day 1 . Generally, SR tends to increase with increases in concentrate intake, forage digestibility and silage fermenta- tion quality. MTT data indicated that SR was 0.51 when the highest amount of concentrate did not exceed 10 kg day 1 and 0.61 when it exceed- ed 10 kg. The effects of silage D-value are not always consistent. Rinne et al. (1995) observed that SR was greatest with the lowest D-value si- lage. In a recent study, Shingfield et al. (unpub- lished) obtained SR values of 0.34, 0.51 and 0.41 for untreated, formic acid-treated and inoculated silage demonstrating the importance of silage fermentation. Increasing concentrate CP content enhances silage DM intake. In studies with RSM, Tuori (1992) reported a mean increase of 0.027 kg si- 226 Seminar in honour of the 100th anniversary ofMTT AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND lage DM per g kg ' additional CP in the diet. In later studies reviewed for this paper, the corre- sponding response was 0.029. These values are greater than the mean response of0.012 observed for fish meal supplementation (Huhtanen 1993a, Heikkilä et al. 1998a) but similar to those re- ported for SBM for supplementation of grass si- lage and barley diets (Chamberlain et al. 1989). Marginal increases in ME intake are approxi- mately 0.30 MJ per 1 g kg* 1 rise in dietary CP content. Increases in silage DM intake caused by protein supplementation have been suggest- ed to result from a more efficient ruminal cell wall digestion (Oldham 1984) when the intake is limited by fill. However, as discussed before the effects of RSM on NDF digestibility are marginal at best, and cannot therefore explain increased silage intake. Greater intakeresponses would be expected with late-cut or low CP silages because on such diets the supply of ru- men-degradable N is more likely to limit diges- tion. However, Rinne et al. (1995) noted that im- provements in silage DM intake with RSM tend- ed to be greater with early-cut than late-cut si- lages (0.75, 1.09, 0.32 and 0.49 kg day 1 for si- lages with D-values of 739, 730, 707 and 639, respectively). Duodenal casein infusion has been shown to increase silage DM intake more than ruminal infusion (0.3 vs. 0.6 kg day 1 ) suggest- ing that post-ruminal metabolism may also in- fluence DM intake (Khalili et al. 1995a). Rumen NDF fill was increased by duodenal infusion suggesting that rumen fill was not limiting in- take during ruminal infusions or that cows were able to increase capacity when the balance be- tween amino acids and energy was improved. Cows given duodenal casein infusion also in- creased totalchewing time despite spending 930 min day 1 chewing on control diets of silage alone (Khalili et al. 1995b). Small increases in silage DM intake with ruminal casein infusion were associated with a faster rate of ruminal NDF di- gestion. Rumen fermentation The rumen fermentation pattern in dairy cows given diets based on restrictively fermented silage is characterised by a small molar propor- tion of propionate and high molar propor- tions of acetate and/or butyrate in total VFA (Table 3). The ratios of acetate to propionate and that of acetate plus butyrate to propionate are very high, which may explain the high Finnish milk fat content (44 gkg' 1 ). Variation in fermen- tation parameters is small supporting the sug- gestion of Chamberlain and Choung (1993) that with grass silage-based diets rumen fermenta- tion pattern is mainly controlled by silage type. It is also noteworthy that despite high feeding levels of dairy cows, the molar proportion of propionate is not higher than that in growing cattle fed similar diets at a lower level of intake (e.g. Jaakkola and Huhtanen 1993, Jaakkola et al. 1993, Rinne et al. 1997). Table 3. Pattern of rumen fermentation of dairy cows given diets based on restrictively fermented grass silage (data derived from Finnish studies). N Mean SD Maximum Minimum Acetate (mmol mol') 34 665 20.2 696 624 Propionate (mmol mol ') 34 165 10.9 187 142 Butyrate (mmol mol 1) 34 133 10.7 158 113 A/P 1 34 4.05 4.89 3.53 0.36 (A+B)/P2 34 4.85 0.38 5.73 4.23 1 Acetate / Propionate 2 (Acetate + Butyrate) / Propionate 227 Vol. 7(1998): 219-250. AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Manipulating the proportions of rumen VFA in animals fed diets based on restrictively fer- mented grass silage is difficult. According to review of Huhtanen (1987a), increasing the pro- portion ofbarley-based concentrate from 0 to 750 g (kg DM) 1 did not affect the proportion of pro- pionate in rumen VFA, but acetate decreased and butyrate increased with supplementation level. Even at very high levels of supplementation [750 g (kg DM)'] molar proportions of propionate did not increase (Thomas et al. 1980, Jaakkola and Huhtanen 1993). Elevated butyrate with in- creased concentrate may be related to higher ru- men protozoal numbers (Chamberlain et al. 1983. Jaakkola and Huhtanen 1993). Replacing barley with unmolassed sugarbeet pulp (Huhtanen 1988, Murphy et al. 1993) or barley fibre (Huhtanen 1992) and sometimes delaying the harvesting of grass for silage (Rinne et al. 1996, 1997) have increased propionate mainly at the expense of butyrate. These re- sponses are rather unexpected since propionate tended to increase with dietary NDF content. In addition, theseresponses are, at least partly, as- sociated with increases in protozoal number with diets containing less NDF. Replacing barley with oats (Vanhatalo et al. 1995a) or including RSM or SBM in the diet (Aronen and Vanhatalo 1992, Tuori et al. 1993) had no effects on rumen fer- mentation pattern, whereas large inclusions of rapeseed oil markedly enhanced ruminal propi- onate (Tesfa 1993), probably as a result of par- tial rumen defaunation. Rumen fermentation pattern is greatly influ- enced by the extent of silage fermentation. A review of data from studies conducted on cattle showed a close positive relationship between the silage lactic acid concentration and the molar proportion of propionate in rumen VFA and a negative relationship between silage lactate and the lipogenic to glucogenic ratio in rumen VFA (van Vuuren et al. 1995). Similar relationships were found in sheep (Martin, P.A. et al. 1994). In their study, differences between silages in ru- men fermentation pattern were maintained irre- spective concentrate composition. The effects of lactate on ruminal propionate have been very consistent but water soluble carbohydrates (WSC) in restrictively fermented silages have sometimes increased acetate (Vanhatalo et al. 1992, Huhtanen et al. 1997a) and sometimes butyrate (Jaakkola et al. 1991, 1993). The rea- sons for different fermentation pattern of WSC are not known but it may be related to rumen methanogenic capacity, since contrary to bu- tyrate production methanogenesis is a prerequi- site of acetate (Demeyer and Van Nevel 1975). The effects of silage lactate and WSC on rumen fermentation patterns have been consistent with those observed when supplements of lactate (Jaakkola and Huhtanen 1992) or sucrose (Syr- jälä 1972, Khalili and Huhtanen 1991) were giv- en to animals fed silage-based diets. Protein supply Protein requirements of ruminant animals are met from two sources, microbial protein synthe- sised in the rumen and feed protein escaping ru- men degradation. With grass silage and cereal grain-based diets microbial protein is the major source of amino acids absorbed from the small intestine, since CP of silage, barley and oat is rapidly and extensively degraded in the rumen. Despite larger contribution of microbial protein to the total supply of amino acids than that of undegraded feed protein, the main focus of pro- tein evaluation has been on estimating ruminal protein degradability and intestinal digestibility ofundegraded feed protein. This is probably due to nylon bag and mobile bag methods being handy tools to estimate these parameters. Stud- ies of Varvikko (1986) and Vanhatalo(1995) have shown several problems with these methodolo- gies. Less attention is paid to determining mi- crobial protein production and factors influenc- ing the efficiency of microbial protein synthesis (MPS), probably because the methods available for determining MPS are much more complicat- ed, labour intensive and expensive. However, unless we can predict differences in the efficien- cy of MPS, limited real progress in protein ra- tioning systems can be expected. 228 Seminar in honour ofthe 100th anniversary ofMTT AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND It has often been claimed that the efficiency of MPS is lower in animals given silage diets than those fed fresh or dried forage, although there is little direct evidence to support this. Three reasons have been suggested for the low- er efficiency of MPS with silage diets: a lower energy supply for rumen microbes from silage fermentation products than from WSC; an asyn- chronous release of energy and N from silage; and the nature of silage nitrogenous constituents (Thomas and Thomas 1985). Our studies exam- ining the effects of silage additives have con- firmed that the reduced supply of energy from silage fermentation products is the main reason for low efficiencies of MPS. Jaakkola et al. (1991) reported a lower efficiency of MPS for diets based on untreated or enzyme-treated si- lage than that based on formic acid treated si- lage. Gradual increase in FA application from 0 to 6 litres per tonne reduced the extent of in silo fermentation and proteolysis, which clearly in- creased microbial protein production from 49.0 to 65.4 g N day 1 (Jaakkola et al. 1993). In a re- cent study by Huhtanen et al. (1997a), microbi- al protein production was 10% greater in cows given FA-treated silage than in those given in- oculated silage. Intraruminal infusion ofincreas- ing amounts of lactic acid did not affect MPS (Jaakkola and Huhtanen 1992) indicating that lactic acid is of little or no value as an energy source for rumen microbes, which is in accord- ance with the theoretical considerations of Chamberlain (1987). Jaakkola and Huhtanen (1992) compared the effects of barn-dried hay and FA-treated silage each fed with three levels of barley-based sup- plement on ruminal N metabolism. Efficiency of MPS 117.3 vs. 14.8 g N (kg DOM) 1] was signif- icantly higher with silage than hay diets. Duo- denal feed protein flow tended to be greater with hay diets, which partially compensated for low- er MPS. In three feeding experiments cows giv- en silage-based diets produced on average 4.8% more milk protein than those given barn-dried hay made from the same grass sward (Heikkilä 1993). Both studies demonstrate that the protein value of restrictively fermented silage is not in- ferior to barn-dried hay. Suggestions of lower protein value of ensiled forages apply only to extensively and/or badly fermented silages. Silage N is extensively degraded in the silo to peptides, amino acids and ammonia. Soluble N in silage is rapidly degraded in the rumen, whereas the amount of energy available is limit- ed because of WSC fermentation. Therefore it was logical to conclude that asynchronous sup- plies of energy and N can limit the efficiency of MPS with silage diets. Syrjälä (1972) found that sucrose supplementation was more efficient than starch or cellulose in decreasing rumen ammo- nia concentration in sheep and attributed this to a faster release of energy from sucrose. Cham- berlain et al. (1985) suggested that increases in rumen protozoal population and consequently, increased intraruminal recycling of N explains the less efficient utilisation of starchy supple- ments for ruminal MPS. Khalili and Huhtanen (1991) showed that sucrose supplementation was effective in decreasing rumen ammonia N and increasing MPS, but continuous infusion of su- crose stimulated MPS more than twice-daily feeding, despite the latter providing a more syn- chronous supply of energy and N. Feeding su- crose twice daily rapidly reduced rumen pH and increased lactic acid concentration. At low pH ‘energy spilling’ increases because rumen ATP is used to maintain intracellular pH at a higher level than in rumen fluid (Strobel and Russel 1986). In addition, the acrylate pathway provides much less energy for microbes than other path- ways. Further, depression in cell wall digestion caused by a low mean pH decreases microbe energy supply. Chamberlain and Choung (1995) discussed the importance of synchronisation of energy and N release and concluded that there is no convincing evidence of a need for close syn- chronisation of energy and N release in the ru- men to ensure efficient MPS. The best approach might be to attempt to achieve an even pattern of rumen energy supply (Henning et al. 1993). In the data reviewed by Chamberlain and Choung (1995) the increase in MPS of 22 g kg ' for carbohydrate supplements indicated that sug- ars had no additional value compared with mi- 229 Vol. 7(1998): 219-250. AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND crobial protein production from the basal diet. However, the increase in the amount offermenta- ble substrate is overestimated owing to adverse effects of sugar supplements on ruminal diges- tion of the basal diet. The effects of sugar sup- plementation in the form of molasses have been disappointing both in lactating dairy cows (Huh- tanen 1987b) and growing cattle (Huhtanen and Hissa 1996). From the previous discussion it can be concluded that asynchronous supply of ener- gy and N from silage does not limit the efficien- cy of MPS. Rumen ammonia concentrations of animals fed twice daily at restricted levels can be subop- timal for optimal microbial growth for extended periods of time. Therefore using protein supple- ments may improve the efficiency of MPS by providing a more constant supply of nitrogen for rumen microbes. However, the effects of protein supplementation on ruminal N metabolism are not conclusive. Substantial increases in rumen MPS withprotein supplementation (Rooke et al. 1987, Rooke and Armstrong 1989) support the suggestion that when grass silage is supplement- ed with easily degradable carbohydrates, micro- bial growth is stimulated by additional amino acids and peptides. In contrast, RSM supplemen- tation did not increase MPS in growing cattle (Aronen and Vanhatalo 1992) or lactating dairy cows (Ahvenjärvi et al. 1997). Bacteria digest- ing easily degradable carbohydrates in particu- lar are considered to benefit from N in the form of amino acids and peptides (Russel et al. 1992). Increased MPS in response to ruminal casein infusion in cows given a diet based on red clo- ver-grass silage as a sole feed (Khalili et al. 1995a) suggests that under some circumstances bacteria using forage carbohydrates can also benefit from supplementary high quality protein. Variable responses of protein supplements on ruminal MPS may be related to the form of sol- uble N in silage. For example, Jacobs and McAl- lan (1992) found a greater increase in MPS with supplementary RSM with enzyme- than FA- treated silage. The proportion ofpeptides is much higher in FA-treated than untreated or inoculat- ed silage (Nsereko 1996). High marginal MPS (38-58 g kg’ 1 fermentable OM) responses to re- stricting in silo fermentation (Jaakkola et al. 1993) suggest that improvements of MPS as- sociated with restriction of fermentation proba- bly involve changes in N fractions as well as in- creases in the supply of sugars. These values are considerably greater than those reported for sup- plementary carbohydrates (Chamberlain and Choung 1995). However, when proteolysis was not increased in extensively fermented silage, the decrease in microbial N output could be entirely explained by decreases in fermentable OM (Huh- tanen et al. 1997a). It seems that the efficiency of MPS is high- est when moderate amounts of concentrates are fed (Jaakkola and Huhtanen 1993). Increasing the proportion of concentrate in the diet from 250 to 500 g kg’ 1 enhanced MPS, whereas a fur- ther increase to 750 g kg 1 decreased it slightly. When moderate amounts of concentrates are fed, different sources of carbohydrates provide a more constant supply of energy maintaining ru- men pH at optimal levels and avoiding wide fluc- tuations.The effects of the composition of ener- gy supplements on MPS have been small. There was no difference between barley and unmolas- sed sugarbeet pulp (SBP) in their effects on MPS and neitherpartial replacement of barley or SBP with sugarbeet molasses did not influence MPS (Huhtanen 1988). Barley and oats had a similar effect on MPS when fed either with grass or red clover silage (Vanhatalo et al. 1995b). Replace- ment of barley with barley fibre decreased ru- men protozoal number and increased the efficien- cy of MPS but not the duodenal flow of micro- bial protein (Huhtanen 1992). Similarly, supple- mentation of grass silage and barley diet with rapeseed oil decreased rumen protozoa and in- creased the efficiency of MPS but microbial N flow to duodenum was not increased, due to re- duced ruminal OM digestibility (Tesfa 1993). The results of these two studies imply that im- proved efficiency of MPS cannot necessarily be interpreted as increasing the supply of amino acids when it is related to reduced OM diges- tion in the rumen. Replacement ofbarley with fibrous by-prod- 230 Seminar in honour of the IOOth anniversary ofMTT AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND ucts such as unmolassed sugar beet pulp (Huh- tanen 1988, Murphy et al. 1993) and barley fi- bre (Huhtanen 1992) increased the flow of feed protein escaping ruminal degradation. Howev- er, the quantity of amino acids absorbed from the small intestine was markedly changed due to higher faecal N output with fibrous supple- ments. RSM supplementation had no influence on microbial N flow in dairy cows, but the amount of feed protein escaping ruminal degra- dation increased significantly (Ahvenjärvi et al. 1997). Heat-moisture treated RSM did not in- crease either feed or totalN flow compared with untreated RSM despite a large difference in ru- minal N degradability determined by in situ in- cubations. Response to nutrients Energy supply Rationing system used by the Finnish farmers advisory service proceeds from a desired milk production. This is used to calculate the feed input required to meet corresponding require- ments. Generally, fixed and often restricted amounts of silage are fed while energy and pro- tein supplements allocated according to milk yield. To optimise the profitability of milk pro- duction it is important to know the relationship between marginal changes in input and induced changes in animal performance. Increasing the amount of concentrate in the diet is the most common strategy to increase energy intake and energy density of the diet. Marginal responses to increased concentrate sup- ply and incremental ME differconsiderably from theoretical values calculated from changes in input and average efficiencies of energy utilisa- tion. In a large data set including 121 compari- sons milk yield increased by 0.77 kg per 1 kg DM extra concentrate (Ryhänen et al. 1996). However, the responses were highly variable (SD = 0.54) but markedly consistent for continuous and change-over experiments (0.84 vs. 0.77). Marginal responses to additional concentrate decreased with the level of supplementation be- ing 0.94, 0.80 and 0.60 when daily concentrate DM allowance was below 5.0, from 5.0 to 7.3 and above 7.3 kg, respectively. However, mar- ginal responses of 0.10 and 0.09 kg of milk and energy corrected milk (ECM) per MJ additional ME are considerably lower than 0.194 kg ECM predicted from theoretical approaches (Tuori et al. 1996). Marginal responses to increased amount of concentrate were evaluated from five recent stud- ies conducted at MTT (Heikkilä 1994,Rinne et al. 1995, Saarisalo et al. 1997, Heikkilä et al. 1998b, Shingfield et al. unpublished). Data in- cluded 16comparisons. Other factors, precision- chopped vs round- baled silages (Heikkilä 1994), silage digestibility (Rinne et al. 1995), level of RSM supplementation (Saarisalo et al. 1997), forage preservation method and silage fermen- tation (Shingfield et al. unpublished) and spring- and autumn-harvested silage (Heikkilä et al. 1998b), were also assessed. In all studies, total diet OM digestibility was determinedusing acid insoluble ash as an internal marker. ME intake was estimated using feed table values and as the product of 16 (MJ kg ') x ( DOM (kg). Data were further divided into low and high concentrate levels the latter including studies in which con- centrate supplementation was 12 or 15 kg day 1 (Heikkilä 1994, Heikkilä et al. 1998b). The other studies had concentrate levels of 3 to 6 and 7 to 10 kg day 1 . The effects of concentrate supplementation on feed intake, milk yield and milk composition are shown in Table 4. The mean substitutionrate was 0.53 (SD 0.12) and it was higher (0.61 vs. 0.51) at higher concentrate levels. Substitution rate in this data set was higher than the mean value of 0.39 based on the data of Ryhänen et al. (1996), which may also explain smaller produc- tion responses [0.56 (SD 0.19) vs. 0.77 kg milk per 1 kg extra concentrate DM]. Milk and ECM yield responses were lower at high (0.45 and 0.43) than low levels of concentrate (0.60 and 0.68), In earlier studies (Ettala et al. 1978) the 231 Vol. 7 (1998): 219-250. AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Table 4. Effects of the level of concentratesupplementation on milk production. Data derived from studies of Heikkilä (1994), Rinne et al. (1995), Saarisalo et al. (1997), Shingfield et ai. (unpublished). Heikkilä et ai. 1998b). High concentrate Low High Low concentrate Low High All data Low High N 4 4 12 12 16 16 Intake (kg DM day ') Concentrate 6.7211.57 5.037.63 5.458.61 Silage 13.5510.59 11.9010.59 12.3110.59 Total 20.2722.16 16.9318.22 17.7619.20 ME'(MJday') 225.1254.2 191.8209.5 200.1220.6 ME 2 (MJday') 220.9238.4 182.2196.9 191.9207.3 Milk yield (kg day 1) 27.8330.03 21.6923.24 23.22 24.94 ECM yield (kg day 1) 29.03 31.13 24.1725.92 25.3827.22 Milk composition (g kg 1 ) Fat 44.042.8 49.949.4 48.447.8 Protein 31.832.6 34.535.2 33.834.5 Lactose 49.2 49.4 48.648.9 48.849.0 Yield (g day 1) Fat 1218 1281 1057 1128 1097 1166 Protein 881 974 732 802 769 845 Lactose 1369 1483 1053 1133 1132 1221 1 ME calculated from feed table values or digestibility measurements in sheep 2 ME calculated as 16 x DOM intake DM = dry matter ME = metabolisable energy ECM = energy corrected milk mean response to additional barley DM was 0.76 kg fat corrected milk (FCM) in cows producing 16 kg day 1 and mean barley DM intake of 2.2 kg day 1 . It is generally assumed that high silage D- values and good fermentation quality are likely to increase substitution rate and reduce produc- tion responses to extra concentrate. However, marginal responses of 0.56, 0.37 and 0.62 kg with untreated, inoculatedand FA-treated silage (Shingfield et al. unpublished) and 0.41, 0.46, 0.94 and 0.43 kg with silages of reducing D-val- ue (Rinne et al. 1995) do not substantially sup- port the possibility to compensate for the effects of reduced fermentation quality or digestibility by feeding more concentrates. In our trials the best responses (0.86 kg ECM) to extra concen- trate were obtained in late lactation of heifers producing only 14kg milk day 1 (Saarisalo et al. 1997). This could be related to a lower diet di- gestibility and lower allocation of concentrate on the control diet (3 kg day 1 ), but it also sug- gests that late-lactation cows can respond to in- creased supply of nutrients. The effects of in- creased concentrate feeding on milk composi- tion were relatively small on milk fat content [- 0.18 g (kg DM) 1] but protein content in- creased [0.24 g (kg DM)' 1] the effect being great- er at a low supplementation level [0.26 vs. 0.16 g (kg DM)' I ]. Negative associative effect on digestibility is another factor helping to explain the small re- sponses to additional concentrate. An ECM yield response of 0.093 kg per MJ additional ME is only 48% of that expected by theoretical ap- proaches. In the present data, marginal responses were lower at high than low levels of concen- trate allowance (0.100 vs. 0.073 kg per MJ addi- tional ME). When ME intake was estimated from 232 Seminar in honour of the 100th anniversary ofMTT AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Table 5. Partitioning of ME from additional concentrate given at high and low levels of supplementation. [ME contents of concentrates and silage were assumed to be 12.5 and 10.5 MJ (kg DM)' 1 ]. Change High concentrate MJ day 1 (%) Low concentrate MJ day 1 (%)High Low Concentrate (kg DM) (12.5 MJ kg ') LOO 1.00 Silage DM intake (kg) 12.50 100.0 12.50 100.0 (10.5 MJ kg ') -0.61 -0.50 Negative associative 6.38 51.1 5.31 42.5 effects on digestion Milk 2.35 18.8 1.15 9.2 (5.2 MJ kg ' ECM) 0.43 0.68 LW change 2.25 18.0 3.50 28.0 (1.0 MJ kg 1 cone. DM) Unaccounted 1 LOO 8.0 0.52 4.2 1.00 8.0 1.54 12.3 1Errors in the estimation of LW change,reduced efficiency ME = metabolisable energy DM = dry matter ECM = energy corrected milk LW = live weight DOM intake, the increases in ME intake in re- sponse to additional concentrate were markedly smaller than when estimates were based on feed table values. This difference can be attributed to a reduced efficiency of digestion (negative as- sociative effects). As expected, deviations in ME intake estimated from DOM intake from that based on feed table values or sheep digestibility measurements were greater at high than low con- centrate levels (11.4 vs. 3.0 MJ day 1). True in- creases in ME intake were only 82.5% and 60.0% of calculated increase for low and high concen- trate levels, respectively. Taking into account the negative associative effects on digestion, mar- ginal ECM yield responses were increased to 0.125 kg per MJ additional ME at both levels of concentrate, i.e. 64% of expected response. These data suggest that a better response to ex- tra concentrate at lower level of supplementa- tion is associated with smaller decreases in si- lage intake and negative associative effects. Partitioning of available energy between body tissues and mammary gland changes in favour of body tissues with increased concentrate allo- cation. Changes in body energy accounted for 1.0 MJ per kg additional concentrate DM when estimated from LW change [34 MJ ME (kg LW) 1] in continuous trials (Heikkilä 1994, Heikkilä et al. 1998b). Table 5 shows the partitioning of ME from additional concentrate at two levels of concentrate supplementation. Reduced silage DM accounted for the largest proportion of ad- ditional ME derived from the concentrate at both levels. The contributionof additional milk yield and negative effects on digestion were similar at high concentrate levels, whereas at low concen- trate inputs the contribution from milk was much greater. The proportion of additional ME ac- counted for by reduced silage DM intake, in- creased milk yield and negative associative ef- fects in digestion were 79% and 88% at low and high concentrate levels, respectively. The re- maining variation may be accounted for by LW change and reduced efficiency of energy utilisa- tion, the former being a more likely explanation. It may be assumed that in practical conditions over several lactations the response to addition- al concentrate is greater than in feeding experi- ments, because of residual effects during the same lactation or subsequent lactations. How- ever, field data from controlled herds in Finland indicated that the marginal response to additional 233 Vol. 7 (1998): 219-250. AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Table 6. Selected treatment combinations from studies of Rinne et al. (1995) and Shingfield et al. (unpub- lished) to demonstrate the effects of forage quality on milk production. Reference Rinne et al. 1995 1 Shingfield et ai. unpubl 2 Forage High D Low D FA-treated Untreated Supplement 7 kg day' 10kg ' 7 kg day 1 10kg day 1 Intake (kg DM day ') Concentrate 6.16 8.90 6.20 8.86 Silage 12.28 9.76 13.70 11.19 Total 18.43 18.66 19.90 20.05 Milk yield (kg day 1) 25.1 25.1 26.7 26.9 ECM yield (kg day 1) 27.9 27.6 29.6 28.9 Milk composition (g kg ') Fat 49.1 48,3 49.0 45.9 Protein 33.0 33.2 34.2 33.6 Lactose 48.7 48.2 48.3 48.4 Yield (g day') Fat 1226 1207 1290 1212 Protein 821 826 908 898 Lactose 1221 1209 1293 1294 1 D-values of silages 707 (high D) and 639 (low D), CP content of concentrates 124(high D)and 155(low D) 2 Composition of FA-treated and untreated silages (g kg ' DM): water soluble carbohydrates 62 and 22, total acids 51 and 118 and ammonia N(gkgl N) 38 and 109,respectively. DM = dry matter ECM = energy corrected milk FA =formic acid concentrate was 0.11 kg milk per Ml ME (Kaustell et al. 1998), which is similar to values reported in feeding experiments. Marginal responses to additional ME derived from increased digestibility of silage have been much higher than those obtained from addition- al concentrate. In the study of Rinne et al. (1995), marginal increases in ECM yield were 0.139 or 0.151 between silages of D-values of 739 and 639 g DOM (kg DM)' 1 , respectively. The former estimate is based on ME calculated from silage digestibility coefficients determined in sheep and from feed table values for concentrates. The lat- ter is based on ME derived from DOM intake. In a similar study, Heikkiläet al. (1993) observed response of 0.173 kg per MJ additional ME (sheep digestibility and feed tables). True in- creases in ME intake are close to those expected when silage D-value was improved, which can account for the improved utilisation of additional ME from silage. The importance of forage qual- ity on the performance of dairy cows is demon- strated in Table 6. Performance of cows fed a high D-value (707) silage with 7 kg day 1 grain- based concentrate [124 gCP (kg DM) 1] was sim- ilar to those fed a low D-value (639) silage with 10 kg day 1 of RSM containing concentrate (155 g CP). Likewise, there were no differences in the performance of cows given FA-treated silage with 7 kg day 1 and untreated silage with 10 kg day 1 of concentrate. In these studies, mean re- sponses to increased concentrate inclusion were 0.56 and 0.52 kg ECM kg 1 concentrate DM, re- spectively. Rinne et al. (1995) noted that a pro- duction response of 10 g kg' 1 rise in silage D- value corresponded to 1.0kg concentrate (fresh weight) and that the differences in response to silage fermentation quality between FA-treated and untreated silage were equivalent to 3.0 kg (fresh weight) of concentrate (Shingfield et al., unpublished). Predicting milk output responses solely from 234 Seminar in honour of the 100th anniversary ofMTT AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND increases in ME input is not easy. However, pre- diction accuracy can be improved if variations in forage quality, substitution rate, negative as- sociative effects and nutrient partitioning are tak- en into account. When both the supply of ME and amino acids are manipulated, responses to ME can be different depending on the source of additional ME. To illustrate interactionsbetween ME and amino acids absorbed from the small intestine (AAT), responses in ECM and protein yield to increments in nutrient supply are shown in Figure 2. Results are based on three studies, in which the effects of ME and AAT intake were studied in 2 x 2 factorial designs (Rinne et al. 1995, Saarisalo et ai. 1997, Heikkilä et ai. 1998b). ME intake was increased by feeding more concentrates and AAT intake by replacing grain with RSM. The four diets were low energy - low protein (LL), low energy - high protein (LH), high energy - low protein (HL) and high energy - high protein (HH) CP intake from con- centrate was similar for LH and HL diets. CP contents of the four diets were 138,161, 137 and 159 g (kg DM) 1 , respectively. Marginal responses to additional ME derived from increased silage intake with high protein diets were almost three- fold (mean 0.312) those obtained by increasing concentrate (mean 0.127). LH diets produced similar amounts ofECM to HL diets despite 9.6 MJ and 59 g day 1 higher intakes of ME and AAT, respectively, for the latter. This suggests that provision of additional energy with a limited supply of amino acids is used with a low effi- ciency or partitioned towards body tissues. In contrast, enhancing the supply of amino acids the nutrients are partitioned more efficiently to milk production as indicated by higher marginal response to additional ME derived from in- creased silage DM intake than the theoretical value of 0.194 kg ECM (MJ ME) 1. Differential responses to additional ME may be accounted for by differences in ME utilisation or partition. Calorimetric studies have not confirmed that ME is used more efficiently (see Choung and Cham- berlain 1993b) which suggests that energy is repartitioned with changes in protein supply. Although the difference in the utilisation of ad- ditional ME between energy and protein supple- mentation was large, an improvement of 0.025- 0.030 in the efficiency of use ME available for milk production would account for this differ- ence. Utilisation ofincremental AAT supply was also lowest between diets LH and HL (0.31). However, the high ratio of ME to AAT of the incremental nutrient supply should improve the efficiency of AAT utilisation by enhancing the supply of glucose and other nutrients (Old- Fig. 2. Responses of energy corrected milk (ECM) yield to incremental increases in ME (above) and protein yield to incremental increases in amino acids absorbed in the small intestine (AAT) (below) when nutrient supply was increased by energy and protein supplementation. (Data from studies of Rinne et al. 1995, Saarisalo et ai. 1997, Heikkilä et ai. 1998b; Diet LL: low energy - low protein; LH: low energy - high protein; HL: high energy - low protein; HH: high energy - high protein). 235 Vol. 7(1998): 219-250. AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Seminar in honour of the ham 1994). In contrast, incremental AAT was utilised more efficiently (0.56 and 0.53) when increases in ME supply were relatively small between diets LL and LH and diets HL and HH, respectively. Protein supply Protein evaluation Protein evaluation in Finland was based on di- gestible CP until 1995 when a modification of 100th anniversary ofMTT the Scandinavian AAT - PBV (protein balance value in the rumen) was adopted. The strategy for being self-sufficient in protein feeding and meeting protein requirements of dairy cows in the 1960 s and 1970 s was to feed silages of high CP supplemented with barley. High CP content of silage was achieved by applying high levels of N fertilisers and early cutting. This approach often resulted in inefficient protein utilisation, since the recovery of additional N obtained by increased N fertilisation is completely lost from the rumen (Vanhatalo and Toivonen 1993) and that obtained by earlier cutting is only partially recovered in duodenum (Rinne et al. 1997). At that time, the strategy based on very high CP content of silage was not really challenged by feeding high quality protein supplements. The details of the Finnish AAT-PBV system are described by Tuori et al. (1998). The main differences from the Nordic system (Madsen et al. 1995) are the calculation of microbial pro- tein production on the basis of digestible carbo- hydrates and rumen degradable protein and us- ing slower passage rate values of feed particles to calculate rumen effective protein degradation. In studies conducted after the AAT-PBV system was adopted in Finland, the relationship between AAT supply calculated using feed table values (Tuori et al. 1996) and milk protein yield has been very close (Fig. 3). Protein responses were linear within experiments and the slopes (about 0.50) were not very different from a mean slope of 0.58. Root mean square error of protein yield predicted from AAT intake was only 27 g. In a similar survey, Webster (1992) noted that slopes between experiments was close to the theoreti- cal utilisationof metabolisableprotein but within experiments, marginal responses were rather small and very different from the mean slope. Linear responses similar to the mean slope, in contrast to data of Webster (1992), clearly sug- gest that utilisation of additional protein is very high and that Finnish requirements may be too low. Around the requirements productive traits tend to follow the law of diminishing returns. The accuracy of protein evaluation system may also be estimated by comparing marginal Fig. 3. Relationships between the supply of amino acids absorbed in the small intestine (AAT)and milk protein yield derived between (above) and within (below) experiments. [Data from studies of Rinne et al. 1995 (□), Huhtanen and Heikkilä (o) 1996,Saarisalo et ai. 1997(■); Heikkilä et ai. 1998 a (O), Rinne et ai. 1998 (�), Shingfield et ai. unpub- lished (•). 236 AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND protein yield responses to incremental AAT. When the amount of concentrate in the diet is increased, calculated supply of AAT rises as a result of higher feed intake and higher AAT con- tent in typical barley-based concentrates than in grass silage. In five studies conducted at MTT, mean protein yield responses were 0.416 g (g AAT) 1 . Smaller responses than mean or within experiment slopes suggest that the protein value of energy supplements is overestimated. This may be due to negative associative effects in di- gestion leading to overestimation of the true in- crease in energy supply for rumen microbes. Lower rumen pH and reduced efficiency ofMPS at higher levels of concentrate supplementation may also be involved in a lower apparent utili- sation of incremental AAT intake with increased concentrate supplementation. When AAT supply was increased by replacing energy supplements with RSM in 13 comparisons, a higher marginal response (0.551) was obtained than thatachieved by feeding more energy supplements. The value is similar to the slope ofregression in the whole data set indicating that our protein system accu- rately predicts the relative protein value of RSM. When AAT supply was increased by earlier cutting of silage or by improving silage fermen- tation quality, marginal responses to incremen- tal AAT were much higher. Incremental AAT supply obtained by earlier harvesting of grass for silage resulted in a marginal response of 0.84 (Heikkilä et al. 1993). In the study of Rinne et al. (1995), the corresponding response was 0.59 between four silages harvested at different stages of growth, which was upgraded to 0.78 when the earliest cut silage was excluded from the data. Very high apparent marginal responses (1.09- 1.19) to incremental AAT supply were obtained in two recent studies (Jaakkola et al. 1996, Shing- field et al., unpublished) when silage fermenta- tion quality was improved. These data suggest that the protein value of high digestibility and well-preserved silages are underestimated in re- lation to concentrates, and that the AAT-PBV system underestimates the incremental increases in AAT supply when forage quality is improved. This could be associated with fixed values assigned to the efficiency of MPS to calculate AAT values. Improving silage fermentation qual- ity has clearly improved the efficiency of MPS as discussed previously and also tend to be im- proved with higher D-value of silages (Rinne et al. 1997,Rinne et ai. unpublished). RSM supplementation RSM is the most common protein supplement used in dairy cow diets in Finland. In recent stud- ies it has produced considerable production re- sponses when used to replace energy supple- ments in the concentrate. The mean response in 13 comparisons was 1.05kg milk and 39.4 g milk protein per one kg RSM as fed basis (Table 7). Treatments to reduce ruminal protein degrada- bility RSM have not produced any further re- sponses in milk yield compared with untreated RSM (Tuori 1992, Huhtanen and Heikkilä 1996, Rinne et al. 1998). RSM also slightly increased milk protein content (0.5 g kg 1 ) but only 15% of the milk protein yield response can be attribut- ed to the change in milk protein content. Mar- ginal increases in milk and protein yield per one gram increase in CP intake were similar to those reported by Chamberlain et al. (1989) with SBM supplementation of grass silage and barley di- ets. Although RSM supplementation increases silage DM intake, additional ME intake does not fully account for the increased milk yield. The mean increase in ECM yield of 0.35 kg per MJ ME in studies of Rinne et al. (1995), Huhtanen and Heikkilä (1996), Saarisalo et al. (1997) and Rinne et al. (unpublished) is much higher than corresponding responses of 0.09 to increased lev- els of concentrate supplementation (Ryhänen et al. 1996) or thatbased on theoretical considera- tions of 0.194 (Tuori et al. 1996). A higher ap- parent efficiency of utilisation of incrementalME with RSM supplementation indicates that either efficiency ofenergy utilisation is improved with a more balanced supply of amino acids and/or nutrients are partitioned towards the mammary gland. An increase in milk yield of 1.45 kg per 100 g increase in AAT intake with RSM supple- mentation is much higher than 0.50 kg ECM per 100 g additional PDI (protéines digestibles dans 237 Vol. 7 (1998): 219-250. AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Table 7. The effects of replacing the energy supplement in the concentrate supplement with rapeseed meal in cows given grass silage-based diets. Data include 12 comparisons derived from Huhtanen et al. 1995, Rinne et al. 1995,Huhtanen and Heikkilä 1996, Jaakkola etal. 1996,Ahvenjärvi et ai. 1997,Saarisalo et ai. 1997, Heikkilä et ai. 1998b). Control RSM Change per Change per g kg RSM kg 1 diet CP content(No RSM) (2.0 kg RSM) Intake Silage (kg DM day 1) 10.92 11.42 0.247 0.025 0.027Total (kg DM day ') 17.67 18.29 0.318 250Crude protein (g day') 2408 AAT (g day 1) 1564 2911 1708 71.6 Diet crude protein (g kg" 136 159 11.4 Milk yield (kg day 1' 23.92 26.02 1.05 0.092 Protein content (g kg ') 32.3 32.8 0.23 0.023 Protein yield (g day ') 763 841 39.4 3.44 Milk urea (mg 100 ml 1) 19.9 28.5 4.0 0.374 OM digestibility (g kg ') 723 725 1.0 0.107 NDF digestibility (gkg 1) 635 643 4.0 0.309 OM = organic matter NDF = neutral detergent fibre RSM =rapeseed meal CP = crude protein I’intestin) (Vérité et al. 1997) implying that addi- tionalprotein from RSM was usedefficiently. High marginal responses to additional AÄT also suggest that the supply of amino acids from the basal diet of silage and energy supplements is suboptimal. Milk protein yield responses to RSM supple- mentation at 0.156 g g' 1 increase were similar to those observed with fish meal supplementation (0.153) in four comparisons ofHuhtanen (1993a) and Heikkilä et al. (1998a). Responses to RSM were not related to CP content of the basal diet (r = 0.11). In a similar comparison of SBM and fish meal, Chamberlain et al. (1989) reported that the relative value of SBM was about 80% of that of fish meal. In a comparison of RSM and SBM, Tuori (1992) found that RSM had at least the same value as SBM as a protein supplement for dairy cows. In our studies with postruminal ca- sein infusions marginal increases in milk pro- tein yield of 0.288 g g* 1 were markedly higher than that of RSM. In eight comparisons, casein infusion (mean 285 g day 1 ) increased milk yield (21.1 vs. 22.9 kg day 1 ), protein content (33.5 vs. 34.6 g kg* 1) and protein yield (703 vs. 788 g day 1 ). The effect on milk protein content was much greater with casein than with RSM (0.5 vs. 1.1 g kg 1), and since milk lactose slightly decreased with casein infusion (49.1 vs. 48.7 g kg 1), its infusion increased the yield ofmilk pro- tein more than lactose (85 vs. 80 g day 1 ). Factors affecting protein response In general, it appears that the magnitude of pro- duction responses to protein supplementation is not related to the level of concentrate supple- mentation, CP content of silage or production level of the control diet. Rinne et al. (1995) and Heikkilä et al. (1998b) observed no differences in milk protein yield response when similar amounts of RSM were used to replace grain at concentrate levels of 7 and 10 or 6 and 12 kg day 1 . In contrast to these studies. Saarisalo et al. (1997) reported a that increases in milk pro- tein yield in first lactation cows given 6 kg day 1 of concentrates were smaller than that in cows given 3 kg day 1 (48 vs. 93 g day 1). A higher 238 Seminar in honour of the 100thanniversary ofMTT AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND 239 increase in silage DM intake at lower level ofcon- centrate is likely to account for larger increases in protein yield. In other studies RSM has pro- duced similar silage intake and protein yield re- sponses at low and high levels of concentrate (Rinne et al. 1995, Heikkilä et ai. 1998b). Traditionally it has been expected that the rates ofresponses to protein supplementation are greater when the CP content in silage is low and MPS is limitedby N supply for rumen microbes. However, inclusion of RSM in the diet has pro- duced similar increases in milk protein yield over a wide range of silage CP contents (Fig. 4). On the basis of these observations it can be argued that calculated PBV can be from -15 to -20 g per kg DM without adversely affecting MPS. Likewise, lack of responses to urea or RSM sup- plementation in omasal or duodenal flow of microbial N in cows fed a basal diet containing 127 gCP (kg DM)' (Ahvenjärvi et al. 1997) also supports the suggestion that the N requirements of rumen bacteria can be satisfied by relatively low dietary CP content. The magnitude of protein yield responses to RSM supplementation is not related to produc- tion level (Fig. 5). Since the amount of RSM varied between studies, responses were scaled to 2 kg RSM day 1 assuming a linear relation- ship between RSM inclusion and protein yield. This assumption is supported by linear increas- es in protein yield from 0 to 3 kg RSM day 1 (Rinne et al., unpublished). Regression of pro- tein yield against RSM and control diets was par- allel with y = x (slope 0.994) but had a positive intercept of 87 g. This implies that relative in- creases are higher in low- than high-producing cows. Marked increases in milk protein yield of low-producing cows have also been reported with postruminal casein infusions (Choung and Chamberlain 1993b) and fish meal supplemen- tation (Chamberlain et al. 1992). There are sev- eral reasons which explain production respons- es to increased supply of amino acids in low- yielding cows. Due to slower passage rates of digesta the efficiency of MPS is decreased and ruminal degradability of feed protein increased with lower levels of intake in less productive cows. The efficiency of MPS was on average 17.4 g N (kg DOM)' 1 for 39 diets in growing cattle fed at the level of 70-80 g DM (kg LW) 075 in stud- ies conducted at the Universtity of Helsinki us- ing a marker technique to estimate duodenal di- gesta flow. The corresponding value estimated from urinary purine derivative excretion in cows eating 17-18 kg DM day 1 was 24.0 g N (kg DOM) 1 for 18 diets in studies carried out at Fig. 4. Relationship between si- lage crude protein content and pro- tein supplementation responses. [Data from studies Heikkilä et al. 1993 (■), Rinne et al. 1995 (�), Heikkilä et ai. 1998 b (□), Jaak- kola et ai. unpublished (+); RSM was fed at 0.8, 1.2, 2.0 and 2.0 kg day-1 , respectively]. Vol. 7 (1998): 219-250. MTT. These results emphasise the importance of feeding level on the efficiency of MPS, al- though some differences may be associated with methodological problems encountered in MPS measurements. Higher efficiencies of MPS and reduced ruminal degradability of feed protein imply that the ratio of amino acids and ME at tissue level increases with level of feeding and therefore requirements of protein supplementa- tion between low and high producers are small- er than that calculated based on traditional ra- tion formulation schemes. Similar milk and pro- tein yields in cows given the same amount of protein in concentrate as high-low, medium-me- dium and low-high strategies in early and mid- lactation (Aston et al. 1994) also suggest that there is no advantage of feeding more protein in early than mid-lactation. Large positive responses in low-producing cows to supplementary protein may be associated with increased partitioning of nutrients for milk production. Similar ECM yield in cows given 3 kg day 1 ofhigh protein concentrate and in those given 6 kg day 1 of a low protein grain supple- ment despite 13 MJ day 1 higher ME intake with the latter (Saarisalo et al. 1997) suggest that the risks of excessive fattening during late lactation may be reduced with protein supplementation. High responses to postruminal casein infusion in cows receiving excessive amounts of energy and protein in relation to requirements (Choung and Chamberlain 1993b) also provides evidence partitioning effects of increased amino acid sup- ply. Increases in milk protein yield in low-pro- ducing late-lactation cows or in cows of posi- tive AAT balance may also be associated with imbalances in amino acids absorbed from the small intestine. To evaluate this hypothesis, cal- culations of amino acid balance were conduct- ed. Two diets consisting of grass silage and bar- ley (SB; 600:400 g kg ') on DM basis) or grass silage, barley and rapeseed meal (SBR; 600:320:80 on DM basis) were fed to meet ME requirements. Amino acid supply was calculated according to the AAT-PBV system (Tuori et al. 1996) with exception that MPS was calculated using a value of 24 g N (kg DOM) 1 . It was assumed that 80% of microbial N flow was bac- teria and 20% protozoa. The supply of amino ac- ids from microbial N was estimated using ami- no acid composition of bacteria derived from Storm and orskov (1983) and protozoa from Martin, C. et al. (1994). Undegraded feed pro- Fig. 5. Relationships between milk protein yield and responses to rapeseed meal (RSM) supplemen- tation. 240 Seminar in honour of the 100th anniversary ofMTT AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND tein amino acids were calculated using rumen degradability values and amino acid composi- tion documented in Finnish feed tables (Tuori et al. 1996). Undegraded feed protein was assumed to have the same amino acid composition as the original feed. A value of 0.35 g N (kg LW) 075 was used for maintenance requirement (AFRC 1992) and it was assumed that the amino acid profile for maintenance is similar to that in bovine tissue. Calculations are based on the assumption that mixtures of ideally balanced amino acids are utilised with an efficiency of 0.90. Balances of the supply and requirements of total AAT and some individual amino acids are shown in Fig. 6. The SBR diet satisfied the needs of AAT for maintenance and milk production, whereas SB diet supplied sufficient AAT for cows producing up to 15 kg day 1 . Both diets met lysine requirements at all production levels. Methionine became limiting when milk yield exceeded 20 and 30 kg day 1 for SB and SBR di- ets, respectively. According to the present cal- culations methionine was not, however, the first limiting amino acid, since histidine became lim- iting for the two diets at 15 and 25 kg milk pro- duction, respectively. These calculations are con- sistent with our amino acid infusion studies. Post-ruminal infusions of increasing amounts of methionine or lysine did not lead to changes in milk and protein yields (Varvikko et al. 1997), whereas histidine significantly enhanced milk protein yield (Vanhatalo et al. 1997, Huhtanen et ai. 1997b). A limited supply of histidine may explain production responses in studies with low- producing cows (Saarisalo et al. 1997) when AAT requirements were met. Owing to a low feeding level, deficiency ofhistidine may be accentuated since the efficiency of MPS is likely to be lower than that used in the model. Positive responses at higher level of RSM than used in the present calculations (Rinne et al., unpublished) may also be associated with a limited supply of histidine despite satisfying AAT requirements. Calcula- tions suggest that in high-producing cows the supply of leucine and/or phenylalanine + tyro- sine may also become limiting. Glucose supply Although restricting grass in silo fermentation improves silage protein value, limited supply of glucose may limit the utilisation of amino acids. Rumen fermentation pattern rich in acetate and butyrate and low in propionate in animals given diets based on restrictively fermented silages does not provide sufficient precursors for glu- coneogenesis. Lower plasma glucose concentra- tion in cows given restrictively fermented silage than in those given high lactate silages (Mietti- nen and Huhtanen 1997, Heikkilä et al. 1998b, Shingfield et al. unpublished) may indicate that the supply of glucose from these diets is limit- ed. To illustrate the glucogenic potential of di- ets based on restrictively fermented silage, the supply from different precursors was calculated based on stoichiometric principles. SBR diet described previously was used to meet ME re- quirements at differentproduction levels. Based on the assumptions that the proportion of OM digested apparently in the rumen was 0.70 and mean VFA proportions were acetate 665, pro- pionate 165 and butyrate 133 mmol mol' 1 (Table 3) estimates of VFA production were calculated. These estimates also assumed that VFA were produced in the same proportions as present in the rumen or that the absorption rates of propi- onate and butyrate are 20% higher than that of acetate. In this case, molar proportions esti- mated by a simulation model were 626, 187 and 151 mmol mol' 1 . Complete conversion of propi- onate to glucose on molar basis was also as- sumed.The extent ofamino acid catabolism was estimated as amino acids absorbed minus amino acids secreted as milk protein. A maximum con- version rate of 100 g amino acids to yield 55 g glucose was used. A third net source of glucose, derived from starch digestion in the small intes- tine, was estimated assuming that 10% of starch intake escaped rumen fermentationand that 50% of absorbed starch was recovered as glucose in the liver. A maintenance requirement of glucose of2 g (kg LW 075 (Girdler et al. 1984) and a pro- duction requirement of 70 g kg' 1 milk (Danfaer 1994) were used. 241 Vol. 7(1998): 219-250. AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND 3 Fig. 6. Estimated requirements, supply and balance of amino acids absorbed in the small intestine (AAT), and some amino acids from two diets. [Requirement: solid line; supply from silage-barley (SB; 600-400 on DM basis) diet: dashed line with �; supply from silage-barley-RSM (SBR; 600-320-80) diet: dashed line with O; Balance with SB diet open bars; balance with SBR diet dashed bars]. 242 Seminar in honour of the I OOth anniversary ofMTT AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND 243 Theoretical calculations of glucose supply and requirement at different production levels of cows fed to meet ME requirements are shown in Fig. 7. If the proportions of VFA present in the rumen are equal to production, the supply ofglu- cose appears to be suboptimal when milk yield exceeds 20 or 25 kg day 1 with the both methods of computation. Glucose supply from branched- chain VFA and propionate production in the hind-gut were not taken into account, but quan- titatively these are of minor importance. How- ever, a high coefficient ofruminal OM digestion (0.70) and maximum conversion rates for amino acids and propionate were used. The greatest uncertainty is how reliably ruminal VFA ratios predict true proportions of VFA production. If glucose is limiting, more amino acids are used for gluconeogenesis reducing the efficiency of amino acid utilisation for milk protein synthe- sis. Although incremental amounts of amino ac- ids may not represent a large proportion of glu- coneogenesis, its influence on the amount of amino acids available for protein synthesis can be considerable. When the supply of amino ac- ids increases without a change in other energy yielding nutrients, additional amino acids need to be catabolised to maintain a constant lactose to protein ratio in milk (Oldham 1994). Oldham suggested that under these circumstances the maximum conversion of metabolisable protein to milk protein is 0.25. Interestingly, mean con- version rates of incremental protein to milk pro- tein in our casein infusion studies, 0.286, are very close to this value. Although a proportion of this response may be mediated through increased N retention, a low efficiency of utilisation of in- cremental protein may be due to catabolism of amino acids to produce glucose necessary for lactose synthesis. Two examples can be given of interactions between amino acid and glucose metabolism. The effects of RSM and wet distillers’ solubles (WDS) on milk protein yield were additive in cows given a grain-based concentrate. RSM and WDS increased protein yield by 55 and 52 g day' when given alone and by 99 g day 1 when com- bined (Huhtanen et al. 1995).With a supplement containing fibrous by-products the correspond- ing increases were 73, 19and 72 g day 1, respec- tively. WDS probably increased protein yield with a starchy supplement through increased glu- coneogenesis from WDS lactate, which is main- ly fermented to propionate in the rumen. In a study with cannulated animals WDS did not in- crease duodenal N flow (Huhtanen 1992) and therefore would not increase amino acid supply. In a postruminal infusion study, both glucose and histidine alone increased milk protein yield (15 and 29 g day 1) but the increase was 57 g day 1 when infused together (Huhtanen et al. 1997b). With histidine alone, glucose production was Fig. 7. Estimated requirements and supply of glucose from different precursors. Rates ofvolatile fatty acid (VFA) pro- duction were estimated assuming that production was sim- ilar proportions in the rumen (above) or that absorption of propionate and butyrate were 20% greater than acetate. Vol. 7 (1998): 219-250. Table 8. Effects of glucose supplementation given either as a ruminal infusion of propionate or a post- ruminal infusion of glucose. Data derived from Miettinen and Huhtanen 1996(P + PB vs. BP +B), Huh- tanen et al. 1997a, 1998, Vanhatalo et al. unpublished. Milk (kg day 1) Milk composition (g kg ') Component yield (g day ') Fat Protein Lactose Fat Protein Lactose Diet Low glucose 23.243.9 32.146.5 1001 739 1074 High glucose 24.141.4 32.347.0 981 771 1129 Difference +0.9 -2.5 +0.2 +0.6 -20 32 55 probably limiting lactose synthesis leading to amino acid catabolism, whereas responses to glucose alone were possibly limited by the first limiting amino acid. The effects of increasing glucose supply on milk protein yield by either manipulating the profile of VFA infused into the rumen or by post- ruminal glucose infusion have been variable, but in most cases are positive. Data from studies in- vestigating the effects of glucose supply with grass silage-based diets is shown in Table 8. Glu- cose supply was manipulated either by VFA ru- minal infusions (propionate vs. butyrate) or by abomasal glucose infusion. Increasing the pro- portion of propionate at the expense of butyrate lead to better responses than glucose infusion. This may be related to higher milk production and therefore glucose requirements and to the fact that supplementary protein feeding in VFA infusion studies provided more amino acids for increased milk protein secretion. In addition, butyrate may have reduced the efficiency of the utilisation of propionate for gluconeogenesis thereby reducing glucose supply further. In prac- tical feeding it is very difficult to increase pro- pionate production in cows given diets based on restrictively fermented silage. For example, pro- duction responses with supplements of propyl- ene glycol (Jaakkola et al. 1996, Shingfield et al. unpublished) or glycerol (Khalili et al. 1997) were not promising. Increments in the yield of lactose have been markedly greater than that of protein when glucose supply has been increased. The ratio of the increments in protein and lac- tose yield (PL ratio) was only 0.48, whereas the corresponding ratios with RSM or casein sup- plementation were considerably higher at 0.99 and 1.15, respectively. Low PL ratio with glu- cose supplementation would suggest that one or more amino acids limited milk protein secretion under these circumstances. However, a low PL ratio in incremental yields with protein supple- mentation may indicate a shortage of glucose leading to increased amino acid catabolism. Duodenal casein infusion produced a higher PL ratio with inoculant than FA-treated silage (1.55 vs. 0.89) in the study of Huhtanen et al. (1997a). Likewise, the PL ratio was higher (0.95 vs. 0.76) when RSM was given in combinationWDS rath- er than fed alone (Huhtanen et al. 1995). In both cases glucose supply was likely to be higher with the diets eliciting a higher PL ratio. Further work is needed to elucidate the interaction between amino acids and glucose, because minimising the catabolism of amino acids for glucose produc- tion would improve the efficiency of utilisation for milk protein secretion and reduce N losses to the environment. Conclusions and future aspects In Finland, lower temperatures and longer days than at lower latitudes together with grass varie- ties adapted to northern latitudesproduce a grass with a high-digestibility with a DM yield poten- 244 Seminar in honour of the 100th anniversary ofMTT AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND tial almost two-fold greater than that of cereal grains. Good ensiling technology and the use of efficient silage additives preserve grass for long winter feeding periods without extensive nutri- ent losses. Addition of high levels ofacids tends to increase effluent losses compared with un- treated or inoculant silages, which needs to be prevented. In Finland, relative advantages offor- age-based feeding systems are probably one of the highest providing that subsidy systems do not bias feed prices. For ration formulation more accurate predic- tions of silage D-value from the standing crop are urgently needed. Changes in digestibility are extremely rapid at northern latitudes and not accurately predicted by the chemical composi- tion of grass. Harvesting either too early or too late can present economic losses in terms of re- duced DM yield or nutritive value, respectively. Production experiments have demonstrated that it is difficult to compensate for the effects of low D-value in silage by feeding additional concen- trate. Approximately 1 kg day 1 additional con- centrate is required to compensate for a decrease of 10 g kg 1 in silage D-value, which typically occurs within2 days. Using meteorological data available from weather stations and measure- ments of changes in D-value by NIR techniques may provide better tools to optimise harvesting time. Traditionally in Finland, grass has been en- siled using high rates of FA application (4 to 5 litres per tonne). Typically theses silages con- tain 40-50 g (kg DM) 1 oflactic acid and 40-50 g (kg N)' 1 of ammonia N. Losses in nutritive value during ensiling are extremely limited, and are not higher than that of barn-dried hay harvested from the same sward. Measurements of digesti- bility, ruminal protein metabolism, feed intake and production responses in lactating dairy cows all suggest that restrictively fermented silage has at least the same nutritive value as barn-dried hay produced from the same sward. Our studies suggest that a lower protein value of ensiled for- ages than of fresh or dried forages applies only to badly and/or extensively fermented silages. Although the protein value and intake poten- tial of restrictively fermented silages are higher than those of extensively fermented silages, available nutrients are not well balanced for milk protein production. The pattern ofrumen fermen- tation in animals given diets based on restric- tively fermented silages is characterised by small molarproportion of propionate and high molar proportions of lipogenic VFA. Due to limited gluconeogenesis from propionate, more amino acids are required for glucose production. This can compromise higher protein values of restric- tively fermented compared with extensively fer- mented silages, which tend to produce more pro- pionate in the rumen. The pattern of rumen fer- mentation in animals given restrictively ferment- ed silage is resistant to manipulation, since it is controlled mainly by silage type. For example, increasing the amount of barley-based concen- trate has proved to be inefficient. Imbalanced amino acid composition may also explain why the higher protein value ofFA-treated silage is not fully realised in production experiments. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effects of amino acid supplementation and interactions between amino acid and glucose metabolism. Marginal responses to additionalconcentrate have been relatively small in recent studies, es- pecially at higher levels of supplementation. High substitutionrates ofhighly digestible well- fermented silages and moderate amounts ofcon- centrate are likely to explain the smallerrespons- es to additional concentrates than has been gen- erally reported. Total diet digestibility does not increase with increased concentrate inputs, and thereforeincremental increases in ME intake are generally smaller than expected. Although we could estimate the true increment in ME intake, variation in the partitioning of additional ME between mammary gland and body tissues cre- ates a further problem in attempting to predict milk production responses. There are large dif- ferences in the apparent efficiency of utilisation of additional ME provided by additional concen- trate, improved silage digestibility or increased silage DM intake in response to protein supple- mentation. More research is needed to under- stand the effects of and the interactions between 245 Vol. 7(1998): 219-250. AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND nutrients on energy utilisation and partitioning. Supplementation of grass silage-based diets with RSM, SBM or fish meal has consistently produced considerable responses indicating that the supply of amino acids from silage and grain diets is either quantitatively or qualitatively limited. Protein yield responses can be accurately predicted from changes in AAT supply suggest- ing that our protein evaluation system can ade- quately evaluate typical diets used in Finland. High marginal responses to additional AAT in milk protein and ECM yield indicate that sup- plementary protein is used efficiently and that the present feeding recommendations are rather low. Production responses are not related to pro- duction level, stage of lactation, amount of con- centrate, silage CP content or total diet CP indi- cating that simpler protein feeding strategies can be applied in practice than currently used in the present ration formulation system. References AFRC 1992. Nutritive requirements of ruminant animals: Protein. Technical Committee on Responses to Nu- trients, Report No. 9. (Agricultural and Food Research Council). Nutrition Abstract and Reviews, Series B 62: 787-835. Ahvenjärvi, S., Vanhatalo, A., Huhtanen, P. & Varvikko, T. 1997. Rypsirouheen ja lämpökäsitellyn rypsipuris- teen vaikutus lypsylehmien pötsistä viilaavien ravin- toaineiden määrään. Kotieläintieteen päivät 1997. Maaseutukeskuksen julkaisuja 914: 191-194. Aronen, I. & Vanhatalo, A, 1992. Effect of concentrate supplementation to grass silage diets on rumen fer- mentation, diet digestion and microbial protein syn- thesis in growing heifers. Agricultural Science in Fin- land 1: 177-178. Aston, K., Fisher, W.J. & McAllan, A.B. 1994. Intake and production responses by holstein-friesian cows to the level and pattern of crude protein supplied in a fixed concentrate diet given with grass silage ad libitum. BSAS Winter Meeting, Scarborough, UK. Paper 129. Bosch, M.W., Lammers-Wienhoven, S.C.W., Bangma, G.A., Boer, H. & Adrichem, P.W.M. van 1992. Influ- ence of stage of maturity of grass silages on diges- tion processes in dairy cows. 2. Rumen contents, passage rates, distribution of rumen and faecal par- ticles and mastication activity. Livestock Production Science 32: 265-281. Chamberlain, D.G. 1987. The silage fermentation in re- lation to the utilization of nutrients in the rumen. Pro- cess Biochemistry 22: 60-63, - & Choung, J.-J. 1993.The nutritional value of grass silage. In; O’Kiely P. et al. (eds.). Silage Research 1993. Proceedings of the 10th International Confer- ence on SilageResearch. Dublin City University, Ire- land, 6-8 September 1993. p. 131-136. - & Choung, J.-J. 1995. The importance of rate or ru- minal fermentation of energy sources in diets for dairy cows. In: Garnsworthy, P.C. et al. (eds.). Recent Ad- vances in Animal Nutrition. Butterworths, London, p. 3-27. -, Choung, J.-J. & Robertson, S. 1992. Protein nutri- tion of dairy cows receiving grass silage diets: ef- fects of feeding a protein supplement of unbalanced amino acid composition. Journal ofFood Science and Agriculture 60: 425-430. - , Martin, P.A. & Robertson, S. 1989. Optimizing com- pound feed use in dairy cows with high intakes of silage. In: Haresign, W. & Cole, D.J.A. (eds.). Re- cent Advances in Animal Nutrition. Butterworths, Lon- don. p. 175-193. -, Thomas, P.C. & Anderson, F.J. 1983. Volatile fatty acid proportions and lactic acid metabolism in the rumen of sheep and cattle receiving silage diets. Journal ofAgriculturalScience, Cambridge 101: 47- 58. -, Thomas, PC., Wilson, W., Newbold, C.J. & McDon- ald, J.C, 1985. The effects of carbohydrate supple- ments on ruminal concentrations of ammonia in ani- mals given diets of grass silage. Journal of Agricul- tural Science, Cambridge 104: 331-340. Choung, J.-J. & Chamberlain, D.G. 1993a. Effects of addition of lactic acid and postruminal supplementa- tion with casein on the nutritive value ofgrass silage for milk production in dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 48: 380-386. - & Chamberlain, D.G. 1993b, The effects of aboma- sal infusions of casein or soya-bean-protein isolate on the milk production of dairy cows in mid-lactation. British Journal of Nutrition 60: 103-115. Clancy, M., Wangsness, P.J. & Baumgardt, R.B. 1977. Effect of silage extract on voluntary feed intake, ru- men fluid constituent, and rumen motility. Journalof Dairy Science 60: 580-590. Cushanan, A. & Mayne, C.S. 1995. Effects of ensilage of grass on the performance and nutrient utilization by dairy cattle. 1. Food intake and milk production. An- imal Science 60: 337-345. Danfaer, A. 1994. Nutrient metabolism and utilization in the liver. Livestock Production Science 39: 115-127. Deinum, 8., Beyer, J. de, Nordfeldf, P.H., Kornher, A., Ostgård, O. & Bogaert, G. van 1981, Qualify of herb- age at different latitudes. Netherland Journal inAgri- 246 Seminar in honour ofthe 100th anniversary ofMTT AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND cultural Science 29: 141-150. Demarquilly, C. 1973. Composition chimique, charactéris- tiques fermentaires. digestibility et quantlté des en- silage de fourrage: modifications par rapport au four- rage initial. Annates deZootechique 22: 1-35. Demeyer, D.l. & Van Nevel, C.J. 1975. Methanogenesis, an integrated part of carbohydrate fermentation and its control. In; MacDonald, I.W & Warner, A.C.I (eds.). Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant. Univer- sity of New England Publishing Unit, Armidale, Aus- tralia. p. 366-382. Ettala, E. & Lampila, M. 1978. Factors affecting volun- tary silage intake by dairy cows. Annates Agriculturae Fenniae 17: 163-174. - , Lampila, M. & Rissanen, H. 1978. Effect of concen- trate feeding level in grass silage-based diets on milk production of dairy cows. AnnalesAgriculturae Fen- niae 17: 175-185. Parhan, S.M.A. & Thomas, PC. 1978. The effect of par- tial neutralization of formic acid silages with sodium hydroxide on their voluntary intake by cattle and sheep. Journal of the British Grassland Society 33: 151-158. Gasa, J., Holtenius, K., Sutton, J.D. & Dhanoa, M S. 1991. Rumen fill and digesta kinetics in lactating Friesian cows given two levels of concentrates with two types of grass silage ad lib. British Journal of Nutrition 66: 381-398. Girdier, C.P., Thomas, PC. & Chamberlain, D.G, 1984. Exogenous supply of glucose precursors and nitro- gen utilisation in sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 45; 43A. Gordon, F.J., Porter, M.G., Mayne, C.S., Unsworth, E.F. & Kilpatrick, D.J. 1995. Effect of forage digestibility and type of concentrate on nutrient utilization by lac- tating dairy cattle. Journal ofDairy Reseacrh 62:15- 27. -, Unsworth, E.F. & Peoples, A.C. 1981. Protein sup- plementation of silage-based diets for milk produc- tion. 54th Annual Report, Agricultural Research In- stitute of Northern Ireland. Belfast, HMSO. p. 13-25. Harrison, J.H., Blauwiekel, R. & Stokes, M.R. 1994. Fer- mentation and utilization of grass silage. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 3209-3235. Heikkilä, T, 1993. Concentrate supplemented silage or hay harvested at early growth stage in the feeding of dairy cattle. In; Proceedings of the Russia’s-Finnish symposium Elaboration of Ecologically Safe Meth- ods forAgriculture", Sanct-Petersburg, Russia, 1993. p. 176-178. - 1994. Nykyhinnoilla runsas väkirehuannos ei ole ta- loudellisesti kannattava. Maito ja Me 4/94; 38-40. -, Toivonen, V. & Huhtanen, P. 1998a. Effecs of and interactions between the extent of silage fermenta- tion and protein supplementation in lactating dairy cows. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland, (in press). - , Toivonen, V. & Huhtanen, P. 1998b. Effect of spring and autumn silage, protein and concentrate level on milk production. Proceedings of the 17th General Meeting of European Grassland Federation. 18-21 May 1998, Debrecen, Hungary, p. 717-721. - , Väätäinen, H, & Toivonen, V. 1993. Effects of acid and biological additives on grasss silage quality and milk production in dairy cows supplemeted with con- centrates containing three levels of rapeseed meal. In: O’Kiely, P. et al. (eds.). Silage research 1993. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Silage Research, Dublin City University, Ireland, 6- 8 September 1993. p. 190-191. Henning, P.H., Steyen, D.G. & Meissner, H.H. 1993. Ef- fect of synchronization of energy and nitrogen sup- ply on ruminal characteristics and microbial growth. Journal ofAnimal Science 73; 142-148. Huhtanen, P. 1987a. The effects of carbohydrate sup- plements on the utilization of grass silage diets. Ac- ademic dissertation. University of Helsinki. -1987b. The effect of dietary inclusion of barley, un- molassed sugar beet pulp and molasses on milk pro- duction, digestibility and digesta passage in dairy cows given silage based diet. Journal of Agricultural Science in Finland 59: 101-120. - 1988. The effects of supplementation of silage diet with barley, unmolassed sugar beet pulp and molas- ses on organic matter, nitrogen and fibre digestion in the rumen of cattle. Animat Feed Science and Tech- nology 20: 259-278. - 1992. The effects of barley vs. barley fibre with or without distiller’s solubles on site and extent of nutri- ent digestion in cattle fed grass silage based diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 36: 319-337. -1993a. The effects of concentrate energy source and protein content on milk production in cows given grass silage ad libitum. Grass and Forage Science 48: 347-355. -1993b. Factors influencing forage intake. In; Fredeen, A. (ed.). Proceedings of Nova Scotia forage confer- ence forage: seeding to feeding. Nova Scotia For- age Council, Canada, p. 103-127. -, Blauwiekel, R. & Saastamoinen, I. 1998. Effects of intraruminal infusions of propionate and butyrate with two different protein supplements on milk production and blood metabolites in dairy cows receiving grass silage-based diet Journal of Science in Food and Agriculture 77: 213-222. - & Heikkilä, T. 1996, Effects of physical treatment of barleyand rapeseed meal in dairy cows given grass silage-based diets. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 5: 399-412. - & Hissa, K. 1996. The influence of molasses and yeast culture on the performance ofgrowing bulls on grass silage-based diet. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 5: 201-215. - & Jaakkola, S. 1994. Influence of grass maturity and diet on ruminal dry matter and neutral detergent fi- bre digestion kinetics. Archiv forAnimal Nutrition 47: 153-167. - , Jaakkola, S. & Saarisalo, E. 1995. The effects of con- centrate energy source on milk production of dairy cows given a grass silage-based diet. Animal Sci- ence 60; 31-40. - , Miettinen, H. & Toivonen, V. 1997a. Effects of silage fermentation and postruminal casein supplementa- tion in lactating dairy cows. 1. Diet digestion and milk production. Journal of Science in Food and Agricul- ture 74: 450-458. 247 Vol. 7 (1998): 219-250. AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND & Vanhatalo, A. 1997. Ruminal and total plant cell wall digestibility estimated by a combined in situ method utilizing mathematical model. British Jour- nal of Nutrition 78; 583-598. Vanhatalo, A. & Varvikko, T. 1997b. Effects of abo- masal infusions of histidine, leucine and glucose on milk production in cows given grasssilage based diet. Journal of Dairy Science 80, Supplement 1: 247. Jaakkola, S. 1992. Silage fermentation in relation to the feeding value with special reference to enzyme- treat- ed silage. Academic dissertation. University of Hel- sinki, Finland. - & Huhtanen, P. 1992. Rumen fermentation and mi- crobial protein synthesis in cattle given increasing levels of lactic acid with grass silage based diet. Jour- nal ofAgricultural Science, Cambridge 119: 411-419. - & Huhtanen, P. 1993. The effects of the forage pres- ervation method and the proportion of concentrate on nitrogen digestion and rumen fermentation in cat- tle. Grass and Forage Science 48: 146-154. - , Huhtanen, P. & Hissa, K. 1991. The effect of cell wall degrading enzymes or formic acid on fermentation quality and on digestion of grass silage by cattle. Grass and Forage Science 46; 75-87. - , Huhtanen, P, & Kaunista, V. 1993. VFA proportions and microbial protein synthesis in the rumen of cat- tle receiving grass silage ensiled with different rates of formic acid. In: O’Kiely, P. et al. (eds.). SilageRe- search 1993. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Silage Research, Dublin City Univer- sity, Ireland, 6-8 September 1993. p. 139-140. - , Rinne, M., Heikkilä, T., Toivonen, V. & Huhtanen, P. 1996. Effects of restriction of silage fermentation with formic acid on milk production. Proceedings of the Xlth International Silage Conference. University of Wales, Aberystwyth 8-11 September 1996. p. 76- 77. - Rinne, M., Huuskonen, K., Vesterinen, V. & Huhtanen, P. 1995. The Effect of silage fermentation on the re- sponse to protein supplementation in milk produc- tion and rumen fermentation in vitro. VII Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, 24-27 May 1995, Estaco Zootecnica Nacional Portugal, p. 235- 236. Jacobs, J.L. & McAllan, A.B. 1992. Protein supplemen- tation of formic acid and enzyme-treated silage, 2. Nitrogen and amino acid digestion. Grass and For- age Science 47:114-120. Kaustell, K., Mäntysaari, E M. & Huhtanen, P. 1998. Con- centrate feeding and milk yield based on the field data of milk recorded herds. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland (in press). Keady, T.W.J. & Murphy, J.J. 1993. The effects of ensil- ing on the intake of herbage and milk production by lactating dairy cows. Animal Production 56: 423-424. (abstract). Khalili, H. & Huhtanen, P. 1991. Sucrose supplements in cattle given grass silage based diet. 2. Digestion of cell wall carbohydrates. Animal Feed Science and Technology 33: 262-273. - , Huhtanen, P., Jaakkola, S. & Varvikko, T. 1995a. The effects or ruminal and duodenal casein infusion on intake of red clocer silage, milk production and mi- crobial protein synthesis. British Society of Animal Science Winter Meeting 1995. Scarborough 20-22 March 1995. Paper No 123. 2 p. - , Huhtanen, P., Jaakkola, S. & Varvikko, I. 1995b. The effects of ruminal and duodenal casein infusion on dry matter (DM) intake of red clover silage and ru- men pool size, digestion and passage kinetics of neutral detergent fibre (NDF). Annales de Zootech- nique 44, Supplement, p. 243. -, Varvikko, T., Toivonen, V., Hissa, K. & Suvitie, M. 1997. The effects of added glycerol, or unprotected free fatty acids, or a combiantion of the two on silage intake, milk production, rumen fermentation and diet digestibility in cows given grass silage based diet. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 6: 349-362. Lampila, M., Jaakkola, S., Toivonen, V. & Setälä, J. 1988. Forage conservation and supplementation in cattle rations. Proceedings of the VI World Conference on Animal Production. Helsinki, Finland, p. 51-71. Madsen, J., Hvelplund, T., Weibjerg, M., Bertilson, J., Olsson, 1., Spörndly, R., Harstad, 0.m., Voiden, H., Tuori, M., Varvikko, T, Huhtanen, P. & Olafson, B.L. 1995. The AAT/PVT protein evaluation system for ruminants. A revision. Norwegian Journal in Argicul- tural Science, Supplement 19. 37 p. Martin, C., Williams, A.G, & Michalet-Doreau, B. 1994. Isolation and characteristics of the protozoal and bacterial fractions of bovine ruminani contents. Jour- nal ofAnimal Science 72: 2962-2968, Martin, P.A., Chamberlain, D.G., Robertson, S. & Hirst, D. 1994. Rumen fermentation patterns in sheep re- ceiving silages of different chemical composition sup- plemented with concentrates rich in starch or digest- ible fibre. JournalofAgricultural Science, Cambridge 122; 145-150. Mertens, D.R. 1994. Regulation of forage intake. In: Fahey, G.C., Jr (ed.). Forage quality, evaluation and utilization. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wl. p. 450-493. Miettinen, H. & Huhtanen, P. 1996. The effects of rumi- nal propionate to butyrate ratio on milk production and blood metabolites in dairy cows fed a grass si- lage based diet. Journal of Dairy Science 79: 851- 861. - & Huhtanen, P. 1997. Effects of silage fermentation and postruminal casein supplementation in lactating dairy cows. 2. Blood metabolites and amino acids. Journal of Science in Food and Agriculture 74: 459- 468. Mould, F.L. 1988. Associative effects of feeds. In: orskov, E.R. (ed.). World Animal Science 84, Feed Science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 279-292. Murphy, M., Khalili, H. & Huhtanen, P, 1993. The substi- tution of barley by other carbohydrates in grass si- lage based diets to dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 41: 279-296. Nissinen, O. & Hakkola, H. 1995. Effects of plant spe- cies and harvesting system of grassland production in norhern Finland. Agricultural Science in Finland 4: 479-494. Nsereko, V.L. 1996. Peptidase inhibitors as additives for 248 Seminar in honour of the 100th anniversary ofMTT AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND silage. Effects on silage characteristics with refer- ence to peptides. PhD Thesis. University of Aber- deen, UK. Oldham, J.D. 1984. Protein energy relationships in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 67: 1090-1114. - 1994. Amino acid nutrition of the dairy cow. In: D’Mello, J.P.F. (ed). Amino Acids in Farm Animal Nutrition. CAB International, UK. p. 351-375. Pitt, R.H. 1990. Silage and hay preservation. Cornell University Cooperative Extension NRAES-5. p. 53. Rinne, M., Jaakkola, S., Heikkilä, T, Huhtanen, P. & Toivo- nen, V. 1995. Nurmirehun sulavuuden ja väkirehun yhdysvaikutukset lypsylehmillä. Kotieläintieteen päivät 1995. Maaseutukeskusten Uiton julkaisuja 888: 41-46. Jaakkola, S. & Huhtanen, P. 1996. Maturity effects of grass ensiled on diet digestion by dairy cows. Pro- ceedings of the 11th International Silage Conference. Aberyswyth, Wales, p. 196-197. Jaakkola, S. & Huhtanen, P. 1997. Grass maturity effects on cattle fed silage-based diets. 1. Organic matter digestion, rumen fermentation and nitrogen utilization. Animal FeedScience and Technology67: 1-17. Rook, A.J., Gill, M., Willink, R.D. & Lister, S.J. 1991. Pre- diction of voluntary intake of grass silages by lactat- ing cows offered concentrates at flat rate. Animal Production 52: 407-420. Rooke, J.A. & Armstrong, D.G. 1989. The importance of the form of nitrogen on microbial protein synthesis in the rumen of cattle receiving grass silage and con- tinuous intraruminal infusion of sucrose. British Jour- nal of Nutrition 61: 113-121. - , Lee, N.H. & Armstrong, D.G. 1987. The effects of in- traruminal infusions of urea, casein and glucose syr- up and a mixture of casein and glucose syrup on ni- trogen digestion in the rumen of cattle receiving grass silage diets. British Journal of Nutrition 57; 89-98. Russel, J.8., O’Conner, J.8., Fox, D.G., Van Soest, PJ. & Sniffen, C.J. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating diets for cattle. Journal of An- imal Science 70: 3551-3561. Ryhänen, M., Huhtanen, P, Jaakkola, S. & Ahvenjärvi, S. 1996. EU-jäsenyyden vaikutus maidontuotantoon. In: Ylätalo, M. (ed.). Maatalousyritysten sopeutumi- nen EU:ssa vallitseviin hintasuhteisiin. University of Helsinki, Department of Ecomics and Management Publications 12; 75-118. Saarisalo, E., Jaakkola, S. & Huhtanen, P. 1997. Valkuaistäydennyksenvaikutus maidontuotantokau- den loppuvaiheessa. Kotieläintieteen päivät 1997. Maaseutukeskuksen julkaisuja 914: 167-170. Storm, E. & Orskov, E.R. 1983. The nutritive value of ru- men microorganisms in ruminants. 1. Large scale iso- lation and chemical composition of rumen microor- ganisms. British Journal of Nutrition 50: 463-470. Strobel, H.J. & Russel, J.B. 1986. Effect of pH and ener- gy spilling on bacterial protein synthesis by carbohy- drate limited cultures of mixed rumen bacteria. Jour- nal of Dairy Science 69; 2941-2947. Syrjälä, L. 1972. Effect of different sucrose, starch and cellulose supplements on the utilization of grass si- lages by ruminants. Annates AgriculturaeFenniae 11: 199-276. Tesfa, A. 1993. Effects of rape-seed oil supplementation on digestion, microbial protein synthesis and duode- nal microbial amino acid composition in ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 41: 313-328. Thomas, C. & Rae, R.C. 1988. Concentrate supplemen- tation of silage for dairy cows. In: Garnsworthy, PC. (ed.). Nutrition and Lactation in the Dairy Cow. But- terworths, London, p. 327-354. - & Thomas, PC. 1985. Factors affecting the nutritive value of grass silage. In: Cole, D.J.A. (ed.). Recent Advances ofAnimal Nutrition. Butterworths, London, p. 223-256. Thomas, PC., Chalmers, J.C., Chamberlain, D.G. & Be- libasakis, N. 1980. The effect of diet on the content and compostion of crude protein in milk. In: Oslage, H.J. & Rohr, K. (eds,). Proceedings of 3rd European Association Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition. Braunschweigh, Germany. Vol II: 522-528. - & Chamberlain, D.G. 1982. Silage as a foodstuff. In: Rook, J.A.F. & Thomas, PC. (eds.). Silage for Milk Production. Technical Bulletin, National Institute for Research in Dairying, Reading, England, p. 63-101. Tuori, M. 1992. Rapeseed meal as a supplementary pro- tein for dairy cows on grass silage-based diet, with the emphasis on the Nordic AAT-PBV feed protein evaluation system. AgriculturalScience in Finland 1: 367-439. - , Kaustell, K. & Huhtanen, P. 1998. Comparison of the protein evaluation systems of feed for dairy cows. Livestock Production Science (in press) - , Kaustell, K., Syrjälä-Qvist, L. & Kajaste, S. 1992. Di- gestibility of silage from meadow fescue and tall fes- cue grass harvested at different growth stages. In: Proceedings of the 14th General Meeting of Europe- an Grassland Federation. Lahti, Finland, p. 252-255. -, Kaustell, K., Valaja, J., Aimonen, E, Saarisalo, E. & Huhtanen, P. 1996. Rehutaulukot jaruokintasuosituk- set. (Feed tables and feeding recommendatios). Hel- sinki. 99 p. -, Syrjälä-Qvist, L. & Kokkonen, T. 1993. Rumen fer- mentation and passage rate of digesta of direct cut and prewilted grass silage. In: O’Kiely, P. et al. (eds.). Silage Research 1993. Proceedings of the 10th In- ternational Conference on Silage Research, Dublin City University, Ireland, p. 143-144. Vanhatalo, A. 1995. Assessment of intestinal feed nitro- gen digestibility in ruminants bymobile-bag method. Academic dissertation. University of Helsinki, Finland. 44 p. + 5 app. -, Heikkilä, T. & Gäddnäs, T. 1995a. Puna-apilapitoi- nen säilörehu lypsylehmien ruokinnassa: vaikutus valkuaissynteesiin, pötsifermentaatioon ja maidon tuotantoon heinäsäilörehuun verrattuna. Kotieläin- tieteen päivät 1995. Maaseutukeskusten Liiton jul- kaisuja 88: 190-193. - , Heikkilä, T. & Gäddnäs, T. 1995b. Microbial protein synthesis in dairy cows fed grass silage or red clo- ver-grass silage. In: VII Symposium on Protein Me- tabolism and Nutrition: Abstracts, 24-27 May 1995, Estacao Zootecnica Nacional, Portugal, p. 88. 249 Vol. 7 (1998): 219-250. AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Huhtanen, P. & Varvikko, 1.1997, Response of dairy cows fed grass silage based diets to the abomasal infusions of histidine alone or in combinations with methionine and lysine. Journal of Dairy Science 80, Supplement 1: 257. - & Toivonen, V. 1993. Microbial protein synthesis in cattle fed silage cut fro grass fertilized with different level of N. In: O’Kiely, P. et al. (eds.). Silage Research 1993. Proceedings of the 10th International Confer- ence on SilageResearch, Dublin City University, Ire- land, 6-8 September 1993. p. 168-169. - , Varvikko, T. & Aronen, I. 1992. The effect of type of additive on rumen fermentation and digestion of grass silage in cattle. Agricultural Science in Finland 1:163- 175. Van Soest, PJ., Mertens, D.R. & Deinum, B. 1978. Pre- harvest factors influencing quality of conserved for- age. Journal ofAnimal Science 47: 712-720. van Vuuren, A M., Huhtanen, P. & Dulphy, J.-P. 1995. Improving the feeding and health value of ensiled forages. In: Journet, M. et al. (eds.). Recent Devel- opments in the Nutrition of Herbivores. INRA, Paris. p. 297-307. Varvikko,!. 1986. Evaluation of rumen-undegraded feed protein. Academic dissertation. University of Helsin- ki, Finland. - , Vanhatalo, A. & Huhtanen, P. 1997. Lactational and metabolic responses to abomasal methionine and lysine infusions in dairy cows fed grass silage based diet. Journal of Dairy Science 80, Supplement 1: 249, Vérité, R., Faverdin, P. &Agabriel, J. 1997. Developments in the INRA feeding systems for dairy cows. In: Garns- worthy, PC. & Wiseman, J. (eds.). Recent Advances of Animal Nutrition 1997. Butterworths, London, p. 153-166. Webster, A.J.F. 1992. The metabolisable protein system for ruminants. In: Garnsworthy, PC. et al. (eds.). Recent Advances of Animal Nutrition 1992. Butter- worths, London, p. 93-110. Wilkins, R.J., Hutchinson, K.J., Wilson, R.F. & Harris, C.E. 1971. The voluntary intake of silage by sheep. 1. In- terrelationships between silage composition and in- take. JournalofAgricultural Science, Cambridge 77; 531-537. SELOSTUS Ravintoaineiden saantiin ja maidontuotantoon vaikuttavat tekijät runsaalla säilörehuruokinnalla Pekka Huhtanen Maatalouden tutkimuskeskus Tämän kirjallisuuskatsauksen tavoitteena on selvittää ravintoaineiden saantiin ja maidontuotantoon vaikut- tavia tekijöitä ruokinnan perustuessa runsaaseen säi- lörehun käyttöön. Suomessa rajoittuneesti käynyt säi- lörehu on maidontuotannon perusta. Nurmisäilörehun viljaa suurempi satopotentiaali ja pienemmät sääriskit, lyhyt laidunkausi sekä pohjoisilla leveysasteilla kas- vaneen nurmirehun hyvä sulavuus ovat edistäneet säi- lörehuun perustuvan ruokintasysteemin kehittämistä. Nurmen korjuuhetken kehitysaste on tärkein re- huannoksen sulavuuteen vaikuttava tekijä. Sen sijaan väkirehun määrä ja valkuaispitoisuus vaikuttavat su- lavuuteen yleensä vähän. Säilörehun syöntiin vaikut- tavat sekä rehun sulavuus että käymislaatu. Rajoit- tuneesti käynyt säilörehu tuottaa pötsissä runsaasti mikrobivalkuaista, mutta niukka propionihapon tuo- tanto pötsissä voi rajoittaa mikrobivalkuaisen hyväk- sikäyttöä maitovalkuaisen tuotannossa. Väkirehun määrän lisäyksellä saadut tuotosvasteet ovat melko pieniä etenkin, kun väkirehun päivittäinen käyttömää- rä ylittää 10 kg. Korkea säilörehun syönnin korvaus- suhde, rehun sulatuksen negatiiviset yhdysvaikutuk- set ja energian siirtyminen kudosvarastoihin selittä- vät lisäväkirehun huonoa tuotosvastetta. Rypsirehui- na annettu valkuaistäydennys on poikkeuksetta lisän- nyt maitovalkuaisen tuotantoa, mutta lehmien tuotos- taso, säilörehun valkuaispitoisuus, väkirehun määrä tai lypsykauden vaihe ei näytä vaikuttavan tuotosvas- teiden suuruuteen. Uusi valkuaisjärjestelmä ennustaa tuotosvasteet tavallisimmilla dieeteillä erittäin hyvin. Sen sijaan lisävalkuaisen korkea hyväksikäyttö (noin 0,50) viittaa siihen, että valkuaisen hyväksikäyttö on erittäin tehokasta ja nykyiset valkuaisen ruokintasuo- situkset ovat todennäköisesti liian pienet. 250 Seminar in honour of the lOOth anniversary ofMTT AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND