Evaluation of the spot urine sampling technique to assess urinary pseudouridine excretion in lactating dairy cows Kevin J. Shingfield Grassland and Ruminant Science Department, SAC Auchincruive, Ayr, KA6 SHW, United Kingdom , Current address: Agricultural Research Centre ofFinland, Animal Production Research, FIN-31600 Jokioinen, Finland, e-mail: kevin.shingfield@mtt.fi Nicholas. W. Offer Grasslandand Ruminant Science Department, SAC Auchincruive, Ayr, KA6 SHW, United Kingdom The potential of the spot urine sampling technique to assess urinary pseudouridine excretion was evaluated. Twelve multiparous Holstein-Friesian cows were fed two experimental diets in a complete change-over design with two 14 day experimental periods. Diets were either silage fed ad libitum with a concentratesupplement offered as a single meal (SF), or a complete diet formulated from the same ingredients (CD). Total urine collections were performed for 24h at 2 h intervals on days 11 and 14. Pseudouridine and creatinine excretion during each 2h interval depended on time of collection (pseudouridine, P Dry matter corrected for loss of volatiles (Shingfield and Offer 1998) 121 calculated according to MAFF (1975) <3> calculated using DM and ME values of silage and concentrate (4> calculated according to the equation ofThomas et al. (1988) ND = Not determined 2 samples collected at 12 h intervals (12 h scheme), 3 samples collected at 8 h intervals (8 h scheme) and 4 samples collected at 4 h in- tervals (4 h scheme) were evaluated. Sampling regimen Ps/c estimates were derived using all data collected during the 24h collection period and were correlated with the measured (by total urine collection) daily mean Ps/c ratio, for each cow within a group for both sampling days within a period. To assess the increase in accuracy from using two sampling days, the process described above was repeated using data from both sam- pling days. Exploratory data handling and regres- sion analysis were undertaken using MINITAB statistical software (Minitab Inc. 1980). Results Animal production Chemical composition ofsilage, concentrate and complete diet is shown in Table 1. Mean treat- ment effects on dry matter, crude protein and ME intake or milk yield and composition were not significant (P>0.05; Table 2). Mean cow live weights (kg) were 615 and 617 for treatments SF and CD respectively (P>0.05). Urinary pseudouridine concentration and excretion The effect of dietary treatment on daily mean urinary pseudouridine concentration of 437 and 439 (s.e.d. 14.9) |imol/l, for SF and CD treat- ments, respectively or daily excretion of 8.06 and 8.33 (s.e.d. 0.33) mmoles/day, for SF and CD treatments, respectively were not significant (P values of 0.909 and 0.431, respectively). Two- hourly pseudouridine concentration was signifi- cantly affected by cow (PcO.001), sampling time (P<0.001) and by treatment x sampling time interactions (P<0.05), Mean (n = 24) 2h pseu- douridine concentration varied diurnally between 346-561 and 344-548 pmol/1 for SF and CD treatments, respectively. Two-hourly pseudouridine excretion was sig- nificantly different between sampling times (PcO.001) and by interactions between treatment and sampling times (P<0.05), while differences due to cow approached significance (P<0.092). 348 AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND Vol. 7(1998): 345-356. Variations in mean pseudouridine excretion be- tween each 2h sampling interval followed a di- urnal pattern, the extent of which was greater for SF (0.46 to 0.91 mmoles) than CD (0.52 to 0.87 mmoles) treatments (Figure 1). Daily mean pseudouridine excretion was positively correlat- ed with daily mean pseudouridine concentration (r = 0.500, n = 48, P<0.05) and metabolic live weight (r = 0.299, n = 48, Pc0.05). Coefficients of variation (CV) due to the effects of cow, ex- perimental period, sampling day and sampling time on urinary pseudouridine concentration and excretion are shown in Table 3. Table 2. Effect of dietary treatment on nutrient intake, milk production and urinary output. Daily intake Separate feeding Complete diet SED P Total dry matterintake (kg) 20.1 19.8 0.557 >0.05 Crude protein (g) 3558 3569 98.5 > 0.05 Metabolisable energy (MJ) 245 234 7.1 >0.05 Milk yield and composition Milk yield (kg) 28.8 27.5 0.61 >0.05 Fat (g/kg) 39.7 37.0 1.76 >0.05 Protein (g/kg) 30.8 31.0 0.22 >0.05 Lactose (g/kg) 47.4 46.4 2.17 >0.05 Fat (g/d) 1149 1037 90.7 >0.05 Protein (g/d) 889 850 56.7 >0.05 Lactose (g/d) 1361 1275 87.0 >0.05 Urinary output (1/d) 19.1 19.9 0.36 >0.05 Fig. 1.Diurnal variation in urinary pseudouridine excretion for cows offered concentrate separately (•—) or as a complete diet (O—). Each point is the mean of 24 observations with s.e. Lines without markers indicate treat- ment daily means. 349 Shingfield, K.J. & Offer, N.W. Assessment ofpseudouridine excretion by spot urine sampling Table 3. Coefficients of variation (CV%) forconcentration and daily excretion ofpseudouridine and creat- inine and Ps/c ratios. Source of variation Cow Sampling period Sampling day Sampling hour Concentration Pseudouridine 16.8 8.1 18.5 41.1 Creatinine 18.3 6.4 13.0 34.5 Excretion Pseudouridine 10.5 9,1 17,0 41.6 Creatinine 15.4 7,8 9,1 32.3 Ratio Ps/c 10.8 6.5 10.8 27.3 Diurnal variation in urinary Ps/c ratio Urinary creatinine concentrations reported pre- viously (Shingfield and Offer 1998) were used to calculate Ps/c ratios. Use of creatinine as an internal marker of urinary output reduced varia- tions in pseudouridine concentration between sampling days and sampling intervals (Table 3). Daily mean Ps/c ratios were not significant- ly differentbetween treatments (P = 0.785, mean 0.062 and 0.063 (s.e.d. 0.002) for SF and CD treatments, respectively) or sampling days (P = 0.171, mean 0.061 and 0.064 (s.e.d. 0.002) for days 1 and 2, respectively). In contrast, dai- ly mean Ps/c ratios were significantly different between cows (P<0.01) and were negatively cor- related with metabolic live weight (r= - 0.59, n = 48, P<0.001). Mean two-hourly Ps/c ratios were significantly influenced by sampling time \ treatment interactions (P<0.05) and were sig- nificantly different between sampling times (P<0.00l), ranging between 0.051 to 0.091 and 0.054 to 0.076 for SF and CD treatments, respec- tively (Figure 2). Accuracy of spot sampling for assessing daily Ps/c ratios Accuracy of the spot sampling technique was initially assessed by comparing estimates of Ps/c ratios from individual spot samples collected at each sampling interval with the daily mean obtained by total urine collection. Correlations between daily mean Ps/c ratios and estimates based on the collection of single spot samples (Figure 3) were generally poor (mean r value 0.558), while differences due to treatment were inconsistent between sampling intervals (mean r values 0.593 and 0.523 for treatments SF and CD, respectively). In practice however, more than one spot sam- ple would be used to assess daily mean Ps/c ra- tios. Consequently threemultiple sampling meth- ods were evaluated. Mean Ps/c ratios were de- rived from the appropriate spot samples for each sampling regimen and compared to the daily mean obtained by total urine collection (Table 4). This process was repeated using estimates based on spot samples obtained over two sam- pling days to investigate whetheraccuracy could be improved by extending the observation peri- od. Collection of multiple spot samples within a day improved correlations between spot sample estimates and the reference mean, while only minor improvements in spot sampling accuracy were achieved by collecting urine over two days. The most intensive sampling regimen (4-h sam- pling) gave average correlations (across both SF and CD treatments) of 0.824 and 0.743 based on single and two day urine collections, respective- ly, while respective minimum values were 0.679 and 0.075. 350 AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND 351 Fig. 2. Diurnal variation in the mo- lar ratio of urinary pseudouridine to creatinine forcows offered con- centrate separately (•—) or as a complete diet (O—). Each point is the mean of 24 observa- tions with s.e. Lines without mark- ers indicate treatmentdaily means. Fig. 3. Correlation coefficients between Ps/c ratio in spot urine samples taken at different times and the mean daily Ps/c measured by total collection (n=l2; mean of two correlations, range shown as error bars). Vol. 7(1998): 345-356. Shingfield, K.J. cfc Offer, N.W. Assessment ofpseudouridine excretion by spot urine sampling Table 4. A summary of correlation coefficients derived between sampling regimen estimates and daily mean Ps/c ratios. Sampling Number of Number of Separate feeding Complete diet feeding regimen (hours) samplingdays correlations Min Max Mean Min Max Mean 12 I 14 1 0.348 0.922 0.615 0.506 0.837 0.618 8 I 10' 0.602 0.957 0.798 0.579 0.903 0.740 4 1 14 1 0.708 0.931 0.848 0.679 0.896 0,800 12 2 142 0.357 0.953 0.744 0.185 0.988 0.575 8 2 102 0.648 0.981 0.869 0.075 0.967 0.654 4 2 142 0.528 0.986 0.839 0.080 0.946 0.647 1 Correlations were derived using 12 units of data, obtained from 6 cows for both sampling days within each period 2 Correlations were derived using 6 units of data, obtained from the mean of both sampling days within each period for each cow Mean r values based on a single sampling day were relatively similar for both treatments (Ta- ble 4), while mean r values based on two-day urine collections were higher for treatment SF. Minimum r values were higher for treatment SF for every sampling method tested, except for 12 h sampling based on a single day urine collec- tion. Relationship between urinary pseudourid- ine excretion and Ps/c ratios Daily mean Ps/c ratios obtained by total urine collection were poorly correlated with daily pseudouridine excretion (r = 0.360, n = 48, P<0.05; Table 5). The most accurate prediction of pseudouridine excretion was attained by weighting daily mean Ps/c data by daily urinary creatinine excretion for each individual cow. Adopting this approach is however impractical since assessment of urinary creatinineexcretion requires a total urine collection. Weighting dai- ly mean Ps/c ratios of individual cows by uri- nary creatinine concentration, live weight or metabolic live weight improved the prediction of urinary pseudouridine excretion. Use of live weight as a weighting factor gave a relationship which accounted for approximately half the var- iation in pseudouridine excretion. Discussion Table 5. Relationships between scaled daily mean molar ratios of pseudouridine tocreatinine (Ps/c) with pseudouri- dine excretion. Since, milk production, urinary purine deriva- tive and creatinine excretion data has been dis- cussed previously (Shingfield and Offer 1998), discussion is confined to examination of the sources of variation of urinary psuedouridine excretion and evaluation of the accuracy of the spot sampling technique to assess it. Weighting factor Ps/c Pr None 0.36 <0.05 0,62